View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 102 / Friday, May 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(v) Clearing balance means the
average balance held in an account at a
Federal Reserve Bank by an institution
over a reserve maintenance period to
satisfy its contractual clearing balance
with a Reserve Bank.
*
*
*
*
*
(y) Eligible institution means—
(1) Any depository institution as
described in § 204.1(c) of this part;
(2) Any trust company;
(3) Any corporation organized under
section 25A of the Federal Reserve Act
(12 U.S.C. 611 et seq.) or having an
agreement with the Board under section
25 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C.
601 et seq.); and
(4) Any branch or agency of a foreign
bank (as defined in section 1(b) of the
International Banking Act of 1978, 12
U.S.C. 3101(b)).
(z) Excess balance means the average
balance held in an account at a Federal
Reserve Bank by or on behalf of an
institution over a reserve maintenance
period that exceeds the sum of the
required reserve balance and any
clearing balance.
(aa) Excess balance account means an
account at a Reserve Bank pursuant to
§ 204.10(d) of this part that is
established by one or more eligible
institutions through an agent and in
which only excess balances of the
participating eligible institutions may at
any time be maintained. An excess
balance account is not a ‘‘pass-through
account’’ for purposes of this part.
(bb) Required reserve balance means
the average balance held in an account
at a Federal Reserve Bank by or on
behalf of an institution over a reserve
maintenance period to satisfy the
reserve requirements of this part.
(cc) Targeted federal funds rate means
the federal funds rate established from
time to time by the Federal Open Market
Committee.
■ 3. Revise § 204.10 to read as follows:

tjames on PRODPC75 with RULES

§ 204.10

Payment of interest on balances.

(a) Payment of interest. The Federal
Reserve Banks shall pay interest on
balances maintained at Federal Reserve
Banks by or on behalf of an eligible
institution as provided in this section
and under such other terms and
conditions as the Board may prescribe.
(b) Rate. Except as provided in
paragraph (c) of this section, Federal
Reserve Banks shall pay interest at the
following rates—
(1) For required reserve balances, at 1⁄4
percent;
(2) For excess balances, at 1⁄4 percent;
or
(3) For required reserve balances or
excess balances, at any other rate or

VerDate Nov<24>2008

15:25 May 28, 2009

Jkt 217001

rates as determined by the Board from
time to time.
(c) Pass-through balances. A passthrough correspondent that is an eligible
institution may pass back to its
respondent interest paid on balances
held on behalf of that respondent. In the
case of balances held by a pass-through
correspondent that is not an eligible
institution, a Reserve Bank shall pay
interest only on the required reserve
balances held on behalf of one or more
respondents, and the correspondent
shall pass back to its respondents
interest paid on balances in the
correspondent’s account. Any passing
back of interest by a correspondent to a
respondent under this subsection is not
a payment of interest on a demand
deposit for purposes of Part 217 of this
chapter (Regulation Q).
(d) Excess balance accounts. (1) A
Reserve Bank may establish an excess
balance account for eligible institutions
under the provisions of this paragraph
(d). Notwithstanding any other
provisions of this part, the excess
balances of eligible institutions in an
excess balance account represent a
liability of the Reserve Bank solely to
those participating eligible institutions.
(2) The participating eligible
institutions in an excess balance
account shall authorize another
institution to act as agent of the
participating institutions for purposes of
general account management, including
but not limited to transferring the excess
balances of participating institutions in
and out of the excess balance account.
An excess balance account must be
established at the Reserve Bank where
the agent maintains its master account,
unless otherwise determined by the
Board. The agent may not commingle its
own funds in the excess balance
account.
(3) No required reserve balances or
clearing balances may be maintained at
any time in an excess balance account,
and balances maintained in an excess
balance account will not satisfy any
institution’s reserve balance
requirement or contractual clearing
balance.
(4) An excess balance account must be
used exclusively for the purpose of
maintaining the excess balances of
participants and may not be used for
general payments or other activities.
(5) Interest shall be paid on excess
balances of eligible institutions
maintained in an excess balance
account in accordance with paragraph
(b)(2) or (b)(3) of this section.
(6) A Reserve Bank may establish
additional terms and conditions
consistent with this part with respect to
the operation of an excess balance

PO 00000

Frm 00015

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

25629

account, including, but not limited to,
terms of and fees for services,
conditions under which an institution
may act as agent for an account,
restrictions on the agent with respect to
account management, penalties for
noncompliance with this section or any
terms and conditions, and account
termination.
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, May 22, 2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9–12432 Filed 5–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Parts 204 and 209
[Regulations D and I; Docket No. R–1307]

Reserve Requirements of Depository
Institutions; Issue and Cancellation of
Federal Reserve Bank Capital Stock
AGENCY: Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Board is amending
Regulation D (Reserve Requirements of
Depository Institutions) and Regulation
I (Issue and Cancellation of Federal
Reserve Bank Capital Stock) to make
two substantive changes and other
clarifying amendments. The first
substantive amendment conforms
Regulation D to Section 603 of the
Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act
of 2006 (Pub. L. 109–351, Oct. 13, 2006)
by authorizing member banks of the
Federal Reserve System to enter into
pass-through arrangements. Previously,
member banks were statutorily
prohibited from passing required
reserve balances through a
correspondent institution. The second
substantive amendment eliminates the
provision in Regulation D’s definition of
‘‘savings deposit’’ that limits certain
kinds of transfers from savings deposits
to not more than three per month. As a
result, all transfers and withdrawals
from a savings deposit that are subject
to a monthly limit will be subject to the
same limit of not more than six per
month. The remaining clarifying
amendments reorganize the provisions
relating to deposit reporting and the
calculation and maintenance of required
reserves, clarify the definition of ‘‘vault
cash,’’ and make other minor editorial
changes.
DATES: This final rule is effective July 2,
2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sophia H. Allison, Senior Counsel (202/

E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM

29MYR1

25630

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 102 / Friday, May 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations

tjames on PRODPC75 with RULES

452–3565), or Dena L. Milligan,
Attorney (202/452–3900), Legal
Division, Seth Carpenter, Deputy
Associate Director (202/452–2385), or
Margaret Gillis DeBoer, Section Chief
(202/452–3139), Division of Monetary
Affairs; for users of
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf
(TDD) only, contact (202/263–4869);
Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, 20th and C Streets,
NW., Washington, DC 20551.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Statutory Background
For monetary policy purposes, section
19 of the Federal Reserve Act (the
‘‘Act’’) imposes reserve requirements on
certain types of deposits and other
liabilities of depository institutions.
Currently, reserve requirement ratios for
‘‘transaction accounts’’ are graduated
between three and ten percent. Reserve
requirement ratios for ‘‘nonpersonal
time deposits’’ and ‘‘Eurocurrency
liabilities’’ are currently zero percent.
Although section 19 expressly defines
accounts with certain transfer
characteristics as ‘‘transaction
accounts,’’ section 19 authorizes the
Board ‘‘to determine, by regulation or
order, that an account or deposit is a
transaction account if such account or
deposit may be used to provide funds
directly or indirectly for the purpose of
making payments or transfers to third
persons or others.’’ 1 Section 19 also
authorizes the Board to define, by
regulation, the terms used in the
section. The Board implements the
provisions of section 19 through
Regulation D.
Section 11(a)(2) of the Act authorizes
the Board to require any depository
institution ‘‘to make, at such intervals as
the Board may prescribe, such reports of
its liabilities and assets as the Board
may determine to be necessary or
desirable to enable the Board to
discharge its responsibility to monitor
and control monetary and credit
aggregates.’’ 2 These provisions are
specifically implemented in the
computation and maintenance
provisions of Regulation D (12 CFR
204.3).
Section 19(c)(1) of the Act provides
that a depository institution’s required
reserves shall be either in the form of a
balance maintained for such purposes
by such a depository institution in an
account at a Federal Reserve Bank or in
the form of vault cash. Prior to 2006,
section 19(c)(1)(B) of the Act provided
that non-member banks could maintain
1 Section 19(b)(1)(F) of the Federal Reserve Act,
12 U.S.C. 461(b)(1)(F).
2 12 U.S.C. 248(a).

