The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
...'· \ ·• I I l___ ¥ - - - · - - ••• J Summer 1996 News and Views for Eighth District Bankers National Check Service Debuts New Account Structure Announced https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis ffecti ve Ian. 1, 1998, the Federal 1-{eserve will implement a new flexible account structure that is designed to meet the needs of deposito1)· institutions ~L'i they branch interstate. The new structure was developed based on a series of interviews with a broad crosssection of bankers nationwide. l lnder the new structure, depositOt)' institutions will maintain a single, m~L-;ter account at a designated Reserve Bank. The account will be used to settle all credits and E all 46 Reserve Bank check processing offices. The cash letter fee is $4.00, and the per-item fees are 2.2 cents for low-cost endpoints and 3.2 cents for high-cost endpoints. While pricing is consistent nationwide, the endpoints included in the tiers vary by Reser\'e office. CS is the first national check product the Fed has introduced and is a continuation of the Reserve Banks' move to have consistent check product names and definitions across Fed Districts. !lank Bourgaux, the St. Louis Fed's operating officer, says that the time is ripe for product-; like CS. "\\'ith interstate branching and industry consolidation, Nationwide City Sort is a way for the Fed to respond to the changes in the marketplace," Bourgaux says. For more information on Nationwide City Sort, contact Frank Blacharczyk at CH"±) 444-8960 or your account executive. debits arising from financial transactions with any Reser\'e Bank, regardless of location. Reserve administration and risk management activities also would be conducted from this single location. Additionally, institutions, regardless of whether they have an interstate presence, can set up subaccounts to define subsets of information . For example, a depository institution could track financial activity in a given geographic region by designating a subaccount for a group of branches. lnstitutions could also use subaccounts to identi~· activity by type of financial transaction, such as J\Cl I, Feclwire, etc. Further details 011 how the account structure can be used will be provided via a series of educational materials and seminars that will be offered in early 1997. Questions should be directed to Jeff Dale at (.~ l '+) 444-8400 or 1-800-:m-0810, extension 8'--100. Feditorial Balancing Advances in Retail Payments with the Public Interest n researching the topic for our 1995 annual report, which describes some of the recent technological advances in retail payments, one thing became Thomas C. Melz er clear: The transformation of the U.S. payments system raise s a numbe r of complex and difficult public policy questions. Tied in with virtually every new payments technology----smart cards, cyberbanking, electronic cash, etc.-are a host of issues that have yet to be fully addressed. Who s hould be authorized to issue electronic currency? What happens if an issuing agent fails? Is the "money" loaded onto s mart cards insured? What safeguards are being instituted for Internet purchases? And so on. It is the Federal Reserve's responsibility-as spelled out in the Federal Reserve Act-to improve the efficiency and reliability of the nation's payments system. Thus , we generally I How Will Reg E Apply to Stored-Value Cards? https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis A proposal for making many types of stored-value card systems exempt from Regulation E w~L'i made available for public comment in the Fedf'ml Neg{c;/er on ~lay 2. The Federal Reserve will accept public comments on the proposal through Aug. 1. The proposal's recommendations can be summarized into the following four points: 1) Any stored-value system that limits the maximum value on the card to S100 at any given time would be complele(r e.rem(JI from Regulation E; support payment innovations that contribute to this goal. In the meantime, as market forces develop and refine new technologies, the appropriate role for the Fed is to tackle questions like those just posed, without unnecessarily impeding payments system progress. I believe the Fed is uniquely positioned to accomplish this task effectively. Because of the expertise we have gained over the years in providing financial services at the regional Reserve Bank level, our centralized regulatory function in Washington is better able to write regulations with full knowledge of their likely effects on the industry. As long as both the Fed and industry players remain flexible and committed to collaboration, our payments system will evolve in a way that will enable the entire nation to reap the economic rewards. Tb omas C Melzer is pres idl'11f of tb e Fede ral Resert •e Ba11k <~( St. Lo11is. 2) Stored-\'alue systems that do not require authorization from a central database at the point-of-sale and do 110/ link individuals to an account ('"off-Iine unacco un tab le") would also be completely exempt from Regulation E, even if they al low a maximum value above $l00 to be stored on the care!; 5) Stored-value systems that do not require authorization from a central database at the point-of-sale, do link individuals to an account ("off-line accountable") and allow