View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

RESERVE BANK OF PHILADELPHIA

W ho Changed the Rules o f the Game?
Another Problem Year for Farmers




BUSINESS REVIEW

is produced in the Department of Research. Jack C . Rothwell was primarily
responsible for the article, "W h o Changed the Rules of the G a m e ?" and J . Allan Irvine for "Another Problem
Year for Farmers." The authors will be glad to receive comments on their articles.
Requests for additional copies should be addressed to Bank and Public Relations, Federal Reserve Bank of
Philadelphia, Philadelphia I, Pennsylvania.



WHO CHANGED THE RULES
OF THE
GAME?
The Evolution and
Development of Tools
of Federal Reserve Policy

Early one morning a ship pulled out of the

course of events, events that stimulated central

misty, fog-enshrouded harbor. In its hold was

bankers to search out ever more adequate and

$50 million in gold bullion. Late that same aft­

finely honed tools to implement their policies.

ernoon the central bankers met. They looked
over charts and figures, discussed the situ­

Wars, recessions, depressions, and inflations—

ation, then raised the discount rate by one-half

these were the forces of change. For as the Brit­

of one percentage point. In the weeks that

ish economist, D. H. Robertson, has written,

followed, other interest rates rose. Money and

“ . . . a monetary system is like a liver: it doesn’t

credit

take up very much of our thought when it goes

became

tighter.

It was less easy to

borrow.
Thus, a few decades ago the tools and tech­

periods of political and business instability—

right, but it attracts a deal of attention when it
goes wrong.” 1

niques used to determine how much money and

In this article we take a look at the evolution

credit should circulate were relatively simple,

through time of monetary policy with emphasis

in many instances reduced almost to a formula,

upon the tools used to implement that policy.

as in the example above.

We shall look for sources of change— why and

As time went on, things changed considerably.
For just as a carpenter needs better tools to

how new tools evolved, how they developed.
As a starter, let’s see why the Federal Reserve

build a finer house, so must central bankers

System was established in the first place. What

have better and more sensitive tools if they are

were the immediate events leading to the crea­

to do a more competent job of adjusting the

tion of the Fed, and what bearing did these

supply of money and credit to the needs of a

events have on the tools given the new System?

more complex economy.
The “ who” in these changes was actually the




1 D. H. Robertson, Money, (Cambridge: The University Press, 1922)
p. 2.

3

business review

PA N IC!

wave of selling, stock prices might fall and

The crises and money panics of the late nine­

many brokers would be unable to repay the

teenth and early twentieth centuries were the

New York banks. The New York banks, in turn,

immediate seed from which the Federal Re­

would be unable to meet all of the demands of

serve grew. During these periods of crises, bank

smaller banks.

runs were an everyday affair. Frightened de­

Then panic would set in. Bank depositors

positors queued up by the thousands to withdraw

would lose confidence and line the dusty streets

deposits from suspect institutions.

to withdraw their funds. The result: bank fail­

The basic problem was a general lack of
liquidity— the absence of some ultimate source

ures, loss of savings, financial disaster. The ul­
timate capacity of banks to pay depended upon

of credit and currency on which the banking

a thin margin of collateral which could not

system could draw when it encountered large-

readily be converted into cash. There was no

scale demands for funds. For the banking sys­

ultimate source of currency and credit which

tem which preceded the Federal Reserve was a

could be called upon when nearly everyone

hierarchical affair in which almost any disturb­

wanted currency instead of bank deposits.

ance could cause financial trouble. National

The crisis of 1907 was the turning point. The

banks were required to hold reserves, of course,

National Monetary Commission was created and

but smaller banks were allowed to keep a large

given the task of investigating banking condi­

proportion of their reserves on deposit with

tions, recommending needed changes, and re­

medium-sized

porting to Congress. Following the 1912 report

or

large

banks.

Medium-sized

banks, in turn, held a sizable proportion of their

of the Commission, Congress acted quickly, and

reserves with the New York banks. Finally, New

the Federal Reserve Act became law on Decem­

York banks were allowed to use three-quarters

ber 23, 1913.

of the pyramided reserve funds to expand credit,
and they typically loaned them to stock brokers
on call.
Thus, the ultimate capacity of the banking

NATURE OF THE N E W SYSTEM
Under the Federal Reserve Act, 12 regional
Federal Reserve Banks were set up and a Board

system to meet the demands of its depositors

was established

depended heavily upon the collateral of these

banks which became members of the System

in

Washington.

Commercial

call loans to brokers. Everything might go rea­

were required to keep reserves with the System

sonably well as long as the call loans could be

and the Reserve Banks were given the power to

converted into cash with little or no delay. But

extend credit to member banks by discounting

let the demands for credit and currency pile

specified

up and panic would begin.

this credit banks could obtain currency from

short-term commercial paper. With

It might start in the smaller towns, say a de­

the Federal Reserve Bank or could meet drains

mand by farmers to be paid in currency for

of funds to other banks. This “ discount mech­

their fall crops. If demands were sufficiently

anism” became the first important tool of Fed­

large, the New York banks would feel the pinch

eral Reserve policy. The System could use this

and call for repayment of their brokers’ loans.

tool to make credit and currency available when

Brokers would sell stock to get cash. With a

the banking system needed additional funds.

4




business review

At first it was thought that the funds made

production grew, credit would grow. If produc­

available by the Federal Reserve Bank came

tion were contracting, so would credit. Thus it

from the centralized pool of reserves which the

was thought that credit would not outgrow pro­

commercial banks kept with the Fed. But later

duction and hence there would be no danger of

it was realized that the bulk of these reserves

too much credit. The whole thing would be au­

was legally required and thus could not be

tomatic.

“ drawn out,” and that the Fed actually created
new reserves when it gave credit on its books

Gold flow s and discount rate

for discounted commercial paper.

Gold flows and discount rate administration

This, then, was the first tool utilized by the

under the so-called “ rules of the game” of the

Fed. But what checks were put on the use of

classical gold standard (which influenced the

this tool to prevent a flood of new money and

thinking of most System officials) provided an

credit from descending upon the economy as

additional safeguard against over-expansion of

banks discounted paper to get new money from

credit. If too much credit were made available,

the Fed?

prices would rise (with more money chasing a

The answer, or so it was thought at the

limited supply of goods)

and interest rates

time, was provided within the Federal Reserve

would fall. When this happened, gold would

Act itself. It was thought that the proper quan­

flow abroad as (a)

tity of money and credit could

be assured

abroad (at lower prices) and foreigners bought

(among other ways) by controlling the quality

less here, and as (b) Americans invested more

of credit extended by the System, and allowing
the System to vary the interest or “ discount”

abroad (at higher interest rates) and foreigners
less here. Thus, gold outflows provided a ready

rate charged for discounting commercial paper.

signal that too much money was around; under

But how was this supposed to work?

the “ rules of the game,” central banks should

Americans bought more

use their tools to make money tighter at home,

Q uality of credit

thereby adding to business stability.

