View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

NOVEMBER 1960

Capital Spending Turns Down
Furniture: Durable but Different

FEDERAL



RESERVE

BANK

OF

PHILADELPHIA

CAPITAL SPENDING
TURNS DOWN

Manufacturers in the Philadelphia area anticipate sub­
stantially lower capital expenditures in 1961 , after setting
a record in 1 9 6 0 .

Manufacturers in the Philadelphia Metropolitan

million, a projected drop of 20 per cent. In the

Area will spend an estimated $412 million on

history of our survey, such hesitancy is not

plant and equipment in 1960. This is about what

unusual, but it is by no means universal. Last

they reported last March, and is 8 per cent

year, for example, participants in the survey

greater than the year-ahead projections they

confidently predicted that capital expenditures

made in September 1959. It surpasses the previ­

in 1960 would substantially exceed 1959 totals,

ous highest estimate recorded in our survey of

and, as it turned out, they were right. This year

manufacturers’ capital expenditures— $391 mil­

that note of assuredness is absent.

lion in 1957.

Manufacturers of both durable and nondur­

The plant and equipment modernization which

able goods plan to spend less in 1961. Most

these figures reflect means that manufacturers

industries follow the same pattern; increases

here are backing with large capital outlays their

are few and scattered. The petroleum industry,

determination to compete for future business.

which in the spring cut back its plans of last

This in a sense is a vote of confidence in the

fall, has again cut back; however, this industry

prospects of their companies. But when we asked

plans to spend as much in 1961 as in 1960.

about capital spending in 1961, a note of hesi­

Printing and publishing, substantial activities

tancy became evident. The capital expenditures

in this area, plan to increase capital expenditures

planned for next year add up to only $330

20 per cent next year. Primary metals producers

2




business review

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES OF MANUFACTURERS,

AREAS IN THE SURVEY

1952-1961

Philadelphia Area.
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS

equipment in 1961 than in 1960. As in Phila­
delphia, most industries anticipate decreases,
and no really sizable increases are expected in
any category.
The su rv e y re v e a ls presen t anticipations;
these w ill ch an ge
Plans for capital spending are always under
review, continually affected by the ever-changing
crosscurrents of a particular industry or of

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES OF MANUFACTURERS,
1957-1961

Trenton, Wilmington, Lehigh Valley.
indicate they will sustain their present rate of
plant and equipment expenditures. But these
industries constitute a minority. No really large
increases show up in the returns. Companies
are being conservative about 1961.
N e ig h b o r in g a re a s: Trenton,
W ilm in g to n , the Lehigh V a lle y
Cautious planning is evident elsewhere in the
Third Federal Reserve District. In the counties
surrounding Trenton and Wilmington, and in
the Lehigh

Valley,

manufacturers expect

to

spend an average 13 per cent less on plant and




3

business review

PHILADELPHIA MANUFACTURERS’ EXPE
PRODUCTION,
Employment Projections by Quarters
(Index: Third quarter• = 100)
19 6 1
1 9 6 0
Second
First
Fourth
Third
99.1

98.8

Durables
Lumber & furniture

100.0
100.0
100.0

98.2
100.9

97.5
103.8

Stone, clay & glass

100.0

98.5

Primary metals

100.0

103.1

98.2
103.9

Fabricated metals
M achinery (excl. elec.)

100.0
100.0

99.0
98.9

All manufacturing

Electrical machinery
Transportation equipment

100.0

101.1
86.4

Instruments & miscellaneous

100.0

98.5

100.0

Nondurables

100.0

99.5
98.4
106.8
99.8

100.0

104.0
102.4

99.0
102.2

103.3

99.2

76.0

77.1
99.9

100.1

99.5
100.2

100.8
1 1 1.6

99.1

Food & tobacco
Textiles

100.0
100.0

99.5
100.2

98.3
107.7

A p parel
Paper

100.0

101.4

101.4

100.5

100.0

99.5

100.2

Printing & publishing

100.0

101.2

99.0
99.4

100.8

98.5

Chem icals

100.0

100.3

100.4

Petroleum & coal

100.0
100.0

99.0
99.6

99.0

99.4

99.3

100.6

Rubber & leather

the general economy. The figures reported here

decline turned out finally to be a decrease of

represent expectations for 1961. As it so often

20 per cent.

goes with expectations, they may not be realized.

Our survey of manufacturers’ capital spend­

It is quite possible that 1961 could bring with

ing in its present scope covering the eight-

it total capital expenditures commensurate with

county Philadelphia area began in 1952. An

those of 1960. This happened in 1956, when an

ideal set of anticipatory figures would always

anticipated 6 per cent drop turned into a 10 per

predict correctly. The survey’s figures have not

cent increase, and in 1955, when a projected

achieved this, which is not surprising. Business­

20 per cent drop was cut to 5 per cent by the

men change their minds as economic events un­

time final totals for the year were in. On the

fold. Consequently, next year we expect to find

other hand, in 1958 a planned 14 per cent

that actual expenditures will differ from those

4




business review

CTATIONS CONCERNING EMPLOYMENT,
AND INVENTORIES
Production as

Inventory Expectations, 1961

Per Cent of C apacity by Quarters
I 9 6 0
Third

Fourth

Per C ent of Total Firms Expecting:

