The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
The Financial Situation HE past week has brought considerable clarifiT cation of the legislative situation in Washington, although the outlook in several directions is still even any substitute measure will be enacted seems very doubtful, despite optimistic statements by ite sponsor. The tariff bill is expected to meet some• shrouded with substantial uncertainty. The situation what greater opposition in the Senate, but there is no as thus revealed is probably about as favorable as apparent reason to expect it to fail. There were rethe business community had any right, a week ago, ports toward the end of the week to the effect that to expect. It nonetheless leaves a good deal to be the President would at an early date send a message desired. Washington dispatches seem to make it to Congress having to do with the War Debts, but it clear that the President is determined to prevent is hardly probable that he will ask Congress to reduce any very drastic new silver legislation this session if these obligations or to grant him authority to do so— he can. On the other hand, there are many who or that he would get either if he did ask for them. are uneasy lest he feel himself obliged to promise Specific predictions as to what Congress will do are Congress to exercise in some part, at least, the extraordinarily hazardous in the existing circumstanextended powers in respect ces, but the chances now of silver now enjoyed by seem definitely to favor him. Neither the real the enactment of a Stock The Gold Standard and Financial status of this matter nor Exchange Control measure Rehabilitation the attitude of the Presiwith a good many more An academic authority in a public dent in regard to the teeth in it than Wall Street address the other day urged "generous Senate amendments to the would prefer. The latest co-operation" on the part of the American Government in the re-establishment of Tax Bill were, however, advices from Washington "a workable international gold standard" clear at the close of the that the final draft suggest as a first step in world financial rehabiliweek. of the measure will carry tation. Meanwhile, persistent margin limitations fixed by The learned professor is doubtless too well versed in such subjects not fully to weakness in some of the law, but will also carry realize that no such objective can in the important commodities rates and other arrangenature of the case be reached if attention markets, notably wheat, ments more liberal than is confined to banking or monetary was viewed by thoughtful mechanisms. seemed likely two or three The reason that the gold standard in its observers as strengthening weeks ago. The plan for conventional form has not proved "workthe hands of the inflationorganization of a sepathe able" during the post-war period, particuists in and outside of Conrate commission to adminlarly during the past few years, is to be gress. The movement to found not so much in that standard itself ister the law—and possibly as in the industrial and trade conditions have the Government pay sooner or later the Securiin which it has been called upon to funcoff depositors who have ties Act of 1933—is retion. "frozen" deposits in failed ported in the press to be The best, if not the only, way to make banks continued to show the gold standard work in the future is to scheduled for adoption. create international economic relations some strength, even at the While the commission so and promote domestic business policies in close of the week. Disenvisaged is not the sort of which any rational credit or monetary patches to the effect that body suggested by the local mechanism can be expected to function effectively. Administration officials Stock Exchange authoriViewed in this way,the re-establishment were at work on the subties, it is preferred in the of a workable gold standard not only ject seemed to indicate district to the financial would be the first step in world financial that the President was conFederal Trade Commission rehabilitation, but would furnish a valid basis for sound and permanent recovery. sidering what could reasonas the administrating body. ably be done under existing The highly important legislation to take the edge provisions placing many off the demand for outright and full payment of all groups in the financial community under heavy such depositors at the expense of the taxpayers of civil liabilities have been modified substantially in the country. It seems to be certain that the Presi- the course of time and appreciably softened. They dent is opposed to all such plans, which would with- are, however,still present, and still impose the burden out doubt be extremely expensive to the public of proof of innocence or fair dealing upon the detreasury. As Secretary Morgenthau himself said the fendant. With each succeeding draft the general other day, these deposits in substantial part are not authority of the administrative body has been broad"frozen"; they are lost, no assets of real value re- ened as specific provisions of law have been eliminated maining behind them. or modified. In this respect the proposed Act has taken on somewhat more of the character of the The Wagner Bill recommendations of the so-called Dickinson ComEPORTS vary somewhat concerning the once mittee. On the whole, the measure in the form in much dreaded Wagner bill. But in view of the which it now appears very likely to become law is to terms under which the automobile strike was settled be preferred to the original draft and probably to the some weeks ago,it is difficult to see how the President draft which the President, just before leaving for his can consistently lend his support to the Wagner bill vacation, told Congress embodied about the miniin any form closely approximating its original draft. mum of control and regulation that ought to be Without Presidential support, no such measure is enacted at this session. It is, however, still a rather likely to become law during this session. Whether "large order." R Financial Chronicle 2626 April 21 1934 been, or are being, organized throughout the country, instructions have been sent forward requesting local HE outlook for substantial modification of the groups to report clear-cut cases of violation to Securities Act of 1933 appears at this moment to respective District Attorneys, and the National Rebe somewhat less bright than many thought it was covery Administration staff at headquarters in ten days ago. The impression is gained from WashWashington has been drastically reorganized preington dispatches that the door has not been closed sumably for the purpose of giving more effective to any amendment to this statute, although in the attention to the new kind of work that is expected confusion and the urgent desire to have Congress of it. Apparently industry and trade are to get a adjourn it may become so. But what is said to be real taste of the medicine they have prepared for most probable is that certain amendments which themselves or which has been prepared for them by have been prepared in Administration circles will public officials. A few industries have already had presently be recommended by the President and opportunity to see how they like it. But from this adopted. As to just what these will be it is difficult time forward experience of this sort is apparently at this time to form a very concrete opinion, but to be gained rapidly. appearances suggest that they will in some degree Verdict of Experience mitigate the rigors of the liability provisions of the existing law. There is, however, a dearth of evidence What is likely to be the verdict of this experience, that these plans call for the more drastic and basic and what the effect upon our economic system of the amendment that the financial community believes practical operation of these codes and related indesirable, not to say essential. struments? In order to lay a basis for individual The situatiOn as a whole is thus seen to be still judgment concerning such questions, it is well to in doubt at many points. In others, it is to be prepass in review before the mind's eye some of the ferred to that existing a month ago. Probably the essential characteristics of this new system. At the financial community never had good reason to expect very outset, let it be definitely understood that we more. have undertaken a program that no other country NRA Problems of the earth not under the iron hand of an effective HE immediate urgency of several highly im- dictator or the equivalent has ever attempted. Outportant legislative questions during the past side of Italy under the Fascist regime, Russia under week or ten days has served to draw the attention of the Soviet Government, and possibly Germany under the public away from a number of fundamental prob- Hitler, the nearest equivalent of the system we have lems that the progress of the National Recovery Ad- installed is that of the cartels in Germany. But the ministration to date ought to bring into the acute German Government (prior to Hitler) except for a consciousness of the American people. The warning few industries such as coal and potash during and of a group of well known Columbia University immediately after the war, never undertook to oblige professors a few days ago that higher prices being industry to enter into cartel agreements, and never induced by the operations of the sundry codes and accepted the responsibility of enforcing such agreeother agreements under the National Industrial Re- ments except as contracts voluntarily entered into covery Act are not to be accepted as indications of by business men are normally enforceable in court. returning prosperity may, and in some quarters The coal and potash arrangements soon proved undoubtless will, fall on deaf ears. The ruling of a workable and the Government largely retired from Federal District Court during the past week affirm- the field. Generally speaking, the industrial selfing the power under the law of trade groups to control exercised in that country was a privilege regulate in considerable detail the business of mem- granted to business, not a duty imposed upon it by bers of the trade whether or not—for all practical law. purposes—such members have entered into any Under our existing system any group thought agreements in the matter, may well, because of con- reasonably representative of an industry may formuditions existing in the particular industry there in late a code which, when finally approved by the question, receive popular approval and be forgotten. President, has the force of law in respect not only Yet unless common sense has ceased to be any guide, of those signing it, but also of those not a party to the American people are destined to learn by actual it. In addition the President has power to write experience in the months to come that the arrange- codes for industries which do not come forward of ments now set up under the National Industrial Re- their own accord, or which are unable to agree among covery Act simply cannot be taken for granted in themselves. At the moment the President, as a the off-hand manner now prevailing. These codes means of enforcement of any arrangement he may and similar agreements could not be more effectively think proper, can license any industry. Starting designed when once in actual operation to thrust originally from a position of insisting upon extreme into the foreground of our thought certain age-old laissez faire in all such matters, at least as far as problems that have not by any means as yet been the content of our laws is concerned, we have now solved. gone far beyond anything any Government of our It has been announced with solemnity in Washing- general type has ever before undertaken in limiting ton that while the National Recovery Administra- individual freedom of action in 'business enterprise. tion to this date has been engaged almost exclusively Price Fixing in the formulation and imposition of codes of fair Now, practically all these codes have provisions competition and other agreements of a similar sort, in them which are intended to control prices, and from this time forward turn its attention must it primarily to the enforcement of the several hundred many of them undertake to limit or otherwise consuch accords now in effect in 'branches of business trol production. At least one of them goes so far as ranging from mop'handle manufacturers to the giant to grant the organization set up to control the insteel industry. Enforcement groups have lately dustry power to prevent additions to productive The Securities Act T T Volume 138 Financial Chronicle equipment. Let us not deceive ourselves in these matters. In one degree or another, and to one extent or another, a great many industries in this country were actively engaged in co-operative effort of this general sort long before the National Industrial Recovery Act was ever thought of, and indeed long before the so-called New Era with its allegedly endless prosperity finally and decisively came to an end in 1929. The Federal Trade Commission itself had for years prior to the inauguration of the present regime in Washington been actively pushing forward the program of codes of ethics, and fair trade practice conferences as they were then called. The Department of Justice in conjunction with the Department of Commerce had worked out a system under President Coolidge for conferring in advance with business executives wishing to undertake cooperative procedures likely to run afoul of the antitrust laws, and during the later days of President Coolidge's second term of office, a technique had developed by which a good many transactions designed to do a substantial part of what the NRA codes are now undertaking to do gained assurances from the law enforcing authorities that they were not likely to be interfered with. Certain elements in Congress, however, became deeply dissatisfied with the practices thus described, and the Department of Justice under President Hoover, by no means satisfied that the procedure was in accord with law, undertook a much more rigorous enforcement program. Earlier Efforts Collapse Partly due to the greater activity of the Department of Justice, but partly also as a result of the natural forces of competition in times of depression and failing markets, many if not most of these arrangements broke down in actual practice. Not only did demoralized conditions develop on a wide scale, but a number of old abuses, such as the sweatshops, re-appeared in re-invigorated form. It was at this stage and with this historical background that the idea of the present-day codes sprang into existence. It was because of the popular support of any movement designed to eliminate social abuses that had come to such vigorous life in our midst, and the support within industry itself of the idea of combinations for the purpose of joint control of prices and production that the program was able to move forward with such vigor. At some stage during its existence, of course, there was grafted upon it the thought that the mechanism thus brought into being could be used to advance wages as a means of promoting prosperity, and (at times at least) that it could likewise be employed to raise prices—a consummation at one time considered the keystone of the arch of recovery. But at no time has the public, or, so far as can be inferred, public officials for that matter, ever paused in the mad rush of events to give serious and dispassionate thought to the implications of all this. The time is now most opportune for such consideration. Fuadamental Questions Several questions come at once to mind. The first is: Are we not in a good many industries running a serious danger of creating for ourselves another prohibition enforcement problem? It is a commonplace in Germany, with its long experience with cartels, that industries composed of many small enterprises widely scattered over large geographical 2627 areas, or devoting themselves to the production or sale of non-standardized products, are not well adapted to effective self-discipline. Indeed, in that country it has never been possible to build effective cartels in such industries or trades. Yet we have gone blithely ahead with an undertaking not only to organize them, but to make the Government an active party to their enforcement. There is real danger that the law in many instances will presently become a mockery. On the other hand, there is plenty of historical evidence to support belief that industries dominated by a relatively few large producers of relatively highly standardized products can be effective, at least for considerable periods of time, in jointly controlling production and prices. They doubtless can be the more effective in doing so when they have the Government as an:actually'supporting agency. What in these arrangements is termed "fair competition" of course used to be viewed as "restraint of trade" and as such was condemned by law. Has it now become wise to nurture monopoly? It is all very well for reformers to talk glibly about the wastes of competition. There are plenty of them. Let the theoricians assert that in modern industry with its enormous overhead, profit, or the lack of it, does not act with the usually assumed effectiveness as an automatic regulator of production. There is substantial truth in such statements. But after all, not even half the story is thus told. Along with all its shortcomings, the older system possessed certain qualities of ruggedness, and carried incentives, not to say compulsions, to efficiency, which appear plainly to be lacking in any of the substitutes we have now devised. Moreover we are plainly unprepared to protect the consumer from oppression. There is no reason to suppose that we should in the long run fare better for the adoption of contracts that probably cannot be enforced and may result only in friction and injustice, or for the formulation of agreements that largely eliminate the competition which has been the hand-maiden of our successful industrial development of the past. On the contrary all history plainly teaches that there is much hazard in both. Another Aspect But there is another aspect of this situation that deserves very careful thought. These code authorities are usually dominated by the larger, more powerful and aggressive elements in the trades to which they relate. Not infrequently only a portion of a given trade or industry is primarily responsible for the formulation of the code—and largely for the personnel of the managing organization under it. A majority of this section is effective in these decisions. The net result is that an industry may in extraordinary degree come under almost complete control of a group really representing a relatively small section of it. In any event, it is usually true that the larger enterprises and interests dominate both the code making and the code administration. That almost limitless opportunity is thus afforded for discrimination is evident. In existing circumstances, it would be an almost super-human task for Governmental authorities effectively to guard against evils of this sort, no matter how consciencious or how capable. No enlightened business man is likely to complain of the introduction of any new system or plan by 2628 Financial Chronicle which the old order can be improved. But we of course ought to be certain that such changes really are likely to improve the situation. Under existing arrangements it would appear that minorities and the less well represented groups in business, and the consumer, are destined to suffer severely if great care is not exercised in preventing it, while the whole structure of society may be weakened by a further courting of disregard for laws which in the nature of the case cannot be effectively enforced. These, no doubt, are rather strong words, but the situation seems to require them. We have now reached the stage where all these matters ought to have the attention they deserve. We shall probably not escape the necessity of thinking seriously about them during the coming half-year. The Federal Reserve Bank Statement IPLE indication again is afforded in the current combined condition statement of the 12 Federal Reserve banks that the Treasury is determined to push relentlessly the expansion of credit resources in the country, regardless of its effect, actual and potential. Utilization of the so-called gold profit which resulted from devaluation of the dollar was pushed on a large scale in the week covered by the statement, apparently in order to offset Treasury requirements for the redemption in cash on April 16 of the portion of called Fourth Liberty 4/ 1 4% bonds 4% that was not converted into new long-term 31/ bonds. The Treasury deposited or sold to the Federal Reserve banks $90,142,000 of the new gold certificates which now represent the interest of the Reserve System in the monetary gold of the country. But the net gain in gold stocks was only $14,000,000, and utilization of the "free gold" thus indicated naturally resulted in a further rapid increase of the reserves of member banks with the system. The deposits of member banks on reserve account advanced $109,152,000 in the week, and the excess reserves now have reached the alarming and altogether unprecedented figure of $1,600,000,000. There could hardly be a more open and direct stimulation to the reckless use of credit than is applied by the Treasury in its present policy. In these circumstances it is only necessary to call attention to the announcement on Thursday by the American Acceptance Council of a new and extraordinarily low level of yield rates on prime bankers' acceptances. The rates for instruments maturing up to 90 days are only 14% bid and 3/16% asked, while longer datings show returns that also are not likely to pay much more than the costs of bookkeeping and other incidentals. In Chicago a movement was reported yesterday for reducing interest payments on thrift accounts in banks. The Treasury itself is one of the chief beneficiaries of the policy of extreme credit ease, as it is enabled thereby to borrow against the emissions of short-dated discount bills at rates that are purely nominal. The increase in gold certificates brought the total of such holdings by the Federal Reserve banks up to $4,476,979,000 April 18 from the former level of $4,386,837,000 April 11. The member banks, as a matter of course, are continuing their reductions of borrowing, the discounts falling on April 18 to $40,473,000 from $43,251,000 on April 11. Federal Reserve bank holdings of bankers' acceptances again declined, the aggregate being only $13,499,000 in the current statement, against $17,059,000 a week A April 21 1934 earlier. Holdings of United States Government securities were down slightly to $2,430,264,000 from $2,431,979,000, but the decrease of $1,715,000 appears to represent only incidental shifting of the various types of obligations, occasioned by the Treasury's conversion operations. Bonds were down to $406,277,000 April 18 from the total of $431,225,000 on April 11, which suggests sales of Fourth Liberty 4/ 1 4% called bonds in the open market before the redemption date of April 15. Certifkates and bills also receded somewhat, but Treasury note holdings increased to $1,207,603,000 this week from $1,179,906,000 last week, and this increase offset almost entirely the declines in holdings of other types of Federal Government obligations. Member bank reserve balances moved up to $3,669,177,000 on April 18 against $3,560,025,000 on April 11. There was also some increase in Treasury deposits and other deposits, so that the total deposits advanced to $3,900,897,000 from $3,737,748,000. Federal Reserve notes in actual circulation increased $4,000,000 to $3,029,647,000 from $3,025,812,000, but the net circulation of Federal Reserve bank notes provided an offset, as these notes dropped to $83,102,000 from $88,336,000. Payment was made by the Federal Reserve banks of the second and final instalment of the subscription to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation stock, and this item of $69,649,000 was carried to reserves. The increase in deposit liabilities exceeded the acquisition of new gold certificates, and as note liabilities were not greatly changed the ratio of total reserves to deposit and Federal Reserve note liabilities combined declined slightly to 68.3% on April 18 from 68.7% on April 11. Annual Report of Southern Railway Co. HE annual report of the Southern Railway Co. for the calendar year 1933 must be considered as favorable in spite of the fact that the company failed to earn its fixed charges in the amount of$734.799.96. The prolonged business depression which played a part in greatly reducing revenues reached its nadir in March of last year, when trade and industry were at a virtual standstill owing to the suspension of banking by order of the President. Some improvement in business was evidenced during part of the year, with the result that the freight revenue of the Southern Railway Co. for the calendar year increased by $4,160,711 over 1932. The extent of the decline in business is reflected in the total operating revenue of $76,148,103, which represents a decrease of $67,035,845, or 47%, compared with 1929. Nevertheless, this great railway system's gross revenue, which had been steadily shrinking since 1929, is able to show an upward turn, the 1933 figures having increased over 1932 to the extent of $3,161,561, or 4.33%. This betterment in the gross earnings has been due, as stated above, to improvement in general business conditions, as passenger revenue for 1933 declined 12.03% under 1932. On Dec. 1 1933 the company put into effect reduced passenger fares for an experimental period of six months. Although the effect of the reduction in the fares is not shown in the 1933 report, the company early this month, in asking permission of the Inter-State Commerce Commission to extend the reduced rates to Dec.31 1934, stated that the results obtained from its reduced passenger fares represent the "first ray of sunshine on the railroad passenger T Volume 138 Financial Chronicle horizon" in a long period. Curtailment of operating expenses was continued throughout the year in line with traffic volume and service requirements. Total operating expenses were $53,705,409, a decrease of $7,159,630, or 11.8%, this decrease being principally in maintenance of equipment of $3,196,435, maintenance of way and structure of $2,178,237,and transportation expenses of$1,143,632. For the third successive year (this also being the third time in the company's entire history) there was an income deficit, amounting to $734,800 for 1933, as compared with deficits of $11,218,507 for 1932 and of $5,922,842 for 1931. Although the company reported, as stated above, that it failed to earn its fixed charges by $734,800, the fact remains, however, that the improvement over 1932 is of huge proportions, as the company in that year failed to earn fixed charges by $11,218,507. That a railroad system so strongly located as the Southern Railway System and 60 superbly administered should have sustained such enormous loss in the brief space of three years bears testimony to the depth of the business depression under which the country has been laboring and of its widespread character. No one can prophesy what the outcome for the current calendar year will be, but at least some favorable features are already noticeable. Passenger revenues for the months of January and February 1934 show increases of 10.75% and 18.55% over the corresponding months of 1933, while freight revenues also show increases for both months. The New York Stock Market LTHOUGH quiet conditions prevailed this week on the New York stock market, the trend of prices was generally 'higher on demand for almost all leading groups of shares. There was much to contend with in the way of sharp recessions in grain prices and threats of unfavorable legislation in Washington, and at times the market proved quite irregular. But such movements usually gave way quickly to a resumption of the advance, which appears to have been based largely on reports of business improvement and the expectation of new gains in trade. At the start of the week, the stock market was unsettled along with other markets, and losses in the more volatile shares exceeded two points in some instances. A firm tendency was established Tuesday, and the movement was extended Wednesday, until profit-taking developed late that day. Net gains were general on Wednesday, however, despite the late liquidation. Nervousness was occasioned. Thursday by developments in the grain markets, but stocks had a good undertone and changes at the end were small. In yesterday's dealings the upward movement was resumed, with some issues in vigorous demand. The turnover exceeded 1,500,000 shares only on Wednesday and yesterday, other sessions being exceedingly dull. Performances in stocks were considered quite cheerful, in view of the severe declines which developed at times in grains and cotton. Opposition by President Roosevelt to inflationary silver legislation produced the unsettlement in commodities, and silver naturally was affected by the incident. In Monday's trading all grains receded to permissible limits, and the downward tendency was continued Tuesday. After an uncertain session Wednesday, in which cotton managed to make a little A 2629 progress, declines again developed on Thursday. The tendency was somewhat better yesterday. Foreign exchange dealings reflected some uncertainty, with the dollar weak at times in relation to sterling and the gold currencies. The unsettlement in the foreign exchanges was attributable to Congressional consideration of measures for paying all sums lost to depositors in closed banks. In the bond market the tone was good at almost all times,and activity was pronounced in all sessions. United States Government securities were the outstanding exception to the general upward trend, these issues receding slightly, because of the large volume of undigested obligations resulting from the successful conversion offering of last week. High grade bonds were well maintained, and good advances were registered in a long list of speculative bonds. A favorable earnings report of the American Telephone & Telegraph Co., for the first quarter of this year, aided the markets for stocks and bonds. Significant of the industrial trend was an advance in steel operations to 50.3% of capacity for the week beginning April 16, the report of the American Iron and Steel Institute for last week showing a rate of 47.4%. Production of electric power in the entire country for the week ended April 14 was 1,642,187,000 kilowatt hours, according to the Edison Electric Institute, the figure for the preceding week (April 7) having been 1,616,945,000 kilowatt hours. Carloadings of revenue freight likewise reflected a favorable trend, the American Railway Association reporting loadings for the week ended April 14 of 578,837 cars, as compared with 557,887 cars, or an increase of 3.8% over the preceding week. Dividend declarations the present week were again few in number and were mostly of a favorable nature. Among the more prominent ones may be mentioned the Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co., which on April 13 increased the dividend on its no par common stock from 25c. a share to 50c. a share, payable May 15; however, on Feb. 15 last a quarterly dividend of 25c. a share and an extra dividend of like amount was paid on this issue. Harbison-Walker Refractories Co. on April 16 resumed the dividend on its no par common stock by the declaration of 25c. a share, being payable June 1. This is the first distribution to be made on the above issue since March 1 1932, when 12/ 1 2c. a share was paid. As indicating the course of the commodity markets, the May option for wheat in Chicago closed yesterday at 753 / 4c. as against 851/ 4c. the close on Friday of last week. May corn at Chicago closed 4c. as against 47%c. the close on yesterday at 441/ Friday of last week. May oats at Chicago closed yesterday at 2734c. as against 30%c. the close on Friday of last week. The spot price for cotton here in New York closed yesterday at 11.80c. as against 12.05c. the close on Friday of last week. The spot price for rubber yesterday was 12.37c. as against 12.08c. on Friday of last week. Domestic copper was quoted yesterday at 8/ 1 2c., the same as on Friday of last week. Silver displayed a weaker tone, due in part to the President's opposition to inflationary silver legislation, and prices closed lower for the week. In London the price yesterday was 197 /8 pence per ounce as against 20 3/16 pence per ounce on Friday of last week, and the New York quotation yesterday was 45.70c. as against 44.60c. on Friday of last week. In the matter of the foreign exchanges, 2630 Financial Chronicle cable transfers on London .yesterday closed at $5.173 / 4 as against $5.153 / 8 the close on Friday of last week, while cable transfers on Paris closed yesterday at 6.6634c. as against 6.60c. the close on Friday of last week. On the New York Stock Exchange 222 stocks reached new high figures for the year, while seven stocks touched new low levels. On the New York Curb Exchange 116 stocks reached new high levels for the year, while 16 stocks touched new low points. Call loans on the New York Stock Exchange again remained unchanged at 1%. On the New York Stock Exchange the sales at the half-day session on Saturday last were 501,160 shares; on Monday they were 1,290,650 shares; on Tuesday, 944,275 shares; on Wednesday, 1,540,350 shares; on Thursday, 1,325,000 shares, and on Friday, 1,887,380 shares. On the New York Curb Exchange the sales last Saturday were 152,915 shares; on Monday, 262,305 shares; on Tuesday, 245,455 shares; on Wednesday,360,625 shares; on Thursday, 355,030 shares, and on Friday, 346,106 shares. As compared with Friday of last week, prices in the main tended toward higher levels. General Electric closed yesterday at 23% against 22/ 1 2on Friday of last week; North American at 20 against 191/ 4; 8 against 13; ConsoliStandard Gas & Elec. at 131/ dated Gas of N. Y. at 39 against 38; Pacific Gas & Elec. at 197 / 8 against 19%; Columbia Gas & Elec. at / 8; Electric Power & Light at 7% 16% against 155 against 71/ 8; Public Service of N. J. at 39% against 38; J.I. Case Threshing Machine at 71 against 71%; / 4 against 423 International Harvester at 421 / 8; Sears, Roebuck & Co. at 50% against 49%; Montgomery / 8; Coca-Cola "A" at Ward & Co. at 31/ 1 2 against 315 53/ 1 2 bid against 53; Woolworth at 54% ex-div. against 52%; Western Union Telegraph at 56 2 against 54½; against 56½; Safeway Stores at 561/ American Tel. & Tel. at 123/ 1 2 against 1201/ 8; Amer1 2against 104; Commercial Solvents ican Can at 104/ at 29 against 29%; Shattuck & Co. at 11/ 1 2 against 12, and Corn Products at 767 / 8 against 773 / 4. Allied Chemical & Dye closed yesterday at 152 1 2 on Friday of last week; Associated against 150/ 1 2 against 173 Dry Goods at 17/ / 8; E. I. du Pont de 1 2against 97; National Cash Register Nemours at 98/ "A" at 20 against 19/ 1 4;International Nickel at 27% against 27%; Timken Roller Bearing at 35/ 1 2against 4 against 58%; Gillette 35; Johns-Manville at 571/ 1 4 against 10%; National Dairy Safety Razor at 12/ Products at 17/ 1 2 against 16; Texas Gulf Sulphur at 37/ 1 4 against 37; Freeport-Texas at 457 /8 against 5 / s ; United Gas Improvement at 161/ 2 against 101/ 45 4; 8; Continental / 4 against 441/ National Biscuit at 441 Can at 83 against 82; Eastman Kodak at 95% 1 4; against 91; Gold Dust Corp. at 22% against 21/ 8 against 2134; Paramount Standard Brands at 221/ 1 4 against 5½; Westinghouse Publix Corp. ctfs. at 5/ Elec.& Mfg. at 41% against 38%; Columbian Carbon 2; Reynolds Tobacco class B at at 73% against 691/ / 2 against 17%; / 8; Lorillard at 181 44% against 427 Liggett & Myers class B at 96 against 92%; Yellow 8 against 5%; Owens Glass at / Truck & Coach at 57 2; United States Industrial Alcohol 88% against 881/ 1 2; Canada Dry at 28 against 26%; at 54 against 53/ 4 against 30%; Crown National Distillers at 303 1 2, and Mengel & Co. Cork & Seal at 33 against 30/ 4. 8 against 91/ at 97 / The steel shares for the most part show slight fractional gains for the week. United States Steel 4 against 52 on Friday of closed yesterday at 521/ April 21 1934 last week; United States Steel pref. at 96 against 8 against 42/ 78, and 967 / 8; Bethlehem Steel at 431/ Vanadium at 273 / 8 against 27. In the motor group, with a few exceptions, prices continue to show declines for the week. Auburn Auto closed yesterday at 43/ 1 4 against 51% on Friday of last week; General 2; Nash Motors at 24/ 1 2 Motors at 39/ 1 4 against 381/ 8 against 537 against 24½; Chrysler at 541/ /8;Packard 1 2; Hupp Motors at 51/ 8 Motors at 5% against 5/ / 8 against against 5/ 1 2, and Hudson Motor Car at 203 20%. In the rubber group, Goodyear Tire & Rubber 1 4 against 36/ 1 2 on Friday of closed yesterday at 37/ 1 2against 16/ 1 2, and last week; B. F. Goodrich at 17/ 1 2 against 20/ 1 2. United States Rubber at 23/ In the railroad list prices closed higher than a week ago. Pennsylvania RR. closed yesterday at 36 8 on Friday of last week; Atchison Toagainst 351/ peka & Santa Fe at 71% against 68%; Atlantic Coast Line at 50 against 471/s bid; New York Central 1 4 against 8 against 36; Baltimore & Ohio at 30/ at 357 / /8; Union Pa29%; New Haven at 19% against 187 1 2 against 130%; Missouri Pacific at 5 cific at 133/ against 47 /8 bid; Southern Pacific at 28% against 281%; Missouri-Kansas-Texas at 12% against 11%; 1 4 against 32½; Chesapeake Southern Railway at 34/ / 8 against 47; Northern Pacific at 361/8 & Ohio at 477 against 33%; Chicago Rock Island & Pacific at 4% against 4/ 1 2 bid, and Great Northern at 30% / 8. against 287 The oil stocks closed fractionally lower for the week. Standard Oil of N. J. dosed yesterday at 46 against 45% on Friday of last week; Standard Oil 1 4 against 37%, and Atlantic Refining of Calif. at 37/ at 29/ 1 2against 29%. In the copper group, Anaconda 8 against 163 4 on Copper closed yesterday at 171/ Friday of last week; Kennecott Copper at 22 against 211/2; American Smelting & Refining at 4334 against 4 against 17½; Cerro de 45;Phelps Dodge at 173 Pasco Copper at 3634 against 37, and Calumet & Hecla at 5% against 5%. European" Stock'Markets DRICES were irregular and dealings quiet in most sessions of the current week on stock exchanges in the leading European financial centers. There was a flurry on the London Stock Exchange after the budget speech by Chancellor of the Exchequer Neville Chamberlain, as the income tax reduction announced by the Chancellor created a very favorable impression. But the higher prices established in the early trading of Wednesday occasioned profit-taking In the London market, and the desultory tone soon was resumed. The Paris Bourse was generally firm with rentes in keen demand at times, but on the Berlin Boerse the dominant tendency was downward. In London and Paris satisfaction was taken in the increased gold reserves of the respective central banks,but the German position shows no considerable improvement. The whole question of international currency matters remains unsettled, and concern regarding future developments is ever present to some degree on the European markets. Trade indices, on the other hand, remain favorable in a number of important countries. The foreign trade returns of Great Britain for March, published by the Board of Trade, reflected an unusually large increase in British exports for that month. Imports also advanced. German foreign trade statistics for March showed that the Reich again is exporting more than is imported, but the export surplus of 3,000,000 marks Volume 138 Financial Chronicle achieved for the month compares rather poorly with the favorable balance of 64,000,000 marks in the same month of last year. The London Stock Exchange was dull in the opening session of the week, as the impending budget presentation acted as a brake on dealings. As usual on such occasions, there was no tendency to increase commitments. British funds were slightly lower, while home rail stocks improved. Most of the leading industrial stocks were soft, and international securities also drifted lower. Formal dealings Tuesday were much of the same nature, but British funds tended to improve a bit. British industrial issues and international securities again sought lower levels. The budget speech was made late Tuesday, and a "street" market developed thereafter in which many issues were bid up substantially. Trading on the Stock Exchange was active on Wednesday morning, with British funds materially improved. Motor stocks were the feature of the industrial section, owing to the decline of the registration tax, but most other issues also showed gains. Home rail stocks were improved at first, but unfavorable traffic returns occasioned recessions in later dealings. International securities improved on good overnight reports from New York. The tone Thursday was generally cheerful, although British funds weakened after a firm start. Home industrial stocks showed gains, and renewed interest was taken in some of the African gold mining stocks. The international section continued to improve. The tone yesterday was uncertain and recessions appeared in all 'groups. British funds dipped slightly, while other issues showed larger declines. On the French Bourse a sharp rally marked the initial dealings Monday, with attention centered on rentes. This was due to the week-end announcement by the French Government of new reductions in salaries of civil employees and curtailed payments to war veterans. French railroad securities also improved sharply, while other securities were mildly better. The tone on Tuesday was again satisfactory, but profit-taking developed and prevented prices from rising to any great degree. Some issues of rentes again closed with net gains, while French bank and industrial stocks held their gains of the previous day. The upswing in rentes was resumed on Wednesday, but some of the speculative stocks suffered as holders liquidated with the intention of buying the Government issues. Bank and railroad issues were well maintained, but such securities as Suez Canal shares receded sharply. The advance broadened in Thursday's session on the Bourse, indicating a speedy return of financial confidence owing to the budgetary action by the Doumergue regime. Rentes remained in greatest demand, but French equities also were bought liberally and sizable gains in quotations were recorded. International stocks listed on the Bourse tended to recede. Rentes again advanced in yesterday's dealings, and small gains also were recorded in other issues. The Berlin Boerse started the week with a dull session, in which declines predominated. Shares of leading industrial units were off a point or two, while bonds also displayed a weak tone. Trading was listless on Tuesday, and the tendency was again toward lower levels. The Reichsbank statement showed a further loss of gold and foreign exchange reserves, and reduction of the note coverage to 6.8% was not comforting. Recessions in quotations for leading stocks 2631 were very small, however, and a few issues managed to reflect small gains. A sharper decline developed on the Boerse in Wednesday's dealings, with some stocks showing losses up to 5 points. Issues of the heavy industrial concerns were hard hit, and bonds also were weak. Nervousness regarding the impending debt conference was said to be one of the chief factors in the recession. A rally finally developed on the German exchange on Thursday, but it was not of a pronounced order. Small advances were recorded in most of the heavy industrial stock, while electrical issues and specialties were in great demand. The gains did not extend to bonds,these securities remaining listless. Stocks again tended to advance in a quiet session on the Boerse yesterday, but gains were small. Disarmament Problem UROPEAN differences on armaments matters E again reached an acute stage this week, and all informed observers now concede readily that the aim of actual reduction of armaments must be given up as a hopelessly lost cause. A Government "White Paper" was published in London Wednesday, which contained notes received in preceding days from the French and German Governments, as well as the views of Premier Mussolini of Italy, as expressed to Captain Anthony Eden, Lord Privy Seal in the British Cabinet. These documents furnish conclusive proof, if further proof were needed, that the current conversations on armaments among the great Powers of Europe are nothing more than moves in the old diplomatic game of affiances and counteralliances. The whole discussion is based not upon disarmament, but upon rearmament for Germany and security-guarantees (alliances) for France. The pious utterances about disarmament sound rather hollow in view of the actual course and intent of these exchanges, but the diplomatic moves have at least the redeeming feature of being carried on in the open, whereas before the World War such arrangements usually were secret. The sessions of the General Disarmament Conference next month can hardly be expected to accomplish very much in view of the current situation. That Conference has been a wearying and completely fruitless affair throughout the 27 months that it has been in progress. Unquestionably the most important document disclosed at London on Wednesday was a French reply to the British query as to the nature of the guarantees desired by France, and the further query as to whether the British draft disarmament convention would be acceptable as a basis of discussion if such guarantees were forthcoming. Neither question was answered directly by the French Government's note, which was received in London early Wednesday. Pointing to the recent German budget, which showed increases of 352,000,000 marks for the various military services, the French note holds that Germany is rearming in clear defiance of the Versailles Treaty. Such figures prove, it is asserted, that the German Government, "whether of set purpose or not, has made impossible negotiations, the basis of which it has by its own act destroyed." The old insistence upon security is reiterated by France—"security which, moreover, she does not separate from that of other interested Powers." The French view that the discussions should be continued at Geneva was detailed in such fashion as to leave no doubt that France considers the private exchanges between the 2632 Financial Chronicle Powers at an end. Another bid for British support is contained in the concluding statement that "the French Government does not doubt that it will retain at the forthcoming session the co-operation of the British Government in the task of consolidating peace by guarantees which general security demands." A German statement in the White Paper leaves no doubt of the desire of the Berlin Government for an extensive measure of rearmament. A willingness was expressed by.the Nazi Government to accept the British arms memorandum of Jan. 29 as the basis for discussion, "subject to a certain important modification." The modification consists of a demand for earlier rearmament in the air than would be permitted under the British plan. A system of adjustments should be instituted after five years, so that at the end of ten years Germany would attain full air equality with other Powers, the German'statement contended. The Nazi Storm Troops and other special forms of semi-military organizations could be placed on a non-military basis, it was admitted, but only reciprocally. But German return to the League of Nations can only be dealt with after disarmament matters, and above all, the question of equality of rights, are settled. The White Paper also republished a statement by the Reich on the German budget for military requirements, which was first made available on Monday. This was in answer to the British inquiry as to the precise purpose of the increases in expenditures. The increased allocation of funds to the army was due to the anticipated conversion of the Reichswehr (the regular army)into a shortservice army, it was explained. Larger naval expenditures were required for renovation of old units, while increased air expenditures should be considered not as an armaments matter, but as preparation for the development of commercial aviation. The summary of the Italian Government's views, prepared by Captain Anthony Eden, is little more than a restatement of many previous declarations by Premier Mussolini. Under present conditions the Italian Government is very doubtful of the possibility of inducing the armed Powers to disann. Accordingly, it was again suggested that Germany be given the right to partial rearmament, while other Powers are limited to their present forces. A force of 300,000 men for the Reich, reformation of the League of Nations and other changes are included in the Italian plan. After publication of these documents, there was some anxiety in London. An Associated Press report on Thursday states that Europe is on the verge of an unrestrained armaments race. Official circles in the British capital were divided in their opinions of the course of events. In some quarters it was maintained that the Italian plan now offers the only hope for some form of limitation, while others appeared to believe that British sentiment will favor alignment with France and a system of guarantees that would amount to a renewal of the defensive alliance. French circles admit candidly, Paris reports indicate, that their aim is an alliance with Great Britain. "The Cabinet, united in its flat decision to stand pat against Germany's rearmament demands, decided the next move for limitation of arms must .come either from that nation or from England," an Associated Press dispatch from Paris said. Early in the week it was reported at Geneva that the European countries which remained neutral April 21 1934 in the World War now are tending to view with some favor the French thesis of security by guarantees. German Transfer Conference ISCUSSIONS are to begin April 27, at the Reichsbank, in Berlin, on the problem of transferring sums abroad to meet interest payments in foreign currencies on the external long- and mediumterm debts of German municipalities, corporations and banks. Official invitations to creditors' representatives in the United States, England, Holland, Switzerland and Swedan were issued by Dr. Hjalmar Schacht, President of the Reichsbank, last Saturday. The conference promises to be long and difficult, and it is quite possible that disagreement among the representatives of the various creditor countries will again result, as it did on previous occasions, in the announcement of transfer terms by Dr. Schacht that he considers suitable in view of all the conditions and the expressed opinions. A preliminary conference of creditors' representatives was held in Basle, Switzerland, early this month, with the aim of achieving a common front at the Berlin meeting, but it is no secret that the aim was not realized. The German situation, moreover, has become steadily more precarious, with gold and foreign exchange holdings of the Reichsbank furnishing only a slim backing for note liabilities. In this situation it is already quite clear that there is little hope of more than a further temporary arrangement to meet the exigency, although the prospective conference was originally planned for the purpose of placing German external debt service on a "contractual basis." The many differences revealed in the Basle discussion have occasioned the suggestion for appointment of a neutral chairman at the forthcoming Berlin meeting, a dispatch to the New York "Times" remarks. Leon Fraser, President of the Bank for International Settlements, has been suggested for this office, it is added. The German viewpoint at the conference is already well known, as Dr. Schacht has taken occasion to emphasize the difficulties of his country. He declared at Basle that a complete transfer moratorium seems unavoidable under the circumstances. "In announcing the date of the new conference, Reichsbank authorities took the opportunity to reiterate their viewpoint on the transfer question, as submitted by Dr. Schacht," a Berlin report to the New York "Herald Tribune" said. It is thought in Reichsbank circles, the dispatch adds, that the Basle conversations have given international banking authorities a better understanding of the German position. In a Berlin report of Monday, to the United Press, it was suggested that Dr. Schacht may offer as an alternative to complete default a plan for stimulating German exports and using part of the increased foreign exchange thus made available to meet interest payments in other currencies. The remainder of the funds made available in this fashion, it is indicated, might be used for purchases of raw materials by Germany in other countries. The Ministry of Economics, in Berlin, announced on Wednesday a new series of foreign exchange regulations, applicable only to German nationals, and designed to increase the supply of foreign currencies at the Reichsbank. British Budget HANCELLOR of the Exchequer Neville Chamberlain presented before the. British House of Commons Tuesday the budget of the National Gov- D C Volume 138 Financial Chronicle ernment for the fiscal year which began April 1. The statement by the Chancellor reflects the first move by any great Government, during the present depression, toward lowering the heavy tax burdens that are now universal, and in this respect it sets an admirable example. Tax levies were reduced in a number of important directions, and in addition Mr. Chamberlain was able to announce restoration in part of the salary cuts and all unemployment relief payment reductions effected in recent years. Measures adopted by the Chancellor were much in accordance with the expectations aroused by the substantial budgetary surplus of the British fiscal year ended March 31. As in former years, no provision was made for any payment on debt account to the United States Government, although large sums are due to be paid in June and December under the debt agreement. "Neither last year nor the year before did I make any provision for the payment of the war debts to America, nor for the receipt of war debts or reparations by ourselves," the Chancellor explained. "In the absence of any fresh development, I propose to follow precisely the same course this year." In view of this declaration, it is generally assumed that the British Government will again make small token payments this year in acknowledgment of the debts. Details of the British budget will be found in our department "Current Events and Discussions." Governmental Retrenchments UMMARY action was taken in France and Italy this week toward balancing the national budgets of those countries, while Soviet Russia also found it advisable to curtail expenditures in some directions. The French Government promulgated a series of decrees, Monday, reducing soldiers' pensions and benefits by 1,200,000,000 francs a year, and effecting other reductions of 2,800,000,000 francs in the annual budget. Finance Minister GermainMartin issued the usual statement,in connection with these decrees, that they would "assure a true balance of the budget and guarantee the stability of the franc." Some objections to pay cuts have been made by civil servants, but so far they have not been serious. The Italian Government announced measures, also effective Monday, which are expected to go far toward eliminating the deficit of 3,000,000,000 to 4,000,000,000 lire in the budget of that country. Salaries of State employees receiving more than 500 lire a month were reduced on a sliding scale of 20% for highest paid officials to 6% on salaries down to 500 lire monthly. Compensating in part are enforced reductions in house rents in Italy, while a number of measures for increasing revenues also were enacted. The Soviet Government has formulated a sweeping economy program calling for reductions of 753,000,000 rubles in administrative expenses, the money thus saved to be utilized in actual construction. S Haitian Financial Control r a conference in Washington, Tuesday, between President Roosevelt and President Stenio Vincent, considerable progress was made toward that final relinquishment of American control of Haitian finances which both Governments desire. This problem has been discussed on a number of occasions, and it was made plain after conferences last year that the United States Government would terminate its A 2633 control with alacrity if a way could be found to protect the holders of Haitian bonds sold in this country on the understanding that the control would continue. President Vincent went to Washington early last week to renew the talks on this matter, and after protracted conferences with State Department officials a meeting between the two Presidents was arranged. The prospects are, a dispatch to the New York Times said, that the fiscal control exercised by the State Department will be ended before the last United States marines are withdrawn next October. In a joint statement issued by the two Presidents after the meeting,it was indicated that Mr. Roosevelt intends to request authority from Congress to make a gift to Haiti of some of the Marine Corps material which the Haitian Government feels would be useful to it. "We are both inclined to the belief," it was added, "that the policy of the good neighbor w'lich the Government of the United States is endeavoring to apply in its relations with the other American republics will be signally manifested in the results which will be obtained from this exchange of views and from negotiations which are now taking place with a view to a practical application of the decisions reached in principle during our present conversations." The discussion, it was stated officially, related to "the possibility of a commercial agreement which would increase the flow of goods between the two countries," while there was also discussed "a new form of financial administration which is satisfactory to our two Governments and which should be equally satisfactory to the holders of the bonds of the 1922 loan." Washington dispatches indicated that the basis of the discussion regarding the bonds was the Leger plan, which provides for the exercise by the National Bank of Haiti of the supervisory functions now exercised by the American fiscal representative. The National Bank of Haiti is controlled by the National City Bank of New York, and it was reported in Washington that sale of the institution to the Haitian Government is under consideration. Japanese Policy HERE were some indications this week that Japanese policy on the Asiatic mainland will be devoted rather toward further encroachments on Chinese territory than to conquest of the Maritime Province of Siberia. Concentrations of Japanese troops in Manchuria and railway extensions in the Japanese puppet-State of Manchukuo gave the impression that the Tokio militarists were preparing for ventures against the Soviets, and the Moscow Government made no secret of its apprehensions. But the war between Japan and Russia so widely predicted for this Spring did not eventuate. Quite possibly the answer to the puzzle of Japanese intentions thus posed is to be found in an astonishing statement issued to the press by the Foreign Office in Tokio, Wednesday. Japan, it was indicated, would act "positively," if necessary, in the application of her restated China policy of responsibility for peace in the Far East. The Foreign Office spokesman was reported in an Associated Press dispatch as saying that if foreign efforts to "disturb peace in Asia" were backed forcefully, then "Japan herself may be compelled to resort to force." The Tokio Government will determine, it was added, whether foreign attempts to aid China imperilled peace and order in the Far East. Foreign nations were urged to realize "that technical or T 2634 Financial Chronicle financial assistance to China must attain political significance." Specifically, the statement indicated, Japan will oppose such projects as the supplying of China with warplanes, building of airdromes and detailing military instructors or advisers to China, or contracting a loan to provide funds for political purposes. No official comments on the Japanese declaration were available in Washington or London, but it was indicated unofficially that the tendency is considered in a very grave light in both capitals. Chinese authorities in Geneva declared last week that Japan plans to extend its conquest of Northern China and consolidate Peiping and the surrounding area with the new country of Manchukuo.‘ Wheat Conference XPERTS from 15 countries concluded at Rome, Tuesday, their protracted discussions on the world wheat problem, and while the results are not conclusive, they do permit of some mild hopes for solution of the wheat surplus question in further conferences. The conferees drew up a series of recommendations to interested Governments and also adopted a number of reports on specific aspects of this matter. Foremost among the achievements is a recommendation to the Governments regarding export prices of wheat. "This recommendation," an official announcement said last Saturday,"is regarded as supplementary to the provisions of the London international wheat agreement, and not as lessening in any degree the necessity for full observance of both the letter and spirit of that agreement, with particular reference to the adjustment of production. In framing the recommendation, the Committee kept in mind the desirability of avoiding, as far as possible, interference with the machinery and practice of world trade in wheat." Although the text of the recommendation was not disclosed, it was made known that the 15 Governments are urged to act promptly and place the price system in force before May 4, when the wheat problem again will be considered in a further conference in London. Four men, with wide powers, would be designated under the proposed agreement to sit in London and control world movements of wheat. Quotas would be fixed by these men, and prices raised or lowered in the various countries, so far as exports are concerned, according to quota shipments. Sales above or below the quotas would govern the increase or reduction of prices. The experts in Rome also busied themselves with the drafting of a report setting forth in general terms desirability of denaturing low grades of wheat to render them unfit for human consumption, a dispatch to the Associated Press states. It was contended that the denaturing of such wheat would increase the prices of higher grades, since the poorer wheat now competes with the better product and lowers its price. A report also was prepared on a French proposal that wheat-exporting countries grant tariff concessions on other products to importing countries in exchange for guarantees that the importing States will curtail production. The final session of the conference on Tuesday was devoted largely to a consideration of various proposals for curtailment of production, submitted by an American delegate, Frederick E. Murphy,of Minneapolis. Reduction of wheat acreage is a fundamental requirement of any plan for regulating wheat prices and eliminating surpluses, Mr. Murphy contended. Three plans were submitted, providing respectively for reductions of 14%, 25% E April 21 1934 and 35% of the 1933 plantings in the United States, Canada, Argentina, Australia and the Danubian countries. The experts praised this address, with the exception of the Australian delegate, who was frank enough to admit that his country would find it most difficult to curtail the wheat acreage. Washington reports have made it clear this week, moreover, that new difficulties will be encountered at further conferences on the wheat problem. The United States probably will request a considerable increase in its wheat export quota over the figures arranged at the London conference last year, it is indicated. This can hardly be regarded as a promising development when it is remembered that Russia refused to accept any limitation, while Argentina and Australia joined in the plan only with extreme reluctance. Discount Rates of Foreign Central Banks HERE have been no changes the present week in the discount rates of any of the foreign central banks. Present rates at the leading centers are shown in the table which follows: T DISCOUNT RATES OF FOREIGN CENTRAL BANKS. Country. Austria__ Belgium. ._ Bulgaria__ Chile Colombia__ Czechoslovakia____ Danzig_ _ _ _ Denmark _ _ England... Estonia__ Finland__ France _ _ _ _ Germany - Greece Holland _ _ _ Rate in Effect Dale Apr.20 Established. Prepious Rate. 5 334 7 434 4 mac.23 1933 Jan. 13 1932 Jan. 3 1934 Aug. 23 1932 July 18 1933 6 234 8 534 5 314 4 234 2 534 434 3 4 7 214 Jan. 25 1933 July 12 1932 Nov. 29 1933 June 30 1932 Jan. 29 1932 Dec. 20 1933 Feb. 8 1934 Sept.30 1932 Oct. 13 1933 Sent. 18 1933 AX 5 3 254 614 5 234 5 734 3 Counts'y. Rate in Date Effect Apr.20 Established. P. oious Rate. Hungary— AII Oct. 17 1932 5 India 334 Feb. 18 1933 4 Ireland__ _ _ 3 June 30 1932 334 3 Dec. 11 1933 334 Italy 365 July 3 1933 4.38 Japan Java 434 Aug. 16 1933 5 Lithuania 6 Jan. 2 1934 7 Norway.- - 334 May 23 1933 4 Poland_ _ _ .. 5 Oct. 25 1933 8 Portugal— 554 Dec. 8 1933 6 Rumania _ 8 Apr. 7 1933 6 South Africa 4 Feb. 21 1933 7 Spain 6 Oct. 22 1932 534 Sweden.... 234 Dec. 1 1933 8 Switzer and 2 Jan. 22 1931 yi Foreign Money Rates In London open market discounts for short bills on Friday were y@15-16%, as against %@15-16% on Friday of last week and 15-16@1% for three months' bills, as against 15-16@1% on Friday of last week. Money on call in London yesterday was %%. At Paris the open market rate remains at 23.17 0 and in Switzerland at 13/2%. Bank of England Statement HE Bank of England statement for the week ended April 18 shows a loss of £85,132 in bullion, bringing the total down to £192,076,257, as compared with £184,834,947 a year ago. As this was attended by a contraction of £3,253,000 in circulation, reserves rose £3,168,000. Public deposits decreased £1,473,000 while other deposits rose £1,326,690. The latter consists of bankers' accounts, which decreased £473,452, and other accounts, which increased £1,800,142. The proportion of reserve to liabilities moved up to 49.92% from 47.86% a week ago; last year the ratio was 45.83%. Loans on Government securities fell off £4,505,000 while those on other securities expanded £1,197,584. Other securities include discounts and advances, which decreased £58,473, and securities, which rose £1,256,057. The discount rate remains unchanged at 2%. Below we furnish a comparison of the various items for five years: T BANK OF ENGLAND'S COMPARATIVE STATEMENT. Apr. 18 1934. API. 19 1933. Apr.20 1932. Apr. 22 1931. P. Ayr.23 1930. £ £ £ £ E 373,993,000 376,122.995 854,271,157 348,444,248 382,184,405 Circulation 14,382,000 9.912,351 9,149,015 13,864,073 17.313.565 Public deposits 142,197,025 139,989,389 107,424,864 90,187,815 101,789,944 Other deposits Bankers'accounts_ 103,388,348 103,975,618 72,839,657 54,784,701 68,010,758 Other accounts.... 38,808,877 36,013,751 34,585,207 35.403,114 35,779,188 79,498,738 75,201,127 57,605,906 30,949,684 58,052,629 Govt.securities Other securities 16,570,564 23,661.762 34,480,345 32,481,730 17.078,488 Dint, ez advances. 5,375.078 11,829,557 11,197,845 5,981.876 6,804,492 11,195,486 11,832,205 23,282,500 28,499.854 10,273,978 Securities Reserve notes dr coin 78,182,000 68,711,952 42,158,359 58,295,468 61,658,812 Coin and bullion 192,076,257 184,834,947 121,429,516 146,739,714 183,843,217 Proportion of reserve 49.92% 45.83% to liabilities 36.16% 56.02% 51.76% 2.7, 2% Bank rate 3V. 3t 31.011 Financial Chronicle Volume 138 • Bank of France Statement The Bank of France statement for the week ended April 13 shows another increase in gold holdings, the current advance being 171,250,735 francs. The Bank's gold now aggregates 74,978,196,828 francs, as compared with 81,079,982,799 francs a year ago and 77,065,006,078 francs two years ago. Credit balances abroad and advances against securities record decreases of 1,000,000 francs and 9,000,000 francs, while French commercial bills discounted and creditor current accounts register increases of 33,000,000 francs and 730,000,000 francs, respectively. Notes in circulation reveal a contraction of 680,000,000 francs, bringing the total of notes outstanding down to 81,630,379,585 francs. Circulation last year aggregated 84,622,573,835 francs and the year previous 81,827,133,740 francs. The proportion of gold on hand to sight liabilities now stands at 77.53% as against 77.57% a year ago. Below we furnish a comparison of the different items for three years: BANK OF FRANCE'S COMPARATIVE STATEMENT. Changes for Week. Apr. 13 1934. Apr. 141933. Apr. 151932. Francs. Francs. Francs. Francs. +171,250,735 74,978,196,828 81,079,982,799 77.065,206,078 13,261,148 2,354,492,753 4,408,306.561 —1,000,000 Gold holdings Credit bals. abroada French commercial bills discounted.+33.000,000 5,314,319,125 3.513,631,190 3,693,232.435 b Bills bought abr'd No change. 1.056,678,350 1,528,392,409 8,143,741,626 Advs.against secure —9,000,000 3,060,479,876 2,684,562,872 2,808.121.203 Note circulation- —680,000,000 81,630.379,585 84,622,573,835 81,827,133,740 Credit. curr. acc'ts. +730,000.000 15,081,670,974 19,908,884,984 27,802,944,355 Propor'n of gold on hand to sight liab_ 70.30% 77.57% 77.53% +0.14% a Includes bills purchased In France. b Includes bills discounted abroad. Bank of Germany Statement The Reichsbank's statement for the second quarter of April shows a decline in gold and bullion of 4,308,000 marks. The total of gold is now 226,390,000 marks, which compares with 421,363,000 marks a year ago and 859,786,000 marks two years ago. Decreases appear in reserve in foreign currency of 4,255,000 marks, in bills of exchange and checks of 68,449,000 marks,in advances of 7,810,000 marks,in investments of 20,429,000 marks, in other assets of 20,429,000 marks, in other daily maturing obligations of 42,020,000 marks and in other liabilities of 8,750,000 marks. Silver and other coin and notes on other German banks register increases of 25,036,000 marks and 3,081,000 marks, respectively. The proportion of gold and foreign currency to note circulation now stands at 6.8%, as compared with 15.5% a year ago. Notes in circulation reveal a loss of 46,368,000 marks, bringing the total of the item down to 3,428,671,000 marks. Circulation a year ago stood at 3,422,534,000 marks and the year before at 4,000,354,000 marks. A comparison of the various items for three years appears below: 2635 excess reserves of member banks approximately $1,600,000,000, acceptable bank paper was in keenest possible demand. The American Acceptance Council recognized the situation in the bankers' bill market by announcing, Thursday, a general reduction of yield rates on these instruments. The market for such obligations lacked uniformity previously, owing to the tendency of some dealers to quote lower rates than the official ones on best names and slightly higher rates on others. This tendency was still in existence after official rates were reduced, but was less pronounced. The new rates are: I/4% bid and 3/16% asked for bills due up to 90 days; / 40 / %% bid and 1 0 asked for bills due from 91 to 120 days, and / / 8% asked for bills 1 270 bid and 3 due from 121 to 180 days. Rates now established are record low figures. Two series of Treasury discount bills were awarded Monday. One series of $75,000,000, due in 91 days, went at an average discount of 0.08%, while $50,000,000 bills due in 182 days went at an average of 0.19%. Call loans on the New York Stock Exchange remained unchanged at 1%, both renewals and new loans being arranged at that rate. In the unofficial street market funds were reported available every day at 3 / 4%. Time loans held at their former range of 3 / 4@1% for all maturities. Brokers' loans against stock and bond collateral declined $9,000,000 in the week to Wednesday night, according to the report of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The loan total of this compilation is now $993,000,000. New York Money Rates EALING in detail with call loan rates on the Stock Exchange from day to day,1% remained the ruling quotation all through the week for both new loans and renewals. The market for time money has been at a standstill this week, as no transactions have been reported. Rates are nominal at 3 / 4@l% for two to five months, and 1@11/ 4% for six months. The market for commercial paper has been unusually active this week, and as there has been a plentiful supply of paper on hand dealers have been exceedingly busy. Rates are 1% for extra choice names running from four to six months and 11/ 4% for names less known. D Bankers' Acceptances HE demand for prime bankers' acceptances has been fairly good this week, and the supply of bills has shown improvement. Rates were reduced on Thursday 1/ 8% in the bid column and 1/16% in the asked column for bills running from 30 to 90 days, y8% in both the bide and asked columns for REICRSBANK'S COMPARATIVE STATEMENT. 120-day bills, and 3/ 4% in the bid and asked columns Apr. 15 Apr. 14 Apr, 15 Changes 1933. 1934. for bills running from 150 to 180 days. The 1/ 1932. for Week. 4% bid Assets— Reichsmark.. Retchsmarks. Reichsmark,. Reichsmark.. and 3/16% quotations asked on rates are the lowest Gold and bullion —4,308,000 226.390,000 421,363,000 859,786,000 Of which depos. abr'd No change. 18,548,000 71.557.000 73.489.000 record. Quotations American of Acceptance the Ree've in for. currency5,707.000 108,369,000 128,006,000 —4,255,000 BWis of exch. de checks. _ —68.449.000 2,913,248,000 3,028.291,000 3,025,909,000 Council for bills up to and including 90 days are Silver and other coin__ +25,036,000 254,274,000 205.649.000 221.178,000 Notes on oth. Ger. bks_ 9,855.000 12,120,000 8,854,000 +3,081,000 I/ 4% bid and 3/16% asked; for four months, 3 / 8% Advances 72,112,000 63,002,000 7.810,000 99,135,000 Investments —20,004.000 669,378.000 318,503,000 361,561,000 bid and 11/ 47 0 asked; for five and six months, 1/2% bid Other assets —20,429,000 514,648,000 399,297,000 929,168,000 Ltablitties— and 3 / 8% asked. The bill buying rate of the New Notes in circulation —46,368,000 3,428,671,000 3,422,534,000 4,000,354,000 0th.daily matur.oblig. —42.020,000 460,042,000 359.986,000 384,448,000 York Reserve Bank is y2% for bills running from Other liabilities —8,750,000 147,263,000 157.768,000 681,369,000 Proper.of gold and torn one to 90 days, and proportionately higher for longer curr. to note ciroula'n 6.8% -o le. 15.5% 24.7% maturities. The Federal Reserve banks' holdings of The New York Money Market acceptances fell during the week from $17,059,000 to EAVY downward pressure upon the rate struc- $13,499,000. Their holdings of acceptances for forture in the New York money market remained eign correspondents, however, remain unchanged at the chief characteristic of dealings this week. With $4,669,000. Open market rates for acceptances are H T . Financial Chronicle 2636 nominal in so far as the dealers are concerned, as they continue to fix their own rates. The nominal rates for acceptances are as follows: SPOT DELIVERY. -180 Days- -150 Days- -120 Days Asked. Bid. Asked. Bid. Asked. Bid. Prime eligible bills 34 34 X 34 34 34 - -30 Days -90 Days- -80 Days Asked. Asked. Bid. Bid. Asked. Bid. Prime eligible bills *II 118 Ii 3 35' FOR DELIVERY WITHIN THIRTY DAYS. 34% bid Eligible member banks % bid Eligible non-member banks Discount Rates of the Federal Reserve Banks. HERE have been no changes this week in the rediscount rates of the Federal Reserve banks. The following is the schedule of rates now in effect for the various classes of paper at the different Reserve banks: T DISCOUNT RATES OF FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS. Federal Reserve Bank. Boston New York Philadelphia Cleveland Richmond Atlanta Chicago St. Louis Minneapolis Kansas City Dallas San Francisco Rate in Effect on April 20. Date Established. Previous Rate. 2 134 2;4 2 3 3 234 2% 3 3 3 2 Feb. 8 1934 Feb. 2 1934 Nov. 18 1933 Feb. 3 1934 Feb. 9 1934 Feb. 10 1934 Oct. 21 1933 Feb. 8 1934 Mar. 18 1934 Feb. 9 1934 Feb. 8 1934 Feb. 18 1934 2% 2 3 2% 334 334 3 3 334 3;5 3% 2% Course of Sterling Exchange TERLING exchange is steady on the whole, but displays a slightly easier undertone than last week, not only against the dollar but against the French franc. The factors affecting exchange this week resulted chiefly from operations abroad and seem to have had their origin in an improved sentiment with respect to the French franc. The range for sterling this week has been between $5.13 and $5.175A for bankers' sight bills, compared with a 4 last week. range of between $5.153/ and $5.177 The range for cable transfers has been between $5.13% and $5.17%, compared with a range of between $5.1534 and $5.18 a week ago. The following tables give the mean London check rate on Paris from day to day, the London open market gold price, and the price paid for gold by the United States: S MEAN LONDON CHECK RATE ON PARIS. 78.082 I Wednesday, Apr. 18 Saturday, Apr. 14 78.158 Thursday, Apr. 19 Monday, Apr. 16 78.17 Friday, Apr. 20 Tuesday, Apr. 17 77.80 77.84 77.75 LONDON OPEN MARKET GOLD PRICE. 134s. 113id. 1 Wednesday,Apr. 18__135s. 4d. Saturday, Apr. 14 134s. 1034d. Thursday, Apr.19135s. 3d. Monday, Apr. 16 Apr. 20_ ___135s. 23.d. 134s. 830. Friday, Tuesday, Apr. 17 PRICE PAID FOR GOLD BY THE UNITED STATES (FEDERAL RESERVE BANK). 35.00 35.00 1 Wednesday, Apr. 18 Saturday, Apr. 14 Thursday, Apr. 19 35.00 35.00 Monday, Apr. 16 Friday, 35.00 Apr. 20 35.00 Tuesday, Apr. 17 In all essential respects there is no change in the foreign exchange situation from the past several weeks, and despite day to day fluctuations, markets everywhere show marked confidence in sterling. As the British position improves a better tone becomes manifest in most of the other foreign exchanges. This is particularly true of the gold bloc currencies, with the exception, perhaps, of the German mark, which is governed by a complicated set of special circumstances unfavorable to mark exchange. For several weeks,apparently, Germany had to ship gold to both London and Paris in order to support mark credits. The dollar continues firm in terms of sterling and all other European currencies, though for the day to day quotations, as judged by the old April 21 1934 parity, the pound is the firmer. The dollar, on new parity basis, is firm rather than the pound. For instance, on a percentage of the new parity,the dollarsterling rate and price for gold in London indicate a value for the dollar in London ranging this week between 100.57% and 100.86%. This means, of course, that the dollar has been gradually approaching the new parity set upon devaluation of the unit. Since the middle of March this valuation in London has hardly varied. It will be recalled that early in January, London set a value upon the dollar ranging from 3% to 4% above that placed upon it by Washington. The United States gold buying price continues unchanged at $35 per fine ounce. This figure continues to attract gold to the United States from London and other points, but the profit on importing gold is not now so attractive with the result that the inflow is gradually diminishing. The dollar equivalent varies with the fluctuation in dollar-sterling exchange and has ranged this week between 134s. 83/ 2d. and 135s. 4d. The dollar rate in London at the hour of fixing the gold price (11 a. m. Greenwich time) has ranged from $34.73 to $34.77, while the New York rate on London based on the pound at the close in New York has ranged between $34.76 and $34.99. This last figure only one cent under the official United States gold price was reached yesterday, in an active market, as European interests dumped dollars and bought francs and sterling. An improvement in the economic position of both Great Britain and France together with newlyaroused fears of further inflation here are ascribed as reasons for the sudden upturn of sterling and francs, or, for what amounts to the same thing, the fall of the dollar. The speech on the budget delivered by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Mr. Neville Chamberlain, on Tuesday, April 17, had a decidedly encouraging effect on the underlying tone of sterling. Reports relating to Chancellor Chamberlain's speech will be found in our news columns, but it might be noted in passing that one or two features of the budget speech are especially favorable to the future course of sterling. Reductions have been made, even if slight, in the income tax, and the budget is expected to show a surplus of £796,000,with receipts at £706,520,000 and expenditures at £705,724,000. Mr. Chamberlain pointed out that the £375,000,000 exchange equalization fund still shows a profit. However,in accordance with practice, he did not reveal the extent of the profit, merely disclosing that the original capital was intact. The speech revealed that the Government started a new financial year on April 1 with a surplus in revenues of £31,148,000. At the outset of his speech the Chancellor said, with reference to recovery: "We have now finished the story of 'Bleak House' and have settled down to the first chapter of 'Great Expectations.'" Gold has been coming to the London open market in more normal amounts during the past several weeks, as the premium has declined from the high peaks prevalent so short a time ago as early February, when the open market price touched 140s. However, it may be safely assumed that gold will continue to come from all parts of the world so long as the open market price in shillings and pence is above the Bank of England's purchasing price. The bank's statutory price for buying is 85s. an ounce. It is Volume 138 Financial Chronicle prohibited from sel ing gold by the Gold Standard Departure Act and may take only gold transferred to it or offered to it at 85s. an ounce. When the bank buys gold it does so as the agent of private buyers or of the Equalization Fund,in which case the difference in price over its statutory figure is debited to the fund's account. On Saturday last, £160,000 bar gold was available in the open market and was taken for unknown destinations. On Monday,£286,000 was'similarly taken. On Tuesday, £315,000, and on Wednesday, £530,000 went to unknown destinations. On Thursday, £57,000, and on Friday, £432,000 was similarly taken. The Bank of England statement for the week ended April 18 shows a decrease in gold holdings of £85,132, the total standing at £192,076,257, which compares with £184,834,947 a year ago and with the minimum of £150,000,000 recommended by the Cunliffe committee. At the Port of New York the gold movement for the week ended April 18, as reported by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, consisted of imports of $6,056,000, of which $3,297,000 came from Canada,$2,653,000 from England,$68,000 from India, and $38,000 from Guatemala. There were no gold exports. The Reserve Bank reported an increase of $38,000 in gold earmarked for foreign account. In tabular form the gold movement at the Port of New York for the week ended April 18, as reported by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, was as follows: GOLD MOVEMENT AT NEW YORK, APRIL 12-APRIL 18, INCL. Imports. Exports. $3,297,000 from Canada 2,853,000 from England 88,000 from India None. 38,000 from Guatemala $8,058,000 total Net Change in Gold Earmarked for Foreign Account. Increase: $38,000. During the week approximately $941,000 of gold was received from China at San Francisco. The above figures are for the week ended Wednesday evening. On Thursday there were no imports or exports, but gold held earmarked for foreign account decreased $350,000. On Friday $1,681,300 of gold was received from Canada. There were no exports or change in gold held under earmark for foreign account. On Friday $591,000 of gold was received at San Francisco from China. Canadian exchange continues firm and at a slight premium in terms of New York. On Saturday last Montreal funds ranged at a premium of from Y 8 to 3-16%. On Monday the premium was 3-16 to 5-16%, on Tuesday 3-16 to/ 1 1%,on Wednesday 3-16 to 4%, 3 on Thursday. 3 to /%, and on Friday at / to /% premium. Referring to day to day rates, sterling exchange on Saturday last was steady in dull trading. Bankers' sight was $5.153.@$5.15%; cable transfers, $5.153A @$5.15%. On Monday the undertone was firm. The range was $5.15h@$5.15% for bankers' sight and $5.15/@$5.15/ for cable transfers. On Tuesday, sterling, while slightly easier, was steady. Bankers' sight was $5.15/®$5.15%; cable transfers, $5.1514@$5.15/. On Wednesday, the undertone was decidedly easier. The range was $5.13@ $5.13% for bankers' sight and $5.133@$5.14 for ca .ble transfers. On Thursday, sterling was steady. The range was $5.133 4@$5.14% for bankers' sight and $5.14@$5.14/ for cable transfers. On Friday, sterling rose sharply, the range was $5.15/@$5.17% 2637 for bankers' sight and $5.153/ 2@$5.17% for cable transfers. Closing quotations on Friday were $5.17 for demand and $5.173 % for cable transfers. Commercial sight bills finished at $5.17; 60-day bills at $5.163/2; 90-day bills at $5.16; documents for payment (60 days) at $5.16, and seven-day grain bills at $5.17/. Cotton and grain for payment closed at $5.17. Continentaland Other Foreign Exchanges XCHANGE on the Continental countries is generally firm and shows more favorable action than in the last few weeks, though in terms of new dollar parity these units are still ruling fractionally under New York. The Italian lira and the German mark are exceptions. 'The lira has been under slight pressure abroad for the past few weeks owing to considerable transfers of funds from Rome in connection with the Italian Government's conversion operations. The mark has undergone a setback owing to additional restrictions on exchange promulgated by the Reichsbank. French francs are exceptionally strong and in Friday's trading went as high as 6.663 4, above new dollar parity of 6.63. The rise of the franc makes the exchange, for the time being, the market leader. At the high on Friday, the dollar dropped to a discount against francs for the first time since dollar devaluation. Were the franc to continue up to 6.69 gold could, theoretically, move from New York to Paris. However, it is doubtful that the Treasury would give license for gold exports, except at some higher and arbitrarily fixed gold pOint. It is believed that French and other European operators who had been favoring sterling since February, have been selling sterling and dollars during the past week and buying francs for investment in rentes, which have been rising steadily since Premier Doumergue promulgated his economy decrees. Railway and other shares on the Paris Bourse are also finding support as confidence increases in the new government. The franc was also helped by withdrawal of European commitments from United States commodity markets. The fear of further inflation here has also played a part. The steady improvement in the position of the Bank of France is also doubtless a factor in the turn of sentiment in Europe toward the franc. The French bank has been parting with little gold during the past few weeks and this loss has been greatly offset by imports of gold from Switzerland, Holland, Italy, Germany, and other centers. A few days ago M. Moreau, former governor of the Bank of France, apparently expressed the general opinion of the European bankers when he ascribed to the abandonment of the gold standard by the United States, not only the delay in stabilizing the pound which, in their opinion, would otherwise already have been stabilized, but also the general disorder resulting on the exchange markets. The Bank of France statement for the week ended April 13 shows an increase in gold holdings of 171,250,735 francs, which follows upon an increase during the week ended April 6 of 193,661,012 francs. This makes the sixth successive increase in the bank's gold holdings, totaling in all approximately 1,049,997,382 francs. Total holdings now stand as of April 13 at 74,978,196,828 francs which compares with 81,079,982,799 francs a year ago and with 28,935,000,000 francs when the franc was stabilized in June 1928. The bank's ratio stands E Financial Chronicle 2638 April 21 1934 at the high figure of 77.53%, compared with 77.39% at 8.59 for bankers' sight bills and at 8.60 for cable on April 6, with 77.57% a year ago, and with legal transfers, against 8.523/ and 8.533/2. Austrian schillings closed at 19.25, against 19.05; exchange on requirement of 35%. 2, against 4.163/2; on BuThe following table shows the relation of the lead- Czechoslovakia at 4.203/ ing currencies still on gold to the United States charest at 1.02, against 1.013I; on Poland at 19.14, against 18.95, and on Finland at 2.30, against 2.28. dollar: Range Old Dollar New Dollar Greek exchange closed at 0.953/i for bankers' sight This Week. Parity. Parity. bills and at 0.95% for cable transfers, against 0.94 6.59% to 6.664 8.63 3.92 France (franc) 23.37 to 23.62 25.54 13.90 Belgium (belga) and 0.94%. 8.51 to 8.60 8.91 5.26 Italy (llra) Germany (mark) Switzerland (franc) Holland (guilder) 23.82 19.30 40.20 40.33 32.67 68.06 39.40 32.36 67.68 to 39.73 to 32.71 to 68.37 The German mark, like the Russian ruble, became a purely domestic currency on April 18, when the Government issued a decree prohibiting the removal from the country of any mark bills or domestic gold coin. The decree also limited the amount of cash which may be taken or sent out of the country to 50 marks monthly a person. The new instrument is the eighth affecting foreign exchange and becomes operative on May 1. In another decree the Government assumed virtual control of securities and credits held by German citizens abroad. Claims against foreigners when in marks must be reported to the Reichsbank. These drastic decrees are the result of the precarious foreign exchange position of the Reichsbank, which has reduced its official note coverage to 6.8% as of April 14. Fears are expressed that the Reichsbank rate of coverage may be forced still lower and that its function as a central bank may be seriously impaired. However, new German foreign trade returns for March indicate the possibility that the Reichsbank position may soon show improvement. The German authorities claim that for the first two months of the year exports were not providing foreign exchange enough to meet the needs of imports. This has all along been the chief argument for reduction of transfers to meet foreign debt service. In January the import surplus was in excess by 22,000,000 marks and in February by 35,000,000. It is believed probable that Dr. Hjalmar Schacht, President of the Reichsbank, will urge a complete moratorium on the entire German debt service. Italian lire are on the whole steady although under pressure as a result of transfers abroad in connection with the recent conversion offer. Some gold has been shipped to Paris in support of the lire. The Italian situation on the whole is exceptionally sound. By the terms of the recent conversion of the old 5s consolidated bonds into new 33/2% redeemable loan 1978, the Italian Treasury will pay in a lump sum, April 23,a bonus amounting to the difference between the old and the new interest rates for the next three years, that is 432%. The bonus will entail the very substantial outlay of 2,750,000,000 lire, which the Italian Treasury will be able to meet from its own resources. The London check rate on Paris closed on Friday at 77.70, against 78.09 on Friday of last week. In New York sight. bills on the French center finished on Friday at 6.663/2, against 6.593 on Friday of last week; cable transfers at 6.66%, against 6.60, and commercial sight bills at 6.65, against 6.58. Antwerp belgas finished at 23.61 for bankers' sight bills and at 23.62 for cable transfers, against 23.39 and 23.40. Final quotations for Berlin marks were 39.72 for bankers' sight bills and 39.73 for cable transfers, in comparison with 39.53 and 39.54. Italian lire closed -4-- XCHANGE on the countries neutral during the war shows no appreciable change from last week. Swiss francs and Holland guilders have fluctuated in a wider range, tending toward firmness. The gold coverage of the Netherlands Bank rose last week from 76.8% to 78.5% and that of gold and silver combined from 79.2% to 81%. Legal gold requirement is 40%. The statement of condition of the Swiss National Bank for the week ended April 14 showed gold reserves of 1,679,000,000 Swiss francs. Switzerland has been sending gold to France for several weeks past. Its total gold cover is now 92.32%. Legal requirement is 40% against outstanding notes. Bankers' sight on Amsterdam finished on Friday at 68.34, against 67.69 on Friday of last week; cable transfers at 68.35,against 67.70,and commercial sight bills at 68.33, against 67.68. Swiss francs closed at 32.69 for checks and at 32.70 for cable transfers, against 32.38 and 32.39. Copenhagen checks finished at 23.14 and cable transfers at 23.15, against 23.02 and 23.03. Checks on Sweden closed at 26.69 and cable transfers at 26.70, against 26.58 and 26.59; while checks on Norway finished at 26.01 and cable transfers at 26.02, against 25.91 and 25.92. Spanish pesetas closed at 13.81 for bankers' sight bills and at 13.82 for cable transfers, against 13.673/ and 13.683/ 2. E XCHANGE on the South American countries presents no new features of interest. The currencies and foreign trade relations of all these countries continue under regulations of control boards and the currencies are only nominally quoted. The control boards, either because of the force of treaties or from practice, favor London in the allotment of exchange remittances. The "free" market for the South American units, such as it is, quotes them at a heavy discount. For instance the Argentine paper peso is officially quoted 343-343 %, but the unofficial rate this week had a range of from 25.10 to 25.40. Argentine paper pesos closed on Friday nominally at 344 for bankers' sight bills, against 34 on Friday of last week; cable transfers at 34%, against 3432. Brazilian milreis are nominally quoted 8.60 for bankers' sight bills and 8.75 for cable transfers, against 8.60 and 8.75. Chilean exchange is nominally quoted 103, against 1034. Peru is nominal at 22.40, against 223/2. E XCHANGE on the Far Eastern countries has been fairly steady for several weeks. The Chinese units are influenced largely by the course of world silver prices, while the Japanese yen is strongly inclined to be governed by the course of sterling exchange. The Indian rupee, of course, moves in strict harmony with sterling to which it is legally attached at the rate of is. 6d. per rupee. Closing quotations for yen checks yesterday were 30.52, against 30.43 on Friday of last week. Hong E Volume 138 Financial Chronicle 2639 Kong closed at 38 13-16@38Y8, against 38.95® have so many important Constitutional questions 39 5-16; Shanghai at 34 13-16, against 35®35 1-6; been raised as those which have emerged in connecManila at 50 8,against 50A;Singapore at 61,against tion with the "new deal" legislation. Most of the 60 Bombay at 39.05, against 39, and Calcutta at acts passed in 1933 by the first session of the present Congress claimed as their justification the existence 39.05, against 39. of a national emergency, while for the extraordinary Foreign Exchange Rates as Reported by Federal regulation of industry, trade and agriculture which Reserve Bank of New York. was inaugurated, further warrant was sought in the to the requirements of Section 522 Constitutional right of Congress to regulate interof the Tariff Act of 1922, the Federal Reserve State and foreign commerce. On the basis of these Bank is now certifying daily to the Secretary of the claims, enlarged by the spacious assumption that Treasury the buying rate for cable transfers in the the Federal Government could do anything that was different countries of the world. We give below a not clearly prohibited by the Constitution, holders record for the week just passed: of gold were compelled to part with their property, FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES CERTIFIED BY FEDERAL RESERVE contracts calling for payment in gold were set aside, BANKS TO TREASURY UNDER TARIFF ACT OF 1922. APRIL 14 1934 TO APRIL 20 1934, INCLUSIVE. industry and business were forcibly regimented, production was limited and prices fixed, hours of Noon Buying Rate for Cable Transfers in New York. Country and Moneta Value in United States Money. labor and minimum rates of wages were decreed, and Unit Apr. 14. Apr. 16. Apr. 17. i Apr. 18. Apr. 19. Apr. 20. a vast and complicated program of industrial, busiEUROPE$ $ ness and social regulation was inaugurated under Austria,schilling .189316* .189316* .189333* .189300* .189266* .190400* Belgium, belga .233865 .233669 .233800 .233711 .233896 .235250 immediate direction of a President to whom Conthe Bulgaria, lev 013250* .013250* .013250* .013250* .013250* .013375* Czechoslovakia, kron .041625 .041590 .041603 .041603 .041641 .041878 gress had delegated unprecedented powers. Denmark, krone .230241 .230176 .230066 .229100 .229408 .230700 England, pound There have not been wanting those who, while as sterling 5.154416 5.155583 5.151083 .133583 5.138541 5.166083 Finland, markka .022710 .022712 .022680 .022620 .022660 .022795 France,franc eager as any one for all the "recovery" that could 066001 .065921 .065981 .065983 .066081 .066470 Germany, reichsmark .395184 .394630 .394207 .394072 .393953 .395771 Greece, drachma 009375 .009416 .009427 .009421 .009417 .009470 legitimately be attained, have nevertheless pointed Holland, guilder 676985 .676721 .676966 .677461 .677950 .681742 Hungary, pengo .296750* .296750* .296875* .297000* .297000 .298375* out that not only was the Constitution being strained .085173 .085411 .085313 .085246 .085098 .085468 Italy. lira Norway, krone .258983 .258884 .258827 .257783 .258108 .259491 the breaking point, but that a good deal of what to Poland, zloty 188900 .189000 .188600 .188783 .189112 .189766 Portugal, escudo .047125 .047125 .046937 .046995 .046922 .047200 was being done was almost certainly unconstituRumania,leu .010037 .010008 .010062 .010031 .010043 .010100 Spain, peseta 136785 .136689 .136664 .136665 .136839 .137665 Representative James M. Beck of Pennsyltional. Sweden,krona 265780 .265730 .265609 .264554 .264941 .266281 Switzerland, frano_ _ .323914 .323669 .323619 .323689 .324021 .326007 done yeoman service in keeping the Convania has Yugoslavia, dinar .022650 .022616 .022583 .022600 .022650 .022810* ASIAissue before the public, and Senators stitutional ChinaChefoo (yuan) dol'r .347291 .347083 .344583 .344583 .344583 .345416 and William E. Borah have voiced Glass Carter Hankow(yuan)dol'r .347291 .347083 .344583 .344583 .344583 .345416 Shanghai(yuan)dol'r .346406 .346406 .343281 .343750 .344062 .344843 emphatic dissent from parts of the Administration Tientsin(yuan)dol'r .347291 .347083 .344583 .344583 .344583 .345416 Hongkong, dollar_ - .386875 .386875 .383750 .384062 .384375 .384687 program. From industrial or trade associations India, rupee .387625 .387350 .387460 .386531 .386650 .387750 Japan. yen 303340 .303305 .303140 .302450 .302635 .303690 Singapore (Eh S.) dol'r .603125 .603125 .603125 .601250 .602500 .604375 has come a long list of well reasoned and forcible AUSTRALASIAAustralia, pound protests against the infringements of Constitutional 4.104583 4.104166*4.102500* .087916*4.097187.4.119375* New Zealand, pound. 4.115000 4.114583+4.113333* .098750+4.109375*4.130937* AFRICAwhich various items of pending legislation rights South Africa, pound.,.. 5,095937 5.096875* 5.092500* 5.073750* 5.079750* 5.106750* NORTHAMER.embodied. In the comparatively few cases which Canada, dollar 1.001197 1.002395 1.003203 1.001171 1.001953 1.004713 Cuba, peso 998937 .998937 .998937 .998937 .999150 .999150 have come before the lower Federal courts the Mexico, peso (silver)., .277160 .277250 .277250 .277250 .277250 .277250 Newfoundland, dollar .998562 .999937 1.000812 .998625 .999500 1.002000 has been to give the Government the benetendency SOUTH AMER.Argentina, peso 343350* .343112* .343333* .342300* .342566 .344400* doubt, and the Supreme Court has not yet fit of the Brazil, milreis 085532* .085978* .086575* .086603* .085950 .085450* Chile, peso 102600* .102600* .102600* .102400* .102500 .102750* any of the fundamental Constitutional upon passed Uruguay. Peso 804066* .804066* .803733* .804066* .804066 .807233* Colombia, peso 581400* .606100* .632900* .595200* .571400* .588200* issues involved in the recovery acts and their ad* Nominal rates; firm rates not available. ministration. The discussion, however, has had the Gold Bullion in European Banks. effect of bringing under debate not only specific HE following table indicates the amount of gold matters in which Constitutional issues are presented, bullion in the principal European banks as of but also the larger question of the adaptability of April 19 1934, together with comparisons as of the the Constitution to the present time. Irrespective of particular problems which the "new deal" legislacorresponding dates in the previous four years: tion presents, increasing consideration is being given I Banks ef1934. 1932. 1631. 1933. 1930. to the question whether the Constitution itself may 10111. • £ £ £ E £ not be in need of overhauling. England__, 192.076.257 184,834,947 121,429,516 146,739.714 163,843.217 France 0.... 599,825,574 648,639,862 616,521,648 448,786,338 338,669,227 One or two recent instances will illustrate the Germany b 7,741,650 38,966,050 106,859,750 120,353,250 17,865,700 Spain 90,487,000 89,997,000 90,363,000 96,846,000 98,750.000 Italy ways in which the Constitution is being jeopardized 76,593,000 60,858,000 57,434,000 67,331,000 56,261,000 Netherrds. 74,324,000 65,534,000 79,061,000 37,104,000 35.996,000 Nat. Belg. specific points. On March 15 the Senate passed at 77,135,000 72.001,000 76,308,000 41,148,000 33,784,000 Switzland. 63,805,000 88,727,000 66,030,000 25,711,000 22,645,000 Sweden a bill "to regulate inter-State commerce by grant14,800,000 12,116,000 11,440,000 13,329,000 13,535,000 Denmark_ 7,398,000 7,397,000 8,032,000 9,546,000 9,572,000 Norway_ _ _ 6,576,000 6,561,000 8,380,000 8,133,000 ing the consent of Congress to taxation by the several 8,145,000 Total week 1,201,971,481 1,281,023,509 1,166,160,214 991,696,802 901,553,694 States of certain inter-State sales." The bill (see Prey. week 1,201,278.257 1.282.095.109 1.161.951.964 991.131.521 897 750 gin the "Chronicle" for March 31, page 2179) provided a These are the gold ho dings of the Bank of France as reported in the new form of statement. b Gold holdings of the Bank of Germany are exclusive of gold held that "all taxes or excises levied by any State upon abroad, the amount of wh eh the present year is £3,577,850. sales of tangible personal property, or measured by sales of tangible personal property, may be levied The Constitution and the upon, or measured by,sales of like property in inter"New Deal." State commerce, by the State into which the propNot since the period of Reconstruction, when the erty is moved for use or consumption therein, in the rapid adoption of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth same manner and to the same extent that said taxes Amendments made possible the passage by a radi- or excises are levied upon or measured by sales of cal Republican Congress of a series of drastic stat- like property not in inter-State comMerce, and no utes intended to insure Negro suffrage and make the such property shall be exempt from such taxation reconstructed South safe for the Republican party, by reason of being introduced into any State or PURSUANT T 2640 Financial Chronicle Territory in original packages or containers or otherwise." The National Publishers' Association promptly pointed out that the bill proposed to allow a State to tax sales of personal property in inter. State commerce in the same way that it taxes sales of such property arising within the State. Specifically, the bill would authorize the imposition of State taxes, under a sales tax law, upon subscription copies of newspapers and periodicals transported from another State, whereas in the 26 States that now have sales tax laws only single copies or news-stand sales are taxed where not specifically exempted. The invasion of the Constitution which began with the "original package" law of 1890, when, at the demand of the prohibition forces, liquors brought into a State in the original packages were made subject to the laws of the State in the matter of sales, would by this bill be broadened to include any kind of tangible personal property. The States, in other words, are to be allowed to tax inter-State commerce. On April 4 Senator Clark of Missouri, Democrat, was reported to have ready for presentation a bill providing for Federal taxation of hitherto exempt State and municipal bonds. The exemption, of course, is based upon the idea of comity which prevails in the relations between the States and the Federal Government, with neither jurisdiction taxing the securities or property of the other, a tax on State bonds being in effect a tax on the power of the State to borrow money. Senator Clark, how-. ever, was reported by the United Press as seeing in the Sixteenth Amendment, which, provides that "the Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever sources derived, without apportionment among the several States and without regard to any census or enumeration," a clear grant of authority to tax exempt securities, notwithstanding that the sole purpose of the Amendment, which was ratified in 1913, was to enable Congress to impose an income tax without apportioning it among the States in accordance with population. Another introduced in the Senate early this month, not only extends the authority of the Federal Trade Commission, at present limited to corporations, to partnerships and "persons" in dealing with what are vaguely described as "unfair methods of competition" and "unfair or deceptive acts and practices in or affecting commerce," but contains what has accurately been called an "amazing" provision that "the Congress confers upon the Commission so much of the auxiliary power of Congress to obtain information in and of legislation as may be necessary to enable the Commission to carry out the provisions" of an amended section of the present law under which the President • would be given virtually unlimited authority to institute inquiries regarding things which the bill declares to be "unlawful." In an address before the Commerce Committee of the American Bar Association in this city, on April 10, Raoul E. Desvernine, counsel for the Association of Stock Exchange Firms, pointed out some of the implications of Federal regulation of stock exchanges, as proposed by the Fletcher-Rayburn bill and others, in the matter of the Constitutional relations between the States and the United States. "Unless the test of the Federal jurisdiction," Mr. Desvernine said (we quote from a report in the New April 21 1934 York "Herald Tribune") "is that some continuity exists between the various phases of related business so that they may be reasonably considered as one large inter-State business, it would seem practically impossible to determine where Federal jurisdiction ends and State jurisdiction begins. . . . Under our present economic system there are so many interlocking relationships that undoubtedly almost every conceivable transaction has some effect on the flow of commerce. If the mere existence of such effect, however indirect or far removed, is sufficient to permit Federal regulation of that transaction, then it is anomalous to speak of the jurisdiction of the States. Such complete destruction of the fundamental nature of our Federal Government cannot be justified on any of the decisions of the courts heretofore, nor upon any reasonable interpretation of the Constitution." The large question of recasting the Constitution as a whole cannot, of course, be separated entirely from that of revision by amendment. Two amendments of much importance have lately been made. The Twentieth Amendment, proclaimed as in effect on Feb. 6 1933, but operative as of Oct. 15 for some of its provisions, changed the date for the regular meeting of Congress so as to do away with the "lame duck" session, and altered the dates of the Presidential and Congressional terms. The Twentyfirst Amendment, in force Dec. 5 1933, repealed the Eighteenth or prohibition amendment. A. further amendment, abolishing the Electoral College and adjusting the electoral vote to conform to the popular vote, is pending in Congress and has received the endorsement of President Roosevelt. One of the most distinguished of American journalists and publicists, Dr. Albert Shaw, in an article in the April issue of the "Review of Reviews," strongly urges a further amendment which should extend to six years the terms of members of the House of Representatives, thereby protecting them from being "insulted with impunity by organized private interests because they seek re-election every twentyfour months," and at the same time, in his opinion, greatly improving the quality and efficiency of Congress and minimizing partisanship. The method of specific amendment is not satisfactory to those who feel that the Constitution as a whole should be overhauled and, in the common phrase, brought up to date. They point to the fact that almost all of the amendments adopted have been political, and insist that the times now call for economic improvements. As a practical matter, however, the question of general revision, whether political or economic, is not a live one at this time, and will hardly show much life until the depression is over. Piecemeal change is doubtless not entirely satisfactory, but it nevertheless works. Moreover, it is possible to defeat bad amendments as well as to adopt good ones. It took a long time to get rid of the vicious Eighteenth Amendment, but that calamity is now a thing of the past. The probable failure this week of the Child Labor Amendment in the New York Legislature shows what sound argument, backed by organized and vigorous protest, can do in defeating a proposal whose consequences would certainly have been disastrous, and which should never have been revived at all after half the States had rejected it. The important question at the moment is not to call for further Constitutional changes, and least of Volume 138 Financial Chronicle all to open the Constitution to radical attack from the extremists of the "new deal," but to insist upon the maintenance of the individual and property rights which the Constitution guarantees and which much recent and some pending legislation in Congress jeopardizes. The recovery program has already gone ominously far in over-riding Constitutional prescriptions and limitations, and in the excitement and pressure of putting the program into operation a good deal that is constitutionally unsound has been overlooked. The time has come to call a halt in measures for which there is no clear Constitutional warrant, and for searching examination of legislation and Executive acts by which Constitutional rights have been infringed. The appeal to the Constitution is not a wail of reaction nor an indiscriminate rejection of change. It is a call for intelligent, aggressive and patriotic action to the end that the foundations of government shall not be undermined or the primary rights of citizens curtailed. State-Owned Railroads a National Burden Canada has shown us that Government ownership and operation of railroads is against a sound public policy for either nation. Further proof of this theorem is to found in the experience of Mexico. These statements are attributed to W. W. Colpitts, of Cloverdale & 'Colpitts, consulting engineers. In counting up the cost to the taxpayers of creating the Canadian National System, he found that as of Dec.31 1931 the Government had expended a total of $1,393,000,000. This amount includes direct cash outlay on the International and Transcontinental lines,loans interest due and unpaid, and advances to cover operating deficits. There is also the funded debt of the National Lines amounting to $1,276,000,000, all of which is in the hands of the public, and three-fourths actually, and one-fourth virtually, guaranteed by the Government. The total of these two figures is $2,669,000,000. The magnitude of this sum is apparent from the statement that the direct expenditures alone represent approximately one-half of Canada's gross debt, and if the funded debt of the railways also is considered a part of the national debt, which in effect it is, these direct expenditures, plus the funded debt, represent about seven-tenths of the total obligations of the national Government. Mr. Colpitts computes the annual interest charge on this $2,669,000,000 at approximately $133,000,000, which may be said to represent the principal item in the annual cost of Government ownership of the National Lines. The annual net income of the railways naturally offsets this item, however, the inefficiency of this net income is the crux of the situation. Without making any allowance for depreciation of physical property, which is a large item on a railroad as extensive as the National System, Mr. Colpitts pointed out that the net income over the nineyear period from 1923 to 1931 averaged about $25,000,000 per year. It reached a maximum of $44,000,000 in 1928. It was $32,000,000 in 1929, and $16,000,000 in 1930. A deficit of $5,000,000 was incurred in 1931. Thus, in the latter year, neglecting depreciation, the cost of ownership was $138,000,000, and when a 2641 reasonable allowance is made for depreciation, it was found that this cost of ownership in 1931 was approximately $150,000,000. In 1932 it was a somewhat larger amount, and in 1933 still larger. None of these figures take into consideration the very heavy expenditures made each year for capital account. During the year 1913 the Federal debt was only $366,000,000 and the annual interest charges only $20,000,000. These figures aid one in visualizing the extent the Government's obligations have grown since that time from its railway policy alone. It is asserted that not only is this a serious situation now, from the point of view of the taxpayer, but it is one that is growing more acute as the obligations of the railway to the Government increase every year. The desire for profit in a private enterprise, however small the prospect for profit may be, is a tremendous stimulus to economy and efficiency, while in the nature of things this stimulus is not nearly as persistent where political considerations influence expenditures. The Ogpu at Washington—Cancellation of Air Mail Contracts [Editorial in :New York "Herald Tribune" of April 16 1934.] The revelation that Charles A. Lindbergh was questioned secretly for four hours by a Department of Justice agent following his appearance before the Senate Post Office Committee a month ago makes unpleasant and disturbing news. Following so closely upon the cancellation of the air mail contracts—an utterly unjust and dictatorial abuse of public power—this resort to star chamber tactics calls for a strict investigation. The test of the character of Colonel Ristine's investigation lies in the stenographic report thereof. Senator Austin does well to announce that he will insist that this secret record he produced before the Black Committee. Were the questions designed to develop constructive advice? Or were they the grueling to which a District Attorney subjects a suspect? The record will speak for itself. If it was a grilling, as is charged, the episode will constitute one more milepost on the road from normal American processes of justice to the Russian system. As such it is of deep concern to the whole nation. Mr. Lindbergh can take care of himself on any witness stand, as he has demonstrated. Such scrupulous integrity and clear-eyed courage as are his are proof against the assaults of any browbeating inquisition. But the resort to such tactics would constitute a vicious and highly dangerous precedent and deserve the sternest rebuke. Incidentally, it would be interesting to know whether Commissar Farley played any part in instigating this experiment with Ogpu methods. Having punished the air mail companies without the pretense of a trial, did he perhaps think that a little terrorizing of a hostile witness might help out his case? The country is already greatly in the debt of Senator Warner Robinson Austin, of Vermont, for taking up the air mail fight. Here is another opportunity for his clear, fair questionin2 in the pursuit of truth. The Course of the Bond Market Bond prices have again exceeded former highs this week, record high levels on the recovery being reached in averages for all grades. The strength of high-grade bonds i,s, of course, attributed to the superabundance of institutional funds seeking high-grade investment, which in turn is a result of the creation of huge excess reserves of member banks—much larger than any which have been seen heretofore. Another factor is the virtual moratorium on new fihancing occasioned by the Securities Act. United States Government bonds, after reaching a new high for several years last Saturday, upon announcement of the calling of about one billion dollars more of the Fourth Liberties, have eased off fractionally this week. No plans for taking care of the called Pits have as yet been announced. A new low record in acceptance rates was made 2642 Financial Chronicle April 21 1934 this week, and quotations for the first time were in sixteenths. Bills of 90 days or less are now at %.% bid, 3/16% asked. Excess reserves in the Federal Reserve System are again higher, estimated at more than $1,600,000,000. High-grade and medium-grade railroad bonds have continued in demand this week, with closings indicating very little change. Atchison gen. 4s, 1995, closed at 102 on Friday,'unchanged since last week; Chesapeake & Ohio ref. 4%s, 1995, ended the week at 102, also unchanged; Great Northern gen. 7s, 1936, at 99 compared with 99%. Medium to lower-grade rail bonds, however, made further headway, showing gains of one or more points during the last seven days. Denver & Rio Grande Western ref. 5s, 1978, closed at 49%, up 5% points since a week ago; Wabash 2nd 5s, 1939, at 82%, up 2% points; Norfolk Southern 1st & ref. 5s, 1961, at 24, up 3, and Missouri Pacific gen. 4s, 1975, at 18%, up 1%. After some hesitation in utility bonds in the early part of the week, the upward movement was again resumed, principally in the secondary list. High grades showed no marked tendency one way or another. In the speculative group, substantial gains were made by Standard Gas & Electric 6s, 1935, up 3% to 79 for the week; Continental Gas & Electric 5s, 1958, up 4% to 56%; Consolidated Gas Utilities 6s, 1943,6% points higher at 51%, and American & Foreign Power 5s, 2030, 3 points higher at 58%. Generally higher prices were seen during the week for Industrial bonds. Previous advances were held, and most Issues remained close to their year's highs. Persistent demand continued to broaden the advance in bonds "behind the market" on a yield basis, pushing an additional number of securities into new high ground. Tire issues as a group were strong, with U. S. Rubber 5s, 1947, up 1% to a new high at 90%, and Goodyear 5s, 1957, up % to par. Motion picture issues were also strong, Warner Bros. Pictures 6s, 1939, gaining 4 points to 66. Steels for the most part were fractionally higher, and oils were steady. Miscellaneous gains included Container Corp. 5s, 1943, up 2% to 81; National Dairy 5%s, 1948, up 1% to 95%; Remington Rand 2s, 1947, up 1% to 91%, and International Cement 5s, 51/ 1948, up % to 89%. Among foreign issues, there was considerable interest marketwise in French railway dollar bonds. Nord Railways 6Y2s, 1950, closed the week at 150%, up 9% points, and Paris Orleans Railway 5%s, 1968, at 143%, were up 11 points. Such issues, virtually guaranteed by the Government, and usually not as active as some other bonds, are apparently catching up with other issues payable on a gold equivalent basis. Strength was displayed this week in Argentine issues, while Chilean and Brazilian bonds were weak. German issues were irregular and for the most part lower. The largest municipal refunding plan as yet proposed was declared in operation this week, involving about $280,000,000 of the City of Detroit bonds to be issued in exchange for all Detroit general obligations, not including the longer-term street railway and water bonds. Detroit obligations have been at least partially in default for over a year. Moody's computed bond prices and bond yield averages are given in the following tables: MOODY'S BOND PRICES. (Based on Average Yields.) MOODY'S BOND YIELD AVERAGES.? (Based on Individual Closing Prices.) U.S. 120 120 Domestic Corporates by Ratings. 1934 Gov. DomesDaily Bonds. tic. Aa. A. Baa. ** Averages. Corp.* Aaa. 120 Domestic Corporate* by Groups. RR. P. U. Indus. AU 120 Domestic Corporate 1934 120 by Ratings. Daily DomesBaa. A. Aa. Averages. tic. Aaa. 120 Domestic Corporate by Groups. RR. 'Pi 30 P. U. Indus. signs, 5.25 4.73 4.49 5.91 Apr. 20._ 4.82 4.92 7.21 4.40 4.05 4.74 5.96 5.28 4.50 19_ _ 4.84 4.93 7.18 4.06 4.40 5.98 4.74 5.29 4.51 7.19 18_ 4.85 4.93 4.06 4.42 5.32 5.99 4.76 4.52 17._ 4.86 7.21 4.96 4.07 4.43 5.32 4.77 4.53 16__ 4.87 6.01 7.22 4.96 4.43 4.07 5.30 4.75 4.52 14._ 4.86 5.98 7.22 4.95 4.42 4.07 4.76 5.30 13__ 4.86 5.98 4.53 4.96 7.20 4.07 4.42 4.77 5.32 12._ 4.87 6.01 4.53 7.20 4.97 4.07 4.42 5.33 4.78 4.54 IL_ 4.88 6.02 7.19 4.98 4.43 4.09 4.78 10_ 4.89 6.04 5.34 4.55 7.21 5.00 4.09 4.44 4.79 5.35 9._ 4.91 4.58 6.06 7.20 5.01 4.10 4.46 5.37 7__ 4.92 6.08 4.80 4.58 7.21 5.02 4.09 4.47 5.40 6.11 4.81 4.58 6__ 4.93 7.22 4.11 5.02 4.47 4.83 5.41 4.57 5_ 4.94 6.12 7.23 4.11 4.48 5.04 4.85 5.44 4._ 4.96 6.18 4.60 5.06 7.26 4.11 4.49 3.. 4.99 6.22 4.89 5.46 4.61 7.29 4.12 4.52 5.09 2..., 4.99 4.90 5.46 4.62 7.29 6.24 4.12 4.51 5.10 Weekly xchang e Close d. Mar.30... Stock E xchang e Closed. 95.93 110.42 103.48 94.43 79.68 97.47 89.17 101.81 4.91 5.48 23__ 5.01 4.64 6.24 7.34 4.15 4.54 5.11 96.70 111.16 104.16 95.18 80.60 98.41 89.86 102.47 16.._ 4.96 4.85 5.43 4.60 7.23 6.16 4.11 4.50 5.06 95.63 110.79 103.15 94.14 78.88 97.47 88.50 101.47 5.53 4.66 9_ 5.03 4.91 7.25 6.31 4.13 4.56 5.13 94.88 110.23 101.81 93.11 78.66 96.54 87.96 100.49 2__ 5.08 4.97 5.57 4.72 7.38 6.33 4.16 4.64 5.20 95.18 110.23 101.97 93.26 79.68 97.16 88.36 100.81 Feb. 23_ 5.06 5.54 4.70 7.49 4.93 4.16 6.24 4.63 5.19 95.33 109.86 101.47 93.26 80.37 97.31 88.36 100.81 16__ 5.05 5.54 4.70 7.52 4.92 4.18 6.18 4.66 5.19 93.99 109.12 100.00 92.10 78.88 95.33 87.43 100.00 9_ 5.14 5.05 5.61 4.75 7.57 4.22 6.31 4.75 5.27 93.85 108.75 99.68 91.81 78.99 95.33 87.04 99.68 2__ 5.15 5.64 4.77 7.55 4.24 5.05 4.77 5.29 6.30 91.53 107.67 98.41 89.31 75.50 92.68 83.97 98.88 Jan. 26_ 5.31 5.88 4.82 7.97 5.23 4.30 6.62 4.85 5.47 90.55 107.67 97.16 87.96 74.36 91.39 82.38 98.73 19__ 5.38 4.30 6.01 4.83 8.05 4.93 5.57 6.73 5.32 87.69 108.25 95.48 84.85 70.52 88.36 78.44 98.00 12._ 5.59 4.87 8.33 4.38 5.54 6.35 5.04 5.81 7.12 84.85 105.37 93.26 82.02 66.55 85.74 74.25 97.00 5_ 5.81 4.94 8.55 6.74 4.43 7.58 5.74 5.19 6.04 98.88 112.31 105.89 97.31 83.60 100.33 92.39 104.33 Low 1934 4.82 5.25 4.49 7.18 4.05 4.40 4.92 5.91 4.73 84.85 105.37 93.11 81.78 66.38 85.61 74.25 96.54 High 1934 5.81 6.74 4.97 8.65 4.43 5.75 5.20 6.06 7.68 Low 1933 4.96 92.39 108.03 100.33 89.31 77.66 93.26 89.31 99.04 7.23 4.60 4.11 4.83 5.43 4.49 5.04 6.16 74.15 97.47 82.99 71.87 53.16 69.59 70.05 78.44 High 1933 6.75 6.35 11.19 4.91 7.17 5.96 6.98 9.44 7.22 Yr. Ago82.99 71,87 54.92 70.15 71.96 81.07 74.15 97.47 Apr.2033 6.75 4.91 6.12 10.61 5.96 6.98 7.16 6.97 9.15 2 Yrs.Ago 69.13 93.70 81.78 66.38 48.61 61.64 70.14 70.'0 Apr.20'32 7.27 7.08 13.41 4.16 8.17 6.56 6.06 7.58 10.28 •These prices are computed from average yields on the basis of one -ideal" bond (41i% coupon, ma uring In 31 years) and do not purport to show either the average level or the average movement of actual price quotations. They merely serve to illustrate In a more comprehensive way the relative lave s and the relative movement of yield averages, the latter being the truer picture of the bond market. For Moody's Index of bond prices by months back to 1928, see the Issue of Feb.6 1932, page 907. **Actual average price of 8 long-term Treasury issues. t The latest complete list of bonds used In computing these indexes was published In the Issue of Feb. 101934. page 920. t t Average 01 30 foreign bonds but adjusted to a comparable basis with previous averages of 40 foreign bonds. Apr. 20-- 103.65 19- 103.96 18_ 104.08 17__ 104.14 16_ 104.24 14__ 104.49 13__ 104.35 12__ 104.12 11.... 104.02 10__ 103.98 9__ 103.96 7__ 104.01 6.... 104.03 5__ 104.05 4._ 103.82 3__ 103.43 2__ 103.28 Weekly Mar.30__ StockE 23_ 103.32 16__ 103.52 9.. 103.06 2__ 101.88 Feb. 23__ 102.34 16_ 102.21 9-- 101.69 2__ 101.77 Jan. 26__ 100.41 19__ 100.36 12__ 99.71 5__ 100.42 High 1934 104.49 Low 1934 99.06 High 1933 108.82 Low 1933 98.20 Yr. AgoApr.20'33 99.72 2 Yrs.Ago Apr.20'32 99.24 98.88 98.57 98.41 98 25 98.09 98.25 98.25 98.09 97.94 97.78 97.47 97.31 97.16 97.00 96.70 96.23 96.23 112.31 112.11 112.11 111.92 111.92 111.92 111.92 111.92 111.54 111.54 111.35 111.54 111.16 111.16 111.16 110.98 110.98 105.89 105.89 105.54 105.37 105.37 105.54 105.54 105.54 105.37 105.20 104.85 104.68 104.68 104.51 104.33 103.82 103.99 97.31 97.16 97.16 96.70 96.70 96.85 96.70 96.54 96.39 96.08 95.93 95.78 95.78 95.48 95.18 94.72 94.58 83.60 82.99 82.74 82.62 82.38 82.74 82.74 82.38 82.26 82.02 81.78 81.54 81.18 81.07 80.37 79.91 79.68 100.33 100.17 100.17 99.84 99.68 100.00 99.84 99.68 99.52 99.52 99.36 99.20 99.04 98.73 98.41 97.78 97.62 92.39 91.96 91.81 91.39 91.39 91.67 91.67 91.39 91.25 91.11 90.97 90.69 90.27 90.13 89.72 89.45 89.45 104.33 104.16 103.99 103.82 103.65 103.82 103.65 103.65 103.48 103.32 102.81 102.81 102.81 102.98 102.47 102.30 102.14 Indications of Business Activity THE STATE OF TRADE-COMMERCIAL EPITOME. Friday Night, April 20 1934. Trade continued to make a good showing despite the very unfavorable weather during the week. A steady consumer demand had a stabilizing effect on all basic trades. Nearly all sections of the country contribute to the large volume of business being done. The heavy industries made a particularly good showing, with steel operations reaching 50.3% of capacity, a gain of 6.1%, and automobile production up to the highest peak since July 1930. Electric production also exceeded that of the previous week, and there was some increase in carloadings, despite the fact that this is usually the season of the year when a decline takes place. Retail business continued to increase, although unfavorable weather hurt the sale of women's suits, coats and millinery. Sales of men's clothing and furnishings, however, were large. Wholesale markets were more active, particularly in summer goods, and more interest was shown in fall merchandise. Sales of hardware were larger and a further increase is expected during the spring and summer months. Shoe manufacturers reported a good business, with reorders coming in in large volume. Woolen mills were fairly active on old orders, but new business was rather small. The break in cotton failed to stimulate mill demand for spot cotton, but operations continued active, with many mills having sufficient orders on hand to maintain schedules well Into the summer. News from Washington that the Administration was opposed to inflationary measures caused a sharp break in grain,.cotton and other commodities during the week. On some days the decline in grain reached the limit allowed, and prices in most cases were down to new lows for the movement. Secretary Wallace's statement Volume 138 2643 Financial Chronicle The "Annalist" presented as follows the indices of domestic that domestic and world price levels of wheat would tend to come together this year was also followed by heavy and foreign wholesale prices for March: DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN WHOLESALE PRICE INDICES liquidation, and other selling. Cotton and grain transac(Measured in currency of country: index on gold basis also shown when currency tions, as a result of these reports from Washington, were has depreciated; 1913=100.0.) very heavy. Yet there were rallies at times on buying on 0 MO S * Mar. a Feb. Jan. Mar. Mar. Change, hopes that the President would be won over at a conference 1934. 1934. 1934. 1933. 