View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Following the Money
An Analysis of Foundation Grantmaking
for Community and Economic Development

The Federal Reserve Banks of Philadelphia and Atlanta recently
investigated the way in which grants to support community
and economic development activities were distributed across
366 metropolitan areas in the U.S. The research relied on data
provided by the Foundation Center that captured grants of at
least $10,000 made by the 1,000 largest foundations between
2008 and 2013. Here’s what we found.

TOTAL GRANTMAKING

VARIATION ACROSS METRO AREAS

Nearly 169,000 grants to support local
community and economic development
efforts were made by the largest
foundations during the study period.
These grants totaled almost $15 billion.

The typical metro area received roughly $3.3 million in community and economic development
grant capital during the study period, or about $12.35 for every resident. In 18 metro areas, this
figure fell below $1.00 per capita, while in another 18, it exceeded $100 per capita.

169,000
TOTAL GRANTS

$15
billion

PER CAPITA RANKINGS
TOP 10

ACTIVITIES FUNDED
Grants were directed to a wide variety of
activities to promote community and
economic development, enhance human
capital, and improve residents’ quality of
life. Educational activities accounted for
roughly 30 cents of every dollar granted.
Core Community and
Economic Development

29%

Education

BOTTOM 10

Battle Creek, MI ......................................................... $392.59
San Francisco–Oakland–Fremont, CA ........................ $216.79
Omaha–Council Bluffs, NE–IA ................................... $214.78
Jonesboro, AR ............................................................ $157.80
Pittsburgh, PA ............................................................ $157.13
Flint, MI ..................................................................... $150.75
New Orleans–Metairie–Kenner, LA............................. $144.63
Washington–Arlington–Alexandria, DC–VA–MD–WV.. $142.64
Durham–Chapel Hill, NC ............................................ $140.81
Memphis, TN–MS–AR................................................ $132.68

357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366

Monroe, MI............................................................ $0.56
Mansfield, OH ....................................................... $0.49
Lebanon, PA .......................................................... $0.47
Warner Robins, GA ................................................ $0.32
Kankakee–Bradley, IL ............................................ $0.32
Sandusky, OH........................................................ $0.31
Longview, TX ......................................................... $0.24
Williamsport, PA .................................................... $0.18
Hattiesburg, MS..................................................... $0.17
Lake Havasu City–Kingman, AZ............................. $0.17

WHAT ATTRACTS GRANT CAPITAL?
Human Services

18%
10%

30%

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Our research shows that metro areas that received a greater level of per capita grant support:

Health

13%

250K

Other

are home to a
large foundation

have a dense
nonprofit sector

Dollar amounts are inflation-adjusted to 2013. For more information, read “Following the Money:
An Analysis of Foundation Grantmaking for Community and Economic Development,” written by
Keith Wardrip, Will Lambe, and Mels de Zeeuw and published by The Foundation Review (2016,
forthcoming). An interactive tool to explore the results of this research can be found at
https://www.frbatlanta.org/followingthemoney. The views expressed here are those of the
authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Federal Reserve Banks of Philadelphia or
Atlanta or the Federal Reserve System.

have 250,000
residents or more

are more
impoverished

are located
in the West