View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FRBSF WEEKLY LETTEA
Apri I 15, 1988

A Cashless Society?
For years analysts have been predicting that the
u.s. will become a cashless society in which
most payments will be made electronically.
Such predictions might seem reasonable in light
of rapid advances in computer and telecommunications technology and the growth of electronic funds transfers.
However, less technologically sophisticated
means of payments stubbornly refuseto go
away. Most individuals still rely primarily on
checks, cash, and credit cards to make payments. A fully electronic payment system apparently remains a far distant development. In fact,
trends in cash usage and holdings suggest that
cold, hard cash is becoming an even more popular means of payment. This Letter examines
trends in the use of cash, checks, and electronic
payments to assess the likely evolution of the
payment system over the next few years.

Means of payment
In the U.s., households' primary means of payment (in dollar volume) are checks, followed by
cash (currency and coin), and then credit cards.
According to a 1984 Federal Reserve survey, 57
percent of a typical family's expenditures are
made by check, a surprisingly large 36 percent
are made by cash, and the remaining 7 percent
are made by credit card. Very few households
make payments via electronic wire transfers.
Detailed data on trends in the use of various
means of payments are not readily available.
However, trends in the Federal Reserve's provision of various payments services may give a
useful indication of underlying trends. The
Federal Reserve is a major provider of check
clearing services, electronic funds transfers, and
cash services. Trends in both dollar volumes and
numbers of items processed suggest that
although electronic payments are growing, traditional means of making payments are well
entrenched.
In terms of dollar volume, electronic wire transfers are by far the most important type of payments processed by the Fed. Over $142 trillion

dollars were transferred over the Federal
Reserve's electronic transfer system in 1987,
more than twelve times the dollar volume transferred by check. Most of these transactions
occurred among large corporations, depositories, and financial companies. Moreover, electronic transfers mainly involved federal funds
trades and securities purchases and sales, not
purchases and sales of final goods and services.
Individual electronic transfers tended to be
large, averaging $2.7 million each. Thus, the
number of these "wholesale" electronic transfers was minuscule in relation to the total check
volume processed by the Federal Reserve.
The growth in electronic transfers has been
rapid, with a 62 percent increase in dollar value
and a 39 percent increase in transfer volume
between 1983 and 1987. In contrast, checks
grew only 16 percent in dollar value and 16 percent in volume over the same period. Thus,
electronic transfers apparently are gaining in
popularity over checks. But checks still handle
over 300 times the number of payments that
electronic transfers do, so it is unlikely that electronic funds transfers will displace checks as the
most popular mode of payment anytime soon.

Cash still is king
It is not surprising that electronic funds transfers
are used for large-dollar transfers and that they
have become increasingly popular, but it is surprising how popular currency still is. In fact,
contrary to predictions of a cashless society, currency is becoming increasingly popular as a
means of payment.
The dollar volume of currency outstanding in
the hands of the public has been growing for a
long time. In keeping with this trend, currency
grew from $148 billion in 1983 to $200 billion
in 1987, a 35 percent increase. Moreover, currency's share of the Fed's M 1 monetary aggregate - a measure of transaction balances declined only slightly from 27 percent in 1977
to 26.5 percent in 1987, even though interestearning NOW and Super-NOW checking
accounts for individuals were introduced during

FRBSF
this period. In theory, the introduction of such
accounts should have increased the popularity
of checking accounts' and reduced the attractiveness of cash balances. Interest-paying checking
accounts, in fact, have been very popular (over
35 percent of households had them by 1985),
but their popularity did not diminish that of currency. RaJher, they attracted funds mainly from
non-interest bearingchec:king accounts and
other interest bearing accounts.

Federal Reserve cash processing
Another sign of the growing popularity of cash
as a means of payment is the rapid growth in the
volume of currency and coin processed by the
Federal Reserve. As part of their central. bank
services, the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks
and their branches count, sort, store, and ensure
that the quality of currency in circulation is
maintained. Banks can deposit excess or unfit
currency at a Federal Reserve Bank or branch
and can withdraw sorted, fit currency from their
reserve accounts upon request. Typically, the
total volume of cash withdrawals from reserve
accounts follows deposit volume fairly closely
over time, but withdrawals run slightly higher
than deposits as a result of the growing volume
of cash held by the public. (New currency is
printed by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing.)
The volume of currency received by all Federal
Reserve Banks has been growing rapidly for
some time. During the 1983-1987 period, unit
volume increased 47 percent and dollar volume
52 percent - approximately triple the corresponding percentage increases for check volumes and in line with the percentage increases
in electronic transfer volumes. Moreover, the
1986-87 growth rate in unit volume was about
9.5 percent, considerably greater than the 6.6
percent average annual growth rate since 1974.
In 1987, the Federal Reserve System processed
about 17 billion notes of various denominations,
representing a dollar value of more than $216
billion. Thus, slightly more than the entire dollar
volume of currency outstanding ($200 billion)
circulates through the Federal Reserve during a
typical year.
These figures understate the extent to which
cash is used as a means of payment, however.
According to the 1984 Federal Reserve survey,
only 15 percent of all currency (or about $30

j

billion in 1987), is held for transaction purposes
by domestic residents. (The rest is held outside
the U.s., or possibly within the u.s. in hoards
for illegal purposes.) Apparently, each dollar
held by a u.s. resident for transaction purposes
circulated through the Federal Reserve System
several times, probably after being used in several transactions. Thus, the $30 billion held
domestically for transaction purposes probably
supports transactions valued at several times the
$216 billion that the Fed receives annually in
currency deposits. In view of these estimates, the
cashless society is far from reality.