1932. P.C. to-morrow. Silver and other commodities were also under 81.9 91.1 +0.1 108.2 108.1 105.2 United States of America heavy selling pressure as a result of Washington develop65.4 66.1 81.4 91.1 -1.4 64.5 Gold 110.6 107.9 -0.1 112.5 112.6 110.3 Canada ments concerning silver legislation. The break in cotton 84.0 96.5 -1.2 66.9 67.7 69.2 Gold 97.6 104.6 +0.1 105.4 105.3 104.6 was the worst seen since last February, but the decline United Kingdom 68.8 78.2 -0.2 65.9 68.5 65.8 Gold 390 444 -1.2 395 400 405 was more orderly than in wheat and silver. Sugar was France 91.1 99.8 -0.3 95.9 96.2 96.3 Germany rather quiet, with the trade marking time pending Senate Italy 275.5 276.0 277.6 287.2 322.1 -0.2 133.6 134.1 132.6 134.0 119.8 -0.4 action on the compromise quota bill. Raws dropped to Japan 77.3 -0.6 50.5 57.2 48.2 48.5 Gold CaNnInnalta onld r 728 73.3 74.4 77.8 87.8 --0.7 2.70c. as compared with 3.10c. at this time last year. Wool to March 1934. * Preliminary. a Revised. b Change from February 1934 was quiet and easier. Copper remained unchanged at 8%c., c Includes also Netherlands and Belgium. Bureau of Statistics; Dominion Canada, the same as on Friday of last week, with demand fair. Lead "Annalist"; U. S. A., Indices used: Kingdom, Board of Trade: France, "Statistique Generale"; Germany, was in good demand and firmer. Zinc was steady. Tin United •Statistische Reichsamt"; Italy, Milan Chamber of Commerce; Japan. Bank was rather quiet and lower. The weather over the week-end of Japan. and early in the week was more spring-like and pleasant, Latest Week Were but later on it was rainy and cooler. To-day it was fair and Revenue Freight Loadings During 16.2% in Excess of Same Period Last Year. mild here, with temperatures ranging from 46 to 57 degrees. Loading of revenue freight for the week ended April 14 The forecast was for fair to-night and Saturday. Colder, totaled 578,837 cars, an increase of 20,950 cars, or 1934 probable frost to-night. Sunday probably fair and warmer. 3.8%, over the preceding week and 80,655 cars, or 16.2%, Overnight at Boston it was 46 to 66 degrees; Baltimore, in the corresponding period in 1933. It was also higher than 54 to 66; Pittsburgh, 40 to 62; Portland, Me., 44 to 58; of 12,011 cars, or 2.1%, over the comparable week in Chicago, 36 to 54; Cincinnati, 36 to 64; Cleveland, 34 to 52; a gain loading for the week ended April 7 1934 exceeded Detroit, 32 to 58; Charleston, 64 to 74; Milwaukee, 34 to 48; 1932. Total last year by 13.4% and was also 2.2% in period same the Dallas, 50 to 72; Savannah, 60 to 80; Kansas City, 38 to 60; week ended April 9 1932. the of excess Springfield, Mo., 38 to 60; St. Louis, 42 to 62; Oklahoma The first 16 major railroads to report for the week ended City, 42 to 66; Denver, 38 to 58; Salt Lake City, 52 to 76; total of 254,412 ears of revenue freight Las Angeles, 56 to 74; San Francisco, 50 to 64; Seattle, April 14 1934 loaded a compared with 242,586 cars in the lines, own their on 52 to 80; Montreal, 40 to 60, and Winnipeg, 28 to 44. previous week and 219,087 cars in the seven days ended these carriers, with the exception of the "Annalist" Weekly Index of Wholesale Commpdity April 15 1933. All of Northern RR., continued to show subGreat International Prices Dropped Slightly During Week of April 17 -Indices of Domestic and Foreign Prices for stantial gains over the corresponding period in 1933. ComMarch. parative statistics follow: A rising level of prices in the first month and a half of REVENUE FREIGHT LOADED AND RECEIVED FROM CONNECTIONS. (Number of Cars.) the year, as indicated by the "Annalist" weekly index of wholesale commodity prices, while the dollar was dropping Loaded on Olen Lines. Rec'd from Connections. Week Ended. toward its official new par of 69.06 cents, and relative Apr. 14 Apr.7 Apr, 15 Apr. 14 Apr.7 Apr. lb 1934. 1934. 1933. 1934. 1934. 1933. stability during subsequent weeks was the record for the first quarter of 1934. The first half of the same period was Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Ry _ 18,631 17,138 17,461 4,100 4,314 3,698 20.253 16,386 16,810 7,893 7,263 6,185 & Ohio Ry marked, says the "Annalist," by a declining level of prices, Chesapeake 4,960 Chicago Burlington J. Quincy RR. 13.644 13,036 12,576 5,726 6,214 5.337 when measured in terms of gold, due to the fact that the Chicago Milw.St. P.& Pac. Ry 15,706 15,457 15,300 6.205 6.537 Chicago & North Western Ry_ _ 14.133 13,552 12.344 8,809 9,072 7,080 839 stimulus of the falling dollar operated primarily upon those Gulf Coast Lines 2,894 2,459 2,292 1,226 1,297 Great Northern RR.._ _ 2,735 2,776 2,950 1,836 1.958 1,596 commodities active in international trade, while the others Internat. 2,180 2,614 2.751 4,232 4.335 4,251 _ Lines_ _ Missouri-Kansas-Texas 12,757 12,243 11,327 7,030 7,688 6,342 were affected only to a relatively minor extent. As to its Missouri Pacific RR 4,026 3.849 3,571 7,933 8,534 6,579 N.Y.Chicago & St. Louis Ry_ _ 41,872 35,229 51,554 53,823 42.455 42,561 index for the week of April 17, the "Annalist" said: New York Central Lines 17,051 16,783 12,842 3,699 3,729 3,356 Despite the sharp break in the speculative markets April 16, a loss of only 0.6 point was recorded by the "Annalist" index during the week ended April 17,the index declining to 108.3 on that day from 108.9 April 10. Strength in steers and beef, poultry products, some of the fruits, hides, rubber, copper and especially gasoline partly offset the losses in the grains, cotton, coffee and the reduction in anthracite prices. THE ANNALIST WEEKLY INDEX OF WHOLESALE COMMODITY PRICES Unadjusted for seasonal variation (191100). April 17 1934. April 10 1934 April 18 1933. Farm products 90.6 a92.3 68.1 Food products 106.1 106.5 89.6 Textile products *118.4 al18.8 69.4 Fuels 160.5 161.1 102.3 Metals 105.7 105.6 93.0 Building materials 113.8 113.8 106.6 Chemicals 100.2 100.2 95.0 Miscellaneous 88.4 88.0 68.1 All commodities 108.3 108.9 83.7 b All commodities on old dollar basis_ xi a 64.7 64.3 •Preliminary. a Revised. b Based on exchange quotations for France, Switzerland. Holland and Belgium. The break in the markets was precipitated by the stand of the President, upon his return from his vacation, against the proposed silver legislation. The latter, designed to "do something for silver" (at whatever cost to the country) and at the same time to start a genuine currency inflation, constituted the first test of strength of the President after his setback in the matter of veterans' benefits. It is true that Mr. Roosevelt was reported by Speaker Rainey, a silver advocate, as being "for" silver-pretty cold comfort, indeed, since everybody, of course, is "for" silver just as everybody is "for" peace. That, nevertheless, he opposed the desired legislation, and that even the most fervent silver advocates made no claims to being able to override his veto, showed that his hold on Congress had not been seriously impaired. The markets generally regarded the matter as indicating that Inflation was definitely "out" at present, and the hardy speculative element that had still been counting on a real inflation program had nothing to do but take its losses. While the drain on the Treasury involved in the heavy expenditures by the Administration, if not carefully controlled, may well bring about inflation in the end, the present position of the Administration appears to be definitely against further currency experimentation. The elimination of that element of uncertainty will be much to the benefit ofsound business; the situation of last year, when even the most conservative were compelled to devote much of their time to the attempt to anticipate the measures that the Administration was likely to take (an impossible task, in the absence ofknowledge on that point by the Administration itself), was fundamentally unhealthy and encouraged speculative activity in quarters where it was least desirable or necessary. It is to be hoped that henceforth those who do not wish to speculate will be able to devote themselves to their legitimate business interests. Norfolk & Western Ry Pennsylvania RR Pere Marquette Ry Southern Pacific Lines Wabash Ry 54,484 52.787 46,263 30.039 30,190 26,463 5,472 5,552 3,705 4,789 4,952 3,416 20,725 19,544 17,353 5,089 4,817 4,832 7,152 7,466 6,331 254,412 242.586 219,087 150.742 155,651 126.817 Total x Not reported. TOTAL LOADINGS AND RECEIPTS FROM CONNECTIONS. (Number of Cars.) Week EndedChicago Rock Island & Pac. Ry.._ _ St. Louis-San Francisco Ry Tntal Apr. 14 1934. Apr.7 1934. Apr. 15 1933. 18,952 11,899 18,920 12,180 17,973 11,266 30.851 31,100 29,239 The American Railway Association, in its review of the week ended April 7, reported as follows: Loading of revenue freight for the week ended April 7 totaled 557,887 cars, a decrease of 50,556 cars under the preceding week, but an increase of 65,826 cars above the corresponding week in 1933 and 12,264 care above the corresponding week in 1932. Miscellaneous freight loading for the week of April 7 totaled 228,378 cars, an increase of 1,451 cars above the preceding week, 50,300 cars above the corresponding week in 1933, and 31,438 cars above the corresponding week in 1932. Loading of merchandise less than carload lot freight totaled 167,040 cars, an increase of 915 cars above the preceding week, and 6,145 cars above the corresponding week in 1933, but a decrease of 20,866 cars below the same week in 1932. Grain and grain products loading for the week totaled 25,917 cars, a decrease of 1,595 cars below the preceding week, 7,295 cars below the corresponding week in 1933, and 3,139 cars below the same week in 1932. In the Western districts alone, grain and grain products loading for the week ended April 7 totaled 15,976 cars, a decrease of 5,604 cars below the same week in 1933. Forest products loading totaled 23,550 cars, a decrease of 412 cars below the preceding week, but an increase of 6,766 cars above the same week In 1933, end 3,955 cars above the same week in 1932. Ore loading amounted to 5,089 ears, an increase of 890 cars above the preceding week, 3,301 cars above the corresponding week in 1933, and 2,416 cars above the corresponding week in 1932. Coal loading amounted to 88,940 cars, a decrease of 49,618 cars below the preceding week, but an increase of 6,458 cars above the corresponding week in 1933 and 752 cars above the same week in 1932. Coke loading amounted to 5,937 cars, a decrease of 1,687 cars below the preceding week, but an increase of 2,453 cars above the same week in 1933 and 1,878 cars above the same week in 1932. 2644 Financial Chronicle Live stock loading amounted to 13,041 cars, a decrease of 500 cars below the preceding week, 2,302 cars below the same week in 1933, and 4,170 cars below the same week in 1932. In the Western districts alone, loading of live stock for the week ended April 7 totaled 10,212 cars, a decrease of 1,811 cars below the same week in 1933. All districts reported increases for the week of April 7 compared with the corresponding week in 1933 except the Southwestern, which showed a slight decrease, while all reported increases compared with the same week in 1932 with the exception of the Allegheny and the Central Western. Loading of revenue freight in 1934 compared with the two previous years follows: Four weeks in January Four weeks in February Flve weeks in March Week ended April 7 Total 1934. 1933. 2,177,582 2,308,869 3,059,217 557,887 1,924,208 1,970,566 2.354.521 492,061 2,266.771 2,243,221 2,825,798 545,623 8.103,535 6,741.356 7,881,413 1932. April 21 1934 In the following table we undertake to show also the loadings for the separate roads and systems for the week ended April 7 1934. During this period 33 of the smaller roads showed decreases as compared with the corresponding week last year when the bank holiday was in effect. Among the larger carriers showing increases as compared with the same week in 1933 were the Pennsylvania System, the Baltimore & Ohio RR., the New York Central RR., the Southern By. System, the Chesapeake & Ohio By., the Louisville & Nashville RR., the Norfolk & Western Ry., the Illinois Central System, the Chicago Milwaukee St. Paul & Pacific By., the Chicago & North Western Ry., the Chicago Burlington & Quincy RR., the Missouri Pacific RR., the Southern Pacific Co. (Pacific Lines), and the Reading Co.: REVENUE FREIGHT LOADED AND RECEIVED FROM CONNECTIONS (NUMBER OF CARS)-WEEK ENDED APRIL 7. Railroads Total Revenue F' eight Loaded. 1934. Eastern District. Group ABangor & Aroostook Boston & Albany Boston & Maine Central Vermont Maine Central New York, N. H.& FIartford__ Rutland Total 1.841 3,063 7,630 986 2,619 10,826 574 1933 1.531 2,806 6,494 . 598 2.159 9,030 565 Total Loaas Received from Connections. 1932. 1934. 1933. 1,921 3,066 7,812 660 2,620 11,130 541 291 4,613 10,162 2,497 2,657 11.051 1,043 265 4,242 8,705 2,151 1,974 10,211 950 27,539 23,183 27,750 32,314 28,498 4,806 8,542 12.433 189 987 6,248 1,156 19,021 1,290 212 307 4,679 7,228 9,598 171 1,400 6,546 1,108 16,606 1,937 328 252 6,099 9.591 11,805 225 1.982 8.307 1,490 18,193 2,036 405 364 6,773 6,479 12,625 1,690 1,147 6,956 43 25,718 1,906 23 225 5,583 4,924 10,967 1,541 708 5,980 30 20,258 1,801 36 173 55,191 49,853 60.497 63,585 52,001 537 1,159 6,550 24 175 299 1,999 4,540 8.956 1,578 3,849 5,552 4,197 1,155 4,817 2,910 388 1,134 6,701 14 189 220 1.265 2,640 5,349 2,481 3,264 3.512 2,667 736 4,582 2,389 529 1,313 7,475 44 206 197 1,416 2,294 5,945 3,630 4,193 4,022 3,355 1,013 4,697 2,046 1,045 1,801 10,480 77 135 3,049 1,235 7,342 9,689 180 8,534 4,952 3,090 1,083 7,466 2,837 821 1,498 8,211 44 70 1,648 627 4,812 6,228 163 6,619 3,505 3,093 628 5,989 1.687 48.297 37,511 42,375 62,995 45,643 Grand total Eastern District__ 131,027 110,547 130,622 158,894 126,142 543 24,077 2,273 235 5,688 378 266 96 761 1,055 52,787 12,593 7,071 13 2,336 253 21,073 1.002 217 4,817 0 144 72 853 868 45,517 9,817 2.546 52 2,335 a 25,028 856 143 6,720 47 278 138 1,255 b 56.632 13,117 3,893 32 2,997 682 12,760 1,135 10 9,838 67 35 21 2,215 1,072 30,190 14,178 1,736 1 4,915 533 10,618 567 7 9,034 35 13 9 2,557 1,022 26,573 12,561 538 0 3,192 110,172 89,566 111,116 78,855 67,259 16,386 16,783 1,658 2,781 16,202 12,484 1,557 2,393 15,878 12.594 1,539 2,423 7,263 3,729 1,081 727 6,244 3,173 1,218 538 37.808 32,838 32,434 12,800 11,173 9,723 1,224 431 113 44 1,092 499 348 8.283 19,783 124 9,621 759 417 122 45 1.412 477 260 7.968 17,801 150 9,904 880 448 111 56 1,520 475 318 7.759 18,589 182 4,760 1.565 1,087 288 138 1,293 871 3.221 3,859 12,299 700 3,910 1,157 1,059 297 138 1,170 743 3,568 3.284 10,256 811 Group BDelaware & Hudson Delaware Lackawanna & Wen.. Erie Lehigh & Hudson River Lehigh & New England Lehigh Valley Montour New York Central New York Ontario & Western_ Pittsburgh & Shawmut Pittsburgh Shawmut& Northern Total Group CAnn Arbor Chicago Ind.& Louisville Cleve. fin. ChM. dr St. Louis Central Indiana Detroit & Mackinac Detroit & Toledo Shore Line... Detroit Toledo & Ironton Grand Trunk Western Michigan Central Monongahela New York Chicago & St. Louis Pere Marquette Pittsburgh 3, Lake Erie Pittsburgh & West Virginia.. Wabash Wheeling & Lake Erie Total Allegheny District. Akron Canton & Youngstown_ _ Baltimore & Ohio Bessemer & Lake Erie Buffalo Creek & Cauley Central RR.of New Jersey.... Cornwall Cumberland es Pennsylvania_ Ligonier Valley Long Island b Penn-Read Seashore Lines... Pennsylvania System Reading Co Union (Pittsburgh) West Virginia Northern Western Maryland Total Pocahontas District. Chesapeake AC Ohio Norfolk & Western Norfolk & Portsmouth Belt Line Virginian Total Southern District. Group AAtlantic Coast Line Clinchtield Charleston & Western Carolina Durham & Southern Gainesville & Midland Norfolk Southern Piedmont & Northern Richmond Frederick. & Potom. Seaboard Air Line Southern System Winston-Salem Southbound...... Total Revenue Freight Loaded. Railroads. Group BAlabama Tenn. & Northern_ __ Atlantic Birmingham & Coast__ All.& W.P.-West.RR.of Ala Central of Georgia Columbus & Greenville Florida East Coast Georgia Georgia & Florida Gulf Mobile & Northern Illinois Central System Louisville & Nashville Macon Dublin & Savannah_ _ _ Mississippi Central Mobile & Ohio Nashville Chatt.& St. Louis_ Tennessee Central Total Total Loads Received from Connections. 1934. 1933. 1932. 153 927 859 4.293 262 1,483 905 378 1,585 16,773 15,128 171 156 1.931 3,171 341 216 706 709 3,987 135 1.350 878 347 1,317 14,807 12,885 85 153 1,761 2.817 298 275 737 768 3,993 179 886 848 376 1,393 16,017 13,407 129 148 1,963 2,755 448 179 741 1,115 2,501 225 543 1,357 475 735 8,503 3,785 473 267 1,415 2,295 568 1933 148 757 909 2,050 152 430 1,348 403 589 7,319 3,568 472 237 1,366 2,311 526 48.516 42,451 44,312 25,177 22,585 Grand total Southern District.. 90,180 81,483 84,534 55,244 48,778 Northwestern District. Belt Ry. of Chicago Chicago & North Western Chicago Great Western Chic. Milw. St. Paul & Pacific_ Chic.St.Paul Minn.& Omaha_ Duluth Miasabe e. Northern_ Duluth South Shore & Atlantic. ElginJoliet & Eastern Ft. Dodge Des M.& Southern_ Great Northern Green Bay di Western Lake Superior & Ishpeming._._ Minneapolis & St. Louis Minn. St. Paul & 8.8. Marie__ Northern Pacific Spokane & International Spokane Portland & Seattle 1,009 13,552 2,091 15,457 3.298 438 554 4,751 266 7,952 444 275 1,536 3.757 7,972 103 1,103 777 11.923 1,948 14,343 2.840 355 323 2,623 275 8,752 425 175 1,592 4.102 6,620 92 795 1,062 13,418 2,434 15,178 2,796 419 373 3,043 301 7,327 505 a 1,630 4,110 7,666 a 1,109 1,641 9.072 2,488 6,537 2,859 94 355 4,639 136 2,184 414 105 1,328 2,382 2,144 159 707 1,254 8,585 1.811 5,289 2,192 40 333 3,084 141 1,757 318 49 1,145 1,683 1,771 109 965 64,558 55,960 61,371 37,244 28,526 17,138 2.421 156 13,036 816 9,961 2,224 859 1,629 IRO 803 1,749 654 121 14,146 213 241 10,963 201 1,160 17,141 2,811 152 12,430 1,511 10.206 2.002 742 1,387 152 1,207 1,905 418 69 11,519 199 274 10,308 211 1,260 19,034 2,841 173 13,203 a 11,829 1,881 931 1,529 95 1,206 a 469 185 14,012 222 273 11,018 238 1,146 4,314 1.663 32 6,214 604 6,028 1,957 841 1,833 3 825 993 303 35 3,184 288 987 6.141 3 1,290 3,491 1,439 22 5,07, 637 4,901 1,500 761 1,549 8 903 816 180 66 2,283 222 839 5,001 2 1,206 78,651 75,904 80,265 37,538 30,903 177 149 92 2,489 2,778 114 1,579 1,030 137 305 397 73 4,335 12,243 41 103 8,961 1,895 5,398 3,921 1,484 22 129 144 138 2,270 4,119 182 112 184 3,363 1,571 122 1,366 1,325 • 77 538 81 4,513 12,160 33 98 8,740 2,125 5,891 3,444 1,597 21 3,336 . 209 150 1,297 1,958 797 1,285 795 318 834 205 195 2,814 7,688 18 98 3,413 1,775 2,282 3,481 2,027 42 2,385 278 119 1,051 1,873 691 1,237 727 228 543 140 287 2,025 6,053 14 107 2,928 1,323 1.916 2,992 1,894 36 Total Central Western District. Atch. Top.& Santa Fe System. Alton Bingham & Garfield Chicago Burlington & Quincy Chicago & Illinois Midland_ _ _ Chicago Rock Island & Pacific_ Chicago & Eastern Illinois Colorado & Southern Denver & Rio Grande Western. Denver & Salt Lake Fort Worth & Denver City__ _ _ Illinois Terminal Northwestern Pacific: Peoria & Pekin Union Southern Pacific (Pacific) St. Joseph & Grand Island Toledo Peoria & Western Union Pacific System Utah Western Pachlo Total Southw n District. Alton & Southern Burlington-Rock Island Fort Smith & Western Cult Coast Lines International-Great Northern Kansas Oklahoma & Gull Kansas City Southern Louisiana & Arkansas Louisiana Arkansas & TeXasLitchfield & Madison Midland Valley Missouri & North Arkansas..... Missouri-Kansas-1 MB Lines... Missouri Pacific Natchez & Southern Quanah Acme & Pacific Bt. Louis-San Francisco St. Louis Southwestern Texas & New Orleans Texas & Pacific Terminal RR. Assn.01St. Louis Weatherford Min.Wells& N.W. oo 1,445 944 121 290 480 72 4,288 11,125 52 151 6,981 1,820 5,180 4,598 1,532 20 41,664 39.032 40,222 Total 30,067 45,985 26.193 45,281 Total 45,891 34,794 28,447 •Not available. b Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines include the new consolidated lines of the West Jersey & Seashore RR.. formerly Part of Pennsylvania RR..and Atlantic: City RR.,formerly Dart of Reading Co :1932 flames included in Pennsylvania System and Reading Co Col. Leonard P. Ayres of Cleveland Trust Co. Sees Probable Price Advances in Commodities Which He Says May Operate to Check Demand and Production. Stating that "a considerable number of threatening labor disputes have been settled, and it now seems likely that we shall escape any period of numerous and serious strikes," Colonel Leonard P. Ayres, Vice-President of the Cleveland Trust Co., in the "Business Bulletin" of the company, issued April 16, observes that "this is most encouraging, but," he adds, "some of the accompanying developments of recent labor compromises raise problems that may prove difficult." Colonel Ayres points out that "important wage increases have been generally granted in the three great industries of iron and steel, coal, and automobile manufacturing." Continuing, he says: Volume 138 In each case the settlements were shortly followed by sweeping advances In the prices of the products. Similar developments have taken place in many smaller industries, and it seems probable that important price advances for many commodities will shortly be announced. These may operate to check demand and production, and they will complicate the difficulties of establishing desired price parities between agricultural products and industrial goods. The further comments of Colonel Ayres follow in part, the charts and diagrams being omitted: Business improvement has made good progress during the first quarter of this year. Industrial production has steadily expanded, employment has increased, and payrolls have grown larger even more rapidly than the number of workers has moved up. There have been steady advances in the security markets. Bond prices have risen almost continuously. Early in April the index of all bonds had reached a new high for the year. Highgrade bonds have been especially strong, and by the end of the first week in April the Dow Jones price index of 10 highest-grade rail bonds reached the highest figures ever recorded, since the index was started in 1915. Many of the limited indexes of stock prices have seemed to reflect Indecisive movements, but an index of this bank which includes all stocks traded rose early in April to a new high for this year. In securities a general and sustained creeping advance has been under way. . . . Meanwhile our most difficult and important problem continues to be that of getting back to work the great numbers of men and women who are unemployed. It is always true in periods of recovery following depression that industry expands its output far more rapidly than it increases the numbers of its workers. In the recovery from 1921 to 1923 factory production increased by over 80%, while employment was rising 32%. Production. Business has been improving steadily and rapidly during the past five months. The decline which began last July continued to November. Then the present new advance began and carried the volume of industrial production up from nearly 34% below normal in November to less than 24% below in March, and the gains are continuing in April. The diagram [this we omit.—Ed.) shows the monthly changes in the volume of industrial production since the beginning of 1929. The index is based on the data of the Federal Reserve Board recomputed so as to show the percentages of deviation above and below the assumed normal level. The January figure shown in the small table within the diagram may be accepted as being almost a final one, but the February one is still pre liminary and subject to revision, and the March figure is an estimate. . . . It is worth noting that if the April record is better than that of March, as now seems almost assured, this present series of five consecutive months of advance will be the longest period of steady improvement so far in the depression. The February gains in manufacturing output were most pronounced in Iron and steel, in textiles, and in the production of automobiles. There were small declines in the output of food products, in lumber, and in tobacco manufactures. In mining there were important increases in both bituminous and anthracite coal, a slight decline in the output of petroleum, and no changes in the production of zinc and lead. Factory employment Increased by about 6%, which is more than the normal seasonal advance. Factory payrolls moved up by 12%, or twice as much as the increase in the number of workers. Fundamentals. Evidences of improvement in financial and banking conditions continue to develop, and to demonstrate that the turning of the corner in the business depression involves the turning of many minor corners. The accompanying diagram [this we omit.—Ed.] shows a depression index or Indicator of three components developed several years ago, and designed to reflect promptly and surely any real changes in the fundamental factors of business activity. The diagram covers the period since the beginning of 1929, and the figures used are weekly data, with the average of the entries for January of 1929 considered as being equal to 100. The upper line in the diagram reflects changes in the amount of bank credit in use. It shows changes in the sum of loans and of bank deposits in the city banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System. In recent months it has slowly but definitely been moving up. The sharp increase in the autumn of 1929 was caused by the banks taking over at the tirrie of the stock market crash many large accounts that had beern with brokers. The long decline that began late in 1930, and reached the low point at the time of the bank crisis early last year, reflects the great shrinkage in bank credit which has constituted one of the most serious features of the depression. The recent advances reflect the building up of deposits by bank purchases of Federal securities rather than expansion of commercial loans. The dotted line shows the long decline and recent advance in the wholesale prices of commodities. It is constructed by counting each week the number of advances and declines in Dun's list of commodity price quotations, and recording cumulatively the net differences. The advances were vigorous in the second quarter of last year, but since last July they have been small and irregular. The dashed line is a weekly index of industrial production. It is a combination of an index compiled by this bank, the index of the "Times" Annalist, and. that of the "Business Week." These three indexes of bank credit, of wholesale prices, and of industrial production, have been given equal weights and combined into the depression index represented by the heavy solid line. That index has now advanced to the high level it reached last July. . . . International Recovery. The world's industrial activity has now been expanding for nearly two ”ars, after having contracted continuously and almost steadily for three years. The diagram [this we omit.—Ed.] shows the monthly changes in an international index of industrial activity during the past 10 years. The index has been constructed by combining for each of eight industrial contr. tries the monthly data for the production of iron, steel, and coal, and the records of railway freight movements, and then bringing together the data for the eight countries into a single index. The index for each country was given a weight based on the population of the country. The data were corrected to eliminate merely seasonal variations, and they were slightly smoothed. The average for the years 1927, 1928 and 1929 was taken as being equal to 100. The figures used were taken from the records published by the statistical section of the League of Nations. The eight countries in the order of population are Belgium, Canada, France, Italy, the United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, and the United States. The course of the resulting composite index line is an irregularly advancing one from 1924 to 1929. Its fluctuations in that time are numerous and sharp, but the total increase amounted to well over 25%. The peak of 2645 Financial Chronicle the movement was reached in the summer of 1929, shortly before the crash in our security markets. Then the line followed a steep downward slope to the summer of 1932, when it turned up again. Its subsequent advance has been irregular, but the trend has been a rapidly rising one. It is not so simple as would first appear to answer the question as to which country has made the best showing in recovery. The highest records of prosperity and the lowest ones of depression were reached in different years in different countries. Moreover, questions arise as to whether or not the measure of depression loss should be from the extreme high month of prosperity to the lowest month of depression, or between yearly averages, and further similar problems arise in the measurement of recovery. Various results are produced by following different methods. If we use the indexes of the individual countries as they were combined in making this composite index, and measure the decline from the highest month of prosperity to the lowest one of depression, we shall find that the percentages of those losses that had been regained by the end of 1933 were as follows: Japan, 76; United Kingdom, 46; United States, 29; Germany, 27; Canada, 23; France, 22; Italy, 15, and Belgium, 13. Strikingly different results are obtained if one compares the figures of the indexes of industrial production as compiled in these several countries, except Italy, and reduced by the League of Nations to a common base by which the average results of 1928 are taken as equal to 100. By the end of 1933 the index of Japan had advanced 39% above the 1928 level. The other indexes were still below it, but the percentages which they had regained of their extreme losses below the 1928 level were for the United Kingdom, 92; for Canada, 43; for Belgium, 42; for France, 40; for Germany, 35, and for the United States, 32. Durable Goods. The diagram and text presented on the last page of last month's "Bulletin" showed that there was no serious overproduction of consumption goods in the prosperity period just before the depression. The statistical evidence shown here this month indicates that there was no serious overproduction of durable and capital goods just before the depression, but that serious shortages have developed during the depression. Durable goods as distinguished from consumption goods, are those made of the lasting materials. In the main they are not bought at retail, and in large part they are paid for by borrowed funds secured from bond issues, mortgages, and instalment notes. The most important classes of durable goods are those made from iron and steel and other metals, transportation equipment including railroad rolling stock, automobiles, airplanese, and ships, lumber, cement, stone, clay and glass. The largest purchasers are corporations. The diagrams at the foot of this page show the monthly changes in the physical volume, but not in the value, of the industrial production of durable goods during the past 35 years. The top section is the index of production. It is based on the data, the weightings, and the methods used by the Census and the Federal Reserve Board in the construction of their indexes of production. A straight line computed by the method of least squares and based on the data from 1899 through 1930, inclusive, has been drawn through the irregular index line to show the trend, and to serve as a computed normal from which to measure the plus deviations of the prosperity periods, and minus deviations of the depressions. The black silhouette of the middle section shows the percentages by which production exceeded this computed normal or fell below it. The lowest diagram was made by cumulating the data of the middle one. The percentages by which production exceeded normal were continuously added until a depression period was reached, and then they were subtracted. If production had. been above normal by 10%'for 10 months the accumulated surplus would equal the normal output for one month. The theoretical surplus so measured in terms of normal monthly output was a little over four months in 1920, and nearly three months in 1929. The accumulated shortage was four months in 1915, and nearly 22 months in February 1934. Despite technocracy the fact is that no serious surplusses of durable and capital goods were accumulating before the depression. Present shortages are acute in durable goods, and minor in consumption goods. Unemployment cannot be cured by subsidizing consumer purchasing power, but can be cured by re-establishing financing of durable goods production. Estimated Freight Car Loadings in Second]Quarter of Year Approximately 10.7% Higher Than Actual Loadings Same Time Year Ago. According to estimates compiled by the 13 Shippers' Regional Advisory Boards and made public on April 3, freight car loadings in the second quarter of 1934 will be about 10.7% above actual loadings in the same quarter in 1933. On the basis of these estimates, the announcement said, freight car loadings of the 29 principal commodities will be 4,367,725 cars in the second quarter of 1934, compared with 3,945,568 actual loading for the same commodities in the corresponding period last year. The announcement continued: Each one of the 13 Shippers' Regional Advisory Boards estimates an increase in the loadings for the second quarter of 1934, compared with the same period in 1933. The tabulation below shows the total loading for each district for the second quarter of 1933, the estimated loadings for the second quarter of 1934, and the percentage of increase or decrease: Shippers' Advisory Board. Allegheny Atlantic States Central West Great Lakes Mid-West New England Northwest Chlo Valley Pacific Coast Pacific Northwest Southeast Southwest Trans-Missouri-Kansas Tntal Estimated Actual Loadings, 1933. Loadings, 1934. Per Cent Increase. 523,495 426,335 144,002 237,774 551.369 93,679 200,531 454,381 151,147 114.868 448,499 332,411 267,077 570,002 474,306 152,924 303,121 577.689 101,041 212,027 550,041 169,937 133,700 500,876 347.354 274.707 8.9 11.3 6.2 27.5 4.8 7.9 5.7 21.1, 12.4 16.4 11.7 4.5 2.9 3.945.568 4.367.725 10.7 April 21 1934 Financial Chronicle 2646 Of the 29 commodities covered in the forecast, it is estimated that 24 will show an increase. They are: Flour, meal and other mill products; cotton, cottonseed and products except oil; potatoes, other fresh vegetables; poultry and dairy products; coal and coke; ore and concentrates; gravel, sand and stone; salt; lumber and forest products; petroleum and petroleum products; sugar, syrup and molasses; iron and steel; machinery and boilers; cement; brick and clay products; lime and plaster; agricultural implements and vehicles other than automobiles; automobiles, trucks and parts; fertilizers of all kinds; paper, paperboard and prepared roofing; chemicals and explosives; canned goods, including all canned food products. The five commodities for which reductions are estimated are: All grain; hay, straw and alfalfa; citrus fruits; other fresh fruits, and live stock. Of the commodities for which increases are estimated in the second quarter compared with the same period last year, those showing the largest percentage increases are: Automobiles, trucks and parts, 91%; agricultural implements and vehicles other than automobiles, 79.2%; ore and concentrates, 44.8%; brick and clay products, 27.3%; cement, 20%; lumber and lumber products, 17.7%; iron and steel, 15.5%; lime and plaster, 15%; gravel, sand and stone, 14.4%, and coal and coke, 13%. The estimated carloadings for the second quarter of 1934, together with actual carloadings for the same period in 1933 and the percentage of increase or decrease for each of the 29 commodities included in the forecast of the Shippers' Advisory Boards, follows: CarloadingsCommodity. Actual 1933. Estimated 1934. Estimated Per Cent Inc.(-1-) or Dec.(-). 263,245 Grain,all 192,891 Flour, meal and other mill products 27,331 Hay, straw and alfalfa 34,735 Cotton 11,943 Cottonseed and products, except oil 33,909 Citrus fruits 42,093 Other fresh fruits 57,877 Potatoes 68.667 Other fresh vegetables 195,544 Livestock 38.030 Poultry and dairy products 1,225,865 Coal and coke Ore and concentrates 105,056 223,410 Gravel, sand and stone 25,528 Salt 288,505 Lumber and forest products 458,495 Petroleum and petroleum products 35,600 Sugar, syrup and molasses 189,989 Iron and steel 15,578 Machinery and boilers 82,237 Cement 35,892 Brick and clay products 24,110 Lime and plaster Agricultural implements and vehicles, other 5,080 than automobiles 84,648 Automobiles. trucks and parts 63,826 Fertilizers, all kinds 67,255 Paper, paper board and prepared roofing__ _ 14,941 Chemicals and explosives Canned goods-all canned food products, (Includes catsup, jams, jellies, olives, 35,288 pickles, preserves, ezc.) 205,263 198,742 26,591 35,986 13,586 23,650 41,836 59,452 77.902 189.674 38,368 1,385,545 152,123 255,540 26,593 339,508 480.023 36,925 219,375 18,571 98,717 45.704 27,718 -22.0 ±3.0 -2.7 +3.6 +13.8 -30.3 -0.6 +2.7 +13.4 -3.0 9,103 161,701 72,808 72.934 16,594 +79.2 +91.0 +14.1 ±8.4 ±11.1 37,193 +5.4 3.945.568 4.367.725 4-10.7 Total +0.9 +13.0 +44.8 +14.4 +4.2 +17.7 +5.2 +3.7 +15.5 +19.2 ±20.0 +27.3 +15.0 Moody's Daily Index of Staple Commodity Prices in Sharp Decline. The principal commodity markets were unsettled during the week by a sudden and pronounced decline in wheat prices, which affected not only other grains but many of other speculative commodities as well. As a result, Moody's Daily Index of Staple Commodity Prices registered a sharp decline on Monday, which was extended on Tuesday and Thursday, when it reached 133.1, the lowest mark since Jan. 22. Friday brought a fair recovery, the close being at 133.7, a drop of 3.6 points during the week. Although the Index as a whole broke out of the narrow range which it had occupied for three months, wheat alone accounted for over two-thirds of the loss in the Index number, all other commodities holding remarkably well. Nine of the fifteen staples included in the Index registered declines, but hogs and cotton showed the only important losses, aside from wheat. The remaining declines, in corn, sugar, cocoa, wool tops, silver, and silk, were all nominal and were just about offset by the solitary advance in rubber. Hides, steel, copper, lead, and coffee were unchanged. The changes in the Index number during the week, with comparisons, are as follows: Fri., April 13 Sat., April 14 Mon., April 16 Tues., April 17 Wed., April 18 Thurs., April 19.. Fri., April 20 137.3 137.1 134.4 133.9 134.1 133.1 133.7 2 Weeks Ago, April 6 Month Ago, Mar.20 Year Ago, April 20 1933 High, July 18 Low, Feb. 4 Feb. 16 1934 High. Low, Jan, 2 137.9 138.1 99.9 148.9 78.7 140.4 126.0 Slight Increase Noted in "Annalist" Monthly Index of Business Activity for March. The "Annalist" index of business activity shows a slight gain for March, the preliminary figure being 78.5, as against 77.0 for February, 73.1 for January and 69.7 for December. The index, the "Annalist" said, shows a net gain of 8.8 points since the close of last year, and a gain of 20.0 points since March of last year, while the decline from the high for last year has been cut to 11.0 points. With the exception of June, July and August of last year, the March index is the highest since August 1931. The "Annalist" further stated: The most important factor in the March rise of the combined index was an estimated increase in the adjusted index of electric power production to 95.4 from 93.2 for February. Substantial increases were recorded in the adjusted indices of steel ingot production, freight car loadings, pig iron production and automobile production. Minor gains were shown in the adjusted indices of cotton consumption, silk consumption and zinc production. Only one component of the combined Index, boot and shoe production, showed a decrease. Table I gives the combined index and its components, each of which is adjusted for seasonal variation and where necessary for long-time trend, for the last three months. Table II gives the combined index by months back to the beginning of 1929. TABLE I-THE ANNALIST INDEX OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY AND COMPONENT GROUPS. Freight car loadings Steel ingot production Pig iron production Electric power production Cotton consumption Wool consumption Silk consumption Boot and shoe production Automobile production Lumber production Cement production Zinc production Combined index March. February. January. 69.0 60.1 50.9 a95.4 89.9 67.4 55.7 45.8 93.2 89.2 75.8 66.6 c119.3 72.2 49.5 55.8 61.5 77.0 65.2 48.8 42.7 89.4 88.8 73.9 60.6 101.7 58.7 54.5 46.2 62.1 73.1 69.6 c95.6 b76.9 62.1 *78.5 TABLE II-THE COMBINED INDEX SINCE JANUARY 1929. January February March April May June July August September October November 1934. 1933. 1932. 1931. 1930. 1929. 73.1 77.0 *78.5 63.0 61.7 58.5 64.1 72.5 83.4 89.5 83.6 76.5 72.4 68.5 69.7 70.1 68.1 66.7 63.2 60.9 60.4 59.7 61.3 65.2 65.4 64.7 64.8 81.4 83.1 85.1 86.4 85.1 82.6 83.1 78.9 76.3 72.6 72.2 72.1 102.1 102.5 100.5 101.8 98.5 97.1 93.1 90.8 89.6 86.8 84.4 83.9 112.9 112.4 111.9 115.0 115.7 116.6 116.7 115.6 115.0 113.4 106.0 101.2 --- -- -___ flanamhor of 7,862,000 kilowatt * Subject to revision. a Based on an estimated output kilowatt hours in Febhours, as against a Geological Survey total of 7,057,000,000 output of 338,000 ruary and 6,674,000,C00 in March 1933. b Based on an estimated of 243,947 cars and cars and trucks as against Department of Commerce total1933. c Based on an March trucks in February and 124,581 cars and trucks inestimated output of 31.000.000 estimated output of 28.500,000 pairs as against an total of 28,576,463 Pairs in February and as against Department of Commerce in March 1933. Retail Prices of Food 0.4 of 1% Lower During Two Weeks Ended March 27, According to United States Department of Labor. Retail food prices declined 0.4 of 1% during the two weeks' period ending March 27, according to an announcement Issued April 14 by Commissioner Lubin of the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor. The Bureau's index receded to 108.0% of the 1913 average as compared with 108.5% on March 13 and 108.1% on Feb. 27. The announcement quoted Mr. Lubin as stating: The decline for the United States as a whole is largely due to a decrease In the prices of nine of the 42 commodities in the retail price index. Among the items that showed the largest decline were pork chops, butter, bananas, potatoes and cabbage. Twenty-two articles in the index showed an increase, and 11 registered no change in price over the two-week period. Food prices showed decreases in 34 of the 51 cities covered by the Bureau. In 14 cities price rises were registered, and three showed no change. As compared with March 15 1933, when the index number was 90.5, present prices are up by 19%. They are approximately 3% over the level of March 15 1932, when the index registered 105.0. The current index is 4 of 1% over the high point of last year (Sept. 28 1 slightly more than / 1933), when the level was 107.4, and approximately 20% over the low point reached in April 1933, when the index was 90.4. The announcement further said as follows: Cereal foods, with an index of 144.7, showed an increase of 1% during the two weeks. This figure is approximately 29% 'over the corresponding month of one year ago, and 101/2% over two years ago. Meats, with an 4 of 1% to a point 10% above a year ago, but 1 index of 109.7, rose / nearly 8% under the level for two years ago. The dairy products group, which now registers 101.1% of the 1913 average, declined more than 1% 4% above prices of one year ago and a little less than / but still remains 141 1% below two years ago. Important items showing price increases were sirloin steak, rib roast, sliced ham, sliced bacon, white bread, canned peas, canned pork and beans. and sugar. Among the important items showing no change in average price were fresh and evaporated milk, wheat flour, corn meal, rice, raisins, canned corn and tomatoes, and prunes. Prices used in constructing the weighted index numbers of the Bureau are based upon reports from all types of retail food dealers in 51 cities and cover quotations on 42 important food items. Indexes are based on the average price of 1913 as 100.0%. Comparisons of the current index with the indexes for March 13. Feb. 27 and Feb. 13 1934, March 15 1933, March 15 1932 and March 15 1929 are shown in the following table: INDEX NUMBERS OF RETAIL PRICES OF FOOD (1913=100.0) Mar.27 Mar.13 Feb. 27 Feb. 13 Mar.15 Mar.15 Mar.15 1934. 1934. 1934. 1934. 1933. 1932. 1029. All foods Cereals Meats Dairy products 108,0 144.7 109.7 101.1 108.5 143.4 109.1 102.3 108.1 143.4 107.8 101.8 108.3 143.3 106.7 102.6 90.5 112.3 100.1 88.3 105.0 124.3 118.9 101.9 153.0 164.1 182.8 152.4 The largest decline n food prices occurred in Baltimore where a drop of more than 2% was recorded. Other cities showing a decrease of 1% or more were Norfolk, Columbus, Portland, Me., Birmingham, Los Angeles and Boston. Food prices in Washington, D. C., declined 0.3 of 1%. The largest increase occurred in Mobile, where prices advanced by approximately 1%. Of the 14 cities showing increases, eight advanced less 2 of 1%. Cleveland, New Haven and Richmond showed no change 1 than / during the two weeks. As compared with March 15 1933, all of the cities showed material advances. Minneapolis, where food prices have increased 28%, showed Financial Chronicle Volume 138 the largest advance. The smallest increase was reported for Los Angeles, amounting to 61 / 2%. In Washington, D. 0., the increase has been 171 / 2%. As compared with the corresponding period of two years ago, 42 of the 51 cities have shown an advance in prices, while nine recorded decreases. In the two-year period retail food prices in Washington have advanced approximately 3%, or by approximately the same amount as the average for all of the cities covered. The following table shows the percent change that has taken place in each city and the individual food items on March 27 as compared with March 13 1934, March 15 1933 and March 15 1932: CHANGES IN RETAIL PRICES OF FOOD BY CITIES. Percent Change on Mar. 27 1934. Compared with. Mar.15 Mar.15 Mar.13 1932. 1933. 1934. Percent Change on Mar. 27 1934, Compared with C. Mar.15 Mar.15 Mar.13 1932. 1933. 1934. Atlanta +2.8 +22.6 +0.4 Minneapolis..+5.7 +20.3 -2.2 Mobile Baltimore Birmingham._ +0.6 +16.0 -1.3 Newark Boston +1.9 +16.2 -1.2 New Haven... Bridgeport +0.7 +21.6 -0.7 New Orleans.-Buffalo +5.7 +22.5 New York Butte -5.6 +9.6 +0.5 Norfolk Charleston,S.C. -1.5 +21.1 -0.5 Omaha Chicago -5.3 +16.9 -0.5 Peoria Cincinnati +3.3 +20.9 +0.8 Philadelphia... Cleveland +7.5 +24.4 0.0 Pittsburgh Columbus +4.2 +24.4 -1.4 Portland, Me.. Dallas +3.0 +21.3 -0•3 Portland, OreDenver +3.3 +15.9 +0.3 Providence---Detroit +9.6 +26.0 +0.6 Richmond Fall River +1.4 +19.5 -0.4 Rochester Houston +3.5 +17.9 -0.2 St. Louis Indianapolis_ _ _ +4.1 +23.1 -0.4 St. Paul Jacksonville... +3.7 +22.6 +0.3 Salt Lake City. Kansas City,... +3.5 +16. -0.6 San Francisco.. Little Rock.... +7.5 +24.9 +0.2 Savannah Los Angeles.... -2.9 +6. -1.3 Scranton +0.1 Seattle Louisville +6.3 +23. Manchester_ -- +3.7 +18.8 -0.9 Springfield, Ill_ +3.5 +23.8 +0.2 Wash'g'n,D.C. Memphis Milwaukee_ +0.6 +17.6 -0.6 United States-- +4.3 +1.8 +4.0 +0.3 +2.9 +3.4 -0.4 +3.7 +2.9 +7.4 +5.9 -0.2 -1.1 +1.4 +5.4 +4.1 +3.7 +5.8 +2.7 -1.4 +6.4 +4.0 +0.5 +3.1 +3.6 +2.8 +28.0 +17.0 +23.1 +23.6 +19.1 +19.9 +23.2 +26.4 +20.4 +26.0 +25.0 +18.0 +13.1 +15.9 +23.2 +23.2 +21.6 +27.6 +18.5 +11.0 +22.1 +19.1 +15.0 +19. +17.6 +19. +0.2 +0.9 +0.8 0.0 -1.0 -1.8 +0.5 -0.2 -0.3 -0.2 -1.4 +0.2 -1.1 0.0 -1.0 -0.5 -0.1 -0.2 -1.8 -0.1 -0.6 -1.0 -1.0 -0.3 -0.4 CHANGES IN FOOD PRICES BY COMMODITIES. Percent Change on Mar. 27 1934, Compared with. drride. Sirloin steak_ _ _ Round steak... Rib roast Chuck roast... Plate beet Pork chops_ _ _ Bacon sliced... Ham sliced__ Lunn. leg of... Hens, Salmon, red, canned Milk, fresh.... Milk. evapor'd. Butter Oleomargarine. Cheese Lard Vegetable lard substitute_ _ _ Eggs Bread, white_ Bread, rye Flour Percent Change on Mar. 27 1934, Compared with Article. Mar.15 Mar.15 Mar.13 1932. 1933. 1934. Mar.15 Mar.15 Mar.13 1932. 1933. 1934. Corn meal +10.3 +28.5 0.0 Rolled oats.... -13.0 +21.8 +1.5 Corn flakes._ _ +4.8 +9.6 +1.1 Wheat cereal__ +7.0 +9.5 0.0 Macaroni +0.6 +9.0 +1.3 Rice 0.0 +9.9 +36.8 Beans, navy... +9.4 +41.5 -1.7 Potatoes +64.7 +75.0 -6.7 Onions -47.7 +60.7 0.0 Cabbage -33.9 +5.7 -2.6 Pork and beans. -13.7 +7.8 +1.5 Corn, canned-- +1.8 +15.3 0.0 Peas, canned-- +26.7 +32. +1.2 Sugar +1.9 +5.8 +10. Tea -5.5 +6.5 +0.3 Coffee -11.7 -0.7 +0.7 Tomatoes,can'd +9.4 +23.5 0.0 Prunes 0.0 +14. +28.4 Raisins -18. +2.2 0.0 Bananas +2.3 -2.2 -4. Oranges -9. +9.9 +0.7 Peaches, canned ____ +0.6 --Pears, canned-----------0.5 -11.5 -11.9 -15.2 -12.1 -12.1 +12.1 -0.4 -9.6 +0.8 -10.6 +3.5 +3.3 -0.5 +1.3 +2.0 +26.8 +21.9 +13.7 +16.2 +15.1 +1.4 +0.4 +1.0 +0.7 -1.0 -2.0 +2.0 +0.7 +1.6 +1.7 -25.6 -1.8 -10.5 +4.1 -20.1 +1.7 +13.2 +14.6 +9.9 +15.3 +23.8 +2.4 +15.8 +30. +0.5 0.0 0.0 -3.8 +0.8 +0.4 +1.0 -11.2 +3. +16.6 +24. +14.3 +52. +50.0 +60.0 -0.5 -0.4 +1.3 0.0 0.0 Revision in Index Numbers of Factory Employment and Payrolls of Bureau of Labor StatisticsIndex to Be Based on Three-Year Average, 192324-25, as 100, Instead of 1926 as Heretofore. "The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor has revised its index numbers of factory employment and payrolls from January 1919 to March 1934," Commissioner Lubin of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, announced April 17. "Hereafter the Bureau's index will be based on the three-year average, 1923-24-25, as 100 as recommended by the Advisory Committee to the Secretary of Labor," Mr. Lubin said. He further stated: Two radical changes have been made in the index. First, the index for each of the 90 separate industries surveyed each month has been adjusted to conform with the figures on employment and payrolls for previous years as published by the Bureau of the Census. Similar adjustments have been made for the 14 groups into which these industries are classified. and for the general index for all manufacturing industries. This change has been made so that the indexes may reflect as accurately as possible the changes in total factory employment and payrolls, not only from month to month, but also over a period of years. The Bureau's Indexes are based on returns supplied by representative manufacturing establishments In each of the industries surveyed. The establishments supplying these monthly data employ approximately 50% of all factory wage earners of the country, and their combined reports indicate with close accuracy the short-time trend in employment and payrolls. The former indexes did not, however, accurately reflect the long-time trends. They did not fully portray the increases resulting from the establishment of new plants, or the decreases brought about by the permanent shut down of establishments not included In the Bureau's sample. Such changes are shown only by the complete coverage of every plant in each industry, as made by the Biennial Census of Manufacturers. As now readjusted. the Bureau of Labor Statistics' index makes allowance for new establishments coming Into existence, and old establishments dropping out. A second change in the revised series of index numbers is the shifting of the base from the 12-month average for 1926 to the average for the three-year period. 1923-24-25. Henceforth, the average for these years will equal 100 in the Bureau's index. This broader base was selected as preferable to the single-year base, not only because it minimizes any unusual condition which would greatly affect the relative position of any industry in any single year, but also to place the Bureau's indexes on a base similar to a number of other official and private series of indexes on employment, payrolls and production. 2647 Data for the non-manufacturing industries are also being revised and improved by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. More than 100,000 additional firms in the field of wholesale and retail trade, real estate, building construction, dry cleaning and laundries have recently been added to the roll of establishments reporting to the Bureau. The United States Department of Labor, in announcing this, said: The Advisory Committee to the Secretary of Labor, which recommended these changes and improvements, was appointed at the request of Secretary Perkins by the American Statistical Association. The Committee consists of Bryce M. Stewart, Director of Research of Industrial Relations Counselors; Ewan Clague, Director of Research. Community Council of Philadelphia; Meredith B. Givens, Social Science Research Council; Ralph G. Hurlin, Director of Statistical Research, Russell Sage Foundation; Aryness Joy, Office of the Economic Adviser to the Executive Council; Murray W. Latimer, Industrial Relations Counselors; Howard B. Myers, Bureau of Statistics and Research, Illinois Department of Labor; Morris A. Copeland, Executive Secretary, Central Statistical Board, and J. Frederic Dowhurst, Twentieth Century Fund. Fairchild Retail Price Index for April 1 Highest Since August 1931-Increased 0.5 of 1% Over March 1. Retail prices during March gained 0.5 of 1%, according to the Fairchild Retail Price Index. Current quotations show a gain of 29.1% above April 1 1933. The increase above the 1933 low point is 29.6%. The index on April 1 at 90.0 (Jan. 3 1931 equals 100) compares with 67.9 as of April 1 1933 and 79.2 as of April 1 1932. The latest index is the highest since August 1931. However, it is still 24% below November 1929. The index further notes: The movement of prices during the month was not uniform, for the increase is largely to be explained by the sharp advances in men's clothing prices, which gained 5.9%; fur prices, which gained 3.2%; blankets and comfortables, which gained 3.5%. Women's apparel, however, advanced 1.3%. Women's apparel prices, however, showed a greater increase above the corresponding period a year ago, as well as above the low. Home furnishings recorded the second greatest advance, due to the gains In domestics, floor coverings, and china and glassware. The increase in piece goods and infanta' wear during the month was comparatively negligible. However, piece goods prices are showing the greatest advance from the low point, but still continue to show the greatest decline as L'ompared with the January base. There is a definite tendency of the various items included In the index to move closer to the composite index. There are still a number of items which are selling below replacement. The tendency continues against sharp mark-ups. THE FAIRCHILD RETAIL PRICE INDEX-JANUARY 1931=-100. Copyright 1933. Fairchild News Service. 1932. 1933. 1934. April 1, July 1. Arpil 1. May 1. Mar. 1. April 1. Composite index Piece goods Men's apparel Women's apparel Infants' wear Home furnishings Piece goods: Silks Woolens Cotton wash goods Domestics: • Sheets Blanketa & corafortables. Women's apparel: Hosiery Aprons & house dresses_ etersets and brassieres_ Furs Underwear Shoes Men's apparel: Hosiery Underwear Shirts and neckwear_ _ Hats and caps Clothing,incl. overalls... Shoes Infants' wear: Socks Underwear Shoes Furniture Floor coverings Musical instruments Luggage Elec. household appliances. China and glassware 79.2 75.5 80.9 79.9 85.5 79.1 75.1 71.5 77.2 76.2 79.5 76.2 69.7 65.8 71.2 71.7 76.4 70.9 69.4 65.1 70.7 71.8 76.4 70.2 89.5 85.6 88.4 90.2 93.2 87.5 90.0 85.8 89.0 91.4 94.0 88.6 75.1 76.1 75.2 68.4 74.0 72.1 60.1 69.2 68.3 57.4 69.2 68.6 71.2 81.2 104.5 70.9 79.7 106.9 76.4 80.2 71.8 77.2 65.3 72.9 65.0 72.9 96.1 94.7 97.9 98.1 77.2 85.2 89.1 70.2 76.3 81.5 68.2 80.6 87.4 66.5 73.8 81.0 59.2 75.1 83.5 66.2 69.2 76.9 59.2 75.5 83.6 66.8 69.2 76.5 79.0 102.6 95.7 90.5 89.5 84.0 79.6 103.7 96.5 93.4 90.0 85.0 78.1 75.9 83.2 79.9 83.5 85.0 71.0 73.7 79.5 74.6 80.6 83.6 65.2 70.0 75.6 69.0 70.5 77.2 64.9 69.6 74.3 69.7 70.1 76.3 87.9 96.3 91.9 81.0 84.1 89.6 87.2 94.4 92.0 81.4 89.1 89.9 84.6 84.1 87.1 79.1 83.1 61.4 71.1 83.2 88.2 72.8 80.0 85.8 77.0 81.4 58.4 66.3 81.4 86.3 74.0 73.9 81.2 69.8 80.7 52.3 60.0 73.6 81.6 74.0 74.3 80.9 69.4 79.9 50.6 60.1 72.5 81.5 _ 94.2 95.1 90.4 97.1 96.4 60.4 80.6 77.5 90.3 96.7 94.9 90.5 96.3 98.4 60.7 80.5 77.7 91.7 Index of Wholesale Commodity Prices of National Fertilizer Association Unchanged During Week of April 14. Wholesale commodity prices as a group showed no change during the week of April 14, according to the index of the National Fertilizer Association. This index, based on 476 quotations, remained at 71.1 for the week. During the preceding week the index advanced one point, and two weeks ago it declined two points. A month ago the index stood at 71.3. There has therefore been a decline of two points during the last four weeks. A year ago the index stood at 57.1. (The three-year average, 1926-1928, equals 100.) The Association, under date of April 16, further said: Only six of the 14 groups in the index were affected by price changes during the latest week. Four groups declined and two advanced. Foods, textiles, fats and oils, and fertilizer materials were lower. The largest loss was shown in fats and oils. Fuel advanced because of higher prices for gasoline. Metals also advanced. During the latest week there were 22 price advances and 22 price declines In the list of individual commodities that showed price changes. During the preceding week there were 26 advances and 13 declines. Two weeks 23.2 16.0 12.8 10.1 8.5 6.7 6.6 6.2 4.0 3.8 1.0 0.4 0.4 0.3 Foods Fuel Grains, feeds and livestock Textiles Miscellaneous commodities_ _ Automobiles Building materials Metals House-furnishing goods Fats and oils Chemicals and drugs Fertilizer materials Mixed fertilizers Agricultural Implements_ __ _ A II ornnna rehmhluar1 Month Ago. Year Ago. 70.8 68.7 55.0 71.8 69.6 91.3 80.5 79.7 85.2 48.7 93.0 67.5 75.9 92.4 71.1 68.1 55.0 71.9 69.6 91.3 80.5 79.2 85.2 50.4 93.0 67.6 75.9 92.4 72.2 67.9 54.6 72.4 69.5 91.3 80.0 78.8 85.2 52.1 93.3 67.7 75.9 92.4 57.6 50.6 41.6 43.7 58.2 84.9 71.6 66.9 75.9 43.9 87.1 61.5 62.4 90.2 711 71.1 71.3 57.1 PER CENT CHANGES (1934 OVER 1933). Week Ended Week Ended 1Veek Ended Week Ended April 14 1934. April 7 1934. Mar. 31 1934. Mar. 24 1934. Major Geographic Divisions. -L1A A +16.5 +12.5 +22.4 +15.5 +14.3 +10.2 +16.8 New England Middle Atlantic Central Industrial_ _ Southern States Pacific Coast West Central Rocky Mountain +.......,'T...., Q..... _L IR A NON -4-4A., 1 Group. 4441444" Latest PreWeek April 14 ceding Week. 1934. Per Cent Each Group Bears to the Total Index. Coi::."*66CAO WEEKLY WHOLESALE PRICE INDEX-BASED ON 476 COMMODITY PRICES (1926-192100). compares with 1,616,945,000 kilowatt hours produced during the week ended April 7 1934, and 1,665,650,000 kilowatt hours during the week ended March 31 1934. The gain for the week ended April 7 1934 over the same period in 1933 was 15.5%. The New England, Middle Atlantic, Central Industrial, Southern States and Pacific Coast regions for the week ended April 14 1934 showed larger percentage gains over the corresponding 1933 period than they did in the week of April 7 1934 over the April 8 1933 week. Smaller percentage increases were reported by the West Central and Rocky Mountain regions. The Institute's statement follows: 0 ago there were 33 declines and 14 advances. Cotton was steady during the latest week. Wheat was higher at Minneapolis, but lower at Kansas City. Corn, cattle, hay and lambs advanced. Hogs and most feedstuffs declined. Other commodities that advanced included apples, peanuts, oats, copper, lead, silver, rosin, gasoline, and rubber. The list of declining commodities in addition to those already mentioned included wool, burlap, silk, butter, eggs, potatoes, cottonseed meal, and coffee. Inn 11 April 21 1934 Financial Chronicle 2648 +19.2 +12.7 +27.0 +12.1 +12.3 +11.3a +18.4 -L.15 II .11, a • a Corrected figure. Valuation of Construction Contracts Awarded. March contracts for construction of all descriptions amounted to $179,161,500; this was almost twice the total reported for February and about three times the volume of March 1933, according to F. W. Dodge Corp. Increases over both the previous month and March of last year were scored in each of the four principal classes of construction. For the first quarter of 1934 contracts totaled $462,341,500 as contrasted with only $196,026,800 in the corresponding quarter of 1933. For residential building the gain over 1933 to date amounted to about 46%; for nonresidential building the increase was almost 85%; for public works the 1934 volume was more than 3% times the size of the 1933 total; while for public utilities the first quarter's total was about 2% times as great as In the corresponding period of 1933. Contracts awarded in March showed gains over February in each of the 13 Dodge districts except southern Michigan, where a relatively unimportant decline was reported. Gains over March 1933 were universal throughout the 13 districts. Likewise, for the initial quarter of 1934 contracts showed gains over the corresponding quarter of 1933 in each of the 13 districts without exception. The Dodge bulletin states: "During the second quarter of 1933 contracts for all classes of construction in the 37 States as a whole totaled $236,086,600. For the second quarter of 1934, contracts in the same territory should exceed $375,000,000 by a fair margin. Of the contract volume for the second quarter of the current year it is probable that at least 70% of the total will represent publicly-financed undertakings. During the initial quarter of the year this class of work, totaling almost 350 millions, represented 75% of the contract total." CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS AWARDED-37 STATES EAST OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS. No. of New Floor Projects. Space (Sq. Ft.). Month of March1934-Residential building Non-f esidential building Public works and utilities Total construction 1933-Residential building Non-residential building Public yanks and utilities Total construction First Three Months1934-Residential building Non-residential building Public works and utilities Total construction 1933-Residential building Non-residential building Public works and utilities Total construction 2,962 2,957 2.006 828,076.100 57,338,100 92.940.600 7,925 14,788,900 $178,354,800 3,198 2.254 851 4,773,000 5,000,300 116,900 816.021,000 26,359,100 17,578,400 6.303 9,890,200 $59,958,500 6,657 8,631 5,872 14.528,400 17,466.100 669,400 $57,706,800 143,969,000 259,859,000 21,160 32.663.900 $461.534,800 6.878 5,252 1,857 11.082,200 13,545.600 1,097.300 $39,777,200 78,761,100 77,488,500 13,987 25,725,100 $196,026,800 Valuation. 3,626 3.984 2,079 $99,501,500 101,911.800 207,657.800 4,101 3,049 1,321 $32,965,800 65,768,900 46.033,500 9.689 $409,071,100 8,471 $144,768,200 First Three MonthsResidential building 8,496 Non-residential building 12,460 Public works and utilities.... 7,474 $184,425,600 380,710,400 756,247,200 9,092 7,419 3,630 $75,151,000 138,062,400 147,584,000 31.321,383,200 20,141 $360.797.400 Total construction Total construction 28.430 Weekly Electric Output Shows Improvement. According to the Edison Electric Institute, the production of electricity by the electric light and power industry of the United States for the week ended April 14 1934 amounted to 1,642,187,000 kilowatt hours, an increase of 16.5% as compared with the corresponding period in 1933, when output totaled 1.409,603,000 kilowatt hours. The current figure also Week of- May 6 1,435,707,000 May 13 1,468,035,000 May 20 1,483.090,000 May 27 1,493,923,000 June 3 1,461,488,000 June 10 1,541,713,000 June 17 1,578,101.000 June 24 1,598,136.000 July 1 1,655,843,000 July 8 1,538,500,000 July 15 1,648,339,000 Ju.y 22 1,654.424,000 July 29 1,661,504,000 Aug. 5 1,650,013,000 Aug. 12 1,627,339,000 Aug. 19 1,650,205,000 Aug. 26 1,630,394,000 Sept. 2 1,637,317,000 Sept. 9 1,582.742,000 Sept. 16 1,663,212,000 Sept. 23 1,638,757,000 Sept. 30 1,652,811,000 Oct. 7 1,646.136.000 Oct. 14 1,618,948,000 Oct. 21 1,618,795,000 Oct. 28 1,621,702,000 Nov. 4 1,583,412,000 Nov. 11 1,616,875,000 Nov. 18 1,617,249,000 Nov. 25 1,607,548.000 Dec. 2y1,553,744,000 Dec. 9 1,619,157,000 Dec. 16 1,644,018,000 Dec. 23 1,656,616.000 Dec. 30 1,539,002.000 May 7 1,429,032,000 May 14 1,436,928,000 May 21 1,435,731,000 May 28 1,425,151,000 June 4 1,381,452,000 June 11 1,435,471,000 June 18 1.441,532,000 June 25 1,440,541,000 July 1 1,456,961,000 July 9 1,341,730,000 July 16 1,415,704,000 July 23 1,433,990,000 July 30 1,440,386,000 Aug. 6 1,426,988.000 Aug. 13 1,415,122,000 Aug. 20 1,431,910,000 Aug. 27 1,436.440,000 Sept. 3 1,464,700,000 Sept. 10 x1,423,977,000 Sept. 17 1,476,442,000 Sept.24 1,490,863,000 Oct. 1 1,499,459,000 Oct. 8 1,506,219,000 Oct. 15 1,507,503,000 Oct. 22 1,528.145,000 Oct. 29 1,533,028.000 Nov. 5 1,525,410,000 Nov. 12 1,520,730,000 Nov. 19 1,531,584.000 Nov. 26 y1,475,268,000 Dee. 3 1,510,337,000 Dec. 10 1,518,922,000 Dec. 17 1,563,384,000 Dec. 24 1.554.473,000 Dec. 31 1,414.710,000 May 9 May 16 May 23 May 30 June 6 June 13 June 20 June 27 July 4 July 11 July 18 July 25 Aug. 1 Aug. 8 Aug. 15 Aug. 22 Aug. 29 Sept. 5 Sept. 12 Sept. 19 Sept. 26 Oct. 2 Oct. 10 Oct. 17 Oct. 24 Oct. 31 Nov. 7 Nov. 14 Nov. 21 Nov. 28 Dec. 5 Dec. 12 Dec. 19 Dec. 26 1934. 1,563.678,000 1,646.271.000 1,624,846,000 1.610,542,000 1,636,275.000 1.651,535,000 1,640,951.000 1,640,465,000 1,658.040,000 1,647,024,000 1,650,013.000 1,658,389,000 1,665.650,000 1,616,945,000 1,642,187,000 1933. Jan. 73.1,425,639,000 Jan. 14 1,495,116,000 Jan. 21 1,484,089.000 Jan. 28 1,469,636,000 Feb. 4 1.454,913,000 Feb. 10 1,482,509.000 Feb. 18 1,469,732,000 Feb. 25 1,425,511,000 Mar. 4 1,422,875,000 Mar. 11 1,390,607,000 Mar. 18 1,375,207,000 Mar,25 1,409,655,000 Apr. 1 1.402,142.000 Apr. 8 1,399,367,000 Apr. 15 1.409,603,000 Apr. 22 1,431,095,000 Apr. 29 1,427,960,000 May 6 1,435,707,000 Jan. 2 Jan. 9 Jan. 16 Jan. 23 Jan. 30 Feb. 6 Feb. 13 Feb. 20 Feb. 27 Mar, 5 Mar. 12 Mar. 19 Mar. 26 Apr. 2 Apr. 9 Apr. 16 Apr. 23 Apr. 30 May 7 Jan. 6 Jan. 13 Jan. 20 Jan. 27 Feb. 3 Feb. 10 Feb. 17 Feb. 24 Mar. 3 Mar. 10 Mar. 17 Mar, 24 Mar. 31 Apr. 7 Apr. 14 Apr. 21 Apr. 28 May 5 1931. 1933 Over 1932. 0.5% 1,637,296,000 2.2% 1,654,303,000 1,644,783,000 3.3% 4.8% 1,601.833.000 5.8% 1,593,662,000 1,621,451,000 7.4% 1,609,931,000 9.5% 1,634,935,000 10.9% 1,607,238,000 13.7% 1,603,713.000 14.7% 1,644,638,000 16.4% 1,650,545,000 15.4% 1,644,089,000 15.4% 1,642,858,000 15.6% 1,629,011,000 15.0% 1,641,229,000 15.2% 1,637.533,000 13.5% 1,635,623,000 11.8% 1,582,267,000 11.1% 1,662.660,000 12.7% 1,660,204,000 9.9% 1.645,587,000 10.2% 1,653,369,000 9.3% 1,656,051,000 7.4% 5.9% 1,646,531,000 1,651,792,000 5.8% 1,628,147,000 3.8% 1,623,151,000 6.3% 1.655,051,000 5.6% 1,599,900,000 } 5.9% 1,671,466,000 1,617,717,000 6.6% 5.2% 1.675,653,000 6.6% 1,564,652,000 8.8% 1932. 1934 Over 1,523,652,000 1933. 1,619,265,000 9.7% 1,602,482,000 10.1% 1,598,201,000 9.5% 1,588,967,000 9.6% 1,588,853,000 12.5% 1,578.817,000 11.4% 1,545,469,000 11.6% 1,512,158,000 15.5% 1.519,679,000 16.5°4 1,538,452.000 18.4% 1,637,747,000 20.0% 1,514,553,000 17.6% 1.480,208,000 18.8% 1,465,076,000 15.5% 1,480,738,000 16.5% 1,469,810,000 1,454,505,000 1,429,032.000 - x Revised figure. 3,Includes Thanksgiving Day. DATA FOR RECENT MONTHS. Month of- 1934. 1933. 1932, January _ _ _ _ 7,131,158,000 6,480,897,000 7,011,736,000 February_ _ _ 6,608,356,000 5,835,263,000 6,494,091,000 March 6,182.281,000 6,771,684,000 April. 6,024.855,000 6,294,302,000 May 6,532,686.000 6,219,554,000 June 6,809,440,000 6,130,077,000 7,058,600,000 6,112,175,000 July 7,218,678,000 6,310,667,000 August 6,931,652,000 6,317,733,000 September. 7,094,412.000 6,633,865,000 October 6,831,573,000 6,507,804,000 November _ 7,009,164,000 6,638,424,000 December_ 1931. 4.04 CI C.C 0:erCO CO No. of Projects. 1932. Ce. 0 Month of MarchResidential building Non-residential building Public works and utilities Valuation. 1933. Week of- 1933. .icloci4dOcticco mnnwoor-coccorinac 1-Zont-4.:re.:cOn NEW CONTEMPLATED WORK REPORTED-37 STATES EAST OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS. No. of Projects. Week of- Valuation. • 6,950,600 7,595.460 242,900 1934. Arranged in tabular form, the output in kilowatt hours of the light and power companies of recent weeks and by months since and including January 1931 is as follows: 1934 Over 1933. 10.0% 13.2% ...- .... .-........ _... --- - --- -- - Total 80.009.501.000 77.442.112.000 86.073.989.000 Note.-The monthly figures shown above are based on reports covering approximately 92% of the electric ight and power industry and the weekly figures are based on about 70% Increase of 20% in Wages of Farm Hands from April 1 1933 to April 1 1934 Reported by Bureau of Agricultural Economics. Wages of farm hands have advanced more than 20% during the past year, from 73 as an index figure on April 1 1933 to 88 on April 1 1934, according to the Bureau of Agricultural Ecbnomics, United States Department of Agriculture. A slightly more than seasonal gain is reported since Jan. 1 when the index was 81. The 1909-14 average equals Financial Chronicle Volume 138 100. An announcement issued under date of April 12 by the Department of Agriculture added: Day wages without board ranged from 75 cents in South Carolina and Georgia to $2.40 in Massachusetts, on April 1 and averaged $1.27 for the country as compared with $1.05 a year ago. The average on Jan. 1 last was $1.21. The advance in wages during the past year is attributed to increased demand for farm hands and a reduced supply. Better prices for farm products and increased farm incomes have enabled farmers to hire more hands and pay them better wages, says the Bureau, whose crop correspondents report that there were 80 hired workers on every 100 farms this April 1 as contrasted with 64 on Jan. 1 and with 79 a year ago. Also the higher farm wages are believed to reflect increased opportunity for jobs outside of farming. The supply of farm labor, expressed as a percentage of demand. was 154.2% of normal on April 1. against 173.4 in January, and 213.5 a year ago. The April 1 supply-demand ratio is the lowest since July 1931. Lumber Orders at Mills Show Further Slight Decline. Production at the lumber mills during the week ended April 14 1934, was heavier than during any week since last August except for two weeks in March; new business received was somewhat less than during any of the preceding six weeks, according to telegraphic reports to the National Lumber Manufacturers Association from regional associations covering the operations of 1,511 leading hardwood and softwood mills. These mills reported production 207,960,000 feet;shipments, 193,361,000feet;orders, 193,272,000 feet. Revised figures for 1,534 mills for the week ended April 7 were production, 202,568,000 feet; shipments, 194,653,000 feet; orders, 194,626,000 feet. Further reviewing lumber operations during the week of April 14, the Association went on to say: West Coast, Southern Pine and California Redwood regions, as in the preceding week, were the only softwoods to report orders less than production during the week ended April 14 1934. Likewise the southern and Appalachian was the only hardwood region reporting orders greater than output during the week. Total softwood orders were 9% below production; hardwood orders. 3% above hardwood output. Every region showed orders and production above those of corresponding week in 1933, total softwood orders being 24% above, and hardwood orders, 30% above, those of a year ago; production exceeded that of a year ago by 56% and shipments were 18% above shipments of similar week of 1933. Unfilled orders as reported by 1.745 mills during the week ended April 14 1934 totaled 886,520,000 feet; gross stocks were 5,289,376,000 feet. Identical mills reported unfilled orders the equivalent of 26 days' average production as compared with 20 days' a year ago and stocks the equivalent of 147 days' production as against 150 days' on similar date of 1933. Forest products carloadings during the week ended April 7 totaled 23,550 cars, a decrease of 412 cars below the preceding week, but increase of 6,766 cars above the same week of 1933 and 3,955 cars above similar week of 1932. Lumber orders reported for the week ended April 14 1934, by 992 softwood mills totaled 162,651,000 feet; or 9% below the production of the same mills. Shipments as reported for the same week were 166,646.000 feet, or 6% below production. Production was 178,126.000 feet. Reports from 567 hardwood mills give new business as 30,621.000 feet, or 3% above production. Shipments as reported for the same week were 26.715,000 feet, or 10% below production. Production was 29,834,000 feet. Unfilled Orders and Stocks. Reports from 1,745 mills on April 14 1934, give unfilled orders of 886.520.000 feet and gross stocks of 5,289,376,000 feet. The 517 identical mills report unfilled orders as 608.377.000 feet on April 14 1934, or the equivalent of 26 days' average production, as compared with 471,282,000 feet, or the equivalent of 20 days' average production on similar date a year ago. Identical Mill Reports. Last week's production of 419 identical softwood mills was 154.331,000 feet, and a year ago it was 101,301.000 feet; shipments were respectively 145,756,000 feet and 123,933.000; and orders received 141,918.000 feet and 114,413.000 feet. In the case of hardwoods,210 identical mills reported production last week and a year ago 18.398,000 feet and 9,320,000; shipments 16.155,000 feet and 13,693,000 and orders 19,359,000 feet and 14.843.000 feet. SOFTWOOD REPORTS. Vest Coast. The West Coast Lumbermen's Association reported from Seattle that for 586 mills in Washington and Oregon, shipments were duction, and orders 16% below production and 6% below 13% below proshipments. New business taken during the week amounted to 82,611,000 feet (previous week 86,277,000 at 579 mills); shipments 86,039.000 feet, (previous week 87,362.000); and production 98.890,000 feet.(previous week 93.714.000). Orders on hand at the end of the week at 586 mills were 382,373,000 feet. The 184 dentical mills reported a gain in production of 44%, and in new business an increase of 22% as compared with the same week a year ago. Southern Pine. The Southern Pine Association reported from New Orleans that for 162 mills reporting, shipments were 14% below production, and orders 3% below production and 13% above shipments. New business taken during the week amounted to 27.535,000 feet, (previous week 21,502.000 at 190 mills); shipments 24,281,000 feet, (previous week 25,418,000); and production 28,275,000 feet, (previous week 31.363,000). Orders on hand at the end of the week at 162 mills were 93,422,000 feet. The 85 identical mills reported an increase in production of 14%, and in new business a gain of 10%, as compared with the same week a year ago. Western Pine. The Western Pine Association reported from Portland, Ore., that for 129 mills reporting, shipments were 7% above production, and orders 1% above production and 5% below shipments. New business taken during the week amounted to 41,356.000 feet, (previous week 43.476.000 at 137 mills); shipments 43.646.000 feet, (previous week 42,307.000); and production .10,814,000 feet. (previous week 39.730.000). Orders on hand at the end of the week at 129 mills were 142,656,000 feet. The 124 identical mills reported a gain in production of 96%, and in new business an increase of 40% as compared with the same week a year ago. 2649 Northern Pine. The Northern Pine Manufacturers of Minneapolis, MUM., reported production of 27 American mills as 493,000 feet, shipments 2,045,000 feet and new business 1,305,000 feet. Orders on hand at the end of the week were 5,466.000 feet. California Redwood. The California Redwood Association of San Francisco reported production of 17 mills as 6,651.000 feet, shipments 5,159,000 feet and new business 4,512,000 feet. Orders on hand at the end of the week were 33.268,000 feet. Twelve identical mills reported productino 137% greater and new business 0.3% above that of the same week last year. Southern Cypress. The Southern Cypress Manufacturers Association of Jacksonville, Fla., reported production of 23 mills as 1,134,000 feet. shipments 2.752,000 feet and new business 2,262,000 feet. Orders on hand at these Mi11B at the end of the week were 5.682,000 feet. Northern Hemlock. The Northern Hemlock and Hardwood Manufacturers Association, of Oshkosh. Wis., reported softwood production of 20 mills as 1,416,000 feet, shipments 1,341,000 and orders 2.133.000 feet. Week-end orders on hand at 12 mills were 5.734,000 feet. The 14 identical mills reported an increase of 559% in production and a gain of 61% in new business, compared with the same week a year ago. Northeastern Softwoods. The Northeastern Lumber Manufacturers Association of New York reported softwood production of 28 mills as 453,000 feet, shipments 1.383.000 and orders 937,000 feet. Orders on hand at the end of the week were 7,766,000 feet. HARDWOOD REPORTS. The Hardwood Manufacturers Institute of Memphis, Tenn., reported production of 353 mills as 24,213,000 feet, shipments 22,176,000 and new business 26,212,000. Orders on hand at the end of the week at 589 mills were 182,558.000 feet. The 196 identical mills reported production 82% greater, and new business 25% greater than for the same week last year. The Northern Hemlock and Hardwood Manufacturers Association, of Oshkosh. Wis., reported hardwood production of 20 mills as 3.006,000 feet. shipments 2,165,000 and orders 2,270,000 feet. Orders on hand at the end of the week at 18 mills were 8,249,000 feet. The 14 identical mills reported an increase of 352% in production and a gain of 114% in orders, compared with the same week last year. The North Central Hardwood Association of Indianapolis, reported Production of 166 mills as 1,534,000 feet; shipments, 1,461,000 feet; orders. 1,072,000 feet; unfilled orders, 12,972,000 feet. The Northeastern Lumber Manufacturers Association, of New York reported hardwood production of 28 mills as 1.081.000 feet. shipments 913,000 and orders 1,067,000 feet. Week-end orders on hand were 6.374.000 feet. Automobile Financing During February 1934. A total of 132,485 automobiles were financed in February, on which $47,099,890 was advanced,compared with 109,997, on which $36,533,359 was advanced,in January, the Department of Commerce reported on April 11. Volume of wholesale financing in February was $62,551,490 as compared with $36,577,358 in January. Monthly statistics on automobile financing, based on data reported to the Bureau of the Census by 456 identical organizations, are presented in the table below for January and February 1934 and for July to December 1933; and for 282 identical organizations for January and February 1934 and for January to December 1933. The increase in the number of reporting organizations from July 1933 to February 1934 resulted from the inclusion of additional organizations. The changes in the number of organizations included have not greatly affected the totals, as is indicated by comparisons for the same months appearing in the two summaries. AUTOMOBILE FINANCING. Retail Financing. Year and Month. Wholesale Financing Volume. in Dollars. Total. Number of Cars. Volume in Dollars. Summary for 456 Identical Orga atzations. 1934January• 336,577,3.58 109,997 $36,533,359 February 62,551,490 a132,485 47,099,890 Total(2 months)- 399,128,848 242,482 $83,633,249 1933 bJuly 58,793,704 194,552 68,522,872 August 70,705,795 211,708 74,813,725 September 52,276,214 184,998 65,665,515 October 39,776,604 172,432 60,316,106 November 18,364,889 135,584 46,063,578 December 17,060,916 108,606 35,217,934 cSummary for 282 Identical Orga nizations. 1934January $35,879,064 101.700 134.437,380 February 61,513,896 d124,349 45,377,552 New Cars Financed. Number of Cars. Volume In Dollars. 35,691 319.841.711 54.455 29,699,621 90,146 $49,541,332 86,926 94,613 80,928 73,002 51,356 33,729 44,694,167 48,860,024 42,166,003 37,940,369 27,077,214 18,486.989 34,426 52,772 319.189,736 29,290,038 Total(2 monthsl_ 1933January _, February $97,392,960 226,049 179.814,932 87.198 $48,479,774 30,133,915 27,514,654 92,083 87,512 31,280,101 29,188,663 35,546 32,609 18,327,630 16,842,415 Total(2 months) March April May June July August September October November December $57.648,569 27,706,336 40.840.508 5.5,005,590 56,937,616 57.866,453 69.613,121 51,127,428 38,962,531 17,703,226 16.572,650 179,595 101,458 132.088 168,328 185,286 182,244 198,911 173.770 162,140 126,855 100,457 $60,468,764 33,546,689 45.337.026 58,192,788 65,514,154 65,152,510 71,186,944 62,538.790 57,502,969 43,889,055 33,124,069 68,155 $35,170,045 38,329 19,463.540 55.571 28.225,885 75.025 37,475,257 84,358 43,004,313 84,282 43,333,572 91,617 47,290,779 78,379 40,887,086 70,669 36.790,012 49,719 26,278,194 32,467 17.794,238 3489.984,028 1,711.130 $596.453,758 728.571 $475.712,921 Total (year) Financial Chronicle 2650 Retail Financing. Year and Month. Used Cars Financed. Number Of Cars. Volume in Dollars. Summary for 458 /donne at Organized ions. 1934$15,884,436 71.607 January* 75,283 16,510.453 February $32,374,889 146,890 Total (2 months) 1933 b22,538,097 103,554 July 112,917 24,580,709 August 22,231,578 100.265 September 21,323,104 95,947 October 18,116,265 81,550 November 72,279 15,933,279 December cSummary for 282 /define at Organtzat ions. 193414,420,432 64,575 January 15,197,698 68,830 February Unclassified. Number of Cars. Volume in Dollars. 2,699 2,747 $827.212 889,818 5,446 81,717,028 4,072 4,178 3.805 3.483 2,678 2,598 1,288,608 1,372.992 1,267,934 1,052,633 870.099 797,666 2,699 2,747 827,212 889,816 Total (2 months) 1933January February 133,405 $29,618.130 5,448 31,717,028 54,234 52,796 12,173,577 11,725,419 2,303 2,107 778,894 620,829 Total (2 months) March April May June July August September October November December 107,030 60,625 73,267 89,260 96.741 93,930 103,161 91,611 87,998 74,458 65,392 $23,898,996 13,335,403 16,106,512 19,428,060 21,181,515 20,542,189 22,535,753 20,392,629 19,665,186 16,740,762 14,532,165 4,410 2,502 3,250 4,043 4,187 4,032 4,133 3,780 3,473 2,678 2,598 81,399,723 747,746 1,004,629 1,289,471 1,328,326 1,276,749 1,380,412 1,259,075 1,047,771 870,099 797,656 812,381,667 39,086 943,473 $208,359,170 Total (year) * Revised. a Of this number 41.1% were new cars, 56.8% used cars and 2.1% unclassified. b Data prior to July not available. c Of these organizations 8 discontinued automobile financing in January and 2 in February 1934. d Of this number 42.4% were new cars, 55.4% used cars and 2.2% unclassified. World Wheat Advisory Commission Adjourns Rome Parley After Adopting Report Urging Reduction in Acreage-Delegates Will Reassemble in London May 7-American Proposals Endorsed. The World Wheat Advisory Commission, which has been meeting at Rome,Italy, adjourned April 17 after approving a report which stressed the desirability of further measures to reduce production. The Commission planned to assemble again in London on May 7, and in the meanwhile delegates are expected to take up with their respective governments proposals to reduce wheat acreage on a wide scale. The initial sessions of the Commission were described in our issue of April 7, pages 2333-34. The most important action taken by the conference was the adoption on April 16 of a United States motion for a further cut in wheat production. A summary of this report, together with a listing of other principal accomplishments at the meeting, was given as follows in Associated Press advices from Rome April 16: The Americans contended that minimum price needs, denaturing, reduction of milling percentages and similar proposals are of less importance than production limitation. The Commission, agreeing to this motion, decided to place reduction on the agenda of its June meeting in London. The Americans are expected to submit definite proposals at the London meeting. The conference, which will polish off final details of its reports and adjourn to-morrow, has these achievements to its credit: An agreement on a definite plan for establishing and maintaining a minimum price for exported wheat, with the actual prices to be established by a committee of experts in London from month to month provided the government represented approves the plan. The drafting of a report setting forth in general terms the discussion of denaturing wheat to render it unfit for human consumption. The writing of a report of flour milling restrictions, intended as the basis for subseurfent discussion. The preparation for the interested government of a report on the French proposal that wheat-exporting nations give tariff concessions in return for guaranties of importers to cut their production. Ofthese,the minimum price scheme was regarded as the principal achievement of the conference. This is intended as a supplement to the London agreement of last August on restriction of exports. This plan suggests tentative levels 5 to 10% higher than present prices based on cost insurance and freight delivered at Liverpool. The purpose of the denaturization project is to remove low-grade wheat from competition in the markets with better grades. The suggestion was made that a bushel of wheat dyed blue be mixed with 19 bushels of poor quality uncolored wheat. This would prevent it from being made into flour, but it still could be fed to poultry. A cable from Rome April 17 to the New York "Journal of Commerce" described the closing session of the conference as follows: While American markets for wheat were weakening under speculative selling the United States delegates to the World Wheat Commission to-day urged the other wheat exporting nations to scale down their production drastically through acreage reduction. The American representative, Frederick Murphy of Minneapolis, told the conference that the question of crop reduction was far more important than the establishment of minimum export prices, with which the delegates have been chiefly concerned since the conference started. Mr. Murphy submitted several alternative proposals to effect this plan. To bring about absorption of excess world wheat supplies over the next three years, he proposed that production be lowered in the chief producing countries 250,000,000 bushels, about 13,000,000 acres, or 14% of the total. Allowance was made for the possible increase in the per acre yield on the acreage now under cultivation, also for the likelihood of intensified cultivation on the reduced acreage. If applied to the United States, Canada, Argentina and Australia. the Danubian countries and whatever co-operation may be offered by the importing countries the object would be achieved. April 21 1934 Under a second alternative in the American plan stocks would be absorbed in two years, which would call for reductions totaling 320,000,000 bushels annually, 36,000,000 acres, or 25% of the aggregate production acreage. A third alternative would bring about the desired result in one year, but this would require a reduction In production of540.000,000 bushels,50,000.000 acres, or 35% of the total area. Mr. Murphy made it plain in offering his plan that exporting countries would have to join in a program which calls for much more curtailmenti effort than provided by the plans adopted in London last summer. Otherwise a balance between world production and consumption which will provide the wheat farmer with a reasonable and profitable price cannot be achieved, he said.' The speaker also urged that action on acreage reduction for 1935-36 be taken at this meeting of the Commission, or not later than next month at London. In some quarters of the conference it was believed that nations other than the United States would find it difficult, if not impossible, to bring about wheat reduction, if such plans could only be achieved through subsidles and benifications to agriculture. The governments involved are financially unable to go through with such a program, it was believed. Proceedings April 12 were noted in part as follows in an Associated Press Rome dispatch of that date: The Commission decided to place on record without recommendations the reports on a French proposal that nations receiving advantages by the curtailment of wheat crops in importing nations-such as France-should grant special privileges to industrial exports of these nations. In the case of France, this scheme would mean that the United States, Canada and Argentina would accord privileged entry to French perfumes and wines-and perhaps other goods-in exchange for a reduction in the French wheat crop. Simultaneously, negotiations were proceeding quietly on another front In the many-sided assault on low wheat prices. American, Canadian and Australian delegates agreed in principle that an additional export quota, increasing the allotment fixed by international accords in London last August, should be granted Argentina for the next wheat year beginning Aug. 1. The delegates said they expected to have no difficulty in reaching a compromise. Delegates from the United States, Canada and Australia who remained at Rome after formal adjournment of the conference formulated an agreement on April 19 for a proposed increase in the Argentine wheat export quota for 1933-34. The proposals will be transmitted by the Argentine delegates to Buenos Aires. Associated Press advices from Rome April 19 outlined this plan as follows: In response to Argentina's request for an increase of 40,000,000 bushels, the tri-power post-conference agreement offers 30.000,000 bushels from this quota as a loan to be repaid by Argentina in one or two years by giving the trio part of her quotas. There are several conditions attached to the offer: First, that Argentina begin next year to reduce her wheat acreage; second, that Argentina agree to put in effect a minimum price agreement; third, that Argentina agree to denaturize 10,000,000 bushels of wheat which she would be permitted to export outside the quota. The 30.000,000-bushel loan would be divided as follows: The United States, 12,000,000; Australia, 12,000,000; Canada. 6,000,000. Sugar Consumption of 14 Principal European Countries 1.8% Higher During Six Months Ended Feb. 28 as Compared with Same Period Year Ago. Consumption of sugar in the 14 principal European countries during the six months' period ending Feb. 28 1934, totaled 3,521,411 long tons, raw sugar value, as against 3,458,144 tons consumed during the similar period ended Feb. 28 1933, an increase of 63,267 tons, approximately 1.8%, according to European advices received by Lamborn & Co. The 14 countries included in the survey are Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, France, Germany, Holland, Hungary, Irish Free State, Italy, Poland, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Sugar stocks on hand for these countries on March 1 1934 approximated 4,568,345 tons, the company announced April 17, as compared with 4,648,635 tons on the same date last year, a falling off of 80,290 tons. World Consumption of Coffee July 1 to March 31 Higher Than Like Period Year Before, According to New York Coffee & Sugar Exchange. The New York Coffee and Sugar Exchange announced April 6 that world consumption of coffee is continuing at a record rate, deliveries for the nine months of the crop year, July 1 to March 31, totaling 18,925,331 bags against 16,827,245 bags in the 1932-33 period, a gain of 12.5%. United States consumption amounted to 9,586,331 bags against 8,431,245 bags, the Exchange said, a gain of 13.7%. The Exchange continued: Europe accounted for 8,364,000 bags against 7,628,000 bags, an increase of 9.6%, while the rest of the world took 975,000 bags against 768,000 bags, a gain of 27%. In the opinion of the trade, rising prices have caused a building up of invisible supplies which accounted in part for the large disappearance into consumptive channels. The fact that deliveries to other than Europe and United States are 27% above the previous year is a definite indication of the success of the campaign conducted by Brazil and Colombia during the last few years for the increase of consumption in countries that, in the past, have consumed little, if any, coffee. Their conviction that coffee, properly grown, carefully blended and expertly prepared, will gain immediate popularity once tasted, has proved well founded. Volume 138 Financial Chronicle Larger Shipments of Raw and Refined Sugar from Puerto Rico to United States Reported Up to April 14 This Year as Compared with Same Period Last Year. Raw sugar shipments from Puerto Rico to the United States from Jan. 1 to April 14 totaled 320,521 short tons, an Increase of 27% when compared with shipments of 252,582 short tons during a similar period last year, according to cables to the New York Coffee and Sugar Excrhange, announced by the Exchange April 14. Refined shipments amounted to 35,550 short tons, a 13% increase over the 34,801 ton total for the 1933 period. The Exchange said that ship ments of raw and refined together for the week ending April 14 amounted to 33,450 tons against 38,827 tons in the same week last year. About 40% of the total available for the United States of the 1933-34 crop has been shipped to date. *Production of Sugar in Germany During Crop Year Sept. 1 1933 to Aug. 31 1934 to Be Higher Than Previous Crop, According to B. W. Dyer & Co. Sugar production in Germany during the crop year, Sept. I 1933 to Aug. 31 1934, when completed will approximatt 1,390,000 long tons, raw sugar value, according to B. W Dyer & Co., sugar economists and brokers. This compares with 1,049.329 tons produced the previous crop year, 1.542 350 tons during the 1931-32 crop year, and 2,488,637 tons produced in the 1930-31 crop year. The firm further reported: Consumption of sugar in Germany during the crop year 1980-31 amounted to 1,656 709 tons, whereas only 1,452,745 tons were consumed during the September-August period of 1932-33. German exports of sugar during the first five months (September to January) of their 1933-34 crop year were practically negligible, amounting to only 2,336 tons, when compared with the exports of the September to August period of 1930-31, which amounted to 427,291 tons. Production of Cotton in India H'gher-4,613,000 Bales Grown During Year Ended Aug. 31 1933 as Compared with 4,025,000 Bales Year Previous. Progress in India's cotton industry is revealed in a report to the United States Commerce Department from Trade Commissioner C. E. Christopherson, Calcutta. According to figures published in the annual report of the Indian Central Cotton Committee, Bombay, for the year ending Aug. 31 1933, the area under cotton totaled 22,558,000 acres compared with 23,722,000 acres during the preceding year and 28,403,000 in 1925-26. The condition of last year's crop, the report stated, was fair, with the result that the final estimated yield stood at 4,613,000 bales of 400 pounds, compared with 4,025,000 bales for the year 1931-32. The average yield per acre during the last cotton year was 80 pounds, compared with 68 pounds in the 1931-32 season. We further quote as follows from an announcement issued March 28 by the Commerce Department: Cotton pressed during the year totaled 3.311.130 bales in British India and 1.351.640 bales in Indian States, making a total of 4,662.770 bales for the whole of India, compared with 3.309.180 bales during 1931-32. The average yield per acre during the last cotton year was 80 pounds, compared with 68 pounds in 1931-32 season. Cotton pressed during the year totaled 3.311.130 bales in British India and 1.351,640 bales In Indian States, making a total of 4.662.770 bales for the whole of India. compared with 3.309.180 bales during 1931-32. The quantity of loose cotton received by the mills during the year amounted to 215,280 bales, compared with 211,790 bales during the preceding year. Prices of Indian cotton which were above parity with American cotton during the preceding season declined relatively during the year, with the result that imports of American cotton fell off considerably. The uncertainty of Indian mill demand, due to large Imports of Japanese piece goods and the threatened boycott of Indian cotton by Japan were further depressing influences on the markets. Consumption of Indian cotton in India. excluding Bombay Island, has risen during the past 10 years from 1,073.330 bales to 1,794,980 bales. Exports during 1932-33 totaled 2.741.000 bales compared with 1,582,000 bales during the preceding cotton year. 2651 In Asia there was a decline in the consumption of American cotton the past six months where as consumption of Indian cotton increased. The price of Egyptian cotton also has been lower relative to American than for two or three seasons, and the consumption of Egyptian has increased relative to the consumption of American, particularly in Europe where most of the Egyptian is consumed." Favorable progress in the European cotton textile industry duHng February with sales generally increased and mill activity holding about the same as in the preceding two months. is reported: but in Great Britain. sales of cotton textiles during February and the first part of March were considerably below production, and mill activity has been reduced somewhat. Sales of cotton textiles in the United States during February were probably well in excess of production but reports indicate that sales were below output toward the end of February and the first part of March,says the Bureau. Slightly Larger Than Seasonal Decrease Reported in World Consumption of All Cottons from January to February—Consumption During February Largest for That Month in Three Years. World cotton spinners consumed approximately 2,084,000 bales of all kinds of cotton during February as compared with 2,222,000, revised, in January, 1,993,000 in February last year, 1,933,000 two years ago, 1,830,000 three years ago and 2,118,000 four years ago, according to a report issued April9 by the New York Cotton Exchange Service. The decline of 138,000 bales in consumption from January to February this year was slightly more than seasonal. On a percentage basis, the decline in the use of all growths was 6.2% as compared with an average decline from January to February in the past six years of 4.9%. World consumption of both American and foreign cottons registered slightly more than the usual seasonal decline from January to February. Consumption of American cotton declined 7.2% this year as compared with an average decline of 5.7% in the past six years, while consumption of foreign growths declined 5.0% as compared with an average decline of 3.9%. During the seven months of this season from Aug. 1 to Feb. 28, spinners of the world used 14,827,000 bales of all growths of cotton as compared with 13,998,000 in the corresponding portion of last season, 13,631,000 two season ago, 12,809,000 three seasons ago, and 15,102,000 four seasons ago. The Exchange Service also says: All of the major divisions of the world cotton spinning industry used more cotton in February than in February a year ago, and all divisions except Great Britain used more than two years ago. Domestic mills consumed 478.000 bales of all growths of cotton during February as compared with 441.000 in February last year. 451.000 two years ago. 434.000 three years ago, and 495.000 four years ago. British spinners used 214.000 bales as against 205.000 last year. 229,000 two years ago. 157.000 three years ago, and 222.000 four years ago. Spinners on the Continent consumed 668.000 bales as against 640.000 last year. 634.000 two years ago, 597.000 three years ago and 721.000 four years ago. The Orient and minor consuming countries used 724.000 bales as against 707.000 last year. 619,000 two years ago. 642,000 three years ago and 680,0011 four years ago. Poles Buy $200,000 Russian Soviet Cotton. United Press advices from Warsaw March 28 stated: A group of textile mill owners at Lodz to-day signed a contract with the Soviet trade delegate here to purchase 2.500 bales of Soviet cotton for 8200.000. It was the first contract signed here for Russian cotton since the World War, the Poles having placed their orders exclusively in the United States. Consumption of Raw Cotton in Italy During 1933 Reported 16% Above 1932—Exports of Cotton Goods Declined. Italy increased its purchases of raw cotton by 16% in 1933 compared with the preceding year, according to a report to the United States Commerce Department from Trade Commissioner E. Humes, Rome. Total imports amounted to 219,776 tons in 1933, compared with 190,200 tons in 1932. The report, made public by the Commerce Department on April 9, further said: Consumption of Foreign Cotton Increased More Than American Cotton, According to Bureau of Agricultural Economics. European consumption of Indian and Egyptian cotton has increased relatively more than consumption of American cotton, principally because of an unusual price spread in favor of the foreign growths, according to the Bureau of Agricultural Economics, United States Department of Agriculture, in its current report on world cotton prospects. An announcement issued April 3 by the Department of Agriculture, in noting the foregoing, continued: Consumption of cotton by the mills exceeded the number of bales used in 1932 by 14% and was the heaviest consumption registered since 1929. Official figures show consumption by the mills for the six-months' period ended Jan. 31 1934, at 455.244 bales, compared with 455,655 bales for the six months ended July 311933, and 404,473 bales for the six months ended Jan. 31 1933. The proportion of American cotton used by Italian mills was considerably less during the latter part of 1933 than during the first six months while the relative consumption of Indian cotton increased. Export trade of Italy's cotton mills did not keep pace with the expansion In production. In 1933 the volume of exports of cotton yarn decreased 4% and those of cotton piece goods 15% compared with 1932: shipments of cotton goods to foreign markets during 1933 totaled 289,520 quintals against 339,988 quintals in 1932. The loss in export trade is attributable to a number of causes, chief among which were high tariffs, the high exchange value of the lira and Japanese competition. The shrinkage in exports was, fortunately, in part offset by a larger consumption of cotton goods on the home market. Prices of Indian cotton in Liverpool during March were more than 30% less than the price of American cotton, and during the six months ended Jan. 31 three types of Indian cotton at Liverpool averaged 23% less than the price of American Middling and Low Middling, compared with 16% less during the preceding six months. The Bureau says that "the more favorable relative prices of Indian cotton no doubt explain in part why the consumption of Indian cotton in Europe during the six months ended Jan. 31 increased 42% over the preceding six months whereas consumption of American cotton increased only 5%. New York Cotton Exchange Estimates World Cotton Production in 1933-34 Season at Approximately 24,913,000 Bales. World production of cotton during the current season will total approximately 24,913,000 bales, according to a report issued April 16 by the New York Cotton Exchange Service, Financial Chronicle 2652 as compared with 23,505,000 last season, 26,535,000 two seasons ago, 25,190,000 three seasons ago, and 26,597,000 four seasons ago. Production of American cotton, including allowance for city crop, was 12,810,000 bales as against 12,961,000 last season, 16,877,000 two seasons ago, 13,873,000 three seasons ago, and 14,716,000 four seasons ago, the Exchange said, adding: Production of foreign growths this season is estimated at 12,103,000. equivalent 478-pound bales as compared with 10,544,000 last season. 9,658,000 two seasons ago, 11,317,000 three season ago, and 11,881,000 four seasons ago. Production of foreign cottons this season was the largest on record,surpassing the previous maximum of 11,881,000 bales in the 1929-30 season. The indicated increase of 1,559,000 bales in foreign production this season over last season is due in large measure to a return by producers in some foreign countries, notably in Egypt, to a normal acreage following several years of acreage contraction. Cotton production in Egypt is estimated at 1,784,000 bales as compared with 1,038,000 last season, and 1,307,000 two seasons ago. The indication for India is 4,320,000 bales as against 4,109,000 last season, and 3,334,000 two seasons ago. The Chinese crop is tentatively placed at 1,950,000 bales, comparing with 1,871,000 last season, and 1,106.000 two seasons ago. Brazil grew 525,000 bales as compared with 293.000 last season, and 464,000 two seasons ago. The Russian crop is reported to total 1,889.000 bales in comparison with 1,778.000 last season, and 1,851,000 two seasons ago. Minor cotton-growing countries, including Peru, Mexico, Argentina, Chosen, the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan, Uganda, and a number of other small cotton-producing countries, raised a total of 1,635,000 bales, as against 1,455,000 last season, and 1,596,000 two seasons ago. Census Report on Cotton Consumed and on Hand, &c., in March. Under date of April 14 1934, the Census Bureau issued its report showing cotton consumed in the United States, cotton on hand, active cotton spindles and imports and exports of cotton for the month of March 1934 and 1933. Cotton consumed amounted to 543,690 bales of lint and 74,529 bales of linters, compared with 477,890 bales of lint and 59,674 bales of linters in February 1934 and 495,183 bales of lint and 55,541 bales of linters in March 1933. It will be seen that there is an increase over March 1933 in the total lint and linters combined of 67,595 bales, or 12.27%. The following is the statement: MARCH REPORT OF COTTON CONSUMED, ON HAND, IMPORTED AND EXPORTED. AND ACTIVE COTTON SPINDLES. [Cotton In running bales, counting round as half bales, except foreign, which Is In 500-pound bales.] Cotton on Hand March 31- Cotton Consumed During- Year United States 11934 543,690 3,945,304 1,649.807 7.852,780 26,503,876 11933495.1833,748.573 1,343,114 8.901,203 23.488,134 All other States American-Egyptian cotton 1 10,705 7,212 3,807 3,197 1,288 1,207 75,377 54,595 28,649 28,751 9,097 12,449 30,919 25,118 19,153 29,264 7,760 5,481 25,479 37,894 10,306 5,873 1,214 7,558 OM Other foreign cotton 429,441 3,145,081 1,278,944 7,502,509 17,943.782 413.292 3.133,927 1.066.271 8,403.839 16.725,620 97,783 685,121 305,531 255.579 7,838,186 69,599 513,763 225,290 291,419 6,160,528 94,692 721,908 16,486 115,102 65,332 12,292 100,883 51,553 205,945 601,986 00400.240 Included AboveEgyptian cotton 00000,04 New England States I 32A232 X2A2X2 X2 Cotton-growing States.-- Not Included AboveLinters Cotton In Con- In Public Spindles Eight Active Months sinning Storage Ended Establish- m at Cora- During March presses menus March. Mar. 31 (bales). (bates). (bales). (bales). (Number). 74,529 55.441 529,287 443.867 323,153 316.116 42,835 64.874 Imports of Foreign Cotton (500-1b. Bales). Country of Production. March. 1934. Egypt Peru China Mexico British India AU other Total 8 Mos. End. Mar. 31. 1933. 14,373 252 2,153 40 1,738 109 4,469 21 8,568 18,665 1934. 1933. 43.885 3,362 39,356 161 135 67,433 3,409 14,391 1,401 12,892 624 13,354 100,150 88,406 1,106 697 Exports of Domestic Cotton. Excluding Linters (Running Bales-See Note for Linters). Country to Which Exported. United Kingdom France Italy Germany Spam Belgium Other Europe Japan China Canada All other March. 8 Mos. End. Mar. 31, 1934. 1934. 1933. 83,922 33,545 45.587 119,626 29,407 8,283 52,303 129,281 20,812 24,052 3,308 71,646 1,055,887 1,052,560 686,525 33,219 681,521 533,670 63,470 580.439 80,274 1,142,753 1,298,978 31,285 229,349 229,173 103.460 10,590 137,778 467,926 30.954 355,615 108,574 1,451,920 1,320,548 212.197 31,887 225,178 184,113 11,168 118,938 50,231 14,921 84,006 1933. 550,104 487.988 6,098,011 6,084,734 Total Note.-Linters exported, not included above,. were 17,092 bales duringMarch in 1934 and 13,606 bales in 1933; 116.144 bales for the eight months ended March 31 1141934 and 109,488 bales In 1933. The distribution for March 1934 follows: United Kingdom, 4,721; Netherlands. 1,159; France, 1,278; Germany. 8,792: Italy, 200' Canada, 920; New Zealand, 8; Panama, 15: Newfoundland, 1. WORLD STATISTICS. The world's production of commercial cotton, exclusive of linters, grown In 1932 as compiled from various sources was 23,634,000 bales, counting American in April 21 1934 running bales and foreign in bales of 478 pounds lint, while the consumption of cotton (exclusive of linters In the United States) for the year ended July 31 1933 was 24,986,000 bales. The total number of spinning cotton spindles, both active and idle, is about 158,000,000. Petroleum and Its Products-Congress to Get New Oil Bill Shortly, Ickes Says-Attack on Code by Consumers' Advisory Board Answered by Oil Administrator-Charges of Labor Leader Explained-Nine Members to be Added to Planning and Co-ordination Committee. The highlights of the week's developments in Washington was the news that the new measure designed to correct the weaknesses in the oil code had been completed to the satisfaction of Administrator Ickes and would be introduced in Congress within a few days. The measure has been submitted to President Roosevelt and met with his approval. The new measure was drafted by experts of the Oil Administration and will plug up the loopholes that have hindered effective enforcement of the present code. Modification of the oil code to prevent"complete demoralization of the retail price structure and wiping out of the independent refiner" was recommended by the National Recovery Administration Consumers' Advisory Board to the NRA Review Board headed by Clarence Darrow. Stating that some provisions of the code, "while probably not intentionally monopolistic," are definitely injurious to the consumer, the report brought up to date the protests made by the Consumers' Board against the code since last fall. "Since the code tends to perpetuate objectionable practices of long standing," the report continued, "immediate emergency steps should be taken by the Government pending the collection of data necessary to drafting a long range oil program." The Consumers' Board particularly objected to the curtailment of crude oil production as a means for conservation and price stabilization, stating that such a program "takes more from the consumer than it gives the wage earner." "The increase of several hundreds of millions of dollars, which has taken place during the past year in the consumers' annual bill for petroleum products, constitutes a real threat to success of the recovery program," it was contended. Charging that the profits incidental to the discrepancy in the rise of wages and prices in the petroleum industry has gone to the large integrated companies, the report contended that the independent operators in the industry are in a "serious situation." In denying these charges, Administrator Ickes said Thursday that the petroleum code had been of distinct aid to the smaller operator. Mr. Ickes disclosed that he had seen the report of the Consumers' Advisory Board at the White House but had not yet read the complete statement. "All I know," he said in dealing with the charge that the major companies were enjoying benefits under the code denied to the smaller operators," is that when I came here a year ago oil was selling at 10 cents a barrel in East Texas, and all the producers, the little as well as the big companies, were complaining. It stands to reason that the small companies were worse off than the others, because the big companies could afford to buy and store their oil, or even to buy the others out. "It has always been true that big companies have the advantage over small ones, and nothing in any code can take away from one company, big or little, anything that belongs to it and give it to another. But my understanding is that the Oil Administration has been to the advantage particularly of the 'little fellows' and that they all bear testimony to that effect." Administrator Ickes charged Harvey C. Fremming, head of the International Oil Workers' Union, with "deliberate attempt" to misrepresent labor conditions in the "ultimatum" presented to President Roosevelt Thursday, in which the oil union head said that unless wage differentials and conditions in the industry were equitably adjusted,"economic warfare perhaps never before equalled," will be the result. President Roosevelt was informed by Mr. Fremming, Mr. Ickes said, that no labor men held positions on any of the regional oil committees, the Planning and Co-ordination Committee, or the Petroleum Administrative. The union leader also charged that the Labor Advisory Board established by Mr. Ickes was composed of "three college professors," two of whom had no "practical or direct experience or contact with the industry." Workers in the industry could not be "pressed further" Mr. Fremming declared. In answer, Mr. Ickes stated that Mr. Fremming had refused to serve as a member of the original board and that he (Ickes) had named a membership which would consist of Volume 138 Financial Chronicle impartial public representatives familiar with problems of labor and industry. The demands followed the action of the Labor Policy Board in throwing out a proposal submitted by the Planning and Co-ordination Committee after hearings for the purpose of establishing wage differentials in the indsutry had been held for several days. The Labor Policy Board said that it would recommend to Administrator Ickes that he fix the differentials. Urging a complete inquiry into the situation by President Roosevelt, union leaders held that such action should be taken even though it result in the abolition of the present code authority and the agencies of the Government charged with enforcing the code. Nine members will be added shortly to the roster of the Planning and Co-ordination Committee, it was announced Thursday, which will bring the total from 12 to 21. The new members will represent groups not previously represented on the Committee. The place vacated by K. R. Kingsbury, President of the Standard Oil Co. of California, who resigned recently following his indictment in a California Federal Court for alleged oil code violations, on the Planning and Co-ordination Committee will not be filled for the present, Mr. Ickes said. Settlement of the difficulties in which the Pacific Coast oil industry has found itself in since the proposed marketing cartel was held illeghl by the Department of Justice after it had been approved by the Oil Administration, seems to be in view following concerted action taken by the companies to restore conditions to a more normal basis. Following two weeks of almost continuous conferences held in California, an agreement was reached Wednesday which provides for the establishment of an agency subscribed to by the major refiners for the handling of oil surpluses. In addition, members signing the agreement pledge themselves not to purchase any "hot oil." A provision providing for the setting up of a one-price selling arrangement for primary refiners and their subsidiaries is believed to eliminate the objections of the Department of Justice to the former cartel plan. While the conference agreement has been agreed to in principle by nearly all major factors concerned, formal approval has not been made yet, although this is reported to be but a formality. Only one major unit did not participate in the conferences and this company is believed ready to stand by the other units, although not officially stating its position yet. A representative of the Oil Administration sat in at all meetings and if companies representing 95% or more of the Pacific Coast sales total formally announce their approval of the measure, approval of Mr. Ickes is expected to follow promptly. The Oklahoma Corporation Commission launched a drive Wednesday for more rigid enforcement of the proration regulations governing the Oklahoma City field, assessing a fine of $5,000 and costs against John H. Peacock, Inc., accused on 55 counts of filing incorrect refinery reports. The majority members of the Corporation ruled that the difference of 55,083 barrels between the 67,579 barrels received by the refinery and the 11,496 barrels listed in its report, was far too great to be explained away as mistakes or errors in preparing the reports. Attornies for the company gave notice of appeal to the State Supreme Court. The Texas allowable was boosted to 990,682 barrels daily Monday, against the April allotment of 980,700 barrels daily recommended by Administrator Ickes. The recent jump was due to a rise of 5,000 barrels daily in the allowable for the Van field on orders of the Texas Railroad Commission and the completion of additional wells in the east Texas field. The Commission has issued no allowable production order for this month,the former ruling having expired April 1. Conditions in the east Texas field have improved greatly and production of "hot oil" has been materially curtailed following the stern enforcement steps taken by R. D. Parker of the Railroad Commission who has placed more than 100 field workers in the area to see that the Commission's proraration orders are obeyed. Many refineries were closed by Mr. Parker's agents for proration violations. Reports on the progress made by the Railroad Commission are expected to be made April 24 at a convention of East Texas Chambers of Commerce in Texarkana. The placing of Mr. Parker in the east Texas field was the result of a joint meeting held recently by the Texas Petroleum Council, the Dallas Chamber of Commerce and the East Texas Chamber of Commerce at which State oil officials were flatly 2653 ordered to clean up the fields. A meeting scheduled for last Monday at which reports on the situation were to have been made was deferred when it became apparent that Mr. Parker was securing results in his work. Every lawenforcing agency in the State is being utilized in the drive against violators of proration rulings and both civil suits and criminal action are in the cards for those refiners violating the Commission's rulings. Crude oil production in the United States last week spurted 111,650 barrels above the previous week to 2,449,300 barrels daily, 83,100 barrels above the level set for the nation by Administrator Ickes, reports to the American Petroleum Institute disclosed. Production in Oklahoma rose 62,100 barrels to 522,600 barrels daily, against the Federal allotment of 476,400 barrels. California also was far above its Federal allowable of 462,500 barrels for April, output here reaching 492,400 barrels, up 21,500 from the week ended April 7. Texas made a slightly better showing, although production here also exceeded the Federal allowable. Total output in the Lone Star State last week was 983,600 barrels, an increase of 14,050 barrels from the previous week's level. Total stocks of domestic and foreign crude oil held in the United States as of April 14 dipped 44,000 barrels from the previous week, aggregating 341,922,000 barrels, against 341,966,000 barrels, Oil Administration officials reported. The decline, which compared with a gain of 603,000 barrels in the previous week, represented a gain in domestic crude of 155,000 barrels and a dip in foreign crude of 199,000 barrels. There were no price changes this week: Prices of Typical Crudes per Barrel at Wells. (All gravities where A. P. I. degrees are not shown.) Bradford. Pa $2.45 Eldorado, Ark., 40 81.00 Corning. Pa_ 1.20 Rusk, Tex., 40 and over 1.08 Illinois Dust Creek .87 Western Kentucky 1.13 Midland District. Mich .90 Mid-Cont., Okla., 40 and above 1.08 Sunburst, Mont 1.35 Hutchinson, Tex., 40 and over 1.03 Santa Fe Springs, Calif..40 and over 1.30 Spindletop, Tex., 40 and over 1.03 Huntington, Calif., 26 1.04 Winkler, Tex_ .75 Petrone, Canada 1.82 Smackover, Ark.. 24 and over .70 REFINED PRODUCTS—STRENGTHENING OF BULK GASOLINE MARKETS IN MID-CONTINENT AND GULF COAST AREA NOTED — CALIFORNIA OUTLOOK IMPROVES — CHICAGO BULK GAS PRICES UP; SERVICE STATION LEVELS LOWER— BROOKLYN RETAIL QUOTATIONS CUT 1 CENT A GALLON ON GASOLINE. Early correction of the unusual weakness in retail gasoline market prices throughout the country at this season seems definitely in view following the strengthening of the bulk gasoline markets in the mid-continent and Gulf Coast areas. Several companies met the upward revision announced by Gulf Oil Corp. along the Atlantic Seaboard during the week and a definitely stronger trend is noted in the local bulk gasoline market. Another encouraging factor is seen in the action of the Pacific Coast oil companies which have apparently agreed upon a method by which the costly price war currently raging in some sections of California in the retail gasoline markets will be ended and similar wars in the future be prevented. Approval of the new agreement should bring an early upward adjustment of prices in the areas affected by the current war. Chicago tank car gasoline prices have advanced more than 1 cent a gallon during the past 10 days, prices extending their rise this week to a range of 44 to 434 cents with a rising trend in evidence in the spot market. This is more than a cent above the lows reached for low octane material last month. The regular grade is strongly held at 43 4 to 5 cents a gallon in tank car lots, in the Chicago market. The improvement is held due to the improved underlying tone of the market resulting from effective action taken in East Texas to reduce production of "hot oil" with the consequent stoppage of supplies of low-priced crude which furnished price-cutters with potent ammunition. In Chicago, however, competitive conditions in the retail market forced Standard Oil of Indiana to reduce service station and tank-wagon prices on regular and third-grade gasoline 1 cent a gallon, the second such reduction in a week. The new scale, posted Monday, and affecting the metropolitan Chicago area only, listed regular at 15.8 cents a gallon for service station and 13.8 cents for tank wagon with third-grade held at 14.8 cents and 12.8 cents a gallon, respectively. In St. Louis, local competitive conditions brought regular grade gasoline service station prices down 24 cents a gallon with third-grade being reduced 14 cents a gallon, effective April 14. Philadelphia tank car prices were advanced cent a gallon last Saturday by the Atlantic Refining Co., Standard 2654 Financial Chronicle Oil of Pennsylvania, Sun Oil and the Texas Corp., following the advance initiated earlier in the week by Gulf Oil. The new scale is 6% cents a gallon for over 65 octane with 61% cents asked for under 65 octane. The Texas Corp. also announced that it would meet the % cent a gallon cut in tank car kerosene prices announced by Standard of New York at Boston and Providence. Monday brought the Standard Oil Co. of Kentucky into line with the higher prices posted by Gulf Oil in its territory, tank car gasoline quotations in Savannah, Jacksonville, Tampa and Mobile being lifted 34 cent a gallon by this company. The local retail market was featured by a reduction of 1 cent a gallon in tank wagon and service station prices of all grades of gasoline in Brooklyn, Queens and Nassau county yesterday (Friday). In Suffolk, the reduction was cent a gallon. Initiated by the Standard Oil Co. of New York, Inc., all major marketers swung in line with the new price schedule, which was the result of persistent pricecutting by independents which resulted in a serious drainage on the majors' gallonage totals. Tank car quotations in the affected area were cut 35 points to 6 cents a gallon. This situation, which has been credited with being the main factor in preventing a general advance in retail gasoline prices in the Eastern marketing area in keeping with the strengthening of bulk gasoline at primary markets, has been threatening to result in a general price cut for some time. However, until yesterday's move, some hope had been felt that seasonal gains in demand would aid the independents to maintain profitable gallonage movements without resorting to price-cutting. Some hope of the situation improving is now in view as it is believed that the independents cannot afford to compete with the major units on a price basis. Early upward readjustment of the local retail gasoline price structure is expected by some factors who point out that the underlying strength of the bulk gasoline markets would indicate such a development. However, until the Brooklyn situation is straightened out, there seems little hope of any general price advanec. Grade C bunker fuel oil is in good demand at $1.30 a barrel refinery, with Diesel oil moving in a fair way at $1.95 a barrel, same basis. Kerosene is suffering from a normal seasonal decline in demand. Other refined products moved along in routine fashion. Total stocks of finished gasoline rose 187,000 barrels during the week ended April 7 to 57,700,000 barrels, the American Petroleum Institute estimated. The rise in stocks was accompanied by a gain in refinery operation by the plants reporting to the Institute. Price changes follow: ,6 cent a gallon reduction in April 14.-The Texas Co. to-day met the ; tank car kerosene prices at Boston and Providence instituted by Standard 011 of New York last week. cent a gallon advance in bulk April 14.-All leading refiners met the gasoline prices posted last week by Gulf 011 Corp. in the Philadelphia market. a April 14.-Local competitive conditions brought a cut of 2% cents gallon in service station prices of regular grade gasoline and 1% cents on third-grade material in St. Louis. April 16.-Standard 011 of Indiana reduced tank wagon and service gallon station prices of gasoline in the metropolitan Chicago area 1 cent a on regular and third-grade material. prices April 16.-Standard Oil of Indiana advanced tank car gasoline bringing cent a gallon at Savannah, Jacksonville, Tampa and Mobile, a quotations into line with the higher schedule established by Gulf 011 week or so ago. tank and wagon April 20.-Standard Oil of New York. Inc., reduced Brooklyn, service station prices of all grades of gasoline 1 cent a gallon in was M cent a Queens and Nassau county. In Suffolk county the cut to 6 cents gallon. Tank car prices in these areas were lowered 35 points a gallon. Gasoline, Service Station. Tax Included. l4t New Orleans $19 Detroit 3 155 New York z 125 Philadelphia 17 Houston 19 Atlanta San Francisco: 19 Jacksonville 165 Boston ..16 Third grade.-Los Angeles: 17 Buffalo Above 65 octane- .17% Third grade.... .1119 158 Chicago 19% Premium 13 Standard .205 Cincinnati 12% St. Louis 15 Premium 205 Cleveland z Less taxes. 15 Minneapolis 20 Denver Kerosene, 41-43 Water White, Tank Car, F.O.B. Refinery. New Orleans, ex_5.419-431 $03 North Texas New York: Tulsa .0459-.0319 .0419-.06 3.0531 Los Ans..ex (Bayonne) Fuel 011, F.O.B. Refinery or Terminal. $1.15 Gulf Coast C California 27 plus D N. Y.(Bayonne): 1.30 8.75-1.00 Phila. bunker C $1.30 Bunker C 1.15 Diesel 28-30 D__-_ 1.95 New Orleans C Terminal. or Refinery F.O.B. Gas Oil, X 0119 Tulsa Chicago: N. Y.(Bayonne): 8.01% 32-36 00 28 plus G 0--$.0331-.04 Refinery. Tank Car Lots, F.O.B. U. S. Gasoline, Motor (Above 65 Octane), $.0419-.0419 Chicago N. Y.(Bayonne): N.Y.(Bayonne): New Orleans... .04 Shell Eastern Pet 8.06 Standard Oil N.J.: __ 0411-.07 ex Aug., Los York: New Motor. U. S___$.06 Colonial-Beacon- .061 Gulf ports_-- .0419-.04% 62-63 octane.- .0531 0419-.0434 Tulsa 054 Texas z .061 Y... N. 011 Stand. .0631 rennsylvania- .05 Gulf *Tide Water 011 Co .0585 0631 Republic Oil xRichtleld 011(Cal.) .0335 Sinclair Refining. 06 Warner-Quin. Co_ .0631 Chief," $0.07 * Tydol, 80.0635. y "Good X Richfield "Golden." a "Fire Gulf." $0.634• April 21 1934 Daily Crude Oil Output Increased Sharply in Week Ended April 14 1934, Exceeding Federal Allowable Figure by 83,100 Barrels-Gas and Fuel Oil Inventories Dropped 485,000 Barrels. The American Petroleum Institute estimates that the daily average gross crude oil production for the week ended April 14 1934 was 2,449,300 barrels, an increase of 111,650 barrels over the output for the previous seven days and an increase of 83,100 barrels over the Federal allowable figure which became effective on April 1 last. The current figure compares with 2,337,650 barrels per day produced during the week ended April 7 1934, a daily average of 2,375,400 barrels during the four weeks ended April 14 1934 and an average daily output of 1,934,000 barrels during the week ended April 15 1933. Further details, as reported by the American Petroleum Institute, follow: Imports of crude and refined oil at principal United States ports totaled 720,000 barrels for the week ended April 14, a daily average of 102,857 barrels, compared with a daily average of 119,821 barrels for the last four weeks. Receipts of California oil at Atlantic and Gulf ports totaled 657,000 barrels for the week ended April 14, a daily average of 93,857 barrels, compared with a daily average of 83,893 barrels for the last four weeks. Finished gasoline in storage at Gasoline stocks increased slightly. refineries, bulk stations, in transit and at terminals totaled 57,770,000 barrels at April 14, or 187,000 barrels more than at the end of the preceding week. Stocks of unfinished gasoline declined from 8,823,000 barrels at April 7 to 8,496,000 barrels at April 14, while other motor fuel inventories were Increased during the latest week by 30,000 barrels to 4,150,000 barrels. A further decline was reported during the week ended April 14 1934 in inventories of gas and fuel' oil, from 103,338,000 barrels at April 7 to 102,853,000 barrels at April 14. Reports received for the week ended April 14 1934 from refining companies owning 89.7% of the 3,736,000-barrel estimated daily potential refining capacity of the United States, indicate that 2,340,000 barrels of crude oil daily were run to the stills operated by those companies and that they had in storage at refineries at the end of the week 39,423,000 barrels of finished gasoline; 8,496,000 barrels of unfinished gasoline and 102,853,000 barrels of gas and fuel oil. Gasoline at bulk terminals, in transit and in pipe lines amounted to 18,347,000 barrels. Cracked gasoline production by companies owning 95 1% of the potential charging capacity of all cracking units averaged 450,000 barrels daily during the week. DAILY AVERAGE CRUDE OIL PRODUCTION. (Flatres in Barrels) Actual Production, Federal Arerage 4 Weeks Agency Allowable Week End. Week End. Ended April 7 April 14 E.ffertire AlYtti 14 1034. 