VerDate Nov<24>2008

15:25 May 28, 2009

Jkt 217001

required reserves in an account at a
depository institution that maintained
required reserve balances at a Federal
Reserve Bank, known as a ‘‘pass-through
account.’’ The Financial Services
Regulatory Relief Act of 2006 (Pub. L.
109–351, Oct. 13, 2006), amended
section 19(c)(1)(B) of the Act to remove
the language restricting pass-through
arrangements to non-member banks.
Accordingly, the Act now permits all
depository institutions to maintain
required reserves in a pass-through
account with a correspondent
depository institution.
II. Request for Public Comment and
Summary of Comments Received
The Board requested public comment
on proposed changes to Regulations D
and I on February 7, 2008 (73 FR 8009
(Feb. 12, 2008)). In response, the Board
received 27 comments on the proposal,
consisting of comments from nine
depository institutions, two financial
holding companies on behalf of their
depository institution subsidiaries,
seven individuals, seven financial
institution trade associations, one law
firm, and one association of depository
institutions. Of these, three commenters
supported the proposal in its entirety,
while the majority of the other
comments received concerned (A) the
proposed amendment to the definition
of ‘‘savings deposit’’ describing the
monthly numeric limits imposed on
certain ‘‘convenient’’ types of transfers
and withdrawals from savings deposits
or (B) the proposed amendments to the
definitions of ‘‘time deposit’’ and ‘‘vault
cash.’’ Other comments addressed
reserve requirements generally and
other technical aspects of the proposal.
III. Section-by-Section Analysis of
Proposal and Comments
A. Section 204.2(c) Definition of Time
Deposit
(1) Background of Proposed
Amendment
The current definition of ‘‘time
deposit’’ in Regulation D provides that
an early withdrawal penalty must be
charged on any amount withdrawn from
a time deposit ‘‘from within six days
after the date of deposit.’’ 3 The
definition contemplates that an early
withdrawal might be an early
withdrawal of the entire deposit amount
or of a partial withdrawal, that is, a
withdrawal of some amount that is not
the entire deposit amount. In either
case, if part or all of the time deposit is
withdrawn within six days after the date
of the initial deposit, the specified early
3 12

PO 00000

CFR 204.2(c)(1).

Frm 00016

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

withdrawal penalty must be imposed on
the amount so withdrawn. The current
definition further states that ‘‘[a] time
deposit from which partial early
withdrawals are permitted must impose
additional early withdrawal penalties of
at least seven days’ simple interest on
amounts withdrawn within six days
after each partial withdrawal.’’ This
language has been subject to numerous
inquiries as to the meaning of the terms
‘‘additional’’ and ‘‘early.’’
(2) Proposed Amendment and
Comments
The Board proposed to amend the
definition of ‘‘time deposit’’ to remove
the references to ‘‘early’’ and
‘‘additional’’ in the second sentence of
the definition and to clarify that ‘‘early’’
withdrawals include withdrawals
within six days after deposit as well as
withdrawals within six days of the last
withdrawal. The Board received two
comments on the proposed amendments
to the definition of ‘‘time deposit.’’ Both
comments expressed concern that the
proposed amendments, if adopted,
would have the effect of precluding
certain depository institutions from
continuing to avail themselves of the
deposit type referred to as a ‘‘time
deposit open account,’’ or ‘‘TDOA.’’
From as early as 1915, ‘‘time deposit
open account’’ was a separately defined
term within the general category of
‘‘time deposit’’ in Regulation D.4 Board
interpretations in later decades
described bank trust departments’ use of
TDOAs for disposition of certain
commingled uninvested trust and
agency funds awaiting disbursement or
further investment.5 ‘‘Time deposit
open account,’’ however, ceased being a
separately defined term under the
general definition of ‘‘time deposit’’ in
1980. Further, the Board interpretations
discussing use of TDOAs by trust
departments for trust and agency funds
were rescinded in 1987 as having been
incorporated into section
204.2(c)(1)(i)(C) of Regulation D.6
Nevertheless, the Board referred to
TDOAs by name in subsequent
rulemakings as continuing to be viable,
at least when used other than as a
method of evading reserve
requirements.7
4 Federal Reserve Board, Circular No. 6 (Series of
1915) (Jan. 15, 1915).
5 Board Interpretation, 1950 Fed. Res. Bull. 44;
Board Interpretation, 1959 Fed. Res. Bull. 1475.
6 52 FR 47689, 47691 (Dec. 16, 1987). Section
204.2(c)(1)(i)(C) states that ‘‘[t]ime deposit includes
funds * * * payable only upon written notice that
is actually required to be given by the depositor not
less than seven days prior to withdrawal * * *’’
7 57 FR 38417, 38423–24 (Aug. 25, 1992)
(declining to adopt ‘‘LIFO’’ rule for withdrawals
from time deposits, in part because of potential

E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM

29MYR1

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 102 / Friday, May 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(3) Comment Analysis and Final Rule
The Board believes that adopting the
proposed amendments would have no
effect on the continued use of TDOAs in
bona fide arrangements by trust
departments for trust and agency funds.
The final amendments, however, do not
adopt revisions to the definition of
‘‘time deposit’’ that were proposed in
the Board’s request for public comment
because the only two comments
received on the proposed revisions
indicated that the proposed revisions
would create more confusion than
clarity.
B. Section 204.2(d) Transfers From
Savings Deposits

tjames on PRODPC75 with RULES

(1) Background of Proposed
Amendment
The Board’s criteria for distinguishing
between ‘‘transaction accounts’’ and
‘‘savings deposits’’ in Regulation D are
based on the ease with which the
depositor may make transfers (payments
to third parties) or withdrawals
(payments directly to the depositor)
from the account. Generally, the more
convenient making withdrawals or
transfers from an account is, the more
likely the account holder will use the
account for making payments or
transfers to third parties rather than for
holding savings. Accordingly,
Regulation D limits the number of
certain convenient kinds of transfers or
withdrawals that an account holder may
make in a single month from an account
if that account is to be classified as a
‘‘savings deposit.’’ 8 ‘‘Convenient’’
transfers or withdrawals for this
purpose include preauthorized or
automatic transfers (such as overdraft
protection transfers or arranging to have
bill payments deducted directly from
the depositor’s savings account),
telephonic transfers (made by the
depositor telephoning or sending a fax
or online instruction to the bank and
instructing the transfer to be made), and
transfers by check, debit card, or similar
order payable to third parties.
Regulation D currently limits the
number of ‘‘convenient’’ transfers and
withdrawals from savings deposits to
not more than six per month. Within
this overall limit of six, not more than
three transfers or withdrawals may be
made by check, debit card, or similar
order made by the depositor and
payable to third parties (the ‘‘three’’
negative impact on operation of TDOAs;
interpretation prohibiting linked time deposit
accounts at 12 CFR 204.134 limited to its terms and
does not necessarily apply to TDOA types of
accounts operated by trust departments).
8 12 CFR 204.2(d)(2) (definition of ‘‘savings
deposit’’).

VerDate Nov<24>2008

15:25 May 28, 2009

Jkt 217001

sublimit). Regulation D does not limit
less convenient transfers and
withdrawals from savings deposits. For
example, an account holder may make
transfers or withdrawals ‘‘by mail,
messenger, automated teller machine, or
in person or * * * made by telephone
(via check mailed to the depositor)’’
from savings deposits without
numerical limit.
(2) Proposed Amendment and
Comments
The Board proposed to amend
Regulation D’s definition of ‘‘savings
deposit’’ to eliminate the ‘‘three’’
sublimit that applies to checks and
drafts and simply limit all ‘‘convenient’’
transfers to not more than six per
month. Fourteen commenters supported
eliminating the ‘‘three’’ sublimit, eight
commenters favored doing away with
numeric transfer limits entirely, and five
commenters favored raising the monthly
numeric limit to some number higher
than six. One commenter proposed
allowing depository institutions to set
their own monthly numeric limits on
convenient transfers and withdrawals.
One commenter opposed both raising
the monthly numeric limit to a higher
number and making all kinds of
transfers and withdrawals unlimited in
number. One commenter stated that
eliminating only the ‘‘three’’ sublimit
did not go far enough, but made no
recommendations as to how the Board
could improve the proposal to address
that concern. Two commenters
requested that, if the proposed
amendment becomes final, then the
Board should provide a sufficiently
delayed effective date (either six months
or one year) to allow depository
institutions time to modify their systems
and customer disclosures.
(3) Comment Analysis and Final
Amendment
The Board has carefully considered
the comments received and has adopted
the amendment to the definition of
‘‘savings deposit’’ as proposed. The
sublimit in the definition of ‘‘money
market deposit account’’ began in 1982
with the enactment of the Garn-St
Germain Depository Institutions Act and
lapsed in 1986. The Board retained the
distinction between transactions subject
to the overall limit of six and those
subject to the sublimit in Regulation D
after the Depository Institutions Act
lapsed in 1986. Technological
advancements, however, have
eliminated any rational basis for the
distinction.
The Board has determined neither to
raise the monthly numeric limit on
convenient transfers to a number higher