The original Act limited Federal Reserve dis­

How to tighten credit? Raise the rate charged

counts to short-term paper “ issued or drawn

banks when they discount their commercial

for agricultural, industrial, or commercial pur­

paper. A higher discount rate would discourage

poses.” In other words, the Fed should provide

bank

new credit through the discount mechanism to

banks. This would help to limit the amount of

borrowing

from

the

Federal

Reserve

banks but only on the basis of their short-term

bank credit available and raise its price. With

loans made to finance current production—

less money pursuing domestic goods, some steam

goods in process. It was thought that this would

would be taken out of the boom and pressure

assure that not too much money and credit

on prices would be eased.

would be created.

In short, it was hoped that the new Federal

Since the Fed made funds available only on

Reserve System could put an end to the money

the collateral of productive loans, it was argued

crises of the nineteenth and early twentieth

that each new grant of credit by the Fed would

centuries and could provide a measure of eco­

match the needs of the production process. If

nomic stability. The main tools for the task:




5

business review

discount accommodation and the discount rate.

In May of 1920, John Wanamaker’s in New

The beauty of the tools (in theory at least)

York cut retail prices 20 per cent. By August

was their automaticity— provision of the proper

of 1921 wholesale commodity prices had plunged

quantity of credit by controlling its quality and

40 per cent. Unemployment leaped to 4 % mil­

by adjusting discount rates to gold movements.

lion in 1921. Farmers were especially hurt as

Unfortunately, that stability was not to be

they had used extraordinarily high wartime

forthcoming. And just as economic instability

earnings to buy and bid up prices of agricul­

was a motivating factor behind the creation of

tural land and thus were faced with huge mort­

the Federal Reserve System, it was an important
force behind the further development of ideas

prices.

and tools.
The new instability was the inflation-deflation
cycle associated with . . .

gage debts in a period of declining commodity
War, inflation, deflation: these conditions set
the stage for a fundamental reappraisal of Sys­
tem goals, guides, and tools. And this reap­
praisal was to bring important changes. The

W A R A N D ITS AFTERMATH

direction of change: a growing dissatisfaction

Hardly had the System begun functioning effec­

with passive implementation of monetary policy

tively when the guns heard in Europe caught

based on automatic guides. But why a new

the United States in the turmoil of World War

emphasis on discretion and action?

I and the System’s efforts were turned in the
direction of wartime financing.
After the war the almost inevitable inflation

The new em phasis
The reasons were at least two in number. First

came, described by System officials at the time

of all, there was widespread dissatisfaction with

as “ characterized by an unprecedented orgy of

the cycle of inflation and deflation that the coun­

extravagance, a mania for speculation, over­

try had just gone through,2 and dissatisfaction

extended business in nearly all lines and in

with the past invites re-evaluation.

every section of the country, and general de­

A second reason for the new emphasis upon

moralization of the agencies of production and

discretion was simply that the old guides to

distribution.” The war was financed in large

policy— gold flows and qualitative discount ad­

measure by creating money, and the money had

ministration— were becoming increasingly ob­

come home to roost.

solete. The international gold standard was no

At first the System declined to take restric­

longer in operation. Indeed, the United States

tive action, working instead to keep credit read­

was the only major country still maintaining

ily available and interest rates low so as to fa­

gold payments. So how could gold be a guide

cilitate Treasury handling of the large war debt.

to policy?

Not until May of 1920 did the System embark
upon a thorough-going policy of restraint. But

With regard to the gold standard, the 1923
Annual Report noted that:

unfortunately this very month marked the end

Under the present conditions, with gold

of the postwar boom and the beginning of one

embargoes in force in most foreign

of the sharpest and most severe price declines
in history.

6




2 The hearings in 1 2 before the Joint Commission of Agricul­
91
tural Inquiry provide a pungent example of this dissatisfaction.

business review

countries and the United States practi­

Reserve Bank was signed by a farmer, this

cally the only free gold market of the

didn’t mean that the new funds so obtained by

world, the movement of gold to this

the commercial bank would be used to make

country does not reflect the relative po­

additional “ productive”

sition of the money markets nor does

business. The funds might be used to finance

the movement give rise to corrective

speculation, say, in stocks. Thus, money might

influences, working through exchanges,

grow at a faster rate than production.

loans to farmers or

money rates, and price levels, which

In short, since System officials were dissat­

tend to reverse the flow. The significance

isfied with the past record of instability and

which movements in the reserve ratios

since they could no longer rely on the automatic

formerly possessed rested upon the fact

guides of the past, the System began to move

that they were the visible indicators of

away from the era of rules and automatic ad­

the operation of the nicely adjusted

justment. In the 1923 Annual Report, the Fed­

mechanism

eral Reserve Board had this to say:

of

international

finance.

With this mechanism now inoperative,

In its ultimate analysis credit adminis­

the ratios have lost much of their value

tration is not a matter of mechanical
rules, but is and must be a matter of

as administrative guides.
Moreover, the old “ real bills” or “ commercial

judgment —

of judgment concerning

loan” theory of discount administration was

each specific credit situation at the par­

questioned for logical consistency:

ticular moment of time when it has

There are no automatic devices or de­
tectors for determining, when credit is

arisen or is developing . . . the Federal

granted by a Federal Reserve Bank in

primarily to information concerning the

response

Reserve Board must look for guidance

demand,

state of industry and trade and the state

whether the occasion of the rediscount

of credit. Changes in the volume of

was an extension of credit by the mem­

bank credit in use are the outcome of

ber bank for nonproductive use. Paper

changes in the volume of business. A

offered by a member bank when it re­

proper and effective credit policy, con­

to

a

rediscount

discounts with a Federal Reserve Bank

sidered in its broader aspects must,

may disclose the purpose for which the

therefore, be based on that wide vari­

loan evidenced by that paper was made,

ety

but it does not disclose what use is to

brought together, throw light on the

be made of the proceeds of the redis­

changes taking place in the business

count. A farmer’s note may be offered

situation and their relation to current

for rediscount by a member bank when

of

economic facts

which, when

banking and credit trends.

in fact the need for rediscounting has

Two words summed up the new attitude: dis­

arisen because of extensions of credit

cretion and action. These two words were in

by the member bank for speculative use.

sharp contrast to those which best described

In other words, just because a note redis­

earlier policy. It was now discretion and action

counted by a commercial bank at a Federal

instead of automatic and passive. Of course




7

business review

there was no sharp break with the past. Some

bank

within and without the System still clung to

amount of funds which the banking system had

check

which

reduced

the

aggregate

“ the real bills doctrine.”

available to lend and to invest.

Yet the new emphasis had indeed arrived, and

Here, then, was a new technique the Fed

it carried through to the tools of Federal Re­

could use to inject or withdraw funds from the

serve policy. For during the period of transi­

economy. And most important, the Fed could

tion toward discretion and action an important

do so at its own initiative. It didn’t have to

finding had been made, which was to provide

depend upon banks to come in and borrow as

much of the wherewithal to implement the new
attitude. That finding was the discovery of the

it did with discount policy. It didn’t have to
wait for banks to react to a change in the dis­

monetary impact of open market operations.

count rate.