1934. 1934. April 1. Oklahoma Kansas 476,400 122,100 Panhandle Texas North Texas West Central Texas Wen Texas East Central Texas East Texas Conroe Southwest Texas Coastal Texas (not Includ ing Conroe) Total Texas 980.700 North Louisiana Coastal Louisiana Total Louisiana Week Ended April 15 1933. 522.600 131,600 460.500 123,700 486.050 126,350 336.050 121,350 51,600 57.350 26,450 138.000 43.800 456,900 48,700 47,600 54.100 56,250 27,000 138.500 44.150 437.450 48.300 49,550 55.000 56.200 27,000 138.100 43.900 440,850 48,400 48,750 48,400 52,200 23,050 160,450 58,600 178,050 39,100 49,150 113.200 114,250 112,700 114,100 983,600 969,550 970,900 723,100 26,350 49,950 26,850 46.400 27,200 46,850 30,850 41,700 72,400 76,300 73,250 74,050 72,550 Arkansas Eastern (not Incl. Mich.) Michigan 32,300 99.600 31,300 30.650 98,650 28,900 30.700 98,750 26,900 30,850 88,500 27,350 30.300 90.450 14,600 Wyoming Montana Colorado 32.400 7,700 3,000 30,500 7,000 2,700 29,550 7,050 2,400 30.2C0 7,050 2.550 31.400 5,050 2,550 43,100 40.200 39,000 39.800 39,000 Total Rocky Mtn.States New Mexico California Total United States_ 45,800 44.400 44,400 43,300 36,100 462,500 492,400 470,900 478.250 470,500 2,366.200 2.449.300 2,337,650 2,375,400 1.934.000 Note.-The figures Indicated above do not include any estimate of any oil which might have been surreptitiously produced. CRUDE RUNS TO STILLS,FINISHED AND UNFINISHED GASOLINE AND GAS AND FUEL OIL STOCKS-WEEK ENDED APRIL 14 1934. (Figures In Thousands of Barrels of 42 Gallons Each.) Dag Refining Capacity of Plants. Distrid, East Coast__ Appalachian. Ind., Ili., Ky Okla., Kan., Missouri_ Inland Texas Texas Gulf_ La. Gulf _...._ No. La.-Ark Rocky MtnCalifornia-Totals week Apr. 14'34 Aor. 734 Potenlial Rate. Crude Runs to Stills. Stocks a Stocks of of FinOnDaily P. C. tatted finished Repor lag. A vet- Oyer- Gaso- GamTotal. P. C. age, ated, line. line. b Stocks of Other Motor Fuel. 493 84.7 17,778 96 68.6 1,858 323 76.5 9,748 1,435 316 1,243 212 112 58 60.6 5.548 59.3 1,342 86.4 5,054 69.1 1,555 306 61.0 71.9 1,521 52.8 13,060 1,025 315 2,941 229 48 173 771 582 150 446 582 100.0 140 93.3 422 94.6 461 351 542 168 92 98 848 386 167 528 162 77 64 822 83.7 47.6 97.4 96.4 83.7 66.7 96.9 234 99 458 112 47 46 434 Stocks of Gas and Fuel Oil, 5,702 858 2,618 593 2,772 274 1,661 291 4,319 ____ 892 33 531 42 699 2,535 82,801 3,738 3,350 89.7 2,340 69.9 c57,770 8,496 4.150 102.853 3.736 3.349 89.6 2.096 62.6 d57.583 8.823 4.120 103 356 b Estimated. a Amount of unfinished gasoline contained in naphtha d athletes Includes unblended natural gasoline at refineries and plants: also blended motor (del at plants. c Includes 39,423,000 barrels at refineries and 18,347.000 barrels at bulk terminals, in transit and pipe lines. d Includes 39,068,000 barrels at refineries and 18,515,000 barrels at bulk terminals, in transit and Pipe lines. Volume 138 Financial Chronicle Note.-Stocks in California are now on the same basis as stocks east of California, which excludes stocks held at or in transit to local marketing points. Formerly stocks in California have included these stocks. Oil Administrator Ickes Declares Moratorium to Protect Independent Pacific Refiners. Secretary of the Interior Ickes, Oil Administrator, on April 15 announced that he had approved a proposal of Pacific Coast oil refiners that a temporary moratorium be declared on the solicitation of the business of gasoline pumps handling unbranded products which are now supplied by independents. This action was taken, Mr. Ickes said, to protect independent refiners and distributors of gasoline. The moratorium will remain effective until April 23 if a proposed substitute agreement is not signed by that date, or until Mr. Ickes has approved it if the agreement is submitted tO him by April 23. Non-Ferrous Metal Market Quiet-Copper and Lead Firm-Zinc Prices Slightly Lower-Silver Declines. "Metal and Mineral Markets" in its issue of April 19 stated that considering the large volume of business that was placed in major non-ferrous metals in the preceding week, the quiet that prevailed throughout the last seven days occasioned no great concern among producers. Operators seem satisfied that the trend of general business continues upward. Fabricators of copper have booked a substantial tonnage of their products so far this month,and specifications are still coming through at a good rate. The recent advances in copper and lead were easily maintained in the face of the decline in new business. Zinc eased moderately yesterday. Tin was featureless. Silver declined more than lc. per ounce on liquidation by speculators who had counted on additional legislation in Washington at this session of Congress. "Metal and Mineral Markets" further reported as follows: Copper Selling Moderates. Demand for copper moderated last week,following the substantial trading In the metal during the preceding seven-day period. Sales totaled about 3,100 tons, and an 81ic., delivered Connecticut, price basis was quoted in all directions throughout the week. The falling off in consumer interest was attributed largely to the delay in the signing of the code of fair practice for the industry, the imminence of which action was the principal factor in stimulating the buying of the preceding week. The general position of the metal, however, is held to have undergone no marked change, inasmuch as the steady improvement in business conditions continues. Not a few consumers are reporting a better outlet for their products, and apparently the increasing demand for copper goods covers a wide range of such commodities. Sales abroad also fell off sharply last week, the recent heavy buying in those markets presumably having satisfied immediate requirements for the metal. The threat of higher prices under a code here is generally held to have been responsible for the activity abroad during the last few preceding weeks, and pending signing of the code or some other incentive, little improvement in European buying is expected to develop. Prices during the week ranged from 8.25e. to 8.50c., c.i.f. L. S. Cates, President of Phelps Dodge Corp., told stockholders that he thought the proposed code would have quite a stimulating effect on the demand for copper. The code, he said, would not cure everything, but would have a stabilizing tendency. He does not expect any great advance in the price, but believes that under the code it would be reasonable to expect 9c. a pound in this country within the next 12 months. The copper statistics for March were regarded as favorable,showing a reduction in so-called world stocks of refined metal of about 21,500 tons. The reduction in stocks held in North and South America amounted to 17,500 tons. A summary of the statistics circulated privately among the members of the Copper Institute, who account for more than 90% of world's production, for the months of February and March, in short tons, follows: Month ofFebruary. March. Production, refined 87,000 104,500 Deliveries, refinedUnited States 37,000 42,500 Foreign 68,500 84,500 Totals Stocks, refinedNorth and South America Rest of world Totals Production, blisterU. S., mine U. S., scrap Foreign, mine Foreign, scrap Totals 105,500 127,000 511,500 101,000 494,000 97,000 612,500 591,000 20,000 7,000 57,000 5,000 20,000 7,500 62,500 6,000 89,000 96,000 Lead Quiet But Firm. Lead business almost vanished last week, buyers, after having purchased heavily in the three preceding weeks, showing no desire to stock up further at the recent advance in prices. With the movement of lead into consumptive channels increasing,and production due to come down,producers regard the situation as firm. Quotations were maintained at 4.25c., New York,the contract basis of the American Smelting & Refining Co., and 4.10c., St. Louis. The refined lead statistics for March are expected to make a better showing than those for February. A definite downward trend in stocks, however,is not expected until the April and May figures appear on the scene. Lead sold so far this month for April shipment to consumers totals around 29,000 tons, against sales of 28,400 tons for delivery in March. May shipment lead sold to date totals slightly more than 14,000 tons. Zinc at 4.35c., St. Louis. Consumer interest in zinc last week, as in the instance of the other nonferrous metals, was materially less than that prevailing a week earlier. This 2655 condition led to weakness in the price structure of zinc, the metal selling yesterday in fair tonnage for early delivery on the basis of 4.35c., St. Louis. One seller was said to have been offered metal as early as Monday at that level, and at 4.375c. on Friday; these offers, however, did not result in any metal changing hands. Rumors prevailed early yesterday that some shading of the 4.35c. basis would probably develop before the close of the market. but no business below that level was reported. Tin Trading Slow. Consumption of tin in the United States is proceeding at a high rate, which tends to make foreign operators disregard the warnings of consumers here that prices are too high. Tin-plate operations in this country are holding at 80% of capacity. Nothing new has developed in connection with the proposed buffer pool. Straits tin, compared with a week ago, was slightly lower. There was a fair inquiry at times for brands other than Straits tin. Chinese 99% was quoted nominally as follows: April 12th, 54.625c.: 13th. 54.50c.; 14th, 54.35c.; 16th, 54c.; 17th, 54.35c.; 18th. 54.30c. Steel Outlook Favorable-Operations Up to 52% of Capacity, Says "Iron Age"-Higher Prices Soon to Go Into Effect. With iron and steel makers heavily booked for the second quarter and with higher prices about to go into effect on most products, the outlook in the industry is most favorable, reports to "Iron Age" of April 19, in its weekly review of iron and steel conditions throughout the country. Some mills have such heavy commitments that they will have difficulty in turning out the tonnage if buyers specify fully against their contracts. To prevent an accumulation of releases toward the end of the quarter a number of producers are already pressing their customers for shipping Instructions. Under the most popular form of contract, buyers are required to order out material in approximately equal monthly quantities, adds the "Age," which further goes on to say: The anxiety of the mills to obtain releases is matched by the desire of most buyers to build up maximum stocks of materials at pre-advance prices. Without doubt much of the pig iron and steel that will be made in the next three months will supply buyers' needs part way through the third quarter, barring a further acceleration of industrial activity. The increase in business coming from regular contract sources has been augmented by heavier releases from the railroads. Orders for car steel are growing in number and tonnage, and purchases of track material have been large. Rail contracts placed in the final week before the expiration of the code provision permitting deliveries until Aug. 31 called for a total of 75,250 tons. The New Raven closed for 25,000 tons, the Baltimore & Ohio for 35,000 tons, the Norfolk & Western for 10,000 tons, the Maine Central for 4,200 tons, and the Pere Marquette for 1,050 tons. Total purchases since the transportation co-ordinator first proposed Government financial aid amount to 627,000 tons, as compared with his original estimate of 850,000 tons. Only one large prospective order remains unplaced-35,000 tons for the Chesapeake & Ohio. Steel ingot output has made another gain, rising from 491,W0 to 52% of capacity, the highest rate since mid-August 1933. Operations are up four points to 54% at Chicago, three points to 40% at Pittsburgh, three points to 59% in the Valleys, two points to 60% at Cleveland, five points to 59% at Buffalo, and two points to 70% in the Wheeling district. The Detroit rate continues at 100%, the average for the Philadelphia territory at 40%, and that for the South at 54%. Price advances are slow in taking effect. Under the code a price at a given basing point is considered effective until it is withdrawn. Since various producers have delayed following the lead of mills that first announced advances, the effective dates for the price changes have been moved ahead, in some instances until late next week. Part of the confusion growing out of the advances has been due to conflicting views of the mills. The first increases filed on wire products were nullified by a later filing of more moderate advances by a leading interest. On most products, of course, the time of filing the price changes is of little practical concern to buyers, who are given ample opportunity to contract for their needs through this quarter at previously existing prices. The latest price advances to be announced are on pipe and billet steel reinforcing bars. Discounts on standard and line pipe have been reduced three and one-half points, or the equivalent of an advance of about $7 a ton. Oil well goods have been marked up $6 to $7 a ton. The rise in billet steel reinforcing bars is $3 a ton. Alloy steel bars have been marked up $2 a ton, instead of $1 a ton as originally announced. No move has yet been made to raise rail and track fastening prices, which, under the code provisions, are now applicable only to shipments during the current quarter. Pending the going into effect of recent advances, the "Iron Age" composite prices for pig iron and steel remain unchanged at $16.90 a gross ton and 2.028c. a pound, respectively. The scrap composite also is unaltered at $12.58 a gross ton. A large movement of scrap, stimulated by the arrival of spring weather and the opening of Lake navigation, has offset the heavier consumption of the steel industry. Close to 100,000 tons of oil country scrap from the Southwest has recently moved to Pittsburgh and other large markets. Structural steel awards, at 13,650 tons, compare with 12,160 tons a week ago. New projects total 12,160 tons against 13,700 tons in the previous week. Plate lettings aggregate 3,650 tons, and new plate inquiries 15,465 tons. THE "IRON ACE" COMPOSITE PRICES. Finished Steel. April 17 1934, 2.0280. a Lb. fBased on stee. bars, beams, tank plates. One week ago 2.028e wire, rails, black pipe and sheets. One month ago 2.028e. These products make 85% of the One year ago 1.8670. United States output. High. Low. 1934 2.028e. Jan. 2 2 028c. Jan. 2 1933 2.036e. Oct. 3 I.867e. Apr. 18 1932 1.977c. Oct. 4 1.926e. Feb. 2 1931 2.037o. Jan. 13 1.945c. Dec. 29 1930 2.273o. Jan. 7 2018e. Dee. 9 1929 2.217c. Apr. 2 2.2730. Oct. 29 1928 2.286c. Dec. 11 2.2170. July 17 1927 2.402e, r tI, 4 2.2120. Nov. 1 Pig Iron. April 17 1934. 316.90 a Gross Ton. (Based on average of basis Iron at Valley One week ago 316.901 furnace foundry irons at Chicago. One month ago 16.901 Philadelphia. Buffalo, Valley. and BitOne year ago 13.681 mingham. High. 318.90 Jan. 2 16.90 Dec. 5 14.81 Jan. 5 15.90 Jan. 6 18.21 Jan. 7 18.71 May 14 18.59 Nov.27 19.71 Jan. 4 1934 1933 1932 1931 1930 1929 1928 1927 Low. 318.90 Jan. 2 13.56 Jan. 3 13.58 Dec. 6 14.79 Dec. 15 15.90 Dec. 16 18.21 Dec. 17 17.04 July 24 17.54 Nov. 1 Steel Scrap. Apr. 17 1934. $12.58 a Gross Ton. (Based on No. 1 heavy melting steel One week ago 312.581 Quotations at Pittsburgh. Philadelphia, One month ago 12.671 and Chicago. One year ago 7.671 Low. High. $11.33 Jan. 2 1934 313.00 Mar. 13 6.75 Jan. 3 1933 12.25 Aug. 8 .42 July 5 1932 8.50 Jan. 12 1931 8.50 Dec. 29 11.33 Jan. 6 11.25 Dec. 9 1930 15.00 Feb. 18 14.08 Dec. 3 1929 17.58 Jan, 29 13.08 July 2 1928 16.50 Dec. 31 13.08 Nov.22 1927 15.25 Jan. 11 The American Iron and Steel Institute on April 16 announced that telegraphic reports which it had received indicated that the operating rate of steel companies having 98.1% of the steel capacity of the industry would be 50.3% of the capacity for the current week, compared with 47.4% last week and 46.8% one month ago. This represents an Increase of 2.9 points or 6.1% over the estimate for the week of April 9. Weekly indicated rates of steel operations since Oct. 23 1933 follow: 1933. Oct. 23 31.6% Oct. 30 26.1% Nov. 6 25.2% Nov. 13 27.1% Nov.20 26.9% Nov.27 26.8% Dec. 4 28.3% April 21 1934 Financial Chronicle 2656 1933. Dec. 11 31.5% Deo. 18 34.2% Dec. 25 31.8% 1934. Jan. 1 29.3% Jan. 8 30.7% Jan. 15 34.2% 1934. Jan. 22 32.5% Jan. 29 34.4% Feb. 5 37.5% Feb. 12 39.9% Feb. 19 43.6% Feb. 26 45.7% Mar. 5 47.7% 1934. Mar. 12 46.2% Mar. 19 46.8% Mar. 26 45.7% Apr. 2 43.3% Apr. 9 47.4% Apr. 16 50.3% "Steel," of Cleveland, in its summary of the iron and steel markets,on April 16 stated: Responding briskly to an inflow of April specifications on heavy contracts placed before price advances go in effect this week, steelworks operations last week rose 3 points to 51%. Sharp gains were made in the major producing districts, with Pittsburgh up 3 points to 39%; eastern Pennsylvania 3% to 38%%; Youngstown 2 to 57%, and Chicago 1% to 50%. Wheeling was up 7 points to 69%; Cleveland 2 to 69%. Birmingham remained at 52%; Buffalo 50%, while Detroit was down 6 points to 82%, and New England 4 to 78%. Youngstown operations this week are scheduled at 59%, and Pittsburgh at 40%. Steelmakers see ahead a period of steadily mounting operations. Some stopped taking contracts last week, several days prior to the effective dates for new prices, fearing a shortage of skilled labor before July. Automotive, railroad and miscellaneous demands continue strongly upward. In summary, recent events in the steel industry mean: By giving 10 days' notice. of price increases and throwing wide open their order books, steelmakers have sacrificed no less than $25,000,000. This is based on finished steel output with the industry operating around 50%, and the difference between "Steel's" composites of the old and new finished steel prices. As an offset to this, the industry has built up tonnage by giving consumers the opportunity to cover their requirements three to four months ahead, meantime to make their own adjustments. The industry has not antagonized the Government, because finished steel prices even at the new level still are $4.98 a ton below the 1926 average-the President's mark for commodities. And labor benefits through the return to the 1929 wage standard April 1-three months ahead of the time when steelmakers gain, except through increased tonnage. Price advances applying this week, or immediately in view, practically blanket all iron and steel products. In addition to the increases announced in "Steel" last week, stock tin plate is up $7 a ton, structural rivets $5, sheet piling $3. Light rails are up $3 a ton, and an increase is expected in the $36.374 price on standard rails, quoted to the Government last fall, and which expired April 15. A rise of $7 a ton is expected shortly on tubular products, and $10 on electrical sheets. While some producers raised wire $3, effective April 18, one large manufacturer filed an increase of only $2, effective April 19. Lake Superior iron ore producers have quoted last year's prices on an Inquiry for 50,000 tons from the Ford Motor Co. With a 10% wage increase for Great Lakes seamen, larger crews, and higher coal prices, transportation costs this year will be up 25%. A miners' strike in Alabama is reducing coal output, and by-product coke there has been raised 50c. a ton. Scrap prices are unchanged following recent heavy buying. Most of the Western railroads have now placed contracts for their major rail requirements, the Great Northern distributing 20,000 tons. New York Central has contracted for 10,500 tons of miscellaneous steel products for second quarter; Norfolk de Western, 4,500 tons. Pere Marquette has purchased 1,600 tons of rails and fastenings. New York New Havel' & Hartford is expected to inquire shortly for 25,000 tons of rails and 10,000 tons of accessories. Structural shape awards for the week, 12,427 tons, compare with 6,021 tons in the preceding week. Price protections for 60 days on specific jobs have brought out many new projects. The Solvay Process Corp. is taking bids for a plant at Baton Rouge, La., requiring 5,000 tons. "Steel's" London correspondent cables daily average pig Iron output in Great Britain in March rose 13.4% over February; steel, 9.4%. With the new finished steel prices now in effect or about to become effective early this week, "Steel's" finished steel composite is up $3.80 to $54.90; the iron and steel composite is up $2.37 to $34.77, while the scrap index holds at $12.21. Production of Bituminous Coal and Anthracite Declined Sharply During Week Ended April 7 1934, Due Largely to the Observance of "Eight-Hour Day"-Soft Coal Output, However, Continued Higher Than in Corresponding Period Last Year, While Anthracite Production Was Off Slightly. According to the United States Bureau of Mines, the total production of soft coal during the week ended April 7 was estimated at 5,450,000 net tons, as against 9,205,000 tons in the preceding week. Loadings on April 2 showed the heavy loss which usually accompanies the observance of "Eight-Hour Day." During the rest of that week, however, a general decline was apparent, and the average daily rate of output for the entire week was approximately 32% lower than in the final week of March. Production during the corresponding week last year amounted to 4,755,Q)0 tons. Anthracite production in Pennsylvania during the week ended April 7 was estimated at 824,000 net tons. Compared with the preceding week, this shows a decrease of 202,000 tons, or 19.7%. There was but little loss in hard coal production not due to the holiday on April 2. Output during the corresponding week in 1933 amounted to 874,000 tons. The total production of beehive coke during the week ended April 7 is estimated at 17,600 net tons. ESTIMATED UNITED STATES PRODUCTION OF COAL AND BEEHIVE COKE (NET TONS). Calendar Year to Date Week Ended Apr. 7 1934.c Mar. 31 1934.d Apr.8 1933. 1934. 1933. 1929. Bitum. coal:a Weekly total 5,450,000 9,205,000 4,755,000 108,833,000 83,080,000 150,110,000 Daily aver_ _ 1,048,000 1,534,000 793.000 1.322,000 1,002,000 1,809,000 Pa. Anthra.:b Weekly total 824,000 1.026,000 874,000 19,319.000 13.531,000 19,851,000 166,000 237,000 243,600 Daily aver_ _ 164.800 171,000 145.700 Beehive coke: 382,100 274,800 1,683,300 12,000 26.600 17,600 Weekly total 4,549 3,271 20,039 2,000 4,433 2,933 Daily aver__ a Includes lignite, coal made into coke, loca sales, and colliery fuel. b Includes Sullivan County, washery and dredge coal, local sales and colliery fuel. c Subject to revision. d Revised. ESTIMATED WEEKLY PRODUCTION OF COAL BY STATES(NET TONS).a Week Ended Slate. Mar. 31 1934. Mar. 24 1934. Apr. 1 1933. Apr. 2 1932. March. 1923, Aver.d 136,000 423,000 131.000 226,000 238.000 Alabama 10.000 14,000 77.000 19,000 24,000 Arkansas and Oklahoma 80,000 69,000 195,000 73,000 122,000 Colorado 1,213,000 908.000 747,000 912,000 1,684,000 Illinois 227.000 335,000 575,000 355,000 390,000 Indiana 68,000 61,000 122,000 64,000 69,000 Iowa 88,000 85,000 144,000 112,000 128.000 Kansas and Missouri 710,000 674,000 367,000 406,000 560,000 Kentucky-Eastern 139,000 114,000 175,000 215,000 190,000 Western 28,000 27,000 46,000 52,000 44,000 Maryland 13,000 9,000 11,000 32,000 4,000 Michigan 35,000 29,000 38,000 68,000 42,000 Montana 17,000 21,000 19,000 53,000 19,000 New Mexico 30.000 24,000 30,000 34,000 32,000 North Dakota 287,000 740,000 277,000 409,000 554,000 Ohio Pennsylvania (bituminous) 2,480,000 2,468.000 1,336,000 1,480,000 3,249,000 64,000 55,000 95,000 118,000 94,000 Tennessee 12,000 11,000 13,000 19,000 13,000 Texas 35,000 37.000 35,000 68,000 35,000 Utah 130,000 131,000 228,000 230,000 229,000 Virginia 21,000 31.000 28,000 74,000 27,000 Washington West Virginia1,775,000 1,858,000 1,047,000 1.113,000 1,172.000 Southern b 238.000 420,000 717.000 682,000 890,000 Northern c 61.000 62,000 80,000 136,000 78,000 Wyoming 2,000 4,000 3,000 7,000 4,000 Other States 9,205,000 8,657,000 5,136,000 5,940,000 10,764,000 Total bituminous coal 881,000 2,040,600 1,026,000 1,149,000 1,005,000 Pennsylvania anthracite . 10.231.000 9.806.000 6,141.000 6,821,000 12.804.000 Total enal a Figures for 1923 and 1932 only are Mal. b Includes operations on the N. dr W.; C.dr 0.; Virginian; K.& M..and B. C & G. c Rest of State, including panhandle, d Average weekly rate for the entire month. Livestock Handled During 1933 by Chicago Producers Commission Association Sets Record-21,462 Decks Handled During Year Represents Increase of 22.64% Over 1932. A new record of 21,462 decks of livestock handled, an increase of 22.64% over the previous year, was set in 1933 by the Chicago Producers Commission Association, according to a report to the Co-operative Division, Farm Credit Administration. Animals sold were 18,375 decks, a gain of 3,053 decks over the 1932 business, while those purchased numbered 3,087 decks. The value of livestock handled jumped from $12,919,316 in 1932 to $15,197,435 in 1933. An announcement issued April 17 by the FCA,in noting the foregoing, said: An classes of animals participated in the increase in number of head handled. For years recognized as the largest hog firm on the market. Chicago producers last year took the leading position in cattle, handling the equivalent of 6.279 carloads of cattle and calves, which was over 800 carloads more than the next largest cattle firm. Receipts amounted to 139,854 head, an increase of 23.8%, whereas the number of cattle sold on the Chicago market increased only % of 1%. The Association's percentage of the total receipts of the market advanced 5.07 in 1932 and 7.09% in 1933. The year's receipts comprised shipments from 21 States. Illinois lead with 13.111 decks, and Iowa was second with 2,109 decks. , Financial Chronicle Volume 138 2657 Current Events and Discussions The Week with the Federal Reserve Banks. The daily average volume of Federal Reserve bank credit outstanding during the week ended April 18, as reported by the Federal Reserve banks, was $2,504,000,000, a decrease of $7,000,000 compared with the preceding week and of $6,000,000 compared with the corresponding week in 1933. After noting these facts, the Federal Reserve Board proceeds as follows: On April 18 total Reserve bank credit amounted to $2,493,000,000, practically unchanged from last week, an increase of $109,000,000 in member bank reserve balances being offset by an increase of $14,000,000 In monetary gold stock and decreases of 560.000,000 in non-member do posits and other Federal Reserve accounts, and $35,000 in Treasury cash and deposits with Federal Reserve banks. The System's holdings of bills discounted declined 33,000,000, of bills bought in open market $4,000,000. of United States bonds 525.000,000 and of Treasury certificates and bills $5,000,000. while holdings of United States Treasury notes increased $28,000,000. During the week the Federal Reserve banks made the final payment on their subscriptions to the stock of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The surplus accounts of the Federal Reserve banks were charged with an amount equal to such subscriptions at the time the subscriptions were made, and beginning with this week the total amount thus charged to surplus is included in the new item "Reserves (FDIC stock, self-insurance, &c.)." This item, as the caption implies, also includes self insurance reserves set aside to take care of losses which may not be covered by other insurance, as well as reserves for possible losses on bills and securities, which have heretofore been included in "All other liabilities." The statement in full for the week ended April 18 in comparison with the preceding week and with the corresponding date last week will be found on pages 2704 and 2705. Changes in the amount of Reserve bank credit outstanding and in related items during the week and the year ended April 18 1934, were as follows: Increase (-I-) or Decrease (—) Since Apr. 18 1934, Apr. 111934. Apr. 19 1933. Bills discounted Bills bought U. S. Government securities Other Reserve bank credit 40,000,000 13,000.000 2,430,C00,000 9,000,000 —3,000,000 —4,000.000 —2,000,000 +9,000,000 —374,000,000 —195.000,000 +593,000,000 —21,000,000 TOTAL RES'VE BANK CREDIT__2,493,000,000 +1,000,000 +3,000.000 Monetary gold stock 7,746,000,000 +14.000,000 +3,720,000,000 Treasury and National Bank currency2.381,000,000 +73,000,000 Money In circulation —434,000,000 5,347.600,000 Member bank reserve balances 3,669.000,000 +109,000,000 +1,510,000,000 Treasury cash and deposits with Federal Reserve banks 3,204,000,000 —35.000.000 +2,838,000.000 Non-member deposits and other Federal Reserve accounts 400,000,000 —60,000,000 —118,000.000 Returns of Member Banks in New York City and Chicago—Brokers' Loans. Below is the statement of the Federal Reserve Board for the New York City member banks and that for the Chicago member banks for the current week, issued in advance of the full statement of the member banks, which latter will not be available until the coming Monday. The New York City statement also includes the brokers' loans of reporting member banks, which for the present week shows a decrease of $9,000,000, the total of these loans on April 18 1934 standing at $993,000,000, as compared with $331,000,000 on July 27 1932, the low record since these loans have been first compiled in 1917. Loans "for own account" decreased from $842,000,000 to $827,000,000, while loans "for account of out-of-town banks" increased from $155,000,000 to $162,000,000 but loans "for account of others" decreased from $5,000,000 to $4,000,000. CONDITION OF WEEKLY REPORTING MEMBER BANKS IN CENTRAL RESERVE CITIES. New York. Apr. 18 1934. Apr. 11 1934. Apr. 19 1933. Loans and Investments—total 7 238,000,000 7.405,000.000 6,439,000,000 Loans—total 3,324,000,000 3,431,000,000 3,073,000,000 On securities All other Investments—total 1 723,000.000 1.756.000,000 1,538,000,000 1,601,000.000 1,675,000,000 1,535,000,000 3,914.000,000 3,974,000.000 3,366.000,000 U. S. Government securities 2 742,000,000 Other securities 1172.000,000 Reserve with Federal Reserve Bank 1,236,000,000 Cash in vault 37,000,000 Net demand deposits 5 971,000.000 Time deposits 690.000.000 Government deposits 679,000,000 Due from banks 89,000,000 Due to banks 1.578.000,000 Borrowings from Federal Reserve Bank.. Loanson secur. to brokers & dealers: For own account 827,000.000 For account of out-of-town banks 162,000,000 For account of others 4,000.000 Total On demand On time 2,804,000,000 1,170,000,000 1,142,000,000 39,000,000 5,989,000,000 696.000.000 713,000,000 82,000,000 1,581,000,000 2,236,000,000 1,130,000,000 882,000,000 842,000,000 155,000.000 5,000,000 363,000,000 20,000,000 3,000,000 4o.00p,000 5,136,000,000 749,000,000 117,000,000 58,000.000 1.138,000.000 23,000,000 993.000,000 1,002,000,000 386,000,000 732,000,000 261,000,000 242,C00,000 144,000,000 746,000,000 256,000,000 Chicago. Apr. 18 1934. Apr. 11 1934. Apr. 19 1933. 1,399,000,000 1,359,000.000 1,090,000,000 Loans and investments—total Loans—total On securities All other Investments—total U. S. Government securities Other securities Reserve with Federal Reserve Bank Cash in vault Net demand deposits Time deposits Government deposits Due from banks Due to banks 594,000,000 594,000,000 629,000,000 288,000,000 306,000,000 295,000.000 299,000,000 347,000,000 282.000.000 805,000.000 765,000,000 461,000,000 512.000,000 293,000,000 479,000,000 286,000,000 248,000,000 213,000,000 405,000,000 41,000,000 390,000.000 41,000,000 175.000,000 42,000,000 1 265,000,000 1,213,000,000 347,000,000 344,000,000 45,000,000 41,000,000 793.000,000 345,000.000 10,000,000 192,000.000 376,000,000 205,000.000 219,000.000 169,000.000 375,000,000 Borrowings from Federal Reserve Bank_ Complete Returns of the Member Banks of the Federal Reserve System for the Preceding Week. As explained above, the statements for the New York and Chicago member banks are now given out on Thursday, simultaneously with the figures for the Reserve banks themselves and covering the same week, instead of being held until the following Monday, before Which time the statistics covering the entire body of reporting member banks in 91 cities cannot be got ready. In the following will be found the comments of the Federal Reserve Board respecting the returns of the entire body of reporting member banks of the Federal Reserve System for the week ended with the close of business on April 11: The Federal Reserve Board's condition statement of weekly reporting member banks in 91 leading cities On April 11 shows increases for the week of $73,000,000 in loans, $30,000,000 in investments, $215,000,000 in net demand deposits, $16,000,000 in time deposits, and $57,000,000 in reserve balances with Federal Reserve banks, and a decrease of $53,000,000 in Government deposits. Loans on securities increased $43,000,000 at reporting member banks in the New York district, $13,000,000 in the Chicago district, and $43,000,000 at all reporting member banks, and declined $9,000,000 in the Boston district. "All other" loans increased $21,000,000 in the New York district and $30,000,000 at all reporting banks. Holdings of United States Government securities increased $71,000,000 at reporting member banks in the New York district, $17,000,000 in the Boston district, $7,000,000 in the Cleveland district, and $59,000,000 at all reporting member banks, and declined $15,000,000 in the St. Louis district and $12,000,000 in the San Francisco district. Holdings of other securities declined $32,000,000 in the New York district and $29,000,000 at all reporting banks. Licensed member banks formerly included in the condition statement of member banks in 101 leading cities, but not now included in the weekly statement, had total loans and investments of $999,000,000 and net demand, time and Government deposits of $1,127,000,000 on April 11, compared with $1,011,000,000 and $1,093,000,000, respectively, on April 4. A summary of the principal assets and liabilities of the reporting member banks in 91 leading cities that are now included in the statement, together with changes for the week and the year ended April 11 1934 follows: Increase (1-) Or Decrease Since April 11 1934. April 4 1934. April 12 1933. Loans and investments—total_17,611,000,000 Loans—total On securities Another +103,000,000 +1,724,000,000 8,310,000,000 +73,000.000 +63,000,000 3,612,000,000 4,698,000,000 +43.000,000 +30,000,000 +28.000,000 +37,000.000 9,301,000,000 +30,000,000 +1,659,000,000 U. S. Government securities— 6,234,000,000 Other securities 3,067,000,000 +59,000,000 +1,650,000.000 +9,000.000 —29,000,000 Investments—total Reserve with F. R. banks Cash In vault Net demand deposits Time deposits Government deposits Due from banks Due to banks Borrowings from F. R.banks 2,588,000,000 246,000,000 +57,000.000 +1,029.000.000 +7,000,000 +17,000.000 12,136,000,000 4,424,000,000 1,305,000,000 +215,000,000 +2,172,000,000 +16,000.000 +90,000,000 —53,000,000 +1.015,000,000 1,588,000.000 3,616,000,000 +10,000.000 +489,000.000 +38,000,000 +1,193.000.000 7,000,000 —1,000,000 —161.000,000 New Canadian Budget Contains Tariff Concessions to Great Britain and Other Members of Commonwealth—Imposes 10% Tax on Gold Mined in Canada. The imposition of a 10% tax on gold mined in Canada and provision for a number of important tariff concessions to Great Britain and other members of the British Empire featured the budget submitted to the Canadian Parliament April 18 by E. N. Rhodes, Canadian Minister of Finance. The gold tax is not applicable when it would reduce the value of the metal to less than $30 an ounce in Canadian currency. The proposed levy is intended to offset the loss in revenue resulting from a lowering of the sugar tax from 2 cents to 1 cent a pound, Mr. Rhodes said. It was reported late this 2658 Financial Chronicle week that there is'much opposition'in-Canada to the proposed 10% tax on domestically mined gold, but it was also said yesterday (April 20) that no change is likely to be made in the levy. The budget as presented by Mr. Rhodes did not make any important change in the import war tax, while the sales tax remains at 6%. Montagu Norman Re-Elected Governor of Bank of England. On April 17 Montagu Norman was unanimously re-elected Governor of the Bank of England, and Sir Ernest Musgrave Harvey was re-elected Deputy Governor. Mr. Norman enters his fifteenth year as Governor and Sir Ernest began his sixth year as Deputy Governor. Text of Newly Enacted Johnson Measure Barring Loans to Foreign Governments in Default on Their Obligations to United States—Bill Signed by President Roosevelt, Who Seeks Interpretation by Secretary Hull. President Roosevelt, who on April 13 signed the Johnson bill prohibiting the purchase or sale of securities of foreign governments Which have defaulted on their obligations to the United States, has called upon Secretary of State Cardell Hull to decide what interpretation shall be placed on the newly-enacted measure. In Associated Press advices from Washington, April 13, it was stated in part: and not merely The Act's verbiage makes it apply to all debtor nations many foreign to those in default on World War debts. This would bring Powers within the scope of the law. finding out of task One of the questions presented to Mr. Hull was the nation was what part token payments would play in deciding whether a in default. . . . regarding the Although the Government officially has maintained silence has been $187,000,000 it claims Soviet Russia owes on debts, the subject York, mentioned ina Congress. Representative Fish, Republican, New the House the ranking Republican of the Foreign. Affairs Committee, told would be State Department had the understanding that no further loans sanctioned until the Soviet had "recognized" these debts. The bill was passed by the Senate on Feb. 2, and without change was passed by the House on April 4. The Senate action was noted in our issue of Feb. 3, page 770, while two Items bearing on the House action appeared on page 2348 in our April 7 issue. In one of these items we quoted in part what Representative Fish had to say in the House on April 4 during the debate on the bill; among other things he made the statement that "I have had assurances to-day from the Department of State that until the Soviet Government adjusts its debts with our Government to the satisfaction of the President we will make no loans to the Soviets." In our account of the passage of the bill by the House reference was made to an announcement by Chairman McReynolds of the House Foreign Affairs Committee that a resolution had been adopted by the trustees of the Russian Export-Import Bank to the effect that no credit transactions would be undertaken with the Soviet Government until settlement had been made of the Russian indebtedness. Comment pertaining to the new legislation was contained in the following editorial which appeared in the New York "Herald Tribune" of April 16: Senator Johnson's bill, signed by the President on Friday, prohibiting the purchase or sale in this country of the obligations of foreign governments that will not pay their debts to the United. States Government is so limited in its practical applicability that it seems to be directed against little else than the Federal financing of Russian trade. It puts no ban on the securities of private corporations in the defaulting debtor countries. In many of the European countries the most important utilities and industries are so heavily mortgaged to their governments that their bond issues In the United States would simply be government flotations in masquerade. In other States, with dictatorial regimes that brook no legislative interference with fiscal affairs, it would be a very simple matter for the dictatorship to have an ostensibly private corporation formed which would be free to put its obligations on the American market. The Johnson Act puts no effective ban on the investment by American citizens in the obligations of defaulting nations; for if any one is anxious enough to buy Austrian, French, Greek, Polish or Russian Government bonds he need only subscribe to them in London and have his coupons slipped there to evade the law. Finally, the new law raises no really effective barrier against the financing of trade with any defaulting debtor nation but Russia with American public funds through Federal import and export banks. All but Russia are obtensibly capitalistic countries, in which all the corporations that might seek Federal loans to enable them to export goods from this country are outside the scope of this law, hewever deeply they may be involved with their governments. In Russia, however, there is no company or corporation of any sort that might waht its purchases of American exports financed here that is not frankly and openly a Soviet Government "subdivision, organization or association." It would take a tremendous lot of ingenuity to show that Russia's debts to this country, about which one Administration after another has quibbled for nearly seventeen years, will not be in default until such time as a formal agreement is reached for their settlement. It is quite possible that individual American exporters may be able to finance the Russian purchases of their wares indirectly, without running foul of this new law. How a Federal export bank can now contemplate making advances against the obligations of a "subdivision" of the defaulting Russian Government is, April 21 1934 however, impossible to see. It almost appears as though a ban on just such Federal participation in Russian trade were the one subtle purpose of the Johnson act. The text of the bill as passed by Congress and signed by President Roosevelt reads as follows: [PUBLIC—No. 151-73d CONGRESS.] [S. 682] An Act to prohibit financial transactions with any foreign government in default on its obligations to the United States. Be it enacted by the Senate and Rouse of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That hereafter it shall be unlawful within the United States or any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States for any person to purchase or sell the bonds, securities, or other obligations of, any foreign government or political subdivision thereof or any organization or association acting for or on behalf of a foreign government or political subdivision thereof, issued after the passage of this Act, or to make any loan to such foreign government, political subdivision, organization, or association, except a renewal or adjustment of existing indebtedness while such government, political subdivision, organization, or association, is in default in the payment of its obligations, or any part thereof, to the Government of the United States. Any person violating the provisions of this Act shall upon conviction thereof be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both. Sec. 2. As used in this Act the term "person" includes individual, partnership, corporation, or association other than a public corporation created by or pursuant to special authorization of Congress, or a corporation in which the Government of the United States has or exercises a controlling Interest through stock ownership or otherwise. Approved, April 13 1934. We also give herewith the report on the bill presented to the House on March 14 by Chairman McReynolds of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. GOVPROHIBIT FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS WITH ANY FOREIGN ERNMENT IN DEFAULT ON ITS OBLIGATIONS TO THE UNITED STATES. Mr. McReynolds, from the Committee on Foreign Affairs, submitted the following report. [To accompany S. 682.1 The Committee on Foreign Affairs has had under consideration the bill government in (S. 682) to prohibit financial transactions with any foreign default on its obligations to the United States, and reports it to the House without amendment with recommendation that it do pass. The report of the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate on this bill is as follows: [S. Rept. No. 20, 73d Gong., let sess.1 The bill thus reported favorably has been pending before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary for more than a year. It was introduced in the Senate during the last session by Hon. Hiram W. Johnson, of California, immediately after the investigation held by the Senate Committee on Finance respecting foreign securities. That investigation was so recent, and its results so astonishing, that apparently nothing more need be done in demonstrating the necessity for legislation upon the subject than merely to remind the Senate of the disclosures. It is sufficient to say that billions of dollars of securities of certain foreign countries were offered for gale to the American people, with little thought of final payment, and, in some instances, with sufficient knowledge on the part of the American intermediary, and the borrower also, that it would be well-nigh impossible for these securities ultimately to be paid. Sums of money to the amount of billions of dollars are now due to the American people upon the bonds and obligations of foreign governments, including political subdivisions thereof and municipalities which have defaulted not only in interest payments, but which hold meager hope of payment of any considerable part of the principal. These foreign bonds and obligations, of course, in sane instances were issued and were sold in good faith; while in some instances, the testimony has demonstrated that they were issued by the borrower merely to obtain money, with little expectation of redemption, and were sold by the American financiers to make outrageously high profits, and both had reasonable cause to believe that the American public purchasing such bonds or other obligations would be the ultimate sufferer. The bill was introduced, after the revelations concerning the sale of bonds and other obligations of foreign governments by American financiers and bankers, to prevent a recurrence of the practices which were shown by the investigation to be little less than a fraud upon the American people. The bill seeks therefore, to make it unlawful to loan money to, or to purchase or sell the bonds or other obligations of, any foreign government, including any political subdivision thereof, while such foreign government, or political subdivision thereof, is in default in the payment of its obligations to our people or to our Government. It is a brief penal statute, protective in character. The investigation above referred to, regarding foreign securities, not only justifies the enactment of this bill, but demands it in behalf of the American public. Moreover, much that has occurred since that investigation, and subsequently to the introduction originally of the bill, in the matter of the obligations due to the United Staters Government from certain foreign governments, emphasizes not only the justice of the measure, but its necessity. It would be unjust to permit the further sale of securities of a defaulting government, the sale of whose securities heretofore in this country have brought distressing loss upon our people, or the further offering for sale of the bonds and obligations of a foreign country able indeed to pay its obligations to our own Government but repudiating its solemn agreements. Thus, because of the facts demonstrated by the investigation above referred to, an because of what has occurred since respecting the nonpayment of foreign debts due to the United States, the bill is appropriate. To curb the rapacity of those engaged in the sale of foreign obligations, as an admonition to governments well able to pay but which nevertheless repudiate their written engagements, is its laudable purpose, and it is as well a measure of simple justice for the protection of the American investor and the American people generally. Comparative Figures of Condition of Canadian Banks. In the following we compare the condition of the Canadian banks for Feb. 28 1934 with the figures for Jan. 31 1934 and Feb. 28 1933. Financial Chronicle Volume 138 STATEMENT OF CONDITION OF THE BANKS OF THE DOMINION OF CANADA. Assets, Current gold and subsidiary coin— In Canada Elsewhere Total Dominion notes— In Canada Elsewhere Total Notes of other banks United States & other foreign currencies_ Cheques on other banks Loans to other banks in Canada,secured, Including bills rediscounted Deposits made with and balance due from other banks in Canada Due from banks and banking correspondents in the United Kingdom Due from banks and banking correspondents elsewhere than in Canada and the United Kingdom Dominion Government and Provincial Government securities Canadian municipal securities and British, foreign and colonial public securities other than Canadian Railway and other bonds. debs. & stocks Call and short (not exceeding 30 days) loans in Canada on stocks, debentures, bonds and other securities of a sufficient marketable value to cover Elsewhere than in Canada Other current loans & cllscits in Canada_ Elsewhere Loans to the Government of Canada_ _ _ Loans to Provincial Governments Loans to cities, towns. municipalities and school districts Non-current loans, estimated loss provided for Real estate other than bank premises Mortgages on real estate sold by bank Bank premises at not more than cost, less amounts (if any) written off Liabilities of customers under letters of credit as per contra Deposits with the Minister of Finance for the security of note circulation Deposit in the central gold reserves---Shares of and loans to controlled cos_ _ _ _ Other assets not included under the foregoing heads Total assets Feb. 28 1934. Jan. 31 1934. Feb. 28 1933. $ 40,634,375 11,642,226 $ 40,321,904 10,437,222 IS 38,844,152 21.523,370 52,276.603 50,759,129 60.367,526 136,799,636 10,919 139.438,121 10,881 140,759,218 10,351 136,810.556 139,449,003 140,769,571 8,435,466 19,661,579 86,261,076 7,856,401 19,229,529 80,069,493 9,196,024 16,677,940 69,104,115 3,711,506 3,358,997 4,339,793 12,584,843 20,396,876 13,463,152 67,516,245 59,760,731 83,580,498 635,456,344 635.190,432 581,282,145 148,380,924 49,187,850 146.497,409 49.959,940 168,493,509 47,676.945 101,526,182 96,413,357 869,125,576 140,826,565 103,698,207 86,185.938 878,748.673 136,339,485 97.166,190 76,287,191 923,764,135 155.162,061 25,368,987 23,242,615 24,595,737 116,844,328 110,147,586 120.799,070 13,618,999 7,681.538 6,115,881 13.608,019 7,534,199 6,270,743 13,778,175 7,623,419 6,387,652 78.409,311 78,367,434 79,248,175 53,240,647 51,207,846 41,999,250 6,506,708 15,881.732 12,959,374 6,506,708 14,581,732 13,091,273 6,605,675 19,081,732 12,965,722 1,755,836 1.809,422 1,549,424 2,766,598,111 2,743,867,917 2,781,964,923 Liabilities. Notes in circulation 125,707,707 121,218,816 121,140,822 Balance due to Dominion Govt. after deducting adv. for credits, pay-lists, &q. 19,800,832 23,191,444 26,273.504 Advances under the Finance Act 43,444,000 44,344,000 41,944,000 Balance due to Provincial Governments_ 22,704,400 27,051,856 18,813,775 Deposits by the public, payable on de'mand in Canada 487,363,557 475,774,365 445,859,615 Deposits by the public payable after no tics or on a fixed day in Canada 1,854,764,769 1,350,903,682 1,397,063,161 Deposits elsewhere than in Canada 319,414,790 316,071,916 309,736,501 Loans from other banks in Canada, so cured, Including bills rediscounted. Deposits made by and balances due to other banks in Canada 12,479,509 10,863,148 10.883,831 Due to banks and banking correspondents in the United Kingdom 5,836,151 3,722,453 5,066,818 Elsewhere than in Canada and the United Kingdom 26,873,072 26,211,090 40,557,241 Bills payable 960,838 862,948 585,555 Letters of credit outstanding 53,240,647 41,999,250 51,207.846 Liabilities not Incl. under foregoing heads 2,569,494 2.363,384 2,335.985 Dividends declared and unpaid 2.986,024 2,447,000 957.068 Rest or reserve fund 132,500,000 132,500,000 162,000,000 Capital paid up 144,500,000 144,500,000 144,500,000 Total liabilities 2,754,400,701 2,733,061,029 2,770.635,264 Note.—Owleg to the omission of the cents in the official reports, the footings in the above do not exactly agree with the totals given. British Budget Reduces Income Tax, Increases Dole, Partially Restores Pay Cuts—Omits Provision for War Debt Payments to United States-1934-35 Surplus Estimated at £796,000. Neville Chamberlain, British Chancellor of the Exchequer, presented to Parliament on April 17 a budget totaling £706,520,000, with provisions for a number of tax reductions, including an approximate 10% reduction in income taxes and a 25% reduction in the automobile tax. The budget makes full restoration of unemployment insurance benefits (the dole) to the old level and restores half the economy pay cuts which were effected in 1931 to balance the budget. He estimated a budget surplus for 1934-35 of £796,000. Mr. Chamberlain for the third consecutive year made no provision in his budget for any payment to the United States on account of the British war debt. When he told the Parliament that he was repeating this omission expressions of approval came from the floor of the House of Commons. In his budget speech Mr. Chamberlain made this reference to the American debt: Neither last year nor the year before did I make any provision for the payment of the war debts to America nor for the receipt of war debts or reparations by ourselves. In the absence of any fresh development. I propose to follow precisely the same course this year. A London cable of April 17 to the New York "Times" described the principal features of the budget message in part as follows: When Mr. Chamberlain presented his first budget in 1932, he made no mention of the American debt, but the explanation at that time was that it would be offset by receipts from Germany and other Continental powers on account of reparations and war debts owed to Great Britain. Despite 2659 their omission from that budget, both instalments due to the United States In 1932 were paid in full. Token Payments Last Year. In last year's budget there was no reference to the American debt, but the explanation was different. Britain then had no intention of continuing payments on the basis of the Baldwin settlement and did not. Instead she made two nominal token payments in June and December 1933, amounting to £3,304,000. Another outstanding measure of relief in the new budget is for the benefit of automobile owners. Hereafter they will be obliged to pay a road tax of only 15s. for each unit of horsepower at which their cars are rated. The old tax was 20s. It was imposed originally to protect the small-car industry of this country by keeping out low-priced American automobiles of large horsepower. But another effect has been to discourage mass production of more powerful cars in this country, which in turn has prevented the development of British automobile export trade. With Ford now manufacturing in England, there is no incentive to keep his cars out. Revenue Put at £706,520,000. The estimated revenues for the year ending with March 1935 are. Income tax Surtax Estate duties Stamp duties Excess profits Land tax Customs Excise Motor vehicles Post Office net receipts Miscellaneous Total revenue 1219,500,000 50,000.000 76,000,000 25,000.000 1,200,000 800,000 183,650,000 106,350,000 5,000,000 14,000,000 25,020,000 £706,520,000 The estimated expenditures are. Public debt Northern Ireland Consolidated fund Post Office fund Army Navy Air force Army, navy, air pensions Education War and civil pensions Health and Labor departments Foreign services Home and Justice departments Local revenue aid Central government Trade and industry Works and stationery Cost of tax collection Restoration of pay cuts Total expenditures £224,000,000 6,500.000 3.700,000 2.000.000 31 418 000 47,208.000 17,168,000 17.917.000 51,270.000 46,703,000 147.526,000 8,098,000 16.038,000 45,454.000 2,050,000 10.208.000 8.256,000 12,610,000 7.600,000 /705,724,000 SurplusL796,000 — The estimated income tax revenue of £219.500,000 at the new rate of 4s. 6d. in the pound Is £9,250,000 less than the estimate for the year just closed at the old 5s. rate. Another London dispatch to the "Times" April 17 pointed in the British income out that despite the_ latest . reduction— 'a ; s Rho highest for any country in the world, tax added: A married man with one child, earning £2,000 [the pound was quoted yesterday:at 85.151 year, must pay £353 tax at the existing rate which remains in effect until Jan. 1. At the new rate he will pay £317. If the same man earned £1.000. he would pay £128 now and £115 under the ;the earned only £500 a year, he would nevertheless pay new schedule. £28 tax now and a little more than £25 at the lower rate. Taxes for marrie (men without children and for single men are proportionately stiffer. Thus a bachelor whose salary touches £2,000 must pay £378 income tax this year and £330 under the new schedule. If he earns £1.000, his tax bill this year would be £153 and next year £137. A single man earning £500 pays £53 tax this year and £47 at the new rate. The exemptions, reduced two years ago, have not been restored. Thousands earning as little as £2 a week must pay income taxes, although they never paid before 1931. No allowance is made for payments to dependents, unless their .incomes from all_sources do not exceed £50 annually._ i'• A copyright London dispatch _ - April 17 to the New York "Herald Tribune 'quoted from the Chancellor's budget speech in part as follows: In opening his speech the Chancellor referred briefly to the dark days of the two previous budgets and then went on in a tone of restrained optimism: "To-day the atmosphere is distinctly brighter. There is a small but distinct rise in wholesale prices. The rates of short-term interest have achieved new low records. The prices of long-term loans also have improved, to an extent. I think, not perhaps fully realized. I wonder how many people have recognized that stocks such as old 21,i% consols actually stand higher to-day than before the war? "Equilibrium has practically been restored in balance of payments. Looking at the telltale statistics of such things as retail trade, consumption of electricity, transport, iron and steel production and house building, in every case there has been a definite revival of activity. We have established a new spirit of hope and confidence." Continuing in a cautious vein, Mr. Chamberlain said. "We must not allow ourselves to be tempted into forgetfulness of certain unpleasant facts which will have to be reckoned with before we can feel that our troubles are at an end. The improvement of the condition of the country is due almost entirely to extension of the home markets and to the greater part of that market which has been secured by our own people. But, on the other hand, our export trade, although it is better, is still far behind the figure it reached only a few years ago, not because we are being beaten out of the field by competitors—for, on the contrary, we have now regained our place as the first exporting',country—but because of the disastrous shrinkage of international trade." The Chancellor gave the budget and the British people a pat on the back by asking the latter to compare the financial situation here with that of any other country outside the British Empire. . . . The Chancellor estimated the total revenue for the current financial year at £706,520.000 (83,642,110,600 currently), with a total expenditure of £705.724.000 (83.638,007,220), leaving an estimated surplus of £796,000 ($4.103.380). Ezchange Fund Shows Profit. In his remarks about the British -national-debt, Mr. Chamberlain revealed that the exchange equalization_account_so far had made a profit. 2660 Financial Chronicle Referring to last year's budget accounts, he explained a "net reduction in the nominal total of the deadweight debt of £21,500,000 ($110.832,500)." The members will see," he said, "that there is an apparent increase in the debt of £178,500,000 ($920.167,500), but if you will add these two figures together you will see that the difference is accounted Yor by an issue from the exchequer to the exchange equalization account of £200,000,000. Thus, the account still shows a profit." Import Duties on Rice Increased by France—Not Known Whether United States Rice Is Affected. The French import duties on rice have been increased by a law published in the French "Journal Official" for March 25 1934, according to a cablegram to the United States Department of Commerce from Commercial Attache C. MacLean, Paris. An announcement issued March 28 by the Commerce Department added: On whole rice, meal and grits, the general (maximum) rate has been increased from 34.40 francs to 137.60 francs per 100 kilos gross, and the minimum rate, which was also 34.40, to 68.80 francs per 100 kilos gross. It is not known whether rice of United States origin will be subject to the new general or the new minimum rate. Rice originating in French Indo-China, the principal supplier to France, is admitted duty free. "Vossische Zeitung," One of Germany's Oldest Newspapers,Suspends Publication—Described as Victim of Nazi "Co-ordination" of Press. The "Vossische Zeitung," one of the oldest German newspapers, suspended publication April 1 after it had been printed for 230 years. This action was taken, according to press reports from Berlin, as a partial result of the Nazi "co-ordination" of the newspapers in Germany. Before the accession of Chancellor Hitler to power the paper had supported liberal causes and opposed the Hitler movement. Within the last year, however, the publication was controlled by the Government, and its circulation dropped below 50,000. A Berlin dispatch, March 23, to the New York "Times" gave the following translation on an announcement which appeared in the "Vossische Zeitung," March 24: The "Vossische Zeitung," which looks back upon a tradition of more than two centuries, was faced with an uncertain fate 20 years ago whe6 its director and part owner for many years, Karl Robert Leasing, died. The House of Ul'stein took it over to preserve it as a cultural treasure and as the traditional newspaper of spiritually leading circles of the bourgeoisie. The "Vossische Zeitung" gained new importance. Because it addressed Itself to a relatively thin level of readers and put the highest requirements on its own accomplishments, it demanded at all times such large contributions by the publishing house that they were perhaps unprecedented in the history of the German press. The "Vossische Zeitung" continued its work in a Germany with fresh impulse, but our times have an urge toward larger communities—larger than the circles to which the "Vossische Zeitung" addressed itself. The need of the day is to consolidate all forces. The task of a newspaper of the style of the "Vossische Zeitung" is ended. Therefore, by our own free will we have made the painful cut and logical decision again to give up the "Vossische Zeitung" and not publish it after the end of this month. Thereby the resources in means and personnel of our House, which employs nearly 9,000 persons, will be liberated for our other newspaper and periodicals, as well as for new tasks. Baron von Freitag-Loringhoven Appointed by Cermany to Hague Court of International Justice. The German Government has appointed Baron Axel von Freitag-Loringboven, Professor of Law at Breslau University and a member of the Prussian State Council, to the Permanent Court of International Justice at The Hague. A wireless message April 13 from Berlin to the New York "Times" added: His predecessor at The Hague Court, Professor Walther Schuecking, International law authority, was dismissed last November from his professorship at Kiel University for being politically unreliable from a National Socialist point of view. Reichsbank Sets April 27 as Date for Conferences on Germany's Long-Term Debt. President Schacht of the Reichsbank has fixed April 27 as the date for the coming conference in Berlin on Germany's long-term and medium-term foreign debts. The Basle conference on Germany's foreign debt was noted in our April 14 issue, page 2494. April 21 1934 "gift" securities acquired abroad may be sold by the Reichsbank, and even emigrants' credits are put under additional restrictions. These drastic measures, like the embargoes decreed against the purchase of it, number of foreign raw materials, are a result of the precarious foreign exchange position of the Reichsbank, which has reduced official note coverage to 6.8% and is likely to force it even lower. Foreign Purchases of Hides and Skins Temporarily Prohibited by Germany—Decree to Remain in Effect Until May 15. A German Government decree of April 10 1934 extended the Government import control on the purchase of foreign raw materials to include hides and skins (tariff item 153), according to a cablegram to the United States Department of Commerce from the Commercial Attache at Berlin. Purchases abroad are prohibited until May 15 1934. An announcement issued April 12 by the Commerce Department said that it is understood that this measure is connected with the efforts to counteract the growing deficit in the German trade balance and for the better rationing of supplies of industrial raw materials. In the latter part of March similar control was established over textile raw materials and copper; reference to the same was made in our issue of March 31, page 2156. Holland's 900,000,000-guilder Conversion Offering Oversubscribed. Under date of April 13 advices from Amsterdam to the New York "Times" stated: The Government's conversion loan of 900,000,000 guilders, for which the subscription books opened yesterday, was reported successful to-day. A total of 749,000,000 guilders was presented for conversion, while the free subscription amounted to 155,000.000. Thus the total subscriptions exceed the offer by 4,000,000. These figures are, of course, tentative. Because of reduced interest the Treasury will gain about 5,000,000 blinders a year. Earlier advices(April3)to the same paper,in reporting the' issuance of the prospectus, said: The price of the issue is not, as generally expected, 9935%, but is par, which means a saving of 4,500,000 guilders for the State. The price, however, is somewhat disappointing to the Stock Exchange here which had figured upon 99li%. The interest rate is 4%, as previously announced. The Department of Commerce at Washington on April 9 announced the receipt of a report from Commercial Attache Mse F. Van Wiekel, The Hague, with regard to the new financing. The Department's announcement said: The measure authorizes the Government to float one or more loans to a maximum of 900,000,000 florins ($600,000,000 according to current exchange quotations) for the purpose of reducing the charges for debt service and to permit redemptions more in keeping with conditions expected to prevail a few years hence. The new loan is to have a maturity of 40 years with certain provisos for earlier redemption and is to retire certain outstanding loans. Although the new loan will probably bear interest at 4% and, therefore, the interest rate will not be reduced on the 4% 1916 issue by its retirement,the date of maturity will be extended (it is now 1943)and the provision in the original loan for a progressively nigher rate of redemption from 1937 onward will be eliminated, with a saving of carrying charges. No information is vouchsafed for the exclusion of the existing 4.4% loans from the conversion operation. These may possibly figure in a later conversion, the report states. A reference to the conversion loan appeared in our issue of March 10, page 1654. Proposal Made by Bulgaria to League Loans Committee as to Interest Payment on Bulgarian 7% Refugee Settlement Loan of 1926 and Bulgarian VA% Stabilization Loan of 1928. Eliot Wadsworth, American member of the League Loans Committee (London), has advised Speyer & Co. and J. TeTiry Schroder Banking Corporation, as American fiscal agents for the Bu garian 7% Refugee "Settlement Loan of 1926, and the Bulgarian 73'% Stabilization Loan of 1928, that a communique was published in London on April 20 Fearing on a proposal of the Bulgarian Government to transfer in foreign exchange"5-2M% of theinterest serVice on tire two League Loans during the next two years. The communique says: Mark Exportation Is Banned by Germany—Decree Makes Currency a Purely Domestic One, Like the Ruble. Under date of April 17 a wireless message from Berlin to the New York "Times" said in part: As the Government has provided in foreign exchange up to 15th April 1934 only 25% of the monthly installments of interest, it will provide forthwith In foreign exchange sufficient additional sums to make up 32li% of the coupon due 15th May 1934 on the 1928 Loan, and let July 1934 on the 1926 Loan respectively. Thereafter it will transfer in foreign exchange 32li% of the amounts due for interest on each of the normal monthly installment dates. The German mark, like the Russian ruble, became a purely domestic currency to-day, when the Government issued a decree prohibiting the vemoval from the country of any mark bills of domestic gold coin. The decree further limited the amount of cash of any kind that could be taken or sent out of the country to 50 marks monthly per person. Travelers leaving Germany will have to exchange their mark bills at the border. The new decree, which is the eighth affecting foreign exchange, goes Into effect on May 1. In another decree the Government assumed virtual control over credits and securities held by German citizens abroad. All transactions with them are made subject to approval and claims against foreigners, when in marks, must be reported to the Reichsbank; The League Loans Committee announce that during the past few days they have discussed the service of the two above-named League of Nations Loans with Mr. Moushanoff, Prime Minister of Bulgaria, Mr. Stephanoff, Finance Minister, and Mr. Stoyanoff. Director of the Debt Administration. The Bulgarian Government has duly carried out its undertaking, announced on the 24th of August 1933, to transfer in foreign exchange 25% of the interest service of the two League Loans for the period May 1933 to April 1934 inclusive. The Government has in addition provided the untransferred balance of the services as agreed In Levas, which the League of Nations' Commissioner has relent to the Government against 2% Leva The communique as published in London follows: Volume 138 Financial Chronicle Treasury Bills, and the 1934-35 Budget as now passed by the Bulgarian Parliament provides the full service (interest and sinking fund) of the two League Loans in Lovas as before. The Bulgarian Government now addresses the following proposal to the League Loans Committee, 1. The Bulgarian Government will transfer in foreign exchange 32Si% of the interest service on the two League Loans during the next two years, viz. for the 1926 Loan 32Si% of the coupons from 1st July 1934 to the 1st July 1936 inclusive; for the 1928 Loan 32Si% of the coupons from the 15th may 1934 to the 15th May 1936 inclusive. The coupons will be regarded as satisfied by these payments, and no scrip will be given in respect of the untransferred portion. As the Government has provided in foreign exchange up to 15th April 1934 only 25% of the monthly instalments of interest, it will provide forthwith in foreign exchange sufficient additional sums to make up 32Si% of the coupon due 15th May 1934 on the 1928 Loan, and 1st July 1934 on the 1926 Loan respectively. Thereafter it will transfer in foreign exchange 323i% of the amounts due for interest on each of the normal monthly instalment dates. 2. These payments will be in addition to and distinct from those which Bulgaria has undertaken to make in respect of the 10% payment on the blocked Lovas which have accumulated during the years 1932-34 as announced on the 24th November 1933. A separate notice will be issued giving further details of these payments. 3. The Bulgarian Government will provide in each of its Budgets for the financial years 1934-35 and 1935-36 the full service (interest and sinking fund) of the two League Loans in Levas; out of these sums it will transfer each month to the Trustees 32%% of the monthly instalments of interest as described above;for the balance of the service in each year, viz. 67)4% of the interest and the full amount of the Sinking Fund it will hand to the League of Nations' Commissioner non-interest bearing Lova Treasury Bills at the beginning of each of the financial years 1934-35 and 1935-36. At the end of each of these years, when the Government has duly transferred in foreign exchange 3234% of the interest throughout the year the Commissioner will release these Bills to the Government. 4. The Bulgarian Government undertakes that if it accords more liberal terms to any other foreign obligation due from or guaranteed by the Bulgarian State it will accord as favorable terms to the two League Loans. 5. The Bulgarian Government expressly states that the foregoing proposals relate solely to the two years covered by the present arrangement,and will in no way prejudice the ultimate arrangements for the service of the two League Loans after this period has elapsed. The Government undertakes to discuss these ultimate arrangements w th the League Loans Committee before it frames its Budget for the financial year 1936-37, and in any case before the 31st January 1936. Signed for the Bulgarian Government, N. Moushanoff, Primate Minister, Stephanoff, Finance Minister N. Stoyanoff, Director of the Public Debt. The League Loans Committee have properly considered these proposals and have also studied the situation of Bulgaria in the light of the information which has been made available by the League of Nations, as well as by the Bulgarian representatives themselves. In the circumstances the Committee believe that the bondholders would be well advised to acquiesce in the Bulgarian Government's proposals. For the League Loans Committee, Austen Chamberlain, Chairman. Soviet Russia Floats New Loan of 3,500,000,000 Rubles. In Associated Press advices from Moscow, April 14, it was stated that the issuance of a new domestic loan, aggregating 3,500,000,000 rubles and running ten years, was announced that night by the Soviet Government. It will be known as "the loan of the second year of the second FiveYear Plan," and will carry the option of either a lottery or interest-bearing bonds, which will pay 10% annually. Regarding the campaign which is being conducted in behalf of the loan, a cablegram from Moscow April 15 to the New York "Times" said in part: Bond selling teams will be organized in cities, villages,factories and farms and will engage in "Socialist competition" in an effort to bring about the speedy success of the drive. The Central Committee of the Soviet has Issued an appeal to workers to subscribe three weeks' wages. A houseto-house canvass also will be made. Mikhail Kalinin, Chairman of the committee, in a telegram to all local authorities, directed that all cultural forces and the press be used to insure the success of the campaign. He closed with the statement. "The whole campaign is to be conducted without the least coercion, on a basis of voluntary contributions." The people who do not subscribe, however, will be socially very uncomfortable. The workers' subscriptions will be deducted automatically from their wages in instalments covering tea months. The press emphasizes that the money will be devoted to making life fuller and more comfortable, and points out that the number of industrial workers increased from 14,000,000 in 1930, when the Soviet budget was 35.000,000,000 rubles, to 21,000,000 last year, when the budget was 50,000,000,000 rubles. In this same period the total annual wages rose from 13.000,000,000 to 34,000,000,000 rubles. The present bond issue is the largest of any made for the first and second five-year plans, and will bring the total for internal loans since 1928 to 13,911,000,000 rubles. All this is still outstanding, as these loans are for ien years. Break in Grain Prices—Prediction by Secretary Wallace Question of Duty on Polish Rye Reported Among Contributing Causes. Grain prices broke sharply on the Chicago Board of Trade this week, with the decline led by wheat and rye. Yesterday (April 20), however, there was a partial recovery, with wheat futures closing fractionally higher, although they ended the week at the lowest levels since last October. Several reasons were advanced in trading circles for the unsettlement in grain prices. It was said that some speculators with heavy commitments on the long side had been forced to close out, thus precipitating a wave of liquidation. Another cause of the break was said to have been intimations from Washington that the Administration disapproves certain proposed inflationary measures before Congress, particularly those calling for silver remonetization. The fall of grain prices on Apil 18 was ascribed to the refusal of Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau to raise the tariff on Polish rye. On the following day (April 19) renewed liquidation was attributed to a statement by Secretary of Agriculture Wallace, in which he was quoted as saying that 2661 no exportable commodity could be indefinitely held on a domestic basis above the world price. This was taken to mean that a downward readjustment of grain prices would be tolerated at Washington and is to be expected. As a result of the steady daily declines,interrupted only yesterday, wheat prices have fallen more than 15 cents a bushel in Chicago in the last week. A Chicago dispatch April 18 to the New York "Times" read in part as follows: Charges were made by a committee of Board of Trade members to-day that the Federal Administration was directly responsible for the drastic declines in grains this week by failing to raise the tariff on rye imported from Poland. The charges were contained in a letter addressed to Secretary Morgenthau and sent by P. It. O'Brien for the board members. The effect of the ruling of Mr. Morgenthau on April 11, when he dedined to raise the tariff on Polish rye, the letter asserted, has been to cause such concern in the grain trade over the possibility of similar action in other commodities as to have shaken tne national markets. Mr. O'Brien asserted that Secretary Morgenthau had not obeyed Section 303 of the Grundy Tariff Act of 1930, making mandatory upon the Secretary of the Treasury an increase of duties on crops when the exporting nation pays a bounty. He charged the Administration with knowing these facts for months, but by delays permitting millions of bushels of rye to come into the American market and causing general price declines in all grain markets. "In your published order," the latter said, "you say domestic stocks of rye are inadequate to supply the demand. This is contrary to fact. From the present supplies on hand and with average domestic disappearance there is shown to be at least an 8,000,000-bushel carry-over into the new crop. "The imports of rye into the United States are practically the same as will be our carry-over on July 1. Therefore, dumping under Governmet bounty forced down prices in a manner wholly unjustified." Increase in Gold Reserves of Bank of Poland. Under the above head, the American Polish Chamber of Commerce and Industry in the United States, Inc., has the following to say in its "Survey of Poland," issued under date of March 24-31: The decrease in the prices of gold coin, which are now at par, have resulted in the liquidation of hoarded gold in Poland in recent months, and this change is reflected in the latest statements of the Bank of Poland, which show an increase of the gold reserve of the bank over and above any increase which could be expected under normal conditions. At the end of January the gold reserves of the bank stood at 478 million zlotys, an increase of two million zlotys over the total at the end of December. In the first 10 days of January a further increase of 843,000 zlotys is shown, while the returns for the period from Jan. 20 to Jan. 81 reveal an increase of 700,000 zlotys, the total reserve being 477.5 million. There was also during this decade a decrease in foreign currencies and bills by 6.3 million to 81.8 million, and the bank repaid to French banks half of the credit of 30 million French francs taken in the autumn of 1933 for the financing of loans against registered security on crops. The bank's statement for the third decade of January shows bills discounted 644.4 million zlotys (an increase of 9.1 million) collateral loans 57.5 million (a decrease of 0.3 million), and Treasury bills discounted 47 million (a decrease of 0.3 million). The note circulation was 947.1 million (en increase of 22.9 million) ; gold coverage of note circulation and sight liabilities 43.60% (as against 43.79% in the previous 10-day period). This coverage is 13.60 points over the minimum required by the statutes. Profits on Gold Reduce Taxes in South Africa—Treasury Surplus Leads to $10,000,000 Budget Cut. Surpluses resulting from the premium on gold enabled Finapco Minister:N.C. Havenga of South'Africa,in presenting the budget on April 10 to announce reduction in taxation amounting to $10,000,000, including restoration of penny postage within the Empire. Canadian't Press advices, April 10, from Cape Town, published in the New York "Herald Tribune" added: Striking figures showing the effect on the'enhanced value of gold on South Africa's mining profits and general discs] position were given in the budget covering the first full year since South Africa went off the gold standard. Despite the tax on excess gold mine profits, the mine dividends increased by 51% in 1933 compared with 1932. the Finance Minister stated. While gold production decreased by 545.000 ounces, owing to the mining of lower grade ore, the total value of the gold mined had increased by $95,000,000. Supplementary Drawing for Redemption of $194,500 Bonds of San Paulo 7% Coffee Realization Loan of 1930. Speyer & Co. and J. Henry Schroder Banking Corp., United States of America fiscal agents for the State of San Paulo 7% Coffee Realization Loan 1930, announced April 17 that a supplementary drawing has taken place for redemption on April 20 1934, of $194,500 bonds of the loan. Numbers of these bonds are published in the "Chronicle" to-day. Drawn bonds will be paid in New York on the basis of which equals E1 sterling, or at the rate of $1,061.34 $5.16 for each $1,000 drawn bond. Accrued interest on the above bonds will be paid, without premium, from April 1 1934 to April 20 1934, the announcement said; it adds: The loan contract provided for the redemption on April 1 1934,of$1,750,000 bonds, but the funds available for this purpose, after absorbing the reserve fund and providing for the payment due on the coupons of the above issue, allowed for the redemption on that date of only $1,255,000 bonds, which, together with the $194.500 bonds repayable on April 20. will make a total of $1,449,500 bonds redeemed. 2662 Financial Chronicle After retirement of these bonds there will remain outstanding $24,137.000 of the $35,000,000 bonds originally issued in the United States of America. Sinking Coupons Maturing May 1 on External 7 Fund Gold Bonds of Buenos Aires to Be Paid at Rate of $30.98 for Each $37.50, $15.49 for $18.75 and $3.11 for $3.75. Announcement was made on April 16 that the Province of Buenos Aires is notifying holders of its external 732% sinking fund gold bonds dated Nov. 1 1925 and due Nov. 1 1947 that it has made available at the Corporate Agency Department of the National City Bank, New York, for delivery on or after May 1 1934 to bondholders who assent to the loan readjustment plan of 1933, the sum in cash of $30.98 with respect to each $37.50 coupon; $15.49 with respect to each $18.75 coupon and $3.11 for each $3.75 coupon maturing May 1, together with 5% arrears certificates for the balance remaining unpaid. United States Withdrawal from Haitian Affairs Probable as Result of Conference Between President Roosevelt and President Vincent—Fiscal Control and Marine Occupation to be Ended by October— Plans Viewed as Satisfactory to Bondholders. Complete withdrawal of official participation by the United States in the affairs of Haiti appeared likely April 17, following a conference between President Roosevelt and President Stenio Vincent of Haiti, who arrived in the United States March 26. After the White House conference it was announced that American marines would be removed from Haiti by the end of October, and it was indicated that the fiscal control exercised by the United States would be concluded before that date. It was reported from Washington that adequate protection would be afforded the holders of $11,000,000 in Haitian bonds outstanding. In a joint statement issued by both Presidents April 17, the policy of "the good neighbor" in international relations was praised. The statement also said that a possible commercial agreement had been discussed. The text of the statement follows: We have had an opportunity to discuss in the most friendly and cordial manner the different problems arising in the relapions between the governments of the United States and of Haiti. In connection with the departure of the United States Marines from Haiti during the month of October next, as already provided in the agreement of Aug. 7 1933. President Roosevelt intends to request authority from the Congress of the United States to make a gift to Haiti of a portion of the Marine Corps material which the Haitian Government feels would be useful to it. We have exchanged views regarding the possibility of a commercial agreement which would increase the flow of goods between the two countries: and finally, we have discussed a new form of financial administration which is satisfactory to our two governments and which should be equally satisfactory to the holders of the bonds of the 1922 loan. We are both inclined to the belief that the policy of the good neighbor which the Government of the United States is endeavoring to apply in its relations with the other American republics will be signally manifested in the results which will be obtained from this exchange of views and from negotiations which are now taking place with a view to the practical application of the decisions reached in principle during our present conversations. "Certainly Haiti will now be in a position to look forward to her future with the greatest confidence." A Washington dispatch April 17 to the New York "Times" commented upon the conference as follows: The basis of discussion of the fiscal control was understood to be the Leger plan, under which supervision of customs and other receipts, now exercised by Sidney de la Rue, fiscal representative of Haiti, would be turned over to the National Bank of Haiti. The Leger plan, originally proposed by a Port au Prince lawyer, was not satisfactory in Its entirety to Sumner Welles, Assistant Secretary of State, and other State Department officials in touch with the Haitian situation. It was considerably modified at the conference. Proposal to Sell National Bank of Haiti to Haitian Government—Offer of National City Bank Reported Under Consideration by State Department at Washington. From Washington April 17 a dispatch to the New York "Times" stated that an offer by the National City Bank of New York to sell the National Bank of Haiti, a subsidiary, to the Haitian Government, is under consideration by the State Department. The dispatch went on to say: The plan is regarded as a step in the movement toward less stringent supervision of the island republic's customs and finances by Americans. The offer is said to have been made as an outgrowth of the feeling among officials of the National City Bank that the Haitians should own their bank. James H. Perkins, Chairman of the Board of the National City Bank. originally made the offer to sell the Haitian Bank three months ago, but the •facts were not learned until to-day. State Department officials refused to -night. discuss the offer to The stock of the National Bank of Haiti has been wholly owned by the National City for several years. The latter bank has been active In Haitian finances more than 12 years. In 1922 the National City Co., affiliate of the National City Bank, offered $16,000,000 of Republic of Haiti customs and general revenue external 30-year sinking fund gold bonds for the purpose of refunding Haitian loans outstanding in France, and to provide funds to pay Internal floating debts. The Banque Nationale de la Republique d'Halti, which I. the official name of the national bank of Haiti, was incorporated in August 1922, in April 21 1934 Haiti as the successor to the Banque Nationale d'Halti, a French corporation. It conducts a general commercial business, is the sole bank of issue In Haiti and is the depository ofcustoms receipts. The head office is at Port au Prince. The bank has eight branches and three agencies in Haiti. It is not a member of the Federal Reserve System. The bank Is controlled by the National City through its subsidiary. the International Banking Corp., which holds the foreign banking units of the National City. On Nov.30 1932. the National Bank of Haiti had total assets of $6,919.394. Its deposits totaled $3,176,192. and its notes in circulation amounted to $1,332,107. Its capital was $2,000,000, and Its surplus and undivided profits, $251,621. Puerto Rico Legislature Votes to Ask Congress for Statehood—Resolution Calls for Constitutional Convention. The Puerto Rico Legislature on April 18 adopted a resolution asking the United States Congress to authorize the calling of a constitutional convention to prepare a Constitution for the State of Puerto Rico. The resolution was adopted in the House without debate and without a record vote, while the Senate passed the resolution by a vote of 11 to 3. This was the first time the Island Legislature ever voted for statehood. A wireless dispatch April 18 to the New York "Herald Tribune" from San Juan summarized the Senate debate as follows: Senators Luis Munoz Mann and Antonio Barcelo, leaders of the IndePendence and Liberal parties, respectively, opposed the resolution. The former said that statehood never had been promised by the Federal Government; that it meant the election of a Governor, the appointment of a Supreme Court and Congressional representation, but that it spelled economic ruin, because of the imposition of Federal income and other taxes, while the island would lose Federal revenue now returned to the insular treasury. Independence, Senator Munoz Mann argued, would bring tariff-making power and freedom to seek markets favorable to the Island. Ile considered Independence inevitable within five years as an escape from the economic and social situation, and he ridiculed a demand for statehood from a community, the majority of which aspired to independence. Senator Barcelo held that statehood offered nothing essential, that the Island already Possessed a national language and a national soul. He questioned the sincerity of the resolution. Rafael Martinez Nadal, President of the Senate and verteran advocate of statehood, said membership. In the American Union meant for Puerto Rico peace, plenty, security and freedom from "hunger, bloodshed and dictatorship." First Consignment of Gold from El Salvador Since 19!11 Arrives in New York. The first consignment of newly-mined gold from El Salvador to the United States since 1921 arrived in New York City toward the close of last week. The shipment, consigned to the United States Assay Office, arrived at Miami, April 9, having been shipped from El Salvador to the southern port via Pan-American Airways. It is stated that this first shipment was made possible through the commencement of gold mining operations at the Potosi Mines in El Salvador, according to A. J. McAllister, President of the Central American Mines, Inc. The latter company is a holding company, which through subsidiaries controls the Potosi and other gold and silver properties in the Republic of El Salvador. The first consignment, Mr. McAllister said, amounted to 512.05 troy ounces. President Roosevelt Praises Pan-American "Unity of Interest" and Ideals—Message Read at PanAmerican Day Celebration—Secretary of State Hull Urges Wider Cultural Relations. The "essential unity of interest and community of ideals of the Nations of the Western World" were praised by President Roosevelt, in a message read in New York, April 14, by John L. Merrill, President of the Pan-American Society, in a radio broadcast celebrating the observance of PanAmerican Day. Secretary of State Cordell Hull, in a PanAmerican Day address at Washington, April 14, stressed the growth of close cultural relations between the nations of North and South America. President Roosevelt's message, as read during the radio broadcast, was as follows: I wish to send to you and to the members of the Pan-American Society a warm word of greeting on the occasion of the celebration of PanAmerican Day. The observance of this day throughout the continent serves to emphasize the essential unity of interest and community of ideals of the nations of the Western World. It must be a source of gratification to every citizen of our country that our relations with the republics of Latin America are closer to-day than they have ever been before. What has been accomplished by governmental action must now be supplemented by the people of North, Central and South America in establishing those currents of cultural and intellectual understanding so necessary to the development of Pan-American co-operation. Permit me to express a sense of appreciation for the important contribution which the Pan-American Society is making to this great purpose. Secretary Hull's address, in part, follows: During the last year it has been my privilege to preside over the meetings of the Governing Board of the Pan-American Union. I have been deeply impressed with the fine spirit of co-operation which the members of the Board bring to each and every one of the important problems which they are called upon to consider. It Is this spirit of unity, of essential community of interests, which characterizes the discussions and which guides Volume 138 Financial Chronicle the Board in reaching its concluSions. I know of but few, if any, instances in the history of international relations in which higher standards of international dealing have been maintained. This occasion atfords me the opportunity again to emphasize the importance of fostering closer cultural ties between the nations of this continent. Such currents of understanding are essential to the growth of a truly continental system based upon mutual comprehension of purposes and ideals. The interchange of professors, and especially the establishment of scholarships and fellowships for students from other American countries are essential factors in furthering this great purpose. I cannot emphasize too strongly the importance of giving more attention in the schools and universities of the United States to the history of Latin America. I am under the impression that in the schools of these republics the fullest attention is given to the history of the United States. We must devote equally full attention to the history of the Latin American countries in any instance where we may not be doing so. Their history is full of lessons of great value. To all of us, whether living north or south of the Equator, the record of the development of democratic institutions on this continent is a matter of vital interest. In a sense, this continent has been and is a great laboratory, in which the development of similar institutions, under totally different environmental conditions, is full of instruction both,to the student and to the statesman. No one would accuse me of being unmindful of the importance of developing closer commercial ties between the nations of America, but considering the situation from the point of view of the development of a distinctly American system, based upon mutual confidence and mutual understanding, I cannot escape the conclusion that the establishment of more and more channels of intellectual intercourse is of primary importance. The commemoration of Pan-American Day this year possesses a special significance for us in the United States. At no time in our history have the relations with our sister republics been on a more firm and sound foundation. Suspicious aroused in the past have been allayed. The recent Pan-American conference at Montevideo marks the beginning of a new era. We, in the United States, in common with the citizens of the republics of Latin America, have every reason to rejoice that this new spirit pervades the continent. The free peoples of the Americas are now in a position to give to the world an example of an international system in which mutual sympathy, fair dealing and constructive co-operation are the guiding principles of international conduct. In so doing, we shall best serve our own permanent interests as well as those of the world at large. Message of President Roosevelt to Congress Transmitting Report of Survey for Inter-American Highway Between Panama and United States. On March 6 President Roosevelt, in a brief message to Congress, transmitted the report of a reconnaissance survey for an inter-American highway between Panama and the United States. It was noted in Associated Press advices from Washington March 6 that the proposed road is the first link in the great Pan-American Highway between the United States and Argentina, envisioned by officials for many years and referred to favorably by President Roosevelt last November in his Pan-American Conference announcement. The message follows: To the Congress of the United States: I transmit herewith two copies of a report prepared by the Bureau of Public Roads, Department of Agriculture, a letter of transmittal addressed to the Secretary of State by the Secretary of Agriculture, and a letter from the Secretary of State concerning a reconnaissance survey for an interAmerican highway FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT. The White House, March 6 1934. From Secretary of State to the President. The President: Pursuant to the act of Congress approved March 26 1930 71st Congress), I beg to submit herewith, for transmission (Public No. 78 to the Congress, two copies of a report of a reconnaissance survey between the Republic of Panama and the United States, together with a letter of transmissal from the Secretary of Agriculture dated Jan. 25 1934. As shown in that letter, the report was prepared by the Bureau of Public Roads, Department of Agriculture, which Bureau was the to co-operate with the several governments, members of theagency selected Pan-American Union, which signified a desire to participate in the surveys. A third copy of the report, for your personal use, is also submitted. The report contains a description of the selected route with accompanying diagrams of line and profile, and there appears in reagrd to each country which will be traversed by the highway a general statement of the principal facts of an economic nature related to the proposed enterprise. There Is also included in the report a series of airplane photographs as well as other pertinent information regarding the proposed highway. In submitting the report. I desire to acknowledge the helpful co-operation which has been received from officials of the several interested governments. That of Panama not only collaborated with the representatives of this Government in connection with the survey conducted through that country. but also generously provided, free of rent, office space in which were established the headquarters of the officials conducting the surveys throughout the three-year period during which the work was in progress. Valuable assistance was also received from officials of the Governments of Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Honduras and Guatemala in connection with the reconnaissance surveys made in these countries. While the Governments of El Salvador and Mexico did not make an official request for co-operation through the Pan-American Union as provided for under the Act of Congress, since the route through those countries had already been largely determined and the highway Partly constructed, nevertheless officials of both of these Governments furnished important information regarding the route selected and highways completed in their respective countries. Respectfully submitted, CORDELL HULL. Daylight Saving Time in Effect 2 A.M. April 29—Announcement by Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The New York Federal Reserve Bank has issued the following announcement regarding the observance of daylight 2663 saving time, which goes into effect at 2 a.m. Sunday, April 29 (when the clocks will be set ahead one hour): FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK. [Circular No. 1378, April 20 1934.1 DAYLIGHT SAVING TIME. To All Banks and Trust Companies in the Second Federal Reserve District and Others Concerned. So-called daylight saving time will be effective in the cities of New York and Buffalo, New York, during the period from 2 a.m. on Sunday. April 29 1934, to 2 a.m. on Sunday, Sept. 30 1934. During this period local time in the cities of New York and Buffalo, New York. will be one hour in advance of Eastern standard time, and this Bank will operate on such local time. GEORGE L. HARRISON, Governor. Senate and House Sub-committees Redraft Bill Providing for Federal Regulation of Stock Exchanges— Senate Bill Proposes Independent Commission as Administrative Authority—House Bill Lodges Authority with Federal Trade Commission. Redrafts of the Fletcher-Rayburn bill for Federal regulation of stock exchanges were completed this week by respectively a sub-committee of the Senate Banking and Currency Committee and a sub-committee of the House Committee on Inter-State Commerce. The Senate bill as redrafted by the sub-committee embodies the amendment proposed by Senator Glass providing for an independent commission with power to regulate margin requirements. The bill redrafted by the House sub-committee carries a 45% marginal requirement, and contrary to the Senate committee's bill, which sets up a separate commission, to regulate stock exchanges, the House measure invests the regulatory authority in the Federal Trade Commission. Both redrafted measures were presented to the full committees on April 19. The Sub-Committee's report was approved yesterday (April 20) by the Senate Banking and Currency Committee by a vote of 11 to 8; 9 Democrats and 2 Republicans voted for the measure, while 2 Democrats and 6 Republicans voted in opposition. In its Washington advices April 18 the New York "Times" stated that the Senate Sub-Committee redraft is a document of more than 13,000 words. In includes the Glass amendments covering administration and margins transactions. A change was made in the time limit for the application of the law to margin accounts existing at the time of enactment. Senator Glass fixed Jan. 31 1939 as the limit. The Sub-Committee made it June 30 1936. In part the account added: Subcommittee of Senate Increased Membership of Proposed Commission. For a while after the President's conference with House leaders Sunday night there was talk that the Glass amendment might be eliminated and a fixed margin provision substituted along the same lines as that written by the House Committee. The Glass amendment was designed to vest power in a commission of three members to regulate margins so far as Exchange transactions are concerned, with authority to the Federal Reserve Board to fix margin requirements applicable to collateral loans and other credits granted by or through member banks. The subcommittee draft increases the number of the proposed board from three to five. The House bill fixes the loan value of a security at 55% of its market price, or 100% of the lowest price at which it sold in the preceding three years, providing that the loan value shall not exceed 75% of the current market price. There is a modifying clause, however, by which discretionary powers are vested in the Federal Reserve Board to raise or lower margins when in its opinion such action is deemed necessary. The fact that only minor changes were made in the Glass amendment was interpreted as meaning that President Roosevelt is not as much opposed to it as was .made to appear. Senator Fletcher conferred with the President last Saturday, at which time he is understood to have called to his attention all of the major changes written by the committee of which he is the Chairman. Not more than three of the five members of the administrative board called for in the Glass amendment would be from the same political Party. There has been considerable discussion of a suggestion that the Board. which would be officially known as the Federal Securities Exchange Commission, ultimately may be vested with the administration of the Securities Act of 1933, the amending of which Congress is expected to undertake soon. Whether the subcommittee had this in mind when it decided to enlarge the Commission was not disclosed. With the exception of control by the Federal Reserve Board of margin transactions involving member banks of the Reserve System, the Commission which would be set up by the Senate bill would have the broadest of powers to control the use of manipulative and deceptive devices on the exchanges, regulate the floor-trading activities of Exchange members and fix regulations governing reports of condition by corporations. The title of the Senate bill also is changed. As originally written. the purpose was declared to be "for the registration of National securities exchanges operating in inter-State and foreign commerce and through the mails and to prevent inequitable and unfair practices on such exchanges and for other purposes." Title of the Bill Redrafted. The redraft amends this title to read: A bill to provide for the regulation of securities exchanges and overthe-counter markets operating in inter-State and foreign commerce and through the mails, to prevent inequitable and unfair practices in such exchanges and markets and for other purposes. Representative Rayburn of Texas, Chairman of the House Committee on Inter-State Commerce, said that the bill as redrafted by the subcommittee, of which he is Chairman, carries all the changes previously announced by the Committee without material revision. It would put the Federal Reserve Board in charge of margins, while the Federal Trade Commission would be the administrative agency. These are the two major points of difference between the two committees and, according to all 2664 Financial Chronicle signs, will be the provisions around which the battle in conference will center after the two Houses have acted. Recording one of the last-minute changes made in the bill by the Senate sub-committee, Washington advices April 17 to the "Times" said: As changed, the draft would exclude stockholders owning less than 10% of a company's stock from the clauses requiring monthly reports on stock holdings by officers, directors and principal stockholders. Previously the bill required these reports from stockholders with 5% or more of stock. Profit Calculations Modified. Advocated because of the disclosures of the activities of Albert H. Wiggin, former Chairman of the Chase National Bank, the section would allow the company to recover from the principal stockholders any of their profits on transactions in the company's stock within six months. Another part of the section was softened by striking out arbitrary methods of figuring the profits subject to suit by the stock issuer. The language eliminated read: "For the purposes of this subsection the profit shall be calculated on the sale or sales by such person of such security made at the highest price or prices, and on the purchase or purchases made by such person of such security at the lowest price or prices, during the six-month period, irrespective of the certificates for such security received or delivered by such person during such period." On April 19 it was stated in Associated Press advices from Washington that the full Senate Banking and Currency Committee resisted a series of efforts to attach weakening amendments to the bill, and all but completed action on the measure. A final vote on reporting it favorably was deferred until the following day. The Associated Press accounts of April 19 said: Ferdinand Pecora, who as Counsel for the Senate Committee conducted the long investigation of Wall Street and banking practices out of which the measure grew, expressed himself as well satisfied with the bill. "With the one possible exception of Section 7, on margins," he said, "it will give the public protection that the investigation conducted by this committee shows the public should have." On three roll calls efforts of Republican members to have certain sections stricken from the measure were defeated, Senator John G. Townsend, Republican of Delaware, moved the elimination of the section giving the regulatory commission disciplinary powers over stock exchanges. His motion was beaten, 9 to 6. Voting for the proposal were Reynolds, Democrat,and Goldsborough,Townsend, Walcott, Carey and Kean,Republicans; against were Glass, Wagner, Bulkley, Costigan, Byrnes, Bankhead and Fletcher. Democrats, and Norbeck and Couzens, Republicans. A motion to eliminate a provision authorizing the regulatory commission to fix "reasonable rates of commission, interest and other charges" was defeated, 12 to 5. Voting for it were Townsend, Walcott,Goldsborough, Carey and Kean, Republicans, and against, Glass, Wagner, Barkley, Bulkley, Costigan, Reynolds, Byrnes, Bankhead and Fletcher, Democrats. and Norbeck, Couzens and Steiwer, Republicans. An effort to eliminate the section which would forbid representation that the commission's permission for listing a stock commends that issue as an Investment was defeated, 9 to 8. The committee reinserted the much-disputed Section 2,in a form differing from the original but satisfactory to the friends of the bill. This is a recital of constitutional authority for the measure,intended to strengthen it against Inevitable court tests. Penalties for violation were reduced. The original measure stipulated 10 years and $25,000 fine. This was changed to five years and $10,000 fine for violations of regulations by the commission and five years and $25,000 fine for violations of the act. In the case of the bill of the sub-committee of the House, it was stated on April 19 that such opposition to it developed in the whole committee on April 19 that an adjournment was taken until April 20. From a dispatch April 19 to the "Times" we quote: The principal opposition is understood to be directed at the margin and administrative provisions of the redraft. They are completely at variance with those of the Senate Committee on Banking and Currency, which adopted the Glass separate administrative commission plan and more liberal margin provisions written by Senator Glass. The House redraft retains a statutory formula for margins with a modifying clause, as it vests discretionary authority over margins and credits with the Federal Reserve Board. It retains the Federal Trade Commission as the administrative agency. The House redraft fixes Aug. 1 as the effective date of the law, while the Senate sub-committee draft, reported to the Banking and Currency Committee yesterday, makes the law effective Oct. 1. Differ on Emergency Clause. Section 2, the so-called "necessity-forThe Senate committee regulation" provision written by the experts of the Treasury, Federal Reserve Board and Federal Trade Commission, was modified. This provision Samuel Untermyer described as "a stump speech." Certain members of the Senate sub-committee viewed it as not an entirely honest expression of legislative thought. 2. The House sub-committee, however, did not so interpret Section experts, Instead, it retained the "stump speech" in the form written by the which declared the legislation to be of an emergency nature and necessary to hold unemployment within bounds and to prevent the dislocation of trade, transportation and industry. the Both the Glass amendments written Into the revised Senate draft, first creating an independent administrative agency to be known as the eliminating second Federal Securities Exchange Commission, and the fixed margin requirements and vesting authority in the commission and in the Federal Reserve Board to raise or lower margins as they deemed necessary, were rejected by the House sub-committee. Stipulations of the House Draft. The House sub-committee's provisions stipulate that the extension of margin credits shall be based on a fixed standard: namely, 55% of the current market price of the security, or 100% of the lowest market price during the preceding three years, but not more than 75% of the current price. The rigidity of this standard is modified by empowering the Federal lower Reserve Board to disregard the standard and to prescribe such accommodation margin requirements as it considers necessary "for the empowers the board to of commerce and industry." The same provision raise the requirements when action is deemed necessary to prevent excessive use of credit in speculation. Members of exchanges, brokers and dealers are permitted under the when House subcommittee's redraft to borrow from non-member banks April 21 1934 the bank files with the Federal Reserve Board an agreement under terms prescribed by the Board, to comply with the Federal Reserve Act and the Banking Act of 1933. As to restrictions of floor trading, the House draft empowers the Federal Trade Commission to "regulate, limit or prevent" floor trading by members for their own or discretionary accounts. The Senate draft omits the word "limit." Acts of directors, officers and principal stockholders of corporations. whose stocks are listed on the Exchange, would be under such regulations and rules as the Federal Trade Commission may prescribe. They would apply to every person who is directly or indirectly the owner of more than 5% of any class of any equity security, provided the security is not in the exempted class. The Senate bill fixes the percentage of beneficial interest at 10%. The bill also would increase the membership of the Federal Trade Commission from five to seven members, the additional membership being provided to take care of the additional burden the Commission will shoulder In the event that the House bill is enacted. The House bill fixed the maximum penalty for individual violation ofthe law at two years in prison or a fine of$10,000 or both, while Exchanges violating the law would be subject to a maximum fine of $500,000. 250 New England Corporations Protest Bill for Federal Regulation of Stock Exchanges. Approximately 250 corporations, representing a cross section of New England industry, have filed a formal protest at Washington against the recently revised Fletcher-Rayburn bill. Among the companies leading the opposition to the Act are the United Fruit Co., United Shoe Machinery Co., and United Drug Co. At a meeting called by President Eliot Wadsworth of the Boston Chamber of Commerce, representatives of some of the largest employers of labor in New England voted to oppose the proposed National Securities Exchange Act, and their ranks have increased notably since the meeting. The protest, which declares that "the operation of the proposed National Securities Exchange Act of 1934 would hinder recovery and handicap present forces making for increased and continuous employment" has been sent to the House and Senate Committees studying the proposed Act and to the Massachusetts representation in both branches of Congress. Other companies signing the protest include: Alrington Mills, Boston Insurance Co., Central Aguirre Associates, Employers' Group Associates, Gillette Safety Razor Co., Jordan Marsh Co., Ludlow Mfg. Associates, Massachusetts Gas Cos., Merrimac Chemical Co., Old Colony Insurance Co., Pepperell Mfg. Co., Plymouth Cordage Co., Revere Sugar Co., Saco-Lowell Shops, W. F. Schrafft & Sons Corp., L. S. Starrett Co., Union Twist Drill Co., U. S. Smelting, Refining & Mining Co., Warren Brothers Co., Whitin Machine Works. Rubber and Hide Futures Markets on Commodity Exchange, Inc., to Open Earlier Beginning May 7. The board of governors of Commodity Exchange, Inc., New York City, adopted an amendment to the general trading rules, to become effective May 7 1934, changing the opening of the rubber market to 10 a. m. instead of 10.10 a. in., as at present, and the hide futures market to 10.10 a. m. from 10.30 a. m., it was announced by the Exchange April 13. 