View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FEDERAL

I

RESERVE

BANK

OF

PHILADELPHIA

W ill Growth Stop the Gold Drain?
Dowsing for the Investment Stream




NOVEMBER

1963

BUSINESS REVIEW

is produced in the Department of Research. Jack C. Rothwell was primarily respon­
sible for the article, "W ill Growth Stop the Gold D rain?" and John F. O'Leary, Jr. for "Dowsing for the Investment
Stream." The authors will be glad to receive comments on their articles.
Requests for additional copies should be addressed to Bank and Public Relations, Federal Reserve Bank of
Philadelphia, Philadelphia I, Pennsylvania.



Some say an increase in the rate of economic growth in this country will
help solve our balance-of-payments problem and stem the outflow of gold to
foreign lands. In this article we examine the reasoning behind this argument
and take a look at some evidence which may help answer the question . . .

WILL GROWTH
STOP THE
GOLD DRAIN?
Eighty-five feet below the busy streets of Man­

we have been paying more out to foreign nations

hattan lies a treasure in gold— over $13 billion

for imports, investments, military aid, and the

cast in bricks, truncated pyramids, and thin
sash-weight bars. Each bar bears the seal of its

like than we have received from them for our

caster, some exotic Oriental gold merchant, or

international

perhaps the mighty House of Rothschild. And

difference, we have paid out gold and dollars,

each bar is carefully stacked in one of 118 steel

and foreigners have accumulated our short-term

exports of goods and services and from other
transactions.

To

make

up

the

wire cages, many of which evidence the pre­

I.O.U.’s in such forms as Treasury bills and

serve of a particular foreign government or

commercial bank time deposits.

central bank.

Of course, a nation, much like an individual,

In recent years, long hours have been spent

can’t go on forever spending more than it

transferring gold bars in and out of these cages.

receives. So we have been doing many things

The men putting in these hours are the physical

to try and decrease our deficit. These things

manifestation of a problem which has plagued

range all the way from Government-sponsored

this nation for over six years. They are em­

programs to expand exports to a decrease in the

ployees of the Federal Reserve Bank of New

dollar value of duty-free goods that American

York and much of the metal they put into the

tourists may bring in from abroad. Yet the

cages marks the physical shift of gold from

deficit has continued.

States ownership to that of foreign

In recent months a relatively new balance-of-

nations. It is partial settlement of our “ balance-

payments thesis has gained widespread accept­

of-payments deficit.”

ance: that the deficit can be relieved through

United

The payments deficit stems from the fact that




an acceleration in the rate of economic growth

3

business review

in this nation. In this article we examine the

and our import-threatened industries to compete

degree of confidence which might be accorded

with foreign goods.

this thesis on the basis of experience with

It is recognized that the rise in incomes
created by a hike in the growth rate might mean

growth and the balance of payments.
But first, just what is the reasoning behind

an increase in imports and thus an increased
outflow of dollars for imported goods. But the

the growth thesis?

growth proposition concludes that the combina­

REASONING

tion of

The rationale behind the growth proposition

(a)

the decrease in capital flowing

abroad and (b) the better competitive position

and

of our export and import industries will provide

trade transactions between this country and

more than enough counterforce to make up the

concerns

both

the international

capital

foreign nations. It is reasoned, first of all, that

increased

more rapid economic growth in the United

reduction in our deficit.

States will make this nation more attractive to
foreign and domestic investors— more attractive

imports

and still contribute to

a

This is the argument. Let us examine it in the
light of experience.

because accelerating growth will create a greater
demand for capital and a rise in profits and

TECHNIQUE OF ANALYSIS

interest rates. Greater demand for capital and

Since the theory hinges on growth, one might

higher profits and interest rates will cause both

go back in history, look at periods characterized

domestic and foreign investors to channel more

by substantially differing rates of

of their funds into United States investments—

growth, and see how our balance of payments

into new plant and equipment, purchases of

actually

stocks and bonds, and into short-term invest­

growth, for example, did the rate of capital

ments, such as Treasury bills. The increased

outflow really decline in response to greater

investment at home, it is reasoned, will mean

demands for capital and higher profits and

a

reduction

of

investment

funds

flowing

abroad— funds that reached a $3.3 billion total

behaved.

During

periods

economic
of

fastest

interest rates? And what actually happened to
the trade balance?
To answer these questions, balance-of-pay-

last year.
It is also reasoned that accelerating economic

ments flows first were examined during different

growth would have favorable effects on our trade

phases of the business cycle. Every cycle since

position. A higher growth^ rate, the argument

1920 was analyzed to see if discernible patterns

goes, would increase income and demand for

of behavior could be established for balance-of-

goods. Greater demands for goods during a

payments items as the cycle phase shifted from

period of less than full employment would in­

fast growth to slow growth to recession. Then

crease production from present levels, thereby

longer time spans were examined to see if the

doing two things: (a) cutting unit costs of pro­

expected growth patterns emerged. First, then,

duction and (b) providing more profits so busi­

how did the balance of payments behave over

ness could modernize plant and equipment, thus

the differing growth phases of the business

further cutting costs. This double-edged decrease

cycle? The answer to this question is provided

in costs would help both our export industries

in the tables which follow. But before we ex­

4




business review

amine the findings, let us take a look at the

into two time periods: the period 1920-1962

structure of the tables.