PO 00000

Frm 00017

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

25631

than six, nor to eliminate monthly
numeric limits on all convenient
transfers and withdrawals (including
online) from savings deposits generally.
Section 19 of the Act requires the Board
to impose reserve requirements on
transaction accounts and not on other
types of accounts. Accordingly, the
Board must maintain the capacity to
distinguish between transaction
accounts and savings deposits. The sixper-month limitation on certain
convenient transfers and withdrawals
has existed, in one form or another,
since 1982. Such types of transfers and
withdrawals appear to have become
even more convenient since that time
due to technological advances, such as
the ability to make transfers online, and
the increased availability of debit-card
transfers at point-of-sale terminals and
elsewhere. The greater the number of
convenient transfers and withdrawals
permitted per month from a ‘‘savings
deposit,’’ the greater the difficulty in
distinguishing such an account from a
transaction account. Therefore, the
Board has determined that the final rule
will neither increase the number of
convenient transfers and withdrawals
permitted per month from a savings
deposit, nor eliminate such numeric
limits entirely (on either online transfers
or all convenient transfers and
withdrawals).
For similar reasons, the Board
believes that it would not be appropriate
to adopt a rule allowing depository
institutions to set their own monthly
numeric limits on convenient transfers
and withdrawals that account holders
may make from savings deposits.
Allowing different limits at different
depository institutions would erode any
definitional distinction between
‘‘transaction accounts’’ and ‘‘savings
deposits.’’ Even if some depository
institutions were to choose relatively
low numeric limits, there likely would
be broad variation among depository
institutions in the numeric limits
selected, creating significant
discrepancies between accounts
classified as ‘‘savings deposits.’’ In
addition, the Board believes that
depository institutions would have costavoidance and competitive incentives to
set numeric limits as high as possible
while still being able to report such
deposits as nonreservable ‘‘savings
deposits’’ that may bear interest. The
Board is obligated by statute to maintain
some regulatory distinction between
‘‘transaction accounts’’ and ‘‘savings
deposits’’ and to enforce such a
distinction with consistency.
Accordingly, the Board has determined
not to adopt a final rule permitting

E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM

29MYR1

25632

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 102 / Friday, May 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations

depository institutions to select their
own numeric limits on convenient
transfers and withdrawals from savings
deposits.
The Board also believes that selecting
a monthly numeric limit to apply to all
types of transfers and withdrawals from
‘‘savings deposits,’’ including those
types that are currently unlimited in
number per month, would not be
appropriate. The Act provides that a
‘‘transaction account’’ is one ‘‘on which
the depositor or account holder is
permitted to make withdrawals by
negotiable or transferable instrument,
payment orders of withdrawal,
telephone transfers, or other similar
items for the purpose of making
payments or transfers to third persons or
others.’’ 9 As such, the statutory
definition specifically contemplates the
kinds of transfers and withdrawals that
are, or are most likely to be, transfers
and withdrawals ‘‘for the purpose of
making payments or transfers to third
persons or others.’’ In contrast,
withdrawals made in person or at an
ATM are generally payments directly to
the depositor, even if the depositor may
subsequently provide those same funds
to a third person or use them for a
payment. Accordingly, the Board has
determined that the final rule not
impose numeric limits on all types of
transfers and withdrawals that may be
made from savings deposits, including
those that are currently unlimited.
Finally, the Board believes that
delaying the effective date for the final
rule eliminating the ‘‘three’’ sublimit
from the definition of ‘‘savings deposit’’
is unnecessary because the final rule is
permissive. Under the final rule,
depository institutions may classify
accounts subject to the ‘‘three’’ sublimit
as ‘‘savings deposits’’ as long as
necessary. Accordingly, the Board has
determined not to delay the final rule’s
effective date.

legislation recognized that currency and
coin in a member bank’s vault and a
balance in a member bank’s account at
a Federal Reserve Bank were
‘‘interchangeable’’ as liabilities of the
Reserve Banks.11 For operational
reasons, however, ‘‘country banks’’
generally found it necessary to hold
more currency and coin in their vaults
than did ‘‘reserve city banks’’ or
‘‘central reserve city banks.’’ 12
In 1970, the Board issued an
interpretation of Regulation D relating to
the eligibility of currency or coin held
principally for numismatic value to
satisfy member bank reserve
requirements.13 The Board specified in
the 1970 interpretation that in order for
a member bank to count currency or
coin towards reserve requirements, the
member bank must have ‘‘the full and
unrestricted right to use [such currency
or coin] at any time to meet depositors’
claims. * * * ’’ 14 The 1970
interpretation also specified that a bank
does not have such a ‘‘full and
unrestricted right’’ if the bank is
prevented, legally or practically, * * *
from using the currency or coin at any
time to meet customer’s demands.’’ 15
The 1980 amendments to Regulation
D, which implemented the Monetary
Control Act of 1980, introduced ‘‘vault
cash’’ as a defined term. The 1980
amendments defined ‘‘vault cash’’ to
mean ‘‘currency and coin owned and
held by a depository institution that
may, at any time, be used to satisfy
depositors’ claims,’’ incorporating into
the new definition the 1970
interpretation’s principles of bank
ownership and availability at any time
to satisfy depositors’ claims. Subsequent
Board guidance and staff opinions
provided additional clarification of
these requirements, including clarifying
what vault cash is ‘‘owned and held’’ by
the depository institution claiming it
and the circumstances under which
vault cash is ‘‘immediately available.’’

C. Section 204.2(k) ‘‘Vault Cash’’
Definition

(2) Proposed Amendment and
Comments
The Board proposed amending the
definition of ‘‘vault cash’’ to incorporate
the substance of prior written staff
guidance as to when currency and coin
that the depository institution does not
hold at its physical location may be
considered ‘‘vault cash.’’ 16 Specifically,
the Board proposed dividing the

tjames on PRODPC75 with RULES

(1) Background of Proposed
Amendment
From 1917 to 1959, the Act permitted
member banks to satisfy reserve
requirements solely with balances in
their accounts at Federal Reserve Banks.
In 1959, Congress amended section 19
of the Act to provide that the Board,
‘‘under such regulations as it may
prescribe, may permit member banks to
count all or part of their currency and
coin as reserves required under this
section.’’ 10 The history of the 1959
9 12

U.S.C. 461(b).
Act of July 28, 1959 (73 Stat. 263).

10 The

VerDate Nov<24>2008

15:25 May 28, 2009

Jkt 217001

11 S. Rep. No. 86–195, at 3 (1959); H. Rep. No. 86–
403, at 3 (1959).
12 Id.
13 Former 12 CFR 204.116 (1979).
14 Id.
15 Id.
16 See, e.g. FRRS ¶ 2–307.2 (rented vault); Staff
Opinion of Aug. 9, 1982 (ATMs).

PO 00000

Frm 00018

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

definition of ‘‘vault cash’’ into two
subsections: one that addresses vault
cash ‘‘held at a physical location of the
depository institution * * * from which
the institution’s depositors may make
cash withdrawals,’’ and the other that
addresses vault cash ‘‘held at an
alternate physical location.’’ The
amendments proposed by the Board
expanded primarily the second
proposed subsection to incorporate
prior guidance.
(3) Comment Analysis and Final
Amendment
The Board received two comments on
the proposed amendments to the
definition of ‘‘vault cash.’’ One
commenter expressed support for the
proposed amendments, and one
commenter opposed the proposed
amendments. The commenter opposing
the amendments specifically opposed
certain provisions relating to when vault
cash at alternate physical locations may
be considered to be ‘‘immediately
available,’’ namely, that (1) the
depository institution claiming the
currency and coin as ‘‘vault cash’’ must
receive it by 4 p.m. on the same day if
requested by 10 a.m., and that (2) the
depository institution must have a
written contract in place for the delivery
of the currency and coin claimed as
‘‘vault cash.’’ This commenter stated
that 4 p.m. should not be selected as a
cut-off hour because some depository
institutions conduct business after 4
p.m., and because customers can
usually obtain cash through an ATM or
at POS (point of sale) terminals after 4
p.m. The commenter proposed an
amendment that would require the
currency and coin to be received on the
same calendar day that it is requested.
The commenter also stated that
requiring written contractual
arrangements for delivery of currency
and coin claimed as ‘‘vault cash’’
imposes unnecessary costs on
depository institutions because
contractual agreements ‘‘will likely
never be used’’ and because updating
the agreements as offices are opened
and closed would be expensive. The
commenter proposed ‘‘leav[ing] the
particular details of the arrangement up
to the institution.’’
The Board believes that the selection
of 4 p.m. as a cut-off hour for
characterizing currency and coin as
‘‘vault cash’’ under Regulation D is
appropriate. The Board believes that the
rationale provided for an alternate
‘‘same calendar day’’ rule would not
justify such a significant departure from
the consistent position taken in
numerous Board staff opinions over the
years on the issue. Furthermore, such a