78,000 Shares of Capital Stock of Corn Exchange Bank Trust Co.,New York,Offered to Public—Announced as Oversubscribed. Public offering of 78,000 shares of capital stock of the Corn Exchange Bank Trust Co., New York, priced at $54 per share (not carrying the dividend payable May 1 1934) to yield 5.55% at the present dividend rate of $3 per annum, payable quarterly, was made on April 16 by Lehman Brothers and associates. On the same day (April 16) Lehman Brothers announced that "selling group subscription books on their offering of 78,000 shares of Corn Exchange Bank Trust Co. capital stock have been closed, the issue having been oversubscribed." Reference was made in our issue of April 14, page 2520 to an announcement by Walter E. Frew, Chairman of the Corn Exchange, that public offering of stock of the bank would be made on April 16 by the Lehman syndicate. The ls.tter's announcement April 16 of the offering said: This offering does not constitute new financing on the part of the Corn Exchange Bank Trust Co. We and our associates have contracted to purchase 70.000 shares (together with an option exercisable at $50 per share on an additional 77,010 shares) at $50 per share (carrying the dividend payable May 11934). In addition to this offering of 78,000 shares for public subscription, 22,000 shares have been withdrawn from sales by certain of our associates. Noting the purchase by Lehman Brothers of 150,000 shares of stock of the Corn Exchange, representing 20% of the bank's capitalization, which was held by affiliates of the Chase National Bank, the New York "Times" of April Volume 138 Financial Chronicle 14 had the following to say in part regarding the offering proposed by Lehman Brothers. The offering represents a transaction in the bank-merging days of 1929. The stock was acquired by the Chase interests over a period of some months beginning late in 1929. It has been held by the Chase Corp. and the American Express Co., affiliates of the Chase National Bank, which must be liquidated or divorced from their parent by June 16, under the Banking Act of 1933. At the offices of Lehman Brothers it was said yesterday that the offering price would be below the over-the-counter quotation for Corn Exchnage stock, which then was about $58.75 a share bid. The stock closed at $57 bid, offered at $59, off 50 cents a share from Thursday's final quotation. The transaction is expected to result in widespread distribution of the shares which, in a block, are enough to constitute working control of the Corn Exchange. Size of Holding a Surprise. Although the Chase organization had been known to hold a large amount of Corn Exchange stock, the size of its holdings, as revealed yesterday, was a surprise. Extreme interest had attached to the acquisition of the shares, which became a matter of widespread rumor early in 1930, because of the events of the fall of 1929 when a merger which had been Planned between the Corn Exchange and the National City Bank fell through. . . . Support for this opinion was given by Winthrop W. Aldrich, Chairman of the Chase National Bank, at the annual meeting of that institution on Jan.9 last,when,in response to a stockholder's question, he said he could not tell exactly why the Corn Exchange stock had been purchased but believed that it had been in connection with a contemplated merger. a Mr. Aldrich at that time disclosed that the Chase Corp. held 77.010 shares of Corn Exchange, which were carried on its books at $41.50 a share. The holdings of the American Express Co. were not revealed, but on the basis of the total disclosed yesterday to have been sold by the Chase affiliates to Lehman Brothers they must have been almost as large as were those of the Chase Corp. $50 a Share Reported Paid. The price paid by tile Chase interests for Corn Exchange shares is a matter of conjecture, but the stock was selling above $350 a share at the time that the purchases are believed to have begun. It was reported yesterday that the shares had been sold for about $50. Incident to the offering an announcement bearing on the Corn Exchange said: pi The bank, one of the oldest in New York City, was established in 1853 and operates 73 branches located throughout the city. Cash dilvdends have been paid on its stock since Feb. 1 1854, without intermission. From 1930 to 1932 inclusive, dividends were paid at the annual rate of $4 per share. The rate was reduced to $3 in April 1933. - In the statement as of March 311934, net deposits on the Clearing House basis were reported at $200,519,000 compared with 1190,540.000 at Dec. 31 1933. Average net deposits for 1933 represented 3% of the total net deposits of all New York Clearing House banks. A feature of the bank's record has been the comparative stability of deposits during the last four years. Its surplus and undivided profits were reported at $16,083,736 as of April 1934. The capital of the bank is $15,000,000, represented by 750,000 shares of capital stock of a par value of $20, and a capital note. payable on or before July 31 1934, of $3,000,000. Opposition by Secretary Morgenthau to McLeod Bill Calling for Reimbursement of Depositors in Closed Banks—Memorandum Presented to Sen. Fletcher Asserts Bill Would Establish Principle of Guarantee of Deposits, Past, Present, and Future. In a memorandum presented on April 16 to Senator Fletcher, Chairman of the Senate Banking and Currency Committee, Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau detailed his objections to the McLeod bill which calls for the reimbursement of depositors in closed National and State member banks of the Federal Reserve System, through the purchase and liquidation of their assets by the Reconstruction Finance Corporation. In the last analysis, says Secretary Morgenthau, "this bill would establish the principle of guarantee by the United States of bank deposits, past, present and future." According to Secretary Morgenthau, also, the bill "establishes a precedent that may be extended to any business activity over which the Government exercises any supervision." It is likewise pointed out by Mr. Morgenthau that "the bill attempts to suspend the statute of limitations, apparently to enable the Reconstruction Finance Corporation to obey the mandate given that it allow debtors 10 years to pay and yet avoids the barring of such debts by State statute of limitations of shorter duration." He adds that there may be some question as to whether Congress can suspend the operation of such a State statute. While we are referring further in another item to Secretary Morgenthau's opposition to the bill, we give here his memorandum submitted to Senator Fletcher, as contained in a Washington dispatch to the New York "Times": Reference is made to S. 2949, being a bill "to promote resumption of Industrial activity, increase employment and restore confidence by fulfill. scant of the implied guaranty by the United States Government of deposit safety in National banks." This bill directs the Reconstruction Finance Corporation to purchase and liquidate the remaining assets of closed National banks and State member banks of the Federal Reserve System, paying the receivers or conservators thereof sufficient funds to satisfy the remaining deposit liabilities of such banks in full. while the initial disbursement involved in this proposal can only be approximated and the ultimate cost vaguely surmised, the following figures and comments are suggested.: As of March 12 1934 there were 1,468 National banks in receivership, with an unpaid deposit liability (which is exclusive of other liabilities, such as for money borrowed, &c.) of $920,000,000. There were 284 2665 National banks in conservatorship with similar unpaid deposit liabilities of $210,000,000. As to State member banks, 250 were in receivership and 47 in conservatorship, together having a total similar unpaid deposit liability of approximately $685,000,000. The initial disbursement thus required by the Reconstruction Finance Corporation would be approximately $1,815,000,000. Ultimate Coat to Taxpayers. As to the ultimate cost of this project, after crediting probable realization by the Reconstruction Finance Corporation from the assets acquired, an estimate was reached by analyzing a representative group of 100 closed National banks of all sizes in all sections of the United States, as of Dec. 31 1933. It was found there was an average deficiency in assets as against deposit liabilities only, of 44%. Total deposit liabilities of closed National banks and State member banks, as of their suspension, were approximately $3,104,500,000. Applying to this figure the 44% average deficiency in assets, there is ascertained an approximate actual deficiency or ultimate cost to the United States Treasury and to the taxpayers of $1,366,000,000. This loss will be substantially increased by the interest to be paid on the money borrowed to finance this plan, and by the expense incurred over the 10-year period in liquidating the assets of the banks. If, as is likely in this instance, it is found that adoption of the bill can be had only by amending it to include State non-member banks, the ultimate loss will be increased to an extent far beyond present computation. Responsibility for Precedent. The title of the bill states that its proposals are in fulfillment of the implied guaranty by the Government of ,deposit safety in National and State member banks. This is considered a most hazardous responsibility to admit or accept. It establishes a precedent that may be extended to any business activity over which the Government exercises any supervision. Thus the holders of the bonds of Joint Stock Land banks and of Federal Land banks and of the debentures of Federal Intermediate Credit banks would be in a position to contend that the Government's supervision over these agencies, being similar to that which it exercises over National banks, entitles such holders to recover from the Government any loss which they may ever have sustained as a result of dealing in these securities. Indeed, a similar argument might be advanced with respect to other business activities supervised to any extent by the Government, suah as the sale of alcoholic liquor, railroad, radio, and possibly even to include individual losses on securities registered under the Securities Act and in the stock market in the event that the Government assumed supervision thereof. It is not clear whether the billis limited to banks closed at date of its enactment or whether it embraces banks that suspended any time in the future. If the latter are included, the obligation being assumed is immeasurable, and it would seem the functions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as insurer of deposits will be entirely superseded. As to Deposits Already Waived. If the plan is not to extend to future suspensions, it is difficult to see how a distinction between depositors of a bank closing before the bill's enactment and depositors of one closing a week thereafter can be supported legally or in principle. Like comment may be made on the fact that no relief is given to the depositors of hundreds of closed banks who in the past year waived part of their deposits in order to restore the banks to solvency under Section 207 of the Bank Conservation Act or to the non-consenting minority of depositors in such banks who lost part of their deposits involuntarily due to the operation of Section 207. Would Penalize Depositors Who Waived Part of Deposits. Those who voluntarily waived part of their deposits are penalized for their patriotic effort to reopen the banks during this emergency, whereas if they had acted otherwise the respective banks would be in receivership and under this bill those depositors would be paid in full. Depositors of closed banks, liquidation of which has been completed and receivers discharged, are likewise excluded. There have been 287 such receiverships of National banks closed the past three years with substantial loss to depositors. If this legislation is based on an implied governmental guaranty of safety as set forth in its title, then it would seem such implied guaranty has been equally given to all the excluded classes of depositors and to creditors other than depositors as well. If these excluded classes must be included. to sustain the constitutionality of the legislation, the cost to the taxpayers will, of course, greatly exceed estimates herein submitted. Rights of Other Creditors. Provision is made that all remaining assets of the banks, including assessment liability of shareholders, shall pass to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation. This is an effort to accomplish what is deemed a legal impossibility as against creditors other than depositors. The Supreme Court of the United States has held several times that the rights of all creditors attach to the bank's assets at suspension, and that the assessment liability of shareholders is an asset belonging to the creditors (Scott v. Deweese, 181 U. S. 202, &c.). Provision is made under the National Bank Act, United States Code, Title 12, Section 65, for the direct enforcement of shareholders' liability by the creditors without intervention of a receiver. Hundreds of millionehf dollars are owed by closed banks to open banks that hold deficiency notes of such banks or have loaned money to them. Closed banks are indebted in large amounts to beneficiaries of trust estates administered by their trust departments. They are largely indebted on outstanding drafts and checks. None of these obligations are depositor obligations and none would be provided for by this bill. Consequently, such creditors would appear to have a prior claim against the assets of the banks and the assessment liability of their shareholders, which prior claims cannot be destroyed by this legislation, even though it attempts to do so and which would substantially reduce the figures above given as to the estimated probable recovery by the Reconstruction Finance Corporation and correspondingly increase the figures as to the ultimate cost or loss involved under this plan. Consideration of Shareholders. If the transaction is considered as a sale of assets, then the Reconstruction Finance Corporation does not become a creditor of the bank; hence is not entitled to assert assessment liability against its shareholders, inasmuch as such liability is for the benefit of creditors only. 2666 Financial Chronicle If the Reconstruction Finance Corporation is to be considered as becoming a creditor of the bank by virtue of the transaction, it becomes such after the bank's suspension, as to banks in the hands of receivers, and the courts held that shareholders are not subject to assessment for debts arising subsequent to suspension. If, on the other hand, the purpose of the bill is to create what is, in effect, a purchase from the shareholders of their rights, in exchange for payment to them of the amount of their deposit, a different problem arises. It may be true that under this theory the Reconstruction Finance Corporation would, on the principle of subrogation, be entitled to proceed against the shareholders for any deficiency to the same extent that the depositors had that right. On this theory, however, the Reconstruction Finance Corporation would obtain only such rights in the assets as the depositors had. Future developments in realization on assets of some of the banks involved, especially of banks in conservatorship, may be such that in ordinary course of liquidation there will be a surplus for distribution to shareholders. On the theory of subrogation, these rights would have to be considered, but the present bill entirely overlooks any property rights of such shareholders and purports to invest absolute title in the Reconstruction Finance Corporation to all future recovery on the assets taken over. Suspending Limitations Statute. The bill attempts to suspend the statute of limitations, apparently to enable the Reconstruction Finance Corporation to obey the mandate given that it allow debtors 10 years to pay and yet avoid the barring of such debts by State statute of limitations of shorter duration. There may be some question as to whether Congress can suspend the operation of a State statute of limitations now operating in favor of an existing debtor, unless the dehtor consents under the circumstances here involved. There are pending or in prospect numerous suits against bank directors based on their civil liability to the bank's depositors and other creditors. No adequate provision is made for carrying on such litigation or giving the Reconstruction Finance Corporation any benefit of recovery therefrom. Furthermore, since the depositors are to be paid in full, the bulk of such directors' liability as now exists may thereby be extinguished, because such liability is based on loss to the creditors; hence, may be substantially eliminated to the extent that depositor creditors are relieved from loss through payment by the Reconstruction Finance Corporation. It is doubtful whether the Reconstruction Finance Corporation will be subrogated to the rights of the bank or its receiver against the sureties on fidelity bonds, particularly in view of the provisions of many of the surety contracts involved. Numerous suits and claims of this character involving large sums are pending. No Provision for Pending Suits. There are pending many suits and claims of depositors involving determination of the amount of the bank's deposit obligation to them or whether or not there is in fact a deposit obligation or an obligation of a different character. No provision of the bill adequately cares for this situation. Suits and claims of depositors and debtors involving offset and consequent determination of net deposit liability are pending. The bill does not provide for the determining of such matters. Suits involving collection of stock assessments already levied are pending and no provision of the bill provides for the disposition of the same. Inasmuch as the Reconstruction Finance Corporation cannot enjoy the benefit of these assessments to the exclusion of non-depositor creditors and in fact may not be entitled to participate therein at all, and since once a receiver is in charge, he alone can collect such assessment, it follows that the Reconstruction Finance Corporation could not proceed on its own behalf to collect such assessment. If the receivers are to remain in charge of banks to collect such assessments, then, since the Reconstruction Finance Corporation will have taken possession of all the assets, there will be no means of carrying the expense of such receivership and litigation pertaining thereto except by anticipation against hoped-for collections which may not materialize. As to Recovery Objective. No doubt one of the objects of the bill is to stimulate recovery by pro meting industrial activity and employment. This will not necessarily follow because an analysis of the distribution that will be made to the depositors of a large closed city bank shows that 46% would be received by half of 1% of the depositors, while in a small county bank 44% would go to 7.3% of the depositors. In other words, nearly half of the money to be distributed would be received by about 4% of the depositors, and this group may in large part place comparatively little thereof in circulation by purchase of commodities or in industrial activity productive of employment. Since the program must be financed ultimately through taxation, there is a serious question whether taxation may be resorted to for the benefit of such an arbitrarily selected class, particularly where half of the proceeds will be enjoyed by a comparatively small group in the class intended to be benefited. In the last analysis, this bill would establish the principle of by the United States of bank deposits, past, present and future.guarantee April 21 1934 President Raises Two Points. In a discussion of the background of the problem raised by the McLeod bill, President Roosevelt emphasized two points. First, the impossibility of administering such a law equitably; and. second, official refutation of the belief that the Government holds a moral obligation to reimburse depositors in banks that have failed. The President illustrated his first point by recounting a talk he had yesterday with A. Mitchel Palmer, Attorney-General in the Wilson Cabinet. who, with Representative McLeod of Michigan, also attended the conference on the latter's bill. Mr. Roosevelt cited a possible case of two banks in the same town which failed on the same day. One of the banks was in fair shape and the receiver liquidated it and paid depositors 60 cents on the dollar, and the case was closed. The assets of the bank no longer exist. The other bank, being in greater difficulties, might still be in the hands of a receiver and tnus be eligible. the President said, to come under the proposed law, which would mean that depositors in the latter bank would be paid in full. Another difficulty arising in such legislation cited by the President was the difficulty in fixing a date for bank failures from which depositors would be paid: He pointed out that such legislation might easily be extended back to cover the bank failures in 1893. While stating this definite opposition to the pending bill, Mr. Roosevelt said that for six months the Federal Government has been trying to take care of thousands of banks, both State and National, which are in need of assistance. Money has been lent to these banks in large quantities, he said, and an open market has been provided for their securities, but he emphasized that that is as far as the Federal Government can go. Michigan Representatives discussed the McLeod bill to-day with Speaker Rainey, Representative Byrns and Chairman Steagall of the House Banking and Currency Committee. None of them was sanguine about the bill being reported out of the Rules Committee and agreed that if the bill did come up it would have to be In decidedly modified form. In another item we refer to the memorandum presented by Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau to Senator Fletcher of the Senate Banking and Currency Committee detailing objections to the proposed legislation. In a letter to Senator Fletcher accompanying the memorandum Secretary Morgenthau said: Receipt is acknowledged of your clerk's letter of March 8 1934, transmitting a copy of the bill S. 2949, "to permit resumption of industrial activity, increase employment, and restore confidence by fulfillment of the implied guarantee by the United States Government of deposit safety In national banks," and requesting a report thereon. The bill proposes to free deposits frozen in closed banks by directing the Reconstruction Finance Corporation to purchase all the remaining assets of closed national banks and State member banks of the Federal Reserve System. The proceeds are then to be made immediately available to the depositors, while the RFC is to liquidate the assets over a period of years. There is the gravest doubt whether recovery could be materially assisted by the plan proposed. Since a very high percentage of the total amounts ofdeposits now frozen stands to the credit of a small percentage of depositors, the expenditure involved could scarcely be justified as a means of affording widespread relief. The administrative and legal difficulties which would ensue could only minimize the gains which the measure is designed to achieve. Furthermore, the adoption of the principle, Implicit in the bill, that the Government should guarantee the efficiency of those functions and activities of its citizens because it may have, to a greater or less extent, supervised or controlled them, would be unfortunate. Finally, the addition of this burden upon the taxpayers which, exclusive of interest, may be estimated at from $1,250,000,000 to $2,500,000,000, would, in the opinion of this Department, outweigh any benefits that the legislation could achieve. A memorandum, discussing the measure in greater detail, is enclosed for your convenient reference. In stating that Secretary Morgenthau's letter had specific reference to the bill of Senator Elmer Thomas (Democrat) of Oklahoma, Associated Press advices from Washington, April 15, stated that Mr. Morgenthau's views became known within a few days after the McLeod bill had been sidetracked by House leaders. At the time nearly 145 names had been obtained on a petition to force it to a vote. In Washington advices to the "Wall Street Journal" of April 16, it was stated that Chairman Jesse R.Jones'believes that the RFC has gone about as far as it can in making loans to closed banks, so far as outstanding advances are concerned. In part the account also said: However, he believes that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation could step In and make additional loans. Opinions to this effect were expressed in the Chairman's press conferences In a discussion of the McLeod bill to liquidate frozen deposits inclosed banks. It is obviously objectionable, in Mr. Jones's opinion, to buy assets of closed banks according to a universal or common yardstick. This is inadvisable, he holds, because of the varying percentages of real worth among assets of such institutions. Some closed banks, he pointed out, have assets worth 90 cents on the dollar, while others are worth only about 10 cents. 0 the whole, the RFC Chairman feels the closed bank deposit liquidswork has made a creditable showing. ti Opposition to McLeod Bill by President Roosevelt— Secretary Morgenthau and Jesse H. Jones Among Those Declaring Against Payment Through RFC of Depositors of Closed Banks. . On April 18 President Roosevelt was reported as having indicated his opposition to the McLeod bill, which would provide for payment through the Reconstruction Finance Corporation of depositors in closed National and State member banks of the Federal Reserve System. At the sam 'Dyer 55,000,000 Accounts Insured by Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation According to Leo T. Crowley tune (we quote from a Washington dispatch, April 18, to —In Address Before Executive Council of American New York "Times") Mr. Roosevelt stated at a press nBankers Association Urges Extension of Temporary ference that the books of all closed banks are bein reFund for Another Year. examined to determine whether the Government, through The extension for another year of the temporary insurance the Comptroller of the Currency and the RFC has adopted fund, administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Cora really liberal policy. The account went on to say: poration, was urged by Leo F. Crowley, Chairman of the It was recalled that Jesse Jones, Chairman of the RFC. told Board of Directors of the Corporation, in an address at newspaper men yesterday after a conversation witn the President on the McLeod Hot Springs, Ark., on April 18 before the Executive Council bill, that RFC advances to banks are based in many cases not only on present values of securities but on prospective values in the light of of the American Bankers Association. According to Mr. recovery efforts. He said 3750,000,000 had been advanced by the RFC. Crowley on March 31 there were 13,870 banks which were Volume 138 Financial Chronicle members of the Temporary Insurance Fund. "This means," he said, "that 91% of all licensed banks in the country which are eligible for membership, had made application and were admitted to the Fund. It is true," he went on to say,"that National banks and State Federal Reserve member banks were required to join the Temporary Insurance Fund but this group of banks represents less than 45% by number of all the banks which have joined. In other words then 55%, or more than half of the members of the Temporary Insurance Fund on March 31, were members because of their own voluntary application." Giving further details of the operations of the Fund Mr. Crowley said: Total deposits in banks which are members of the Temporary Insurance Fund, exclusive of mutual savings banks, amounted to in excess of 31.7 billion dollars on Dec. 30 1933. Total deposit liability for all licensed banks Iin the *United States, exclusive of mutual savings banks. amoyed to in excess of 32.4 billion dollars, according to recent estimates. It would appear that 98% of the total deposits in all licensed banks oper ing in the Uniteg Statesare in banks which are members of the Temporary Insurance Fund. Banks which are members of the Temporary Fund, considered from the.polnt of view of the number of institutions, as well as the deposit liability of those institutions, represent an overwhelming majority of all the licensed banks in the United States. At the present time the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has insured 55.6 millions of accounts. Put another way,the number of accounts which are insured through the operation of the Temporary Fund are almost as great in number as half the population of this country. Finally, the aggregate amount of the accounts which are insured represents 37A % of the total deposit liability of all the licensed banks at present operating in the United States. These are staggering figures. I do not wish to burden you further with such dry statistics. but I cannot help from pointing out a few of these vital facts involved with the insurance of deposits. Let me bring two more studies to your attention. On May 13 1933 the Comptroller of the Currency requested an analysis of the accounts in all National and State Federal Reserve member banks. The results of this request were tabulated and published in the Federal Reserve Bulletin for last July. Among 5,500 banks it appeared that $2,500 would fully cover over 96% of the accounts. If the 5.500 banks chosen were representative of all the banks in the country,and they were not, it would lead one to believe that at the present time, through the operation of the Temporary Fund of the FDIC, over 96% by number of all the accounts in the country are fully insured but, the 5,500 banks chosen were not representative, since they were all National and State meaaber banks. We know from the statistics which we have gathered that on the whole the average State member bank is larger than the average National bank, and likewise the average National bank is larger than the average State non-member bank. We know too that the average account as a result is larger in State member and National banks than it is in State non-member banks. We are lead to the conclusion then that the study made last May is a conservative estimate of the actual situation. It is probably true that the number of accounts which are at present fully covered by insurance is greater than we would have occasion to believe as a result of the study made last May. ( The Temporary Insurance Fund, said Mr. Crowley, has been in operation since Jan. 1 1934, and there are now 13,870 banks which are members of this fund. He noted that on Feb. 28 1934 the Senate passed an act extending for one year the operation of the Temporary Insurance Fund; continuing he said: It is now before the House Banking and Currency Committee, and we are expecting it to be reported out any day. It is important for the House to make into law the bill as passed by the Senate. There are many reasons a few of which are as follows: In the first place approximately two-thirds of all the deposits in mutual savings banks are in banks which are members of the Temporary Insurance Fund. Such mutuals are members provisionally, however, and may remain so only as long as the Temporary Fund is in operation owing to the fact that before they may become members of the Permanent Fund it will be necessary for the various States which have chartered these mutuals to adopt certain enabling provisions in order that the mutuals may subscrib to stock in the FDIC. Since there are over 8,000.000 accounts insured mutual savings banks you may readily recognize the importance of prot ing, through insurance, this large number of accounts. Another reason for the extension of the Temporary Fund develops from the fact that it would be impossible to examine all the National and Federal Reserve member banks between now and July 1 1934. According to the Permanent Act as it is now written, it will be necessary for the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Reserve banks to certify as to the solvency of all Federal Reserve member and National banks. Furthermore, it will be necessary to issue new certificates for all non-member State banks. Such certificates obviously must be based upon current examinations. In view of the fact that it is impossible to make such re-examinations of all banks within the short period between now and July I, it is impractical to force into operation the permanent portion of the legislation. Then again, there are technical details in connection with the liquidation of the Temporary Fund which unnecessarily complicate the situation, and the short time between now and July 1 hardly allows for adequate handling of this operation. But more important than all of these reasons is the fact that we wish to study the situation further so that we may make recommeddations for such changes in the permanent legislation as seem advisable before the inauguration of the Permanent Fund. From the experience which we have had we are already aware of certain necessary changes which will have to be made in order to assure the success of the FDIC. It must be realized that at the time the permanent legislation was written there was no experience upon which to base the,establishment of the Corporation. In creating such a vast enterprise as the FDIC it is humanly Impossible to anticipate all of the practical details which may be embraced. On the whole the framers of the legislation did an unusually good job. It was inconceivable that they should have an understanding of some of the details which developed in the practical operation of the insurance idea. I have mentioned the fact that we have already become aware of certain changes, which, if made, will make the Corporation more successful. Let me alaborate upon what I believe some of these alterations to be. In the first place it will probably be unnecessary to protect the large depositors to the extent implied in the legislation as it now exists. After 2667 all, the depositor with from 310,000.to $50,000 dollars and over in his account is an individual who is well able to care for himself. Deposit insurance is designed for the small depositors. The small depositor must be assured the absolute protection of his deposit. The hardships which the recent untoward economic conditions have developed have been felt most acutely by that large group of people whose right it is to have absolute protection or those hard earned dollars which are placed to their credit for the so-called "rainy day." It is only just that the Governmentshould guarantee this minimum protection. Those who question the constructive aspects of a program whereby a minimum amount of hard-earned savings of half tne population of the country is absolutely insured fall to comprehend the most fundamental aspects of American society. The insurance of such savings which is is the right of every man to enjoy is essentially a government function. Just as the Constitution offers every man the protection of law and order,so should the Government insure the protection of the deposits of the masses. As the law concerning both the Temporary and the Permanent Funds now exists the FDIC is sorely lacking in the power ofsupervision ofthe banks which are insured. At the present time the FDIC is obliged to insure all banks provided they can show sufficient assets to meet deposit liability. In other words, the law describes solvency only and says nothing about capital, management or any of the other important factors determining the degree of risk involved. The Corporation, then, is obliged to insure all solvent banks and at the same time is given no power of supervision which it may exercise over such banks in order to minimize the risk factor. Let me elaborate on this further. At the present time the FDIC is given the power of examination only with no power to correct dangerous existing situations. Practically, the Corporation's agents have met with little opposition in endeavoring to overcome such conditions which greatly weaken a particular bank's situation. The Corporation has enjoyed the wholehearted co-operation not only of bank directors but of State supervising authorities as well. However, in order for the Corporation's Insurance Fund to be well managed and in order for the remaining banks which are members of the Fund to enjoy that degree of security which they expect to gain through membership in the Fund. it will be necessary for the Corporation to be given greater supervisory power over the banks which constitute its risks. At the present time the FDIC has no way of controlling the chartering of new banks. Such new banks once chartered may easily become members of the Insurance Fund whether or not they are sound economic units and whether or not they will be able to continue operations over a considerable period,of time. This obviously is a faulty condition. And again, the FDIC is obliged to insure a solvent reorganized bank without having any voice as to the soundness of the reorganization. New branches may be admitted to the Fund without even being examined by the FDIC. Spreading the risk in such fashion is a mistake and works hardship to the remaining members of the Insurance Fund. In the interest of protecting the Corporation's future stockholders such matters as these should be changed. As the law now reads, the Corporation upon assuming control of an insolvent bank is obliged to organize a new National bank. Such new National bank is to be operated by the Corporation until such time as sufficient capital can be raised locally to sell the institution to such interests. Such a scheme embraces two fallacies. In the first place, a provision should be made in the law allowing the FDIC the right to sell the asets in an insolvent institution to another neighboring institution in order that the credit of the Corporation may be released. In the second place, where the insolvent institution is not warranted it should be wholly eliminated from the picture. There is no purpose in perpetuating those institutions which experience has shown are not warranted from the point of view of service to the community. Recent experiences have shown the banking system of the United States to be greatly at fault. Banks operate throughout the country under 49 different supervising authorities. The supervision which the depositor assumes the various State and National governments to exercise over the banks has been sadly lacking in effectiveness. We have heard much in the past few days about the moral obligation of the government to depositors in banks which have failed because of the fact that the various governments assume supervisory power over the banking institutions of the country. If it is true that the government is to exercise such supervisory power, it is likewise true that the people are entitled to full protection for at least a minimum amount of their deposits. In my estimation, the government has a moral ob)lgation to depositors in the banks throughout the country. and for th eason the establishment of the FDIC is a constructive tep toward realization of this moral obligation. • llin A. Wilbur Elected Managing Director o Investment Bankers Code Committee—Fair JPractice 3. Amendments to Code Become Effective Rollin A. Wilbur was elected Managing Director of the Investment Bankers Code Committee at a meeting of the Committee in New York on April 12, it was announced on April 16 by B. Howell Griswold Jr., Chairman of the Committee. The offices of the Committee are to be established immediately in Washington, and Mr. Wilbur is to make his headquarters there. At the same time it was announced that Mr. Wilbur has resigned as Vice-President of Atlas Corp., to which post he was elected on Nov. 1 1932. The code of fair competition for investment bankers was approved by President Roosevelt on Nov. 27 1933, and the full text of the code was given in our issue of Dec. 9, page 4130. Fair practice amendments to code of fair competition were approved by the President on March 23 1934, and the amendments will become effective on April 23. President Roosevelt's Executive Order of March 23 approving the amendments authorized the Administrator to modify or amend further the code as and when such modifications or amendments become necessary in order to meet unforeseen contingencies, or to afford "prompt relief for any hardship which may have been inadvertently imposed" by the provisions. In a letter transmitting to the President the supplemental code, General Hugh S. Johnson, National Recovery Administrator, described it as "a remarkable document." The amendments, it is stated, went to the President with the 2668 Financial Chronicle approval not only of the Administrator but of a substantial majority of the bankers who assented to the basic code. In a recent meeting 888 of them, in person or in proxy, formally approved and only 117 registered objections. Practically all of the objections were said to have been aimed at specific provisions which have been since modified. "Prescribing and proscribing investment banking activities in all fundamental essentials," the principal purposes of the provisions were summarized by the Administrator as follows: To eradicate past and existing abuses and to establish principles and practices which will justify public confidence, greatly assist in restoring the markets for both public and private investment funds and result in an increased flow of investment capital into sound, productive enterprises, which will unquestionably increase employment and distribute added wealth among the people. "The importance of developing a capital market in connection with the recovery program cannot be overemphasized," the Administrator added. "The extent to which the amendments are designed in the interest of the investors of this country is peculiarly significant," said the Administrator's letter, which pointed out that in addition to 11 sections stating general principles, other important features include: 1. Five sections to govern the issuance of new securities. In the future those issuing securities will be required to provide adequate detailed information to investors as long as a security is outstanding. This is a far-reaching provision. It marks a very long step in the right direction and furnishes a new safeguard to protect investors. 2. Seventeen sections regulate the underwriting and distribution of new issues. Provisions are included which will tend to establish one price for all investors irrespective of the size of the transaction or the importance of the purchaser. Adequate time is provided for the proper study and analysis of the facts regarding new issues by all investment bankers participating in the distribution of each issue. 3. Eight sections are directed to retail sales and purchases dealing with disclosure of the adequate and the pertinent facts required to be made available to investors. 4. Four sections pertain primarily to salesmen, and stipulate the minimum qualifications for those employed in that capacity and the requirement for responsible supervision of their activities. 5. One important section relates to investment companies and places certain restrictions on investment bankers having relations or transactions with such companies. 6. Thirteen sections provide a unique opportunity for investment bankers, through registration, to agree with one another upon the expeditious enforcement of effective self-discipline in the investment banking business. Investment Bankers.Code Committee consists of the following: Francis A. Bonner, Bonner, Troxell & Co., Ctiicago. Arthur H. Bosworth, Bosworth, Chanute, Loughridge & Co., Denver. George W. Bovenizer, Kuhn, Loeb & Co., New York. Robert E. Christie Jr., Dillon, Read & Co., Inc., New York. Sydney P. Clark, E. W. Clark & Co., Philadelphia. Edward J. Costigan, Whitaker & Co., St. Louis. Harry S. Grande, Grande, Stolle & Co., Seattle. B. Howell. Griswold Jr., Alex. Brown & Sons, Baltimore. Edward H. Hilliard, J. J. B. Hilliard & Son, Louisville. W. Hubert Kennedy, Wells-Dickey Co., Minneapolis. Lamartine V. Lamar, Lamar, Kingston & Labouisse, New Orleans. Lawrence H. Marks, Lawrence H. Marks, New York. Frank McNair, The N. W. Harris Co., Chicago. Robert H. Moulton, R. H. Moulton & Co., Los Angeles. Daniel W. Myers, Hayden, Miller & Co., Cleveland. Joseph R. Swan, Guaranty Co. of New York, New York. Henry B. Tompkins, Robinson-Humphrey Co., Atlanta. Frank Weeden, Weeden & Co., San Francisco. Sidney J. Weinberg, Goldman, Sachs & Co., New York. George Whitney, J. P. Morgan & Co., New York. Orrin G. Wood, Estabrook & Co., Boston. Mr. Wilbur, who has been named Managing Director of the Code Committee, was President of the Investment Bankers Association of America in 1929. Prior to his becoming affiliated with the Atlas Corp., Mr. Wilbur was associated for over 15 years with former Ambassador Myron T. Herrick, his son, Parmely, and James Parmelee of Cleveland in various financial and other related activities. Mr. Wilbur was born in 1872 at Wellington, Ohio; graduated from the Western Reserve University Law School in 1900, after Wrhich he attended the Harvard Law School for two years, and practiced law in Cleveland and Salt Lake City prior to his engaging in financial activities in 1915. In 1931 Mr. Wilbur was appointed Deputy Superintendent of Banks of Ohio in charge of the Toledo banking situation, and assisted In the rehabilitation program of the closed banks in Toledo. Robert E. Christie Jr., President of the International Bankers Association of America, in a statement made before the National Recovery Administration in Washington, on March 15, at the hearing on the fair practice provisions, stated that "the code proposes to supplement the Securities Act, but in no sense to supplant it." In part, Mr. Christie also said: In any program for reform in security transactions, the careful elaboration of safeguards relating to factual disclosures is an Indispensable detail in a larger category that includes abuses of salesmanship, abuses of confidence, and abuses of competition. The safeguards must be of a kind to April 21 1934 raise all investment practices to the level of the highest traditions in our business. It is important to bear in mind that there have been created and distributed great quantities of sound securities, measured by any standard that intelligent critics might set up. We cannot do better than to equal the best that has been done in the past. Importance of Continuous Information. In the proposed code we have realized that facts must be current to be of value. Thus we would try to assure the continuous disclosures of indispensable data, such as many corporations have supplied in the past. We would not attempt to require the disclosure of all data that might be of some interest, for we think in that direction lies endless confusion. Issuing corporations, which are of course primarily responsible for the needed data, are not subject to the investment bankers code. To reach them we would require all investment bankers, as a condition to issuing curVr...ate securities, to obtain a contractual promise from the issuers that they will supply the stipulated facts as long as their securities remain outstanding: In this, we believe that the code makes a distinct advance upon anything hitherto attempted in the effort to protect the investor. Reforms in Salesmanship. Certainly not less important in security dealing than the disclosure of facts is the correction of abuses in salesmanship. Under the stress of unregulated competition and under the pervasive influence of selling methods successful in other fields of American business, securities dealers in this country have allowed selling practices to grow up which have no proper place in the machinery of a capital market. Securities should not be "pushed" on investors. Our ultimate goal should be to bring nearer the day when it will be the custom for the investor to take the initiative in establishing a close relationship with reliable firms for the purpose of buying securities in accordance with his individual needs. The purchase of securities should not result from the mere selling ability of a salesman, but from a meeting of the minds of the investor and his investment banker, in which the investor assumes a due sense of his own responsibility. The eradication of selling evils in the securities business is no easy task. The spirit of high pressure selling runs through most forms of American business and has naturally tended to permeate the investment mechanism. The technique of retail salesmen is not alone in question. Originating houses have too frequently appraised a new piece of business by the criterion of whether it could be sold rather than whether it should be sold. Restrictions on House-to-House Calls. A large number of firms now employ men as security salesmen upon a salary basis only. There is, however, a very large number of security salesmen employed throughout the United States upon a commission basis. To require, as has been suggested, that all of them should be paid fixed salaries would mean that thousands of men would be immediately thrown out of work. The wise and conservative approach to this problem is to Impose conditions of employment which will exact of security salesmen a knowledge of the business in which they are engaged. We have also embodied in the code a very important feature which will tend to greatly restrict high pressure salesmanship, in forbidding the attempted sales of securities by house-to-house canvass, unless the investor has definitely indicated his willingness to be approached in this manner. No less important than selling practices and no lees difficult is the problem of conflicts of interests in the investment banking business, and the abuses to which they may give rise. We feel that every party to a security transaction is entitled to know the position or interest of every other party. Such a disclosure, if it does not eliminate abuses, guards against them, and is indispensable for the enduring growth of mutual confidence. This is not the time to explain all the details of our code. That will be done by others. I have merely attempted to indicate something of our purposes, indeed, of our ideals, as embodied in it. It is far from a perfunctory document. It upsets many of the practices of the past. It disturbs the even tenor of many who want things continued in the old way. It frankly and positively calls for a new sense of responsibility to the public on the part of everyone engaged in the investment business. Provisions for Administration. We wish now to draw particular attention to the provisions in the proposed code for its administration and enforcement. If approved by the Administrator, the fair trade practice provisions become an integral part of the code of fair competition for investment bankers, and as such carry with them the enforcement sanctions of the National Industrial Recovery Act. But it has seemed to us that it is incumbent upon securities merchants to devise a procedure for enforcing the spirit of the code to be adopted which will be far more expeditious, elastic and effective than is provided by the courts. Such a procedure we have undertaken to provide. In substance, it proposes that security merchants may register with the Investment Bankers Code Committee, and by so doing enter into a contractual engagement with all other registered investment bankers to accept the jurisdiction of the Investment Bankers Code Committee in enforcing the code. This proposal has far-reaching implications. It is expected that this contractual relationship will supply the groundwork on which to build, for the first time, effective self-discipline in the investment banking business. It is hoped that the rules as prepared will mark the birth of a new epoch in American investment banking, in which the best traditions of the business will govern. Undoubtedly experience will suggest innumerable amendments, and with the passage of years the document now before us will seem but an imperfect beginning. We are convinced, however, that the principles underlying the present document are sound. $8,000,000 Suit Against New York Clearing House Banks Given Preference on Court Calendar—Need of Depositors of Closed Harriman National Bank & Trust Co. Called Urgent—Proposed Senate Inquiry. The $8,000,000 suit brought by James B. T. O'Connor, Comptroller of the Currency; Frederick B. Goess, receiver of the Harriman Bank & Trust Co., and Henry E. Cooper, against the member banks of the New York Clearing House Association and their officers was given preference in an order signed April 10 by New York Supreme Court Justice Edward J. McGoldrick. It was placed on the reserve calendar for May 21 ,and will probably be tried before the courts adjourn in June. Volume 138 Financial Chronicle The suit has been brought on behalf of the depositors and other creditors of the bank on the ground that Mr. Cooper took the Presidency of the Harriman bank in July 1932 after the Clearing House banks promised they would not permit the institution to fail. Justice McGoldrick acted after a plea for a preference had been made in an affidavit by Mr. Goess submitted by Alfred A. Cook and Clarence J. Shearn, counsel for the plaintiffs. The New York "Times" of April 11 added the following information regarding the status of the case: Mr. Gam said the action also was directed against the Clearing House Association officers on the ground that they warranted to the Comptroller of the Currency and to Mr. Cooper "that they had authority to speak for and bind the defendant banks, and if, as asserted by some of the banks, they lack authority, they breached their warrant of authority to the consequent damage of the depositors." When the bank closed there were 11,000 deposit accounts totaling $24,670,000. A loan from the Reconstruction Finance Corporation enabled the bank to pay a 50% dividend last July. Mr. Goess said that "without recovery in this action no further amount can be paid out for a very considerable time and the final dividend:, if any, would be very small." He said there were 4,200 thrift accounts. "I have received numerous communications from depositors revealing their dire circumstances," he continued, "and accordingly asking for immediate action. Because of the principles involved, as well as the unfortunate circumstances of the case, so many dependent upon this cause of action necessarily affects a very large part of the community." Incidentally it was noted in a Washington dispatch, April 5, to the New York "Herald Tribune" that an investigation of the dispute between the depositors of the closed Harriman National Bank of New York and the New York Clearing House Association by the Senate Banking Committee was promised that day by Ferdinand Pecora, Committee Counsel, as Samuel Untermyer, lawyer and stock market reform advocate, protested against provisions of the pending FletcherRayburn Exchange Regulation bill. The dispatch added: The depositors of the Harriman bank have pending a suit against the Clearing House, based on an alleged guaranty by the Clearing House to support the bank. It is charged the Clearing House violated this agreement and refused to give financial aid when needed, with the result the bank failed. Cited as Monopoly. Mr. Pecora's announcement was made when Mr. Untermyer criticized a provision of the pending bill requiring brokers to borrow only from members of the Federal Reserve System. This would tend toward a dangerous credit control monopoly, he said, and cited the New York Clearing House as an example of such monopoly. "What are you going to do with an organization like that?" Mr. Untermyer asked, after recalling the Harriman case. "We are going to hear some evidence on that," Mr. Pecora replied. Isidor J. Kresel Disbarred Because of Conviction in Bank of United States Case. Isidor J. Kresel, who was convicted Nov. 27 1933 of misapplication of funds of the Bank of United States, of which he was a director and counsel, was disbarred April 13 by the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court. This action was compulsory under a law requiring disbarment when a lawyer is convicted of a felony. The New York "Times" of April 14 noted the court's opinion as follows: The opinion, written by the entire court, recited that Mr. Kresel was admitted to the bar on July 17 1900, and that on Nov. 27 last he was convivcted of "a violation of Section 305 of the Penal Law, which is a felony, and sentenced to imprisonment in the State prison." The court then cited Section 477 of the Judiciary Law, which requires disbarment on a felony conviction. Mr. Kresel was convicted in the Criminal Brands of the Supreme Court for abetting in the misapplication of funds of the Bank of United, States, of which he was chief counsel. In the event that his appeal, which is to be heard by the Appellate Division in the fall, results in a reversal of the conviction, Mr. Kresel will be entitled to ask for reinstatement. The Appellate Division took such action in the case of Herbert Singer, son of Saul Singer, bank executive now in Sing Sing. Mr. Singer, who was in Mr. Kresel's office, was cleared of the charges against him by the Court of Appeals. Mr. Kresel settled recently the $60,000,000 suit brought against him and other directors of the Bank of United States by the Banking Superintendent, and also the assessment action on his stock. At that time it was said that the fortune he had acquired as one of the leading lawyers in the city had gone, and that his future as an attorney depended upon a reversal of his conviction. Bill Creating Nine Branch Banking Districts in New York State Passed by Assembly at Albany. By a vote of 92 to 59, and it is stated, over the protest of up-State members,the New York State Assembly on April 18 passed the bill, sponsored by Assemblyman Stephens (Republican) creating nine branch bank districts in the State. In effect, said an Albany dispatch April 18, to the Re'w York "Herald Tribune" the bill extends the present system under which a bank may be permitted to establish branches within the city in which its main establishment is located. From the same dispatch we quote: It permits a bank, with the approval of the Banking Superintendent and two-thirds of the State Banking Board, to establish a branch or branches anywhere within the district in which its main establishment is located. 2669 While New York City, under the bill would not be wholly within one district, a New York bank would be permitted, as now, to establish branches anywhere within the city, with the approval of the Superintendent and twothirds of the Banking Board. Two Metropolitan Districts. District No. 1 would be composed of Kings, Queens, Nassau and Suffolk, and District No. 2 would be comprised of New York, Bronx, Richmond, Westchester and Rockland. Assemblyman James R. Robinson, Republican, of Tompkins, attempted to block action on the bill, contending it had been killed in Committee on April 11,and therefore wasimproperly on the House calendar. Assemblyman William Breitenbach, Democrat, of Brooklyn. said it was an amendment offered by Assemblyman Irving M. Ives, Republican, of Chenango, and not the bill itself that was killed. Mr. Ives led the fight against passage of the bill on the ground that it was "weak" and that the grouping of counties to make up the nine districts was unsatisfactory. Assemblyman Jacob H. Livingston, Democrat, of Brooklyn, said that enactment of the bill was necessary to meet the problem of up-State banks, which he saidivould otherwise be forced to close. Assemblyman Laurens M. Hamilton, Republican, of Rockland,a nephew of J.P. Morgan,opposed the bill on the ground that the grouping ofcounties "could not be justified." The most bitter opponent of the bill was Assemblyman W.Allan Newell. Republican, of St. Lawrence, who said: "This is Just another brain-child of the bankers of Wall Street, who are reaching out their tentacies for more of our rural money. They want to put our money in the great banks of New York City." Assemblyman D.Mallory Stephens, Republican,ofPutnam,Chairman of the Committee on Banks, and sponsor of the bill, said that it was approved by Joseph A. Broderick, State Superintendent of Banks, and the Federal Comptroller of the Currency. Mr. Stephens displayed a photostatic copy of a letter from the Comptroller of the Currency pledging compliance with the bill in his supervision of National banks. Assemblyman Abbot Low Moffat opposed the bill because of "the extraordinary manner" in which it had been placed on the calendar, but said he believed that the principle was sound. According to Albany advices, April 18, to the New York "Times" the branch offices must be approved by the State Superintendent of •Banks and by a two-thirds vote of the State Banking Board. The "Times" account likewise stated that the bill also provides that a trust company in a city of over 50,000 population may open one or more branch office's, whether or not the city is located entirely within one banking district. Opposition to the proposed legislation voiced by George V. McLaughlin, was noted in our issue of April 14, page 2502. President Roosevelt Approves Proposed Legislation for Federal Reserve Aid to Industry. Approval by President Roosevelt of the proposed legislation authorizing the Federal Reserve banks to make direct loans to industry was indicated in Associated Press advices from Washington last night (April 20) which also said: Senator Glass (Dem.). Virginia, and Governor Black of the Federal Reserve Board went over their bill with the President and upon leaving the White House said they had the go-ahead signal to push it through Congress. Industrial advisory committees are to be established in each of the Federal Reserve Districts to advise on the loans, which would be limited to five years. The bill stipulates. In exceptional circumstances, when it appears to the satisfaction of the Federal Reserve Bank that an established industrial or commercial business located in its District is unable to obtain requisite financial assistance on a reasonable basis from the usual sources, the Federal Reserve Bank may make loans to or purchase obligations of such business, or may make commitments with respect thereto, on a reasonable and sound basis. for the purpose of providing it with working capital, but no obligation shall be acquired or commitment made hereunder with a maturity exceeding five years. A compromise of what was described as "a three-way 'Collision of plans" for direct Federal loans to industry emerged on April 17, according to Associated Press accounts from Washington that day, which reported: The tangle occurred when Eugene Black, Governor of the Federal Reserve Board; Jesse Jones, Chairman of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, and Senator Glass (Dem.). Virginia, all offered the Senate Banking Committee differing proposals to the same end. Messrs. Glass and Black, however, sought to-day the Chief Executive's approval for a bill agreed upon between themselves for five-year loans through the Federal Reserve System. Both were confident of the President's indorsement. The Reserve System would have a capital of about $300,000,000 for making the loans, half of which would be provided by the Treasury and the other half by the Reserve banks. In effect, the Reserve System would be authorized to discount fiveyear paper presented by banks or other financial institutions, with the latter taking 20% of the risk. Loans direct to industrial enterprises could be made by the Reserve banks, however, under extraordinary circumstances where other credit was not available. References to the several proposals appeared in our issues of March 31, page 2184, and April 7, page 2349. Charter Granted to First Federal Savings and Loan Association of New York. by Federal Home Loan Bank Board. John H.Fahey, Chairman of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board,announced on April 15 that by resolution of the Board a charter has been granted to the First Federal Savings and Loan Association of New York. The present offices of the 2670 Association are in the Grand Central Terminal Building, New York City; eventually the Association will be housed in the Rockefeller Center. Its affairs will be directed by Gardner W. Taylor, President; J. Spencer Smith, VicePresident, and A. G. Lampke, Secretary and Counsel. The directors include: E. R. Plunkett, H. H. Tinkham and Phillip W. Kniskern. Mr. Taylor is President of the Gardner, Taylor Lumber Co., and a director of the Bronxvine Trust Co., and the Bronxville Savings and Loan Association. Advices from Washington April 15 to the New York "Journal of Commerce" stated that Mr. Smith is a director of the Tenafly Trust Co., and since 1911 has served as President of the New Jersey Harbor Commission. Mr. Kniskern is President of the American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers and advisor to the board of the }Tome Owners Loan Corporation in Washington. Mr. Plunkett is President of the Northeastern division of the lumber code authority. In his announcement Mr. Fahey said: The organization of this first Federal association in the Nation's financial capital is of special significance, in view of the purpose of such Federal institutions to attract private savings into home loans by providing a safe meansofinvestment for people oflarge or small means and a practical method of financing home ownership. The First Federal Savings and Loan Association of New York will operate within a radius of 50 miles of New York City and under the regulations will confine its loans to first mortgages on homes. Loans are mainly restricted to not more than $20,000 on any single property and to an amount not exceeding 75% of conservatively appraised valuation. Loans are payable by monthly installments over a period of not less than five nor more than 20 years. under the amortization repayment plan which has been emphasized by the Federal Government as an essential step in placing American home financing on a permanently sound basis for borrower and lender. Shares are of $100 par value and may be purchased outright or by instalments as low as 50 cents monthly,offering a direct incentive to systematic, regular saving even to people of limited income. Mr. Fahey also said that "over 200 Federal savings and loan associations had previously been established in some 35 States and in many metropolitan centers, including Chicago, Philadelhpia, Cleveland, Detroit, St. Louis and Milwaukee." Rates on Bankers'Acceptances Go to New Low Figure— Multiples of One-Sixteenth of 1% Used For First Time in Open-Market Discounts. Referring to the action of the American Acceptance Council in announcing on April 19 a reduction of its official schedule of open-market discount rates on bankers' bills carrying rates to the lowest level ever posted by the Council and employing multiples of one-sixteenth of 1% for the first time in the history of the American bill market, the New York "Times" of April 20 added: The new rates are. 4% bid, 3-16 asked, for bills having a maturity of asked, bid, bid, 4, asked, for four months' bills; 90 days or less; % on the bid for five and six months' bills. The reductions amount to rate, 1-16% on the asking rate for short-term bills; 34 on bid and asked rates for four months' bills and 34 on both rates on longer bills. The change Is the first official one since March 8. The new schedule does not restore uniformity to the bill market, but it recognizes the rates at which most business in prime bills is being done by dealers. The dealers are, however, asking somewhat higher rates for bills carrying names in less demand and quoting somewhat better rates for bills carrying names in greatest demand. Quotations Only to Applicants. Since April 6, bill dealers disregarding the official uniform rates of the Acceptance Council have been quoting prices only upon application by customers. Decrease of $64,972,932 In Volume of Outstanding Bankers' Acceptances During Month—Total March 31, $685,154,155 Compared With $750,127,087 on February 28—Rates Quoted Only on Application. In presenting on April 19 the monthly figures of outstanding bankers' acceptances, Robert H. Bean, Executive Secretary of the American Acceptance Council, states that "reflecting the extraordinary conditions governing money and credit, which have also resulted in the lowest quotations on record, the volume of bankers acceptances declined $64,972,932, during the month of March, leaving a total on March 31 of $685,154,155." "This," says Mr. Bean, "is by many millions, the largest single month change in bill volume in recent years and while a part of the loss may be attributed to normal credit reduction at this time of the year, an important part is directly due to the overburdening surplus of funds in the banks control." Mr. Bean continues: Notwithstanding a reduction of approximately $65.000,000, the grand total is still $14,036,664 above that reported for March 311933. It has been noted for some weeks that large commercial banks, ordinarily heavy acceptors, have been making use of their cash in over the counter loans instead of putting such credit needs on an acceptance basis. This. of course, is a natural thing for the banks to do and as long as this period of excessive money ease continues, the volume of acceptances will suffer. In the recent survey of the American Acceptance Council as of March 31, the volume of bankers' acceptances to finance imports was the only type that for of bill to show an increase, the amount being $4,641,339 above the previous month end. Acceptances created for the purpose of financing exports went off $16,896,933. Acceptances based on goods, stored in or April 21 1934 Financial Chronicle shipped between foreign countries, dropped $16,240,849. Domestic shipment acceptances went off $1,894,275 and dollar exchange acceptances declined $1,058,852. The most important reduction and the one most directly traceable to the emergency shifting of acceptance credits to over the counter loans was in the classification of bills created for the purpose of financing commodities in domestic warehouses, this volume going off $33,523,362, bringing the total of this type of business down to $214,867,917. which despite the heavy current reduction is still $41,000,000 above the figures for the corresponding date in 1933. The volume of bills purchased and held by accepting banks and accepted, but not yet put Into the market, continues to be a very large part of the total volume. On March 31, these banks were holding of their own bills $251.743.973 and of other banks' bills purchased $324,449,201, a total of $576,193,174, or 84% of the total volume of created bills. This very heavy absorption of bills by the accepting banks and their • disinclination to dispose of them at this time, has been partly responsible for the very unusual situation in the discount market, with respect to rates. For the first time in many years, since the earliest steps were taken to create a discount market, the dealers have within the last few days quoted rates only upon application, although for the time being the official rate has been held until to-day at the last previous open quotation of 4-4% for the maturities up to 90 days. Detailed statistics furnished by Mr. Bean follow: TOTAL OF BANKERS' DOLLAR ACCEPTANCES OUTSTANDING FOR ENTIRE COUNTRY BY FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICTS. March 31 1934. Feb. 28 1934. March 31 1933. Federal Reserve Dtstrid. 1 a a $43,155,108 544,473,744 15.793,020 2,231,155 840,859 8,272,898 36.774,398 2,283,295 2,986,819 1.300,000 1.790,931 25,452,332 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 344,347,090 802,882,588 15,232.482 2,293,366 758.899 8,485,824 40,938.605 2.229,828 3.287,422 1,250,000 2,553.458 25,839.529 941,350,518 553,133.815 10,372,191 3.174,940 154,801 4,082.749 33 440,853 1,188,494 2,205.804 1,100,000 1.358.978 19,574,950 $750,127,087 8671.117.491 3885,154,155 Grand total Decrease for month,804,972,932 Increase for year, $14,038,884 CLASSIFIED ACCORDING TO NATURE OF CREDIT. March 31 1934. Feb. 281934. March31 1933. Imports Exports Domestic shipments Domestic warehouse credits Dollar exchange Based on goods stored in or shipped hixtars.an fnmicen onnntrian 3102,520.218 185,887,895 10,873,327 214,867,917 3,136.815 897,878,877 202,784,628 12,567.802 248,391,279 4,195,687 $73,137,951 175,275,870 9,913,482 173.992,293 8,357,578 158058.185 154 2011 024 920 4411 810 CURRENT MARKET QUOTATIONS ON PRIME BANKERS ACCEPTANCES Apr. 18 1934, Days— 30 60 90 Dealers' Dealers' Buying Rate. Selling Rate. X 34 34 X X X Days— 120 150 180 Dealers' Dealers' Buying Rate. Selling Ran. 35 X 34' 34 X ii Treasury Department Provides for Retirement of $300,000,000 43i Fourth Liberty Bonds Through Sinking Fund. Referring to an announcement from Washington on April 18 that the Treasury had purchased on Monday for the sinking fund $300,000,000 of Fourth Liberty 43.s as "puzzling to Wall Street," the New York "Times" of April 19 in its comments on financial matters, went on to say: It was at first suggested that these bonds might have been the holdings of Federal Reserve Banks in the called issues, but inquiry disclosed that such was not the case. The Reserve Banks, it is understood, converted whatever called bonds they held before the books were closed on the conversion offer, having previously disposed of part of their holdings to the market. The Treasury obviously did not buy so large an amount of bonds in the open market on Monday. Possibly the explanation is that $300.000,000 was set aside on Monday for redemption of unconverted bonds: but reports of the announcement which appeared yesterday did not indicate that redemption was involved but instead used the word "purchase," which has a slightly different connotation in financial circles. Second Call for Redemption of Fourth Liberty Loan 4% Bonds of 1933-38—Bonds to Be Presented After Sept. 15 and in Advance of Redemption Date on Oct. 15. A second call for partial redemption before maturity, on Oct. 15 1934, of Fourth Liberty Loan 4%eyo bonds of 1933-38, as indicated in our issue of April 14, page 2503, was made on April 13 by the Treasury Department. The call involves about $1,200,000,000 of the bonds, of which about $4,300,000,000 are outstanding. The bonds affected by the call are those bearing serial numbers the final digit of which is 8, or 2 (such serial numbers in the case of permanent coupon bonds being prefixed by the corresponding distinguishing letter H, or B, respectively.) The Treasury announces that the called bonds may be presented for redemption after Sept. 15, and it is urged that such presentation be will in advance of Oct. 15 so as to insure prompt payment of principal when due. Announcement of the initial or first call for partial redemption of the Fourth Liberty Loan 414% bonds of 1933-38, before maturity, was made on Oct. 11 1933 by the Treasury, and provided for the redemption on April 15 1934 of bonds Volume 1.2R of that issue bearing serial numbers ending with the digit 9, 0, or 1, and in the case of permanent coupon bonds also preceded by the letter J, K, or A, respectively. The Treasury, at the time of the issuance of the first call, announced an offering of Treasury bonds of 1943-45, for which the called Liberty bonds were permitted to be exchanged. The Treasury bonds were dated Oct. 15 1933, bearing interest from that date at the rate of 414% per annum to Oct. 15 1934, and 314% thereafter. About $1,875,000,000 of the Fourth Liberty bonds were involved in the first call, of which there were then outstanding about $6,268,000,000. Approximately $872,000,000 were tendered in exchange for the Treasury bonds, leaving more than $1,000,000,000 of the called bonds due for payment on April 15 1934. Provision to retire practically all of these $1,000,000,000 of bonds was made in the April 15 financing of the Treasury, the latter offering 314% bonds of 1944-46 in exchange for whiCh the Fourth Liberty bonds, called for April 15, could be tendered, in addition to 3% Treasury notes maturing May 2. Final exchange figures have not, as yet, been announced by the Treasury Department, but an estimate by the Treasury (as stated in our columns of April 14, page 2503) showed that $965,000,000 of the Fourth 414s and the maturing 3% notes had been tendered in exchange for the Treasury bonds up to 5:30 p. m. April 12. In issuing the second call, on April 13, Henry Morgenthau Jr., Secretary of the Treasury, gave out the following statement: The Treasury to-day issued a call for two series of Fourth Liberty Loan 4148 for redemption on Oct. 15 1934. There are outstanding about $4,800,000,000 of uncalled Fourth Liberty Loan bonds. The present call will include about $1,200,000,000. Copy of the call follows: FOURTH LIBERTY LOAN 414%, BONDS OF 1933-38. Notice of Second Call for Partial Redemption Before Maturity. To Holders of Fourth Liberty Loan 414% Bonds of 1933-38 and Others Concerned: Public notice is hereby given: 1. All outstanding Fourth Liberty Loan 414% bonds of 1933-88 (hereinafter referred to as Fourth 414s) bearing serial numbers the final digit of which is 8, or 2 (such serial numbers in the case of permanent coupon bonds being prefixed by the corresponding distinguishing letter H, or B, respectively), are hereby called for redemption on Oct. 15 1934, on which date interest on such bonds celled for redemption will cease. 2. This second call for partial redemption is made pursuant to the Provision for redemption contained in the bonds and in Treasury Department Circular No. 121, dated Sept. 28 1918, under which the bonds were originally issued, the bonds to be redeemed having been determined by lot In the manner prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury. 3. Outstanding Fourth 4%s bearing serial numbers (and prefix letters) other then those designated are not included in or affected by this second call for partial redemption. Holders of Fourth 4%s now called for redemption on Oct. 15 1934 may, In advance of that date, be offered the privilege of exchanging their called bonds for other interest-bearing obligations of the United States, in which event public notice will hereafter be given. Full information regarding the presentation and surrender of Fourth 4140 under this call is given in Department Circular No. 509, dated April 13 1934. HENRY MORGENTHAU JR., Secretary of the Treasury. Treasury Department, Washington, April 13 1934. Fourth 4148 bearing serial numbers ending in 9, 0, or 1, have heretofore been called for redemption on April 16 1934, on which date interest on such bonds will cease. Tenders Aggregating $315,323,000 Received to Two Issues of Treasury Bills Offered to Total of $125,000,000 or Thereabouts—Bids of $75,047,000 Accepted for 91-Day Bills at Average Rate of 0.08%, and $50,033,000 for 182-Day Bills at Rate of 0.19%. Tenders received at the Federal Reserve banks and the branches thereof, up to 2 p. m., Eastern Standard time, April 16 to the offering of $125,000,000 or thereabouts of 91-day and 182-day Treasury bills, dated April 18 1934, amounted to $315,323,000, Henry Morgenthau, Jr., Secretary of the Treasury, announced April 16. The Secretary said that $125,080,000 of the bids were accepted;$75,047,000 for the 91-day bills, which were offered to the amount of $75,000,000 or thereabouts, and $50,033,000 for the 182-day bills, offered to the amount of $50,000,000 or thereabouts. Tenders of $164,508,000 were received to the 91-day bills while the 182-day series brought bids of $150,815,000. The 91-day bills, according to Secretary Morgenthau, sold at an average rate of about 0.08% per annum, on a bank discount basis, and the 182-day bills at a rate of about 0.19% per annum. A previous offering of 91-day, 182-day bills (dated April 11) sold at rates of 0.07% and 0.18% per annum, respectively; the 0.07% rate is the lowest at which Treasury bills ever sold. Announcement of the offering of the bills dated April 18 was made on April 12 by Secretary Morgenthau; reference to the same was made in our issue of April 14, page 2503. The 2671 Financial Chronicle 91-day bills mature on July 18 and the 182-day bills Oct. 17 1934, and the face amount of each series will be payable without interest on their respective maturity dates. On April 16 Secretary Morgenthau announced in detail, as follows, the results of the offering: For the 91-day Treasury bills, maturing July 18 1934. for $75,000,000. or thereabouts, applications totaled $164,508,000, of which $75,047,000 was accepted. The accepted bids ranged in price from 99.987. equivalent to a rate of about 0.05% per annum to 99.977, equivalent to a rate of about 0.09% per annum,on a bank discount basis. The average price of Treasury bills of this series to be issued is 99.980 and the average rate is about 0.08% per annum on a bank discount basis. For the 182-day Treasury bills, maturing Oct. 17 1934. for $50,000.000. or thereabouts,applications totaled $150,815,000,of which $50,033,000 was accepted. Except for two bids totaling $55,000, the accepted bids ranged in price from 99.914, equivalent to a rate of about 0.17% per annum, to 99.900, equivalent to a rate of about 0.20% per annum,on a bank discount basis. Only part of the amount bid for at the latter price was accepted. The average price of Treasury bills of this series to be issued is 99.906, and the average rate is about 0.19% per annum on a bank discount basis. New Offering of 91-Day and 182-Day Treasury Bills to Total Amount of $125,000,000 or Thereabouts— ana Will Be Offered in Amounts of $75,000,000— $50,000,000, Respectively—Both Series to Be Dated April '15, 1934. Announcement of a new offering of $125,000,000 or thereabouts of Treasury bills in two series, maturing respectively in 91 days and 182 days, was made on April 19 by Henry Morgenthau, Jr., Secretary of the Treasury. Both series will be dated April 25 1934. The 91-day bills, which mature July 25, will be offered in amount of $75,000,000 or thereabouts, and the 182-day bills, maturing Oct. 24 1934, in amount of $50,000,000 or thereabouts. The face amount of the bills of each series will be payable without interest on their respective maturity dates. Tenders to the bills, which will be used to meet an issue of $125,126,000 of similar securities maturing April 25, will be received at the Federal Reserve banks, or the branches thereof, up to 2 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, Monday, April 23. Bids will not be received at the Treasury Department, Washington. The bills will be sold on a discount basis to the highest bidders, and the bidders are required to specify the particular series for which each tender is made. Secretary Morgenthau's announcement of the offering also said in part: I The bills will be issued in bearer form only, and in amounts or denomina- tions of $1,000. $10,000. $100,000, 3500.000 and $1.000,000 (maturity value). No tender for an amount less than $1,000 will be considered. Each tender must be in multiples of $1,000. The price offered must be expressed on the basis of 100, with not more than three decimal places, e. g.. 99.125. Fractions must not be used. Tenders will be accepted without cash deposit from incorporated banks and trust companies and from responsible and recognized dealers in investment securities. Tenders from others must be accompanied by a deposit of 10% of the face amount of Treasury bills applied for. unless the tenders are accompanied by an express guaranty of payment by an incorporate bank or trust company. Immediately after the closing hour for receipt of tenders on April 23 1934, all tenders received at the Federal Reserve banks or branches thereof up to the closing hour will be opened and public announcement of the acceptable prices for each series will follow as soon as possible thereafter. probably on the following morning. The Secretary of the Treasury expressly reserves the right to reject any or all tenders or parts of tenders, and to allot less than the amount applied for, and his action in any such respect shall be final. Any tender which does not specifically refer to a Particular series will be subject to rejection. Those submitting tenders will be advised of the acceptance or rejection thereof. Payment at the price offered for Treasury bills allotted must be made at the Federal Reserve banks in cash or other immediately available funds on April 25 1934. The Treasury bills will be exempt, as to principal and interest, and any gain from the sale or other disposition thereof will also be exempt, from all taxation, except estate and inheritance taxes. No loss from the sale or other disposition of the Treasury bills shall be allowed as a deduction, or otherwise recognized, for the purposes of any tax now or hereafter imposed by the United States or any of its possessions. 111 $1,156,369 of Hoarded Gold Received During Week of April 11—$119,619 Coin and $1,036,750 Certificates. According to a statement issued April 16 by the Treasury Department gold coin and certificates totaling $1,156,368.54 was received by the Federal Reserve banks and the Treasurer's office during the week of April 11. Total receipts since Dec. 28 1933, the date of the issuance of the order requiring all gold to be returned to the Treasury, and up to April 11, amount to $80,671,130.84. The total receipts are shown as follows: Received by Federal Reserve Banks: Week ended April 11 Received previously Total to April 1 1 Received by Treasurer's office: Week ended April 11 Received previously Cold Coin, 119,618.54 27,061.948.30 Cold Certificates. 1,009,650.00 50,794,120.00 $27,181,566.84 $51,803,770.00 243,294.00 27.100.00 1,415.400.00 $1,442,500.00 $243,294.00 Total to April 11 Note.—Gold bars deposited with the New York Assay Office to the amount of $200.572.69 previously reported. 2672 Financial Chronicle Government Securities Amounting to $20,580,000 Purchased by Treasury During Week of April 14. Purchases of Government securities in the open market by the Treasury Department during the week of April 14 amounted to $20,580,000, it is shown in a statement issued April 16 by the Treasury. According to the statement, $10,290,000 of this amount was purchased for the investment account of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and $10,290,000 for other investment'accounts. Since the inception of the Treasury's support to the Government bond market last November, reference to which was made in our issue of Nov. 25, page 3679, the weekly purchases have been as follows: Nov. 25 1933 $8,748,000 Feb. 13 1934 *22,528,000 Dec. 2 1933 2,545,000 Feb. 17 1934 7,089,000 Dec. 9 1933 7,079,000 Feb. 24 1934 1,861,000 Dec. 16 1933 10,208,100 16,600,000 Mar. 3 1934 Dec. 23 1933 6.900,000 16,510,000 Mar. 10 1934 Dec. 30 1933 7,909.000 11,950,000 Mar. 17 1934 Jan. 6 1934 44,713,000 Mar. 24 1934 37.744,000 Jan. 13 1934 33,868,000 Mar. 31 1934 23,600,000 Jan. 20 1934 17,032,000 Apr. 7 1934 42,369.400 Jan. 27 1934 2,800,000 Apr. 14 1934_ 20,580,000 Feb. 5 1934 $7,900,000 •In addition to this amount, $638,400 of bonds held by the Treasury a3 collateral security for postal savings deposits purchased Feb. 9 by the FDIC. Silver Purchases by Treasury During Week of April 13, 10,032.51 Fine Ounces-3,680,984.95 Fine Ounces Received by Mints Since January. Figures issued April 16 by the Treasury Department show that silver amounting to 10,032.51 fine ounces was received by the various United States mints during the week ended April 13. The silver was purchased by the Treasury in accordance with the President's proclamation of Dec. 21 1933, which authorized the Department to buy at least 24,000,000 ounces annually. Since the issuance of the proclamation referred to in our issue of Dec. 23, page 4440, the total receipts by the mints amount to 3,680,984.95 fine ounces. The weekly receipts are as follows (we omit the fractional part of the ounce): Week Ended— Ounces. Week Ended— Jan. 5 1,157 Mar. 9 Jan. 12 547 Mar. 16 Jan. 19 477 Mar.23 Jan. 26 94.921 Mar.30 Feb. 2 117,554 Apr. 6 Feb. 9 375.995 Apr. 13 Feb. 16 232,630 Feb. 23 322.627 Mar. 2 271,800 Total * Approximate total (official total. 3,680,984.95). Ounces. $126,604 832,808 369.844 354,711 569.274 10,032 *3,680.981 List of Companies Filing Registration Statements With Federal Trade Commission Under Federal Securities Act. The Federal Trade Commission announced on April 9 the filing of 10 security issues involving approximately $70,000,000 for registration with the Commission under the Securities Act. This group, said the announcement, is the largest in point of value of the securities involved to be announced by the Commission since the Act became effective. The advices made public by the Commission further said: A Boston voting trust certificate issue amounting to $48,100,000 is the argest single issue filed for registration since the Securities Act became effective. It was filed by Incorporated Investors, an investment trust. Three power companies are represented in the registrations, two of them operating in Canada. They are the Dominion Gas & Electric Co.. a holding company for several subsidiaries in the western provinces, and Bowater's Canadian Paper Corp., Montreal, a reorganized group having electric and water power operations in addition to its paper production. Ttia third utility is Central States Power & Light Corp., Chicago, a subsidiary of Utilities Power & Light Corp., the holding company of which Harley L. Clarke, Middle Western utilities operator, is President. Combined security issues of the three companies handling power amount to approximately $19,000,000. With $6,000,000 of securities proposed, the Chicago utility's issue is the largest single industrial proposal in the group of 10. Other industrial proposals include the Dominion Gas & Electric Co.'s approximately $2,000.000 issue and a Pennsylvania barrel manufacturer's issue of more than $1,000,000. The Commission announces the refiling of a statement which was withdrawn by permission of the Commission Dec. 14 1933, so that R. M. Hollingshead Corp. (2-478), Camden, N. J., manufacturer of lubricants and soaps, could present a new statement incorporating accounting data as of Dec. 31. The issue is for a readjustment plan involving more than $900,000 debenture bonds, common and preferred stock. Companies and committees filing securities in this group of 10 have headquarters in New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Boston, Montreal, De.nver, and Marcus Hook, Pa. The list of statements filed for registration announced April 9 (790-799) follows: Financial Independence Founders, Inc. (2-790), New York City, an investment trust offering periodic and full paid investment service contracts at an aggregate price not to exceed $2,000.000. The initial public offering was made about Feb. 8 1932. Each trust issued under a periodic or fully paid investment service contract is set up on the books of the trustee (The Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives and Granting Annuities, Philadelphia) in the name of the holder of such contract. These service contracts are known as Financial Independence Founders, Inc.. trustee certificates series "D." Among officers of Financial Independence Founders, Inc.. are Ira C. Jones, New York. President, and Hugh J. Reilley, New York. Secretary-Treasurer. Dominion Gas & Electric Co. (2-791). Philadelphia a Delaware corporation, a holding company owning directly or indirectly through a subsidiary April 21 1934 holding company, not less than 90% of the common capital stock of companies furnishing gas, electricity, and water service in the Canadian Provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan and British Columbia. Among the subsidiaries are. Canadian Western Natural Gas, Light, Heat & Power Co.. Ltd.; Calgary Gas Co., Ltd.; Northwest Fidelity Trust Co., Ltd.; Edmunton Utilities, Ltd.; Canadian Utilities, Ltd.; Union Power Co., Ltd.; Nanaimo Electric Light, Power & Heating Co., Ltd.; Duncan Utilities, Ltd., and Gas Production & Transportation, Ltd. The company•expects to issue $1,884,500 in collateral trust gold bonds. % series with common stock purchase warrants attached. No part of the proceeds will be received by the issuer, as the bonds are already outstanding. In the event of exercise of the rights granted by the warrants to purchase in the aggregate 28,2673.6 shares common stock of Dominion Gas which are attached to the $1,884,500 principal amount of collateral trust gold bonds, the proceeds will be received by Dominion Gas as follows. Ifsuch rights are exercised on or before Sept. 1 1936—$7.50 a share; 2) If such rights are exercised thereafter and on or before Sept. 1 1938— $10.00 a share. The issue has not been underwritten. Among officers of the Dominion company are. P. M. Chandler, New York. Chairman of the Board; H. R. Milner, Calgary, Alberta, Can., President; A. D. McNab, Secretary, and E. M. Butler, Treasurer, both of New York City. The company is not a Canadian organization. Its principal business office is at 1500 Walnut St., Philadelphia. It was organized June 17 1930. Bowater's Canadian Paper Corp., Ltd. (2-792), Montreal, a Canadian corporation organized Jan. 9 1934. contemplating acquisition of the mortgaged assets and probably other assets of Price Brothers & Co., Ltd., of Quebec, which is said to be in bankruptcy. If the acquisition is made, the company's name may be changed to include "Price Brothers." Company expects to issue $11,061,600 first mortgage bonds in a reorganization plan for the old Price Brothers Co. Bowater's group expects to carry on the production of newsprint paper, cardboard, paper specialties, pulpwood and other products as well as the development and transmission of water power and electric energy. F. C. Dobell of Montreal is temporary President of the Bowater group. J. 0. Kemp of Montreal, is Secretary-Treasurer. F. C. Dobell, J. 0. Kemp and Garth Wilkinson, the latter of London. England, are directors. They will serve until regular officers and directors are chosen. Affairs of the old company have been in the hands of a bond committee which acted pursuant to a deposit agreement. The United States representative is Victoria Agencies, Inc.. 18 East 48th St., New York City, Knabb Barrel Co.,Inc.(2-793). Marcus Hook,Pa., a Delaware corporation manufacturing and selling cooperage, particularly tight cooperage consisting of barrels, kegs and other wooden packages for the oil, packing and liquor industries. Company expects to issue $1,143,200 preferred and common stock, proceeds to be used for the purchase of raw materials, for working capital, organization expenses and the purchase from A. Knabb & Co., Inc., of its assets at Marcus Hook, Pa., in preferred and common stock of the Issuer, amounting to $262,950. The underwriters are Valiance & Co. and S. J. Leonard & Co., both of New York City. The securities are to be offered by the underwriters at $3.75 a share of common stock, of which $3.00 is to be paid the issuer and 75c. to the underwriters for selling services. Among officers are: Albert H. Knabb, Ridley Park, Pa., President; William H. Heins, St. Albans, L. I., Treasurer and First Vice-President, and Arden H. Rathkopf, Lynbrook, N. Y., Secretary. Central States Power & Light Corp. (2-794), Chicago, a Delaware corporation. a combination public utility holding and operating company furnishing electric light, power, gas and other services in Iowa, Kentucky, Minnesota and Texas. Through subsidiaries it furnishes such services in Oklahoma, Missouri, North Dakota and in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia In Canada. The company expects to issue $6,000,000 of 5% unsecured debentures, the proceeds to be issued in exchange for the surrender for cancellation by Utilities Power & Light Corp of a demand note owned and held by it and made by the issuer, dated Jan. 29 1932, on which there is a balance owing of $5,957,120.68. The cash balance of the proceeds, $42,879.32, will be used for working capital and other corporate purposes. It is contemplated that $1,400,000 in principal amount of the debentures will subsequently be offered by Utilities Power & Light Corp. through Central States Utilities Corp.(which in turn controls Central States Power & Light Corp.) to the holders of 10-year 6% secured gold bonds of Central States Utilities Corp. in exchange for these gold bonds on the basis of 40% in principal amount of debentures for 100% in principal amount of the secured gold bonds. Among officers of Central States Power & Light Corp. are: H. T. Pritchard, President; D. H. Bender, Vice-President & Treasurer, and W. A. Horner. Secretary, all of Chicago. Incorporated Investors Voting Trust (2-795), Boston. The issue includes voting trust certificates filed for registration by Incorporate Investors, Voting Trust, Boston, representing 2,500.000 shares of capital stock of an aggregate market value of $48,100,000. Among voting trustees are: William Tudor Gardiner, Gardiner. Me., Chairman of the Board; William A. Parker, North Easton, Mass., President; Ivan C. Patterson, Delmont, Mass., Vice-President; George Putnam. Manchester, Mass., former President. and B. Loring Young, Weston, Mass., a director. The voting trustees hold a certain amount of voting trust certificates but these represent less than 25% of the outstanding stock. Incorporated Investors (2-796). Boston, a Massachusetts corporation, an investment company holding a diversified list ofcommon stock. It proposes an issue of 2.500.000 shares of capital stock which will not be offered directly to the public but will be transferred to the voting trustees listed in registration statement No. 2-795 above. They, in turn, will offer to the public voting trust certificates for this capital stock. The issue is valued at a total market price of $48,100,000. Winfield P. E. Viering & Others (2-797), Boston, trustees under a voting trust agreement dated March 21 1934, issuing voting trust certificates for 6.450 shares of common stock of Thirty Federal Street Corp., Boston, in the amount of $322,500. It is expected the certificates will be offered upon acquisition of the stock from the Bondholders' l'rotective Committee of the first mortgage 6% serial gold bonds of the Federal District Trust, to which it is to be issued by the Thirty Federal Street Corp. on conveyance to it by the Committee of the property at 30 Federal Street, Boston, when and if the Committee purchases this property at a foreclosure sale to be held on a date not yet fixed. Trustees under the voting trust agreement are Winfield P. E. Viering of Hartford. Conn., who is also President. Treasurer and a director; and C. 0. Neumeister, Auburn, N. Y., and William H. Phelps, Winsted, Conn., directors. Thirty Federal Street Corp. (2-798), Boston, a Massachusetts corporation, owning and operating real estate at 30 Federal St., Boston, and proposing to issue 6,450 shares of common stock pursuant to a plan of readjustment or reorganization, the issue amounting to $322,500. The plan contemplates the possibility that the bondholders' protective committee will bid in the property at 30 Federal St., Boston, covered by a mortgage securing the first mortgage 6% serial gold bonds of the Federal District Trust at a foreclosure sale which has been ordered by court. The committee will Volume 138 Financial Chronicle then transfer the property to the Thirty Federal Street Corp., which will issue all of its capital stock to or upon order of the committee in exchange therefor. The capital stock will be placed in the voting trust and the voting trust certificates issued to the participating bondholders, they having deposited their bonds with the committee in the ratio of one share for each $100 principal amount of participating bonds held. Officers of the company are: Winfield P. E. Viering, Hartford, Conn., President, Treasurer and director; Albert T. Dewey, Hartford, Conn., Vice-President and director, and the following directors: G. Arthur Heermans, Corning, N. Y.; C. A. Neumeister, Auburn, N.Y.; William H. Phelps, Winsted, Conn., and Carlos S. Holcomb, Hartford, Conn. The details of the statement filed for registration by the bondholders' protective committee may be seen in File No. 666, Release No. 119. Bruce Consolidated Mining Co. (2-799). Denver, a Colorado corporation proposing to own, explore and develop mines and mining rights; to treat and prepare ore and mineral substances for market and to deal in plants and mining machinery. The company proposes offering 500.000 shares of common capital stock at an aggregate price not to exceed $165.000. the proceeds to be used for general corporate purposes. The underwriter. A. Downs. Denver, doing business under the name of Downs & Co., will pay out of the gross sales price all incidental expenses and is to pay the issuer. $108.750. Among officers of the company are. William A. Lamb, Denver. President: George W. Randall, Denver, Secretary, and A. Downs. Denver, Treasurer. On April 12 the Commission stated that 10 security issues amounting to $5,000,000 filed with it for registration under the Securities Act. More than $1,000,000 of these issues is for industrial or commercial purposes, including those of a liquor manufacturer, a brewery, an amusement park, a gold mine and a book publisher. Reorganization issues pertain to the telephone, real estate, and kraft paper industries. Companies or committees filing these securities for registration have headquarters in New York City. Chicago, Baltimore, Hopewell, Va., New Castle, Del., Park Ridge, Ill., New Lisbon, Wis., and Manitou, Colo. Statements filed for registration (800-809) were listed as follows: • David Pinski Books, Inc. (2-800), New York City, a New York corporation organized Feb. 6 1934, to publish and sell in a unform binding the worksi of David Pinsk' of 2178 Broadway, New York City, issuing 1,000 shares of first preferred stock at $10 each. Friends of Mr. Pinski, in order to preserve his writings, will publish all of his works, new and old. in uniform edition. To facilitate this purpose a corporation has been formed. All common stock has been issued to Mr. Pinski in return for which he has granted the company the right to publish all his works, he to do all the editorial and proofreading work. Hummel-Ross Fibre Corp. (2-801), Hopewell. Va., a Virginia corporation proposing under a plan of readjustment or reorganization to Issue 8400.000 first mortgage serial bonds. This company. organized in 1920, manufactures kraft pulp, paper and board. Among officers are J. P. Hummel, Richmond, Va., President, and P. M. Tam. Honewell, Secretary' Treasurer. 2480 Broadway Corp. (2-802), 11 West 42d Street, New York City, calling for deposits of 81,281.000 outstanding of the original $1.700.000 first mortgage 64% serial gold bonds of Lucania Realty Corp., which was incorporated in 1921 for the sole purpose of building and owning No. 2480 Broadway, New York City. The above issue is the only funded debt now outstanding as listed. A foreclosure action on the mortgages securing the bonds to be called for deposit was instituted Feb. 14 1934. 2480 Broadway Corp. (2-803). 11 West 42nd Street. New York City, filing for registration a $640,500 issue of second mortgage 3% secured gold bonds In a reorganization and readjustment plan involving the property at 2480 Broadway, New York City, listed in Registration Statement No. 2-802 above. The second mortgage bonds to be issued under the reorganization will bear interest at 3% and will be due 10 years after issuance. Purpose of the present issue is to distribute the second mortgage bonds in amounts equal to 50% of the face amount of the First Mortgage 64% serial gold bonds of Lucania Realty Corp. to all bondholders. The amount of this issue, or $640.500. represents 50% of the total amount of the old first mortgage bonds of Lucania Realty Corp. now outstanding. Officers of the new corporation proposing to own the premises at 2480 Broadway are as follows. Sidney Ritt, President; Benjamin Mosher. Vice-President, and Ralph E. Schneider, Secretary-Treasur r, all of New York City. Potomac-Maryland Debenture Corp. (2-804), Baltimore, organized to liquidate the collateral held as security for bonds of the Mortgage Co. of Maryland, Inc., which have been deposited under a deposit agreement dated May 11933. The debentures are listed at a value of $1.120.000 par. Mortgages underlying these bonds were, in a large degree, in default because of unprecedented economic condition and the resulting depression in real estate values, according to the registration statement. A general refunding plan Is proposed to permit liquidation in an orderly way without sacrificing values, according to the statement. Among officers of the company are: Edward J. Bond, Jr., President; Austin J. Lilly, VicePresident and Secretary; John G. Rouse. Vice-President and Treasurer. all of Baltimore. The readjustment or reorganization committee consists of the following: Fred G. Boyce. Jr.. Charles B. Gillet. both of Baltimore; Charles P. Lineaweaver of Philadelphia; Hugh F. MacColl. Providence, R. I.; Virgil C. McGorrill, Portland, Me.: Robert G. Merrick. Baltimore: Charles Morris Smith, III, Providence, R. I.; G. J. Taussig, St. Louis, and Byron S. Watson, Providence. R. 1. Mary Ann Gold Mines, Inc. (2-805), Manitou, Colo., a Colorado corporation, organized March 14 1934, to engage In metal mining. and Proposing to issue 287.500 class A common stock, the proceeds to be used for organization and operating expenses. No underwriters have been appointed but, should any portion of the Inane later be underwritten, a discount not in excess of 30% may be allowed the underwriters. Should salesmen be engaged, a commission of not exceeding 25% may be paid them, according to the company's statement. Officers of the company are: A. de Marconnav, Moulton, Colo., President; 0. K. Woods, Cripple Creek. VicePresident. and H. J. Holt, Manitou, Colo., Secretary-Treasurer. Joseph Triner Beverage Corp. (2-806), Chicago, an Illinois corporation. organized March 15 1934. to manufacture and sell wines, liquors and pharmaceutical products. The company proposes issuing 60.000 shares of common capital stock at an aggregate price not to exceed $300.000, proceeds to be used for purchase of merchandise, payment of bank loans, and payment of accounts payable, to a total extent of 8120,000. Haskell. Scott & Geyer, underwriters, of Chicago, have an option to purchase all of the shares registered, receiving no commissions or discounts although the company has agreed to pay all expenses incident to compliance with its agreement with the underwriters. Among the officers are: James Trifler, 2673 Oak Park. Ill., President; Kathryn Triner, Chicago, Treasurer. and Ella Lagorio, Chicago, Secretary. Christmann Brewing Co. (2-807). New Lisbon, Wis., a Delaware corporation, organized July 10 1933, to manufacture and sell beer. Company expects to issue 85,497 shares of common stock at an aggregate price not to exceed $427,485. Refinance Corp., Chicago, underwriter, has received 19,999 shares of stock without cost and an option to purchase 34,998 shares as assignee of Arthur C. Lueder, Vice-President, at 50 cents a share. Of the 34,998 shares, 21,000 have been purchased for cash. In addition, 40,000 are under option to Refinance Corp. from M. Lippmann at the option price of 65 cents a share. No commissions as discounts will be paid by the issuer. Among officers are: Charles Christmann. President and Treasurer, and Carl W. ehristmann, Secretary, both of New Lisbon, Wis. Middle Western Telephone Co.(2-808). Park Ridge, Ill., calling for deposits of 8497,000 principal amount of convertible 6% gold debentures and 49.700 shares of class B common stock of no par value of Middle Western Telephone Co. Funded debt of the company now outstanding in addition to the above issue consists of 8651.500 15-year 6% collateral gold bonds. The company reports that its income is dependent upon receipts from operating subsidiaries and that in the last few years the gross revenues of operating companies have steadily declined with the result that the company is not now receiving sufficient revenue to provide for the payment of its fixed interest charges on its present outstanding interest bearing securities. The company defaulted in the payment of interest due Nov. 1 1933. on the above debentures. A readjustment plan is contemplated. Officers of the company are: James G. Kellogg, President; George A. Yanochowski, Vice-President; Curtis B. Kemp, Secretary, all of Chicago, and James F. Burns, Pekin, Ill., Treasurer. Deemer Beach Amusement Associates (2-809), New Castle, Del., a common law trust registered in New Castle County, Del., organized March 27 1934, to carry on an amusement park business, and proposing to issue 8385,000 preferred stock, the proceeds to be used for purchase of collateral trust certificates and organization expenses. Among officers of the enterprise are: Charles S. Rose, Baltimore, President and General Manager; John A. Miller, Homewood, Ill., Treasurer; C. D. Se Cheverell, Madison, Wis.. Secretary, and D. Stewart White, Wilmington, Del., Vice-President. In making public the list of registration statements 810819 on April 15 the Federal Trade Commission announced that the list embraced reorganization issues amounting to more than $18,000,000. In the group of 10 registration statements carrying amounts totaling more than $19,000,000, there are four industrial projects totaling $660,000. The Commission added: In the reorganization and certificates of deposit group are statements filed by protective committees for two railroads. In one of these, that of the Rock Island Arkansas & Louisiana RR., certificates of deposit were filed for $14,862,000 in first mortgage bonds as previously announced April 10; the other concerns' certificates of deposit filed for more than $1,000,000 first moztgage bonds of the Sierra Railway Co. of California. Companies or protective committees filing these securities are situated In New York City, Boston, Chicago, San Francisco, Lincoln, Neb., and Red Rock, Ariz. Statements filed for registration (810-819) were made public as follows: International Depositors Corp. (2-810), Denver, a Colorado corporation organized Oct. 14 1926, and since 1931 engaged in the investment trust business. Company expects to sell $250,000 in investment trust units. There are no underwriters, but commissions to dealers have been estimated with a view to averaging 5% of the selling price of the unit, in no case to exceed 12%% of that price. The unit price is listed as $800 or par. Among officers are: F. M. Zimmers, President; Henry Gleed Jr., VicePresident; A. H. Trome, Secretary-Treasurer, and Irene Zimmers, Assistant Secretary, all of Denver. Gold Bell Mining Co., Ltd. (2-811), Red Rock, 'iris., an Arizona corporation organized Sept. 1 1932 to mine and deal in mineral ores, proposing to issue 125,000 shares of common stock at an aggregate price of $37,500, the proceeds to be used for equipment and other operating expenses. The company expects to offer its stock to the public at 25 or 30c. a share par value. Not less than 16c. a share Is to be received by the company after paying sales commissions, according to the company's statement. Among officers are: Anton Kolinowski, Los Angeles, President; Adolph Royeski, Red Rock, Ariz., Treasurer, and Arthur Lishner, Los Angeles, Secretary. Moulded Pulp Corp. (2.812), New York City, a Delaware corporation manufacturing and dealing.in wood pulp paper and products, proposes to Issue $300,000 par value 6% cumulative preferred stock, the proceeds to be used to pay indebtedness and provide working capital. The underwriter, United Bond & Mortgage Co., New York, plans to sell the stock to the public at $100 a share. Discount of $2 a share is expected to be paid by the issuer on stock sold. Officers are: Paul Plunkett, President; William A. Fleming, Secretary, and Roger F. McGrath, Treasurer, all of New York City. Great Divide Mining Corp. (2-813), New York City, a Montana corporation proposing to mine gold, lead and silver in Lewis & Clark County, Montana, proposing to issue $125,000 common stock. Company expects to sell 50,000 shares at $1 a share, the next 25,000 shares at $1.25 a share, and the remaining 25,000 shares at $1.75 a share. Among officers are: Herbert Smith, President; Montgomery Waddell, Treasurer, and Francis P. Pace, Secretary, all of New York City. Regent Co. (2-814), Boston, a Massachusetts corporation operating and owning an apartment house in Brookline, Mass., and proposing to issue common stock without par value in pursuance of a readjustment or reorganization plan, the issue not to exceed $250,000. Among officers of the reorganized company are Walter J. Sugden, President, and Robert H. Davison, Treasurer, both of Boston. Stock is to be issued to voting trustees and a voting trust certificate representing one share of stock will be issued In exchange for each $100 face principal amount of bonds of The Regent, Inc. The plan of reorganization was approved by the Bondholders Protective Committee which called for certificates of deposit of the company's first mortgage bonds as announced in Registration Statement No. 2-707. Dayton Keith and Others (2-815), Boston, voting trustees proposing to Issue voting trust certificates representing 4,750 shares of the common stock without par value of Regent Co., Boston. The amount of the issue is not to exceed $250,000. The trustees are: Dayton Keith, Frederick G. Curry and Walter J. Sugden, voting trustees under a voting trust agreement dated April 2 1934. 2674 Financial Chronicle Committee for Woods Brothers Corp. 10-Year 6% Collateral Trust Sinking Fund Gold Bonds Due April 1 1937 (2-816), 48 Wall Street, New York City, calling for deposit of the above bonds in a principal amount of $1,710,500 outstanding from an original issue of $2,500,000 of Woods Brothers Corp., Lincoln, Neb., engaged in the real estate business and dealing in agricultural lands and ranches in the Central West. Members of the protective committee are all investment bankers, as follows: A. Perry Osborn, New York; Charles A. Collins, Boston; J. G. Gosling, Cleveland, and IL Kenyon Pope, Chicago. The interest coupons on the above issue, due April 1 1933, Oct. 1 1933, and April 1 1934, have not been paid, according to the committee, and the company is also in default with respect to its sinking fund. "In view of the foregoing," the committee says, "it is important that the bondholders should unite promptly for the protection of their interests." . . . "Through the co-operation of the bondholders, this Committee can ask and has been assured it will obtain active representation in the company's affairs. . . ." / 2% Gold Bonds, Bondholders' Protective Committee for First Mortgage 41 Due March 1 1934, of Rock Island Arkansas & Louisiana Railway Co. (2-817), 120 Broadway, New York City. This file number (2-817) has been assigned to the registration statement of the above committee. Details of the proposed registration were announced Tuesday, April 10. [They are given under a separate heading in this issue of the "Chronicle."] Bondholders' Protective Committee of Sierra Railway Co. of California (2-818), 320 Market Street, San Francisco, calling for deposits of first mortgage 6% bonds and second mortgage 5% bonds of total amounts outstanding, $1,382,000, preparatory to a reorganization plan of the company, which operates railway service from Oakdale, Stanislaus County, Calif., through the towns of Jamestown, Sonora and Tuolumne, with a branch line running from Jamestown to Angels Camp, Calaveras County. Members of the protective committee are: D. J. Murphy, banker; S. P. Eastman and J. W. Preston Jr., capitalists, all of San Francisco. Mr. Murphy, as of March 9 1934, held $15,000 first mortgage bonds of the railroad. In announcing the reorganization plan, the Committee, in part, said: "The primary difficulties of the Sierra Railway Co. have apparently been two: a sharp decline in operating revenues (amounting to 75% from 1929 to 1932), and excessive fixed charges. . . . "Any reorganization must, of course, be so framed that an improvement In gross revenues and resulting improvement in net will flow proportionately to security holders assenting to the plan. We have been informed that an increase in gross revenues is quite possible, both from lumber traffic and traffic resulting from the Hetch Hetchy project. However, it is impracticable at the moment to estimate probable earnings, and it is therefore necessary to construct our plan upon theoretical assumptions as to these earnings." Phoenix Gold Mining Corp. (2-819), Reno, Nev., a Nevada corporation organized Dec. 13 1933, to mine metals in Nevada and California, proposing to issue 200,000 shares of common stock at $1 a share, the proceeds to be expended on mine development, purchase and installation of a mill for treatment of the ore, and in meeting payments on the property coming due before the mine reaches the productive stage, according to the registration statement. Not more than 20% commission will be paid on sales of stock. Rodney H. Davis, Seattle, Wash., is President; T. C. Magrath, of Seattle, Vice-President and Treasurer, and Wayne Hampton, Seattle, Secretary. With the issuance of the above lists the Commission said: In no case does the act of filing with the Commission give to a security Its approval or indicate that the Commission has passed on the merits of the issue, or that the registration statement itself is correct. The last previous list of registration statem.ents appeared in our April 7 issue, pages 2341-2343. Filing with Federal Trade Commission Under Securities Act of Certificates of Deposit Covering Bond Issue of Rock Island Arkansas & Louisiana RR. Co. An announcement April 10 by the Federal Trade Commission stated that certificates of deposit covering a bond issue of $14,862,000 of the Rock Island Arkansas & Louisiana RR. Co. with the Chicago Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. as guarantor, have been filed for registration with the Securities Division of the Federal Trade Commission. The • bonds are first mortgage 432% due March 1 1934, now in default. The Commission's announcement continued: The registration statement (817) was filed by a bondholders' protective committee whose members are: James G. Blaine, 120 Broadway, New York City, President of the Marine Midland Trust Co. of New York; James R. Trowbridge,8th Ave. and 42d St., New York City, President of the Franklin Savings Bank in the City of New York, and Vincent Cullen, 118 William St., New York City, President of National Surety Corp. The committee's address is 120 Broadway. Both railroads are now involved in bankruptcy proceedings in the United States Court for the Northern District of Illinois, with former Governor Prank 0. Lowden, James E. Gorman and Joseph B. Fleming, all of Chicago, named as trustees. Lines of the R. I. A.& L. were leased by the C. R. I. & P.In 1906. All stock of the R. I. A. & L. was said to be of the same class and all outstanding shares except directors' qualifying shares are said to be owned by the C. R. I. Sc P., better known as the "Rock Island." Under Section 77 of the Federal Bankruptcy Act a plan of reorganization may be adopted which, according to the company's registration statement, may include "a proposal to modify or alter the rights of creditors generally, or any class of them, secured or unsecured, either through the issuance of new securities of any character or otherwise." While no definite plan of reorganization or readjustment was presented. the committee suggests it may be advisable for the protection of the bondholders' interests "that they be organized and represented by a committee representing such bonds only in connection with the matters which are now arising and will hereafter arise in the pending proceedings and in connection with any reorganization which may be proposed therein." Outstanding stock of the C. R.I. & P.Is listed in the statement as follows: 7% preferred, $29,422,189; 6% preferred, $25,127,300, and common, $74.877,200; total (less $517,477.50 held in the treasury), $128.909,211.50. Outstanding stock of the R. I. A. & L. is listed as $1,768.000 capital stock. The Marine Midland is successor trustee under the first mortgage of R.I. A.& L.to Bankers Trust Co., New York,trustee, dated as of March 1 April 21 1934 1910,securing the bonds to be called for deposit. Depositaries are: Bankers Trust Co.. New York; The First National Bank of Chicago. Chicago, and J. Henry Schroder & Co., London, England. No depositary has other business connections with the two railroad companies except that James R. Trowbridge is a stockholder of Bankers Trust Co., and the latter company,in its individual capacity, holds a demand loan for $5,000 and interest running to a committee previously representing R. I. A. & L. RR. Co. first mortgage bonds, a part of which loan may be assumed by the issuers. Balance sheet of the R. I. A. & L. of Dec. 31 1933 shows total assets of $17,803,422.32; total liabilities of $16,264,402.47; total current liabilities of $421,572. The profit and loss statement for the year ending Dec. 31 1933 shows a deficit of $774,293.69. Amendments to Liberalize Federal Securities Act Proposed by Merchants' Association of New York— Fear of Increased Unemployment and Business Difficulties Under Present Law. Convinced that unless action is taken before adjournment of Congress to liberalize the Federal Securities Act, the country will be faced by increased unemployment and bankruptcy of going concerns unable to finance themselves under the terms of the present law, the Merchants' Association of New York has placed in the hands of Duncan U. Fletcher, Chairman of the United States Senate Committee on Banking and Currency, and Sam Rayburn, Chairman of the House Committee on Inter-State and Foreign Commerce, a memorandum suggesting immediate amendment of the Act in 21 important particulars. It is stated that the proposed amendments have been worked out by the Association with a view to redrafting the Act in such fashion that it will still accomplish its major purpose of protecting the investor and will, at the same time, remove unfair and needless restrictions whin are now interfering with the sale of the securities of sound companies. With respect to the proposals of the Association, an announcement on April 15 said: The decision was reached to ask for immediate amendment along the lines indicated after information had been brought to the Association that some companies are already experiencing difficulty in refinancing. The amendments suggested would have the effect of bringing the Act more closely in line with the British Companies Act, which many have regarded as a model of fairness to the investing public, the investment banker and the corporation in need of funds. In calling for the amendment of the Act during this session of Congress, the Association told Senator Fletcher and Representative Rayburn that the employees of the merchants and manufacturers of durable goods and their employers are the greatest sufferers under the law as it exists to-day, and that the Act is in fact more prohibitive to legitimate interests which may wish to issue securities for going concerns with long and honorable histories than it is to those who desire to use it in connection with new and untried securities interests. It was pointed out that business securities amounting to nearly $1,000,000,000 are maturing in the course of the current year and that unless they are refunded deflation will result because of the withdrawal of these funds from industry and thus retard or prevent industrial recovery. The amendments proposed by the Merchants' Association are designed generally to bring the responsibility that is placed upon directors, accountants and underwriters within the bounds of reason. It is proposed, for instance, that recovery for allegel misrepresentation should be limited to those purchasers who can prove that they relied on a registration statement or a prospectus authorized by the Issuer; that rescission actions should be limited to those against the person actually selling to the purchaser or against the issuer or other person responsible for misstatements or omissions of material facts, but only when it is shown that these misstatements or omissions adversely affected the value of the security or were an inducement to the purchaser to buy or would have materially influenced him in not buying. It is proposed that directors, officers and experts shall be liable for misstatements or omissions only if such statement or omission of a material fact is a result of fraud or lack of reasonable care or if they knowingly contravene the provisions of the Act. This amendment would bring the Act in line with the British Companies Act. For the purpose of defining reasonable investigation, the Association's memorandum proposes that the standard of reasonableness be that of a "reasonably prudent man in the conduct of his own affairs," instead of that of a "person occupying a fiduciary relationship," a definition that is regarded as vague and varies in different jurisdictions. It is also proposed that, in this connection, the exact language of Section 372 of the English Companies Act be adopted. It is also proposed that damages arising under Section 12 shall be limited to those which are a direct consequence of a material untruthful statement. Another very important change would make it possible for the original underwriter to obtain firm commitments from other underwriters before the lapse of 20 days, since at the present time it is impossible for a corporation to know whether its securities will be firmly underwritten at the time of filing registration statement. The operation of the present law in this particular has been found in practice to be a serious deterrent to new financing. In the Association's memorandum many other sections of the Act are analyzed and proposals made for changes which, in the judgment of those who have studied the operation of the Act, will make it fairer and more workable and will not detract materially from its main purpose. Modification of Securities Act Likely—Representative Bacon Introduces Amendment to Liberalize Penalty Provisions—Finds Long Time Capital Market Dried Up—Durable Goods Industry Board Urges Amendment. President Roosevelt's advisers were reported on April 19 as going ahead with the consideration of amendments to the Securities Act of 1933, these to be in the forms of a companion measure to the Stock Exchange control bill. In Volume 138 Financial Chronicle reporting this in a Washington dispatch, April 19, the New York "Times" said: Pending financial legislation, including the Stock Exchange bill and the possible amendments to the Securities Act, was discussed to-day in a 15-minute conference of President Roosevelt and Winthrop W. Aldrich and J. H. Perkins, Board Chairmen of the Chase National Bank and the National City Bank of New York. The bankers said afterward that the general financial situation had been discussed. "We gave the President our views on the subject and he listened," Mr. Perkins said. The same dispatch had the following to say, in part: It is thought virtually certain now that some modifications will be made, and some Congress members who advocate placing Stock Exchange control under a new commission of five rather than the Federal Trade Commission appear satisfied that if such a course is followed administration of the Securities Act will be put under the same new agency. There are reports that the President feels that the two should fall under one commission, whether a new or old one. One group is said to have suggested the introduction of an entirely rewritten Securities Act rather than a bill containing amendments, but Congressmen working with the Administration expressed belief that if any such effort were made it would prove futile. They doubted that even the sharpest opponents of the Securities Act would attempt such a manoeuvre. No new bill has been presented, and the Identity of any group advocating such a course could not be learned. On April 18 Representative Bacon fRep., N. Y.) introduced an amendment in the House to the Securities Act liberalizing Its civil penalty provisions, alleging, it is stated, that the Act is so drastic that it has "completely dried up the longtime capital market." Advices to this effect were contained In a Washington dispatch, April 18, to the New York "Journal of Commerce," in which it was further stated: The changes proposed, which are in line with similar amendments offered In the Senate last week by Senator Hastings (Rep., Del.), followed a plea to Congress by the New York Legislature that the liability provisions be eliminated in order that business might be restored to a "stable and economically sound normalcy." Wants to Thaw Market. "I believe that the law should be modified to prevent the freezing of long-time capital markets," Mr. Bacon declared, "but at the same time continue to provide ample protection for the investing public." He called attention to a resolution adopted last week by the New York Legislature urging liberalization of the law and pointed out that although the lower House is Democratic and the upper House Republican, the measure had been approved unanimously. The resolution was read in the House by Mr. Bacon and presented to the Senate at the same time by Senator Copeland (Dem., N. Y.). Economists Are Cited. The measure asserted that it was the judgment of eminent economists and practical business executives that business recovery is retarded by the inability of manufacturing and commercial establishments to obtain operating capital, and it is "conceded that the operation of the Federal Securities Act of 1933 has interfered with the orderly recovery of business." Commercial executives, it was added, have in the main co-operated sincerely with the National Government in an effort to relieve suffering, but the inability of business to obtain capital has "aggravated the deplorable unemployment situation." It was urged that Congress amend the Securities Act by "eliminating all of its civil liability provisions to the end that business, by being permitted to finance itself, may thereby be in a position to finance employment when the ability of the Government so to do is exhausted." Senator Hastings's bill was referred to in our issue of April 7, page 2340, and reference to the resolution of the New York Legislature urging amendment of the Securities Act appeared in our issue of April 14, page 2506. Under date of April 12, United Press advices from Washington to the New York "Herald Tribune" said: The recovery program gradually is forcing nationalization of productive wealth in the United States, the Durable Goods Industries Committee, formed under NRA auspices, declared to-day in a resolution demanding immediate amendment of the 1933 Securities Act. Unless the Act is amended to remove "impossible liabilities and penalties" from American business men and bankers, recovery must be merely temporary, the Committee said in a broadside which complained also that the proposed Stock Exchange Control Act "has threatened serious interference to recovery." Tax Bill Sent to Conference—Senate Measure Provided Additional Annual Revenues of $481,000,000, Against $261,000,000 in House Bill—Tax on Cocoanut Oil May Draw Presidential Veto—Senate Voted Publicity for Income Tax Returns—Amendment for Taxation of Tax-Exempt Securities Withdrawn. The general tax revision bill was referred to a conference committee of Representatives and Senators April 17, in an effort to adjust major differences in the.measure as passed by the Senate April 13, and the bill passed by the House on Feb. 21. A reference to the bill as adopted by the House appeared in our issue of Feb. 24, page 1329. One of the controversial features in the bill is the levy on Philippine cocoanut oil, written in despite President Roosevelt's outspoken opposition. The House voted a tax of 5c. a pound and the Senate changed the rate to 3c. It was rumored this week that the President might veto the bill if it is finally passed by Congress with the cocoanut oil tax included. 