View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

'W

THE BUSINESS REVIEW
.Wg-J

r«sa
-*'^*a.' »«Vi*^SSS

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
OF PHILADELPHIA
SEPTEMBER 1, 1945

*

Transition from War to Peace
The sudden ending of the war against Japan on August 14 changed the whole as­
pect of reconversion overnight. The Government was faced with a choice of imme­
diately cancelling contracts or gradually tapering off war production. The first al­
ternative Involved an abrupt dislocation in employment but the second meant a
needless tying up of scarce materials which could only prolong the process of re­
conversion and inject uncertainty into the timing of the transition. The decision was
to cancel all contracts except those which were needed to supply the occupation
forces abroad and the troops undergoing demobilization. In the first week after V-J
Day, the Army and Navy cancelled $30 billion in war contracts in addition to pre­
vious cancellations of $14 billion between V-E Day and V-J Day. This action precip­
itated an immediate shift from war to peacetime activity.

Philadelphia in Transition
This area undoubtedly has a less difficult
Against this background a complete reap­
praisal was needed of the reconversion picture problem of reconversion than many other cen­
in the Philadelphia-Camden industrial area, the ters throughout the country. Although it was
major war production center of the Third Fed­ the fourth largest war production center in the
eral Reserve District. In the week following United States, most of its facilities can be
Japan’s surrender, the Philadelphia Committee readily converted to peacetime production.
for Economic Development, through the facili­ Relatively few new plants were constructed in
ties of this bank, made a new survey of manufac­ the area during the war and most of the war­
turing plants in this area comprising eight coun­ time increase in capacity, as shown in the chart,
ties—Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery resulted from expansion in existing plants to
and Philadelphia in Pennsylvania, and Burling­ produce the same products as in peacetime. New
ton, Camden and Gloucester in New Jersey. The aircraft facilities formed a small percentage of
survey showed that manufacturers expect to em­ total increase in capacity, and synthetic rubber,
ploy in mid-November 98 per cent as many explosive, and aluminum plants were relatively
workers as they had on their payrolls the day unimportant. Shipbuilding is the major problem
industry for the reconversion period.
The
the war ended.




Page One

ment is likely to be somewhat greater than is
indicated by the net changes. But this type of
rapid turnover within the short period of a
month constitutes no major problem.

WARTIME PLANT EXPANSION

PER CENT

100 r
iit

The First Month—Declining Employment

75 •
□

50 •

EXPANSION

TOTALS

25 ■

O

CONVERSION

UNITED STATES
$24326 MILLION
PHILADELPHIA AREA
$622 MILLION

UNITED STATES

PHILADELPHIA
8-COUNTY AREA

SOURCE-US. WAR PRODUCTION OOWO

Philadelphia area has the third largest concen­
tration of shipbuilding facilities in the coun­
try, and many of the ways will not be needed
after the war. Fortunately, it has a large pre­
dominance of consumer goods industries which
can be counted on to absorb many of the workers
laid off by the shipyards. Textiles, food, tobacco,
printing establishments, and paper mills have
little or no reconversion problem and are re­
stricted only by temporary shortage of raw
materials.
Reconversion Prior to V-J Day

A large contraction in manufacturing em­
ployment in the Philadelphia area had already
occurred by the time Japan surrendered. As
shown by the accompanying table, manufac­
turing employment declined from a wartime
peak of 640,000 in June 1943 to about 560,000
in August 1945. Of the net decline of approxi­
mately 80,000 workers nearly three-quarters
were released from the transportation equip­
ment, iron and steel, and machinery industries,
indicating that reconversion was already under
way. However, unemployment was not serious
because the total civilian labor force declined
as a result of continued inductions into the
armed forces.
The sizeable shift in the working force which
has already occurred should ease the transition
now taking place. Manufacturers estimate that
in the first month of reconversion the net release
of men and women from manufacturing estab­
lishments will total only 27,000. Many more
will be laid off for short intervals and imme­
diately re-employed, so that the total adjust­

Page Two



The greatest declines in employment in the
first month after the war are expected to occur
in the transportation equipment industry, and
in the electrical and nonelectrical machinery
groups which anticipate a net loss of 20,000
workers by the middle of September. In view of
the fact that almost 200,000 workers were em­
ployed in these industries at the time the war
ended, the decline of only ten per cent is not
large. Several shipbuilding establishments ex­
pect to continue work on ships now on the ways
or to retain a large number of employees for re­
pair work. Other transportation equipment in­
dustries were already partially converted by
V-J Day, and were not severely affected by con­
tract terminations. Employment in these indus­
tries will undoubtedly continue well above the
eventual peacetime level during September and
as far ahead as November.
Textile and apparel establishments also ex­
pect a further decline in employment of about
7,000 beyond that which has already occurred
over the war period. The principal difficulty of
textile and apparel firms is a shortage of mate­
rials. Although raw cotton and raw wool are
abundant, the yarn manufacturers have had
difficulty getting adequate labor and equipment
in the past year so that supplies of finished yarn
are not now available. Rayon is still being used
in the manufacture of tires; and nylon, although
it is being turned out in considerable quantity,
will not be available in sufficient amounts to
satisfy the famished market for several months.
The War Production Board has not yet removed
restrictions on most textile yarns which are
scarce. A few industries such as printing, rub­
ber, petroleum, shoes, and food are already
absorbing additional labor.
The chief problem emphasized by manufac­
turers is the difficulty of getting materials for
processing and materials for new construction.
The War Production Board has largely elimi­
nated the Controlled Materials Plan and relaxed
restrictions on many major raw materials includ­
ing steel, aluminum, copper, and chemicals, but
a number of important items such as lumber,
paper, rubber, and textile yarns continue to be
scarce. The need for skilled labor to assist in

ESTIMATES OF EMPLOYMENT IN THE
PHILADELPHIA EIGHT-COUNTY AREA
1940

1943
(a)

Aug.
14,
1945
(b)

Sept.
15,
1945
(b)

Nov.
15,
1945
(b)

194X

(in thousands)
Total manufacturing...........
Food................................................
Tobacco.........................................
Textiles...........................................
Apparel...........................................
Lumber & lumber products.. .
Paper..............................................
Printing..........................................
Chemicals & petroleum prods.
Rubber...........................................
Leather...........................................
Stone, clay & glass.....................
Iron and steel...............................
Nonferrous metals.....................
Machinery (except electric). . .
Electrical machinery.................
Transportation equipment. . . .
Miscellaneous...............................

425
35

639
35

561
37

534
38
9
50
41

549
39

512
41

11

12
68

Total nonmanufacturing. ..
Transportation, communica­
tions, utilities.............................
Trade............... ................. .............
Finance & business services. . .
Personal services.........................
Other*............................................

