View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

NOVEMBER 1952

T H E

BUSINESS
REVIEW
FEDERAL




RESERVE

BANK

OF

PHILADELPHIA

1953 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
IN THE PHILADELPHIA AREA
The annual survey
of plant and equipment outlays
by Philadelphia area manufacturers
reveals that the high spending level
of recent years will be maintained.
The most outstanding increase
•'•UKEUjSv.
f— - > "JF’-TT

in capital expenditures is by

the petroleum and coal products industries.
It is expected that manufacturing employment
will be even greater by next spring.

FINANCING CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Corporations had less funds
from retained profits
to finance their capital expenditures
in the first six months of 1952.
Result: a record volume
of new securities issued.

CURRENT TRENDS
Production, employment, and payrolls
expanded in September.
Durable goods industries
accounted for most of the gains.
Business loans continued to rise.




Additional copies of this issue are available
upon request to the Department of Research,
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia,
Philadelphia 1, Pa.

THE BUSINESS REVIEW

1953 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES IN THE PHILADELPHIA AREA
The Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia has just com­
pleted its annual survey of capital expenditures’ estimates
by Philadelphia manufacturers. This year (September 1,
1951 through August 31, 1952) the study was extended
to cover manufacturing in the Philadelphia metropolitan
area—the eight-county area centering on Philadelphia—
including Delaware, Chester, Bucks, and Montgomery
counties in Pennsylvania and Gloucester, Camden, and
Burlington counties in New Jersey. This, unfortunately,
reduces to a minimum the comparability of the current
estimates for 1952 and 1953 and those of earlier survey
years. By covering the larger industrial area and includ­
ing a greater number of firms, the survey results prob­
ably are more representative and will have a wider use.
Four hundred sixty-one firms participated in the survey,
representing more than half of the total manufacturing
employment in the eight-county area. These firms were
used as a “sample” from which estimates of capital expen­
ditures and employment for the entire industrial comrnun-

ESTIMATED CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
AND EMPLOYMENT
Manufacturing
Industries in the
Philadelphia
Metropolitan area

Expenditures
(.$ thousands)
Sept. 1951
through
Aug. 1952

Sept. 1952
through
Aug. 1953

Employment
Sept.
1952

March
1953

All manufacturing ........ 274,659.8 286,901.5 602,800 613,800
Durable goods ................ 122,868.8 105,409.1 291,700 300,100
Nondurable goods .......... 151,791.0 181,492.4 311,100 313,700
Food and tobacco............
15,271.2
18,667.5
59,100
58,300
Textiles ............................
9,664.2
6,324.6
59,500 60,500
Apparel ............................
5,602.3
1,428.5
61,500
62,100
Lumber and furniture...
2,071.8
3,650.5
9,300
10,500
Paper ................................
15,795.2
7,499.6
21,100
21,400
Printing and publishing..
8,737.0
8,543.4 34,300
34,200
Chemicals ........................
44,092.3
38,523.3
36,600
37,800
Petroleum and
coal products ..............
50,704.6
99,250.8
23,900
23,900
Rubber and leather..........
1,924.2
1,254.7
15,100
15,500
Stone, clay, and glass....
6,867.8
5,129.1
12,800
13,100
Primary metals ..............
19,111.0
17,744.0
32,500
32,700
Fabricated metals ......
19,396.6
14,215.3
45,100
45,200
Machinery
(excl. electrical) ........
16,046.4
32,256.6
45,800
46,900
Electrical machinery ....
24,505.1
16,570.1
58,100 60,300
Transportation equipment
24,831.7
8,560.0
56,000
58,500
Miscellaneous ..................
10,038.4
7,283.5
32,100
32,900




ity were made. The published figures are estimates for all
manufacturing firms in the Philadelphia area. The sur­
vey results are primarily indicative of regional rather than
national trends. They do, however, supplement the national
estimates made by the Department of Commerce and the
McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.
Discussions of the business outlook which have appeared
in the press in recent weeks seem to lean toward the view
that country-wide employment and income will remain
high, at least until the latter part of 1953. Numerous ob­
servers doubt the ability of the economy to sustain the
boom after that time. A few dare to predict a sizable
recession for 1954. In most cases the doubts and fears
about the future health of business are associated with
an expected tapering off of defense outlays by Govern­
ment. A second factor very often mentioned is the possi­
bility of “over-production” as the result of recent additions
to industrial capacity. One of the chief consequences of
such over-production would be the sharp curtailment of
expenditures for new construction and equipment by in­
dustry. While investment of this type probably does not
occupy so important a place as it once did in the explana­
tion of business booms and depressions, there is no doubt
that a drop in plant and equipment outlays, if it occurs,
would contribute to a slackening in business activity.