2675 Passage of the tax bill by the Senate was noted in our issue of April 14, pages 2504-05. The Senate bill carries a total annual estimated additional revenue of $481,000,000, as compared with $261,000,000 provided for in the House bill. One feature inserted by the Senate was a provision that income tax returns in the future shall be open to public inspection. This "publicity" amendment was offered by Senator LaFollette and was adopted by the Senate on April 13 by a vote of 41 to 34. It provides that income tax returns shall be public records, and whenever a return is made available for inspection, under regulations promulgated by the Secretary of the Treasury and the President, any person may be furnished with a certified copy after payment of a "reasonable" fee, to be fixed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. According to Washington advices, April 13, to the New York "Times" the Senate was spared a vote on another perennial controversial matter of taxation when Senator Clark withdrew his amendment providing for taxation of income from heretofore tax-exempt securities. From the same dispatch we also quote: a The Missouri Senator withdrew his amendment after the Senate, by maintaining vote of 38 to 27, adopted an amendment by Senator McKellar bonds. the exemption from taxation of income from State and municipal "That action so emasculated my amendment that it will be of no avail," Senator Clark said. Income Levies Sharply Raised. $82,000,000 be In its revision of the measure, the Senate directed that permanent added to the income tax yield for next year, $27,000,000 by addition changes in the rates and structure, and $55,000,000 by a flat 10% structo the taxes returnable next March 15. The change in the permanent partially ture would serve to increase heavily the taxes on dividends and individuals. on surtaxes tax-exempt securities by substantial increases in the The Senate voted that $102,000,000 a year be added to the inheritance to taxes by an addition of $95,000,000 to the estate tax and $7,000,000 its companion, the gift tax. Under the former, the maximum levy was raised to 60% on that part of any estate above $10,000,000. The tax would be imposed, as under present law, according to the value of the estate at the time of death. All property which was held by any deceased person, corporate stocks, securities, business interest or whatever the the assets, would be appraised as of the date of death and included in after "gross estate." The tax would be applied only to the "net" estate, numerous statutory deductions were allowed. The Senate, as well as the House, refrained from attacking the present depreciation allowances under the promise of the Treasury so to tighten up its administration as to add $85,000,000 a year to the revenue from this source. The Senate voted that $30,000,000 more should come from capital gains and losses. The House bill was calculated to increase this yield by $35,000,000. The Senate agreed with the House that personal holding companies, or "incorporated pocketbooks," should bear a surtax of upward of 30%, but changed the rates and brackets so as to reduce the expected yield from $25,000,000, as in the House bill, to $20,000,000. Another major change of the Senate bill was to eliminate entirely the privilege of corporations to file consolidated returns for subsidiaries and affiliates. The House had voted to raise the penalty on this form of return from 1% to 2%. The Senate action was calculated to squeeze $35,000,000 more out of the corporation tax, whereas the House sought $20,000,000 more. The Senate voted a total increase in taxes of around $502,000,000, but certain deletions either from the House bill or from the present law brought the net new yield to an estimate of $481,000,000. Excise Taxes Amended. Just before the final vote the Senate struck from the present law the manufacturers' excise tax on candy. It also amended the fur excise to exempt all fur articles sold by the manufacturer for less than $75 and jewelry items sold for less than $25. It struck about $12,000,000 from the bill by providing, according to an amendment adopted Wednesday (April 111, that the proceeds from the fats and oil tax, voted over President Roosevelt's protest, should go largely to the treasury of the Philippine Islands, from the products of which it will be collected. In one of its final actions on the bill, the Senate reduced the stamp tax on sales of commodities on exchanges and boards of trade for future deliveries from 5e. per $100 value to the old level of lc. per $100. The Senate also thwarted by the overwhelming vote of 58 to 19 an attempt of Senator Hastings to reconsider the action by which it had stricken out the privilege of consolidated returns. The main section of the LaFollette income tax return publicity amendment adopted April 13 by the Senate was given as follows in Associated Press advices from Washington that day: Returns made under this title upon which the tax has been determined by the commissioner shall constitute public records and shall be open to public examination and inspection under rules and regulations promulgated by the Secretary (of the Treasury) and approved by the President. Whenever a return is open to the inspection of any person a certified copy thereof shall, upon request, be furnished to any person under rules and regulations prescribed by the commissioner, with the approval of the Secretary. The commissioner may prescribe a reasonable fee for furnishing such copy. The 53 votes registered by the Senate in favor of the bill were cast by 38 Democrats, 14 Republicans and one FarmerLaborite; the seven votes in opposition to the adoption of the bill were, as we indicated in our issue of a week ago, cast by Republicans. The Democrats have voted solidly for the bill. A Washington dispatch, April 13, to the New York "Herald Tribune" gave the following summary, which compares 2676 Financial Chronicle provisions of the tax bill as passed by the Senate with the bill previously passed by the House and with the present law: PERSONAL INCOME TAXES. Senate Bill. Normal tax: 4%. Exemptions, $2,500 for married persons; $1,000 for single persons; $400 for each dependent. Earned income deduction to 10% upon income up to $20,000, the first $3,000 of which is assumed to be "earned" while the remainder must be proved as "earned." Surtax: Beginning with 5% on net incomes of between $4,000 and $6,000, graduating upward to 59% on net incomes in excess of $1,000,000. Exemptions and credits for dependents allowable the same as against normal taxes. Supertax: Senator Couzens's amendment for 10% addition to income taxes on 1934 income. House Bill. Normal tax: Same as Senate bill with exception that amount that may be classed as "earned income" may not exceed $8,000. Surtax: Beginning with 4% on net incomes of between $4,000 and $8,000, graduating upward in slightly different brackets from Senate bill to the same maximum of 50% on incomes in excess of $1,000,000. Exempttions and credits for dependents allowable against surtax the same as against normal taxes as provided also in Senate bill. Present Law. Normal tax: 4% on first $4,000 of net income, plus 8% on balance over $4,000. Exemptions: Same as in Senate and House bills. No credit for "earned income." Surtax: Beginning with 1% on net incomes of more than $6,000 and extends upward to 55% on net incomes of more than $1,000,000. ESTATE AND GIFT TAXES. Senate Bill. Estate tax: Begins at 1% on net estates not in excess of $20,000, rising to 60% upon net estates in excess of $10,000,000. Exempts first $40,000 of any estate. No credits under this schedule for estate taxes paid to the States. Gift tax: Beginning at % of 1% on net gifts not in excess of $20,000, graduating upward the same as proposed for estate tax. House Bill. No change from present law. Present Law. Estate Tax: One schedule ranging from 1% on the first $50,000 of net estate to 20% on the net estate in excess of $10,000,000 against which a credit of 80% is allowed for estate taxes paid to the States and which carries an exemption of $100,000. Another schedule, called the "super estate tax," with rates running from 1% on the first $10,000 of new estate to 45% on that part of the net estate above $10,000,000, on which no credit is allowed for State taxes and which carries an exemption of $50,000. CAPITAL STOCK TAX. Senate Bill. A tax of 1/10 of 1% of the adjusted declared value of the capital stock of each corporation. An excess profits tax of 5% on the earnings in excess of 12%% of the "declared" value of such stock. House Bill. No change from existing law. Present Law. Capital stock tax expires June 30 1934. Excess profits tax repealed by Presidential proclamation of the Eighteenth Amendment as of Dee. 31 1933. SURTAX ON PERSONAL HOLDING COMPANIES. Senate Bill. A special surtax of 30% on the first $100,000 of undistributed adjusted net income of personal holding companies plus 40% on all over that amount. Personal holding company defined as any corporation 80% of whose gross income is derived from royalties, dividends, interest, annuities and gains from sale of securities and more than 50% of whose outstanding voting stock is owned by not more than five persons. Exempts part of income from rent, also allows a "reasonable" reserve for debt liquidation. House Bill. Imposes flat rate of 35% on all undistributed adjusted net income of personal holding companies. Exempts no part of such income from the tax. Present Law. No provisions for special tax on personal holding companies. CAPITAL GAINS AND LOSSES. Senate Bill. Losses: Allows deductions from taxable income of capital losses only to the extent of similar gains, with the exception that $2,000 of any excess loss may be charged off from ordinary income. Gains: Measures for tax purposes 100% of the gain on capital assets if the asset is held for less than one year, 80% if held from one to two years; 60% if held from two to five years; 40% if held from five to 10 years; 30% if held for more than 10 years. House Bill. Losses: Limits deductions for losses on capital assets strictly to gains in similar transactions for the same taxable year. Gains: Measurement for taxation same as Senate bill, with exception that the last bracket-30% if gain is held for more than 10 years—ia not included. Present Law. Special treatment for gains and losses on capital assets held for more than two years, providing a limitation of taxes of gains of 12%% with a corresponding limitation on the amount of deductible losses. In the case of capital assets held for less than two years, the gains realized thereon are tated in full and the losses allowed in full except that in the case of stocks and bonds losses are deductible only to the extent of gains in similar transactions. April 21 1934 CORPORATE CONSOLIDATED RETURNS. Senate Bill. Prohibits consolidated returns for subsidiaries and affiliates. House Bill. Imposes a 2% penalty tax. Present Law. Imposes 1% additional tax on corporations filing consolidated returns. EXCISE TAXES. Senate Bill. Repeals tax on soft drinks, clocks and furs selling for less than $20; increases tax on colored stem wooden matches from 2 to 5c. per 1,000. Imposes "processing tax" of Sc. a pound on cocoanut oil, copra and other vegetable and fish oils. House Bill. Leaves intact excise list as carried in present law; imposes processing tax of 5c. a pound on cocoanut oil and copra and sesame oil and sesame seed. BANK CHECK ACT. Senate Bill. Deletes provision of House bill repealing 2c. bank check tax as of Jan. 1 1935, which, under present law, would expire on July 1 1935. DEPRECIATION AND DEPLETION ALLOWANCES. Both bills continue provision of present law under promise of Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau so to improve administration of these provisions as to add $85,000,900 to the annual revenue. EXCHANGE AND REORGANIZATIONS. Both bills limit the charge-offs on account of exchanges and corporate reorganizations in a manner to add directly or indirectly $10,000,000 to the revenue. ADDITIONAL TREASURY PERSONNEL. Both bills provide for creation in the Treasury Department of the office of General Counsel to be appointed by the President with confirmation of the Senate at $10,000 a year. Both bills direct the appointment of six assistants to the General Counsel; the House bill provides for appointment by the Secretary, but the Senate bill specifies appointment by the President with confirmation by the Senate. Salaries, $10,000 a year each. Both bills also authorize appointment of assistants to the Secretary to handle the $2,000,000,000 stabilization fund; the House bill for selection by the Secretary and the Senate bill for appointment by the President with Senate affirmation. Salaries, $10,000 a year each. Increased Taxation Provided in Senate and House Bills Over Present Taxes. Increases over the present law in the yield of the Senate and House tax bills were estimated by L. H. Parker, Chiefof-Staff of the Joint Congressional Committee on Internal Revenue Taxation, as follows: Item— Senate Bat. Capital stock tax $95,000,000 Increase in estate taxes 95.'00(4 043° 0 Increase in gift tax Changes in income tax structure 27 7:000 001 00 Couzen's 10% increase for 1934 55,000,000 Administration of depreciation allowances (not in bill, but promised by Treasury) 85,000,000 Capital gains and losses 30,000,000 Personal holdings companies 20,000,000 Exchanges and reorganizations 10,000,000 Consolidated returns (Borah amendment) 35,000.000 Partnerships 5,000,000 Administrative changesin gasoline and lubricating oil tax Miscellaneous provisions 2 10 8:M:000 Dividends out of pre-March 1913 earnings Foreign tax credits Gross total House BM. $28,000,000 85,000,000 35,000,000 25,000,000 10,000,000 20,000,000 5,000,000 2 240:001:0 001 8.000,000 6.000.000 5502,000,000 8263.000,000 Deductions. A. Allocation of fats and oil tax to 512.000,000 Philippine Treasury B. Deletion of candy tax 3,000,000 C. Amendment of fur tax 4,000.000 D. Amendment of Jewelry tax 2,000,000 Total deductions Net total $21,000,000 5481,000,000 8263,000,000 Sugar Control Bill Goes to Conference Committee After Approval by Senate—All Proposed Amendments to Measure Defeated. The sugar control and allotment bill was sent to a conference committee of the House and Senate yesterday (April 20) in order to adjust minor differences in the measure as passed by the House and that approved by the Senate. The House passed the bill April 4, as noted in our issue of April 7, page 2347. It was approved by the Senate April 19 by a vote of 49 to 18. The bill guarantees domestic beet sugar growers an annual quota of 1,550,000 tons, while Florida and Louisiana cane growers are assigned a quota of 260,000 tons. The measure authorizes Secretary of Agriculture Wallace to fix the amount of sugar that may be imported each year from Cuba, Puerto Rico, Hawaii and the Philippines. Both sugar beet and sugar cane are made basic agricultural commodities under the Agricultural Adjustment Act by the terms of the bill. Senate action before approving the bill April 19 was described as follows in a Washington dispatch of that date to the New York "Herald Tribune": The Senate voted down a series of amendments designed to fix the quotas of sugar to enter the United States from Puerto Rico and Hawaii, and the debate provoked a flare-up on child labor. Volume 138 Financial Chronicle Senator Robert F. Wagner, Democrat, of New York, brought the Senators from sugar-producing States up in protest when he suggested that reports on labor conditions showed that children were forced to work long hours in the beet fields and were kept from school to do the job. When Senator Wagner read that they were compelled to work sixteen hours a day Senator William E.Borah,insurgent Republican, of Idaho, denounced the report as "a slander." Senator Wagner fought for the language of the House sugar bill providing that all agreements authorized by the act "may contain provisions which will eliminate child labor and fix minimum .wages for workers." The Senate Finance Committee had changed it to read: "May contain provisions which will limit or regulate child labor." Minimum Wage Called Outrageous. After an argument in which Senator Arthur H. Vandenberg, Republican, of Michigan, said that the farmers would be unable to get the money for the minimum wage, and Senator Daniel 0, Hastings, Republican, of Delaware, said the attempt to fix the wages a farmer would pay was "an outrageous thing," Senator Wagner withdrew his amendment. The Senate Finance Committee amendment then was adopted. . . Senators Royal S. Copeland, Democrat, of New York, and David A. Reed, Republican, of Pennsylvania, sought to fix the allotment for Puerto Rico, to be left by the bill to the judgment of the Secretary of Agriudture. at 850,000 tons annually. Others failed in attempts to fix the Hawaiian allotment between 850,000 and 975,000 tons. Congress Adopts Conference Report on Bankhead Cotton Control Bill. Congressional action on the Bankhead Cotton Control bill was completed on April 17, when the House by a vote of 235 to 105 adopted the conference report on the bill. The Senate adopted the report on April 14 by a vote of 39 to 28. Associated Press accounts stated that the Senate gave its approval despite a prediction from Senator Bailey of North Carolina that it would lead to "a political revolution." Three Republican Senators joined with 36 Democrats to send the conference report to the House. Six Democratic Senators cast their ballots against the bill. The measure, which is described as the nation's first Federal compulsory production control Act would force farmers to keep cotton production in the coming crop year at 10,000,000 bales. On April 17 Associated Press advices from Washington said: It is a new venture in economic planning and becomes effective upon the President's signature. It may be extended a second year through Presidential proclamation if two-thirds of the farmers favor it. The measure imposes a tax of half the current market price, or not less than 5 cents a pound. on all cotton produced in excess of 10,000.000 bales. It is designed to aid the Farm Administration in its voluntary cotton production reduction program. In the brief debate it was charged by opponents led by Representative Jeff Busby, Democrat, of Mississippi,that it meant an "irretrievable surrender" of the rights of farmers to control their own production. With few exceptions the bill went to the President as the House originally passed it, the Senate having receded on its controversial proposal to exempt the first six bales from the so% tax imposed on production in excess of quotas. President Roosevelt recommended the bill in principle in a letter to Chairman Jones when the Agriculture Committee was considering it. The measure was initiated by the Bankhead brothers, of Alabama— Senator and Representative—after a poll of cotton farmers showed that about 95% favored the plan. Its advocates claim it will aid the voluntary reduction program,stimulate prices and whittle down the large annual carry-over of recent years. Long staple cotton is exempted in States in which production has-not exceeded 250,000 bales in any one year in the last five years. With the adoption of the conference report by the Senate on April 14 the Associated Press said: Final Senate debate centred on the action of the conferees in striking out a Senate amendment to base quotas on the average production for the last ten instead of five years. There was no discussion of the elimination of the Senate's amendment exempting six bales on each farm from limitation. Senator Thomas launched the fight on the five-year plan, saying it reduced Oklahoma's quota by 20% and amounted to an annual tax of $4,200.000 on the State. Chairman Smith of the Agriculture Committee said the five-year plan would limit the Eastern States more severely than Oklahoma. Senator Gore said Argentine producers already were being urged to Increase their cotton and warned that once the foreign market was lost it would be almost impossible to regain it. Senator Bailey said the five-year base would harm North Carolina and aid Alabama, the home of the Bankhead brothers and authors of the bill— Senator Bankhead and Representative Bankhead. He recalled President Roosevelt's campaign promises to the "forgotten man" and said the bill would harm the small producer. An item regarding the conference report appeared in our Issue of April 14, page 2509. 200 Members of Congress Greet President Roosevelt at Station as Executive Returns to Washington from Vacation—Warns Representatives He Is a "Tough Guy."' President Roosevelt, returning to Washington, April 13, after a vacation spent in Southern waters on the yacht Nourmahal, was met at the Union Station by more than 200 members of Congress, headed by the United States Marine Band. In an impromptu speech at the railroad station the President said that he had learned "all sorts of new lessons" from barracuda and sharks, and warned his hearers that he was "a tough guy." The President's speech to the members of Congress who greeted him was as follows: I am very glad to see you all, and it was mighty good of you to come down here. I can't be truthful and say that I am glad to be back, because I am awfully sorry to be back. 2677 But while I have been having a wonderful time, I gather also that both houses of Congress have also been having a wonderful time in my absence. And, furthermore, I expected on this trip to get some good publicity about the fish I was catching, but you couldn't get any publicity in view of the fact that here in Washington apparently you good people have been going from Wirt to Wirt. The newspaper boys coming up on the train have been trying to make me say that I hope Congress would go home very soon. I can't say it, because I hope you will stay just as long as you like to. For you younger people in both houses, speaking from the experience of many years in Washington, I want to point out to you the advantages of the Washington climate in July and August. It rarely gets over 110 here. There is no humidity and I don't mind if I stay here all summer. Well, anyway, I wish you had the chance that I had to get away for two weeks. It has been a wonderful holiday, and I come back with all sorts of new lessons which I have learned from barracuda and sharks. I am a tough guy I So, if you will come down and see me as often and as soon as you possibly can I will teach you some of the stunts I learned. Anyway, many thanks, and I will see you all very soon. United Press Washington advices, April 13, described the President's arrival in the capital in part as follows: Administration Congressional leaders interpreted the speech as a plea for early adjournment of Congress and indicated to-day they would meet at the White House this week-end to discuss hasty conclusion of the session. There was a moment before the parade started when it seemed possible that the affair might turn into a fight instead of a frolic. "Who the hell do they think they are?" demanded Representative Cannon (D., Wis.), in a last-minute statement. He was talking about members of the United States Senate, and he explained himself as follows: "As a member of the House I am incensed at news articles which stated that Senators said it was beneath their dignity to march behind a brass band. "While it is barely possible their presence with members of the House would not subtract, I am sure it would not add to the 'occasion. Some of the Senators should be following a plow instead of a brass band." Only four Republicans were counted—Representatives Welch (Calif.), Lambertson (Kan.) and Senators La Follette (Wis.) and Nye (N. D.). Leading the marchers was Speaker of the House Rainey, wearing a flowing black tie and a large pink carnation in his lapel. Mrs. Isabella Greenway (D., Ariz.), who broke with the Administration on the veterans' compensation issue, paraded beside Mrs. Virginia Jenckes (D., Ind.). Representative Dickinson (D., Mo.), the oldest member of Congress, an 85-year-old Civil War veteran, marched •proudly along, swinging a cane. Speaker Railey, House Majority Leader Byrne and Representatives Cullen (D., N. Y.), and Sabath (D., Ill.) led the marchers through the station and to a lower level. The bank played "The Star-Spangled Banner," "Swanee River" and "Dixie." Almost lost in the Congressional throng were several Cabinet members. They wouldn't parade, either, but arrived in limousines. President Roosevelt Opposed to Farm Mortgage Bill Which Would Authorize Issuance of $2,500,000,000 in New Currency. President Roosevelt would veto the Frazier-Lemke bill to refinance farm mortgages through the issuance of about $2,500,000,000 in new currency, if the measure passed Congress, Speaker Rainey said April 10. The bill is still under consideration by the House Agriculture Committee, despite the efforts of its sponsors to secure the 145 signatures necessary to force a House vote on the legislation. Thirietal of signers to a petition to bring the measure on to the floor at one time reached 139, but later several of the signers withdrew their names, leaving only 131 names on the petition. Associated Press advices from Washington April 10 quoted the co-author of the bill as follows: Representative Lemke (Rep.), of North Dakota. co-author of the declared that until he himself had official notice that the President would not approve the,measure he was unwilling to be guided by Mr. Rainey's announcement. Mr. Lemke, who is also the author of a petition to force the bill out of the Agriculture Committee for House consideration. said: "The Governor of New York and candidate for President certainly gave assurances of his intention to help the farmers. I am not willing to take anybody's word but his own for it that he will not live up to his promises. "We are going ahead and expect no difficulty In getting the necessary 145 signatures on the petition, which now has 133." Opponents of the measure say $7,000,000.000 or $8,000,000,000 would be needed and that it would result in too broad a currency Inflation and other undesirable effects. President Roosevelt Recommends Congressional Commission to Study Aviation—Senate Considers Administration's Air Mail Bill—Suit Against Postmaster-General Farley for Contract Cancellations Brought by Aviation Companies. President Roosevelt on April 16 suggested to Congressional leaders that Congress might authorize the appointment of a commission "to make immediate study and recommend to the next Congress a broad policy covering all phases of aviation and the relationship of Government thereto." On the followingsday (April 17) the Senate began consideration of the airmail bill sponsored by Senator, McKellar and indicated that the measure- might be amended to meet the views of the President. Secretary of War Dern on April 17 instructed the members of a committee inquiring into the efficiency of the Army Air Corps to restrict their deliberations to.the defense functions of the War Department. 2678 Financial Chronicle A White House statement issued April 16 reads as follows: In conversation with Senators McKellar and Black and Congressman Mead, the President suggested that in connection with pending aviation legislation it should be borne in mind that the United States has had no broad aviation policy: that a large number of inter-related factors enter into the general subjects of civilian and military flying and their subdivisions into material, personnel, manufacturing and experimentation. That in view of the lack of and the need for a national policy the Congress might well authorize the appointment of a commission to make immediate study and recommend to the next Congress a broad policy covering all phases of aviation and the relationship of Government thereto. In so far as that part of aviation which relates to carrying United States malls is concerned, contracts could well be let on competitive bidding for one year or until such time as a broad policy relating to aviation as a whole is adopted. United Press Washington adives April 17 outlined recent. developments in the aviation situation in part as follows: Four operating divisions of United Airlines to-day started legal action against Postmaster-General James A. Farley to compel restoration of their air-mail contracts. The companies also seek to recover damages from Mr. Farley personally for all losses resulting from his cancellation order of Feb. 9. Complaints in the suits were delivered to the Solicitor of the Post Office Department late to-day. "The bills of complaint charge that Mr. Farley arbitrarily and in a manmer contrary to law canceled the air-mail contracts of these companies without giving them any notice or any opportunity to present the true facts," a United statement said. Companies filing the action are Boeing Air Transport, National Air Transport, Pacific Air Transport and Varney Air Lines—major operating lines of the United system, which extends from coast to coast. Announcement of the suit came shortly after the Administration air-mall bill. embracing President Roosevelt's new plan for a commission of experts to develop a unified Federal aviation policy, was placed before the Senate. It met immediate opposition which promises to develop into long and bitter debate. Other air mail developments to-day were: 1. The Aeronautical Chamber of Commerce indorsed the Roosevelt commission plan. 2. A special civilian and military board headed by Newton D. Baker opened its investigation of the Army Air Corps. 3. The Post Office Department proceeded with plans to open bids of temporary air-mail contracts Friday. 4. Chairman Hugo L. Black announced the Senate air-mail investigating committee would not inquire into questinoning of Col.Charles A.Lindbergh by Justice Department officials last month. 5. The Committee heard testimony that Century Air Lines in 1931 enlisted the "friendly co-operation" of Mark L. Bogus, California Republican National Committeeman and close friend of former President Hoover, in an effort to obtain contracts. In the Senate to-day consideration of the Administration air-mail bill was ordered by a vote of 48 to 25 despite protem of many Republicans and several Democrats that the Administration was trying to "force it down our throats." Then after Chairman Kenneth McKellar (Dem., Tenn.) of the Post Office Committee, has spent most of the afternoon explaining the measure, the Senate decided it would take up the sugar control bill to-morrow and dispose of that before going back to air mail. Reviewing testimony before his committee, Mr. McKellar said "Col. Charles Lindbergh had a complaint about cancellation of contracts, but otherwise his testimony was favorable to the bill." He said many other famous fliers had supported the measures. President Roosevelt Outlines Legislative Program to Congressional Leaders with View to Early Adjournment—Reported Opposed to Silver Measures— Seeks Relief Appropriation, Stock Market Bill, Amendments to Securities Act—Silver Senators to Confer at White House To-day. President Roosevelt, after conferences April 14 and 15 with Congressional leaders and with Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau, Manned a tentative schedule of legislation which he wishes enacted during the current session of Congress. According to newspaper dispatches from Washington, the President is anxious that Congress adjourn around May 15. He was said to desire a legislative program which would include an appropriation of approximately $1,500,000,000 to enable the continuance of the Administration's relief program, a stock exchange regulation bill, and amendment of some of the more controversial sections of the Securities Act of 1933. The President was said to have told the Senate and House leaders that he was against any further monetary or inflationary measures at this time, and that he would not look favorably upon bills designed to re-monetize silver or in other ways further tamper with the currency. Speaker Rainey said April 16 that the President is opposed to pending silver legislation at this session. A number of Senators who advocate such legislation, however, made an appointment to discuss the silver situation with the President at the White House April 19, but this conference was postponed, and it was planned instead to hold it at noon to-day (April 21). The President on April 14 talked with a number of Senate leaders about the general legislative program. At the close of this 'meeting the following statement was, given out at the White House: The President and the Senators held an interesting, informal meeting this afternoon which covered a discussion of almost all legislation now pending before the Senate. Definite progress was made in outlining the more important measures which it is expected will be disposed of during the balance of the session, such as the tariff bill, the revenue bill, monetary April 21 1934 legislation, Federal deposit insurance bill, municipal bankrupcty bill, stock exchange bill and a number of others. The conference this afternoon was of definite value in shaping the program for the remaining sessions of the Congress. The President will have a similar talk with members of the House tomorrow night. The White House conference on April 15 was attended by leaders of the House. A Washington dispatch of that date to the New York "Times" said in part: No White House statement was issued after the conference. The President told the conferees that he expected to send to Congress within a few days estimates for a blanket relief bill providing enough money to care for the Government's relief program until the next Congress came into session. The appropriation will be divided among various activities such as public works, direct Federal relief and aid to States and other political subdivisions in carrying out their own relief programs. Mr Roosevelt will ask, however, that the bill be extremely flexible, so that the money may be applied to any contingency. This is exactly in line with the budget message read in the early days of Congress; in which President Roosevelt anticipated a request for appropriations approximating $2,000,000,000, part of them already voted to handle the relief and recovery program for the fiscal year beginning July 1. Silver legislation was also mentioned at the conference, but apparently nothing definite in that direction was arrived at and it seemed to be the opinion that this legislation still belonged in the doubtful class. The Wagner Labor Bill was not mentioned at the conference. The President, it was said, was in the best of humor, but was very positive in making clear his desires as to the course Congress should take in the next four or five weeks. The men with whom he conferred are for the most part the "key men" of his forces in the House. Against a Monetary Authority. Secretary Morgenthau, who sat in at the conference, told newspaper men that every controversial matter had been discussed and some very concrete decisions reached, but he would not say what they were. It was learned, however, that the President had stepped very hard on measures now pending in Congress to set up a central authority to handle all monetary matters. He took this action, presumably, to head off agitation for silver legislation of an inflationary nature. Comments regarding the silver,situation and other legislative plans were noted as follows in a Washington dispatch April 16 to the New York "Herald Tribune": Speaker Rainey said he expected the President to request appropriations of about 82.200,000.000, of which $1,600.000.000 would be for public works. $300.000,000 for continuation of the Civilian Conservation Corns and $300.000,000 for the emergency work relief system which has supplanted the CWA. These appropriations are to be carried in a forthcoming deficiency bill. With respect to the President's desire for a stock market bill with "teeth' in it. Speaker Rainey remarked that "he wanted to have margin requirements stipulated in the measure." This was not interpreted, however, as meaning that the President would insist on the stringent margin provisions written into the bill as originally submitted. Rather, it was taken to mean that the President might be willing to accept a reduction in the margins stipulated, provided the bill contained explicit margin requirements. Discussing the Administration attitude toward silver legislation, the Speaker indicated that the President was opposed to action pending a complete test of the silver-purchasing plan. He gave the impression that he expected the President to veto the Dies bill, which was recently passed by the House and is being greatly expanded in the Senate, if finally passed. This measure was not a remonetization bill in the strict sense of the word. as it passed the House. In that form it provided merely for acceptance at a premium of silver in payment for farm products sold abroad, the metal so received to be used as a base for issuance of silver certificates. The Senate silver bloc is planning to use it, however, as a vehicle for carrying some of its proposals in the form of amendments. "President Roosevelt is just as much for silver as I am," said Speaker Rainey. "He questions, however, the advisability of going ahead with legislation just now without first letting his present silver-purchase plan work out." This is the plan, he pointed out, whereby, under an agreement reached by the London Economic Conference, the five silver-producing nations, the United States, Canada, Spain, Peru and Mexico, undertook to utilize all newly mined silver in coinage. All of these nations except Mexico have approved the arrangement. Mr. Rainey said, and Mexican concurrence Is expected soon. The plan further provides for an effort to Induce the sixty nations using silver to extend that use to their subsidiary coinage. On April 19 a "Times" Washington dispatch stated that President Roosevelt,according to Democratic Senate leaders, has induced the active members of the silver bloc to foster, instead of mandatory action by Congress, legislation conferring upon him optional powers over remonetization. In part the dispatch added: President's Opposition Reiterated. President Roosevelt's opposition to the Dies-Thomas bill, with its mandatory feature, was reiterated during the day. Its advocates were told that the President, supported by the Secretary of the Treasury and Eugene R. Black, Governor of the Federal Reserve Board, was prepared to reject the pending bill and, while favoring remonetization of silver at the proper time, would exert his influence against any compulsory action. Following the postponement of the conference and the word from the President that his attitude had not changed,some of the leaders in informal conferences agreed to revise the bill. Federal Power Commission to Investigate Electricity Rates Under Joint Congressional Resolution Signed by President Roosevelt—Privately and Publicly Owned Plants to Furnish Information. A nation-wide investigation of electric power rates will be conducted by the Federal Power Commission as a result of passage by Congress of a joint resolution directing the inquiry and providing funds for the survey. The resolution, which passed the Senate on Feb. 20, was approved by the House on April 4 without a record vote. President Roosevelt signed the resolution on April 14. Senator Norris of Volume 138 Financial Chronicle Nebraska and Representative Rankin of Mississippi (sponsors for the resolution) were present at its signing. The President used two pens, one being given to each. Representative Rankin issued a statement in which he said: This is the first measure of its kind ever passed in this country. Its effect will be far-reaching. In my opinion. it will do more to bring Justice to the consumers of electric energy than any other steno yet taken, with the exception of the passage of the Muscle Shoals 13111. I predict that the publicity it will give and the discriminations and excessive rates it will reveal will result in a reduction in the costs of lights and power to the ultimate consumers of this country of not less than $50,000.0O3 a year to begin with. It may reach many times that amount. The resolution specifies the need of "accurate and comprehensive information regarding the rates charged for electrical energy and its service to residential, commercial and industrial consumers throughout the United States." The Federal Power Commission will obtain data, from both privately and publicly owned plants. A Washington dispatch April 4 to the New York "Times" described the House debate prior to passage of the resolution as follows: In a brief debate preceding the House vote Representative Rankin of Mississippi, who championed the resolution, said what was sought was not so much an "investigation" as"a compilation of rates which we should have on hand." The Tennessee Valley Authority and several State utility commission want the rate investigation, Mr. Rankin told the House. "The Edison Power Institute gives rates in various cities of several States," he added,"but there is no comprehensive information available." Representative Bakewell of Connecticut asked what use the data would be to Congress. "We should know why rates in one city are three times larger than those in another," replied Mr. Rankin. "After all, we keep statistics on other vital problems. We whould have them on this." "In the case of the public utilities investigated," asked Mr. Bakewell, "are you going to find out what their true costs are and how much they have saved by not paying taxes?" Mr. Rankin replied in the affirmative. The following is the text of the resolution as passed by Congress and signed by the President: JOINT RESOLUTIONS Authorizing necessary funds to conduct investigation regarding rates charged for electrical energy and to prepare report thereon. Whereas accurate and comprehensive information regarding the rates charged for electrical energy and Its service to residential, rural, commercial, and industrial consumers throughout the United States is required by the Congress and other governmental agencies: and Whereas no compilation of such rates and charges has been made by any official body: Therefore be it Resolved 1,1 the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Federal Power Commission be. and It is hereby authorized and directed to Investigate and compile the rate charged for electric energy and its service in residential, rural. commercial. and industrial consumers throughout the United States by private and municipal corporations and to report on such rates, together with an analysis thereof, to the Congress at the earliest practicable date. . Sec. 2. That for the purposes of this investigation the Federal Power Commission Is authorized and directed to utilize, as far as may be practicable, information relating to electric rates and rate schedules filed with the public service commissions of the several States and shall have power to require, by general or special orders, corporations engaged in the sale of electricity to file with the Commission, in such form as the Commission may prescribe, schedules of rates charged to all classes of consumers and to submit to the Commission reports, or answers in writing to specific questions, furnishing such information as the Commission may require relative to the sale of electrical energy and its service to consumers. Such reports and answers shall be made under oath, or otherwise, as the Commission may prescribe, and shall be filed with the Commission within such reasonable period as the Commission may prescribe, unless additional time be granted In any case by the Commission. The Commission, or its duly authorized agent, or agents, shall at all reasonable times have access to. for the purpose of examination, and the right to copy any documentary evidence relative to the sale of electrical energy or its service to consumers by any corporation engaged in the sale of electricity. Sec. 3. That the President of the United States is hereby authorized to make available from the funds which have been or may be appropriated for expenditure subject to his discretion the amount which, in his judgment, is necessary for the purposes of this investigation and preparation of a report. The following is the report on the resolution of the House Committee on Inter-State and Foreign Commerce: The Committee on Inter-State and Foreign Commerce. to whom was referred the resolution (S.J.Res. 74) to investigate the rates charged for electrical energy to residential, rural, commercial, and industrial consumers by private and municipal corporations and to make a report to the Congress, having considered the same, report thereon with a recommendation that it Pass. There is at the present time no adequate and comprehensive information as to electrical rates, and the Congress and other Governmental agencies have a great need for this information in measuring the charges made in various sections of the country for both public and private power companies. The Federal Power Commission is the best agency to conduct this investigation. It is at present engaged in a survey of the available sources of electrical power throughout the country. This study would be closely related to that. It is provided that the expenditures may be authorized out of the funds appropriated for expenditure subject to the discretion of the President, and accordingly no special appropriation is made. Mortgage Suits Limited to State—Court Holds Van Schaick Alone May Bring Actions on Illegal Dividends and Waste. A ruling that the State Superintendent of Insurance as rehabilitator of title and mortgage companies alone has power to bring suits against the companies and their directors for the return of dividends alleged to have been paid illegally 2679 and other moneys alleged to have been wasted was made April 16 by Supreme Court Justice McGoldrick. The court accordingly dismissed suits brought by Joseph Nemerov and others as attorneys and said the plaintiffs might intervene in the suits brought by Superintendent Van Schaick. Justice McGoldrick said the assertion that the plaintiffs were creditors of the companies they sued was "beyond question," but held that "the right to sue resides primarily in the superintendent" and. said "he is apparently acting with diligence." Mortgage Heads In $37,000,000 Suit—Directors of Three Concerns Are Accused of Causing Losses By Improper Acts. George S. Van Schaick, State Superintendent of Insurance, filed complaints in the New York Supreme Court April 19 against the directors of three mortgage guaranty companies now under rehabilitation. The suits demanded an accounting of alleged losses laid to the payment of unearned dividends and other acts of the directors asserted to have been improper. The total involved in the suits was put at more than $37,000,000. The New York "Times" states: A suit against the New York Title & Mortgage Co. and its directors also named the Bank of the Manhattan Co. and demanded more than $20,000.000. Transactions of the latter company were alleged to have caused a loss of $7,000.000. The other suits were brought against the directors of the Westchester Title & Trust Co., from whom an accounting of more than $5,000.000 was asked, and the Bond & Mortgage Guaranty Co., in which $12,000,000 was declared to have been lost. Sales of Realty Attacked. The suits in the main allege that during 1931 and subsequently the business of the mortgage companies suffered a serious decline and they were compelled to foreclose on and buy in "countless" pieces of property. Serious reductions in the liquid assets and working capital of the companies are alleged to have resulted. after which the mortgage companies sold the realty acquired, so far as the market would absorb it, at sums substantially below the amount of the guaranteed mortgages. To acquire necessary money the defendants are alleged to have sold guaranteed mortgages on representations that they were first liens on realty, "and that to conceal the depletion of assets and the true financial condition" of the companies the directors advanced interest not received and carried the items on the books as good when a large part of them were known as "either bad or collectable only in part." In the New York Title & Mortgage Co. case the defendants include Harry A. Kahler, Lewis L. Clarke, Richard L. Babbage, Frederic J. Fuller, W. Burke Harmon, Morgan J. O'Brien, James A. O'Gorman. Robert E. Simon, Matthew Sloan, James P. Warburg, the estate of Paul Warburg and the Bank of the Manhattan Co. The directors are alleged to have ordered the payments of unearned dividends between 1931 and 1933. Improper Deals Laid to Bank. The suit alainst the Bank of the Manhattan Co.alleged that the company bought the stock of the mortgage company in January 1930, and thereafter controlled it. Up to December 1932, the defendant is asserted to have represented to the public that the mortgage company was its affiliate and that "its funds and resources would be available to safeguard and protect the credit of the mortgage company." Although the mortgage company applied for and failed to get sufficient money from the Bank of the Manhattan Co. to enable it to operate, the Manhattan Co. caused the mortgage company directors to declare dividends, the complaint asserts. In the suit against the directors of the Bond & Mortgage Guaranty Co. in which Frank Bailey, John A. Garver and others are named it is alleged that $4,400,000 in improper dividends were declared. Mr. Bailey is also one of the defendants, with J. Mayhew Wainwright, J. Crawford Stevens and others, in the action against the directors of the Westchester Title & Trust Co., in which the "illegal, unlawful and imprudent dividends" are put at $480,000 from 1931 to 1933. These dividends are alleged to have "largely contributed to the destruction of its business." Death of T. D. Robinson, Former Assistant Secretary of the Navy. Theodore D. Robinson, former Assistant Secretary of the Navy and for many years a member of the New York State Legislature, died on April 10 at his home in the town of Warren, N. Y. He was 50 years old. Mr. Robinson's mother was a sister of President Theodore Roosevelt, and he himself was an advocate of his uncle's political policies. He was Assistant Secretary of the Navy in the Coolidge Administration. Death of Ex-Senator John J. Blaine of Wisconsin— Former Governor Was Member of RFC. John J. Blaine, former United States Senator and former Governor of Wisconsin, died April 16 at his home in Boscobel, Wis., of bronchial pneumonia, with which he was stricken about the week previous. Mr. Blaine was a member of the Board of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation. He was 58 years old. Associated Press accounts from Boscobel, on April 16, said in part: Mr. Blaine, a Republican, became ill while attending a conference of Reconstruction Finance Corporation officials in Madison on April 7. He returned to his home here the next day, and was ordered to bed. . . . Since his appointment to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation Mr. Blaine had passed most of his time in Washington. He returned to Wisconsin several months ago and had been mentioned as a possible candidate for Governor at the next election. 2680 Financial Chronicle The New 'York "Times" of April 17 commented on his career in part as follows: Former Senator BlaMe, author of the resolution which brought about the repeal of prohibition, was known as an insurgent, a "bolter," an independent Republican, and one of the most interesting characters among the national legislators. After years of identification with the independent La Follette group of Wisconsin, he was defeated by the conservative wing of his party in the same year, 1932, that the country went almost completely for President Roosevelt and his now policies. President Roosevelt appointed him a Member of the Board of the RFC In June 1933, and since then the former Senator had been active in Washington and in the politics of his own State. The name of the former Senator was brought before the public most often In recent years by his hard fight to bring about repeal. His resolution, which passed the Senate on Feb. 16 1933, was later passed by the House and then presented to the several States. With an independence that rivaled that of Senator La Follette, whose leadership he acknowledged, he rode through the stormiest period of political history in Wisconsin. He eventually won a seat in the United States Senate, and after the death of Senator La Follette shared with the latter's son the leadership of the State Progressive party machine. April 21 1934 "Meanwhile, other naval powers, their own needs correctly in view, far outstripped us—while remaining always within the treaty limitations. By balanced programs of new and replacement construction they have so ordered their affairs that their establishments, already approximating treaty strength, will in all probability realize it entirely by 1938." Calls Disarming Fantastic. Thanks to the limitations placed upon the naval powers by treaties, Mr. Roosevelt said, an unlimited naval race is out of the question. However, he dismissed as "too fantastic to be taken seriously" the question of complete disarmament and declared an inadequate navy to be "just as useless as no navy at all." Both Colonel Roosevelt and Secretary Dern, who preceded him on the evening prggram, maintained that army and navy officers were "really practical pacifists," and that peace advocates should unite with them in "fighting the common foe." Merchants' Association of New York Declares Against Unemployment Insurance—Opposed to Bills Pending at Albany to Establish Compulsory Unemployment Reserves—Would Place Ill Advised Financial Burdens on Business—Wagner-Lewis Bill in Congress Also Disapproved. On April 17 the board of directors of the RFC adopted On the ground that unemployment insurance legislation a resolution expressing "for itself and for all of its personnel, their deep and abiding sorrow in their great loss." at this time would be a costly experiment which is certain to add extravagantly to public expenditures, the Merchants' In part, the resolution said: Association of New York announced on April 16 its opposiPrior to his [Mr. Blaine's] appointment to this Board by President Roosevelt, his distinguished services to his State as Attorney-General and tion to the three bills pending at Albany to establish comas Governor, and to his nation as a Senator of the United States, had right- pulsory unemployment reserves. fully earned for him an outstanding position as a leader whose highest Figures prepared by the Association's Committee on interest was in the preservation and perpetuation of the ideals of American democracy; . . . because of his distinguished service, and of his Industrial Relations, obtained from both England and unusual ability, he brought to the position as Director of the RFC a melGermany, are said to show that insurance plans failed in lowed philosophy, an understanding of human nature and human needs, a their purpose in both countries throughout the continuing broad comprehension of the economic and social problems involved in the work to which he was called by the President, and above all a charm of depression. The Association took the view that any unpersonality that endeared him to all of the directors and members of the employment insurance plan should be regarded as a reconorganization with whom he came in contact. struction effort and that for the time being effort should be concentrated on accelerating recovery. Action in opposition Death of Edwin V. Morgan, United States Ambassador to the bills was taken by unanimous order of the Association's to Brazil for 20 Years. Board of Directors who also gave instructions to oppose the Edwin V. Morgan, former United States Ambassador to Brazil, died suddenly at his residence in Petropolis, Wagner-Lewis unemployment insurance tax bill now pending Brazil, April 16. He was 69 years old. Mr. Morgan in Washington. A communication, addressed to the Chairserved as American envoy to Rio de Janeiro for 20 years, men of the Committees that were studying the Byrnebut resigned the post during the present Administration. Condon, Steingut-Mastick and the Hanley-Ehrlich bills in He returned to Brazil in February, planning to retire from Albany, set forth the conclusion of the Directors as follows: New York State's past independent pioneering activities in social legisactive life. While in the American foreign service he had lation, while commendable in many respects, have already produced discriminatory been assigned to Korea, Cuba, Paraguay, Uruguay, and differentials between the cost of doing business in New York States. We can see no justification for and such neighboring costs in Portugal. His 20 years as Ambassador to Brazil was a deliberately increasing those differentials at this time by continuance of record for the American diplomatic service. such pioneering. President Roosevelt Praises Ideals of D. A. R.—Assistant Secretary of Navy Roosevelt Assails Policy of Previous Administrations—Secretary of War Dern Denies Militarist Spirit in Army. A tribute to the Daughters of the American Revolution was paid by President Roosevelt in a message read at the P. A. R. convention in Wasbington, April 16. The President said that "no body of American citizens could be more steadfast in their support of our ideals of liberty and of progress than are the Daughters of the American Revolution." Henry L. Roosevelt, Assistant Secretary of the Navy, speaking at the same session, charged that every Republican Administration since the World War has neglected the navy, and said that the present Administration is only trying to build up the navy to the strength "allowed and sanctioned by solemn treaties with other countries." Secretary of War Dern, in another address, denied that army officers foment conflict and said that instead they are "practical pacifists." The text of President Roosevelt's message follows: The patriots of the Revolutionary period handed down to their successors and to us the noblest heritage which Divine Providence has entrusted to any people. The extent of their achievement sometimes veils from us a full understanding of their distresses and their difficulties and tends to obscure our vision of the unconquerable spirit of the time, the spirit of the birth of America. Let us keep in mind not only what those men and women did but also how they made their very obstacles a part of their success. What we are doing for these years and for our future is the same task In mind as that of our fathers; it holds the same necessity of devotion to the common weal; under new conditions and with an empire of country and of people, we are to keep assured a land of equality of freedom; this is the sacred charge which is ours; this is our noble burden. Well do I know that no body of American citizens could be more steadfast in their support of our ideals of liberty and of progress than are the Daughters of the American Revolution. Unemployment insurance reserve plans which provide weekly benefits of 815 for a maximum of 16 weeks in any year will, at best, furnish only an economic bridge over which the worker may pass from one Job to another during periods of mild unemployment. They cannot relieve depressional unemployment nor can they prevent it and depressionsl unemployment is the type of unemployment which has been the most distressing problem. Scientific research has demonstrated that the risk of unemployment is definitely not insurable in the same sense that the risk of death or old age can be covered on an actuarial basis. The chief reasons for this are that the risk of unemployment is definitely unpredictable and that the contingency of unemployment may occur and, in fact, during the last four years has occurred, to too large a porportion of the population simultaneously. The course of unemployment from 1920 to 1930 is no criterion of what will be experienced between 1930 and 1940. It should be borne in mind that if compulsory legislation is enacted, setting up certain reserves which prove to be inadequate to provide the disbursements under the law and the fund becomes exhausted, the chances are strong that unemployed workes will turn to the State and demand that it continue payment of benefits to those persons who continue to be or in the future may become unemployed. The possibility of such a condition is not remote in view of the experience of the plans which have been tried out abroad. Records will show that in January 1931. 81% of unemployed workers in England were receiving insurance benefits and 16% were on the dole. In January 1934, 43% were receiving insurance benefits and 42% were on the dole. In Germany in January 1931, 49% of unemployed were receiving insurance benefits and 15% were receiving doles. In January 1934, but 15% were receiving insurance benefits and 31% were on the dole. In the light of the foregoing, it is obious that the legislation in question would constitute an experiment, the costs of which, while unknown, are certain to exceed those set forth in the measures themselves. Such an experiment, if tried at all, should be regarded as a reconstruction effort. To undertake it now, when every effort should be bent toward accelerating recovery rather than reconstruction, is to place additional, destructive and ill-advised financial burdens upon New York State's business enterprises at a time when those enterprises are least able to assume such burdens. Opposition to New York Compulsory Insurance Bill Voiced in Telegram Sent to Governor Lehman by State Chamber of Commerce. Strong opposition to the New York State compulsory unemployment insurance bill was voiced on April 19 in a A Washington dispatch, April 16, to the New York "Times" telegram sent to Governor Lehman by the Chamber of summarized the speeches by Mr. Henry L. Roosevelt and Commerce of the State of New York. The telegram was Secretary Dern in part as follows: based on an interim report of the Committee on Internal "The indifference from which the navy suffered through the three previTrade and Improvements, which attacked the proposed ous Administrations left it dangerously weak in many important aspects," Mr. Roosevelt told the Daughters. "Although its strength had been fixed, legislation as objectionable on social, political and economic in the course of international agreements, at the lowest figure held to be grounds. The Chamber at its April meeting last year consistent with national security, those in authority had not only failed to unanimously adopted a report opposing bills then in the provide ships in the deficient categories but had further failed to authorize Legislature making it compulsory upon employers to create the replacement of existing units when such vessels passed their term of usefulness and grew obsolete. unemployment reserve funds. This year's bill is similar, Volume 138 Financial Chronicle 2681 except it is based solely on the State fund principle and is modeled after the State Workmen's Compensation Law. The report, made public April 19, said: Washington dispatch April 17 to the New York "Times" summarized the testimony before the House committee on that date in part as follows: While your Committee on Internal Trade and Improvements appreciates the humane purposes behind this measure, it believes that numerous social, political and economic reasons make this legislation objectionable. As pointed out in the Chamber's 1933 report, politics would soon vitiate this form of relief. The State has over one million wage earners in manufacuring alone, and over five and one-half million in all gainful occupations. Their political pressure would be irresistible. Furthermore, the 3% tax would operate like a general sales tax on commodity prices, the tax being pyramided by its addition to each successive turnover of the article. Employers who could not pass the burden on to the consumer would be at a serious disadvantage in competition with other States; and industry and business in many fields would tend to migrate to other jurisdictions. Manufacturers also contend that this tax would hinder re-employment, reduce the employment of older men,and discourage the employer from raising wages. At best, the reserve could only aid seasonal or purely temporary unemployment. In foreign countries unemployment insurance has not been a factor in easing the depression; all the plans have been unsuccessful', and the governments have made large advances to meet the deficits. The system is now commonly called the dole, and is considered to lower the recipient's efficiency most materially. The combined burden of Federal, State and local taxes is now the highest in the history of the nation, and this is no time to further increase this load. The probable effects of this so-called "unemployment insurance" would be detrimental not only to the employer and the consumer, but also the employee. Every witness, and they Included all who attended the dinner where. Dr. Wirt testified, the disclosures were made, swore that Dr. Wirt himself did practically all the talking, and that it was almost impossible for any of the others to interject a word into the discussion. In other words, as Miss Mary Taylor, one of the witnesses, pictured the occasion, "it was a monologue" with Dr. Wirt in the solo role. The proceedings before the House committee to-day began at 10 o'clock and lasted four hours. Dr. Wirt entered the room with Senator Reed. The witnesses, Miss Hildegardge Kneeland of the Bureau of Economics. Department of Agriculture; Miss Alice Barrows of the Bureau of Education, Department of the Interior; Miss Mary Taylor of the Agricultural Adjustment Administration; Laurence Todd of the Soviet-owned "Tess" News Agency, David Cushman Coyle of the PWA and Robert Bruere of the NRA, trailed Chairman Bulwinkle. These were the five who made up. with Dr. Wirt, the dinner party at which the plans of the "revolutionists" were disclosed, according to the testimony of Dr. Wirt. Miss Barrows,the hostess of the dinner party, was the first witness. . . . Answering questions by Mr. Bulwinkle and Mr. O'Connor of the Democratic membership of the committee, Miss Barrows said that she had "listened in" from start to finish and declared that at no time did she hear the names of Dr. Tugwell. of Kerensky, Stalin or even the President mentioned, so far as she could recall. If they were, she indicated, Dr. Wirt must have been the one who did it, since, she said, he did practically all the talking. Concluding her direct examination Miss Barrows declared that none of the "Kerensky" or "Roosevelt in the middle of a swift stream- or talk Involving the "overthrow of the established order in America," which Dr. Wirt had charged featured the after-dinner discussion, had taken place... . Taking the record of Dr. Wirt's testimony, Mr. O'Connor read in order each of the revolutionary utterances credited to Miss Kneeland by Dr. Wirt. In every instance she declared the statement was untrue and that nothing of the kind had been said by her. Miss Kneeland said that she could not have quoted Dr. Tugwell, since she had never read a book or other article of his authorship. Dr. Wirt had testified that Miss Kneeland continually quoted from the writings of Dr. Tugwell. . . . Miss Kneeland also denied that she had, as Dr. Wirt had claimed,sought to give him the facts behind "the main idea," as the alleged revolutionary program was described by the professor. Miss Mary Taylor was next. . . . So far as the after-dinner discussion was concerned it was, said Miss Taylor, a monologue and Dr. Wirt was the monologist. "The statements made by Dr. Wirt as to what transpired following the dinner were untrue," said Miss Taylor, Laurence Todd, correspondent of the Soviet-owned Tass News Agency, frankly admitted he had been for many years a Washington correspondent for radical publications. For the past few months he has been the reprosentative of the Toss Agency, which he described as "the A. P. of Soviet Russia." As did the others, he denied there was any truth in what Dr. Wirt said when he charged Mr.Todd with referring to the President as the "Kerensky of this revolution," and that those behind the alleged movement to overthrow the established order were holding the President in the middle of a swift stream until the time came for a Stalin to appear. No such statement, Mr. Todd said, had been made by himself or any of the others who "listened in" while Dr. Wirt was talking. "It was a most wearying experience," said Mr. Todd. Mr. Bruere and Mr. Coyle were called last. Neither figured to any extent in Dr. Wirt's testimony. Both declared they had heard none of the things charged by Dr. Wirt. Mr. Coyle added he was able to so testify because "he had been able to remain awake" during the three hours Dr. Wirt was talking. William H. Coverdale is Chairman of the Committee that sponsored the report, which was also signed by John F. Fowler, Eustis L. Hopkins, James J. Maguire, John P. H. Perry and Thomas F. Woodlock. The report will be acted upon by the full membership of the Chamber at the next meeting on May 3. Armistice Day Made Legal Holiday in New York State. Armistice Day will henceforth be a legal holiday in New York State, following Governor Lehman's action April 11 in signing the Hayes bill. New York is the 30th State to make Armistice Day a legal holiday. Liquidating Distribution of $6,166,500 to Be Made April 30 by RCC—Will Bring Total Repayments to $14,038,600. Railroads which borrowed from the fund administered by the Railroad Credit Corporation have anticipated their maturities to such an extent that the Corporation will, on April 30, repay approximately $5,166,500 to participating carriers, of which $2,335,000 will be in cash to non-borrowing 'carriers and $2,831,500 will be in credits on obligations of borrowing carriers. This repayment, said an announcement issued April 16 by E. G. Buckland, President of the Corporation, amounts to 7% of the emergency freight charges contributed to the pool, and will be in lieu of the 1% distribution announced March 15. It will bring the total distributions to $14,038,600, or 19% of the net contributions, which aggregated $73,887,600. In our columns of April 7, page 2343, we referred to the Corporation's monthly statement for March, which said that a repayment of only $735,000 would be made on April 30. Dr. W. A. Wirt's Charges of Alleged Activities Toward Overthrow of Social Order Termed False by Witnesses Before House Investigating Committee. Six persons who attended a dinner party last September at which Dr. William A. Wirt of Gary, Ind., charged he had heard conversation indicating that a group within the Government was planning the overthrow of the American social order, testified before a special committee of the House of Representatives April 17 and denied the truth of the educator's statements. All six witnesses agreed, according to press accounts from Washington, that they had been unable to talk much during the evening in question because, they said, Dr. Wirt had monopolized the conversation with a discussion of inflation and currency expansion. Previous reference to Dr. Wirt's charges was contained in our issues of March 31 (pages 2188-89) and April 14 (pages 2512-13). After the conclusion of the testimony on April 17, some members of Congress were reported as considering a move toward Dr. Wirt's indictment on the grounds of alleged perjury, but Representative Bulwinkle, Chairman of the House committee, said that in his opinion Dr. Wirt could not be cited for perjury. On the preceding day (April 16) Mr. Bulwinkle apologized on the floor of the House for an earlier statement in which he said that Dr. Wirt had been imprisoned during the World War because of proGerman activity. Mr. Bulwinkle said he had later learned that the statement was false. A Governor Langer of North Dakota Indicted—Charged with Forcing Political Contributions from Federal Employees in State—Eight Others Accused Incident to Publication of Political Paper. A United States Grand Jury at Fargo, N. D., on April 16 indicted William Langer, Governor of North Dakota, together with eight other persons who, it is alleged, were charged with forcing political contributions from Federal employees in North Dakota. The charges had to do with the publication of "The Leader," a political newspaper founded about a year ago and supporting the Administration of Governor Langer, who has announced that he will be a candidate to succeed himself in the June 20 primary election for nomination on the Republican ticket. Associated Press advices from Fargo April 16 summarized the charges as follows: The indictments were returned late to-day as the climax to a week's session of a Federal Grand Jury after Government agents had worked several weeks gathering evidence. Previously, Governor Langer, who was elected as a non-partisan leaguer, had been removed by Relief Administrator Harry Hopkins as State Relief Administrator. At that time Washington officials asserted preliminary investigation had revealed relief workers were compelled to contribute to the support of "The Leader," Langer administration newspaper. The Governor then termed the charges politically inspired. Others named in the indictments, which charge conspiracy to violate Federal statutes, are Oscar Chaput, business manager of "The Leader"; State Senator Oscar Erickson, listed as publisher of the paper; State Highway Commissioner Frank A. Vogler; Harold McDonald, solicitor for the paper; R. A. Kinzer, Joseph Kinzer, Paul J. Yeates and G. A. Hample. One of the offenses alleged was violation of the statute making it an offense for one Federal employee to solicit funds from another for political purposes. Those indicted face trial at the next term of Federal Court in Bismarck. P. W. Lanier, United States District Attorney here, issued a statement saying a second indictment charges the defendants "with conspiracy to interfere with the proper administration of an Act of Congress." "After a long drawn-out and careful investigation a Federal Grand Jury has returned indictments of such importance, both from the standpoint of the general public and the parties involved, that trials should be had as speedily as possible," Mr. Lanier added. "It is the purpose of my office to press these cases to trial juries not later than the latter part of May." 2682 Financial Chronicle The conspiracy charges carry a penalty of not more than two years in the Federal penitentiary or a fine not to exceed $10.000. or both. The Kinzers and McDonald already have been arrested and are at liberty under $2,500 bond each pending trial at the next term of Federal Court in Bismarck. Warrants for the others will be issued within a day or two and placed In the hands of Osmund Ounvaldsen, United States Marshal, for service. The KInzers and McDonald. according to an announcement last week by Federal authorities, are charged with violation of the penal code section which prohibits solicitation of funds in a Federal building for political purposes. R. A. Kinzer, it was said then, also is charged with violating a section which makes it unlawful to discharge, promote or in any way change the rank or compensation of a Federal employee for not contributing to a political fund. Mr. Lanier said he would recommend the same bond for those who have not yet been arrested as was set for the Kinzers and McDonald. cretary Wallace Offers Program for Milk Control Output Would Be Reduced at Least 10% and Farmer Reimbursed from $165,000,000 Processing Tax—New York and New Jersey Officials Oppose Plan. A nation-wide program for Federal control of milk production was outlined by Secretary of Agriculture Wallace April 2 at a regional meeting of dairymen in Philadelphia. The plan would include a processing tax to raise a fund of $165,000,000 to reimburse the farmer for reducing his sales. The farmer would be required to agree to reduce 10% for one year the sale of surplus milk marketed for manufacture into cheese and butter, with a possible reduction of 20% if the smaller figure did not prove adequate. Opposition to Mr. Wallace's proposal was expressed by State officials of New York and New Jersey. Mr. Wallace, in his speech at Philadelphia, April 2, said in part: I think we must look forward to more and more reliance upon voluntary co-operation among farmers, and view proposals for regimentation with skepticism, at least until experiment proves their worth. While the instruments of the benefit payment exists to help the Government assist the farmers in organizing, it seems important that the producers should organize themselves now, so that they may be able better to grapple with their problems in the future when the time comes that the Government may not be able to afford immediate help, and when the producers will be left more to their own organizations and own devices. The Federal Government, through the Emergency Relief Corporation, and to some extent with the co-operation of the Agricultural Adjustment Administration, has been purchasing and distributing considerable quantities of beef, pork, butter and other food products. These products were purchased with Federal funds and distributed to needy people who are on relief. This was the Federal Government's attack upon the paradox of surpluses on one hand and human need on the other. I think we have gone far enough to demonstrate that while this Administration is in command people are not going to be permitted to starve in this country in the presence of plenty. Now, should this operation be substantially expanded through some sort of a stabilization pool? What would be the reaction of American farmers and the general public to a proposal to extend substantially relief purchases of dairy products? What would be the opinion if such extension were proposed to be financed by processing taxes on dairy products? The dairy program which we are discussing certainly does not pretend to offer any miraculous return of prosperity to the dairy farmer. Its $150,000,000 proposed benefits are, after all, a moderate offering to an industry whose annual income fell 880 million dollars from 1929 to 1932. But, even so, the plan has encountered resistance, and I do not know that I assent to the proposition that it is incumbent upon the dairy farmers to forego moderate control over their production for the temporary benefit of the rest of society while industrial elements in that society maintain firm control over production and do curtail production of necessities in order to maintain industrial prices. The argument against the evils of curtailed output might much better be made against an industrial policy which has permitted such curtailment of industrial production, for the sake of maintaining prices and profits, as to throw 12,000,000 people out of work and thus undermine our whole agricultural structure. A Philadelphia dispatch, April 3, to the New York "Times" noted opposition to Secretary Wallace's proposals as follows: Opposition to the program reached its climax with a threat that New Jersey might seek an injunction if the Federal Government sought to enforce the plan in that State. William B. Duryea, New Jersey Secretary of Agriculture, was particularly critical of Secretary Wallace's request that farmers reduce by 10% or more for one year their surplus milk sold to manufacture products such as cheese and butter. "It would be difficult for us to sell a reduction program in New Jersey," said Mr. Duryea, "especially since we produce only 40% of what we use. "I feel that if the Government pressed this program there would be a request for an injunction against its enforcement in New Jersey. I firmly believe that Eastern fluid milk markets and similar markets in other parts of the country cannot be considered together." Associated Press Syracuse, N. Y., advices, April 6, described further opposition to the plan in part as follows: State officials of the milk control division to-day took the lead in opposition to the Federal Government's dairy adjustment program in so far as it calls for a reduction of herds and a curtailment of production. Leaders of distributing organizations and produters' groups joined with Commissioner Charles H. Baldwin of the State Department of Farms and Markets and Henry S. Manley, counsel to the milk control division. Dissatisfaction with the production phase of the Washington plan developed before Government executives completed their explanation of the program at to-day's conference with dairymen. Washington's attitude toward dairy relief was expressed by V. A. Christgau, Assistant Administrator of the AAA; Roger B. Corbett and H. W. Hochbaum. Ap-'1 21 1934 Mr. Christgau, a former Minnesota Representative, asserted that the dairy problem "is the most complex and most difficult we have undertaken." "The dairy industry cannot be divided along States lines," he said, "and for that reason all producers and distributers, where‘er they may be in the United States, are affected by surpluses and other d,pressing factors." Mr. Corbett explained the adjustment plan in detail. It calls for a 10% reduction in butterfat production to be based on 1932-33 averages. The processing tax, to be paid by the manufacturer to the internal revenue, will be 1 to 5c. a pound on butterfat. There would be a compensating tax on oleomargarine. Federal Court in Chicago Upholds Power of AAA to Fix Milk Prices—Cites Recent Opinion of United States Supreme Court. The right of the Agricultural Adjustment Administration to regulate the milk industry by means of a fixed schedule --of,prices at which milk must be bought from farmers was upheld April 14 by Judge William H. Holly in a Federal Court of Equity at Chicago. The AAA planned to use the decision immediately in an effort to end the milk price war In the Chicago area. Judge Holly issued a temporary injunction restraining Lloyd V. Shissler, dairy operator, and the Peoples Dairy of Cicero from continuing business in violation of terms of the AAA milk license for the Chicago area. We quote in part from the court's ruling, as given in the Chicago "Tribune" April 15: In his memorandum the Judge held in effect the United States Supreme Court, in a recent decision involving milk price fixing by the State of New York, had upheld the power of the State to fix prices in an emergency. He also ruled that high court opinions in other cases have upheld the right of Congress to legislate in emergency cases, and to regulate inter-State commerce. Cites Congress' Power. "It is insisted by defendants that the Agricultural Adjustment Act is invalid," stated Judge Holly. "The defendants say it is beyond the power of Congress, in the exercise of the power granted to it to regulate inter. State commerce, to fix the price at which a commodity may be bought or sold. "But the power granted to Congress to regulate inter-State commerce by clause 3, section 8, of article 1 of the Constitution has no limitations other than those that may be found in the Constitution itself. Except as prohibited by some other provisions in the Constitution, Congress has complete and arbitrary power." The Judge looked up, smiled, and interpolated he perhaps should have used the word "unlimited" instead of "arbitrary." The only other Constitutional limitation of the powers of Congress, said Judge Holly, is that in the Fifth Amendment which provides that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. Upholds AAA Authority. After reviewing the elements in the case before him, and citing the recent Supreme Court decision in the New York milk price fixing case, the Judge said that "I am compelled to hold that the Secretary of Agriculture has authority to fix the price of all milk produced and sold in the Chicago sales area whether it is produced in another State and transported into Illinois or produced and sold within the State." United States Appeals Court Upholds AAA Marketing Agreement for Florida Citrus Crowers—Dissolves Injunction Against Control Agency. The United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals at New Orleans on April 14 revoked an injunction restraining the control committee for the citrus growing industry of Southern Florida from enforcing its regulations restricting the shipment of certain varieties of oranges and grapefruit, and in its opinion said that the Agricultural Adjustment Administration marketing agreement for Florida citrus growers was "legal." When the injunction was originally granted against the control committee, an agency of the AAA, Judge Alexander Akerman of the United States District Court for Southern Florida had held that certain sections of the Agricultural Adjustment Act were unconstitutional. The New Orleans "Times Picayune" of April 15 quoted from the Appeals Court opinion in part as follows: In setting aside the injunction the Circuit Court of Appeals said: "We think the District Court erred. The question of the constitutionality of the Agricultural Adjustment Act or any action shown by the record to have been taken under it, is not, in our opinion, properly presented for judicial decision." Agreement Signed. The decision was handed down in a suit filed by the Hillsborough Packing Company and the Lake Fern Groves, Inc., against I. A. Yarnell, chairman of the Florida control committee. The Hillsborough company admitted it had signed the marketing agreement which it sought to enjoin but asserted this had been done under duress and through coercion. The Lake Fern company did not sign the agreement and asserted it would suffer a "total loss" of 75% of its midseason grapefruit and oranges if it was prohibited from shipping the fruit, which totaled 10,000 boxes. Judge Akerman granted the injunction on the grounds that sections of the Agricultural Adjustment Act complained of and the means adopted for their enforcement by the marketing agreement licenses, orders and penalties were unconstitutional and void. "Inasmuch as the District Court did not acquire jurisdiction over the Secretary of Agriculture, it was powerless to enjoin the suspension or revocation of any license issued by him or the enforcement of any fine or penalty resulting from orders which, under the act, only he can make," the decision read. Volume 138 Financial Chronicle The opinion reviewed provisions of the Agricultural Adjustment Act and the marketing agreement for prorating, allotting and restricting interState shipments. Validity Not Assailed. "The act provides that such agreement shall be lawful notwithstanding the antitrust laws," the opinion continued. "The validity of that provision is not assailed, and so the marketing agreement, being legal, is enforceable, even though other provisions of the act may be invalid. "The excuses made by the packing company for signing the agreement fall far short of showing coercion or duress. It is a voluntary party to a valid agreement. The bill as to it should be dismissed. The case of the Lake Fern Groves stands a little different in that it did not sign the marketing agreement, but the injunction was improvidently granted." The opinion asserted that the control committee has no power to enforce its orders but may only report violations to the Secretary of Agriculture, but said the committee might go farther than it has yet done and "assume authority directly or as the agent of the Secretary of Agriculture." "In order to provide against such a contingency and to enable the Lake Fern Groves to apply for relief promptly, we hold that it is proper for the District Court to retain its bill of complaint for necessary future amendment." The opinion was written by Judge Nathan P. Bryan and signed also by Judges Sam H. Sibley and Joseph C. Hutcheson, Jr. Celery Marketing Agreement Tentatively Approved by Secretary Wallace. Secretary of Agriculture Wallace. announced on March 24 that he had tentatively approved and sent to contracting shippers for signature 'a marketing agreement to improve returns to Florida celery growers. Associated.Press advices from Washington, on March 24, said: The agreement seeks to establish orderly marketing through proration of shipments. A control committee would be authorized to determine requirements and regulate the shipments with the view to bringing the best price to producers without unduly increasing consumer costs. Whenever necessary to improve returns to growers, the volume of celery to be shipped would be prorated equitably among shippers and growers. The proration would be based on the production they had available for market when the plan was made effective. Shippers and growers would comprise the control body. The agreement also contemplates national proration of shipments between Florida and California. Marketing Agreement for California Date Shippers Approved by Secretary Wallace. Tentative approval by Secretary of Agriculture Wallace of a marketing agreement for California date shippers was reported on March 7, at which time it was stated that the agreement had been submitted to industry members for signature. With regard to the agreement, it is stated that improved returns to growers through establishment of a uniform schedule of minimum prices is sought in the pact, which was drafted by the date industry in co-operation with the AAA's general crops section. The following further advices from Washington, March 7, are from the New York "Journal of Commerce": Under provisions of the tentative plan, shippers would elect a Control Committee with authority to establish a schedule of minimum prices. The Committee would, on the basis of market factors, allow such quantities of dates to be sold as would bring the largest returns to growers. When the plan is put into operation the Committee would present estimates of the quantities of dates to be marketed, and the minimum prices of dates to be sold in the ensuing month. Adjustment of these prices by the Secretary of Agriculture is privileged, ii such action is deemed necessary to effectuate purposes of the agreement. Minimum prices specified by the pact are listed as f.o.b. Imperial or Riverside Counties, California. On "proper showing" by a shipper, however, the Committee may permit dates to be offered for sale on a delivered basis at prices equal to minimum prices, f.o.b., plus the average freight charges to any defined zone and plus the average cost of delivery to distributors within the zone to which the dates are shipped. Crop Control Plan for California Rice Approved by Secretary Wallace — Marketing Agreement for Southern Rice Industry Signed. A Crop control plan for California rice, which would limit annual output to less than 3,000,000 bags, was approved on April 16 by Secretary of Agriculture Henry A. Wallace. According to Washington advices, April 16, to the New York "Journal of Commerce" the approval followed a declaration of the California Rice Crop Control Board that a plan to curtail production in 1934 should be placed in operation under the provisions of the marketing agreement for the California rice industry, entered into last fall by all rice millers and a number of growers' associations. The advices continued: Survey Is Proposed. According to provisions of the agreement, the Board is required to make a survey of planting intentions before each season. Should their fisdings Indicate that more than 3,000,000 bags of rice will be produced, an acreage restriction plan may be declared in effect, subject to the approval of the Secretary of Agriculture. From statements of growers, the Board has ascertained that the total capacity for rice production during the coming season is 4,404,000 bags. Thus a reduction sufficient to curtail production by 1,404,000 bags will be necessary. 2683 The amount of reduction required, translated into acreage, will be prorated to producers on the basis of their average production during the base period 1929-33, inclusive. Terms of Benefits. tirowers under the agreement who contract to restrict their 1934 acreage and production by the desired amount will in return receive benefit payments equal to 40% of parity, or the "Secretary's price" of $3.60 per hundredweight, basis of extra fancy, clean Japan California rice, f.o.b. San Francisco. This benefit is an addition to the minimum prices guaranteed growers by the agreement, which is placed at 60% of the Secretary's price. Contracting growers will receive at least the minimum price on sale of their rice. Millers have agreed to set up a trust fund into which they will pay the remaining 40% of the Secretary's price which is to be distributed to participating growers. Growers who do not contract to receive allotments and quotas for reduction of the crop will receive the minimum price set up under the agreement but will not be eligible to participate in any benefits out of the trust fund. The signing of a new marketing agreement for the Southern rice industry, designed to provide parity prices for the 1934 crop to farmers who co-operate in the crop control features of the agreement, has been signed by Secretary of Agriculture Wallace was indicated in Washington advices, March 7, to the New York "Journal of Commerce," in which it was also stated: The new agreement is similar to the pact which became effective Oct. 16 1933, although the former provides a crop control plan while the latter did not. Plans for curtailing acreage and production by 20% of the average of the five-year period, 1929-33, inclusive, through acreage allotments and production quotas for individual producers, are contained in the new agreement. Arkansas, Louisiana and Texas are covered by the pact. To Get Payments. Texas, producers have elected to receive individual allotments and quotas on the basis of their three-year, 1931-33, average, and will be required to reduce production by 22%. It is pointed out that this reduction amounts to exactly the same in acres and units of production as if Texas growers were to use the five-year period as a base and reduce by 20%, as growers in other States are doing. Growers who contract with the Secretary of Agriculture to restrict their rice acreage by 20%, and to restrict their marketings from the allotted acreage to the average of such acreage for the base period, will receive in return benefit payments equal to 40% of parity, or the "Secretary's price," from the trust fund which the rice millers have agreed to establish. This benefit is in addition to the 60% growers are to receive when they market their production. A Control Committee, consisting of representatives from the three States, will administer the marketing fund. The minimum prices to producers in the agreement are fixed by the Secretary for number one grade, prime A milling quality for each variety, end the millers are to compute minimum prices for other grades in accordance with a schedule of differentials based upon United States standards for rough rice. Millers agree, also, not to sell domestically for less than actual cost o; the rough rice delivered at the mill, plus conversion coat, the cost of the container, and the marketing fund charge. Certain terms of sale and brokerage are also established in the agreement. Federal Court Restrains Secretary of Agriculture Wallace from Reducing Commissions Charged on Livestock. A temporary injunction, restraining Secretary of Agriculture Wallace from enforcing his recent order lowering the rates charged by live stock commission houses to farmers whose stock they sell, was issued April 19 in Chicago by Federal Judges Samuel Alschuler, James H. Wilkerson and Yohn P. Barnes. The order, which provided an average reduction of about 30%,had been issued by Mr. Wallace in his capacity as Administrator of the Federal Stockyards and Packers' Act. Associated Press advices from Chicago April 19 added the following regarding the decision: The new rates,scheduled to become effective to-morrow, were ordered by Secretary Wallace after a hearing on complaints from the American National Livestock Association that the fees were unreasonably high. The order was appealed by 160 commission firms. The Judges ordered the firms to deposit with the clerk of the Federal Court sums equal to the difference between the commissions now charged and those that would have been effective under Secretary Wallace's order. Those sums will be retained by the court until final disposition of the case. The commission firms argued that enforcement of the new rates would be unfair to them, and that they would cause a decrease in employment by commission houses. Government attorneys replied that Mr. Wallace had modified an original order so that the reduction would aggregate only $500,000 a year,instead of $1,000,000 as provided by the original order, and declared that the Secretary had been liberal in his findings, arrived at after extensive hearings. Secretary Ickes Orders Condemnation Proceedings to Obtain Land for Federal Low-cost Housing Project —Acts as President of FEHC to Obtain Property in Atlanta, Ga. Secretary of the Interior Ickes announced April 14 that In his capacity as President of the Federal Emergency Housing Corporation he would exercise his authority to condemn land for use of a university housing project in Atlanta, Ga. Mr. Ickes said that this action will be the first undertaken by the Public Works Administration to expedite a project of the Government's low-cost housing program which has been retarded by failure to acquire land by negotiated pur- 2684 Financial Chronicle chase. In the future, he said, the FERO will condemn, through Federal courts, property which it desires for slum clearance when property owners prove obstructive. Further details of the plan are given below, as reported In a Washington dispatch, April 14, to the New York "Herald Tribune": The Atlanta project contemplates an expenditure of $2,100,000 in slum clearance and the housing corporation proposes to acquire 134 parcels of land. Speaking as Public Works Administrator, Mr. Ickes made it clear that the condemnation proceedings were not being resorted to as threat, but merely to move up the program. The Government at all times was willing to pay a fair price and would continue to consider any reasonable offer even after legal proceedings had been filed. The Atlanta action amounts to definite and direct embarkation of the Government into the real estate business. Heretofore the housing operations have been limited to the making of loans to limited dividend corporations. To-day's announcement is the first contractual obligation on a housing corporation project. After title to the land has been vested in the United States the corporation will award the contract for the buildings. "It has been decided," said Secretary Ickes, "to exercise the right of the Government to institute condemnation proceedings to acquire land at reasonable prices as a fair and expeditious method of carrying forward the low-cost housing and slum-clearance program. "This procedure will not change our original purpose in any way. Representatives of the Public Works Administration will continue to negotiate with property owners for private settlement of a fair purchase price for properties under consideration. I have signed contracts for the purchase of several pieces of property in Atlanta and will continue to do so when contracts for the purchase of properties are offered at a fair price. "Acquisition of suitably situated land at proper prices remains the chief difficulty and key to the housing program. Low-cost housing cannot be built on high-priced land." PWA Approves 2,000 Non-Federal Projects with.Proposed Expenditure of 96500,000,000—Will Furnish 45,500,000 Man-Days of Work—Federal Allotments Total $1,381,000,000. Approximately $500,000,000 will be expended on 2,000 non-Federal projects already approved by the Public Works Administration, according to an announcement April 15 which estimated that these projects will furnish 45,500,000 man-days of employment. The PWA said that,it has enlarged its legal staff, which is completing preliminary work on 345 other applications for allotments. The non-Federal projects will be financed through grants to States and other political subdivisions. In addition, the PWA has already allotted $1,381,000,000 for Federal projects. The PWA announcement was given, in part, as follows in a Washington dispatch April 15 to the New York "Times": "How rapidly men go to work on the 2,000 projects and at the mines, rarlls and factories where materials will be produced will be determined by how fast the successful applicants are able or willing to function," said a statement from PWA headquarters. "PWA stands ready to advance the loans and grants called for by the bond contracts and grant agreements as soon as the money is required to pay for work actually done, provided the applicants have signed the contracts and agreements and complied with their terms and condition, many of which result from local legislation and regulations imposed to safeguard expenditure of public funds." The PWA insists that the recipients of the grants begin work within a reasonable time or forfeit the allotments since the primary object is to provide immediate employment. "Of the 2.000 contracts sent out," it was stated. "the applicants have executed and returned 1,500 of which Administrator Ickes has signed 1,150. The remaining 350 will be signed as rapidly as PWA attorneys have examined changes made or requested by the applicants. When contracts are signed by applicants as sent they are executed by PWA almost immediately. "There is a standing order in PWA that contracts be expedited. The 1,150 contracts which have been signed call for the payment of $328,000.000 In loans and grants. In addition to these contracts Administrator Ickes also has signed contracts calling for work-creating loans totaling $171.272,000 to 23 railroad companies making a total of $499,272,000 of contracts signed, sealed and delivered by both parties. "No bond contracts or grant agreements are required on the $1,381,000,000 allotted to Federal projects. This credit has been transferred to the various departments of the Federal Government which received the allotments. Over $700.000,000 in PWA allotments to finance OWA and CCC work is not included in these figures." Federal Relief Rolls Reach Record Peak of 4,700,000 Families April 1—Relief Administrator H. L. Hopkins Estimates 8,000,000 Persons Receiving Government Aid. Despite substantial increases in private employment, Federal relief rolls reached an all-time peak on April 1, when 4,700,000 families were the recipients of Federal aid, Relief Administrator Harry L. Hopkins announced April 13. This figure, he added, is equivalent to approximately 8,000,000 individuals. He attributed the rise in relief cases to the fact that monetary reserves of persons who had been unemployed during a great part of the depression had become exhausted. United Press Washington advices April 13 added the following information: The figure in March 1933 he put at 4,600,000, and in October 1933, before civil works became effective, approximately 3,000,000. He estimated that about 1,950,000 heads of families now are employed under the new work relief program. The rest, he said, are receiving direct relief. Mr. Hopkins said State relief organizations have reported varying April 21 1934 employment increases, but that despite this their organizations hit the new high in the relief load. The peak is expected to continue through April due to the transition from CWA to the emergency work program. Mr. Hopkins expects an additional pick-up in employment during May. Relief statisticians reported the number of relief cases in the United States increased 13%, and the expenditures increased 20% during February and March. The report was based on a survey of 140 cities and urban cotmties. The figures did not include those from New York and Chicago. The 140 cities, Mr. Hopkins said, represent 65% of the total urban population of the country. Another cause of the rise, he was advised, was the continuous reduction in employees working on civil works projects. CWA employees declined from a peak of more than 4,000,000 in January to about 3.000,000 at the end of February and to slightly less than 2,000,000 March 31, when, with a few exceptions, the civil works program ended. Government Officials Praise Accomplishments of CCC—Letters to President Roosevelt Discuss First Year's Operation of Corps. Conservation work in the United States has been advanced between 10 and 20 years as a result of the first year's operation of the Civilian Conservation Corps, according to communications by various Government officials made public April 15. The first anniversary of the CCC was April 7.. The accomplishments of the CCC were described in letters to President Roosevelt from Robert C. Fechner, Director of emergency conservation work; Secretary of War Dern, Secretary of Agriculture Wallace, Secretary of the Interior Ickes, Secretary of Labor Perkins and BrigadierGeneral Frank T. Hines, Administrator of Veterans' Affairs. Among the accomplishments credited to the corps were the following: Furnishing work for 600,000 men and restoring their morale; almost $60,000,000 sent by members of the CCC to their families while the Government was disbursing $255,000,000, of which two-thirds went into general circulation; reduction of forest fire losses to 17% of the average for the preceding five years. Excerpts from the letters are given below, as contained in Washington advices April 15 to the New York "Times": Secretary Darn's letter called the President "the father of the corps." "The major interest of the War Department has been in the man himself," his letter said. "Its chief pride lies in his improvement. No group of men understands youth so well or holds it in greater affection than does the commissioned personnel of the army. "With no desire to inculcate a military discipline, the understanding leadership or army officers has lifted the head, quickened the pace, given assurance to the approach of practically every member of the corps." The War Department is in charge of enrolling, supervising and handling the men of the corps and commanding the camps. Secretary Ickes, whose department supervises all work in National and State parks, on Indian reservations and in Hawaii, called the President's attention to the work accomplished during the year in National and State parks. "The presence of the enrollees," he said, "has enabled the planned recreational program for our National park areas to be carried forward in an effective manner and results have been accomplished that would have taken 10 years to achieve in normal circumstances." He said that Governors and. other State officials had reported that State emergency conservation work had advanced their programs of acquisitions and development anywhere from 10 to 20 years. Secretary Wallace, whose Department of Agriculture plans and supervises all work on National, State and private forest lands, and in Puerto Rico and Alaska, said that fire prevention had, as a result of CCC work. been perfected on a far larger scale. The Labor Department took charge of the selection of all CCC men, with the exception of the war veterans. quota. Commenting on the year's work, Secretary Perkins said. "During the years of the depression hundreds of thousands of young men arrived at working age and found all doors leading to employment locked against them. It is for just such young men that emergency conservation work has been made available. "It is a plan whoch dots conserve the social resources of the nation." General Hines, whose Veterans' Administration selected the CCC quota of war veterans, said that 42,682 needy veterans had been enrolled in the corps and that 11,000 more had been selected to be enrolled this month. Governor Ely of Massachusetts Advises Abandonment of Much of Recovery Program—Says Action Would Shortly Bring "Normal Conditions." If much of the Administration's recovery program were abandoned immediately "we would shortly see a return to normal conditions," Governor Joseph B. Ely of Massachusetts asserted in a speech before the New York Board of Trade April 11. Governor Ely said that the Administration should definitely announce its future course of action. He. remarked that he favored much of the program as an emergency measure, but said that the American people will not permit the provisions of the National Industrial Recovery Act or the Agricultural Adjustment Act or the Public Works. Program to remain on the statute books in their present form "if we experience a reasonable return to prosperous conditions." In fact, he insisted, according to the New York "Herald Tribune," "it would seem to me, although I lay no claim to the title of economist, that the general trend of business, the underlying strength of conditions, will shortly warrant,. Volume 138 Financial Chronicle if it does not warrant to-day, complete abandonment of those very expensive measures for recovery." From the same paper we take the following: The danger arising from the present situation and the success of the emergency measures, explained the Governor, lies in the fact that the fundamental principles upon which this Government was founded may be lost sight of. There is no question in his mind, he said, that the American people prefer a democratic form of government to an autocratic one "whether it be Facist or Nazi or just an old-time absolute monarchy—they are all alike." Nor would they countenance communism, he said. The people permitted the enactment of the recovery measures purely as an emergency program, Mr. Ely held, and they should not permit them to remain upon the statute books with the reasonable return of prosperity. "if their belief is still firm in the wisdom of the founders and the great exponents who from time to time have enunciated the principles and controlled the destinies of the United States." "In this emergency," Mr. Ely continued, "your sentiment and mine have been aroused to the sad plight of so many of our fellow men, responding to which we have yielded an exception temporarily, and to some extent perhaps permanently, that the tax moneys may be used for the benefit of a few." But caution must be exercised, he warned, that the numbers entitled to the benefit be not permitted to increase, and "that in our sympathy we all become objects of that same charity, with no one left to provide the sustenance." Suggests Limiting Public Works. lie said that under the present arrangement private business was competing with public business, and suggested that it might be wise to limit the program of public construction to a completion of the plans already formulated. Senator Nye Attacks NRA as"'Old Deal' in High Gear" —Predicts President Will Soon "Divorce Its Leadership from Big Business." A prediction that President Roosevelt will soon reorganize the National Recovery Administration to "divorce its leadership from big business" was made April 14 by Senator Nye in a luncheon address before the Cleveland City Club, Senator Nye criticized the present policies of the NRA and remarked that "the regimentation of business" through the NRA is only "the 'Old Deal' in high gear." Associated Press advices from Cleveland April 18 quoted from his address as follows: "One cannot be unmindful of the unfulfilled promises of reform which have been made by the 'crack-down' artists," he said. "If the NRA continues under existing leadership and direction it will carry us to greater economic havoc than we have ever known. "All the Army officers on the Federal pay roll are not going to be able to stuff the public much longer with this incessant ballyhoo the NRA the credit for what Public Works Administration, which gives Civil Works Administration, Civilian Conservation Corps, natural causes and the purse of Uncle Sam have done. "I say these things as one who supported and believes that the NRA under wise direction can accomplish great things for America. I do not believe these policies are going to continue. "I believe that President Roosevelt is about to give NRA a shake-up— that he is going to divorce its leadership from big business and reform its policies, making it the agency to help decentralize industry and aid small business against the unscrupulous practices of monopoly and its sponsors. "I believe he will do this when he has, in addition to Ilk wise knowledge of the trend, the report which he has requested of the National Recovery Review Board, an agency removed from the NRA and created by Executive order. "I am confident that the President will act to clean up NRA. I have yet to see a problem or a responsibility placed in his lap upon which his decisions and action have been other than courageous and right." Senators Metcalf and Patterson Criticize Recovery Program—Former Warns of "Dictatorship"—Senator Patterson Says Government Usurps Proper Functions of Its Citizens. An attack on the principles and practices of the present Administration was made April 13 in addresses over the radio network of the National Broadcasting Co.,by Senators Metcalf of Rhode Island and Patterson of Missouri (Reps.) Senator Metcalf criticized the dual budget system and the rising Federal debt, and warned of the dangers of "dictatorship." Senator Patterson asked for a return to the "time-honored principles" of American Government, and said that "most of our ills" resulted from the "usurpation by the Government of the proper functions of its citizens." We quote in part from these addresses, as given in a Washingtion dispatch April 13 to the New York "Herlad Tribune": "The average American citizen falls to realize that he is paying more than one-third of all he earns to the Government in one form or the other," Senator Metcalf said. "I repeat, taxation is power. Not only have the costs of government ascended with startling rapidity, but there has been a prohounced movement of power concentration toward a central government. We are drifting from pure democracy to dictatorship. Events of the last year have more than emphasized this fact. The tremendous acceleration toward the investment of a central authority with the powers of taxation and regulation of society Is something we would not have believed could exist five years ago. • • • Twin Budgets Assailed. "The trend toward abdication of the democracy in favor of a dictatorship is exemplified by transfer to the Executive in two distinct ways. The first is the power to tax. The second is the power to control." He cited the tariff bill and the tax powers in the Agricultural Adjustment Act, and continued: "Powers are being bestowed on the Executive that point toward distatorshill) that is unwise and dangerous. The courage and the ability of the President of the United States is unquestioned, but no man and no system 2685 Is infalliable. We should let him know our wishes and assist him toward their realization, but constructive criticism and orderly and sound thought are essential in times like these. We are heading into new and strange fields. We should move with utmost caution and guard against top-heavy taxation or entering into social experiments from which we will not easily recover." Senator Patterson said. "It is becoming clearer each day that unless interrupted, we are directly headed for permanent collectivism in government with regimentation and regulation of finance industry, agriculture and commerce. The Administration is traveling fast into state socialism and is abandoning what we have been pleased to call the American system of Individual initiative and effort which has been the greatest success in self-government that the world has ever known. Under the pretense of meeting an emergency Congress has delegated power vested in it by the Constitution to the Chief Executive at such a rapid rate that it will soon be denuded of power. Senator Patterson Hits "Repudiation." "The experiments that have been conducted have involved us in an orgy of extravagance unparalleled in peace time by any nation in the history of the world. The sound financial policies that have been followed from the birth of the nation have been abandoned in direct violation of the solemn pledge of the Democratic Party and its Presidential candidate Forty per cent, of the gold belonging to the people has been confiscated and the Administration has shamelessly boasted of a profit to the Government by the process amounting to more than $2,810,000,000. "The Government under the New Deal has sold Government obligations upon the false prepresentation that such obligations were payable in gold, and within 30 days thereafter Congress, at the behest of the President. has sought by legislative action to repudiate the gold clause in such obligations and thereby change the terms of the contract. By legislative enactment Congress has repudiated contracts, both public and private, and under this Administration, for the first time in our history, we have sunk to the low level of a repudiating nation. . . . "It is my opinion, amounting to a firm conviction, that the ills from which we are suffering to-day are caused not by adhering to the timehonored principles upon which this Government rests, but by a departure from those principles." College Students "Strike" in Protest Against War and Fascism. Several thousand students at colleges and universities throughout the United States went "on strike" as a protest against war and Fascism April 13, when they remained away from classes for an hour and held meetings at which war was denounced. The demonstrations in New York City were organized by the Student League for Industrial Democracy, a Socialist organization, and the National Students' League, said to be Communistic. Disorder marked some of the meetings and in a few cases students clashed with police, but in most instances the demonstrations were comparatively orderly. At Vassar College a parade of 300 students and faculty members was led by Dr. Henry N. MacCracken, President. NRAI,Issues Seven Interpretations Explaining Modifications of Retail Drug Code—Selling Below Manufacturers' Trade Price Declared Unfair Trade Practice. Seven interpretations designed to clarify a recently approved amendment to Schedule A of the general retail code applying to drug retailers, and modifying the so-called "losslimitation" provisions, were made public April 7 by the National Recovery Administration. On March 30 the NRA had modified the drug code to restrict low-price sales by a provision that selling drugs, medicine, cosmetics, toilet preparations or drug sundries below the manufacturers' wholesale dozen price would constitute an unfair trade practice. This modification is indicated as follows by the NRA on April 7: Schedule A of the code of fair competition for the retail trade is hereby amended by the addition of a new Section, No. 6, as follows: Section 6, Loss Limitation Provision: In place of the provisions of Article VII, Section 1, the following provision shall apply to all retailers selling the products specified hereinafter: Inasmuch as the vast preponderance of drug store products are distributed through small drug retailers who are unable to purchase on a quantity basis but who perform services which are essential to the welfare of those in their communities, and whereas such services cannot adequately be performed through the facilities provided by their competitors, and whereas in some cases sales are made to consumers by such competitors at prices below the lowest cost of purchase normally obtainable for such merchandise by small drug retailers, and whereas in most instances such sales prices are not a true indication of the general level of prices of such competitors and no general benefit to those in the community accompanies the same, but such prices are in fact in the nature of bait offers of merchandise to attract trade, it is hereby declared an unfair trade practice and is prohibited by this code for any drug retailer to sell any drugs, medicines, cosmetics, toilet preparations or drug sundries at a price below the manufacturers' wholesale list price per dozen, provided, however, that in the case of biologicals or other of the above mentioned products which are not customarily sold in dozen or greater lots the Code Authority may fix a comparable unit quantity, and provided further that any discount, free deal, or rebate which is made available to all purchasers of dozen lots or comparable quantities, shall be considered as part of the manufacturers' wholesale list price. The interpretations as made public April 7 were in the form of questions and answers. Summarizing these, a dispatch, April 7, to the New York "Times" from Washington said: The first of seven interpretations issued to-day applies the provision only to drugs, medicines, cosmetics and drug sundries. The latter are 2686 Financial Chronicle defined as "articles or appliances as used in the promotion of public health and sanitation." Another interpretation applies the amendment only to those articles for which a manufacturer's wholesale price list is available in "dozen or comparable units." In another, "comparable units" are defined as "the lowest number of the article listed" when it is not listed in dozen units, but in no case over a dozen. Still another interpretation applies the manufacturer's wholesale price to articles sold in the open market or otherwise below that price, for purposes of determining cost. Another allows for deduction of the cost of free goods offers from the manufacturer's price, provided that the period of the offer is announced by the manufacturer and open to all. The remaining rulings provide for superseding of the old provision of the code by the new amendment and for the opening of all discount free deals and rebates to all purchasers by the manufacturer, before such discounts can be considered in determining the wholesale list price of the manufacturer. Budgets and Assessments of Code Authorities Must Be Approved by NRA—Executive Order Requires Administrator's Approval of Expenditures. General Hugh S. Johnson, Recovery Administrator, must hereafter approve all budgets and assessments of code Authorities to finance code administration, according to an Executive Order signed April 14 by President Roosevelt. Under this order, failure to pay assessments is made a violation of the NIRA in all cases where codes specifically contain such provisions, or when codes are modified to include such provisions after application and public hearing. The expenditures and assessments must, however, be approved by the Recovery Administrator. The NRA made public at the same time as the Executive Order an administrative order by Colonel G. A. Lynct, NRA Administrative Officer. It was explained that all Code Authorities which have been collecting money to defray expenses of code administration must halt that practice until the figures are approved by the NRA. The administrative order stated that industries which are under more than one code need not contribute to the expenses of more than one Code Authority, except that code authorities other than the one for which a company is already contributing may present evidence to prove that they should also be permitted to collect from the firm. It was explained in Washington that the President's Executive Order and the administrative order followed protests of "racketeering" by some code authorities, which were alleged to have paid high salaries to clerks and employees, and to have incurred unduly high expenses. • The text of the Executive Order follows: EXECUTIVE ORDER MAKING PROVISION FOR A CLAUSE IN CODES OF FAIR COMPETITION RELATING TO COLLECTION OF EXPENSES OF CODE ADMINISTRATION. By virtue of and pursuant to the authority vested in me under the provisions of Title I of the National Industrial Recovery Act of June 16 1933 (Ch. 90, 48 Stat. 195), and in order to effectuate the purposes of said title. I hereby order that the following clause or any appropriate modification thereof shall become effective as a part of any code of fair competition approved under said title upon application therefor (1) pursuant to the provisions of the code relating to amendments thereto or (2) by one or more trade or industrial associations or groups truly representative of the trade or industry or subdivision thereof covered by the code, if the Administrator for Industrial Recovery 'ball find that approval by him of such clause is necessary in order to effectuate the policy of Title I of said Act: 1. It being found necessary, in order to support the administration'of this code and to maintain the standards of fair competition established by this code and to effectuate the policy of the Act, the Code Authority is authorized, subject to the approval of the administrator: (a) To incur such reasonable obligations as are necessary and proper for the foregoing purposes and to meet such obligations out of funds which may be raised as hereinafter provided and Nvilich shall be held in trust for the purposes of the code; (b) To submit to the administrator for his approval, subject to such notice and opportunity to be heard as he may deem necessary, (1) an itemized budget of its estimated expenses for the foregoing purposes, and (2) an equitable basis upon which the funds necessary to support such budget shall be contributed by members of the industry; (c) After such budget and basis of contribution have been approved by the administrator, to determine and secure equitable contribution as above set forth by all such members of the industry, and to that end, if necessary. to institute legal proceedings therefor in its own name. 2. Only members of the industry complying with the code and contributing to the expenses of its administration as provided. in Section 1 hereof shall be entitled to participate in the selection of the members of the Code Authority or to receive the benefit of its voluntary activities or to make use of any emblem or insignia of the NRA. FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT. Approval recommended: Hugh S. Johnson, Administrator. By G. A. Lynch, Administrative Officer. The White House, April 14 1934. The administrative order which supplemented the Executive Order read as follows: ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER. Regulations governing collection of expenses of code administration: By virtue of the authority Nested in me under Title 1 of the National Industrial Recovery Act, I hereby prescribe the following regulations to April 21 1934 supplement the President's Executive Order of April 14 1934, "making provision for a clause in codes of fair competition relating to collection of expenses of code administration." A member of any trade or industry, the code for which contains the provision included in the above-mentioned Executive Order or any other provision whereunder non-payment of an equitable contribution to the costs of code administration is in violation of the code, shall be deemed in violation of that code only if: 1. The administrator has approved an itemized budget of estimated expenses and an equitable basis of contribution as required by the provision included in the above Executive Order. 2. In conformance with the basis of contribution so approved, an agency authorized by the Code Authority certifies to the National Recovery Administration that: A. It had given such member due notice of contribution due, which notice clearly stated: (1) The basis of contribution and the fact that it had been approved by the administrator. (2) That continued non-payment after 30 days of the receipt of the notice is a violation of the code, and (3) The right of the member to file a protest with such authorized. agency or the National Code Authority or directly with NRA within 15 days on the ground that the basis of contribution is unjust as applied to such member or that the basis of contribution is not being followed by such authorized agency as to such member. B. Such member, after 30 days of the receipt of the notice, has failed to pay such authorized agency the amount due and has failed to file a protest with such agency within 15 days from the date of notice. 3. No protest has been filed with the National Code Authority or with NRA within 15 days from the date of notice, or such a protest has been filed with the Code Authority or NRA and has been overruled by NRA. Provided, however: That no member of any trade or industry shall be deemed in violation of a code for failure to contribute to the expense of administration of the code for any trade or industry other than for that trade or industry which embraces his principal line of business, subject to such exception as NRA may provide. Any Code Authority for any trade or industry may show cause to NRA why any member or group of members, subject to the administration of such Code Authority, should contribute to the expenses of administration of that code in addition to a contribution required of that member or group of members to the expenses of administration of some other code or codes, but no ruling made by NRA on any such application shall apply to any member of the distributive and service trades and industries until after July 15 1934. Further, provided: That under no circumstances may any Code Authority demand a contribution to the expense of code administration by any member of the trade or industry unless the code contains a provision whereunder nonpayment of an equitable share of the cost of code administration constitutes a code violation and whereunder the administrator shall have approved an itemized budget and an equitable basis of contribution. HUGH S. JOHNSON, Administrator. By G. A. Lynch, Administrative Officer, April 14 1934. Plans of NRA For Concentration on Code Enforce-. ment Under Supervision of W. A. Harriman— General Johnson Creates Boards to Avert Threatened Industrial Strikes. General Hugh S. Johnson, Recovery Administrator, announced on March 28 reorganization plans for the National Recovery Administration, designed to place greater emphasis on code enforcement rather than code formulation. On March 30 General Johnson took further steps to set up machinery within the NRA to settle labor disputes Which might develop into strikes. He issued an order providing for the creation of industrial relations boards to handle labor disputes under codes, and he said that as soon as the NRA Labor Advisory Board and Consumers' Advisory Board submitted lists of nominees he would appoint advisers from these two Boards to be Government members of Code Authorities. United Press Washington advices, March 28, outlined the reorganization plans in the NRA as follows: In the new setup. General Johnson gave to W. Averell Harriman the task of supervising and co-ordinating the NRA for code administration. His tremendous task will include compliance, enforcement and code authority procedure. Mr. Harriman is a son of the railroad magnate, Edward II. Harriman. He has been Chairman of the Board of Union Pacific RR. The new group of special assistants includes several now in that capacity: Robert W. Lea, Industrial Adviser; Edward F. McGrady, Labor Adviser ; Alvin Brown, Executive Officer; Leon Henderson, Research and Planning Director; Frances M. Robinson, the Administrator's personal assistant. General Johnson's son, Lieutenant Kilbourne Johnson, will continue to have special and direct assignments. George Buckley, who has assisted with the. newspaper code, will continue, and possibly may take charge of public relations in the post vacated by Charles Michelson. The division formerly headed by Arthur D. Whiteside, who has returned to private business, has been divided. Administration of service codes was given to Colonel G. De Freest Lamer. Thomas L. Robinson has been named Deputy Administrator for financial codes. Garment industry codes have gone to the division headed by Sol A. Rosenblatt. Codes for textile and retail trades are unassigned. A litigation division will be added to the legal division. It will co-ordinate legal matters, examine and review transcripts of cases, carry on cases in the name of the Justice Department, present them to the National Compliance Board. Two weak spots in the recovery organization, proper code enforcement and application of codes to all industries, are expected to be strengthened by the new procedure. Separate policy boards are to be created for labor, trade practices, and code authorities. Representatives from the long-standing labor, industry, and consumer advisory boards, planning and research and legal divisions will be on each policy board, and Clarence Darrow's recovery review board will be invited to send representatives to all policy meetings. Volume 138 Financial Chronicle A Washington dispatch, March 30, to the New York "Times" noted the new NRA plans for averting industrial strikes in part as follows: Instead of attending all meetings of the Code Authorities, the Labor and Consumers Advisers about to be appointed as attaches to the Government agents on the Code Authorities will attend meetings only by invitation. They will have, however, free access to minutes of the meetings and have a right "to appear before the Code Authority to make statements on specific subjects." Data to Be Confidential. Information obtained by the advisers will be kept strictly confidential, the General said. The order calling for creation of the Industrial Relations Boards, or Committees, directs the creation of these agencies at once. It was suggested that such Boards follow the pattern previously set and have equal numbers of representatives of employees and employers, with both sides choosing the Chairmen. The Labor Policy Board, the office order states, "will consider all problems involving the labor provisions of codes and all questions of labor policy." . "Typical problems within the fields of this Board," it adds, "are those involving hours and wages, differentials, conditions of labor, inconsistencies in codes for similar industries, &c." The Board is to include a Chairman appointed by General Johnson and "one representative each from the Labor, Industrial and Consumers' Advisory Boards, and from the Legal and Planning and Research Divisions." Mr. Green explained that the fact that labor would have but one of five members would appear to make the Board one-sided in the handling of labor policies. He said that labor was of the impression that the new Board seemed to usurp authority already delegated to other agencies. Mr. Harriman, as first assistant to General Johnson, will have as aides an assistant for compliance, one for code authority authorization and one for other problems of code administration. Details of Reorganisation. The reorganization order governs the procedure to be followed by all divisions in ruling on code administration problems. To the deputies and divisional administrators enormous powers are entrusted to expedite rulings and make decisions. The order states that each deputy will arrange with the legal, labor, industrial and consumers' advisers assigned to him for periodic meetings. The deputy will consult these assistants on all requests made upon him for rulings. "After such consultation the deputy will make his proposed ruling," the order continues. "These proposed rulings must be made promptly. The protracted delays which have occurred heretofore will not be tolerated, and It is not necessary that the deputy obtain the approval of his advisers before making a ruling; it is only necessary that he consult with them. 