Reasons for cash's popularity
There are several reasons why cash as a means
of payment is likely to remain popular. There are
even some reasons why it is likely to become
more popular. For one thing, cash is a convenient means of payment, especially for small purchases. It takes much less time to make a cash
payment than it does to make a check or credit
card payment, and cash is more widely acceptable. The time involved in making a transaction
is a very real cost, which increases with the
value of alternative uses of an individual's time.
These values have increased along with real
wages and the proportion of the population
employed. As a result, convenience has become
a more important determinant of the choice of
method of payment.
Another reason for using currency is that cash
transactions are anonymous, making them
widely used in illegal transactions or for tax evasion. In fact, several economists have relied on
patterns of cash usage to try to estimate the size
of the "underground" economy. However, the
recent reductions in federal marginal tax rates,
in theory, should have reduced the incentives
for tax evasion and therefore, reduced the popularity of cash transactions.
Growth in AlMs
Perhaps a more important reason for the growing popularity of cash is the introduction and
rapid growth of automatic teller machines
(ATMs), a trend that is also related to the convenience demand for cash. The number of these
machines has grown from 10,000 nationwide in
1977 to over 80,000 today.
By offering virtual around-the-clock availability
from many locations, ATMs make it possible for
individuals to obtain cash frequently and at their

Billions
a! Notes

7

Growth of Notes Received by Federal Thousands
Reserve and ATMs Installed
of ATMs

70

ATMs ••••

..........

6

50

5
4

3

60

40

l""'""',_ .••~r• ./~;'·'·

Ones

..

~.,~ ~,.:.:.:;.:

"".......

........ - " .

30

..

20

Other bills

2

10
1975

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

convenience, thereby reducing the time costs
involved in obtaining cash. Moreover, individuals do not have to risk possible Joss, theft, or
loss of interest on large cash balances. Instead,
they can obtain cash frequently and in amounts
more closely related to the size and timing of
planned expenditures. In fact, the 1984 Federal
Reserve survey confirms that ATM users hold
smaller average cash balances and obtain cash
more frequently than do non-ATM users. Also,
ATMs are used more frequently by high-income
persons with high time costs and thus larger
incentives to economize on the time involved in
making payments.
The chart shows a correlation between the
growth of ATMs and the demand for cash. Since
most ATMs use $20 bills, it is interesting to note
that the growth in the volume of $20 bills has
been greater than that of other denominations
since 1977 - about the same time that the
number of ATMs installed started to grow
rapidly nationwide. Moreover, the volume of

$20 bills processed by the Federal Reserve has
exceeded that of other denominations since
1983. Surveys by the Bank Administration
Institute in 1979 and 1986 also show that the
fraction of the number of all debits from checking accounts arising from ATM cash withdrawals
increased 336 percent while the number of
debits associated with checks actually declined
about 4 percent.
One final reason that cash has been and likely
will continue to be so popular is that the Federal
Reserve's cash services are not priced.
(However, institutions pay the full costs of transporting cash to and from the Federal Reserve.)
Check services and wire transfers, in contrast,
are both priced at levels intended to recover
processing costs. Because Federal Reserve cash
services are underpriced compared to checks
and electronic transfers, cash payments are more
economical than if users had to pay the full costs
of the Federal Reserve's services. This, in turn,
may help to explain the rapid growth of ATMs,
since ATMs require sorted and fit currencytwo services banks can obtain without cost from
the Federal Reserve.

Cash is here to stay

u.s.

Far from becoming a cashless society, the
appears to be relying more on currency as a
means of payment. The reasons for this trend
include increased time costs, the innovation of
ATMs and the underpricing of Federal Reserve
cash services. Thus, it seems unlikely that electronic payments will replace cash anytime in the
near future.

Michael Co Keeley

Opinions expressed in this newsletter do not necessarily reflect the views of the management of the Federal Reserve Bank of
San Francisco, or of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Editorial comments may be addressed to the editor (Barbara Bennett) or to the author.... Free copies of Federal Reserve
publications can be obtained from the Public Information Department, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, P.O. Box 7702,
San Francisco 94120. Phone (415) 974-2246.

uo~6Ui4S0m

04 0PI

4o~n

!!omoH O!UJOJiIO)

U060JQ
ouozPtl

OpOA0U
o~soltl

O)SI)UOJ:I UOS

JO ~uo8
aAJaSa~ IOJapa:l
~uaw~Jodaa 4)Joasa~
NOTE
The table entitled, "Selected Assets and Liabilities of Large Commercial Banks in the Twelfth
Federal Reserve District," will no longer be published in conjunction with the Weekly Letter.
For those in need of these data, a more timely publication entitled, "Weekly Consolidated
Condition Report of Large Commercial Banks and Domestic Subsidiaries" (F.R. 2416x), is
available from the Statistical and Data Services Department of this Bank.