View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

federal

Reserve

bank of

DALLAS, TEXAS

Dallas

75222

Circular No. 80-2
January 7, 1980

PROPOSED POLICY STATEMENT
BANK HOLDING COMPANY ACT
(Formations of Small One-Bank Holding Companies)
TO ALL MEMBER BANKS,
BANK HOLDING COMPANIES,
AND OTHERS CONCERNED IN THE
ELEVENTH FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT:
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has issued for
comments, a proposed policy statement amending the criteria applied when
accessing financial factors in the formations of small one-bank holding companies.
The Board's o rd er, as submitted to the Federal Register, is enclosed.
Those wishing to make comments on the proposal should do so in
writing, and direct all such correspondence to Mr. Theodore E. Allison,
Secretary, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, D.C.
20551. All material submitted should be received by the Secretary no later than
January 31, 1980, and include the docket number R-0265.
Any questions concerning the enclosed document should be referred to
Mr. Robert Hankins, Coordinator of Applications, of our Holding Company Super­
vision Department, Ext. 6120.
Sincerely yours,
Robert H. Boykin
First Vice President

Enclosure

Banks and others are encouraged to use the following incoming W A T S numbers in contacting this Bank:
1-800-442-7140 (intrastate) and 1-800-527-9200 (interstate). For calls placed locally, please use 651 plus the
extension referred to above.

This publication was digitized and made available by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas' Historical Library (FedHistory@dal.frb.org)

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
POLICY STATEMENT
FOR ASSESSING FINANCIAL FACTORS IN
THE FORMATION OF SMALL ONE-BANK. HOLDING COMPANIES
PURSUANT TO THE BANK HOLDING COMPANY ACT
[Docket No. R-0265I

AGENCY:

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

ACTION:

Proposed policy statement.

SUMMARY: In the interest of helping to maintain the safety and
soundness of the banking system and, in particular, of small community
banks, as well as to improve the transferability of ownership of such
institutions and facilitate local ownership of these banks, the Federal
Reserve Board is proposing for public comment a policy statment for
assessing financial factors in the formation of small one-bank holding
companies.
DATE:

Comments must be received on or before January 31, 1980.

ADDRESS: Theodore E. Allison, Secretary, Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, Washington, D.C. 20551. All materials submitted
should include the Docket Number R-0265.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: James I. Garner, Division of Banking Supervision
and Regulation (202-452-2415), Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, Washington, D.C. 20551.
POLICY
OF THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS
FOR ASSESSING THE
THE FORMATION OF SMALL
PURSUANT TO THE BANK

STATEMENT
OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
FINANCIAL FACTORS IN
ONE-BANK HOLDING COMPANIES
HOLDING COMPANY ACT

In acting on applications filed under the Bank Holding Company
Act, the Board has adopted, and continues to follow, the cardinal principle
that bank holding companies should serve as a source of strength for their
subsidiary banks. When bank holding companies incur debt and rely upon the
earnings of their subsidiary banks as the means of repaying such debt, a
question arises as to the probable effect upon the financial condition of
the company and its subsidiary bank or banks. Incurring debt under these
circumstances is of particular concern when the debt proceeds are used for
acquisitions rather than for internal purposes such as meeting the capital
needs of a subsidiary bank.
The Board believes that a high level of acquisition debt impairs
the ability of a bank holding company to come to the aid of its subsidiary
bank in times of need and in some cases the servicing requirements on such

