View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Federal Reserve Bant m Philadelphia




Review

Economic Discipline and the Middle Generation
Washington’s "New Discipline” and the
Banking Business

About This Issue
The feeling of restiveness prevailing in the United States
today has left its impact on the world of economics and
banking. The following attempts to analyze this impact are
based on talks given during the Spring at a series of meet­
ings of bankers and businessmen throughout the Third Fed­
eral Reserve District.

BUSINESS REVIEW is produced in the Department of Research. Evan B. Alderfer is Editorial Consultant;
Donald R. Hulmes prepared the layout and artwork. The authors will be glad to receive comments on their articles.
Requests for additional copies should be addressed to Public Information, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19101.



Economic
Discipline
and
the
Middle Generation
by David P. Eastburn
With so much attention focused on the plight

The old economic rules stressed concepts like

of the Nation’s youth, the forgotten group in

work, thrift, incentives, rewards, and the free

these unhappy times is the middle generation.
It shares the prevailing frustrations over Viet­

market. These all revolved around the idea of

nam, bitterness about the racial conflict, and

discipline. Success came to individuals and na­
tions who disciplined themselves to work hard

despair in the face of an overwhelming urban

and to save. Incentive to do so was provided by

crisis. But it also has special problems of its

a free market that distributed rewards accord­

own.

ing to contribution. The ethic of the system was

Defined as an age group, the middle generation

the ethic of discipline.
The middle generation sees today’s economy

comprises one-fourth of the population. Defined
more meaningfully in terms a a state of mind,

as denying this ethic. It believes thrift has given

the term describes a group that is, figuratively,

way to spending as the driving force. Social

caught in the middle between two ways of think­

programs of government, by-passing the market

ing. It is ambivalent between a rather clearly

place, weaken incentives by providing rewards

delineated set of values it was brought up to be­

for not producing. Self-discipline and discipline

lieve in and a new, more flexible set of values

of the free market have been eroded by ad hoc

it is now asked to accept. It is a generation torn

approaches to specific economic problems— a

between old black-and-white principles of right

sort of “ situation economics.”

and wrong and new ethics of the situation.

The old saying that “ there ain’t no free lunch”

Nowhere is this more apparent than in the

has real meaning in the philosophy of the middle

world of economics, the world in which the middle

generation. An economist would recognize this

generation spends most of its time and exerts

simply as “ the basic economic problem,” name­

power out of proportion to its size.

ly, that use of a given resource to satisfy one




3

b u s in e s s r e v ie w

want requires giving up its use for another. The

really deserve to have it so good. Nevertheless,

middle generation tends to believe that this hard

the idea of recessions as a way of disciplining

fact of economic life is being forgotten with re­

the economy has greatly weakened. We are less

spect to at least five important current issues: re­

willing to subject ourselves to this harsh and

cessions, debt, gold, foreign aid, and poverty.

impersonal discipline of the market place.

1. Recessions. Until fairly recently, a recession

But unpleasant as it may be, a recession does

was regarded as a chief form of economic dis­

serve periodically to force the economy to live

cipline. If individuals, businesses, and govern­
ments could not restrain themselves sufficiently to

within its means. The danger the middle genera­
tion now fears is that government, in its quest

prevent prosperity from becoming a boom, a re­
cession which inevitably followed would purge

for eternal prosperity, will perpetuate inflation.

the economy of its excesses. A recession was the

preferable to recessions, but the middle genera­

distasteful medicine to be taken on the morning

tion has its doubts.

after over-indulging in prosperity. It was the

2. Debt. John Maynard Keynes upset the old

price to be paid for attempting to live beyond
our means.

rules some thirty years ago by arguing that sav­
ing could be a bad thing; too much of it could

