View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Common Markets and the Common Good




The Quarter-Acre Living Room

MARCH 1 6
9 3

BUSINESS REVIEW

is produced in the Department of Research. Bertram W . Zumeta was primarily respon­
sible for the article, "Common Markets and the Common Good" and Lawrence C. Murdoch, Jr. fo r "The
Quarter-Acre Living Room." The authors will be glad to receive comments on their articles.
Requests for additional copies should be addressed to Bank and Public Relations, Federal Reserve Bank of
Philadelphia, Philadelphia I, Pennsylvania.



OD
The new international competition
offers the Third District real opportunities.

Something there is that doesn’t
love a wall,
That wants it down!
— Robert Frost

could not efficiently produce. One reason for our
tremendous economic growth was that we had a
common market.
The countries of Europe had tariff walls for

The United States is a common market and al­

years. Then they took a new look at their

ways has been. Maine potatoes, Michigan auto­

situation. In Robert Frost’s words:

mobiles, Kansas wheat and Texas cotton go

Before I built a wall I’d ask to know

anywhere in the country without payment of

What I was walling in or walling out . . .

tariffs. If national boundaries had cut up our

The European countries decided they all had

land into small and warring segments, we would

lost by walling out each other. The central six

have had industries located where conditions of

nations*

production were less than best. There might

Community (EEC), which most people call the

have been steel mills in Kansas or cotton fields

Common Market.

established the European Economic

in Delaware, producing at too high a cost. For­

The EEC has made the world sit up and take

tunately, we did not do these things. Instead, the

notice. Lowering tariff walls should spur eco­

states best adapted to growing cotton specialized

nomic growth, because of the advantages of

in producing it; the places well endowed with

regional specialization and large-scale produc­

fuel and ore supplies made iron and steel. Every­

tion. Up to now, that seems to have been the

body gained because each region worked at

effect in EEC, as the charts show.

its trade, and could then sell its products any­
where and use the proceeds to buy what it




* Belgium,
Germany.

France,

Italy,

Luxembourg,

Netherlands,

W e st

3

business review

Since they formed the European Economic Community, trade among the Common Market nations has increased faster
than their external trade, while as a group they have continued to enjoy rapid economic growth.

TOTAL INTERNATIONAL TRADE OF EEC NATIONS
INDEX 1958=100

INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION
INDEX 1953=100

for the United States. Common Market countries
are important markets for United States exports.
If these nations find that elimination of internal
trade barriers has uncovered cheaper sources of
The Common Market has some knotty prob­

supply among themselves, we lose markets. The

lems still before it, however. Common Market

EEC external tariffs already inhibit entry of

internal tariffs have gone down by half, but they

some American goods. Common Market nations

still have halfway to go. The first part of a

also compete with the U. S. in other world

journey is not necessarily the hardest. Nor has

markets. Increased efficiency and lowered costs

every commodity enjoyed such large tariff re­

resulting from

ductions. Agricultural commodities and some

production will make them more effective com­

others have had gentler treatment. Furthermore,

petitors everywhere. This includes not only for­

adjustments in Europe up until now created few

eign countries where our products compete with

real hardships, because they came when the

theirs, but even our own domestic markets.

nations of EEC were enjoying full employment
and vigorous economic activity.

specialization and larger-scale

These considerations were important in lead­
ing Congress to enact the Trade Expansion Act

The Common Market’s rise has sharpened

of 1962. This new law means that reciprocal

some pointed problems of economic adjustment

tariff reductions will be negotiated between the

4




U. S. and other nations, particularly Common

THE CASE FOR COMMON
MARKETS
Specializatibn promotes efficiency. There are two
parts to this proposition. Applied to nations, the
firs t part is called the principle of absolute advan­
tage. It points out that a group of several pro­
ducers will gain by cooperating if each can make
a certain product more efficiently than the others.
For example, we do not try to fight our absolute
disadvantage in banana production by high-cost
hothouse forcing. O ur productive resources earn
more if used to make and sell machines to tropical
countries, using the payments to buy their prod­
ucts. Both we and the tropical nations gain. They
get machines they otherwise could not have; we
get bananas at much lower cost.
The second part of the free-trade proposition
is one of the hopeful facts of life. Called the
principle of comparative advantage, it explains
why people and nations endowed only with
modest resources can play useful roles in the
world. It states that several producers will gain
by cooperating if each concentrates on produc­
ing those goods or services which he makes most
efficiently, even if one producer excels at every­
thing. A good illustration of this is the case of
the businessman and the bookkeeper. The busi­
nessman may be better able than tne bookkeeper
to maintain the firm 's accounts; he may have an
absolute advantage as an entrepreneur and also
as an accountant. But his time returns far greater
rewards if he works altogether at promoting the
business and hires the bookkeeper to keep ac­
counts. The bookkeeper, on the other hand, may
be better at bookkeeping than anything else. He
minimizes his absolute disadvantage at every­
thing, including bookkeeping, by taking advan­
tage of his comparatively greatest skill.
The principle of comparative advantage
implies that international trade should be unre­
stricted. Free trade allows each nation to maxi­
mize its productivity by specializing in producing
those goods and services in which it is most
efficient. Since no nation is wasting efforts in
lines where it is relatively inefficient, there is a
larger total output to be distributed through
trade.




Market nations. Changes in tariff structures will
affect producers in every part of the country.

