View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

August 16,1974

The agricultural scene presented a
very cloudy picture at midsummer.
Wholesale farm prices turned
around in July after a steep 18percent decline between February
and June, and many analysts fore­
cast further increases in the wake of
a serious drought situation. For non­
farmers, this development presaged
a worsening of inflation, after a
period in which falling farm prices
offset at least some of the inflation­
ary pressure arising from the
industrial sector.
For farmers, meanwhile, several
critical problems are now dogging
their income prospects. The cur­
rent drought in the Midwest has
destroyed the hopes for a bumper
harvest and thereby set in motion
the new upsurge in crop prices. The
gradual slowdown in overseas
economies and the improvement
in foreign crop prospects have
hampered the export trade,
although they have also eased
some of the pressures on domestic
prices. Meanwhile, a price-cost
squeeze has developed as a resul­
tant of the earlier slump in farm
commodity prices and the con­
current upsurge in production costs.
Because of these factors, the fall-off
in receipts from last fall's peak has
been precipitous, so that net farm
income this year could fall 8 per­
cent or more below the 1973 level.
It should be remembered, however,
that net income rose nearly 85
percent to $32 billion in 1973, a
year of unprecedented prosperity
for the nation's farmers. Thus, farm1

Digitized for FR A SER


ers this year seem certain to reach a
much higher level of income than
they attained in any year prior to 1973.
Changing factors

Farm markets have been undergo­
ing important structural adjust­
ments, due among other things to
the disappearance of grain reserves
and the recultivation of millions of
acres of previously idle land. Given
the relatively inelastic demand and
supply schedules for farm com­
modities, prices and incomes have
been very sensitive to changing
production developments. During
the second quarter alone, prices re­
ceived by farmers fell 13 percent
from the record first-quarter figure,
reflecting the massive shift from
shortage to surplus of livestock
products plus the prospect for
bumper harvests of most major
crops. But the situation then began
to change because of several unex­
pected weather and market devel­
opments. Farm product prices rose
6 percent in the single month end­
ing mid-July, with increases of 11
percent for feed grains, 13 percent
for wheat, 19 percent for soybeans
and 16 percent for meat animals.
At this juncture, most analysts fore­
see a continuing price uptrend
into the early part of 1975.
During the past several months, ad­
verse weather conditions have
markedly reduced crop prospects
for 1974. In early spring, excessive
rainfall and plant disease caused
delayed plantings, acreage aban­
donment and shifts to alternative
crops in many important farming
(continued on page2)

JR airdrn O
es@
ejpaurtaneim
fc

Opinions expressed in this newsletter do not
necessarily reflect the views of the management of the
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, nor of the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

areas. More recently, a severe
drought has taken a heavy toll
throughout the Midwest, com­
pounding the damage from earlier
flooding. Crop estimates for all
major products have been sharply
reduced; the corn harvest, for exam­
ple, is now estimated at only 5.0
billion bushels compared with the
6.4-billion bushel figure accepted
just a month ago. A record wheat
harvest still seems likely, largely
because of the strength of the al­
ready harvested winter-wheat crop,
but the overall situation appears
gloomy.

past half-year alone, prices paid by
farmers increased 8 percent, fueled
by the dramatic rise in prices of
fertilizer and petroleum products.
The price-cost squeeze was most
severe in the livestock industry,
with some feeding operations going
out of business or at least sharply
restricting the number of animals
on feed. Livestock producers may
return only slowly to profitable
operations, especially in view of
the large farm inventory of animals
and the unusually high levels of
prices for feed and feeding
stock.

While prices should rise because of
worsening crop prospects, some
pressures may develop in the other
direction because of a slowdown in
export demand. For the marketing
year just ended, farm exports
jumped 65 percent to more than
$21 billion. Demand for U.S.
products may now decline some­
what, however, reflecting improved
crop prospects abroad and a slow­
down in the economies of our
major overseas trading partners. Of
course, weakening crop prospects
in this country could bring foreign
buyers back into the U.S. market,
causing price pressures to be some­
what stronger than would other­
wise be expected from the growing
sluggishness of overseas demand.

Changing prospects
For 1974 as a whole, cash receipts
from farm marketings may increase
about 11 percent to $98 billion,
with crop receipts again rising
sharply and livestock receipts show­
ing only a moderate gain. This rise
in total receipts would reflect a
substantial year-to-year increase in
prices and a still-high level of crop
production. However, net farm
income may drop almost 8 percent
to $30 billion, with the rise in re­
ceipts being offset by a continued
uptrend in production expenses
and a sharp decline in government
payments to farmers.