This clearly was the prevailing view before the

produce a recession. His prescription for curing

Great Depression, but the experience of the ’30’s
did much to dispel the idea that recessions are

a recession was to go into debt and spend. Al­

Government seems to act as if some inflation is

though the wisdom of this has long since been

good for what ails us. Recalling the suffering

granted by an overwhelming majority of econo­

during the Great Depression and fearing a pain­

mists, it is yet to be accepted by the public at

ful economic adjustment after the war, Congress

large. What the New Economists have called the

passed the Employment Act of 1946, pledging

Puritan Ethic is still very much alive in the

use of governmental powers to maintain maxi­

minds of the middle generation. Few still believe

mum employment, production, and purchasing

that it is evil to go into debt at all; this extreme

power. Experience in the 1950’s raised hopes

is a hangover of the days before cars and other

that the severity of recessions could indeed be

durables became available to everyone through

lessened by intelligent governmental action. The

the instalment plan. But most of the middle gen­

past seven years of continuous prosperity, the

eration is keenly aware of the limitations of in­

longest on record, now suggests that we need not

debtedness. You can borrow against tomorrow’s

have recessions at all. Not only are recessions

income to spend today, but only up to a point.

not good for what ails us, they are not inevitable.

The argument that analogies between princi­

Most economists have yet to be convinced that

ples of private and public finance are faulty

they know enough, or that government can act

because government has the power to tax does

intelligently and promptly enough, to eliminate

not convince the middle generation. Statistics

recessions. The middle generation, long con­

showing that Federal Government debt is actu­

ditioned to the view that recessions are the

ally a declining percentage of gross national

price of too much prosperity, is not ready to buy

product sway it only a little. And the theory

the idea, one suspects, for another reason— a

of the New Economics that government debt

lingering guilt complex, a feeling that we do not

should be used when necessary to stimulate the


4


b u s in e s s r e v ie w

economy leaves it relatively unmoved.

cies. If the United States attempts to live beyond

W hy? Because it sees no consistent evidence

its means, it will lose gold to others. Sooner or

that government can or will run a surplus when

later, if the dollar is to maintain its value relative

necessary to restrain the economy. The principle

to others, the U. S. will be forced to retrench.

of the constantly balanced budget makes no eco­

This in fact is happening now. President Johnson

nomic sense, but at least it imposes a control on

has imposed drastic direct controls on investment

overspending.

in Europe and has asked Congress to restrain

Until

government demonstrates

greater flexibility in cutting spending, raising

spending by tourists.

taxes, and paying off debt when the economy is

To the middle generation this action is only

booming, it will not wean the middle generation

belated recognition of the fact that the U. S. has

away from its fear of government debt and its

been living dangerously beyond its means in the

admiration for the discipline of the balanced

world economy. Proof is found in a decade of

budget.

deficits in the balance of payments and loss of

3. Gold.

Gold is the disciplinarian par excel­

more than $11 billion of gold to other countries.

lence. Under the old gold coin standard, the

Why has the U. S. avoided the traditional

amount of specie was supposed to regulate the

discipline of gold? One reason is the changed

domestic economy automatically by placing a

attitude toward

ceiling on the expansibility of a nation’s money

Government has used specific measures to deal

supply. The public could demand gold for its

with specific causes of the deficit in the balance

money if it feared money was losing value, and

of payments rather than shrink the economy and
force deflation. Another reason, however, is a

the Federal Reserve would tighten up if the money

recessions

already

discussed.

supply threatened to expand beyond its proper
relationship to the amount of gold behind it. It

growing distrust of gold as a disciplinarian. This

would be impossible to live beyond our means.

Allan Sproul when he was President of the Fed­
eral Reserve Bank of New York:

Or so the theory went. In fact, gold proved to

view was persuasively argued some years ago by

be such a harsh and capricious disciplinarian

The gold-coin standard was abandoned,

that this Nation decided it could do better with­
out it. The public no longer can demand gold

an international gold bullion standard adopt­

for its money. The Federal Reserve no longer

that internal convertibility of the currency,

regulates the money supply in accordance with

at best, was no longer exerting a stabilizing

the amount of gold it holds. These facts appar­

influence on the economy and, at worst, was

ently cause no concern on the part of the middle

perverse in its effects. Discipline is necessary

generation. When the last vestige of the domestic

in these matters but it should be the disci­

gold standard— the 25 per cent backing of cur­

pline of competent and responsible men;

ed, because repeated experience has shown

rency by gold certificates— was removed by Con­

not the automatic discipline of a harsh and

gress recently, hardly anyone noticed.