June

10

10

8

65
46
9
16
27
34
3

58
58
9
17
28
42
5
9
9
85

53
45

(a)

8

8

17
29
43
5
9

17
31
44

57
40
9
18
33
45

6
10

6
11

22

41
39
161
27

72
5
32
33
128
29

7
70
5
29
25
119
25

7
70
5
30
27
117
24

9
59
5
24
33
72
25

740

765

736

747

754

804

82
219
168
116
155

94

100

222

149
99

152
103
170

98
229
155
107
165

95
242
176

201

216
149
99
172

100
222

1,404

1,297

1,281

1,303

1,316

11
8

46
5
22

23
43

Grand Total................................. 1,165

6

8

51
9
18
31
39
4
12

121

170

♦Includes agriculture, mining, construction, government, and miscellaneous
(a) Based on first C. E. D. manufacturing survey made in 1943-44.
(b) Based on C. E. D. manufacturing survey made in August 1945.

retooling was also mentioned by manufacturers
as an obstacle to reconversion. Some lowerpaying industries will have difficulty getting
workers in the immediate transition period.
Workers Reabsorbed

Reconversion in the Philadelphia area is ex­
pected to be virtually completed in three
months, and out of the total of 27,000 workers
released in the first month after V-J Day nearly
15.000 will have been reabsorbed in manufac­
turing by November.
The net decline in manufacturing employ­
ment in the transition period will be only about
12.000 in the eight-county area around Phila­
delphia, if present estimates of manufacturers
are correct. This in itself would constitute but
a small addition to unemployment even if no
workers are absorbed by nonmanufacturing
industries. Obviously, many persons will be
needed by the nonmanufacturing industries
which have had to carry on with a reduced labor
force during the war period. The construction
industry alone will need several thousand more
workers in order to provide new housing, new
plants for civilian production, and much-needed
repair work on offices, homes, and highways.
The service industries, including business, finan­
cial, personal, and domestic services, have




greatly reduced employment since 1940. All
of these nonmanufacturing industries may be
expected to expand as soon as labor becomes
available. It is estimated that nonmanufacturing
industries might absorb as many as 18,000 per­
sons in three months which would mean that
total employment in all industries might accord­
ingly be higher in November than it was in
August.
Unemployment Low in November

The effect of these changes on unemployment
can only be estimated in a very general way.
Immediate layoff of workers at the end of
August probably swelled the ranks of job
hunters to a fairly high level but many plants
expected to rehire employees within a few weeks
or days when plans could be completed for the
changeover. This initial unemployment is but
temporary and not indicative of conditions by
November. If we assume no increase in job
opportunities in nonmanufacturing, unemploy­
ment in this area could be as high as 60,000 or
70,000 workers but if nonmanufacturing lines
absorb even a moderate number of workers, un­
employment would be about 46,000 in November
—no higher than on V-J Day. Either of these es­
timates would be negligible in comparison with
the 1940 unemployment level of 243,000
workers. As shown by the table below, both
of them are close to the irreducible minimum
prevailing in 1943.
The return of veterans to the labor force will
probably have no great effect on the Philadel­
phia labor market at least for the present since
it will be largely offset by the retirement of
women and older workers and the out-migration
of workers to other areas. In-migration, how­
ever, might be a factor in increasing unemploy­
ment since a number of workers from Bucks
County have commuted to Trenton during the
war and many from Philadelphia and Delaware
Counties have been employed in Wilmington.
If sharp reductions should occur in these nearby
cities, they might well affect the local labor mar­
ket situation.
ESTIMATES OF THE CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE
PHILADELPHIA EIGHT-COUNTY AREA
(in thousands)

U nemployment........................................

1940

June
1943

Aug.
1945

Nov.
1945

1,408
1,165
243

1,437
1,404
33

1,343
1,297
46

1,349
1,303
46

Page Three

Declining Incomes

The significance of transitional unemployment
lies in its effect on incomes and purchasing
power. Any major increase in the number of
persons without jobs, especially if prolonged,
would tend to reduce the demands for goods
and services and this in turn might affect deci­
sions of manufacturers with regard to employ­
ment. The decline in income during reconversion
will be considerably greater than the decline in
employment because of shifts to lower-paid
industries, reductions in the number of hours
worked per week, and reduction of over­
time pay. To some extent, these declines in
“take home’' pay may be offset by increases in
basic wage rates, now that the War Labor
Board has abandoned the “little steel formula”.
Such increases, however, may be limited ulti­
mately by ceiling prices on manufacturers’
goods. Unemployment compensation benefits
paid to workers will help to maintain pur­
chasing power during the period of transition.
In the state of Pennsylvania benefits of $20 a
week are payable for twenty weeks according
to a recent revision in the provisions of the state
law; a $600 million fund is available for taking
care of a large volume of transitional unemploy­
ment in the state.
Savings of Individuals

The chief offset, however, to the decline in
income during reconversion is the large backlog
of personal savings built up by individuals dur­
ing the war period. Total liquid asset holdings
of individuals in the Third Federal Reserve Dis­
trict at the present time are estimated at be­
tween $7% and $8'4 billion including demand
deposits, time deposits, currency, and Govern­
ment securities. Although it is difficult to esti­
mate the increase in such holdings over the
war period, a reasonable assumption would be
that between $4 and $5 billion of the present
total holdings constitute a net gain over 1939.
Prior to the war, liquid assets were held pri­
marily for everyday transactions, but as a result
of increased earnings there exists today a large
volume of potential purchasing power in the
form of readily available funds which could be
drawn upon at any time and will encourage
spending out of current income. What per­
centage of these funds are owned by persons
who might be unemployed or might suffer a
sharp reduction in income during the transition
to peacetime production it is impossible to say.