THE THIRD DISTRICT, THE U. S., AND
FOREIGN TRADE
Business firms go through a continuous process
of adjustment to changes in methods and mar­
kets, tastes and techniques. The rise of the Euro­
pean Economic Community and the new trade
act confront U. S. businesses with one more
adjustment. Protected industries will be under
pressure because, protection diminished, foreign
goods will move into their domestic markets.
Gradual removal of protection will force these
producers either to improve efficiency and tech­
nology drastically, shift operations to products
in which they can develop a comparative ad­
vantage, or close. Removing trade restrictions
leaves an industry facing the cold facts of costs.
There is, of course, another side to the coin.
Protected industries will not always operate at a
comparative disadvantage if protection is dimin­
ished. Simultaneous reductions in tariffs abroad
are built into the system of negotiated trade
liberalization. If an industry enjoyed brisk ex­
port trade before tariffs were reciprocally re­
duced, it should continue to do so. If an industry
had little or no protection to begin with, freeing
trade should stimulate it considerably. In every
region, a new balance will be struck between
the stimulus of export expansion and the con­
traction resulting from domestic tariff reduc­
tions. How that new balance will affect the re­
gion depends on the comparative advantages its
industries enjoy in international trade.

Trade potential vs. industrial structure
Industries in a region do not come labeled as to
where they stand on the scale of competitiveness

5

How w the Third District fare?
ill
THE TRADE EXPANSION ACT
OF 1962

The net result of the effort to measure trade

Enacted in October, 1962, the Act empowers the
President to negotiate reciprocal ta riff reduc­
tions with foreign countries. He can reduce
tariffs up to 50 per cent; he can remove entirely
tariffs where the rate does not now exceed 5 per
cent. He can negotiate reductions in excess of
50 per cent on products in which the U. S. and
EEC together account fo r 80 per cent or more of
free world trade. There are numerous other pro­
visions reflecting various safeguards and some
compromises. There are in addition two impor­
tant sets of provisions: adjustment assistance
for firm s and groups of workers adversely affected
by ta riff reductions, and a requirement that re­
ductions must be gradually staged over a period
of at least five years. The Trade Expansion Act,
therefore, directly recognizes two important
principles: (I) common markets serve the com­
mon good; (2) where trade restrictions have dis­
torted an economy, moves toward maximum use
of comparative advantage must be gradual, and
adjustment assistance may be in order.
The Trade Expansion Act of 1962 continues
our traditional principle of the most favored
nation. That means we do not intend to dis­
criminate in reducing ta riffs. A reduction nego­
tiated with EEC can and usually will be extended
to similar products entering the U. S. from any
free nation.

major U. S. manufacturing industries has been

in foreign trade. Having said this, one is re­

largest industries, accounting for approximately

potential is a set of rankings. Each of the 20
ranked with respect to its estimated prospects
for benefiting if reciprocal tariff reductions go
into effect. Sets of trade potential rankings also
have been constructed for the State of New
Jersey and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Having trade potential ranks for each region, we
can tentatively answer two major questions. Is
the U. S. industrial structure weighted toward
industries with good or poor export trade poten­
tial? Are the states in this region more or less
favorably situated than the nation as a whole?*
The tables on the opposite page make it pos­
sible to visualize the part each industry plays in
each region’s export trade prospects. Industries
are listed two ways: down the page in decreas­
ing order of estimated trade potential; across
the page in decreasing order of importance as
employers. They are divided into four groups
each way. The groupings on the scale of trade
potential simply segregate the top one-quarter,
next one-quarter, and so on. The groupings
across the page single out first the two or three

minded of the draftee who, instructed to remove

the first one-fourth of total employment, then

his eyeglasses and read the chart on the wall,

the industries accounting for

peered about and calmly inquired, “ What wall?”

fourth, and so on. The actual percentage of total

There is no standard measuring stick for trade

employment accounted for by each individual

the next one-

potential. An index is needed which takes into

industry is recorded at the place in its column

account an industry’s actual export trade as well

marked by where that industry ranks in the

as the probable net balance of effects following

trade potential list.

reduction of both import duties and foreign

The positions at the upper left and lower left

tariffs, and which also reflects regional differ­

of the tables are vitally important. Concentra-

ences in competitiveness. Since such an index

( Continued, on Page 8)

did not exist, we have constructed one. The data,
sources and methods used are outlined later. In
the next section, the findings are described.

6




* The follow ing analysis is restricted to manufacturing industries.
Manufacturing is the dominant activity in the Th ird D istric t. O f
course, materials and agricultural products also enter into foreign
trade. In many agricultural commodities, the United States has a
commanding competitive advantage.

1962 EMPLOYMENT RELATED TO ESTIMATED TRADE POTENTIAL RANK
United States Manufacturing Industries
Tota
Industries Ranked
by Estim ated
Trade
Potential

Pennsylvania Manufacturing Industries

Percentages of
Manufacturing Employment

Percentages of
To ta l Manufacturing Employment
Industries Ranked
by Estimated
Trade
Potential

Individual Industries
Top
three in
employ­
ment

Next
three

Next
five

Lowest
nine

Group
Totals

Nonelectrical machinery
Chemicals
Tobacco,manufactures
Instruments
Tra nsp ortation equipment
Prim ary metals
Rubber and plastics
Electrical machinery
Paper
Fabricated metals

5.1
0.5
2.1
9.8

Printing and publishing
Petroleum and coal
Miscellaneous manufacturing
Stone, clay and glass
Food

2.3
3.6
6.7
24.4
3.6
3.4
10.6
20.7

To tals




7.4
21.2

18.0
5.2
1.5
4.5
4.6
2.2
25.3
8.1

Food
Leather
Furniture
Lum ber and wood
Apparel

2.2
2.3
3.6
26.2

1.6
2.9
16.5

L o w e r fo u rth :

5.2

23.1

38.2
7.4
9.8

Textiles
Petroleum and coal
Printing and publishing
Stone, clay and glass
Miscellaneous manufacturing