perverse mechanism. If you are not willing

Gold remains an important disciplinarian of

to trust men with the management of money,

the international economy, however. It is still,

history has proved that you will not get pro­

by common consent, the prime monetary asset

tection from a mechanical control. Ignor­

and the unit of account for the world’s curren­

ant, weak, or irresponsible men will pervert




5

b u s in e s s r e v ie w

that which is already perverse.

of life often stresses non-material goals. Accum­

Mr. Sproul was speaking of the role of gold in

ulation of wealth is likely to take the form of gold

the domestic economy. More and more experts

and jewelry rather than invested capital. Yet,

now believe the same can be said of gold in the

observing extreme affluence in other parts of the

international economy. Consequently, in work­

world, these nations chafe under their “ have

ing to reform the world’s monetary system, they

not” status and are unwilling to repeat the time-

are moving away from gold as the centerpiece.

consuming process by which the developed na­

They have devised a supplement to gold— a
new “ paper gold” — so that the international fi­

tions achieved their “ have” status.

nancial system will be free from the undesirable

the road to economic development today must be

Foreign aid is a recognition of the fact that

restraints imposed by an uncertain supply of

different from the one the U.S. traveled. But

metal.

while the middle generation shares the human­

“ But where then is the discipline?” asks the

itarian motives behind foreign aid and endorses

middle generation. Whereas a discretionary mon­

the political objectives of winning friends for

etary policy may effectively impose discipline on

capitalism, it finds it hard to understand why the

a single economy, the middle generation sees

same old principles of growth are not good still.

the nations of the world still a long way from

If hard work, thrift, and a good return on invest­

establishing any unified or coordinated monetary

ment did the trick for us, it should for others if

authority which could impose discipline on the

they will just be patient. Recurring examples of

international financial system.

waste and inefficiency in the foreign aid program

4. Foreign aid. The greatest need of developing

only serve to reinforce this view.

nations is for capital formation, the process of

5. Poverty. “ The poor we have with us always”

building up plant and equipment which can pro­

is a sentiment the middle generation understands.

duce large quantities of goods and services for

It recognizes that an economic system which dis­

consumers. To form capital, however, consumers

tributes rewards in accordance with contribution

must save— do with less consuming— for a time.

inevitably produces inequality of income, but it

This is the “ hooker” for developing nations-;

believes that inequality is necessary to the sys­

their standard of living is so low already that

tem; inequality provides the incentive that makes

further reduction would mean starvation for

the system go. If some people are poorer than

large numbers of their population.

others, this is a reflection of the value the market

At one time the U. S., as a developing nation,

puts on their economic worth. The middle gener­

got over this hump with help from outside in the

ation might regard social programs to alleviate

form of investment by governments and busi­

poverty as desirable from the humanitarian point

nesses of other nations. Simultaneously, the domi­

of view but would guard against destroying in­

nant Puritan Ethic, stressing hard work and thrift,

centive.

contributed to the accumulation of capital for
investment in productive plant and equipment.

Few of us feel completely comfortable with
such a view today. Poverty now is seen as an

Developing nations today, however, seek other

inexcusable flaw in an economic system capable

solutions. Investment from outside runs counter

of producing great affluence. The poor are poor

to their nationalistic ambitions. Their philosophy

not simply because they are lazy or incapable;

Digitized for 6FRASER


b u s in e s s r e v ie w

they are victims of a system that prevents them

tions of the disadvantaged that recessions should

from making their maximum potential contri­

ever again be used deliberately to discipline the

bution.

economy. The concept of a flexible fiscal policy,

One current solution is to develop these poten­

although never applied with complete success, is

tialities through better education and training.