and the sub-period 1945-1962. Of course, our
balance-of-payments

data

were

not

so good

THE TABLES

during the earlier years, but the similarity of

Column 1 of the first three tables contains sev­

behavior during the two periods is an indication

eral balance-of-payments items, both individual

that the data may be adequate for the type of

entries and selected groupings. First, we have

analysis employed.

the total of net private capital flows abroad and

Now to the findings of the analysis. What

then the sub-items which compose these cap­

actually happened to our balance-of-payments

ital flows.

items as we moved from slower to faster rates

Next we have private capital outflows and for­

of growth?

RESULTS

eign capital flowing in, and the difference be­
tween the two, both including and excluding a

Looking first at the net private capital flow

portion of errors and omissions. (Errors and

abroad in Table I, we see a different sort of

omissions is a catch-all category which includes

picture than we might have anticipated, given

flows of funds which have gone undetected in

the growth thesis. In only two out of the ten

the process of gathering together the balance-of-

cycles composing the 1920-1962 period (and

payments statistics. The category is thought to

also in only 20 per cent of the postwar cycles)

be composed of a sizable portion of undetected

was our balance of payments better off in the

capital flows.)

fast growth or expansion phase than it was in
the recession phase.

Next comes our imports and exports, our net
export balance, and finally we have combined

Looking next at the items composing our net

net capital flows, trade balance, and errors and

private capital flow abroad, we see that all

omissions.

contributed to an improvement more often in

The remaining columns contain a series of

recessions than in the accompanying expansion

ratios for each balance-of-payments item and

phase. The pattern is even more pronounced in

group. The ratios tell us the percentage of

the postwar cycles than in the period as a whole.

business cycles in which an improvement oc­

When we add one-half of errors and omissions

curred as we changed from a slower to a faster

to the net private capital flow abroad,1 we see

rate of growth. For example, if in eight of the

a fifty-fifty pattern during the entire period

ten cycles occurring since 1920 the capital out­

1920-1962,

flow slowed down as we moved from recession

improvement in expansions or recessions. In the

to expansion, then we would put 80 per cent in

postwar period, however, there is still a slight

the expansion column and 20 per cent in the

edge in favor of improvements during recessions.

indicating

no

preponderance

of

recession column, indicating that capital flows

After calculating the difference between U. S.

contributed to an improvement in our balance

capital outflows and foreign capital inflows, we

of payments 80 per cent of the time as we

once more see a fifty-fifty pattern during the

changed from recession to the faster growth

1920—1962 period and a slight edge in favor of 1

phase.
The cycles in the first two tables are broken




1
N o one really knows the am ount of undetected ca p ital flows
counted as e rrors and om issions. The 50 pe r cent figu re m igh t be
con sid e re d a rule o f thum b.

5

business review

TABLE

I

Per C e n t of Total Business C yc le s D u rin g W h ic h Item C o n trib u te d to an Im prove m e nt
in the Balance of Paym ents*
Balance-of-Paym ents Item

1920-1962 (10 Expansions, 10 Recessions)

1945-1962 (5 Expansions, 5 Recessions)

Expansions

Recessions

Expansions

R ecessions

20ft
33**
37**
4 4**

80 ft
6 7**
63**
56**

201
20f
40
20f

80f
80f
60
801

1. N e t private ca p ita l flows a b ro a d
(a) Direct investm ents
(b ) Long-term p o rtfo lio investm ents
(c) Short-term investm ents
N e t private ca p ita l flows a b ro a d plus one-half
errors and om issions
2. Foreign d irect and long-term p o rtfo lio investm ent
in the U. S.
3. U.S. private ca p ita l flows less fore ig n d ire c t and
long-term investm ent
A b o v e plus one-half errors and om issions
4. Exports of g o o d s and services
(e xclu ding m ilitary transactions)
5. Im ports of g o o d s and services
6. N e t export ba lance
7. N e t export b a lance less difference in U.S. ca p ital
outflows and fo re ign ca p ita l inflows
A b o v e in c lu d in g total of errors and om issions

50

50

40

60

70

30

80

20 f

50
40
60

50
60
40

40
40
60

60
60
40

30
50

70
50

20 f
60

80f
40

50
60

50
40

60
60

40
40

* In this and follow in g tab le s b a lance -of-p aym e nts items from which the ratios are d e rive d are expressed in a v e ra g e m onthly flows of funds.
A n im provem ent d u rin g the b oom phase (say in ca p ital account) w ould occur if the rate of outflow of funds d e cre a se d relative to that in
the p re ce d in g recession p e rio d o r if an outflow of funds in the recession were re placed by an inflow. N.B.E.R. reference da te s were used to
determ ine cycle p e rio d s and quarte rly b a lance -of-p aym e nts data (yearly data in the earlie r p e rio d ) were inte rpolate d to a rrive at the
a v e ra ge m onthly flows of funds for each cycle.
* * O d d num ber because a v a ila b ility of da ta perm its co m p a riso n of fewer cycles, 9 for d ire c t investm ent and short-term cap ital, 8 for lo n g ­
term po rtfo lio investm ent.
ft Statistically sign ifica n t at 9 0 % level of confidence,
t Statistically sign ifica n t at 8 0 % level of confidence.