19 6 1
First

ncrease

Second

N o Change

Decrease

78.0

78.9

79.5

80.4

1 1.6

72.3

16.1

72.9

74.4

75.3

20.7

87.5
82.4

88.9

1 1.8
16.7

67.5

88.7

76.6
91.4
84.4

10.0
17.4

83.3
65.0

25.0

52.2

30.4

7.7

69.2

23.1
12.9

66.5
79.9

75.9
64.7

67.6

79.0
71.6
78.3

9.3

77.8

20.0

41.5

85.1
41.6

50.0

OJ

61.1

77.8
78.4

OO

82.4

50.0

80.7

81.6

13.0

73.9

84.1

84.6

1 1.5

76.2

87.6
75.8

85.7
78.1
91.3

9.1
10.8

78.8
73.8
79.7

81.0
86.4

82.7
88.3
83.9
84.2

16.0
15.4
22.7

78.4

80.1

10.7

77.3

77.8

82.4

83.7

84.3

47.1

42.8

77.6
83.8

82.0
83.7

87.7
68.7

87.4
70.9

92.5
80.4
90.7

92.1

94.4

82.3
89.0
78.7

81.6
85.9

78.9
86.6
77.3

86.3
79.1

5.1

30.0
41.7
13.1
12.3
12.1
15.4
15.2

84.0
69.2

15.4

77.3
83.3
71.4

16.7
17.9

planned now. In such a situation, it is instruc­

1962

tive to study the biases in one’s data — the

The firms in Philadelphia providing informa­

changes which seem to deviate persistently from

tion concerning capital expenditures

the purely random. Our survey has tended to

seem to have suffered a fundamental impairment

do

not

be on the pessimistic side; only twice in eight

of confidence. Although most of them expect to

years has the gain realized been less than the

cut back spending substantially in 1961, opin­

predicted gain, or the realized loss greater than

ions about 1962 lean a little toward optimism.

that predicted. There is, therefore, at least as

Two-thirds of those responding said spending

good a chance that next year’s capital expendi­

in 1962 will equal 1961— not an unusual survey

tures will turn out higher than now anticipated

result in a year of uncertainty— but a clear

as that they will be lower.

majority of the remaining one-third feel that




5

business review

ANTICIPATED CHANGE IN CAPITAL EXPENDITURES

ESTIMATED CAPITAL EXPENDITURES OF
MANUFACTURERS

1961-1962—Philadelphia Area

1960-1961—Delaware and Lehigh Valleys

Per C e n t of

( M i l li o n s $ )

1 9 6 0 -6 1

I9 6 0

1961

41 1.9
191.1
2 .7

3 3 0 .3
170.3
1.7
6.9

—
-

19.8
10.9

—
—

3 7 .0
14.8

84.1
16.7

+
—

3 .4
15.7

17.8
2 8 .0
7.9
7.2
1 6 0 .0
2 1 .9
4 .6
2.2
14.4
18.7
4 6 .9
3 8 .6
12.7

—

2 9 .9
25.1

P h ila d e lp h ia M e t r o p o li t a n A r e a
A ll

m a n u fa c tu rin g
D u r a b le s
L u m b e r & f u r n it u r e
S to n e , c la y & g la ss
P r im a r y m e t a ls
F a b r ic a t e d m e t a ls
M a c h i n e r y (e x c l. e le c .)
E le c t r ic a l m a c h in e r y
T r a n s p o r t a t io n e q u ip m e n t
In s t r u m e n t s & m is c e l la n e o u s
N o n d u r a b le s
Food & to b a c c o
T e x t ile s
A p p a re l
Paper
P r in t in g & p u b l is h in g

8.1
8 1 .3
19.8
2 5 .4
3 7 .4
10.4
6.0
2 2 0 .8
3 6 .4
10.6
3.2
2 5 .8
15.4
7 6 .2
3 6 .7
16.5

F irm s E x p e c t in g :
In No
Dec r e a s e C h a n g e c r e a se

Per C e n t
Change

E x p e n d itu r e s

— 2 4 .0
+ 2 0 .0
— 2 7 .5
— 3 9 .8
— 5 6 .6
- 3 1 .3
— 4 4 .2
+ 2 1 .4

A ll m a n u fa c tu rin g
D u r a b le s

19.8
2 5 .6

6 6 .5
5 9 .4

13.7
15.0

L u m b e r & f u r n it u r e
S t o n e , c l a y & g la s s
P r im a r y m e t a ls

2 6 .7

6 0 .0

13.3

3 0 .0
21.1

5 5 .0
63.1

F a b r ic a t e d m e t a ls
M a c h i n e r y (e x c l. e le c .)

2 0 .5
2 3 .2
3 5 .0

6 1 .6
66.1
4 0 .0

15.0
15.8
17.9
10.7
2 5 .0

4 1 .7
23.1
15.0
2 7 .8
9.1

3 3 .3
6 9 .2
7 2 .4
6 6 .6
7 7 .3
9 0 .0
5 4 .2
6 5 .6
6 5 .2
57.1
7 5 .0

E le c t r ic a l m a c h in e r y
T r a n s p o r t a t io n e q u i p m e n t
In s t r u m e n t s & m is c e l la n e o u s
N o n d u r a b le s
Food & tobacco
T e x t ile s
A p p a re l
Paper
P r in t in g & p u b l is h in g
C h e m ic a ls
P e t r o le u m & c o a l
R u b b e r & le a t h e r

7.5
2 5 .0
17.2
8 .7
—

2 5 .0
7.7
12.6
5 .6
13.6
2 .5
2 0 .8
17.2
26.1
4 2 .9

—
+

3 8 .5
5.2

—

2 3 .0

2 0 .5

—

2 5 .7

8.1
12.4

-3 1 .9

15.7

—

2 1 .0

5 1 .7

4 6 .8

—

9.5

49.1
4 0 .3
8.8

4 4 .4
3 5 .8
8 .6

—
—
—

9 .6
1 1.2
2.3

ware and Lehigh Valley regions now plan to

their spending in 1962 will surpass 1961. Only

ing new highs in 1960. Plans for capital ex­

two important industries— chemicals

C h e m ic a ls
P e t r o le u m & c o a l
R u b b e r & le a t h e r

2 7 .6
1 1.9

D u r a b le s
N o n d u r a b le s
W i lm i n g t o n
A ll m a n u fa c tu rin g

D u r a b le s
N o n d u r a b le s

3 .6

result from increased efficiency, however, for

T re n to n
A ll m a n u fa c tu rin g

L e h ig h V a lle y
A ll m a n u fa c tu rin g

2 1 .4

employment is expected at best to hold its own,
and in durable goods plants to decline.
Su m m ariz in g
We have seen that manufacturers of the Dela­
decrease capital spending in 1961, after reach­

and pe­

penditures can change; in the history of our

troleum— expressed the contrary opinion, with

survey changes have been more often upward

one-third of the firms anticipating further spend­

than down, so the data presented here by no

ing decreases in 1962.

means guarantee depressed capital spending in

In ventories, e m p lo y m e n t,

however, the survey totals remain, and they are

a n d production

not encouraging. They presage a drop from a

Manufacturers in the Philadelphia area intend

record total of $412 million in Philadelphia in

1961. Having noted this very real possibility,

no inventory buildup in 1961, but they do

1960 to $330 million in 1961. Decreases also

anticipate increasing production

are anticipated in the Trenton, Wilmington, and

rates

some­

what. The production increases will have to

6




Lehigh Valley areas.