E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM

29MYR1

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 102 / Friday, May 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
rule would remove any nexus between
the characterization of currency and
coin as ‘‘vault cash’’ and having such
currency and coin ‘‘immediately
available,’’ because any such currency
and coin received after a closing hour
(no matter how late) would not be
available to a customer until the next
business day. While customers may be
able, as a practical matter, to obtain cash
from ATMs and from POS terminals at
various hours, not all such cash is
sought to be characterized as ‘‘vault
cash’’ for Regulation D purposes: the 4
p.m. requirement would apply only to
currency and coin that an institution
counts towards satisfying its reserve
requirement.
The Board also believes that the
rationale provided for eliminating the
requirement for written contractual
arrangements to be in place for ‘‘vault
cash’’ does not justify changing the
long-standing position on this issue. As
with the 4 p.m. cut-off, the requirement
for written contractual arrangements in
this context is the position the Board
has consistently taken over the years in
staff opinions. Moreover, the Board
believes it would be difficult, if not
impossible, for a depository institution
to establish what currency and coin is
physically subject to the retrieval plan
without written delivery plan to that
effect. Likewise, the Board believes that
it would be difficult, if not impossible,
for the depository institution to
establish its ‘‘full and unrestricted
right’’ to such currency and coin if it
were subject only to an oral
understanding for retrieval within the
requisite time frame. Accordingly, the
Board is adopting the ‘‘vault cash’’
amendments as proposed.

tjames on PRODPC75 with RULES

D. Section 204.2(l) Definition of ‘‘Passthrough Account’’
The Board proposed to amend the
definition of ‘‘pass-through account’’ to
eliminate the language restricting passthrough account arrangements to nonmember banks in order to conform the
definition to section 19(c)(1)(B) of the
Act. The Board also proposed moving
the provisions relating to pass-through
accounts to paragraph (d) under
proposed § 204.5, ‘‘Maintenance of
Required Reserves.’’ The Board received
five comments in support of the
proposed amendments, and is adopting
them as proposed.
E. Section 204.2(w) Definition of
‘‘Clearing Balance Allowance’’
The Board proposed (1) adding a new
definition of ‘‘clearing balance
allowance’’ to Regulation D to replace
the undefined term ‘‘required chargefree band’’ used in provisions relating to

VerDate Nov<24>2008

15:25 May 28, 2009

Jkt 217001

carryovers of excess reserves and
deficiencies in reserves and (2) moving
the existing carryover provisions to a
new paragraph (e) under proposed
§ 204.5, ‘‘Maintenance of Required
Reserves.’’ The Board received no
comments on these amendments. The
Board is setting forth the definition of
‘‘clearing balance allowance’’ in new
§ 204.2(w), and moving the carryover
provisions to § 204.5, as proposed.
F. Section 204.2(x) Definition of
‘‘Contractual Clearing Balance’’
The Board proposed adding a new
definition of ‘‘contractual clearing
balance’’ to Regulation D to replace the
undefined term ‘‘required clearing
balance.’’ The Board proposed to define
‘‘contractual clearing balance’’ as ‘‘the
amount that a depository institution
agrees or is required to maintain in its
account at a Federal Reserve Bank in
addition to balances the depository
institution may hold to satisfy its
required reserve balance.’’ Further, the
definition specified that ‘‘[a] depository
institution that has a required reserve
balance of zero may still hold a
contractual clearing balance.’’ The
Board received no comments on the
proposed amendment.
The Board is revising the proposed
definition of ‘‘contractual clearing
balance’’ to provide consistency of
usage of terms throughout Regulation D.
When the Board proposed the new
definition of ‘‘contractual clearing
balance,’’ ‘‘required reserve balance’’
was an undefined term. New
§ 204.2(bb), however, defines ‘‘required
reserve balance’’ as ‘‘the average balance
held in an account at a Federal Reserve
Bank by or on behalf of an institution
over a reserve maintenance period to
satisfy the reserve requirements of this
part.’’ 17 The proposed definition of
‘‘contractual clearing balance’’
contemplated the contractual clearing
balance to be in addition to the amount
an institution is required to maintain as
a balance at a Reserve Bank in order to
satisfy its reserve requirements, and not
in addition to those balances actually
held to satisfy such requirements.
Accordingly, the final rule defines
‘‘contractual clearing balance’’ as ‘‘an
amount that an institution agrees or is
required to maintain in its account at a
Federal Reserve Bank in addition to any
reserve balance requirement.’’ For
similar reasons, the Board is amending
the last sentence in the definition of
‘‘contractual clearing balance’’ to read:
‘‘An institution that has a reserve
17 See final rule on payment of interest on
balances and excess balance accounts in today’s
Federal Register.

PO 00000

Frm 00019

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

25633

balance requirement of zero may still
have a contractual clearing balance.’’
G. Section 204.3 Reporting and Location
(1) Proposed Amendment
The Board proposed re-organizing the
regulatory provisions governing the
calculation of required reserves, the
maintenance of required reserves, and
the submission of reports of deposits
(from which required reserves are
calculated) into three separate
subsections. The proposed amendments
were not intended to make substantive
changes to these provisions, but rather
to reorganize them for greater ease of
reference and to make minor editorial
changes for clarity.
The Board proposed a new § 204.3(a),
consisting of the text of the first
sentence of current § 204.3(a)(2)(i) with
proposed amendments clarifying (1) the
authority of the Board or a Federal
Reserve Bank to require reports of
deposits or any other form or statement
from a depository institution relating to
reserve requirements and (2) where
reports of deposits are to be submitted
in light of the account location
provisions of the regulation.
The Board proposed to relocate the
text of the second sentence of current
§ 204.3(a)(2)(i) (stipulating reporting
requirements for a foreign bank’s U.S.
branches and agencies and for an Edge
or Agreement corporation’s offices
operating within the same State and the
same Federal Reserve District) to new
§ 204.3(b). The Board proposed to
relocate the text of the third sentence of
current § 204.3(a)(1) (obligations of
majority-owned U.S. subsidiaries of a
depository institution) to new § 204.3(c).
The Board proposed to relocate the
text, with one technical amendment, of
current § 204.3(a)(3) (governing
assignment of low reserve tranche and
reserve requirement exemption) to new
§ 204.3(d). The Board proposed
amending the text of current
§ 204.3(a)(3) (new § 204.3(d)) to conform
the section number reference to reserve
requirement ratios (§ 204.9) to that
section’s new section number
(§ 204.4(f)).
The Board did not propose any
changes to current § 204.3(e), which
addresses computation of transaction
accounts for deposit reporting purposes.
The Board proposed to relocate current
§ 204.3(a)(2)(iii) (correspondent not
responsible for guaranteeing the
accuracy of reports submitted by
respondents) to new § 204.3(f).
Finally, the Board proposed to
relocate the text of current § 204.3(b)(2)
to new § 204.3(g) with two amendments.
One amendment would conform

E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM

29MYR1

25634

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 102 / Friday, May 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations

internal references to other proposed
amendments. The other amendment
would provide that a depository
institution is considered to be located at
the location specified in the institution’s
articles of incorporation or as specified
by the institution’s primary regulator.
The Board proposed the second
amendment in light of the fact that an
institution may move its head office or
primary location from that specified in
its charter or organizing certificate, but
that the charter or organizing certificate
may not reflect that move. In such cases,
the move instead may be reflected in the
institution’s revised articles of
incorporation or otherwise as
recognized by the institution’s primary
regulator.
(2) Comments Received
The Board received one comment
regarding proposed new § 204.3(a),
asking that the Board ‘‘be judicious in
the information requested’’ from
reporting entities because ‘‘the
collective burden of myriad reports and
other information collections imposed
by the bank regulators is enormous.’’
This commenter stated that ‘‘[w]hile the
proposed additional text in section
204.3(a) is not objectionable on its face,
it nevertheless creates another
opportunity for the Federal Reserve
System to impose more regulatory
burden in a way that evokes the image
of ‘death by a thousand cuts.’ ’’

tjames on PRODPC75 with RULES

(3) Comment Analysis and Final Rule
The Board is keenly aware of the
burden imposed by regulatory reporting
on depository institutions. The
proposed amendment to section 204.3(a)
was intended solely to express existing
authority. The Board did not propose
this amendment as an attempt to
increase its authority to require
regulatory reports, or to increase the
number or extent of regulatory reports
currently required. As required by other
law, the Board re-evaluates its reporting
requirements periodically in order to
minimize or eliminate duplicative or
otherwise burdensome reports. As also
required by other law, the Board
carefully evaluates any proposed new
reporting requirements to avoid placing
unnecessary additional costs on
reporting entities. With these principles
in mind, the Board is adopting
§ 204.3(a) as proposed.
The Board received no comments on
proposed §§ 204.3(b)–(g) and is adopting
those amendments as proposed.
H. Section 204.4 Computation of
Required Reserves
The Board proposed moving the
provisions relating to computation of