Page Four



A wide redistribution of income has occurred as
a result of the war, and lower income groups
undoubtedly hold a greater percentage of sav­
ings than they did six years ago.
Expenditures for Construction

Not only have individuals built up a large
accumulation of savings which will help to tide
them over the transition, but state and city gov­
ernments and business corporations are plan­
ning to spend a large volume of funds, which
can be put to work immediately to employ
workers on necessary construction. The state of
Pennsylvania has appropriated $75 million for
public works projects of one kind or another,
and an additional $100 million is now available
for road improvements in the next two years.
The city of Philadelphia is planning to spend an
estimated $34 million on waterworks, sewage
plants and street repairs in the immediate
future, apart from several long-term projects
still under consideration. Camden has available
approximately $6 million for immediate con­
struction and highway repair.
Manufacturers in the Philadelphia area have
accumulated funds to finance a fair-sized pro­
gram of plant construction and equipment as
soon as labor and materials become available.
In a survey conducted by the Philadelphia Com­
mittee for Economic Development early this
year, manufacturing plants in the city estimated
that they would spend $100 million for new
construction and new equipment, of which nearly
70 per cent would be financed out of their own
funds and the remaining 30 per cent would be
obtained from banks and other sources. Some
estimates indicate that the need for construction
and equipment expenditure will be much larger
if industries bring their facilities up to date.
The Danger of Inflation

The existence of a large volume of savings
serves to counterbalance declines in income dur­
ing reconversion and encourages manufacturers
to expand production, but it also constitutes a
potential threat of inflation. Consumers have
built up a large backlog of demand in the last
four years for all types of durable goods. If they
endeavor to spend large amounts of money be­
fore goods return to the markets in sufficient
quantities, we face the possibility of an upward
spiral in prices and wages. Up until the present
time war bond redemptions by individuals in the
Philadelphia area have not risen seriously, al­
though marked increases have been noted in the

past two weeks. The whole question of convert­
ing savings into purchasing power, however, is
not a local problem but a national one; the an­
swer to it depends largely on the behavior of
consumers generally. The general consensus
seems to be that, until the flow of goods meas­
ures up to the purchasing power, appropriate
restraints or controls are inescapable in order
to prevent a spiral of inflation such as followed
the first World War.
Conclusion

The immediate outlook for a rapid reconver­
sion of industry in the Philadelphia-Camden
industrial area is extremely favorable because
of—first, the ease with which war plant facil­
ities can be converted to civilian use; second,
the extent to which reconversion had already
taken place before the surrender of Japan; and
third, the number of consumer goods industries
and nonmanufacturing lines which can absorb
labor rapidly. The collapse of demand for war
goods will be replaced to a large extent by the
accumulated pressure for construction and other
durables backed up by huge savings in the
hands of individuals and businesses. The exist­
ence of these sources of purchasing power to­




gether with the knowledge of a great backlog of
demand for durable goods is encouraging
manufacturers to formulate extensive plans for
a high level of production.
Post-war goals of manufacturers in the Phila­
delphia area call for an increase in employment
from 425,000 in 1940 to 512,000 in 194x, the
first year after reconversion. This was the con­
clusion of the first survey of 1943 made by the
local Committee for Economic Development.
This goal will not absorb all of the employable
workers in the area unless new job opportunities
are opened up in other lines.
The ease with which the Philadelphia indus­
trial area expects to make the transition to peace
should not obscure the fact that over a long-run
period the city and its environs face a number
of difficult problems. A sizeable portion of its
industrial plant and equipment is old and in
need of renovation. Technological improvements
have been developed which can well be applied
to various lines of industry. Only an intelligent
and imaginative application will enable Phila­
delphia to maintain its position as a leading in­
dustrial area.

$

Page Five

Bank Capital and Bank Risks
The primary purpose of bank capital is to
protect creditors, chiefly depositors, against loss.
It can serve this purpose only if it is large enough
and sound enough so that losses will not impair
the claims of creditors. How to measure ade­
quacy of capital in relation to possible losses is
the question that has perplexed bankers and
supervisory authorities for many years. Up to
the present no single factor or formula has given
a satisfactory answer. Experience and study of
the problem, however, have emphasized (a) the
complete inadequacy of the traditional ratio
based on the relationship between capital funds
and deposits, and (b) the necessity for consid­
ering a complex of factors such as the amount
and character of deposit liabilities, the char­
acter and quality of assets, the quality of man­
agement, the corporate powers exercised, and
current and prospective conditions of the econ­
omy within which a bank operates.
Bank capital in relation to total resources has
been declining over a long period of time. In
the early days of American banking the capital
account was not uncommonly as large as notes
and deposit liabilities combined, although “cap­
ital” frequently consisted more of stockholders’
promises than of actual investment. The Na­
tional Banking Act, which in 1865 restricted
bank note issues and provided substantial re­
quirements for paid-in capital, not only was an
important stabilizing factor but ushered in a new
era of deposit banking in the United States.
At the end of 1866 the proportion of capital ac­
counts to deposit liabilities of national banks
was 72 per cent, but by 1900 the ratio had
fallen to 28 per cent. This decline continued
from a ratio of 25 per cent at the outbreak of
the First World War to 12 per cent at the begin­
ning of the present war, and had reached a low
of 6.3 per cent by the end of 1944. What has
happened is that with temporary interruptions
bank liabilities have continued to expand
rapidly while capital accounts have generally
expanded at a much slower pace.
What is the significance of this trend? Does
it mean a progressive deterioration in the cap­
ital position of banks, or does it merely reflect
a fundamental change in the structure and
magnitude of bank assets and liabilities? Our
banking system probably was never stronger
than it is at present, yet the proportion of cap­
ital funds to deposits is the lowest on record.

Page Six



Some of the strongest banks show the smallest
ratios. Obviously, the traditional ratio of tento-one has outlived its usefulness, and no com­
petent student of banking will use it even as a
benchmark in measuring the adequacy of bank
capital. Records also show that the character
and composition of bank assets and liabilities,
as well as their inter-relationship, have changed
enormously in recent decades. Sources of bank
earnings likewise have been changing from
loans to investments, so that at present over
one-half of bank income is derived from secur­
ities, most of which are Government obligations.
Capital Adequacy Depends Primarily
Upon Asset Quality

Adequacy of capital is purely a relative matter
and depends upon the amount of bank capital
in relation to the risk of loss on bank assets,
rather than upon any fixed ratio between capital
and liabilities. Most commercial bank liabilities,
however, are demand claims and banks must be
prepared to meet them as they arise. Their
character should determine the character of
assets as well as the relative amounts of each
asset held. For this reason, liquidity of assets is
a factor in determining the risk of loss. Unless
a bank has sufficient cash and assets which can
readily be turned into cash, it may be forced to
sacrifice otherwise good assets at a loss. Rela­
tively risk-free assets, therefore, include only
those that at any time either can be sold in the
market without substantial loss or can be used
at their full value to obtain funds from the
Federal Reserve Banks, the nucleus of our credit
system. The convertibility of assets into cash at
the Federal Reserve Banks through discounting
or borrowing is the most important source of
liquidity in times of unsettled markets and wide­
spread pressure on banks.
Access to a central banking system having
excess reserves and legal authority to create cash
assures both bank liquidity in the sense of
supplying cash immediately and bank solvency
in the sense of protecting the value of sound
assets. The ability of banks to shift assets to
central institutions, such as the Federal Reserve
Banks, meets critical needs of the moment by
preventing panicky liquidation of loans and
securities and helps conserve asset values by
moderating the pressure and eventually restor­
ing orderly conditions in the money market.

