View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Federal R eserve Bank
OF DALLAS

June 6, 1986
DALLAS, TEXAS 7 5 2 2 2

Circular 86-55

TO:

The Chief Executive Officer of all
member banks, bank holding companies
and others concerned in the
Eleventh Federal Reserve District
SUBJECT

Request for public comment on Regulation Y, Bank Holding Companies
and Change in Bank Control
DETAILS
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has issued for
public comment a proposal that the Board should modify and grant relief from
the conditions it imposes on the acquisition of thrift institutions by bank
holding companies.The conditions are contained in the Bank Holding Company Act
and the Garn-St Germain Depository Institutions Act of 1982.The proposal is to
permit bank holding companies to conduct joint marketing and sales operations
between thrift subsidiaries and other affiliates, advertise through thrift
subsidiaries the services and products offered by its other affiliates, and
engage in certain transactions between thrift and other affiliates.
Comments should be addressed to Mr. William W. Wiles, Secretary,
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, D.C. 20551.
All correspondence should refer to Docket No. R-0572 and must be received by
June 27, 1986.
ATTACHMENTS
The Board's press release and Federal Register are attached.
MORE INFORMATION
For further information, please contact Basil J. Asaro at (214)
698-4345 or Gayle Teague at (214) 651-6481.
Sincerely yours,

For additional copies of any circular please contact the Public Affairs Department at (214) 651-6289. Banks and others are
encouraged to use the following incoming WATS numbers in contacting this Bank (800) 442-7140 (intrastate) and (800)
527-9200 (interstate).

This publication was digitized and made available by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas' Historical Library (FedHistory@dal.frb.org)

FEDERAL RESERVE press release

May 19, 1986

For

immediate

The

release

Federal

com me nt

on wh e t h e r

thrift

Reserve

in st i t ut i o n s

modified.

applications

and

b e ne fi ts

the

by

the

pu bli c

acquisition

com pan ies

r e ce iv ed

Board

bank

h o l di ng

designed

In

pu bl ic

to ass ur e

as s e p a r a t e
also

and

limit

has

sho ul d

Board

ap pr ov ed

com pa ni es

institutions.

of the ac qu is i t i on s,

conditions

holding

be

the

si gn i f ic a n t

c on di t i o n s
operated

should

r eq ue st ed

it imposed on

bank

1982,

by

thrift

after

by

today

of

be

no

later

1986.

Since

failed

conditions

Comment

than Ju n e 27,

Board

to a c q ui re

approving

comm ent

the

indep en de nt

tr ans ac ti on s

those

trouble d

the

es ta b l i s h e d
thrifts

thrift

be tw ee n

or

acquisitions,

r e ga rd in g

the Boar d
that

several

public

a number

co nt i n u e d

to be

institutions.
the ac q u i r e d

of

The

thrifts

and other h o l d i n g c o m p a n y affiliates.
The
from

these

holding
s e r vi ce s

Boar d

has

r e c e nt ly

l i m i t a ti o n s

c om p a n ie s
wit h

cross-advertise

to

o t he r
the

to

rec ei ve d

permit

jo intly
bank
services

thrifts

ma rk et
ho ld in g
and

and

req ues ts
acquired
sell

co m p a n y

products

for

of

by

products

relief
bank
and

af fil iat es,
othe r

holding

c om pa ny
wi th

af fi liates,

other

and

holding

si gn i f i c a n t

of

company

public

de ve l o p m e n t
is

appropriate

co nd it i o n s
pu rp os es

d ev el o p m e n t s

in

the

public

that

to

thrift

be

in

In

the

Boar d

light

ba n k i n g

the

or ig ina l

b e l ie ve s

accomplishing
in

of

the

re ga r d i n g

ap pr o p r i a t e

and

tr a n s a c t i o n s

su r r o u n d e d

co mm en t

effective

co nt inu e

limi ted

affiliates.

r e st ri cti ons ,

seek

have been

and

ce rt ain

participation

these
to

co nduct

that

wh e t h e r
their

light

industries,

of
or

it

the

intended
recent
wh et her

the c o n d it io ns sh oul d be modified.
A copy of

the B o a rd 's

order

is attached.