Open m arket operations as a tool
of credit policy

ing ideas of action, initiative, and judgment.
Where System policy called for action, the new

Open market operations simply mean the pur­

tool provided the wherewithal for prompt, de­

chase and sale of securities by the Federal Re­

cisive action. Where policy called for discretion

serve System in the “ open” market. The Federal

and initiative

Reserve Act gave the System legislative author­

formulas of yesteryear) the new tool provided

ity to engage in these operations and the Sys­

the wherewithal to invoke that initiative— to

tem did so on numerous occasions in its early

change the funds available to lend and invest

history. Until the early twenties, however, the

at its own discretion and judgment instead of

The new tool fit in perfectly with the evolv­

(as opposed to the automatic

Federal Reserve Banks bought or sold securi­

at the judgment of the banking system. Thus

ties primarily:

in its 1923 Annual Report the Board recognized

(a)

with an eye toward pro­

viding earnings (the securities purchased gave

that:

the banks an interest income), (b) to facilitate

The difference between discount opera­

Treasury financing, or (c) to provide the col­

tions and open market operations is

lateral to back Federal Reserve Bank notes, a

that the initiative in rediscounting lies

type of currency no longer issued by the Fed.

with the member banks, while in the

Then in the early twenties a curious thing

purchase and sale of securities the ini­

happened. System officials began to notice that

tiative may be taken by the Reserve

the purchase and sale of Government securities

Banks.

had interesting effects on credit conditions. Pur­

Moreover the Board directed:

chases by the System seemed to ease credit while

That the time, manner, character, and

sales tended to make credit less available.

volume of open market investments pur­

The explanation of this phenomenon was sim­

chased by Federal Reserve Banks be

ply that, when the Fed purchased securities, it

governed with primary regard to the

paid for them with newly created funds which,

accommodation of commerce and busi­

when deposited in the banking system, made

ness and to the effect of such purchases

more money available to lend and to invest.

or sales on the general credit situation.

When it sold securities, it generally received a

No longer would open market operations be

8




business review

primarily for income. They now reflected an

led to the use of new guides and new tools with

active and positive credit policy.

which to affect the quantity of money and credit.

The Federal Reserve in the early 1920’s also

Yet this was by no means to be the end of the

be­

evolutionary process. There were other disturb­

tween open market operations and discount pol­

ances to come. One of the most important: the

icy. Most important— they learned to coordinate

Great Depression of the 1930’s.

discovered many important

relationships

the two tools to achieve maximum effectiveness.
Now that Federal Reserve officials had

THE GREAT DEPRESSION

come to understand open market op­

The Depression of the 1930’s was one of the

erations, their control instruments could

most severe and prolonged of all time. It was

be employed with more initiative, pre­

marked by bread lines and shanty towns. Its

cision, and effectiveness. They could

emblems were the blue eagle and the C.C.C.

use discount rates alone, open market

Its despair was the breeding ground for polit­

operations alone, or the two together in

ical agitation, even violent revolution.

varying degrees, depending on condi­

The economic statistics of the Great Depres­

tions and the results desired. For ex­

sion were morbid reminders of human despair.

ample, if they wanted merely to offset

By 1933, one of the worst years of the depres­

gold or currency or to take only mildly

sion, total spending as measured by gross na­

restrictive or easing action, they might

tional product was one-third less than in 1929.

leave discount rates unchanged and rely
solely on sales or purchases in the open

And unemployment, the most important indi­
cation of human misery, reached almost 13 mil­

market . . .

lion by 1933. One out of every four persons in

if the Federal Reserve

wished to restrict credit, it would usu­
ally begin by selling Government se­

the labor force was out of a job.
What could the Federal Reserve System do

member

about it? At first, the hands of System officials

banks more deeply into debt at the Re­

were pretty much tied. One problem was gold

curities, which would

force

serve Banks. This alone would lead the

reserves and collateral requirements. The Sys­

banks to lend less liberally and market

tem was still required to back its notes and de­

rates of interest would rise. The Reserve

posits with gold and eligible commercial paper,

Banks would then decide whether, and

and since gold was flowing out and the volume

how much, to add to the restrictive

of eligible paper was declining (with the slow­

pressure by raising discount rates.3

down in production), the System could not act

Thus disturbances in the economic liver stim­
ulated Federal Reserve officials to reappraise
monetary policy. First, the money panics of the
nineteenth and early twentieth centuries had

aggressively to push currency and credit into
the banking system.
More than this was involved, however. Some
System officials

given us the Fed and its original tools. Now

considered

the war and postwar inflation-deflation cycle

and inevitable to purge the economy of

the

depression

necessary

the extravagances of the new-era pros­
3 Lester V. Chandler, Benjamin Strong, Central Banker (Washington:
The Brookings Institution), pp. 236-237.




perity. This feeling was accompanied

9

business review

by an unwillingness to do anything that

among other things, to refuse credit accommo­

might involve a return of what were

dations to offending member banks.

considered the artificial conditions of

Then came the Securities Exchange Act of

that period. For a time there was both

1934 which gave the System its first “ selective”

a return to traditional theories

and

control of credit, selective in the sense the con­

principles and a hesitance to devise or

trol would not affect the total amount of credit

employ new techniques

of monetary

put to use in the economy as a whole, but which

management. These developments are
illustrated in the caution with which

could change the amount of credit put to use

the Reserve officials pressed for exten­

in a particular sector of the economy— in this
case, for the purchase and carrying of securities

sion of the discount facilities of the

listed on national exchanges. (See the table de­

System and the collateral provisions

scribing Federal Reserve tools in more detail.)

for Federal Reserve notes.4

The stock market was singled out for a very

Nevertheless, the legislative mills began to

important reason. It was thought that much of

grind as the Depression worsened, and the Sys­

the panic and perhaps some of the roots of the

tem emerged with major changes in its box of

Depression lay in the speculative binge that

tools.

carried stock prices to the inflated highs of

Legislation affecting System tools

Reserve officials had been disturbed about the

1929. Many times during the twenties Federal
Among the first of many bills passed affecting

rapid rise in stock prices and the volume of

System tools was the Glass-Stegall Act of 1932

credit which was helping to push stock prices

which gave the System power in exceptional

up. (It was possible to buy a stock costing $100

circumstances to extend credit without requir­

by putting up say, $10 of your own money

ing eligible paper. The word “ exceptional,” how­

and borrowing the rest). By October, 1929,

ever, was an indication that the old “ commer­

loans to brokers had risen above $8.5 billion,

cial loan theory,” though dealt a blow to the

more than two-and-a-half times their level three

logical chin, was still stirring.

years earlier.