improvement during recessions for the postwar
period.
Adding one-half of errors and omissions to

ten cycles, this combination of items shows
improvement as we move from slow to fast
growth; during four out of ten cycles, it shows

the U. S. capital flow changes the pattern only

deterioration.

slightly. In both periods we are better off six out

significance

of ten recessions and four out of ten booms.

which

Indeed,

the test for statistical

(the daggers on the table show

items may

be considered

statistically

Looking next at the trade picture, our net

significant) tells us that we can have virtually

export balance shows a fifty-fifty pattern during

no confidence that the 60^10 pattern did not

the entire period indicating no preponderance

evolve simply due to chance.2

of improvements in expansions or recessions. In

In summary, then, private U. S. capital tends

the postwar period, a slight edge appears during

most often to cause deterioration rather than

the expansion phase.
The last entry in Table I combines our capital

improvement as we move from recession to
expansion. But after adding in errors and omis­

flows, net export balance, and errors and omis­

sions and foreign capital inflows, the total cap­

sions. As can be seen, this most comprehensive

ital

measure of our balance-of-payments performance

2 The ch i-square test was used to d eterm ine statistical sig n ifi­
cance. The hypothesis form ulate d was that the item s contrib ute d
redom inantly to neither im prove m e nt nor d e te riora tion in our
alance of paym ents d u rin g either phase of the cycle. A rejection
of this hypothesis on the basis of the test in d ic ate d that an item
d id indeed con trib ute pre d o m in a n tly to im prove m e nt o r de te rio ra ­
tion. The p e rce n ta ge ind icates the d e g re e of con fide nce (i.e., 80 per
cent, 90 per cent) with which the hypothesis was rejected. This co n ­
fidence d id not prove extrem ely high even for the item s w here the
hypothesis was rejected.

gives a slight edge to improvements during the
expansion phase. This is true both for the
1920-1962 period and the 1945-1962 period.
Yet the margin is small. During six out of

6




account

shows

little

preponderance

for

business review

TABLE

II

Per C e n t of Total Business C y c le s D u rin g W h ic h Item C o n trib u te d to an Im provem ent
in the Balance of Paym ents
(Six M o n th s L a g in Balance-of-Paym ents Item s)
Balance-of-P aym ents Item

1920-1962 (10 Expansions, 10 Recessions)
Expansions

1. N e t p riva te c a p ita l flows a b ro a d
(a) Direct investm ents
(b ) Long-term p o rtfo lio investm ents
(c) Short-term investm ents
N e t p riva te ca p ital flows a b ro a d plus one-half
errors a nd o m issions
2. F o re ig n d ire c t and lon g-term p o rtfo lio investm ent
in the U. S.
3. U.S. private ca p ita l flows less fo re ign d ire c t and
lon g-term investm ent
A b o v e plus o ne-half errors and om issions
4. Exports of g o o d s and services
(exc lu d in g m ilita ry transactions)
5. Im p o rts of g o o d s and services
6. N e t export b a lance
7. N e t export b a lan c e less difference in U.S. ca p ital
outflow s and fo re ign ca p ita l inflows
A b o v e in c lu d in g total of errors and om issions

Recessions

1945-1962 (5 Expansions, 5 Recessions)
Expansions

Recessions

30
30
50*
56*

70
70
50
44

50

50

40

60

60

40

60

40

60
50

40
50

60
60

40
40

80ft

2 0 ft

toot

iott

0

40

90ff
60

40

60f

60
50

40
50

60
40

40
60

20 f
20 f

80t
80t

40
60

40

60

ot
100

* O d d num ber because a v a ila b ility of d a ta perm its com p a rison of fewer cycles, 8 fo r long-term p o rtfo lio investm ent and 9 for short-term
investm ent.
ft Sta tistica lly sign ifica n t at 9 0 % level of confidence,
t Statistica lly sign ifica n t at 8 0 % level of confidence.

improvement during either the expansion or

the payments items. Yet despite the lag adjust­

recession phase. Similarly, out net export bal­

ment, the main groups of items show a striking

ance shows no marked tendency toward improve­
ment in either expansions or recessions. The

similarity to those in Table I.
The total U. S. private capital outflow tends

same thing is true when we group capital, the

to cause deterioration in the balance of payments

net export balance, and errors and omissions.

as we move from recession to expansion but,

One would thus be hard pressed to make a case

after correcting for errors and omissions and

for the growth thesis on the basis of Table I.