1.2

29.5

2.1
3.6
.8

T h ir d f o u r t h :

5.6

Textiles
Leather
Furniture
Lum ber and wood
Apparel

18.5
4.0

Fabricated metals
Electrical machinery
Rubber and plastics
Paper
Prim ary metals

9.1

L o w e st fo u rth :

Group
To tals

Lowest
ten

S e c o n d fo u rth :

28.7
7.0

T h ir d fo u rt h :

Next
five

8.0

Nonelectrical machinery
Chemicals
Instruments
Tra nsp ortation Equipment
Tobacco

8.7

S e c o n d fo u rth :

Next
three

U p p e r fo u rth :

26.2

U p p e r fo u rth :

Individual Industries
Top
two in
employ­
ment

2.4
1.6
0.9
12.3
28.8

To tals

100.0

25.9

25.7

100.0

19.6

New Jersey Manufacturing Industries
Tota
Industries Ranked
by Estimated
Trade
Potential

Percentages of
Manufacturing Employment

Individual
Top
two in
employ­
ment

Next
three

ndustries
Next
five

Lowest
ten

33.0

U p p e r fo u rth :

Chemicals
Nonelectrical machinery
1nstruments
Prim ary metals
Transportation equipment

11.4
7.3
4.1
4.8
5.4
29.4

S e c o n d fo u rth :

Tobacco manufactures
Rubber and plastics
Electrical machinery
Paper
Fabricated metals

0.2
3.5
15.4
3.5
6.8
16.8

T h ir d f o u r t h :

3.5
1.3
4.1

Textiles
Petroleum and coal
Printing and publishing
Stone, clay and glass
Miscellaneous manufacturing

4.3
3.6
20.8

L o w e r fo u rth :

8.0

Food
Leather
Furniture
Lum ber and wood
Apparel
To tals

Group
To ta ls

1.4
1.2
0.7
9.5
26.8

24.8

25.4

23.0

100.0

7

business review

suggestion of the pattern of entries running from

(Continued from Page 6)
tion of industries at the upper left means a

upper left to lower right. And the entries in the

region’s important industries are high on the

last column reveal a concentration of employ­

trade potential list. Concentration in the lower

ment in the higher trade potential groups.

left means the region’s large industries are not
likely to benefit greatly from trade increases

Correlating size and trade potential

under liberalized trade conditions.

There is a way to summarize all this informa­

It is interesting to compare the situations in

tion. Why not rank the 20 industries by em­

Pennsylvania and the United States. The U. S.

ployment size, and find out if there is a large

has a well balanced industrial distribution from

or small amount of correspondence between the

top to bottom of the trade potential scale. This
is revealed by the figures at farthest right in

trade potential ranks and the employment size
ranks? What kinds of correspondence can

the table. A little more than one-quarter of

there be? There are two. The highest-ranking

U. S. manufacturing employment is in indus­

industry in terms of employment might also

tries in the top group, and another full one-

have the highest trade potential rank, and so

quarter in industries in the second group with

on down the line. That would mean the indus­

respect to trade potential. Rather less than one-

trial structure was tilted to the maximum de­

quarter each goes to the two

lowest trade

gree toward industries with good prospects for

potential groups. But in Pennsylvania, there is

benefiting from expanded foreign trade. On

a dearth of jobs at the top of the list, an

the other

hand,

oversupply in the second grouping, a shortage

have

lowest

in the third group but not in the lowest class.

second

Furthermore, Pennsylvania’s apparel indus­

the

largest

the largest
trade

might

industry

potential

have

the

might

rank,
next

the

lowest

potential, and so on. That would mean the

try, a very important employer in the state,

industrial structure was weighted to a maxi­

appears in the lower left position, where no

mum away from industries with good trade

U. S. industries occur. At the other extreme,

prospects.

there is no

upper-bracket

Pennsylvania

em­

There is a standard measure of correspond­

ployer sufficiently high on the trade potential
list to get into the promising upper left posi­

ence of rankings. It is called the rank correla­
tion. In the first case, where the ranks corre­

tion. The table for a region optimally oriented

spond perfectly, the rank correlation would be

toward export trade would be empty in the

1.00. In the opposite case, where the largest

lower left and upper right corners, because in

industry had the lowest comparative advan­

such a region all large industries would have

tage, the second largest the next lowest, and so

good foreign trade prospects and therefore all

on,

industries with poor export prospects would be

— completely negative.

the

rank

correlation

would

be

— 1.00

small. There is little evidence of any such

The U. S. industries have been ranked by

tendency in the U. S. and Pennsylvania tables.

employment size, and the correlation between

The table for New Jersey reveals a more
export-oriented

computed. It turned out to be .05. That puts

those one would want empty; there is a clear

it almost in the middle between the two possi­




The empty

blocks

their trade potential and size ranks has been

are

8

area.

business review

ble extremes of — 1.00 and — 1.00. There is,

Rules

concerning

disclosure

then, no particular tendency for the nation’s

therefore bar access to estimates of employment

industrial structural to overbalance either toward

attributable to exports in Delaware. Delaware’s

or away from export-linked industries.*

industrial

employment,

of

however,

information

is

concen­

The rank correlation between the trade po­

trated into only a few industries. Most of the

tential and size ranks of the Pennsylvania in­

large ones export in proportion equal to or

dustries

For the industries in New

greater than their size. The three largest manu­

Jersey, it is .31. The correlation for Pennsyl­

facturing industries in Delaware are chemicals,

vania indicates an overall situation similar to

food processing, and the machinery group in­

is .04.