Other legislation was aimed at curbing some

Yet despite their concern with the stock mar­

of the speculative excesses typical of the twen­

ket, System officials were often hesitant to use

ties— excesses such as those that had contrib­

their general controls to decrease over-all avail­

uted to the stock market crash.

ability of credit (which might be needed by

The Banking Act of 1933 empowered the
System to prevent undue use of “ bank credit

industry in general) just to keep some of this
credit from spilling over into one sector.

for the speculative carrying of or trading in

This was the environment giving rise to the

securities, real estate or commodities or for any

development of the Fed’s first “ selective” tool.

other purpose inconsistent with the maintenance

The Board was empowered to prescribe mini­

of sound credit conditions.” To put teeth in this

mum margin requirements (the amount of cash

provision the Act authorized the Reserve Banks,
4 Kar! R. Bopp, "Three Decades of Federal Reserve Policy,"
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, 1947) No. 8, p. 13.

Postwar Economic Studies, (Washington:

10




relative to borrowed funds) for purchasing or
carrying securities or selling them short. Later,
as will be discussed, the Board was given ad­

business review

ditional selective controls when conditions in­

yet spent itself when the roar of guns was heard

dicated the desirability of checking the amount

once more in Europe. It was the eve of the

of credit flowing into one or more other sec­

bloodiest conflict of them all: World War II.

tors of the economy.
Finally, in the Banking Act of 1935, the Fed­

W A R A N D ITS AFTERMATH

eral Reserve Banks were allowed to “ make ad­

When national borders are threatened, all ob­

vances to any member bank on its time or

jectives become secondary to that of defense.

demand notes . . . which are secured to the

World War II was certainly no exception to

satisfaction of such Federal Reserve Bank” but

this general rule, and as part of the national

of 1 per cent. As a re­

effort, the money and credit-creating powers

sult, the Board of Governors issued a regulation

of the Federal Reserve System were placed at the

which made all sound assets of member banks

disposal of the Treasury. An important objec­

at a penalty rate of ^

a potential basis of advances by the Federal

tive of war finance was to see that as much war

Reserve Banks. This regulation marked, for all

borrowing as possible should tap savings. Yet no

practical purposes, the demise of “ the commer­

bond would go unbought for lack of funds. The

cial loan theory.”

System stood ready to create additional money if

The 1935 Act also gave the System an im­

it were needed to finance the war effort. This

portant new tool which it had asked for (but

decision was to have an important influence on

had not received) as far back as 1916. It em­

the System’s bag of tools— especially on its se­

powered the Board of Governors to change re­

lective controls and on the postwar development

serve requirements within specified limits and

of open market operations.

thus increase or decrease the volume of bank
support. If, for example, a certain class of banks

P e ggin g the Governm ent
securities m arket

was allowed to reduce required reserves held

To carry out the war policy the Treasury and

with the Fed from, say, 12 to 10 per cent of

the Fed agreed in March of 1942 that the then-

deposits which a given volume of reserves would

their net demand deposits, these banks could

existing pattern of interest rates on Govern­

then expand loans, investments, and deposits

ment securities would be maintained. This would

immediately.

assure funds at relatively low rates and it would

In summary, then, the Great Depression re­

mean that potential buyers of securities would

sulted in significant changes in Federal Reserve

not delay their purchases, hoping to gain by

tools. Reserve Banks could now lend to member

waiting for interest rates to rise.

banks on any sound banking asset. Reserve re­

It also meant, however, that the Fed would

quirements could be changed within specified

have to provide funds needed to purchase any

limits. And, finally, the System was given its

securities that others were unwilling to take at

first “ selective” tool— the authority to set stock

prevailing rates. For to peg a price (and an

margin requirements.

interest rate is a price) one must be willing to

Thus another period of business instability

buy all that the market rejects. Thus the Fed

had brought change. Still, however, there was

lost effective control over the money supply.
(Continued on Page 14)

more to come. The Great Depression had not




11

F E D E R A L R E SE R V E T O O L S : W H O , W H A T , W H E N , W H E R E , W H Y , A N D H O W
DISCOUNT

OPEN MARKET OPERATIONS

POLICY

Discount Rate

C H A N G E IN RESERVE REQUIREMENTS

SELECTIVE INSTRUMENTS

Member Bank Borrowing

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I. W hat is it?

Rate charged member banks for borrowing from the Federal
Reserve Bank.

Mainly purchases and sales of Government securities.

Change in percentage of deposits which member
banks are required to hold as reserves.

Instruments designed to influence the amount of
credit put to use in a particular sector of the econ­
omy. A t present, only margin requirements are in
effect.
Margin requirements: set minimum required down
payments tor purchasing or carrying of securities
listed on national exchanges.
Consumer credit controls: set minimum down pay­
ments and maximum periods of repayment ap­
plied to consumer credit.
Real estate credit controls: set minimum down
payments and maximum periods of repayment for
credit extended to finance new construction.

Federal Open Market Committee.

Board of Governors.

Board of Governors.

Federal Reserve

Rules and practices involved in borrowing. Rules are not
changed flexibly as a tool of policy but have an important
bearing on use and impact of borrowing.

Federal Reserve

Federal Reserve

♦

Who

_>

§
,E

2. Who has the
authority?

Board of Directors of each FRB establishes rate subject to re­
view and determination by Board of Governors.

Rules of Board of Governors (Reg. A ) administered by each
Federal Reserve Bank.
'

3. Who takes the
initiative?

Federal Reserve

Member bank

4. Limits to use

■ "S
“

Lower limit, zero; no upper limit.

Lower limit, zero; upper limit provided by tradition against
borrowing, administration of discount window and total expan­
sion of reserve credit permitted by gold certificate reserve
ratio.

Y*

’Limit of purchases: lower, zero; upper, gold certifi­
cate reserve ratio.
Sales: lower, zero; upper, size of portfolio.

Demand deposits: Reserve City banks
Country banks
Reserve City banks
Country banks

Time deposits:

- 10-22%
- 7-14%
) u o
/
) 3~

Stock Margin Requirements: lower limit, zero;
upper limiL 1 per cent.
00
Consumer Credit: the power to change the mini­
mum down payments and maximum periods of
repayment was not limited, but was left to the dis­
cretion of the Board of Governors.
Real Estate Credit: power to change requirements
was in some cases limited by statute.

Changes can be small but are not easily reversed over short
periods; for this reason, experimental "probing" action is more
appropriate for open market operations, with later "confirma­
tion" through change in discount rate.

With borrowing at the initiative of the banks, reserves can be - supplied in precise amounts and for periods needed by individ­
ual banks.

The most subtle instrument of all; volume can be
large or small; operations easily reversible.

The least subtle instrument; a large volume of de­
posits is affected by small change in requirements;
not easily reversible.

Flexibility is limited by trade practices and ad­
ministrative problems. Makes over-all policy more
flexible, however, by enabling the Federal Reserve
to influence credit in one area of the economy
without restricting credit in others.

6. How is it coor­
dinated with
other instruments?

Generally to "confirm" prior action in open market operations;
(e.g. by selling Government securities the F.R. can bring about
higher rates on Treasury bills and then follow with an increase
in the discount rate; also, by restrictive open market operations
the F.R. can tighten reserve positions, forcing more banks to
borrow from the Reserve Banks and hence making the discount
rate more "effective").

Acts as a safety valve; if other instruments unduly tighten re­
serves of individual banks, they may resort to the discount
window.
Pressure on the discount window will depend partly on coordi­
nation of discount rate and open market operations (e.g. if
the discount rate is significantly below rates on Treasury bills
for an extended period, banks will tend to obtain reserves by^
discounting rather than selling bills).