FURNITURE:
DURABLE BUT DIFFERENT

Man

started

using furniture

soon

after

he

to slight furniture. When they speak of con­

climbed down from the trees. A log to sit on,

sumer

a flat-rock table, a bed of straw or skins— these

“ durables” ) they discuss automobiles and ap­

durable

goods

(usually

shortened to

early caveman pieces developed into one of

pliances but seldom furniture, the most durable

civilization’s most essential and familiar prod­

of them all. This omission is in spite of the

ucts. Imagine what eating, sleeping, and work­

almost $5 billion that is being spent for furni­

ing would be like without furniture!

ture each year.

Yet for all its necessity and everyday famili­

Perhaps the widespread lack of understanding

arity, furniture is far from understood. Men

is due to the many changes that have taken

who use furniture seldom notice it unless it is

place in the furniture industry or maybe it is

too lumpy; women who buy it are often con­

due to the unusual nature of the product and

fused by style and mystified by construction.

the demand for it.

And if consumers don’t understand the product,

This article focuses on the demand for furni­

neither does the industry seem to understand

ture— why people buy it and why they don’t.

its consumers— or so it is often alleged.

First, we shall see that spending for furniture

Economists and GNPanists have a tendency




has been behaving in some surprising ways.

7

business review

A STEADY SHARE
OF THE CONSUMER’S DOLLAR
Expenditures on furniture as a percentage of dis­
posable personal income.

demand for durable goods is supposed to swing
way up in good times and way down in recessions
for durables last a long time and their purchase is
usually postponable. When the economy slack­

PER CENT

ens, many consumers make do with what they
have, the theory goes, and sharply curtail their
buying of new durables.
When the economy moves upward incomes
and optimism increase. The future looks bright
and many people decide to buy that durable they
have been putting off. At this stage of the busi­
ness cycle, consumers often are quite willing to
borrow in order to buy. Propelled by optimism
and credit, the sale of durables is supposed to

THE R E M A R K A B LE 1.5 PER CENT

rise considerably faster than income.

The furniture industry’s number one target seems

The theory works for automobiles and ap­

to be a bigger share of the consumer’s dollar.

pliances. Their sales charts look like cyclical

This goal is mentioned frequently in the industrial

STABILITY IN A FLUCTUATING FAMILY

self-analyses that appear in the trade publica­

Expenditures on durable goods.

tions. It is, of course, a natural objective for it

RATIO SCALE
BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

can mean millions of dollars in extra sales.
In the competition for the consumer’s dollar
furniture has been firmly holding its own.1
Furniture expenditures as a percentage of dis­
posable personal income have been virtually
stable since 1946. The figure has been running
just below 1.5 per cent. We should emphasize
that furniture spending in dollar terms has
doubled since 1946. The stability of which we
speak is in relation to disposable income which
has also doubled in the same period.
Like a rolle r coaste r
This constant relationship to income is hard to
understand. According to economic theory, one
would expect furniture spending to fluctuate
widely over the business cycle— both in actual
volume and as a percentage of income. The
1 W e are d e a lin g with hom e furniture in this article, in c lu d in g
m attresses and b e d sp rin g s but e x c lu d in g floor cove rin gs.

8




, ___ 1
___ I____I_ J ____L .......1 ....J _____ 1
_
...
______ I_____ L _____I..........i.... - J ____1____

1946

*8

'50

'52

'54

'56

'58

'60

business review

roller coasters. But it does not work nearly so

average a shade under 1.5 per cent of it. This, of

well for furniture. The swings in furniture spend­

course, does not mean that all families spend

ing are small no matter how they are measured.

1.5 per cent of their income on furniture. The

It is puzzling for the unstabilizing elements of

percentage varies with the amount of income

postponability, credit, and style are ever pres­

received. It runs high in the middle-income

ent in furniture.

ranges and drops in the over-$7,500-a-year and

There are several possible explanations. In

under-$4,000-a-year categories.

the first place, although furniture is exceedingly

The importance of income as a demand factor

durable, not all purchases are, in fact, post-

shows up on a monthly as well as a yearly basis.

ponable. Just-married couples and individuals

We constructed a monthly'series of furniture

moving out from a family group must of neces­

sales and adjusted it for seasonal variations.1

sity buy some furniture. Up to 20 per cent of

Plotted together, our series moves closely with

all furniture sales, it is estimated, is made to

monthly personal income.

these first-time housekeepers.
Second, there are many ways to scale down

Is furniture try in g to

furniture purchases. If the time doesn’t seem

tell us so m e th in g

right for a sofa, one might still manage an easy

We discovered something else about our furni­

chair; if not, maybe a bureau or maybe just an

ture series— something we can’t explain. It seems

end table. There is a piece for every pocket-

to have powers to predict the future. In the

book. The point is that although purchases may

recession of 1953, sales of furniture turned down
sharply six months before the peak quarter of

be reduced, ^people will probably continue to
buy some furniture. Automobiles and major
appliances, on the other hand, are more of a

Gross National Product (see chart). In the 1957
recession, furniture began to drop three months

you-buy-it-or-you-don’t proposition.
Third, furniture retailers reputedly hold bigger
sales and extend them longer than do other
durable dealers. This policy gives an extra spark
to sales when business is slack.
Finally, furniture lacks some of the glamour
and work-saving convenience that stimulate the