This facility, as strengthened by legislation since
the early 1930’s, is probably the most significant
development in our banking during the past
three decades, and obviously no capital ratio
can measure its full effectiveness in meeting
crises affecting individual banks or the banking
system as a whole.
No one would question that banks were
stronger and deposits safer at the end of 1944
when the capital-deposit ratio was 6.3 per cent
than in June 1932 when, as banking approached
its greatest crisis, the ratio was over 20 per
cent. The reason for present banking strength
lies in the relatively risk-free nature of bank
assets generally. Government securities and
cash held by member banks at present aggre­
gate 85 per cent of their total deposits, so that
their other assets could depreciate by almost
30 per cent of book values and still be sufficient
to cover the remaining liabilities.
What the future market for Government
securities is likely to be no one of course can
predict with absolute certainty. It will depend
on many circumstances, important among which
is the extent to which banks expand their loans
and other investments beyond the scale pre­
vailing in recent years. Recognition also must
be given to the fact that most Government se­
curities held by banks are of short maturities,
ten years or under. Any change in interest
rates would have relatively little effect on the
intrinsic value of such assets.
Monetary policy designed to stabilize money
markets and to aid in keeping economic activity
on an even keel will be a factor as important as
it has been during the war. There is at present
no prospect for any substantial change in inter­
est rates in the near future. Still another im­
portant aspect is the fact that supervisory
authorities appraise Government securities for
examination purposes at amortized cost or book
value, whichever is the lower, so that no ques­
tion of bank solvency can arise on account of
such securities. These considerations, together
with their usefulness as collateral for Federal
Reserve credit, make Government securities held
by banks as riskless as any bankable asset can
be under present or anticipated conditions.
It would of course be very convenient for
bankers and supervisory authorities if some
effective formula could be devised to measure
accurately the adequacy of a bank’s capital.
Attempts in fact have been made to measure
the sufficiency of capital in relation to the




degree of risk exposure that may confront a
bank. Three ratios which have been suggested
for this purpose deserve consideration, what­
ever may be their shortcomings. If they do not
provide an answer to our problem, they at least
suggest a more'objective approach than does
the conventional ratio of capital to deposits.
They may be stated as follows:
Capital
1. ---------------Risk assets
“Net capital”
2.

3

Deposits less cash and Governments

“Net capital”
_
' Risk assets less fixed assets

Risk assets are defined as total resources less
cash and Government security holdings. It has
sometimes been suggested that among Govern­
ment securities only those of short maturity—
say under one year or even five years—should
be included with risk-free assets, but under
prevailing conditions it is reasonable to include
all Governments in that category.
Net capital, as used in two of these ratios, is
ascertained by subtracting fixed assets from
total capital accounts. It should not be con­
fused with the more familiar term “net sound
capital” which is determined by adjusting book
capital for assets adversely “classified” by bank
examiners. Net sound capital should be used
when considering capital adequacy of an indi­
vidual bank, but information of this type is not
available for measuring changes in the bank
system over long periods. When net capital is
compared with assets it is necessary to deduct
fixed assets from total assets, since the former
have already been offset by an equal amount
of capital.

The ratio of capital accounts to risk assets is
an improvement over the ratio of capital to de­
posits because it relates capital to the function it
is expected to perform, namely, to absorb losses
which may arise. But this ratio makes no allow­
ance for the differences in risk that actually exist
among assets which are not risk-free.
The ratio of net capital to deposits less cash
and Governments goes one step further by elimi­
nating fixed assets and a corresponding amount
of capital on the assumption that such assets are
of limited liquidating value. In effect, fixed

Page Seven

assets are entirely written off the balance sheet.
The remaining capital is then related to the
amount of deposits not covered by risk-free
assets. The ratio of net capital to risk assets is
similar except that the net capital is here related
to the source of losses—namely, assets which
may shrink—instead of to liabilities. These two
ratios share, although in lesser degree, the
weakness in the total capital to risk assets ratio.
Although they eliminate fixed assets, they make
no distinction in degree of risk among other
risk assets.
The accompanying charts show these ratios,
together with the traditional capital-deposit
ratio, for key dates since the beginning of the
Federal Reserve System. Bank failures per hun­
dred member banks also are shown as a basis for
judging the effectiveness of the ratios in meas­
uring adequacy of capital. An appropriate
measure, reflecting all risks to which bank assets
might be exposed, would be expected to decline
before a rise in bank failures takes place. Cer­
tainly when such a ratio was high, fewer bank
failures might be expected to occur.
Obviously these ratios have not allowed for
all banking risks since no such inverse correla­
tion between bank failures and any of these
ratios is apparent over most of the period. The
capital-deposit ratio is, as might be expected, the
least reliable. The high point reached by this
ratio since 1916 was in June 1932. This was
the last call date preceding the final wave of
bank failures which ended in the collapse of
our banking system less than nine months later.
The ratio has declined rapidly and continu­
ously since 1933, while member bank failures
have almost reached the vanishing point.
The other three ratios, while reflecting the
risk situation more accurately since 1933, follow
a pattern very similiar to the outmoded capitaldeposit ratio during the preceding eighteen
years. They seem to have been particularly
significant only in periods of heavy excess re­
serves or of bank credit expansion stimulated
almost entirely by Government deficit financing
—in other words, in times of relatively risk-free
banking. From 1919 through 1921, all four
ratios rose sharply but were accompanied by
rising bank failures and followed by several
years of still higher failure rates. The ratios
were at approximately the same levels in 1929
as at the end of 1921, and in fact fluctuated by
only a few percentage points at intervening

Page Eight



dates not shown on the chart. During this pe­
riod, however, there was a prolonged bulge in
bank failures with a relative decline in 1928
and 1929. During the liquidation spiral of the
next two and a half years, which accompanied
our greatest economic decline, all of these cap­
ital ratios rose sharply although bank failures
were soaring. This was due to rapidly declining
deposits rather than increased capital.
The absence of consistent inverse correlation
between these capital ratios and bank failures
prior to 1933 was to a considerable extent the
result of inherent defects in our banking struc­
ture. Banking theory and practice had long
emphasized the importance of self-liquidating
bank loans, but provisions for assuring liquidity
in a large part of bank assets had not kept pace
with the changing nature of bank portfolios.
Many failures were due to lack of assets which
could be liquidated to meet deposit drains rather
than to a lack of sound assets. These defects
have been largely remedied by (a) more liberal
lending powers of the Federal Reserve Banks;
(b) the confidence engendered by insuring de­
posits under the Federal Deposit Insurance Cor­
poration; and (c) adoption of uniform and
more objective methods for appraisal of assets
by supervisory authorities.
If these conditions had prevailed in earlier
years, bank failures would probably have been
greatly reduced, and perhaps no bank with in­
herently sound assets would have failed because
of temporary pressure for liquidity. The point
remains, however, that as long as banks assume
risks under changing banking and economic cir­
cumstances, a capital ratio which might be ade­
quate to avoid all failures under a given set of
circumstances might be entirely inadequate as
conditions fluctuate, unless so designed as to
reflect all risk factors. At the heart of the
problem is the fact that the degree of asset
exposure is frequently determined by broad
national and international economic conditions
over which individual banks have no control.
Dynamic changes in these conditions inevitably
influence intrinsic values of bank assets as well
as their liquidity.
Complex of Factors in Measuring
Capital Adequacy