the nation, but the higher New Jersey figure

cluding transportation equipment. The machin­

indicates some tendency toward specialization

ery and transportation equipment industries as

in export-linked industries. This is of course

a group are at least average in export trade

not a surprise. The rank correlations are a

potential. The food processors in Delaware in

numerical

the

1960 accounted for more of the state’s exports

visual

than they did of its employment; the situation

original

expression
two-way

of

tables,

what

was,

a

general

in

was the reverse for this industry in both Penn­

impression.
A region would face serious difficulties if

sylvania and New Jersey. Delaware’s chemicals

trade liberalization promised to benefit few but

manufacturers in 1960 exported about 30 per

harm many of its industries. In two of the

cent of the state’s total of goods sent abroad;

three states included in the Third Federal Re­

this was much more than proportional to their

serve District, such evidence as can be mar­
shaled concerning trade potential does not

importance as employers in the state. These
three industrial groups account for more than

indicate this is the situation. In Pennsylvania,

half the jobs in manufacturing in Delaware.

the machinery industries, with good trade po­

They appear in total to have better than aver­

tential,

age potential for taking advantage of foreign
trade opportunities.

are

important enough

to

offset the

state’s large apparel industry, which is not
likely to benefit from intensified international
competition. In New Jersey, there is a definite

The Third Federal Reserve District

tendency

We have related trade potential to size of in­

toward

concentration

in

industries

with good international trade prospects.

dustry for three states, but significant portions
of both Pennsylvania and New Jersey lie out­

Delaware

side the Third Federal Reserve District. What

Delaware is a small state, and many of its in­

difference would it make if we could eliminate

dustries are dominated by a very few firms.

them? While there are not specific estimates of

* The fact tha t the rank correlation fo r the U . S. was close to zero
does not reveal some so rt o f neutral foreign trade position— neither
good nor bad. The position actually is very favorable— U . S. exports
exceed U . S. im ports by more than 20 per cent. The correlation
fig ure only indicates tha t U . S. performance, good as the exportim p o rt balance shows it to be, could be pushed even fa rth e r in
term s o f specialization in export-oriented industries. The real
service o f the rank cocrelations fo r our purpose is to provide a basis
fo r comparison, a way o f saying whether o r not each state's indus­
tria l structure puts it in a position as favorable as the good U . S.
situation.




export-linked employment for Eastern Pennsyl­
vania and

Southern

New Jersey,

a general

judgment concerning their trade potential is
possible.
The

main

effect

of

eliminating

Western

Pennsylvania from consideration would be to

9

decrease the employment rank of the primary
metals

industry.

This

drastically

Outside manufacturing, the business of sea­

change the relationships already established for

ports will improve, and free movement of farm

Pennsylvania.

products if it comes will help one of our most

The

would

several

not

lean toward having export-oriented industries.

machinery

cate­

gories and the chemicals industry are more
important in Eastern Pennsylvania, but so are

efficient industries.
Without doubt, foreign trade expansion will

the apparel, textiles and some other industries

intensify

with

the competitive

problems

of

some

In

firms. Nevertheless, the fact that certain indus­

South Jersey, food processing is a dominant
industry. Food products have relatively low

tries are low on the trade potential scale does
not mean they are bound to be badly hurt if

export rankings. However, the industries which

foreign trade is liberalized. There were viewers

contributed most to New Jersey’s good pros­

with alarm who predicted trouble for French

comparatively

less

trade

potential.

impor­

industry in the Common Market. But the fresh

tant in South Jersey also. If one could correlate

air of competition actually blew away cobwebs

trade potential and employment size for East­

of rigidity which had grown up in French in­

pects— machinery

and

chemicals— are

ern Pennsylvania and Southern New Jersey, he

dustrial

probably would find the two regions looking

manufacturers found they could compete and

more

The

they have done so very effectively. American

a

industrialists have some reputation for com­

the New Jersey relationship probably

petitiveness; many of them will pass the test,

would not be so good as it was for the entire
stale.

too, even in industries which do not rank high

alike than

Pennsylvania
little;

do

the

correlation

whole

states.

might

increase

practices.

Put

to

the

test,

French

at present in foreign trade comparisons.

One of the most important economic activi­
ties in this

region

will

benefit handsomely

A NOTE ABOUT METHOD AND SOURCES
In this study, information was needed which
would provide an objective basis for ranking
industries by trade potential, while simultane­
ously allowing for discrimination between re­
gions. The main source for such data is the

from any increase of trade, whether exports or

export origin surveys for 1960, published by

imports. This is, of course, the business of the

the Department of Commerce. They contain

Delaware River ports.

estimates, for each major industry, of the em­
ployment which is directly or indirectly at­

Adding up the score

tributable to production of goods for export.

The nature of the industrial structures of the

These

states in the Third Federal Reserve District

performance. An industry with a high per­

estimates

reflect

an

industry’s

recent

puts them in a position to benefit from foreign

centage of its employment attributable to ex­

trade expansion. We have seen that in manu­

port trade certainly has in the recent past

facturing the Third District portions of Dela­

specialized more in export trade than one with

ware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania in total

a low percentage. The estimates do not dis-

10




criminate between an industry which is grad­
ually losing ground in export trade and one
which is gaining, however. This question was
attacked by means of a different set of data.

c. Export-import

balance,

1960— positive

(exports exceeding imports) or negative.
d. Change in export-import balance, 19541960— becoming more or less favorable.

