View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FRBSF

WEEKLY LETTER

May 26,1989

The Dollar Dilemma
Over the past year, strong upward pressure on
the doLlar has posed an unexpected dilemma for
West Germany and japan. On the one hand, a
rising dollar increases inflationary pressures in
the German and japanese economies, and at the
same time threatens to slow the pace of adjustment in their external surpluses. On the other
hand, a decision to raise their domestic interest
rates to offset the strong dollar carries the risk
that German and japanese domestic demand
growth would slow, thereby imperiling their
external adjustment.
West Germany and japan have responded in very
different ways to this dilemma. To the surprise of
many observers, the West German central bank
raised its lending rates twice this year by a total
of one percentage point to offset the impact of
the stronger u.s. dollar. In contrast, japan's
response ha~ been far more muted. This Letter
examines th~ differences in the way a strong
dollar affect§ Germany and japan in an effort to
explain the two countries' contrasting responses
to recent episodes of dollar appreciation.

Robust growth, low inflation
In recent years, Germany and japan have
enjoyed robust economic growth as well as
declining inflation and falling current account
surpluses. In 1988, real GNP grew 3.4 percent in
Germany and 5.7 percent in japan, well above
their respective average annual growth rates of
1.2 percent and four percent from 1981 through
1985. Consumer price inflation was estimated at
1.2 percent in Germany and 0.5 percent in japan
in 1988, down from average annual inflation
rates of 3.9 and 2.8 percent, respectively, in the
1981-1985 period, and well below u.s. inflation
of 4.1 percent last year. Between 1986 and 1988,
current account surpluses as a percentage of
GNP declined from 4.4 percent to about 3.7
percent in Germany, and from 4.4 percent to
2.2 percent in japan.
However, these trends may not continue. Strong
demand has raised capacity utilization rates to
recent peaks and increased inflationary pressures

in both economies. External adjustment also is
expected to slow.

Tighter U.S. monetary policy
The recent rise in the value of the dollar
associated with tighter u.S. monetary pol icy,
as reflected in the gradual increase in the
federal funds rate since early 1988, could add
to ihflationary pressures in West Germany and
japan and further slow the decline in their
current account surpluses. Tighter U.S. monetary
policy tends to raise U.S. interest rates relative
to those abroad, encouraging a shift to dollardenominated assets that causes the dollar to
appreciate. Moreover, upward pressure on
interest rates and the dollar is exacerbated by
persistently high u.S. budget deficits.
The weaker deutschemark and yen tend to
increase inflation in West Germany and japan,
as well as economic growth and exports in these
two economies. However, the impact on current
accounts is uncertain. On the one hand, export
growth and increased interest income on dollardenominated assets held by German and japanese residents tend to increase these countries'
current account surpluses. On the other hand,
income effects tend to reduce such surpluses;
faster growth tends to stimulate import demand
in Germany and japan, while demand for German and japanese exports falls because tighter
u.S. monetary policy tends to lower economic
growth in the u.s.

Simulation results
Simulation of the Federal Reserve Board's
Multicountry Model (MCM) can help to provide
insights into the impact of tighter u.s. monetary
policy. (See Federal Reserve Board International
Finance Discussion Papers, Number 293, Octobel' 1986.) According to the MCM, a sustained
(over an eight-year period) one-percentage point
increase in the u.s. Treasury bill rate causes the
u.s. dollar to appreciate relative to the deutschemark and the yen, thereby raising prices in both
Germany and japan. However, the impact on
prices in Germany is much larger than it is in

FRBSF
Japan-about three times higher in the first year,
and 70 percent higher in succeeding years. The
impact on prices may be stronger in Germany
because the ratio of imports to GNP historically
is much larger in Germany (24 percent in 1985) .
than in Japan (nine percent).
On the other hand, the MCM model also predic:ts that the expansionary impact of a tighter
U.s. monetary policy on GNP is much stronger
for Japan than for Germany. A dollar appreciation
may stimulate a stronger expansion in Japan than
in Germany because the u.s. hasa larger share
in Japan's exports.
Thus, in Germany, tighter U.S. monetary policy
entails a larger inflation cost and a smaller GNp
gain, but it also apparently facilitates Germany's
external adjustment. Over an eight year period,
tighter u.s. monetary policy reduces Germany's
current account surplus, suggesting that the
income effects discussed above may predominate. In contrast, Japan's current account surplus
increases.
Germany and Japan can attempt to offset the
effects of a rise in U.s. interest rates by raising
their own domestic rates. However, the MCM
model predicts that a rise in short-term rates in
Germany and Japan to match the rise in U.s. interest rates would leave the path of their current
accounts largely unaffected. The model also finds
that higher domestic interest rates have a much
stronger contractionary effect in Japan than in
Germany. Germany's GNP still expands slightly
after an initial contraction, in contrast to Japan,
where the economy contracts over the· entire
simulation period. In addition, prices fall in Japan
but still rise in Germany, albeit at a lower rate.

At the same time, the simulation results also offer
an explanation for Japan's apparent decision not
to offset the appreciating dollar with tighter
monetary policy. On the one hand, the model
suggests that the rising dollar poses less inflation
risk in Japan than in Germany, and on the other,
it shows that the risks of dampening domestic
demand growth through tighter monetary policy
appear to be greater in Japan than they are in
Germany. Thus, Japan has the leeway to allow
the dollar to rise against the yen. It can simultaneously offset the tendency for the current
account surplus to increase by providing
continued stimulus to domestic demand.