The insuperable difficulty in developing an
adequate capital ratio lies in the large number
of factors which influence the adequacy of cap­
ital as a protection to bank creditors. The

MEMBER
BANK CAPITAL RATIOS
*
SELECTED DATES 1914-1944

PERCENT

CAPITAL TO DEPOSITS
CAPITAL TO RISK ASSETS
1
NET CAPITAL TO DEPOSITS LESS CASH AND GOVERNMENTS
'NET CAPITAL TO RISK ASSETS

FAILURES PER IOO MEMBER BANKS

PER CENT

1914-1920 INCLUSIVE,BASED ON
NATIONAL BANK FIGURES.
__

OR LESS 1914

’16




'18

’20

’22

’24

’26

'28

'30

'32

’34

'36

38

'40

'42

'44

Page Nine

tangible factors alone could be measured only
by a ratio of formidable complexity, but more
important is the fact that many intangible fac­
tors could not be. accurately evaluated by any
mathematical formula.
Tangible factors upon which the adequacy
of a bank’s capital depends would include:
1. Accurate evaluation of each asset under existing
conditions.
2. Type, quality, and distribution of assets, as well as
their convertibility into cash without substantial
loss.
3. Degree of risk inherent in individual assets. This
is in part dependent on their sensitiveness to chang­
ing economic conditions.
4. Total deposits and relative importance of the differ­

ent types of deposits.
5. Scope of corporate powers exercised by the bank,
such as trust powers, title guarantee, and the like,
which may involve contingent liabilities.
6. Earning power of the bank.

Perhaps even more important are the in­
tangible factors which influence a bank’s pros­
pects. These would include:
1. The management of the bank—its general com­
petency, speculative or conservative tendencies, and
likelihood of change in management personnel.
2. Fluctuations in general economic conditions with
particular stress on the cyclical phase in which the
test is being made.
3. The kind of community in which the bank is lo­
cated; the nature of and trends in population; and
the types, diversification, and degree of stability to
be found in its industries.
4. The character of the bank’s clientele, both borrow­
ers and depositors; their economic level and sources
of income.

Any formula designed to reflect, even approxi­
mately, the influence of all these factors would
be too complicated to be useful. The human
factor becomes the real determinant when these
influences are evaluated, and any purely mech­
anistic approach is likely to be more misleading
than enlightening.
A formula could perhaps
be designed to fit a given situation, but it is very
unlikely that any capital ratio can be developed
to fit all banks under all economic conditions.
In any event a rigid standard probably would
be unwise and'would produce undesirable and
perhaps unexpected results over a period of
.time. It might force .liquidation..or .sacrificing

Page Ten



of otherwise good assets at the very time when
contraction of bank credit would be most harmful to our economy. If based on risk assets, such
a formula might also encourage banks to avoid
all risk lending and to depend on various service
charges to supplement any deficiency in income
to be derived from assets consisting of cash
and practically risk-free investments such as
Governments.

*

The lack of a satisfactory measure does not ,
mean that the importance of adequate capital
should be ignored. While the present capital
position presents no important problem for
banks in general, because of the dominance of
relatively riskless assets among bank resources,
the situation may change considerably in the
years following the war. When banks expand
private lending and security investment many
of them may need more capital to provide a
satisfactory margin of safety and enable them *
to serve their communities effectively. It is
greatly to be desired that banks assume neces­
sary risks inherent in financing private indus­
try and trade as we return to a peacetime econ­
omy. They will be expected to provide agricul­
tural credit, inventory and receivables financing,
term loans for equipment, and mortgage credit,
as the needs of our economy dictate. The same
will be true of investments in corporate liens 4
and other types of domestic or even international
securities according to the dictates of good
investment practice. No matter how skillful a
bank may be in selecting good loans and invest­
ments, these assets involve risks greater than a
portfolio of Government securities and Govern­
ment-guaranteed loans.
As is well known, two methods are available
for increasing bank capital. Banks have been ^
adding to capital by retaining about two-thirds
of their earnings. Although earnings are rela­
tively high, and probably will remain so, this
method alone is slow to meet the situation satis­
factorily, especially since banks may have to
face increased expenses. Adjustments of salary
schedules and pension provisions may be neces­
sary if banks expect to attract and retain desir­
able personnel, particularly in view of the
..present .attempts to promote effective relations y
with customers and the public. It is also possible
that some adjustment in interest rates may have
to be made on time deposits if banks expect to
compete with other savings "channels after the
war; - Many bankers are already giving serious
..attention.jto the.se. possibilities,

The second method of increasing capital is by
• selling additional stock. But general popularity
of bank stock will require maintenance of earn­
ings and possibly somewhat higher dividends
than some banks are now paying. The consid­
erable number of banks in this area which
recently have offered new shares, either to re­
tire outstanding preferred stock or to increase
total capital, have encountered favorable
response by the investing public. Additional
v stock, of course, will dilute the earnings on
existing shares, but increased capital may well
justify the acquisition of more risk assets whose
volume and higher yields may more than sup­
port existing dividend rates.
This analysis has been concerned with aggre­
gate or average capital ratios of member banks.
Individual banks, naturally, vary widely from
the average; and the immediate problem of
, supervisory authorities is usually concerned
with individual cases. Whatever method is
used in appraising the adequacy of an indi­
vidual bank’s capital, satisfactory results will
depend upon accurate evaluation of all factors
affecting the particular bank, rather than on the
application of some formal minimum ratio.
Competent and constructive analysis of a bank’s
problem probably will gain the cooperation of its
management in correcting a weak situation
*- more effectively than pointing to some rule-ofthumb minimum capital ratio. Over-simplified
ratios are not accurate guides in themselves,
and even reasonably good ratios would of neces­
sity be so complicated that they would result in
misunderstanding and bad relations between
supervisory authorities and management of
banks.