Each major industrial classification covers a

The 16 possible combinations were ranked by

host of subindustries. It is probable that those

the estimated degree of export potential they

particular

represented. For example, an industry which

subindustries

which

are

export-

oriented will cluster more in some regions of

achieved

a favorable

and

increasing

export

the country than others. These regions should

balance in the face of high tariffs abroad, while

have higher percentages of export-linked em­

being protected against competition from for­

ployment. The Department of Commerce data

eign goods

reflect such regional differences.

tariffs, was judged to be in the most favorable

only by relatively low domestic

The Surveys and Research Corporation of

position. An industry, highly protected, which

Washington, D. C. has classified products by

faced low tariff rates abroad but in spite of

major manufacturing industry and estimated

these advantages was developing an increas­

export-import

balances

for

1954

and

1960.

These estimates, published in the Trade Expan­
sion Act hearings in 1962, enable one to iden­

ingly unfavorable export-import balance, was
judged in the least favorable position.
The outcome of the above procedures was an

tify industries, perhaps equal by the export

ordering of the 20 industries into several trade

employment criterion, which differ in that their

potential categories. There were a number of

trade balances are changing in different direc­
tions. This information provides a clue to

empty classes, and there were a number of

future trade potential, in the sense that upward

contained

or downward trends
balance may continue.

least favorable was unoccupied.

in

the

export-import

ties. For example, the top class described above
three industries.

The

one

judged

The next step was to rank the 20 industries

A further check on future potential can be
made by noting whether most of the important

according to their percentages of employment

products produced by an industry meet rela­

were four sets of ranks:

attributable to exports. At this point, there

tively high or low tariffs abroad, and whether

a. The set obtained from the tariffs and

they are protected by relatively high or low

export-import balances. These were modified

tariffs at home.

slightly

for

application

to

Third

District

The information outlined above was assem­

states in recognition that aircraft are less

bled in the following way. First, each industry

important and steel more important in local

was placed into one of 16 possible categories

than in national industrial structures.

defined by which combination it possessed of
the following 4 characteristics:
a. Tariff rates on imports of similar prod­
ucts— relatively high or low.
b. Tariffs met by the industry’s products
in Europe— relatively high or low.




b. Three sets obtained from the data of
the export origin surveys: one each for the
U. S., Pennsylvania and New Jersey.
The two methods of ranking produced re­
sults which correlated quite well. In the few
cases where large discrepancies occurred, the

11

business review

final trade potential rank was a compromise.

tions were rather evident; in several cases it was

For example, primary metals was high in the

difficult to decide between adjacent industries, so

export origin survey rankings but near the

that the final choice had to be arbitrary.

middle of the other set. Its final rank was put
in between.

How good are the rankings? At the least,
they are so constructed that extreme errors are

To construct the final trade potential rank­

unlikely. Each independently constructed pre­

ings, the tentative position indicated by the

liminary set serves to check the other. And the

rank category based on export-import balances

final results do not do violence to one’s general

and tariffs was modified by reference to the

expectations. It is no surprise to find the ma­

appropriate set of regional rankings based on

chinery industry high up on the list, for in­

export origin survey data. Most relative posi­

stance, or apparel in a lower position.

THE QUARTER-ACRE
LIVING ROOM
A discussion of
the money
and motives
behind the American
passion for outdoor
living.

Buds on the forsythia, the first robin, income

hibernation.

Florida

First he puts on an old plaid jacket, dirty

about “ can’t-miss” rookies— all are traditional

khaki pants and vintage army boots and tours

harbingers of spring. They help to awake the

his quarter-acre estate to see what damage

hardy American yard-owner from his winter

winter has done. Then he checks his equip-

tax

returns,

glowing

12




reports

from

business review

ment: the rotary mower, electric edger, power

This figure will be only slightly less than con­

sprayer, automatic sprinkler, adjustable spreader

sumers spend directly for education or for re­

and the lawn sweeper. A little oil here and there

ligious and welfare activities.

and everything should be ready to go.

YARD GOODS

It’s never too early to get after those dor­
mant

crabgrass

seeds

so

he

selects several

pounds of prevention from a supply of chem­
icals that would make Rachel Carson blanch.
Into the spreader it goes and he trudges off
trailing a granular wake.
To many people gardening is a fine hobby
and

they

derive

real

satisfaction

from

Estimates of outdoor living expenditures— 1960
($ Millions)
Nursery stock, seeds, bulbs andplants
Garden tools, supplies and power
equipment
Fertilizers and insecticides
Furniture and barbecue equipment

$1,000
1,800
500
500
$3,800

it

throughout the growing season. But, let’s face

We also discovered that most estimates of

it, to many others gardening may be a tedious

outdoor-living expenditures for the year 1950

chore. They probably wouldn’t admit it, even

clustered around the one billion dollar mark. This

to themselves, but a sizable percentage of the

means a fourfold increase in little more than a

so-called

“ garden

enthusiasts”

really

dislike

decade. Such a growth rate is more than twice
that of total consumer spending during the

gardening.
This is not surprising; in fact, it is in keep­

same period. Estimates of the outdoor-living

ing with the modern American character. What

bill were widely divergent in the mid-1950’s,

is surprising is that the relatively uncoordi­

and we hesitate to even guess about the shape

nated outdoor-living industry has recognized

of the year-to-year growth curve.

and capitalized on this attitude. A neat tailor­

GOLD IN GREENERY

ing of supply to meet a “ quite-contrary” de­
mand

is

one

reason

outdoor

living

now

Sales of flowers, seeds, and potted plants.
M ILLIO N S O F DOLLARS

commands a multibillion-dollar price tag.

BROW NBACKS AND GREENBACKS
Statistics on

outdoor living are sparse and

spotty. Much of the data are based on estimates
which seem to vary with the skill, and perhaps
the motives, of their makers.
Our research shows, however, a fair amount
of agreement that about four billion dollars was
spent for outdoor living in 1960. This includes
not only garden supplies and equipment but
patio furniture and barbecue paraphernalia (see
the following table). We expect the total to be
well over four billion dollars this year— pro­
vided, of course, the weatherman cooperates.