Results of the Survey
On the basis of this year’s survey of the Philadelphia area,
no drop in capital expenditures appears to be in prospect
for the coming year. On the contrary, as the accompany­
ing table shows, a 4 per cent increase in total outlays is
estimated. This figure is subject to an important qualifi­
cation, however. It does not include the Fairless Works
project of the United States Steel Company at Morrisville,
Pennsylvania. Published information concerning the cost
of the huge new mill indicates that the amount spent on it
during the past year might approximate the expenditures
of all other manufacturing facilities in the area combined.
The Fairless Works’ construction time table is such that
the bulk of the work is now completed and much less will

Page 3

THE BUSINESS REVIEW
be spent on the project during 1953 than in 1952. Thus,
if the Fairless plant had been included in the survey, that
one project might have caused a decline in total expendi­
tures for 1953 in the neighborhood of 20 per cent. The
inferences which might be drawn from such a result
would be misleading for many purposes, but the omission,
obviously, is an important one and should be borne in
mind in interpreting the figures.

Buildings vs. Equipment
By far the greater part of the new capital outlays will be
for equipment rather than for new construction. The line
separating these two categories is often vague and the divi­
sion cannot be precise; but it appears that less than one
third of all the money will go into buildings. This Bank’s
past studies of manufacturers’ intentions were limited to
the city of Philadelphia and are not strictly comparable,
with the present survey. However, the direction of the
trend in recent years away from construction and toward
equipment is unmistakable. A shift from extensive to in­
tensive capital improvement—from mere enlargement of
facilities to modernization and improvement—was, of
course, to be expected as the post-war shortage of indus­
trial space was overcome and, more recently, as the expan­
sion of new defense facilities has been accomplished.
This does not mean that manufacturers have stopped
expanding their capacity. Of all the participating firms
reporting capital development of some type for next year,
nearly 55 per cent stated that their new facilities would
enable them to produce more goods. Very few of these
firms will increase their potential output by as much as 20
per cent, but most of them expect to be able to turn out
better than 5 per cent more. Durable goods manufacturers
show a much greater tendency to expand capacity than
makers of nondurables.

More Workers
Many improvement programs now under way and antici­
pated for next year will not be completed for a long time,
and demands for additional labor to man the new facilities
will come gradually. Nevertheless, Philadelphia manufac­
turers can foresee a need for more workers within the next
six months—about 11,000 more, or a little less than 2 per
cent of their present force. Even with the addition of the
many hundreds of manufacturing workers that the Fairless
plant will take on during the period (as distinguished from
construction workers who have been employed at Fairless

Page 4




for many months), this apparently is a moderate expan­
sion in labor requirements in comparison with the plans
of a year and two years ago. But coming at a time when
the labor force is more fully employed, and being con­
centrated in durable goods industries, these new demands
undoubtedly will be difficult to meet.
Anticipated gains in employment within the next six
months are not proportional to capital outlays, of course.
In the short-run, many other factors are of great impor­
tance. Petroleum and coal products industries, for in­
stance, are the largest spenders for 1953, having doubled
their 1952 outlays; yet they anticipate no increase in em­
ployment. Electrical machinery and transportation equip­
ment manufacturers will reduce their plant and equipment
expenditures next year. They anticipate the largest in­
creases in employment. In fact, durable goods industries
in general, which are increasing employment in the imme­
diate future—possibly, in part, as a result of past plant
expansion—have reduced their planned capital spending
from last year’s figure. The large expansion in the petrol­
eum and coal products industries’ outlays brings the non­
durables total up, but, with the exception of food and
tobacco, all other industries in this group also are reducing
their spending.

