View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

DALLASFED

EL PASO BRANCH • ISSUE 1 • 2013­­

Crossroads
ECONOMIC TRENDS IN THE DESERT SOUTHWEST

Southeast New Mexico Shines
as State Economy Slowly Mends
by Avilia Bueno and Roberto A. Coronado

} Data indicate there is a
significant difference in
economic performance
between northern
and southern New
Mexico, with the
southeast leading the
recovery. Strong
economic growth in
southeast New Mexico
has been driven mostly
by energy.

N

ew Mexico has a long tradition
of rapid growth compared with
the rest of the United States.
The so-called Great Recession
touched virtually every region, and New
Mexico was no exception. But while the
U.S. economy has been in recovery mode
since the summer of 2009, New Mexico
has struggled to keep up the pace.
The nation has recovered 77 percent
of the 8.7 million jobs lost to the recession. Although New Mexico’s job losses
were similar to those of the U.S. in percentage terms, the state’s performance
in restoring lost jobs has been very poor
in comparison; the state has added back
only 27 percent of the 51,700 jobs lost.1
Data indicate there is a significant
difference in economic performance
between northern and southern New
Mexico, with the southeast leading the
recovery. Strong economic growth in
southeast New Mexico has been driven
mostly by energy.2 The economic performance of this area was discussed at
a recent Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
conference, “The Role of Southeast
New Mexico in the Global Economy,” in
Carlsbad and Hobbs, N.M.

The sessions examined topics such
as the role of energy markets, refining
and petrochemicals, and trade as well
as current economic conditions in the
U.S. and the world. What follows is a
summary of those presentations and
discussions.3

Southeast N.M. and Energy
New Mexico State University professor Jim Peach noted in his presentation
that Eddy and Lea counties in southeast
New Mexico are very different from the
rest of the state. The current oil boom
has greatly benefited the two counties.
Crude oil production in the state was
around 84.4 million barrels in 2012, and
Eddy and Lea took the lead, producing 44
million and 35.8 million barrels, respectively (Chart 1). The counties combined
accounted for over 90 percent of the
state’s crude oil production. In addition,
the production of potash, a potassiumbearing mineral used primarily in fertilizer, has been rising and is likely to bring
considerable investment to the region in
the coming years.
From April 2012 to April 2013,
employment growth was 3.9 percent

Crossroads
was 82 percent of the national level in
2012. Despite relatively strong population growth, Eddy and Lea counties had
respective per capita income of $41,539
and $37,898 in 2011 (the most recent
available), corresponding to 99 and 91
percent of the national level (Chart 2).
In 2012, only 11 of the 33 counties
in New Mexico reported population
increases. At the top of the list were Lea
at 1.9 percent, San Juan at 1 percent and
Eddy at 0.8 percent. Peach said the main
challenges the region faces are the slow
recovery of the national economy, oil and

in Eddy County and 5.4 percent in Lea,
significantly higher than the 1.2 percent
growth in New Mexico and 1.6 percent
nationwide. The unemployment rate in
southeast New Mexico is remarkably low
at 3.7 percent in both Eddy and in Lea
counties, compared with the state’s 6.7
percent rate for May.
Peach argued that movements in per
capita income in the region are usually
in lockstep with movements in U.S. per
capita income levels. Historically, New
Mexico has had lower per capita income
levels than the nation; for instance, it
Chart

1

2012 New Mexico Crude Oil Production

Millions of dollars

50
44

45
40

35.9

35
30
25
20
15

Southern N.M. and Trade

10
4.7

5
0
Eddy County

Lea County

Rest of the state

SOURCE: New Mexico Oil Conservation Division, county production.

Chart

2

Per Capita Income in 2011

Dollars

45,000

41,539

40,000

41,560
37,898
34,133

35,000
30,000

30,319

25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0

Eddy

Lea

New Mexico

U.S.

SOURCE: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Economic Information System.

2

gas price volatility, infrastructure needs
and workforce issues.
In “The Hydrocarbon Hat Trick,”
economist Jesse Thompson from the
Houston Branch of the Federal Reserve
Bank of Dallas explained that the development of technologies such as hydraulic
fracturing and horizontal drilling in the
U.S. have boosted the production of natural gas and, as a result, the price of this
commodity has reached historically low
levels in recent years.
Thompson said natural gas price
movements followed movements in oil
prices until very recently, when there was
a decoupling of these two key commodity
prices. The recent technological revolution in the energy sector has resulted in
a significant increase in the supply of
natural gas and natural gas liquids such
as ethane. The market could not absorb
the rapidly rising supply and, hence, U.S.
petrochemical firms have seen elevated
input costs begin to unwind.
Texas oil production has accelerated
the past three years, undoing 30 years
of production declines. New Mexico has
also seen a notable increase in oil production (Chart 3).