13

The Department of Commerce does publish

find it cooler outdoors than in.

flowers,

In their effort to house so many for so little,

seeds and potted plants. In 1950 the figure was

builders have eliminated the porch. This is a

$524 million; in 1961 it was $1,058 million.

crime against society that ranks with Detroit’s

reliable yearly data

on

outlays for

As the chart shows, this type of spending in­

removal of the rumble seat. The porch was an

creased only moderately as a percentage of all

effective and pleasant place to accommodate

consumer expenditures, which could mean the

the overflow from indoors. It was well suited

estimates we cited for total outdoor living in

for

1950 and 1960 are far off. More likely it indi­

courting. It was an observation booth on the

cates other components of the outdoor spend­

neighborhood and a rainy-day playground. It

ing total increased

also was expensive to build.

considerably

faster than

rocking,

reading,

talking,

visiting

and

Without a veranda families moved around to

flowers, seeds and plants.

the backyard. There they found a level spot and

FROM PARLOR TO PORCH TO PATIO

unfolded their chairs. More often than not, they

Many things play a part in the soaring popu­

set bricks or flat stones on the ground and called

larity of outdoor living. Such pillars of postwar

them a patio.

analysis as the movement to the

In other words, one of the reasons people

suburbs, increasing leisure and expanding in­

spend so much time outdoors in the summer­

come are of major importance, to be sure. In

time is because it is hot and crowded indoors

consumer

addition, a number of more specialized influ­

and living on the porch is no longer possible.

ences have come into play.

Thus the yard helps

Most obvious among them is the fact that it

overcome

the modern

house’s inadequacies. It is used as an extension

is pleasant to be outdoors in good weather;

of the house— a second living room without

people

walls.

naturally

enjoy

summer

smells

and

sounds. At the same time they were being lured

Many people garden simply as a means to

by the birds and the breeze, many people also

decorate their quarter-acre living room. They

were

use petunias instead

being

driven

outdoors

by

modern

architecture.
Postwar homes of two and three bedrooms,

of

Picasso prints

and

blue-grass instead of
broadlooms. But the

a bath, kitchen, and living room are just too

basic

small to comfortably contain a family with

doors and out, is to

several noisy children. Everybody bursts out—

provide attractive sur­

for a bit of privacy, if nothing else— as soon as

roundings

the weather permits.

family to enjoy and

Modern houses often are of frame construc­
tion with low ceilings, and they get hotter than
earlier models with thick masonry walls. Fur­

objective,

for

in­

the

to show off with pride
to visitors.
It follows then that gardening

and lawn

thermore, the young trees that recent home

maintenance often assume the status of house­

buyers have planted do not yet shade their

keeping chores— necessary but not much fun.

dark-shingled roofs. No wonder many families

In typical housekeeping fashion many garden-

14




BEDS, BUDS, AND BLOOMS

over for products to make the doing easier and

Per cent of all gardening households that bought during

the results more appealing.
Work-saving appliances— long

1961 . . .
0

10

20

30

40

50

------ 1 ------ 1 ------- r -------1
--------1
---------|

FLOWER OR VEGETABLE SEEDS
BULBS

I

1
~
___________________________]

G R A SS SEEDS

1

SEEDLINGS OR MATURED PLANTS

I

popular

in­

doors— naturally found great acceptance in the
yard.

Power-mower

sales

soared

from

$17

million in 1946 to almost $300 million in 1959.
Today over 60 per cent of all households with
lawns of any type or size owns a power hand-

ROSES

I

mower. Another five per cent has mowers that
SHRUBS A N D VINES
CUTTINGS

I
I

Source: A d vertising Research Foundation, Inc.

can be ridden. They are something of a status
symbol in certain areas and even come with
tailfins.

ers are interested in the results, not the doing.

It used to be that one either pulled weeds

Such reasoning runs contrary to the tradi­

out one by one or learned to live with them.

tional concept of the gardener’s motivation. He

Now

derives great satisfaction from watching seeds

grubs— almost

germinate, we are told. He is supposed to get a

sprouts, flys, burrows or crawls— has its chem­

dandelions

and

any

plantain,
unwanted

beetles

and

thing

that

thrill from working rich warm earth. Older

ical nemesis.

people are said to transfer their instinctive

have been combined with weed and bug killers

desires to create life from one kind of nursery

so that one can feed

to the other.

foes at the same time. Such broad-spectrum

Efficient,

long-lasting fertilizers
friends and eradicate

No doubt many of the nation’s 42 million

ability is a reason why yearly sales of fertiliz­

gardeners do love gardening as such. Certainly

ers and insecticides have increased to $500

the two million members of garden clubs and

million from $100 million in 1950.

untold millions of other practitioners do. But

Other industries have profited by the out­

many homeowners look on gardening and lawn-

door-room

ing only as a means to the end of providing at­

wide selection of aluminum-and-plastic chairs,

tractive backgrounds for outdoor living rooms.

chaises and coffee tables are available to fur­

A recent survey by the Advertising Research

nish the summer living room. Consumers have

philosophy of the homeowner. A

Foundation, Inc. revealed that almost 50 per

responded

cent of all gardeners disliked the work in­

outdoor furniture by more than 120 per cent

by

increasing

their purchases

of

volved in gardening and felt it was too much

in 10 years. Television, radio and even stereo

bother. When the respondents were asked what

sets now emphasize portability for use outside.

appealed to them about gardening, “ gardening

A number of magazines cater to outdoor inter­

work” came in a poor eighth.

ests. They feature full-color pictures of care­

With an insight matching Edwin Markham’s

fully cultivated Edens to show what results are

poem, the outdoor living industry appears to

possible if one has time, energy— and money.

understand the modern

The popularity of the outdoor kitchen with its

“ man with a hoe.”