too valuable to permit a return to the old idea of

This the middle generation endorses. Another is

a constantly balanced budget; we need all the

to assure everyone a minimum standard of living

ammunition we can get to achieve stable eco­

through a guaranteed annual income, negative

nomic growth. The traditional gold standard

income tax, or some such device. This, however,

clearly is inadequate as a basis for a growing

the middle generation views with misgivings. It

world economy. In short, there is no turning

feels that somehow an economic system as strong

back.

as ours should be able to generate a satisfactory

This is not to say that discipline is no longer

income for everyone; but it is unwilling to

necessary. Indeed, with all the things the U.S. is

weaken the incentives which make the economy

trying to do— fight a war in Vietnam and a war

so strong or to tamper with the market place in

against poverty, clean up our water and air, solve

which these incentives are expressed.

the problems of the cities, send a man to the
moon— discipline is needed more than ever. The

Needed: a new discipline

middle generation is right in insisting that “ there

Such a portrait of the middle generation as

ain’t no free lunch.” The solution is to develop

seen in these five issues runs the danger, of
course, of turning into a caricature— a caricature

a new kind of discipline— a more flexible, dis­
criminating, humane kind— based, as Allan

of a reactionary, cold-hearted advocate of 19th

Sproul said, on men, not a mechanism.

Century laissez faire. This is not the case. The

It must be a more mature type of discipline.
A child is disciplined by his parents because he

middle generation is ambivalent precisely be­
cause it does recognize some merit in the new
views. It would like to eliminate recessions, sees

doesn’t know how to behave. A mature adult,

possibilities in a flexible fiscal policy, recognizes

self. A teenager often overthrows imposed dis­

limitations of gold as the basis of our inter­

cipline before he is completely prepared for self-

national monetary system, and wants to help the

discipline. In this sense, our economy is going

disadvantaged at home and abroad. It is schizo­

through its teens, groping for a new kind of

phrenic because it is afraid these objectives may

discipline for which it is not fully prepared.

be achieved only at the sacrifice of disciplines
which it values highly.

having learned correct behavior, disciplines him­

Progress toward adulthood can be achieved
only through better understanding. More people

But the middle generation is fighting a losing

must understand the need for restraining the

battle; the old disciplines are vanishing for good.

economy at times as well as stimulating it at

We now see them as too harsh and perverse, like

others. More people must understand the need for

Horace Greeley’s prescription for curing a dog of

budget surpluses when the economy is booming

killing sheep: cut off his tail— just behind the

as well as deficits when it is lagging. Nations

ears.

must understand the need for cooperating for

It is unthinkable in this day of rising aspira­




the good of the world economy rather than

7

b u s in e s s r e v ie w

pursuing their own short-run interests. The well-

necessary fiscal restraint by raising taxes and

to-do must understand the special problems of

cutting spending. The new discipline requires

developing nations abroad and the poor at home.

much more courage and intelligence than the

This understanding will take time and there

old. The schizophrenia now besetting the middle

will be many disillusionments along the way. No

generation may be painful, but it is a first step

better example can be found than the recent

toward the understanding needed for a new dis­

reluctance of the U.S. Government to exercise

cipline.




FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF
PHILADELPHIA RESEARCH AWARDS, 1968
The Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia takes
pleasure in ann ou n cin g the follow ing research
fello w sh ip awards to Third D istrict scholars.
Dr. Gerald C. Fischer, Tem ple University, fo r a
stu dy of the potential com petition issue as it
relates to bank m erger proposals.
Dr. Dwight Jaffee, Princeton University, fo r a
stu dy of the relations am ong m ortgage rates,
the volum e of m ortgage funds, and housing
starts.
Dr. M ark H. W illes, U niversity of Pennsylvania,
for a stu dy of the lags associated with m onetary
policy.
Dr. Jo h n H. Wood, University of Pennsylvania,
for a study of the dynam ics of com m ercial bank
portfolio selection during expansions and reces­
sions.