Crossroads • Issue 1 • 2013

Jerry Pacheco, executive director of
the International Business Accelerator
of the New Mexico Small Business
Development Center Network, discussed
the role of the border in the New Mexico
economy during his presentation “New
Mexico’s Border: Status, Vision and
Action.”
In 2012, Mexico was the secondbiggest export market for New Mexico,
accounting for 21 percent of the state’s
total exports. These exports are valued at
around $618 million, which is small compared with other border states. Arizona,
for example, exported about $6.3 billion
to Mexico during 2012 (Chart 4).
Pacheco noted that through the first
six years of the North American Free
Trade Agreement (NAFTA, 1994–99),
only two states experienced a decrease
in trade with Mexico—West Virginia and
New Mexico, with the latter experiencing
the worst decline. Although New Mexico
saw trade with Mexico rise in 2000, the
state is still well below national average
growth of 16 percent per year during

Crossroads
Chart

3

Mexico can be explained by this border
industrialization.
New Mexico led the nation in export
growth in 2012, with an increase of 42
percent. More than 50 percent of all New
Mexico exports to Mexico originate in
Doña Ana County (Santa Teresa–Las
Cruces corridor). The biggest share of the
state’s exports to Mexico is the industrial
inputs/components that New Mexico is
exporting to the maquiladora industry.
Pacheco listed some factors posing a
significant downside risk to growth in the
region’s productivity, including underskilled workers, delays at ports of entry,
aging or obsolete infrastructure and electricity issues.

30 Years of Crude Oil Production Declines Undone in 3

Index, January 1981 = 100

160
140

New Mexico
Texas

120

U.S. (minus Texas and N.M.)

100
80
60
40
20
0

’81

’83

’85

’87

’89

’91

’93

’95

’97

’99

’01

’03

’05

’07

’09

’11 ’13

SOURCE: Energy Information Agency.

Chart

4

2012 Exports to Mexico by Border State

Millions of dollars

100

94,800

90
80
70
60
50
40
30

26,320

20
6,269

10
0

Texas

California

Arizona

618
New Mexico

SOURCE: U.S. Census Bureau.

the NAFTA period. New Mexico trade
went from $102 million in 1994 to $111
million in 2001, an 8.8 percent increase,
aided by a rise in manufacturing exports
in 2000. More recently, in 2012, trade
between New Mexico and Mexico grew
36 percent.
Traditionally, the New Mexico
manufacturing base has been centered
around Albuquerque, the state’s largest
metropolitan area. However, within the
last 10 years, the Santa Teresa Port of
Entry on the state’s border with Mexico
has received a tremendous amount of
public and private infrastructure invest-

ment. This, in turn, has resulted in Santa
Teresa becoming a major export platform
to Mexico. In 2011, Santa Teresa was
home to more than 40 companies, most
of which have a direct logistical and/
or manufacturing relationship with a
Mexican maquiladora or manufacturer.
From 1999 to 2003, approximately
2 million square feet of new industrial
space was built around the Santa Teresa
port. Nearly all of this space was dedicated to the processing of goods and/or
materials for the maquiladora industry
across the border. Much of the increase
in manufactured goods exports to

Crossroads • Issue 1 • 2013

National and Global Economies
One of the main drivers of the
New Mexico economy is the national
economy, as noted by economist Roberto
Coronado from the El Paso Branch of the
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. During
his presentation “Is the U.S. Economy
Gaining Momentum?” he provided evidence that the U.S. recovery continues to
be modest. In the first quarter of this year,
real gross domestic product (GDP) grew
1.1 percent.4 In the second quarter, U.S.
economic growth picked up somewhat,
with GDP rising an annualized 2.5 percent.5 Although government expenditures
and net exports took a toll on growth,
private domestic sales remained healthy
and contributed 2.1 percent to GDP
growth in the second quarter.
The labor market is slowly moving in
the right direction. In July, total nonfarm
employment increased by 162,000, and
the unemployment rate was 7.4 percent.
Consumption and consumer confidence
have improved in recent months. Net
worth is advancing, while housing wealth
is bouncing back. Both of these indicators
are key inputs into future U.S. consumption. The housing market hit bottom and
is now gaining momentum, with home
prices appreciating and new single-family
construction beginning to stabilize. In
addition, the inventory of unsold homes
is reaching prerecession levels.
The industrial production recovery is going through a soft patch, with
manufacturing slowing down and vehicle
sales weakening slightly. Coronado said
a high level of uncertainty, which deters