A look at past actions
While this simulation cannot fully capture the
factors underlying German and Japanese monetary policies, the results are at least consistent
with the behavior of West German and Japanese
interest rates when the dollar has appreciated in
the last few years. Charts 1 and 2 show the dollar
exchange rate and a representative short-term
interest rate in Germany and Japan, respectively,
as a proxy for their respective monetary policies.
The charts show that domestic short-term rates
apparently have responded strongly to offset
episodes of dollar appreciation in Germany,
while they have not done so in Japan.
Since 1987, the German short-term rate rose on
three of the four occasions that the deutschemark
fell agai nst the dollar (shaded areas in Chart 1).
The nearly two-percentage point increase in
short-term rates between April and August 1988,
when the deutschemark dropped 11.5 percent,
Chart 1

German Short-Term Interest Rate
and Exchange Rate
Percent

$/Marks

Implications
Given the current policy environment in both
countries, the MCM simulations suggest one possible explanation for the differences in Germany's
and Japan's responses to the dilemma posed by a
rising dollar and tighter U.s. monetary policy. In
Germany, where inflationary pressures currently
are stronger than in Japan, the central bank has a
stronger incentive to raise interest rates because
the impact of a rising dollar on domestic inflation
is much stronger in Germany than it is in Japan
and a larger rise in German interest rates is
required to offset the impact of a dollar
appreciation.

7.0

0.64
0.60

6.0
0.56
5.0

0.52
0.48

4.0
0.44
0.40
JFMAMJJASONOJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJAsDNDJFM
1986

1987

1988

Shaded areas show episodes when deutschemark
depreciated for more than 1 month.

1989

and the sharp increase in rates since the beginning of 1989 are particularly striking.
There are two exceptions to this relationship
between the value of the dollar and German
short-term rates. First, short-term rates rose
sharply between August and October 1987, even
though the dollar was not appreciating. In this
case, German rates were rising in tandem with
a rise in the U.s. federal funds rate (not shown),
a rise that was interrupted by the stock market
decline of October 1987. The pattern was not
repeated in 1988. (Between August and September1988, German short-term rates declined
once the deutschemark stopped falling, even
though the federal funds rate continued rising.)
Second, between December 1987 and january
1988, German short-term rates declined even
though the dollar rose. Fresh memories of the
October 1987 stock market decline apparently
encouraged continued German monetary ease
to support the dollar's recovery.
Overall, however, Germany appears to follow
a monetary policy that leans strongly against
movements in the dollar. In sharp contrast, since
mid-1987, movements in the dollar apparently
have had little effect on japanese monetary
policy. As illustrated in Chart 2, notwithstanding
sharp fluctuations in the dollar exchange rate,
the path of the japanese short-term rate was fairly
flat from the first half of 1987 up to july 1988,
when the rate began to drift upward. Downward
movements in the yen (shaded areas in Chart 2)
Chart 2

Japanese Short-Term Interest Rate
and Exchange Rate
$/Yen

Percent

7.0

(X10 -2)

0.82
0.78
0.74

6.0

0.70
5.0

generally have not been associated with upward
movements in the short-term japanese interest
rate (in contrast to japanese long-term rates,
which rose sharply during the periods when
the dollar appreciated in 1987 and 1988). And
although japanese rates did rise when the yen
depreciated seven percent between May and
September 1988, the increase was small.
A paradox
u.s. monetary policy and international policy
coordination to stabilize the dollar may be in
conflict if the U.S. tightens policy when the
dollar is appreciating, as occurred over the
Summer of 1988 and early in 1989. The principal
difficulty is that a stronger dollar may lead to
higher inflation abroad in the short run, particularly in Germany, where monetary authorities
tend to respond vigorously to offset movements
in the dollar.
Paradoxically, although u.s. trading partners have
expressed discomfort at rising U.S. interest rates
and the strong dollar, they also have supported
the Federal Reserve's efforts to control inflation.
One possible explanation is that other industrial
countries prefer a tighter U.S. monetary policy,
even if it raises foreign inflation above trend in
the short run, because it may lower trend inflation abroad in the long-run. An increase in trend
u.s. inflation may be exported abroad and may
be more costly to offset in the long run.
Foreign monetary authorities also recognize
that high U.S. interest rates and the strong dollar
are also the result of persistent U.S. government
budget deficits. Accordingly, a less expansionary
fiscal policy, rather than an easier U.s. monetary
policy, may be seen as a better means of easing
upward pressure on the dollar while curbing
inflation. The need to reduce the u.s. budget
deficit was emphasized at the meetings of the
Group of Seven major industrial countries (G-7)
this year.

0.66
0.62

4.0

Ramon Moreno
Economist

0.58
0.54
0.50

3.0 +h'TT1rTT"
JFMAMJJASONOJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFM
1986

1987

1988

1989

Shaded areas show episodes when yen
depreciated for more than 1 month.

Opinions expressed in this newsletter do not necessarily reflect the views of the management of the Federal Reserve Bank of
San Francisco, or of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Editorial comments may be addressed to the editor (Barbara Bennett) or to the author.... Free copies of Federal Reserve
publications can be obtained from the Public Information Department, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, P.O. Box 7702,
San Francisco 94120. Phone (415) 974-2246.

¥

Research Department

Federal Reserve
Bank of
San Francisco
P.O. Box 7702
San Francisco, CA 94120

Address Correction Requested