View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

F ed er a l Re s e r v e Ba n k
DALLAS, TEXAS

of

Dallas

75222
Circular No. 76-67
May 6, 1976

A m e ric a n R e v o lu tio n B ic en ten n ia l

CLARIFICATION o f t h e p r o p o s e d
A MENDMENT TO REGULATION Q
Preauthorized Transfers of Funds from
Savings Accounts to Cover Overdrafts

TO ALL MEMBER BANKS
AND OTHERS CONCERNED IN THE
ELEVENTH FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT:
Following is the text of a statement issued April 29, 1976, by the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System announcing a clarification of the proposed
amendment to Regulation Q regarding automatic overdraft transfers. The proposal,
announced March 15, 1976, was sent to you in our circular No. 76-38.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System today pub­
lished a statement supplementing an earlier proposal that would author­
ize transfers of funds from savings accounts to cover check overdrafts.
The statement makes clear that such transfers can be made only upon
the voluntary action of depositors.
In view of today's action, the Board extended the period for com­
ment by 30 days, to June 14, 1976.
The Board published the clarification after receipt of comments
indicating that the proposal, first made public March 15, 1976, could
be misunderstood as permitting banks to transfer funds from savings
to checking accounts without customer approval.
As indicated in the first announcement, overdraft protection trans­
fers could be made only on the basis of a voluntary agreement by the
depositor with his bank. The Board's present Regulation Q does not
permit banks to enter into such agreements.
The proposed service would permit customers to instruct their
banks— also on an entirely voluntary basis— to transfer funds automat­
ically from a savings to a checking account when the checking account
falls below a minimum level set by the customer.

This publication was digitized and made available by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas' Historical Library (FedHistory@dal.frb.org)

- 2 -

The supplementary announcement also made it clear that banks
may make a service charge for overdraft protection transfers, ifthe
service charge equals or exceeds 30 days' interest on the amount
transferred.
Comments on the proposed amendment should be sent to the Secretary, Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, D.C. 20551, to be received
not later than June 14, 1976. All materials submitted should include the docket number
R-0027.
A copy of the Board's proposal is enclosed.
Sincerely yours,
T. W. Plant
First Vice President

Enclosure

TITLE 12— BANKS AND BANKING
CHAPTER II— FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
SUBCHAPTER A— BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
[Reg. Q]
[Docket No. R-0027]
Part 217— Interest on Deposits
Clarification of Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Withdrawals from Savings Deposits

On March 15, 1976, the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System invited public comment on a proposed amendment to
Regulation Q (Interest on Deposits) to permit banks that are members
of the Federal Reserve System to transfer funds automatically from
savings accounts to demand deposit (checking) accounts when the customers'
demand deposit account balances are insufficient to permit payment
by the bank of checks that the customers had written (41 FR 12039).
The proposed service would permit customers to instruct their banks
to add funds automatically to a demand deposit account when a balance
has fallen below a specified level.

Such a service is not permitted

at this time under the provisions of Regulation Q.
In reviewing the comments that have been received to date
on this proposal, it has been found that several comments evidence
some misunderstanding concerning the operation of the proposed overdraft
service.

This statement is being issued to clarify the Board's proposal

concerning overdraft transfers from savings accounts.

-2 The overdraft service proposed by the Board is completely
voluntary.
service.

Bank customers will not be required to obtain the transfer
Banks would not be authorized to transfer a depositor's

funds from a savings account unless the depositor voluntarily had
entered into an agreement previously with the bank specifically authorizing
this transfer practice.
The overdraft service was proposed to provide depositors
with an alternative to existing procedures in those instances where
there are insufficient funds in depositors' checking accounts.

Generally,

if a customer's check is presented to the bank and there are insufficient
funds in the customer's checking account, the check is returned to
the payee with the term "insufficient funds" indicated on the check.
As a result, the bank usually charges a fee to the customer when it
is necessary to return these checks.

As an alternative to returning

checks, many banks currently advance funds to customers in accordance
with overdraft loan agreements.

Under such overdraft loan agreements,

the bank charges customers interest on the funds advanced.
The Board's proposal is intended to provide an additional
alternative available to bank customers in order to permit them to
avoid having checks returned because of insufficient funds in their
checking accounts.

As proposed, a depositor by prior agreement could

instruct the bank to transfer funds from his or her savings account
to his or her checking account in the event there are insufficient
funds in the checking account to cover checks that have been presented

-3 -

for payment.

The service could also be used to replenish the customer's

checking account if the depositor wishes to maintain a specified
minimum balance in the checking account.
The proposal would permit depositors to transfer funds in
multiples of $100 or more.

In addition, the depositor would be required

to forfeit at a minimum an amount equivalent to at least 30 days'
interest on the funds transferred.

The Board believes that the forfeiture

of interest provision aids in preserving the effectiveness of the
statutory prohibition against the payment of interest on demand deposits.
The proposed minimum forfeiture amount would be approximately $.42
per $100 transferred if the bank pays interest at a rate of 5 per
cent on its savings deposits.

Member banks, however, would be permitted

to impose any service charge for such transfer services provided such
charge equals or exceeds the minimum forfeiture amount specified in
the proposal and had been agreed upon by the bank and its depositor.
The Board believes that this penalty would compare favorably with
service charges now imposed by banks for processing returned checks
or for lending money to the depositor to cover these checks.
If adopted, the Board believes that the overdraft service
could reduce the number of checks that are returned through the check
clearing operations of the banking system and could result in a sub­
stantial savings for customers, businessmen, bankers*, and the Federal
Reserve System.

-4 -

Accordingly, further public comment is requested on this
proposal and on whether some other minimum forfeiture would be appropriate
and whether transfers of denominations different from the proposed
$100 minimum would be appropriate.
In view of the above, the Board has extended the comment
period for an additional 30 days.
to submit their views or arguments.

Interested persons are invited
Any such material should be

submitted in writing to the Secretary, Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, Washington, D.C. 20551, to be received not
later than June 14, 1976.
docket number R-0027.

All material submitted should include the

Such material will be made available for inspection

and copying upon request, except as provided in § 261.6(a) of the
Board's Rules Regarding Availability of Information.
By order of the Board of Governors,

April 29, 1976.

(Signed) Theodore E. Allison

Theodore E. Allison
Secretary of the Board

[SEAL]