View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FOR PRESS RELEASE AFTER 10:15 P. M.

Prepared

SUNDAY, MARCH 18, 1962

1n

the

Research

Department

of

the

FEUEHJ\L HESEH\/E HANK OF ClE\'Elf\ND
Serving

the

Fourth

Federal

Reserve

District

1962, WHAT KIND OF YEAR FOR BUSINESS?
One year ago this month, business activity in
the U.S. started expanding from the trough of the
mildest recession since the first World War.
This February, after a year of rising business
activity, the Federal Reserve Board Index of Industrial Production was approximately 13%
higher than in February 1961 (based on a preliminary estimate for February 1962). In comparison with first-year progress in other recovery periods, the recent 12-month increase
in the FRB index was one of the mildest expansions since World War I. The very mildness of
the expansion, accompanied by the setbacks of
several widely watched economic figures during January has given rise to the question of
whether or not business activity during 1962
will actually be maintained at a high level.
Since the major elements in the expansion
may sometimes be obscured by the myriad of
economic data that floods the business news
today, a brief examination of several of the
major forces which have been determining the
course of business recently might possibly
sharpen one's perspective on this question.
The pattern of business activity, particularly
in recent months, appears to have been largely
determined by the nature of the last business
contraction and by the output patterns of the
steel and automotive industries since last fall.
An analysis of these three factors leads to the
tentative conclusion that the expansion is likely

to remain a moderate one over the year (for
which there is ample historical precedent) and
that a slowing of the rate of increase in business
activity at this s tage is by no means a signal
of an immediate business downturn.
The Past as Prologue. As previously mentioned, the past year has seen a milder expansion in the FRB Index of ·Industrial Production
during the first year of recovery than at any
similar time since the first World War. That
such an event also followed the mildest business
contraction since 1920 is not entirely happenstance. The National Bureau of Economic Research in its studies of business cycles has
observed that there is a recurring tendency for
recoveries in output to be faster after severe
depressions than after mild recessions. An
analysis of this tendency, including the most
recent business upswing, supports this tentative conclusion of the Bureau and further shows
that the 13% increase in the industrial production index which has occurred since February 1961 is well within the range of probability
as established by relating each contraction in
the FRB index since 1920 to its succeeding
expansion. (For those who are interested in the
technical aspects of this relationship, it may be
stated that the coefficient of correlation between previous downswings in the FRB index
and its succeeding expansions after one year
is on the order of .81.)

Broadcast by Noel A. McBride, Senior Economist, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland,
Cleveland, with Charles Day, News Editor, WGAR, Sunday, March 18, at 10:15 p. m.

 over WGAR,
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Thus, it may be inferred that the mild expansion in the physical output of goods that has
occurred during the past year is to a large
extent directly attributable to the mildness of
the decline in production which occurred during
the last period of contraction.
A Moderating Outlook. Again, a significant
argument for an even more moderate upswing
during the remainder of 1962 may be found in
the history of previous expansions after one
year and their relationship to the severity of
the previous contraction. Once more there is an
apparent tendency for expansions in the second
year of recovery to be strong following severe
contractions, and less strong following moderate contractions; and in all instances the forces
of expansion are less during the second year
of recovery than during the first year. Nonetheless, the average period of business expansions in peacetime as far back as 1854
has been 26 months; and the average expansion
since 1945 has lasted 32 months. The possibility of an imminent decline in business activity, therefore, would not appear to be as
reasonable an assumption at this time as would
be an assumption that the balance of 1962 will
see a continued, but slow, expansion.
In addition to the evidence for moderation
during 1962 provided by the history of business
expansions, the developing pattern of output in
the steel and automotive industries also indicates a more moderate level of production
in coming months.
Steel Production Levels. Steel output, which
rose vigorously during December and January,
leveled off during February. (January ingot
production was 10 .4 million tons, an annual
rate of approximately 119 million ingot tons.)
The advanced level of steel output reached
around the turn of the year was in sharp contrast to the average forecast of 105-110 million
tons for the year 1962. It would appear quite
likely, therefore, that after steel inventories
held by the users of steel are increased to


https://fraser.stlouisfed.org
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

desired levels, a more moderate rate of production might be anticipated for the balance of
1962, regardless of whether or not there is a
steel strike.
Auto Production Geared to Sales. Moreover,
the level of automobile production during the
balance of 1962 will be geared more closely
to sales than it was during January and February. It is s t ill too early to say how high
the spring buying surge will be or how long it
will be s ustained. However, two general observations on the pattern of output may be
made now.
First, the high level of output reached by
the auto industry during the fourth quarter of
1961 (production during November and December was at an annual rate of approximately
6.9 million cars) means that further increases
in total industrial production will not be abetted
by further large increases in the automotive
component of the industrial production index.
Second, the need for a level of car production
in excess of car sales in order to increase

dealer inventories is nearing an end. Dealers'
new car inventories increased from the 821,000
level at the end of December to 1,006,000 on
the first of Mar ch and were in close approximation to the all-time month-end high of
1,063,000 reached July 31, 1960.
Thus, the already high level of automotive
output together with diminished inventory requirements indicate that future increases in the
level of automotive output may be of a moderate
nature.
Taken together, then, it would appear that the
course of business expansion, while it is not up
to some expectations, is not passing through
entirely uncharted waters. Moreover, the
forces of moderation which the steel and automotive industries are presently exerting on the
production index are largely technical adjustments to inventory demands which have been
fulfilled for the present.

Additional copies of "Business Trends" are available upon request.