'However, each adviser should signify his approval or disapproval (with reason for disapproving) on the record. If an adviser is absent at a meeting and neither he nor a substitute can be contacted after reasonable effort on the part of the deputy, or if an adviser is present but refuses to commit himself until conferring with his Board, the deputy will nevertheless make the proposed ruling—merely signifying on the record the adviser's absence or refusal to commit himself. "Without further delay the deputy will submit the file, including all recommendations, to the Division Administrator, who will approve, disapprove or modify the proposed ruling." The following is underscored for emphasis: "The Division Administrator's decision will be final (subject only to the ultimate disapproval of the Administrator), and will be immediately transmitted to the Code Authority." Small Steel Companies Praise NRA Code Operation— Protest FTC Charges That Large Concerns Are Unduly Benefited. The American Iron and Steel Institute made public on April 10 a pamphlet containing a number of messages sent to Washington by the heads a small steel companies, protesting against the recent report of the Federal Trade Commission on the operation of the steel code, which was submitted to the Senate March 19. This report implied that the code tended to promote monopoly and that it enabled the larger companies to oppress and eliminate their smaller competitors. The communications from officials of smaller companies, reproduced in the booklet, protested against the Commission's findings and praised the steel code for promoting recovery in the industry. There is given below the text of a representative telegram sent by T. E. Kilby, former Governor of Alabama, and now President of the Kilby Car & Foundry Co. of Anniston, Ala.: Ours is a small industry, perhaps the smallest of all members of steel code. The code has not oppressed or eliminated us, but on the contrary has encouraged and helped us. The code has not created a monopoly, but It has given the small producer a chance to compete on an even basis with large producers. Large producers have always shown a fair and liberal attitude toward small producers. Since the adoption of the code our business has been fairly well stabilized, employing more labor at better rates without unreasonable advance in prices. If all managers of small Industries were consulted instead of demagogic politicians who are thinking more of their political interests than of the business interests of the country, you would, in our opinion, hear a very different story from that carried in the Federal Trade Commission's report. NRA Code for Real Estate Brokerage Industry Approved by NRA Administrator and by Directors of National Association of Real Estate Boards. The proposed code for the real, estate brokerage industry, filed with NRA by the National Association of Real Estate Boards, and recently submitted to member boards in final form, was approved by the Executive Committee and board 2687 of directors of the Association at a special meeting called in Washington, D. C., for action on the code. No change in principles or intent was made in the code as submitted in full to member boards. Action followed a discussion which covered two all-day sessions and one night session of the Board. The Association, in announcing this on March 6, said: The code will now be formally placed in the hands of NRA officials for their final action. As adopted, the code provides for registration with the code authority of every one in the industry. It covers the representation of others, for compensation, fee or valuable consideration, as a whole or partial vocation, in the buying, selling, or exchange of real property; leasing, renting, and the collection of rent; appraising real property; the brokerage of insurance or the negotiating and procuring of loans on real property as an adjunct to the business. The code was approved by the Administrator on April 9. The code becomes effective 10 days after its approval by the Administrator. The setting up of a Code Authority, and adoption by the Code Authority of by-laws and regulations for code administration are steps to follow approval of the code. Representatives of the National Association of Real Estate Boards on the Code Authority are to be elected by the Association at its annual convention (which this year will be held in the Nicollet Hotel, Minneapolis, June 25-30). Appointment of representatives to serve until elected representatives are chosen is to be made by the President of the Association, Hugh Potter, Houston, Tex. Details of the code were given in our issue of Feb. 24, Page 1340. New Jersey Silk Company Pays Fines of $1,000 After Pleading Guilty to Violations of NRA Code— Criminal Prosecution First of Kind in United States. The first crimin21 prosecution of a company for allevd villation of a National Recovery Administration code ended April 6 when the Allied Dye & Print Works, Inc., of Clifton, N. J., pleaded guilty to 11 violations of the code for the silk dyeing and printing industry and was fined $1,000 by Federal Judge Phillip Forman in Trenton. The defendant, through its counsel, Frederic M. Pearse, admitted the offences charged and expressed regret. It also said that it was strongly in favor of Government regulation. District Attorney Harlan Besson recommended leniency. He said the law provided a fine of $500 for each of the offences charged, but suggested that on each of three counts a fine of $120 be imposed, with a fine of $80 each for the other eight. A Trenton dispatch April 6 to the New York "Times" added the following details of the charges: The bill of c,ompaint charged that the company "worked" its employees on Saturday, whereas the NRA code stipulates that the silk dyeing and printing industry must halt production from 6 a. m. Saturdays to 6 a. m. Mondays. Three counts of the information charged Saturday employment. The other eight allegations were that the company employed its workers for more than eight hours a day on eight days in January. Mr. Pearse, addressing the Court, said technical requirements of the industry were responsible for the company's violation. He said silk run through the printing machinery Friday nights had to be placed in the dyeing machinery on Saturdays or the materials would be spoiled. "We have endeavored to make our peace with the Code Authorities," Mr. Pearse said. "The company is anxious to abide by the provisions of the code. We have frankly discussed the matter with the District Attorney, the Code Authorities and the NRA, and I advised my client plead guilty because of plea of no vult could not be made." "Since you have pleaded guilty, I am assuming that your client has no quarrel with the NRA," the Court replied. "In fact, I gather from your stand that the company approves of the law and wants to support it." Comptroller-General McCarl Rules Bidders on Government Contracts Must Submit Certificates Showing NRA Code Compliance. Comptroller-General J. R. M. McCarl on April 7 upheld the validity of an Executive Order requiring certificates of National Recovery Administration code compliance from companies or individuals bidding for Government contracts. This ruling is expected to apply to Henry Ford and his distributors, who must submit certificates of compliance with the automobile code when seeking Government contracts in the future. In sustaining the Executive Order issued in March, Mr. McCarl reversed his previous opinion in which he had held that the Government should furnish proof of code violation but that, once violations were established, damages could be collected. Associated Press Washington advices April 7 added the following regarding the new ruling: The new ruling makes statements of compliance a prerequisite to bidding. The ruling was given to Postmaster-General James A. Farley regarding a gasoline contract, the lone bidder for whic had his certificate in Prober shape. In its controversy with Mr. Ford. the Recovery Administration contended the auto manufacturer should be required to sign the automobile code before Ford dealers could bid on government contracts. Mr. McCarl held then no statement of adherence to code provisions was necessary from bidders, but once a Government contract was accepted the contractor would be bound by code compliance required therein. Mr. McCarl now has made clear his attitude on the Executive order Issued by President Roosevelt last month providing for certificates of compliance as a prerequisite to bidding. His ruling said the low responsible 2688 Financial Chronicle bid should be considered the one "containing or accompanied by the required certificate. The Executive Order was given in our issue of March 24. page 2018, Code of Fair Competition for Retail Booksellers Forbids Price Cutting for Six Months After Publication Date—Pact Effective April 19. A code of fair competition for retail booksellers became effective April 19, following its approval by the National Recovery Administration April 13. The principal feature of the code was a section, applying to all booksellers and book departments of retail stores, which forbids the sale of books at retail below the resale price fixed by the publisher. Under this provision prices must be kept at the publisher's rates for six months after the date of publication. If a book is published before July 1, the price remains unchanged until Jan. 1 of the following year to allow the book the benefit of one Christmas buying season. A Washington dispatch April 13 to the New York "Times" added the following description of the code: The code, however, will not affect books chosen by book clubs as their monthly selections, nor will it affect books published exclusively for mail order or subscription sale. A further provision excepts sale to public or college libraries, church libraries and other public agencies. The schedule, demanded by leading booksellers on the ground that their business was being destroyed by price cutting in department stores and drug stores, and by the use of books as "bait," was granted by the NRA after a division of opinion in the Consumers' Advisory Board. NRA officials to-day could recall no other code in which prices set by the producer of an article were protected, although several industries, notably the retail drug trade, attempted to have such a provision inserted In their codes. Cultural Value a Factor. The Consumers' Advisory Board was thought here to have given way on its original objections to the proposal because of the very special conditions which surround the industry, and because of the cultural implications In the continuance of book shops. It was pointed out that the competition of lending libraries, magazines and cheap editions was enough to keep publishers from profiteering because of the provision and, furthermore, that book publishing is one of the few industries where sale is made direct from the producer to the retailer, With no jobbers or middlemen. Another reason for inclusion of the provision, which was said to be the most drastic price-fixing to be permitted by the NRA, is that the establishment of the retail price by the publisher was a universal custom of the trade up to a few years ago. The code provides for an Administrator's Price Control Committee with a representative of the Consumers' Advisory Board as a member to check any rise in prices. 13,ThelAdministrator's letter to the President notifying him of the approval of the code, said. "Members of the trade are facing an acute situation as a result of 'lossleader'icompetition encountered from certain large department stores. "Prior to the adoption of the retail code a few titles of popular new books were placed on sale occasionally as 'loss leaders' or 'bait' by some department stores, but the base for price-cutting has spread since the retail code hasibeen in effect. Each competing department store knows that the other cannot sell below cost and the cut-price competition is, therefore, spread over the wholelbook department. Competition of this sort for the independent bookseller means eventual bankruptcy." President Roosevelt Signs Poultry Code for New York Metropolitan Area—Pact, Effective April 23, Seeks to End Racketeering and Monopolies. A code of fair competition for the live poultry industry of the New York metropolitan area will become effective April 23, following its approval April 13 by President Roosevelt. The code is designed to eliminate monopolistic trade practices which increase prices to consumers and at the same time lower returns to producers. Leroy C. Peterson, who was recently connected with the Consumers' Counsel of the Agricultural Adjustment Administration, was appointed Code Supervisor by General Hugh S. Johnson, Recovery Administrator, and Secretary of Agriculture Wallace, Who have joint jurisdiction over the code. It was said by AAA officials that anti-racketeering provisions in the code seek to prevent the collection of unearned "fees" and coercing members of the industry. A Washington dispatch, April 13, to the New York "Journal of Commerce" summarized the code provisions as follows: AAA officials see an especial significance in the approval of the code, since prices paid for live poultry on the New York market have always served as a guide to prices in all principal markets. This fact will be further carried out, since the code specifically provides that a better system of daily market quotations, "more accurately reflecting actual supply and demand conditions," shall be established for the Industry. As requested by Commissioner of Markets Frank Morgan of New York at the code's public hearing here on Jan. 17, the approved draft contains anti-racketeering provisions, which seek to prevent collection of unearned "fees," and the forcing of industry members to join any association through threats of violence or other means of coercion. Monopoly Charged. In the hearing, it was testified by many that special groups within the industry had forced yielding of privileges, which resulted in monopolistic control of the market, with consequent widening of the spread between prices received by producers and the cost of poultry to consumers. Combinations to apportion territory of trade, or to allocate customers among certain firms, are declared unlawful by the fair practice provisions April 21 1934 of the code. Further unlawful competitive methods include unreasonable charges for rental of coops, trucking, loading and unloading of trucks and cars. It is specifically provided that these services may be performed by the shipper at his option. Sale of inedible products, secret rebates, overfeeding just before sale and commercial bribery are also strictly prohibited. Wage and Labor Provisions. Wage and labor provisions place 40 hours as a maximum work week for commission houses, and 48 hours as the maximum for slaughter houses, with minimum wages of 50c. per hour. Must Make Reports. Weekly reports of the range of daily prices and the volume of sales is required from every industry member by provisions of the code. Also, each week firms are to make reports regarding expected shipments, and no unreported poultry can be unloaded or sold. Administration of the code will be under the jurisdiction of a code supervisor, to be appointed by the Secretary of Agriculture and the Administrator of the National Recovery Act. This supervisor will be assisted by an Industrial Advisory Committee, elected by both commission merchants and slaughter house operators. Senator Wagner Charges Many Large Employers Hamper Work of National Labor Board—Reports 218 Strikes in March Against 78 in February. Many large employers fail to adopt an attitude making for industrial peace, and consequently hinder the work of the National Labor Board and the Regional Labor Boards in settling industrial disputes, it was charged April 15 by Senator Wagner, Chairman of the National Labor Board, in a report which showed a recent increase in strikes throughout the country. There were 218 strikes in March, involving 139,000 workers, the survey revealed. This compared with 78 strikes involving 56,000 workers in February. Senator Wagner said that 139 strikes were settled in March. compared with 51 in February. In each month 90 strikes were averted by National and Regional Labor Boards. A United Press Washington dispatch of April 15 added the following: Since their creation the Labor Boards have received 2,643 disputes of all kinds, involving 1,375,253 workers, Senator Wagner said. Cases pending on April 1 totaled 717. Commenting on these figures, Senator Wagner said two points stood out: "First is the fact that a majority of employers and employees continue to make increased use of the Boards. Second is the fact that a niinority of large employers, whose following has not diminished, persist in an attitude which does not make for industrial peace and constitutes a heavy obstacle in the way of the work of the Boards. "The necessity of dealing with the situation, which was pointed out in a report to the President last February, is even more noticeable to-day." Senator Wagner, Democrat from New York, did not elaborate on his charges, but previously he had made his position clear. He feels that many large employers are resisting organization of labor, in violation of the spirit if not the letter of the labor provisions of the NIRA. D. L. Podell Asserts "Brain Trust" and NRA Oppose "Red Menace"—Defends NIRA Before Commerce Committee of American Bar Association—Criticism by Others. David L. Podell, one of those who formulated the National Industrial Recovery Act, declared April 11, that the National Recovery Administration and the "brain trust" were opposed to the "real danger of a red menace" in the United States. Speaking before the Commerce Committee of the American Bar Association in New York City, Mr. Podell said that he would far rather "be in the hands of Rex Tugwell and any other member of the brain trust than in the hands of a wildeyed labor agitator leading an angry mob of unemployed." Further extracts from his address, and from speeches by other speakers, are given below, as contained in the New York "Times" April 12: Mr. Podell said the strength of the "legitimate labor unions" had been sapped and their treasuries impoverished by unemployment before the NRA was organized, and that "Communist groups, red agitators and left-wingers were eating into their very heart." "The real evil, the greatest conspirator in this country, was unemployment, and it was that which the NRA struck at," he added. He told the committee, which will report on the legal side of the recovery program at the annual meeting of the American Bar Association in Milwaukee in August, that one of the important questions yet to be resolved was "If it lies in the power of the government to say the decisions of a majority in any industry are binding on the minority." Julius Henry Cohen, General Counsel for the New York Port Authority and representative of employers in garment industry negotiations for seven years, proposed that collective-bargaining agreements be made legally binding on all when they have been accepted by the majority, without forcing the minority to join the labor groups comprising the majority. Mr. Javits Urges Permanence. Benjamin A. Javits, anti-trust law authority and Counsel for several trade associations and code authorities, said the recovery program represented "a radical departure from many of our accustomed notions of constitutional law, confronting us with the principle that equally fundamental with private right is the right of the public to regulate it in the common interest." Nevertheless, he continued, he hoped that "some of the benefits of the NRA will be made permanent when the Act expires next year." He said he expected the Supreme Court to give finality to the administrative definitions of the NRA and the AAA as t,o what constituted fair practices in competition. He doubted that the Court would extend such finality, however, to Administrative findings that a respondent had violated a practice. A vigorous dissent from the general belief in the constitutionality of the NRA expressed by counsel who appeared before the committee was voiced 2689 Financial Chronicle Volume 138 by Hal H. Smith, General Counsel for the Michigan Manufacturers Association, who said it was "clearly unconstitutional." He contended that the emergency added nothing to the power of Congress to enlarge the inter-State commerce clause and that if the public wanted the NRA the Constitution would have to be changed first, because there was no legal short cut. Among the supporters of the constitutionaltiy of the recovery program, on the other hand, was Dean Charles E. Clark of the Yale University Law School, who said the "due-process attack on the NRA is the fundamental argument," but that the Supreme Court has moved in the direction of recognizing that "the public interest may justify a sharp limitation of the rights of individuals." Meeting of Executive Council of A. B. A.—Membership of Association Increased by Nearly 2,000 President Law Regards Gain As Evidence of Emergence From Depression. An increase of almost 2,000 in the membership of the American Bankers Association was indicated in a report presented to the Executive Council meeting at Hot Springs, Ark., on April 17 by President F. M. Law, President First National Bank, Houston, Tex. About 275 representatives of members of the Association were in attendance at the meeting. Mr. Law said: To-day, I feel in a very cheerful and hopeful frame of mind, when I think of the American Bankers Association as an organization of its membership. of its past and of its future. I am encouraged, for instance, when I contemplate the fact that from a low membership of approximately 9,600 just a few months ago, we have now gotten that membership back, in round numbers, to about 11.500. and the number is constantly increasing. That certainly is a very substantial evidence that we are beginning, at least, to emerge from the depths of depression. Reopening of Closed Banks for Business and Lifting of Restrictions. Since the publication in our issue of April 14 (page 2519), with regard to the banking situation in the various States, the following further action is recorded: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. From the Washington "Evening Star" of April 15 it is learnqd that the Washington Mechanics Savings Bank of Washington, D. C., which recently reopened the Mount Vernon Savings Bank at Ninth Street and Massachusetts Avenue, as its headquarters, was to change its title on April 16, to The City Bank. We quote further from the paper mentioned: This follows formal approval of that name yesterday (April 14) by the Corporation Commission of Virginia, at Richmond. The action of the Commission consisted in approving an amendment to the charter of the bank, which had been adopted April 10 at a meeting of stockholders at Alexandria. New new name will be put up conspicuously on the five branches of the old Washington Mechanics Savings Bank, and soon will appear on the old Franklin National Bank, which is to reopen as part of the City Bank. Clarence F. Burton, President of the City Bank, received word late Yesterday of the favorable action of the State Commission in Richmond, and this in reality changed the name of the bank beginning late yesterday. President Burton expects to reopen the Franklin National Bank before the first of May. ILLINOIS. The St. Louis "Globe-Democrat" of April 12 had the following to say concerning the affairs of the First National Bank of East St. Louis, Ill.: A letter drawn up by the Central Trades and Labor Union of East St. Louis, requesting President Roosevelt, the Comptroller of the Currency and Illinois Senators and Congressmen to authorize an investigation to determine why the closed First National Bank of East St. Louis has not been reopened, was approved last night (April In at a meeting of about 500 depositors of the defunct institution in the City Hall. The bank has been closed for 13 months. Recently a delegation representing the Labor Union conferred with Guy Hitt, Conservator in charge of the bank, and sought information as to why it still remains closed. The delegation was unable to obtain the information it desired, and the depositors meeting was called to pursue the inquiry further. A. L. Wegener, President of the Labor Union, was named Chairman of the depositors' organization, and George Suprunowski was elected Secretary, KENTUCKY. James R. Dorman, State Banking Commissioner for Kentucky announced on April 11 that the First State Bank of Harlan, which is in liquidation, has completed distribution of a 50% dividend to depositors. Associated Press advices from Frankfort, Ky., noting this, went on to say: The bank closed Aug. 25 1933, having assets of $1,200,000, capital of $100,000 and surplus of $100,000. I. C. Dickinson has been in charge.of liquidation. According to reports received at the banking department. the bank will pay off depositors in full. Commissioner Dorman said the Bank of Harlan was organized on the structure of the old bank and is now doing business. The new bank has capital of $50.000, surplus of $10,000 and deposits of more than $500,000. W. W. Lewis is President and Elwood Hart, Cashier. MARYLAND. Baltimore advices on April 13 to the "Wall Street Journal" stated that J. J. Ghinger, State Bank Commissioner, and receiver for the Citizens Bank, at Hurlock, in Dorchester County, Md., has mailed checks to depositors and general creditors for 10% of their balances. As an outgrowth of the reorganization of the Baltimore County Bank at Towson, Md., three new banks located at Towson, Randallstown and White Hall, were to open on April 12, according to an announcement by John J. Ghinger, State Bank Commissioner for Maryland. The new institutions will be known respectively, as the Bank of Baltimore County, Towson; Randallstown Bank, Randallstown, and White Hall Bank, White Hall. They will be operated as separate and independent successors to the Baltimore County Bank and its two former branches at Randallstown and White Hall. The Baltimore "Sun" of April 11, from which the foregoing information is obtained, continuing said: Opening of the new bank will follow adoption of a plan of reorganization of the Baltimore County Bank whereby each of the new banks will have a capital stock of $50,000. This capital will be divided into 5,000 shares of $10 par value, all of which will be sold to the old bank except directors' qualifying shares at $12 a share, so as to provide a $10,000 surplus, or a total capital structure of $60,000 in each instance. Elmer It. Haile has been elected President of the Bank of Baltimore: County. Other officers will be Eugene W. Weakley, Vice-President: H. Edward Rusteberg, Acting Cashier, and Jennie E. Weil, Assistant Cashier. Besides Mr. Haile and Mr. Weakley. . . Officers of the Randallstown Bank will be John K. Ruff, President; Dr. William E. Martin, Vice-President, and G. Roland Price, Cashier. . . Samuel Streett will be President of the White Hall Bank; George 0. Richardson, Vice-President; William P. Wright, Cashier, and Lida E. Slade, Assistant Cashier. In a letter to depositors and stockholders of the old bank, the Board of Directors and depositors'committees aid it had been their hope that, upon opening the new banks, it would have been possible to make a cash distribution to depositors through a loan from the Reconstruction Finance Corporation on the assets of the Baltimore County Bank. Formal application for this loan was made early last November, it was stated, but because of many difficulties "beyond their control," no definite commitment has yet been obtained from the RFC as to the amount of the loan or when it will become available. The Baltimore "Sun" of April 16 stated that payment of a dividend of 10% of the funds on deposit in the Southern Maryland Trust Co. of Seat Pleasant, Md.(P. 0. Washington, D. C.) and 10% of all recognized claims against that company was announced the previous day by Lee J. Naughton, conservator of the trust company. The "Sun" continuing said: The payment will aggregate $19,316.97 and will be credited to-day (April 16) to depositors' and claimants' accounts in the Seat Pleasant Bank, which has been formed out of the reorganization of the Southern Maryland Trust Company and supersedes that bank. MICHIGAN. The First Savings Bank of Bronson, Mich., opened last week, according to the "Michigan Investor" of April 14, which added: Frank Coward, President of the Bronson Bank, reported 25% more deposits than withdrawals on the first day of business. The People's National Bank of Bronson is at work effecting a reorganization. We learn from the "Michigan Investor" of April 14 that distributions to depositors are being made by the following Michigan banks: Bank of Kalamazoo, 40% or $2,203,000; Peoples State Bank of Imlay City. $20,000: First National of Three Rivers, $167,000; Peoples State Bank for Savings of Muskegon, $27,717.55 by court order; State Savings Bank of Ionia, $40,000, and Gladwin State Savings Bank, $30,000. NEW YORK STATE. Announcement was made April 16 by Joseph A. Broderick, State Superintendent of Banks for New York, that the American Bank of Lackawanna, N. Y., which had been operating on a restricted basis since the bank holiday of March 1933, has been reopened for unrestricted business. Concerning the affairs of the Mount Vernon Trust Co., Mount Vernon, N. Y., a dispatch to the New York "Times" under date of April 15 had the following to say: Because Henry M. Kahle is the only stockholder who has filed a notice of appeal to the Appellate Division from the order of Supreme Court Justice Close, allowing the reopening of the Mount Vernon Trust Co. on a three-point plan, hundreds of petititions were being circulated to-day calling on Mr. Kahle to drop his appeal. The bank has been closed on a restricted basis since the bank holiday declared by President Roosevelt. More than $12,000,000 has been tied up. Under the court order, the bank expected to reopen to-morrow, but the appeal of Mr. Kahle blocked this procedure. More than 22.000 depositors are affected by the court action. With a loan of $1,500.000 from the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, the bank expected to release 55% under the reopening plan. This would allow about $5,000,000 for distribution among the depositors. OHIO. In regard to the affairs of The Chagrin Falls Banking Co. of Chagrin Falls, Ohio, now being operated by a conservator, a proposed plan for the resumption of normal business by the institution was mailed to the depositors under date of April 17. This plan seeks to avoid a forced liquidation of assets under present unfavorable conditions, to provide a 50% payoff of restricted deposits, and to restore adequate banking facilities to Chagrin Falls and vicinity. 0.P. Van Sweringen and two former officials of the defunct Union Trust Co. of Cleveland, Ohio, namely Joseph R. Nutt, Chairman of the Board, and Wilbur M. Baldwin, President, were named in indictments returned on April 13 by the Cuyahoma County Grand Jury. From the Cleveland "Plain Dealer" of April 14 we quote: Financial Chronicle 2690 The indictment charges false entry in the books and records of the bank and false entry in a statement of the bank's financial condition. Mr. Nutt and Mr. Baldwin are named as principals and 0. P. Van Sweringen is charged with being an aider and abettor. The indictment involves a transaction in September 1931, as a result of which the Van Sweringen Corp. sold to the Union Trust Co. Government bonds in the amount of $10,112,540.98. Less than 10 days after this sale, the Union Trust Co. sold the securities back to the Van Sweringen Corp. The grand jury held that this transaction was entirely fictitious and made for the sole purpose of enabling the bank to make a better financial statement as of Sept. 29 1931, than its actual condition warranted. Therefore the alleged false entries were made to deceive, the Indictment charges. 0. P. Van Sweringen issued a statement last night in which he said: "In September 1931, the Van Sweringen Corp., of which I am President, had among its assets ten millions of dollars of United States Government securities. J. R. Nutt, Chairman of the Union Trust Co. knew that the Van Sweringen Corp. owned such a block of securities, and asked me if the company would sell them. "I told him it would and it did. The price was the current price, plus the accrued interest. Mr. Nutt asked me if we would deposit with the Union Trust Co. the money we received for the bonds. He offered to post the bonds as security for such a large deposit if we would do so. This was a business proposition, and I agreed to it. "Some time later we were asked if the Van Sweringen Corp. would be willing to purchase the bonds back from the Union Trust Co. We were and we did. "These were open and shut purchases and sales of property for cash. Now perfectly simple transactions are being construed as having been part of something claimed to have been done unlawfully by the Union Trust Co. "Perhaps I am a little old-fashioned, but I still believe we are living in a government of law, and I feel no concern over the outcome, which is going to be determined in the unbiased considered judgment of the court, where all motives, save those in pursuit of Justice, are excluded." Mr. Nutt, in a statement last night, charged that the indictment .,ad resulted from months of "critical search for something on which to base a charge against me" and pointed out that there was no intimation in the charge that he profited or that the bank lost by the transaction. He assumed full responsibility for suggesting the transactions on which the indictment was based, but expressed confidence that he would be cleared of any imputation of wrongdoing. "Not a word was said about the repurchase of the bonds at the time of the original transaction," Mr. Nutt said, "and the sale back to the Van Sweringen Corp. was first suggested by me. I regret that it has involved Mr. Van Sweringen in this unpleasantness." Mr. Baldwin said the would have no comment to make on the indictment last night. Attorney William H. Boyd has been retained to represent all three men. PENNSYLVANIA. Plans for a new bank to replace the closed Real Estate Savings & Trust Co. of Allegheny, Pittsburgh, Pa., have been approved by Dr. William D. Gordon, State Secretary of Banking for Pennsylvania, according to the Pittsburgh "Post-Gazette" of April 19, which added: The bank probably will open June 1, when the receiver will have available about $1,500,000 for payment to depositors, according to a reorganization committee headed by Edward A. Young. Other members, who are soliciting stock subscriptions, are D. L. Clark, Herman P.Brandt, Henry J. Voegtly and James A. Geltz. More than two-thirds of the required capital and surplus has been subscribed, Young announced. The new bank will have capital of $200,000 surplus of $100,000 and undivided profits of $12,500. Making $1,500,000 available to depositors, the First National Bank at McKees Rocks, Pa., was to open on April 18, with T. W. Friend as President, John J. Thomas Vice-President and Earl W. Sutton, Cashier, according to the Pittsburgh "Post-Gazette" of April 16, which went on to say: The new bank replaces the First National Bank of McKees Rocks, which closed in the bank holiday of March 1933, and has since been on a restricted basis, with Mr. Friend as conservator. A dispatch by the Associated Press from Harrisburg, Pa., under date of April 12 reported that a charter had been issued to the Mt. Pleasant State Bank, Mt. Pleasant, Westmoreland Co., Pa., organized as the successor of the Citizens' Savings & Trust Co. of that place, which had been operating on a restricted basis. The new bank, it was stated, was incorporated with a capital stock of $50,000 by S. N. Warden, W. S. Leeper and J. B. Goldsmith, all of Mt. Pleasant. WISCONSIN. That a new bank has been organized at Durand, Wis., under the title of the Security National Bank, to replace the First National Bank of that place, is indicated in the following taken from the Milwaukee "Sentinel" of April 12: Reorganization of another Wisconsin bank has been completed, it was disclosed yesterday (April 11) when it was announced that the Comptroller of the Currency at Washington has granted a charter to the Security National Bank of Durand, Wig. Capital stock consists of $20,000 common and $30,000 preferred. John Brunner Jr., is President and G. C. Schelfelbein is Cashier. The bank succeeds the First National Bank of Durand. ITEMS ABOUT BANKS, TRUST COMPANIES, &c. New York Cotton Exchange membership of the Estate of T. LureIle Guild was sold, April 17, to Homer W. Orvis, for another, for $20,000, an increase of $100 over the preceding sale of April 9. A membership on the Chicago Board of Trade sold, April 19, at $7,000 net to the buyer, off $200 from the previous sale. Charles Prentiss Noyes, who held the sixth oldest membership on the New York Stock Exchange, died at his home in April 21 1934 New York City on April 16. He was 74 years old, and had been a member of the Stock Exchange since Oct. 9 1884. Mr. Noyes's father, Julius M. Noyes, was a member of the Exchange from 1872 until his death in 1889. The elder Mr. Noyes founded the brokerage firm of Harriet & Noyes, which later became J. M. Noyes & Co., of which the son was a member until it dissolved in.1932. Since then, Charles Noyes, and his son Julius W. Noyes, also a member of the Stock Exchange, have been floor traders on the Exchange. Robert Otis Hayward, partner of Dillon, Read & Co., New York, investment bankers, died at his home in Bronxville, N. Y., on April 17. Mr. Hayward, who was an expert on foreign government financing, was 47 years ago. Mr. Hayward was admitted to the New York bar in 1911. In 1916 he joined William A. Read & Co., now Dillon, Read & Co., and in 1926 was made a partner. During the World War he was a special representative of the State Department in Europe and was a War Trade Board representative of the United States in Holland. At the time of his death Mr. Hayward was also a director of the Brazilian Traction Light & Power Co., Ltd., of Toronto; the National Depositor Corp., and the St. Louis-San Francisco RR. Co. Richard Marshall Coleman, partner in the former banking firm of Winslow, Lanier & Co., New York, which dissolved in 1930, died on April 19. He was 56 years old. Mr. Coleman was removed from his home to Bellevue Hospital following the taking of an overdose of a sedative which caused his death. Mr. Coleman entered the banking house of Winslow, Lanier & Co. in 1896, and was made a partner in 1926. He retired on Jan. 1 1929. Following the dissolution of the'firm in December 1930, Mr. Coleman had maintained a mailing address with Gammack & Co. The New York Savings Bank, New York City, celebrated its eightieth anniversary on April 17. It was organized on April 17 1854. According to its statement as of April 1 1934, it now has more than 56,000 depositors, with deposits of $68,918,594. The New York State Banking Department on April 12 approved a reduction in the par value of the capital stock of the Community Trust Co. of Sayville, N. Y., from $100 a share to $50 a share; an increase in the number of shares from 1,000 to 3,000, and an increase in the capital stock from $100,000 to $150,000. to consist of 3,000 shares of the par value of $50 a share. On the same date the Department also approved a change in the bank's title from Community Trust Co. to The Oystermen's Bank & Trust Co. Ferdinand T. Burger has announced his resignation as Vice-President and Treasurer of the West Side Trust Co. of Newark, N. J., according to the Newark "News" of April 14, which added: Mr. Burger has been active in local banking circles for a number of years. He is a past President of the Essex Chapter of the American Institute of Banking and a member of the Board of Governors for the last eight years. He has served as Chairman of the educational committee, public affairs forum and committee on public education; has spoken often on banking and finance before civic clubs and schools and over the radio. He is a member of the Board of Trustees of the New Jersey Association of Credit Men and last year was Chairman of the banking division of the Newark Community Chest. Regarding the affairs of the Steneck Title & Mortgage Guaranty Co. of Hoboken, N. J., former subsidiary of the defunct Steneck Trust Co. of that city, the New York "Evening Post" of April 17 carried the following: Alleged frauchfsnt practices in the affairs of the Steneck Title & Mortgage Guaranty Co. of Hoboken,*which was closed In June 1931, will he investigated under the direction of the Chancery Court of New Jersey, Vice-Chancellor Charles M. Egan has decided. . Francis A. Murphy, attorney for 900 certificate holders, requested the inquiry, charging that there were indications of gross neglect and fraud. William H. Kelly, State Banking Commissioner, also asked the Court to intervene after having conducted its affairs for two years. "No matter whom it hits, there will be an investigation of the affairs of this company and a thorough one," said the Vice-Chancellor. "The officers will have to face the results of the investigation in this and other courts." William M. Tuttle, Assistant Vice-President of the Paterson National Bank in Paterson, N. J., died on April 17 at his home in Glen Rock, N. J. Mr. Tuttle had been associated with the Paterson National Bank for 35 years. Recently he became a member of the examining board of the Home Ownership Building & Loan Association of Glen Rock. Volume 138 Financial Chronicle 2691 Second and partial accounts of the affairs of two closed Philadelphia banks, the County Trust Co. and the Olney Bank & Trust Co., both in the possession of the Pennsylvania Banking Department, have been filed in the office of the Prothonotary of Common Pleas Court, according to the Philadelphia "Financial Journal" of April 7, which went on to say: The First National Bank in Indiana, Indiana, Pa., was chartered by the Comptroller of the Currency on April 7. The new bank succeeds The First National Bank of Indiana and is capitalized at $225,000, $75,000 of which is preferred and $150,000 common stock. Edward B. Bennett is President and Paul J. Straitiff, Cashier, of the institution. Deupty receiver of County Trust Co. reports application has been made to Reconstruction Finance Corporation for a loan of $762,018 on a pledge of "substantially all assets of institution." Court will be asked to authorize receiver to negotiate loan and to direct borrowed money to be distributed. Securities to be pledged have face value of $3,615,104 and appraised value of $2,887,201, according to report. According to advices by the United Press from Washington, D. C., yesterday, April 20, Jesse H. Jones, Chairman of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, stated that nearly a third of the $90,000,000 "Dawes loan," to the Central Republic Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago bylithe,Corporation, has been repaid. Cheeks totaling $343,727.32, representing a 32% payment, were sent April 9 to depositors of the closed Citizens Trust Co. of Bellevue, Pa., according to State Banking Secretary Dr. William D. Gordon. This payment, made possible by a Reconstruction Finance Corporation loan, brings to 62% the amount restored to depositors since the bank closed (Oct. 24 1931), with $1,074,127.36 in deposits. The above information is obtained from the Pittsburgh "Post-Gazette" of April 10, which also said: The balance still due this bank's depositors is $408,279.98, Dr. Gordon said, and to meet this sum he placed the assets at an appraised value of $199,952.77. The 32% payment apparently marked the end of a controversy between depositors and Dr. Gordon over methods of liquidating closed State banks. John E. Malone on April 11 was elected President of the Fulton National Bank of Lancaster, Pa., to succeed the late John C. Carter, according to the Philadelphia "Ledger" of April 12. Checks on account of a 10% payment to depositors of the closed Farmers' State Bank of Hellam, Pa., were being mailed by the State Banking Department, according to the Philadelphia "Ledger" of April 7, which added: The checks represent a third payment to the depositors, or a total of 35%. The institution still has a deposit liability of $139,011 and assets of an appraised value totaling $64,491. It is learned from the Pittsburgh "Post-Gazette" of April 10 that the report of Ernest Ruth, receiver of the defunct Monongahela National Bank, of Pittsburgh, Pa., shows cash on hand March 31 amounting to $71,349. Three months earlier cash on hand was $93,099. The bank has paid 65% to depositors. The paper mentioned continued: It is reported that there is a possibility of a loan from the Reconstruction Finance Corporation being made available before the end of the first half of the year which would permit another dividend to depositors. The Monongahela National Bank closed Oct. 21 1931, as noted in the "Chronicle" of Oct. 24 1931, page 2713. The Equitable Trust Co. of Baltimore, Md., effective April 10 removed its shopping district office from Howard and Fayette Streets, that city, to more modern and central offices at Lexington and Liberty Streets. Acting under authority of the court, John J. Ghinger, State Bank Commissioner of Maryland and receiver for the Citizens' Bank of Hurlock, Md., on April 3 mailed checks to depositors and general creditors of that institution for 10% of their respective balances, according to the Baltimore "Sun" of April 3, which went on to say: The payments being made at this time total approximately $25,000. This institution, located in Dorchester County, was closed by the Bank Commissioner on Feb. 15 1932, and this is the first distribution to depositors and creditors. —4— The Lagonda National Bank of Springfield, Springfield, Ohio, was granted a charter on April 13 by the Comptroller of the Currency. The new bank replaces the LagondaCitizens National Bank of Springfield, and is capitalized at $350,000, made up of $200,000 preferred and $150,000 common stock. H. E. Freeman is President and F. W. Hartford, Cashier, of the new organization. —4-E. T. Stringfellow, Deputy Superintendent of Banks, in charge of the liquidation of the Security-Home Trust Co. of Toledo, Ohio, which recently paid a 5% dividend, announced on April 10 that another 5% payment should be ready in the next two months. Mr. Stringfellow said this will be made possible also by refinancing of mortgages through the Home Owners Loan Corporation. The Toledo "Blade" of April 10, in indicating the above, furthermore stated: Mr. Stringfellow said he has $500,000 in cash on hand now and that it requires about $850.000 for a 5% dividend. Scores of other mortgages held by the bank are in process of refinancing through the HOLO, he said. A new Chicago bank, the District National Bank, was to open on April 18 at 1110 West 35th St., according to an announcement made April 14 by its President, Clarke Washblame. The new institution which is capitalized at $200,000, consisting of $100,000 preferred stock (subscribed by the Reconstruction Finance Corporation) and $100,000 common stock, surplus of $30,000 and reserves of $20,000—has no connection with any other institution, nor were its officers and directors connected with the Central Manufacturing District Bank, which formerly occupied the same quarters. The Chicago "News" of April 14, from which the above information is obtained, further said in part: Mr. Washburn° has been connected with loop banking activities for 25 years and more recently served the RFC. C. E. Herrod, Vice-President of the new bank, was formerly an Assistant Vice-President of the FirstUnion Trust & Savings Bank. W. S. Sadler, Jr., who has been identified with National bank examinations, has been chosen Assistant Cashier. ... The opening of the new institution will be celebrated with a luncheon in the Central Manufacturing District Club, Wednesday (April 18). The following promotions in the personnel of the First National Bank of Chicago, Chicago, Ill., were announced on April 14 by Edward E.Brown,President of the institution: Carl E. Schiffner, Assistant Cashier in division C, advanced to Assistant Vice-President in division G; Melvin H. Thies, Assistant Cashier in the bank's and banker's division, named Assistant Vice-President; Emerson R. Lewis, Personal Trust Officer, promoted to Secretary of the trust department, and Edmund Burke, chief of the clerical staff of special auditors, advanced to Assistant Auditor. Albert S. Martin, Second Vice-President in the savings department of the Continental-Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, Ill., died on April 13 after an illness of several months. Mr. Martin, who was born in Chic tgo, had been in the employ of the Continental-Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. and its predecessor institutions for 36 years. He was 53 years old. Three changes in the official staff of the Northern Trust Co. of Chicago, Ill., were announced by the directors, following their meeting on April 17, according to the Chicago "News" of April 18. Harry M. Gustafson, a Second VicePresident, was given the additional title of Assistant Secretary; Irving B. Phillips was appointed a Second VicePresident, and Charles B. Weaver was named an Assistant Cashier. Mr. Gustafson and Mr. Phillips, it was stated, were being transferred for service in the trust department and Mr. Weaver for service in the banking department. We learn from the Chicago "News" of April 18 that Charles F. Meyers has been elected Assistant Vice-President of the American National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, and will be actively engaged in the trust department, according to an announcement by Lawrence Armour, President of the institution. The paper mentioned went on to say: Until recently and for eight years Mr. Meyer was Assistant vice-President and Trust Officer of the National Boulevard Bank of Chicago. Prior to that period he was for six years associated with the trust department of the Northern Trust Co. as Estate Officer and later was for two years VicePresident and Cashier of the Commercial Trust & Savings Bank of Evanston. The resignation of Hiland B. Noyes as Cashier of the City National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, Ill., was accepted by the directors at their regular monthly meeting on April 17 and Wilfrid L. Burgess, a Vice-President, was elected to the vacant office, becoming Vice-President and Cashier. The Chicago "News" of April 18, in reporting the matter, added: Mr. Noyes has resigned to engage in business for himself in the field of public accounting under the name of Noyes, Costello & Co. The National Bank of Detroit, Detroit, Mich., this week opened new permanent quarters for the trust department on the ground floor of the National Bank Building. The trust 2692 Financial Chronicle department is headed by Henry S. Hulbert, Vice-President and Trust Officer with C. H. Haberkorn Jr., as Manager. Other officers of the trust department are: George E. Parker Jr., Supervisor of Personal Trust Division; George D. Clark, Supervisor of Corporate Trust Division; Lester E. Zubrigg, Supervisor of Stock Transfer Division; Edwin G. Terrell, Supervisor of Safekeeping Division. The trust investment committee of the bank consists of the following members: Henry S. Hulbert, Chairman; Fred J. Fisher, John B. Ford Jr., James Inglis and Walter S. McLucas. The Comptroller of the Currency on April 12 issued a charter to The Iron River National Bank at Iron River, Mich. The new organization replaces The First National Bank of Iron River and The Caspian National Bank of Caspian, and is capitalized at $62,500. Earl J. Van Ornum and Henry J. Vesser are President and Cashier, respectively, of the new institution. As of April 6 a charter was granted by the Comptroller of the Currency to The Security National Bank of Durand, Durand, Wis. The new organization succeeds The First National Bank in Durand and is capitalized at $50,000, consisting of $30,000 preferred and $20,000 common stock. John Brunner, Jr., is President, and G. C. Scheifelbein, Cashier. A charter was issued by the Comptroller of the Currency on April 9 to The Rapid City National Bank, Rapid City, S. D. It succeeds the Pennington County Bank of that place and is capitalized at $100,000, consisting of $50,000 preferred and $50,000 common stock. Roy Dean and A. E. Dahl are President and Cashier, respectively, of the new institution. Effective March 20 last, The Villisca National Bank, Villisca, Iowa, with capital of $60,000, was placed in voluntary liquidation. It was replaced by the Nodaway Valley National Bank of Villisca. Effective April 9 1934, the First National Bank in Independence, Independence, Kan., capitalized at $300,000, was placed in voluntary liquidation. The Citizens' National Bank in Independence, is the successor institution. The First National Bank at Marianna, Marianna, Ark., was chartered by the Comptroller of the Currency on April 7. The new institution succeeds The Lee County National Bank of Marianna and is capitalized at $50,000, consisting of $25,000 preferred and $25,000 common stock. 0. L. Williamson is President and Elgan C. Robertson. Cashier, of the new bank. The Comptroller of the Currency on April 5 granted a charter to the National Bank of Caruthersville, Caruthersville, Mo. The new bank is capitalized at $50,000. E. L. Abington is President of the institution, while A. B. Rhodes is Cashier. Removal of the Bank of Oakman at Oakman, Ala., to Jasper, Ala., is indicated in the following dispatch from Jasper on March 31 appearing in the Birmingham "AgeHerald": Plans are being completed here for opening a second bank in Jasper. Local business men are co-operating with Walker and Fayette County financiers in the undertaking, in which it is planned to move the Bank of Oakman to Jasper. Stockholders of the Oakman bank voted recently to make the move. B. M. Richards, of Oakman, is President of the bank. It is planned to open the new bank in the building formerly occupied by the Jasper Trust Co. Wirt Davis was elected Chairman of the board of the Republic National Bank & Trust Co. of Dallas, Tex., at the regular monthly meeting of the directors on April 10. He succeeds the late W. 0. Connor. Mr. Davis, who has been connected with the institution since its establishment in 1920, has recently been serving as Vice-Chairman of the board, a post which is now abolished. The above information is obtained from the Dallas "News" of April 11, which also had the following to say in part: Although still interested in the law, having appeared as an attorney in a civil suit in South Texas within recent weeks, Mr. Davis has been mainly interested in business for many years. He has long been an important factor in the lumber industry of Texas. . . . He is also actively interested in the oil _industry and is a large landholder, including farms and ranches. . . . The Republic Bank was organized on Feb. 14 1920 as the Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. In 1929 the Republic and the North Texas National banks were consolidated and at present it has a capital structure of $7,000,000. April 21 1934 Including 81,000,000 surplus. Leslie Waggener is Chairman of the executive committee and F. F. Florence is President. A charter was issued on April 13 by the Comptroller of the Currency for the First National Bank in Groveton, Groveton, Tex. The new institution succeeds The First National Bank of Groveton, and is capitalized at $100,000, consisting of $50,000 preferred stock and $50,000 common. L. P. Atmar is President and R. R. Robb, Cashier, of the institution. On April 10 the Comptro-ller of the Currency issued a charter to The First National Bank of Goose Creek, Goose Creek, Tex. It succeeds the Security State Bank of Goose Creek and has a capital of $75,000, made up of $50,000 preferred stock and $25,000 common stock. W. W. Moore is President and M. S. Kerby, Cashier, of the new institution. The Comptroller of the C- urrency on April 12 granted a charter to The First National Bank of Riverton, Riverton, Wyo. The new institution is capitalized at $50,000, half of which is preferred and half common stock. W. J. Otto is President and Carl W. Hee, Cashier, of the new bank. Effective March 26 last T-he Hollywood National Bank of Los Angeles, Calif., was placed in voluntary liquidation. The institution, which was capitalized at $200,000, was absorbed by the Seaboard National Bank of Los Angeles. -of the Crocker First National Wm. H. Crocker, President Bank of San Francisco, Calif., and the Crocker First Federal Trust Co., announced on April 18 that at meetings of the boards of directors of both banks a plan of consolidation has been agreed upon whereby the two institutions will be consolidated under the name of Crocker First National Bank of San Francisco. Mr. Crocker said: The ownership of the two banks is identical and the stock of the National Bank has always carried with it a proportionate interest in the stock of the Trust company. Under the terms of the Banking Act of 1933 it would be necessary before June 16 to discontinue this practice and to issue directly the stock of the Crocker First Federal Trust Co. Inasmuch as both banks have always been operated as one unit, it was deemed advisable to make a consolidation at this time so that a continuance of the same manner of operation could be assured. The new institution will succeed to the present business of the two banks and will have a combined capital, surplus and undivided profits in excess of 812,500,000. The management will remain the same. Controlling interest in the F- irst National Bank of Baker, Ore., one of the oldest financial institutions in eastern Oregon, has been purchased by J. W. Stuchell, wholesale grocer of that city. The Portland "Oregonian" of April 11, from which the foregoing is learned, also said: It is understood Mr. Stuchell will assume active charge of the bank Immediately and it is presumed will either be elected President or Chairman of the board. Control of the bank was secured by purchase of the interests of some 25 stockholders, including the estate of the late William Pollman, for many years President of the institution. It was understood that the total consideration, while not revealed, was considerably in excess of 8200,000. Purchase of the institution followed weeks of negotiation, during which its sale to outside interests was considered likely. As soon as it became known that control might pass to non-resident hands, plans were formulated to retain ownership in Baker, and Mr. Stuchell actively entered the picture. Announcement made in Baker by the now purchaser said that all present directors of the bank would be asked to remain. Officers of the bank are: John Schmitz, President; 0. J. Bartlett and Fred H. Moes, Vice-Presidents; Joe Rogers, Cashier. The bank was established in 1883 and is known as one of the substantial institutions of the great eastern Oregon territory. It has capital of 8200,000 and surplus and profits in excess of that amount. The Army National Bank of Fort Lewis, Fort Lewis, Wash., with capital of $25,000, was placed in voluntary liquidation on April 3 1934. The institution was taken over by The National Bank of Tacoma, Wash. THE WEEK ON THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE. The New York stock market has been somewhat unsettled this week, and while the tendency has been toward higher levels there have been a number of reactionary periods during which the price trend was sharply downward. Amusement shares, rubber iErsues and specialties have attracted most of the speculative attention, though railroad stocks have been fairly steady and industrial shares have had brief periods of strength. In the forepart of the week trading was dull and without noteworthy feature, but the volume slowly increased as stocks extended their advances though, on the whole, the changes continued within a narrow channel. Scattered selling has been in evidence from time to time, but was usually quickly absorbed and had little or no effect on the market movements. Volume 138 Financial Chronicle Call money renewed at 1% on Monday and continued unchanged at that rate throughout the entire week. Preferred stocks, particularly those of investment grades, were in demand during most of the short session on Saturday, and while the general list pushed slowly upward, the volume of business was small due to the fact that many traders were unusually careful in making commitments pending the result of President Roosevelt's week-end conference with Congressional leaders on matters of major legislation. Public utility shares attracted some attention as they held firmly, despite the easing tendencies of the general list. The bulk of the turnover was contributed by the low-priced stocks, Warner Brothers showing the sale of one block of 11,500 shares at 73 4. Packard Motors, Radio Corp. and Armour A were also active. Industrial shares made a fairly good showing, but rails were still affected by the decrease in the weekly carloadings resulting from the decline in coal traffic. Steel stocks were moderately strong for a time, but failed to hold its advance. Oil issues eased off and motors weakened, though manufacturers insisted that incoming orders are' holding up well despite price advances. Merchandising and food prices held up well and specialties acted nicely, but did nothing spectacular. The changes for the day were small, and while there were occasional exceptions, the major portion was on the side of the decline. Prominent among the latter were Glidden Co. pref. (7), 2 points to 100; M. A. Hanna pref. (7), 25 % points to 933%; Industrial Rayon (5), 23 / 3 points to 873%; Kresge Dept. Stores pref., 2 points to 45; National Supply Co. pref., 2 points to 53; Radio Corp. pref. A, 23% points to 35; and Western Union Telegraph Co., 13 points to 553%. Heavy selling as a result of the Washington developments concerning the Exchange control bill was the outstanding feature of the trading on Monday. Leading shares dipped from 1 to 3 or more points, Auburn Auto leading the down5 points. Radio Corp. pref.(B) moved turn with a loss of 3% contrary to the market trend and closed with a net gain of 13% points at 313%. Principal changes were on the downside, the recessions including among others such active stocks as American Beet Sugar pref. 53% points to 63; Armour of Ill. pref., 3 points to 70; Bayuk Cigar, 2% points to 3414; Bloomingdales pref. (7), VA points to 963%; J. I. Case Co., 33 4 points to 68; Central RR. of N. J., 3 points to 75; Federal Mining & Smelting, 16 points to 85; New Haven pref., 23 4 points to 293%; Owens-Ill. Glass, 2 points to 86; Republic Steel pref., 3 points to 5832; United States Smelting & Refining, 33% points to 1233%, and Universal Pictures 1st pref., 2 points to 44. Public utilities and miscellaneous industrials registered small gains during the moderate rally on Tuesday. Trading was quiet, however, and there was little or no liquidation. Scattered short covering was apparent in the motor stocks, and the rubber and merchandising shares firmed up toward the end of the session. United States Rubber attracted considerable speculative attention, both common and preferred giving a good account of themselves, and amusements were fairly steady, but made little progress upward. Oil stocks and alcohol shares were practically at a standstill. As the market closed a few popular favorites showed small losses, but the majority of the changes were on the upside. These included among others, Allied Chemical & Dye, 33/i points to 152; American Beet Sugar pref., 3 points to 66; American Tel. & Tel., 2 points to 1207 %; Armour of Illinois pref., 3 points to 73; Brooklyn-Manhattan Transit pref. (6), 3 points to 87; Cushmans Sons pref. (8), 6 points to 76; General Printing Ink pref. (6),6 points to 85; National % points to 1473%; Spalding 1st pref., 5 points Lead (5), 43 to 65; United States Rubber 1st pref., 2 points to 513%; West Penn Power pref. (6), 3 points to 100, and Wilson & Co. pref. (332), 2% points to 813%. Stocks again moved upward on Wednesday, extending the rally that developed in the late trading on Tuesday. Miscellaneous issues were up about 2 points, and while sentiment showed much improvement, trading continued in small volume and the buying was scattered over a considerable part of the list. Preferred stocks were again in demand some of the more popular issues breaking into new high ground for 1933-1934. Public utilities were down during the opening hour, but improved as the day progressed. Rubber stocks, amusements and merchandising issues were in demand at higher prices and motor shares moved sharply forward under the leadership of General Motors and Chrysler, both of which showed good gains for the day. Other outstanding strong spots in the early trading included Radio 2693 pref.(B), United Aircraft, United States Smelting & Refining and United States Rubber pref. Some profit taking was in evidence during the first hour, but this was readily absorbed and made little impression on the market movements. Outstanding among the gains were American Commercial Alcohol, 2% points to 503 4; Amer. Tel. & Tel. (9), 23% 3 points to 1233%; American Tobacco B (5), 2% points to 74%; Crucible Steel pref., 73/ points to 70; Green-Cananea Copper, 5 points to 35; Liggett & Myers (5), 4 points to 9532; National Lead (5), 13 points to 1603%; United Fruit (23/ 2), 33% points to 733 4;and Wright Aero, 2 points to 573/2. Stocks were somewhat irregular during the early dealings on Thursday, but the trend turned upward in the last hour and there were a number of substantial gains at the close. Scattered selling appeared from time to time, but made little impression on the market movements. Rubber stocks, food shares and merchandising issues were the features of the trading, particularly in the final dealings. During the morning transactions, Canadian gold mining stocks dipped more than two points following the proposal of a 10% tax on gold mined in the Dominion. The improvement in the final hour did not extend to all parts of the list as there were exceptions in several important groups, notably the tobaccos in which a number of active stocks were unsettled and the motors, particularly Auburn Auto which tumbled 35% points to 4532. Included among the gains registered at the close of the session were Adams Express pref. (5) 23% points to 773%, American Chain pref. 43/i points to 303/s, Brooklyn Queens Transit pref. (6) 33 4 points to 493%, Laclede Gas 23% points to 423%, Cushmans Sons pref. (8) 33% points to 793%, Pittsburgh Steel pref. 2 points to 40, Standard Brands pref. (7) 23% points to 124 United States Rubber 1st pref. 53% points to 59, West Penn Electric A (7) 2 points to 67, West3)2 points to 90 and Virginia Electric inghouse 1st pref. (33/ & Power pref. (6) 23% points to 76. Aircraft stocks were hi demand on Friday due to the opening of bids for temporary air-mail contracts. The improvement in this group extended to the rest of the market and around noon prices all along the line were moving higher. Some of the leaders sagged around a point, but soon got in line again and worked upward with the rest of the list. Railroad stocks were prominent in the advance and so were the preferred shares among the metals, rubbers and specialties. Other strong stocks were Eastman Kodak and CocaCola, the latter reaching a new top for 1934. Among the gains recorded at the close were American Chain pref 37/s points to 34; A. M. Byers pref., 43% points to 66; Gulf States Steel pref., 4 points to 83; Homestake Minmg,9 points to 365; United States Industrial Alcohol, 2 pomts to 54, and Wright Aero, 5 points to 61. TRANSACTIONS AT THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE DAILY. WEEKLY AND YEARLY. Week Ended April 20 1934. Saturday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday 501,160 1,290,650 944,275 1,540,350 1,325,000 1,887,380 $6,678,000 11,241.000 9,860,000 11,600,000 10,982,000 12,974,000 ,AOO 1215 227 11X /Inn Sales at New York Stock Exchange. 60,191,000 2,431,500 2,079,000 2,227,000 2,279,000 2,371,000 210 A72 1934. 1933. $1,774,000 3,771,000 2,579,000 1,589,600 2,201,900 3,113,300 $9,643,000 17,443,500 14,518.000 15,416,600 15.462,900 18,458,300 roil Ron 500042.200 SlA Jan. 1 to April 20. Week Ended April 20. 1933. 1934. 162,368,312 90,092,510 $178,905,900 261,211,500 962,877,000 $185,620,000 214,360,000 470,888.900 $90,942,300 $85,364,000 31,402.994,400 $870,868,900 Stocks-No.of shares7,488,815 20,828,932 Bonds. Government bonds_ _ _ $15,028,800 $24,256,000 12,578,500 19,251,000 Stare & foreign bonds_ Railroad ds misc. bonds 63,335,000 41,857,000 Total Ann Total Bond Sales. United States Bonds. Railroad Stocks. State. Number of and Miscell. Municipal 42 Shares. Poen Bonds. Bonds. DAILY TRANSACTIONS AT THE BOSTON. PHILADELPHIA AND BALTIMORE EXCHANGES. Week Ended April 20 1934. Saturday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Total Prey. orpplc NM/3M Boston. Baltimore. Philadelphia. Shares. Bond Sala. Shares. BondSales. Shares. BondSales. 9,926 $6,500 22,091 13.100 16,031 26,000 25,023 13,000 HOLI DAY 5,833 21,000 8,949 13,571 9,006 15,674 13,007 10.660 319,000 36,500 6,000 13.500 3,000 416 2,712 3,027 4.089 2,769 4,732 313.800 7,000 13,600 3.000 78.904 $79,600 70,867 $78,000 17,745 $37,300 142 2611 152 940 as ass trdi ann 7 an 5574110 THE CURB EXCHANGE. Stocks on the Curb Exchange have shown considerable irregularity during the present week, and while there have been numerous periods of decline, the tendency, particularly during the last half of the week, has been toward higher levels. Trading has been quiet and without noteworthy movement except on Thursday, when Canadian gold mining 2694 Financial Chronicle stocks tumbled downward due, in a measure, to the announcement of a 10% gold tax in the Dominion budget. Some profit taking was apparent on Monday and shares eased off, the declines extending to all sections of the list. Industrial specialties were in moderate demand and there was some interest displayed at times in the public utilities, but the changes were comparatively small. On Saturday the curb market developed a moderately firm tone, though trading was quiet and the turnover small. Some of the industrial specialties worked gradually higher and stocks like Parker Rust Proof, Sherwin Williams, Safety Car and New York Steam moved slightly higher. In the oil division, International Petroleum was fairly active, while Imperial Oil of Canada was briskly traded in at higher levels. The movements in the public utility group were narrow and alcohol stocks were inclined to sag. Metals were inactive and mining shares showed varying degrees of activity. The volume of trading was extremely light on Monday as most of the active stocks started the new week with narrow changes. Specialties were slightly stronger than the rest of the list, though the changes were small and without special significance. Aluminum Co. of America moved contrary to the trend and recorded a gain of 3 or more points at its top for the day. Pittsburgh Plate Glass attracted considerable buying, particularly in the early dealings when the price ran up about 2 points. American Cyanamid B,Swift & Co., Standard Oil of Indiana and Cord Corp. were fairly steady and Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. showed a substantial gain around the first hour but lost most of its advance later in the day. Alcohols were quiet and public utilities fluctuated back and forth without definite trend. Around noon time considerable profit taking was in evidence, but this dried up as the day progressed. In the public utilities group, Electric Bond & Share sagged and American Gas & Electric and United Light & Power were lower. Oil securities moved to the front on Tuesday as the market resumed its quiet trading. Price changes, however, were small and only a few prominent issues developed any volume. Mining stocks were moderately steady, and while some interest was apparent in this group during the morning dealings, there was little change from the preceding close. The public utility group had a firm undertone but was not especially active. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. was off two points on the initial turnover and Newmont and Aluminum Co. of America sold off more than a point. Alcohol stocks moved within a narrow range. Greyhound Corp. was a trading favorite but made little change from the close of the previous day. Industrial stocks featured the trading on Wednesday, and while the dealing was small in volume, interest centered largely around this group. Public utilities also displayed moderate improvement due to the advance in the power output figures for last week. In the oil section, Creole Petroleum was again active at higher prices, while International Petroleum attracted renewed buying, though the gain was somewhat smaller. Greyhound Corp. moved ahead about a point and Montgomery Ward A, Sullivan Machinery and Pittsburgh Plate Glass showed gains ranging from fractions to 2 or more points. American Cyanamid B, Swift & Co. and American Can were firm and New. Jersey Zinc rallied about a point as the market closed. Canadian gold stocks slipped backward during the early trading on Thursday, the weakness in this group being due largely to the announcement of the Dominion's 10% gold tax. These stocks were offered freely during the opening hour, but the group was consistently heavy throughout the session. In the public utility list, Electric Bond & Share and American Gas & Electric were lower, while Niagara Hudson and United Light & Power were fairly firm. Oil stocks were practically at a standstill and most of the alcohol shares sold off. In the miscellaneous industrial group many of the active trading favorites were firm but there were few gains. Small price movements and a somewhat broader list characterized the dealings on the Curb Exchange on Friday. Public utilities led the modest upward swing, and while the gains were small, the group was fairly strong throughout the session. Mining stocks were quiet and failed to recover much of the loss of the previous day, though Wright Hargreaves managed to hold part of its gain. A. 0. Smith moved lower and gold shares were dull and showed only fractional changes. Public utilities were generally firm, though the gains were not especially noteworthy. Gulf Oil and Standard of Indiana showed moderate improvement, April 21 1934 but Humble Oil made little change. As compared with last week, many of the popular favorites were higher, American Gas & Electric closing on Friday at 2934 against 26% on Friday of last week, American Light & Traction (1.60) at 1634 against 153, American Superpower at 334 against 334, Atlas Corp. at 14 against 1334, Consolidated Gas, Baltimore, (3.60) at 5934 against 59, Creole Petroleum at 1334 against 1134, Electric Bond & Share at 1734 against 1734, Gulf Oil of Pennsylvania at 6734 against 6734, Hudson Bay Mining at 14 against 1334, International Petroleum (1.12) at 27 against 25%, Niagara Hudson Power at 634 against 634, Parker Rust Proof at 66 against 6534, Pennroad Corp. at 334 against 334, Standard Oil of Indiana at 2734 against 2734, Swift & Co. (%) at 1834 against 18, United Gas Corp. at 334 against 3, United Light & Power A at 434 against 3%, United Shoe Machinery at 6734 against 67 and Utility Power at 134 against 134. A complete record of Curb Exchange transactions for the week will be found on page 2725. DAILY TRANSACTIONS AT THE NEW YORK CURB EXCHANGE. Week Ended April 20 1934. Stocks (Number of Shares). 152,915 $3,452,000 262,305 5,427,000 245,455 4,413,000 360,625 5,706,000 355,030 5,399,000 346,106 7,744,000 $56,000 105,000 175,000 117,000 108,000 55,000 1,722,436 $32,141,000 $616,000 Saturday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Total Bonds (Par Value). Foreign Foreign Domestic. Government Corporate. 1934. $561,000 $33,318,000 Jan Ito April 20. Week Ended April 20 Sales at New York Curb Erchange. Total. $40,000 $3,548,000 113,000 5,645,000 71,000 4,659,000 124,000 5,947,000 147,000 5,664,000 66,000 7,865,000 1934. 1933. 1933. 2,471,496 Stocks—No,of shares_ 1,722,436 Bonds. Domestic $32,141,000 $18,856,000 482,000 Foreign government_ _ 616,000 782,000 Foreign corporate 561,000 28,780,986 12,031,290 $368,363,000 14,268,000 12,934,000 $247,459,000 10,524,000 14,476,000 $33,318,000 $20,120,000 $395,565,000 $272,459,000 Total COURSE OF BANK CLEARINGS. Bank clearings this week will again show a substantial increase as compared with a year ago. Preliminary figures compiled by us, based upon telegraphic advices from the chief cities of the country, indicate that for the week ended to-day (Saturday, April 21) bank exchanges for all cities of the United States from which it is possible to obtain weekly returns will be 53.8% above those for the corresponding week last year. A part of this gain is due to the fact that last year many of the banks were operating on a restricted basis. Our preliminary total stands at $6,188,142,212, against ,022,956,977 for the same week in 1933. At this center there is a gain for the five days ended Friday of 53.8%. Our comparative summary for the week follows: Clearings—Returns by Telegraph. Week Ended April 21. 1934. — Per 1933. cent. New York Chicago Philadelphia Boston Kansas City St. Louis San Francisco Pittsburgh Detroit Cleveland Baltimore New Orleans $3,595,398,068 201,573,574 276,000,000 177,000,000 64,644,696 56,100,000 101,100,000 74,265,536 59,884,341 50,032,013 43,796,102 25,303,000 $2,083,190,210 +72.6 139.390,573 +44.6 173,000,000 +59.5 128,000,000 +38.3 44,912,772 +43.9 45,500.000 +23.3 72,576,000 +39.3 56,950,196 +30.4 7,513,195 +697.1 32,476,474 +54.1 29.080.446 +50.6 11,350.000 +122.9 Twelve cities, 5 days Other cities. 5 days $4,725,097,330 515,021,180 $2,823,939,866 404,440,945 +67.3 +27.3 Total all cities, 5 days All cities, 1 day $5,240,118,510 948,023.702 $3,228,380,811 794,576,166 +62.3 +19.3 $6.188,142.212 54.022 OAR 077 _Lica 2 Tntal all ritlar Inr weak Complete and exact details for the week covered by the foregoing will appear in our issue of next week. We cannot furnish them to-day, inasmuch as the week ends to-day (Saturday) and the Saturday figures will not be available until noon to-day. Accordingly, in the above the last day of the week has to be in all cases estimated. In the elaborate detailed statement, however, which we present further below, we are able to give final and complete results for the week previous—the week ended April 14. For that week there is an increase of 67.0%, the aggregate of clearings for the whole country being $5,609,064,027, against $3,357,861,263 in the same week in 1933. A part of this increase is due to the fact that many of the banks in the country in this week last year were still operating on a restricted basis and that Good Friday, which day is observed as a holiday in many cities, fell in this week last year. Outside of this city there is an increase of 50.9%, the bank clearings at this center having recorded a gain of 76.5%. We group the cities according to the Federal Reserve dis- Volume 138 Financial Chronicle triets in which they are located and from this it appears that in the New York Reserve District, including this city, the totals record an expansion of 74.9%, in the Boston Reserve District of 40.0%, and in the Philadelphia Reserve District of 77.1%. In the Cleveland Reserve District the totals are larger by 55.0%, in the Richmond Reserve District by 55.8%, and in the Atlanta Reserve District by 43.9%. The Chicago Reserve District has to its credit a gain of 77.9%, the St. Louis Reserve District 37.9%, and the Minneapolis Reserve District 32.0%. In the Kansas City Reserve District the increase is 34.6%, in the Dallas Reserve District 40.1%, and in the San Francisco Reserve District 27.7%. In the following we furnish a summary of Federal Reserve districts: SUMMARY OF BANK CLEARINGS. Week Ended Apr. 14 1934. 1934. Inc.or Dec. 1933, 1932. 1931. Federal Reserve Mats. $ let Boston_ _ _ _12 cities 229,103,382 2nd New York_ _12 " 3,827,678,970 3rd Philadelpla 9 " 312,303,919 4113 Cleveland__ 5 " 201,422,056 5th Richmond.6 " 98,718,699 6th Atlanta____10 " 100,571,397 7th Chicago. ._19 " 345,853,992 8th 81.Louis_ __ 4 " 103,976,023 9th Minneapolis 7 " 72,923,055 10th Kansas City10 " 97,720,676 11th Dallas 5 " 41,911,978 12th San Fran_ _13 " 175,848,880 $ 163,697,303 2,188,681,222 176,299,167 129.920,777 63,368,013 69,856,495 194,388,306 76,140,913 55,236,416 72,623,910 29,926,979 137,711.762 'rota' 112 cities Outside N. Y. City 5,609,064,027 1,871,861,230 3,357,861,263 +67.0 1.240,359,428 +50.9 5,281,402,144 2,030,199.402 9,166,267,735 3,150,125,952 204 400 ArA 203 852.210 4-526 230.524.746 342.892.037 flanmila 29/41*m % +40.0 +74.9 +77.1 +55.0 +55.8 +43.9 +77.9 +37.9 +32.0 +34.6 +40.1 +27.7 $ $ 291,955,215 500,684,524 3,364,160.943 6,164,879,220 315,692,839 434,104,152 210,541,365 346,633,328 111,619,887 149,348,096 92,918,173 131,848.658 387.516,674 701.095.709 98,727.265 144,375,244 71,320,138 101,944,777 105,333,409 149,183,504 38,579,729 57,092,682 193,036,507 285,677,841 We now add our detailed statement, showing last week's figures for each city separately for the four years: Week Ended April 14. Clearings at- First Federal Me.-Bangor _ _ Portland Mass.-Boston_ _ Fall River. _ _ Lowell New Bedford_ Springfield Worcester Conn.- Hartford New Haven_ R.1.-Providence N.H.-Manches' Total(12 cities) 1934. 1933. 5 $ fat. OF Dec. % Reserve Dist riot-Boston- 1932. $ 1931. $ 495,581 1,619,160 201,338,589 703,315 338,213 641,628 2,633,833 1,207,599 8,424,013 3,198.411 8,108,100 394,940 356,473 834,805 143,739,221 474,337 251,095 414,571 2,617,797 847,401 5,970,612 2,220,562 5,671,600 298,829 +39.0 +94.0 +40.1 +48.3 +34.7 +54.8 +0.6 +42.5 +41.1 +44.0 +43.0 +32.2 435,160 2,229,321 254,299,355 830,595 346,368 704,348 3.807.503 2,213,881 8,612,125 6,425,265 11,627,500 423,794 603.899 4,008,539 448,854,118 1,369.004 521,037 1,147,849 5,268.443 2,861.985 14.997,777 7,850,576 12,722,200 479,107 229,103,382 163,697,303 +40.0 291,955,215 500,684,524 Second Fade al Reserve D Istrict-New N. Y.-Albany _ _ 7,035.532 7,087,417 Binghamton _ _ _ 678.000 708,415 Buffalo 27,709,478 22,763,317 Elmira 450,250 569.129 Jamestown _ 423,697 331.025 New York _ 3,737.202.7972,117,501.835 Rochester 5,979.460 4,782.733 Syracuse 2,787.860 2,640,271 Conn.-Stamford 2,319,003 2,069,402 N. 1.-Montclair 278,742 450,275 Newark 17,469,387 11.922,412 Northern N. J_ 25,344,824 17.856,991 York-0.7 9,392,459 7.795.985 -4.0 728,444 1,256,297 +21.7 28,832,581 44,239,372 -20.9 724.541 1,123,485 +27.8 637,235 895,135 +76.5 3,251,202,742 6,016,141,783 +25.0 7,385,668 10,155,581 +5.6 3,466,915 4.987,701 +12.1 2,648.829 3,534.913 -38.1 750,200 968,263 +46.5 23,768,460 33,703,526 +41.9 34,622,869 40.077.179 Total(12 cities) 3,827,678,970 2.188,681.222 +74.9 3,364,160,943 6,164,879,220 Third Fedora Pa.-Altoona Bethlehem _ Chester Lancaster Philadelphia Reading Scranton Wilkes-Barre York N.1,-Trenton. Total(0 cities) Reserve Dis trict-Phila delph . I a344,546 206,924 +66.5 561,338 b b b 242.434 207.185 +17.0 454,206 845,374 527,956 +60.1 1,347,683 302,000,000 169,000,000 +78.7 303,000,000 946,099 655,849 +44.3 2,293.966 2,136.378 1,595.494 +33.9 2,196.953 1,324,900 1,261,711 +5.0 1,922,256 1,240,188 760,048 +63.2 1,381,437 3,225,000 2,084,000 +54.8 2,535.000 312,304,919 626,362 b 987,845 2,951,385 412,000,000 3,228,284 4,632.168 2,968,730 2,181,378 4,528,000 176,299,167 +77.1 315,692.839 434,104,152 Fourth Fede r al Reserve D Istrict-Clev elandOhio-Akron.._ C c c Canton C c c Cincinnati.... 42,151,226 31,943,177 +32.0 Cleveland. _. 61,925,421 36.087,536 +71.6 Columbus._ _ . 8,373,700 8,849,500 +22.3 Mansfield... . 1.093.702 819.010 +33.5 Youngstown _ b b b Pa.-Pittsburgh . 87,878,007 54,221,554 +62.1 C c 43,835.835 72.624,456 8,793,600 1,134,230 b 84,153,244 c c 61,929,112 120,854.063 15.164,600 1,805,119 b 146,280,434 129,920,777 +55.0 210,541,365 346,033,328 Fifth Federal Reserve Dist rict-Richm ondW.Va.-Hunt'to 1 132,530 111,453 +18.9 Va.-Norfolk _. 1,962,000 2,003,000 -2.0 Richmond . 243,265.666 20,838.383 +28.0 C.-Charlesto 3 945,149 S. 493,224 +91.6 Md.-Baltimore. 54,046,955 30,669,880 +76.2 D.C.-Washing' 3 15.366,399 9,252,073 +66.1 453,600 2.986,086 25,695.148 1,021,634 60,249,033 21,214,386 680,676 3,532,084 36.043,877 2,201,464 80,534,180 26,355,835 63.368,013 +55.8 111,619.887 149,348,096 Sixth Federal Reserve Dist riet-Atiant aTenn.-Knoxville 2,622,294 4,687,346 --44.1 11,542,252 Nashville _ _ 7,851,840 +47.0 Ga.-Atlanta.. _ . 37,100,000 26,800,000 +38.4 1,121.744 . 816,917 +37.3 Augusta 563,821 Macon 391,613 +44.0 -Jack'nvill a 12,122,000 7,494,668 +61.7 Fla. Ala.-Birm'ham. 11,744,871 7,766,634 +51.2 957,345 Mobile 703.913 +36.0 b 'b Miss.-Jackson b 108,224 100,084 Vicksburg-+8.1 22,688.846 13,253,480 +71.2 La.-New OrIe3xE3 2,662,802 10,372,731 32,700.000 938,527 498.525 10,480,209 8.454,364 869,172 b 115,607 25,826,236 1,750,000 14,041,327 41,002,453 1.552,954 740,363 14,875,501 16,808,587 1.277,002 b 149,340 39,851,131 92,918.173 131,848,658 Total(5 cities). Total(6 cities). Total(10 cities I 201,422,056 98.718,699 100,571,397 69,866,495 +43.9 2695 Week Ended April 14. Clearings al 1934. 1933. Inc. or Dec. Seventh Feder al Reserve D strict-Chi Cag0 Mich.-Adrian 54.608 Ann Arbor.. 364.985 450,485 Detroit 71.463.884 8.203,181 +771.2 Grand Rapids. 1,644,647 803,135 +104.8 Lansing 844,192 158,820 +431.5 Ind.-Ft. Wayne 584,928 324,438 +80.3 Indianapolis_ _ _ 11,363,000 8,388,000 +35.5 South Bend_ _ _ 954,176 471,443 +102.4 Terre Haute 3,945,284 3,006,888 +31.2 Wis.-Milwaukee 16,898,959 9,910,503 +70.5 Ia.-Ced, Rapids 299.211 Des Moines_ _ _ 5,642,257 3.375,000 Sioux City 2,299,294 1,547,244 +48.6 Waterloo Ill.-Bloomington 338,180 191,234 Chicago 224,763,493 154,200,000 +45.8 Decatur 500,857 414,984 +20.7 Peoria 2,471,849 1,822,752 +35.6 Rockford 637,574 410,442 +55.3 Springfield.... 782,614 709.757 +10.3 1932. 1931. 119,045 511,345 68,804,593 2,903,061 1.200,300 1,156,824 12.988,600 1,235,540 3,267,675 17,618,033 723,323 5,463,244 3.003,614 193,943 644.677 140,293.698 4,592,024 2,522,602 2,717,833 17,216,000 2,931,913 4,421,961 25.316,258 2,758,231 7,021,104 3,921,305 1,114,328 261,357,736 650,854 2,570,675 1,027.928 1,800,556 2,074,583 474,023,378 1,029,436 3,478,789 3,012.508 2,925.466 194,388,306 +77.9 387,516,674 701,095.7W Eighth Fedora Reserve Dia trict-St.Lo UIS-tad -Evansville. Mo.-St. Louis.. 66,700,000 50,600,000 Ky.-Loulaville _ 24,110318 17,464,576 +38.1 Tenn.- Memphis 13,794,605 8,076,337 +70.8 111.- Jacksonville Quincy 371.000 67,400,000 20,033,281 10,740,278 103,900.000 25,691,597 13,876,622 Total(19 cities) 345,853.992 553,7C6 907.025 76,140,913 +37.9 98,727.265 144,375,244 Ninth Federal Reserve Dist Het-Mune spoils Minn.-Duluth_ _ 2,005,062 1,807,873 +24.7 Minneapolis _ _ _ 47,791.984 37,922,749 +26.0 St. Paul 18,519,841 11,573,889 +60.0 N. Dak.-Fargo 1,856.459 1,520,379 +22.1 S.D.-Aberdeen. 432,068 477,106 -9.4 Mont.-Billings 380,316 285,038 +33.4 Helena 1,937,325 1,849,382 +4.8 2397.028 48,153.892 16,213,854 2,115.750 619,416 377,037 1,643,161 3,457,640 68,252,909 23,110,987 2,497.648 897,533 562,739 3,165,321 55.236,418 +32.0 71,320,138 101,944,777 Tenth Federal Reserve Die trict-Kans as City Neb. Fremont. 70,903 42,432 +67.1 Hastings 64.301 Lincoln 2,109,095 1,504,739 +lb:i Omaha 25,954.707 16,834,936 +54.2 Kan.-'Topeka.. 1.563,069 1.338.223 +16.8 Wichita 2,094,955 1,507,316 +39.0 Mo.-Kan. City. 62,054,012 48.352,448 +28.3 St. Joseph_ _ 2,849,960 2,112,437 +34.9 Colo.-Col. Spgs. 474,429 483,761 -1.9 Pueblo 485,245 447.618 +8.4 199.309 168,223 2,242.832 24,029.912 2,093,586 3,968,790 68,194.966 2,931,601 695,133 809,052 234,644 427.308 3,183,259 37.156.373 2.789,903 5,405,915 93,426,134 4,290,003 1,060,045 1,209,920 105,333.408 149.183,504 las+43.5 +46.3 +11.1 +38.2 +25.2 853,622 27,146,764 5,643.091 2,259,000 2,677,252 1,689,921 41,162,738 7,898.612 2,305,000 4.036,411 29.926,979 +40.1 38,579.729 57,092,682 Franci sco+25.4 27,498,693 +83.6 7,156.000 +87.8 446,376 +44.2 18,793,664 +39.2 9,228,412 3,553,170 +6.1 +13.9 3,760,330 +551.5 6,256.067 +19.4 110,643,457 +27.2 1,833,944 +17.3 1,434,490 +17.3 1,118,598 +10.4 1,313,306 36.058,449 10,211,000 934,752 29,793,269 17,578,485. 6.144,075. 5,949,432 7.054.798 163.272,798 2.705,938 2,403,712 1.946,033 1,625,100 Total(4 cities). Total(7cities)- Total(10 cities) 104,976,023 72,923,055 97,720,676 72.623,910 +34.6 Eleventh Fede cal Reserve District-Da Texas-Austin _ _ 940,543 655,581 Dallas 32,811,052 22,432.904 Ft. Worth_ _ 4,305,308 3,875,418 Galveston 1,867,000 1,351,000 La.-Shreveport. 2,018,075 1,612,076 Total(5 cities). 41,941,978 Twelfth Feder at Reserve D strict-San Wash.-Seattle 22,205,808 17,709,192 Spokane 6,080,000 3,311,000 Yakima 436,451 232,463 Ore.-Portiand 20,929,332 14,515.219 Utah.-S.L.City 9.755.652 7,006,399 Calif.-L.Beach. 2,998,356 2.827,088 Pasadena 2,876,015 2,525,075 Sacramento_ _ _ 6,870.658 2,742,853 San Francisco. 98,976,605 82,869.419 San Jose 1,639,853 1,289,231 Santa Barbara. 1,130.661 940,581 Santa Monica. 883,201 753,191 Stockton 1.093,288 990.05 Total(13 cities) 175,848,880 137,711,782 +27.7 193,036,507 285,677,841 Grand total (112 5 609,064,027 3,357.861,263 +67.0 5,281,402,144 9,166,267,735 cities) Outside N. Y___ _ 1,871,861,230 1,240.359,428 +50.9 2,030,199,402 3,150,125,952 Week Ended April 12. Clearings at 1934. Canada- 5 Montreal Toronto Winnipeg Vancouver Ottawa Quebec Halifax Hamilton Calgary St. John Victoria London Edmonton Regina Brandon Lethbridge Saskatoon Moose Jaw Brantford Fort William_ _ _ _ New Westminster Medicine Hat _ _ _ Peterborough_ _ _ _ Sherbrooke Kitchener Windsor Prince Albert _ Moncton Kingston Chatham Sarnia Sudbury 100,756,915 113,049,878 32,774,083 15.612,235 4,194.787 3.759.451 2,193,311 5.096,383 4,010,082 1,835,058 1,558,834 2,582,013 3,571,187 2,950,755 260,561 379,815 1,132,357 414,343 745,807 614,795 505,430 220,818 571,329 645,462 1,077,603 2,091.637 246,565 563,863 523,105 475,579 431.607 763,908 Total(32 cities) 305,409,356 1933. $ 61,394,965 66,768,939 27,020,085 10,649,266 3,358,268 2;997,855 1,675,045 2,826,628 4.157.677 1,220,798 1,202.058 1,766.390 3,040.048 2,822,824 236,577 303,859 960,355 423.081 603,805 429.614 396,026 136,185 459,970 476,123 740,083 1,854,853 206,402 472.220 396,048 352,299 318.210 425.654 Inc. or Dec. % 1932. 1931. $ $ +64.1 +69.3 +21.3 +46.6 +24.9 +25.4 +30.9 +80.3 -3.5 +33.9 +29.7 +46.2 +17.5 +4.5 +10.1 +25.0 +17.9 -2.1 +23.5 +43.1 +27.6 +62.1 +24.2 +35.6 +45.6 +12.8 +19.5 +19.4 +32.1 +35.0 +35.6 +79.5 64,314,559 63,655,942 48.493,995 12.499,860 4,892,385 3.687,509 2,175,346 3,504,723 4,556.190 1,695,576 1,340,261 2.232,445 3,678,797 2,970,976 295,652 336.626 1,122.364 447,199 783,092 533,205 462,298 166,466 530,228 555.865 813,333 2,061,380 239,851 694,220 518,699 457,100 344.869 463.735 117.662,753 116,959,586 41,025,635 15,590,823 5,805,290 5,784,928 3,111,449 5,164,633 6,090,716 2,428,278 1,882,411 2,828,627 5,203,474 3,823.529 435,132 435.461 1,545,092 800,335 1,085,553 745,974 619,426 226,808 704,378 825.078 1,075,295 4,331,345 453,995 730,903 625.416 ' 543,686 602,215 743,813 200,092,210 +52.6 230,524,746 349.892.037 b No clearings available. c Clearing House not tune toning at present. Financial Chronicle 2696 April 21 1934 THE ENGLISH GOLD AND SILVER MARKETS. We reprint the following from the weekly circular of 'Samuel Montagu & Co. of London, written under date of April 4 1934: PRICES ON PARIS BOURSE. Quotations of representative stocks on the Paris Bourse as received by cable each day of the past week have been as follows: GOLD. The Bank of England gold reserve against notes amounted to £191.'080,514 on the 28th ultimo, showing no change as compared with the previous Wednesday. Moderate amounts have been available in the open market, about £1,500,000 being disposed of during the three working days under review. There have been no fresh features and the demand continued to be fairly general. Quotations: Equivalent Value of Per Ounce £ Sterling. Fine. 12s. 6.52d. id. 1358. 5 March 29 12s. 6.84d. 135s. 2d. April 3 12s. 7.87d. 134s. 3d. April 4 125. 7.08d. 1345. 11.50d. Average of above 3 days The following were the United Kingdom imports and exports of gold egistered from mid-day on the 26th March to mid-day on the 31st March: Apr. 14 Apr. 16 Apr. 17 Apr. 18 Apr. 19 Apr. 20 1934. 1934. 1934. 1934. 1034. 1934. Francs. Francs. Francs. Francs. Francs. France. 10,900 11,100 11,100 11,000 11,300 11,300 Bank of France 1,402 1,399 1,404 Banque de Paris et Pays Das- 1,389 1,435 171 ____ 173 Banque d'Union Parisienne. 168 174 263 Canadian Pacific 264 258 260 260 "iii 19.4o) 19.400 19,200 18,600 18,300 18,300 Canal de Suez 2,310 2,350 2,355 2,270 2,350 Cie Dist d'Electricite 1,730 1.790 1,760 1,750 Cie Generale d'Electricite 1,790 1,iiel 25 26 Cie Generale Tran.satiantique 25 2523 231 215 Citroen B 216 216 212 Comptoir Nationale d'Electricite 1,004 1.011 1,010 1,009 1,018 160 160 160 Coty SA 160 58 170 263 270 264 Courrleres 260 273 --._ _ 697 700 696 CrecHt Commercial de France 695 710 1,990 2,020 2,030 2,030 2,C50 2-J070 Credit Lyonnais 2,550 2,570 2,560 2,500 2,510 2,570 Eaux Lyonnais 680 683 675 Energie Eleetrique du Nord _ 674 667 ---792 792 786 Energie Electrique du Littoral._ 773 795 __ -527 550 Kuhlmann 740 730 L'Air Liquide 6FF1o° -Fni 919 939 935 Lyon (P L DA) 945 995 ---1,334 1,360 1,351 Nord RY 1,355 1,425 818 818 818 Orleans Ry 820 836 -185 63 64 64 Pathe Capital --1,017 1,042 1,025 1,42 1, Pechiney 69.30 70.70 70.80 71.90 730.P Rentes, Perpetuel 3% 0 7130 76.80 78.10 78.30 78.60 80.50 80.10 Rentes 4% 1917 76.75 78.20 78.30 78.60 80.20 80.00 Rentes 4%,1918 82.80 84.75 84.50 85.20 85.40 85.90 Rentes 452% 1932 A 83.80 83.20 83.10 83.70 84.10 84.60 Rentes 434%, 1932 B 107.50 105.70 105.60 106.75 108.30 108.50 Ren tea 5%, 1920 1,600 1.650 1,630 1,630 1.630 Royal Dutch 1,620 1,249 1,250 Saint Gobain C & C 1,221 1,280 1,321 __.... 1,542 1,542 1,524 1,545 1,565 Schneider de Cie 60 58 60 60 Societe Francalse Ford 60 60 65 68 67 Societe Gcnerale Fonciere 66 68 --__ 2,550 2,575 2,540 2,480 2,535 Societe LyonnaLse --535 535 535 535 Societe Marseilialse 535 .._. 144 142 140 141 Tubize Artificial Silk pref 143 -745 743 738 951 Union d'Electricite 735 97 98 '97 Wagon-Lita 96 97 _.... Exports. Imports. £26,760 £1,338,377 France Germany 8,207 119,433 Austria Netherlands 1,943,000 Roumania 54,942 France 259.004 United States of America- 699,516 China 1,014 7,947 Other countries Hongkong 642,692 British India 49,932 British Malaya 1,087.785 British South Africa 21.644 Australia 25.305 New Zealand 832 United States of America_ 21,053 Venezuela 14,948 Ecuador 22.886 Other countries £2,678,497 £3,666,780 The S.S. Mooltan which sailed from Bombay on the 31st ultimo carries gold to the value of about £690,000. The Southern Rodesian gold output for February 1934 amounted to 53,818 fine ounces as compared with 57,843 fine ounces for January 1934 and 47.661 fine ounces for February 1933. SILVER. Owing to the Easter Holidays, the week under review contained only three working days. during which the market ruled steady with only small variations in prices. Support was given by speculators and America, the New York market showing some firmness on reports of legislative proposals, whilst moderate sales have been made on Continental account. The Indian Bazaars have both bought and sold but business on the whole has been rather quiet although the market continues to show a fairly steady undertone. The following were the United Kingdom imports and exports of silver registered from mid-day on the 26th March to mid-day on the 31st March: Exports. Imports. £1,154 1,750 18,041 16,215 5,000 2,697 £11,642 Germany Germany United States of America__ 18,900 Sweden 6,550 Syria British South Africa 15,355 Persia Australia 34.422 British India New Zealand 4,500 Other countries Canada 3,112 Other countries £44,857 £94,481 Quotations during the week: IN NEW YORK. IN LONDON. (Cents per Ounce .999 Fine.) Bar Silver per or. Std. Cash Deli,. 2 Mos. Deli,. 45% Mar.28 Mar.29..19 15-16d. 20d. 45,34 Mar.29 20 1-16d. Apr. 3- _ _20d. 453 4 Mar.30 19 15-16d. 4d. Apr. 4.--193 4534 Mar. 31 of Average 46 7-16 Apr. 2 above 3 46g Apr. 3 days---19.937d. 20.000d. The highest rate of exchange on New York recorded during the period from the 29th ultimo to the 4th inst. was $5.1934 and the lowest $5.11%• INDIAN CURRENCY RETURNS. Mar. 15. Mar 22. 17,661 17,674 9,772 9,785 3,765 4,153 4,124 3,736 (In Lacs of Rupees)Notes in circulation Silver coin and bullion in India Gold coin and bullion in India Securities (Indian Government) Mar. 7. 17,658 9.823 3.765 4,070 The stocks in Shanghai on the 29th ultimo consisted of about 138.400,000 ounces in sycee, 364,000,000 dollars and 19,800,000 ounces in 355,000,000 bar silver. as compared with about 149,700,000 ounces in sycee, dollars and 21,000 silver bars and the 24th ultimo. Statistics for the month of March last are appended: -Bar Silver per Oz.Std.- Bar Gold Per Or. Fine. Cash Delia. 2Mos. Deli,. 137s. 2d. 20 13-16d. 20%d. Highest price 5;i(1. 135s. 15-16d. 19 19.4 7 d. Lowest price 136s. 5.66d 20.3475d. 20.2775d. Average ENGLISH FINANCIAL MARKET-PER CABLE. The daily closing quotations for securities, &c.,at London as reported by cable, have been as follows the past week: Wed.. Tues., Mon., Sat., Apr. 14. Apr. 16. Apr. 17. Air. 18. 20 3-16d. 193461. Silver. per oz._ 20 3-16d. 20s4d. Gold,p.fine oz. 134s.1130.1348.1034d.1348.834d. 1358.4d. 807-16 8034 80 805-16 Consols, 234% British 334%10434 104k 10434 10434 W. L British 4%11334 1123.4 11234 11234 1960-90 French Rentes 71.00 70.80 77.70 (in Paris)3% fr. 69.30 French War L'n (in Parts)5% 106.70 105.60 105.70 107.50 1920amort Thurs., Apr. 19. 1932d. 1358.3d. 80 Frt., Apr. 20 19%cl. 135s.2 34d. 79 13-16 10434 10434 11334 11334 73.50 73.50 108.30 108.50 'the price of silver in New York on the same days has been: Silver in N. V., per oz. (eta.) 4634 4534 453,4 453,4 45 4534 48ng THE BERLIN STOCK EXCHANGE. Closing prices of representative stocks as received by cable each day of the past week have been as follows: Apr. Apr. Apr. Apr. Apr. 14. 16. 17. 18. 19. Per Cent of Par 149 149 150 147 148 86 86 86 86 85 47 47 46 46 45 60 2 60 2 6 52 9 6 6 50 7 59 6 Reichabank(12%) Berliner Handel's-Gesellschaft (5%) Commerz-und Privet Bank A G Deutsche Bank und Discords-Gesellschaft Dresdner Bank Deutsche Reichsbahn (Ger Rye)pref(7%) 113 25 Allgemeine Elektrizitaets-Gesell(A E G) 132 Berliner Kraft u Licht(10%) 124 D Gea ma iueureeri Gas %( )7%) Hamburg Elektr-Werke (8%) Siemens & Halske(7%) I G Farbenindustrie(7%) Salzdetturtb (734%) Rheinische Braunkohle (12%) Deutsche Erdoel(4%) Mannesmann Roebren Hapag Norddeutscher Lloyd 97 113 141 141 210 115 66 27 31 Apr. 20. 113 25 132 123 113 25 131 122 113 23 131 120 113 24 130 121 149 86 46 57 60 113 26 130 12 39816 1 96 113 140 140 145 210 113 66 27 30 " 1r. 133 137 144 142 210 205 112 110 65 64 27 26 30 30 1111 136 139 143 205 111 66 27 31 139 143 210 112 66 28 31 WO 2 In the following we also give New York quotations for German and other foreign unlisted dollar bonds as of Friday April 20 1934: Bid. Ask. Bed. AM. 36 Hungarian defaulted coups /90 132 Anhalt 7s to 1946 Hungarian Ital Bk 7348.'32 179 Argentine 5%, 1945. 3100 95 Jugoslavia 58, 1956 pieces 35 /28 32 Jugoslavia coupons Antioquia 8%. 1948 142 Koholyt 634s, 1943 Austrian Defaulted Coupons f spa 162 68 Land M Bk, Warsaw 88.'41 170 Bank of Colombia, 7%,'47 117 73 19 Leipzig Oland Pr. 634s,'46 /63 Bank of Colombia, 7%,'48 117 68 Bavaria 65,02 to 1945 13912 4112 Leiptig Trade Fair 7s. 1953 /48 50 Luneberg Power, Light & Bavarian Palatinate Cons. 32 Water 7%,1948 Cit. 7% to 1945 139 /57 60 22 Mannheim & l'alat 78 1941 172 Bogota (Colombia) 634.'47 118 76 10 Munich 78 to 1945 Bolivia 3%. 1940 17 136 38 125 26 Muni('Bk, Hessen, 7s to '45 130 Buenos Aires scrip 33 47 Municipal Gam & Elm Corp Brandenburg Elec. 6s, 1953 145 64 Brazil funding 5%. '31-'51 63 Recklinghausen, 78, 1947 148 52 Nassau Brazil funding scrip 163 Landbank 6328.'38 156 59 Natl. Bank Panama 634% British Hungarian Bank 58 1946-9 7325. 1962 /56 /4012 4112 Nat Central Savings Bk of Brown Coal Ind. Corp 160 67 Hungary 734s, 1962____ /5512 5712 634s, 1953 15 National Hungarian 4c Ind. Call (Colombia) 7%. 1947 /13 mtge.7%,1948 8 912 Callao (Peru) 734%. 1944 /60 6I1 Ceara (Brazil) 8%. 1947__ 10 Oberpfalz Elec. 7%, 7 _ 134 38 /32 34 Oldenburg-Free State Columbiascrip 19467% 46 to 1945 Costa Rica funding 5%.'51 44 /31 35 144 Porto Costa Rica scrip Alegre 7%. 1968_ -- 118 20 Protestant Church (GerCity Savings Bank, Buda15212 5412 many), 78, 1946 Peed. 7s, 1953 /39 41 63 Prov Bk Westphalia (is, '33 153 Dortmund Men Util 6s,'48 160 56 32 Prov Bk Westphalia 13s, '36 151 Duisburg 7% to 1945 127 54 32 Rhine Duesseldorf 71 to 1945...__ 120 WeetPh Elec 7%.'36 /76 79 5212 Rio de Janeiro 6%, 1933_ 12412. 26 East Prussian Pr. 6s, 1953. 151 Rom Cath Church 634s,'46 160 European Mortgage & In61 65 C Church Welfare vestment 734s, 1966....- 1E4 '41 130 41 160 Saarbrueoken M Bk es French Govt. 5348, 1937 74,'47 /8312 8812 Salvador 7%,1957 French Nat. Mall SS.68,'52 148 /2712 29 132 26 Salvador 7% etf of dep '57 123'2 25 Frankfurt 7s to 1945 German Atl Cable 7s. 1945 14612 4812 Salvador scrip 114 17 Santa Catharina (Brasil), German Building & Land150 5112 8%, 1947 bank 634%. 1948 24 /23 German defaulted coupons 163 67 Santander(Colon)7s, 1948 111 13 /1912 21 Sao Paulo (Brazil) 6s, 1943 /23 German scrip 24 /40 Saxon State Mtge.(is, 1947 /6612 German called bonds Serbian fa, 1956 70 Haiti 6% 1953 33 36 Hamb-Am Line 634s to '40 183 87 Serbian coupons /42 Stem & Halske deb 68, 2930 1330 Hanover Harz Water Wks. 34139 Stettin Pub Util is, 1946.. 547 6%. 1957 /35 49 49 Tucuman City 7s, 1951._ Housing & Real Imp 7s,'46 /45 140 42 Hungarian Cent Met 7s,'37 /4612 4812 Tucuman Prov, 78, 1950_ 55 58 Hungarian Discount & ExVesten Eleo Ry 7s. 1947_ 123 28 change Bank 78. 1963_ _ /4012 4212 Wurtemberg 78 to 1945... 137 39 I Flat price. Government Receipts and Expenditures. Through the courtesy of the Secretary of the Treasury we are enabled to place before our readers to-day the details of Government receipts and disbursements for March 1934 and 1933 and the nine months of the fiscal years 1933-34 and 1932-33. General Funds. —Month of March— —July 1 to Mar. 311932-33. 1933-34. 1933. Receipts—1934. Internal revenue: Income tax 564,051,964 590,214,117 232,007,129 180,712,321 Miscell. internal revenue__ 588,860,625 129,759,402 67,214,433 1,115,510,353 Processing tax on farm prod's_ 238,005.909 37,100,762 Customs 189,891,195 247,764,000 17,444,369 23,121,671 Miscellaneous receipts: Proceeds of Govt.-owned securities: Principal—for'n obligations 31,567,200 394,175 67,184,087 Interest—foreign obliga'ns_ 19,869,636 All other 11,030,679 35,028,633 225,028 830,605,593 Panama Canal tolls, &c 18,660,444 16,587.060 2,974,521 2,941,828 Other miscellaneous 53,066,684 40,257,455 3,465,624 5,778,282 Total receipts Expenditures— General: Departmental (see note 1)__ _ Public bldg. construction and sites, Treas. Dept.(note 1)_ River and harbor work(note 1) National defense (note 1) Veterans' Admin. (note 1)_ .._ Adjusted service ctt. fund__ Agricultural Adjustinent Administration (note 1) Farm Credit Admin.(note 1)_ Agricul market'g fund(note 2) Distribution of wheat and cotton for relief Refunds of receipts: Customs Internal revenue Processing tax on farm prod. Postal deficiency Panama Canal Subscription to stock of Federal Land banks Civil Service retirement fund (Government share) Foreign Service retirement fund (Government share)_ Dist. of Col.(Govt. share)..... Interest on the public debt.-Public debt retirements: Sinking fund Purchases and retirements from foreign repayments. Received from torn govts. under debt settlements._ Estate taxes, forfeitures, gifts. &c Total Emergency (see note 3): Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works' Civil Works Administration Loans and grants to States, municipalities, Am Loans to railroads Public highways River and harbor work. Boulder Canyon project _ Emergency Housing Corp All other Civil Works Administration Federal Emergency Relief Administration Administration for Industrial Recovery Agricultural Adjust. Admin.... Farm Credit Administration Emergency Conserva'n Work.. Reconstruction Finance Corp. Federal Farm Mtge. Corp. bonds, prin, and interest_ _ _ Tennessee Valley Authority._ Federal Land banks (subscenS to paid-in surplus. strc )_- - Federal Says. & Loan Ass'ns (SUbscrip'ns to pref. shs.) Federal Deposit Insur. Corp. (subscriptions to stock)__ 420,103,481 272,036,296 180,273,824 1,170,668 Ames— Gold 63.836,286 1,721,361,557 56,386,6981 334,712,62 075,827,953 3 100,000,000 50,000,000 56,671,099 519,955,798 14,972,884 32,898,079 965,951 2,177,278 22,003,581 1,519,418 81,546,780 45,944,769 58,128,509 10,588,026 38,386,746 386,738 17,002.999 6,149,107 9,363,955 40,784,233 87,247,954 8,355,088 51,737,780 5242,545 20,850,000 20,850,000 292,700 5,700,000 453,262,068 416,000 7,775,000 420.291,660 51,976,000 418,764,000 30,977,000 357,850 5,000 160,424,266 273,370,346 2,057,250 1,987,039,132 2,883.853,283 5,000 400,005,000 7,684,864 22,729,227 7,523,379 1,649,457 1.930 16,086,707 177,298,591 60,591 277 6,990,000 179,761,074 43,427,660 12,483.261 1,930 80,055,907 202,877,859 40,502,101 40,802,939 678,403 2,453,350 5981,247 27,313,505 76,221,766 4.012,222 57,978,456 39.018,753 235,076,275 1,287,354,800 157,106,776 2,909,650 14,000 25,036,413 1,159,363 25,036,413 4,178,955 4,077,221 31,558,008 55,000 103,500 40,413,641 149,620,997 893,214,626 449,808,671 157,106,776 2,860,965,286 893,214.626 610,232,937 430,477,122 4,848,004,418 3,777,067,909 Excess Of receipts Excess of expenditures (note 4). 190,129,456 158.440,826 2,542,299,695 2,254,828,416 Summary. Excess of expenditures Less public debt retirements 190,129,456 5,000 158,440,826 2,512.299,695 52,347,850 2,254,128,416 434,707,903 190,124,456 158.440,826 2,489,951,845 1,800,120,518 1,092,095 2,151,959 2,826,780,108 Total Expenditures— Trust and contributed funds_ _ Excess of receipts or credits_ _ _ Excess of expenditures 3E8.081 105,134,107 12,218,270 427,734,968 11,149,477 3,618,837,132 115,534,996 1,875,461,733 112,249,874 2,810,451,390 2,233,252 14,451,522 11,149,477 2,925,989,386 112,249,874 13,359,470 1,092,044 8,997,519 99,209,278 111,861,793 2151,958 2,826,780,108 388,081 Counter entry (deduct). b Excess of credits (deduct). Note 1.—Additional expenditures on these accounts for this month and the fiscal year 1934 are included under emergency expenditures, the classification of which will be shown in the statement of classified receipts and expenditures appearing on p. 4 of the daily Treasury statement for the 15th of each month. Total 7,695.087,462.75 Total 7,695.087.462.75 Note.—Iteserve against $346,681,016 o U. S. notes and 71,192,174 of Treasury notes of 1890 outstanding. Treasury notes of 1890 are also secured by silver dollars in the Treasury. SILVER. Assets— Liabilities— $ S Silver bullion (Sec. 45, Silver ctfs. (Sec. 45, Act Act of May 12 1933)._ 1.560,000.00 of May 12 1933) 1.560.000.00 Silver dollars 505,310,579.00 Silver ctfs. outstanding_ 496.487,591.00 Treasury notes of 1890 outstanding 1.192,174.00 Silver dols,in gen.fund._ 7,630,814.00 Total .506,870.579.00 Total 506.870,579.00 GENERAL FUND. Assets— s Liabilities— $ Gold (see above) 3,041,299,175.33 Treasurer's checks outSilver dols. (see above).. 7,630,814.00 standing 452,951.18 United States notes__ 2,133,836.00 Deposits of Government Silver ctfs. (Sec. 45, Act officers: of May 12 1933) 921,880.00 Post Office Dept 8,309,325.68 Federal Reserve notes__ 16,459,125.00 Board of Trustees, Fed. Reserve bank notes 2,359,041.00 Postal Savings SysNational bank notes...,.. 21,174.245.00 tem: Subsidiary silver coin_ _. 10,228,261.96 5% reserve, lawMinor coin 4,721,427.66 ful money 60,554,707.63 Silver bullion 37,646,562.86 Other deposits_ __ 52.553,449.01 ,.., -At. , Postmasters, clerks of Unclassified— Collections, Am 2,473,076.13 courts, disbursing Deposits in— officers, Ac 190,978,930.69 Fed. Reserve banks_ 98,536,605.36 Deposits for: Special depos. acct. of Redemption of F. R. sales of Govt. sebanknotes(5% fund amities 1,914,432,000.00 9.085,500.00 lawful money) Nat. and other bank Redemption of nat'l depositaries: bank notes(5% fund. To credit of Tress39,743,574.13 lawful money) urer of U. S 6,698,241.70 Retirement of addl To credit of other circulate notes, Act Govt. officers_ _ _ 23,649,133.75 of May 30 1908_ _ _ 1,350.00 Foreign depositaries: Uncollected items, exTo credit of Tress14,400,607.04 changes, Lee 1.474,143.62 urer of U. S To credit of other 376,080,395.36 1,250,743.38 Net balance Govt. officers 4,817,870,615.36 Philippine Treasury: To credit of Treas862,697.97 urer of U.S Treasury Money Holdings. The following compilation, made up from the daily Government statements, shows the money holdings of the Treasury at the beginning of business on the first of January, February, March and April 1934: Holdings in U.S. Treasury Jan.1 1934, Feb. 1 1934. Mar. 11934. April 1 1934. Total excess of expend.(+)or receipts (—) +189,032411 +156,288,867 —336,828,263 +1,799,732,435 Increase(+) or decrease (—)in general fund balance —83,898,304 +271,446,101 +3,955.665,395 +75,729,298 Increase in the public debt CURRENT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES. GOLD. Liabilities— 7,695,087,462.75 Gold certificates: Outstanding (outside of Treasury) 1,059,982,099.00 Gold et!. fund—Fed. Reserve Board._ _ _3,405,018.628.66 Redemption fund— Fed. Reserve notes_ 32,748,471.73 Gold reserve 156,039,088.03 Gold in general fund_ _ _..3.04i.299.175.33 5,193,951,010.72 5.193,951.010.72 Total Total Note.—The amount to the credit of disbursing officers and agencies to-day was $611.125,261.95. $1,206,975 in Federal Reserve notes, 52,359,041 in Federal Reserve bank notes and $21,098,125 in national bank notes are in the Treasury in process of redemption and are charges against the deposits for the respective 5% redemption funds and retirement funds. Total expend's (note 4) Truer and Contributed Funds and Increment on Gold. (See note 5) Receipts— Trust and contributed funds__ Increment resulting from reduction In weight of gold dollar Treasury Cash and Current Liabilities. The cash holdings of the Government as the items stood March 31 1934 are set out in the following. The figures are taken entirely from the daily statement of the United States Treasury as of March 31 1934. 229,176,164 20,027,807 18,566,586 519,402,385 1,606,146 2,624,870 248,937 Note 2.—On and after May 27 1933 repayments of loans made from Agricultural Marketing Fund—Federal Farm Board, and interest thereon, are reflected as credits in the expenditures of the Farm Credit Administration. Note 3.—Emergency expenditures for the fiscal year 1933 (except Reconstruction Finance Corporation) are included in general expenditures, the classification of which emergency expenditure, is not available for comparison with emergency expenditures for the fiscal year 1934. Therefore neither the totals of general expenditures nor the totals of emergency expenditures for the two fiscal years are comparable. Note 4.—Total expenditures and excess of expenditures for the fiscal year 1933 Include expenditures made by the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, whereas In last year's daily Treasury statements Reconstruction Finance Corporation expenditures appeared on p. 3. Note 5.—The classification of receipts and expenditures on account of contributed funds prior to the fiscal year 1.34 is not available. Such receipts and expenditures were classified as special funds and are included in the receipts and general expenditures under general and special funds for the fiscal year 1933. 1,522,239,494 253,843,150 28,187,394 3,600,020 3,532,670 36,829,542 39,056,809 2,305,704,722 Total Excess of expenditures (exclud'g public debt retirements) Trust & contributed funds and increment on gold, excess of receipts 2697 Financial Chronicle Volume 138 Net gold coin and bullion.. Net silver coin and bullion Net United States notes.._ Net National bank notes_ Net Federal Reserve notes Net Fed. Res. bank notes_ Net subsidiary silver Minor coin. dm $ 274,608,953 47,679,232 3,524,666 19,567,388 17,110,685 1,919,197 10,212,774 29,404,497 $ 5 $ 346,269,963 3,302,788,571 3,197,338,263 46,199,257 49,662,843 47,381,652 2,864,366 2,133,836 2,422,372 17,774,695 21,174,245 19,170,668 16,569,475 17,041,690 16,459,125 1,930,137 1,876,159 2,359,041 10,228,262 11,042,114 11,324,018 7,361,766 6,965,532 7,194.504 Total cash in Treasury_ Less gold reserve fund 404,027,392 156,039,088 454.428,981 3408 016,683 .3303086,533 156,039,088 156,039,088 156,039,088 Cash balance in Tresss'y 247,988,304 298,389,893 3,251,977,595 3,147,047,445 Dep. In speel depositories account Treas'y bonds, Treasury notes and certificates of Indebtedness 1,006,825,000 1,312.308,000 1,944,487,000 1,914,432,000 Dep. In Fed. Res. bank _ _ 104,372,400 313,833,868 109,848.573 98,536,605 Dep. in National banks— To credit Treas. U. S.... 7,145,171 6,595,383 7,190,726 6,698,242 To credit dist). officers_ 24,063,320 20,911,600 23,649,134 21.844,679 Cash in Philippine Islands 1,119,368 1,179,767 862,698 1,054,228 Deposits In foreign dents_ 2,739,960 2,814,141 2,724,887 3.020,749 Dep. in Fed. Land banks_ Net cash in Treasury 1,394,253,523 1,956,033,009 5,339.423.550 5,193,951,011 and in banks Deduct current liabilities_ 368.104,900 418.831,897 437,654,630 376,080,395 1.026.145.623 1.537.201 119 4 not 7118 ono 5 917 srm 11111 • Includes April 1 $37,646.563 silver bullion and $4,721,428 minor, &c., coin not included in statement "Stock of Is oney." 2698 Financial Chronicle Debt Statement of the United States March 31 1934. The preliminary statement of the public debt of the United States March 31 1934, as made upon the basis of the daily Treasury statement, is as follows: Preliminary Bonds2% Consols of 1930 2% Panama Canal Loan of 1916-36 2% Panama Canal Loan of 1918-38 3% Panama Canal Loan of 1961 3% Conversion bonds of 1946-47 245% Postal Savings bonds(7th to 46th series) $599,724,050.00 48,954,180.00 25,947,400.00 49,800,000.00 28,894,500.01 78,030,240.00 $831,350,370.00 First Liberty Loan of 1932-47: 345% bonds 81,392,226,350.00 4% bonds (converted).5,002,450.00 535.981,500.00 434% bonds (converted) 5,367,374,200.00 7,300,584,500.00 3758,983,300.00 1,036,834,500.00 489.087,100.00 454,135.200.00 352,993,950.00 .544,915,050.00 819,096,500.00 755,481,350.00 834,474,100.00 1,400,570,500.00 7,446,571,550.00 Total bonds Treasury Notes3% Series A-1934, maturing May 2 1934 234% Series B-1934, maturing Aug. 1 1934-3% Series A-1935, maturing June 15 1935 134% Series B-1935. maturing Aug. 1 1935 ._ 234% Series C-1935, maturing March 15 1935235% series D-1935, maturing Dec. 15 1935._ 334% Series 4-1936, maturing Aug. 11936 234% Series B-19.36, maturing Dec 15 1936_ 274% Series C-1936, maturing April 15 1936__ 334% Series A-1937. maturing Sept. 151937 3% Series 13-1937. maturing April 151937 3% series C-1937, maturing Feb. 15 1937._ 234% Series A-1938. maturing Feb. 1 1938._ 244% Berle. 13-I938 maturing June 15 1038 3% series C-1938. maturing May 15 1938._ 815,578,506,420.00 $244,234,600.00 345,292,600.00 416,602,800.00 353,865,000.00 528,101,600.00 418,291.900.00 364,138,000.00 357,921,200.00 558,819,200.00 817,483,500.00 502,361,900.00 428,730,700.00 276,679,600.00 618,056.800.00 455 175 500.00 86,685.754,900.00 4% Civil Service Retirement Fund. Series 1934 to 1938 4% Foreign Service Retirement Fund. Series 1934 to 1938 4% Canal Zone Retirement Fund, Series 1936 to 1938 235,000,000.00 2,389.000.00 2,214,000.00 6,925,357,900.00 Certificates of Indebtedness34°I, Series TJ-I934. maturing June 151934... 145% series TS-1934, maturing Sept. 15 1934_ 234% series TD-1934, maturing Dec. 151934. $174,905,500.00 524,748,500.00 992,496,500.00 $1.692,150,500.00 4% Adjusted Service Certificate Fund Series, maturing Jan. 1 1935 123,700,000.00 1,815,850,500.00 Treasury Bills (Maturity Value)Series maturing April 4 1934 Series maturing April 11 1934 Series maturing April 18 1934 Series maturing April 25 1934 Series maturing May 2 1934 Series maturing May 9 1934 Series maturing May 16 1934 Series maturing May 23 1934 Series maturing June 20 1934 Series maturing June 27 1934 Series maturing Aug. 8 1934 Series maturing Aug. 15 1934 Series maturing Aug. 29 1934 Series maturing Sept. 5 1934 Series maturing Sept. 26 1934 net debt on that date, we append a summary thereof, making comparison with the same date in 1932: CASE AVAILABLE TO PAY MATURING OBLIGATIONS. Dec. 311933. Dec. 311931. 3 Balance end of month by daily statements, &c 554,751,994 1.026.148,623 Add or Deduct-Excess or deficiency of receipts over or under disbursements on belated Items -105.538,056 -37,167,587 Deduct outstanding obligations: Matured interest obligations Disbursing officers' checks Discount secured on War Savings Certificates_ _ _ _ Settlement on warrant checks Total 31,933,210,300.00 434% Fourth Llberty Loan of 1933-38 (called and uncalled) Treasury bonds: 445% bonds of 1947-52 4% bonds of 1944-54 334% bonds of 1946-56 334% bonds of 1943-47 335% bonds of 1940-43 345% bonds of 1941-43 345% bonds of 1946-49 3% bonds 01 1951-55 334% bonds of 1941 44(-334% bonds of 1943-45 April 21 1934 8100,990,000.00 100,050,000.00 125,340,000.00 125,126,000.00 150,320,000.00 125,493.000.00 75,007,000.00 74,955,000.00 100.110,000.00 50,091,000.00 50,078.000.00 75,044,000.00 75,088,000.00 100,236,000.00 50,525,000.00 920,610.567 517,584,407 38,047,355 68,193,738 4,061,740 660,742 36,075,776 85,227,068 4,277,570 891,611 110,963,575 126,472,025 Balance, deficit (-) or surplus(+) +809,646,992 +391,112.382 INTEREST-BEARING DEBT OUTSTANDING. Interest Dee. 31 1933. Dec. 311932. Title of LoanPayable. $ $ 2s Consols of 1930 Q -J 599,724,050 599,724,050 Q.-F. 213 of 1916-1936 48,954,180 48,954,180 25 of 1918-1938 25,947,400 25,947,400 Q.-F. 3s of 1961 Q.-M. 49,800,000 49,800,000 35 convertible bonds of 1946-1947 Q.-J. 28,894,500 28,894,500 Certificates of indebtedness 1,753,601,0002,284,458,100 345s First Liberty Loan, 1932-1947 J.-D. 1,392,227.350 1,392,227,850 4s First Liberty Loan, converted 1932-1947_ ....J.-D. 5,002,450 5,002,450 532,491,150 454s First Liberty Loan, converted 1932-1947_ _J.-D. 532.489,950 434s First Liberty Loan, 2d cony., 1932-1947J.-D. 3.492,150 3,492,150 A -O. 5.369.864,250 6,268,099,450 44.1s Fourth Liberty Loan of 1933-1938 A -O. 758,983,300 445s Treasury bonds of 1947-1952 758.983,300 J D. 1.036.834,500 1,036,834,500 4s Treasury bonds of 1944-1954 3*48 Treasury bonds of 1946-1956 M.-S. 489,087,100 489,087,100 J.-D. 454,135,200 3445 Treasury bonds of 1943-1947 454,135,200 J.-D. 352,993,950 345s Treasury bonds of 1940-1943 352,994,460 M.-S. 544,915,050 3458 Treasury bonds of 1941-1943 544,916,050 J -D. 819,097,000 344s Treasury bonds of 1946-1949 821,402,000 M.-S. 755,486,350 38 Treasury bonds of 1951-1955 766,531,350 334a Treasury bonds of 1941 F.-A. 834,474,100 A.-0. 1,398,083,850 4qs-34$5 Treasury bonds of 1943-1945 J.-J. 68,633,500 43,453,360 254s Postal Savings bonds Treasury notes 5,124,810,200 3,298,775,600 Treasury bills, series maturingc100,050,000 1934-Jan. 3 c75,020,000 Jan. 10 c75,523,000 Jan. 17 c80,034,000 Jan. 24 c60,180,000 Jan. 31 c75,335,000 Feb. 7 c75,295,000 Feb. 14 c60,063,000 Feb. 21 Feb. 28 c100,027,000 Mar. 7 c100,050,000 Mar.21 c100,263.000 Mar.28 c100,890.1300 c75.954,000 1933-Jan. 11 c75,110,000 Jan. 18 c80.295,000 Jan. 25 c75,056,000 Feb. 8 e75,480,000 Feb. 15 c60.000,000 Feb. 23 c100,000,000 Mar. 1 c100,039,000 Mar. 29 23,450,281,380 20,448.138,100 299,877.139 292,810.097 64,389,095 64,380,095 Aggregate of interest-bearing debt Bearing no interest Matured,Interest ceased a23,814,527,614 20,805,108,382 Total debt Deduct Treasury surplus or add Treasury deficit......_ +809,646,992 +391,112,382 Net debt b23,004.880,622 20,413,996,000 a Total gross debt Dec. 31 1933 on the basis of daily Treasury statements was 323.813.790,735.55, and the net amount of public debt redemptions and receipts In transit, &c., was $736,878.17. b No reduction is made on account of obligations of foreign Governments or other Investments. c Maturity value. CttominercialanaRtisceliatteonsgems 1,378,453,000.00 Total Interest-bearing debt outstanding Matured Debt on Which Interest Has CeasedOld debt matured-issued prior to April 1 1917 4% and 445% Second Liberty Loan bonds of 1927-42 445% Third Liberty Loan bonds of 1928 334% Victory Notes of 1922-23 434% Victory Notes of 1922-23 Treasury notes. at various interest rates Ctfs. of Indebtedness, at various Int. ratesTreasury bills Treasury Savings Certificates 825,698.167.820.00 81,518,410.28 2.134,700.00 3,454,450.00 11,150.00 868,550.00 2,300,400.00 27,070,550.00 21,791,000.00 470,400.00 Bank Notes-Changes in Totals of, and in Deposited Bonds, &c. We give below tables which show all the monthly changes in National bank notes and in bonds and legal tenders on deposit therefor: Amount Bonds on Deposit to Secure Circulation for National Bank NO1418. 59,617.610.26 Debt Bearing No InterestUnited States notes Less gold reserve $346,681,016.00 156,039,088.03 3190,641,927.97 Deposits for retirement of National bank and Federal Reserve bank notes... Old demand notes and fractional currency _ Thrift and Treasury savings stamps, unclassified sales, .4e 203,726,079.50 2,038,655.49 3,317,598.74 399,724,261.70 326,157,500,691.96 Total gross debt COMPARATIVE PUBLIC DEBT STATEMENT. (On the basis of daily Treasury statements.) Aug. 311919, When War Debt Mar. 311017, Mar. 31 1933, a Year Ago. Pre-War Debt. Was at Its Peak. 1,282,044• ,346.28 26,596,701,648.01 21,362,464,177.21 Gross debt 74.216.460.05 1,118,109,534.76 492,926,476.44 Net balance in general fund_ Mar. 31 1934 Feb. 28 1934 Jan. 31 1934 Dec. 31 1933 Nov. 30 1933 Oct. 31 1933 Sept. 30 1933 Aug. 31 1933 July 31 1933 tune 30 1933 May 31 1933 Apr 30 1933 Mar 31 1933_ 847,058,170 887,005,520 890.191,530 890,136.780 859.738.430 852,631,430 857,210,430 955,781,930 852,529.890 856,394,230 897.952.290 899,410.240 885.871.740 $2,470,887 Federal Reserve bank lawful money. against 82,628,343 on Public Debt of the United States-Complete Returns Showing Net Debt as of Dec. 31 1933. The statement of the public debt and Treasury cash holdings of the United States, as officially issued Dec. 31 1933, delayed in publication, has now been received, and as interest attaches to the details of available cash and the gross and Bonds. Legal Tenders. Total. 840,848,330 884,147,835 886,086,290 885.835.878 853.937,995 849,453,595 852,464,810 851,509.995 848.207.263 853,935,968 864,590.423 893,199,238 875.820.165 140,669,333 981,547,683 100,489,113 984,836,948 99,508.223 985,594,513 101,678.700 987,514,878 107,333,292 981.271,287 112,094,540 981,548,185 110,533,735 962,998,545 114.422.100 985,932,095 118.428.910 988,834,173 116,865,120 970,601,088 118,072,980 980,683,403 88,832,155 982.031,893 90.840.375 966.660.540 notes outstanding April 2 1934 secured by April 11033. The following shows the amount of each class of United States bonds and certificates on deposit to secure Federal Reserve bank notes and National bank notes Mar. 311934: Gross debt less net balance in general fund__ 1,207,827,886.23 25.478,592,113.25 20,869,537.700.77 Feb. 28 1934, Dec. 311933. Last Month. Mar. 311034. Last Quarter. $ $ $ 23,813,790,735.55 26,052.375,584.80 26,157,509.691.96 Gross debt Net balance in general fund_ 1,026,148,622.86 4,901.768,919.51 4,817,870,615.36 Gross debt less net balance in general fund .._22,787,642,112.69 21,150,606,665.29 21.339,639.076.60 National Bank Circulation Allots! on- U. S. Bonds Held March 311934. Bonds on Deposit April 2 1934. 2s. U. 8. Consols of 1930 Is. U. S. Panama 01 1936 3s, U. S. Panama of 1938 3s. U. S Treasury of 1951-1955 334s. U. S. Treasury of 1948-1949 334s. (7.8. Treasury of 1841-1943 334s, (7. S. Treasury 01 1940 1943 3Ms, U S. Treasury of 1943-1947 3s, U S. Panama Canal of 1961 3s, U fl convertible of 1946-1947 334s, 1.1.5. Treasury of 1933-1941 Totals On Deposit to On Deposit to Secure Federal Secure Reserve Bank National Bank Notes. Notes. Total Held. 553,219,200 43,889,120 22.723,200 50,783,600 34,092.650 36,285,400 17,516,651) 30,297,000 1,000 1,020,000 57,230,350 553,219,200 43,889,120 22,723,200 50,783,600 34,092,850 36,285,400 17.518,650 30,297,000 1,000 1,020,000 57,230,350 847,058,170 847,058,170 Financial Chronicle Volume 138 The following shows the amount of National bank notes afloat and the amount of legal tender deposits Mar. 1 1934 and April 2 1934 and their increase or decrease during the month of March: National Bank Notes-Total AfloatAmount afloat March 1 1934 Net decrease during March $984,836,948 3.089,285 Amount of bank notes afloat April 2 Legal Tender NotesAmount deposited to redeem National bank notes March 1 Net amount of bank notes redeemed in March 1981,547,663 1100,489.113 40,210,220 Amount on deposit to redeem National bank notes April 2 1934._ _8140,699,333 Breadstuffs Figures Brought from Page 2778.-All the statements below, regarding the movement of grainreceipts, exports, visible supply, &c.-are prepared by us from figures collected by the New York Produce Exchange First we give the receipts at Western lake and river ports for the week ending last Saturday and since Aug. 1 for each of the last three years: Receipts at-I Flour. I Wheat. I I 1 Corn. Oats. Rye. Barley. bbls.19131bs bush 60 Ws bush. 56 lbs. bush. 32 lbs bush.48lbs.bush.561bS. Chicago 132,000 574,000 93,0001 181,000 10.000 161,000 Minneapolis_ 100,000 491,0001 60,000 43,000 361,000 Duluth 279,0001 25,000 8.000' 23.000 Milwaukee_ -12,060 81,000 8,0001 6,000 5,000 218,000 Toledo 179, 4,000 44,000 Detroit 13,000 6,000 17,000 20,000 Indianapolis51,0001 218,000 130,000 23.000 St. Louis_ _ 117.000 174,0001 193,000 178,000 13,000 Peoria 48,00 6,0001 260,000 62,000 23,000 33,000 Kansas City 12,000 174,000 573,0001 36,000 Omaha 99,000 5,000 137,0001 St. Joseph_ 50.0001 53,000 22.000 Wichita 31,000 103,0001 Sioux City11,000 8,000 1,000 3,000 Buffalo 105,000 83,000 126,000 6,000 14,000 Total wk. '34 Same wk. '33 Same wk. '32 321,000 408,000 362,000 2,273,000 4,245,000 3,031,000 1,909,000 3,255,000 1,812,000 868,000 1,570,000 1,109,000 118,000 309,000 456,000 846,000 939,000 134.000 Since Aug.1I 1933 12,703,000 170,635,000156,587.000 56,042.000 8.960.00040,986.000 1932 14,033,000251,013,000,139,754,000: 66,800,000 8,448,00031,116,000 1931 15,453,00(1252.709,0001 98,112.0001 54,535.000 5,444,00027.134,000 Total receipts of flour and grain at the seaboard ports for the week ending Saturday, April 14 1934, follow: Receipts at-1 Flour. New York _ _ _ Philadelphia__ Baltimore.... Norfolk New Orleans* Galveston_ St. John, West Boston Halifax Wheat. I Oats. I Corn. Rye. Barley. bbis.1961bs bush.60 lbs.bush. 56 lbs. bush. 32 lbs.bush.481bs. 155,000 837,000 20,000 28,000 2,000 22,000 61,000 3,000 39,000 9,000 1,000 27,000 85,000 8.000 1,000 25,000 63,000 30,000 8,000 18,000 419,000 21,000 64,000 8,000 42,000 48.000 5,000 18,000 Total wk. '34 293,000 1,438,0001 113,000 118,000 18,000 87,0001 Since Jan.1'34 3,980,000 12,549.0001 1,621,000 1,531,000 762,0001 134,000 Week 1933._ 335,000 640,000 117,000 102,000 6,000 Since Jan.1'33 4,341,0® 9,758,000 1,350,000 1,215,000 162,000 64,000 * Receipts do not Include grain passing through New Orleans for foreign ports on through bills of lading. The exports from the several seaboard ports for the week ending Saturday, April 14 1934, are shown in the annexed statement: Exports from- Wheat. Corn. Flour. Oats. Rye. Barley. Bushels. Bushels. Barrels. Bushels. Bushels. Bushels. 672,000 1,000 17,790 64,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 18,000 3.000 17,000 19,000 419,000 18,000 48,000 42,000 5,000 New York Boston Baltimore Norfolk New Orleans Galveston St. John, West Halifax Total week 1934_ 1,220,000 Same week 1933_ _ 950,000 19,000 1,000 102.790 108,328 5.000 11.000 The destination of these exports for the week and since July 1 1933 is as below: Flour. Exports for Week and Since Week Since July1 toApr. 14 July 1 1934. 1933. United Kingdom_ Continent So. & Cent. Amer_ West Indies Brit.No.Am.Cols. Other countries... Total 1934 Total 1933 IVheat. Week Apr. 14 1934. Since July 1 1933. Corn. Week Apr. 14 1934. . Since July 1 1933. Barrels. Barrels, Bushels. Bushels. Bushels. Bushels. 43,430 2,198,180 385,000 34.530.000 18,000 317,000 20,360 554,132 773,000 48.716,000 237,000 1,000 51,000 5,000 422.000 1,000 36,000 693,000 1,000 42,000 44,000 2,000 47,000 1,000 _.__ 174,528 56,000 668,000 1.000 11.000 102,790 3,717,840 1,220,600 84,378,000 108,328 3,089,316 950,000 124,548.000 19,000 611,000 1.000 4,771,000 The visible supply of grain, comprising the stocks in granary at principal points of accumulation at lake and seaboard ports Saturday, April 14, were as follows: United StatesBoston New York " afloat Philadelphia Baltimore Newport News New Orleans Galveston GRAIN STOCKS. Wheat, Corn, bush, bush, 87,000 84,000 99,000 75,000 240,000 20,000 933,000 19.000 333,000 29,000 26,000 112,000 495,000 Oats, bush, 6,000 69,000 Rye, bush. 1,000 a34,000 Barley, bush. 91,000 73,000 c154,000 b16,000 6,000 2,000 42,000 9,000 9,000 United StatesFort Worth Wichita Hutchinson St. Joseph Kansas City Omaha Sioux City St. Louis Indianapolis Peoria Chicago afloat Milwaukee " afloat Minneapolis Duluth Detroit Buffalo 2699 Wheat, Barley, Corn, Oats, Rye, bush, bush. bush, bush, bush. 2,449.000 24,000 422,000 6,000 147,000 1,270,000 9,000 2,515,000 4,000 1,525,000 2,607,000 12,000 323,000 30,137,000 3,835,000 94,000 53,000 300,000 4,870,000 6,474,000 1,106,000 79,000 59,000 387,000 11,000 746,000 260,000 6,000 3,144,600 1,201,000 212,000 134,000 9,000 586,000 1,897,000 420,000 10,000 98,000 6,000 166,000 2,665,000 20,571.000 2,670,000 2,922.000 1,078.000 795,000 12,000 3,496,000 1,760,000 48.000 643,000 292,000 268.000 19,682,000 4,738,000 14,465.000 2,804,000 7,031-,660 12,762,000 6,163,000 11,401,000 2,746.000 1,848,000 143,000 14,000 32,000 30,000 81,000 3,335,000 6,713,000 874,000 1,208.000 598,000 Total Apr. 14 1934_ 87,690,000 59,350.000 34,962,000 11,086,000 11,494,000 Total Apr. 7 1934.._ 88,874,000 61,423,000 36,069,000 11,347,000 11,958,000 Total Apr. 15 1933_ _128,389,000 31,267,000 22,251,000 7,827,000 8,239,000 a Includes 33,000 Polish rye. b Also has 236,000 Polish rye. c Includes foreign rye, duty paid. Note.-Bonded grain not included above: Wheat. New York, 919,000 bushels; New York afloat, 748,000; Boston. 220,000; Buffalo, 163,000; Buffalo afloat. 263.000; Duluth,8,000; total, 2,321.000 bushels, against 4,896,000 bushels in 1933. Wheat, Corn, Barley. Oats. Rye, Canadianbush, bush. bush, bush, bush. Montreal 3,009,000 128,000 452,000 160,000 Ft. William dr Pt. Arthur 73,034,000 4,958,000 2.188,000 4.936,000 Other Canadian and other water points 30,531,000 3,153,000 467,000 422,000 Total Apr. 14 1934_ _ _106,574,000 8,239.000 Total Apr. 7 1934_ __107,127,000 7,923,000 Total Apr, 15 1933_104,682,000 4,514,000 SummaryAmerican 87,690,000 59,350,000 34,962,000 Canadian 106,574,000 8,239,000 3,107,000 5,518.000 3,113,000 5,504,000 3,590,000 2,851.000 11.086,000 11,494.000 3,107,000 5,518,000 Total Apr. 14 1934...194,264,000 59,350,000 43,201.000 14,193,000 17,012,000 Total Apr, 7 1934_196,001,000 61,423,000 43,992,000 14,460,000 17,482,000 Total Apr. 15 1933...233,071,000 31.267,000 26,765,000 11,417,000 11,090.000 The world's shipment of wheat and corn, as furnished by Broomball to the New York Produce Exchange,for the week ending Friday, April 13, and since July 1 1933 and July 2 1932, are shown in the following: Wheat. Exports. Week Ayr, 13 1934. Since July 1 1933. Corn. Since July 2 1932. Week Apr. 13 1934. Since July 1 1933. Since July 2 1932. Bushels. I Bushels. Bushels. Bushels. Bushels. Bushels. North Amer_ 4,151.060174,681,000 244,136,000 22,000 721,000 .5,452,000 Black Sea... 496,000 37.747,000 19,458,000 1,140,000 29,016,000 54,782,000 Argentina... 