3

Crossroads
consumption and investment spending,
is the biggest threat to the continuing U.S.
recovery. Sources of uncertainty include
the euro zone crisis, the federal budget
sequestration and the lack of lending
availability to consumers and businesses.
In “International Economic
Outlook,” economist Michael Sposi
from the Dallas Fed’s Globalization and
Monetary Policy Institute said the financial crisis and ensuing recession were
global phenomena.6 World merchandise
trade volumes declined 20 percent, and
global industrial production fell 18 percent (Chart 5). While trade surpassed
prerecession peak levels in November
2010, industrial production remains
below the peak. Emerging economies
are set to help the global recovery; the
International Monetary Fund forecasts
real GDP growth of 5.7 percent for these
economies, compared with 2.2 percent
for advanced economies (Table 1).

Sposi argued that in the short run,
higher demand for energy products from
emerging economies will benefit southeast New Mexico. In the long run, population and income growth in emerging
economies and a declining agricultural
workforce—leading to a need for fertilizer
and energy-intensive inputs as substitutes for labor—will boost demand for
potash. New Mexico has the largest concentration of the mineral in the U.S.

Table

1

Emerging
World
U.S.
Advanced
U.K.
Euro zone
Japan

Real GDP Growth Forecast
One year ahead
(percent)
5.7
4.0
3.0
2.2
1.5
1.1
1.4

Five years ahead
(percent)
6.2
4.5
2.9
2.5
2.5
1.6
1.1

SOURCE: International Monetary Fund.

Uneven Recovery
The New Mexico economy is going
through a difficult recovery—it has
gained back only 13,800 of the 51,700 jobs
lost during the recession. The recovery
has been led by southeast New Mexico,
spurred by rising commodity prices.
Global demand for commodities is
expected to continue, driven by emerging
economies. While this is good news for
New Mexico overall, the benefits of rising

commodity demand are unevenly spread
across the state, with the southeastern
region capturing most of the share.
Bueno is a senior research analyst and
Coronado is assistant vice president in
charge and a senior economist at the El
Paso Branch of the Federal Reserve Bank
of Dallas.

Notes

Employment data are as of July 2013 for the U.S. and
June for New Mexico.
2
For more details, see “New Mexico Recovery Still
Struggles in 2012,” by Monica Bonilla-Romero and
Robert W. Gilmer, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
Crossroads, no. 1, 2012.
3
Conference presentations may be viewed at
www.dallasfed.org/research/events/2013/nm.cfm.
4
For a more current discussion of the U.S. economy,
see the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas National
Economic Update at www.dallasfed.org/research/update/
us/index.cfm.
5
The second quarter GDP growth rate was released after
the conference.
6
For a more current discussion of the global economy,
see the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas International
Economic Update at www.dallasfed.org/institute/update/
index.cfm.
1

Chart

5

World Merchandise Trade Volumes Drop During Crisis

Index, January 2000 = 100

200

Peak levels surpassed in
November 2010

180
160
140
120

20% decline

100
80
60
40
20
0

’00

’01

’02

’03

’04

’05

’06

’07

’08

’09

’10

’11

12

’13

SOURCE: Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.

DALLASFED

Crossroads

is published by the El Paso Branch of the Federal
Reserve Bank of Dallas. The views expressed are those
of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the
positions of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas or the
Federal Reserve System.
Subscriptions are available free of charge.
Please direct requests for subscriptions, back issues
and address changes to the Public Affairs Department,
El Paso Branch, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, 301 E.
Main St., El Paso, TX 79901-1326; call 915-521-5235;
fax 915-521-5205; or subscribe via the Internet at
www.dallasfed.org.

Articles may be reprinted on the condition that
the source is credited and a copy of the publication
containing the reprinted material is provided to the Research Department, El Paso Branch, Federal Reserve
Bank of Dallas.			
Crossroads is available on the Bank’s website at
www.dallasfed.org.

Roberto A. Coronado, Editor
Kathy Thacker, Associate Editor
Ellah Piña, Graphic Designer