Sources of Funds
Most of the money for new plant and equipment—72 per
cent of it—is coming from internal sources, the companies’
own earnings and allowances. Almost all the participating
firms expected to draw on their own funds. About 15 per
cent of the firms will call on the banks for some money.
Only 8 per cent of the funds for investment will come from
this source, however. A small group—only about 5 per cent
of the firms—expect to raise money in the securities mar­
ket or from insurance companies and other lenders. These
are undoubtedly large firms and they will raise by these
means 20 per cent of all the money to be spent.
National Trends
It is extremely difficult to draw any conclusions for na­
tional trends from a regional survey of this nature, particu­
larly when it has no history which can be analyzed. Hidden
local influences may be strong and inapplicable to the na­
tional scene. A more obvious difficulty is the different
product “mix” in the region as opposed to the nation. Tex­
tiles in the Philadelphia area, for instance, account for
almost 10 per cent of all manufacturing employment—for

THE BUSINESS REVIEW
the nation the proportion is only about 7.6 per cent.
Petroleum and coal products industries in Philadelphia
employ over 4 per cent of all manufacturing workers—
nationally, less than 2 per cent. It so happens that petro­
leum and coal products account for the greatest increase
in capital expenditures in the Philadelphia area. Without
them total outlays would show a sizable decline from 1952

to 1953. If they were reduced to their national importance,
the total would probably decline moderately. Other sur­
veys, notably the recently published McGraw-Hill study,
cover somewhat different time periods than this one, but
their results for 1953 thus far—indicating a small decline
for plant and equipment expenditures throughout the na­
tion—appear to be reasonably consistent with this survey.

FINANCING CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
The first six months of 1952 were busy and, in some re­
spects, “trying” months for many corporate managers.
They were busy in that corporations spent at a record rate
for plant and equipment. They were somewhat trying be­
cause corporate managers have had to finance this in­
creased spending at a time when funds available from
internal sources were shrinking. Many concerns compen­
sated for this loss by raising funds from new security offer­
ings. They usually relied on bonds, principally because
of the wider demand for debt instruments and because of
tax advantages. Recently, some signs have pointed toward
a revival of interest in stock issues but in the near future,
at least, it appears that bonds will continue to represent
about three-quarters of all new security issues.
In the first half of this year, business spent $13 billion
for enlargement and modernization of productive facilities.
This was 10 per cent more than in the same period last
year—the record year. Durable goods manufacturers, util­
ities, railroads, and other transportation companies did
most of the increased spending. Corporations not only
spent a larger dollar amount for plant and equipment but
proportionally more of their total spending was for this
purpose. This was principally because they spent only
$500 million for inventory accumulation, as against $8
billion in the first six months of the preceding year.

Sources of Funds
The purposes for which corporations want funds influence
the sources from which they get funds. When firms need
money to purchase supplies and inventory or to pay wages
and taxes, they generally borrow. Outlays for plant expan­
sion or modernization, for new equipment, and for long-




range research programs are usually financed from retained
profits, depreciation allowances, and new security issues.
The ultimate source of most funds for capital investment
in plant and equipment is saving. This saving generally
comes from individuals or from the corporations them­
selves. Individuals save when they spend less on consump­
tion goods than they earn. Corporate saving is that part
of net corporate profits that is retained rather than dis­
bursed as dividends. Corporations also might be consid­
ered to be saving when they set aside funds for replacement
of capital equipment. Many firms prefer to finance their
capital expenditures with retained earnings and deprecia­
tion allowances, thereby protecting themselves from the
vicissitudes of the security market and the cost and com­
plicated arrangements frequently required in tapping sav­
ings of individuals. Internal financing has been the
dominant means of meeting post-war requirements, and
has constituted more than twice the amount of funds ob­
tained from external sources.

Internal Sources
The internal funds have been derived primarily from un­
distributed profits which supplied nearly $65 billion
from the end of 1945 to December 31, 1951. Since late
1950, retained profits have declined. This reflects lower
profits before taxes as a result of shrinking sales volume
in many consumer lines and declining wholesale prices.
Out of these lower profits have come larger taxes and con­
tinued large dividend payments. The effect has been to
cut retained profits in the first six months of this year to 25
per cent below the same period last year.
A second major internal source of long-term funds is

Page 5

THE BUSINESS REVIEW

SOURCES OF FUNDS FOR CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
BILLIONS

BILLIONS $
IS------------------

$

15---- ---------

10-

10-

I. Corporations spent
record amounts on
PLANT and
EQUIPMENT

BILLIONS

3
_

BILLION

$

3. But DEPRECIATION
ALLOWANCES
were larger..«

4

t -------------------;----- -

2. RETAINED PROFITS
dropped below
last year's level

1951
FIRST

HALF

1952
FIRST

HALF

depreciation allowances. Corporate depreciation allow­
ances were larger in the first half of this year than in the
same period last year. It has been estimated that the pro­
vision for rapid amortization of defense facilities which
allows firms to write off their investment in defense facili­
ties over a period of five years has added between Si
billion and $2 billion a year to depreciation charges. Cer­
tain industries, moreover, such as chemicals and petroleum,
are adopting a more rapid depreciation policy as a matter
of long-range planning and these industries are accounting
for a greater share of business capital investment. So

Page 6




---------

1951
FIRST

HALF

4. and NEW
SECURITY ISSUES
provided more funds

1952
FIRST

HALF

depreciation is a more important source of funds. The net
effect of higher depreciation charges but lower retained
profits has been a reduction of about 8 per cent in funds
flowing from these two most important internal sources,
as compared with the first six months of 1951.