4,292,000 107,066,000 79,276,000 4,122,000 166,006,000 162,371,000 Australia --- 1.415,000 73,493,000128.256,000 1 0th. countr's 360.000, 22,928,000 22,245,000 281,000 9,707,000 29,226,000 Total 0,714,000415,915,000493,369,000 5,565,000205.450,000251.831,000 National Banks.-The following information regarding National banks is from the office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Treasury Department: CHARTERS ISSUED. Apr. 7-First National Bank at Marianna, Marianna, Ark__ Capital stock consists of 125,000 common stock and $25,000 preferred stock. President, 0. L. Williamson; Cashier, Elgan C. Robertson. Will succeed the Lee County National Bank of Marianna. Apr, 7-Furst National Bank in Indiana, Indiana, Pa Capital stock consists of $150,000 common stock and $75,000 Preferred stock. President, Edward B. Bennett; Cashier. Paul J. Straitiff. Will succeed the First National Bank of Indiana. Apr. 9-The Rapid City National Bank, Rapid City, S. Dak Capital stock consists of $50,000 common stock and $50,000 preferred stock. President, Roy Dean; Cashier, A. E. Dahl. Will succeed Pennington County Bank of Rapid City. Apr. 10-Berlin National Bank. Berlin, N. H President, W. E. Corbin; Cashier, M. A. Wheeler. Will succeed the Berlin National Bank. Apr. 10-The First National Bank of Goose Creek, Goose Creek. Texas Capital stock consists of $25,000 common stock and $50,000 preferred stock. President W. W. Moore; Cashier, M. S. Kerby. Will succeed Security State Bank of Goose Creek. Apr. 12-The Iron River National Bank, Iron River, Mich.... President, Earl J. Van Ornum; Cashier, Henry J. Veeser. Will succeed the First National Bank of Iron River and the Caspian National Bank of Caspian. Apr. 12-The First National Bank of Riverton, Riverton, Wyo. Capital stock consists of $25,000 common stock and $25,000 preferred stock. President, W. J. Otto; Cashier, Carl W. Hoe. Primary organization. Apr. 13-First National Bank in Groveton, Groveton, Texas__ _ Capital stock consists of $50,000 common stock and $50,11141111 preferred stock. President. L. P. Atmar; Cashier. R. R. Robb. Will succeed the First Nat. Bank of Groveton. Apr. 13-Lagonda National Bank of Springfield, Springfield, 0_ Capital stock consists of $150,000 common stock and 1200,000 preferred stock. President, H.E. Freeman; Cashier, F. W Ilarford. Will succeed Lagonda-Citizens National Bank of Springfield. VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATIONS. Apr. 9-The First National Bank of Breckenridge, Texas Effective March 29 1934. Liq. Agent, M. E. Daniel, Brockenridgo, Texas. Succeeded by "First National Bank in Breckenridge," Texas. Apr. 10-The Hollywood National Bank of Los Angeles. Calif.. Effective March 26 1934. Liq. Committee, W. L. Brown G. A. Wheaton and Chas. L. Marble, care of the liquidating bank. Absorbed by the Seaboard National Bank of Los Angeles, Calif. Apr. 11-The First National Bank of Boulder, Boulder. _ Effective Apr. 10 1934. Liq, Agent, A. T. Henry, Boulder, Colo. Succeeded by "First National Bank in Boulder." Apr. 11-The Army National Bank of Fort Lewis, Fort Lewis, Wash Effective April 3 1934. Liq. Agent, J. E. Pinkham, Fort Lewis, Wash. Absorbed by the National Bank of Tacoma. Wash. Capital. 150,000 225,000 100.000 100,000 75,000 62,500 50,000 100,000 350,000 200,000 200.000 100 000 25,000 Financial Chronicle 2700 Capital. Apr. 13—First National Bank in Independence, Independence, 300,000 Kan Effective April 9 1934. Liq. Committee. C. A. Connelly, H.C.Hergman,Jr., and Ernest Sewell, all of Independence, Kan. Succeeded by the Citizens Nat. Bank in Independence. Auction Sales.—Among other securities, the following, not actually dealt in at the Stock Exchange, were sold at auction in New York, Jersey City, Boston, Philadelphia, and Buffalo on Wednesday of this week: By Adrian H. Muller & Son, New York: $ per Share. Mares. Stocks. 1 Bank of America National Assn. and two 25-100th share scrip certificates $25 lot of Transamerica Corp., par $25 $7 lot 1 Blue Ridge Ry. Co.(Md.), par $1 $50 lot Certificate No. 395 of the Queens Valley Golf Club, Inc $50 lot Certificate No. 147 of the Queens Valley Golf Club, Inc $50 lot Certificate No.85 of the Queens Valley Golf Club, Inc $50 lot Certificate No. 235 of the Queens Valley Golf Club, Inc-550 lot Inc Club. Golf Valley Queens the Certificate No. 54 of $50 lot Certificate No. 207 of the Queens Valley Golf Club, Inc $7 lot 57 Midwood Trust Co.(N. Y.). par $100 $5 lot 11 New England Laundries, Inc. (Mass.), pref., par 5100 20 S. W. Straus Investing Corp. (Del.), series "A" preferred, par $50; 20 $10 lot common, no par 4 Great Lakes Detroit Terminal Co. (Del.), common, no par; 5 Salamanca Sugar Co.(Cuba), common v. t. c., par $10; 1 Northeastern Public Service Co. (Del.), pref. ctf. of dep., no par; 1 Northeastern Public Service Co. (Del.), prior pref, ctf. of dep., no par; 5 Middle West Utilities Co. (Del.), $4 lot common ctf. of dep., no par $400 2 East 61st St. Corp. (N. Y.), income debentures, is of 1957; 1 class $15 lot "A," no par; 4 class "B," no par Per Cent. Bonds— $30 lot $20,000 Fort Smith & Western RR,Co. 1st mtge. 4% bonds, ctf. of dep $2,000 National Press Building Corp. (Del.), general mtge. 634s. 1948; April 43,4% flat 1932 and subsequent coupons attached $1,000 United Public Service Co. (N. J.), collatetal trust 65, 1942; April $6 lot 1932 and subsequent coupons attached $500 Pelham Manor Building Corp.(Chicago, Ill.), 1st mtge.64s,ctf. of dep_S9 lot $1,000 341 Madison Avenue Building 1st mtge. leasehold, 63is, 1939, elf. $30 lot of dep $2,000 Hotel Governor Clinton, Inc., subordinated 1st mtge., series "B." $11 lot 6345 1943, Mt of dep $1,000 One West 57th St. Corp., 5-year general mtge. fee, 68 1933. elf, of dep-$7 lot By Adrian H. Muller & Son, Jersey City, N. J.: $ Per Share. Shares. Stocks. 60c. 55,000 Power, Gas & Water Securities Corp incorrectly were value par $100 Texas Note.-266 shares of Kirby Lumber Co. of reported in our last week's Issue. This should have appeared at $5 per share instead of being included with lot. By R. L. Day & Co., Boston: $ per Share. Shares. Stocks. 28 3 Webster & Atlas National Bank, Boston. par 850 93i 50 United States Trust Co., Boston. par $10 1831 19 Irving Trust Co., New York, par $10 $1 lot 28 Harmony Mill, common, par $100 1034 25 Dwight Manufacturing Co., par $15 24 50 Home Insurance Co., par $5 3 American Soda Fountain Co., par 5100; 5 Chicago & Alton RR. Co. 4% prior lien pref.. par 5100; 3 Wm. Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co.. par $100; 3 United American Soda Fountain Co., 7% pref., par $20; 15 J. R. Whipple, common; 10 J. R. Whipple, 1st pref.: 20 Cohasset Na$20 lot tional Bank, par MO 2434 15 Massachusetts Utilities Associates, pref., par $50 $150 lot 150 Olympia Theatres, Inc., common ctf. of deposit 1534 21 Massacnusetts Bonding & Insurance Co.. par $1294 113.1 3 units Thompson's Spa, Inc By Barnes & Lofland, Philadelphia: $ Per Share. Shares, Stocks. -kg 13 Tioga National Bank & Trust Co., par $25 270 10 First National Bank of Philadelphia, par $100 2534; 100 Central-Penn National Bank. par $10 3694 30 Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co., Dar $20 70 Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives & Granting Annuities, par $10.... 31 1034 20 Real Estate-Land Title & Trust Co., par $10 30 55, B. Van Solver Co., Camden, N. J., common, par $100 $100 lot 249 George A. Klinges, Inc $8 lot 11 Associated Gas ex Electric Co., class A, no par $1 lot 2 Associated Gas & Electric Co., common, no par $5 lot 2 Cities Service Co.. common, no par 20 Commonwealth St Southern Corp., common $40 lot $50 lot 25 Blue Ridge Corp., common, no par 1 5-7 United Founders Corp., common, no par $1 lot By A. J. Wright & Co., Buffalo: $ per Share. $0.10 Shares. Stock. 15 Angel International Corp., common DIVIDENDS. Dividends are grouped in two separate tables. In the first we bring together all the dividends announced the current week. Then we follow with a second table in which we show the dividends previously announced, but which have not yet been paid. The dividends announced this week are: Name of Company. When Holders Per Share. Payable. of Record. Agricultural Insurance Co Allen Industries $3 preferred Allied Kid Co., preferred (quar.) American Art Works6% pref. (quar.) American Book Co. (quar.) American Cities Power & Light Corp. class B.- _ Amsterdam City National Bank (quar„) American Credit Indemnity Co. of N.Y American Factors, Ltd.(monthly) Monthly American Fork & Hoe.6% pref American & General Securities class A common_ _ $3 series cumulative preferred American Re-Insurance Co.(quar.) Artioom Corp. cumulative preferred (quar.) Associated Telephone (Calif.), pref. (quar.)---Atlantic Steel 7% preferred (semi-annual) Auto City Brewing (quar.) Bangor & Aroostook RR.Co.corn.(guar.) Preferred (guar.) Beacon Manufacturing Co.6% preferred (quar.) Binghamton Gas Works 6 Si% preferred (quar.)_ Bourjois. Inc.. preferred (quar.) Bourne Mills (quar.) Broadway Dept. Stores 7% nreferred (quar. Buckeye Steel Castings Co.IS% pref. (quar.)Prior preferred (quar.) Buck Hill Falls (quar.) Bullock Fund, Ltd Bullock's. Inc.(Los Angeles)7% pref.(quar.) Camden Fire Insurance (semi-annual) Canadian Investment Fund ordinary shares Special shares Cedar Rapids Mfg.& Power (quar.) Charlton Mills (guar.) Apr. 2 Mar. 26 June I May 31 May 1 Apr. 23 Apr. 15 Mar.31 Apr. 21 Apr. 16 10c Apr. 30 Apr. 24 $394 Apr. 30 Apr. 15 25c May 1 Apr. 24 10c May 10 Apr. 30 10c June 9 May 31 h$3 Apr. 27 Apr. 20 7Sic June 1 May 15 75c June I May 15 50c May 15 Apr. 30 h$1 94 June I May IS 373ic May 1 Apr. 14 $3g May 1 Apr. 21 May 1 Apr. 20 62c July 2 May 31 $194 July 2 May 31 $1 Si May 16 May 1 Si% May 1 Apr. 20 68 c May 15 May 1 $134 May 1 Apr. 17 May 1 Apr. 19 May 1 Apr. 23 May 1 Apr. 23 3 c May 15 May 1 21 17 May 1 Apr. 14 May 1 Apr. 11 $1 500 May 1 Apr. 14 3.6c. May 1 Apr. 14 3.5c May 1 Apr, 14 75c May 15 Apr. 30 $1 May 1 Apr. 16 65c h75c $194 sin 1: Name of Company. April 21 1934 Per When I Holders Share. Payable. ofRecord. $131 Cherry-Burrell Corp., preferred (quar.) 25c Chicago Flexible Shaft Co.. corn. (guar.) 25e Chicago Yellow Cab (quar.) City Water of Chattanooga 6% pref. (quar.)- - _ $134 Colonial Finance of Rhode Island 7% pref.(qu.) 1734c $1 Concord Gas preferred (guar.) Connecticut Light & Power,634% pref. (quar.)_ $194 5Si% preferred (guar.) $2 Consolidated Oil Corp.8% pref. (quar.) 3 Central Arizona Light & Power $7 pref. (quar.)- 31% $1 Si $6 preferred (quar.) 23c Coast Breweries. Ltd. (guar.) il X Dallas Power & Light $T pref. (quar.) 3194 $6 preferred (quar.) 3134 Davenport Water 6% preferred (quar.) 1.5c Dividend Shares 50c Fidelity Fund, Inc. (quar.) 25c Extra 8734C Florida Power Corp., pref. (quar.) Sc Fort Pitt Brewing (quar.) 87Xc Fulton Industrial Securities pref.(quar.) 3194 Gardner Denver Co. preferred (guar.) 80 fr. Generale d'Electricite 45c General Foods Corp.(quar.) 40c Goshen & Deckertown RR 25c Harbison-Walker Refractories common 134% Preferred (quar.) 25c Hobart Manufacturing Co.. corn. (quar.) 1294c Hollander (A.)& Son,Inc.. common 41 Holland Land Co.(liquidating) 5c Home Insurance (extra) $1 Idaho Power. 7% preferred (guar.) $1 $6 preferred (quarterly) $1 Illuminating Power Security (quar.) $134 7% preferred (guar.) $194 (quar.) preferred Co. International Harvester 25c Kalamazoo Stove Co. common (quar.) 25c Extra $20 Kings County Trust Co.(Brooklyn)(quar.) 25c Klein (D. Emil) Co.,common (quar.) $131 Preferred (quar.) $1 Kokomo Water Works6% preferred (quar.)_ $1 Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Co. of N.J.(guar.) $1 Lerner Stores Corp.63i% pref.(quar.) 4c Life Savers Corp. (quar.) 31 (quar.) corn. Co., Tobacco Liggett & Myers Common B(quarterly) 25c Loblaw Groce`erias Co., Ltd., class A & B (qu.) Class A and B (bonus) $194 Lord & Taylor preferred (quar.) 1211 Lunkenheimer Co.. common (guar.) Luther Manufacturing Co.(guar.) 100fr. Lyonnaise des Eaux Sc Managed Investment (quar.) Marconi Int'l Marine Communications Co.— 18.3c register ordinary for receipts depository Amer. 25c McIntyre Porcupine Mines (quar.) 25c Bonus and extra 5134 (quar.) pref. Mercantile Stores Co.,7% h500 Mississippi Power & Light, .$6 1st pref. $lit Monmouth Consolidated Water.7% pf.(qu.) Montreal Light, Heat & Power (quar.) 75c Moody's Investors Service, Partic. Pref. (guar.) 314 Muskogee Co., 6% cum. pref. (quar.) Mutual Telephone (Hawaii) (monthly) 54 Nashua & Lowell RR. (s.-a.) $1 X National Biscuit Co., pref. (guar.) 7$1 X National Grocers,7% preferred 51% National Lead Co., class A pref. (guar.) 20c National Power & Light 40c annual) (semi Co. Transit National 3c Nationwide Securities (Colo.), series B 40c New England Grain Products 50c (quar.) common New Process Co., $134 Preferred (guar.) 50c 1900 Corp., class A (quarterly) 15c North American Oil Consolidated 10c Oahu Sugar, Ltd. (monthly) 58 1-3c Ohio Public Service Co.7% pref.(monthly) 50c 6% preferred (monthly) 41 2-3c 5% preferred (monthly) $2.10 Ohio State Life Insurance Co.(guar.) 20c Onomea Sugar Co. (monthly) 231 Ontario & Quebec Ry., deb. (8.-a.) Semi-annual $2 Oswego Falls Corp., 8% pref. (quar.) 75c Owens-Illinois Glass Co., cow. (quar.) 311i Pacific American Fire Insurance Co 20c Pacific Finance Corp. of Calif.(Del.) pref A (qu) 1634c Preferred C (guar.) 1734c Preferred D (quar.) 373.c Pacific Gas & Electric,6% pref. (quar.) 34c 53.4% preferred (quarterly $494 Package Machinery,7% preferred (guar.) 30 fr Pechiney Chemicals Co e pref Co., $294 3134c Pennsylvania Bradford Pitney-Bowes Postage Meter Co.(guar.) 75.• Princeton Water (N. J.) (quarterly) 50c Public Service Corp. of N. J.,6% pref. (mo.).— 25c Quebec Power Co.(quarterly) Warehouse Quincy Market Cold Storage & h$2 5% preferred Railway & Light Security Co., pref. A (guar.).- $1% 75c Raymond Concrete Pile Co. preferred (quar.) 30c Rich's. Inc. (quar.) 5134 634% preferred (quar.) /III Russell Motor Car.7% preferred 25c Ryerson (Jos. T.)& Sons, Inc.. corn. (special) 200 Second Twin Bell Oil Syndicate (monthly) /Mounties Corp. general $7 pref. (guar.) $6 preferred(quar.) 40c Selby Shoe Co. common (quar.) 25c Extra $131 Preferred (guar.) 120 Shawinigan Water & Power Co.common (guar.) Shenango Valley Water 6% preferred (guar.)--- $134 50ie Sherwin-Williams Co., corn. (guar.) $134 Preferred AA stock (quar.) Sierra Pacific Electric 6% preferred (guar.)._ _ _ $134 12 34c Smith Agricultural Chemical Co. (quar.) $194 6% preferred (quar.) 9c Standard Corp. (quar.) 50c Standard Oil Co.of Kansas(quar.) 35 51 (quar.) A pref. Strawbridge & Clothier, $2 Syracuse Storage,8% pref.(quar.) $134 634% preferred (quar.) 3134 6% preferred (quar.) 90c Thatcher Mfg. Co., cony. pref. (quar.) 10c Third Twin Bell 011 Syndicate (bi-monthly) x5% Tobacco Securities Trust Co., cont. (interim)- - _ $1 Troxel Mfg. Co. common 31% Preferred (quar.) 8.4c Trustee Standard Utility Shares 32 Twin Bell Oil Syndicate (monthlyi $2 United Companies of N. J.(quar. V United N. J. RR.& Canal (quar. V Quarterly 70 United States Banking Corp.(monthly) 551 pref 7% Shuttle, dr Bobbin S. U. 20c Wailuku Sugar(monthly) Weston (Geo.), Ltd., pref. (quar.) West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co. pref.(guar.)--- E Illi May 1'Apr. 20 June 30tJune 20 June 11May 21 May 1 Apr. 20 Apr. 25 Apr. 20 May 15 Anr. 30 June 1 May 15 June 1lMay 15 May 15 May 1 May 1 Apr. 17 May PApr. 17 May 11Apr. 20 May 11Apr. 20 May 1Apr. 20 May 1 Apr. 2 May 1 Apr. 14 May 1 Apr. 20 May 1 Apr. 20 June I May 15 May 10 Apr. 25 May 1 Apr. 15 May 1 Apr. 20 May 15 May 1 Apr. 20 Apr. 11 June I May 22 July 20 July 10 June 1 May 18 May 15 Apr. 30 Apr. 27 Apr. 16 May 1 Apr. 13 May 1 Apr. 14 May 1 Apr. 14 May 10 Apr. 30 May 15 Apr. 30 June I May 5 May 1 Apr. 20 May 1 Apr. 20 May 1 Apr. 25 July 2 June 20 20 y 11 May Apr. Apr. 20 Apr. 10 May 1 Apr. 23 June 1 May 1 June 1 May 15 June 1 May 15 June 1 May 14 June I May 14 June 1 May 17 May 15 May 5 May 1 Apr. 17 May 15 May 1 Apr. 24 Apr. 4 June 1 May 1 June 1 May 1 May 15 Apr. 30 May 1 Apr. 14 May 15 May May 15 Apr. 30 1 May 15 May 1 June I May 19 May 20 May 5 May 1 Apr. 15 May 31 May 17 May 1 Apr. 20 e 15 June June June 1 May 7 June 15 May 25 May 1 Apr. 14 May 1 Apr. 20 May 1 Apr. 26 May 1 Apr. 26 May 15 ANp parr. y. 2 0 140 1 MayMMa y 14 May 1 Apr. 14 May 1 Apr. y 1 19 . 14 pr. 20 May 10 I May 1 I May 1 2289 101 Apr. 2289 1 Apr. 14 1 Apr. 14 1 A pr. 14 May June June y May May May y ay ma M May 15 Apr. 30 May 15 Apr. 30 May 1 May May May May May 1 Apr. 25 1 Apr. 20 1 Apr 20 31 May I 25 Apr. 25 May 1 Apr. 18 May 1 Apr. 25 May 1 Apr. 20 May 15 Lvlay 1 June 30 June 15 May 1 Apr. 20 May 1 Apr. 23 May 5 Ain% 30 May 1 Apr. 20 May 1 Apr. 20 May 1 Apr. 20 May 1 Apr. 20 May 1 Apr. 20 May 15 Apr. 25 June 1 May 20 May 15 Apr. 30 June 1 May 15 June 1 May 20 May 1 Apr. 20 May 1 Apr. 20 May 15 Apr. 20 July 31 July 2 June I May 16 May 15 Apr. 20 May 15 Apr. 20 May 15 Apr. 20 May 15 Apr. 30 Apr. 31 Apr. 26 May 15 May 1 Apr. 20 May 1 Apr. 20 May 1 May 5 Apr. 30 July 10 June 20 Oct. 10 Sept. 20 1-10-35 Dec. 20 May 1 Apr. 17 May 1 Apr. 11 May 20 May 15 May 1 Apr. 20 May 15 May 1 Name of Company. White (S. S.) Dental Manufacturing Co Whitting Corp,6%% Pref.(quar.) Worcester Salt,6% preferred (guar.) When Holders Per Share. Payable. ofRecord. xer1% May 1 Apr. 19 51% May 1 Apr. 20 May 15 May 1 S1 Below we give the dividends announced in previous weeks and not yet paid. This list does not include dividends announced this week,these being given in the preceding table. Name of Company. When Holders Per Share. Payable. of Record. Abraham & Straus 7% pref. (guar.) $1% May 1 Apr. 14 Adams-Millis Corp. common (guar.) 50c May 1 Apr. 19 Preferred (guar.) at May 1 Apr. 19 Affiliated Products. Inc.(monthly) Sc May 1 Apr. 16 Alabama Power Co., $5 preferred (guar.) $t si May 1 Apr. 16 Alaska Juneau Gold Mines (guar.) 15c May 1 Apr. 10 Extra 15c May 1 Apr. 10 Albany & Vermont R.R Ca. $1.% May 15 May 1 Allied Chemical & Dye Corp..common (quar.) $1% May 1 Apr. 11 Allied Laboratories preferred (guar.) 87%c July 1 June 26 Alpha Shares. Inc. (s a.) 15c May 10 Apr. 30 Aluminum Mfg.(guar.). 50c June 30 June 15 Quarterly 50c Sept.30 Sept. 15 Quarterly 50c Dec. 31 Dec. 15 7% preferred (gnarl $1% June 30 June 15 $1% Sept.30 Sept. 15 7% preferred (guar. 7% preferred (guar. $13 Dec. 30 Dec. 15 Amerada Corp..capitalstock(guar.) 50c Apr. 30 Apr. 16 American Can Co. coin. (guar.) $1 May 15 Apr. 24a American Cities Power & Light Corp.— o May 1 Apr. 11 Class A convertible (quarterly) American Coal Co.of Allegany Co.(N.J.) p50c May 1 Apr. 10 American Crayon 6% pref.(guar.) $1.A May I Apr. 20 $1% June 1 May 25 American Envelope, 7% pref. (guar.) 7% preferred (guar.) $1% Sept. 1 Aim. 25 7% preferred (guar.) $13 Dec. 1 Nov. 25 American Factors (monthly) 10c May 10 Apr. 30 American Gas & Electric, preferred (quar.)_ $1% May 1 Apr. 7 25c July 1 American Hardware Corp.(guar.) 25e Oct. 1 Quarterly Jan 1'35 Quarterly 20c May 1 Apr. 14a American Home Products Corp. (monthly) $l3 Apr. 25 Apr. 6 American Ice Co., preferred (guar.) 75c May 15 Apr. 30 American Investors, Inc.,$3 pref.(guar.) 50c May 1 Apr. 21 American Investors of Ill. A (guar.) 40c May 1 Apr. 13a American Light & Traction Co., corn. (guar.)._ 37)c May 1 Apr. 13a Preferred (quarterly) May 1 Apr. 20 American Machine & Foundry Co..com.(guar.) 50c May 1 Apr. 20 American Paper Goods (quarterly) 50c May 1 Apr. 14 American Ship Building, common (quar.) American Smelting & Refining, 7% 1st pref...... 144A June I May 14 250 May 1 Apr. 10 Amer. Water Works & El. Co.,Inc., com.(qu.)lc May 10 Apr. 30 Amparo Mining Androscoggin Electric,6% pref.(guar.) , $1% May 1 Apr, 28 Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.Pref. (guar.) $1% May 1 Apr. 20 35c May 1 Apr. 20 Asbestos Mfg. Co., cony. pref. (guar.) Atlantic City Electric, preferred (quarterly) $111 May 1 Apr. May 1 MaY AtlanticMacaroni Co., Inc Atlas Corp.,$3 pref. A (guar.) 750 June 1 May 19 75c Sent. 1 Aug. 20 preferred (guar.) 75c Dec. 1 Nov.20 3 DI &erred (guar.) Atlas Powder Co., preferred (guar.) 51% May 1 Apr. 20 $1 May 1 Apr. 13 Austin Nichols & Co., Inc.. prior A (guar.)_ — Bangor Hydro-Electric, common (guar.) 373c May 1 Apr. 10 Barber(W. H.)& Co.,pref.(guar.) $1% July 1 June 20 Preferred (guar.) $1% Oct. 1 Sept.20 Preferred (guar.) $1% Jan r35 Dec. 20 Beatty Bros. Ltd., pref. (guar.) $1 A May 1 Apr. 14 81 May 1 Apr. 14 Belding-Corticeill, Ltd., com. (guar.) Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., cont. (quar.).. 3734c Apr. 30 Apr. 16 Preferred, series A (quarterly) itbor.. Ag 87j.c A25cgpary. Best & Co. common (guar.) 16 Birtman Electric Co. pref. (guar.) $1% May 1 Apr. 16 Block Bros. Tobacco (guar.) 37c May 15 May 11 Quarterly 373c Aug. 15 Aug. 11 uarterly 37%c Nov. 15 Nov. 11 S13 June 30 June 25 teferred (marl Preferred guar. $1 A Sept.30 Sept.25 Preferred guar. $1% Dec. 31 Dec. 24 $1% May 1Apr.20 Bloomingdale Bros., preferred (guar.) Bon Ami Co.,class A (guar.) $1 Apr. 3 AU.r. 15 Boston & Providence R.R. Co.(guar.) $2.125 July 2 June 20 Quarterly 32.125 Oct. 1 Sept. 1 Bridgeport Machine Co., preferred Ail Apr. 30 Apr. 20 Briggs Manufacturing Co. (quar. 25c Apr. 30 Apr. 16 Brown Shoe Co.. preferred (guar.) 51. May 1 Apr. 20 Buffalo Niagara & Eastern Power $.5 1st pref.__ $14 May 1 Apr. AU!'. 11 Burma Corp.. Ltd., Amer. dep. rec. (inter.) w2 an Apr. 26 Calamba Sugar Estates (guar.) 40c July 1 June 15 7% preferred (guar.) 350 July 1 June 15 Calgary Power Co.. preferred (quarterly) 51% May 1 Apr. 14 California Packing Corp 37c June 15 May 31 Camps Corp., 6%% preferred (quarterly) S1t May 1 Apr. 16 Canada Iron Iroundries,6% pref. (semi-annual) $1 A Apr. 30 Apr. 15 Canada Northern Power, Ltd., common (guar.) 250 Apr. 25 IVb,r. 31 Canadian Bronze Co., Ltd., com.(guar.) 15e May 1 Apr. 20 Preferred (quarterly) $1% May 1 Apr. 20 Canadian Converters, Ltd., com.(guar.) 50c May 15 Apr. 30 Canadian Dredge & Dock„pref. (guar.) $1% May 1 Apr. 19 Canadian Industries, A & B preferred (quar.)_ 87Ac Apr. 30 AUr.31 Capital Management Corp. (guar.) 15c May 1 Apr. 20 Carnation Co. preferred (guar.) $1% July 2 Preferred (guar.) 1.% Oct. 2 Preferred (attar.) 1% Ian. 1 Central Cold Storage (guar.) 12)c May 15 May 5 Central Franklin Process, 1st & 2nd prof. $1% July 2 June 30 (gu.)Central Hudson Gas & Electric, com. (quar.).... 20c May 1 Mar.31 Voting trust certificates (guar.) 20c May 1 Mar.31 Central Illinois Securities. cum. pref. (guar.) 15c May 1 Apr. 20 Centrifugal Pipe Corp. (guar.) 10c May 15 May 5 Quarterly 10c Aug. 15 Aug. 5 Quarterly 10c Nov. 15 Nov. 5 Century Ribbon Mill, Inc., preferred (attar.) $131 June 1 May 19 Cerro de Pasco Copper Corp 50c May 1 Apr. 16 Chain Store Invest. Corp. $6% cum. pref 50c May 1 Apr. 16 Chesapeake & Ohio R.R. preferred (semi-ann.) $3% July 1 June 8 Chicago Mali Order 250 May 10 May 1 Cincinnati Sandusky & Cleveland uref. $134 May 1 Apr. 16 Cincinnati Union Terminal,4% pref.(quar.).... $131 July 1 June 20 4% preferred (guar.) 8131 Oct. 1 Sept.20 4% preferred (quar. Janl'35 $1 Citizens Passenger Railway (Philadelphia, Pa.). $1.65 May 1 Dec. 20 Cleve. Cincinnat & St. Louis.5% pref.(guar.). $13-1 Apr. 30 Apr. 20 Cleveland & Pittsburgh, reg. gtd.(guar.) 87 Mc June 1 May 10 Registered guaranteed (quar.) 8731c Sept. I Aug. 10 Registered guaranteed (guar.) 57 c Dec. 1 Nov. 10 Special guaranteed quar. c June 1 May 10 Special guaranteedquar. 50c Sept. 1 Aug. 10 Sepcial guaranteed guar. 50c Dec. 1 Nov.10 Cluett Peabody & Co., Inc., com.(guar.) 25c May I Apr. 20 Columbia Gas & Electric Corp., common 512Sic May 15 Apr. 20 5% apmulative & convertible pref. (guar.).- - $13-I May 15 Apr. 20 6% preferred (quarterly) $l A May 15 Apr. Columbus Ry.Pow.& Lt..6 A % prof. B•(guar.) $1.63 May I Apr. 20 14 Commonwealth Edison Co. (guar.) May 1 Apr. 14 Commonwealth Investment(San Francisco).— 4c May 1 Apr. 14 Confederation Life Association (guar.) June 30 June 25 Quarterly $1 Sept.30 Sept.25 Quarterly $1 Dec. 31 Dec. 25 2701 Financial Chronicle Volume 138 t Name of Company. Per Share. ma amble ;Apr.!fd _ _ _ 30c PaTVhiiy Consolidated Amusement 3734c May 1 Apr. 15 (guar.).-Consolidated Chemical Industries,A(quar.).June I May 15 Consolidated Cigar Corp., pref. (quar.) $1 May I Apr. 16 Si Prior preferred (quarterly) Consolidated Gas of N.Y.,5% pref.(quar.)...... $1g May 1 Aiar. 20 15c June I May 21 Consolidated Paper Sc Apr. 25 Apr. 14 Consolidated Royalty Oil(guar.) $131 July 2 June 15 Consumers Power Co..$5 pref.(guar.) Jun une e 15 ttly 2 j $1.65 J1dy 6.6% preferred (guar.) 7% preferred (guar.) $1 Apr. It ag 50c JunoAp 14 67 preferred (monthly) 6 preferrd (monthly) 1 J m une 50c 15 preferred (monthly) 67 55c May 1 Apr. 14 It 6.6% preferred (monthly 550 JulJune 6.6 preferrednthly 55c July 1 June 15 6.6 o preferred monthly 750 May 15 Apr. 25a Continental CanCo.. Inc., corn. (guar.) 250 Apr. 30 Apr. 00 Continental Oil of Delaware (initial) $131 May 1 Apr. 14 Coon (W. B.)7% preferred (guar.) 750 May I Apr. 23 Corn Exchange Bank & Trust Co- com.(quar.)_ 3c May 15 Apr. 30 Cresson Consol. Gold Mining & Mill Co.(guar.) $2 June 30 June 20 Crum & Forster. 8% preferred (guar.) 3% May 1 Apr. 20 Cudahy Packing Co.,6% pref. (semi-annual) 331% May 1 Apr. 20 7% preferred (semi-annual) Cumberland County Power & Light, pref.(qu.). $1% May 1 Apr. 14 30c May 1 Apr. 20 Cuneo Press, Inc., com.(guar.) $1% June 15 June I Preferred (guar.) 50c May 1 Apr. 20 Dayton Power & Light, 6% pref. (guar.) 50c July 1 Denver Union Stockyards (guar.) 50c Oct. 1 Quarterly 50c Jan. 1 Quarterly June I May 20 7% preferred (guar.) Sept. I Aug. 20 7% preferred (quar. Dec. 1 Nov.20 7% preferred (guar • May 1 Mar.21 Deposited Insurance S res, A (semi-annual) July 7 June 20 Detroit Hillsdale & Southwestern (semi-ann.)— Apr. 21 Apr. 13 Dictaphone Corp., common June I May 18 Preferred (guar.) June I May 15 Doctor Pepper Co.(guar.) Sept. 1 Aug. 15 Quarterly Dec. 1 Nov. 15 Quarterly May 15 Apr. 30 Dominium Bridge Co.. Ltd.,common (guar.) Apr. 25 Apr. 10 E. 1. du Pont de Nemours & Co.. deb.stk.(cm.) May I Apr. 5 Eastern Bond & Share series B (guar.) June I May 15 Eastern Gas & Fuel Associates, corn.(guar.)._ July 1 June 15 Prior preferred (quarterly) July 1 June 15 $6 preferred (quarterly) May 15 May I Eaton Manufacturing (guar.) May 1 Apr. 10 Edison Elec. Illuminating Co.of Boa.(quar.) May 1 Apr. 6 Electric Bond & Share Co.. $6 pref. (quar.)........ May 1 Apr. 6 $5 preferred (quarterly) May 1 Apr. 16 Electric Power Associates, Inc., cl. A & com___ Oct. 1 Sept. 20 Elizabeth & Trenton (s-a) Oct. 1 Sept. 20 5% preferred (s-a) May 1 Ayr. 20 Elmira & Williamsport R.R. (s.-a.) June I May 22 Empire & Bay State Teleg.,4% guar.(guar.)--Sept. 1 Aug. 22 4 o guaranteed (guar.) Dec. 1 Nov.21 4 guaranteed (guar.) May 31 May 21 Emp°re Capital, series A (guar.) Apr. 30 Apr. 16 Employers Group Assoc. (quarterly) Eppens, Smith (semi-annual) Aug. 1 July 25 Escanawba Power & Traction$134 May 1 Apr. 26 6 preferred (guar.) 5131 Aug. 1 July 27 6% preferred (guar.) $134 Nov. 1 Oct. 26 67 preferred (guar.) Si May 1 Apr. 16a Eureka Pipe Line Co.capital stock Si May 1 Apr. 16 wuarterly 250 June I May 15 Faber Coe & Gregg (quarterly) 250 Sept. 1 Aug. 15 Quarterly 250 Dec. I Nov. 15 Quarterly 250 3-1-35 2-15-35 Quarterly $131 May 1 Apr. 20 7% preferred (quarterly) $234 July 1 June 10 Farmers & Traders Life Insurance Co.(luar.) Quarterly 3231 Oct. 1 Sept. 10 Federal Knitting Mills. com.(guar.) 6231c May 1 Apr. 15 Fiberboard Products, prior pref. (quar.) $134 May I Apr. 16 Fire Association of Philadelphia (semi-annual) May 15 Apr. 27 25c May 1 Apr. 20 Franklin Fire Ins. Co. capital stock (guar.) Franklin Telegraph, % guar. stock (s.-a.)— $131 May 1 Apr. 14 Freeport Texas,6% preferred (guar.) $134 May 1 Apr. 13 El May 1 Apr. 16 General Cigar Co.,Inc..common (quarterly) $131 June 1 hUy 23 Preferred (guar.) $1 y, Sept. 1 Aug. 23 Preferred (guar.) Preferred (guar.) $131 Dec. 1 Nov.22 15c Apr. 25 Mar. 16 General Electric Co.,common Sendai preferred (guar.) 15c Apr. 25 Mar. 16 General Hosiery 7% pref. (guar.) $131 May 1 Apr. 20 General Investors Trust (s.-a.) 10c May 1 Mar.31 General Mills, Inc., common (guar.) 750 May 1 Apr. 14 General Motors Corp., $5 preferred (quar.) $131 May 1 Apr. 9 250 May 1 Apr. 16 General Stockyards Corp., common $10 21 May I Apr. 16 Convertible preferred (guar.) Apr. 25 Apr. 20 Gilmore Gas Plant N. I. (monthly) "r. 2 Gillette Safety Raror Co., preferred (quar.) $1 J Are 11 Godman (H. C.), 1st preferred (guar.) 30c May 1 Apr. 10 Gold Dust Corp.. com.(guar.) e2 12 0 May 2j Gotham Silk Hosiery Co., preferred (quar.) 1 Aupnr. JulyM Gottfried Baking Co.,Inc., preferred (quar.)_ 131% Oct. 1 Sept. 20 Preferred (guar. Preferred (guar. 131% Jan. 2 Dec. 20 $3 June 30 June 28 Grace(N. R.)6% irst pref. (semi-annual) $3 Dec. 29 Dec. 27 6% first preferred (semi-annual) 10c May 1 Apr. 24 Great Lakes Engineering Works (guar.) Great Western Electro-Chemical (guar.) $1 Aay 15 May 5 Green & Coats Street Phila. Passenger Hy.. pref.. $131 July 7 June 22 Preferred $134 Oct. 6 Sept.22 750 May 1 Apr. 16 Greenfield Gas Light. 6% pref. (guar.) 250 May I Apr. 17 Griesedieck West Brewery Co 15c June 1 May 15 Hale Bros. Stores,Inc.(guar.) 150 Sept. 1 Aug. 15 uarterly Quarterly 150 Dec. 1 Nov. 15 40c Apr. 30 Apr. 24 Halle Bros. Co., common $1 A Apr. 30 Apr. 24 Preferred (quarterly) $131 Aug. 1 July 21 Harbauer Co.. 7% preferred (guar.) 7% preferred (quar.) 51% Oct. 1 Sept.21 707 preferred (guar.) r35 1g Dec Jan e ay $ .2 51 14 j 11 5 Hardesty (R.) Mfg.,7% pref.(guar.) 7% preferred (quar.) $131 Sept. 1 Aug. 15 7% preferred (guar.) 5131 Dec. 1 Nov. 15 Hartford Electric Light(guar.) 68%c May 1 Apr. 14 Hartford Times, Inc.. $3 pref. (quar.) 75c May 15 May 1 Hawaii Consolidated Ry., Ltd.. 7% pref. A._. 20c June 30 HerculesPowder Co., preferred (quar.) $131 May 15 May 4 Hershey Chocolate Corp., corn. (guar.) 750 May 15 Apr. 25 Convertible preferred (guar.) $1 May 15 Apr. 25 Hibbard, Spencer, Bartlett& Co.(guar.) 10c Apr. 27 Apr. 20 10c May 25 May 18 Quarterly Quarterly 10c June 29 June 22 Hollinger Consolidated Gold Mines (monthly) r5c Apr. 23 Apr. 6 . Extra r5c Apr. 23 Apr. 6 Holly Development(guar.) lc Apr. 15 Mar.31 Home Insurance Co. (guar.) 30c May 1 Apr. 13 Homastake Mining Co.(monthly) 51 Apr. 25 Apr. 20 Extra $1 Apr. 25 Apr. 20 Honolulu Gas(monthly) 15c May 20 May 12 Monthly 15c June 20 June 12 Hormel(Geo. A.)& Co.,common (guar.) 250 May 15 Apr. 28 Class A preferred (guar.) $131 May 15 Apr. 28 Horn & Hardart Co.(N. Y.). common (quar.) 40c May 1 Apr. 11 Horne (Jos.) Co., 6% pref. (guar.) 5131 May 1 Apr. 24 Houston Lighting & Power,7% pref. (guar.)._ _ $131 May 1 Apr. 16 $6 preferred (quarterly) $131 May 1 Apr. 16 Financial Chronicle Name of Company. Per When Holders Share. Payable. of Record. Humberstone Shoe (quar.) 50c May 1 Illinois Northern Utilities, 7% Prof. (quar.) $1% May 1 Apr. 14 6% preferred (quarterly) $1% May 1 Apr. 14 Imperial Chem.Ind. Amer.dep.rec. for ord.shs. 5% June 8 Deferred shares I% June 1 Imperial Life Assurance (quar.) $3% July 3 Quarterly $3% Oct. 1 Quarterly $334 Jan.1'35 Indiana Pipe Line 15c May 15 Apr. 27 Industrial CottonMills(R.H..S.C.).7%pf.(qr.) $1% May 1 Apr. 26 7% preferred (guar.) $1% Aug. 1 July 27 International Cigar Machinery Co. (quar.) 45c May 1 Apr. 20 International Nickel of Canada, pref. (quar.)_ $1% May 1 Apr. 3 International Printing Ink Corp.. pref. tquar.)- - $134 May 1 Apr. 14 International Utilities Corp.,$7 prior pref. (qu.) 8734c May 1 Apr. 20 $.33.4 prior preferred, series 1931 (quar.) 43%c May I Apr. 20 Interstate Dept. Stores 7% pref. (quar.) $1% May 1 Apr. 20 Interstate Hosiery Mills (quar.) 50c May 15 May 1 Quarterly 50c Aug. 15 Aug. I Quarterly 50c Nov. 15 Nov. I Iron Fireman Mfg. Co., com.(quar.) 20c June 1 May 10 Common (quar.) 20c Sept. I Aug. 10 Common (quar.) 20c Dec I Nov. 10 Jamaica Water Supply, 734% pref. (5.-a.) $1% May I Apr. 10 Jefferson Lake Oil 25c May 1 Apr. 15 Kalamazoo Vegetable Parchment Co. (quar.)_ _ 15c June 30 June 20 Quarterly 15c Sept. 30 Sept. 20 Quarterly 15c Dec. 31 Dec. 20 Kelvinator of Canada. Ltd.117% pref. (quar.) $1% May 15 May 5 Kendall Co., partic. pf.ser. A (quar.) $134 June 1 May 10a Partic. preferred series A (partic. div.) 92c June 1 May 10a Ring Royalty Co., corn 25c May I Apr. 14 Kress (S. H.) SC Co.. common (quar.) 250 May 1 Apr. 11 Common(extra) ,f50c May 1 Apr. 11 Special preferred (quarterly) 15c May 1 Apr. 11 Kroger Grocery & Baking, common (quar.)...... 250 June 1 May 10 Si 34 July 2 June 20 6% preferred (quarterly) 7% preferred (quarterly) $1% Aug. 1 July 20 Landers, Frary & Clark.com.(quar.) 37Sic June 30 Common (guar.) 3734c Sept. 30 Common (quar.) 37Sic Dec. 31 Landis Machine, pref. (quar.) $1% June 15 June 5 Preferred (quar.) SI% Sept. 15 Sept. 5 Preferred (quar.) $1% Dec. 15 Dec. 5 Lane Bryant, Inc.. 7% pref. (quar.) $1% May I Apr. 16 Langley s, 7% preferred h$1% May 15 Apr. 30 Lawbeck Corp.6% preferred (quar.) $1% May 1 Apr. 20 Lazarus (F. Sr It.) Co., pref. (quar.) $1% May 1 Apr. 20 Lehigh & Wilkes Barre (quarterly) $2 Apr. 21 Apr. 12 Libby Owens Ford Glass (quar.) 30c June 15 May 31 Lincoln Nat. Life Ins.(Ft. Wayne)(quar.) 30c May I Apr. 26 Quarterly 30c Aug. 1 July 26 Quarterly 30c Nov. I Oct. 26 6% pref. A (quar.)-- -- $134 May 10 Apr. 30 Lincoln Telep. & 5% special preferred Teleg..(quar.) $1% May 10 Apr. 30 Link Belt Co., common (guar.) 10c June 1 May 15 Preferred (quar.) $1% July 2 June 15 Liquid Carbonic Corp 25c May 1 Apr. 16 Loew's, Inc., $634 preferred (quarterly) $1% May 15 Apr. 28 London International Trustee Shares, series A 7c May 1 Apr. 15 Lone Star Gas Corp., 634% pref. (guar.) $1.62 May 1 Apr. 20 Loose Wiles Biscuit Co., corn. (quar.) 50c May I Apr. 20 Preferred (quar.) $1% July I June 18 Lord & Taylor Co..2nd preferred (quar.) $2 May 1 Apr. 17 pref. (quar.) $1% May 15 Apr. 30 Los Angeles Gas & Electric pref.' (quar.) Louisiana Power & Light.$6 Corp' $1% _day 1 Apr. 14 Lunkenheimer Co. 634% pref. (quar.) $134 July 1 June 22 $1, Oct. 1 Sept. 21 634% preferred (quar.) $1 Jan. 2 Dec. 22 634% preferred (quar.) May 15 Apr. 20 & Co.(quar.) Macy (R. Magnin (I.) & Co.. preferred (quar.) $1% May 15 May 5 Preferred (quar.) $1S4 Aug. 15 Aug. 5 Preferred (guar.) $1% Nov. 15 Nov. 5 Mahoning Coal. common (quar.) $6% May 1 Apr. 11 Malone Light & Power. $6 pref. (quar.) $1% May I Apr. 10 Manhattan Shirt Co., corn. (guar.) 15c June I May 15 Mapes Consol Mfg.(guar.) 750 July 2 June 15 Maytag Co., preferred (quar.) $1% May 1 Apr. 16 Preferred 85734 May 1 Apr. 16 McCall Corp., orn. (quartery) 50c May 1 Apr. 20 McGoldrick Kond & Mtge., 7% pref. (s.-a.) $3% May 2 Melville Shoe Corp.. common (quar.) 40c May I Apr. 12 1st preferred (quarterly) $1% May 1 Apr. 12 7Sic May 1 Apr. 12 2d preferred (quarterly) Metal & Thermic (quar.) $1 May 1 Apr. 20 Metropolitan Industrial,6% pref.(quar.) 25c May 1 Apr. 20 Metropolitan Storage Warehouse (quar.) 750 May 1 Apr. 16 Michigan Gas & Electric Co..7% prior lien stock 8734c May 1 Apr. 16 $6 prior lien stock 75c May 1 Apr. 16 Apr. 14 Michigan Public Service Co.,7% pre( 87Sic May 75c May 1 Apr. 14 6% preferred 250 May 15 Apr. 11 Mid-Continent Petroleum Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co. $1% Apr. 30 Apr. 20 6% Preferred (quarterly) Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.. com.... 50c May 15 May 4 Modine 'Manufacturing Co. (quar.) 15c May 1 Apr. 20 Apr. 30 Apr. 20 Monsanto chemical Co el00 May I Apr. I $I Montana Power Co..$6 pref.(quar.) Montgomery & Erie (semi-annual) 1754c May 10 Apr. 10 Montreal Light, Heat & Pow.(quar.) 37c Apr. 30 Mar. 31 Moore Dry Goods Co.(quar.) $1% July 1 July 1 $1% Oct. 1 Oct. 1 Quarterly Quarterly $1% Jan. 1 Jan. 1 Morris 5 & 10c. Stores. 7% pf.(quar.) $1% July 1 June 20 Oct. 1 Sept.20 7% preferred (quar.) $1 June 1 May 26 Morris Plan Ins. Soc.(quar.) Sept. 1 Aug. 25 Quarterly Dec. 1 Nov. 26 Quarterly $jSl%i May 1 Apr. 24 Mortgage Corp. of Nova Scotia (quar.) $134 June 28 June 21 Mutual Chem.of America, pref.(quar.) $134 Sept.28 Sept.20 Preferred (quar.) 136 Dec. 28 Dec. 20 Preferred (guar.) National Bearing Metals, pref. (quar.) $1% May 1 Apr. 18 h$2 May 1 Apr. 18 Preferred (accumulated) $2 May I Apr. 20 National Carbon Co., preferred (quarterly)-__ _ National Casket Co.. com. (s.-a.) Si May 15 Apr. 28 50C June 1 May 15 National Container. pref. (quar.) h50c June 1 May 15 Preferred 50c Sept. 1 Aug. 15 Preferred (quar.) h50c opt. 1 Aug. 15 Preferred 50c Dec. 1 Nov. 15 Preferred (quar.) h50c Dec. I Nov. 15 Preferred National Lead Co., class B preferred (quar.)_ _ _ $1 36 May 1 Apr. 20 National Power & Light.$6 pref.(guar.) $1.% May 1 Apr. 6 40c May 1 Apr. 20 National Screen Service Corp 25c Apr. 30 Apr. 20 National Steel Corp. (quar.) 13%c May 1 Apr. 13 National Tea Co., 53.4 .4 preferred (quar.) National Telep. & 88c May 1 Apr. 16 $3% 1st pref. (quar.) 88c May 1 Apr. 2 2d preferred (quarterly) Toles.' $1% May 1 Apr. 16 Neisner Bros., cum. pref. (quar.) h$334 May 1 Apr. 16 Cumulative preferred 750 May 1 Apr. 14 Neon Products of West Canada.6% pref.(quar.) Nevada-California Electric. pref $1 May 1 Mar.31 Newberry (J. J.) Co.. preferred (quar.) $lg June 1 May 16 Newberry (J. J.) Realty,634% pref.(quar.) $136 May 1 Apr. 16 $1% May I Apr. 16 6% preferred B (guar.) 50c May 10 Apr. 20 New Jersey Zinc Co. (guar.) Nevrmont Mining Corp 50c Apr. 30 Apr. 16 25c Apr. 28 Apr. 17 New York & Honduras Rosario Mining (quar.)_ 50c Apr. 28 Apr. 17 Extra New York Merchandise Co., common (quar.)_ _ 3734c May 1 Apr. 20 $1 May 19 Apr. 30 Norfolk Sc Western.K.R.adiustment pref.(quar.) Name of Company. April 21 1934 Per When Holders Share. Payable. of Record. North American Edison Co., pref. (quar.) Juno 1 May 15 North Ontario Pow. Co., Ltd.,com.(quar.)-_ _ _ Apr. 25 Mar.31 6% preferred (quar.) Apr. 25 Mar. 31 North River Insurance Co. (quar.) June 11 June 1 Extra June 11 June I Northern New York Utilities, pref. (quar.)___ _ May 1 Apr. 10 Northern ItR. of New Hampshire (quarterly)-Apr. 30 Apr. 6 Northern RR.of N.J.4% guaranteed (quar.) June 1 May 21 4% guaranteed (quar.) $1 Sept. 1 Aug. 22 4% guaranteed (guar.) $1 Dec. 1 Mar. 21 Northern States Power Co..com.(quar.) 25c May 1 Mar. 31 Norwich Pharmacal Co. (quar.) 5134 July 2 June 20 Quarterly $1 34 Oct. 1 Sept.20 Quarterly $1% Jan 1'35 Dec. 20 Noyes (Chas. F.), 6% preferred (quar.) 450 May 1 Apr. 28 Oahu Ry. & Land (monthly) 15c June 15 June 11 O'Sullivan Rubber 10c Tune 30 May 31 Outlet Co., common (quar.) 50c May 1 Apr. 20 Common (extra) 50c May 1 Apr. 20 1st preferred (quarterly) $1% May 1 Apr. 20 2d preferred (quarterly) $1% May 1 Apr. 20 Pacific Lighting Corp., com.(quar.) 75c May 15 Apr. 20 Pacific Tin Corp.. special stock $1 May 1 Passaic & Delaware Extention RR. (s.-a.) $2 May 1 Apr. 21 Peninsula Telephone Co., 7% pref. (quar.)_ _ $1%, May 15 May IS 7% preferred (quar.) 111% Aug. 15 Aug. 6 Penman's, Ltd.(quar.) 75c May 1 Apr. 21 6% preferred (quar.) $1% May 15 May 5 Pennsylvania Power Co.,$6.60 pref.(monthly)_ 55c May 1 Apr. 20 $6.60 preferred (monthly) Mc June 1 May 21 $6 preferred (quar.) $1% June I May 21 Petroleum Corp. of America 50c Apr. 30 Mar.29 Philadelphia Co., common (guar.) 20c Apr. 25 Apr. 2 6% preferred (semi-annual) $134 May I Apr. 1 Philadelphia Electric (quarterly) 450 May 1 Apr. 10 $1% May I Apr. 10 $5 preferred (quar.) Phillips-Jones Corp., preferred (quarterly) $1% May 1 Apr. 20 Phillips Petroleum Co 25c May 14 Apr. 12 Phoenix Finance, pref. (quar.) 50c July 10 July I 50c Oct. 10 Oct. 1 Preferred (quar.) 50c Jan. 10 .1h 1 '35 Preferred (quar.) Piedmont & Northern (quarterly) 75c July 10 June 30 Pioneer Mill Co., Ltd.(monthly) 10c May 1 Apr. 21 Pittsburgh Bessemer & Lake Erie R.R.(s.-a.) 75c Oct. I Sept. 15 Pittsburgh Fort Wayne & Chicago:R.R.(quar.)_ 5134 July 3 June 11 Quarterly $1% Oct. 2 Sept. 10 Quarterly $11 1-1-35 Dec. 10 July 3 June 11 $1 7 preferred (quar, $1 * Oct. 2 Sept. 10 7 preferred guar. 7 preferred guar. $1% 1-1-35 Dec. 10 Pittsburgh Youngstown & Ashtabula R.R.— $1% June I May 21 7% preferred quar. $1% Sept. 1 Aug. 20 7% preferred quar. $1 S/- Dec. 1 Nov. 20 7% preferred quar. Pollock Paper Sr Box o., pref. (quar.) June 15 Preferred (quarterly) Sept. 15 SI, Dec. 15 Preferred (quarterly) Potomac Edison Co.,7% pref.(quar.) May 1 Apr. 20 $1 6% preferred (quar.) May 1 Apr. 20 $1 Powell River. 7% preferred 1 June 1 7% preferred $1' Sept. 1 $13SI 7% preferred Dec. I 3734c May 15 Apr. 25 Procter & Gamble, corn. (quar.) Public Service Co. of Colo., 7% pref. (mo.)__ _ _ 58 1-3c May 1 Apr. 14 50c May 1 Apr. 14 6 preferred (monthly) 41 2-3c May 1 Apr. 14 5 0 preferred (monthly) Pub ic Service Corp. of Nor. Ill.. 6% pref. (qu.) $1% May 1 Apr. 14 7% preferred (quar.) $13.1 May 1 Apr. 14 Pullman Inc. (quar.) 75c May 15 Apr. 24 May 31 May 1 Quaker Oats Co.. 6 preferred (quar.) Quarterly Income Shares, Inc. (quar.) May I Apr. 14 Railroad Credit Corp 1 '7,e3 Apr. 30 Reading. R.R. common (guar.) 250 May 10 Apr. 12 Real Estate Land Title & Trust (Phila., Pa.)_ _ 250 May 1 Apr. 14 Reed (C. A.), class A (quar.) 50c May 1 Apr. 21 Reliance Mfg. Co.of T11., com.(quar.) 15c May 1 Apr. 20 Reublic Insurance, Texas (quar.) 20c May 10 Apr. 30 20c Aug. 10 July 31 Quarterly Quarterly 20c Nov. 10 Oct. 31 Republic Supply Co. (quar.) 25c July 5 July 2 (Quarterly 25c Oct. 5 Oct. 2 Rhode Island Hospital Trust (R. I.) (quar.)_ 330 May 10 Apr. 30 Rhode Island Public Service, 2nd pref. (quar.)_ _ 50c May 1 Apr. 16 Richmond Insurance of N. Y. (quarterly) 10c May 1 Apr. 10 Extra 25c May 1 Apr. 10 Riverside Cement, $6 cum. 1st pref. (quar.)_ _ _ _ $1% May 1 Apr. 14 Series A $134 cum. participating 20c May 1 Apr. 14 Rockland Light & Power (quarterly) 20c May 1 Apr. 16 Rolls-Royce, Ltd., ordinary register ve12% May 23 Apr. 11 American depositary receipts, ord. register_ rw12% May 31 Apr. 11 Rose's 5-10-25c. Stores. Inc. (quarterly) 50c May 1 Apr. 20 preferred (quarterly) $134 May 1 Apr. 20 7 St. Lawrence Flour Mills Co. Ltd., corn. (guar.) 37Sic May 1 Apr, 20 Preferred (quar ) $134 May 1 Apr, 20 Salt Creek Producers Association (quar.) 20c May 1 Apr. 14a Savannah Sugar Refining Co., corn. (quar.)- -- - $134 May 1 Apr. 14 Preferred (quar.) $1' May 1 Apr. 14 Scott Paper Co.,class A preferred (quar.) $1% May 1 Apr. 17 Class 15I preferred (quar.) $1% May I Apr, 17 Scotten Dillon Co 30c May 15 May 7 Seeman Bros., Inc.(quar.) 62 Stc May 1 Apr. 16 Extra May 1 Apr. 16 Sharp & Dohme,cum.cony. pref. A (quar.) 87Sic May 1 Apr. 17 Simpson (Robert) Co.. preferred (8.-a.) $3 May 1 Apr. 16 Sioux City Stockyards Co., pref. (quar.) $1 May 15 May 14 Preferred (quar.) Si Aug. 15 Aug. 14 Preferred (quar.) $1 Nov. 15 Nov. 14 Smith (S Morgan) Co.(quar.) Si May 1 Quarterly 51 Aug. 1 Quarterly Si Nov. 1 Solvay American Invest. Corp.. 534% pf. (qu.) $134 May 15 Apr. 16 South American Gold & Platinum Co 10c May 29 May 18 Southern California Edison Co.. Ltd. com 2% May 15 Apr. 20 Southern Calif. Gas Corp.. $634 cum. pf.(qu.)_ _ $1% May 31 Apr. 30 Southern Canada Power Co.. Ltd.. corn. (quar.) 20c May 15 Apr. 30 Spiegel. May, Stern, 63.4% pref. (quar.) h$1% May 1 Apr. 16 Squibb (E. R..) & Sons (quar.) 25c May 1 Apr. 14 1st preferred (quar.) $134 May 1 Apr. 14 Standard Cap & Seal Corp., common (quar.)_ 60c May 1 Apr. 3 Standard Fire Insurance (Trenton, N. J.) 40c Apr. 23 Standard Gas & Electric— $6 prior preferred (quar.) 45c Apr. 25 Mar. 31 $7 prior preference guar.) 52Sic Apr. 25 Mar. 31 Standard Oil Co. of Kansas (guar.) 50c Apr. 30 Apr, 2 Standard Power & Light Corp.. pref 52Sic May 1 Apr. 14 Stanley Works, 6% preferred (quar.) 3734c May 15 May 5 Steel Co. of Canaria. common (quar.) May 1 Apr. 7 Preferred (quar.) 43%c May 1 Apr. 7 Suburban Elec. Sec. Co.,6% pref.(quar.) S134 May 1 Apr. 16 Superior Portland Cement. class A h55c May 1 Apr. 23 Sutherland Pa per Co 10c May 1 Apr. 20 Syracuse 13'nghamton & New York (quar.) May 1 Apr. 21 Tacony-Palmyra Bridge, 734% pref. (quar.) 514 May 1 Apr. 10 Teck Hughes Gold Mines. Ltd. (quarterly)_ _ - _ r15c May I Apr. 10 Telautograph Corp. ((mar.) 250 May 1 Apr. 16 Telephone Investment Corp.(monthly) 20c May 1 Apr. 20 Monthly 20c June 1 May 20 Monthly 20c July 1 June 20 Tennessee l'ublic Service. $6 prof h75c May 1 Apr. 17 Toledo Edison Co., 7% preferred (monthly)..... 58 1-3c May I Apr. 14 6% preferred (monthly) 50c May 1 Apr. 14 5% preferred (monthly) 41 2-3c May 1 Apr. 14 Volume 138 2703 Financial Chronicle Weekly Return of New York City Clearing House.— When Holders Per Share. Payable. ofRecord. Name of Company. Texas Power & Light Co., 7% pref. (quar.)__ - - $1 Y. May 1 Apr. 14 6% preferred (quarterly) $1% May 1 Apr. 14 Trite Printing Ink, pref. (quar.) $1;4 May 1 Apr. 14 Tung-Sol Lamp Works $3 cum.pref.(quar.)__- 75c May 1 Apr. 19 $3 cumulative preferred h25c May 1 Apr. 19 Union Bag & Paper Co $1 Apr. 25 Apr. 17 Union Oil of Calif. (quar.) 25c May 10 Apr. 19 United Biscuit Co. of Amer.. pref. (quar.) SI 94 May 1 Apr. 16 United Carbon Co., preferred (8.-a.) $3;4 July 2 June 16 United Cos.of New Jersey (quar.) $234 Apr. 29 Mar.20 United Light & Rys.(Del.),7% prior pref.(mo.) 53 1-3c May 1 Apr. 16 7% prior preferred (monthly) 53 1-3c June 1 May 15 7% prior preferred (monthly) 53 1-3c July 2 June 16 6.36% prior preferred monthly 53c May 1 Apr. 16 6.36% prior preferred monthly 53c June 1 May 15 6.36% prior preferred monthly 53c July 2 June 16 6, ye prior preferred (monthly) 50c May 1 Apr. 16 6 prior preferred (monthly) 50c June 1 May 15 6 prior preferred (monthly) 50c July 2 June 16 United New Jersey RR.& Canal (quar.) $2;4 July 10 June 20 United Profit Sharing Corp., prff. (s.-a.) 5% Apr. 30 Mar.31 United States Fire Ins. Co. (guar.) 30c May 1 Apr. 23 Extra 10c May 1 Apr. 23 United States & Foreign Securities Corp. 1st preferred (quar.) $1 A May 1 Apr. 23 U.S.Petroleum Co.(quar.) lc June 10 June 5 lc Sept. 10 Sept. 5 ic Dec. 10 Dec. 5 U. S. Pipe & Foundry Co.. corn. (quar.) 12;4c July 20 June 30 Common (quar.) 1234c Oct. 20 Sept.29 Common (quar.) 124c Jan. 20 Dec. 31 Preferred (quar.) SOc July 20 June 30 Preferred (quar.) 30c Oct. 20 Sept. 29 Preferred (quar.) 30c Ian. 20 Dec. 31 United Verde -Extension Mining 25c May 1 Apr. 3 Universal Leaf Tobacco Co., common (quar.) 50c May I Apr. 17 Upper Michigan Pow. dr Lt.pref.(quar.) $1 A May 15 6% preferred (quar. $135 Aug. 15 6% preferred (quar. Nov. 15 $1 6% preferred (quar. 2-1-35 $1 Utica Chenango & Susquehanna Valley May 1 Apr. 14 Virginian Railway, pref. (quar.) May 1 Apr. 14 July 2 June 15 Vortex Cup Co.. class A (qua.) July 20 July 10 Vulcan Detinning Co., preferred (quar.) fl 70 Oct. 20 Oct. 10 Preferred (quar.) May 1 Apr. 16 Walgreen Co.,common (quar.) Walker Mfg., preferred (quar.) 75c May 1 Apr. 20 Walton (Chas. S.), 8% pref. (quar.) $2 May 1 Apr. 15 Washington Gas Light Co. (quar.) 90c May 1 Apr. 16 Westinghouse Air Brake Co. (quar.) 25c Apr. 30 Mar. 31 Westinghouse Electric Mfg. Co.. pref. (quar.) 97Sic Apr. 30 Apr. 16 West Penn Electric Co.,6% pref. (quar.) $l)4 May 15 Apr. 20 7% preferred (quar.) $1 A May 15 Apr. 20 West Penn Power,6% pref.(quar.) $I A May 1 Apr. 5 7% preferred (quar.) $1,4 May 1 Apr. 5 Wilcox-Rich Corp., class A (quar.) 62;4c June 30 June 20 Class B stock (quar.) 20c May 15 May 1 Winstead Hosiery (quar.) $1 A May 1 Apr. 15 Quarterly $135 Aug. 1 July 15 Quarterly $1 A Nov. 1 Occ. 15 Wisconsin Telephone Co., preferred (quar.)$13i Apr. 30 Apr. 20 Woodley Petroleum Co 110% Sept.30 Sept. 15 Woolworth (F. W.) Co.(quar.) 60c June 1 Apr. 23 Wrigley (Wm.) Jr. Co.(monthly) 25c May 1 Apr. 20 Monthly 25c June 1 May 19 Monthly 25c July 2 June 20 Monthly 25c Aug 1 July 20 Monthly 25c Sept. 1 Aug. 20 Monthly 25c Oct. 1 Sept.20 York Railways, 5% pref. (quar.) 62 Sic Apr. 0 Apr. 20 t The New York Stock Exchange has ruled that stock will not be quoted ex-dividend on this date and not until runner notice. j The New York Curb Exchange Association has ruled that stock will not be quoted ex-dividend on tots date and not until further notice. a Transfer books not closed for this dividend. d Correction. e Payable in stock. f Payanle in common stock. g Payable in scrip. h On account of accumulated dividends. I Payable in preferred stock. o American Cities Power & Light pays a dividend of 1-32d of one share of class B stock, or at the option of the holder 75c. in cash. p American Coal Co. of Aileg. Co., N J., books close April 10 1934 to May 2 1934 inclusive. r Payable in Canadian funds, and in the case of non-residents of Canada, a deduction of a tax of 5% of the amount of such dividend will be made. U Payable in U. S. funds. o A unit. to Less depositary expenses. z Less tax. y A deduction has been made for expenses. Quarterly 8 Quarterly The weekly statement issued by the New York City Clearing House is given in full below: STATEMENT OF MEMBERS OF THE NEW YORK CLEARING HOUSE ASSOCIATION FOR THE WEEK ENDED SATURDAY, APRIL 14 1934. Clearing House Members. •Capital. • Surplus and Net Demand Deposits, Undivided Average. Profits. Time Deposits, Average. $ 6,000,000 20.000,000 127,500,000 20,000,000 90,000,000 32,935,000 21 ,000.000 15,000,000 10.000,000 50,000,000 $ $ 87,693,000 9,885,400 301,118,000 31,931,700 35.561,900 a906,099,000 47,510,600 301,902,000 177,660,100 b992,126,000 232,912,000 10,297,500 517.482,000 61.291,500 16.083,700 185,604,000 375.177,000 73,717.000 362,587,000 57,612,800 $ 10,141.000 31.586,000 158,961,000 27,292,000 52,118,000 100,318,000 45,121,000 22,110.000 15,262,000 13,260.000 4,000,000 Continental Bk & Tr Co_ Chase National Bank__ e150,270.000 500.000 Fifth Avenue Bank Bankers Trust Co 25,000,000 10,000.000 Title Guar & Trust Co 5.000,000 Marine Midland Tr Co 12,500,000 New York TrustCo Comm'l Nat Bk & Tr Co7.000.000 8.250.000 Public Nat Bk & Tr Co_ 3,467,400 27,796,000 e59,526,800 c1.210,220,000 43,575,000 3,148,900 60,610.800 d529,450,000 19,250,000 10,655,800 48,092,000 7,314,700 210,800.000 21,490,900 51,749,000 7,572,600 44,229,000 4,860,600 1.254,000 91,519,000 852,000 33,965,000 321,000 4,875,000 17,923,000 1,902,000 33.146,000 nnn 001 09111100 Bank of N Y az Trust Co Bank of Manhattan Co_ National City Bank..___ Cnem Bank & Trust Co Guaranty Trust Co Manufacturers Trust Co Cent Hanover Bk & Tr Co Corn Each Bank Tr Co_ First National Bank Irving Trust Co Tett.t. 014 occnnn 7nn9nn 71111 04471101 Includes deposits in foreign branches as follows: (a)$218,537,000:(b)$60,571,000; (c) $72.458,000: (d) $17,163,000. •As per official reports: National. March 5 1934: State, March 31 1934: trust companies. March 311934. e As of March 15 1934. The New York "Times" published regularly each week returns of a number of banks and trust companies which are not members of the New York Clearing House. The following are the figures for the week ended April 13: INSTITUTIONS NOT IN THE CLEARING HOUSE WITH THE CLOSING OF BUSINESS FOR THE WEEK ENDED FRIDAY. APRIL 13 1934. NATIONAL AND STATE BANKS—AVERAGE FIGURES. Loans Disc. and Investments. Manhattan— $ 23,771,700 Grace National Trade Bank of N. Y. 2,948,643 Brooklyn— - A ona AAA Res. Dep., Dep. Other N. Y. and Banks and Elsewhere. Trust Cos. Cash. 8 117,800 128,751 $ 1,573,300 693,132 etl AAA SIR nnn Gross Deposits. $ $ 1.335.700 22,127,000 249,819 3,356,589 WM AAA A OK,nnn TRUST COMPANIES—AVERAGE FIGURES. Loans, and Invest. DUG. Manhattan— Empire Federation Fiduciary Fulton Lawyers County United States Brooklyn— Brooklyn SZ 1 nivel Ortm.v Res. Dep., Dep. Other N. Y. and Banks and Elsewhere. Trust Cos. Cash. Gross Deposits. $ $ $ 62,354,900 *3,667,500 8,827,200 454,142 6,538,713 61,538 429,788 *593,039 9,466,188 832,500 16,908,700 *2,177,800 500,000 29,865,000 *4.718,600 63,712,069 6,400,000 16,354,846 8 i 1,270,000 63,646,700 497.775 5,927.300 64,368 8,780,226 448,500 15,465,700 32.333,000 58.440,187 2,193,000 17,945,000 1 741 33:3 0_404.674 218,000 97.807,000 28_718.174 93,872,000 95 17A ans * Includes amount with Federal Reserve as follows: Empire, $2,621,400: Fiduciary. $363,995; Fulton, $2,019,900; Lawyers County, $3,962,100. Condition of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The following shows the condition of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York at the close of business April 18 comparison with the previous week and the corresponding date last year: Assets— Gold certificates on hand and from U.S. Treasury (a) Gold Redemption fund—F. R. notes Other cash due Apr. 18 1934. Apr. 111934. Apr. 19 1933. $ $ 8 1,389,530,000 1,291,022,000 251,243,000 742,811,000 2,427,000 2,685,000 10,323,000 53,580,000 58,344,000 97,902,000 Total reserves 1,450,537,000 1,352,051,000 1,102,279,000 Redemption fund—F,It. bank notes____ 2,565,000 2,401,000 1,000,000 Bills discounted: Secured by U.S. Govt obligations__ 4,950,000 5,474,000 61,914,000 Other bills discounted 13,438,000 14,416.000 48,489,000 Total bills discounted Bills bought in open market U. S. Government securities: Bonds Treasury notes Certificates and bills 18,386,000 2,470,000 19,890,000 2.431.000 149,330,000 381,880,000 249,545,000 159,113,000 376.271,000 251,371,000 187,196,000182,229,000 355,949,000 Total U.S. Government securities— Other securities (see note) 786,755,000 53,C00 786,755.000 53,000 725,374,000 4,927,000 Total bills and securities (see note)____ Gold held abroad Due from foreign banks (see note) F. It. notes of other banks Uncollected items Bank Premises Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.stock— All other assets 807,664,000 809.129,000 870,049,000 1,193,000 3,935,000 121,915,000 11,434,600 42,529,000 25,144,000 1,193,000 5,758,000 109,835,000 11,434,000 21,265,000 34,265,000 1,477,000 5,922,000 98.170,000 12,818,000 Total assets 110,403,000 29,345,000 1934, in Apr. 18 1934. Apr. 11 1934. Apr. 19 1933. $ $ $ Liabilities— 627,315,000 623,476,000 773,976,060 F. R. notes In actual circulation 16,987,000 44,747,000 44,199,600 F. R. bank notes in actual circulation._ Deposits—Member bank reserve aco't-- 1,448,215,000 1,365,480,000 1,047,482,000 3.815.000 5,097,000 10,860,000 Government 3,818,000 612.000 1,796,000 Foreign bank (see note) 32,637,000 42,687,600 29,626,000 Other deposits Total deposits Deferred availability items Capital paid in Surplus Reserves (F. D. I. C. stock, self insurance, &c.) All other liabilities Total liabilities 1,503.558,000 1,403,826,000 1,084.741,000 126,114,000 59,719,000 45,217,000 109,738.000 59,700,000 45,217,000 86,016.000 58,505,000 85,058.000 47,266,000 13,528,000 47,266,000 13,361,000 1,667,000 6.118,000 2,466,916,000 2,347,331,000 2,113.068.000 Ratio of total reserves to deposit and F. It. note Ilabliities combined 68.1% 66.7% 59 3% Contingent liability on bills purchased for foreign correspondents 1,441,000 1,440,000 16,-60,000 21.353,000 2,466,916,000 2,347,331,000 2,113,068,000 •"Other cash" does not Include Federal Reserve notes or a bank's own Federal Reserve bank notes. NOTE.—Beginning with the statement of Oct. 17 1925. two new items were added in order to show separately the amount of balances held abroad and amounts due se foreign correspondents. In addition, the caption "All other earning assets." previously made up of Federal Intermediate Credit bank debentures, was changed to "Other securities." and the caption, "Total earning assets" to "Total bills and securities." The latter term was adopted as a more accurate description of the total of the discount acceptances and securities acquired under the provisions of Sections 13 and 14 of the Federal Reserve Act, which it was stated are the only items included therein. These are certificates given by the U. S. Treasury for the gold taken over from the Reserve Banks when the dollar was on Jan. 31 1934 devalued from 100 cents to d9.06 cents. these certificates being worth lass to the extent of the difference. the difference itself havInz been appropriated as profit by the Treasury under the provisions of the Gold Reserve Act 0( 1934. 2704 Financial Chronicle April 21 1934 Weekly Return of the Federal Reserve Board. The following is the return issued by the Federal Reserve Board Thursday afternoon,April 19,and showing the condition or the twelve Reserve banks at the close of business on Wednesday. In the first table we present the results for the System as a whole in comparison with the figures for the seven preceding weeks and with those of the corresponding week last year. The second table shows the resources and liabilities separately for each of the twelve banks. The Federal Reserve note statement (third table following) gives details regarding transactions in Federal Reserve notes between the Reserve Agents and the Federal Reserve banks. The fourth table (Federal Reserve Bank Note Statement) shows the amount of these bank notes issued and the amount held by the Federal Reserve banks along with the collateral pledged against outstanding bank notes. The Reserve Board's comment upon the returns for the latest week appears in our department of "Current Events and Discussions." COMBINED RESOURCES AND LIABILITIES OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AT THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS APRIL 18 1934. Apr. 18 1934. Apr. 111934. Apr. 4 1934. Mar.28 1934. Mar. 211034. ,lfar. 14 1934. Mar. 7 1934. Feb. 28 1934. Apr. 191933. S S S S S S S $ 4,476,979,000 4,386.837,000 4,309,575,000 4,281,197,000 4,270,695,000 4,252,321,000 4,152,948,000 3,895.811,000 ASSETS. Gold ctfs. on hand Bg due fr. U.S.(a) Gold Redemption fund (F. R. notes) Other cash • 31,499,000 224,332,000 Total reserves Redemption fund-F. Ft. bank notes Bills discounted: Secured by U. S. Govt. obligations.... Other bills discounted 32,938,000 225,771,000 33.749,000 215,178,00C 32,911,000 220,886.000 33,568,000 220,181,000 34,014.000 217,411,000 34,163,000 210,841,000 S 920,107,000 2,380,713,000 35,138,0(10 64,775,000 208,727,000 322.554,000 4,733,309,000 4,645,593,000 4,558.502,000 4,534.994,000 4,524,444,000 4,503,776,000 4,397,952,006 4,139.676.000 3,688,149,000 • 10.868,000 8,513,000 9,038.000 11,495,000 11.111,000 8,362,000 12,597,000 1.601.000 8,223,000 8,369,000 32,101,000 18,362,000 46.028,000 124,277,000 289,993,000 Total bills discounted Bills bought In open market U.S. Government securities-Bonds Treasury notes Special Treasury certificates Certificates and bills 52,579,000 51,412.000 54,887,000 58,577,000 47,529,000 64,390.000 40,473,000 43,251.000 29,359,000 33.250.000 46,366,000 26,045,000 37,459,000 62,345,000 17,059.000 13,499,000 403,277,000 431,225,000 442,795,000 442,923.000 442,865,000 442.475,000 442,843,000 442,830,000 1,207,603,000 1,179,903,000 1,222,681,000 1,214,246,000 1,224,043,000 1,092,063,000 1,068,318,000 1,055,420.000 414,270,000 208,443,000 421,506,000 457,873,000 Total U. S. Government securities Other securities 2,430,264,000 2,431,979,000 2,431,762.000 2,431.886,000 2.431,895,000 2,431,840,000 2.431.863.000 2,431,951,000 1,837.104,000 563,000 563,000 653,000 5,559,000 563.000 653,000 653,000 592,000 532,000 816,384,000 9,276,000 33,975.000 820,843,000 12,244.000 35.235,000 766,236,000 13.592,000 38,987,000 774.712.000 11.605,000 39,807,000 764,987,000 12,607,000 42,280,000 896,902,000 615,117,000 613,460,000 920.702,000 933,701,000 957,725,000 Total bills and securities 2,434,793,000 2,492,851,000 2.505,899,000 2.514,387.000 2,517,120,000 2,524,839,000 2,537,459,000 2.559,339,000 2.465,376.000 Gold held abroad Due from foreign banks 3,131,000 3,131,000 3.760,000 3,130,000 3,132,000 3,132,000 3,128.000 3,485,000 3,130,000 Federal Reserve notes of other banks..... 16.551,000 13,145,000 21.829,000 17,340,000 15.876,000 14,831.000 15.907,000 13,293,000 15,905,000 Uncollected Items 493,347,000 413,780,000 427,933,000 395,844,000 449.448,000 482,658,000 392,474,000 410,791,000 354,608,000 Bank premises 52,432,00C 52,431,600 52,503,000 52.431,000 52,382,000 54,129,000 52,551.000 52.431.000 52,556,000 Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. stock 69,650.000 69,650,00( 60.650.000 69,650,000 69,650.000 69,850,000 139,299,000 69,650,000 All other resources 48,636,000 52,677,000 51,349,000 49,910,000 48,984.000 50.965,000 47.791.00f, 44,942,000 41.879,000 Total assets 7,972,449,000 7,760,942,000 7,694,031,000 7.645,262,000 7,890,908.000 7,714,853.000 7,525,986,000 7,309,002,000 6,637,394,000 LIABILITIES. F. R. notes In actual circulation 3,029,647.000 3,025,812,000 3.032,016.000 2,997,036,006 2,984.943,000 2,989,052,000 3,002,345,000 2,979,637,000 3,477,393,000 89,336,000 103,552.000 122,743,000 143,877.000 159,371,000 184,543,000 195.376,000 F. R. bank notes In actual circulation.... 83,102,000 24,529,000 Deposits-Member banks'reserve account 3,669,177,000 3,560,025.000 3,449,803,000 3,438,948.000 3.449,26)1,0003,454,492.000 3.312.787.000 3,093.119.000 2.158.636,000 29,395,000 66,833,000 Government 34,926,000 68,977,000 56,443.000 45,261,000 25,465,000 24,009,000 16,123,000 4,024,000 Foreign banks 4,565,000 4,623,000 5.019,000 6,178,000 3.433.000 11,088,000 7,378.000 8,994,000 Special deposits-Member bank 27,938.000 22,347,000 29,248,000 25,316,000 1 20,993,000 24,106.000 Non-member bank 9,954.000 12,114,000 10,952.000 11.994,000 11,036.000 11.405,000 6.143,705 1104.109,000 121,924,000 111,838,000 89,111,000 Other deposits 158.178,000 83.324.000 152.349,000 97,747,000 Total deposits 3,900,897,000 3,737,748.000 3,656,794,000 3,656.752,000 3,627,636,000 3.614,082,000 3,480,900,000 3,265.381,000 2.347,538,000 Deferred availability items 488,075,000 422,819,000 427,934,000 394,468.000 462,158,000 478,730,000 394,161,000 406,909,000 333,854,000 Capital paid In 146,363,000 146,389,000 146,273,000 145.586.000 145,731,000 145.820,000 146,118,000 145.310,000 149,700,000 Surplus_ 138,383,000 133,343,000 138,383,000 138,384,000 138,383,000 138,383.000 138,383.000 138,383,000 278.599,000 Reserves for Fed. Dep. Ins. Corp. stock: 161.829,000 161,829,000 12,206,000 69,650,000 Paid 69,650,000 69,650,000 69.600,000 69,650,000 69,650,000 Called for payment Apr11 15 69,650,000 69,650,000 69.650,000 69.650,000 69.650.000 69,650,000 24,133,000 639,826,000 46,730,000 All other liabilities 50,993,000 38.706.000 40,236,000 13.575,000 48.880.000 50,115,000 Total liabilities 7,972,449,000 7.760,912,000 7,694,036,000 7,645.262,000 7,690,908,000 7,714,853,000 7.525,986,000 7.309,002.000 6,637,394,000 Ratio of total reserves to deposits and F. R. note liabilities combined 68.3% 68.2% 68.7% 88.2% 67.8% 66.3% 63.3% 68.4% 68.2% Contingent liability on bills purchased 4.669,000 ' 4,669,000 4,771.000 4,835,000 for foreign correspondents 4.935,000 4,931,000 4,935,000 50,223,000 4,939,000 s Maturity Distribution of Bills and Short-term Securities1-15 days bills discounted 16-30 days bills discounted 31-60 days bills discounted 61-99 days bills discounted Over 90 days bills discounted S $ 3 $ S $ 5 S 29,822,000 3,028,000 4,818,000 2,569,000 236,000 30,600,000 4,600,000 3,096,000 4,725,000 240,000 32,998,000 4,160,000 4,792,000 5,330,000 249,000 37,565.000 2,854,000 5,081,000 6,782,000 297,000 36,605,000 2,964,000 4,757.000 6,774,000 312,000 40,825,000 2,332,000 5,358,000 6,045.000 327.000 46,328,000 3.428.000 4,406,000 4,094,000 321,000 51.491,000 2,700.000 5.519,000 4,285,000 395,000 287,935,000 22,051,000 49,318,000 47,222.000 7,744,000 Total bills discounted 1-15 days bills bought In open market_ 16-30 days bills bought in open market... 31-60 days bills bought In open market... 61-90 days bills bought in open market.. Over 90 days bills bought In open market 40,473,000 9,127,000 3,371,000 823,000 178,000 43.251,000 11,427,000 3,365,000 2,209,00C 61,000 47,529,000 13.193,000 7,934,000 3,442.000 1,526,000 52,579,000 13,712,000 6,634,000 7.381,000 1,632.000 51,412.000 9,374.000 12,346.000 7,877,000 3,853,000 54,847,000 9,9(36,000 13,973.000 8,992,000 4,528,000 58,577,000 14.376,000 9,662,000 16,156,000 6,172,000 64,390,000 26.462,000 9,399,000 19,623.006 6,861,000 414,270,000 68,531,000 73.052,000 59,024,000 7,715,000 121,000 Total bills bought In open market 1-15 days U.S. certificates and bills.-18-30 days U. S. certificates and bills 31-60 days U. S. certificates and bills 61-90 days U.S. certificates and bills Over 90 days U. S. certificates and bills._ 13.499,000 116,831,000 62,180,000 99,301,0b0 42,210,000 495,857,000 17,059,000 90,229,000 115,530,000 38,975.000 117,466,000 459,643,000 26.045,000 65,338,000 107.179.000 55.075.000 116,816,000 421,378,000 29,359,000 61,190.000 76.574,000 129,575,000 112.861,000 394.508,000 33,250,000 90,095,000 65,338,000 137,939,000 108,816,000 364,808,000 37.459,000 205,729,000 61,190,000 147,928,000 29,325,000 452,730,000 46.366,000 207.760.000 90.095.000 143.318.000 49,875,000 429,654.000 62,345.000 201,999.000 91,980,000 130.564,000 107,475,000 401,279.000 208,443,000 127,997,000 52,400,000 246,975,000 67,450,000 462,903,000 Total 13. S. certificates and bills 1-15 days municipal warrants 16-30 days municipal warrants 31-60 days municipal warrants 61-90 days municipal warrants Over 90 days municipal warrants 816,384,000 509,000 820,843,000 500.000 9,0000 766,286,000 510,000 774,712,000 510,000 764,987,000 510,000 896,902.000 590,000 10,000 920,702,000 590,000 10,000 933,701,000 636,000 957.725,000 5,346,000 17,000 36,000 17,000 36,000 17.000 36.000 53,000 53,000 53,000 53.600 17,000 177,000 26,000 10,000 562,000 562,000 563,000 563,000 563,000 053,000 653,000 653.000 Total municipal warrants Federal Reserve NotesIssued to F. R. Bank by F. It. Agent Held by Federal Reserve Bank In actual drculation 3,309,708,000 3,304,860,000 3,310,969,000 3,250,393,000 3,249,829,000 3,244,240,000 3.250.040,000 3,224,644,000 5,760,879,000 280,061,000 279,043,000 278,953,000 253,362,000 264,886.000 255,228,000 247,695.000 245,007,000 283.486,000 3,029,647,000 3,025,812,000 3.032,016,000 2.997,036,000 2,984,943,000 2,989,052,000 3.002,345,000 2,979,637,00C 3,477.393,000 Collateral Held by Agent as Security for Notes Issued to BankGold ctfs. on hand & due from U.S.Tress By gold and gold certificates Gold fund-Federal Reserve Board By eligible paper U.S. Government securltles Total collateral .5,559,000 ---- 3,003,471,000 3,042,896,000 2,924,345,00 2,875,218,000 2,884,152,000 2,897,118.000 2,840.618.000 2,765,318,000 11298619000 1.1328835000 29,332.000 47,019,000 34,413,000 54,148,000 63,030,000 75,426,000 56,471,000 95.149,000 485,164,000 313,400,000 275,400,000 376,000,000 351.700,000 346,700,000 326,400,000 376,000.000 412,800,000 640,000,000 3.346.203.000 1.3.53 714 000 3 447 413 nnn 3 941 nnn nnnn 967 496 nnn 3 94/1 A44 000 3 259 (144 nnn q 971 On7 nnn / on, .... nnn •"Other cash" does not include Federal Reserve notes or a bank's own Federal Reserve bank notes. b Revised. These are certificates given by the U. S. Treasury for the gold taken over from the Reserve Ranks when the dollar was on Jan. 31 1934 devalued from 100 cents to 59.06 cents, these certificates being worth less to the extent of the difference, the difference itself having been appropriated as profit by the Treasury under the provisions of the Gold Reserve Act 01 1934. WEEKLY STATEMENT OF RESOURCES AND LIABILITIES OF EACH OF THE 12 FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AT CLOSE OF BUSINESS APRIL 18 1934 Two Ciphers (00) Omitted. Federal Reserve Bank ofTotal. Boston. New York. Phila. Cleveland Richmond Atlanta. Chicago. Si. Louts. Minneap. Kan.CtIg. Dallas. San Fran. ASSETS. 8 8 $ $ $ $ i Gold certIfIcates on hand and due from U. S. Treasury 4,476,979,0 355,388.0 1,339,530.0 274,909,0 341,965,0 211,516,0 120,418,0 Redemption fund-F R. notes 31,498,0 2,603,0 2,427,0 3,217,0 3,199,0 1,453,0 2,957,0 224,832,0 15,350,0 58,580,0 36,106,0 14,127,0 9,349,0 11,701,0 Other cash Total reserves 4,733,309,0 373.341.0 1,450,537,0 314,232,0 359,291.0 222.318.0 135.078.0 8 8 $ $ 5 5 955,814,0 189,737,0 101,931,0 162,957,0 93,672,0 279,142,0 7,056,0 1,166,0 1,113,0 730,0 656,0 4,921,0 30,544,0 9,610.0 10,439,0 10,353,0 6,301,0 12.372,0 993.414.0 200.513.0 113.483.0 174 040 n 1651 5590 n 'on 445 n 2705 Financial Chronicle Volume 138 Weekly Return of the Federal Reserve Board (Concluded). Two Ciphers (00) Omitted. Total bills discounted Bills bought in open market U. S. Government securities: Bonds Treasury notes Certificates and bills Boston. New York. Total. RESOURCES (Concluded)Redetn. fund-F. It. bank notes_ BIBS discounted: Sea. by U. S. Govt. obligations Other bills discounted Cleveland Richmond Atlanta. Phila. 3 858,0 $ 1,215,0 358,0 681,0 4,950,0 1,594,0 13.436,0 11,787,0 448,0 1,698,0 222,0 1,387,0 210,0 439,0 1,039,0 681,0 18,386,0 13,381,0 2,470,0 1,275,0 2,146,0 1,130,0 1,609,0 474,0 649,0 581,0 $ 8,226,0 $ 1,250,0 8,369,0 32,104,0 40,473,0 13,499,0 $ 2,565,0 $ 269,0 $ Chicago. 3 St. Louts. Ittinneap Kan.Cig, Dallas. San Fran. $ 434,0 $ 247,0 $ 150,0 3 474,0 $ 764,0 2,0 1,168,0 167,0 91,0 10,0 564,0 267,0 8,0 280,0 400,0 378,0 1,170,0 1,754,0 258,0 382,0 574,0 283,0 267,0 408.0 216,0 2,981,0 778.0 1,080,0 406,277,0 22,991,0 1,207,603,0 80,134,0 816,384,0 54,555,0 149,330.0 25,602,0 30.246,0 13,287,0 12,248,0 387,880,0 84,615,0 108,744,0 47,760,0 44.017,0 249,545,0 56,903,0 74,035,0 32,515,0 29,966,0 67,489,0 13,663,0 15,873,0 13,200,0 18,730,0 23,618,0 214,413,0 47,321,0 29,642,0 46,790,0 31,380.0 84,907,0 155,441,0 32,216,0 20,183,0 31.854,0 21,365,0 57,806,0 Total U. S. Govt. securities_ 2,430,264,0 157,680,0 Other securities 562,0 786,755,0 167,120,0 213,025,0 93,562,0 86,231,0 509,0 53,0 437,343,0 93,200,0 65,698,0 91,844.0 71,475,0 166,331,0 Total bills and securities 2,484,798,0 159,400,0 Due from foreign banks 237,0 3,130,0 Fed. Res, notes of other banks_ 357,0 15,905,0 Uncollected items 493,347,0 55,085,0 Bank premises 52,556,0 3,224,0 Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.stock_ 139,299,0 10,230,0 All other resources 905,0 41,879,0 807,664,0 182,285,0 216,301,0 95,645,0 87,461,0 300,0 119,0 110,0 342,0 1,193,0 913,0 866,0 1,096,0 401,0 3,935,0 121,915,0 38.218,0 46,932,0 42.440,0 17,307,0 11,434,0 4,131,0 6,788,0 3,128,0 2,372,0 42,529,0 14,621,0 14,147,0 5,808,0 5,272,0 25,144,0 4,760,0 1,462,0 2,008,0 2.724,0 440,267,0 93,840,0 66,555,0 92,519,0 74,672,0 168.189,0 88,0 222,0 88.0 7,0 10,0 414,0 268,0 1,214,0 966,0 1,542,0 2,663,0 1,684,0 61,933,0 21,730,0 12,479,0 30,698,0 17,782,0 26.828,0 7,382,0 3,110,0 1,657,0 3,485,0 1,755,0 4,090,0 19,749,0 5,093,0 3,510,0 4,131,0 4,359,0 9,850,0 692,0 559,0 1,053,0 354,0 1,201,0 1,017.0 7,972,449,0 604,029,0 2,466,916,0 559,848,0 647,349,0 372,332,0 251,687,0 1,526,839,0 326.768,0250,105,0 307,212,0 201,080,0 508,284,0 Total resources F. R. notes in actual circulation_ 3,029,647,0 243,118,0 627,315,0 242,636,0 295,614,0 142,500,0 129,620,0 1,231,0 F. R.bank notes in act'l circul'n 44,199,0 7,610,0 12,978,0 83,102,0 2,713,0 Deposits: Member bank reserve account_ 3,669,177,0 266,053,0 1,448,215,0 202,665,0 233,407,0 145,691,0 75,510.0 950,0 Government 10,860,0 2,383,0 3,084,0 18,042,0 68,977,0 1,248,0 148,0 161,0 440,0 406,0 Foreign bank 1,796,0 305,0 4,565,0 Other deposits 42,687,0 21.578,0 8.724,0 6,874,0 10,178,0 158,178,0 5,325,0 Total deposits 3,900,897,0 272,931,0 1,503,558,0 227,066,0 250,621,0 170,768,0 86,786,0 Deferred availability items 488,075,0 52,971,0 126,114.0 35,783,0 44,361,0 41,840,0 16,404,0 Capital paid In 59,719,0 15,679,0 12,635,0 4,968,0 4,419,0 146,383,0 10,692,0 Surplus 45,217,0 13,352,0 14,090,0 5,171,0 5,145,0 138,383,0 9,610,0 Reserves: FDIC stock, self Insur47,266,0 17,121,0 16,447,0 6,963,0 7,848,0 ance &c 161,829,0 11,283,0 122,0 234,0 603,0 601,0 All other liabilities 711,0 13,528,0 24,133,0 771,847,0 134,088,0 95,811,0 107,532.0 39,651,0 199,915,0 752,0 2.226,0 3.163,0 3,982,0 4,248,0 614,105,0 129,369,0 72,153,0 138,175.0 115,524,0 223,310,0 516,0 11,005,0 1.782,0 8,822.0 7,516,0 2,769,0 119,0 119,0 301,0 97,0 140,0 533,0 12,783,0 18,185,0 7,772,0 6,541,0 2,390,0 15,141,0 634,937,0 150,463,0 80,538,0 155,840,0 119.815,0 247,574,0 61,887,0 22,478,0 11,768,0 28,866,0 20,877,0 24,726,0 12,536,0 3,963,0 2,999,0 4,153,0 3,962,0 10,658,0 20,681,0 4,756,0 3,420,0 3,613,0 3,683,0 9,645,0 22,718,0 2,233,0 5,946,0 826,0 4,535,0 282,0 4,747,0 235,0 5,490,0 11,465,0 4.439,0 319,0 7,972,449,0 604,029,0 2,466,916,0 559,848,0 647,349.0 372,332,0 251,687,0 1,526,839,0 326,768,0 200,105,0 307,212,0 201,080,0 508,284,0 Total liabilities Memoranda Ratio of total res. to dep. & F. It 62.4 65.8 71.0 note liabilities combined 66.9 63.1 72.3 68.3 Contingent liability on bills 111.1 188.0 173.0 A 'CO n 1144 A 1 411 n 513.0 ' 474.0 Chased for Men corresponden "Other cash" does not Include Federal Reserve notes or banks own Federal Reserve bank notes. 70.6 70.5 64.4 66.1 63.1 66.2 622.0 163,0 114,0 133,0 138,0 350.0 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE STATEMENT. Two Ciphers (00) Omitted. Federal Reserve .4 cent at- Boston. 'Veto York Total. Cleveland. Richmond Atlanta. Phtla Chicago. Si. Louis. Minneap Kan.City. Dallas. San Fran. Federal Reserve notss: S S Issued to F.R.lik. by F.R.Agt. 3,309,708,0 259,866,0 Field by Fed'I Reserve Bank_ __ 280,061,0 16,748.0 $ S S S $ 722,706,0 258,916,0 313,266,0 152,223,0 148,188,0 95,391,0 16,280,0 17.652,0 9,723,0 18,568,0 S S $ S S S 807,563,0 140,023,0 100.784,0 114,945,0 44,297,0 246,931.0 35,716,0 5,935.0 4,973.0 7,413,0 4,646,0 47,016.0 In actual circulation 3,029,647,0 243,118.0 Collateral held by Agent as security for notes Issued to bks: Gold certificates on hand and due from U.S. Treasury _ __ _ 3,003,471,0 261,117,0 Eligible paper 29,332,0 1,242,0 U. S. Government securities 313,400,0 627,315,0 242,636,0 295,614,0 142,500,0 129,620,0 771,847,0 134,088,0 95,811,0 107.532,0 39,651,0 199,915,0 723,706,0 220,000,0 259,431,0 152,340,0 94,385,0 870,0 12,362,0 4,899,0 1,874,0 1,260,0 55,000,0 35,000,0 55,000,0 745,213,0 133,936,0 79,615,0 102,290,0 42,675,0 188,763,0 1,274,0 414,0 3,050,0 370,0 1,215,0 502,0 60,000,0 65,000,0 6,000,0 22,400,0 15.000,0 Total enlInfor411 0 RIIS on.• n ono .1.1 n 70t1 no. n 0K0 ono A 013 0nq n 1,0 arm n 1511 255 n 511 4230 1404380 1023350 117.701.0 45.725.0 250.037.0 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK NOTE STATEMENT. :Iwo ciphers (00) Omitted. Federal Reserve Agent atFederal Reserve bank notes: Issued to 1'. R. Bk. (outstdg.): Held by Fall Reserve Bank__ In actual circulation-net_. Collat. pledged seat. outst. notes: Discounted & purchased bIlls_U. S. Government securities__ Total. Boston. New York. - s s Cleveland. Richmond Atlanta. Phila. Chicago. $ $ s s St. Louts. Minneap. Kan.City s s s s Dallas. San Fran. s s 100,314.0 17,212,0 4,051,0 1,338,0 47,599,0 16.035,0 13,785,0 807,0 3,400,0 8,425,0 1,469,0 238,0 4,534,0 286,0 872,0 120,0 2,402,0 176,0 4,113,0 950,0 5,454,0 1,472,0 83,102,0 2,713,0 44,199,0 7,610,0 12,978,0 1,231,0 4,248,0 752,0 2,226,0 3,163,0 3.982,0 49,274,0 16.500,0 15,000,0 11,0 2,000,0 9,0 7,000,0 10,000,0 3,000,0 7,000,0 15,000,0 on 074 A' la ,1111 A 0 nno n 10 nnn 0 a cm 0 7000 n is 000 n 20,0 129,774.0 ,011 00• /I Total collar...I $ 5,000,0 non n , 1 M /VIII II n11 n 7 *1)0es not include $85.651.000 of Federal Reserve bank notes for the retirement of which Federal Reserve banks have deposited lawful money with the Treasurer of the United States. Weekly Return for the Member Banks of the Federal Reserve System. Following is the weekly statement issued by the Federal Reserve Board, giving the principal items of the resouiees and,liabilities of the reporting member banks from which weekly returns are obtained. These figures are always a week behind those for the Reserve banks themselves. Definitions of the different items in the statement were given in the statement of Dec. 14 1917, published in the "Chronicle" of Dec. 29 1917, page 2523. The continent of the Reserve Board upon the figures for the latest week appears in our department of "Current Events and Discussions," immediately preceding which we also give the figures of New York and Chicago reporting member banks for a week later. Beginning with the statement of Jan. 9 1929, the loan figures exclude "Acceptances of other banks and bills of exchange of drafts sold with endorsement" and Include all real estate mortgages and mortgage loans held by the bank. Previously acceptances of other banks and Wits sold with endorsement were Included with loans. and some of the banks included mortgages In investments. Loans secured by U. S. Government obligations are no longer shown sep tritely, only the total of 10354 on securttlel being given. Furthermore, borrowing at the Federal Reserve is not any more subdivided to show the amount secured by U.S. obligations and those secured by commercial paper. only a BUM) total being given. The number of reporting banks formerly covered 101 leading cities, but was reduced to 90 cities after the declaration of bank holidays or moratoria early In March 1933. Publication of the weekly returns for the reduced number of cities was omitted in the weeks from March I to May 10. but a summary of them is to be found in the Federal Reserve Bulletin. The figures below are stated in round millions. PRINCIPAL RESOURCES AND LIABILITIES OF WEEKLY REPORTING MEMBER BANKS IN EACH FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT AS AT CLOSE OF BUSINESS APRIL II 1934 (In Millions of Dollars). Federal Reserve DistrictLoans and Investments-total Loans-total On securities All other Investments-total U.S. Government securities Other securities RA9017110 with F. It. Bank Cash In vault Net demand deposits Time deposits Government deposits Due from books Due to banks nnrrnarinra from F Ti. Bank Total. Boston. New York Phila. Cleveland. Richmond Atlanta. Chicago. St. Louis. Minneap. Ean.City. Dallas. San Fran. - - $ s s 1,201 8,320 1,029 1,161 8,310 671 3,953 498 437 3,612 4,698 255 416 1,982 1.971 232 266 S 17,611 s s 311 s $ s $ s $ $ 332 1,697 496 337 546 398 1,753 170 182 755 217 162 198 186 881 210 227 57 113 62 120 350 405 81 136 41 121 61 137 61 125 220 661 9,301 530 4,367 531 724 171 150 942 279 175 348 212 872 6,234 3,067 363 167 2,972 1,395 287 244 529 195 121 50 102 48 611 331 183 96 120 55 233 110 162 50 546 326 2,588 246 12,136 4,424 1,305 1,588 3,616 7 199 50 826 345 119 120 201 1,218 50 6.419 1,112 755 145 1,644 6 132 12 653 315 63 142 203, 114 19 586 447 61 100 170 I 40 11 204 131 10 77 80 31 6 169 131 28 85 82 446 51 1,444 469 62 268 463 85 7 339 163 31 94 142 37 4 205 123 7 85 100 76 12 400 167 26 165 224 76 9 274 120 52 130 127 134 1115 612 898 91 177 175 --- 2706 Financial Chronicle • QUIMartial allb Ar;;tiLnnarial Quotations for United States Treasury Certificates of Indebtedness, &c.—Friday, April 20. Maturity. PUBLISHED WEEKLY Terms of Subscription—Payable in Advance Including Postage— 12 Mos. 6 Mos. United States, U. S. Possessions and Territories $10.00 $6.00 In Dominion of Canada 11.50 6.75 South and Central America (except Argentina), Spain, Mexico and Cuba 13.50 7.75 Great Britain, Continental Europe (except Spain), Asia, Australia, Africa and Argentina 15.00 8.50 Thefollowing publications are also issued: COMPENDIUMS— MONTHLY PUBLICATIONS— PUBLIC UTILITY—(semi-annually) RANK AND QUOTATION RECORD RAILWAY & INDUSTRIAL—(four a year) MONTHLY EARNINGS RECORD STATE AND MUNICIPAL—(aeilli-ann.) The subscription price of the Bank and Quotation Record, the State and Municipal Compendium and the Railway and Industrial Compendium is $10.00 per year each. The price of the Public Utility Compendium is $7.50 per year and the price of the Monthly Earnings Record is $6.00 per year. Foreign postage extra. NOTICE. On account of the fluctuations in the rates of exchange, remittances for foreign subscriptions and advertisements must be made in New York funds. Terms of Advertising Transient display matter per agate line 45 cents Contract and Card rates On request CmcAcio-Orricr.—In charge of Fred. H. Gray, Western Representative. 208 South La Salle Street, Telephone State 0613. LONDON7OFFICE—Edwards & Smith, 1 Drapers' Gardens, London, E.C. WILLIAM B. DANA COMPANY, Publishers, William Street, Corner Spruce, New York. Wall Street, Friday Night, April 20 1934. and Miscellaneous Stocks.—The Review of the Stock Market is given this week on page 2692. The following are sales made at the Stock Exchange this week of shares not represented in our detailed list on the pages which follow: Railroad STOCKS. [Week Ending Apr. 20. Sales for Week. Par Shares. Railroads— 10 Canada Southern _ _100 Duluth S S & Atl_ _ _100 1,900 100 3,000 Preferred Havana Elec Ry pfd 100 50 300 Hudson & Man pref 100 220 lot Rys of Cent Amer_• • 230 Certificates 170 100 Preferred 100 Market St RY 160 100 26 preferred 100 10 Preferred 50 10 Morris & Essex 70 yNew On Tex&Mex 100 81,527 N Y Cent rts 110 St Louis-S W pref...100 Range for Week. Lowest. I per share. 54 Apr 16 1 Apr 14 1% Apr 20 7 Apr 20 19% Apr 17 64 Apr 17 5 Apr 17 20% Apr 16 14 Apr 19 2% Apr 19 5 Apr 19 71 Apr 18 16 Apr 19 2% Apr 16 25 Apr 19 Htghest. Range Since Jan. 1. 1.410e41. $ per share. $ per share Fel 54 Apr 16 50 Jan 1% Apr 20 24 Apr 20 Jan 84 Apr 19 3 Jan 20% Apr 20 18 Jan 7 Apr 18 3 Jan 614 Apr 18 34 Ma Jan 22% Apr 17 Jan 1% Apr 16 3% Apr 18 Jan Mar 5 Apr 19 5 Jan 71 Apr 18 58 174 Apr 20 1114 Jan 2% Apr 14 134 Mar 27 Apr 20 20% Mar Indus. & Misc. 100 43 Apr 18 43 Abrah'm & Straus_ _• Apr 18 35 70 106 Apr 19 106 100 Preferred Apr 19 89 Amer Radiator & Stand 10 119 Apr 16 119 Sanitary pref__ _ _100 Apr 16 1114 300 9 Apr 16 10 Apr 16 64 Andes Copper Mining 120 74 Apr 18 714 Apr 20 5 Art Metal Construct_10 500 20 Apr 18 21% Apr 18 20 Atl G & W I SS L p1100 130 55 Apr 16 56 Austin Nichols prior A * Apr 14 3934 Bloomingdale 7%1)1100 120 95 Apr 17 98 Apr 16 88 Blumenthal& Cop!100 120 51 Apr 19 51 Apr 19 48% Ayr 17 82 Apr 18 78 Bon Ansi class A 300 78 Briggs & Stratton_ _ _ _* 1,000 24 Apr 17 24% Apr 20 15 Brown Shoe pref _ A00 %Apr 19 12334 Ayr 19 1184 1 z1235 * Burns Bros class B 200 2 Apr 14 2 Apr 14 17 % Class A cas 300 2 Apr 16 2 Apr 16 1 • Highest. per share. 54 Apr 134 Apr 214 Ayr 8% Apr 26% Jan Apr 7 64 Apr 224 Apr 214 Mar 4 Mar 7% Mar 71 Apr 25 Feb 24 Mar 27 Apr Jan 43 Apr Jan 106% Mar Jan 119 Jan 1014 Jan 9 Jan 22 Jan 59 Jan 100 Feb 56% Apr 82 Jan 24% Jan 123% Apr 334 Jan 44 Apr Apr Feb Feb Mar Mar Feb Apr Apr Apr Feb Feb Jan Apr Jan Jan Jan 16% 13% 94 9 13% Mar Feb Apr Feb Apr Feb Jan Mar Apr 59 65% 85 79% Apr Apr Apr Apr Feb 109 Jan 23 Feb 9% Jan 25 Jan 80 Jan 18 Jan 100 Mar 145 Jan 4% Apr 1164 Jan 70 Jan 105 Mar Feb Apr Apr Mar Apr Jan Apr Apr Apr Apr Apr Apr 20 45 Apr 14 19 Jan 55 90 41 Kresge Dept St pref 100 Jan 26% Apr 17 25% Apr 17 9 Maytag Co pref x-warr* 110 25 Milwaukee Elec Ry & Jan 70 Light pref Apr 14 50 10 70 Apr 14 70 100 40 35 Norwalk T & R pref.50 Apr 18 35 API' 18 344 Mar 37 Feb 45 Outlet Co Apr 17 30 z40 Apr 19 41 Jan 404 Apr 18 3934 Apr 14 21 Peoples Drug Stores--* 500 38 64% cony pret__100 Jan 104 Apr 16 86 Ayr 14 104 210 102 Jan 83 Revere Cop& Br pf _100 Apr 14 46 400 78 Apr 17 83 Standard Brands pt A.* 400 12314 Apr 20 1244 Apr 19 121% Jan 124% The Fair pref Jan 79 100 Apr 18 70 Apr 14 50 100 65 Underwood-ElliottFisher pref Jan 120 10411 Apr 16 102 210119% Apr 16 120 United Amer Bosch _ _ _ Jan 17 1,120 13 Apr 16 164 Apr 18 10 United Dyewood p1.100 Apr 16 70 Apr 20 59% Mar 70 300 65 S Express Apr 14 14 Apr 19 100', 3,200, 34 Mar 14 Linty Leaf Tob pref_100 Apr 19 1124 Jan 121 60 1194 Apr 16 121 Union Pipe & Rad p1100 10 13 Apr 18 13 Apr 18 44 Jan 17 Vadsco Sales pref__ _100 Jan 214 200 214 Apr 17 21,4 Apr 18 20 Jan 80 Webster Elsenlohr pf 100 Apr 20 65 100 75 Apr 20 75 Wilcox-Rich CIA cony * 200 2914 Apr 17 29% Apr 17 27% Jan 32 •No par value. z Ea-dividend. y Companies reported in receivership. Apr Apr Apr 18 12% Apr 17 11 Checker Cab Mfg Corp5 500 11 Chicago Yellow Cab _ _* 100 11% Apr 16 11% Apr 16 114 Collins& Alkman p1100 460 92% Apr 16 94 Apr 18 79 Colonial Beacon 011 Co' 100 8 Apr 20 8 Apr 20 8 Conde Nast PublIca'ns* 9,800 9% Apr 14 134 Apr 19 Consol Cigar prior pret x-warrants 30 584 Apr 19 59 100 Apr 16 49 Apr 17 65% Apr 20 47 Crown W'mette 1st pf-• 20 61 Cushm Sons pf(7%)100 Apr 18 804 Apr 18 85 130 85 Apr 17 79% Apr 19 684 Preferred (8%)--__ 40 76 Devoe & ReynoldsApr 16 108 100 100 108 1st preferred Apr 16: 99 Duplan Silk 600 19% Apr 16 204 Apr 20' 16% 270 7% Apr 20 Fairbks Co pref ctts _100 Apr 18 3 Florshein Shoes cl A_' 100 24 Apr 14 24 Apr 14 15 110 75 Apr 17 75 Apr 17 60 Foster Wheeler pref _• Greene Cananea Cop100 Apr 18 18 10 35 Apr 18 35 Apr 19 98 Apr 16 87 Harbisn-W Ref pref 100 40 96 Helme(G W)pret _100 10 145 Apr 18 145 Apr 18 1234 10 500 3% Apr 20 34 Apr 16 2% Indian Refining 50 1164 Apr 20 1164 Ayr 20 1167% Ingersoll-Rand pref_100 Interstate D Sts pret100 300 67 Apr 14 70 Apr 18 21% Apr 16 105 Apr 14 90 30 101 Island Ck Coal pref....1 Apr Jan Apr Apr Apr Apr Apr Feb Apr Feb Apr Ayr Mar Feb Ayr Feb Feb The Curb Exchange.—The review of the Curb Exchange is given this week on page 2693. p. A complete record of Curb Exchange transactions for the week will be found on page 2725. April 21 1934 June 16 1934... Sent. 15 l934_.. Aug. 1 1935._ Aug. 1 1934._ Dec. 15 1934...... Mar. 15 1935._ Dec. 15 1935.— Feb. 1 1938... Deo. 15 l936.__ Int. Rate. q% 134% 134% 24% 234% 24% 23407 24% 24% Bid 100 33 100nss 1011312 1000,2 10111,2 102 1021112 101882, 10288s, Asked 1001,32 10118,2 10111,2 102112 1022212 1018,s2 103,ss Maturity. Int. Rate. Bid. Apr. 15 1936._ June 15 1938_ May 2 1934... June 15 1935... Feb. 15 1937— Apr. 15 1937,... Mar.15 1988... Aug. 1 1980... Beln.15 1987 __ 234% 24% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 34% 394% 1024,31 102,022 1002,1 1021832 10218,2 10240, 10210,2 102nas 1030ss Asked. 103212 102"st 1038st 1031st 103,st 1031st 1048ss 103nn U. S. Treasury Bills—Friday, April 20. Rates quoted are for discount at purchase. Bid. Apr. 25 1934 May 2 1934 May 9 1934 May 16 1934 May 23 1934 June 20 1934 June 27 1934 July 3 1934 July 11 1934 0.15% 0.15% 0.15% 0.15% 0 15% 0.15% 0.15% 0.15% 0.15% Asked. Bid. July 18 1934 Aug. 8 1984 Aug. 15 1984 Aug. 29 1934 Sept. 5 1934 Sept. 26 1934 Oct. 3 1934 Oct. 10 1934 Oct. 17 1934 0.15% 0.20% 0.20'. 0.20% 0.20% 0.20% 0.20% 0.20% 0.200z. Asked 0.05% 0.05% 0.05% 0.0753) 0.0753) 0.10% 0.10% 0.10% United States Liberty Loan Bonds and Treasury Certificates on the New York Stock Exchange.— Below we furnish a daily record of the transactions in Liberty Loan and Treasury certificates on the New York Stock Exchange. The transactions in registered bonds are given in a footnote at the end of the tabulation Daily Record of U. S. Bond Prices. Ayr. 14 Apr. 16 Apr. 17 Apr. 18 Apr, 19 Apr.20 — -— — 1038% 103"s2 10328ss 103"st 10388n First Liberty LoanHigh 103,8ss 10388,2 10388st 103848 103"st 334% bonds of 1932-47 {Low. 103,882 10328s2 103881, 103"st 1032432 Close (First 3%,) 2 179 9 52 27 Total sales in 31,000 units. Converted4% bonds of(High Low. 1932-47 (First 4s) _ Close Total sales in $1,000 units—. .L 103"st 167" Converted 44% bondrIgh 16-3-1=L 10-3711-2 of 1932-37 (Fleet 45(e) Low. 103,,s2 103"st 10318,2 103"st 103,42 103"n Close 103"st 1038832 10328st 1038,s2 103"ss 103"u 195 3 61 107 Total sales in $1,000 units_ 31 51 Second converted 44%1111111) 102"n bonds of 1932-47(F1ret Low. --102"ss -----Second 43(a) Close __-102nst ____ Total sales in $1,000 units_ 10 -Fourth Liberty Loan -1 10-4.8;; 104812 104, ; {High 10-1 ss 104,22 104 43g% bonds of 1933-38_ Low. 104,32 1011st 103",, 103"ss 103"ss 1038822 104 104 (Fourth 43(5) Close 1048st 1048st 104,ss 104 116 77 205 Total sales in $1,000 units—. 91 92 77 Fourth Liberty 1.05n {High 102"s2 102,022 102, s2 n 102,st 102% 102, 43g% bonds (2d called)- Low. 102",, 102421 1024n 102'n 102,12 1024n Close 102",, 102, st 2s 102,2s 102,n 102,s2 102, 267 Total sales in $1,000 units_ __ 105 99 38 73 35 Treasury {High 111",, 111, st 111,st 111',, 11028,2 110,sn 4%s 1947-52 Low. 110"st 111 110"st 110"n 110"i2 110,ss 110,42, 110"st 110412 Clan 111"ss 111, ss 111 35 23 47 Total sales in $1,000 units__ 37 37 130 107,n 108"ss 108,,s2 (High 107"ss 107,n 107 4e, 1944-54 4Low. 107"ss 107,s2 108"ss 108, 41 105"ts 108, ts (Close 107"n 10742 106",, 108"ss 105,112 108, s2 83 3 Total sales in $1,000 units__. 90 458 147 29 (High 102nss 102"ss 102,n 1021%2 102, st 102,ss 1024st 102 4%s-33041943 45 Low. 102"ss 102,n 102 101"st Close 102,0n 102,12 102, ss 102,ss 102, 21 101"ss 259 Total sales in $1,000 linen_ 11 66 423 146 655 (High 105,0ss 105"ss 105"ss 105nst 1058st 104nn 331e, 1946-58 Low. 105"s2 105"22 105, n 105'n 105 104,41 (Close 101",, 105",, 105% 105"at 1058u 104"ss 30 56 Total sales in $1,000 units_ 18 100 7 33 (High 103"as 103'n 103 102ns, 10281s2 102",, 34e, 1943-47 Low_ 103",. 103 102,0s2 102"ss 102"st 102"st Close 103"s2 103,s2 102,0st 102"s2 102nn 102"s1 115 Total sales in 61,000 unite—. 402 17 93 77 9 (High 992; 99,0n 9988s2 gene 99nss 9924, as. 1951-55 Low_ 99,482 99,,st 992822 99,4” 99,0s2 9918ss Nun ge2s8 , 9954„ Close 99,4n 99nss 9918s2 Total tales in $1.000 unit...... 74 207 76 123 189 696 (High 103,0ss 103,,s2 1031s2 103"s2 1034st 102"st 330. 1940-43 Low. 10320n 1039,2 1038,2 103°,2 1022,” 102"ss Clow 103nn 103"ss 1038,2 103,0n 103 102,4n 101 Total sates in $1.000 units...40 100 123 502 21 1E118h 103,122 103",, 1038s2 103'n 1038,2 102,,ss 34s, 1941-43 Low. 103",, 103,0n 103 103,33 102842 102,4s2 Clow 1030,2 10312,2 1038,2 103,s2 10281s2 102"st Total sates in $1,000 units-__ 152 50 58 28 64 46 1HIgh 101,41 1018s2 100,832 100,,s2 10088s2 100"n 334e 1946-49. Low. 101,21 100'8,2 1001822 100"ss 1001882 100,ln Close 101,s2 100n, 100,822 100.22 1002432 100",, 36 Total sates in $1,000 units... 573 236 29 80 62 {Ftlgb 103,022 103",, 1031,2 103,32 10281u 102"ss 314s, 1941 Low 103"., 103'21 10288,2 102",, 1028822 102":1 , Close 103"n 1034 1031s2 103sst 10228,2 102"s2 Total sales in $1,000 units... 364 540 63 66 317 375 - — 1011832 1018ost 10118,2 1011,e 101"ss {High 345, 1944-46 Low.. — 101",, 101"as 10118s2 101142 101, st Close 101.1122 101,4n 10118,2 10114:2 101, s2 Total sales in $1,000 units__ 983 1508 399 559 530 Note.—The above table includes only sales of coupon bonds. Transactions in registered bonds were: 1 14 26 3 4 First 414s Fourth 434s (uncalled) Fourth 44s (2nd called) Treasury 334s 1943/1047 Treasury 314s, 1941 103",, to 103"st 1038,12 to 1038812 1028st to 10218s, 10218st to 102"ss 103112 to 10341 Foreign Exchange. To-day's (Friday's) actual rates for sterling exchange were 8.18405.17/4 for checks and 5.1544454 for cables. Commercial on banks: Sight. 5.17; 60 days, 5.1636; 00 days. 5.16; and documents for payment, 60 days. 5.164. Cotton for payment 5.17%. To-day's (Friday's) actual rates for Paris bankers' francs were 6.82%@ 6.6636 for short. Amsterdam bankers' guilders were 68.00@68.34. Exchange for Paris on London, 77.70; week's range, 78.27 francs high and 77.70 francs low. Sterling. Actual— Checks, Cables. High for the week 5.1734 5.17% Low for the week 5.13 5.1334 Paris Bankers'Francs— High for the week 6.6636 6.66% Low for the week 6.5934 6.5936 German Bankers' Marks— High for the week 39.72 39.73 Low for the week 39.37 39.40 Amsterdam Bankers'Guilders— High for the week 68.34 68.37 Low for the Week 67.65 67.68 1 2707 Report of Stock Sales-New York Stock Exchange DAILY, WEEKLY AND YEARLY Occupying Altogether Eight Pages-Page One Or FOR SALES DURING THE WEEK OF STOCKS NOT RECORDED IN THIS LIST. SEE PAGE PRECEDING. NOTICE.-Cash and deferred delivery sales are disregarded In the day's range, unless they are the only transactions of the day. sales In computing the range for the year. HIGII AND LOIV SALE PRICES-PER SHARE. NOT PER CENT. Saturday Apr. 14. Monday Apr. 16. Tuesday Apr. 17. Wednesday Apr. 18. Thursday Apr. 19. Friday Apr. 20. $ Per share $ per share $ per share $ per share $ per share $ per share 6812 6878 6634 6914 6714 6812 6834 694 6914 7034 6934 7212 8634 8634 8638 8714 86 86 8614 86 8538 8638 8534 87 .474 48 47 48 4614 4634 47 4912 50 484 4812 50 2914 2914 2834 2934 284 2918 2914 2958 2912 30 29 304 *32 33 32 32 3112 32 32 3234 33 3312 3312 3312 4414 4414 .43 441, .434 44 44 4412 4412 4412 4412 4412 108 108 .106 109 - 109 109 *10612 10834 10834 109 109 110 *14 18 .1414 18 1712 .14 1414 1414 *14 16 .15 154 *6 634 6 6 *558 612 .6 612 638 612 678 7 *43 4712 .44 4712 *44 4618 4618 4714 4734 494 50 5212 31 31 294 31 3012 3112 314 3378 3412 3512 35 37 .8414 87 84 84 .8812 89 87 87 88 88 88 89 1658 1634 1638 1634 164 1678 1658 1678 1612 164 164 174 *88 92 *88 92 .88 92 .88 92 .88 92 .88 92 *76 90 75 75 *73 79 *72 79 •73 80 .73 80 4612 4634 4558 4658 4534 4658 4634 474 47 4712 4714 474 412 412 .4 434 *4 434 *4 412 412 434 *4 434 *5 512 *5 512 .512 512 *54 54 .54 538 512 *5 .432 412 *414 434 .414 434 438 43* 414 434 43s 438 •1078 11 1078 1078 *1012 1078 *1012 11 *1078 1118 11 113*1 612 65* •612 634 612 612 612 634 638 612 634 6$4 11 11 1012 11 1158 1118 1184 1034 104 1058 104 11 1314 1314 127s 1338 124 1314 134 1312 1314 1358 1318 13341 *2334 2434 2312 2312 23,2 23,2 2312 24 2334 2412 2358 2514 412 434 412 412 *412 434 434 434 412 412 412 434 *74 8 734 8 73:4 712 734 8 712 712 734 734 638 612 612 612 .612 97, 8634 672 612 672 632 612 .3512 3612 3512 3512 35 35 3612 3612 3412 3412 3612 3612 2914 30 2812 2812 28 28 28 28 28 *2714 29 28 263* 2638 2512 2512 .23 2234 23 *23 25 25 25 30 434 434 434 434 5 434 434 5 .5 5 44 5 •518 8 *614 8 6 6 .7 8 8 8 .634 8 6512 6512 64 6534 64 64 65 6512 6712 6512 6512 67 28 2818 2712 28 284 2814 27 2858 2814 2914 2818 2938 1014 1014 104 1012 101s 1012 11 11 1114 1114 1114 1114 22 2212 2114 22 214 224 2278 2314 2212 2314 2258 2312 .2614 2712 *2814 27 2614 2634 2734 2712 2818 2712 2818 26 .2058 2112 20 2058 20 20 2232 2234 224 2012 22 .21 2834 2834 2758 2834 28 3038 29 29 2912 2858 2934 29 •13I2 1412 *13 15 .13 15 1412 1412 15 14 .13 14 •3358 3514 33 33 3412 344 353* 31 34 31 .3212 34 *78 j •78 1 1 *78 1 1 *78 112 1 1 14 *832 9 832 858 878 87* 812 812 878 9 878 87s 32 3214 3114 3238 314 32 32 3234 3238 3338 3258 3334 .4138 45 .40 45 *4212 45 *40 42 45 42 *41 45 *62 6512 62 6414 6414 63 62 63 *6158 63 .62 63 .2114 2212 2112 2112 *2112 22 22 2212 .2134 2234 2258 2258 9 9 812 9 812 9 94 934 914 94 914 958 1634 1634 1512 16 16 1652 1634 1714 16 1512 1512 16 *21 23 21 2312 2212 23 21 22 .2012 24 22 22 .1834 19 1814 1834 1812 19 1834 1912 1878 1958 1834 19 6212 8013 6012 6018 6018 5912 5934 6038 604 6078 62 61 2712 28 29 29 31 31 31 31 31 .29 30 30 *1658 1712 1612 1612 1634 1634 173s 1714 1712 1712 1712 17 91 *738 912 41488 92 *888 912 *878 912 *878 *858 10 its *1 *78 118 118 *4 l's .1 1 1 •78 1,8 •212 234 212 212 .212 3 212 212 24 258 .212 3 *334 518 . 378 54 . 54 518 44 54 *414 54 *334 54 634 634 .512 612 .512 7 *512 634 614 614 .512 7 .1134 12 114 1134 12 1218 1212 1214 1278 1218 1234 1214 .28 2814 2712 2812 28 2834 3012 3014 32 3118 32 29 44 474 44 44 434 434 458 458 434 5 434 44 734 778 712 734 8 814 8 712 734 838 734 814 .40 43 .40 40 43 .38 •38 40 .38 43 42 43 134 13: .134 2 *134 2 *134 2 *134 2 .134 2 *58 34 *58 34 *5s 34 *12 34 . *58 12 14 34 3512 36 3458 3614 3458 3538 3514 36 3558 3658 354 3634 23 23 .2134 2234 .22 2312 24 2414 25 2278 2212 23 3212 324 3158 3218 32 3458 36 3234 34 3538 3714 32 .12334 130 .12314 130 *125 130 •125 130 *125 130 125 1264 184 19 1834 1912 19 1958 184 1834 184 1834 184 1914 *31 3134 2914 31 3274 3234 3414 2912 3012 3014 3112 32 953 958 914 912 *912 934 958 934 94 978 *934 10 *14 114 .1 114 .1 114 114 •118 .118 1 114 1 *212 234 25* 24 .258 24 3 4 334 44 278 278 17972 180 17913 180 182 182 .181 18134 17914 17912 180 181 *94_ .94 _ 9414 9412 94 94 9412 9412 94 9414 334 -34-18 3212 -34" 33 3438 344 351: 3438 3512 3452 3614 412 412 .414 412 .414 412 414 412 5 414 5 512 *7 8 *618 8 8 8 612 658 8 1014 934 1114 .358 412 .358 412 *334 412 5 512 412 412 5/ 1 4 614 3518 35,2 3418 3538 3414 344 35 351g 3618 3.553 344 38 . 552 758 558 551: *51. 814 .512 714 *512 714 *512 714 .2712 30 29 29 .27 2104 2934 2934 3034 3034 31 31 3712 3712 .3712 _ 4:3814 41 44 404 42 *44 _ 45 29 29 2912 -29-12 *261.3 33 .29 -31-1-8 33 34 35 3812 4 4 414 414 414 412 51: 514 434 538 44 44 87s 878 9 958 94 1012 104 1238 1212 143* 1258 134 24 24 *24 3812 *2418 3812 .2478 3812 *2412 3818 •2412 3818 .5112 5212 *51 12 53 .51 53 5132 5184 514 514 5112 52 *37 3712 37'2 37'2 *3712 3878 *3734 3878 3812 3878 •38 40 *3412 37 .3412 37 .3412 37 3778 3772 *37 37 3912 37 .1012 16 .1012 15 .1012 15 *1012 15 *1012 15 *1012 15 4 4 378 4 4 4 418 418 .412 414 4 4 54 514 .5 512 5 538 512 5 5 514 54 518 .2012 24 *18 22 .18 22 .18 22 *18 22 .18 22 112 112 14 112 14 138 138 112 112 112 13s 112 .258 274 *258 278 *258 272 *212 24 *212 278 212 258 28 2814 274 285s: 2714 28 1 4 29314 2912 28/ 28 2858 28 325* 3234 3134 3234 3112 323s 325s 3314 32 3312 33 3438 38 38 37 38 37 3734 3734 3918 3812 3934 381 4 4012 *44 46 •427s 46 *4312 4412 4412 441. 4612 4612 4734 4734 .334 35 3312 3312 .31 3312 .31 35 - 35 3534 35 35 *6 7 .614 7 •618 6 634 7 714 714 714 738 312 418 4 412 4 4 414 44 4 418 *312 4 204 2274 2218 2438 22 224 22 23 21 21 21 21 *131 132 132 133 132 132 132 133 132 132 13034 13312 *814 8214 8214 823s 81 8212 8212 81 82 82 82 82 334 4 *334 4 .358 4 4 4 43* 414 . 41s 414 812 7 7 614 638 7 658 634 •658 7 618 658 1512 1534 1453 154 153* 1514 1512 1558 1512 1618 1552 1578 .20 20 213* 20 2034 2034 .19 2112 2012 2012 2012 2012 6,8 61 3 614 614 6,4 614 638 61^ 614 612 614 614 13 131s 1278 13 1234 13 14 - 1358 141: 134 1438 13 •I1111 and, naked prices, no sales on this day. Sales for the Week. STOCKS NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE. h No account is taken of suc PER SHARE Range Since Jan. 1. On Oasts of 100-share lots. Lowest. Highest. PER SHARE Range for Previous Year 1933 Lowest. Highest. $ Per share $ per share $ per share Par $ per share Railroads 345s Feb 8018 July Atch Topeka & Santa Fe 100 54 Jan 6 7334 Feb 5 50 Apt 7934 June Preferred 100 7018 Jan 5 8714 Apr 16 1612 Feb 59 July Atlantic Coast Line RU... 100 39 Jan 6 5414 Feb 16 84 Feb 374 July Baltimore & Ohio 100 22,4 Jan 4 3412 Feb 5 912 Apt 3914 July Preferred 100 2412 Jan 9 3738 Feb 6 20 Jan 4134 Dec Bangor & Aroostook 50 3912 Jan 9 4618 Feb 1 6852 Jan 110 Aug Preferred 100 9518 Jan 5 110 Apr 20 100 11 Jan 11 1912 Feb 5 6 Apr 30 July Boston de Maine 312 Mar 838 Feb 7 478 Jan 8 Brooklyn & Queens Tr_No pal 93* July 3534 Apr 601g July 41 Jan 18 5212 Apr 20 No par Preferred Bklyn Mash Transit_ _.No pa. 2814 Mar 27 37 Apr 20 2134 Feb 4114 July 64 Mat 8312 June 8218 Jan 4 89 Apr 19 $13 preferred series A_No par 712 Apr 204 July Canadian Pacific 1234 Jan 2 1814 Mar 12 25 5014 Apr 7912 July Caro Clinch & Ohio stpd__100 70 Jan 6 88 Mar 14 38 Apr 122 July 100 Central RR of New Jersey.100 70 Jan 15 92 Feb 3 2452 Feb 25 3912 Jan 5 474 Apr 12 4914 Aug 19,700 Chesapeake & Ohlo 23* Jan 15 7 Feb 17 8 July 12 Apr 200 :Chic & East III Ry Co____100 8 Feb 16 100 178 Jan 9 6% preferred 12 Apr 812 July 512 Feb 1 Ps July 278 Jan 3 1CO 800 Chicago Great Western 13* Api 212 Apr 1474 July 614 Jan 4 114 Feb 19 100 500 Preferred 812 Feb 5 1134 July 1 Apr 414 Jan 2 2,700 Chic Milw St P & Pac__No pa, 64 Jan 8 1314 Feb 5 112 Feb 100 1814 July 9.000 ' Preferred 16 July 858 Jan 3 15 Feb 5 114 Apt 14,500 Chicago & North Western 100 Apr 3434 July 2 100 1314 Jan 3 28 Feb 16 Preferred 2,500 Apr 614 Feb 7 104 July 234 Jan 3 1,700 :Chicago Rock led & Pacific100 2 100 458 Jan 3 95s Feb 6 1912 July 312 Apt 1,100 7% preferred 8 Feb 6 15 July 34 Jan 2 278 Apt 100 900 6% preferred 100 27 Jan 4 4038 Feb 1 51 July 1514 Feb 80 Colorado & Southern 100 20 Jan 4 3314 Feb 9 4214 July 1212 Apr 4% let preferred 300 100 20 Jan 12 30 Feb 3 10 Mat 30 July 110 4% 2d preferred 634 Feb 5 114 Feb 1058 June 212 Jan 5 1,200 Consol RR of Cuba pref. _100 212 Jan 100 16 June 3,4 Jan 15 1012 Jan 23 70 Cuba RR 6% pref 100 53 Jan 5 7312 Feb 1 3752 Feb 9334 July 2,000 Delaware & Hudson 46 July 7,900 Delaware Lack & Western_50 2212 Jan 6 3334 Feb 5 1714 Feb 534 Jan 19 1314 Mar 28 2 Feb 1934 July 5,800 Deny tk Rio Or West pref 100 10( 334 Apr 2534 July 137* Jan 8 2474 Feb 5 4,900 Erie 100 18 Jan 3 281s Mar 14 412 Apr First preferred 2912 July 2,500 212 Apr 100 12 Jan 3 2278 Apr 20 2314 July 1,400 Second preferred 1851 Jan 4 3212 Feb 5 100 3334 July 44 Apr 20,900 Great Northern pref 1614 Feb 20 572 Jan 10 134 Ma: 1112 July 300 Gulf Mobile & Northern 100 3534 Feb 21 100 15 Jan 11 2312 July 212 Mai Preferred 900 4 Feb 13 600 Havana Electric Ry Co No par 32 Dec 112 Jan 23 234 June 100 712 Jan 2 124 Feb 7 612 July 19 June 1,500 Hudson & Manhattan 100 2812 Jan 8 3878 Feb 5 812 Apt 5034 July 6,500 Illinois Central 16 Mat 6014 July 100 35 Jan 13 4912 Jan 30 100 8% pref series A Leased lines 100 4834 Jan 5 6412 Apr 11 170 31 Mat 60 July 412 Apr RR See rile serles A__100( 34 July 174 Jan 8 2414 Feb 6 70 74 Mar 31 418 Feb 1334 Jan 2 1334 Dec 3,100 :Interb, ro RapIdTran etc 100 1,500 Kansas City Southern 101 244 July 11 Jan 8 1914 Jan 16 612 Feb Fret: rred 100 1534 Jan 5 26 Feb 10 z12 Mat 3414 July 1,000 4,400 Lehigh Valley 50 13 Jan 4 2114 Feb 5 2734 July 858 Feb 2114 Jan 3,100 Loul2,11 r & Nashville.. _,100 484 Jan 4 6212 Apr 20 6758 July 290 :Manhattan Ry 7% guar _100 20 Jan 3 32I251ar 29 12 Mat 28 Oct Mod 5‘.7 guar 2,900 100 15 Jan 3 1958 Jan 12 6 Jan 20 Oct Market r ‘ t Ry prior pref. _100 44 Jan 16 107g Mar 16 14 Mat 8 June 12 Jan 11 las Mar 28 100 :Minneapolis & St Louis..100 4 Jan 214 July 300 Minn St Paul & SS Marle_100 12 Ma: 358 Feb 8 578 July 178 Jan 2 818 Apr 20 134 Jan 8 100 7% preferred 100 812 July 14 Api 712 mar 10 212 Dec 4% leased line Ws 100 1412 July 312 Jan 2 100 8 Jan 2 144 Feb 5 514 Jan 174 July 4,200 Mo-Kan-Texas RR_ ___No pa: Preferred series A 6,400 1112 Jan 100 3714 July 1734 Jan 5 343s Feb 6 1,400 :Missouri Pacific 100 3 Jan 2 14 Ats 6 Feb 5 1014 July Cone preferred 412 Jan 3 100 934 Feb 1 4,400 158 Apr 1514 July 50 Nashville Chatt & St Louis 100 32 Jan 2 46 Jan 24 Jan 57 July 13 214 Feb 23 10 Nat Rys of Meg 1st 4% pf _100 312 June 1 18 Jan 22 4 Mar 2d preferred 100 1 Mar 7 38 Jan 5 la,, June 4 Jan 100 3112 Jan 6 4514 Feb 5 14 Feb 41,100 New '1 ork Central 581? July 900 NY Chic & St Louis Co...100 15 Jan 3 2534 Feb 23 2758 Aug 218 Jan Preferred series A 100 1712 Jan 3 3714 Apr 20 25g Apt 344 July 8.900 20 N Y & Harlem 50 108 Jan 2 139 Feb 1 100 Mar 15834 June 11,600 N Y N H & Hartford Ills Feb 108 344 Ju'Y 1414 Jan 3 24Ig Feb 5 Cony preferred Apt 56 July 100 2312 Jan 6 3758 Feb 5 7,700 18 8 Jan 5 11'38 Feb 5 900 N Y Ontarlo & western...100 712 Dec 15 July 312 July 18 Hat 1 Mar 21 100 NY Railways pref..... _. No psi 134 Jan 16 44 Apr 20 472 July 7,000 :Norfolk Southern 114 Jan 3 100 12 Apt 100 161 Jan 5 182 Apr 19 1114 Mat 177 July 1,800 Norfolk & Western Adjust 4% pref 270 74 May 8712 Sept 10 82 Jan 8 9412 Apr 10 344 July 93* Apr 25,300 Northern Paeltle 21I Jan 6 3634 Apr 11 10( Jan 7 July 1 2 Jan 4 980 Pacific Coast _ IO 6e Mar 14 lot preferred 10 July 2,400 33g Jan 19 1114 Apr 20 158 Feb Vo par 7 July Feb 1 2d preferred Vo par 2 Jall 3 1,010 612 Mar 14 4214 July 19,400 Pennsylvania 1334 Jan 5( 2914 Jan 4 3778 Feb 19 9 July 4 Feb 100 Peoria & Eastern 108 8 Feb 17 4 Jan 16 37 July 400 Pere Marquette 378 Mai 16,2 Jan 10 33 Feb 6 100 500 Prior preferred Jan 4412 July 6 18 Jan 13 45 Apr 20 10( 3812 July 1,000 44 Pet ...10( 1612 Jan 10 3612 Apr 20 578 July 610 Philadelphia Rap Tran Co50 2 June 3 Feb 8 538 Apr 19 3 Dec 10 July 412 Jan 12 1438 Apr 19 1.790 7% preferred 50 612 Apr 3534 July 100 Pittsburgh 48 West Virginia 10(1 15 Jan 3 27 Feb 21 400 Reading. 6212 July 2312 Ara 50 43 Jan 2 5632 Feb 5 1s5 preferred 38 July 400 25 Apr 3378 Feb 7 384 Apr 19 5( 200 2312 Mar 2d preferred 37 July 374 Apr 19 5( 294 Jan 11 Rutland RR 7% pref Jet 15 10( Feb 7 8 Jan 4 6 1858 July 1,200 :St Louls-San Francisco_ 10( 74 Jac 452 Feb 6 93s July 23s Jan 2 2,000 1st preferred.. ___ 914 July 1 Apt 10 618 Apr 4 214 Jan 4 St Louis Southwestern.. .10 22 July 1212 Jan 19 20 Mar 8 514 Mal 1,300 :Seaboard Air Line____No - pa 2 Feb 6 3 July 1 Jan 2 14 Jar 200 Preferred 38 Has 44 July 100 314 Feb 21 134 Jan 11 31,300 Southern Pacific Co 3834 July Illg Feb 10( 1812 Jan 5 3334 Feb 5 18,000 Southern Railway 100 2334 Jan 6 3612 Feb 5 418 Ma: 38 July 7,400 Preferred 100 49 July 2734 Jan 6 404 Feb 5 574 Jan 300 Mobile & Ohio stk Cr cap 100 39 Jan 19 4734 Apr 20 Ir Jan 4014 July 1,000 Texas & Pacific Ry Co_ _.I00 181 / 4 Jan 3 4314 Feb 1 15 Apr 43 July 1,200 Third Avenue 100 6 Mar 1 124 June 418 Feb 814 Jan 12 4,200 Twin City Rapid Trans Nips' 138 Jan 10 412 Apr 16 434 June 54 Dec 2,550 Preferred 101 8 Jan 12 2438 Apr 16 15 June 412 Dee 3,400 ITnIon Pacific 10b 11012 Jan 4 1334 Apr 11 6114 Apr 132 July 1,600 Preferred .100 7134 Jan 18 8312 Feb 17 7512 July 56 Am 800 :Wabash 100 214 Jan 5 44 Jan 30 712 July 1 12 Jan 2,600 Preferred A 10( 34 Jan 2 752 Apr 11 974 July 1Is Apt 6,700 Western Maryland 100 834 Jan 2 1714 Feb 20 16 July 4 Fet 500 2d preferred 10(1 12 Jan 9 23 Feb 20 1912 July 53* Jar. 1,300 Wertern Pacific 10( 234 Jan 2 912 July Apr 832 Mar 29 1 101 458 Jan 5 1712Mar 28 8.000 Preferred le July 174 Mar Shares. 27,000 2,200 3,600 18,400 1,800 600 130 100 1,300 1,500 53,100 1,300 19,600 ICompanies reported In receivership. a Optional sale. c Cash sale. 801,1 15 days. r Ex-dIvIdend. y Ex-rights. New York Stock Record-Continued-Page 2 2708 tar HIGH AND LOW SALE PRICES-PER SHARE'. NOT PER CENT. Saturday Apr. 14. April 21 1934 FOR SALES DURING THE,WEEK OF STOCKS NOT RECORDED IN THIS LIST. SEE SECOND PAGE PRECEDING. Monday Apr. 16. Tuesday Apr. 17. L5 per share 5 per share $ per share 934 934 933 934 934 9'2 •7514 - - 7514 7514 *7412 _ _ 3112 -323114 32 3134 -3212 10 10 94 978 978 978 *614 7 *618 612 612 612 778 8 758 734 778 74 9838 99 98 98 984 9812 *258 278 278 278 3 3 21 2114 2012 21. 2058 2078 558 618 *5 *5 618 *5 3i8 34 318 3[4 318 314 12 1358 1218 13 13 14 11 1112 *1012 1114 1114 12 1034 1034 1012 1012 1112 12 *2118 24 2118 214 *21 23 150 150 14812 14912 152 152 *12612 129 .1264 12778 •12612 12758 194 1914 1978 1912 1938 19 •1518 16 *1518 1512 1518 1518 Wednesday I Thursday Apr. 18. Apr. 19. Friday Apr. 20. 8 per share 5 per share $ per share 958 10 8 934 1018 934 10 *75 . 7712 7712 7514 7514 3112 32 -3134 3218 232 . -324 1014 1038 10 1038 10 10 64 7 *614 634 64 634 712 734 738 712 714 74 99 100 98 9914 9812 994 278 3 278 278 *234 278 204 2114 1978 2114 2018 21 558 54 *5 578 *6 614 318 314 318 314 318 338 1312 1412 1334 1414 1312 1412 1212 1314 1214 1314 1234 13 1212 13 12 1212 1212 1314 23 23 *21 *21 23 *21 152 15214 15112 15212 15112 152 12738 12758 •126 12712 *12612 12712 1978 2014 1934 2038 1912 204 1538 1538 1534 1578 154 1512 55; 54 534 54 *512 534 *37 3934 3934 *37 3934 *37 5258 5212 5234 5112 5234 52 294 31 3134 3378 334 34 20 2014 20 2112 2178 23 49 4838 4838 4878 49 494 1134 124 124 1238 1112 12 68 67 6734 6612 674 67 32 3212 3212 3212 3212 31 110 11012 11012 11012 *108 11012 10334 105 104 1044 10234 104 1444 14434 14414 14414 *143 145 2714 2818 2818 2858 2814 284 53 52 52 84 834 *834 9 1038 9 *28 31 304 3018 3034 34 5812 60 57 5812 *5812 59 "438 5 *412 5 *458 5 4834 50 4912 5034 49 50 312 353 338 312 *312 334 *734 812 *734 812 *74 8'2 10 1058 10 1038 104 104 244 2518 2412 2512 2314 25 578 578 *578 64 *534 578 3812 "3714 3934 *3312 3978 38 5014 5014 4912 5018 4912 5012 2914 2914 2914 2912 2834 2834 1914 1918 1912 •191; 195; 19 49 49 48 49 *4712 4834 1212 1238 1118 1238 1112 12 6814 7018 63 6714 6334 6618 32 32 *3112 32 304 3112 •110 11714 *110_ _ •110 --_ 10434 1044 10212 1-6458 10212 104 "14118 14512 *14114 14512 *14312 14512 *28 2778 274 2814 2712 28 *5012 52 *9 934 *834 9 *834 934 *26 31 *2514 31 *2514 31 57 554 554 *56 56 56 *5 512 5 5 458 458 4912 4912 48 504 *4812 4912 34 338 35; 34 "314 34 •758 834 *712 84 *74 814 934 10 1014 1038 978 1014 2412 2412 2414 2414 •2312 24 1378 14 1358 1414 1378 1378 1414 144 1412 1434 1412 15 20 20 2034 2034 204 204 1938 2034 1953 195; 1934 21 •18 1812 18 18 18 18 184 1812 1853 1858 1814 1853 9 9 .812 9 *9 *812 918 9 9 938 *834 914 40 40 *39 3978 39 39 3912 3912 40 40 404 40 3414 3434 34 3412 3418 3412 3434 35 3514 3534 3514 3553 834 9 834 834 834 84 9 9 918 9 878 9 *4234 4412 *4234 4412 *4234 4412 *43 4412 *4258 4312 4312 4312 *834 878 812 9 812 834 838 9 853 9 834 918 14 118 118 118 118 1 1 1,8 1 *1 1,2 1 *7 712 6,2 653 618 618 7 7 778 778 *54 578 *3318 3412 3234 3314 .33 3314 3312 34 3312 3414 34 3418 *6912 7012 *6834 70 7012 6812 69 704 70 6934 6934 70 17 1714 1634 1718 16 17 1753 21634 1714 17 164 17 *618 834 612 634 638 812 612 612 634 634 834 634 2514 2512 2278 2514 2318 2412 2412 2518 24 2414 26 25 •8612 90 89 *8612 89 *8612 89 89 89 89 *8612 89 3014 3012 2912 3018 2912 2912 29 3012 3034 30 2912 30 9 914 812 9 84 93; 838 9 9 914 918 912 27 254 26 28 2712 284 2512 2614 2514 2512 2534 28 2412 2378 2512 23 2112 2112 2112 2212 2112 2112 2134 24 1512 1578 1553 16 1534 16 1512 16 1518 1578 1514 1534 24 2458 2334 2412 2334 2478 2414 2412 2338 2438 2338 24 *5058 5112 51 5278 51 51 51 5112 5158 5112 5112 *52 5 , 8 55; 538 51 *514 5'2 / 4 *538 5'2 514 614 518 518 112 158 *14 158 112 *112 158 112 112 112 14 14 25 26 2634 26 2412 2412 25 *24 25 25 2418 25 4412 4514 43 4434 4258 4334 4314 4414 4318 4412 4314 4414 120 120 *120 12212 12134 12134 12134 12212 12112 12112 120 121 9434 *9014 9412 .92 9412 9412 9312 9338 *92 931 / 4 *9212 931 1 56 5614 5534 56 5512 5512 5534 5534 5512 56,4 5534 56 *114_ •115 __ •11518 130 .11518 . _ *11518 130 *11518 130 194 -2-012 20 21 -2-1.2014 2038 -2120 2012 2053 2118 75 *73 75 75 *71 7334 7334 721.4 74 754 7612 774 41 41 *4012 41 404 4012 *4012 41 4078 4078 4078 4112 5213 5053 5134 53 5112 5234 5112 5214 52 5234 52 .53 111 11134 11212 11278 11334 11334 *10978 111 "11018 111 11078 111 18 1812 1912 181, 181* 1858 1838 1812 181* 18 1812 18 120 12012 11878 1204 119 12138 12138 12312 12214 12358 12258 12378 7214 7214 7134 7134 72 71 6934 7014 71 *71 7114 70 71 74 72 72 7434 73 7234 7314 7118 73 7314 7334 120 120 *1204 122 *12038 122 120 120 *11914 120 •11812 120 0 9 94 1012 9 914 958 84 914 94 94 *9 20 21 2212 2412 2512 21 21 2014 2138 20 1914 20 2034 2118 2038 21 2134 2014 2078 2012 2102 2078 2138 21 78 76 .72 •72 76 7634 *72 7518 7634 7734 7734 78 15 15 1414 15 1438 144 1412 1514 1412 1478 1438 15 774 7712 7818 77 76 7712 *7514 7712 7712 78 77 77 353 358 338 312 / 4 3'2 31 / 4 3'2 31 / 4 312 *31 338 34 1318 1312 1338 12 1234 1212 1212 1234 1314 1234 13 .13 818 838 74 74 *74 8 7,2 778 *738 778 *712 818 *43 49 49 *4612 50 *4612 4878 .45 4512 46 49 *39 1612 1612 1678 1638 1634 1614 1714 16 1578 17 1658 17 1114 11 *11 *11 12 1112 11 12 11 1214 11 *11 22 24 21 2112 2134 2134 22 2158 2138 2034 2112 21 9812 9812 99 9912 9912 99 96 100 06 96 96 96 3212 *324 3212 3218 3234 32 3134 32 33 324 3314 32 _ _ *11312 1147s •11312 11478 *114 11478 11478 115 '115.. *115 90 9012 9034 91 91 904 903-4 91 -91-4 9012 9012 91 64 714 738 734 678 712 714 7 712 753 71z 712 312 314 34 334 312 358 3:/ 1 4 358 314 334 34 334 7414 7114 7312 7212 7312 6858 7418 7014 7318 724 7434 72 612 678 658 634 658 678 612 653 612 612 *612 7 8 8 FI 778 9 8 834 94 912 104 *818 812 218 21 / 4 218 24 24 24 214 21 212 / 4 238 238 •214 16 1678 1714 1612 17 1653 1634 1714 1634 1714 164 1712 74 *74 78 74 74 74 7518 7712 78 73 .74 73 644 *60 6478 824 6478 644 *5618 644 .58 *56 *58 65 40 40 .4012 4212 *4013 4212 40 40 *39 *39 40 .39 .1478 22 *1478 22 •1478 22 *14 20 20 *14 20 .14 2978 2878 2934 2912 2912 294 29 2912 29 2912 2978 29 .51 5212 5112 5112 5012 50 5034 5112 5012 51 *5012 54 •9812 100 •100 10112 *100 10112 10138 10112 10012 10112 2101 101 1234 13 1234 .1212 1234 *1212 13 •12 13 •1218 13 .12 5114 52 4714 5233 48 494 4414 484 434 4512 494 49 1438 15 .1412 1434 1412 1478 1412 1412 134 1414 1378 14 858 1.1 878 914 812 9 878 9 884 9 878 94 1358 14 14 1412 144 144 • 144 1438 14 1414 1334 14 5933 5978 60 6412 62 62 6312 64 61,8 5912 61 61 9512 *9412 9512 *9412 9515 9512 *93 9512 *94 9512 *90 .90 512 5,2 5'4 514 534 54 558 584 512 538 578 578 36 3612 36 36 38 36 374 3778 3612 3653 *35 *34 878 94 878 9,4 84 84 84 938 84 918 918 94 34 3412 32 3314 3312 34 34 3312 3312 34 *3418 37 95 95 *9034 95 95 95 *9034 95 •9034 96 *9034 96 1434 15 1412 1434 .14 154 1514 1618 1578 18 •1434 15 8518 8518 *8314 85 8418 8418 85 8312 8312 8312 *82 *82 66 66 67 6814 65 *66 65 66 66 6814 •65 *65 1414 1412 1438 1412 1414 1518 1418 1438 1353 1414 1378 1414 _ *116i4 _ .*11638 11634 11714 •11312- 11412 11412 *11478 181; 11;1 8 1853 19I 1818 1834 184 -1-8-34 1834 179. 1834 -1-917 1738 1634 1738 17 164 1718 1634 1678 1634 1634 17 .Bid and asked prices, no sales on this day. Sales for the Week. STOCKS NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE. Lowest. Shares. Industrial & Mlacel. Par Vo pat 8,900 Adams Express 100 160 Preferred No par 6,000 Adams Millis 10 2,300 Address Multigr Corp 1,800 Advance Rumely No par 4,900 Affiliated Products Inc.No par No par 3,300 Air Reduction Inc 1,500 Air Way Elea Appliance No par 46,000 Alaska Juneau Gold M112- --10 No par 100 A P W Paper Co No par 38,200 Allegheny Corp Fret A with $30 warr___100 9,200 2,400 Fret A with $40 warr__100 _100 Pref A without 2,500 No par 100 Allegheny Steel Co warr_1,900 Allied Chemical & Dye_No par 100 100 Preferred 8,800 Allis-Chalmers Mfg____No par .500 Alpha Portland Cement No par 1 700 Amalgam Leather Co 50 200 7% preferred No par 5,900 Amerada Corp 10,400 Amer Agri° Chem (Del) No par 10 8,200 American Bank Note 50 330 Preferred 3,100 American Beet Sugar__No par 100 1,530 7% preferred 1,300 Am Brake Shoe & Fdy _No par 110 100 Preferred 25 9.800 American Can 100 Preferred 200 1,800 American Car & Fdy___No par 800 100 Preferred 900 American Chain No par 100 7% preferred 600 1,500 American Chicle No par 10 200 Amer Colortype Co 3,400 Am Comml Alcohol Corp 20 1,000 Amer Encaustic TIling_No par Amer European Sec's__No par 12,600 Amer dr Forn Power..__No par 1,900 No par Preferred No par 2nd preferred 2,100 1,600 No par $6 preferred 900 Amer Hawaiian S S Co____10 300 Amer Hide & Leather.No par 100 1,000 Preferred 1 3,900 Amer Horne Products 3,900 American Ice No par 100 6% non-cum pref 100 3.900 Amer Internal Corp___No par 1,100 Am L France & Foamlte No par 100 Preferred 90 2,200 American Locomotive__No par 1,200 100 Preferred 5,500 Amer Mach & Fdry Co_No par 1,000 Amer Mach Ac Metals__No par 8,400 Amer Metal Co Ltd___No par 100 200 8% cony preferred 730 Amer News Co Inc____No par 17,900 Amer Power & Light__No par No pat 7,200 56 Preferred 8,300 No par 55 preferred 32,800 Am Rad de Stand San'y No par 14,400 American Rolling Mill 25 500 American Safety Razor No par 1,000 American Seating v I o_No pa 900 Amer Ship & Comm___No par 210 Amer Shipbuilding Co_No par 23,400 Amer Smelting & Relii_No par 100 Preferred 1,000 400 2nd preferred 6% cum_ _ _100 2,000 American Snuff 25 100 Preferred 5.900 Amer Steel Foundries_No pat 100 Preferred 370 No par 900 American Store* 100 3,700 Amer Sugar Refining 100 700 Preferred 2.100 Am Sumatra Tobacco__No par 100 28,500 Amer Telep At Teleg 25 2,500 American Tobacco 25 Common class B 24,500 400 100 Preferred 1,700 2 Ara Type Founders.__No par 100 Preferred 770 27,600 Am Water Wk* & Elec_No par 181 preferred 600 No par 3,100 2,200 2,600 1,600 1,100 200 59,900 900 2,600 170 2,300 30 1,800 94,000 26,400 60.800 2,000 3,930 800 6,900 900 300 50 18,500 900 80 200 36,100 1,700 35,600 24,200 3,200 1,500 670 18,000 900 30 10,600 400 500 14,900 300 13,100 4,400 PER SHARE Range Since Jan. 1. On hasty of 100-share lots. $ per share 658 Jan 8 7014 Jan 25 16 Jan 5 734 Jan 5 518 Feb 10 618 Jan 13 9334Mar 27 14 Jan 3 1914 Mar 1 5 Jan 13 234 Mar 16 578 Jan 4 558 Jan 3 514 Jan 6 1712 Jan 2 144 Jan 8 12218 Jan 16 1612 Jan 8 124 Jan 2 4 Jan 15 25 Jan 6 4112 Jan 4 254 Jan 4 1412 Jan 4 40 Jan 4 712 Jan 4 4612 Jan 4 28 Jan 5 96 Jan 10 9418 Jan 5 12612 Jan 6 2314 Jan 8 3814 Jan 8 612 Jan 11 2012 Jan 10 4814 Jan 8 34 Jan 29 47 Mar 27 233 Jan 8 6 Jan 3 734 Jan 3 17 Jan 4 934 Jan 4 12 Jan 4 1714 Jan 5 714 Jan 12 304 Jan 8 2618 Jan 5 618 Jan 4 3514 Jan 8 612 Jan 8 84 Jan 5 4 Jan 18 2614 Jan 4 50 Jan 8 13 Jan 4 314 Jan 3 18 Jan 4 73 Jan 2 21 Jan 3 572 Jan 4 1334 Jan 6 1278 Jan 5 1334 Mar 20 1712 Jan 6 36 Jan 13 314 Jan 10 1 Jan 4 1914 Jan 4 4014 Mar 27 100 Jan 2 7114 Jan 2 4834 Jan 5 106 Feb 2 19 Mar 27 68 Jan 4 37 Jan 3 46 Jan 3 10313 Jan 3 1512 Jan 5 10734 Jan 4 6514 Jan 6 67 Jan 8 10714 Jan 3 44 Jan 3 734 Jan 6 184 Jan 4 54 Jan 3 1138 Jan 8 American Woolen____No par 100 6158 Jan 4 Preferred 114 Jan 10 1 Am Writing Paper otfs 514 Jan 6 Preferred certificates No par 533 Jan 4 1 Amer Zinc Lead & Smelt 25 3712 Jan 4 Preferred Anaconda Copper Mining...50 1312 Jan 8 914 Jan 12 Anaconda Wire & CableNo par 18 Jan 8 No par Anchor Cap 86.50 cony preferred_No par 84 Feb 5 Archer Daniels Midrd_No par 2614 Jan 9 100 110 Jan 24 7% preferred Armour & Co (Del) pref 100 764 Jan 2 414 Jan 3 Armour of Illinois class A._25 214 Jan 6 25 Class B 100 55 Jan 3 Preferred 5 Arnold Constable Corp 338 Jan 10 414 Jan 5 No par Artloom Corp 1 Jan 9 Associated Apparel Ind No par 114 Jan 3 1 Associated Dry Goods Jan 1 50 100 6% 1st preferred 100 50 Jan 4 7% 2d preferred 25 2912 Jan 5 Aasociated 011 1214 Jan 2 At 0 & W I SS Lines__No par 25 2814 Jan 3 Atlantic Refining 3514 Jan 8 No par Atlas Powder 100 83 Jan 9 Preferred 712 Jan 15 No par Atlas Tack Corp Auburn Automobile__No par 4314 Apr 21) 7 Jan 4 No par Austin Nichols 5P.1 Feb 10 AviatIon Corp of Del (The)_5 11 Jan 8 Baldwin Loco Works..No par 100 35 Jan 8 Preferred Bamberger (L) 62 Co pret._100 8612 Jan 9 No par 3 Jan 2 Barker Brothers 64% cony preferred__100 1818 Jan 9 5 Barnsdall Corp 7's Mar27 No par 27 Jan 3 Bayuk Clime Inc 100 89 Jan 15 1st preferred 4 Jan 6 Beatrice Creamery 25 10, 100 55 Jan 13 Preferred Beech-Nut Packing Co 20 58 Mar 2 Belding Ileminway Co_No par 872 Jan 3 Belgian Nat Rys part pref.__ 9512 Jan 9 Bandit: Aviation 5 164 Jan 3 1218 Jan 31 Beneficial Indus Loan_ _No par Highest. PER SHARE Range for Previous Year 1933. Lowest. Highest. $ per share $ per share 5 Per share 1178 Feb 5 Feb 1314 July 7712 Apr 19 39 Apr 71 June 3478 Apr 5 8 Apr 2158 July 1138 Feb 6 518 Apr 1212 June 758 Feb 5 134 Feb 938 July 958 Feb 6 558 July 1134 May 10614 Jan 24 474 Feb 112 Sept 314 Feb 16 18 Feb 4 May 2378 Jan 15 1118 Jan 33 Aug 714 Feb 2 1 Jan 952 July 54 Feb 1 7 ; Apr 814 July 1618 Apr 10 1 Apr 2178 July 1438 Apr 10 118 Apr 21 July 1438 Apr 9 114 Mar 20 July 2318 Feb 23 5 Mar 26 July 16034 Feb 17 7034 Feb 152 Dec 12914 Apr 5 115 Apr 125 Oct 234 Feb 5 6 Feb 2638 July 2018 Feb 5 584 Jan 24 July 734 Mar 12 33 Feb 914 July 45 Mar 13 5 Feb 40 July 5334 Apr 5 184 Mar 4738 Nov 74 Mar 35 July 36 Jan 24 23 Feb 5 8 Mar 2812 July 4934Mar 2 34 Apr 4978 June 1234 Feb 3 1 Jan 1634 July 71 Apr 12 234 Jan 64 Sept 38 Fen 6 918 Mar 4212 July Apr 11012 18 60 Mar 106 Aug 10734 Feb 15 4913 Feb 10012 Dec 14512 Apr 13 112 Feb 134 July 3378 Feb 5 618 Jan 3934 July 15 Feb 5934 July 5612 Feb 5 1214 Feb 27 15; Mar 14 July 313 Mar 3112 July 34 Apr 20 34 Mat 51 14 July 60 Apr 20 2 Feb 612 Feb 5 618 June 13 Feb 8978 July 624 Jan 31 1 Jan 5 Feb 16 6 June 372 Apr 1012 Feb 3 13 July 372 Feb 1334 Feb 6 1958 June 30 Feb 7 714 Apr 4478 June 433 Apr 274 June 1712 Feb 6 618 Apr 25 Feb 6 35:4 July 418 Jan 2258 Feb 16 2112 July 1012 Feb 5 212 Mar 16 June 1312 Feb 5712 June 4214Mar 15 3534 Apr 19 244 Dee 4212 May 10 Feb 5 3/ 1 4 Feb 174 June 25 Feb 5778 June 4514 Mar 26 11 Feb 6 414 Feb 1518 July 112 Apr 4 14 Apr 312 June 8 Apr 3 114 Jan 12 June 573 Jan 394 July 3834 Feb 6 7458 Mar 13 1714 Jan 63 July 1934 Feb 5 834 Feb 2238 July 938 Feb 1 1 Jan 8 June 318 Feb 2358 July 2758 Feb 15 91 Feb 15 1512 Jan 7572 Nov 17 3434 Mar 13 Jan 3012 July 4 1214 Feb 6 Feb 1978 July 978 Apr 41 18 July 2978 Feb 6 9 Apr 35 July 2614 Feb 7 4, 3 Feb 1758 Feb 1 19 July 534 Mar 3172 July 284 Feb 19 2018 Apr 474 July 514 Apr 19 78 Ma 74 Feb 19 718 July 238 Jan 30 412 Jane 18 Apr 1112 Mar 3634 June 30 Jan 30 5114 Feb 15 1034 Feb 5312 Sept 31 123 Apr 12 Jan 9912 Dec 9434 Apr 11 2013 Jan 73 July 3212 Jan 5114 Sept 5614 Apr 7 111 Mar 17 1024 Jan 112 July 2612 Feb 5 458 Feb 27 July 81 Jan 30 3758 Mar 86 July 4414 Feb 7 30 Feb 4778 July 81 Feb 6 2112 Jan 74 July 11334 Apr 20 80 Jan 11214 July 2053 Mar 13 6 Jan 26 July 12514 Fen 6 8612 Ai,r 13434 July 8238 Feb 6 49 Feb 904 July 844 Feb 5 504 Feb 9434 July 12312 Apr 10 10234 Mar 120 July 13 Feb 21 218 Dec 25 July 2834 Feb 21 7 Oct3778 July 274 Feb 7 1078 Apr 434 July 80 Feb 6 35 Mar 80 June 1718 Feb 5 312 Mae 17 July 8334 Feb 7 2253 Feb 6712 Dec 414 Mar 14 / 1 4 Feb 418 June 1478 Jan 26 1434 July 34 Feb 9 Feb 16 214 Feb 1078 July 5018 Feb 16 20 Feb 68 July 1734 Apr 11 5 Feb 2278 July 12 Feb 5 44 Jan 1512 June 2434 Jan 31 8 Jan 3914 July 100 Apr 17 6213 Jan 90 June 3334 Apr 12 954 Mar 2914 July 115 Apr 12 95 Feb 115 July 9112 Apr 2( 41 Jar, 90 July 8 Apr 13 14 Feb 7/ 1 4 June 378 Apr 12 4 Feb 5 July pc, 183 y 754 Apr 13 8/ 1 4 Fen 9 14 Jan 7 July 1033 A nr 20 2 Mar 912 June 312 F b 15 114 Apr 514 June 1814 Feb 6 312 Feb 20 July 7712 Apr 20 18 Feb 6112 July 6478 Apr 20 15 Jan 5134 July 40 Apr 18 64 Mar 3512 July 16 Apr 12 412 Mar 26 July 3514 Feb 5 1233 Feb 3212 Nov 5512 Mar 13 9 Feb 3911 July 10112 Apr 17 60 Apr 834 Sent 1614 Mar 14 112 Fel 3434 Dec 5738 Mar 13 31 Oct 8414 July 16, 8 Mar 5 78 Feb 94 July 1034 Jan 31 513 Feb 1638 July 16 Feb 5 312 Apr 1738 July 6412 Apr 20 912 Apr 80 July 99 Feb 23 6814 Feb 9978 Aug 64 Feb 5 74 June / 1 4 Jan 38,2 A9[12 518 Apr 2412 July 10 Jan 22 3 Mar 11 July 39 Feb 5 314 Jan 5213 July 98 Mar 16 27 Jan 100 July 18 Feb 6 7 Mar 27 June 8518 Apr 20 45 Feb 85 May 66 Apr 18 45 Jan 7012 June 1518 Apr 20 1212 July 312 Feb 11714 Apr 20 6214 An 10114 Nov 2373 Feb I 614 Feb 2114 July 15 A11:1 131, Sel,t 18 Mar 16 1 Companies reported In receivership. a Optional sale. c Cash Bale. z Ex- livIdend. July y Ex-rights. New York Stock Record-Continued-Page 3 2709 lar FOR SALE DURING THE WEEK OF STOCKS NOT RECORDED IN THIS LIST, SEE THIRD PAGE PRECEDING. HIGH AND LOIV SALE PRICES-PER SHARE, NOT PER CENT. Saturday Apr. 14. Monday Apr. 16. Tuesday Apr. 17. 1Vednesday I Thursday Apr. 18. I Apr. 19. Friday Apr. 20. Sales for the 1Veek. STOCKS NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE. PER SHARE Range Since Jan. 1. On basis of 100-share lots. Lowest. PER SHARE Range for Preoottu Year 1933. Highest. Lowest. $ Highest. per share $ Per share $ Per share $ per share S per share $ per share S per share Shares. Indus. &Miscell.(Con.) Par $ per share 9 Mar 3313 Aug No par 2612 Jan 8 3414 Apr 10 3212 3278 3234 3312 3314 3313 3314 3334 3,300 Best & Co 1013 Max 4914 July 4134 4278 4212 4312 42 4338 4273 43% 21,200 Bethlehem Steel Corp No par 3434 Jan 4 4912 Feb 19 2514 Feb 82 July 100 65% Jan 4 82 Feb 19 7% preferred 7614 7678 7678 7758 7612 7738 77 7718 4,000 613 Apr 2912 June 820 Bigelow-Sant Carpet Inc No par 27 Jan 4 40 Feb 5 34 3418 3412 3514 34 35 35 3514 1914 July 1053 Jan 4 1614 Jan 30 No par 1314 1314 3% Feb 1312 1312 1314 1312 1312 1334 1,800 Blow-Knox Co 658 Feb 21 July 18 Jan 12 26 Feb 7 *22 Bloomingdale Brothers_No Par 25 "20 25 25 .20 25 *20 912 Mar 5312 Deo 5 55 Jan 6 6834 Jan 24 62 6234 63 6334 6212 6314 63 6414 4,900 Bohn Aluminum & Br 18 Feb 3712 July 2258 23 25 19% Jan 6 2713 Feb 5 2458 2478 2618 37,000 Borden Co (The) 24 2314 24 512 Feb 2214 Dec 10 2034 Jan 3 28', Feb 5 25 2578 12,700 Borg-Warner Corp 2512 25 2434 25 2518 25 3 8 2 3 Feb 9 Jan May 413 July 1 :Botany Cons Mills 2 clan: .13 A 4 _50 2 2 .13 *134 4 2 *134 2% Feb 1452 July 12 Jan 6 1813 Jan 30 45.000 Briggs Manufacturing_No p.i 16 1638 1638 1658 1813 1733 1712 18 25 Dec 3814 Sept 35 5 26 Jan 4 3514 Feb 5 5,100 Bristol-Myers Co 33 3318 33 3378 3358 3334 34 60 Dec 8812 June 69 70 69 1,700 Brooklyn U.ilon Clas___No par 61 Jan 4 8012 Feb 6 8878 69 68 68 68 2812 Mai 53% July No par 5014 Jan 5 61 Feb 16 Brown Shoe Co 58 5558 "55 58 .55 58 .55 .55 Mar 17 10% 134 Mar Jan 5 1812 June 7 Bruns-Balk*-Collender 2,200 _No par 914 934 914 912 914 934 8'2 9 2 Feb 932 Feb 5 12% June 10 653 Jan 9 900 Bucyrus-Erie Co 718 7,2 *714 712 738 738 738 7,2 234 Feb 1952 June Preferred •1034 1114 1112 1134 1134 1134 1134 12'8 1,400 5 10 Jan 2 1414 Jan 30 2013 Mar 72 June 320 6453 6458 6458 6458 66 100 6312 Jan 9 75 Jan 15 66 6412 6412 7% Preferred 752 Jan 30 14 Apr 9% July No par 558 534 538 Jan 3 6 612 614 638 638 673 17,700 Budd (E G) Mfg 3 Mar 35 July 32 32 7% preferred 3114 32 3834 1,490 3538 35 35' 34 3114 31,4 31 '00 25 Jan 2 3834 Apr 20 538 Jan 30 378 373 534 July 3% Jan 5 378 4 334 378 4 412 5,900 Budd Wheel No Par 378 373 *334 373 6 Mar 6 *434 512 *434 512 •434 512 2% Jan 9 78 Mar 5 June 500 Buiova Watch No par 512 534 *518 573 514 512 313 13,42 Feb *12 1212 12 JApre 1314 July 12 7% Jan 4 1512 Feb 16 1,300 Bullard Co No per 1178 12 1212 1234 1258 1258 1278 1278 6 Feb 21 5 June '214 4 158 Jan 26 Burns Bros class A No par *234 312 *234 312 '234 312 •234 4 '234 4 Jan 13 June 1014 1012 10 4 Jan 9 1512 Feb 20 1112 7% preferred 1034 1014 1034 1014 105* •1018 1012 11 520 100 1534 1573 1512 1578 1538 1512 1533 18 6% Feb 20% July 1434 Mar 28 z1933 Feb 1 1614 5,700 Burroughs Add Mach--No Par 1534 1578 16 3% Feb 9 8 June •214 I Apr 278 *212 278 '212 278 *21 *1 12 3 : 212 212 *212 5 100 /Bush Term 21s Jan 2 2 1 No par 1 Apr 6 Mar S *414 512 •4 5 438 438 312 Jan 20 434 434 9,2 June 200 .312 5 Debenture 100 : 1 12,3 4% Dec 1212 1212 1212 1212 12 1212 8 Dec 12 12 90 Bush Term BI gu prod ctf.s_100 12 5% Jan 3 1534 Feb 23 •10 2% June 218 Feb 16 11. 118 I Feb *112 138 113 Jan 13 112 112 500 Butte & Superior Mining_10 112 112 •113 138 18 Mgr 3 Feb 16 414 June .212 278 212 212 1,000 Butte Copper & Zinc 234 258 258 2 Jan 2 233 234 278 273 278 b 434 Feb 1 114 Apr 414 713 June 4 414 412 412 378 4 1,100 Butterick Co 41s 414 .4 213 Jan 2 No pat .312 414 812 F Fe eb 43% July 2738 2778 2534 2712 2678 2712 2713 23 21% Jan 6 3234 Feb 7 27 28 2634 2814 4,700 Byers Co(AM) No par 58 3018 Mar 80 July 53 *58 180 8078 6078 8078 6112 6112 6212 67 8078 *58 Preferred 100 4714 Jan 15 67 Apr 20 ar 3434 July 2812 29 734 Mat 1834 Jan 4 30% Apr 18 28 2912 2778 2812 2878 3038 2913 3014 2918 3014 11,200 California Packing ____No par 1 Jan 134 Jan 23 1 2% June 1 118 1 1 1 118 118 1 % Jan 9 1,600 Callahan Zino-Lead 1 10 118 *1 514 538 Feb14 653 Feb 5 4 Jan 3 514 578 4,000 Calumet & Hada Cons Cop_25 538 538 514 512 9% June 514 512 518 514 Feb 1614 July 1334 1334 1358 1378 1,500 Campbell W & C Fdy __No par 1358 1338 1312 1378 •13 1414 •I312 14 912 Jan 4 1578 Feb 23 2634 2634 2612 27 2778 2734 28 4112 July 7,500 Canada Dry Ginger Ale.