CALLING THE TURNS
The furniture sales series is a seasonally adjusted
combination of the sales of furniture stores and the
furniture departments of department stores. Gross
National Product is shown as a seasonally adjusted
annual rate.
GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT
BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

FURNITURE SALES
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS

demand for other durables (or did throughout
much of the postwar period). Thus when busi­
ness conditions improve, furniture gets a rela­
tively low purchase priority and such spending
doesn’t bounce so high as outlays for automo­
biles.
It is evident that disposable personal income
is one of the principal determinants of furni­
ture demand in good years and bad. Whatever
income

is,

furniture




spending

is

likely

to

1 The series was built from furniture store sales a n d f ig u r e s for the
furniture d e p artm e nts of de p artm e n t stores. There is a w h o p p in g
seasonal in furniture sales— dow n in Ja n u a ry and February, then up
through the year to a spire in Decem ber.

9

business review

before the peak quarter. In both 1954 and 1958,

with some recognized period or influence— to the

furniture turned up at just about recession

mass market.
The initial consumer reaction to style was

trough.
Our series sniffed two recessions coming and

encouraging and furniture men may have felt

signalled when they were over. It’s too bad that

they were on to something big. They long have

comparable figures are not available prior to

envied the automobile industry and its knack of

1952 for it would be interesting to test their

making the still-good unwanted through style

performance in earlier recessions.
As this article is written many analysts ex­

changes. So the manufacturers styled more and
more of their furniture and changed styles more

press considerable doubt about our position in
the business cycle. Is the economy in a recession

frequently.
There are many who believe that style is a

or isn’t it? It may be significant that furniture

good thing for furniture. They say it sells a

sales have been trending down since last March.

lot of pieces. But a number of critics close to
the industry feel that style has gotten out of

THE C O N F U S IN G STATUS O F STYLE
Style is a big new feature in the mass furniture

hand. There are too'many styles, they say, and

market. Arty sorts and people with the money

The result is confusion. The shoppers’ heads are

changes come too fast for consumers to absorb.

to hire professional decorators have purchased

churning with new words they don’t understand

stylized furniture for a long time. Not so the

— Mediterranean,

average consumer. Until after World War II

finish, Regency, Danish modern. Confused shop­

she usually settled for “ borax,”

pers can lose confidence in their own tastes

as unstyled

fruitwood,

dislike

buying

oil

furniture is called. Borax is bulky, high-gloss,

and

amorphous stuff but the typical prewar consumer

The result, critics claim, is that many sales are

seemed to like it— or at least knew nothing

lost.

better.

subconsciously

Directoire,

furniture.

Style has backfired! says one side. No, it

After the war, however, the general level of
public taste began to improve and has continued
to do so to the present day. As one writer puts it,
there has been a “ landslide for good taste.”

hasn’t, claims the other, style is working well.
And the controversy goes on.
It seems to us that the policy of creating de­
mand with style changes, or dynamic obsoles­

There are many reasons for this landslide.

cence as it is often called, has not been nearly so

Among them are widespread travel, growing

successful with furniture as it has been with

incomes, better education, improvements in mass

automobiles. And there is reason to suspect that

communications, and the greatly increased in­

it never can be as successful.

fluence of the “ shelter” magazines. These publi­

Without getting into the current argument

cations expose legions of homemakers to the

about dynamic obsolescence— is it good, bad,

essentials of tasteful decoration and whet their

wasteful, here to stay, dying out, etc.— let’s

appetites for style.

see what has made it work for automobiles.

The furniture industry quickly

sensed the

Automobile styles change once a year. The

general improvement in tastes. It responded by

change is enough to identify each model with

introducing stylized furniture— pieces identified

a given year yet there is a certain continuity

10




business review

from one year to the next. A basic style usually

line. The idea is to give the customer a simple,

is carried through each make in the company’s

easily recognized style on which to concentrate
and then to pound it home with heavy advertis­
ing. Other essentials are. trade-ins and a highly
developed used-car market in which to dispose

SITTIN G PRETTY

of the dynamically obsolete.
W e b ste r

defines

style

as

"a

distinctive

or

Furniture is entirely different. There is no

characteristic m ode of presentation, construction,

organized used-furniture market and most dealers

or execution." Furniture styles can be divided into

will not accept trade-ins. Furniture is not heavily

two basic groups: contem porary and traditional.

advertised and there are few national brands.

C onte m porary or modern was introduced in the

Finally, furniture styles are changed so often—

1920 s and reached its peak in the mid-1950's. It

three and four times a year by some manu­

features clean-lined functionality. Oriental styles

facturers— and exist in such profusion that they

usually are put in the contem porary category.
Scandinavia, many feel, is leading the way in

do not identify a piece as being made in a
certain year.

good, simplified, contem porary design. Imported

Quite possibly this proliferation of styles was

furniture, especially from Denmark, is important

unavoidable, the furniture industry being set

in this country for its influence rather than for its

up the way that it is.

quantity. Inspired by these imports Am erican
designers have developed a style called Danish

R az o r-k e e n com petition

modern.

The

furniture

industry

has

been

called

a

Traditional styles, grow ing more popular all the

“ stronghold of small business.” This is an apt

time, draw from the past. The standbys are Early

description, for there are over 3,000 manu­

Am erican and French and Italian Provincial. But

facturers and more than 30,000 retailers with no

this is only the beginning. Traditional styles break

one or small group of firms in a dominant

down into dozens of sub-categories. Som e follow

position.

the lead of past designers such as Chippendale,

Manufacturers,

for

the most

part,

bypass

Sheraton, Duncan Phyfe, and Hepplewhite. O thers

wholesalers and sell directly to retailers. The

are inspired by historical periods, am ong them

furniture “ market” is an important merchandis­

Regency, Gothic, Louis XV, Directoire, Empire,

ing institution. Markets are periodic expositions

Federal, Victorian, G eorgian, and Queen Anne.

where manufacturers display their latest lines

The A m erican Shaker influence is also important.

for the retailers to inspect and purchase. One

"M e d ite rra n e a n " refers to furniture of French,

of the most important markets is held twice a

Italian or Spanish derivation.

year in Chicago and another at High Point,

Recently there has been a tendency to combine

North Carolina. Others take place at varying

various styles. "Y o u take a leg from some old

intervals in Dallas, New York City, Los Angeles,

table, an arm from some old chair . . . ," as the

and other regional centers.

old college song goes and the result is a brandnew style.