A tt ac h m e n t

-

0-

re q u e s t i n g

pu b l i c

comment

Federal Register / Vol. 51, No. 99 / Thursday, May 22, 1986 / Proposed Rules-_______ 18797
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12CFR Part 225
[D o ck et No. R -0572]

Regulation Y; Conditions Imposed on
Acquisition of Thrift Institutions by
Bank Holding Companies
a g e n c y : Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.
ACTION: Solicitation of public comments.

The Federal Reserve Board is
soliciting comments on whether the
Board should modify and grant relief
from the conditions it imposes on the
acquisition of thrift institutions by bank
holding companies under the Bank
Holding Company Act and the Garn-St
Germain Depository Institutions Act of
1982 to permit bank holding companies
to conduct joint marketing and sales
operations between thrift subsidiaries
and other affiliates, advertise through
thrift subsidiaries the services and
products offered by its other affiliates,
and engage in certain transactions
between thrift and other affiliates.
DATES: All comments should be received
by the Board by June 27,1986.
ADDRESSES: All comments, which
should refer to Docket No. R-0572,
should be mailed to William W. Wiles,
Secretary, Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, Washington,
DC. 20551, or delivered to the courtyard
entrance, Eccles Building, 20th Street,
NW., between “C” Street and
Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC,
between 8:45 a.m. and 5:15 p.m.
weekdays. Comments may be inspected
in Room B-1122 between 8:45 a.m. and
5:15 p.m. weekdays.
S u m m a ry :

J. Virgil Mattingly, Deputy General
Counsel (202/452-3430), Melanie L. Fein,
Senior Counsel (202/452-3594), or Scott
G. Alvarez, Senior Attorney (202/4523583), Legal Division; or, for users of
Telecommunications Device for the
Deaf, Earnestine Hill or Dorothea
Thompson (202/452-3544).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Since
1982, the Board has approved several
applications by bank holding companies
to acquire thrift institutions pursuant to
the provisions of the Garn-St Germain
Depository Institutions Act of 1982 and
the Bank Holding Company Act (‘‘BHC
Act”). In approving these cases, the
Board established a number of
conditions designed to guard against
possible adverse effects that may result
from the affiliation of a thrift institution
and a bank holding company. See
Citicorp [Fidelity Federal Savings and
Loan Association), 68 Federal Reserve
Bulletin 656 (1982).
These conditions were developed in
the context of specific applications
pending before the Board and after
informal public hearings and public
comment that included comments from
local and national bank and thrift trade
associations, state regulatory
authorities, local community groups,
competing bank holding companies and
thrift institutions, and members of
Congress. The conditions have been
adopted in each case involving a thrift
acquisition by a bank holding company
since 1982.
The conditions were designed to
assure that the thrift continued to be
operated as a separate and independent
institution engaged primarily in
mortgage lending activities and did not
operate in fact as a bank in violation of
the interstate banking prohibitions of
the BHC Act. The conditions were also
designed to prevent the acquiring bank
holding company from obtaining an
unfair competitive advantage over other
banks and thrift institutions by using the
thrift to conduct activities not permitted
to bank holding companies or
conducting banking activities through
the thrift that are not permitted to a
savings and loan association.
Among the conditions to the Board’s
approval adopted to accomplish these
purposes are restrictions on certain
operations between thrift institutions
and their bank holding company
affiliates. These conditions require that:
(a) the thrift institution be operated as a
separate, independent, profit-oriented
corporate entity and not be operated in
tandem with any other subsidiary of the bank
holding company; The thrift institution and
bank holding company must limit their

operations to effect this condition, and must
observe the fallowing conditions:
(1) no banking or other subsidiary of the
bank holding company shall link its deposittaking activities to accounts at the thrift
institution in a sweeping arrangement or
similar arrangement, and
(2) neither the bank holding company nor
any of its subsidiaries shall solicit deposits or
loans for the thrift institution, nor shall the
thrift institution solicit deposits or loans for
any other subsidiary of the bank holding
company: and
(b) to the extent necessary to ensure
independent operation of the thrift institution
and prevent the improper diversion of funds,
there shall be no transactions between the
thrift institution and the bank holding
company or any of its subsidiaries without
the prior approval of the appropriate Federal
Reserve Bank. This limitation encom passes
the transfer, purchase, sale or loan of any
assets or liabilities, but does not include
infusions of capital by the bank holding
company, the payment of dividends or the
sale of residential real estate loans from the
thrift institution to any subsidiary of the bank
holding company.