Outside Sources
The ultimate external source of funds for capital invest­
ment is largely individual saving. Corporations tap these
funds by issuing bonds or stocks. New security issues sold
in the first six months of this year totaled $3.7 billion—a

THE BUSINESS REVIEW
record volume of security financing. From 1946 to 1951,
corporations issued a near-record volume of new securities.
In the 1930’s, corporations had smaller capital require­
ments and generally financed them from internal sources.
During the 1920’s, business used external sources to a
greater extent than in the thirties, but the amount of new
money raised through the capital market was lower than
it is today.
Bonds vs. Stocks. Three-quarters of the new securities
offered in the first half of this year were bonds, and this
heavy dependence on bonds is typical of the post-war
period. A number of factors are favorable to bond as
compared with stock financing. It long has been a gen­
erally accepted principle of corporate finance that bonds
or other fixed interest obligations should be issued only
when prospective earnings appear both adequate in amount
and stable in their flow. In the post-war period, this prin­
ciple has been obscured somewhat by two important con­
siderations: the major part of the excess cash of individuals
seeks safety and liquidity, and tax advantages accrue to
corporations using debt instruments.
In general, the small investor is unable to weigh the
risks of different investments or to obtain sufficient diversi­
fication to assume them; therefore, most people prefer to
hold their savings in liquid assets of fixed money value.
For example, it is estimated that only about 2.3 million

NEW SECURITY ISSUES
1919 — First Half 1952
BILLIONS $

•annual




people hold corporate stocks and only 640,000 directly
invest in corporate bonds, as compared with 41 million
families investing in life insurance and 26% million fam­
ilies holding savings accounts. Safety and liquidity seem
to be more important considerations than the rate of
return on investment. In part, this reflects the great empha­
sis on security manifested by Americans,, particularly since
the depression of the thirties, and the redistribution of
incomes to the benefit of lower-income groups who con­
sider life insurance, deposits in banks, and shares in sav­
ings and loan associations preferable to corporate stocks
and bonds. Thus, much of consumers’ unspent funds flow
to these savings institutions and through them into invest­
ment. These financial institutions traditionally adhere to
a conservative investment policy, and legal restrictions also
prevent them from putting a significant proportion of their
funds into stocks. To date, holdings of stocks by life in­
surance companies amount to only about 3 per cent of total
life funds.
High corporate tax rates increase the advantages of debt
financing because interest on bonds, unlike dividends, is
a deductible expense. There are some factors, however,
which favor the sale of stock. Inflation and the threat of
more inflation have aroused an increasing interest on the
part of investors in assets of fluctuating value. Some indi­
viduals have switched a part of their investments from
bonds to stocks hoping to provide themselves with an
inflation hedge.
Institutional demand for stocks has also increased.
Insurance company holdings of preferred and common
stocks rose from $1 billion in 1945 to $2.2 billion at the
end of 1951, but still constitute a small percentage of total
assets. Recently, laws governing insurance company invest­
ments have been altered in some states to permit the pur­
chase of more stocks. Also, mutual investment funds have
continued to gain in popularity and these institutions invest
a substantial portion of their funds in stocks. Pension
funds, which are taking a larger amount of personal sav­
ing, find the higher yields on stocks attractive.
The rise in interest rates, which has narrowed the spread
between the cost of bond and stock financing, is a third
factor diminishing the advantage of borrowing. Estab­
lished companies could expect to finance successfully with
2% to 2% per cent bonds in 1949, whereas today these
same corporations pay 3 to 3% per cent on similar issues.
At the same time, the fact that stock prices are high, his­
torically speaking, is favorable to the issuance of stock.

Page 7

THE BUSINESS REVIEW

RELATION OF STOCK ISSUES TO TOTAL AMOUNT OF
NEW SECURITY ISSUES
1919 — First Half 1952

for about 27 per cent of all new security issues as com­
pared with less than 20 per cent in 1948 and 1949. The
relationship between stock and bond financing since the
war has been comparable with that of the 1921 through
1927 period.