greater than $100 to be stored on the card wou ld only be subject to Regulation E's in itial disclosu re limit~; and 4) Stored-value systems that requi re authori zation from a central database at the point-of-sale ("on- line") are subject to Regu lation E"s provisions with the exception of: (a) the period statement requi rement, if an account balance and summary of recent transactions are provided upon req uest; (b) the annu al erro r resolution notice requirement; and (c) the notificatio n of a change in te rms. How Good Will Price Stability Be for Banks' Bottom Lines? B William R. Emmons https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis oom and bust cycles in financial markets and bank lending have often been driven by cycles of accelerating inflation followed by decelerating inflation. The Federal Reserve recognizes that a moneta,y policy geared toward achieving price stabi lity, which is simply a long-term commitment to annual inflation rates very close to zero, is one of the best ways to prevent disruptive financial cycles. While market speculators may deplore lessened volatility in asset prices, banks and other deposit0t)' institutions are sure to be among the winners in a world of price stability. Or are they? Price stab ii ity also contains a subtle, but potentially far-reaching, threat to depository institutions. In short, price stability translates into lower nominal interest rates, which in tum reduce the value of float to checkwriters and credit-card users. This matters to commercial banks, thrifts and credit unions because they have been the primary purveyors of checking accounts and credit cards. These transaction accounts have, in turn, long ser\'ed w; the basis upon which customer relationships are built. Any threat to the competitive viability of depository institutions' unique payment services is, therefore, also a threat to their overall customer base. The key to understanding why price stability will affect businesses' and consumers' incentives to choose various payment methods and instruments lies in the arcane notion of float. Simply put, float is the grace period during which a checkwriter or credit-card user retains control over interest-earning funds C(/ier a payment is tendered to a merchant or supplier but before the payer's deposit account is actually debited. Float is not the only reason why individuals and businesses use checks and credit cards, of course, but it no doubt plays a role. Check float is typically a few days, while convenience users of credit cards-those who pay off accrued charges each month--€njoy up to several weeks of float because of monthly billing cycles. AFederal Reserve study a few years ago estimated that U.S. businesses earn about $35 billion annually from check float, while consumers who pay off their credit cards each month earn, on average, 44 cents per transaction on the funds they eventually use to pay off each charge. Checkwriters and credit-card users benefit more from float when interest rates are relatively high because the value of each day of float is greater; conversely, float is of less value when rates go down . The simple fact that float works to the advantage of the consumer or business choosing among float-rich and float-free payment instruments leads to the competitive dilemma that price stability poses for deposi tory institutions. Instead of relying primarily on checks and credit cards, which generate sizable amounts of float, consumers facing very low interest rates might increase their use of float-free payment instruments such as cash or stored-value cards, which might be issued by non-bank firms. ~leanwhile, businesses might write many fewer checks and, instead, carry out the bulk of their payments via ACHanother float-free payment method-provided perhaps by a computer-services firm with only basic transactional input from a bank. Thus, banks' ability to enhance their lnsic payment ser\'ices with more lucrative financial offerings, such as lines of credit and cash-management services, is reduced if many payment transactions byp~Lss their payment instruments. Declining float benefits associated with checks and credit cards need not, however, mean the end of financial relationships based on transaction accounts. For example, depository institutions could themselves promote float-free payments instruments as the best way to simpli~ ush-management functions, since there is never any doubt about when funds will be paid or received. Price stability will undoubtedly benefit depository institutions through decre~Lsecl asset volatility. 