Members of the Selection Committee are
Dr. A lbert Ando, U niversity of Pennsylvania
Dr. David P. Eastburn, Federal Reserve Bank
of Philadelphia
Dr. Nathaniel Jackendoff, Tem ple U niversity
Dr. Burton G. M alkiel, Princeton University
Dr. Frank C. Pierson, Sw arthm ore College

W ashington’s
“ New Discipline”
and the
Banking Business
by David C. Melnicoff
The “ restlessness and questioning” of which Pres­

has seen an adverse balance-of-payments, high re­

ident Johnson spoke in his State of the Union

source utilization, and rising prices combine to

Message early this year arise out of conflict and

require a restrictive approach. Two increases in

change which reach into every segment of our
society. In the area of economics and finance,

the discount rate reflected this. The interest rate

Washington’s reactions to this turmoil have often

“ Free reserves” of the banking system have been

been questioned; but on the whole, and viewed
in the context of fast-moving events, responses

negative for some time. Last year, we enjoyed the
luxury of reviewing the 1966 “ crunch” from a

coming

author­

position of relative ease. This year, there has been

ities— and particularly from the Board of Gover­

a disquieting search for parallels with, and dif­

from

the

Nation’s financial

structure is as high as it has been in 40 years.

nors of the Federal Reserve System— have been

ferences from, 1966. We did not have long to

constructively sensitive to changes in financial
structure and the banking environment. In ac­

consider the lessons learned, if any, from the
events of that year. We have been right “ up
against” for several months. In at least one vital

cordance with the “ new discipline” in economic
affairs— the application of man-made constraints

area the Nation was quite obviously not prepared

rather than “ automatically” operative rules— what

— the area of fiscal responsibility. We tried to

appears to be coming from Washington these

meet a wide and expensive range of commitments

days is not a doctrinaire approach which blan­

without paying the tax bill. This has meant a

kets current problems, but a careful, point-by­

heavy burden for monetary policy and for finan­

point response to new situations as they develop.

cial institutions. It remains to be seen how much

This is true in the area of monetary policy; it is

and how fast the income tax surcharge enacted

also true of problems peculiar to banking as a

late in June can offset the damage already done.

business.

What monetary policymakers have been trying
to avoid, of course, is the kind of “ disintermedi­

Monetary policy: 1966 and 1968

ation” which occurs as interest rates rise and the

For monetary policy, contrary to the situation

market attracts funds away from banks and
savings institutions— as the established “ inter­

last year, a time when credit was easing, 1968




9

b u s in e s s r e v ie w

mediaries” in the flow of funds lose their con­

procedure.)

trol of a segment of the monies they usually

almost frenzied business loan demand they knew

Banks have not experienced the

handle, and the established customers of those

in early 1966. Offsetting this to some unknown

institutions are put on short rations. In this

extent is the likelihood that there are probably

process, as in 1966, housing usually takes the

more fixed and paid-for commitments to lend—

worst licking, smaller businesses may be squeezed,

stand-by commitments— outstanding, which could

and some of the affected financial institutions,

reduce commercial bank flexibility as business

faced with a loss of deposits, may be forced into
liquidation of assets in an unfavorable market.

borrowing picks up.
To help control the expansion and flow of

This situation is not upon us. Disintermedi­

domestic credit in 1966, the Board of Governors

ation on an important scale has not begun. If we

rewrote the textbooks with a new and creative

are fortunate, this time around— and this depends

use of Regulations Q (governing interest paid on

on some most uncertain and unpredictable events
— we may not come any closer to it than we are
now.

time deposits) and A (governing member bank
borrowing from the Federal Reserve Banks.)