Conclusions

-

1920

I

The accompanying chart shows the percentage of stocks
to total security issues. Since 1950, stocks have accounted

Page 8




Between now and the middle of 1953, corporations are
likely to continue spending at or near peak levels for plant
and equipment. It seems probable, therefore, that the
demand for long-term funds will continue at a high level.
Internal funds for capital expenditures will probably be
somewhat scarcer than in previous post-war years but may
be more plentiful than in the first six months of this year.
Depreciation accruals will be large and although corpora­
tions can expect little in the way of tax relief in the near
future, the outlook for profits continues good. A more
adequate flow of funds from internal sources would tend
to reduce somewhat the need for outside financing. In
spite of some evidences of increased interest in equities,
it seems unlikely that the current ratio between stocks and
bonds will be much altered in the near future.

THE BUSINESS REVIEW

CURRENT TRENDS
Business expanded in September, picking up additional ground lost by the steel stoppage. Changes recorded by major
commercial and financial indexes were varied, but the level of activity in general was somewhat above a year ago. In
October, the economic picture, although temporarily clouded by the soft-coal strike, was substantially unchanged.
The industrial recovery occasioned by the resumption of operations in the steel industry continued into September.
Production, employment and payrolls in Pennsylvania factories showed, increases, extending the recovery from steel-strike
lows. Although the durable goods group accounted for most of the gains, nondurables also contributed. Activity was
stepped up in both textile and apparel plants where production was above a year earlier.
, September sales of department stores, seasonally adjusted, dropped substantially from the level of the previous month
and were 2 per cent below a year ago. Department store stocks showed no change during the month, but were 10 per
cent under last year. The ratio of stocks to sales was considerably lower than in September 1951, reflecting the greater
decline in inventories than in sales.
Falling food prices more than offset increases in the cost of clothing and fuel during the month. While the Philadelphia
consumer was paying more for cost-of-living items than in September last year, the index has shown a downward tendency
in recent months.
Business loans of District reporting banks increased $13 million to $865 million in the five weeks ended October 29.
Retailers, commodity dealers and producers of metals and metal products accounted for most of the rise in borrowing.
Holdings of Government securities declined $26 million, more than offsetting a rise of $10 million in other investments.
During the same period last year, business loans declined $12 million and bank security portfolios shrank about $5
million.
The nation’s private money supply increased somewhat in September, principally reflecting a substantial expansion
in bank loans. Deposits and currency holdings of business and individuals increased $2.1 billion in the third quarter this
year, as compared with $3.2 billion in the third quarter of 1951.

Third Federal
Reserve District

United States

Per cent change

Per cent change

SUMMARY

Sept.
1952
from
mo.
ago

9
mos.
1952
from
year year
ago
ago

OUTPUT
Manufacturing production. . + 4* + 1*
Construction contracts J . . . . -11 +20
Cool mining................................ +42 + 8

Sept.
1952
from
mo.
ago

year
ago

9
mos.
1952
from
year
ago

-6*
+2
-6

+ 5
- 5
+43

+ 3
+40
+ 6

- 2
0
- 8

—7*
—4*

+ 2

+ 1

Factory*

3

Department Store
Check
Payments

Payrolls

Per cent.
change
Sept. 1952
from

LOCAL
CONDITIONS

Employment

Per cent
change
Sept. 1952
from

mo.
ago

year
ago

mo.
ago

year
ago

Sales

Stocks

Per cent
change
Sept. 1952
from
mo.
ago

year
ago

Per cent
change
Sept. 1952
from
mo.
ago

year
ago

Per cent
change
Sept. 1952
from
mo.
ago

year
ago

+1

+13

EMPLOYMENT AND
INCOME

-1

+
+
+
-

+4
+8
+1
-1
+7

- 7
+ 2

0
- 6

0

+
+
—
-

+ 6
+ 9
+ 4
+ 3
+ 11

+
+
U.S. Govt, securities............ -

2
2
1
1

5
9
l
1

2
2
1
1
1

PRICES
Ot + 3t

+3f

++

Consumers...................................

+2
+3

0
0

— 1
+ 3

+12

+15

3
+ 3

wii

n

+16

-1

0

0

+ 2

+10

+4

+4

+ 12

+48

-3

+5

+ 4

+22

+1

BANKING

+ 7

+4

+1

+ 6
+ 8
+ 5
+ 4
+10

Lancaster............................