Because the typical gardener is more interested

charcoal

in results than in doing, he has been a push­

steaks and other prime cuts of meat.




broiler

has

increased spending for

15

business reviey

AS THE TWIG IS BENT

You spread it out, add water, and stand back.

In addition, to the room-without-walls concept,
the outdoor spending pattern is influenced by

The lust for newness. Dynamic obsolescence,
as the regular style change is called,

is a

other factors, many of which are related to the

marketing mainstay in automobiles, appliances,

basic

pleasure boats, furniture and clothes. Now it’s

drives,

fears

and

ambitions

of

our

big in the garden market too. Many plant and

society.
Status. Gardening is essentially a luxury and

flower merchants make it a policy to develop

long has been associated with the rich. Now

a new “ model” every year. Gardeners pay top

that

a

prices to own the very latest marigold, zinnia,

measure of affluence, it is not surprising that

aster and, of course, that number-one social

they show off their gardens as an indication

climber, the rose.

so

many

Americans

have

achieved

of their new status.

Frugality. The typical homeowner is con­

Competition. Gardening is a good field of

vinced that a lush lawn and attractive plantings

competition in which to outshine the neighbors.

add substantially to the value of his property.

One’s skill can be measured by achievement

Real estate men differ on this, pointing out

and achievement is outdoors for all to see. The

that many sales are made during the winter.

present gardening ethic does not consider it

Nonetheless,

improper to enlist mechanical and chemical help.

money spent on their yards as a sound invest­

Hiring professionals is frowned upon, however.

ment.

gardeners

continue

to

justify

Another way to get one up on the guy next

More or less gregarious? Joan Parry Dutton,

door is to memorize a number of Latin plant

a garden expert from England, remarks on the

names and to use them knowingly in conversa­

relatively few hedges in America. She says this

tion across the back fence.
Self-expression. The houses in many postwar
developments stand cheek-by-jowl— as indistin­

reveals a gregarious streak in the national
character. Tall hedges, it seems, are a sign of

guishable as kernels on an ear of corn. The

unsociability.
Some psychologists

typical owner often resents regimentation, how­

Dutton. They might mention

might

dispute

Mrs.

our increasing

ever. He wants to express his identity and say,

use of fences— which could be called instant

“ This is my property. Color it different.” Trees,

hedges— to

shrubs, plants and flowers serve to set his house

feels that a growing insecurity based on na­

apart from the rest of the block.
Impatience. The popularity of instant this

tional

and

Americans to

insure

privacy.

international

Business

tensions

is

Week
driving

. . retreat to the smaller, safer

and instant that indicates that Americans do

world of the backyard.” In other words, the

not like to wait long for results. It is not surpris­

outdoor room might be turning into a private

ing, therefore, that garden spending is shifting

hideaway to which the snug seclusion of fences

from seeds to more expensive small plants.

is an important element.

Such a running start means flowers in June
rather than August.

The clean-slate syndrome. Many Americans
enjoy being wasteful. When something breaks

Another popular item is the roll-on garden—

down they discard it with a flourish and get a

seeds buried in a strip of green cotton batting.

new one. Now they can wipe away their entire

16




lawn when it displeases them and start over

stores.

The postwar

boom

attracted a wide

from scratch. A new preparation will kill all

assortment of retailers, and now garden and

growth without poisoning the soil and prevent­

other outdoor goods are available in depart­

ing immediate reseeding. It makes a nice, flam­

ment

stores,

boyant gesture.

auto

supply

supermarkets,
stores,

gas

roadside

stations,

stands,

mail-order

houses, discount markets and even drug stores.
As in general merchandise, one-stop shop­

FOR W H O M THE CASH REGISTER RINGS

ping has become popular in outdoor merchan­

We couldn’t find any firm handling silver bells

dising.

and cockle-shells listed in the outdoor living

sprung up all over suburbia. There are some

Stores

called

Garden

Centers

have

industry, but we found almost everything else.

11,000 of them today compared to about 700

Members

giant

in 1956. Such stores usually stock everything

chemical companies that produce fertilizers and

the nearby yardowner might want to sow, spread,

insecticides to the part-time entrepeneur who

spray, set fire to, start up, or sit down on.

of

the industry

range from

raises evergreens for profit in his backyard.
Hand tools are manufactured by a number
of firms including several of the nation’s larg­

ABOUT THE FUTURE

est steel companies. Power equipment comes

We have noticed that articles on the economics

from hundreds of firms, but the top 25 account

of the outdoor industry seem to wind up the

for a large majority of the output. There has

same way. First the writer works in the phrase

been a shake-out in power lawnmowers with the

“ a growth industry.” Then he launches into a

number of producers shrinking from 300 to 150

glowing evaluation of the industry’s future.
Much of the optimism is based on the ex­

in a few years.
The plant and seed industry includes giants

pectation that a high rate of home construction

$8

will prevail indefinitely. Every million housing

million worth of roses a year, but small firms

units constructed is said to mean over 100,000

are characteristic. Almost half of all growers

acres of new lawns and gardens. Mix in the

have annual sales of less than $10,000 and only

standard projections for increasing consumer in­

10 per cent are incorporated.

come and leisure and the result looks like a

like

Jackson

and

Perkins

which

grows

continuing boom.