There is some reason to believe that, compared

somewhat different environment, the System’s

This year, facing a similar situation, but in a

to 1966, there is a little “ cushion” between inter­

strategy was again revised. Taking advantage of

mediaries and market pressures, which can pro­

a new law permitting regulatory differentiation

vide some breathing space, some time for maneu­

among time deposits by size, the Board altered

ver. For instance, the Savings and Loans have

the structure of time deposit ceilings to help

substantially repaid their indebtedness and are

ease disintermediation pressure on the bank­

generally in a more liquid position than they

ing system.

were in 1966. The Federal Home Loan Bank is in

In any event, whether these “ cushions” hold

a better position to assist them, if necessary. Their

up or not, whether action by the Congress on

deposits are probably somewhat less volatile than

fiscal matters is timely or not, whether the “ talks”

they were. (The “ hot” money has been avoided to

in Vietnam move ahead or not, every effort

a great extent.) With the exception of the very

will be made to avoid the disruption which large-

large money market banks, the same is probably

scale disintermediation can bring— not by over­

true of commercial banks. On the average, bank

looking the need for discipline, but by applying

loan-to-deposit ratios are lower than they were

it in a calculated, pragmatic way. Thus, Washing­

prior to the 1966 squeeze— though this “ cushion”

ton’s reaction to continued balance-of-payments

is being deflated by expanding loan totals.

deficits, for instance, was not the classical move

By far the most hopeful contrast with 1966 is

to the “ old” discipline of forced deflation, but a

the better balance which now obtains among the

variety of measures, including not only general

various demands for credit. Mortgage credit has

monetary restraint, but also the voluntary foreign

become more difficult to obtain, but it is still

credit restraint program. Faced with continued

available. (In a few states, including Pennsyl­

deficits in the Nation’s balance-of-payments, that

vania and New Jersey, usury ceilings have been

program was revised and tightened at the begin­

revised;

and the Federal National Mortgage

ning of this year. Certain controls over direct

Association has made helpful changes in its

foreign investment, administered by the Depart­

Digitized for 10
FRASER


b u s in e s s r e v ie w

ment of Commerce, were made mandatory. Con­

percentage of deposits and as a percentage of

trols over foreign lending by banks and other

total assets less cash and Governments.

financial institutions, administered by the Fed­

One should not read too much into these

eral Reserve System, remain voluntary. Every­

figures. Many banks show no such trend; and

one knows, of course, that the foreign credit
restraint program has drawbacks, both adminis­

one year’s results are not necessarily a portent

trative and substantive, which become more

good. But these and many other signs, including

serious as time goes on. Hopefully, we shall be

higher expenses and greater demands on manage­

able to make a basic adjustment before these

ment, point to changes in banking structure and

drawbacks become self-defeating. For the time

in the business and social environment which are

being, however, and, probably, for some time to

leading many banks into new and sometimes un­

come, we are balancing conflicting forces with

tried paths. It is to these developments that Wash­

a specially constructed, selective expedient.

ington’s reaction is often questioned; but more

of things to come. The outlook for banking is

often, these days, close scrutiny reveals that Wash­

The banking business

ington is becoming sensitive to developing needs.

Banking has not fared badly amid the growing
pressures of the past year— at least, as one looks

Mergers and diversification

at the earnings reports and reads the financial

One of the paths which some banks have been

analysts’ columns, there is little evidence that all

investigating is not by any means untried— the

is not going well. I invite your attention, how­

path to merger— but the guideposts are new. The
latest decision to come out of the Supreme Court

ever, to the operating ratios for 1967, which were
published a few months ago. These will not con­
tradict the earnings statements— on the whole

on this subject— on the proposed Nashville mer­

the national averages reflect moderate progress
— but some of the results may temper the eu­

of 1966 did not really make a big difference in
the impact of the Clayton and Sherman Acts. The

phoria. You will see, in the summary of earnings

concept of damage to competition which occurs

and expenses of member banks in the Third

when

Federal Reserve District, for instance, that for

applied; and the burden of showing that a mer­

the first time since the upsurge beginning in

ger will better serve the “ convenience and needs

ger— seems to confirm that the Bank Merger Act

banks

merge

is being

rather

strictly

1962, the ratio of net current earnings to total

of the community” requires evidence of a sort

capital accounts has declined— from 13.3% in

that is hard to come by. Nor is the Court sym­

1966 to 12.6% in 1967. Net income to total

pathetic to vague complaints of a merging bank

capital has declined from 8.4% to 8.1% . The

about the difficulty of obtaining personnel and of

ratio of capital accounts to total assets stopped

solving other management problems. The evidence

declining, thus shutting off a further increase in

must be clear that management really tried and

“ operating leverage.” Time deposits rose pro­

failed. Every merger case is different, of course,

portionately more than demand deposits, and

and the only authoritative judgment a banker can

higher interest costs could not be offset elsewhere.