With a large number of manufacturers trying
to sell to an even larger number of retailers,
competition is razor keen. The manufacturers

11

business review

seem to feel that style is an especially appropri­

vastly different on a chaise, a Chevy, and a

ate competitive weapon. Style changes do not

chemise.

take large amounts of capital. Any firm, no
matter how small, can get into the act. The main

A n ou tpost o f e le gan ce

requirement

Many manufac­

There are really three furniture markets— the

turers, therefore, try to have a new style to show

class market, the huge middle market, and the

at each important market.

remnants of the borax market. Styles are rela­

is

imagination.

Another incentive for offering multiple styles

tively stable in the class market. Changes are

is the retailer’s fondness for exclusive rights to

made infrequently and most styles stay on dis­

sell a certain style in his area. The more style
lines a manufacturer has, the more “ exclusives”

play for years. Contemporary styles are im­
portant in the class market and traditional

he can grant in a given locality.

styles are usually pure rather than combinations.

The multitude

of styles and the frequent

The low-priced, borax market which deals in

changes seem to have their bases in the small-

a product called “ foinicher” is shrinking as its

scale, competitive nature of the industry and

customers move up but it is not yet dead. Here

the market institution. The present profusion of
styles may be more a product of manufacturers’

style is virtually nonexistent.

efforts to sell to retailers than of retailer^’ efforts

EARLY AMERICAN

to sell to consumers.
There are those who would disagree with this
statement. They would say that retailers demand
a large number of styles because that’s what
the consumer wants. Ladies crave the oppor­
tunity to express their individuality with furni­
ture

as

with

clothes.

Others

would

claim,

however, that the furniture industry has been
generally weak in market research and in buyingmotivation studies and quite possibly doesn’t
know what its consumers really want.
The acid test is, does style increase demand
Style has become much more common in the
past five or ten years yet there has been no
sustained increase in furniture’s share of the
consumer’s dollar during that time. There is no
conclusive evidence but the weight of expert
opinion seems to be that style is an important
factor in the selection of specific furniture— once
the decision to buy has been made— but that
style increases the total demand for furniture
only slightly, if at all. The effect of style is

12




business review

The huge middle market accounts for the

two-tone pastel colors, fins, chrome, and all

bulk of furniture sales and it is where style is

sorts of sculptured protuberances. But these are

now rampant. Early American is an ever-popular

now giving way, we understand, to compact

staple. It holds this position partly by default.

simplicity.

Shoppers, not trusting their tastes and confused

Maybe automobiles are a weather vane point­

by other styles, often select Early American

ing to a broad shift in public tastes and furni­

because it is safe and accepted. Contemporary

ture elegance is due for a change. Or it could

styles have declined in importance during the

be that car-buying men have become more self-

past five years but they are still significant.

conscious about displaying affluence than their

Aside from Early American and Contempor­

furniture-buying women. Or possibly homes are

ary, there is a jumbled hodgepodge of styles in

increasing in importance as a status symbol

the huge middle market. No one style seems to

while autos are decreasing.

dominate but there is a currently fashionable
influence or effect noticeable in a number of
popular styles. In a word, it is elegance. It in­
volves embellishment and ornamentation, bold
flowing lines, inlays, carvings, lush colors, and
plush fabrics. The effect is of cozy opulence.
It is possible that the shelter magazines started
the trend to elegance. They certainly have been
playing it up. But it might be that they have

D E M A N D PUSHES A N D

PULLS

So far we have concluded that income has a big
effect on the sale of furniture and that style
probably does not increase total spending very
much. We shall discuss other factors which play
a part in the demand for furniture in the remain­
ing sections of this article.

merely been reporting an existing phenomenon.
Some experts feel that such basic drifts of furni­

N e w w a y s to sell

ture fashion have deep psychological roots.

The old-time furniture store presented an im­

It is said that elegance in furniture is a re­

posing panorama to the customer. Merchandise

flection of our current affluence. People want

was tightly packed over an acre or more of

to express their new status and prosperity and

floor space. Here a herd of sofas grazed flank

they do it with embellishments just as the well-

to flank, there a phalanx of dinette sets, in the

to-do have done for centuries. In fact, a number

corner a copse of lamps— furniture everywhere

of the current styles derive from earlier periods

with only narrow, knee-bumping aisles between.

of opulence: France before the Revolution, the
Italian Renaissance, the Georgian period

in

England.

Consumers like a good selection but such
chock-a-block variety can be overpowering, even
self-defeating. Many stores still display their

The cold war enters into the picture, too.

wares in the old-time manner but there has been

People are supposed to crave cozy, graceful

a trend away from it. An increasing number of

elegance at home to give them a feeling of

stores in the middle market are showing off their

security in insecure times.

furniture in room-like settings complete with

It is curious that while color and ornamenta­

accessories. This gives the shopper an idea of

tion are ascending in furniture, they are waning

how the furniture will look in its natural environ­

in automobiles. In the mid-1950’s, cars ran to

ment, her home.




13

business review

A new institution has blossomed in the class

FRENCH PROVINCIAL

market during the postwar period— the show­
room. Here high-priced, quality furniture is
displayed in dignified settings. But you just
can’t walk in off the street and buy at a show­
room. Like the old speakeasy, someone has to
send you. It could be an interior decorator,
architect, or another dealer. The buyer pays full
price and the person who referred her gets a
percentage. In a sense, showrooms are whole­
salers with retail patrons.
Showrooms are taking a good share of the
high-quality market from the regular retailers.
But most of these retailers are happy to turn

prices at all except on the few nationally ad­

the expensive pieces over to specialists. It is slow

vertised brands?

moving, takes lots of floor space to display to

The “ wayside”

furniture store

innovation.