VerDate Nov<24>2008

15:25 May 28, 2009

Jkt 217001

required reserves to a new separate
paragraph, proposed § 204.4,
‘‘Computation of Required Reserves.’’
For some provisions, the Board
proposed minor editorial amendments
for clarity; for other provisions, the
Board proposed no changes (apart from
re-designation as § 204.4). The Board
received one comment on these
proposed amendments, suggesting that
the words ‘‘or agreement corporation’’
should be added to the end of proposed
§ 204.4(b) (providing that Edge and
agreement corporations may not deduct
balances due from another U.S. office of
‘‘the same Edge or agreement
corporation’’). The Board is adopting a
final § 204.4(b) that incorporates this
comment as the existing omission of ‘‘or
Agreement corporation’’ was
unintentional. The Board is also making
an editorial change to § 204.4(a) to
provide consistent usage of terms
throughout Regulation D. The Board
received no other comments on these
proposed amendments and, apart from
adopting the one suggestion proposed
by the comment and the editorial
change, is adopting the amendments as
proposed.
I. Section 204.5 Maintenance of
Required Reserves
The Board proposed moving the
existing provisions regarding
maintenance of required reserves,
including the provisions on
maintenance of required reserves
pursuant to pass-through agreements, to
a new § 204.5, ‘‘Maintenance of
Required Reserves.’’ Specifically, the
proposed amendments deleted
references to ‘‘non-member institutions’’
in discussing pass-through
arrangements, clarified that depository
institutions that do not hold required
reserve balances may serve as passthrough correspondents, conformed
numeric references to other proposed
amendments, and made other minor
editorial amendments for clarity and to
conform language to other proposed
amendments and current usage. No
substantive changes were intended. The
Board received no comments on these
proposed amendments and is adopting
them as proposed.
J. Section 204.6 Charges for Reserve
Deficiencies
(1) Proposed Amendment
The Board proposed moving the
existing provisions regarding charges for
reserve deficiencies to a new § 204.6,
‘‘Charges for Reserve Deficiencies.’’ The
Board also proposed deleting provisions
describing guidelines for waivers by
Reserve Banks of small or infrequent

PO 00000

Frm 00020

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

charges. The Board proposed this
deletion because the provision
described only in part the extent of the
discretion of the Reserve Banks with
respect to waivers of deficiency charges.
The deletion was intended to avoid the
implication that Reserve Banks must
waive charges in the circumstances
described.
(2) Comments Received
The Board received two comments on
these proposed amendments, both in
opposition to the proposal to delete the
provisions related to waivers. One
commenter stated that it is
‘‘inappropriate to eliminate this policy
direction to Reserve Banks without
acknowledging that its elimination
represents a substantive change’’ from
existing policy, which the commenter
described as ‘‘sound policy [that] should
not be eliminated nor changed.’’ The
other commenter stated that the existing
provision ‘‘simply incorporates the
Reserve Banks’’ guidelines [that outline
when waivers may be appropriate] and
notes two instances where waivers are
available.’’ This commenter also
expressed concern that the proposal to
delete the waiver provision ‘‘impli[es]
that waivers may not be available in the
circumstances identified in the current
rule,’’ that is, ‘‘when the charge would
be small or when the deficiency falls
below a predetermined threshold.’’ The
commenter stated that these two
circumstances ‘‘seem appropriate
situations for the Board to exercise its
discretion not to impose a charge’’ and
that the Board should ‘‘share its
reasoning’’ if the Board intends for
charges to be automatically imposed in
those cases. The commenter urged the
Board ‘‘to retain the current examples of
when charges will be waived and
simply note that they are illustrative.’’
(3) Comment Analysis and Final Rule
The intent of the Board’s proposal
was to eliminate references to obsolete
guidelines and to avoid the implication
that Reserve Banks must waive
deficiency charges in certain
circumstances. The Board did not
intend the proposed amendments to be
a substantive policy change, as the
Reserve Banks retain the same
discretion with respect to waivers of
deficiency charges under the proposed
amendment as under former section
204.7(a)(2). Accordingly, the Board has
decided to delete the reference to the
obsolete guidelines, as proposed, and to
add language to the provision clarifying
the discretion of the Reserve Banks with
respect to waiver of deficiency charges.
The Board is retaining the current
examples of when a Reserve Bank may

E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM

29MYR1

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 102 / Friday, May 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
waive charges and clarifying that they
are illustrative. As proposed, the
language relating to charges for reserve
deficiencies is moved from § 204.7 to
§ 204.6.
K. Section 204.7 Transitional
Adjustments in Mergers
The Board proposed re-designating
the current provisions regarding
transitional adjustments in mergers to a
new section, § 204.7. No other changes
were proposed. The Board received no
comments on these proposed
amendments. Since the Board proposed
these amendments in February 2008, the
Board has made adjustments to its
clearing balance policy that
discontinued practices related to reserve
requirements that were no longer
necessary in light of the amendments to
Regulation D implementing the
payments of interest on balances at
Reserve Banks.18 At that time, the Board
accordingly removed the provision in
Regulation D regarding transitional
adjustments in mergers. The Board has
decided to retain the changes to its
clearing balance policy and has
confirmed that removal as part of the
final rule on payment of interest on
balances at Reserve Banks.19
L. Section 204.8 International Banking
Facilities
The Board did not propose any
changes to § 204.8.
M. Section 204.9 Emergency Reserve
Requirement
The Board proposed re-designating
the current provisions related to
emergency reserve requirements to a
new section, § 204.9. No other changes
to the section were proposed. The Board
received no comments on these
proposed amendments and is adopting
them as proposed.

tjames on PRODPC75 with RULES

N. Section 204.7 Supplemental Reserve
Requirement
The Board proposed re-designating
the current provisions to a new section,
§ 204.10. No other changes to the
section were proposed. The Board
received no comments on the proposed
amendments. Since the proposal,
§ 204.10 has been designated ‘‘Payment
of interest on balances.’’ The Board,
however, has removed the provisions
relating to transitional adjustments in
mergers that were proposed to be moved
to § 204.7. In light of the designation of
§ 204.10 as ‘‘Payment of interest on
balances,’’ the Board is moving the
18 See

73 FR 59482, 59484–85 (Oct. 9, 2008).
final rule on payment of interest on
balances elsewhere in today’s Federal Register.
19 See

VerDate Nov<24>2008

15:25 May 28, 2009

Jkt 217001

provisions previously set forth in
section 204.9 to new § 204.7.
O. Section 209.2(c)(1) of Regulation I
Location of Bank—General Rule
The Board proposed amending
section 209.2(c)(1) to conform that
section to the proposed § 204.3(g) of
Regulation D, which the Board has
decided to adopt, discussed supra. The
Board received no comments on these
proposed amendments and is adopting
them as proposed.
IV. Solicitation of Comments Regarding
Use of ‘‘Plain Language’’
Section 722 of the Gramm-LeachBliley Act of 1999 requires the Board to
use ‘‘plain language’’ in all final rules.
12 U.S.C. 1408. The Board has sought to
present this amendment in a simple and
straightforward manner. The Board
received no comments on whether the
proposed rule was clearly stated and
effectively organized or on how the
Board might make the proposed text
easier to understand.
V. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
An initial regulatory flexibility
analysis (IRFA) was included in the
Board’s proposed rule in accordance
with the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). In the IRFA,
the Board specifically solicited
comment on whether the proposed rule
would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The Board received no
comments in response to its request.
Section 4 of the RFA requires an agency
either to provide a final regulatory
flexibility analysis with a final rule or
to certify that the final rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Banks and other depository institutions
are considered ‘‘small’’ if they have less
than $165 million in assets. For the
reasons stated below, the Board is
certifying that the final rule will not
have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
1. Statement of the need for and the
objectives of the final rule. The Board is
publishing final amendments to
Regulations D and I to conform the
regulations to provisions of the
Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act
of 2006, to modernize the regulations in
light of technological developments, to
reduce regulatory burden, and to
simplify regulatory compliance. Section
19 of the Act was enacted to impose
reserve requirements on certain deposits
and other liabilities of depository
institutions for monetary policy
purposes. Section 19 also authorizes the
Board to promulgate such regulations as