Used in conjunction with discount rate and mem­
ber bank borrowing (as explained under those
headings); also may smooth effects of changes in
reserve requirements.

Often may require use of other instruments to
smooth the effects of changes.

In relation to the general instruments, selective
instruments generally reinforce, compensate, or
at certain times serve as a partial substitute.

7. Administrative
problems?

None

Administration of discount window requires close observation
of nature and purpose of borrowing by individual banks; prob­
lem of determining eligibility of paper for rediscount arises
only occasionally.
^

Execution of open market operations requires the
trading desk to be in intimate contact with the
money and Government securities markets.

Because changes in requirements^ apply to large
groups of banks, the impact on individual banks
must be studied carefully in advance; also, changes
impose some burdens on member banks in calcu­
lating their positions.

Administrative difficulties are much greater than
for general instruments. The difficulties include
problems of determining the value of collateral,
recognition of trade practices, and policing ac­
tions of a large number of lenders to enforce
regulations.

8. What is its
psychological
impact?

Varies. May be taken as reflecting a major policy decision by
the monetary authorities; or may be merely a technical adjust­
ment of discount rate to market rates. Because bank rate is so
important in other countries, a change in the discount rate
takes on additional symbolic significance at times of balance
of payments difficulties.

Tradition against continued indebtedness means that rising
volume of borrowing has increasing tightening effect through
banker psychology.
*

Unless operations are very large scale, likely to
have little effect because it receives relatively
little publicity.

May be considerable. Often used for major policy
actions for dramatic effects; all affected banks
necessarily made aware of the action in computa­
tion of required reserves.

Impact on individuals is likely to be greater than
that of general instruments because individuals
are made aware of regulations in the process of
borrowing or buying the listed articles.

9\ How does it affect
bank reserves?

Determines the price for borrowing reserves.

Borrowing increases reserves; repayment decreases reserves.

re-

No effect on total reserves; changes the amount of
deposits which a given amount of reserves will sup­
port. A reduction in requirements frees reserves
for expansion of deposits; increases in require­
ments have been used principally to mop up excess
reserves.

No effect.

Borrowing member banks.

Borrowing member banks.

Money market banks and Government securities
dealers.

All in particular class of member banks whose re­
quirements are changed (Reserve City or Country).

Borrowers and lenders in the selected credit con­
trol area.

Primarily through the complex of short-term rates ip which the
discount rate plays a pivotal role; a change in the discount rate
influences the method by which banks adjust reserves and
hence affects other rates (e.g. a rise in the discount rate above
the Treasury bill rate induces banks to sell bills rather than
borrow, thus tending to raise the bill ra te).

By shifting indebtedness from bank to bank; because of relucThrough the normal flow of funds among banks
tance to be in debt except for short periods, borrowing banks*' M and regions (e.g. the additional reserves from F.R.
sell securities to repay the Federal Reserve; this reduces repurchases spread from money market centers to
serves of other banks (assuming the F.R. does not increase
^ither parts of the country) and through the corntotal reserves by other means) and forces them to borrow.
plex of rates in the money and Government securi­
ties markets.

5. Can it be used
flexibly?

<
•
<J
<0

a
c

w

Purchases increase
''Serves.

reserves;

sales decrease

v
-C

*■ 10. Where is the
w
immediate impact?
11. How does the
effect spread?

£
12. How does it
affect credit?




Although each of the tools has its unique impact, it works through YheSupply, cost and availability of bank reserves and the level and pattern of
interest rates. In turn, this has an effect, at the margin, on the supply, cost and availability of money and credit. And, finally, this influences the flow
of expenditures and the pace of economic activity.
_

Changes the distribution of credit among differ­
ent sectors of the economy.

business review

would be a greater supply on the market)

( Continued from Page 11)
This arrangement, of course, had great in­
flationary potential. As

additional money is

created the public holds additional purchasing
power which can be used to bid up prices of

and yields would rise. Rising yields and inter­
est rates would increase Government interest
expense.
Falling prices would mean that the hundreds
of thousands of investors in marketable Gov­

scarce goods.
Yet during the war, prices were held rela­

ernment securities would sustain capital losses.

tively stable. Rationing and price controls went

And it was feared at the time that such capital

into effect. Moreover, the Fed was given an ad­

losses might mean real economic trouble. How?

ditional selective tool at the outset of the war—

The possibility of capital losses might bring a

the power to set minimum down payments and

wave of selling by investors who hoped to min­

maximum time-payment periods on a wide range

imize losses. This would mean further capital

of consumer goods.

losses

Despite these measures war finance was to
have an important impact in the postwar pe­
riod.

and

increases

in

yields

and

interest

rates.
Heavy capital losses and rising interest rates,
in turn, could disrupt the lending-investing proc­
ess and demoralize the securities markets. Who

Afterm ath

wants to lend or invest when his investment

Between July 1, 1941 and June 30, 1946 the

might fall precipitously

Federal Government raised $383 billion. Forty-

higher interest rates might be just around the

six per cent of this amount came from taxes and

corner? And what business wants to borrow

in value and when

54 per cent was obtained by borrowing. Over

for capital investment in such an uncertain

40 of this 54 per cent came from the banking

market?

system.
As

Finally,

a result,

the money supply

increased

if

the

lending-investment

process

should break down, plants would not be built,

enormously. From $36.6 billion in 1939, the

houses would not be constructed. The workers

money supply soared to $103.5 billion in 1945.

who built houses and plants would be out of a

Then when wartime price controls and rationing

job, without income, and unable to buy goods.

were relaxed a flood of purchasing power de­

A drying-up of purchasing power could mean

scended upon a relatively limited supply of

depression.

goods, and prices began to rise.

This chain of events could have happened.

At first, the Fed found it difficult to exercise

Again, it might not have happened. At any rate,

the kind of monetary restraint necessary to

the Fed had to consider the possibility in de­

control the inflation. Once again the problems

ciding whether to support the Government se­

of managing a huge Federal debt influenced

curities market. The Fed and the Treasury de­

the

cided the risks were too great.

Fed

to

subordinate

other

objectives

that of facilitating Treasury finance.

to

If the

Of course, the Fed did take some anti-inflation

Fed should try to mop up some of the excess

measures. When forced to buy some securities

liquidity by selling Government securities, the

in order to maintain the rate structure, it might

prices of these securities would fall (as there

sell others. It also raised reserve requirements.

14




business review

Short-term rates were allowed to rise some.

in our rate of growth. This is the paramount

Regulation W was restored. Moreover, the Fed

economic problem we face today.

was given another selective tool in 1950— the
imum payment periods for credit on purchases

G RO W TH, THE BALANCE OF PAYMENTS,
A N D FEDERAL RESERVE TOOLS

of residential real estate. But all this was not

Simply put, the United States balance-of-pay-

enough to contain inflation.

ments deficit results from the fact that we are

power to set minimum down payments and max­

Then came the Korean War; when fighting

paying out more to foreigners than we are re­

broke out the risks of recession were virtually

ceiving from them. To finance the difference,

eliminated and the pressures of inflation greatly

we have been transferring gold and dollars to

increased. So in March 1951, the Fed and the

foreigners.