Even with a turnaround in farm
prices, the recent severe cost
squeeze should continue. Over the

2

Digitized for FR A SER


The recent drought has reduced
crop prospects severely, but the
total harvest could still be large in
view of the record amount of
planted acreage, which reflects the
lifting of government acreage re­
strictions last year. Supplies of

grains and oilseeds should be
very tight in the face of expected
domestic usage and export
demand. As already indicated, crop
prices have risen sharply in the past
month, because of some withhold­
ing of grain by farmers, some specu­
lative buying in the export markets,
and a series of downward revisions
of Agriculture Department crop
estimates. Future price increases
may be considerable, depending on
the state of the weather and on such
other factors as the state of foreign
demand.
The livestock situation has im­
proved somewhat from the de­
pressed June level, when prices hit
a two-year low, but supply condi­
tions remain mixed. Substantial
supplies of livestock products
overhang the market, and the
number of animals on the farm has
grown significantly, but feeding
operations are down sharply from
a year ago, with a 21-percent drop
for cattle and calves and a slight de­
cline for hogs. Altogether, red meat
supplies should hold up well for the
next few months, thereby keeping
cattle and hog prices below the
peak levels of a year ago.
Price prospects

The farm-commodity price index,
although going up this summer and
fall, may not return to the August
1973 peak. Even so, prices received
by farmers may rise at least 9 per­
cent for the year as a whole, on top
of last year's spectacular 37-percent

increase. This continued price rise
at the farm level could mean, for
the second straight year, an increase
of about 14 percent (annual aver­
age) in supermarket prices. The
annual rate of increase in retail
food prices dropped to 3 percent in
the second quarter— only a fraction
of the 1973-early 1974 increase—
but the situation will probably
worsen again, as indicated by the
July wholesale-price figures.
Looking further ahead, the Council
of Economic Advisers recently fore­
cast a high level of farm output for
the next several years, with severe
pressures on farm inputs. Produc­
tion is likely to remain strong be­
cause of the need to replenish
grain stocks and to meet a con­
tinued high plateau of export de­
mand. The cost squeeze meanwhile
is likely to continue, with prices of
fertilizers and fuels rising even
faster than farm prices, with the
farm labor situation becoming
tighter, and with land availability
being less than had previously
been anticipated. (Only 33 million
acres have returned to production
in the past two years, compared
with the 60 million acres originally
considered available.) Thus, the
Council concludes, farm prices will
remain relatively high in the period
ahead, and large price swings may
develop from small shifts in pro­
duction or demand because of the
absence of the excess productive
capacity and reserves of the past.
Dean Chen

3

Digitized for FR A SER


O

uoi8umse/v\ • qejfl • uoSaJO • epBA3|sj . oqepi
HBM BH

•

B jU J O p | B 3

•

B U O Z Jjy

•

B>|SB|V

pi©iuuipT8<dI©(g upjn§®§©^[
BANKING DATA—TWELFTH FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT
(Dollar amounts in millions)

Selected Assets and Liabilities
Large Commercial Banks

Amount
Outstanding
7 /3 1 /7 4

Change
from
7 /2 4 /7 4

Change from
year ago
Dollar
Percent

+
+
+

+ 9,315
+ 8,666
+ 436
+ 3,074
+ 2,742
+ 762
- 466
+ 1,115
+ 6,556
+ 663
- 243
+ 6,250
142
+ 6,195
- 222
+ 4,272

Loans (gross) adjusted and investments*
Loans gross adjusted—
Securities loans
Commercial and industrial
Real estate
Consumer instalment
U.S. Treasury securities
Other Securities
Deposits (less cash items)— total*
Demand deposits adjusted
U.S. Government deposits
Time deposits— total*
Savings
Other time I.P.C.
State and political subdivisions
(Large negotiable CD's)

84,044
66,158
1,602
23,421
19,702
9,423
4,859
13,027
79,123
22,028
355
55,337
17,815
28,154
6,174
15,016

903
906
551
—
30
+
58
+
44
+ 120
— 123
—
10
—
62
—
48
+
98
91
+
43
—
22
+ 100

+
+
+
+
+
+

Weekly Averages
of Daily Figures

Week ended
7 /3 1 /7 4

Week ended
7 /2 4 /7 4

Comparable
year-ago period

40
477
437

57
317
260

108
-1 9 9
- 91

+ 1,417

+ 1,400

+ 167

+

+

-

—

+
+
+
—

+
-

+
—

+

12.47
15.07
37.39
15.11
16.17
8.80
8.75
9.36
9.03
3.10
40.64
12.73
0.79
28.21
3.47
39.76

Member Bank Reserve Position
Excess Reserves
Borrowings
Net free ( + ) / Net borrowed ( —)

-

-

Federal Funds— Seven Large Banks
Interbank Federal funds transactions
Net purchases (+ ) / Net sales ( —)
Transactions: U.S. securities dealers
Net loans ( + ) / Net borrowings ( —)

480

336

75

’ Includes items not shown separately.

Information on this and other publications can be obtained by calling or writing the
Administrative Services Department, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, P.O. Box 7702,
San Francisco, California 94120. Phone (415) 397-1137.
Digitized for FR A SER