Citicorp, which has acquired thrift
institutions in California, Illinois, and
Florida subject to these conditions, has
requested relief from the above
conditions in three general areas, so as
to permit its thrifts to jointly market and
sell products and services with other
Citicorp affiliates, to cross-advertise the
services and products of its affiliates
through its thrifts, and to conduct
certain limited transactions with other
Citicorp affiliates. Citicorp contends that
the conditions place the bank holding
company and its subsidiary thrift
institutions at a competitive
disadvantage compared to local thrift
insitutions and bank holding companies
as well as out-of-state bank holding
companies with nonbanking operations
in those markets, none of whom are
subject to the Board's conditions.
In this regard, Citicorp asserts that it
will only conduct cooperative programs
that are permissible under the BHC Act
between Citicorp’s other subsidiaries.
Citicorp states that its thrifts will not be
operated as banks for purposes of the
BHC Act or branches of Citicorp’s
subsidiary banks for purposes of the
McFadden Act. Citicorp states that the
conditions in (a)(1) and (a)(2) above
assure this by prohibiting the linking of
deposit-taking activities of thrift
institutions in any arrangement with
affiliates, and by prohibiting the
solicitation of deposits by the thrift
institution for its affiliates or by its
affiliates for the thrift institution.
In urging establishment of the
conditions, commenters asserted that
the restrictions on operations are
neccessary to prevent bank holding

187S3

Federal Register / Vol. 51, No. 99 / Thursday, May 22, 1986 / Proposed Rules

companies owning thrift institutions
from operating the thrift institution as a
bank, and from gaining a competitive
advantage over local thrift institutions
by permitting the thrift institution to
appear to the local consumer to be
offering commercial banking and other
services that thrift institutions are
generally unable or not legally permitted
to offer. Commenters argued that joint
marketing, cross-advertising of products
and services available from affiliates,
and transactions with bank holding
company affiliates also may permit a
thrift to avoid restrictions imposed by
the Garn-St Germain Act on the
activities of Federal S&Ls. Commenters
argue further that the use of joint
marketing or cross-advertising may
permit the thrift institution to operate in
effect as branches for soliciting deposits
or loans for its bank affiliates, thereby
undermining the interstate banking
prohibitions.
The Board believes that the recent
requests for relief from the above
restrictions on operations present a
framework for evaluating whether the
conditions have accomplished their
intended purposes and the continued
appropriateness of the conditions.
Commenters are requested to evaluate
these matters taking into account,
among other things, the significance of
the deregulation of interest rate
differentials, increasing similarity in the
powers of banks and thrifts, and the
spread of interstate deposit-taking in
both the thrift and banking industries.
The Board believes that, in considering
action in this area, it is appropriate to
seek public comment, in light of the
significant public participation that
surrounded the original development of
the conditions.
Accordingly, the Board seeks public
comment on whether the restrictions,
other than the restrictions on linking
deposit-taking activities and cross­
solicitation of deposits, should be
retained, modified of removed. In order
to permit the Board to evaluate the
conditions, the Board requests comment
on whether it continues to be necessary
and appropriate to limit thrifts affiliated
with bank holding companies from
conducting activities and marketing
services that both thrifts and bank
holding companies are otherwise
permitted to conduct and market under
applicable Federal law in order to
accomplish the goals of avoiding the
undermining of limitations on interstate
deposit-taking and on preventing unfair
competition. In this connection, the
Board also notes that affiliation of bank
holding companies with thrift