'le) maintain their role in the financial system of the future, however, depositot)' institutions must safeguard their financial relationships by offering the payment services their customers want. 1 William R. E111111011s ism, cco110111isl al the Federal Nescrt'e /Jank q/ SI. Louis. RegionalRoundup OUT FOR COMMENT The following are Federal Reserve System proposalscurrently out for comment: ■ Request for public comment on proposed amendments to Regulation E, Electronic Funds Transfers. The amendments address the rules for treatment of stored-value cards. Comments due by Aug. 1, 1996. (Docket No. R-0919) ■ Request for public comment on additional amendments to Regulation T, Credit by Brokers and Dealers, pertaining to margin regulations. Comments are due by July 1, 1996. (Docket No. R-0923) Direct all comments to William W Wiles, Secretary, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 20th St. and Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20551. Software to Cut On-Site Exam Time https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Electronic Federal Payments Mandated Part of the recently enacted 1996 federal budget law mandates that all federal payments -which total roughly 600 million per year-be made by electronic funds transfer. The law calls for individuals and businesses that become eligible for federal payments after July 26, 1996, to receive their payments electronically. Those already receiving federal payments by check will continue todosounti]Jan.1, 1999; after that date, they wi ll receive their payments electronically, too. New Money Laundering Rules On :v1ay 28, 1996, two regula- must be retained by all parties involved in processing a payment order. The travel rule, which WcL'i issued solely by the Treasury, defines the information that must flow with the payment order. rf you have questions about the recordkeeping rule, call Jerry ~1cGunnigle of the St. Louis Fed at (314) 4448732. Questions about the travel rule should be directed to either Charles Klingman, (703) 905-3920, or.Joseph Myers, (703) 905-3590, at the Treasury. Electronic Tax Filing Required tions that implement the Bank Secrecy Act's money laundering provisions beGune effective. The recordkeeping rule, which WcL'i jointly issued by the Treasury and the Federal Reserve System, defines the information that An estimated 1.3 million corporate taxpayers that had at lecL'it $50,000 in annual tax liability in 1995 will be required to file their taxes electronically starting no later than Jan. 1, 1997. Those in this categot)' will soon receive official notice from the TrecL'iUI\ cL'i well cL'i xaminer Workstation, a series of PC-bcL'ied modu Jes expected to cut examiners' onsite time significantly, will be put into use by the St. Louis Fed after testing hcL'i concluded later this summer. llere's how it works: The Fed examiner will meet with the banker several weeks before the scheduled examination to explain the new process. The examiner will cL'ik the banker to download all of the institution's loan information on to diskettes. The examiner will then take the diskettes back to the Fed and analyze the information there, rather than at the institution. When the examiner does go to the site, he or she will be able to spend more time 011 risk cL'isessrnent since the preliminary work will al ready be completed. "You'll be able to step right in to the banks and start working the credit files right away," says Carl White, <Lssistant field director at the St. Louis Fed. "The capabilities of Examiner Workstation are amazingthere's so much you can do." From the bank's standpoint, this means less distraction. "The fewer days the examiners E an enrollment form that must be processed in part by their financial institution. Taxpayers may choose either an ACH credit or ACH debit option to file and pay their taxes. Tax payments made in this manner wil l be transmitted directly to the Treasury's account, bypassing depository institutions' TT&L accounts. These dollars are then invested back into the note accounts of those institutions participating as note option TT&L depositaries. f nstitutions in Missouri, Illinois and Indiana should call 1-800-945-7900 for questions and 1-800-945-8400 to enroll. Institutions in Arkansas, Mississippi, Tennessee and Kentucky should cal I l -800605-9876 for questions and l-800-555-4477 to enroll. are here, the more time we're able to spend on our customers, and that's what we' re here for," say Larry Wilson, president and CEO of Jacksonville Bank & Trust in Little Rock, Ark., which was one of the test sites for the software. "It looks to be a winwin situation for the examiner and the bank." for more information on Examiner Workstation, contact Carl White at (314) 444-8734. Bankers' feedback will be considered in the development of future versions of the software. ACH or Fedwire: Which Is Right for You and Your Customers? https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis ith the increasing use of electronic payments, you may want to consider the various aspects of the Automated Clearing House (ACH) and Feclwire to ensure that you choose the one best suited to the transaction . This goes not only for bank-to-bank payments, but also payments you originate for your customers. Here are some guidelines to follow when choosing between the ACH and Fedwire. With both systems, the factors to consider are: value, volume, settlement and security. ACH The Automated Clearing House was developed in the 1970s to handle recurring payments, especially payrol l payments. Although payroll use remains popular todayroughly one-third of workers receive their paychecks this way-use of the /\CH has broadened to include a wide range of other debit and credit payments. These include: alimony and child support, cable TV, charitable contributions, taxes, credit card bills, state lottery payouts, investment distributions, membership clues, loan payments, utility payments and church tithing. All told, more than five billion commercial and government ACH transactions, worth