Waysides

is

another

are

usually

proper advantage, and requires salespeople with

marketing

special knowledge and ability.

high-volume outlets located in a monster Quon-

Furniture has a high retail markup— 100 per

set hut or some large building on a heavily

cent in some cases. The industry usually justi­

traveled highway. Waysides have grown rapidly

fies this by saying that retailers perform many

with the exploding suburbs and the week-end

wholesale functions and must carry a large,

drivers they serve.

slow-moving inventory that is subject to the

Furniture retailing may be efficient or it may

risks of changing styles. What is high can come

not. You can find either opinion in the trade

down, however, and this markup policy means

press. The point we are trying to make is that

that good furniture bargains often can be had

marketing

when stores hold sales.

recent years and seem to be moving in the di­

High markups also attract discount houses.

practices

have

been changing

in

rection of greater efficiency.

This kind of furniture store has multiplied
rapidly in recent years. In addition to the local

Fam ilies a n d the

variety, at least one discount chain has set up

p urch asin g pattern

a furniture subsidiary and others are consider­

Most families buy some furniture more or less

ing it.

continuously— a lamp now, a bookcase next

We wonder how the discount stores will operate

spring, an occasional table. Yet there are defi­

and what their ultimate success will be. Lacking

nite purchasing peaks and troughs in the aver­

brand names on which to compare prices, and

age family’s career. Let’s look at Jack and

lacking knowledge of construction, how can the

Betty, a mythical but typical couple.

average customer know if she actually is getting

They were married in May. Shortly before

a bargain? And if she can’t tell, won’t it be

the wedding they went shopping to furnish the

tempting for the discount house not to cut

new apartment. They already had appropriated

14




business review

a few tables and chairs from their parents’ attics

A TROUGH IN TROTHS

so they bought some big stuff— a bed, bureaus,

The number of marriages actual and projected to
1970.

an easy chair, and a sofa.
They lived in the apartment several years

MILLIONS

while Betty continued to work. During this
period they managed to replace some of the
“ early mother-in-law” pieces.
Then the baby came and the apartment was
too crowded— baby things everywhere and that
nighttime wailing. They started making Sunday
trips to sample houses. The house they bought
was quite a bit larger than the apartment and
they needed extra furniture. They bought some
but not so much as they would have liked be­
cause of the down payment on the house, the
settlement charges, and the expense of moving.

ture.

Jack and Betty continued to buy furniture in

Like Jack and Betty, many couples buy furni­

dribs and drabs until the children were in their

ture in spurts— when they marry, when they

early teens. Then they went on a substantial

move, when the children become more than tots,

buying campaign. The children needed more

and when the children leave home. Of them all,

“ grown-up” furniture in their rooms and there

the marriage peak may well be the most im­

was the new recreation room to furnish. Besides,

portant.

some of their first furniture, now 15 years old,
was just about shot.

The lifetime purchasing pattern has a signifi­
cant effect on the present demand for furniture.

It seemed like no time at all before the chil­

Marriages are now at reduced levels due to the

dren were educated and out on their own. Jack

low birth rate in the 1930’s. This also means

was at the peak of his earning power and this

relatively few children are leaving their parents

sudden drop in expenses made him feel rich.

to go out on their own. Thus two purchasing
peaks may be somewhat depressed.

CONTEMPORARY




There are more older folks today and more of
them are living alone. This is something of a
plus factor in the demand for furniture but it
is doubtful that retirement incomes permit ex­
tensive buying of major pieces.
The big news in the population mix is the
tidal wave of teenagers. When they start marry­
ing and setting up housekeeping — probably
around 1965— they should give a hearty boost
to furniture sales. Until then, the effect of the
population structure may be neutral.

15

business review

The g r e a t p o p u la rity

probably reduce sales of the new. The antique

o f antiqu es

vogue, on the other hand, may have stimulated

Sales of antique and semi-antique furniture are

interest in furniture generally. Antiques mix

soaring. In a market that was once the province

well with new furniture and may induce some

of rich dowagers and society matrons, it is not

extra sales.

unusual to find plumbers, machinists, and all
sorts of workingmen waiting slightly bored while

A b a r g a in a t t o d a y ’s prices

their wives dicker over the price of a wobbly
cobbler’s bench.

The retail price of furniture trended upward
from the end of World War II to 1951. During

From 1952 to 1957 the number of antique

that period, furniture prices moved together with

dealers increased by one-half to 12,000. Un­

the consumer price or cost-of-living index. Since

doubtedly there are many more today. Although

1951, however, furniture prices have been stable

there is usually a downtown cluster, the typical

to declining while the over-all index has continued

antique shop is located along the highway in

to climb.

the exurban fringe. But not all antiques are

Several factors have helped hold the price

sold from shops. Auctions held by churches or

line. Like textiles, the furniture industry has

for the liquidation of an estate are also good

been moving to the South where cheaper labor

sources.

is available. Although furniture is still not

Status is undoubtedly one reason why antiques
are so popular. They have always been associ­

a

mass

production

industry,

in

the

last

decade many firms have introduced cost-cutting,

ated with the “ upper crust” and are being used

assembly-line techniques.

today by the nouveau affluent to express wealth

materials such as plastics and new glues also

Better and cheaper

and taste. Some people buy antiques because

have trimmed expenses.

they can be good investments. They are limited

declining retail markups, in part the result of

in supply and, if well chosen, are likely to in­

discount competition.

Important, too,

are

crease in value while being used. Antiques also
help ease the consumer’s taste jitters. They were

ONE PRICE THAT H A SN ’T G ONE UP

accepted once and are likely to be a safe choice.

The consumer price index, 1947-1949 = 100.