HORTICULTURAL PROFESSIONALS

The future of the outdoor industry is promis­
ing but the rate of expansion enjoyed in the

Number of establishments— 1959
Flower growers
Nurserymen
Bulb growers
Flower seed growers
Greenhouse vegetable growers

I 1,772
6,757
861
85
819

Source: Census o f A g riculture.

1950’s may slow in coming years. There are
several troublesome trends.
The recent boom in apartment construction
(see

the

December,

1962

Business Review)

should not be overlooked. Almost 30 per cent
of all housing starts were apartments last year

Retailers. It used to be that outdoor supplies
were

sold

almost




exclusively

in

hardware

compared to only 8 per cent in 1956. It is
likely that the relative scarcity of well located,

17

SUBURBAN SCYTHES
Number of power lawn mowers sold.
MILLIONS

The

market for

garden

tools

and

power

equipment is nearing the saturation level. As
evidence, power-mower sales sagged from 4.2
million units in 1959 to 3.5 million in 1961.
Future demand will depend pretty much on
replacements and new single-home construc­
tion and should be less dynamic than the de­
mand of the 1950’s.
New products, therefore, are particularly im­
portant in this segment of the market. Luckily,
innovation

is not

being

neglected.

For the

gardener who has everything, manufacturers
recently

introduced

a

sprinkler

that crawls

slowly over the lawn, a watering system with
a “ brain”

that turns itself on automatically

when the soil gets dry and all sorts of tools
powered by rechargeable batteries.
Another burr in the outlook: surveys show
that gardening expenditures decrease after a
house is about seven years old. Many of the
residences built during the unparalleled post­
Note: 1951, 1952, and 1953 figures not available.

war construction

Source: Department o f Commerce.

that age,

boom

have already passed

and presumably

their

owners

are

starting to cut back their outdoor budgets.
reasonably priced suburban land and the return

Finally,

the typical

American

homeowner

migration to the city will be among the factors

may change this attitude about making his out­

that maintain apartment construction at high

door living room as attractive as possible. Air-

levels.
Obviously, this could cut sharply into out­

conditioning could keep him inside more often

door living sales. But apartment people offer a

and vacation travel also might cut down on

challenge as well as a threat. The garden in­

yard use. The trend to second houses may hurt

dustry is just beginning to exploit this market

the gardening industry, too. The second house

by developing new, compact products. Already

is often in the woods or on a beach where

miniature flower kits and window-sill green­

Nature is the gardener. Also important, people

during the summer months. Increased weekend

houses are in the stores. Maybe exotic (and

who spend their spare time in a second home

expensive) tropical plants will catch the fancy

are likely to be less interested in the outdoor

of the cliff dweller.

decoration of the first one.

18




FO R THE RECO RD

•

• •

IN DEX

AGO

AGO

1963

Third Federal
Reserve District

United States

Per cent change

Per cent change

Employment

Payrolls

Sales

Stocks

Check
Payments

Jan. 1963
from

Jan. 1963
from

Per cent
change
Jan. 1963
from

Per cent
change
Jan. 1963
from

Per cent
change
Jan. 1963
from

Per cent
change
Jan. 1963
from

Per cent
change
Jan. 1963
from

mo.
ago
M A N U FA C TU RIN G
Production........................................
Electric power consumed..........
Man-hours, to ta l* ........................
Employment, to ta l...........................
Wage income*...............................
C O N S TR U C TIO N **
COAL PRO D UC TIO N

year
ago

mo.
ago

Factory*

year
ago
mo.
ago

+

-

2
1
2

-1 3

0

i
i

+

4

+

i

+

1

-1 3

+

-

5
2

-1 5

i

—

BA N K IN G
(All member banks)
Deposits............................................
Loans..................................................
Investments.......................................
U.S. Govt, securities...................
O th e r..............................................
Check payments.............................

-

9

+

1

-

2
2
1

+

+
+
+

0
+
+

PRICES
W holesale .......................................
Consumer.......................................
‘ Production workers only.
“ Value o f contracts.
‘ “ Adjusted fo r seasonal variation.




2
2t

2

— 3

—

3

mo.
ago

year
ago

7
2

-

3

+

1

+
+

4
4

5
7
4
0

+ 16
+ 5t

-

2
3

0
0
4" 1

+ 6
+ n
+ 4

- 3
+25
+11

2

—

year
ago

mo.
ago

+

2

—

i

+

5

+

3

-

i

+

4

-

year
ago

i

—

Philadelphia. . . .

1

-

1

-

2

+

1

-1 4

0

-

1 +

1 +

1

0

-

Scranton .............
Trenton ...............

+

+

It

+

2

0
0

4

+
4

-

-1 2

+

2

+

-1 0

5

0 +

6

+

4

+

3

+

4

+

5

+

1 +

7

-

1
4

2

+

1

3

0

1

-

3

+

2

+

2

+

1

-

1 +

3

+10

+

3

+

0

+

2

+

3

+

5

-

3

+

2

3

+

3

+

2

+ 16

3

1 +

4

-

1

-

2

8

-

8

+

3

+ 10

+

6

+

4

+

W ilke s-Ba rre . . .

0

-

1

0

+

0

+

W ilm ington.........
ot

mo.
ago

+

0

Reading...............

+

year
ago

— 2
Lancaster............

TRA D E***
Department store sales................
Department store stocks..............

mo.
ago

4

-

year
ago

1

+

i

+

-

Department S to re f

0

+

6

-

5

+13

+

6

+

3

+10

Y o rk ......................

0

0

-

2

-

+

3

+

4

+

5 +

+

0
+

1

f2 0 Cities
^Philadelphia

2

8

‘ N o t restricted to corporate limits o f cities but covers areas of one o r more
counties.
t Adjusted fo r seasonal variation.