+6

+5

+2

+ 13

+3

- 2
-10

0
+8

+3

TRADE**
Department store sales.......... - 9
Department store stocks.. . .
0

+i
+i

+ 3*
0*
+ 7* + 7*

+3

+9

+12

+2

+7

+3

+17

-1

0

0

+ 6

+12

i

—9

n

- 8

+ 5

+ 14

-11

+12

+12

+12

-12

+ 9

+12

+11
+14

-3

+17

+14
+ 9

0

+10

3

+14

+ 8

-18

+11

+11

OTHER
ec ©

p r (
H—

+ 10
+ 5

♦Pennsylvania
**Adjusted for seasonal variation. fPhiladelphia.
JChanges computed from 3-moiith moving averages




York......................................

— 5

-3

+12

- 8

+ 7

+30

*Not restricted to corporate limits of cities but covers areas of one or more counties.

Page 9

THE BUSINESS REVIEW

EMPLOYMENT AND INCOME

MEASURES OF OUTPUT
Per cent change
9 mos.
Sept. 1952
1952
from
from
month
year
year
ago
ago
ago
MANUFACTURING (Pa.)......................
Durable goods industries..........................
Nondurable goods industries...................

+ 4
+ 6
+ 2

+1
0
+ 2

- 6
- 7
- 5

Foods................................................................
Tobacco............................................................
Textiles............................................................
Apparel............................................................
Lumber.............................................................
Furniture.........................................................
Paper.................................................................
Printing and publishing............................
Chemicals........................................................
Petroleum and coal products..................
Rubber.............................................................
Leather.............................................................
Stone, clay and glass..................................
Primary metal industries..........................
Fabricated metal products.......................
Machinery (except electrical).................
Electrical machinery...................................
Transportation equipment.......................
Instruments and related products. . . . .
Misc. manufacturing industries..............

+
+
+
+
+
+
+

3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
0
- 3
- 1
0
0
+12
+ 7
- 1
+ 7
+ 2
+ 3
+ 4

- 4
+ 3
+11
+ 4
- 5
+21
+ 2
- 1
0
+ 1
-17
+10
-12
+ i
+ 3
- 7
+ 9
4- 7
— 10
- 5

- 2
+ 2
-10
- 8
- 8
+ 4
- 8
- 1
0
- 9
- 5
- 5
-13
-16
- 9
- 3
+ 4
4-16
- 6
-17

COAL MINING (3rd F. R. Dist.)*____
Anthracite.......................................................
Bituminous.....................................................

+42
+44
+31

+ 8
+ 11
- 6

- 6
- 4
-18

CRUDE OIL (3rd F. R. Dist.)**.........

- 3

- 1

- 1

CONSTRUCTION—CONTRACT
AWARDS (3rd F. R. Dist.)f..............
Residential......................................................
Nonresidential...............................................
Public works and utilities.........................

-11
+ 6
-21
-20

4-20
4-34
4-30
-13

+ 2
+ 5
-17
4-47

*U.S. Bureau of Mines.
♦♦American Petroleum Inst. Bradford field.
fSource: F. W. Dodge Corporation. Changes computed from
3-month moving averages, centered on 3rd month.

Employment

Pennsylvania
Manufacturing
Industries*

(1939 avg. = 100)
All manufacturing. .. .
Durable goods
industries..................
Nondurable goods
industries...................
Foods............................
Tobacco........................
Textiles........................
Apparel........................
Lumber........................
Furniture and lumber
products.....................
Paper.............................
Printing and
publishing.................
Chemicals....................
Petroleum and coal
products.....................
Rubber.........................
Leather.........................
Stone, clay and
glass.............................
Primary metal
industries...................
Fabricated metal
products.....................
Machinery (except
electrical)...................
Electrical
machinery.................
Transportation
equipment.................
Instruments and
related products. . .
Misc. manufacturing
industries...................

Sept.
1952
(In­
dex)

Per cent
change
from
mo.
ago

Average
Weekly
Earnings

Payrolls

Sept.
1952
year (In­
ago dex)