group an exposure rating representing the maxi­
mum percentage loss which might be anticipated
from the group as a whole. The adjusted value
of each group could then be multiplied by its
exposure rating, and the results added to give
the total amount of asset exposure. This amount
should be less than net sound capital or the
latter is not adequate to protect creditors
against potential risks.
Concluding Comments

The foregoing analysis of our experience over
a long period demonstrates that it is unrealistic
to place faith in any single minimum capital
ratio as a yardstick of capital adequacy. The
traditional ratio of capital to deposits is partic­
ularly unreliable and should be constantly
minimized, if not entirely discarded. Capital
ratios are useful in measuring general trends in
the banking system, and as indicators of need
for further analysis of individual banks which
vary too widely from the general average. Even
here it should be remembered always that cap­
ital ratios may fail to measure either individ­
ual or general banking conditions accurately.
Adequate protection of depositors is of pri­
mary importance, but a dynamic banking sys­
tem must do more than provide safekeeping for
depositors’ funds. Attention also must be di­
rected to the equally important function of
financing productive enterprise. Without sacri­
ficing the necessary safety of deposits, a suc­
cessful banking system also serves the credit
needs of the community and justifies the invest­
ment of stockholders’ funds.

Probably the most effective approach would
r be to stress “net sound capital” and its relation
to the risk inherent in a bank’s assets. Net
sound capital is measured by the excess of
assets, whose book values have been adjusted
to reflect intrinsic values, over liabilities. To
determine the degree of risk, each asset should
be treated independently in the light of tangible
and intangible risk factors.

Under a system of risk-free banking, capital
adequacy would cease to be a problem; but
risk-free banking is hardly banking at all and
would be difficult to justify in a progressive
economy based on private initiative.
Until
recent years, risk assets comprised the bulk of
banking resources, and the interests of the com­
munity and of stockholders alike will best be
served as banking again assumes its role of
financing private enterprise.

In practical application of risk rating, it
might be necessary to group assets according to
degree of risk regardless of their other char­
acteristics, but these groups should not be too
limited in number. The same type of asset—
mortgages for example—might appear in sev­
eral groups since risk may vary widely among
mortgage loans. A bank could assign to each

Bank capital should be adequate to permit
banks to perform this function without endan­
gering depositors’ claims, but a given minimum
ratio of capital to risk may be attained either by
increasing invested capital or by reducing risk
assets. Too much stress on a mathematical
formula may result only in banks avoiding nor­
mal risks in the future.




Page Eleven

BUSINESS STATISTICS
Production

Employment and Income
in Pennsylvania

Philadelphia Federal Reserve District

Industry, Trade and Service
Adjusted for seasonal variation
Indexes: 1923-5 =100
July June July
1945 1945 1944

INDUSTRIALPRODUCTION 129p 130
MANUFACTURING............... 131 p 132
187p 189
92p 92
Metal products....................... 159* 161r
Textile products.....................
68p
66
Transportation equipment. . 421
430
Food products......................... 123p 124
Tobacco and products..........
78
89
Building materials..................
37
38
Chemicals and products.... 177
170
Leather and products...........
80p 81
100
Paper and printing................ 106
Individual lines
Pig iron..................................... 102 101
Steel........................................... 133 128
Silk manufactures.................
88
84
Woolen and worsteds............
64p 64
Cotton products.....................
49
46
Carpets and rugs....................
56p 56
66
Hosiery......................................
76
Underwear................................ 155
135
Cement......................................
36
40
Brick..........................................
52
51
Lumber and products...........
32
28

147
152
237
94
186
70
597
127r
80
34
170
105
98

- 1
- 1
- 1
0
- 1

+ 3
- 2
0
-12

+
+

3
4
1
6

__

Indexes: 1932 =100

21
2

_

— 14
— 3
— 29
— 3
— 2
+ 8
+ 4
— 24
+ 9

124p 128
126p 130

2
8
6

155
63p
409
llOp
84
40
174
73p
103

—
—
— 23

0

— 1
+ 2
+ 5
— 18
+ 3

+ 2
+ 5
- 4

— 6
— 5
— 2
+ 2
— 8
+ 3
— 9
— 6
+ ii
+
+

163r 181
64
64
430 580
112
118r
86
96
37
41
170 167
79
95
95
99

96
130r
83
84 r
61p 62
43
44
53p 55
65
62
129 135
46
44
1
50
53
2
30
33 r
3* 126 127
23
83 107
55
7
56
10
130p 129
2
95
83
0
85
83
3 107 102
86
14
99
24
60p 59
5
93
93
4 162 159
16
76
83
17
74
81
10
96 100 r
12
332 336
2
415 427
0
414 433
2
345 344
94

121

Slaughtering, meat packing.
Sugar refining..........................
—
Canning and preserving....
+
Cigars.........................................
—
Paper and wood pulp............
Printing and publishing........
+
Shoes..........................................
—
Leather, goat and kid...........
—
Paints and varnishes.............
—
Coke, by-product...................
—
COAL MINING........................
—
Anthracite...................................
_
Bituminous...............................
—
CRUDE OIL...............................
ELECTRIC POWER...............
+
Sales, total................................
Sales to industries..................
—
BUILDING CONTRACTS
66
TOTAL AWARDSt..................
78
-16
15
60
57
+
+ 41
Residential!.............................
8
7
4
28 _ 78
9 +53
Nonresidentialf....................... 109
72
91 +52 + 20 + 34 100
Public works and utilities!-. 142 334 120 -57 + 18 +161
122
* Unadjusted for seasonal variation.
p—Preliminary,
t 3-month moving daily average centered at 3rd month, r—Revised.

142
146

80
5
73
317

Allentown...........
Altoona...............
Harrisburg..........
Johnstown..........
Lancaster............
Reading...............
Scranton..............
Wilkes-Barre. ...
York..."................

Factory
employment

Fact ory
payr oils

Buil iing
peri nits
val ue

123
130r
85
82
97

101

340
404
417
363
52

De nts

June
1945

July
1944

June
1945

July
1944

June
1945

July
1944

- 3
- 1
- 1

- 4

-10
- 2

- 7
+ 9
- 4
-13
-13

- 9
+ 70
+165
- 45
+ 90

+478
- 7
- 77
- 58
+114

-22

+ 7
+26
+19
+13

-12

+ 7

-15

+22

-20

—22

+11
+20

+ 36
+834
- 19
- 22
+ 40

+ 86
+579
+183
+ 38
+ 17

-16
-17
-23
-15

- 4
+ 7
-19
+ 8

+19

+ 14

+4io

- 4

0
- 2

- 3
- 2

—12

0

0

- 4
- 2
— 4
0

- 5

8

3
6
8
0

-12

- 3
+ 6

0
-10

- 9

+11

0

-25
- 5

- 4
- 2

- 7
-32
- 2

* Area not restricted to the corporate limits of cities given here.