PO 00000

Frm 00021

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

25635

it may deem necessary to effectuate the
purposes of the section. The Board
believes that the final rule is within
Congress’ broad grant of authority to the
Board to adopt provisions that carry out
the purposes of section 19 of the Act.
2. Summary of significant issues
raised by the public comments in
response to the initial regulatory
flexibility analysis. The Board received
no comments on its initial regulatory
flexibility analysis or on whether the
proposed rule would have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
3. Small entities affected by the final
rule. The final rule would affect all
depository institutions currently subject
to reserve requirements. The Board
estimates that approximately 8,195
depository institutions are subject to
reserve requirements, of which
approximately 3,800 could be
considered ‘‘small’’ for purposes of RFA
(entities with assets of $165 million or
less).
4. Description of projected reporting,
recordkeeping and other compliance
requirements of the final rule. The final
rule does not alter any of the reporting
or recordkeeping provisions that already
apply to depository institutions.
5. Significant alternatives to the
revisions in the final rule. The Board
received no comments suggesting
significant alternatives to the proposed
rule that would minimize the impact of
the proposed rule on small entities.
There are no significant alternatives to
the revisions in the final rule that would
minimize the impact on small entities.
The final rule does not impose any
additional burden on depository
institutions, including small entities.
Moreover, the final rule relieves
depository institutions, including small
entities, of any burdens associated with
the ‘‘three’’ sublimit on certain
convenient transfers from savings
deposits, as well as any burdens
associated with restricting pass-through
account arrangements to non-member
banks. Thus, the Board certifies that the
final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on small entities.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506;
5 CFR Part 1320 Appendix A.1), the
Board reviewed the final rule under the
authority delegated to the Board by the
Office of Management and Budget. No
collections of information pursuant to
the Paperwork Reduction Act are
contained in the final rule.

E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM

29MYR1

25636

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 102 / Friday, May 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations

List of Subjects in 12 CFR Parts 204 and
209
Banks, Banking, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
■ For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Board is amending 12
CFR parts 204 and 209 as follows:
PART 204—RESERVE
REQUIREMENTS OF DEPOSITORY
INSTITUTIONS (REGULATION D)
1. The authority citation for part 204
continues to read as follows:

■

Authority: 12 U.S.C. 248(a), 248(c), 371a,
461, 601, 611, and 3105.

2. § 204.2 is amended by revising
paragraphs (d)(2), (k) and (l), and adding
new paragraphs (w) and (x) to read as
follows:

■

§ 204.2

Definitions.

tjames on PRODPC75 with RULES

*

*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) The term ‘‘savings deposit’’ also
means: A deposit or account, such as an
account commonly known as a
passbook savings account, a statement
savings account, or as a money market
deposit account (MMDA), that
otherwise meets the requirements of
§ 204.2(d)(1) and from which, under the
terms of the deposit contract or by
practice of the depository institution,
the depositor is permitted or authorized
to make no more than six transfers and
withdrawals, or a combination of such
transfers and withdrawals, per calendar
month or statement cycle (or similar
period) of at least four weeks, to another
account (including a transaction
account) of the depositor at the same
institution or to a third party by means
of a preauthorized or automatic transfer,
or telephonic (including data
transmission) agreement, order or
instruction, or by check, draft, debit
card, or similar order made by the
depositor and payable to third parties. A
preauthorized transfer includes any
arrangement by the depository
institution to pay a third party from the
account of a depositor upon written or
oral instruction (including an order
received through an automated clearing
house (ACH)) or any arrangement by a
depository institution to pay a third
party from the account of the depositor
at a predetermined time or on a fixed
schedule. Such an account is not a
transaction account by virtue of an
arrangement that permits transfers for
the purpose of repaying loans and
associated expenses at the same
depository institution (as originator or
servicer) or that permits transfers of
funds from this account to another
account of the same depositor at the

VerDate Nov<24>2008

15:25 May 28, 2009

Jkt 217001

same institution or permits withdrawals
(payments directly to the depositor)
from the account when such transfers or
withdrawals are made by mail,
messenger, automated teller machine, or
in person or when such withdrawals are
made by telephone (via check mailed to
the depositor) regardless of the number
of such transfers or withdrawals.4
*
*
*
*
*
(k)(1) Vault cash means United States
currency and coin owned and booked as
an asset by a depository institution that
may, at any time, be used to satisfy
claims of that depository institution’s
depositors and that meets the
requirements of paragraph (k)(2)(i) or
(k)(2)(ii) of this section.
(2) Vault cash must be either:
(i) Held at a physical location of the
depository institution (including the
depository institution’s proprietary
ATMs) from which the institution’s
depositors may make cash withdrawals;
or
(ii) Held at an alternate physical
location if—
(A) The depository institution
claiming the currency and coin as vault
cash at all times retains full rights of
ownership in and to the currency and
coin held at the alternate physical
location;
(B) The depository institution
claiming the currency and coin as vault
cash at all times books the currency and
coin held at the alternate physical
location as an asset of the depository
institution;
(C) No other depository institution
claims the currency and coin held at the
alternate physical location as vault cash
in satisfaction of that other depository
institution’s reserve requirements;
(D) The currency and coin held at the
alternate physical location is reasonably
4 In order to ensure that no more than the
permitted number of withdrawals or transfers are
made, for an account to come within the definition
of ‘‘savings deposit,’’ a depository institution must
either:
(a) Prevent withdrawals or transfers of funds from
this account that are in excess of the limits
established by paragraph (d)(2) of this section, or
(b) Adopt procedures to monitor those transfers
on an ex post basis and contact customers who
exceed the established limits on more than
occasional basis. For customers who continue to
violate those limits after they have been contacted
by the depository institution, the depository
institution must either close the account and place
the funds in another account that the depositor is
eligible to maintain or take away the transfer and
draft capacities of the account. An account that
authorizes withdrawals or transfers in excess of the
permitted number is a transaction account
regardless of whether the authorized number of
transactions is actually made. For accounts
described in paragraph (d)(2) of this section, the
institution at its option may use, on a consistent
basis, either the date on the check, draft, or similar
item, or the date the item is paid in applying the
limits imposed by that section.

PO 00000

Frm 00022

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

nearby a location of the depository
institution claiming the currency and
coin as vault cash at which its
depositors may make cash withdrawals
(an alternate physical location is
considered ‘‘reasonably nearby’’ if the
depository institution that claims the
currency and coin as vault cash can
recall the currency and coin from the
alternate physical location by 10 a.m.
and, relying solely on ground
transportation, receive the currency and
coin not later than 4 p.m. on the same
calendar day at a location of the
depository institution at which its
depositors may make cash withdrawals);
and
(E) The depository institution
claiming the currency and coin as vault
cash has in place a written cash delivery
plan and written contractual
arrangements necessary to implement
that plan that demonstrate that the
currency and coin can be recalled and
received in accordance with the
requirements of paragraph (k)(2)(ii)(D)
of this section at any time. The
depository institution shall provide
copies of the written cash delivery plan
and written contractual arrangements to
the Federal Reserve Bank that holds its
account or to the Board upon request.
(3) ‘‘Vault cash’’ includes United
States currency and coin in transit to a
Federal Reserve Bank or a
correspondent depository institution for
which the reporting depository
institution has not yet received credit,
and United States currency and coin in
transit from a Federal Reserve Bank or
a correspondent depository institution
when the reporting depository
institution’s account at the Federal
Reserve or correspondent bank has been
charged for such shipment.
(4) Silver and gold coin and other
currency and coin whose numismatic or
bullion value is substantially in excess
of face value is not vault cash for
purposes of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
(l) Pass-through account means a
balance maintained by a depository
institution with a correspondent
institution under § 204.5(d).
*
*
*
*
*
(w) Clearing balance allowance means
the greater of $25,000 or two percent of
an institution’s contractual clearing
balance.
(x) Contractual clearing balance
means an amount that an institution
agrees or is required to maintain in its
account at a Federal Reserve Bank in
addition to any reserve balance
requirement. An institution that has a
reserve balance requirement of zero may
still have a contractual clearing balance.

E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM

29MYR1

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 102 / Friday, May 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
3. Amend § 204.3 by revising the
heading, removing paragraphs (h) and
(i), and revising paragraphs (a) through
(d), (f), and (g) to read as follows:

■

§ 204.3

Reporting and location.