-

2-

debt may be a drain on the bank's resources. For these reasons, the
Board has not favored the use of acquisition debt in bank holding
company formations. Nevertheless, the Board has recognized that the
transfer of ownership of small community banks and the maintenance of
local ownership in those banks often requires the use of acquisition
debt. The Board, therefore, has permitted the formation of small onebank holding companies with debt levels higher than would be permitted
for larger or multi-bank holding companies. Approval of these applica­
tions has been given on the condition that the small one-bank holding
companies demonstrate the ability to service the acquisition debt without
straining the capital of their subsidiary bank and, further, that such
companies restore their ability to serve as a source of strength for their
subsidiary bank within a relatively short period of time.
The Board continues to subscribe to these principles. In the
interest of furthering its policy of encouraging local transfer and owner­
ship of banks in the one-bank holding company format, without diluting
bank safety and soundness, the Board has reexamined the analytical frame­
work and the criteria it applies when considering small one-bank holding
company formations. To these ends, it proposes certain revisions in its
procedures and standards described below.
The proposed criteria shift the focus from debt repayment con­
tained in existing criteria to the relationship between debt and equity at
the parent holding company. The holding company would have the option of
improving the relationship of debt to equity by either repaying the principal
amount of its debt or through the retention of earnings. Under these pro­
cedures, newly organized small one-bank holding companies would be expected
to reduce the relationship of their debt to equity over a reasonable period
of time to a level comparable to that maintained by many large and multi­
bank holding companies.
In general, this policy is intended to apply only to one-bank
holding companies that do not have significant leveraged nonbank activities
and whose subsidiary bank wguld have total assets of approximately $100
million or less at the time the application is filed.

The proposed criteria are as follows:
General
In evaluating applications filed pursuant to Section 3(a)(1) of
the Bank Holding Company Act, as amended, where the applicant intends to
incur debt to finance the acquisition of a small bank, the Board will take
into account a full range of financial and other information, including the
recent trend and stability of earnings of the bank; the past and prospective
growth of the bank; the quality of the bank's assets; the ability of the
applicant to meet debt servicing requirements without placing an undue strain
on the bank's resources; and the record and competency of management of the
applicant and the bank. In addition, the Board will use the following
criteria in assessing acquisition debt:

-

3-

(1) Minimum Down Payment
The amount of acquisition debt should not exceed 75 percent of
the purchase price of the bank to be acquired.
(2)

Maintenance of Adequate Capital

An applicant proposing to use acquisition debt must demonstrate
to the satisfaction of the Board that any debt servicing requirements to
which the bank holding company may be subject would not cause the bank's
ratio of gross capital to assets to fall below 8.0 percent during the
12-year period following consummation of the acquisition. —
Gross capital
is defined as the sum of total stockholders' equity, the allowance for
possible loan losses and subordinated capital notes and debentures.
(3)

Reduction in Parent Company Leverage

The applicant must demonstrate to the satisfaction
of the Board
that the holding company's ratio of debt to equity would decline to 30 per­
cent within 12 years after consummation of the acquisition.
2/
The term "debt",— as used in the ratio of debt to
equity, means
any borrowed funds (exclusive of short-term borrowings which
arise out of
current transactions, the proceeds of which have been or are to be used for
current transactions), and any securities issued by, or obligations of, the
holding company that are the functional equivalent of long-term debt.
The term "equity",^ as used in the ratio of debt to equity, means
the total stockholders' equity of the bank holding company adjusted to
reflect the periodic amortization of "goodwill" (i.e., the excess of cost of
any acquired company over the sum of the amounts assigned to identifiable
assets acquired less liabilities assumed) in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. In determining the total amount of stock­
holders' equity, the bank holding company should account for its investments
in the common stock of subsidiaries by the equity method of accounting.

If

The applicant will be required to submit projected financial statements
covering the 12-year period for the bank holding company (parent only)
and the bank to be acquired. Such financial statements may be condensed
but should identify principal groups of balance sheet and income state­
ment items.

2/

Redeemable preferred stock will be treated as equity if, by its terms,
it is not redeemable until after the ratio of debt to equity at the
holding company is below 30 percent and would remain at 30 percent or
less subsequent to the redemption. If the preferred stock is redeemable
under other conditions, it will normally be treated as the functional
equivalent of debt. Preferred stock that is convertible into common
stock of the holding company will be treated as equity.

(4)

Dividend Restrictions

The bank holding company is not expected to pay any corporate
dividends until such time as lt3 debt to equity ratio is below 30 percent.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
December 13, 1979.

Theodore E. Allison
Secretary of the Board