institutions does not raise the same
concerns regarding the separation of
banking and commerce that has
motivated consideration of similar
restrictions on operations between a
commercial organization and a bank or
thrift affiliate that is contemplated by
currently pending legislation and
conmmenters are requested to take
these differences into account in
formulating their comments.
The Board also requests comment on
whether the deregulation of interest rate
differentials, expansion of the powers of
thrifts, the growing number of states
authorizing interstate banking, and
similar events since the formulation of
the Board’s conditions have affected the
need for the restrictions to accomplish
their objectives. In this regard, the
acquisition of a thrift by a bank holding
company that is located in the same
state or that is authorized under state
law to acquire a bank in the state in
which the thrift is located does not raise
the concern that the acquisition may
evade the BHC Act’s limitations on
interstate bank acquisitions. The Board
requests comment on the extent to
which the restrictions should be
modified in these situations.
The Board also requests comment on
whether modification of the restrictions
in any of the following areas would
adversely affect their policy goals:
Joint Marketing and Sales:
Specifically, the Board requests
comment on whether thrift institutions
owned by bank holding companies
should be permitted to conduct joint
marketing and sales activities with their
bank holding company affiliates. For
example, should a thrift institution and a
bank holding company real estate
lending affiliate be permitted to jointly
solicit business from a real estate
developer, with the real estate lending
affiliate offering to provide construction
lending for a building project and the
thrift offering to provide end loan
financing for prospective purchasers of
the real estate project. In addition,
should a holding company affiliate be
permitted to introduce existing
corporate customers to the thrift
institution for the purpose of obtaining
relocation assistance or other products
and services available through the thrift
institution.
In this regard, the Board requests
comment on whether any adverse
effects that may result from conducting
joint marketing and sales activities are
sufficiently limited by retaining the
condition prohibiting the linking of
deposit-taking activities, and by
requiring that the terms-and pricing of

services not be tied in any way and be
the same regardless of whether the
prospective customer obtains services
from both the thrift institution and its
affiliate or from only one of the
institutions.
Cross Advertising and Referral: The
Board also requests comment on
whether thrift institutions should be
permitted to offer access to services and
products of its bank holding company
affiliates, and bank hplding company
affiliates should be permitted to offer
access to Services and products offered
by the thrift institutions. For example,
should a thrift institution be permitted to
make applications available to its
customers for credit cards marketed by
and student loans underwritten by its
bank holding company affiliates;
advertise the products and services of
its affiliates by placing brochures and
posters in branch offices of the thrift
institution and by including advertising
inserts in monthly statements of
customers of the thrift institution;
provide customer lists to its bank
holding company affiliates; and, refer its
customers to affiliates and provide
promotional material and a toll-free
number for the affiliate. Similarly,
should bank holding company affiliates
of the thrift institutions be permitted to
advertise the products and services of
the thrift institutions.
The Board also seeks comment on
whether any adverse effects that may
result from cross-advertising and
referral activities may be limited by
maintaining the current conditions
prohibiting the thrift institution from
soliciting deposits for its bank holding
company affiliates and prohibiting bank
holding company affiliates from
soliciting deposits for the thrift
institution, and by imposing conditions
preventing the thrift institution from
providing credit analysis in connection
with loans provided to customers of the
thrift by a bank holding company
affiliate, from disbursing credit funds on
such loans, and from otherwise acting as
a branch or loan production office of
any holding company affiliate.
Transactions with Affiliates: The
Board also requests comment on
whether thrift institutions should be
permitted to use services and products
of bank holding company affiliates for
the benefit of the thrift or its customers.
For example, should a thrift institution
be permitted to locate a branch office in
a building owned by an affiliate and in
which holding company affiliates also
have offices with separate access?

Federal Register / Vol. 51, No. 99 / Thursday, May 22, 1986 / Proposed Rules
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System. May 16,1986.
W illiam W . W iles,

Secretary of the Board.

(FR Doc. 86-11480 Filed 5-2t-86; 8:45 am|
BILLING CODE K210-01-M

18799