Per cent
change
from
mo.
ago

year
ago

1952

Average
Hourly
Earnings

%
chg.
from
year
ago

%
chg.
1952

year
ago

138

+3

0

425

+ 7

+ 7

$68.92

+ 7

$1.70

+6

169

+4

+ i

498

+ 9

+ 7

76.09

+ 6

1.86

+7

109
131
90
69
131
146

+1
+4
+2
+1
+1
-4

+
+
+
-

0
2
2
1
1
6

330
340
262
223
403
411

+
+
+
+
+
—

2
4
7
3
3
4

+ 7
+ 1
+ 7
+15
+ 8
0

58.09
57.81
38.30
57.39
43.42
49.00

+ 7
+ 4
+ 5
+14
+ 7
+ 7

1.46
1.40
.98
1.43
1.17
1.16

+4
+5
+3
+4
+2
+6

125
139

+2
0

+18
- 1

412
448

+ 4
+ 4

+31
+ 9

60.66
69.74

+11
+10

1.36
1.61

+8
+7

119
147

+3
+1

- 2
- 3

341
431

+ 4
+ 1

+ 6
+ 2

80.95
69.81

+ 8
+ 5

2.05
1.67

+8
+5

157
227
85

-1
+2
0

0
- 7
4- 5

463
659
242

— 3
+ 2
4- 1

+ 6
-15
+16

88.56
72.15
48.62

+ 7
- 9
4-11

2.17
1.89
1.24

+6
+1
+5

129

0

-10

372

+ 2

- 9

65.88

+1

1.70

+4

145

+8

+ 2

446

+18

+10

85.52

+ 8

2.13

+9

180

+4

+ 2

539

+ 9

+11

71.23

+ 8

1.73

+8

225

-1

- 7

664

0

- 3

74.77

+ 3

1.76

+4

287

+4

+ 8

734

+ 8

+16

71.56

+ 8

1.72

+5

186

+4

+ 10

523

+ 3

+10

79.81

+ 1

2.00

+5

172

+3

8

505

-

6

67.06

1.66

+4

4

381

6

+ 2

58.61

+
+

2

+3

+
+

5

133

-

7

1.38

+7

♦Production workers only.

TRADE
Sales

Per cent change
Third F. R. District
Indexes: 1947-49 Avg. = 100
Adjusted for seasonal variation

Sept.
1952 Sept. 19J>2 from
(Index)
month
year
ago
ago

SALES
Department stores........................
Women’s apparel stores............

105
82

-9
-8
+2*

- 2
- 5
4-17*

STOCKS
Department stores........................
Women’s apparel stores............

113p
102

0
4-5
4-6*

9 mos.
1952
from
year
ago

-10
-10
- 9*

Recent Changes in Department Store Sales
in Central Philadelphia

- 1
- 2
4-15*

Per
cent
change
from
year
ago
- 4
- 1
+11
- 1
-12

•Not adjusted for seasonal variation.

Page 10



p—preliminary.

Departmental Sales and Stocks of
Independent Department Stores
Third F. R. District

Stocks (end of month)

% chg. % chg. % chg.
Sept.
Sept.
Ratio to sales
9 mos.
1952
1952
1952 (months’ supply)
from
from
from
September
year
year
year
1952
1951
ago
ago
ago

Total—All departments.................................................

+2

-2

-11

2.9

3.4

Main store total.................................................................
Piece goods and household textiles..........................
Small wares.......................................................................
Women’s and misses’ accessories..............................
Women’s and misses’ apparel....................................
Men’s and boys’ wear...................................................
Homefurnishings.............................................................
Other main store.............................................................

4-2
-4
+7
+4
+3
+4
0
+5

-3
-8
+i
-1
+3
-1
-8
-1

-12
-15
- 4
- 5
- 5
-12
-16
-25

3.1
3.5
3.6
2.9
2.1
4.5
3.2
4.0

3.6
3.9
4.0
3.2
2.2
5.3
3.8
5.5

Basement store total........................................................
Domestics and blankets...............................................
Small wares.......................................................................
Women’s and misses’ wear..........................................
Men's and boys’ wear...................................................
Homefurnishings.............................................................
Shoes....................................................................................

0
-2
+5
0
+1
+1
-2

-2
-1
-5
-1
-1
-8
-3

- 7
-11
-12
0
- 8
-13
-16

2.1
2.2
1.9
1.6
2.6
2.4
2.6

2.2
2.4
2.3
1.6
2.9
2.8
3.0

+5

+2

THE BUSINESS REVIEW

CONSUMER CREDIT

BANKING
Receiv­
ables
(end of
month)

Sales

% chg. % chg. % chg.
Sept.
Sept.
9 mos.
1952
1952
1952
from
from
from
yearago yearago year ago

Third F. R. District

MONEY SUPPLY AND RELATED ITEMS
United States (billions

$)

Sept.
24
1952

Changes in—
four
weeks

year

Money supply, privately owned.............................................

187.4

+ 1.2

+9.5

Demand deposits, adjusted....................................................
Time deposits...............................................................................
Currency outside banks................................................