also when coupled with foreign capital inflows,

But let us go a step further. It is quite possible

the combined capital account once more shows

that the balance of payments responds to an

little preponderance for

increase in the rate of growth only after a time

either the expansion or recession phase.3

improvement during

lag. One might reason, for example, that (a) it

Similarly, the net export balance exhibits no

takes time for increased growth to be reflected

very significant preponderance of improvements

in rising profits and interest rates, (b) it takes

in either phase. The same pattern holds true

time for investors to become aware of the

when we group together the combined capital, the

increased

growth, higher interest rates, and

net export balance, and errors and omissions.

profits in this country and (c) time is required

Thus, on the basis of Table II, one would also be

for the physical arrangements necessary to direct

hard pressed to make a case for the growth

a larger volume of investment into the domestic

hypothesis.

economy.
Table II shows the recession-expansion com­
parison adjusted to include a six-month lag in




Yet it is still possible that a very fast rate of
3
It should be noted, however, that short-term ca p ital flows now
show a p re d o m in a n ce of im prove m e nts as the cycle m oves from
recession to e xpansion (the postw ar p e rio d ).

7

business review

T A B L E 111
Per C e n t o f T otal Busin ess C y c le s D u r in g W h ic h
Item C o n t r ib u t e d to an Im p r o v e m e n t in the
B a la n c e o f P a ym e n ts

B a la n c e -o f-P a y m e n ts Item

1 9 4 5 -1 9 6 2

(5 R e c essions, 5 E x p a n sio n s)

F a st-G ro w th Pha se
1. N e t p riv a te c a p ita l flow s a b r o a d

S ta b ilit y

80f

20+

D ire c t in v e stm e n ts

60

40

(b )

L o n g -te rm p o r tfo lio in v e stm e n ts

80+

20+

(c )

S h o rt-te rm in v e stm e n ts

60

40

60

40

40

60

(a )

N e t p riva te c a p ita l flow s a b r o a d plus o n e -h a lf errors an d
o m issio n s
2. F o re ig n d ir e c t
in the U. S.

and

lo n g -te rm

3. U .S. p riv a te ca p ita ! flow s
lo n g -te rm in v e stm e n t

p o rtfo lio

in v e stm e n t

less fo re ig n

d ire c t

an d

A b o v e plu s o n e -h a lf e rro rs a n d o m issio n s
4. Exp o rts o f g o o d s a n d se rvice s
(e x c lu d in g m ilita ry tra n sa c tio n s)

20+
40

0+

5. Im p o rts o f g o o d s a n d se rvice s

100+

100+

0+

0+

100+

6. N e t e x p o rt b a la n c e
7. N e t e x p o rt b a la n c e less d iffe re n c e in
o u tflo w s a n d f o re ig n c a p ita l inflow s

80+
60

U .S. ca p ita l

A b o v e in c lu d in g total o f e rrors a n d o m issio n s

40

60

20+

8 0+

f Statistically significant at the 8 0% level of confidence.

cyclical growth might result in a balance-of-

omissions, however, both accounts drop down

payments pattern more in keeping with the

to

growth hypothesis. To test this possibility, a

phase improvements during only 60 per cent

comparison was made of the behavior of the

of the cycles.

post-World War II balance-of-payments items

a statistically insignificant level:

growth-

The net export balance in every cycle shows

within the expansion phase: as the cycle moved

deterioration in the fast-growth phase and im­

from the trough into the very fast upward phase

provement in the stability phase.

and then leveled off into the phase of relative

Finally, when we combine capital, the export

stability or “ bumping along the top” as it is

balance, and errors and omissions, we have im­

sometimes called. What, then, happened as the

provement during the fast-growth phase during

cycle moved from fast growth to stability? In

only one out of five cycles. The predominance

fact, an interesting change occurred.

of capital account improvements during the

As shown in Table III, we have a concentra­
tion of improvements in capital flows during the
fast-growth phase. Both (a) U. S. private net
capital and (b)

the combined U. S. outflow

upswing erodes under the pressure of the export
balance and errors and omissions.
Thus, even though the growth hypothesis looks
a little better on capital account in the fast-

and foreign inflow accounts show improvement

growth/stability comparison, by no means are

in 80 per cent of the cycles during the fast-

we able to establish the proposition.

growth phase. When we include errors and

8




But so much for the cycle. Let us now look

business review

TABLE

IV

A v e r a g e A n n u a l Pep C e n t C h a n g e in Selected Balance-of-Paym ents Flows
O v e r Pe riod s A sso c ia te d W ith Differential Rates of E con om ic G ro w th *
(m inus sig n s ind icate a d e te riora tion in the b a lance of paym ents)

Balance-of-Paym ents Item s

1. N e t private ca p ita l flows a b ro a d
(a) D irect investm ents
(b ) Long-term p o rtfo lio investm ents
(c) Short-term investm ents
N e t priv a te c a p ital plus one-half errors and
o m issions
2. U.S. priv a te ca p ita l outflow s plus one -half errors
a nd om issio n s less fore ig n d ire c t and long-term
p o rtfo lio c a p ita l inflows
3. N e t e xport ba lance
4. N e t e xport b a lance less c o m b in e d U.S. and foreign
ca p ita l flows
5. A b o v e in c lu d in g 100% of errors and om issions