(a) Every depository institution, U.S.
branch or agency of a foreign bank, and
Edge or Agreement corporation shall file
a report of deposits (or any other form
or statement that may be required by the
Board or by a Federal Reserve Bank)
with the Federal Reserve Bank in the
Federal Reserve District in which it is
located, regardless of the manner in
which it chooses to maintain required
reserve balances.
(b) A foreign bank’s U.S. branches and
agencies and an Edge or Agreement
corporation’s offices operating within
the same State and the same Federal
Reserve District shall prepare and file a
report of deposits on an aggregated
basis.
(c) For purposes of this part, the
obligations of a majority-owned (50
percent or more) U.S. subsidiary (except
an Edge or Agreement corporation) of a
depository institution shall be regarded
as obligations of the parent depository
institution.
(d) A depository institution, a foreign
bank, or an Edge or Agreement
corporation shall, if possible, assign the
low reserve tranche and reserve
requirement exemption prescribed in
§ 204.4(f) to only one office or to a group
of offices filing a single aggregated
report of deposits. The amount of the
reserve requirement exemption
allocated to an office or group of offices
may not exceed the amount of the low
reserve tranche allocated to such office
or offices. If the low reserve tranche or
reserve requirement exemption cannot
be fully utilized by a single office or by
a group of offices filing a single report
of deposits, the unused portion of the
tranche or exemption may be assigned
to other offices or groups of offices of
the same institution until the amount of
the tranche (or net transaction accounts)
or exemption (or reservable liabilities) is
exhausted. The tranche or exemption
may be reallocated each year concurrent
with implementation of the indexed
tranche and exemption, or, if necessary
during the course of the year to avoid
underutilization of the tranche or

exemption, at the beginning of a reserve
computation period.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) The Board and the Federal Reserve
Banks will not hold a pass-through
correspondent responsible for
guaranteeing the accuracy of the reports
of deposits submitted by its
respondents.
(g)(1) For purposes of this section, a
depository institution, a U.S. branch or
agency of a foreign bank, or an Edge or
Agreement corporation is located in the
Federal Reserve District that contains
the location specified in the institution’s
charter, organizing certificate, license,
or articles of incorporation, or as
specified by the institution’s primary
regulator, or if no such location is
specified, the location of its head office,
unless otherwise determined by the
Board under paragraph (g)(2) of this
section.
(2) If the location specified in
paragraph (g)(1) of this section, in the
Board’s judgment, is ambiguous, would
impede the ability of the Board or the
Federal Reserve Banks to perform their
functions under the Federal Reserve
Act, or would impede the ability of the
institution to operate efficiently, the
Board will determine the Federal
Reserve District in which the institution
is located, after consultation with the
institution and the relevant Federal
Reserve Banks. The relevant Federal
Reserve Banks are the Federal Reserve
Bank whose District contains the
location specified in paragraph (g)(1) of
this section and the Federal Reserve
Bank in whose District the institution is
proposed to be located. In making this
determination, the Board will consider
any applicable laws, the business needs
of the institution, the location of the
institution’s head office, the locations
where the institution performs its
business, and the locations that would
allow the institution, the Board, and the
Federal Reserve Banks to perform their
functions efficiently and effectively.
■ 4. A new § 204.4 is added to read as
follows:
§ 204.4

Computation of required reserves.

(a) In determining the reserve
requirement under this part, the amount
of cash items in process of collection
and balances subject to immediate

withdrawal due from other depository
institutions located in the United States
(including such amounts due from
United States branches and agencies of
foreign banks and Edge and Agreement
corporations) may be deducted from the
amount of gross transaction accounts.
The amount that may be deducted may
not exceed the amount of gross
transaction accounts.
(b) United States branches and
agencies of a foreign bank may not
deduct balances due from another
United States branch or agency of the
same foreign bank, and United States
offices of an Edge or Agreement
Corporation may not deduct balances
due from another United States office of
the same Edge or Agreement
Corporation.
(c) Balances ‘‘due from other
depository institutions’’ do not include
balances due from Federal Reserve
Banks, pass-through accounts, or
balances (payable in dollars or
otherwise) due from banking offices
located outside the United States. An
institution exercising fiduciary powers
may not include in balances ‘‘due from
other depository institutions’’ amounts
of trust funds deposited with other
banks and due to it as a trustee or other
fiduciary.
(d) For institutions that file a report of
deposits weekly, required reserves are
computed on the basis of the
institution’s daily average balances of
deposits and Eurocurrency liabilities
during a 14-day computation period
ending every second Monday.
(e) For institutions that file a report of
deposits quarterly, required reserves are
computed on the basis of the
institution’s daily average balances of
deposits and Eurocurrency liabilities
during the 7-day computation period
that begins on the third Tuesday of
March, June, September, and December.
(f) For all depository institutions,
Edge and Agreement corporations, and
United States branches and agencies of
foreign banks, required reserves are
computed by applying the reserve
requirement ratios below to net
transaction accounts, nonpersonal time
deposits, and Eurocurrency liabilities of
the institution during the computation
period.

tjames on PRODPC75 with RULES

Reservable liability

Reserve requirement ratio

NET TRANSACTION ACCOUNTS:
$0 to reserve requirement exemption amount ($10.3 million) .............................................
Over reserve requirement exemption amount ($10.3 million) and up to low reserve
tranche ($44.4 million).
Over low reserve tranche ($44.4 million) .............................................................................
Nonpersonal time deposits ..........................................................................................................

VerDate Nov<24>2008

16:38 May 28, 2009

Jkt 217001

PO 00000

Frm 00023

25637

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

0 percent of amount.
3 percent of amount.
$1,023,000 plus 10 percent of amount over $44.4
million.
0 percent.

E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM

29MYR1

25638

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 102 / Friday, May 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Reservable liability

Reserve requirement ratio

Eurocurrency liabilities .................................................................................................................

§ 204.9
■

[Removed]

5. Section 204.9 is removed.

§ 204.5

[Redesignated as § 204.9]

6. Section 204.5 is redesignated as
§ 204.9.
■ 7. New § 204.5 is added to read as
follows:
■

tjames on PRODPC75 with RULES

§ 204.5

Maintenance of required reserves.

(a)(1) A depository institution, a U.S.
branch or agency of a foreign bank, and
an Edge or Agreement corporation shall
maintain required reserves in the form
of vault cash and, if vault cash does not
fully satisfy the institution’s required
reserves, in the form of a balance
maintained
(i) Directly with the Federal Reserve
Bank in the Federal Reserve District in
which the institution is located, or
(ii) With a pass-through
correspondent in accordance with
§ 204.5(d).
(2) Each individual institution subject
to this part is responsible for satisfying
its reserve balance requirement, if any,
either directly with a Federal Reserve
Bank or through a pass-through
correspondent.
(b)(1) For institutions that file a report
of deposits weekly, the balances that are
required to be maintained with the
Federal Reserve shall be maintained
during a 14-day maintenance period
that begins on the third Thursday
following the end of a given
computation period.
(2) For institutions that file a report of
deposits quarterly, the balances that are
required to be maintained with the
Federal Reserve shall be maintained
during each of the 7-day maintenance
periods during the interval that begins
on the fourth Thursday following the
end of the institution’s computation
period and ends on the fourth
Wednesday after the close of the
institution’s next computation period.
(c) Cash items forwarded to a Federal
Reserve Bank for collection and credit
shall not be counted as part of the
reserve balance to be carried with the
Federal Reserve until the expiration of
the time specified in the appropriate
time schedule established under
Regulation J, ‘‘Collection of Checks and
Other Items by Federal Reserve Banks
and Funds Transfers Through Fedwire’’
(12 CFR Part 210). If a depository
institution draws against items before
that time, the charge will be made to its
account if the balance is sufficient to

VerDate Nov<24>2008

15:25 May 28, 2009

Jkt 217001

0 percent.