Treasury reached an accord. Gradually, secur­

At the same time that we have been having

ities prices were allowed to fall and interest

these payments difficulties, we have also had

rates to rise. Open market operations would he

problems connected with our domestic economic

directed toward supplying and absorbing re­

growth:

serves, not toward supporting the prices of Gov­

fast enough to utilize our labor and capital re­

ernment securities. Thus ended an important

sources.
But how does the Federal Reserve System fit

postwar episode— an episode which, as we shall

our economy has not been growing

see shortly, left a legacy which was to influence

into this dual problem of payments deficit and

the use of one of the Fed’s most important tools

insufficient growth?

— its open market operations.
In summary, then, war and postwar develop­

on the availability of credit and thus the level

Since the System has a great deal of influence

ments had led to experiments with new tools of

of interest rates, it is in a position to influence

selective credit control in the area of real-estate

both international flows of funds and domestic

and consumer goods (tools which subsequently

production

were

as conditions

flows of funds across international borders, for

changed). And the experience of the Govern­

example, are often especially sensitive to dif­

ment securities support program was to be par­

ferences in international interest rates. Domes­

tially responsible for self-imposed restraint in

tic production and employment, in turn, can

the use of open market operations as a tool of

be stimulated or damped by credit availability

Federal Reserve policy. Once more the hag of

and interest rates.

withdrawn

by

Congress

tools had undergone a thorough reappraisal in
the light of changed conditions.

and employment.

Some kinds of

But while greater credit availability and loiver
interest rates might be a spur to domestic

Still, however, the story was incomplete. As

growth, such conditions might cause short-term

the decade of the 1950’s drew to a close, a new

funds to flow abroad in search of higher in­

de-stabilizing force appeared on the horizon,

terest rates (other things remaining the same).

one which was to have yet another important

Thus it is conceivable that a monetary policy

effect on the evolution

and development of

appropriate to growth might be inappropriate

monetary tools. That force: a deficit in the bal­

from the standpoint of our balance of payments,

ance of payments compounded by a slowdown

at least in the short run.




15

business review

Given this environment, we might expect some

ing

reserves without

creating

direct

development or modification of the tools of Fed­

pressure on short-term rates. Also, such

eral Reserve policy. This has indeed been the

purchases, by having a moderating in­

case.

fluence on long-term interest rates rel­

O perations in the longer-end
of the m arket

the effect of facilitating the flow of

ative to short-term rates, might have

One

result

of

the

funds through the capital and mortgage
and

markets, thereby encouraging the prog­

growth problem has been a re-thinking of op­

balance-of-payments

ress of recovery.
In other words, the Committee was adapting

erating policies with regard to open market
operations.

open market operations to a new environment,

As already mentioned, the period of the pegs

to supply funds so as to have minimum impact

was to have an important impact on open mar­

on short-term interest rates (thus ease the im­

ket operations in the later postwar period. Par­

pact on our balance-of-payments problem) and

tially as a reaction to the inflation which accom­

at the same time to facilitate

panied the postwar pegging of the Government

longer-term credit markets (thus spur domestic

securities market, and after careful analysis of

growth in output and employment).

financing in

how best to assure a smoothly functioning mar­
ket for Government securities the Federal Open

Sw aps

Market Committee agreed upon the following

The Federal Reserve has also taken other ac­

policy announced in March, 1953:

tions and developed other tools aimed broadly
operations

at mitigating temporary developments which

for the System account should be con­

Under present conditions,

might adversely affect our balance-of-payments

fined to the short end of the market

position thus providing time for other forces

(not including correction of disorderly

to take effect that would correct the basic pay­

markets).

ments problem. One of these new tools is the

Thus was inaugurated the so-called “ bills only

so-called “ swap” arrangements.
Basically the “ swaps” are agreements between

policy” of the Federal Reserve System.
But in February 1961, contrary to the policy

the Federal Reserve and foreign central banks

set in 1953, the Federal Open Market Committee

(plus the Bank for International Settlements)

authorized the purchase of intermediate- and

which provide for reciprocal “ lines of credit.”

longer-term U.S. Government securities having

The Bank of England, for example, will allow

maturities up to 10 years. The maturity limita­

the Fed to draw around 180 million pounds. The

tion was later removed. The Board of Governors

Fed, in turn, will allow the Bank of England to

in the Annual Report for 1961 explained this

draw 500 million dollars.
The foreign currencies may be used for di­

action in the following terms:
. . . the purchasing of securities in the

rect operations in the exchange markets but,

intermediate-

areas,

more typically, the Fed draws foreign currencies

shorter-term

to purchase dollars a foreign central bank has

areas, offered the possibility of supply­

acquired (as a result of international commer­

as

16

contrasted




and
with

longer-term
the

business review

cial and financial transactions) and which are

cles of inflation and deflation, when there is

in excess of those the central bank would or­

depression, war, and problems of growth and

dinarily hold. These dollars would thus be ab­

balance of payments. For if men are too timid,

sorbed and could not be used to purchase gold

too bogged in inertia, then we must continue to

during the period the swap is in effect. It has

suffer from problems that might yield to new

worked out in numerous instances that natural

tools and techniques or to new uses of old tools.

forces have operated to absorb the dollars by

As one observer has put it:

the time the swap matured, so that a transfer

The Federal Reserve System that exists

of gold was avoided entirely.

today is very different, except in its

In a sense, the swap arrangements represent

external structural features, from the

a first line of defense against short-term develop­

System that began operations in the

ments which could cause gold drains and spec­

early months of the First World War.

ulative movements of funds abroad. Moreover,

But for its ability to grow and adjust

the swaps represent an important step in devel­

in pace with the shifting needs of the

oping tools to fit changing situations.

community it serves, the Federal Re­

From this brief discussion, then, we see that

serve would have found itself as out­

the pattern of the past is repeated in the present.

dated as was the National Banking Sys­

Once more economic instability has been ac­

tem which it largely replaced. Doubtless,

companied by a reappraisal of the tools of

also, it would before now have suffered

Federal Reserve policy. To cope with the prob­

the same fate as its predecessors in the

lems of inadequate growth and balance-ofpayments deficit the Fed has adapted old tools

United States. Capacity for adaptation,

to the current environment— flexible open mar­

ways sure, has turned out to be a basic

ket operations in all maturity areas, for example
— and has developed subsidiary tools such as

characteristic of the Federal Reserve
System. Its capacity for change and

the swap agreements. Economic jaundice has

adaptation is the cardinal virtue from

prompted a great deal of innovation in the mon­

which the other virtues of the System

etary system.

chiefly derive.5

adaptation that is seldom quick but al­

In an important sense, then, it is natural for

C O N CLU SIO N S

change to be a stimulus to action. It is only

We all, to a certain extent, distrust change. One

when this stimulus evokes an inadequate re­

reason may be that change almost inevitably

sponse that man’s nations, his institutions, and

brings uncertainty. And the human being is

even his culture can crumble. So it was in Rome

one to avoid uncertainty with its ominous over­

when the Empire could not generate the in­

tones of insecurity.

ternal momentum to push back the barbarians;

It is to the credit of men and institutions, how­

in Germany when public policy was inadequate

ever, that they do respond to changed condi­

to deal with dissatisfactions unleashed by the

tions, that they do seek new answers and new

Great Depression. In the final analysis, much of

ways of doing things when the course of events

________________

goes badly— when there are money panics, cy­




'HR

5 C. R. Whittlesey, Lectures on Monetary Management (Bombay: Uni­
versity of Bombay, I960), p. 3.

17

business review

the history of central banking in the United

as the challenge in the cumulative process of

States has been molded by challenge and re­

moving ahead. Not one, not the other, but both

sponse. And the response has been as important

have changed the rules of the game.