1921-29

1930-39

1948-56

1959-62

-

8.6
N .A .
N .A .
N .A .

+
+
—

11.8
11.6
6.0
4.4

— 24.7
— 12.6
- 59.7
— 137.2

—
-

6.1
1.0
8.3
14.6

— 11.5

+ 14.1

— 86.3

-

4.3

- 4.0
— 2.4

+
+

-

53.5
6.6

+

15.1
54.4

— 5.4
- 9.2

+ 7.8
+ 7.1

—

9.6
9.4

7.4
5.8

+ 13 0 .9
+ 70.2

* Per cent c h a n g e ov e r the p e rio d is ca lculate d from an a v e ra g e for the first two years o f the p e rio d to an a v e ra g e of the last two. Sim p le
annual rates o f grow th as m easured by the Industrial Produ ction Index are as follow s: 1921-29, 11.6%; 1930-39, 2 .3 % ; 1948-56, 6 .0 % ; 1959—
62, 4 .0 % .

at the balance-of-payments items over longer

does not inspire confidence in the validity of

time periods.

the growth thesis.

GROWTH AND THE BALANCE OF PAYMENTS
OVER LONGER PERIODS OF TIME

percentage increases in private capital flowing

As for the individual items in Table IV,
abroad are greater during the fast-growth periods

annual percentage

(though this tendency is less evident when U. S.

changes in selected balance-of-payments items

Table

IV

shows

average

during two fast-growth periods, 1921-1929 and

capital outflows are coupled with foreign capital
inflows). The net export balance deteriorates

1948—1956 and two relatively slow-growth peri­

during the fast-growth periods and improves

ods, 1930-1939 and 1959-1962. Of course, the

during the slow-growth years, as does the group­

depression period is associated with rather ex­

ing of capital, net export balance, and errors
and omissions.

traordinary events affecting the world economy,
but since the years for which we have balanceof-payments data are limited, the period is in­

CONCLUSIONS

cluded with the obvious qualification that the

One might be tempted to draw the conclusion

period may not be representative.

from this analysis that there is a slight edge in

In general, Table IV suggests that fast-growth

favor of the proposition that a faster rate of

periods are associated with deterioration in the

growth tends to promote a worsening in the

balance of payments (increases in outflows of

balance of payments; that imports tend to grow

funds or decreases in inflows) and slow-growth

faster

periods with improvement. The table should not

periods, and that businessmen tend to invest

be taken, however, as evidence that the reverse

more at home— but also more abroad during

of the growth hypothesis is true. The observa­

expansions

tions are too few, data in the earlier period are

expand in Cincinnati, and while we’re at it we

not

two

might reconsider the subsidiary in Milan” —

reservations. Rather one might say that the table

or— “ Things look good the world over so let’s

without

question— to mention




just

than

exports

during

the

fast-growth

(e.g., “ Profits look good so let’s

9

business review

stretch out for an extra 1 per cent on a Canadian

ency for an acceleration in the rate of growth

issue” ) .

to bring about an improvement in our balance

Yet such a conclusion is probably unwar­
ranted. After all (and as previously mentioned)

of payments.
Given this conclusion, then, what guidance

the balance-of-payments observations are rela­

might this study offer the policymaker? Perhaps

tively few; the results of all comparisons were

the following.

the data may be

An increase in the rate of economic growth

questioned; there is some trend in the cyclical

may help relieve our balance-of-payments deficit.

not uniform in outcome;

comparisons (though from an examination of

Then again, it may not. Hence the wisdom which

the data, this problem

may be gained from this study is perhaps this:

is considered to be

minimal).

we should not count too heavily on growth as

To be on firmer ground one might conclude

an equilibrating force; we should not put all our

instead that the evidence presented suggests

eggs in this basket; we should not even commit

that the growth thesis may be a case of over­

half our eggs. Instead, we should continue to

simplification, that the behavior of our bal­

strive

ance of payments is extremely complex and

across the entire broad spectrum of public and

defies simple explanation, that there is simply

private policy. And perhaps we should intensify

no clear-cut and statistically discernible tend­

our efforts.