Page Twelve



- 9
-14
-14
-15

-21

+21

+18
— 7
+ 8

-10
0
-12
- 2
0

0
0

+ 2
- 3

+
+
-

0

+1

101

0

97

- 3

9
1

4
5
- 3

- 5
- 5

- 8

-10

+14
- 9
- 8
- 4
+ 3
+ 2
+ 8
+ 6

-18
0

- 3
- 2
+ 2
0

+ 2
+ 3

-10

+12

- 1 + 1
- 4 +10

Payrolls*

Indexes: 1923-5=100

TOTAL.....................................
Iron, steel and products....
Nonferrous metal products.
Transportation equipment..

Chemicals and products___
Leather and products..........
Others:
Musical instruments..........

107
114
214
132
75
69
98
118
80
49
113
72
103
99

- 2
- 2
- 2
- 4
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 2
- 2
- 4
-1

46
136
81

- 5
- 5
- 1

0
+ 2

+ 3

- 9
-11
+ 6

-18
- 5
- 5
- 7
— 5
- 6
- 6
- 3
- 3
+ 2
+ 5
-12

— 7
- 6

180
240
437
230
118
110

156
190
126
82
211
121

—
_
—
-

5

-10

6

-14
+ 3

4
9

-21

3
3
5

+ 2
+ 3

2

— 2
+ 2
- 4

4
6
0

0

0

160
147

- 1
+ 2
+ 5

+ 4
+ 9
+13

71
305
113

- 5
- 1
+ 5

- 4
+ 1
-20

* Figures from 2801 plants.

Hours and Wages

July
1944

4

4
3

302
440
93
299
117
248
255
152
165
157
193
184
185

10

June
1945

-

- 5
- 9
+ 8

83
103

July
1944
0

2
2
2

Per cent
Per cent
July change from July change from
1945
1945
index June July index June July
1945 1944
1945 1944

110

80
98
169 r
77
74

+

Employment*

121

June
1945

- 7
- 2
-15

166
50
69
49
76
131
98
117
103
107

Manufacturing

Factory workers
Averages
July 1945
and per cent change
from year ago

Re ail
saJ es

124

66

Local Business Conditions*
Percentage
change—
July
1945 from
month and
year ago

Per cent
Per cent
July change from July chang from
1945
1945
index June July index June July
1945 1944
1945 1944

GENERAL INDEX...........
Manufacturing......................
Anthracite mining...............
Bituminous coal mining. . .
Building and construction..
Quar. and nonmet. mining..
Crude petroleum prod.........
Public utilities.......................
Retail trade............................
Wholesale trade....................
Hotels......................................
Laundries................................
Dyeing and cleaning............

98
136 r
79
59
47
54
136
33
48
33
125

IJay rolls

Employment

July June July
1945 1945 1944

- 10
— 10
15

- 13
- 14

_ 4
— 11
+ 5
+1 + 4
+ 7 — 9
+ 1 — 1
+ 15 — 6
+ 15 — 5
+ 9 + 42
+ 3 + 5
-15
7
- 1*
o*
111
138 -19 — 34
91
54
52 121 + 4 — 55
187p 179 163r + 5 + 15
88
77
79 -13 — 3
86
85 + 1 + 2
87
110
103 100 + 7 + 10
92 104 118 -12 — 22
69p
59
91 +16 — 25
100
105 + 10 — 5
91
165 159 172 + 4 — 4
85
78 - 8 — 1
78
0
74
81
74 - 9
109 114r 114 - 4 — 4
332 323 340 + 3 - 2
446 449 434 - 1 + 3
440 446 444 - 1 _ 1
338 341
336 - 1 — 5
107
150r
81
62
54
56
81
164
28
50
30

Not adjusted

Per cent change
July 1945
1945
fr orn
from
7
Mo. Year mos.
1944
ago
ago

-14
-18
-28
-14
-22
-11
-10
- 6

—25
-15

+10
- 1

+18
+ 7
+ 3
+ 4
+n

TOTAL.............................
Iron, steel and prods.. .
Nonfer. metal prods.. .
Transportation equip..
Textiles and clothing. .
Textiles........................
Clothing.......................
Food products...............
Stone, clay and glass. .
Lumber products.........
Chemicals and prods...
Leather and prods........
Paper and printing.. . .
Printing........................
Cigars and tobacco...
Rubber tires, goods. .
Musical instruments.

Wee tly
working
tim 3*

Hou rly
earnir gs*

Week ly
earnin gs!

Aver­
age Ch’ge Aver­ Ch’ge Aver­
hours
age
age

Ch’ge

43 4 - 2 $1,075 +1 $46.52 -1
44.2 - 4 1.142 +1
50.49 - 3
43.5 - 3
1.013 + i 44.07 - 2
0
44.6 - 4 1.255
55,90 - 4
.815 + 7 31.83 + 9
39.1 + 2
40.2 + 2
.827 + 6 33.25 + 8
0
.783 +10 28.80 +10
36.3
0
.840 + 4 37.51 + 3
44.3
40.4 + 2
.967 + 6 39.05 + 8
43.1 - 2
799 + 5 33.92 + 2
46.7 + 2 1.082 + 2 50.39 + 4
.790 + 5 33.82 + 7
42.9 + 2
.947 + 5 41.93 + 8
44.1 + 3
42.6 + 5 1.095 + 4 46.82 +10
42.4
45.7
40.6

* Figures from 2657 plants.

+ 2
+ 5

.664 + 7 28.16
1.090 + 4 49.76
.896 - 4 36.34
f Figures from 2801 plants.
-11

+ 9
+ 9
-15

Distribution and Prices
Per cent change
Wholesale trade
Unadjusted for seasonal
variation

July 1945
Month

Sales
Total of all lines...
Drugs.....................
Dry goods.............
Electrical supplies
Groceries...............
Hardware..............
Jewelry..................
Paper......................

+
+

5
5
7
4

+

-2

Inventories
Total of all lines...
Dry goods.............
Electrical supplies
Groceries...............
Hardware..............
Jewelry...................
Paper............... .. . .

+
+ 45

+41

+20

+10
+10

+10

+15

- 9
- 5

-14

+

+1

8

- 9
-43
+28
- 9

- 7
- 4

0

- 7
- 5
+6

RETAIL TRADE
Sales
Department stores—District........................
Philadelphia...............
Women’s apparel..............................................
Men’s apparel...........................................
Shoe..........................................