“ Antiquing” or browse shopping is high ad­

INDEX

venture to the aficionados. One never knows
what treasure he will find, maybe something
valuable that can be had at a “ steal” price. And
one can never tell what a piece will look like
when the dirty old paint is peeled off and the
wood glows with its mellow patina. In fact, the
refinishing and repairing that many antiques
and semi-antiques require may be a part of their
appeal. Do-it-yourself is a hot trend today and

1 0 /0 0 0 /0 0 0 m o v in g d a y s a y e a r

it is said that 11 million homes have workshops.

New housing starts are supposed to have a big

As a substitute for new furniture, antiques

effect on demand for furniture. People buy a

16




business review

FOLLOWING THE LEADER?

earlier, moved in step with business conditions.

Privately owned housing starts are shown as a season­
ally adjusted annual rate. The series on furniture
sales is the same as used in the chart on page 9.

Starts, on the other hand, have tended to fluctu­

HOUSING STARTS
THOUSANDS OF UNITS

FURNITURE SALES
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ate in a contracyclical fashion— up in recessions,
down in booms. The effect of the business cycle
is likely more responsible for the two series’
behavior than any cause-and-effect relationships
between them.
This does not mean that housing has little or
no effect on furniture sales. A 1950 study made
by the Bureau of Labor

Statistics and the

Wharton School of the University of Pennsyl­
vania shows that

families who moved

into

different homes during the year spent 4.3 per
cent of their income on furniture. This is 2^j
times as much as the figure for all families. If
this is true, why didn’t our chart show a con­
new and probably larger house and right away

sistently close

they need a lot of new furniture, the reasoning

sales and new housing starts?

goes. Here are the facts.

relationship between furniture

New housing starts are only a partial measure
of the number of houses sold during the year.

Housing starts peaked in 1950, 1955, and
1959. In all three years furniture sales moved

Two or more used houses change hands for

up, too. But sales also rose in 1951 and 1956—

every new one. People buying an existing house

years when starts plummeted. These are yearly

have an equal need for extra furniture. In fact,

figures, however, and may average away some

they may actually be able to buy more furniture

delicate relationships.

because an older house usually comes better

To get a closer look, we plotted our monthly

equipped. Storm windows often are installed,

furniture series against monthly housing starts.

lawns are established, plantings and patios are in

Starts bounced up in mid-1953 and furniture

place, freeing money for furniture.

sales turned upward about a year later. Starts

We also should consider families that move

peaked out in late 1954 but furniture sales con­

into rented housing. They outnumber all buyers

tinued to climb until 1957. Starts picked up

three to one. No doubt many of them move to

slightly ahead of sales in the spring of 1958.

larger quarters and have to buy extra furni­

The revised series of starts has been slipping

ture. In some cases even renting less space can

since April 1959 while sales have been jiggling

lead to extra furniture purchases. Take the case

lower since March 1960. Thus starts led furni­

of an older couple switching from a house to

ture up by about a year, down by about two

an apartment. Their existing furniture could

years, up by a month, and down by a year.
We should point out, however, that furniture

be too big and bulky to fit comfortably in the
new unit.

sales and housing starts have behaved differently

It seems to us that moving from one residence

in the business cycle. Sales, as we mentioned

to another is a basic factor in the demand for




17

business review

furniture. New starts alone greatly understate

THE BEST SELLER LIST

the full impact of housing on furniture sales.

Household furniture: The percentage change in
value of shipments, 1947 to 1958.

With mobility at a high level during the postwar
years, there is little question that housing (or

METAL

moving) has had a buoyant effect on the demand

UPHOLSTERED

for furniture.

LAWN
UNFINISHED
MATTRESSES AN D BEDSPRINGS

Architectural crosscurrents
The way houses are built influences how much
and what type furniture people buy. Indeed,
there are those who say our heterogeneous

D IN ING RO O M A N D DINETTE
LIVING RO O M (W OOD)
BEDROOM (W OOD)
RADIO, PHONOGRAPH AN D TV CABINETS

architecture is partially responsible for the pro­

INFANTS' A N D CH ILDREN 'S"!

fusion of furniture styles.

-4 0

0

40

80

120

PERCENTAGE CH ANG E

Though over-all floor space is increasing,
there is a trend toward smaller rooms in new

home— watching TV, reading, completing do-it-

homes. This creates a demand for smaller pieces

yourself projects. One reason is the long-standing

and built-in storage space to take the place of

tendency of man to withdraw to the castle in

furniture. Dining rooms are shrinking into din­

troubled times. Entertaining, too, is becoming

ing areas or giving way entirely to large kit­

more homey with nightclubbers switching to

chens. As a result, dinette and kitchen furni­

living room buffets.
Since the home is being used more intensively,

ture is a big seller.
With more

children

to

accommodate, the

it is natural to want it to be more attractively

number of bedrooms is increasing. In 1949, 30

furnished. With more guests to notice it, furni­

per cent of all new houses had three or more

ture has an increased potential as a status

bedrooms. Only seven years later the figure had

symbol.

zoomed to 80 per cent and it is probably still
higher today. Naturally many more beds and

O n the cuff

bureaus are needed. The game or recreation

Credit is an essential lubricant in the process

room now included in many homes means a

of selling furniture. The average furniture pur­

demand for more casual furniture.

chase is large and 85 per cent of all sales are

Alas, the porch is gone from new houses, and

made on time. More furniture dealers carry

with it the need for wicker rockers and gliders.

their own retail paper than do other durable

A slab patio has replaced the porch and has

goods merchants, but bank and finance com­

created a demand for sun- and rainproof metal

panies also play an important part.

and plastic furniture.

In 1955 furniture credit terms eased— lower
down

payments,

long

maturities— and

this

The castle w ith the crab g r a s s m o a t

helped to bulge furniture sales. We have no

Family life now centers more closely around the

up-to-date information but it is reasonable to

home. Parents and children have drawn closer

assume that, since the same lenders are active

together and spend more time doing things at

in both fields, furniture terms tend to behave

18




business review

in the same manner as automobile terms. Auto­

to inflation, nor to an increase in the number

mobile terms have not eased materially in recent

of households. Retail prices of furniture have

years and it is likely that furniture has not re­

been stable in the past decade and expenditures

ceived any significant boost from credit since

per household have increased more than 60 per

the mid-1950’s.

cent since 1946.