-5 2414 Jan 4 2918 Feb 1 2638 2634 2634 2714 27 14 Feb 3512 July 3934 3714 3638 37 .3512 37 3614 37 3,400 Cannon Mills 38 3512 37 36 No par 2812 Jan 4 38 Apr 2 912 1212 July *9 414 Oat 918 918 1014 •87 8 9 97 8 9 953 1,200 Capital Admirals al A 1 533 Jan 2 10 Apr 13 934 934 3513 3512 36 33 25% Jan 3512 July 39 35 730 3312 33% 34 33,2 •3212 34 10 2634 Jan 24 39 Apr 20 Preferred A etu b 10312 July •71 51113 MF Fe 691 7134 6634 7012 6712 6834 6834 6934 68 3 40 6914 71 7,100 Case (J I) Co 100 6518 Jan 8 8634 Fen 6 •7634 7978 •7718 7978 7634 7718 77 8614 July 77 •76 77 7718 77 290 Preferred certificates_ _100 68 Jan 5 8413 Feb 6 3212 3134 3212 3214 3234 8,000 Caterpillar Tractor___No Par 2312 Jan 4 32% Apr 10 3134 32 2934 July 3034 3218 31 3134 32 3714 3733 3638 3634 36 Fe 3658 3712 14,10 Celanese Corp of AmNo par 33% Jan 2 44% Feb 5 F 3678 3653 3734 3658 37 42 , 12 If 58% July 412 41 *312 41. .312 414 '334 414 5% July 458 Apr 12 214 Jan 9 100 Welotex Corp *334 412 •334 412 No par 312 31 4% July 4 Apr 12 318 318 *314 334 33 Fels 318 314 114 Jan 9 318 3" 900 Certificates 314 314 No par 2018 2078 18 19 18 14 1% Jan Jar, 12% July 1914 1912 1934 1934 20 1934 1934 58 Preferred 612 Jan 18 2238 Apr 13 100 2634 271 2653 2713 2712 2734 2734 28 41 July 28 28 28 28,4 3,80 Central Aguirre Asso_No par 24 Mar 22 3213 Feb 5 •10 1058 10 10 3 Apr 11% July 1012 1058 1034 1173 1113 1178 1138 1112 3.10 Century Ribbon MIlls.No pa, 734 Jan 16 1238 Feb 19 88 88 88 88 88 88 52 Feb 100 88 88 90 Deo 90 '88 93 7 100 82 Mar 31 95 Jan 2 Preferred 3718 3814 3512 3734 36 4434 Sept 3612 3612 3713 358 37 5% Jan 36 37 19,70 Cerro de P8ACO Copper_No par 3114 Mar 27 4014 Feb 15 658 678 658 634 1 Jan 612 678 7% July 734 Apr 5 634 678 634 634 7 718 3,20 Certain-Teed Products_No Par 3,4 Jan 2 33 33 •3018 3458 •31 "30 34 34 4 Mar 3014 July 3334 3334 '3112 33 20 7% preferred 100 1712 Jan 19 35 Apr 5 2113 2112 .2158 22 2153 2158 22 2238 22 25 June Vs Mar 22,4 22 1714 Jan .5 2438 Jan 30 2214 3,100 City Ice & Fuel No par 80 85 81 83 80 82 *82 83 45 Apr 72 July 8212 8312 84 390 85 100 67 Jan 3 85 Apr 20 Preferred 4814 4853 4512 46% 4534 46% 4812 473 Jan 47 4734 4712 4834 6,90 Chesapeake Corp 34 Jan 4 4334 Apr 20 No par 5213 July 833 838 838 9 8 812 77s 838 1232 July 1478 2% Mar 9% Feb 5 834 873 614 Jan 6 834 9 4,80 Chicago Pneumat Tool_No par 2078 2214 2114 2234 2134 23 2313 2458 2414 25 513 Feb 2514 June 25 2534 14,90 No par Cony preferred 1613 Jan 12 2534 Apr 20 2812 28,2 28 2712 28 28 28 28 34 July 2838 28,2 2838 2834 1,10 Chickasha Cotton 011 5 Mar 10 1914 Jan 8 3034 Feb 5 1018 1018 10 978 10 1012 1014 101 2 Fe 1018 July 10 1014 1014 1014 2,50 Childs Co 8 Jan 6 1152 Feb 19 No par •18 15 16 17 Apr .15 163 .1514 1534 21% July 16, 4 *15 6 7 Chile Copper Co 1712 1712 25 13 Jan 13 1758 Apr 9 5334 54 5214 5418 5234 5334 53% 5438 53 5414 5312 5438 55,60 Chrysler Corp 5 4912 Mar 20 6038 Feb 23 7% Mar 5753 Dec 138 138 114 138 215 Feb 6 14 Fe 352 July 133 138 ,4 18 3,80 City Stores 73 Jan 5 114 138 No par 114 P4 34 34 34 34 18 Mar 218 July 114 Feb 6 12 Apr 20 Voting trust certifs No par 34 kr 3 *52 58 58 12 58 3,400 478 .4 •312 5 113 Jan 478 473 812 July 558 Feb 6 434 434 •312 5 Class A No par •312 5 300 334 Jan 9 518 514 July '4 4 412 •378 412 *378 41 518 Feb 21 3 Jan 12 No par 3721 4 ClassAvtc 4 4 800 *1638 17 1634 17 1414 June •15 17 .16 17 •157s 17 834 Jan 5 21% Mar 5 17 19 1,000 Clark Equipment No par *40 42 3912 41 *3912 40 Apr 7 10 6'4 NovMJ a ar is 41% 45 40 Jan 40 .4018 43 3 July 28 700 No Cluett Peabody & Co. *3912 43 par .115 12412 *11512 1271 *115 12912 •1I5 127 *100 117 •100 129 90 Jan 100 June Preferred 100 95 Jan 17 114% Apr 7 119 11912 11712 119 118 11814 11914 1201 11912 12012 121 122 Jan 105 July 4,000 Coca-Cola Co (The)---No Par 95,4 Jan 2 122 Apr 20 •531s 55 5318 54 74 *5318 5412 5334 533 4Apr 3's 51 Dec 5334 5334 •5312 54 Class A 500 No par 5018 Jan 11 54 Apr 16 1712 1758 1678 171 7 Mar 2238 July 167s 1738 1738 18 938 Jan 3 18% Mar 13 17,900 Colgate-Palmolive-Peet No par 1712 18 1758 18 9014 9012 90 90 (82 18 49 Apr 88 Aug 8 9214 Apr 92 9214 921 •92 Jan 93 6% •92 preferred 93 700 100 6812 23 2334 2212 2333 24 2412 2412 25 26 Sept No par 18 Jan 8 2812 Feb 19 2434 2538 25 2512 10,900 Collins & Alkman 633 658 614 833 27 3 8 Decr 834 Feb 6 6 618 618 614 1753 July 358 Jan 2 612 612 •614 612 1,200 :Colorado Fuel & Iron-No Par 6814 691 "8912 71 69 2318 Feb 7112 July 6912 6912 72,4 70 7238 7178 7334 16,100 Columbian Carbon v t o No par 58 Jan 8 7334 Apr 20 2912 2912 2838 291 2918 2918 30 653 Mar 28 Nov 3078 30 3078 3014 3012 3,800 Columb Pict Corp v t o_No par 23 Jan 6 31 Apr 6 1512 1534 1518 1534 15 9 Mar 1513 1514 1578 x1512 1578 15% 1638 42,600 Columbia Gas dr Elec No par 1118 Jan 4 1914 Feb 6 28,3 July *7312 74,4 7414 76 50 Dec 83 June 100 52 Jan 5 7618 Feb 27 Preferred series A 7514 7514 1,400 7514 7514 7512 7512 57412 75 •62 67 66 67 67 67 40 4 May 6612 69 7412 June x69 100 41 Jan 9 z70 Apr 19 70 5% preferred 70 310 70 3334 34 3218 3358 3212 3314 33% 3414 34 Feb 1852 Jan 4 34% Apr 20 1914 Dec 10 3434 3414 3473 14,200 Commercial Credit 28 28 .2712 2834 2712 2812 2813 2812 28 1812 Mar 25 Sept 28 .2712 28 7% 1st preferred 170 25 2317 Jan 5 29 Mar 3 .4913 4973 4912 4912 4912 4912 4933 4912 49 16 49 *4834 49 Feb 3912 Aug Claas A 800 ao 38 Jan 3 50 Mar 9 *2813 2878 2878 2878 2878 2878 •2812 29 *2814 29 •2812 29 1812 Mar 2513 Sept 60 Preferred B 25 24 Jan 3 30 Mar 3 •10112 102 102 102 '102 105 10113 1013* 103 103 634% fIrst preferred____100 9112 Jan 3 103 Apr 19 10212 103 70 Mar 95% Sept 70 59 59 5714 59 57 5812 5334 5918 5834 591s 5914 5933 6,100 Comm Invest Trust. _No par 18 Mar 4312 July 3534 Jan 4 5934 Apr 11 10812 10812 10818 10814 10818 10814 •10734 10814 10734 10734 108 108 Cony preferred Jan 9778 Jan 1,000 No par 91 Jan 3 10813 Apr 14 84 29 2938 2818 2912 2838 2878 2873 2938 2833 2914 2818 2914 37,500 Commercial Solvents_No par 9 Feb 5714 July 26 Mar 8 36% Jan 30 273 3 258 278 234 278 218 234 234 278 234 3 35,300 Commonwilth & Sou._No par 134 Jan 2 114 Dec 618 June 334 Feb 6 4814 4918 47,8 4912 4758 4818 4812 51 49% 51 50 52 14,800 No par 2113 Jan 2 52 Apr 20 17% Dec 6013 June $6 preferred serles 2734 2734 2712 2734 2738 2734 28 2834 2812 2834 2813 2918 7,800 Congoleum-Nairn lno No par 23 Jan 9 3114 Feb 16 733 Jan 27% July .1214 13 1214 1214 '1134 1212 1212 1212 •12 1273 1238 1238 300 Congress Cigar 18 June 613 Feb No pal 9% Jan 12 1412Mar 5 1214 12,2 1178 1218 1158 12 1212 1134 1212 1178 121g 12 1934 June 2,700 Consolidated Cigar ____No par 514 Jan 2 13% Mar 17 •5212 5812 •5212 5812 •55 57 .54 58 56 •54 58 56 10 Prior preferred 65 June 100 4514 Jan 2 60 Apr 11 418 418 418 418 4 4,4 433 438 412 458 455 43g 1,700 Consol Film Indus 534 May 534 Feb 15 1 213 Jan 2 16 16 15'14 16 1634 1673 1658 17 5,000 1534 1514 1618 17 Preferred Mar 1434 May No par 1033 Jan 2 1712 Feb 15 3778 3814 3718 3814 3714 3814 3714 3853 38 38% 3812 3914 45,600 Consolidated Gas Co_ No par 35% Jan 4 4738 Fen 6 34 53117: D AAjaeppn crr 6412 June 8914 8934 8918 8978 8834 8913 8812 8912 89% 89% 8934 9038 4,400 Jan Preferred 8113 Dec 99 No par 82 Jan 4 9214 Feb 6 3 3 3 3 •278 3 3 3 234 3 3 3 2,700 Canso' Laundries Corp_ No par 112 Dec 512 Jan 4% Feb 7 21g Jan 8 1214 1212 12 1218 12 1258 1318 64.900 Consol 011 Corp 1278 1212 13 1214 12 Mar 1534 July Feb 13 par 5 14% No 93 4 Jan 8 .10934 11014 10534 10334 •10312 11014 11034 III •109 111 *109 111 300 8% preferred Oct 9512 Mar 108 100 108 Feb 9 111 Apr 9 133 1,2 114 138 114 114 138 133 4 114 138 7.900 Consolidated Textile_ __No par 153 3,4 July 218 Feb 7 8 4 72 Jan 4 1178 1218 1114 1218 1154 1338 1212 1312 1234 13 13 1353 31,400 Container Corp class A Mar;Jan 1014 135 8 July Apr 20 5 20 Jan 6% 434 5 434 5 4, 5 538 5 8 514 518 518 513 32,500 Class B 558 Apr 18 No par 238 Jan 2 3,142 412 June '1038 12 11111 12 .11 •1153 12 12 115s 11f374 1178 12 8 2,800 Continental 13ak class A No par Mar 1814 July 7 Jan 8 1458 Jan 24 1% 1% 138 134 134 134 134 138 134 138 3.000 Class B Jan 7 I Jan 1 238 No July Feb par 312 •6112 6218 6012 6114 •60 6014 61 61 62 60 60 63 800 Preferred 38 Jan 64 July 100 4614 Jan 6 64 Feb 9 8112 8112 8012 8214 8034 8238 8238 8213 82 8234 8212 83 8.300 Continental Can Inc 3514 Feb 78% Dec Apr 20 83 Jan 6 20 75 •978 10 10 10 934 1073 1078 1112 2,300 Conti! Diamond Fibre •934 10 *934 10 312 Feb 1712 July 5 718 Jan 5 1134 Feb 6 3212 3212 3212 3273 3214 3234 3234 3318 3313 34 3312 3512 7,700 Continental Insurance____2.50 2332 Jan 6 3512 Apr 20 3811 JUIY 158 158 158 1% 158 158 4,700 Continental Motors. __No par 158 158 1% 134 158 138 1 Mar 4 June 233 Feb 21 1 18 Jan 2 21 2114 2013 21 2014 2138 2112 22 2112 22 22 2212 56,700 Continental 011 of Del 4% Mar 19% Sept 5 1613 Jan 13 2212 Apr 20 77 7734 7514 7712 76 77 7612 78 7.200 Corn Products Refining....25 6914 Mar 27 8413 Jan 26 7618 7712 7614 7678 4533 Feb 9053 Aug •14218 144 14212 143 143 14334 143 14478 14358 143% 14413 14413 450 Preferred 14534 Jan 100 135 Jan 4 144% Apr 18 713 7,8 7 718 658 634 634 7 5,800 Cody Inc 634 7 634 7 233 Mar MMrr No par 334 Jan 2 9% Fen 5 1 11:: 713 June 3214 3212 3234 3234 32)8 3234 3212 3312 33 7,200 Cream of Wheat Ws_ No par 28 Jan 3 35 Jan 31 3312 3313 34 23 Feb 3912 July 1478 15 14 1414 1334 14 1412 1412 1414 1412 14 1413 3,000 Crosley Radio Corp__ No par Star 1434 June 8 Jan 2 1518 Apr 13 *3038 3112 30 3012 2978 30 30 31 3012 3134 3178 3318 6,900 Crown Cork & Seal No par 2812 Mar 27 3614 Feb I 14 2 Feb 85 July *40 4078 *40 4212 •4012 4212 4012 411s 41 600 41 414 414 $2.70 preferred No par 3513 Jan 2 4114 Apr 20 2413 Feb 3812 July 5% 51,8 512 518 514 54) 578 618 578 613 15,600 Crown Zellerback v t o_No par 512 614 3% Jan 8 1 Apr 812 July 614 Feb 6 3212 •31 '31 32 •32 3212 3312 32 3273 '3214 3278 3214 800 Crucible Steel of Amerioa_100 2138 Jan 4 38% Feb 19 9 Mar 3712 July 6212 6212 •60 63 63 62 71 71 62 71 70 1,000 71 Preferred 100 48 Jan 12 71 Apr 19 16 Feb 60% July 218 2 •2 2 2 2 2 2 2 218 213 1,600 Cuba Co (The) 2 No pat 1 Jan 2 4% June 313 Feb 9 713 758 3,200 Cuban-American 713 7,2 7 712 718 7% 714 712 733 734 1112 May 9% Feb 8 Jan 10 , 2 Sugar3 ---10 4314 4134 4212 4134 4212 42 *43 42 4212 *4213 4373 43 360 Preferred 100 20% Jan 9 4734 Feb 8 10 1 :82 -IFle Jan nb 68 June 4434 4878 48 •48 47 4778 48 4712 4734 43 4712 4814 2,300 Cudahy Packing 50 37 Jan 2 5034 Feb 16 20% Feb 5912 June 2612 2718 26% 2714 2758 2838 28 2734 24 2818 2712 2813 8,600 Curtis Pub Co (The)___No Par 1312 Jan Mar 8 3214 June 2912 Apr 12 80 80% 7912 78)8 7!) 7912 7912 8012 7914 SO 7938 7934 4,800 Preferred 4313 Jan 3 84,4 Apr 13 30 612 Feb 66 June No Par 418 414 418 414 418 414 4 418 418 414 4 415 35.000, Curtiss-Wright 212 Jan 2 514 Jan 31 1 41% July 1012 1138 1078 1118 1012 1118 1014 1034 1038 1138 19.700( Class A 11 11,8 1 5,4 Jan 3 12,4 Apr 2 2 1'2 Mar Feb1 8 July 1712 177s •1714 1734 •17 18 18 19 *1834 1912 18,4 19 800 Cutler-Hammer 1nc___No par 11 Jan 4 2112 Feb 21 4% Jan 21 July 1 • Bid at (I asked prices. 00 sales on this day. I Companies reported in receivership. a Optional sale. c Cash sale. r Es-dividend. y Ex-rights. Per share 3338 3358 4278 4314 7558 77 35 .34 1333 1333 .22 25 1'6314 6312 2278 2318 2514 2514 .134 2 1658 1658 3334 3334 .68 89 *55 5934 9 9 .714 734 1112 1112 .6458 66 57s 578 5 per share 3212 3333 4134 4314 75 77 34 35 1338 1338 *22 25 62 6314 2234 2338 2412 25,2 *134 2 16 16% 3318 3312 *6612 69 •5638 59, 4 *834 9 . 712 7 , 4 1114 1138 *6458 66 538 578 4, 1; 2710 New York Stock Record-Continued-Page 4 April 21 1934 kitir FOR SALES DURING THE WEEK OF STOCKS NOT RECORDED IN THIS LIST. SEE FOURTH PAGE PRECEDING. HIGH AND LOW SALE PRICES-PER SHARE, NOT PER CENT. Saturday Apr. 14. Monday Apr. 16. Tuesday Apr. 17. Wednesday Apr. 18. Thursday Apr. 19. Friday Apr. 20. Sales for the Week. STOCKS NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE. PER SHARE Range Since Jars .1. On Darla of 100-share lots. Lowest. Highest. $ Per share $ per share $ per Share 3 Per share S per share 3 per share Shares. Indus.& MIsceli. (Con.) Par S per share $ Per share *6 712 . 532 712 •532 712 .612 718 .612 712 100 Davega Stores Corp 7 814 Feb 5 7 5 8 Jan 10 2938 2912 2814 2912 2832 29 29 2932 29 2972 2914 2912 9,000 Deere & CO No par 2612 Jan 5 3412 Feb 1 .1452 15 •1458 15 1452 1452 1434 1514 .1434 15 • 1,200 1434 15 Preferred 20 1114 Jan 2 1512 Jan 30 8012 8012 8012 8012 8012 8012 8012 81 8012 8114 8114 8214 1,700 Detroit Edison 100 6311 Jan 5 84 Feb 23 *5112 5212 50 5112 49 49 52 5252 51 52 2,300 Devoe & Reynolds ANo par 29 Jan 6 53 Apr 11 52 52 2432 2432 2412 2412 2414 2412 2412 2414 *2412 2432 2418 2432 2,000 Diamond Match No par 23 Apr 3 281 :Jan 16 *3012 3052 30 30 31314 3032 30 3032 3032 •29 3038 .29 700 Participating preferred_ __25 2814 Mar 27 311: Jan 24 3812 3812 38 3834 38 3814 38 3014 3612 3712 3618 3734 32,800 Dome Mines Ltd No par 32 Jan 25 4072 Apr 2 2172 2172 22 22 2112 2158 22 22 22 22 1,700 Dominion Stores Ltd_No par *2112 22 19 Feb 10 23 Mar 10 24 2432 2252 2414 2272 2334 24 1414 Jan 2 2812 Jan 31 2458 23 ' 2434 2334 2512 28,000 Douglas Aircraft Co Ino No par •1534 1712 *1512 1712 *1512 16 16 16 16 16 400 Dresser(SR) Mfg cony A No par 1614 1614 914 Jan 10 19 Feb 17 . 952 1012 *932 1012 *938 11 *958 1034 .958 11 •952 11 712 Jan 16 1152 Mar 14 Convertible class B No par .1034 11 1012 1034 1012 1052 1034 11 5,200 Dunhill International 1032 1072 1012 11 612 Jan 13 1134 Mar 26 1 10338 10332 10314 10314 10152 10212 101 1011 2 101 101 170 Duquesne Light 1s1 pref__100 90 Jan 16 10338 Apr 14 101 10172 1032 1032 1012 1014 1012 1014 1014 1012 10 1052 1052 1058 2,900 Eastern Rolling Mills_No par 512 Jan 3 1234 Feb 19 92 92 9114 9214 9152 9312 92 9112 93 9312 9312 9614 8,700 Eastman Kodak (N J)_No par 79 Jan 4 9614 Apr 20 .135 136 136 136 135 136 135 135 135 135 *132 136 70 6% cum preferred 100 120 Jan 16 136 Apr 6 2038 2012 2014 2072 2032 2132 2132 2212 2152 2212 2112 2212 35,900 Eaton Mfg Co 1314 Jan 3 2212 Apr 19 No par 97 9734 9552 9714 9538 9658 9614 9734 96 9732 9612 99 21,900 El du Pont de Nemours_.__20 9052 Jan 4 10372 Feb 16 12034 12034 1203s 12052 12012 12012 12072 12072 12072 12072 12034 12072 1,400 100 115 Jan 2 121 Apr 4 6% non-voting deb *1472 1512 1472 15 *1412 1572 *1412 1534 1412 1412 *1434 1572 400 Eitingon Schild new __No par 1158 Jan 30 1914 Mar 6 2732 2734 2612 2712 2652 2714 2714 2734 2714 2734 27 1812 Jan 9 3138 Feb 21 2734 13,800 Elec Auto-Lite (The) 5 *100 101 101 101 100 101 *100 101 120 101 101 *100 101 Preferred 100 80 Jan 5 101 Apr 6 •512 552 .512 558 514 538 3 538 578 712 Jan 29 538 558 558 534 3,400 Electric Boat 338 Jan 8 634 672 718 634 672 634 732 738 Apr 17 7 414 Jan 3 7 712 634 672 25,000 Elec & Mus Ind Am shares__ 71, 728 7 714 712 712 752 732 7 714 952 Feb 7 714 412 Jan 3 734 9,900 Electric Power & Light No par 1734 1772 1672 1812 1712 1812 1834 21 1978 2052 20 814 Jan 3 21 Apr 18 Preferred No par 16,500 21 1614 1634 1552 1612 16 1634 1652 1834 17 8 Jan 2 1934 Feb 7 $6 preferred 1832 1734 1814 11,400 No par .4412 4534 4412 4412 4412 4412 4514 4514 4412 4532 4512 4512 1,000 Elec Storage Battery _ No pa? 44 Jan 3 52 Jan 24 *1 118 *1 172 Feb 21 Da 112 1 112 1 1 118 112 Is Jan 2 118 1,000 :Elk Horn Coal Corp No pa; .2 21g 2 2 172 172 .172 212 334 Feb 23 218 214 2,300 114 Jan 10 212 212 50 6% part preferred .56 58 5514 5514 *55 58 56 56 5512 5512 55 55 600 Endicott-Johnson Corp..50 5158 Jan 4 63 Feb 16 *125 _ _ 12534 _ __ 12534 12534 *12534 12534 *125 12512 12512 12512 40 Preferred 100 120 Jan 3 126 Mar 20 814 . 534 -5.72 .534 -534 *512 534 *512 812 834 Feb 7 1,500 Engineers Public Serv__No par 6 412 Jan 10 6 614 .17 1912 .17 20 1614 1614 .1652 20 19 18 19 18 300 1158 Jan 3 2312 Feb 6 $5 cony preferred____No par 17 19 *17 18 19 19 19 19 *1712 1972 1912 191s 500 11 Jan 8 2412 Feb 5 $53.8 preferred No par *18 20 .1712 18 1872 1872 19 19 20 20 20 $6 preferred 21 600 1412 Jan 2 2512 Feb 5 No pa? 81 1 814 814 814 734 8 734 8 6,700 Equitable Office Bldg_No par 731 Apr 19 1032 Jan 22 772 814 8 832 1214 1238 12 1212 1158 12 12 , 1212 1232 1318 13 1314 6,200 Eureka Vacuum Clean 712 Jan 8 1438 Feb 19 5 2134 2134 2014 2134 21 2114 2114 2214 2112 2218 2158 22 7,600 Evans Products Co 9 Jan 3 2332 Feb 21 5 9 914 812 9 812 872 812 872 4 Jan 9 1012 Apr 2 834 834 812 918 1,480 Exchange Buffet Corp_No par •112 232 •112 214 214 238 *238 212 .2 212 2 232 Apr 17 2 400 Falrbanka Co 152 Mar 9 25 1114 1212 1114 12 1112 12 1212 Apr 14 1034 1178 1038 1112 1038 1114 Preferred 870 414 Feb 14 100 •1318 14 1414 1414 1438 1438 1412 15 1514 15 *15 7 Jan 6 18 Feb 19 15 1,300 Fairbanks Morse & Co_No par 5112 52 5112 5113 5112 5112 5115 5112 *5118 52 5118 52 Preferred 280 100 30 Jan 10 5514 Mar 6 852 9 01a 912 872 912 834 9 1114 Apr 3 834 9 878 71, Mar 9 914 3,500 Federal Light dr Trao 15 63 •____ 63 *____ 60 '1._ _ _ _ 60 58 Preferred 58 . 20 3412 Jan 12 62 Mar 13 60 No par *90 100 85 90 •80 90 8512 8512 •80 90 90 •80 300 Federal Min & Smelt Co_ RIO 85 Apr 16 107 Feb 14 772 772 714 734 714 712 778 778 834 Jan 30 778 8 8 3,200 Federal Motor Truck No par 8 6 Mar 1 *414 434 4 412 *413 414 *432 458 432 432 .412 434 600 Federal Screw Works_No pat 538 Feb 23 2 Jan 13 .272 3 234 234 252 252 258 272 4 Feb 6 252 234 *234 272 1,000 Federal Water Serv A No par 134 Jan 5 .27 30 29 29 *27 29 2812 29 2814 2834 2814 2834 1,100 Federated Dept Stores.No par 2234 Jan 8 31 Mar 6 34 34 33 3314 3212 3234 3214 3312 3312 3334 3312 35 ' , hen Fire Ins N Y..2.50 2334 Jan 5 35 Apr 20 6,100 Fidel 09 .812 10 934 *812 10 914 914 *812 9 *812 10 7 Feb 15 11 Jan 3 500 Fifth Ave 13us Sec Corp.No par *____ 30 30 *26 *2614 30 2812 Apr 10 *2614 30 *2614 30 *2814 30 Filene's(Wm)Sons Co_No par 25 Feb 1 102 103 103 103 .103 104 6t4% preferred 104 104 *104 105 *104 105 30 100 87 Jan 10 104 Apr 18 132214 2212 21 2252 2172 2214 2214 2258 22 2234 2134 2272 8,000 Firestone Tire & Rubber___10 18 Jan 6 2514 Feb 19 .8312 85 8212 83 83 83 8312 8312 8514 8514 .8312 85 600 Preferred series A 100 71 Jan 9 851 1 Apr 19 65 65 64 6314 65 65 6512 66 66 6672 67 67 2,600 First National Stores_No par 5414 Jan 5 67 Apr 20 12 1214 12 1238 12 1212 1214 1234 1214 1212 1234 1314 3,300 Follansbee Bros 1732 Feb 21 938 Jan 12 No par 17 17 *161 1 1612 16 16 *1612 17 .16 17 •16 17 200 Food Machinery Corp. No par 1012 Jan 9 1714 Apr 13 .1858 1912 1811 1814 1812 1852 1813 1914 1814 1932 1834 1912 3,900 Foster-Wheeler No par 13 Jan 9 22 Feb 16 .1434 16 1412 1434 .14 15 .1434 16 1414 1412 1432 1512 1,800 Foundation Co 1212 Mar 27 1714 Jan 30 No par 2432 25 2472 25 •2432 25 2514 2512 25 2512 .2438 2512 2.100 Fourth Nat Invest w w I 1932 Jan 5 2712 Feb 5 1512 1534 1534 1612 16 1672 1614 1672 1612 1634 1612 1634 21,600 Fox Film class A new_No pa? 1214 Jan 5 1732 Feb 3 .48 50 48 .50 48 48 50 50 50 .51 50 57 280 Fkln Simon & Co Inc 7% pf100 3612 Jan 12 63 Feb 7 4512 4514 44 46 4434 44 4552 4552 4512 46 4538 4578 5,600 Freeport Texas Co 10 4034 Mar 27 5032 Feb 19 .28 29 .2712 28 27 27 2714 28 30 30 *2714 29 70 Fuller (0 A) prior pref.No par 1612 Jan 19 31 Feb 23 1614 1612 1614 1614 .1512 16 1612 1672 1612 1612 1614 1614 150 $6 2d pref No par 9 Jan 4 17 Feb 21 312 3,2 . 332 352 600 Gabriel Co (The) Cl A No par 332 358 . 332 332 Vs 338 •314 3,2 212 Jan 12 458 Mar 12 01634 17 "1634 17 .1634 17 .16 1612 17 17 16 17 230 Gamewell Co (The) 1112 Jan 18 20 Feb 19 No par 10 1012 101a 934 1012 1012 1014 1012 1014 4,600 Gen Amer investors 10 10 1014 Aro par 732 Jan 4 1112 Feb 6 *83 85 83 85 83 85 *84 8512 86 86 86 86 600 Preferred No par 79 Jan 29 87 Mar 13 4072 4078 40 41 3972 4034 4112 4152 4034 4114 41 4134 3,100 Gen Amer Trans Corp 5 3312 Jan 4 4352 Feb 19 1934 1934 1812 1952 1858 1914 1912 2014 1912 2014 2038 2112 10,600 General Asphalt 10 1512 Jan 4 2134 Feb 6 1114 1152 1112 1112 1114 1132 1114 1132 1132 1112 1112 1214 4,600 General Baking 6 11 Jan 3 1432 Feb 5 .10332 10434 .10338 10434 *10338 10434 10312 10312 105 105 10338 104 110 58 preferred No par 10012 Mar 23 10812 Feb 7 *8 818 778 8 734 8 8 838 814 812 838 834 5,300 General Bronze 5 534 Jan 9 1012 Mar 9 53s 578 552 534 . 512 578 558 6 514 534 514 512 1,800 General Cable No par 612 Feb 1 332 Jan 4 11 *1034 1132 1034 1034 .1052 11 11 11 11 *10 111, 400 Class A No par 6 Jan 4 12 Feb 1 3212 *3012 31 *2912 31 32 32 3112 3112 .29 31 33 800 7% cum preferred 100 1412 Jan 9 33 Apr 20 3412 35 34 3412 3412 3452 35 36 36 36 36 36 3,200 General Cigar Inc No par 27 Jan 2 3638 Apr 12 .10712 109 .10712 109 .10712 110 10812 10812 108 108 108 108 200 7% preferred 100 97 Jan 8 10812 Apr 18 2232 2234 2172 2272 22 2234 2212 2312 2212 2312 23 2312 87,800 General Electric No par 1812 Jan 4 2514 Feb 5 1214 1232 1232 1212 1212 1212 1232 1212 1212 1212 1212 1252 3,900 Special 10 1132 Jan 2 1234 Feb 26 3412 3472 3412 3434 3412 3412 3414 3472 3372 3412 3414 35 13,900 General Foods No par 3252 Jan 2 3872 Jan 30 Ps 112 5,400 Gen'l Gas & Elec A 112 118 1 112 112 112 118 112 114 118 134 Feb 6 No par 34 Jan 2 16 *10 16 14 .10 15 *10 100 *14 15 *10 14 Cony pref series A_No par 15 614 Jan 2 19 Mar 13 ._ 23 ...•._ 23 •__ 23 ._ __ _ 23 •__ 23 .____ 23 $7 prof class A 12 Jan 29 21 Mar 13 No par . 25 .____ 25 ._ 25 ____ 20 •____ 20 _ __ 14 Jan 19 22 Mar 12 $8 pref class A No par Gen Ital Edison Elea Corp__ •46 _ _ .4614 __ .4732 ____ 60 •53 _ _ .49 59 52 Jan 13 6114 Feb 16 58 5812 5918 -5914 5838 -587 ; 5838 -587-8 2,000 General Mills *5912 5912 .59 -5914 No par 5373Mar 20 6412 Jan 15 Preferred 600 108 108 108 108 *107 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 100 103 Feb 27 108 Apr 14 3832 3712 3832 3752 3814 3812 39 38 3832 3912 3852 3932 101,000 General Nlotors Corp 10 3312 Jan 4 42 Feb 5 100 10012 4,000 9952 100 $5 preferred 100 100 9972 100 100 10012 100 100 No par 8934 Jan 6 10012 Apr 18 900 Gen Outdoor Adv A 2012 21 834 Jan 5 21 Apr 14 No par 1912 1934 *1914 20 2014 21 2032 203s 20 20 Common 652 Apr 20 534 534 *512 534 6 358 Jan 2 572 6 6 No par 572 612 658 6lg 2,200 880 General Printing Ink_No par 1012 Jan 3 2334 Apr 20 .17 1734 *17 1712 1712 1852 2072 21 23,2 22,4 2334 22 7312 Mar 10 85 Apr 17 $6 preferred No par 88 .81 30 85 .80 85 86 9012 *85 86 85 .85 81 21: Jan 8 No par 1,500 Gen Public Service 4 552 Feb 7 4 4 4 4 *372 4 334 4 4 372 4 4214 4234 4112 4234 4112 4212 1,900 Gen Railway Signal_No par 33 Jan 5 4534 Mar 3 41 4134 42 4112 *4112 44 1 152 Jan 3 352 Jan 30 214 214 232 212 238 212 214 13,900 Gen Realty h Utilities 212 232 214 214 212 52112 23 $6 preferred No par 200 16 Jan 8 263s Jan 30 22 *2112 23 2012 2012 .2012 23 .2012 2212 22 Nn par 1012 Jan 3 2332 Feb 23 1912 2014 2,200 General Refractorles 1912 1912 19 1972 19 1912 2012 201g 2014 19 Voting trwt certifs ,Vo par 121 1 Jan 22 1912 Feb 21 1672 1712 17 1734 1718 1712 1732 18,2 18 1834 1734 1814 19,700 310 Gen Steel Castings pref No par 3012 Jan 13 4812 Mar 15 4312 .42 .42 4512 44 45 43,2 43 .42 45 4412 .42 1214 41.900 Gillette Safety Razor_No par 812 Jan 6 1212 Feb 6 1034 1034 1052 1072 1052 1112 11 1212 1152 1214 12 No par 47 Jan 11 6134 Apr 19 Cony preferred 4,200 57 56 57 56 56 60 5612 57 6014 6134 6078 61 412 Jan 4 No par 632 Feb 5 1,900 Gimble Brothers 5 512 514 5 5 512 512 512 512 514 512 5,4 Preferred 100 1614 Jan 8 30 Feb 5 .25 27 1,000 27 2532 2538 .2412 27 .25 2532 2532 2578 27 No par 27 155s Jan 4 28 Apr 20 2738 261s 2714 2812 Ms 2634 27 13,600 Glidden Co (The) 2834 27 2712 28 100 83 Jan 19 102 Apr 12 Prior preferred 101 10112 10072 101 100 102 10012 10114 100 101 530 10012 10072 5 512 Jan 2 912 Feb 27 812 834 912 14,600 Gobel (Adolf) 812 858 812 852 9 878 914 834 938 214 2138 2034 2132 2078 2138 2138 2172 2112 22 1634 Jan 11 2234 Apr 21 2134 2234 25,800 Gold Dust Corp v t e___No par 9612 Jan 109 Mar 23 •107 112 .107 112 *10712 112 *10712 112 .10712 112 .10712 112 36 cony preferred. __No pa No par 1252 Jan 18 Feb 19 1632 1632 1534 1612 161,2 1612 1614 1634 1612 17 17 1738 28,300 Goodrich CO(B F) 100 40 Jan 6178 Apr 20 5914 5972 58 Preferred 5934 58 6072 6172 4,800 5814 581 1 5914 5834 60 4138 Feb 19 3614 3712 3414 3634 3434 3572 3512 387/1 3534 3672 3614 3734 23,300 Goodyear Tire dr Rubb.No par 3358 Jan 75 Jan No par 84 1st preferred 84 900 8312 8312 83 83 8614 Feb 19 81 81 8314 8312 83 83 7 Jan No par 952 10 1012 952 10 1134 Feb 5 10 10 1012 1014 1012 3,400 Gotham Silk flose 972 10 Preferred *63 69 63 *65 100 4912 Jan 2 63 Apr 4 74 10 68 63 *69 71 *68 74 .68 I 41:Feb 1 234 Jan 331 412 372 4 334 4 334 37s 334 378 334 378 8,500 Graham-Paige Motors 8 Jan 1112 1172 4,100 Granby Cons M Sm & Pr_.100 1332 Feb 16 1212 1212 1112 1112 1114 1172 1152 1152 111.4 12 71 : 71, , 672 7 7 1 732 4 Jan 732 752 834 Jan 31 732 712 2,400 Grand Union Co tr Ws 714 732 Cony pref series 3914 No par 23 Jan 1,500 39 3712 3772 37 3914 Apr20 3713 3772 39 39 39 39 39 30 301g Apr 11 .2912 30 .2912 30 23 Jan! No par 2,200 Granite City Steel 30 30 30 30 3018 *301s 31 No par 34 Jan 2 38 3852 39 4052 Feb 19 40 3914 3912 3812 3912 2,200 Grant (W T) 3812 39 .3712 38 11 Jan 1314 1414 1312 1334 1334 1372 4,900 Gt Nor Iron Ore Prop_No par 1358 1372 14 14 14 1518 Feb 19 14 2814 2912 2812 2912 2934 30 257g Mar 21 30's8,700 Great Western Sugar_No par 30 3472 Jan 20 30 297s 3032 30 109 110 109 110 110 110 480 Preferred 100 102 Jan 2 11012 Apr 19 10972 110 11014 11012 11012 11012 21s 218 21g 214 Ds 212 212 212 212 *212 214 214 1,700 Guantanamo Sugar_ __No par 313 Feb 8 , 4 Jan 2 *32 39 .32 •32 Gulf States Steel 3834 *30 39 40 .32 39 39 •32 No par 24 Jan 2 42 Mar 13 80 77 80 .74 Preferred 83 .74 80 80 .77 40 80 .78 too 47 Jan 8 83 Apr 20 *74 • Bid and asked prices, no sales on this day. 1 Companies reported In recelvership. a Optional sale. c Cash sale. z Es-dividend. PER SHARE Range for Previous Year 1933. Lowest. Highest. $ Per share 152 Feb 2432 July 614 Feb 48 Apr 10 Mar 1712 Feb 2812 Feb 12 Feb 1012 Feb 1014 Feb 634 Feb 212 Mar 72 Apr 85 Nov 112 Mar 46 Apr 110 May 312 Mar 3212 Mar 9712 Apr 3 per share ma, July 49 July 1832 June 9112 July 3372 Aug 2912 July 31 July 3912 Sept 2638 July 1814 July 18 June 1034 June 1434 July 10212 June 10 July 8934 July 130 Mar 16 July 963a Dec 117 July 1-0 Apr 75 Oct 1 Jan 1 Feb 3,2 Feb 7,2 Apr 612 Apr 21 Feb la Jan 52 Apr 26 Feb 107 Feb 334 Dec 11 Deo 11 Dee 12 Dec 612 Mar 3 Apr 72 Mar 312 Nov 72 May 1 Feb 212 Mar 10 Feb 454 Apr 33 Dec 15 Mar 34 Mar 34 Feb 132 Dec 712 Feb 1014 Mar 5 Mar 9 Apr 81 Apr 91s Apr 42 Mar 43 Mar 212 Feb 612 Apr 412 Feb 2 Feb 1352 Mar 12 Oct 12 Jan 1612 Feb 9 Jan 4 Jan 1 Feb 61 : Jan 252 Feb 42 Feb 1334 Feb 458 Mar 1012 Dec 9934 Mar 218 Feb 114 Mar 214 Feb 612 Mar 2414 Dee 90 July 1012 Feb 107a Apr 21 Feb 12 Dec 312 Apr 634 Dec 5 Apr 2414 Jan 3512 Mar 9212 Mar 10 Feb 6512 Mar 512 Jan 212 Mar 314 Jan 31 Mar 2 Apr 1314 Jan 33 Feb 512 Jan 212 Feb 714 Sept 938 Feb 752 Dec 4512 Dec 84 Feb 514 Mar 334 Mar 48 Apr 3 Feb 12 Feb 961: Dec 3 Mar 9 Feb 914 Feb 2734 Mar 612 Oct 41 Apr 1 Apr 372 Mar 352 Mar 20 Sept Ills Mar 1534 Feb 512 Feb 672 Jan 7212 Jan 14 Jan 634 Feb 18,4 Jan /712 July 8812 July 814 July 412 Dec 1532 June 3612 June 3234 June 54 July 4 June 6 June 6272 July 123 Oct 1434 June 47 June 4972 June 55 June 1332 July 1814 July 10 Nov 1112 July 258 June y Is rights. 814 June 1114 June 4212 Nov 1412 June 5912 July 103 Sept 1134 July 472 July 634 June 30 July 36 July 938 Nov 30 July 95 Sept 3112 July 75 Juno 7034 July 19 June Ill July 23 July 2332 July 2614 June 19 Sept 50 Aug 4932 Nov 31 June 23 June 514 Aug 2072 Aug 12 June 85 July 4314 July 27 July 2078 July 1081 1 Sept 1012 July 1112 June 23 June 46 June 4858 June 112 Jan 3014 July 1214 July 3972 Sept 272 June 1612 June 1812 June 20 June 5534 Nov 71 June 10612 Sept 3534 Sept 05 July 24 June 1012 Juno 17 June 82 Aug 814 June 4912 July 452 June 2234 June 1934 July IS June 3812 June 2014 Jan 76 Jan 758 lune 33 July 20 July 9112 Aug 16 July 2752 July 105 July 2112 July 63 July 4712 July 8014 July 1712 June 73 July 558 July 1538 June 1058 June 3632 July 3052 July 3612 Dee 1634 July 41/2 Sept 110 Sept 412 May 38 July 64 June ur FOR SALES New York Stock Record-Continued-Page 5 HIGH AND LOW SALE PRICES-PER SHARE, NOT PER CENT. Saturday Apr. 14. Monday Apr. 16. 2711 DURING THE WEEK OF STOCKS NOT RECORDED IN THIS LIST, SEE FIFTH PAGE PRECEDING, Tuesday Apr, 17. 1Vednesday Apr. 18. Thursday Apr. 19. Friday Apr. 20. Sales for the Week. STOCKS NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE. PER SHARE Range Since Jan. 1. On basis of 100-share lots. Lowest, Highest. PER SHARE Range for Previous Year 1933. Lowest. Highest. $ per share $ per share $ Per Share $S Per share $ Per share $ per share Shares. Indus. & MIscell. (Con.) Par $ per share $ per share $ Per share $ per share .2458 2517 25 25 *2518 2512 2512 26 *2518 26 500 Hackensack Water *2518 26 25 2012 Jan 9 26 Apr IS 15 Mar 2512 July *2818 2812 •2818 2812 2818 2812 2814 2814 *2818 2812 2812 29 7% preferred class A....25 27 Jan 4 29 Apr 20 60 25 Apr 2878 Jan 714 738 678 738 67,1 7 814 Feb 15 718 738 14 Feb 6 Jan 5 718 714 912 July 74 714 9,100 Hahn Dept Stores___No par 47 4812 49 4812 4712 4812 4814 4814 50 Preferred 5134 1,600 100 2514 Jan 9 5134 Apr 20 50 51 9 Apr 3812 July 10,500 Hall Printing 714 712 8 717 712 9 758 8 714 758 10 312 Jan 8 738 8 318 Feb 934 Feb 14 1012 July 712 738 1178 2,800 Hamilton Watch Co___No par 712 8 338 Jan 26 712 754 1178 Apr 20 818 914 212 Apr 94 11,2 11 9 July 45 4518 *501 ___ 50 Preferred 51 *5114 671s 70 5012 51 51 51 100 25 Jan 15 51 Apr 18 15 Feb 35 July 9314 9314 9314 2-95 94 9434 9434 *93 165 Hanna (M A) Co $7 pf_No par 84 Jan 8 96 Apr 4 *93 93 93 95 4512 Jan 85 Aug 23 23 2214 234 22 23 2334 5,300 Harbi9on-Walk Refrac_No par 23 2238 23 618 Feb 2512 July 2212 22 144 Jan 2 24% Feb 21 *614 612 614 614 *534 6 600 Hat Corp of America cl A_ _I 6 6 78 Mar 612 Apr 13 278 Jan 2 618 614 *534 618 712 June 5212 5212 5217 5212 5412 5412 54 55 55 130 54 54 55 100 1934 Jan 4 55 Apr 14 647 preferred 518 Apr 30 June 518 514 538 538 5 2 514 538 514 518 558 114 Jan 2 534 6,700 Hayes Body Corp 518 6% Feb 15 34 Feb 319 July •93 9414 9318 94 9318 9414 94 1,900 Hazel-Atlas Glass Co *95 96 9438 9412 96 25 8634 Mar 28 963 Jan 27 65 July 9712 Dec *106 125 *106 125 106 106 *107 115 *10714 115 *10718 115 100 Helme (0 W) 694 Jan 105 Dec 25 101 Jan 9 107 Feb 4 *1014 12 *1014 12 .11 12 12 *104 12 *11 Hercules Motors 3 Mar No par 9 Jan 4 124 Mar 15 *1014 12 17 July *6812 6912 6712 6712 6878 6878 6878 69 1,100 Hercules Powder _ ...... No par 59 Jan 4 71 12 Feb 19 70 70 6912 704 15 Feb 6838 Dec 119 119 119 11912 120 120 $7 cum preferred 200 85 100 111 Jan 4 120 Apr 17 119 119 *11818 /19 Apr 11018 Dec 119 119 •55 59 5778 5818 57 59 900 Hershey Chocolate____No par 4817 Jan 15 59 Apr 18 57 58 59 3518 Mar 72 July 5834 5834 59 *90 91 91 91 No par 83 Feb 16 9217 Apr 20 *9078 92 300 Cony preferred 9112 9112 .9214 9234 9212 9212 6434 Apr 90 July 814 83 812 9 812 878 19,900 Furnace 934 Holland 512 Apr Jan No 20 3 par 834 9 834 0 312 Jan 9 934 1017 June 10 10 978 97s *912 10 1,000 Hollander dr Sons (A) 978 10 10 214 Mar 10 10 10 5 534 Jan 2 1078 Feb 6 1012 June *358 398 *358 370 *365 385 *365 390 x356 360 300 Homestake Mining 365 365 100 310 Jan 4 388 Mar 29 145 Jan 373 Oct *1912 2012 2034 21 800 Boudallle-Hershey cl A No par 2034 2034 *2014 21 *2014 2034 2012 21 11 Jan 8 234 Jan 30 15 June 44 Apr 512 5 *53s 514 Class B 518 518 514 57g No par 534 578 3,400 1 Mar 678 Jan 26 334 Jan 2 534 578 634 June 52 52 5134 5134 513 513 •5114 5112 5112 5112 5114 51,4 500 Household Finance part p1.50 43 Feb 5 54 Mar 12 43 Nov 5114 Jan 2612 26% 2512 26 2634 2634 26 2612 2612 2612 2634 26 1.500 Houston 011 of Tea tern ct63100 21 Jan 2 2934 Feb 5 814 Mar 38 July 478 478 47 47 434 5 Voting trust ells new._..25 1,900 514 5 54 5 I% Feb 312 Jan 8 48 54 58 Apr 6 73* July 5214 5378 5038 53 4 5318 50 5114 521 19,400 Howe Sound v t c 53 5012 5233 52 5 3512 Jan 3 5512 Apr 9 512 Jan 3838 Dec 2014 2038 1938 2038 1958 2014 2018 2118 20 138 Jan 5 2414 Feb 5 3 Feb 2013 198 2034 15,200 Hudson Motor Car____No par 163* July 538 512 434 514 78 July 10 4 Jan 4 54 434 5 54 158 Mar 5 714 Jan 30 5 51s 15,300 Hupp Motor Car Corp 5 8718 8914 8518 87 8714 8612 8612 9,000 Industrial Rayon No par 7434 Jan 8 9638 Jan 24 86 8514 8034 8612 87 24 Apr 85 Dec •64 67 6514 6534 *6412 6512 65 6534 6612 1,300 Ingersoll Rand 65 No par 5912 Jan 4 733 Feb 3 6518 65 1928 Feb 78 July *4614 4612 4512 48 1,100 Inland Steel 45 No par 4012 Jan 3 4934 Feb 21 45 12 *45 45 45 45 Feb 4578 July 4522 45 .510 .534 512 512 1,500 'aspiration Cons Copper...20 538 534 512 51 412 Jan 4 678 Feb 5 512 514 *512 534 2 Feb 912 June •4 414 *4 37 June 500 Insuransbares Ctfs Inc 4 4 418 4 4 4 418 418 4 I 418 April 218 Jan 2 114 Mar 435 418 4,900 Intercontl Itubber____No par 418 434 412 5 24 Jan 15 5 Apr 20 418 4% *412 48 414 43 38 Mar 412 July 1,200 Interlake Iron 9 No par 9 8 Jan 3 11 14 Feb 19 834 83 94 914 9 94 9 218 Mar 9 .9 9 12 July 412 412 417 514 5,100 Internal Agricul 4 2 Jan 8 438 427 412 No par 414 414 618 Feb 5 414 438 78 Feb 53a July *31 3112 2912 31 Prior preferred 33 3414 32 1.700 3114 31 100 15 Jan 8 374 Feb 3 2912 2912 31 5 Jan 2712 July *11312 144 144 14434 14412 14434 145 145 14312 14378 1,200 Int Business Machines_No par 132 Mar 27 149 14 Jan 30 145 145 7534 Feb 15314 July *978 10 1018 2,500 Internat Carriers Ltd 10 1018 10 1 934 978 1218 Feb 21 10 558 Jan 11 934 978 10 278 Jan 1078 July 1,400 International Oement__No par 2812:gar 21 *30 3038 30 2912 3014 29 3014 .29 291 30 618 Mar 40 July 2934 30 3734 Feb 5 4112 42 4112 4212! 12,900 Internal Harvester____No par 3758 Jan 4 4678 Feb 5 42 4058 41% 4034 4112 4112 4228 41 Feb46 July 1335 •12212 12418 *12217 124 Preferred 200 100 11512 Jan 13 124 Apr IS 12314 12314 124 124 *12312 127 *12312 127 I 80 Jan 11918 Aug 25 734 734 434 Jan 8 712 738 734 812 11,200 Int Hydro El Sys CIA 712 734 712 77 712 734 918 Feb 7 212 Apr 13711 July *434 5 458 438 300 Int Mercantile Marine_No par *458 478 .412 48 438 438 •412 5 318 Jan 2 14 Jan 6 Jan 24 67 June 2734 28 2712 28 2712 2814 2778 2814 2738 2818 2712 2818 61,200 Int Nickel of Canada__No par 21 Jan 4 2812 Apr 2 6% Feb234 Nov •123 124 *121 124 Preferred 100 100 11534 Jan 13 124 Apr 17 124 124 *122 125 *122 125 •122 125 72 Jan 115 Dec 1778 18 890 Internal 2278 1812 1812 183* 188 1914 21 2112 Paper 7% pref _100 1012 Jan 5 2278 Apr 20 2014 2112 212 Jan 2134 July 5 612 8,800 Inter Pap dr Pow CI A__No par 5 6 412 518 *458 478 512 618 4 Jan 4 5 512 12 Apr 612 Apr 20 10 July 278 278 Class B 3.100 31 No par 212 212 *233 234 3 134 Jan 4 234 338 234 34 534 July 14 Apr 33* Feb 6 2 218 2 Class C 218 No par 138 Jan 4 2 214 214 212 2 2 233 2'2 9,500 . 1 Jan 23* Feb 19 4 July 173* 1818 17 Preferred 2212 41,500 224 July 21 100 1014 Jan 8 2212 Apr 20 2 Apr 1812 17 183* 1812 2012 1934 21 1812 1812 1834 1914 Int Printing 6,000 par Ink Corp_No 23 Jan 13 23 Apr 20 9 193* 2012 2034 2212 2134 2212 228 312 Feb14 Oct *78 90 10 Preferred *7812 90 85 100 66 Jan 2 83 Apr 20 85 88 *80 90 Apr 71 *8212 88 35 *85 Aug 29 29 1,000 International Salt 2812 29 No par 21 Jan 3 3012 April 29 13% Mar 2734 July 29 30 3014 3012 301 *2912 30 4534 453 *4512 46 4512 4512 4512 4512 45 800 International Shoe____No par 43 Mar 19 5038 Jan 26 451 *4412 4512 243* Jan 5438 July 3912 40 *3612 391 100 34 Jan 12 4534 Feb 15 3812 3812 1.300 International Silver 38 37 954 Feb 5912 July 37 *3714 3918 37 79 80 360 79 7% preferred 7912 80 80 79 100 69 Jan 4 8412 Apr 9 2412 Mar 79 79 *75 79 79 7178 July 1458 147 1418 1478 1414 1438 1412 1518 1417 15 1458 1514 30,900 Inter Telep & Teleg___No par 1312 Feb 26 17% Feb 8 518 Feb 2134 July 1322 1214 1318 1318 144 1412 153* 15 13 1578 1558 1638 23,700 Interstate Dept Stores. No pa 312 Jan 4 1638 Apr 20 112 Mar 87 July 9 9 400 lntertype Corp 812 9 No par 558 Jan 3 10 Feb 8 .818 9 1 7 Jan 918 918 *812 9 1114 July *84 9 *2512 20 1,100 Island Creek Coal 26 28 2434 Jan 29 28 Feb 21 26 26 1 11 26 264 2714 2712 271_ 28 Feb 33 July 4818 48'g 48 2,100 Jewel Tea Inc 52 4838, 4812 4812 4812 4912 4917 50 I 50 No par 33 Jan 9 52 Apr 20 23 Feb 45 July 5734 5834 564 58 1 56 57 5612 5734 8,000 Johns 11.1anvIlle No par 5218 Mar 27 80% Jan 30 57 5638 5734 56 1214 Mar 6312 Dec .110 112 110 110 *109 111 Preferred 130 112 112 *11114 118 100 101 Jan 4 112 Apr 18 42 Apr 10818 July 111 112 72 1,050 72 Jones & 7312 723 4 pref. Laugh 7412 Steel 7312 72 .100 82 Jan 2 77 Jan 23 35 Feb 91 July 741 ', 4„ 7513 7312 75 , ,•4 1018 104 934 912 9t7 1018 93, June 934 978 3,700 Kaufmann Dept Stores $12.50 10 612 Jan 3 1038 Apr 13 94 10 235 Mar *1738 1758 1738 1712 1738 1734 1712 1738 •1718 1712 1712 1812 8,900 Kayser (J) a Co .Jan 4 1812 Apr 20 6 137 67g Feb 1912 July 314 314 314 338 338 317 4,600 Kelly-Springfield Tire 34 35s 314 314 314 318 78 Mar 5 412 Mar 12 214 Jan 5 64 July 1512 1512 1412 15 15 8% preferred 1534 1614 1634 2,600 15 15 1438 15 11 Jan 2 20 Jan 30 No par 6 Feb 31 18 June *5,2 7 100 Kelsey Hayes Wheel cony .c1A1 *512 7 7 *6 7 7 7 *6 .8 7 4 Jan 13 10 Feb 16 2 Feb 8 May *5 534 *5 Class 13 578 *5 112 Dec 534 *5 512 *5 1 258 Jan 2 712 Feb 16 57 8 834 June *5 5711 1914 1914 1838 1914 18% 19 1912 1878 1912 1918 1958 1,600 Kelvinator Corp 19 No par 1178 Jan 4 2114 Mar 14 318 Feb 15% Sept .81 85 .81 85 33 85 85 85 85 100 Kendall Co pt pf ser A _No par 6518 Jan 18 85 Star 28 85 85 85 30 Jan 73 July 2118 2134 2012 2218 21 2158 2134 2214 2114 2178 2112 223* 55.400 Kennecott Copper 73g Feb 26 Sept No par 1734Slar 27 23 Feb 5 *1712 18_ *1712 18 57 Apr2533 July .1712 18 100 Kimberley-Clark *1712 18 1712 1712 *1712 18 12 Jan 2 1814 Apr 12 No par 612 635 612 634 618 63, 618 678 612 67s 2,900 Kinney Co 6% ' No par 1 3 Jan 16 Apr Apr 13 714 814 June *35 39 .32 38 3312 *3214 3317 3312 3312 .3218 35 .32 100 rreferred No par 1312 Jan 6 3317 Apr 20 458 Feb 30 July 20% 2035 193 2012 20 2012 214 20,400 Kresge 04 Sl Co 2038 2038 2114 2012 21 10 1338 Jan 2 228 Feb 5 512 Mar 1678 July .11018 11012 110 110 110 11012 11012 11012 110 110 109 109 250 7% preferred ._____ _100 101 Jan 4 III Mar 16 88 Apr 105 June *5614 59 *5718 5114 *58 59 5634 5634 *57 51 60 200 Krona (S II) & Cs 60 No par 36 Jan 3 260 Apr 10 27 Jan 443* July 32 32 32% 6,400 Kroger °roe & Bak 5 July 31 14 3214 3114 324 3212 3278 3218 3278 32 No oar 19 1412 2327 234 8 Feb Jan 8 Feb35 •3712 40 40 40 40 4212 4212 4212 49 *3712 4212 42 160 Laclede CRS LI CO St LOUIS 100 40 Feb 2r 6312 Feb 13 30 Nov 80 .11111C •5112 54 5112 5134 514 514 4514 54 5214 5214 54 54 120 5% preferred 100 4212 Jan 1. 60 Feb 9 3717 Apr 61 Jan 2678 27 2634 2678 2638 2618 27 2714 2714 27 2678 2714 3,500 Lambert Co (The).___No par 224 Jan 4 3138 Feb 5 1938 Dec 41 18 July 11 11 1112 1112 12 14 1414 133 14 1218 1212 14 2,600 Lane Bryant No par 5 Jan 6 1414 Apr19 3 Feb1012 June 1314 1338 1234 1314 1314 1234 1314 1318 1334 3.800 Lee Rubber At Tire 1234 1318 13 5 8 Jan 8 141, Feb 19 334 Mar 123* July *1634 18 *16 17 *16 57 Jan 27 June 16 1618 1612 *1512 1634 .15 17 300 Lehigh Portland Cement....50 1312 Jan 3 20 Feb 23 *76 771. 77 77 7712 7712 *7412 85 .7412 85 *7412 85 110 7% preferred 100 7378 Feb 23 7712Mar 3 34 Feb 78 SaP1 314 31. *318 34 9312 313 318 338 3,700 Lehigh Valley Coal____No par 318 314 312 3 1 5 Feb 21 24 Jan 8 Jac 638 July 1014 1012 104 1014 *94 1038 1014 1012 11 971, 11 117 3,200 Preferred 12 June 50 212 Apr 5 Jan 3 1414 Feb 21 •72 73 7278 7278 72 733 74'a 1,400 Lehman Corp (The).,.No par 6518 Jan 4 78 Feb 6 7212 7318 733 74 72 3712 Feb 793 July .20 2012 *2014 20's 2014 20's 21 2212 2214 2312 2234 227s 5,900 Lehn dt Finl, Prod Co 14 5 1634 Jan 23 2317 Apr 19 Feb 2314 June 37 3712 3618 374 3614 374 3738 377 377g 9,500 Libby Owens Ford Glass No par 3414 Star 21 37 373* 373 4% Mar 37% July 4378 Jan 19 *2014 2012 20 2112 22 2014 20 2114 22 2014 21 3,100 Life Savers Corp 20 1558 Oct 2218 Sept 5 1718 Jan 8 22 Apr 19 *91 93 9112 911 .92 9512 94 94 900 Liggett & Myers Tobacco 25 73 Jan 6 9512 Apr 18 9312 9312 9512 *93 49 Feb 118 Sept 9212 9334 9212 93 9612 95 95 964 11,300 9212 9412 9412 97 Series Ii 494 Feb 993 Sept 25 7412 Jan 8 97 Apr 18 •13978 14034 140 140 140 140 139% 140 *14018 14014 1404 14014 500 Preferred 121 Mar 14018 Sept Apr fi 13 1407 129 8 Jan 100 2314 234 2238 2338 2278 2318 2318 23'2 23 23 23 2314 4,300 Lily Tulip Cup Corp...No par Apr 2112 Slay 13 18 Jan 15 2312 Apr 18 29 29 29 29 *2812 29 29 *294 3012 400 Lima Locomot V.orks..No par 293* •2834 30 2512 Jan 4 3314 Feb 5 10 Jan 3I% July *173 18 1734 18 .17 1712 1712 1712 1753 1758 1714 1714 700 Link Belt Co. Apr No 193 . July pa, 1214 Jan 3 63 4 Feb 8 193* *2914 2934 2834 2912 2834 2912 30 33 3212 333 24,300 Litiuld Carbonic 30 31 No pa, 2612 Mar 1 1014 Feb 50 July 3334 Apr 20 3414 3479 334 3412 3388 3424 3418 3434 34 3478 34 343 91,900 Loew's Incorpotated Sept Mar No 3617 par 817 25 3 Apr 4 Jan 12 6 3518 97 97 *9512 98 97 *963g 98 97 97 98 97 *97 300 Preferred No par 72 Jan 2 97 Apr 14 Apr 7818 July 35 214 238 214 23, 214 213 238 1,800 Loft Incorporated 23, 238 214 214 '21 No par 158 Jan 2 Dec 41 . June 1 12 3 Jan 31 I% 178 I% 178 2 2 2 178 *178 2 *178 2 800 Long Bell Lumber A No par 114 Jan 12 512 June 12 Feb 25 Feb 20 *4212 4234 4218 427 24238 423* •4114 42 41% 4134 42 42 800 Loose- Wiles Biscuit 25 3812 Feb 26 z4434 Jan 17 194 Fob 443 Dec 128 128 *126 128 •126 128 *126 128 .126 128 126 126 30 7% 1st preferred 100 Miy 14 120 11 11312 128 Jan 1193 Apr 4 Jan 173 1734 173* 177 1712 1778 1734 184 1818 1835 184 1812 21,100 Lornlard (P) CO 10 153 Jan 8 1912 Feb 5 1038 Feb 25,4 July .10934 ____ •10934 ____ •I093 ____ •109% __ _.*109% ---- *1093 ---77. preferred 100 102 Jan 26 113 Apr 11 8717 Feb 1o6 Nov 238 258 212 21. 258 234 1,4001 Louisiana OH 217 21. .238 234 258 '234 No par 114 Jan 10 38 Jan 338 Apr 4 4 July 16,2 1612 *1634 171; 17 1918 1918 19 18 18 160 173-4 18 Preferred 100 714 Jan 2 2317 Apr 4 317 Feb29 July 18 18 173 177 173 1778 1814 *18 1712 1734 17 1,600 Louisville (las & El A_No par 187 15 Jan 9 21 Feb 7 137. Apr 2534 June *1614 17 1618 1638 1638 1634 1612 1612 1634 1678 1,500 Ludlum Steel 17 17 1 15 Jan 8 1912 Feb 20 4 Feb 2018 July *90 92 89 89 .88 9134 *89 9134 91 9112 •89 100 Cony preferred ....No par 8712 Jan 8 97 Feb 20 •89 14% Mar 95,2 Dec 32 32 3178 32 3214 3214 321: 3314 3318 3358 3334 3378 2,900 MacAndrews A Forbes._ II 30 Jan 5 337 Apr 20 912 Feb 3114 Dec '101..._ 101 101 5101 _ •102 10 • 6'; preferred _ •102 __ •I01 100 95 Jan 1: 101 Apr 16 Apr 96 Nov 74 *3217 33 3217 3217 3312 -3312 33 -4,100 Mack 'I ruck9 Luc. __No par 3034 Mar 20 41% Feb 6 3212 33 337 - 8 33 -3-35s 1312 Feb 4633 July 49 4912 4812 49 4812 4918 49 4958 x4818 4878 4778 483 6,300 Macy (13 H) Co Inc...No par 472 Apr 6 1321s J1111 30 241 . Feb 8534 July 7 54 5 478 5 5 5 5 5 5 514 *5 514 1,300 Madison So Oard v t e_No par 235 Jan 2 514 Apr 19 7 June 13* Mar 2112 21,2 *2012 22 203* 21 21is 22 *2114 2134 21 14 217* 3,200 Magma _ - -- 10 1517 Jan 17 22 Apr 16 538 Mar If", July *234 3 *231 3 278 3 •278 3 278 3 27s 358 8,700 MallinsonCopper.1 June _. par (H RI a00.N0 178 Jan 2 4 Feb 7 5. 7 , Feb •14 1814 20 21 •19 2012 21 20% 204 2012 2312 21 610 7.7, preferred - 100 758 Jan 9 2312 Apr 20 3 Feb 2634 July *2 3 2 2 *2 3 212 212 *218 314 *218 314 200 :Manatl Sugar 53 July 100 I Jan 8 32 Jan 23 Is Jan 612 612 6t2 9512 612 534 *5 6,2 *5 5 5 •5 40 Preferred 100 134 Jan 3 84 Jan 22 678 July se .11813 *634 714 *718 714 . 612 634 634 7 678 678 714 722 1,500 Mandel Bros_ 414 Jan 23 No par 812 Jan 26 97 .June 112 Jan •I818 1812 18 1812 *1712 1812 .18 1812 1812 1812 .18 1834 600 Manhattan shirt. V 1214 Jan 4 2038 Feb I 512 Al" 23 July .23 34 *234 34 ..1 212 2% *212 23 234 23 22 234 200 Maracaibo oil Explor.No par 134 Jan 10 June 4 338 Feb 17 1• Jan 5 5 5 5 5 5 45 54 5 5 5 5 3.500 Nlarancha Corp ' 43* Jan 8 538 Feb " 478 No N 318 NOV 778 77 77 75* 734 812 14,600 Malta- MitlIALO Corp. _ _5 83. 7,2 7% 8 77 8% 9 Feb ' 534 Jan 5 6 5 Dec 11,2 Jan 28 .27 *26 28 *27 28 28 28 28 28 *2612 28 200 Marlin Rockwell No par 214 Jan 8 32 Jail 25 Feb 2314 Dec a 18% 19 1814 1835 1812 19 1818 19 1858 18% 1812 187 7.900 Marshall Field a CO___No par 12)2 Jan 4 1935 Apr II 1839 June 41 . Jan 104 .012 II 1012 101* 10 •10 10 1012 1012 1012 10 700 NfartIn.Parry Corp _.,,.Vo par 612 Jan 24 1238 Mar 3 778 Dec 12 Jan • Bid and asked prices, no sties on thls day. 1 Companies reported in receivership. a Optional sale. c Cash sale. s Sold 15 days. r Ex-dividend. y Ex-rights. I New York Stock Record-Continued-Page 6 2712 April 21 1934 larFOR SALES DURING THE WEEK OF STOCKS NOT RECORDED IN THIS LIST, SEE SIXTH PAGE PRECEDING HIGH AND LOW SALE PRICES-PER SHARE, NOT PER CENT. Saturday Apr. 14. Monday Apr. 16. S per share 36 36 4112 4112 *718 8 *2634 27 *75 80 32 32 3 3 *278 34 2212 2254 812 812 48 4818 *89 8978 812 834 30 30 33 334 46 47 *3334 3412 914 934 43 43 *2412 25 *24% 253 512 .512 1312 1378 1712 1734 85 8518 49 49 433 438 *28 32 19 1918 *92 93% 3112 313 5034 5034 78 1 *1038 104 3614 3612 1414 1438 14% 1438 3412 3412 2478 25 94 914 *1812 1914 244 2412 Tuesday !Wednesday' Thursday Apr. .17. Apr. 18. Apr. 19. Friday Apr. 20. Sales for the Week. STOCKS NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE. I PER SHARE Range Since Jan. 1. On basis of 100-share lots. Lowest. Highest. PER SHARE Range for Previous Year 1033. Lowest. Highest. $ per share S per share $ per share $ per share S per share Shares. Indus.& Miscell.(Con.) Par $ per share $ per share $ per share $ per chars 5,100 Mathieson Alkali WorksNo par 3214 Jan 8 4034 Jan 24 14 Feb 4651 Nov 35 36 3514 3513 3514 361, . 3512 36% 3614 363 41 4212 42 4078 41 4314 43 44 44 44 3,900 May Department Stores___10 30 Jan 2 44 Apr 19 934 Feb 33 Sept 73 7 74 *738 712 No par 438 Jan 2 834 Feb 21 8 *7 738 118 Apr 712 712 1,300 Maytag Co 812 July 2512 2612 2512 26 10 Jan 2 28 Apr 5 2612 2612 26 26 2614 27 1,600 Preferred No par 34 Apr 1514 Aug 7812 80 80 *75 7812 *75 10 49 Jan 3 9212 Apr 3 7812 *75 Prior preferred NO par 7812 *75 15 Apr 58 Oct 3112 3112 3112 3134 3114 3112 x31 No par 24 Jan 11 32 Apr 13 3114 31 31 1,600 McCall Corp 13 Mar 3034 Sept 278 318 279 278 412 Feb 6 278 3 234 3 4,200 :McCrory Stores classANo par 118 Jan 8 278 3 478 June 38 Apr 414 Feb 6 3 3 3 3 3 3 278 3 Class 13 No par 138 Jan 4 *254 34 1,100 118 Dec 6 Jan 2178 24 2278 23 *22 2212 2258 23 2,400 Cony preferred 100 54 Jan 2 2534 Mar 17 22 23 212 Mar 21 Jan *818 918 *814 94 400 McGraw-Hill Pub Co_No par 4 Jan 4 912 Apr 18 *914 11 3 Apr 918 94 *912 11 818 June 4734 4834 48 4814 48 4878 45 18 Mar 48% Oct 4514 4678 49,600 McIntyre Porcupine Mines...5 3812 Jan 25 5014 Apr 2 47 4418 Jan 9584 Aug 89 8978 89 90 90 91 9012 918 2,300 McKeesport Tin Plate_No par 8318 Mar 27 9414 Feb 21 89 90 918 Apr 10 8 412 Jan 2 834 5 134 Mar 1312 July 81s 8% 818 834 814 834 15,900 McKesson & Robbins 814 834 28 30 2878 2914 29 Cony pref series A 31 10,000 50 1178 Jan 2 33 Apr 20 30 31 358 Mar 25 July 2978 33 35 37 558 Mar 17 414 418 378 418 1 Jan 6 33 July No par 312 378 334 378 56,000 :McLellan Stores 14 Feb 4612 47 47 100 912 Jan 2 52 Mar 17 218 Jan 2278 July 4934 4934 50 8% cony pref ser A 49 49 .47 4812 1,900 26 Jan 2 3514 Apr 20 34 34 3312 345 35 No par 35 3412 3434 35 3514 2,300 Melville Shoe 834 Feb 2834 Oct 1 634 Jan 13 11 Jan 22 2 Mar 20 July 934 108 1018 1012 9% 1014 934 1014 934 978 6,900 Mengel Co (The) 7% preferred 100 30 Mar 21 52 Apr 19 4614 47 474 50 4812 51 580 22 50 52 *4712 50 Jan 57 July 5 1512 Jan 4 30 Feb 19 241. 25 25 2714 2634 28 27 2712 27 2714 6,700 Mesta Machine Co 7 Feb 21 Sept 253 ; 2534 2534 2534 2534 26 1,200 Metro-Goldwyn Pict pref__27 21 Jan 5 26 Apr 18 1312 Mar 22 Sept 2578 26 *2578 26 612 Feb 16 934 June 5 418 Jan 9 538 538 558 1,300 Miami Copper 158 Mar 514 514 514 553 514 514 *514 1338 1334 1312 1358 1312 1334 1333 14 1158 Jan 9 1434 Feb 5 334 Mar 16 July 8,000 Mid-Continent Petrol__No par 1312 14 1214 Jan 8 2178 Feb 19 1678 1712 *17 18 1712 1712 1633 1712 17 2,200 Midland Steel Prod____No par 3 Mar 175 July 18 26 Mar 72 Sept 8% cum 1st pre! 100 7012 Jan 12 8518 Apr 14 *83 85 *83 85 85 85 400 *84 8518 85 85 4612 4612 *47 48 4754 48 600 Minn-Honeywell Regu_No par 36 Jan 4 52 Feb 1 13 Apr 365 Dee *47 4834 4834 49 578 Jan 30 218 Jan 4 78 Feb 414 414 4 418 534 July 44 414 44 438 44 4,8 3,800 Minn Moline Pow Impl No par Preferred 1718 Jan 11 3534 Feb I 028 32 *28 32 *30 3112 *2814 32 No par 6 Feb *30 3112 30 July 19 1912 18% 1933 1918 2114 1912 2034 20 7 Jan 22 July 2214 29,300 Mohawk Carpet Mills 20 1212 Jan 4 2214 Apr 20 2.5 Mar 83 Dec *90 937 9314 9312 93 800 Monsanto Chem Wks 10 75 Feb 26 9612 Apr 4 9312 9212 9212 *9033 92 3038 315 305 3112 3114 314 30% 311z 31 858 Feb 287 July 3178 87,900 Mont Ward Az Co Inc__No par 2114 Jan 4 3558 Feb 15 25 50 No par 37 Jan 4 5114 Apr 13 Jan 56 July 50 5014 50 *49 50 600 Mortal (J) & Co 50 50 4934 4934 58 Jan 8 I% Feb 8 78 1 78 1 1 3,500 Mother Lode Coalltion_No par 78 % 78 78 78 218 June 18 Jan *1014 1012 103 1038 1058 1034 1012 1034 1012 10% 5,000 Moto Meter Gauge & Eq____1 714 Jan 6 12 Feb 21 14 Jan 8% Dee 734 Mar 3634 Sept 3.514 3512 3512 36 3614 3612 36 3612 3514 3534 2,400 Motor Products Corp No par 30 Jan 4 4434 Feb 15 112 Mar 14 1438 137 1418 1414 1434 1418 1412 14 1438 5,700 Motor Wheel 5 9 Jan 5 1612 Feb 16 1158 July 112 Mar 1412 1478 148 1514 5,400 Mullins Mfg Co No par 514 Jan 12 1514 Apr 20 134 1434 1414 1414 145 15 1034 July 5 Mar 25 June 3512 37 36 37 3714 3978 3733 3914 3712 3978 3,320 Cony preferred No par 1218 Jan 12 397s Apr 18 5 Mar 25 *24 2514 *2418 2518 2458 24% *2412 2518 600 Munsingwear Inc 25 No par 1334 Jan 6 2514 Apr 13 1838 June I% Feb 8% 93* 10 618 Jan 9 115* Feb 16 1112 July 9 033 94 933 912 934 9,300 Murray Corp of Amer 9318 934 8 Jan 2012 July 1.812 1812 *18 1812 1812 1812 *1838 1812 1812 19 No par 1518 Jan 2 2134 Feb 21 500 Myers F & E Bros 1118 Apr 27 July 2318 2418 2314 24 2412 2478 24 2434 24 2453 23,800 Nash Motors Co No par 23 Jan 4 3214 Jan 30 11 Feb 81 Feb 23 75* 734 *73* 734 734 734 1 44 Jan 9 734 July 714 758 718 712 712 712 2,3001 National Acme 1, ,18 8 Den ja e 1191718 834 9 *812 88 833 85* •834 9 75* Fel, 13 1311 Jan 319 8 .1 , 1 /i,y e 834 912 2,5001 National Aviation Corp.No par 85* 858 912 10 *10 1012 *912 10 1,600 :National Bellas Hess pre:_100 314 Jan 6 I234Mar 19 954 934 934 10 978 10 3112 Feb 6058 June 435* 4418 43 44 4278 4331 43% 443 433 4378 4378 448 11,000 National Biscuit 10 39% Mar 10 4912 Jan 16 *14158 14312 *14318 14312 143 14318 *1423* 14418 143 143 14212 143 900 7% cum prof 100 131 Jan 3 148 Apr 2 118 Mar 145 Aug 19 1914 1934 1918 1934 1912 2014 23,100 Nat Cash Register A___No par 54 Mar 2358 July 19 1812 19 1812 19 164 Jan 8 235 Feb 6 1534 16 154 16 1512 16 16 163., 1638 1678 1678 1712 56,100 Nat Dairy Prod 1012 Feb 255 July No par 13 Jan 4 1712 Feb 6 214 212 % Mar 23 212 212 25* 214 3 Mar 16 *214 212 214 212 212 7.400 INat DepartmentStoresNo par 1 Jan 0 212 June 1612 1714 1712 1912 1812 2034 21 2212 21 2214 20 114 Feb 22 6,750 Preferred 100 5 Jan 17 2212 Apr 18 10 June 207 Dec 3314 Nov 30 3012 2918 3014 293* 3012 3012 3114 3012 3114 3014 3118 84,000 Nati Distil Prod new....No par 2314 Jan 3 3158 Feb 1 25 *24 26 .24 *24 26 25 25 1612 Jan 5 2814 Mar 5 5 Feb 25 2534 26 28 1,000 Nat Enam & Stamping_No par 1933 Dec 141 14712 151 16012 156 158 4314 Feb 140 Nov *139 145 *139 145 150 155 2,900 National Lead 100 135 Feb 10 16012 Apr IS *140 144 *140 143 *140 143 143 143 *142 148 *142 148 100 Preferred A 100 122 Jan 16 143 Apr 18 101 Mar 12814 Nov 76 Feb 10918 July *10812 11812 *10812 11812 *10812 11812 *10812 11658 *107 1165* •10814 11812 Preferred B 100 1001z Jan 9 108 Mar 16 1134 12 1138 1112 1138 12 6% Apr 2012 July 1178 1214 14,200 National Pow & Lt--__No par 812 Jan 4 1512 Feb 6 118 12 113* 12 *4812 4834 4634 48 47 15 Feb 5518 July 4812 ;49 493 48% 49 465* 47 3,000 National Steel Corp 25 45 Mar 22 5814 Feb 5 1812 1834 1718 18 1714 1714 1814 1812 1818 1812 1812 2018 6,400 National Supply of Del__ _25 1112 Jan 10 204 Apr 20 Apr 285* June 4 53 54 52 53 5012 52 517 537 17 Feb 6014 June Preferred 53 55 5612 58 730 100 3312 Jan 4 58 Apr 20 1718 1633 17 612 Jan 27 July 1634 164 17 17 1814 174 177* 15 Afar 27 1834 Feb 1 1712 1784 8,000 National Tea Co No par 2814 2814 2914 27 112 Jan 285* 2978 2634 2734 27 2712 2758 28 5,300 Nehiner Bros No par 612 Jan 4 3014 Apr 13 12,8 June 4812 4812 464 4712 4612 464 4634 4712 47 47,2 4734 4954 2,700 Newberry Co (J J)__ __No par 4112 Apr 2 4978 Apr 10 *103 104 10312 10312 103 103 10318 104 *103 104 104 104 7% preferred 500 100 100 Apr 3 104 Apr 10 1% Mar *1014 1012 1018 104 1018 1014 1018 1014 10 10 10 1014 2,500 Newport Industries 1 6 Jan 10 13 Mar 6 1134 Jul; 618 Apr 234 July 2078 2078 1934 194 19 19 *1934 2012 *1912 2014 19 2034 1,000 N Y Air Brake No par 15 Jan 5 2434 Feb 7 234 Dee 1178 June 814 Mar 19 *634 6% 6 634 *614 612 612 612 .6 7 *6 7 300 New York Dock 100 358 Jan 11 8 1514 1434 1478 *13 Oct 22 June 15% *133 15 Preferred 1512 1512 15 15 15 600 100 8 Jan 8 20 Mar 13 38 Dec 114 Feb 7 84 *84 % 84 78 84 81 34 84 1,100 IN Y Investors Inc____No par 12 Jan 2 234 June *84 78 84 18 1834 1778 18 1834 19 185 1878 1814 1812 1814 1878 3,700 NY Shloblde Corp part stk__1 IN Jan 2212 Aug 1158 Jan 3 22% Feb 1 85 31 85 *8424 85 •84 86 08318 84 8414 8414 *83 Jan 90 Juno 85 30 7% preferred 100 7312 Jan 2 8934 Apr 13 n e 130611728 70 Nov 9712 *97 60 N Y Steam $6 pref No par 82 Jan 5 9912 Apr 10 97% 9712 984 *9612 9812 9612 9612 972 974 *96 83 Nov 110 106 106 *106 108 *107 108 *107 108 *107 108 *106 109 20 $7 1s1 preferred No par 90 Jan 15 107 Jan 27 Jan 4118 425* 42 1738 Jan 387 Sept 4212 4314 433 437 435* 435* 4278 437 4278 18,000 Noranda Mines Ltd_No par 3314 Jan 4 4412 Apr 9 1338 Jan 9 254 Feb 6 1914 198 1858 1912 18% 1918 1858 1912 18% 1912 1914 2014 53,000 North American Co. No par 1214 July 31 Dec 46 4414 4414 4334 4334 4334 4414 4418 4418 *4378 45 4418 45 1,300 Preferred 50 34 Jan 9 45 Apr 20 Jan 5% 6 4 Feb 6 6 5% 618 6 618 6 884 Feb 1 612 14,600 North Amer Aviation 1 418 Feb 10 58 618 9 July 701. 71 *69 7012 7012 7012 7034 7114 715* 7212 1,500 No Amer Edison prcf__No par 4712 Jan 4 73 Feb 7 70 70 39 Nov 79 July *4012 4212 •40 - 4212 *40 43 *4112 43 Mar 29 269 4 *42 Northwestern Telegraph __50 34 Jan 9 42 43 *42 43 Apr 43 June 333 334 44 Feb 19 1 18 Feb 57 July 334 4 238 Jan 8 *334 378 33.4 354 358 334 358 378 2,400 Norwalk Tire & Rubber No par 1318 1314 1278 1314 124 1314 13 133 13 434 Feb No par 1258 Jan 9 1578 Feb 5 138 1278 13% 25,200 Ohio 011 Co 1758 July 47 47 5 5 434 478 *478 5 358 Jan 4 7 Feb 5 118 Feb 478 5 No par 5 518 2,000 Oliver Farm Equip 834 July 225* 225* 2112 22 *2118 2312 2318 2318 2134 2178 2214 2214 314 Feb 3034 June 800 Preferred A No par 12 Jan 8 27% Feb 5 614 Jan 2 134 Mar 533 5% 5% Jan 27 518 54 514 553 54 54 1,400 Omnibus Corp(The)vta No par *5,8 54 *518 538 834 July 212 Feb 13 1318 13 1338 1314 1314 1314 1338 1312 137 1314 13 2,700 Oppenheim Coll & Co No par 74 Jan 4 1458 Mar 31 15 June *1512 16 1512 1533 153* 1512 1558 1534 143 Jan 6 1938 Feb 16 10 1,14 5,100 Otis Elevator No par a Mar5 155* 1534 1512 16 2: 9 4 JJu July un 9912 9912 *99% 100 Preferred 100 100 *9912 100 *9912 100 *9912 100 160 100 92 Jan 18 101 Feb 27 9319 Apr 106 July 8 Feb 19 6% 638 4,000 Otis Steel No par 418 Jan 4 614 63* 6,8 614 618 614 614 612 614 612 June 24 Feb 218 June Prior preferred *183* 19 18 1812 175* 1758 1834 1912 1914 2078 20% 2034 3,400 100 0 Jan 2 25 Feb 20 8612 87 87 86 86 8712 87 8712 8778 884 2,500 Owens-Illinois Glass Co____25 7814 Jan 3 94 Jan 30 88 88 3112 Mar 965k July 15 Dec 32 July 9,100 Pacific Gas 6z Electric 25 1512 Jan 6 2312 Feb 7 1914 1912 1914 194 1918 1914 1918 1934 1912 1958 1914 20 3534 x35 3518 345* 3533 3,500 Pacific Ltg Corp 35 3412 35 345* 345* 3412 35 No par 2312 Jan 2 37 Feb 7 22 Dec 4338 Jan *27 3°78 *2712 3078 3078 3078 31 100 2634 Jan 2 34 Feb 5 *27 3114 *27 31 3118 300 Pacific Mills 6 Feb 20 July 310 Pacific Telep & Teleg 100 72 Jan 11 8512 Mar 13 8014 8014 80 81 80 80 8134 8212 82 8314 8212 82 55 Mar 948 July 230 6% preferred 100 103 Jan 3 112 Apr 17 9914 Nov 1 1 112 sept 112 112 *111 112 *111 112 112 112 *111 112 0111 112 77 888 Apr 13 814 612Mar 19 53 4 7,4 8 84 1)11 734 83* 6 9, 1.2 ..Z31 8 838 812 3,800 l'f1C Western oil Corp_ _No par 838 8 838 378 Jan 4 6% Feb 23 5 512 5 514 5 1 514 5,8 512 518 538 518 538 107,000 Packard Motor Car___No par 500 Pan.Amer Petr de Thins ____5 102 Jan 9 1112 Jan 30 II 11 *1034 114 1118 1118 11 8 June II *1034 1114 *1034 1114 14 July 1 24 Jan 4 3512 Feb 6 30 30% 30 30 3,000 Park-Tilford Inc 3014 31 2934 3114 2912 30 2978 30 6 Jan 3638 Oct 2 Feb 5 1 Jan 11 134 *138 134 .138 158 *138 18 138 138 700 Parmelee Transporta'n _No par 134 14 134 38 Mar 3 July 212 Aim 6 2 114 Jan 2 218 2 134 134 800 Panhandle Prod & Ref_No par 218 218 *2 224 233 218 24 , a Apr 414 June 100 12 Jan 3 2112 Apr 0 90 8% cony preferred 1912 *1512 1812 1812 1812 *154 1812 *1512 1812 53 Jail 1912 1912 19 29 June 57 512 534 518 558 518 538 514 538 518 54 53 33,500 :Paramount Publix etts____10 134 Jan 2 Feb 16 53* % Apr 212 June 1 314 Jan 11 6% Feb 15 5 518 34,900 Park Utah C M 47 54 434 518 478 514 434 5 % Jan 518 514 414 July No par 414 Mar 2 112 Jan 4 3 314 314 338 14 Jan 318 338 318 338 315 314 34 314 19,000 Pathe Exchange 212 July 1012 Jan 4 2331 Apr 19 2178 21 2314 2212 238 Preferred class A__ No par 2012 2218 20 218 22 2234 2314 50,900 133 Jun 1414 Dec 53 Jan 173 Jan 9 2112 Jan 2 1938 194 19 1914 1914 1958 19 1984 1918 1912 1914 198 8,300 Patin° Mines & Enterpr No par 25 Nov 3 2 Jan 2 412 Apr 20 418 414 4 43* 4 4 334 418 414 412 7.600 Peerless Motor Car 334 38 34 Feb 918 July No par 5618 Mar 27 el Jan 311 22512 Feb 6054 Dec *59 5912 *5812 59 •59 60 600 Penick & Ford *574 60 '6814 60 5878 59 No par 5112 Jan 4 677 Mar 3 6712 6712 6612 67 6512 66% 6612 6718 67 675* 67 194 Mar 56 675* 6,200 Penney (J 0) Dec 100 10512Mar 8 108 Feb 19 *10612 108 *10612 108 *107 108 Preferred 108 108 *10712 10812 *10714 10812 200 90 Jan 108 Au, •31, 378 *312 358 35 37 312 312 5312 333 218 Jan ( 412 Jan 24 4 4 600 Penn Coal & Coke Corp_ _ _50 3: Fel 95* July 57 37 Jan 6 6 618 6 534 534 6 618 1,900 Penn-Dixie Cement___N-o par 6 6 534 618 734 Feb 5 14 Jan ti'p June *2514 2712 2514 2514 *244 2712 *26 2712 2612 2712 *2612 2712 100 13 Jan 8 2912 Feb 19 400 Preferred series A 418 Mar .42 July 3814 3814 37 3734 3612 3612 377 385 3734 3734 375 3938 3,600 People's G L & 0 (Chic) 100 27 Jan 4 437 Feb 6 25 Dec 7, Jan *1312 1378 1312 1312 .1214 1378 *1312 1378 1312 1312 *135 138 94 Jan 3 15 Feb 23 400 Pet Milk No par 612 Fel, 151,June 1218 1234 12 1238 1178 ' 12 12% 1212 1258 1238 1254 6,000 Petroleum Corp of Am 9 Jan 5 144 Feb 3 5 433 Jan 15 July 1738 1734 1658 1712 1634 1738 17% 1712 17 1712 1738 184 14,900 Phelps-Dodge Corp 25 145* Mar 27 1834 Feb 16 187. Sept 412 Jun 3212 3212 32 3212 *323 33 33 33 *33 35 50 2414 Jan 2 37 Feb 9 3353 34 1,000 Philadelphia Co 6% pref 21,2 Nov 36 July *60 62 *60 62 60 60 12 *61 62 *___ _ 62 63 Jan 645 63 200 No par 49 4 Feb 17 $8 Preferred 3814 Dec 62 July 512 578 15,100 Phila de Read C & 1 *434 5 412 434 43* 518 5 634 Feb 21 48 43* 6 314 Jan 4 No par 2 1 2 Feb 912 July 1712 1734 1712 175* 1778 19 19 1934 1878 1918 19 19 3,900 Phillip Morris & Co Ltd___10 1112 Jan 3 2014 Mar 26 s Feb 147 June *17 19 *17 1914 20 184 *171 18 18 400 Phillips Jones Corp 9 Jan 5 21 Apr 2 *1712 20 *17 No par 3 Pat, I% July 72 .71 72 72 7114 7114 *7112 72 .714 72 *7112 72 7% preferred 30 100 58 Feb 27 7478 Apr 7 35 Jun( 35 June 20 2038 1914 20 18% 1958 1958 2058 1978 2058 20 2058 40,300 Philips Petroleum No par 154 Jan 9 22084 April 434 Jan 1834 Sept *934 1112 *934 1112 084 10% 9 9 59 1012 *9 1012 100 Phoenix Hosiery 1312 Feb 3 5 8 Jan 11 Its Mar IN Dee 438 4% 414 438 412 43* 43* 434 44 434 7,200 Pierce-Arrow Mot Car Co___ _5 612 Feb 19 43* 412 2 Jan 16 3 Deo 712 Nov .7. 1 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 25 14 Jan 4 118 Jan 30 78 78 1,000 Pierce 011 Corp 14 Jan 178 June *9 9 95* 918 *834 10 912 912 *9 10 *812 10 300 712 Jan 15 108 Feb 14 Preferred 10a 372 Feb 13% Jane 158 158 112 158 112 158 158 158 4,400 Pierce Petroleum 112 134 112 134 2 Feb 6 No par 114 Jan 13 234 June Jan % 2.513 2412 253* 25 2512 2512 24 25 2412 2434 25 25 2,600 Pillsbury Flour Mills...No par 1812 Jan 8 2578 Apr 11 usl Feb 267 June •75 90 *69 8418 *7012 75 *70 75 '70_... *7058 75 Pirelli Co of Italy Amer shares 7014 Jan 22 8412 Mar 24 338 Apr 75 Nov .14 16 .14 16 16 *1414 16 16 *1414 16 •1414 16 100 Pittsburgh Coal of Pa 100 912 Jan 9 1812 Feb 19 4 Feb 23 July 37 *33 37 .33 37 *33 .3634 3818 *33 36 .34 36 Preferred 100 30 Jan 11 421,Feb 1 17 Jan 49 1,0v •Bid and asked prices, no sales on this day. I Companies reported in receivership. a Optional sale. e Cash sale. a Sold 15 days. 2 Ex-dividend. y Ex-rights. New York Stock Record-Continued-Page 7 2713 gar FOR SALES DURING THE WEEK OF STOCKS NOT RECORDED IN THIS LIST, SEE SEVENTH PAGE PRECEDING. HIGH AND LOW SALE PRICES-PER SHARE, NOT PER CENT. Saturday Apr. 14. Monday 1 Apr. 16. Tuesday Apr. 17. Wednesday Apr. 18. Thursday Apr. 19. Friday Apr. 20. Sales for the Week. STOCKS NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE. PER SHARE Range Stnce Jan. 1. On lasts of 100-share lots. Lowest. Highest. I PER SHARE Range for Previous Year 1933. Lowest. Highest. $ per share $ per share S per share $ per share $ per share Shares. Indus.& Miscell.(Con.) Par 5 per :hare $ Per share $ per share $ per share 914 934 934 934 1014 10 914 178 Feb 7 Jan 6 1138 Apr 4 1134 July 1014 1018 1012 10,100 Pittsburgh Screw & Bolt No par 1014 Jan 3834 Slay *331.2 38 *3012 38 180 Pltts Steel 7% cum pref___100 30 Jan 4 43 Feb 21 39 39 37 38 40 38 312 Feb 21 12 Feb 2 Jan 19 100 678 July 100 Pitts Term Coal Corp 212 212 *2 *218 214 *2 214 214 214 *2 4 Jan 2312 July *10 13 *10 13 818 Jan 4 1712 Feb 23 6% preferred 100 13 13 140 •12 1212 1212 13 5 Feb 19 *312 378 *312 378 *312 378 612 July 214 Jan 2 Pittsburgh United 25 *312 4 34 Feb *312 4 1534 Feb 64 July 50 5114 5012 5012 5014 5012 *5014 5478 *5114 52 Preferred 100 37 Jan 2 5978 Feb 19 220 58 Apr 5 Feb 21 *234 338 *234 338 *234 3 7 June 134 Jan 4 No par 3 3 314 314 1,800 Pittston CO (The) 1212 1312 1314 1312 1338 1334 1312 1334 1312 1334 19.500 Plymouth 011 Co 1758 July 834 Feb 5 1258 Jan 13 1634 Jan 30 134 Apr 1384 July 10 10 10 914 Jan 2 1478 Feb 5 10 No par 1014 1014 *1018 1038 1012 1012 1,100 Poor & Co class S 614 Jan 30 158 Mar 8 June 3 Jan 12 412 5 412 412 *414 412 412 412 1,400 Porto RIO-Am Tob cl A_No par 412 458 *214 212 *238 212 58 Feb 314 Jan 30 4 May 112 Jan 3 Class 13 No par 238 212 *214 300 212 *214 212 24 2438 2412 2512 2414 2434 2414 2434 7,100 Postal Tel & Cable 7% prof 100 4 Feb 4034 June 21 Jan 3 2938 Feb 6 2312 25 512 Feb 16 512 June 358 358 358 358 178 Jan 5 No par 358 358 58 Jan 334 334 1,200 :Pressed Steel Car 353 358 15 1512 15 3 Jan *16 15 678 Jan 5 22 Feb 17 Preferred 100 400 16 16 *1512 17 17 18 June 3512 36 3514 3512 3512 36 1958 Feb 4712 July No par 34 Mar 21 4114 Jan 23 3512 3614 36 3612 6,900 Procter dr Gamble 108 109 97 Apr 11034 Nov 10712 10712 10714 10714 *10738 10734 10712 10712 150 5% pref (8ec of Feb 1 '29)100 10212 Jan 22 109 Apr 3 278 June 114 Mar 15 14 Jan 14 Jan 2 58 58 54 58 54 20,000 2Producers & Refiners Corp _ 50 58 34 58 54 34 4 418 4 4 13 June 2 Nov 678 Feb 19 418 418 212 Jan 4 418 418 Preferred . 50 378 418 3,300 3712 38 3258 Nov 5718 June 3712 3814 3734 3834 3812 3834 3834 3912 8,500 Pub Ser Corp of N J.. No par 34 Jan 4 45 Feb 6 7912 7912 7912 7912 79 *7878 83 5978 Nov 8812 Jan 79 $5 preferred No par 67 Jan 2 84 Feb 6 *78 7934 7934 7934 500 9518 9518 a95 *04 95 94 94 75 Dec 10138 Jan 100 79 Jan 8 96 Apr 20 9512 9538 9512 06 6% preferred 96 700 10518 10518 10512 10512 *10314 10512.10334 10518 10512 106 105 105 84 Dec 11212 Jae 100 90 Jan 8 106 Feb 21 7% preferred 500 09 Nov 125 11612 11612 *11618 120 *11618 11912 *11658 121 *11658 121 Jan 100 105 Jan 12 11912 Feb 17 118 118 8% preferred 200 8378 Dec 10312 Jan 102 102 *102 103 *102 10278 10212 10212 *102 103 *102 103 300 Pub Ser El & Gas pf S5_No par 90 Jan 10 10212 Apr 11 5612 5714 56 57 5738 5812 5734 5812 58 57 57 5818 July 18 Feb No par 5014 Jan 8 5938 Feb 5 5914 11,900 Pullman Inc 212 Mar 1538 Sept 1258 1234 1238 1234 1214 1212 1212 1254 1214 1258 1238 1278 11,700 Pure Oil (The) 1018 Jan 8 1478 Feb 16 No par 7418 7418 74 74 30 Mar 6978 Sept 74 74 75 100 5834 Jan 9 80 Feb 6 7512 *74 7512 7512 *74 8% cony preferred 130 1638 1578 16 578 Feb 2538 July 16 *1614 1612 16 1638 1618 1614 1614 1754 2,800 Purity Bakeries No par 1214 Jan 6 1934 Feb 5 818 833 814 834 778 814 1214 July 3 Feb 918 Feb 6 612 Jan 4 734 838 No par 812 878 838 834 212,200 Radio Corp of Amer 35 3612 3712 3912 3712 3812 37 35 3658 3518 38 50 2314 Jan 4 3912 Apr 18 1314 Feb 40 May Preferred 3738 5,300 2914 3212 3118 3214 3214 3434 3234 3434 3278 3438 78,600 2914 30 612 Feb 27 July Preferred S No par 15 Jan 4 3434 Apr 18 338 312 312 334 358 334 I Mar 414 Feb 17 214 Jan 9 338 358 534 June 312 334 312 358 18,300 211a9io-Keith-Orph __ __No par *2012 21 2012 2012 2012 21 16 Jan 9 23 Feb 5 2118 2114 2058 2114 21 5 Feb 2058 Sept 3,000 Raybestos Manhattan_No par 21 .1014 1114 *1012 1034 1012 1012 1078 1078 1078 1078 11 512 Feb 2078 June 838 Jan 9 14 Feb 6 10 1114 600 Real Silk Hosiery 5712 5712 5678 5678 *56 56 56 25 Jan 60 May 60 100 45 Jan 23 5712 Apr 16 *56 Preferred 58 50 *56 58 4 4 378 4 4 4 6 Apr 2 218 Jan 5 438 438 414 438 14 Jan 412 July 412 5 4,500 Reis (Robt) & Co____No par 3114 30 3012 29 *25 2934 827 118 Jan 3138 3012 3012 2934 3278 2,900 1812 June 100 1312 Jan 3 3834 Apr 2 1st preferred 1238 1234 1212 1234 1212 1254 8,500 Remington-Rand 1258 1234 1214 1234 1218 1214 212 Feb 638 Jan 6 1338 Feb 23 1 1114 July 712 Feb 3712 July *6734 60 6714 6712 6734 6712 6712 *6778 6838 6714 6738 67 100 3238 Jan 5 6912 Mar 14 1st preferred 900 8 Feb 3534 Dec *60 69 *60 69 *60 69 *60 69 100 30 Jan 8 67 Mar 14 *60 70 .60 29 preferred 70 512 Feb 23 414 458 418 414 4 418 638 June 138 Feb 318 Jan 2 5 458 5 478 5 24,300 Reo Motor Car 434 5 16 Jan 4 2534 Feb 23 2178 2258 2112 2238 2178 2258 25,900 Republic Steel Corp___No par 2134 2218 2038 2218 2118 22 4 Feb 23 July 9 Feb 5412 July 6112 6112 5812 6014 5838 5978 60 100 39 Jan 4 6712 Feb 23 6112 59 6% cony preferred 6012 6018 6112 3,700 1314 1334 1312 1334 1314 1312 13,4 1358 *1212 1318 *1212 1318 2,000 Revere Copper & Brass 12 June 114 Jan 5 Jan 8 1412 Apr 11 5 *2518 2712 *25 214 Mar 25 June 10 1114 Jan 29 2812 Apr 11 27 26 2618 *22 *2518 27 Class A 200 26 *22 27 2314 2378 2234 2312 2238 2414 2414 25 6 Feb 2112 June 1512 Jan 2 25 Apr I 1 2378 2478 2414 25 15.100 Reynolds Metal Co __No par *1014 1012 1014 1014 *938 10, 112 Feb 1534 July 612 Jan 9 1234 Feb 7 No par 8 1034 1034 1078 11 700 Reynolds Spring 11 11 4238 43 2812 Jan 25414 Sept 4178 4314 4338 4334 4358 45 8 44,s 4512 44 39,000 Reynolds(R J) Tob class 13_10 3934 Mar 21 4512 Jan 9 45 *57 597 8 Jan 5 5734 *57 623 4 Jan 60 Jan Jan 3 57 10 5734 *57 Class A 5731 5758 5738 57 120 57 57 57 *10 61 Feb 9 Jan 17 1312 Feb 8 No par 1218 *914 1214 *918 1212 1112 1112 11 1634 June 300 Ritter Dental 51fg 11 11 11 2338 Nov 2612 Nov *3112 3178 3112 3112 3078 3112 3138 3138 *3038 311s *3014 3138 2638 Jan 3 32 Apr 11 500 Roan Antelope Copper Mines_ 812 858 5 4 Jan 3 1014 Feb 6 814 834 *814 834 *814 834 1072 June 2 Apr 9 9 9 918 1,800 Rossia Insurance Co 3514 3514 3512 3512 3512 3618 *3538 3618 *3538 36 1758 Mar 3934 Nov 900 Royal Dutch Co (N Y shares) 3514 Apr 14 3918 Feb 19 *3514 3578 2318 2314 2218 2338 23 618 Feb 3134 Sept 10 2012 Mar 27 2778 Feb 5 2358 2314 2334 2234 2312 2312 2378 6,300 St Joseph Lead 54 54 5312 54 28 Mar 6238 July No par 44 Jan 5 5634 Apr 20 5334 5334 5418 5534 5478 55 5518 5634 3,800 Safeway Stores 103 10312 10212 10338 103 10358 10312 10312 10312 10334 10312 10312 72 Apr 9412 July 100 8434 Jan 3 10334 Apr 19 6% preferred 670 110 110 110 11078 11014 11012 11012 110, 8014 Feb 105 Sept 100 9812 Jan 15 112 Apr 20 7% preferred 760 111 112 8 11034 111 9 9 214 Apr *834 918 12 July 6 Jan 13 1214 Feb 15 97 9 300 Savage Arms Corp____No par 9 914 914 *914 *834 912 3614 3658 3518 3634 3512 3614 36 24 Nov 4514 Aug 3 2614 Jan 6 3878 Apr 11 3634 3538 3638 3438 3512 78,400 Sclienley Distillers Corp *614 638 58 Mar 1014 July 8 Feb 5 614 634 334 Jan 4 1 618 612 612 634 618 658 614 658 2,600 Schulte Retail Stores 2734 29 318 Apr 3534 July 29 100 15 Jan 2 3034 Apr 16 3034 29 Preferred 30 2812 2912 2834 2012 5,920 20 30 *46 50 50 28 Jan 4478 July 50 No par 41 Jan 10 50 Apr 5 *4612 50 50 50 Scott Paper Co 50 *47 *47 50 50 3678 37 3512 3612 3534 3614 3638 3714 3618 3714 3714 38 15 Feb 4338 Sept 8,000 Seaboard 011 Coot Del_No par 2538 Jan 6 3838 Apr 11 4424 54 118 Feb 478 Feb 7 258 Jan 18 434 July No par 414 *334 4 4 4 300 Seagrave Corp 378 378 373 378 1212 Feb 47 July 4958 50 4814 5014 4812 4912 4912 5038 4878 5012 4978 51 37,800 Sears, Roebuck Ar Co No par 4012 Jan 4 5114 Feb 5 .212 278 414 Jan 26 212 212 •212 278 *234 278 5 Jun 114 Feb 214 Jan 2 1 400 Second Nat Investors 234 234 *258 278 *44 4512 .44 24 Feb 48 July 1 32 Jan 8 4518 Feb 2 4518 44 44 Preferred *45 451 *4434 4518 *42 100 4518 138 138 33,1 June 2 Jan 22 lri Mar 1 Jan 5 138 No par 138 114 138 138 138 1.200 :Seneca Copper 138 138 138 138 853 712 July 112 Feb 814 Apr 2 434 Jan 8 1 758 8 712 814 8 778 818 19,900 Serve( Inc 734 818 734 8 1178 12 534 Apr 1314 July 1114 1178 1114 1112 1138 117s 1112 1134 1112 1134 6,500 Shattuck (F G) 634 Jan 2 1378 Mar 9 No par *1012 1112 1012 1012 1012 1012 1078 lO7s 1034 1034 112 Feb 12 July 518 Jan 11 1314 Feb 23 No par 500 Sharon Steel Hoop 1138 113 8 212 Feb 858 June 778 Feb 5 7 718 714 434 Jan 2 No par 718 714 738 718 718 718 714 1.800 Sharpe & Dohme 718 758 45 45 2114 Mar 4178 July x45 45 45 45 Cony preferred ser A_No par 3814 Jan 8 46 Jan 29 4514 4553 4512 4512 4512 4512 900 934 934 312 Feb 958 934 1158 July 778 Jan 3 1112 Jan 27 No par 912 958 912 958 912 934 912 934 5,600 Shell Union Oil •7618 79 2812 Mar 61 July *75 79 100 58 Jan 2 89 Jan 26 *75 Cony preferred *75 77 77 *75 *75 77 77 2014 2038 1912 2014 1938 2012 2038 211 31 July 438 Feb 17 Jan 3 2418 Feb 5 No par 2012 2114 2058 2114 13,500 Slmmons Co 1238 June 47s Feb 912 958 *95a 978 9 Jan 4 1112 Feb 5 10 938 912 10 10 958 10 934 978 1,600 Simms Petroleum 1058 1034 1012 1034 1058 1058 1058 1034 1034 11 3 Feb 978 June 778 Jan 10 11 Apr 7 25 3,700 Skelly 011 Co 1034 11 *66 67 *66 22 Feb 5712 July 70 100 5434 Jan 9 67 Apr 13 *66 70 Preferred *66 *66 70 *66 70 70 *25 27 *25 27 35 July 7 Jan *25 26 *25 27 Sloss-Shett Steel & Iron 100 15 Jan 9 2712 Feb 17 *25 *25 27 27 *3311 36 *35 8,4 Feb 42 July 36 100 2312 Jan 2 38 Feb 17 35 35 *3412 35 7% preferred 140 35 35 35 35 *1358 1378 1358 1334 1312 1478 53 Mar 634 Jan 78 Apr 20 934 July 1478 153j 147815 1558 1514 1578 19,200 Snider Packing Corp__No par 1614 1612 16 6 Mar 17 Nov 1612 16 25 1513 Jan 4 1978 Feb 5 1612 1638 1634 1612 17 17 1714 51,200 Socony Vacuum Corp *96 97 0612 9612 *96 58 Feb 92 July 9678 9678 97 99 9012 *9934 101 700 Solvay Am Invt Tr pret__100 86 Jan 6 9312 Apr 19 3212 33 3214 3312 3214 3234 3234 3334 3212 3278 3214 3314 4,500 So Porto Rico Sugar___No par 3138 Mar 19 3938 Feb 5 157s Jan 4858 July •126 130 *127 130 *127 130 Jan 132 July 130 130 *126 130 *126 130 100 115 Jan 16 130 Mar 20 112 Preferred 20 1918 1912 1953 1938 1918 1978 x1938 1934 1938 1912 7,800 Southern Calif Edison 1938 1934 28 Jan 141s Nov 25 1514 Jan 4 2218 Feb 7 834 834 *812 912 Jan 1178 July 4 934 934 1078 1112 1112 1112 1134 1212 1,400 Spalding (AG)& Hros_No par 554 Jan 10 1212 Apr 20 •57 60 60 60 65 2518 Mar 72 Apr 20 Jan 11 68 65 61 June 68 100 3014 70 let preferred 71 70 190 72 12 1212 1218 1218 *11 412 Feb 1214 *11 1512 July 1212 1212 1312 1378 15 7 Jan 22 15 Apr 20 380 Spang Chalfant & Co Inc No par *50 60 *50 60 50 50 1712 Feb 50 June *50 53 100 30 Jan 23 55 Apr 20 53 Preferred 53 53 90 55 631 634 658 658 612 678 638 612 8 June 34 Feb 8 Feb 21 612 634 358 Jan 5 634 712 24,700 Sparks WIthington__No par 414 412 412 478 434 534 512 June 738 Apr 18 578 738 12 Jan 2 Jan 3 No par 4,490 Spear St Co 6 7 678 758 02178 22 2178 2218 22 2238 2212 2258 2212 2258 2234 23 712 Apr 22 July 1,800 Spencer Kellogg & Sons No par 1534 Jan 5 2412 Feb 23 1038 1012 10 1012 10 1014 1018 1058 1018 1012 1014 1118 70,000 Sperry Corp (The) v t c 712 July 218 May 558 Jan 5 1138 Apr 2 1 *8 12 .634 12 *714 11 *814 1012 *814 1012 *814 1012 16 June Jan 5 8 Jan 10 13 Feb 7 No par Spicer Mfg Co *2614 28 *27 28 *27 2712 2838 2834 2834 28 28 1134 Mar 3212 June 2134 Jan 2 3112 Feb 20 No par Cony preferred A 28 130 5934 6014 5934 6234 61 63 6314 62 21 12 Dec Feb 60 6214 5912 6434 21,100 Spiegel-May-Stern Co_No par 1 19 Jan 4 6434 Apr 20 2138 2134 2118 2158 21 2112 2112 22 2112 22 1334 Mar 3758 July 2018 Mar 27 2514 Feb 1 2134 2218 43,200 Standard Brands No par 678 7 7 7 658 678 938 Aug Jan 7 7 714 1 738 8 Mar 13 7 4 Jan 9 718 5,900 Stand Comm Tobacco_No par 1234 1318 1214 13 1214 1278 1234 1314 1258 1234 1212 1338 8,000 Standard Gas & El Co_No par 518 Nlar 2212 June 658 Jan 4 17 Feb 6 1338 14 13 1418 1312 1334 1314 1412 14 1412 14 634 Dec 2578 June 738 Jan 8 17 Feb 6 No par 1434 15,200 Preferred 2634 2634 27 28 26 26 2778 2812 2714 2838 2812 2812 2,400 15 Dec 61 June 16 Jan 10 33 Feb 6 56 cum prior pret No par 30 3014 29 32 3014 3138 3112 3234 3112 3212 321 1 33 15 Dec 66 June 1712 Jan 4 3634 Feb 7 5,300 $7 cum prior pref No par •112 158 112 112 *112 138 112 138 *112 158 278 June 12 Mar 112 158 1,400 Stand Investing Corp No par 178 Jan 5 78 Jan 13 10814 10812 *10712 10814 10778 10778 10734 10734 10712 10734 10712 10712 9212 Mar 10234 Sept 600 Standard Oil Export pref__100 9612 Jan 2 108 Apr 12 3738 3738 3658 3738 3612 3718 3678 3712 3634 3714 3658 3714 13,700 Standard 011 of Calif 1912 Mar 45 Nov No par 3514 Mar 27 4278 Jan 30 38 39 39 3853 3814 *3812 40 38 3914 40 1234 Apr 3978 Dee 4018 4012 1,400 Standard 011 of Kansas__10 3334 Feb 13 4012 Apr 20 4538 4538 4478 4512 4478 4538 4538 4534 4558 4534 4512 4618 28,400 Standard 0110? New 2234 Mar 4712 Nov Jersey_25 4418 Mar 20 5018 Feb 17 1214 1238 *1214 1212 1212 14 1134 12 1378 1414 1338 1418 8.100 Starrett Co (The) L 8 No Par 11 12 June 4 Feb Jan 15 1414 Apr 19 6 5812 5878 5812 6014 5878 5912 5934 6014 5978 6014 5978 6078 11,300 Sterling 4538 Dec 6034 Sept 10 4714 Jan 4 6078 Apr 29 Products Inc *218 21 1 214 214 218 218 218 218 218 218 2 218 378 June 5 8 Jan 3 Feb 6 2 1,100 138 Jan Sterling Securities el A_No par *53, 6 6 6 558 558 512 6 .512 578 558 558 734 June 112 Feb 800 7 Feb 6 3 Jan 3 Preferred No par *3412 37 *3412 37 *3112 37 *3412 37 *3412 36 *3412 36 20 Mar 3614 July Convertible preferred__ __50 30 Jan 12 3634 Feb 1 9 918 834 878 834 9 834 9 834 9 878 934 14,600 Stewart-Warner 1112 July 212 Feb 614 Jan 8 1038 Feb 21 10 9 012 938 97s 938 978 934 934 938 958 912 101s 17,900 Stone & Webster 512 Dee 1914 July 6 Jan 6 1314 Feb 6 No par 7 738 7 718 678 718 7 738 714 73s 678 7 19,800 :Studebaker Corp(The)No par 838 June 112 Mar 914 Feb 21 432‘ Jan 2 30 30 30 3114 3113 30 30 3114 3312 31 33 32 Apr 3818 June 4,000 9 Preferred 100 1912 Jan 2 47 Feb 19 6114 6114 6012 6114 *6058 61 61 61 6114 6114 6078 61 1,000 Sun 011 35 Feb 59 Nov No par 5112 Jan 2 6112 Feb 19 110 110 10912 110 110 110 10912 11012 .10912 115 .110 115 350 Preferred 89 Mar 103 July 100 100 Jan 17 11012Mar 22 1858 *18 *19 2018 18 1912 19 800 Superheater Co (The)No par *18 1912 1912 1912 19 712 Feb 27 July 15 Jan 6 2514 Feb 5 231 278 212 278 234 234 258 234 7,400 Superior 011 234 234 '234 234 412 July '4 Jan 3 Feb 1 134 Jan 3 1 *1214 1338 1214 1214 1212 1212 1212 1278 1212 1234 1234 1314 1,400 Superior Steel_ 2 Feb 2238 July 100 1014 Jan 4 1534 Feb 19 •378 414 *378 414 *378 414 *4 4 4 414 *4 100 Sweets Coo? Amer (The).__50 414 1 Mar 10 July 534 Jan 26 314 Jan 9 *114 178 *138 178 178 178 158 •138 17s *Vs 100 Symington Co 178 •138 3 June Vo par 212 Feb 19 114 Jan 3 is Apr 438 434 *414 434 412 478 *414 478 *414 412 414 458 GOO 514 July Class A 14 Apr 538 Feb 23 314 Jan 11 No par *1238 1338 •1238 1338 *12 13 *12 1214 1214 1214 *1238 13 100 Telautograph Corp 163s July Feb 1514 Feb I 4 Jan 2 818 103 5 534 6 534 534 *514 534 *558 534 900 Tennessee Corp 554 534 714 Aug 158 Feb 634 Feb 19 418 Jan 8 5 5311 534 2678 2718 2618 2678 2612 2678 2634 2714 2634 27 2612 2714 17,900 Texas Corp (The) 1034 Feb 3018 Sept 25 2318 Jan 12 2938 Feb 5 3658 3658 3614 37 3618 3634 3638 3714 3638 3634 3612 3714 8,800 Texas Gulf Sulphur, __ No par 3412 Mar 27 4314 Feb 6 1514 Feb 45,4 Nov 434 478 478 5 434 434 478 478 434 478 43.4 478 5,900 Texas Pacific Coal & 011-10 612 May 138 Mar 612 Apr 4 318 Jan 8 11 878 93 938 938 938 914 938 11 18 June 312 Mar 654 Jan 6 12 Apr 2 914 938 9,8 914 9,800 Texas Pacific Land Trust__ 1 *1314 1334 .1334 14 *1338 14 1378 14 14 14 1334 141 1 1,000 Thatcher Mfg 5 Feb 2218 July 10 Jan 4 1512 Jan 30 Vo par 4318 *41 4318 *41 *1078 4318 •41 4318 *41 431s *41 8360 cony mt....No par 39 Jan 15 44 Jan 29 2738 Feb 44 July 431, •Bid and asked prices, no sales on this day. I Companies reported in receivership. a Optional sale. c Cash sale. I Ex-dividend. y Ex-r ghts. $ per share 934 934 *33 38 *2 214 *10 13 *312 4 *5114 52 *234 338 1212 1278 978 10 434 434 *214 212 *2418 2438 *334 4 *1512 16 3512 36 108 109 58 54 4 138 3734 3814 New York Stock Record-Concluded-Page 8 2714 gar FOR April 21 1934 SALES DURING THE WEEK OF STOCKS NOT RECORDED IN THIS LIST. SEE EIGHTH PAGE PRECEDING. HIGH AND LOW SALE PRICES-PER SHARE. NOT PER CENT. 1 Sales for Saturday Monday Tuesday !Wednesday Thursday the Friday Apr. 14. Apr. 17. I Apr. 18. 1 Apr. 19. 1 Apr. 20. Apr. 16. Week. STOCKS NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE. PER SHARE Range Since Jan. 1. On basis of 100-share lots. Lowest. Highest. PER SHARE Rangefor Previous Year 1933. Lowest. Highest. per share $ per share $ per share Per share $ Per share IS per share' $ per share $ per share Shares. Indus.&Miscall.(Conol.) Par per share 10 10 500 The Fair *94 10 No par 6 Jan 6 1218 Feb 16 288 Mar 1213 May 934 10 1 "912 10141 *912 10 614 894 672 1,500 Thermoid Co 7 918 Feb 19 4 7 1 5/ 1 4 Jan 4 8 7I 87 1 Feb 1012 July 68 •1812 19 19 19 I *1814 19 *1834 19 300 Third Nat Investors 19 19 134 Jan 2 193* Feb 6 1 10 Mar 2114 July .729 834 700 Thompson (J RI 84 818 818 84 812 84 84 834 712 Jan 18 11 Feb 5 _25 6 Dec 1512 June 1712 1712 •1712 18 I 18 18 I 18 18 174 1814 1,700 Thompson Products Inc No par 1318 Jan 4 2014 Feb 16 588 Jan 2014 Sept 44 44 414 438 44 414 418 414 j Ja a230 912 June 3 Jan 3 : 9 4% 412 3,700 Thompson-Starrett Ce_No par 4 Mar *1711 21 *1712 21 511 "1712 21 I •1758 21 "1712 21 $3.50 cum pref No par 19 Mar 31 24 12 Jan 30 June 1212 13 1238 13 77,100 Tidewater Assoc 011..._No par 13 1312 1314 1332 1358 14 812 Jan 4 14 Apr 20 34 Jan 1184 Sept 81 83 81 82 8212 83 1 82 Preferred 100 6412 Jan 4 83 Apr 16 82 234 Apr 6514 Nov 8212 8212 3,100 40 *3518 38 *354 40 *35 100 Tide Water Oil No par 31 Mar 26 38 Apr 19 38 38 *3518 40 94 Apr 26 Dec '90 92 Preferred 92 94 92 1,500 94 92 94 93 94 100 80 Jan 11 94 Apr 19 45 Feb 80 Dec 814 Apr 20 378 Jan 4 74 814 41,000 Ttmken Detroit Azle 10 714 7,2 714 712 712 772 112 Mar 784 8 8% June 133 Feb 354 July 344 3514 3412 3418 3418 35 I 35 35.4 35 3578 7,200 Tlmken Roller BearIng_No par 2918 Jan 4 41 Feb 5 678 7 612 Jan 3 64 7 812 Feb 5 7 634 7 238 Mar 7 712 43,100 Transamerica Corp.___No par 74 9% July 10 1012 10,4 10 800 Transue & Williams St'l No par 1018 104' .1014 1012 101* 1058 27 Mar 174 July 812 Jan 2 1312 Feb 17 6% Fen 3 5 514, 54 314/ 5,2 514 234 Feb 518 514 54 514 5,900 Tri-Continental Corp..No par 43s Jan 8 814 July 7232 7312 72, 78 I .7312 78 No par 6014 Jan 9 78 Apr 20 4 7214, "74 500 78 8% preferred 78 41 Apr z75 May 38 2,500 Trloo Products Corp. No par 33 Jan 6 40 Feb 3 384 3814 35141 3812 we 39 39 388 39 2018 Feb 3878 July 11 / 4 Jan 3 400 Truax Traer Coal 312 Feb 23 No par '214 212 *214 238 214 212 '212 234 212 2,2 4 Apr 514 July 71z 712 958 Feb 19 712 712 *712 752 478 Jan 4 10 734 734 712 2 Mar 1274 June 734 741 734 818 3.400 Trusoon Steel 4 Jan 15 2% Jan 5 3 318 "3 318 312 34 1,200 Ulan & Oo 338 3 No par 314 314 314 *3 84 Jan 614 June *4412 4512 *44 44 4432 45 4512 44 4514 4514 4512 46 1,000 Under Elliott Fisher Co No par 36 Jan 5 5112 J21.0 20 979 Feb 3912 July 55 57 57 5512 5534 57,4 56 2,100 Union Bag & Pap Corp_No par 43 Jan 8 8074 Feb 23 57 57 5784 255 57 512 Jan 60 July 8 4434 454 45 45 4512 4412 4518 4412 4518 4412 45, 46 16,900 Union Carbide & Carb-No par 414 Mar 27 50% Jan 19 1984 Feb 51% July 1772 178 1738 1734 1738 17, 8 21712 17, 4 1738 1734 1712 1734 5,000 Union 011 California 25 1578 Mar 21 2012 Feb 5 812 Mar 23, 8 JUIY 1978 20 1912 1912 1912 1978 20 2,800 Union Tank Car 104 Feb 22% June 20% 2012 2012 2018 21 No per 1558 Jan 9 21 Feb 5 2278 2314 2212 23 2214 23 23 8 2532 71,200 United Aircraft at Tran_No par 1758 Feb 13 373* Feb 1 1612 Mar 46% July 2334 2238 2312 22, 2534 26 2614 26,2 2634 2738 2732 2812 5,800 United Biscuit 26 2614 2614 28 No par 23 Jan 8 2812 Apr 20 1312 Feb 27% July 10 •11112 11212 1124 11212 11212 11512 •11212 11512 •113 11512 *113 11512 Preferred 92 May Ill Dec 100 107 Jan 9 11212 Apr 16 3812 4014 3934 4012 4012 42 3938 3938 384 3812 38 38 9,300 United Carbon 1014 Feb 38 Dec No par 35 Jan 4 42 Apr 20 878 Feb 7 618 618 618 638 614 612 6 614 4 Dec 144 June No par 6 614 413 Jan 4 658 618 46,900 United Corp •3338 34 2218 Nov 40% June Preferred 3514 8,000 33 3378 327s 3314 3314 34,2 3332 3414 34 No par 24% Jan 3 3778 Feb 7 16 618 Dec 12 Sept 16% 1518 1618 1518 1614 1612 17 5 1634 1718 1719 1734 29,500 United Drug Inc 914 Jan 8 1734 Apr 20 6 712 Apr 20 6 614 578 612 3% Jan 2 638 712 2,750 United Dyewood Corp 10 6% June 532 5'4 *553 572 34 Feb .312 412 .3,8 412 *4 1 Mar 558 Fen 21 1,200 United Electric Coal___No par 412 5 412 *312 412 .34 412 34 Jan 10 878 July 74 9,800 United Fruit 70 234 Jan 68 Au. 75 7234 7312 73 7014 6912 70,4 6914 7038 70 No par 59 Jan 5 75 Apr 20 1614 1612 1612 1638 1814 1612 1614 1634 1638 1634 1612 1678 18.300 United Gas improve. .No par 1414 Jan 4 2014 Feb 6 13% Dee 25 Julape 18 95 Preferred 95 96 9312 9312 9334 94 95 95 Jan *93 94 *95 8212 8 Dec 100 Ja: 95 700 No par 88 '212 3 34 318 3 It Jan 54 Jul. 318 358 Feb 19 134 Feb 13 600 :United Paperboard 312 312 '214 3 *212 3 100 10 10 10, •1012 1012 •912 10 8 1018 •1014 1012 1012 11 1,300 United Piece Dye Wks_No Par 34 Mar 21% Jul: 7 Jan 8 132 Feb 20 •50 59, 5934 '52 35 Dec 85 Jul' 64% preferred 55 .50 55 .50 55 5534 *51 4 *50 100 49 Jan 12 68 Feb 21 518 512 518 512 6 Apr 20 558 578 6,400 United Stores class A_ _No par 538 5, 512 6 4 34 Feb 5,4 558 714 Jul; 314 Jan 11 '66 45 Mar 66 July 400 Preferred clue A..___No par 5418 Mar 21 66 Apr 16 7518 65 66 *60 68 .60 68 "60 6334 63 63 Mar 24438 16 .4538 4432 *45 4612 *4418 46 4512 214 Apr 5112 July 4558 454 4634 4634 600 Universal Leaf Tobacco No par 404 Feb 26 4784 10 Apr 35 June 49 45 46 44 260 Universal PIcturee 1st pfd.100 16% Jan 8 464 Apr 11 46 *45 46 4614 4614 45 4514 *46 2 212 214 218 2 218 212 2 212 218 212 212 2,200 Universal Pipe .4 Rad 3 Feb 16 114 Jan 2 14 Apr 1 3% July 2812 28, 2732 2834 2858 2938 2814 2914 2832 2912 10.100 US Pipe & Foundry 818 Mar 224 July 2 2714 29 20 18 Jan 4 33 Feb 7 125 Apr 19 May 1832 1832 •1812 1914 •1812 1914 "1812 1914 1838 19 lst preferred 1834 1834 400 No par 1612 Jan 11 1959 Feb 23 1 4 Jan 31 U S Dietrib Corp Oct 8 .212 278 "212 279 •212 272 .212 272 '212 278 *212 2, No par 14 Jan 5 6 June 2312 2312 2338 2338 2338 2338 *2338 25 7 Feb 29% July *2312 25,2 "2312 2512 400 U 8 Freight No par 1912 Jan 4 2712 Feb 5 1114 1134 1134 1112 1178 1134 1134 1,100 U S & Foreign Eleour_No par 1114 1112 11 318 Feb 1754 July '1114 12 84 Jan 2 1514 Feb 5 4.7032 78 '75 78 364 Mar 84 July 100 86 "71 Preferred 86 86 •71 No par 6314 Jan 6 78 Feb 26 7514 7514 .71 4012 4034 41 '40 41 4012 41,2 40 4112 41 18 Feb 5312 July 4114 2,400 17 Gypsum 41 20 3712 Mar 22 804 Jan 24 124 124 12434 12434 1244 125 125 125 125 125 260 125 126 7% preferred 100 115 Jan 10 126 Apr 20 10114 Jan 121 Sept 8 812 712 8 812 979 8 8 978 Apr 18 9 9% 9% 934 10,700 U S Hoff Mach Corp 158 Apr 11% June 458 Jan 9 5118 5134 5134 5312 52 52 52 1312 Feb 94 July , 4 5214 5234 53 3,300 U S Industrial Alcohol_No par 50 Mar 27 6434 Feb 9 5212 54 978 97s 10 1018 1038 10 932 932 10 238 Mar 174 July 10% 104 104 1,400 USLeatbervtc No par 814 Jan 4 1188 Jan 24 1714 17, 414 Feb 2784 July Class A vto 600 4 '1834 1714 1738 18 •1712 18 *1712 18 •1734 18 No par 14 Jan 9 1954 Feb 1 74 *65 74 •65 *65 74 .65 30 Feb 7814 Sept 73 *65 Prior preferred v t a 70 74 "65 100 5512 Jan 5 80 Jan 30 212 Feb 1412 July 912 912 9% 912 914 934 5,100 U S Realty & Impt___No par 914 912 914 934 734 Jan 9 12% Feb 2 914 10 2014 2012 2014 21 20% 2112 2112 2212 2112 2318 2212 234 152,300 U 13 Rubber 2% Feb 25 July 1454 Jan 5 2312 Apr 20 No par 47 491 491 4972 48% 5114 5112 54 512 Feb 4388 July 5712 6114 57,500 Id preferred 5338 59 2418 Jan 8 6114 Apr 20 125 127 123 127 1234 12512 126 12738 12512 12834 1264 12812 14,600 U 8 Smelting Ref & Min_50 9658 Jan 13 13512 Feb 16 134 Jan 10558 Sept 6012 6112 62 62 63 6134 6212 *63 65 *63 65 63 1.800 Preferred 50 544 Jan 13 63 Apr 20, 3912 Jan 58 Sept 7 5212 51 5212 5018 5178 5158 5234 5114 5212 5118 5272 46,200 U S Steel Corp 52 100 48 Jan 5 59 Feb 19 \ 233* Mar 674 July 9678 9678 9638 9738 9538 9612 9612 9714 53 Mar 10512 July 954 9614 5.500 Preferred 4 ISO 100 88 Jan 9 9912 Jan 5 10134 10134 10214 10214 .101 10214 •10114 10312 "102 10312 •102 10312 59 Jan 10912 Dec 200 Tobacco No par 99 Jan 5 110 Feb 6 334 4 3% 4 Ws Feb 6 3% 4 6,200 Utilities Pow & Lt A 334 4 1% Apr 3 258 Jan 5 , 4 372 3 , 4 378 1 8% June 4.122 134 14 138 1% 1% 1% 114 4,800 Vadsco Sales 112 1, 4 No par 1 Jan 2 117 184 34 July 2 27 261.2 2612 26 2712 2678 26, 2612 27 ja en b2 19 5 2612 26 7% 18 M jaanr 3614 July 27% 3,800 Vanadium Corp of Am.No par 21 Jan 5 3117848 F 912 918 938 1132 11 94 938 1138 1034 11 5,700 Van Raalte Co Ino 118 May '812 9 5 44 Jan 2 1138 Apr 18 10 July 67 7012 69 2079 May 65 Sept 6138 62 6432 6458 66 71 1,920 61 69 7% 1st pre 70 100 z544 Mar I 98 Feb 5 33 33 3332 3238 33 3214 33 2318 D.N. 31 Sept 33 33 3312 5,800 Vick Chemical Inc 33 33 5 2438 Jan 4 3317 Apr 20 *328 4 4 4 4 4 4 438 4,600 Virginia-Carolina Chem No par 378 4 5% Jan 23 18 Feb 37s 378 34 Jan 11 74 July 2072 20 21 20 20 *20 20 .20 338 Mar 2612 July 2012 21,4 2134 2412 6,400 6% preferred 100 1412 Jan 3 26 Feb 5 73 73 '70 "70 --- *70 "70 73 73 *7012 73 100 3588 Mar 6312 July 7% preferred 100 5954 Jan 8 73 Feb 5 '72 -72 76 73 7372 75 ii72 *72 72,2 72 460 Virginia El & Pow $6 of Aro par 65 Jan 2 78 Jan 30 60 Dee 954 Jan 7572 77 77.! 718 .614 712 *614 8'4 *64 83s *6% 84 140 Virginia Iron Coal & Coke.100 814 8/ 9 Feb 23 1 4 24 Feb 15 May 478 Jan 11 6978 6978 •6414 Ag 6872 68 64 67 190 Vulcan DetinnIng 67 69 69 68 12% Feb 67% June _100 52 Jan 4 79 Mar 9 •74, 712 '74 74 '718 712 '714 712 8/ 1 4 Feb 20 7% 7% 300 Waldorf Syetem Are par 714 73s 54 Dec 12 July 584 Jan 2 2614 2678 267g 28 2634 27,4 264 27 2714 27% 2734 28 7,600 Walzreen Co No par 2214 Feb 26 28114 Apr 4 6)4% preferred •101 102 10112 10112 102 102 1 4 Apr 20 250 10112 102 103 103 10314 10334 75 *Ai); 11. 100 8412 Jan 4 103/ 6.1-2 Sept 478 5 6% Feb 1 5 434 5 5 *434 5 514 534 No par 78 Apr 2% Jan 4 514 5% 4,600 Walworth Co 8% June 9 8 500 Ward Baking class A No par 812 .8 9 914 .818 914 *814 914 218 Mar 20 July *834 9 618 Jan 5 12 Feb 5 *238 278 238 24 3% Feb 5 2/ 1 4 238 "2% 214 1,100 232 238 258 234 Class B No par 58 Apr 218 Jan 11 5% July 3212 *3112 3218 30 30 •31 600 3012 3012 2972 30 .2912 30 Preferred 1112 Apr 44% July 100 2712 Jan 5 35 Jan 24 1114 Feb 5 738 778 1 738 734 65,000 Warner Bros Pletures 73s 8 478 Jan 6 74 74 Feb 5 7% 734 712 734 CPR Sent 2812 *27 29 3012 29 Apr 2914 30 20 30 25 414 Feb 2412 Oot $3.85 cony prat 3012 2,100 No par 184 Jan 19 2312 2912 294 378 Feb 111 272 278 .232 278 "232 278 500 Warner Quinlan 234 234 .238 3 234 234 158 Jan 4 No par Mar 472 June 212 Feb 22% June 4,600 Warren Bros 10, , 8 1038 1082 10$8 1012 1034 1034 11 4 12 10, 4 10, No par 9% Jan 4 1318 Jan 24 4 10 21 21 2138 2112 21 2112 21 20 2014 2312 1,440 Convertible pre ____No par 16 Jan 8 2474 Jan 23 20 21 7,2 Fat 35% Jane *2414 2512 2478 2512 *25 2512 2512 2512 "2334 25 "2312 24 500 Warren Fdy dk Pipe_ No par 23% Apr 9 31 Jan 20 5 Fel 30 Dec .5 7 Jan 25 478 478 478 478 532 5 Mar 27 1 5 512 *518 512 •5t8 512 1,100 Webster Elsenlohr_ _No par Jan 8 July 74 Mar 23 1 100 Wells Fargo & Co 1 Jan 17 2273814 134 134 *112 1, "112 1, 4 •112 184 •112 134 1 4 •112 134 Apr 312 June Feb 244 2438 25 25 2512 2538 25 2414 2434 1,300 Wesson Oil& Snowdrift No par 1534 Jan 4 25 2514 25 3712 July 59 59 .5714 59 •577g 60 *5734 59 59 Cony preferred 59 300 *59 60 40 Mar 63 July No par 5212 Jan 5 60 Feb 23 53 5514 534 54% 56 .55 5618 54% 5514 55 56 5614 9,200 Western Union Telegraph.100 514 Jan 4 6678 Feb 6 1714 Feb 7714 July 3232 3112 32 32 3114 3114 3114 3218 3114 32,2 3172 32, 4 6,900 Westinglfse Air Brake_No par 204 Jan 5 38 Feb 6 1134 Jan 3552 July 3738 3832 37% 38% 3832 4018 3814 4118 4012 4214 41,400 Westinghouse El & Mfg. 60 35% Jan 4 4714 Feb 5 '3834 39 1958 Feb 58% July let preferred 90 90 130 90 *88 89% 88 *88 90 88 90 88 90 50 8312 Jan 17 92 Jan 311 6012 Feb 96 July 11, 2 •1012 11 •11 6% Jan 3 14 Feb 5 1,800 Weston Elea Instruml_No par •11 1112 1112 1112 1112 12% 1212 13 312 Feb 1314 July Class A _ ... •18 -- *21 •19 - '21 •23 No par 16% Jan 5 23 Mar 27 10 Mar 2214 July 64 *2012-64 65 68 67 67 •65 330 Weer Penn Elea clam A.No par 4412 Jan 8 87 Apr 19 63 63 .63 637s 64 30 Apr 73 June Preferred 75 430 75 75 7432 75 7612 77 75, 75 2 954 76 75 37 Apr 77% June 100 5154 Jan 8 77 Apr 20 6% preferred 130 6512 6512 67 67 26514 67 •65 67 6512 6512 67 67 3312 Apr 6912 July 100 45 Jan 3 67 Apr 111 100 West Penn Power pref 108 108 10734 108 10734 108 10734 107% 10772 10778 108 108 8812 Dec 110% Jan 100 8912 Jan 2 108 Apr 12 140 6% preferred 100 10212 101 101 100 10014 9912 100 *9714 100 *99 100 80 Dec 101 100 7834 Jan 10 101 Apr 19 Jan 64 Jan 30 4 3 Jan 10 334 4 4 378 4 378 412 8,100 West Dairy Prod Cl A_No par 378 378 314 4 34 Apr 1134 June Class B via 118 Jan 3 112 1, 114 1% 11,300 8 132 138 Jan 138 112 No par 14 114 112 112 is 414 June 24 2212 2278 2212 23 2 Feb 311 1478 Jan 12 27Mar 22, 2 2312 2312 23 234 22 22 1,200 Weetvaco Chlorine Prod No Par Mar 2012 July 2412 *24 *2412 25 •24 Wheeling Steel Corp...No par 2412 19 Jan 5 29 Feb 21 2412 *2414 25 •2414 2514 *24 74 Jan 85 July •53 4 Preferred 57 Jan 55 Feb 26 400 55 *53 '53 55 100 38 5312 5314 54 15 Feb 67 July 5484 5484 '53 40 White Motor 112114 25 .2138 24 24 *2134 24 24 1 4 Jan 8 2512 Feb 19 2314 2314 *2118 24 50 16/ 14 Jan 264 July *2834 30,4 2912 29,2 2834 2914 2934 30 314 3078 3072 2,200 WhiteRkMinSpr ottnewNo par 24 Jan 4 3112 Apr 19 30 23 Oct 29 Oct 3% Feb 6 14 Jan 8 3 234 234 .212 234 3 *284 3 3 338 3,900 White Sewing Machine.No par 234 3 Ii Jan 4% July •712 Cony preferred 9% 94 812 934 No par 878 512 Jan 12 1114 Apr 20 914 1114 4,700 834 *712 872 Jan n 1011 July 434 434 5 478 478 414 5 5 5 338 Jan 9 53 Apr 5 514 2,000 Wilcox 011 & Gas 5 .434 2 Mar June 512 518 9 Apr 11 4% Jan 8 812 812 812 812 No par 812 858 •818 84 818 838 5,000 Wilson & Co Inc 814 812 11 June 8 2314 2512 24 2532 25, 27,5s2 A pr 113 2578 24 Class A No pat 1214 Jan 9 8 2518 25 19,000 2512 2418 25 10 47a m j Jan . anr 22 June 78 8014 7912 8114 8012 82 8112 82 Preferred 100 53 Jan 8 80 4,500 80 80 80 7213 July 5318 5234 5312 5312 5412 5312 5412 254 5244 53,2 52 10 414 Jan 3 r5458 Apr 20 545s 21,300 Woolworth (F W) Co 2518 Apr 50% Jul) "2518 27 •26 27 *25 900 Worthington P & W 2614 27 100 21 Jan 5 317 Feb 5 264 26 2612 '2514 27 8 Mar 3988 Jul) 4412 46 .45 "4512 46 Preferred A 4778 46 46 •46 46 47 120 46 100 34 Jan 10 53 Jan 24 14 Mar 51 June Preferred B 3512 3512 36 300 36 .35 *3412 36 37 36 36 .3412 36 100 30 Jan 10 42 Jan 24 14 Feb 47 June 5514 554 56 5714 5712 56 840 Wright Aeronautical...No par 16% Jan 8 75 Jan 27 56 5712 5712 56 551g 62 6 Apr 24 May 6138 6134 6112 6218 6214 6214 26214 6234 6234 63 2,200 Wrigley (Wm) Jr (Del)No par 5412 Jan 11 63 Mar 24 6178 62 3412 Feb 574 Dec Yale & 20 14 20 20 20 Towne Mfg Co.._ .25 20 600 20 Jan 5 2038 Feb I .19 20 •20 21 2014 2014 7 Jan 23 June 578 572 5, 714 Feb 19 8 514 44 Jan 2 538 578 534 578 4,200 Yellow Truck & Coach ol B 10 534 6 534 5'4 24 Mar 784 Jul) 40 '4012 4212 40 42 Preferred *40 45 42 230 42 '41 100 28 Jan 2 46 Feb 23 41 '41 18 Mar 42 Jul) 19 19 '19 1912 1878 1938 1812 18% 19 1912 19 1914 2,200 Young Spring & Wire No Par 15 Jan 8 2214 Feb 19 312 Mar 191g July 2814 2712 2814 28 8,200 Youngstown Sheet & T o par 2112 Jan 3 338 Feb 19 28 2872 2714 2812 27% 28 2812 28 712 Feb 37% July 314 338 484 Feb 5 4 412 332 312 418 418 2,900 Zenith Radio Corp_ _No pa, 312 3, 3 Jan 12 11 354 418 R Dec Ii Feb 672 718 7 718 714 678 7,4 7,700 Zonite Products Corp_ „I 718 1373 7 6s 7 734 Feb 19 544 Jan 15 358 Feb 812 Jul) $ per share .1014 11 634 634 '1812 19 •772 884 1712 17, 4 412 • 412 *1712 2112 1278 13 82 82 '35 40 9112 9138 732 712 3514 3,512 678 718 •1012 11 538 512 *7238 78 38 3838 '214 2I • Bid and asked prices, no sales on this day. I Companies reported In receivership. a Optional sale. c Cash sale. s Sold 7 days. r Ex-dividend. V Ex-rights. New York Stock Exchange—Bond Record, Friday, Weekly and Yearly 2715 On Jan. 1 1909 the Exchange method of quoting bonds was changed and prices are now "and interest"—except for income and defaulted bonds. NOTICE.—Cash and deferred delivery sales are disregarded In the week's range, unless regular weekly range are shown in a footnote In the week in which they occur. No account they are the only transactions of the week, and when selling outside of the Is taken of such sales in computing the range for the year. BONDS N. Y. STOCK EXCH A NGE Week Ended Apr. 20. Li o b .. u t 41 a, , Price Friday Apr. 20. Week's Range or Last Sale. E . 2. eis. U. S. Government. Rid Ask Low High No First Liberty Loan-34 of '32-47 1 D 103,,,, Sale 10324,103.n 239 Cony 4% of 1932-47 J D ____ _ 10014,Jan'3 i ____ Cone 44% of 1932-47 J D 10350,, Sale 103,93,103.n 448 2d cone 434 % of 1932-47 J D 10214, ---- 102,,,,102,,,, 10 Fourth Lib Loan 434% of '33-38 A 0 101 Sale 103,,,, 1014, 671 434% (called) ____ ____ ____ 10110,,Apr31 ____ 4 ‘.i % (2d called)_ 102,3, Sale 1024, 10214, 514 Treasury 448 1947-1952 A0 11041 Sale 1104, 1113, ,, 309 Treasury 44s to Oct 15 1934. thereafter 334% 1943-45 A 0 101 144 Sale 101242102,1n 1662 Treasury 48 1944-1954 J D 1034, Sale 105,,, 10714, 810 Treasury 34s 1948-1956 M 9 101°',, Sale 101211,1051,n 303 Treasury 34s 1943-1947 3 D 10210,2 Sale 10214,1031,n 713 Treasury 3s___Sept 15 1951-1955 M 13 9915,, Sale 991,,, 99,41 1313 Treasury 334s June 15 1940-1943 J D 100, ,, Sale 10224,10310n 894 Treasury 34s Mar 15 1941-1943 M 8 102,,,, Sale 1025411031ln 394 Treasury 334e June 15 1948-1949 J D 10017,1 Sale 10017,, 1014, 1019 rreasury 34e Aug 1 1941 F A 1021,,, Sale 102",,1031,,, 1625 Treasury 334s_ _ _ ____1914-1946 ---- 1014, Sale 1017,, 101,4, 3451 State & City—See note below. Foreign Govt. & Municipals. Agile Mtge Bank s I as 1947 F A Feb 1 1934 subeeq coupon__ Elinktng fund 65 A __Apr 15 1948 --A0 With Apr 15 1934 coupon__ --Akershus (Dept) ext 58 1963 MN Antics:luta (Dept) coil 75 A_1945 2 1 External s f 7s ser B 1945 J J External At 7s ser '3 1945 J 1 External, f 75 ser D 1945 J J Externals f 7s let ser. —1957 A 0 External sec St 7s 01 ser_1957 A 0 External sec 5 f 7s 3d ser 1957 A 0 Antwerp (City) external 5s 1958 J D Argentine Govt Pub Wks 85_1960 A 0 Argentine 88 of June 1925_1959 1 D Eat]51 (is of Oct. 1925-1959 A 0 External 11 f 685eriee A 1957 M S External Os series B_ _Deo 19582 D Extl s f 6s of May 1928 1960 M N External s f (le (State Ry)_1980 NI S Extl 6s Sanitary Works _1981 F A Eat! 6/1 pub wks May 1927 1961 MN Public Works extl 5348_1982 F A Argentine Treasury 66t_ 1945 NI S Australia 30-yr 6s_ __July-15 19552 J External 58 of 1927_ Sept 1957 M S External g 434s of 1928..„1958 MN Austrian (Govt) of 7e 1943 J D Internal sinking fund 78_1957 J J Bavaria (Free State) 6348.__1945 F A Belgium 25-yr esti 6 48 1949 MS External o f Os 1955 J J External 30-year I f 7s 1955 1 D Stabilization loan 75 1956 MN Bergen (Norway)55,0K 15 1949 A 0 External sinking fund 5n_1080 M S Berlin (Germany) s f 6349 1950 A 0 External ,t 8s_.june 15 1958 J D Bogota(City) extl of 88 1945 A 0 Bolivia (Republic of) ext18e_1947 MN External secured 78 (flat).1958.7 -1 Externals 17s (flat) 1969 M S Bordeaux (City of) 15-yr 68_1934 M N Brazil(U 8 of) external 88...._1(141 1 D External 5 f 6345 of 1926_ _1957 A 0 External,1 834,of 1927 1957 A 0 78 (Central Ry) 1952 J D Bremen (State of) extl 78 1935 M S Brisbane (City) 5 f 5e 1957 MS Sinking fund geld 52 1958 F A 20-year, f (is 1950 J D Budapest (City) exti s f 88 1962 1 D Buenos Aires (City) 834e2 B 1955 J J External s 1 6e ser C-2 1960 A 0 Externals 1 Os ser C-3 1960 A 0 Buenos Aims (Prov) ext.! 88_1961 M 8 Stpd (Sep 1 '33 coup on)1961 M S External 8 t 6348 1961 F A Stpd (Aug 1 '33 coup On)1901 F A Bulgaria(Kingdom),f 70_1967 3 J Stabil'n s f 73.4s Nov 15 1968 Tel N Caldas Dept of(Colonabia)7345'46 J J Canada (Domha of) 30-yr 48_1960 A 0 58 1952 M N 448 1936 F A Carlsbad (City)8 f 88 1954 .1 J Cauca Val (Dept) Colom 748'46 A 0 Cent Agile Bank (Ger) 78.._1950 M El Farm Loan of 6s__July 1-5 19602 J Farm Loan s 113s_Oct 15 1960 A 0 Farm Loan as ser A Apr 15 1938 A 0 Chile (Itep)—Ext1 St 78 1942 M N External sinking fund 68_1960 A 0 Ext sinking fund 68__Feb 1961_ F A Ry ref ext s f 6s Jan 1961 J J Ext sinking fund O8-.Sept 1981 51 S External sinking fund Os .1902 M El External sinking fund Os...1963 M N Chile Mtge Ilk 634s June 30 1957 J D 81 854s of 1926_ _June 30 1981 J D Guar 8 f (is Apr 30 1981 A 0 Guar s f as 1962 MN Chilean Cons Munk, 7s 1960 M S Chinese(Hukuang Ry)5s._1951 J D Christiania (Oslo) 20-yr 5'54 85 M 8 Cologne (City)Germany 8451950 M 8 Colombia (Itop)65 of'28_ _Oct'61 Oct 1 1933 and sub COUD0118 on_ A 0 Apr 1 1934 and sub coup's on ---Eater as (July 1 '33 coup on)131 J J With July 1 1934 coupon on__ Colombia Mtge Bank 04e of 1947 A0 _— Sinking fund 7s of 1926 1948 MN Sinking fund 7s of 1927 1947 F A Copenhagen (City) be 19523 D 25-year g 434s 1953 MN Cordoba (City) ext1 s f _ _1957 F A External of 7s____Nov 7s151037 MN Cordoba (Pros') Argentina 71942 J J Costa Rica (Republic)— 75 Nov 1 1932 coupon on_1951 MN 78 May 11930 coupon on_1951 ____ Cuba (Republic) Snot 1904 1944 118 8 External 55 011914 ser A 1949 F A External loan 434e 1949 F A Sinking fund 54s Jan 15 1953 J J Public wks 5349 June 30 1945 J D Cundinamarca 6340 1959 MN Czechoslovakia(Rep of) 8.9_1951 A 0 Sinking fund 88 nor B 1952 A 0 Range Since Jan. 1. Low High 100,,, 1044, 10017,11007n 10114,1032,n 10214,10224, 101.3., 104,,, 10014,11311,n 1024,11021TO 104,1,11111,n 9724,102,4, 101,4,10714n 1004, 16524, 98,4110315n 9314,99,3 98,4,1032,,, 98,0.'1032 n 9511 101, ,, 9724,19314, 1014, 101,4, BONDS N. Y. STOCK EXCHANGE Week Ended Apr. 20. ..g.?: ri ...a. Prize Friday Apr. 20. Week's Range or Last Sale. .g . ,;,..S.3 4541 Range Since Jan. 1. Foreign Govt. & Munic.(Con.) Bid Ask Low 111011 No Low High Denmark 20-year extl 6s____1942 1 J 9614 Sal: 9318 9578 53 8612 9714 External gold 534s 1955 F A 92 Sib 92 36 93 8334 9512 External g 4 4s__Apr 15 1962 A 0 83 Sib 8214 8312 99 71 87 Deutsche Bk Am part ctf 60_1932 Stamped extcl to Sent. 1 1935_ ,,-, 72 747 z74 15 74 7112 7714 DominIcan Rep Cust Ad 530'42 M 9 6414 Sets 64 6414 12 433 65 1st ser 5348 of 1926 1940 A 0 55 Sae 5514 3 55% 36 56% 2d series sink fund 534s 1940 A 0 56 8,12 55 7 57 374 57 Dresden (City) external 78_1945 NI N 5212 55 5238 53 33 48 5818 Dutch East Indies esti 6s 1947 J J 16118 8Ss 162 16414 27 150 1847 40-year external as 1982 M S 164'8 Sete 161 16418 42 15112 165 30-year esti 5 4s____Nov 1953 MN 16312 Site 162 4 151 18412 16312 30-year ext 5348 Mar 1953 M 8 164 Site 162 10 1511/ 164 161 El Salvador (Republic) 8s A_1944 J J 5618 75 5212 Apr'34 ____ 4812 60 Certificates of deposit J .1 502 54 5113 5112 1 38 55 Estonia (Republic of) 78____1967 1 J 75 78 75 8 75 5778 75 Finland (Republic) ext 85_1945 M S 9714 98 974 9 9734 79 9734 External sinking fund 75_1950 M 8 100 Sale z9918 8612 10014 21 100 External sink fund 634s__1956 NI S 9712 Rile 9712 98 15 7812 99 External sink fund 549-1958 F A 92 Rile 9112 933 76 92% 63 Finnish Stun Loan 634n A__1954 A 0 934 9512 9414 9512 10 77 9512 External 848 serial B____1954 A 0 93 95 9312 9412 7512 95 7 Frankfort(City of)01648_1953 M N 3234 337 3312 3414 43 2934 48 French Republic Intl 7(4s._1941 3 D 17738 Sala 17312 17716 60 13414 1778 External 78 of 1924 1949 2 D 179 Silo 176 25 160 13012 179 German Government Internetlonal 35-yr 634s of 1930 1985 J D 4218 Silo 4014 4412 803 40% 631 2 German Republic extl 7s 1949 A 0 6734 Sale 6412 8412 8712 7012 249 German Prov & Communal Bk.. (Cons Mole Loan)8348 A_1958 1 D 3712 Sale 3634 364 7112 3912 55 Graz (Municipallty) 88 1954 MN 8012 Sale 7714 8012 8 57% 8012 Only unmatured coupons on___ - 61 ____ 62 6 62 62 62 Gt Brit & Ire (II K of) 548_1937 FA --11834 Sale 11818 119 37 1114 12412 t4% fund loan £ opt 1980_1990 MN 11714 Sale 11612 z11714 160 109 1173e Greek Government,1 ser 7s_1964 MN 28 32 2712 7 2712 22 3312 St sects Aug '33 coupon 1968 F A 23 Sill 23 10 23 1834 31 2112 - 2318 Apr'34 ____ 18%25 ____ -23- 2112 2112 2 20 24 2112 _2112 2112 2 1538 2512 ____ ____ 2112 2112 2 2512 18 8012 Sale 7916 8012 11 6612 8012 1114 12 1118 12'8 84 173 9 1112 Sale 1118 12 11 9 17 1114 1214 1214 93 17 1214 1 1114 12 1114 124 15 84 1714 1012 1234 11 12 7 818 1434 1012 1112 1114 APr'34 ____ 8 1416 11% Sale 11 1138 7 8 1416 92 95 93 9318 10 824 9912 773 Sale 7434 7812 109 534 7812 7714 Sale 7414 7812 136 5312 7812 774 Sale 7412 7878 89 53 787 Haiti (Republic) s f as ser A _1952 A 0 80 R113 80 7412 81 20 81 7734 Sala 7434 7816 166 7858 Hamburg (State) 65 53 36 55 1940 A 0 337 Sala 333 3334 58 7718 8.113 7416 7812 98 5352 7812 Heidelberg (German)ext1734s'50 3 d 31 3412 30 30 Apr'34 ___ 44 7812 79 7812 7734 Sale 7414 Eleisingfors 535, (City) ma 848_1960 A 0 941 Sale 9412 95 7234 95 42 7814 142 7712 Sale 744 5312 784 Hungarian Music Loan 7345 19452 J 3718 Sill 3718 14 384 2816 4414 7712 Sale 7414 7812 115 5216 781. External s I 78 (coup) 1948 J 3 40 Sib 3934 30% 45 4116 106 7714 Sale 75 7812 100 52% 731; Hungarian Land NI Inst 734s '61 M N 45 47 47 Apr'34 ___ 3312 47 71 Sale 6814 7112 85 4712 7112 Sinking fund 734s ser B 1961 MN 45 52 47 Apr'34 ____ 31 47 9658 Site 9616 9814 20 803 99 Hungary (King of) 5 t 7345_1944 F A 3812 395, 38 3112 424 3834 10 9634 91 9616 Sale 9614 8812 97% Irish Free State tati St 5n..1980 MN 115 Sale 115 5 11018 118 115 9614 Sale 9614 9678 345 89 97% Italy (Kingdom of) esti 75 1951 J 0 10014 Sale 100 101 76 9916 102 9334 Sale 9312 94 157 83 Italian Creel Consortium 70 A '37 M 9 a99 50s 9718 z9718 21 95 95 100 9918 100 9918 9934 20 9118 100 External sec s f 78 ser 13_1947 M 9 9818 sib 9s18 9818 7 914 100 7018 Sale 69 7012 51 7012 Italian Public Utility extl 78_1952 1 J 50 909 Sale 90% 8614 9315 9134 17 ____ 4012 4312 13 38 4012 5912 Japanese Govt 30-yr of 648_1954 F A 953 Sale 953 964 97 86 9612 10314 Sale 102 10314 21 Eat'sinking fund 534s 95 10412 1965 MN 85 Sale 834 734 86 242 86 1034 Sale 10112 10314 92 94 10314 Jugoslavia (State Mtge Bank)— 10712 Sale 10634 10712 29 99 109 Secured et g 7s 1957 A 0 40 41 40 41 41 32 6 1064 Sale 105 10634 33 9578 10634 7s with all unmet coup _1957 18 ____ 27 Apr'34 ____ 23 27 8012 80 82 82 1 68 Leipzig (Germany)s f 78_ _ _1947 --82 FA 5972 Sale 59 32 60 80 3716 8012 84 80 14 8014 864 8012 Lower Austria (Ploy) 734s 1950 J D 8118 7916 ____ 8118 60 4 8118 35 Sale 34 3512 8 31 32 Only unmatured coups attach'd ------------50 Feb.34 ____ 63 50 33 Sale 3212 3412 33 3212 4912 Lyons (City of) 15-year 6s 1934 MN 17014 17112 16778 16918 11 149 1694 1612 2114 2212 Apr'34 __ __18 24 912 41 612 1134 Marseilles (City of) 15-Yr 88-1934 MN 17014 Sub 169 8% 8118 Sale 17014 25 149 17014 534 1012 Medellin (Colombia) 612s 15 8 8 Sale 714 1954 J D 1134 Site 1114 1218 38 87 1616 7% Sale 74 73 33 514 1012 Mexican Brig Asstng 4345_1943 MN 5 4 514 412 738 4 73 4 5 3 17014 Sale 16734 17014 24 149 17014 Mexico (US) esti 55 01 1899 £'45 Q ---------4 Sept'33 -----------3112 Sale 3114 3318 26 223 3612 Amenting 5s of 1899 1945 ---814 1018 812 Apr'34 ____ 6.4 10 27 Sale 2614 2734 67 2014 32 Assenting 55 large ___ ____ ____ 94 914 16 712 1114 2612 Sale 2614 2014 32 2914 111 Assenting 53 small ---- ---- ___ 8 Feb'34 _-_8 8 263 Sale 2634 2814 50 2012 32 Assenting 4s of 1904 51 57 1951 ---53 4 Sale 17 418 74 Sale 5512 5412 56 10 5318 6318 Assenting 48 of 1910 _- _6 634 414 Mar'33 -----------85 8534 13 85e 855, 7314 88 Assenting 4s 01 1910 large ---6 Sale 534 518 834 4 6 854 Sale 28514 854 20 73 8772 Assenting 45 of 19113 small 5% 434 832 -_--7 21 6 512 Sale 94 Sale 94 94 13 83 Tress 6s of'13 assent(large)'33 3 3 95% • * • 41 4614 4134 4314 16 3118 4612 Small * • * 6712 7012 64 6518 15 464 6518 Milan (City, Italy) tut! 834s 1952 A 0 8916 Sale 8814 28 893 8516 917 Apr'34 80 6018 67 47 60 Minas Geraes (State) Brazil— 63 Sale 60 63 8 4514 63 External s t 848 1958 M 8 1918 Sale 1918 2034 10 24 17 4618 48 145121.Apr'34 _ __ 304 4614 1712 234 Ext sec 634s series A 1912 1918 1959 M S 19 1938 9 4014 Sale 393 2674 44% Montevideo (City of) 7s 405, i30 3412 J D 3438 Sale 34 1952 22 3438 2714 4718 52 4612 4673 1 315, 4612 External of 8s series A.-_1959 MN 29 31 2912 30 2614 31 18 41% Sale .41 42 43 27 42 New So Wales (State) extl fts 1957 F A 9412 95 95 944 38 85 96 2212 Sale 2114 2212 19 187s 234 External s t 5s A 0 9412 Sale 9412 1953 Apr 15 95 8514 95% 2314 Sale 23 24 6 23 2812 Norway 20-year ext On 1943 F A 10118 21 9912 Sale 99 914 1014 1414 11 1312 14 1318 10% 1834 20-year external Co 1944 F A 10012 Sale 100 19 101 904 101 9934 Bale 9914 997e 236 997 92 30-year external 65 1952 A 0 997 Sale 9912 100 22 8912 100 10734 Sale 10714 10734 72 10314 10834 40-year s 1 5349 1965 J D 93 Sale 893 9338 55 83.8 9512 104 Sale 1034 104's 73 10034 10418 External s f 5s___Mar 15 1983 M 9 9118 Site el 9112 57 8012 92 7714 Sale 7714 79 4 6712 804 Municipal Bank extl 0158_19374 13 9012 Sale 9012 91 8312 91 6 143 12% 13 t3'e 6 1034 19 Municipal Bank extl St 5s_1970(ll D 90 91 9014 z9014 22 91 81 5713 5712 Sale 55 90 55 73 Nuremburg (City)(art' 65_1952 F A 32 36 3438 12 3312 33 554 4812 Sale 4612 4934 89 4612 69 7712 Oriental Devel guar Os 1953 M 9 77 Sale 7614 7718 28 65 5012 Sale 4714 51% 169 4612 69 Extl deb 534s 73 Sale 72% 1958 M N 6234 74 6 73 5512 Sale 5514 57 152 4912 70 Oslo (City) 30 -years f 88-1955 MN 9178 96 93 9134 7618 93 8 1414 Sale 13 144 29 9 16 137 Sale 1212 14 79 718 16 102% Panama (Rep) extl 530- -1953 i D 1021e Sale 102 9 98 103 144 Sale 1214 144 76 7 Esti St Sneer A_ __May-1-5 1963 MN 42 Sale 42 1512 4214 15 2918 44 14 Sale 1212 14 72 7 Stamped 1534 ___ Sale z42 42 2932 44 15 4312 1414 Sale 12% 1414 131 734 15, 5 Pernambuco (State of) extl 78'47 M 5 15 Sale 15 1514 4 1078 1818 14 Sale 1234 14 25 714 15 Peru (Rep of) external 7s___1959 M S 17 Sale 17 42 17 812 17 134 Sale 1212 1418 102 718 16 57 144 Nat Loan extl s f 6s 1st ser 1960 J D 1012 Sale 1012 1112 140 1418 Sale 1314 1414 99 94 143 Nat loan eat] 0105 2d ser_1961 A 0 11 Sale 1014 1112 131 614 144 1434 1534 14 1438 6 10 1814 Poland (Rep of) gold 6s_1940 A 0 7518 Sale 7312 7518 13 59 7518 14 Sale 1278 1414 47 818 1518 Stabilization loan s t 7s___1947 A 0 9812 Sale 975 9912 201 88 100 1438 Sale 1278 1438 42 8 External sink fund'g se_ _1950 J J 8914 8912 8312 15 85 35 85 694 1012 Sale 1012 11 17 7 12 Porto Alegre (City of) 8s___1981 J D 19 1912 19 18 6 24% 1914 4118 Salo 41 4112 21 2758 4278 Extl guar sink fund 748__1968 J J 1918 Sale 19 2412 18 6 1914 90 917o 93 93 1 81% 93 Prague(Greater City) 734s.1952 M N 99 9934 99 97 83 8 993 4 321213378 3212 33 10 31 50 Prussia (Free State) esti 634s '51 M S 3812 Sale 38 69 40 371s 5412 External s f as 3378 114 1952 A 0 38 Sale 37 37 57(4 26 Sale 24 2612 24 2112 355, Queensland (State) extl 8175 1941 A 0 10612 Sale 10512 10612 37 102 10612 2218 Bale 2158 24 31) 18% 3212 25-year external On 1947 F A 10112 Sale 10112 10112 9411 103 2 ____ ____ 26 2712 2 21 3534 Rhine-Main-Danube 70 A__ _1950 M S 60 Sale 5514 6116 73 50 674 22 Bale 22 2412 12 1812 3218 Rio Grande do Sul extl s 1 88_1948 A 0 234 Sale 2232 2314 21 20 26 1734 1878 1912 Apr'34 ____ 15 24 External sinking fund 63 1988 3 D 20 Sale 20 21 35 1812 24 1734 1918 19 1914 4 1512 24 External s f 78 of 1926 1966 MN 2114 Sale 20% 2112 34 1858 24 1734 20 174 1734 2 15 26 External a t 78 munic loan_1987 J D 21 21 22 21 11 19 244 793 Sale 7838 793 22 6312 84 Rlo de Janeiro 25-year o f 8s.1946 A 0 20 21 20 2014 20 1712 22% 75 Sale 74 753 22 5912 7812 External s f 834s 1953 F A 20 Sale 20 2014 17 1712 22 3314 Sale 32 34 36 144 34 Rome (City) extl 834s 1952 A 0 904 Sale 89 91 57 874 92 3518 37 33% 36 19 297 36 Rotterdam (City) extl 6s 1984 MN ___ 12014 128 Mar'34 ____ 112 134 5012 Sale 4712 53% 25 2518 5338 Roumania (Monopolies) 78_1959 F A 29 Sale 29 2934 14 29 40 Saarbruecken (City) 65 19532 J 78.._ 78 78 2 8618 78 __ 33 34 33 6 30 33 Sao Paulo(City) et 8-1__Mar 1952 MN 244 -2-5 2412 3 2412 2314 30 2014 12I 2012 22 4 1834 22 External 51 64s of 1927 1957 MN 24 2478 24 24 1 173 24 92 Sale z9114 92 10 7472 95 San Paulo (State) esti St Ss_1936 J ./ 28% 3012 2818 30 66 33 18 95 Sale 95 95 3 93 95 External sec etas 1950 J J 25 Sale 2212 81 25 7612 80 a7634 a7712 135, 25 8 13278 78 External s 1 7s Water L'n_1956 M 5 2112 2412 21 33 24 1312 24 80 Bale 76% 81 GO 6178 8418 External 0105 10683 J 2018 23 2012 22 34 125, 22 324 Sale 3112 323S 81 23 4178 Secured a f is 1940 A 0 844 Sale 834 8514 79 65 8616 14 Sale 13 14 76 1032 1934 Santa Fe (Prey Arg Rep) 75_1942 M S 33 Sale 33 34 11 1812 34 0841100 98 9812 7 88 101 Saxon Pub Wks '45 F A 574 Sale 57 (Germany) 75 58 43 5532 67 9734 9934 100 Apr'34 _-__ 90 101 Gen ref guar 64s 1951 M N 4612 52 4612 46% 40 46 60% For footnotes see page '2720. ' No FF.—Sales of State and City securities OCCUr very rarely on the New York Stock Exchange, dealings in such securities being almost entirely over the counter. Bid and asked quotations, however, by active dealers in these securities. will he found on a subsequent page under the general held of "Olintstions tar 11nliste4 Securitlee - New York Bond Record—Continued—Page 2 2716 BONDS N. Y. STOCK EXCHANGE Week Ended Apr. 20. I +4 t 7. t ".4. 0 Price Friday Apr. 20. Week's Range or Last Sale. a'31 Range Since Jan. 1. High High No. Low Ask Gots Bid Foreign Govt. &Munk.(cond.) D ____ 6438 6312 5634 71 65,4 14 Saxon State Mtge lost 7s....1945 5614 70 64 9 Sinking fund g 6 Xs_ Dec 1946 JO 64 Sale 6313 21 18 28 3 2614 Serbs Croats & Slovenes 8s__1962 MN 2518 Sale 2518 22 10 1914 2078 194 Apr'34 All unmatured coupon on. 14,8 15 15 1318 18 15 Nov 1 1935 coupon on 1 2514 18 2414 19 2334 Sale 2313 1962 MN External sec 75 ser 13 1234 20 1778 Salo 174 5 1778 November coupon on____ 17 11 16 13 1238 1 1238 7s Nov 11535 coupon on 1982 5238 654 6512 102 1958 i 6512 Sale 6358 Silesia (Prey of) exti is 69 50 5414 5414 5214 54 8 Silesian Landowners Aeon tls 1947 F A 16612 2 150 16612 Soissoms (City of) exti 6s___1936 MN 16734 ---- 16612 75 55 75 74 15 Styria (Proy) external 7a_ _ _1946 FA 10614 27 102 10934 Sweden external loan 5348_1954 MN 106 Sala 1043.1 93 80 9178 Sala 9178 1955 FA 9214 14 Sydney (City) a f 534s 72 Taiwan Elec Pow s f 543_1971 .1 Tokyo City be loan of 1912_1952 MS 72 Externals f 534s guar__1981 AO 7112 1112 Tolima (Dept of) extl 7s____1947 MN Trondhjem (City) 1st 530_1957 MN Upper Austria (Prov) 7s____1945 3D 8218 External s f 643.June 15 1957 JD 40 Uruguay (Republic) extl 83_1946 PA 3438 Aug 1 1934 couponon 1980 MN 364 External s f 63 3512 1960 May 1934 coupon on 3438 External s f 6s____2!ay 1 1984 1-41 3578 May 1934 coupon on_1964 Venetian Proy Mtge Bank 78 '52 AO 104 85 Vienna (City of) extl vi 63_19.52 75 Unmatured coupons attached_ MN 6418 Warsaw (City) external 7s__1958 FA Yokohama (City) esti 6s1961 3D 76 Railroad. Ala Gt Sou 1st cons A 5s___1943 JO 1943 JO let cons 4s ser B Alb & Susq let guar 3343_1946 AO 1998 AO Aileg & West 1st gu 43 1942 MS Alleg Val gen guar 843 :Ann Arbor 1st g 4s_ _ _July 1995 Q J Atch Top & S Fe—Gen g 43_1995 A0 Adjustment gold 4s _July 1995 Nov July 1995 M N Stamped D Cony gold 43 of 1909____1955 D 1955 Cony 4s of 1905 1900 3 D Cony g 4s issue of 1910 D 1949 Cony deb 434s .1 1965 Rocky Mtn Div let 43 Trans-Con Short L let 4s_1958 J J Cal-Arts 13t & ref 43.4s A_1962 MS Atl Knox & Nor let g bs__1946 JO All & Charl A List 4343 A1944 J lilt 30-year 53 series B_1944 J, Atlantic City let cons 43_ _ _1951 J J Atl Coast Line let cons 48 July *52 M S General unified 43.4s A___1964 JD L & N coil gold 43.___Oct 1952 MN J 1948 Atl & Dan let 8 45 1948 3 264s 1949 AO Atl & Yad lot guar 4s Austin & N W 1st gu 6 58-1941 3, Bait :13 Ohio lat.g 4s_ _ _July 1948 AO Refund & gen bo series A.1995 JO let gold 5s July 1948 AO 1995 JO Ref & gen 65 series C PLE&W Va Sys ref 4s....1941 MN Southwest Div 1st 5s____1950 3, Tot & CM Div 1st ref 4s A _1959 J J Ref & gen ba series D____2000 MS 1960 FA Cony 434s 1996 MS Ref & gen M Seser F J Bangor & Aroostook let 5s 1943 J 1951 Con ref 48 Battle Crk & Stur 1st gu 38_1989 JO J J Beech Creek 1st gu g 48 1936 1936 J 2d soar g 53 Beech Creek ext 1st g 33.4s.._1951 AO Belvidere Del cc(... zu 343_1913 J J 1944 Jo Big Sandy let 48 guar 13..oton & Maine let be A C_1967 M S 1955 MN 'at M bs serfes II 1961 AO 1st g 4 Xs ser JJ Boston & NY Air Line lat 4s 1955 FA Bruns & West lot gu g 4s 1938 ii Buff Roch & Pitts gen gs5a__1937 M S 1957 M Consol 434s Burl C R & Nor 1st dr coil 54_1934 AO Certificates:of deposit Canada Sou cons gu ba A___1982 A 0 Canadian Nat guar 434s____1954 M S 30-year gold guar 443_ _1957 J Guaranteed gold 434s_..1968 J D July 1969 J J Guaranteed g bs Guaranteed g fia Oct 1969 A 0 Guaranteed g 55 A J D 5F 70 Guar gold 443___June 15 195 1956 F A Guar g 434s Guar g 4348 S 1 JM D 950 194 Canadian North deb fSr_1 1946J .1 25-year f deb'8 43 10-yr gold 443___Feb 15 1935J J Canadian Pao By 4% deb stock-----1946 15i-i Coll tr 4 3.4s Coil 1944 J J equip tr ctfs Dec 1 1954 J D Coll tr g 5e Collateral trust 4 43____1960 3 1949 J J Car Cent 1st cons g 45 Caro Clinch & 01st 30-yr 5s_1938 .1 D lot & cons g Baser A_Dec 15'52 J 1981 J D Cart & Ad lat gu g 43 Cent Branch U P let g 43_1948 3 D :Central of Ga 1st g ba_Noy 1945 F A 1945 MN Consol gold 58 Ref & gen 534s series B 1959 A 0 1959 A 0 Ref. & gen .5s series C Chan Div pur money g 48_1951 J D Mac & Nor Div 1st g 53_1948 J J Mid Ga & Atl Div pur m 5s '47 J J 1946 3 J Mobile DIY let g 63 Cent New Engi let gu 4s____1961 3 J Cent RR & Bkg of Ga coil bs 1937 M N 1987 J J Central of N J gen g 5s 1987 J J General 43 F A 1949 gu ref 1st Pao 4s g Cent Through Short List gu 43_1954 A 0 1960 F A Guaranteed g 58 Charleston & Sayli 1st 7s__1936 J J Ches & Ohio let con g 58___1939 M 1992 M S General gold 4394 1993 A 0 Ref & !rapt 44s Ref & impt 434s ser B.......1995 J J Craig Valley 1st 5s _May 1940 J J Potts Creek Branch 1st 43_1948 J J R & A Div 1st con g 4s 1989 .1 J 1989 J J 2d consol gold 48 Warm Spring V 1st g bs 1941 M 8 Sala 7212 72 9 7114 4 72 7334 7112 18 Apr'34 12 8013 9 804 8218 3 8212 6814 674 4 45 37 Mar'34 3912 34 35 11 Sale 34 6 37,4 Sale 32 146 38 3512 7 34 Site 3212 354 24 ____ 104 104 1 Sale 8158 85 47 Sale 71 75 10 Sale 63 6412 62 Site 7512 764 17 9113 Sale 14 8112 Sale 10311 10412 10312 9734 10012 954 96 Sala 9578 85 84 87 103 Site 103 5313 Sale 4934 102 Sale 10112 934 9558 9612 9531 9438 9414 95 8 -- -- 9518 9213 Sale 024 10478 Sala 104 9878 Sala 98 __ 103 103 104 Sale 1034 8. 9934 1035 101 101 10018 10418 106 10418 8912 96 7511 98 Sale 964 9034 Sale 8958 85 Sib 824 5214 Salo 52 47 Sale 4612 61 6412 6231 92 Sale 9012 10312 2 9734 12 9612 10 Feb'34 103 5312 20 10214 152 9338 44 9812 27 3 9514 9558 22 94 2 1044 81 99 46 8 10318 10434 67 Jan'34 Apr'34 10514 25 Jan'34 9812 103 9112 62 251 85 53 18 47 6 63 4 92 20 Sala 99 100 186 Sale 8412 86 171 Sale 105 106 81 Sale 95,2 65 97 Sale 9712 9812 112 Sale 9914 10014 288 Sale 8612 88 57 Sale 84 8518 151 Sale 71 72 265 8578 153 Sale 8378 Sale 05$4 5 10612 9912 9212 9334 15 68 5 63 63 10034 0014 10034 31 _--- 9934 Apr'34 83 Mar'34 _ 10034- -— _ 8812 -89- 10012- Mar'34 8958 33 89 Sale 8834 90 Sale 8918 I 90 17 47 84 8312 Sale 824 I 48 72 4 Sale 704 72 9812 !Apr'34 974 10334 10312 Sale 10312 7 8034 60 80 Sale 7838 • _ Apr'34 52 35 40 11 1 •' 10412 10434 10512 10534 20 25 104 10358 10414 10334 10512 Sale 10478 1054 41 10512 65 10512 Sale 105 10978 Sale 10912 11018 50 11112 68 11078 Sale 11014 11078 25 11034 Sale 11012 48 109 109 Sale 10838 10758 43 10718 Sale 107 10734 58 10712 Sale 107 47 109 10834 Sale 1084 11712 35 117 11712 117 10233 11 10258 Sale 10238 8014 282 8018 Sale 79 964 89 9678 Sale 9614 10512 52 105 o Sale 105 9958 211 094 Sale 9878 179 93 9278 Sale 9112 3712 Mar'34 _ 41 35 10412 21 10412 Sale 10414 1064 11 10678 Sale 10534 4 8334 8312 83 82 36 51 51 Sale 40 15 65 6914 6012 70 3734 48 3712 Sale 3512 22 20 26 Sale 23 60 26 £26 Sale 22 36 Mar'34 .3312 40 Jan'33 13314 ____ 35 Jan'34 _ 21 "55" -317s 33 Mar'34 29 79 7813 Sale 7714 7 71 70 6912 71 47 106 105 __ 10538 9312 15 '90 Mar'34 -157 05 94'x Sale 29378 6 93 914 19234 91 87 86 Sale 185 Feb'34 10314 ___ 104 16 11018 110 Sale 109 10638 Sale 10612 10734 85 10212 83 10134 Site 10134 10214 116 102 1 Sale 1014 10212 105 101 18 Feb'34 I 981, 9813 Sale 9812 2 1001 1 100 10138 10014 ____ 9838 Apr'34 98 ____ 9912 Jan'34 102 9978 8513 10534 97 9838 100 87 8518 7112 8578 10612 9278 63 10012 100 I BONDS N. Y. STOCK EXCHANGE Week Ended Apr. 20, Price Friday Apr. 20. Week's Range or Last Sale. Bid Ask Low Railroads (Coniinued)— Chic & Alton RR ref g 3s__1949 A0 6878 Sala 67 Chic Burl & Q—Ill Div 343_19111 .1 .1 9878 Sala 984 1949 J J 10112 Sal: 10358 Illinois Division 4s 1958 MS 10118 Sala 10118 General 45 1st & ref 4 Mg ser 13 1977 FA 10138 Salo 1004 1971 FA 106 3.11.1 106 let & ref 55 ser A A0 8014 80 III 1934 East & 1st 6s Chicago 1914 gal; 18 :C & E Ill Ry(new co) gen 581951 MN 1614 18 1614 Certificates of deposit Chicago & Erie 1st gold 5s___1982 MN 107 Sala 1064 S 56 8.113 .414 Chicago Great West 1st 45__1959 4513 4413 44 :Chic Ind & Louisv ref 6s___1947 J J 38 40 40 1947 Refunding gold 50 41 40 1947 ii 38 Refunding 4s series C 1818 4 Bab 18, 1966 MN lot & gen 5s series A 1938 2112 19 lot & gen (Is series B_May 1966 J J J 92,2 9412 02 1956 Chic Ind &Sou 50-year 43 D 101,4 1969 Chic L S & East 1st 443 - 101 7118 Bal-a 7312 Chi NI & St P gen 4s ser A 1989 J 71 SO: 7012 Gen g 334s aer B___May 1989 J J Gen 443ser C May 1989 J J 80 Sala 79 j 8014 81 7934 May 1989 Gen 434s ser E May 1989 JJ 84 Salo 83 Gen 4313 aer F g-ife,01081"..4 103 72 -dr Range Since Jan. 1. Mph High No bow 7018 172 5158 7018 9933 0912 93 88 10412 51 97 10412 9212 1024 72 102 10134 53 8818 10131 107 28 96 107 4 81 18 80 53 1912 120 25,2 10 1 1614 934 21 12 107 91 107 5814 159 3512 5!) 4412 33 6 47,2 4218 Mar'34 26 41 Feb'34 40 2012 60 1238 24 2513 Apr'34 13 9312 20 9312 71 Mar'34 99 10414 7478 99 6014 7478 71 10 71 53 8013 77 8012 64 81 19 6312 81 84 8 84 65 73,2 7311 7334 17 8714 8212 6814 48 4018 5612 Sae 5113 5612 570 Chic Milw St P dr Pac 58 A._1975 F A 42 1934 Sale 18 1934 991 Cony adj 6s Jan 1 2000 AO 40 N 6958 Salo 6713 694 20 Chic & No West gen g 3145_1987 42 77 77 Salo 7518 23 1987 11 N General 45 40 7712 S Oa 7712 7712 1 Stpd 4s non-p Fed Inc tax '87 MN 109 8234 18 Gen 445 stpd Fed Inc tax.1987 MN 814 Sao 8134 85 N 2 Sale 386'4 86, 8738 20 Gen 53 stpd Fed Inc tax 1987 75 62 Jan'34 N __ 4 4s stamped 1987 6814 9(114 33 15-year secured g 643_1936 MS 95 SO, 9538 77 66 41 lot ref g Ss May 2037 JO 6578 SOD 65 5912 66 D 5938 Stla 5812 let & ref 434s stpd May 2037 60 D 5914 51, 5834 63 lot & ref 434s ser C__May 2037 91 1034 5312 955 N 5314 sale 5113 1949 Cony 4 Xs series A 96 9734 7212 95 7233 9.113 70 85 9812 Whin R I & P Ity gen 43_1988 3 J 70 Apr'34 72 __Certificates of deposit__ 7334 87 • - —(5 • Refunding gold 42 1931 & 96 10312 2712 33 2714 Salo 2612 Certificates of deposit...... 5312 29 30 111 Secured 443 series A 1952 MS 30 Sae 274 93 10278 Apr'34 2714 3014 27 Certificates of deposit 95 84 1612 91 164 Salo 15 Cony g 443 1960 MN 83 9612 al5 Feb'34 Certificates of deposi. 824 9514 10412 8 ;102 954 Ch St L & N 0 53__June 15 1951 3D iarz 114-7 80 6312 Sept'33 D st38 Gold 334s June 15 1931 784 94 8834 21 86 Sil JO 67:82 Memphis Div 1st g 4s____1951 9514 105 7914 silo 80 27 3,1794 Chic T H & So East let 53__1960 JO 9!) 82 6038 5 62 00 Inc gu 6.3 Dec 1106(1 M 9514 103,4 Chic Un Sta'n 1st gu 454s A.1983 J J 10544 sal, 10512 10578 22 95 105 1st 5s series 13 1963 J J 10514 108 10712 1094 16 9934 103 106 13 Guaranteed g 68 1944 JO 10513 Sala 10514 8678 10034 11334 11414 98 1st guar 634s series C....1903 33 114 88 10514 e 9014 9112 165 9138 S alo 1952 J J 7512 Chic & West Ind con 48 75 10214 19 1st ref 534s series A 1962 Sf S 10214 Sole 102 9812 82 60 Feb'34 1952 MN 9158 Choc Okla & Gulf cons 58 74 9912 Feb'34 JJ ioaCin 2d D & 443 gold 1937 85 68 Apr'34 01 lot 39 534 C I St L & C Ist g 43__Aug 2 1936 9814 9814 3 Cin Leb & Nor 1st con gu 43_1942 MN 9533 47 35 10838 5 106 Salo 106 Cin Union Term 1st 4 4s___2020 3 63 46 10814 23 1i, 108 A54 1E10: 0239 8 18090 : let mtgo be series B 2020 ii: 7914 92 0838 10918 23 lst mtge g 53 series C 1957 MN 9638 Feb'34 Clearfield & Mah lot gu 5s_ _1913 J J 8812 100 9534 30 04 Cleve Cln Chi & St L gen 43_1993 3D 8734 86 00 Apr'34 D General 58 series B 1993 984 10638 98 9814 98l41 6 Ref ar impt 6s ser C 1911 32 90, 9712 77 9014 9112 15 Ref &!met bs ser D 1983 J 9812 85 81 82 J 188 Ref dr Impt 43,4s ser E 1977 8313 10014 101 0078 5 Cairo Div 1st gold 48 1939 J J 88 66 84 Apr'34 90 87 Cin WAM Div 1st g 4s 1991 .j 854 67 90 914 90 5 St L Div 1st coll tr g 4s___1990 SIN 89 67 7234 9734 Mar'34 984 Spr A Col Div 1st g 4s____1940 51 6713 8578 W Val Div lat g 4s___ _ 1940 J J 874 95 83 Apr'34 101 10634 9334 75 10112 10312 0012 Apr'34 Cleveland & Mahon Val g 5s 1938 1 63 60 9912 Feb'34 Clev & Mar let gu g 448__ .1935 MN 10012 90 101 A0 10012 11312 98 .June'33 4 gu gen 13._1942 P & ser 43 Clev 8 997 92 86 Jan'33 Series B 334s 1942 A0 9218 83 83 004 Dec*33 1942 J J 10012 Series A 4343 01 Aug'33 8533 Series C 343 1948 MN -Oars 1101-2 83 Oct'32 Series D 314s 1950 AF 88 73 904 91 Sept'33 Gen 434s ser A 1977 PA 7313 90 101 33 8414 Cleve Sho Line 1st go 4 tie _ _1961 *0 101 Sale 00 68 101 53 61 7312 Cleve Union Term lot 534s__1972 *0 101 Salo 9934 1st s f 53 series B 1973 AG 9414 Salo 94 95,4 44 8878 9812 9138 49 lot f guar 4 Xs series C 1977 AO 91 Salo 90 97 10414 D 100 102 00 Apr'34 804 Coal River By let gu 4s____1945 80 • 9712 Sale 9631 9734 185 Colo & South ref & ext 443_1935 MN 8138 43 General mtge 434s our A__1980 MN 804 Sale 8014 40 34 03 Apr'34 AO 101 18 102 Col & II V 1st ext g 48 1948 0233 10212 11 Col & Tol 1st ext 4s 1955 FA 101 92 100 77 June'33 9858 10173 Conn & Passum Rly 1st 4s 1943 *0 9013 59 63 9813 10512 Consol Ry non-cony deb 4s_ _1954 J J 59 Sale 574 58 Mar'34 52 J Non-cony deb 48 1955 994 10558 59 Mar'34 Non-cony deb 4s 1955 *0 52 105 11014 597 J 2 58 52 - Non-cony deb 43 1956 Mar'34 10478 111 10 D 314 Sale 2813 32 101 1942 105 1104 Cuba Nor By 1st 5343 264 Sale 26 2712 27 Cuba RR 1st 50-year 53 g1952 J J 10218 109 28 2358 let ref 734s series A 1936 JO 23 2438 6 100 10738 1914 Sale 1938 1st lien & rof 88 ser B 7 1938 JO 2012 10018 10778 105 10914 95 Salo 9412 95 167 10834 11812 Del & Hudson 1st & ref 48_ __1943 MN 1935 AO 10218 Sale 0218 63 8 10212 10011 103 Gold 534s 1937 MN 103 Sale 0238 103 65 8012 61 FA 1011.1 RR 10114 D let Bridge & g gu 48__1936 5 10114 7434 964 3 5912 8.118 57 Den & R G 18t C011a g 411-- — 1939 5912 168 9918 108 6118 16 Consol gold 434s 1938 J J 61 Salo 6012 7714 9938 PA 26 Sale 2334 Den & RU West gen 68 Aug 1855 26 250 7118 93 Ref & Inapt 58 our 13—APr 1978 *0 4912 Sale 4234 4912 214 3212 3712 613 8 778 Mar'34 9534 10412 :Dee 94 & Ft Dodge 48 ctfs_1935 33 71 130'34 9014 1064 Des Plaines Val lot gen 443_1947 MS 72 D 21 25 195.5 20 Mar'34 Dot & Mao let lien g 48 84 70 D 11 14 20 11 18 Second gold 48 1995 11 18 51 7 28 Detroit River Tunnel 448_ _1961 MN 10213 Sale 10178 65 10212 13 41 10318 Jan'34 374 Dul Missabe & Nor gen 5s___1941 32 10514 22 Dui & Iron Range 1st 5s____1937 A0 10518 118. 10518 1 10518 124 26 Dul Sou Shore & Atl g 5s____1937 J J 4614 48 47 4812 16 . 26 123 East By Minn Nor Div Ist 48'48. *0 9412 95 Apr'34 _ _ 37 18 East T Va & Oa Div 1st 5s__1958 MN 105 Sale 10414 105 16 8 102 1014 "IT Ill; Elgin Joliet & East let g 5s__1911 MN 102 8li2 Apr'34 El Paso & S W 1st ba 35 1965 *0 72 28 98 Feb'34 81 96 Erie & Pitts g go 314s ser B1940 J 05 97,4 Series C 34s 1940 3, 9812 084 0712 Apr'34 7212 53 81 Erie RR 1st cons g 4s prior_ _1996 3J 94 Sale 914 94 95 106 140 79 1st consol gen lien g 43_1996 79 Sale 7713 J 9114 78 9918 Apr'34 Penn coil trust gold 43..1951 PA 101 7513 95 60-year cony 4s series A___1953*0 7712 Silo 76 7712 49 7313 93 28 77 Series B 6378 87 1953*0 77 Salo 76 Apr'34 75 Gen cony Is series D 103 10314 1953 A0 73 272 79 Ref & knot 5s of 1927 79 Sale 765s 10512 11018 1967 MN Ref & !rapt 53 of 1930____1975 AO 79 Sale 76,2 79,4 447 9834 103 7 10934 8858 10212 Erie & Jersey 151 f 133____1955 ii 10934 Sale 109 5 8812 10214 Genessee River 1st St 63__1957 3 11 109 Salo 10713 109 Apr'34 44 45 974 101 12 Fla Cent & Pen 1st cons g 5a 1943 3 0312 9 9012 9812 :Florida East Coast lat 4348_1959 3D 61 Sale 61 1578 88 1974 51 S 1412 Sale 134 lot & ref is series A 9713 10112 15 49 Sale 14 99 8713 Certificates of deDOM t...... 99 994 6134 66,4 8134 1112 6734 62 4812 344 33 30 2712 2914 2712 974 58 50 53 60 For footnotes see page 2720. 4 April 21 1934 1 374 5612 1234 2338 694 52 5713 77 7712, 58 6313 824 8738 88 6013 62 98 79 434 861 2 6073 39 3858 61 294 531 2 5158 7212 (35 70 • 20 29 204 3234 28 22 858 1834 al5 al5 83 101,, -47; -air, 5512 80 4412 62 10038 10578 10512 10918 9714 106 11134 115 724 9112 8438 104 51 62 90 994 99 101 85 981.1 1004 108% 10438 109 10412 1094 964 9658 754 953t 9213 100 981 1 80 7433 91 12 84 82 02 101 88 86,2 77 90 92 974 7378 85 99,3 101,2 9912 091, _ 8413 82 75 95 84 05 96 97 101 954 9134 101 974 81,2 101 103 -ia50 4438 44 194 18 1614 15 59 58 59 5.338 39 3212 30 29 95 10212 10:3 1011 i 5912 6113 1711 32 2378 4912 4 812 71 65 20 20 1118 Ills 84 10212 10378 1034 10212 106 234 494 8913 951 91 105 944 103 8112 90 944 96 9712 95 7912 91 69,4 79 9918 10(4 6238 7712 77 63 75 62 6014 79 794 60 98 1094 97 109 45 34 6312 59 19 11 1712 11 804 07 92 9914 3613 42 416. New York Bond Record-Continued-Page 3 BONDS N. Y. STOCK EXCHANGE Week Ended Apr. 20. .1. ` ts 35 h /44: Price Friday Apr. 20. Week's Range or Last Sale. 4. ps:a_ 00 Range Since Jan. 1. BONDS N. Y. STOCK EXCHANGE Week Ended Apr. 20. L4 ts zt -8e. 2717 Price FridaY Apr. 20, Week's Range or Last Sale. Q. g 4. 4601 Range Since Jan. 1. Bid Rail High No, Low Ask Low High (Continued)6 :Minn & St Louts 5s ctfs---1934 MN 912 91a 9,8 4 3 918 .514 Sale 151 & refunding gold 4s___1949 M S 478 53s 17 212 578 3 Ref & ext 50-yr 55 ser A._ _1962 Q F 412 3 Mar'34 -- -234 414 312 12 13 12 Q F 7 Sale 314 4 412 Feb'34 ---Certificates of deposit 118 414 M St P & SS M con g 48 lot gu'38 J 1 4634 Sale 4612 83 85 9712 83 Feb'34 ---3434 49 4814 47 1938 J .1 4238 Sale 3712 9614 10414 1st cons 5a ____ 103 Mar'34 ____ 4238 40 3318 4238 let cons 55 gu as to int 5278 33 38 56 1938 3 1 52 Sale 51 1948 J J 36 Sale 35 3614 Galv Bons Sr Bend let 5s A '38 A 0 88 Sale 85 20 75 88 60 88 3614 43 let & ref 613 series A 1512 26 7 24 CM & Ala Ry lot cons ba Oct 1945.8 J 24 Sale 24 25-year 634e 20 35 1949 M S 3214 Sale 30 1612 35 Ga Caro & Nor let gu g be 1929let ref 5 As ser B 5 60 80 80 7958 79 1978 J 1 79 2014 27 Extended at 6% to July 1 1934 l J 2712 40 26 Feb'34 --let Chicago Term at 411_1941 MN 75 -- -- 85 Jan'34 ---85 88 40 5912 Mlealselppl Central let 68...._1949 3 3 80 ._ __ 77 Apr'34 ---8 5912 Georgia Midland let 3s____1946 A 0 5912 Sale 5578 7813 7718 Gouv dr Oswegatchie let 5a__1942 .1 D 85 100 100 Jan'33 ---- ---- - -9534 10018 Or R dr 1 ext let iimi g 4 Ms_ _ _1941 J .1 10118 ____ 10018 Mar'34 ---:Mo-Ill RR 1st bs ser A _ - _ _1959 1 J 23 Sale 20 23 14 61 26 Grand Trunk of Can deb 78_1940 A 0 10811 Sale 10838 109 33 105 109 72 91 Mo Kan & Tex let gold 4a 1990 1 D 9014 Sale 8914 7578 91 15-year e f 65 9012 110 1936 154 S 10614 Sale 10614 1065s 48 10258 10658 Mo-K-T RR pr lien baser A_1962 1 .1 8738 Sale 8714 70 9112 Grays Point Term let 5s_ _1947 J D 59 96 Nov'30 ---- ____ -_ _ 40-year 4e series B 7812 14 6112 79 1962 1 J 7838 Sale 7712 Great Northern gen 78ser-A.1936 J J 99 Sale 99 86 9912 Prior lien 4 ais ser D 99I 420 8 8334 6318 8334 1978 1 J 8214 Sale 82 78 9858 9858 92 let & ref 4afs series A 6114 198 Cum adjust 55 ser A_Jan 1967 A 0 60 Sale 5618 4413 6212 1961 1 1 9832 Sale 9613 7612 99 :1540 Pan let & ref So ser A 1965 F A 3558 Sale 3312 9812 82 General 5348 series B 3578 43 1952 J 1 9712 Sale 9634 2518 39 ___ 33 ____ 27 Apr'34 --General 5s series C 6878 9118 9118 70 1973.8 J 91 Sale 9014 22 Certificates of deposit 28 1975 M 8 1814 Sale 16 General 4348 series D 67 87 86,2 38 1112 2034 1814 440 General 4s 1976 J J 86 Sale 8534 6618 8612 General 434s series E 3658 459 1st St ref be series F 24 3814 1977 M 8 3612 Sale 3312 863e 75 1977.8 J 86 Sale 85 _ 33 ____ 3112 26 32 Green Bay & Weet deb etts A____ Feb 3212 46 2 32 32 2 33 2314 35 Certificates of deposit Feb let & ref 5s ser 0 6 858 Debentures Dia B 534 658 6 Mar'34 ---3658 110 1978 ifi4 3658 Sale 3334 2415 3812 _ 33 ____ 3112 9812 9912 Greenbrier Ry lst gu 4a 8 3212 9912 Mar'34 ---29 3212 Certificates of deposit 1940 MN 10014 Gulf Mob & Nor 1st 534s B_1950 A 0 861s Sale 82 Cony gold 534e 6212 8612 8612 19 1418 285 8 1949 WI'? 14 Sale 1212 1612 1st mtge 58 series C 59 81 33 81 37 218 let ref 858 series H 1950 A 0 81 Sale 7834 24 1980 A 0 37 Sale 331z 381z F. _ 33 ____ 34 Feb'34 - Gulf &8 1 1st ref & ter 6sFeb 1952 J 65--67 70 _ 67 Feb'34 ---Certificates of deposit .1 2318 34 Stamped (July I'33 coupon on) J J 65 80- 55 Dec'33 ------------lit & ref ba ser I 3678 507 3678 Sale 3334 2414 3812 1981 Hocking Val let cons g 434s_19993 J 10512 10612 10512 10578 14 __ 3112 9838 10578 33 26 6 Certificates of deposit_ 33 33 5 82 10012 Mo Pac 3d 7s ext a14% July 1938 1-4151 85 19 89 Apr'34 ---HousatonIc Ry cons g 58__j937 MN 9978 10012 19012 10012 7214 89 H &T C lat g 5s int guar_ _ _1937 J J 103 104 10214 Mar'34 ---91 85 Mar'34 __-97 10258 Mob & Sir Prior lien g 5a__ _1946 J J 83 85 91 J ,1 8978 Sale 85 9113 101 b Houston Belt & Term lot 58.1937.8 .1 10034 102 10014 101 8978 14 Small 85 90 Hud & Manhat let be ser A 1957 F A 8878 Sale 8714 72 89 89 137 1st M gold 48 48 60 1945J 1 ---- 77 60 Jan'34 ---.1 .1 ---- 7238 80 Feb'34 ---55 80 Small 82 5058 4658 299 Adjustment income be Feb 1957 A 0 461,3 Sale 44 :Mobile & Ohio gen gold 48_1938 M S -- -- 9738 9912 Jan'34 -- -99 991s 98 Mar'34 ____ Illinois Central 1st gold 44_1951 J J 100 25 9214 100 21 Montgomery Div let g 58.1947 F A 25 Sale 2278 1912 27 1977 M S 1713 1812 1712 83 9212 let gold 334o 1812 Ref dr Impt 434e 10 2138 3 93- 92 Mar'34 ---1951 1 J 1938 M S 1758 20 1812 1 1812 9218 93 14 23 Sec 5% notes Extended let gold 3ale 1951 A 0 9214 ____ 93 Mar'34 ---_ Mob & Mal 1st gu gold 44-1991 MS 8412 8814 75 Sept'33 181 8016 as sterling 1931 M 8 75____ 73 Nov'30 __-10258 10 Mont C let gu 60 6814 88 8478 20 ____8338 8334 8778 1-03 Collateral trust old 4s_ _1952 A 0 82 19373 J 102 10258 1017e 81 10114 1 let guar gold be 74 881a 8734 53 Refunding 4s 19373 1 10012 10112 10012 10012 1955 MN 8712 8812 8634 8034 Morris & Essex let gu 3%9_2000 J D 8838 Sale 8838 5 63 8913 48 80 7915 Purchased lines 374s 81 7414 8012 1952 J .1 77 1955 MN 10158 Sale 101 10158 12 Constr M Sneer A 6212 7958 79 105 77 10155 Collateral trust gold 4a 1953 MN 7814 Sale 7758 73 95 54 95 1958 M N 9478 Sale 9434 81 9812 9814 62 Constr M 4348 ser B Refunding 58 1955 M N 8712 8814 97 90 10213 15-Year secured 6SO g_ _ _ _1936 J 1 10134 Sale 10134 10213 39 9412 9412 Apr'34 __-40-year 4 he 7612 282 8212 9412 5812 7812 Nub Chatt & St L 48 eer A _ _1978 F A 92 Aug 1 1966 F A 7412 Sale 7334 10232 10432 Cairo Bridge gold 4s 96 Apr'34 ---4 99 10458 N Fla & 81st gu g ba 87 98 1937 F A 10212 19503 D 96 __ Nat Ry of Mex pr lien 4543_1957 i ------___ 18 July'28 ---- ____ 75 80 Litchfield Div 1st gold 3E5_1951 1 .1 7712 __ 75 Mar'34 ---37a Louley Div & Term g 335s 1953.8 .1 8578 Sale 84 414 19 Assent cash war rct No 4 on - , 414 Sale 212 _-414 4 857 76 857s 73 73 73 Mar'34 ___, Guar 48 Apr '14 coupon-1977 A0 Omaha Div 1st gold 3a. _1951 F A 71 76 __ 37s 412 1234 July'31 --- ____ -St Louis Div & Term g 3..,195l1 3 Assent cash war rct No 5 on ---- - - -- ---- 4 Apr'34 ---21s _-4 J 73 78 81 75 75 Nat RR Mex pr lien 430 Oct '26 Gold 334s 85 2 69 11 85 55 1951 J J 8212 Sale 76 712 458 Assent cash war rct No 4 on- , 4 87 80 Springfield Div 1st g 3549_1951 J J 84 ____ 80 Mar'34 ---434 234 5 6 1981 A--0 --------22 Apr'28 -----------lot consol 45 Western Lines let g 4a_ _1951 F A 86 ____ 8612 M'34 ---ar 76 8812 Ill Cent and ChM St L & N-05 2 37s 418 15 378 Sale Assent cash war rot No 4 on ,-82 7113 Nov'32 --_- ____ Joint 1st ref be aeries A __ 87 Naugatuck RR let 848 1954 m N 65 8678 112 68 1963 J D 8514 Sale 85 let & ref 4a 4348series C 80 -87 New England RR cons ba__ A945 J J 8614 ____ 87 Mar'34 _--153 62 81 81 1963 .1 D 7978 Sale 79 8215 8212 I Consol guar 40 66 8212 Ind Bloom & West 1st ext 451940 A 0 93 -- 8212 Feb'34 ---, 8212 8212 168 52 -92 95 9712 NJ Junction KR guar 181 43 198 j 84 F A 57 - 95 Feb'34 _ _ _ 946 72 Ind Ill & Iowa let g 4s 86 92 New On Great Nor Is A __ _ 1983 J 1 75 76 5712 7534 7534 31 1 92 1950 1 J 9258 1412 92 Ind & Louisville let gu 4e 26 25 NO & NE let ref&Impt4%a A '52 1 J 75 Sale 7114 75 64 75 25 25 25 Feb'34 _ _ 1956 J J 17 8458 88 8438 .1 Ind Union Ry gen lis ser A_ _1965 J J 10212 ___ 10214 10214 8412 New J Orleans 48.....1953 103 5 6234 8578 9812 Term 1st 5 190 _ 103 :N Gen & re be series B 2758 NO Tex & Mex n-o Inc 58.1935 A 0 275a Sale 2758 1 16 2934 19853 J 10412 __ _ _ 103 Mar'34 :Int-Grt Nor lst 641 ser A_ 1952 J J 4112 Sale 3918 114 30 1954 A 0 30 Sale 27 1958 32 1st 55 series B 2834 4412 4112 ibi 1228 F A 2934 Sale 28 27 30 Adjustment (ls ser A_July 1962 A 0 14 Sale 1214 2038 33 lst bs series C