198
188
226
152
181

185
176
198
157 r
157

169r
156 r
192
146
163

+ 7
+ 6
+ 14
- 3
+15
-17*

+17
+20

+18
+ 5
+11

+14*

July June July
1945 1945 1944

+12
+10

136

+19
+14
+ 8

127
139

167
153
171
175r
168

156
149
167
61

156 138r
151 r 131 r
189
66
75

150
134

150
136
89
163
290
193

120
101

116r
lOOr
108
97
126

Inventories

0

164
162
223
70

- 9
-21

0

Not adjusted

Per cent ch ange
July 1945
July June July
fro m
1945
1945 1945 1944
from
7
Month Year mos.
1944
ago
ago

Indexes: 1935-1939 =100

8

+
-184

-21
-11
-11

Adjusted for seasonal variation

1945
from
7
mos.
1944

Shoe....................................................
Furniture....................................................

Source: U. S. Department of Commerce.

165r 146
161
143
232 219
68
87

0

+ 1
- 4
+ 3
0*

+13
+14
+ 2
-19
+ 8*

Per ceiit chanf efrom

Prices
Basie commodities
(Aug. 1939 =100)....
Wholesale
(1926=100).................
Farm.............................
Food..............................
Other............................
Living costs
(1935-1939=100)
United States.............
Philadelphia...............
Food............................
Clothing.....................
F uels...........................
Housefurnishings. . .
Other..........................

July
1945 Month Year
ago
ago
0

184
106
129
107

- 1
- 1

100

0

129
128
139
146
113
143

0
0
0
0

Aug.
1939

+1

0

+
+
+
+

+ 84

2

+ 41

4

+111

1
1

+ 59
+ 24

+ 3
+ 3
+ 3
+ 5
+ 3
+ 4
- 1
+ 3
121
0
+ 1
Source: U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

+
+
+
+
+
+
+

31
31
50
47
17
42

FREIGHT-CAR LOADINGS
Total...........................................................
Merchandise and miscellaneous...................
Merchandise—l.c.l..........................................
Coal.............................................................
Ore.............................................................
Coke.....................................................................
Forest products...............................................
Grain and products.......................................
Livestock.............................................................
MISCELLANEOUS
Life insurance sales.....................................
Business liquidations
Number...........................................................
Amount of liabilities.......................................
Check payments.................................................

20

* Computed from unadjusted data.

147
134
86

165
204
221

99
146
123

133

199

146
133
89
181
198
207
97
171

150
138
87
166
215
233

121

132

234

- 2
- 3
- 1

- 2

0

111

111

-28

- 9
+ 2
- 7
-18
+ 5
-15

157
305
203

171

+1
+1
- 3
- 8
+ 3
+ 7
+ 2
-14
+1

196
105

148

110

153
138
87
158
322
214
134
164
147

122

+ 1

+ 9

+11

127

135

116

187

—33*
—73*
-15

62*
62*
+ 9 189

252

178

120
122

- 5
- 5
-17
+20

75*
+ 7

0
0

86

r—Revised.

BANKING STATISTICS
MEMBER BANK RESERVES AND RELATED FACTORS
Reporting member
banks
(Millions $)

Changes in—
Aug.
22,
1945

Assets
Commercial loans................... $ 214
44
Other loans to carry secur...
64
33
Other loans...............................

1
122

Total loans............................ $ 478
Government securities.......... $2007

Four
weeks

One
year

+$10

+
—

- $24
+
8
2* + 50
—
4
—
1
2* + 19

+$10* +

48

6

+$295
- 55
+ 22

Total investments............... $2191

-163

+$262

Total loans & investments. $2669
Reserve with F. R. Bank.. .
425
29
Balances with other banks..
83
Other assets—net...................
49

—$53
+ 10

+$310
+ 49

+
+

+
-

Other securities.......................

i84

Liabilities
Demand deposits, adjusted. $1781
Time deposits..........................
213
U. S. Government deposits.
611
Interbank deposits.................
378
Borrowings...............................
6
17
Capital account......................
249
* Revised.

*




—$69
+

6

3

+$43
+ 3
- 97
+ 12
+ 3
+

2

5

Aug. 1

Aug. 8

Aug. 15

Aug. 22

Changes
in four
weeks

Sources of funds:
Reserve Bank credit extended in district............................
Commercial transfers (chiefly interdistrict).......................
Treasury operations...................................................................

- 5.1
+31.7
-14.2

+18.8
+38.7
-46.8

-12.1
+39.6
- 4.2

+28.5
+14.7
-37.3

+ 30.1
+124.7
-102.5

+12.4

+10.7

+23.3

+ 5.9

+ 52.3

+
+
+
+

+11.8
+ 0.1
- 1.3
+ 0.1

+ 4.0
+19.4
- 0.1
+ 0.0

+10.6
- 5.3
+ 0.7
- 0.1

+ 31.8
+ 19.8
+ 0.2
+ 0.5

Uses of funds:
Member bank reserve deposits...............................
“Other deposits” at Reserve Bank.....................................
Other Federal Reserve accounts.................

5.4
5.5
1.0

0.5

4-19

Member bank
reserves
(Daily averages,
dollar figures in
millions)

Re­
Held quired

Ex­
cess

8

+$184
+ 29
+ 93
+ 28
+
4
+
1
+ 18

Ch anges in w eeks ended—

Third Federal Reserve District
(Millions of dollars)

Phila. banks
1944: Aug. 1-15 . .
1945: July 1-15 ..
July 16-31. .
Aug. 1-15..

$357
407
403
407

$349
394
394
397

$ 8
13
9

Country banks
1944: Aug. 1-15..
1945: July 1-15.
July 16-31. .
Aug. 1-15. .

284
339
331
332

226
262
268
273

58
77
63
59

10

Ratio
of
excess
to re­
quired

+ 52.3

A

Federal Reserve
Bank of Phila.
(Dollar figures in
millions)

Changes in—
Aug.
22,
1945

Disc, and advances.. $ 10.8
Industrial loans........
2.4
2% U. S. securities.......... 1584.4
3
2
Total......................... $1597.6
2
Note circulation. . . . 1566.9
Member bk. deposits 747.2
U. S. general account
49.4
26
Foreign deposits. . . .
98.1
29
Other deposits..........
3.5
Gold certificate res...
23
860.6
22
Reserve ratio.............
34.9%

Four
weeks

year

+$ 7.4
+ 0.4
+ 26.0

+$ 5.6
1.7
+ 463.0

+$33.8
+ 31.8
+ 19.8
- 1.3
+ 4.8
+ 0.2
+ 23.3
+ 0.2%

+$466.9
+ 271.6
+ 105.9
+ 14.3
- 28.0
3.4
- 101.7
- 10.8%

Page Thirteen