C om pe tition in the cornucopia

demand for furniture is consumer income. Furni­

Never before have so many attractive consumer

ture spending seems to seek a natural level of

Perhaps the most important factor in the

goods and services been available. But nearly

around 1.5 per cent of disposable personal in­

everybody

limited

come. Spending has been near this figure during

budgets and consumers must pick and choose

the entire postwar period. If the traditional 1.5

has unlimited wants

and

and assign priorities. In a very real sense, furni­

per cent of income is maintained, furniture sales

ture must compete with all the other things

should zoom to around $8 billion in the year

available to consumers— refurnish the house or

1970. This would mean an average of over

go to Europe or buy a new car, buy a mew easy

half a million dollars more sales a year for

chair or an outboard motor, a coffee table or

each manufacturer and $100,000 extra sales

a new dress for mother.

for each retailer in the nation.

Furniture may be at somewhat of a disadvan­

There is reason to wonder about the 1.5 per­

tage in this competition. It is not exciting like a

centage, however.

vacation trip or a sports car. It is not cultural,
educational, or entertaining. Furniture is not

income families spend a smaller share of that
income on furniture. Though some of the lustre

Studies show that higher-

heavily advertised and it contains no magic

has been rubbed off the “ soaring” 1960’s, in­

ingredient. And, as we said, its purchase can in
many cases be postponed. People can make do

comes are still expected to rise sensationally.
More and more families should be moving into

with their old furniture when something more

the upper brackets where furniture’s share of

attractive catches their fancy.

income declines.
Success in the attempts to create dynamic

IN

C O N C L U S IO N

obsolescence in furniture could put sales in orbit

A number of factors have been tugging the de­

any time. This, however, may be too much to

mand for furniture— some pulling up, others

expect. A policy of accepting trade-ins would

down. The net effect has been favorable. Furni­

help but neither the industry nor the product

ture sales have moved up steadily to double their

appears particularly well-suited to dynamic ob­

1946 level. The rise has not been due primarily

solescence. Furniture is still the different durable.




19

FO R TH E R E C O R D . . .
EX
B U S IN E S S

*• / t
FACTORY PAYROLLS, DIST.
(1949 = 100)

i»

i>
FA CTORY EMPLOYMENT, DIST.
(194 9 = 100)

j y

11

.

,

DEPAF TMENT STORE SALES, DIST.

L
V^

A

r-A /

a

11

/\A
V» V

CONSUMER PRICES, PHILA.
t

_

______ .

YE AR
AC,0

2 YEARS
AGO

SEPT.
1960

Third Federal
Reserve District

Per cent ch an g e

SUM M ARY
Sept. I960
from

9
mos.
I960

mo.

year
ago

year
ago

- 2
+ 10

0
8
6

0
8

F a ctory *

U nited States

E m p lo y­
ment

Per cent c h an g e

Sept. I960
from

9
mos.
I960

mo.

year

+
+
+

+ 4
— 4
+ 2

EM PLOYM ENT A N D
IN C O M E
Factory em ploym ent
(Total) ..........................
Factory w a ge in c o m e ......
TRADE*
Departm ent store sales ...
Departm ent store stocks ..
B A N K IN G
(A ll m em ber banks)
D ep osits ........................
Loans ............................
Investments ...................
U.S. G o v t, securities......
O th e r ...........................
C h e ck paym ents ............

+

-

i
5

3
2
4

ago

i + 18

0

— 4 +

2

6 — 6 + 16

— 5 +

4

— 4 +

Lancaster ...

—

ago

ago

ago

ago

ago

ago

ago

+

2
0

+ 1
+ 1
+ 1
+ 2
+ •
— 2f

+
+

2
4

+
+
+

2

+

0
2

0

2
4

+
+
—
—
—
+

2
9
4
5
1
3|

+
+
—
—
—
+

1
M
7
9
2
5f

+
—

+
+
+
+
+

1
1

2
1
2
2
1
0

+

+

+
+
—
—
—
+

1

0
5

1
7
3
3
3
12

+

5 — 4

Ot

+

It

+

2*

(20 C itie s

0
0

+

0
1

2 — 3

+ 19 +

4 +

1 +

3

0

0 +

1

-

2 -

4 +

1 +

3 -

2 +

R e a d in g

....

0 -

3

0 -

4

+

3 +

2

0 +

2 -

7 + 10

0 -

2

3 -

1

+

2 — 4 — 5 -

5 -

2 +

Trenton

0 — 5 -

2

3

+

4 +

W ilke s-Ba rre

0 -

1 —

1 +

W ilm in g to n . -

2 +

1 +

1

0

+

1 -

3 -

5 -

5

-

2

+

1

+
—
—
—
+

0
10
10
12
4
7

+

1 — 4 0

York ..........

1
1

Philade lphia

Scranton ....

—
—

‘ A d ju ste d for seasonal v a ria tion.




Lehigh V alley —

ago

H a rrisb u rg ..

P R IC E S
C o n su m e r .......................

Stocks

Per cent
Per cent
Per cent
Per cent
Per cent
c h an g e
ch ang e
ch ang e
ch ang e
ch ang e
Sept. I960 Sept. I960 Sept. I960 Sept. I960 Sept. I960

ago
OUTPUT
M a n u fa c tu rin g p roduction.
C onstruction contracts ...

C heck
Paym ents

Sale s

Payrolls

year

+
-

LO CA L
CH A N G ES

Dep artm e nt S tore f

0
2

(P h ila d e lp h ia

......

-

-

3 -

—

4

6

^ — 4 +

^ — 15 — 5

6 +

3 —

1 -

9 —

1 +

3

6

0 -

1 +

1 + 11 -

5

+ 13 +

3 +

1

0 -

2

1 -

*N o t restricted to co rp o ra te im its of cities but cove rs areas of one
or m ore counties.
(A d ju ste d for seasonal varia tion.