10




for

balance-of-payments

equilibrium

DOWSING
FOR THE
INVESTMENT
STREAM

. . . This Bank’s survey indicates manufacturing firms anticipate reduced
capital expenditures during 1 9 6 4 . W hy?
Autumn is a time of falling leaves, air scented

new streams and reservoirs by hiring a hydrolo­

by pungent smoke, and hobgoblins. For some,

gist. His electronic devices can locate hidden

fall means football games and weenie roasts. If

underground springs and wells— your problem is

you happen to be a borough or town official

solved. Should he fail, you can always “ dowse.”

somewhere in the Third District of the Federal
Reserve System, this is the time of year when

Enter the “dowser”

the long, hot summer is over. The extended dry

Somewhat less scientific, but reputedly more

season has all the proportions of a drought, so

effective than all the “ new-fangled contraptions”

you compute water reserves and seek new sources

for locating a stream is that practitioner of the

to rebuild depleted water supplies.

ancient

Using the modern scientific approach, you find




and

venerable

art

of

dowsing,

the

“ dowser.” In caricatures, he is depicted as a

11

business review

hoary gentleman possessing some sort of mysti­
cal relationship with the elements who can find
water where it “ ain’t.” The equipment he uses
is a divining rod— a forked stick, preferably

ESTIMATED CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
OF MANUFACTURERS
DELAWARE AND LEHIGH VALLEYS
R egion and Industry

Expenditures
(m illions of d o lla rs)

from the witch hazel shrub. To dowse, one
grasps the divining rod firmly by the forks,
holds the rod out in front, closes his eyes and
walks. When the dowser is over water, the divin­
ing rod tilts downward indicating where to dig.
Depending on the size of

the underground

stream, the rod will react anyway from twitchings to violent jerks.

Whittling the hazel stick
Twice a year, in the fall and spring, we at the
Philadelphia Bank look for streams. Attempts
are made to locate and measure that highly
important stream in economic activity— the in­
vestment stream. In the fall, we ask manufac­
turers in the Delaware and Lehigh Valleys to
estimate their capital expenditures on plant and
equipment for the coming year.1 The following

1963
Phila de lphia M e tro p o lita n A re a
A ll M a n u fac tu rin g
D u rable s
Lum be r & furniture
Stone, clay, & glass
Prim ary m etals
F a brica te d m etals
M a ch in e ry (excl. elec.)
Electrical m achinery
T ransportation equipm e nt
Instrum ents & m iscellaneous
N o n d u ra b le s
Food & to b a cc o
Textiles
A p p a re l
Paper
Printing & p u b lish in g
C h e m ica ls
Petroleum & coal
R u b b e r & leather
Lehigh V alley
A ll M a n u fac tu rin g
D u rable s
N o n d u ra b le s
Trenton
A ll M a n u fac tu rin g
Du rables
N o n d u ra b le s
W ilm in g to n
A ll M a n u fac tu rin g
D u rable s
N o n d u ra b le s
Total (4 areas)

1964

$349.1
137.4
1.5
22.0
15.5
20.9
29.2
28.6
11.9
7.8
211.7
45.8
12.2
3.0
23.4
18.7
68.9
39.2
0.5

$326.9
130.9
1.6
17.3
21.9
17.5
28.3
29.4
6.6
8.3
196.0
28.3
15.9
1.9
33.1
7.8
68.3
40.2
0.5

68.6
56.0
12.6

45.9
34.3
11.6

— 33.1
— 38.8
— 7.9

22.3
14.8
7.5

19.1
13.6
5.5

— 14.4
— 8.1
- 26.7

44.8
10.2
34.6
484.8

54.1
20.6
33.5
446.0

+ 20.8
+ 102.0
3.2
— 8.0

spring a check-up survey is made. In the spec­
trum of methodology, the survey ranks well
above crystal-ball gazing and reading tea leaves,
but somewhat less than the most sophisticated
techniques currently fashionable in economic
research and survey work.

PER CENT

For 1964— torrent or trickle?
The forked rod vibrated a little! Our most re­
cent survey

indicates

manufacturers

in

the

Philadelphia Metropolitan Area plan to spend
$327 million on plant and equipment in 1964.
This represents a decline— 6 per cent— from the
1963 final estimate of $349 million. Through­
out the other areas surveyed the pattern is the
same, with the exception of the Wilmington
1 The survey includ es m anufa cturing firm s in _ four sta nd a rd
m etropolitan statistical areas: P hila de lphia, W ilm in g to n , Trenton,
and A llentow n-Bethlehem -Easton.

12




ANTICIPATED CHANGE IN CAPITAL
EXPENDITURES 1964-65
Delaware and Lehigh Valleys.

Percent
Change
1963-1964

—
+
—
+
—
+
—
+
—
+
—
+
—
+

6 .4 %
4.7
6.7
21.4
41.3
16.3
3.1
2.8
44.5
6.4
7.4
38.2
30.3
36.7
41.5
58.3
0.9
2.6
0

business review

EXPECTATIONS OF MANUFACTURERS— PHILADELPHIA METROPOLITAN AREA
Production trend.

Inventory expectations for 1964.