96.4
64.5
26.6

+ .6
+ .4
+ .2

+4.4
+3.9
+i.i

21.3*

-1.8*

-1.4*

i

+

+1
+ 2
+ 7

1

Department stores
+ 8
+ 9

Turnover of demand deposits..................................................

i

Loans made

Loan Credit
Third F. R. District

Loan
bal­
ances
out­
standing
(end of
month)

+ .5

+8.5

U.S. Government securities....................................................
Other securities............................................................................

61 2
61.6
14.3

- .4
- .1

+L9
+i+

20.6

+ .8

+1.2

Required reserves (estimated)..........................................
Excess reserves (estimated)...................................................

+11

137.1

Member bank reserves held......................................................

+ 2
+19
+ 9

+ +

Commercial bank earning assets............................................
Furniture stores
Cash.........................................................................................

19.8
.8

+ .2
+ .6

+1.0
+ .2

Changes in reserves during 4 weeks ended September 24,
reflected the following:
Effect on
reserves

Consumer instalment loans
Commercial banks...............................................................
Industrial banks and loan companies..........................
Small loan companies.........................................................

+29
+37
+ 7
+29

+39
+32
+12
+23

0
+25
+18
+16

PRICES

Increase in Reserve Bank holdings of Governments...
Decrease in Reserve Bank loans........................................
Other Reserve Bank credit...................................................
Net Payments by the Treasury..........................................
Miscellaneous..............................................................................

+ .6
—.5
+ .1
+.5
+.1

Change in reserves....................................................................

chg. % Chg. % chg.
Sept.
Sept.
9 mos.
1952
1952
1952
from
from
from
yearago yearago year ago
%

+.8

* Annual rate for the month and per cent changes from month and year ago
at leading cities outside N. Y. City.

Oct.
29
1952

OTHER BANKING DATA

Per cent change
from
Sept.
1952
(Index)

Monthly Wholesale
and
Consumer Prices

United States (billions $):
Loans—
Commercial, industrial and agricultural....................

22.3

Real estate..............................................................................
To banks..................................................................................
All other...................................................................................

6.0
.6
6.8

year

Total loans—gross.............................................................
Investments..............................................................................

+ .6
-1
.1
+ .2

+ 1.7
4
+ -3
0
+ .8

37.9
39.7
86.2

+ .9
+ .5
+ -3

+ 3.2
+ 1.2
4-3 7

Real estate..............................................................................

865
76
147

+ 13
+ 6
+ 1

+ 72
+ 33
+ 15

All other...................................................................................

444

18

+ 9

+ 51

Total loans—gross............................................................. 1,550
Investments............................................................................ 1,463
3,311

+ 43
- 16
- 10

+181
- 39
+ 94

- .1
+ .8
- .1
0
+ -3
+ .3

+ -9
+ 1.0
+ .i
+ i.i
+ i.i
+ .i

+ 18
+ 10
- 2
+ 24
+ .2%

+
+
+
+
+

year
ago

112
106
111
113

0
-3
0
0

-1
-3
0
-1

191
192
233
198

0
0
-2
+1

+3
+3
+5
-3

Third Federal Reserve District (millions $):
Loans—
Commercial, industrial and agricultural....................

153
213
176

+1
0
0

0
-4
+4

Consumer prices (1935-39 = 100)

five
weeks

Weekly reporting banks—leading cities

month
ago

Wholesale prices—United States (1947-49 = 100). . .

Changes in—

4-

+
-

Member bank reserves and related items
Weekly Wholesale Prices—IJ.S.
(Index: 1947-49 average =100)

All com­
modi­
ties

Farm
prod­
ucts

Proc­
essed
foods

Other

111.1

106.6
104.6
105.1
104.5
104.3

108.5
108.1
107.4
106.2
105.6

112.6
112.6
112.5
112.4
112.4

110.7
110.6
110.3
110.1

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.




United States (billions $):held............................................
Member bank reserves
Reserve Bank discounts and advances.......................
Reserve Bank holdings of Governments....................
Gold stock..............................................................................
Money in circulation..........................................................
Treasury deposits at Reserve Banks...........................

$):

20.4
1.2
23.6
23.3
29.5
.6

Federal Reserve Bank of Phila. (millions
Loans and securities......................................................... 1,523
Federal Reserve notes....................................................... 1,773
Member hank reserve deposits......................................
930
Gold certificate reserves................................................... 1,259
45.0%
Reserve ratio
................................................................

(%)

31
78
21
77

-9%

Page 11