ANOTHER PROBLEM YEAR
FOR FARMERS
Once again agriculture qualifies as an area of

A m iserable grow ing season

the economy of the Philadelphia Federal Re­

As was the case in 1962, drought was the main

serve District that must be described as some­

culprit in the growing season now ending; how­

thing less than satisfactory. Local farmers have

ever, late spring and early fall frosts created

experienced a poor growing season for the sec­

additional problems and damaged crops in many

ond straight year. Production costs for both

parts of our area. Unlike 1962, this year’s

crop and livestock farmers have continued to

drought affected fewer entire counties, conse­

increase, but income from sales of farm prod­

quently disaster status for farmers was neither

ucts has failed to rise proportionately.

so widespread nor so publicized as the severity

County farm agents in leading agricultural

of local situations might indicate. The spottiness

areas of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Dela­

of season-long drought conditions along with

ware have described to us what they saw of

temporary relief experienced in a number of

production, harvesting, and marketing problems

areas seems to have resulted in crop yields rang­

in the 1963 season. What follows is based on

ing all the way from excellent to near failure.

their appraisal of the over-all farm situation
and on estimates of crop conditions issued for

W ide variation in field crops

this tri-state area by the United States Depart­

Field crops present a mixed picture. The ex­

ment of Agriculture.

tremely cold winter of 1962-1963 was hard on

18




business review

fall-planted grains, particularly because snow

vegetables were high in quality, and yields were

cover was so light. Spring-planted oats, on the

up to or better than average. Where drought

other hand, was an excellent crop, with record

conditions prevailed, crops grown for both the

yields reported in Pennsylvania. Soybeans also

fresh market and for processing were smaller

are said to be looking good, although they have

and frequently lacked quality. Plant disease

matured more slowly than usual in the dry

problems were not too severe this year, although

weather. Potatoes have been small but high in

tomatoes were a possible exception. This crop

quality and will make a good crop this year.

was somewhat of a problem from the very be­

Hay appears to have suffered most severely

ginning, with a late spring frost having ne­

from the drought in just about all our south­

cessitated much replanting. Later, as the drought

eastern counties. Elsewhere, yields have ranged

intensified, dry rot resulted in widespread losses

from fair to good. Although total production

on unirrigated acreages.

has exceeded last year’s short crop, this season’s

Market prices of fresh vegetables showed con­

yield will be far below average. Corn, another

siderable fluctuation over the season and in

crop counted on heavily by our dairymen, is

some areas there were reports of persistent weak­

requiring a longer-than-normal growing season

ness. Contract prices from processors seem to

because of the drought. Some of it already has

have been something less than satisfactory from

been hit by frost and further damage is feared.

the grower’s standpoint. Conditions varied con­

Much corn planted for grain must be cut for

siderably, however, by crop and by locality. In

silage and, being prematurely harvested, will

one important tomato area, farmers bemoaned

lose some of its food value.

a cut of SI.50 a ton in the contract price but at
the same time they were rejoicing because the

Tobacco hit by frost

processor was accepting every basket of stand­

Killing frost in late September caught unhar­

ard quality that could be delivered.

vested tobacco in Pennsylvania but did not af­
fect the bulk of the crop hanging in drying

Berry crops were hurt

sheds. The damage estimate applies to about 15

The small fruits generally were damaged more

per cent of the total acreage of tobacco. The

by drought and other unfavorable weather con­

early crop is said to be high in quality, although

ditions than orchard fruits. Strawberries seem

plants are somewhat smaller than usual be­

to have come through much better than either

cause of the drought. This portion could use a

blueberries or cranberries. Some winter kill of

lot of warm, dry weather for proper curing. A

blueberry bushes was reported and fruit sub­

smaller planted acreage in 1963 plus the frost

sequently was damaged by late spring frosts.

damage will result in a crop appreciably smaller

In our New Jersey bogs, cranberries, too, suf­

than a year

ago

and below the 1957-1961

average.

fered permanent damage from last winter’s low
temperatures. Latest estimates indicate a very
short cranberry crop— down about one-fourth

Irrigation saved vegetables

from 1962 and nearly one-fifth below the 1957-

Wherever fields were irrigated— and in our area

1961 average. Although a short crop is expected

this means much of southern New Jersey—

in Massachusetts, above-average production in




19

business review

important areas of the Midwest and far West

Feeder cattle operations on reduced scale

may tend to weaken prices this fall.

Farmers producing finished cattle for market

Fruit grow ers are optimistic

meet a reduced feed supply. Finished cattle

Orchard fruits have been less affected by the

prices, although fairly strong, have not been

drought than probably any other crop. Peaches

high enough to justify increasing the size of

and early apples were somewhat smaller than

the feed bill. Under these circumstances, feeder

are said to have scaled down their operations to

usual but quality was high and the fruit brought

cattle seem to be moving to market at some­

good prices in markets that were lightly supplied.
Late apples are said to be sizing and coloring

what lighter weights. As replacement stock are

nicely and quality seems excellent. Our apple crop

prices, the near-future trend of feeding opera­

will be smaller this year but light crops also are

tions is tied closely to the feed situation.

not to be had at what might be called bargain

expected in some nearby competing areas so there
should be less pressure on prices of packaged

Overproduction still plagues poultrymen

fruit. Processing demand is expected to be fairly

Poultrymen have seen many years that were

strong since it is reported that the carryover of

worse— but also some that were better than

last season’s apple products is not heavy.

1963 to date. Their main problem seems to be
making the proper adjustments to market con­

Feed shortage acute for dairym en

ditions. Egg prices hit a few low spots but

Our dairymen are having an especially hard

were fairly well maintained over much of the

time. For many, the situation has gone from

season. The market for poultry meat showed a

bad in 1962 to worse in 1963. In last year’s

mixed trend. Heavy birds continued in light

drought situation, the dairy farmer had at least

demand, but broilers fared somewhat better.

something in the way of a feed carryover to

Early in the year broiler prices were very low,

fall back on. This year he started with a deficit

although they recovered considerably at mid­

instead. Along with another inadequate hay

season, when quotations for a time ran above

crop, much corn must be harvested before reach­

year-ago levels. A continuing trend among poul­

ing maturity to avoid frost damage. Not only

trymen has been the elimination of small opera­

will feed value as corn silage be reduced, but

tors. This has been especially true in the case

corn for grain may be very short again this

of those who raise broilers.

year. Thus, the feed bill for the coming winter
promises to be larger than ever.