PER CENT

PER CENT

area. Lehigh Valley and Trenton registered de­

almost evenly between those who foresee no sub­

clines— 33

respectively.

stantial change occurring through the second

Wilmington, however, flows in the other direc­

quarter of 1964 and those who predict some

tion. Burgeoned by the durable goods manu­

change. Among the manufacturers who antici­

facturers in that area, Wilmington anticipates

pate change, the vast majority are optimistic. In

an increase of 21 per cent over its 1963 capital

the second quarter 1964, for example, 38 per

expenditures. For the entire area surveyed, the
investment stream anticipated for 1964 is a bit

cent of all manufacturers anticipate increases
in production.

and

14

per

cent,

smaller than 1963— $446 million versus $485
million, a decline of 8 per cent.
Looking further into the future, manufacturers

On balance, little change in inventory accumu­
lation is expected during 1964. Most firms— 70
per cent— see no change in inventories, while

were asked to reveal their thoughts on capital
expenditures for 1965. Since 1965 is more re­
mote, we asked simply for an indication of the

EMPLOYMENT EXPECTATIONS OF PHILADELPHIA
MANUFACTURERS
Q U A R T E R L Y IN D E X E S
(Third Q u a rte r = 100)

anticipated direction of change in capital ex­
penditures for 1965. The pattern of expectations

Industry

among the four areas reveals a high correspond­
ence of feelings about the future. In each of the
areas surveyed, about the same proportions—
approximately 68 per cent— see little change in
expenditures for 1965. Among those who fore­
see changes, the scales balance in the direction
of increased expenditures.

Production, inventory, and employment
Opinion regarding production trends is divided




1963
Third

A ll M a n u fa c tu rin g
D u rable s
Lum be r & furniture
Stone, clay & g la ss
Prim ary m etals
F a b rica te d m etals
M a ch in e ry (excl. eiec.)
Electrical m achinery
T ransportation e q uip m e nt
Instrum ents & misc.
N o n d u ra b le s
Food & to b a c c o
Textiles
A p p a re l
Paper
Printing & p u b lish in g
C h e m ica ls
Petroleum & coal
R u b b e r & leather

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

1964

Fourth

First

Second

99.4
99.3
93.1
99.2
100.2
99.7
100.6
98.0
97.6
100.2
99.4
99.7
97.4
104.0
98.9
99.1
99.2
98.1
103.4

100.2
100.6
91.8
102.5
99.6
100.3
101.7
102.9
95.9
102.3
99.8
99.5
98.6
107.5
98.7
98.8
99.2
97.1
103.4

100.1
100.2
97.9
102.9
100.8
101.7
102.8
102.1
91.6
102.7
100.0
99.6
99.4
106.0
99.5
99.4
99.5
97.0
101.7

13

business review

the changes that are foreseen approximately
cancel out on a percentage basis. It should be
noted, however, that the percentage changes do
not reflect the dollar amounts of change for the
manufacturers who see change occurring. Yet,
the over-all pattern is shaped in the direction
of no change.
Employment estimates produce a picture of
relative stability. Using the third quarter 1963
as a base, indexes for the next three quarters
show little change in employment levels. For the

COM PARISONS OF CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
ESTIMATES
All manufacturing industries— Philadelphia Metropolitan
Area.
In each of the charts below, an estimate occurring later
in time is expressed as a percentage of an earlier esti­
mate. Points below 100 indicate the prior figure was an
overestimate; above 100 signifies underestimation. The
charts show that the year-ahead estimates tended to be
low, except for the recession years of 1954, 1958, and
1961. Subsequently, the fall estimates have been revised
upward. The spring estimates, however, tended to be
closer to actual expenditures. These errors were almost
evenly divided between under and overestimation.
nr-n « K1T

A

PERCENT

F IN A L E S T IM A T E A S
O F P R E C E D I N G F A L L E S T IM A T E

Philadelphia area, all manufacturing firms ex­
pect employment in the middle of 1964 to be
only 1 basis point

(l/1 0 th

of 1 per cent)

higher.
The results of this Bank’s most recent “ dows­
ing” expedition appear, then, to reflect rela­
tively small change in aggregate expenditures
on plant and equipment for 1964, with approxi­
mately the same levels of production, inventory,
and employment. Neither torrent nor trickle
has been located; rather, a somewhat dimin­
ished flow of investment, at a lesser rate than
the previous year.

The “earth-juice” theory
Readers may not agree that a reduction of 8 per
cent in capital spending represents a “ relatively
small change” in the investment stream. An
explanation is warranted.
Among dowsers, there is a strong preference
to dowse in the spring. Their efforts are more
often successful in that season. There is a sort of
theory underlying the causes for different de­
grees of success depending on the season of the

* N o t a v a ila b le p rio r to 1957.

year. This theory might be named the “ earthjuice” theory. In short, the theory postulates

The “ earth-juice” theory leads one to specu­

that the divining rod, qua survey, gives more

late that there may be some seasonal factor

reliable readings in the springtime because all

which influences this Bank’s survey of capital
expenditures. Looking back over the experience

the juices of the earth are flowing more freely.