pay it; any resulting impairment of
reserve balances will be subject to the
penalties provided by law and to the
reserve-deficiency charges provided by
this part. However, the Federal Reserve
Bank may, at its discretion, refuse to
permit the withdrawal or other use of
credit given in an account for any time
for which the Federal Reserve Bank has
not received payment in actually and
finally collected funds.
(d)(1) A depository institution, a U.S.
branch or agency of a foreign bank, or
an Edge or Agreement corporation
required to maintain reserve balances
(‘‘respondent’’) may select only one
pass-through correspondent institution
to pass through its required reserve
balances, unless otherwise permitted by
the Federal Reserve Bank in whose
District the respondent is located.
Eligible pass-through correspondent
institutions are Federal Home Loan
Banks, the National Credit Union
Administration Central Liquidity
Facility, depository institutions, U.S.
branches or agencies of foreign banks,
and Edge and Agreement corporations
that maintain required reserve balances,
which may be zero, at a Federal Reserve
Bank. In addition, the Board reserves
the right to permit other institutions, on
a case-by-case basis, to serve as passthrough correspondents. The
correspondent chosen must
subsequently pass through the required
reserve balances of its respondents
directly to a Federal Reserve Bank. The
correspondent placing funds with a
Federal Reserve Bank on behalf of
respondents will be responsible for
account maintenance as described in
paragraph (d)(4) of this section.
(2) Respondents or correspondents
may institute, terminate, or change passthrough agreements for the maintenance
of required reserve balances by
providing all documentation required
for the establishment of the new
agreement or termination of the existing
agreement to the Federal Reserve Banks
involved within the time period
provided for such a change by those
Reserve Banks.
(3) A correspondent that passes
through required reserve balances of
respondents shall maintain such
balances, along with the
correspondent’s own required reserve
balances (if any), in a single
commingled account at the Federal
Reserve Bank in whose District the
correspondent is located. The balances

PO 00000

Frm 00024

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

held by the correspondent in an account
at a Reserve Bank are the property of the
correspondent and represent a liability
of the Reserve Bank solely to the
correspondent, regardless of whether
the funds represent the reserve balances
of another institution that have been
passed through the correspondent.
(4)(i) A pass-through correspondent
shall be responsible for assuring the
maintenance of the appropriate
aggregate level of its respondents’
required reserve balances. A Federal
Reserve Bank will compare the total
reserve balance required to be
maintained with the total actual reserve
balance held in such account for
purposes of determining requiredreserve deficiencies, imposing or
waiving charges for deficiencies in
required reserves, and for other reserve
maintenance purposes. A charge for a
deficiency in the aggregate level of the
required reserve balance will be
imposed by the Reserve Bank on the
correspondent maintaining the account.
(ii) Each correspondent is required to
maintain detailed records for each of its
respondents in a manner that permits
Reserve Banks to determine whether the
respondent has provided a sufficient
required reserve balance to the
correspondent. A correspondent passing
through a respondent’s required reserve
balance shall maintain records and
make such reports as the Board or
Reserve Bank requires in order to ensure
the correspondent’s compliance with its
responsibilities for the maintenance of a
respondent’s reserve balance. Such
records shall be available to the Reserve
Banks as required.
(iii) The Federal Reserve Bank may
terminate any pass-through agreement
under which the correspondent is
deficient in its recordkeeping or other
responsibilities.
(iv) Interest paid on supplemental
reserves (if such reserves are required
under § 204.7) held by a respondent will
be credited to the account maintained
by the correspondent.
(e) Any excess or deficiency in an
institution’s required reserve balance
shall be carried over and applied against
the balance maintained in the next
maintenance period as specified in this
paragraph. The amount of any such
excess or deficiency that is carried over
shall not exceed the greater of:
(1) The amount obtained by
multiplying 0.04 times the sum of
depository institution’s required

E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM

29MYR1

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 102 / Friday, May 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
reserves and the depository institution’s
contractual clearing balance, if any, and
then subtracting from this product the
depository institution’s clearing balance
allowance, if any; or
(2) $50,000, minus the depository
institution’s clearing balance allowance,
if any. Any carryover not offset during
the next period may not be carried over
to subsequent periods.
§ 204.7
■

[Removed]

8. Section 204.7 is removed.

§ 204.6

[Redesignated as § 204.7]

9. Section 204.6 is redesignated as
§ 204.7.
■ 10. New § 204.6 is added to read as
follows:
■

tjames on PRODPC75 with RULES

§ 204.6

Charges for reserve deficiencies.

(a) Deficiencies in a depository
institution’s required reserve balance,
after application of the carryover
provided in § 204.5(e), are subject
reserve-deficiency charges. Federal
Reserve Banks are authorized to assess
charges for deficiencies in required
reserves at a rate of 1 percentage point
per year above the primary credit rate,
as provided in § 201.51(a) of this
chapter, in effect for borrowings from
the Federal Reserve Bank on the first
day of the calendar month in which the
deficiencies occurred. Charges shall be
assessed on the basis of daily average
deficiencies during each maintenance
period. Reserve Banks may, as an
alternative to levying monetary charges,
after consideration of the circumstances
involved, permit a depository
institution to eliminate deficiencies in
its required reserve balance by
maintaining additional reserves during
subsequent reserve maintenance
periods.
(b) Reserve Banks may waive the
charges for reserve deficiencies except
when the deficiency arises out of a
depository institution’s gross negligence
or conduct that is inconsistent with the
principles and purposes of reserve
requirements. Decisions by Reserve
Banks to waive charges are based on an
evaluation of the circumstances in each
individual case and the depository
institution’s reserve maintenance
record. For example, a waiver may be
appropriate for a small charge or once
during a two-year period for a
deficiency that does not exceed a certain
percentage of the depository
institution’s required reserves. If a
depository institution has demonstrated
a lack of due regard for the proper
maintenance of required reserves, the
Reserve Bank may decline to exercise
the waiver privilege and assess all

VerDate Nov<24>2008

15:25 May 28, 2009

Jkt 217001

charges regardless of amount or reason
for the deficiency.
(c) In individual cases, where a
Federal supervisory authority waives a
liquidity requirement, or waives the
penalty for failing to satisfy a liquidity
requirement, the Reserve Bank in the
District where the involved depository
institution is located shall waive the
reserve requirement imposed under this
part for such depository institution
when requested by the Federal
supervisory authority involved.
(d) Violations of this part may be
subject to assessment of civil money
penalties by the Board under authority
of Section 19(1) of the Federal Reserve
Act (12 U.S.C. 505) as implemented in
12 CFR part 263. In addition, the Board
and any other Federal financial
institution supervisory authority may
enforce this part with respect to
depository institutions subject to their
jurisdiction under authority conferred
by law to undertake cease and desist
proceedings.
PART 209—ISSUE AND
CANCELLATION OF FEDERAL
RESERVE BANK CAPITAL STOCK
(REGULATION I)
10. The authority citation for part 209
continues to read as follows:

■

Authority: 12 U.S.C. 2222, 248, 282, 286–
288, 321, 323, 327–328, 333, and 466.

11. § 209.2 is amended by revising
paragraph (c)(1) to read as follows:

■

§ 209.2
banks.

Banks desiring to become member

*

*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) General rule. For purposes of this
part, a national bank or a State bank is
located in the Federal Reserve District
that contains the location specified in
the bank’s charter or organizing
certificate, or as specified by the
institution’s primary regulator, or if no
such location is specified, the location
of its head office, unless otherwise
determined by the Board under
paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*

By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, May 22, 2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9–12431 Filed 5–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P

PO 00000

Frm 00025

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

25639

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
12 CFR Part 327
RIN 3064–AD35

Special Assessments
AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 7(b)(5) of
the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12
U.S.C. 1817(b)(5), the FDIC is adopting
a final rule to impose a 5 basis point
special assessment on each insured
depository institution’s assets minus
Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009. The
amount of the special assessment for
any institution, however, will not
exceed 10 basis points times the
institution’s assessment base for the
second quarter 2009 risk-based
assessment. The special assessment will
be collected on September 30, 2009. The
final rule also provides that if, after June
30, 2009, the reserve ratio of the Deposit
Insurance Fund is estimated to fall to a
level that the Board believes would
adversely affect public confidence or to
a level that shall be close to or below
zero at the end of any calendar quarter,
the Board, by vote, may impose
additional special assessments of up to
5 basis points on all insured depository
institutions based on each institution’s
total assets minus Tier 1 capital
reported on the report of condition for
that calendar quarter. Any single
additional special assessment will not
exceed 10 basis points times the
institution’s assessment base for the
corresponding quarter’s risk-based
assessment. The earliest possible date
for imposing any such additional
special assessment under the final rule
would be September 30, 2009, with
collection on December 30, 2009. The
latest possible date for imposing any
such additional special assessment
under the final rule would be December
31, 2009, with collection on March 30,
2010. Authority to impose any
additional special assessments under
the final rule terminates on January 1,
2010.
DATES: Effective Date: June 30, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Munsell W. St. Clair, Acting Chief, Fund
Analysis and Pricing Section, Division
of Insurance and Research, (202) 898–
8967; Christopher Bellotto, Counsel,
Legal Division, (202) 898–3801 or
Sheikha Kapoor, Senior Attorney, Legal
Division, (202) 898–3960; Donna
Saulnier, Manager, Assessment Policy
Section, Division of Finance (703) 562–
6167.

E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM

29MYR1