Production costs still rising

Faced with this situation, a dairyman must

The results of this season’s drought are clearly

cull his herds more severely— he cannot afford

evident in the increased cost of production so

to keep other than his top producers. And in

many of our farmers have had to face. Top

all probability he may have to delay purchases

billing must go to the heavy out-of-pocket ex­

of replacement stock until the feed situation im­

pense of the dairyman who has such a large

proves. It now looks as though the trend toward

quantity of feed to purchase. Vegetable growers

building up herds and barn modernization may

who were so fortunate as to have irrigation,

be interrupted for quite a while.

discovered that these systems could be costly

20




business review

to operate in a year of persistent rainfall de­

the dairyman, who until last year had been one

ficiency. The upward trend of farm wage rates

of the most liberal spenders, understandably has

continued this year with further advances re­

made a further sharp cutback in his program

ported for both experienced workers and mi­

of capital improvements.

grant harvest hands. Taxes are the remaining
major factor in this year’s increased costs, as

Financial status a little worse

expanding

Two bad years in succession have offered our

urban

developments brought with

them the need for improved facilities.

farmers little opportunity to increase their work­
ing capital or to reduce their outstanding in­

Capital spending off

debtedness. Farm cash income in Pennsylvania,

For the second year in a row the necessity for

New Jersey, and Delaware has shown consid­

“ belt tightening” seems likely to limit outlays

erable fluctuation since early spring. Over the

for major pieces of farm machinery, farm mod­

first seven months as a whole, receipts from farm

ernization, and purchases of new acreages to

marketings were up about 2 per cent from a

increase the efficiency of farming operations. To

year earlier. And taking into account the far

be sure, there are exceptions, one especially

from satisfactory growing season experienced

worthy of note being the outlays made by some

by so many, this small increase is perhaps a

broiler growers in Delaware, where new poultry

better showing than might have been expected.

houses are going up and others are being mod­

It should be remembered, however, that 1962

ernized. Some fruit growers, too, report they

was one of the poorer years from the income

are spending more for equipment and storage
capacity than in several other recent years. But

standpoint in each of these states making up the




Philadelphia Federal Reserve District.

UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE— REVISED DIGEST OF
SECURED TRANSACTIONS
Several years ago the General Council of this Bank de­
vised a two page Digest of Secured Transactions under
Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code which con­
densed its rules in a functional manner. The Pennsylvania
Legislature recently amended its statute to conform to
the amended 1962 Official Text of the Code, which in­
cludes a few changes in Article 9.
The Digest has now been revised to reflect these changes,
and it has been distributed to Pennsylvania banks within
the Third Federal Reserve District. It may also be useful
in other states which have adopted the Code and in
states where it is being studied for adoption.
Copies may be obtained by writing to the Bank and
Public Relations Department of this Bank.

21

F O R THE R E C O R D

•
BILLIONS

• •
$

MEMBER BANKS 3RD E.R.D.

BANKING

s

(20 CITIES)

r\

? V

j V

n

1

a

\

/

J

/a

A

A

CHECK
PAYMENTS

4|

1 /
1/

\

\!

>

l 1
1 !

-' -1

^

' " ' ' d e p o s it s

k
LOANS

^

INVESTMENTS

l
2 YEARS
AGO

YEAR
AGO

2 YEARS
AGO

AUGUST
1963

Third Federal
Reserve District

United States

Per cent change

Per cent change

YEAR
AGO

Factory*

AUGUST
1963

Department Storet

Employ­
ment

Payrolls

Sales

Stocks

Check
Payments

Per cent
change
Aug. 1963
from

Per cent
change
Aug. 1963
from

Per cent
change
Aug. 1963
from

Per cent
change
Aug. 1963
from

Per cent
change
Aug. 1963
from

mo.
ago

mo.
ago

mo.
ago

mo.
ago

mo.
ago

SUM M ARY
Aug. 1963
from

8
mos.
1963
from
year
ago

Aug. 1963
from

year
ago

mo.
ago

year
ago

+ 2

mo.
ago

+

LOCAL
CHANGES

+ 5

+ 1

8
mos.
1963
from
year
ago

M AN UFACTU RIN G
Electric power consumed........... + 5
Man-hours, to tal*....................... + 1
0
Employment, to tal.........................
W a g e income*............................. + 1

+ 8
- 1
0
+ 2

+ 4
- 2
- 1
+ 1

1

+

1

C O N S T R U C T IO N ” ....................... + 3

- 8

- 8

-

2

+ 12

+33

+ 9

+56

+ 15

+ 7

TRADE*”
Department store sales................
Department store stocks..............

+ 3
0

0

+ 4
- 1

+ 9
+ 4

+ 4

0 -

B A N K IN G
(All member banks)
Deposits........................................
Loans.............................................
Investments....................................
U.S. Govt, securities..................
O ther..........................................
Check payments............................

+ 1
+ 2

i

-

year
ago

1

year
ago

year
ago

0

Lancaster............ + 1
Philadelphia........

0 -

0 + 4 -

— 8 + 12

1 + 7 + 9 + 2 -

1 + 3 + 2 -

year
ago

+ 4 + 9

+ 1 + 2 + 1 + 3

+ 8

COAL PR O D U C T IO N ..................... +65

year
ago

1 + 1 + 2 -

i

- 6 + 3

i

- 5 + 7

Reading.............. + 2 + 1 + 1 + 7 + 9 + 12 + 3 - 3 - 2 + 7
-

2
0
0
- 1
+ 3
- 6t

+
+
+
+
+

5
7
4
2
19
7f

+

n

6
8
5
1
19
9t

2
0
- 1
- 3
+ 2
- 5

+ 7
+ 1
1
+ 3
- 6
+23
+ 6

+ 7
+ 1
1
+ 4
- 3
+23
+ 7

+ 2t

0
0

0
+ 2

+

+
+
+
+
+

-

’ Production workers only.
’ ’ Value of contracts.
’ ’ ’ Adjusted for seasonal variation.




Trenton ..............

+ 3 - 4 + 4 - 3 + 5 + 9 -

1 + 6 - 8

0 + 4 + 3 + 1 - 2 + 8 + 5 +22
1

Wilkes-Barre. . . . + 1 + 1

-17

0
- 5

0 + 2 + 4 + 10 - 2 + 9 - 8 + 4

Wilmington......... - 2 + 5 - 5 + 8 - 6 - 7 - 2 + 1 - 5 + 7

PRICES
Consumer......................................

Scranton............

ot

0
1

t20 Cities
^Philadelphia

York................... + 3 -

3 + 3

0 + 9 + 7

+ 1 + 1 - 5

0

’ Not restricted to corporate limits of cities but covers areas of one or more
counties.
fAdjusted for seasonal variation.