14




business review

of the survey, one can see a pattern emerge. To

uncertainty developing in the minds of business­

see the pattern, we computed various ratios

men regarding prospects for the tax bill cur­

using the data gathered in past surveys.

rently being considered by Congress. In this

In summary, experience reveals that firms

bill, the investment credit will be more at­

tend to underestimate when they are projecting

tractive. Furthermore, the tax cut is designed to

capital expenditures a year ahead. Subsequently,

promote

in the spring, they tend to revise their estimates

The effects of an increase in consumer spending

upward. Lastly, the margin of error of estimates

are certainly less direct on investment in plant

is considerably reduced in the spring survey.

and equipment. First, manufacturers will in­

This may be accounted for by two factors:

crease output by greater utilization of existing

1. The projections are for a shorter time
span; and
2. the patterns in the economic fabric of the

increased consumption

expenditures.

capacity; thus there will be a lag between the
time when

increased

consumer

expenditures

register in the market place and the signal goes

year stand in deeper relief when viewed

up for increased expenditures on new plant and

from the springtime. By that time, the firms

equipment. The current survey may indicate

know better what to expect for the year.

manufacturers’ anticipations are not high for
1964, because they feel the tax cut will not

And a speculation

come until later in 1964, and it will take more

One cannot help but speculate on why the cur­

time for the effects of the tax cut to be felt

rent survey reveals “ cautious pessimism” for

in the market. They appear to have adopted

the year 1964. In 1963, investment received
stimulus from the tax credit program written

vestment in plant and equipment, inventory,

into the 1962 tax law. Looking to the future,

employment and production trends lend credi­

however, it may be that there is considerable

bility to this kind of speculation.




a “ wait-and-see” attitude. Their attitudes on in­

15

FOR THE R E C O R D

•

•

BILLIONS

IN DEX

•

$

MEMBER BANKS 3RD F.R.D.

BAN KIN G
A

Vi/

CHECK
PAYMENTS
(20 CITIES)

/»

/

/ \
i

A /
/ *

1

f *

i

\

y

■

1

1 *

1
1
f

1 /

a

A

l/
1/

\

""^ D EPO S IT S
_____________

+

LOANS

INVESTMENTS

s
2 YEARS
AGO

Third Federal
Reserve District

United States

Per cent change

Per cent change

YEAR
AGO

Factory*

SEPT.
1963

Department Storef

Employ­
ment

Payrolls

Sales

Stocks

Check
Payments

Per cent
change
Sept. 1963
from

Per cent
change
Sept. 1963
from

Per cent
change
Sept. 1963
from

Per cent
change
Sept. 1963
from

Per cent
change
Sept. 1963
from

year
ago

mo.
ago

mo.
ago

0

— i

+

1

0

SUMMARY
Sept. 1963
from
mo.
ago
M A NUFAC TURING
Production...................
Electric power consumed
Man-hours, total*........
Employment, total..........
W a ge income*.............

year
ago

+
+

1
0
2

+
+

8
1
0
3

+

+ 12

COAL P R O D U C T IO N ......

+ 2

+21

B A N K IN G
(All member banks)
Deposits.....................
loans...... ...................
Investments..................
U.S. Govt, securities....
Other.......................
Check payments............

+
+

year
ago

+

4

+

5

+

5

+

1

+

1

+

1

LOCAL
CHANGES

3
2

+
+

5
2
1
1

— 6
+10
0

+ 6
+ 3

— 9

+ 13

+

-

2

+12

+

-

5

+

2

+

+
+
+
+
-

•Production workers only.
**Value of contracts.
••‘Adjusted for seasonal variation.

1
2
1
0
3
It

+ 5
+ 8
+ 4
- 3
+22
+ 15t

+ 5
+ 8
+ 5
- 1
+19
+ 7t

+
+
+
+
+
+

2+ +

2t

mo.
ago

year
ago

mo.
ago

year
ago

1 + 3

-

8

+

4

— 5 +24

7

— 1 — 1 — 2

-

2

4

3
2
1
2
1
3

+ 8
+ 12
+ 4
- 5
+23
+ 18

+ 7
+ 11
+ 4
- 3
+23
+10

0
0

+

+

1
1

year
ago

0

Philadelphia. . . .

0

0
1

t20 Cities
^Philadelphia

-

1 +
0 +

1

— 1 — 4
+
W ilkes-Barre. . . .
Wilmington.......

bit +

year
ago

-

Lehigh Valley.. .

+

PRICES
W holesale..................
Consumer....................




mo.
ago

9
mos.
1963
from
year
ago

Sept. 1963
from

mo.
ago

C O N S T R U C T IO N **........

TRADE***
Department store sales___
Department store stocks...

9
mos.
1963
from
year
ago

York................

+

-

3 +

2 +

1 +

4 +

3 +

9

-

6 +

0

-

1 — 1 +

3

2 +17

4 +

5

0

— 5 +11

2

0 +

6

-

5

+

7

3 + 13

+ 12 + 16 + 15 +

5 + 11

-

2

2 +

6

2 +

4 +

7 +

6 +22
2

2 +12

0 + 10 +

1 +

1 +

-

-

0 +

1 -

i
0

0 + 17 — 4 + 2 4

8

-

6 +

1 -

— 1 +10

2 +

0

4 +

3 +18

6 +

-1 2

1

8

+

2

-

1 -

+11

*N o t restricted to corporate limits of cities but covers areas of one or more
counties.
fAdjusted for seasonal variation.