more than $10 trillion , are originated each year in this country. The largest single originator is the U.S. government. • Value- The ACH was designed for check-like payments; that is, those that are low-risk and low-dollar. • Volume- The ACH was designed to handle a high volume of payments. • Settlement-Settlement on the ACH takes place a day or two after the payment is originated. As a result, an ACH originator has time to reverse an error in a transaction. • Security- Securi~' on the ACH is sufficient for those types of payments for which it is intended - low-value, high-volume. Fedwire Feclwi re, the Federal Reserve ·s wire transfer system, was developed in 1918, using ~1orse Code as a way to communicate messages. The system converted to an electronic format in the rnid-1960s and has grown substantially over the years. In 1995, almost 130 million credit transactions worth roughly $340 tril lion were sent over Feclwire. The transactions were for: settlement between financial institutions; settlement between corporations; and settlement between the federal government and states or corvorations. Institutions can access Feclwire directly if they have an account at the Federal Reserve. The most common type of direct access is made online, with the financial institution connecting to the system from its own mainframe computer, or personal computer with Feclline. Online access saves institutions time because they receive immediate confirmation of funds availability. It also saves institutions money on transfer fees, if they make at least one or two transactions a clay. • Value-Feclwire was designed for high-dollar and therefore high-risk payments. • Volume-Fedwi re was intended for a low volume of payments. • Settlement- Once a transaction enters the Fed's computer, the charge or credit is complete and considered final settlement. Therefore, the transaction is irrevocable. • Security-Because Fedwi re is designed to handle extremely large-dollar payments, the Federal Reserve System maintains very strict security measures to minimize the chance of error. Online access also eliminates the need for handling information manually and communicating on the telephone. "We encourage bankers to evaluate these criteria and determine if they are using the most appropriate mechanism for meeting their settlement and security needs," says Kathleen 0. Paese, operations officer at the St. Louis Feel. "Institutions would also benefit from educating their corporate customers on the dimensions of each mechanism to ensure that they are submitting payments in the most appropriate manner. " For more information on using ACH or Feclwire at your institution , contact your account executive. Calendar FedFacts A Faster Way to File FR Y·9SP Financial institutions looking to cut down on the time it takes to prepare and send the semiannual FR Y-9SP report can now file it electronically. To do so, you must have both a Fedline connection and FR Y-9SP computer software. If you've already purchased software to prepare the quarterly call report, you probably already have the FR Y-9SP package. The software enables institutions to do quick mathematical cross-checking and real-time financial analysis. In addition, confirmation of receipt is immediate. If you would like to enroll for the June 30 report deadline, or have questions about the electronic filing of any regulatory Post Office Box •-1'±2 St. Louis, ,\lissouri 6.)166 CB is published quarterly by the Public Information Office of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. \'iews expressed are not necessaril y official opinio11s of the Federal l\eserve S~·stem or the Federal Reserve Ba11k of St. Louis. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis report, call Jim Mack of our Statistics Unit at (314) 444-8599. Annual Report Available In our just-published 1995 annual report, the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis takes a historical look at the U.S. payments system - from the archaic bartering system right through to today's high-tech mechanisms like smart cards and electronic cash. St. Louis Fed President Thomas C. Melzer introduces the report by pointing up the host of public policy questions that new technologies raise. The best answers to these questions, Melzer says, will arise from experimentation and collaboration among parties working together to set common standards and safeguards. To request a copy of the report, call Debbie Dawe of our Public Affairs Office at (314) 444-8809. More Fed Publications Online 1\vo of the St. Louis Fed's Research Department publications, The Regional Economist and the Rez•iew, have been added to our Internet site, which is at http:www.stls.frb.org. 77:;e Regional Economist is a quarterly magazine that covers Eighth District business and economic issues. The Rez 1iew is a bimonthly economics journal that addresses national and international economic topics. For questions on either publication, or our web site in general, contact Lora Holman at (314) 444-8553. Upcoming Fed-sponsored Events for Eighth District Depository Institutions District Dialogues Sept. 25 - St. Louis, Mo. Oct. 22 - Springfield, Mo. Oct. 23 - Fort Smith, Ark. For more infom1ation on District Dialogue meetings, call Bernie Berns of our Public Affairs Department at (314) 444-8321.