get is from his attorney. I merely point out here

Capital accounts— not overly full in recent years

that experience has shown the merger route to be

— continued their steady, gradual decline as a

a tough one to travel, especially for sizable banks




b u s in e s s r e v ie w

operating in the same trading area.
One might wish, as I do, that the recent mer­

tain revenue bonds. This was a matter on which
the former Comptroller of the Currency differed

ger cases had included presentations which made

with the Federal Reserve— and, ultimately, with

better use of modern marketing concepts. (It is

the courts. Governor Mitchell recently testified

ironic that the application of the “ marketing

on this legislation. “ The question before you

approach” now receiving so much attention by

now,” said the Governor, “ is whether, given the

bank managements, apparently has stopped short
of this vital area of decision.) George W.

fact that banks are allowed to underwrite most
municipal obligations, they should nevertheless

Mitchell, a member of the Board of Governors

be prohibited from underwriting a particular

of the Federal Reserve System, has expressed his

kind of municipal obligation, which was of little

dissatisfaction with current standards in a speech

consequence in 1933 but which is now of major

before the Maine Bankers Association on June

importance.” The Governor concludes that they

14, 1968. He states that to identify a banking

should not be so prohibited. The Board recog­

market by the “ cluster of services” available to

nizes that an important change has taken place in

commercial bank customers, is unrealistic. “ Nor

municipal financing and, having considered all

is it true,” he continues, “ that for most financial

the surrounding circumstances and difficulties,
concludes that the banks must be permitted to
play a part.

services these customers do not have other real
alternatives in nonbank financial institutions or
nonlocal banks. . . . The geographic markets for

A second response concerns a bill sponsored

different classes of customers are not coterminous

by Representative Patman to prohibit banks from

— some are worldwide, others nationwide, others

making unsolicited commitments to extend credit

regional, others local and still others are limited

through the medium of the credit card and which

to a single neighborhood.” Despite these views,

might hobble the development of that form of

administrative agencies involved in merger deci­

consumer credit. Board of Governors’ member

sions, including the Comptroller and the Federal

Andrew F. Brimmer testified on this bill as fol­
lows:

Reserve, cannot help but respond to the Surpreme
Court’s stated views.

We, too, have been concerned about cer­
tain aspects of this development, and we

Responses to change

have taken several steps to keep ourselves

Another path banks are well embarked on is

better informed and to strengthen our bank

the diversification and expansion of bank serv­

examination procedures. At the same time,

ices. For a while it appeared that banking

however, the Board also believes that any

agencies might be at odds on some aspects of this

decision as to whether legislation is needed

expansion, with one being aggressive and approv­

in this field should take into account not

ing and others more cautious and conservative.

only the necessity for assuring the safety and

Three recent responses by the Federal Reserve

soundness of the banking system, but also

System may indicate the direction in which the

other considerations— such as the need to

wind is blowing now.

avoid discouraging innovations in banking

One response concerns a U.S. Senate bill to
authorize commercial banks to underwrite cer­

Digitized for 12
FRASER


that will contribute to public convenience.
The Board is studying credit cards carefully.

b u s in e s s r e v ie w

Some information regarding that study will be

are not being permitted to stand in the way of

made available from time to time. In the mean­

current needs.

time, the Board does not want to stifle new devel­
opments which banking may devise to meet new
consumer demands.

New approaches to reserves
and the discount window

The third response concerns a bill which

The Board of Governors is responding, too, to

would enable banks to establish and operate

changing banking conditions bearing on the

funds that would be similar to and would com­

management of reserves and— a closely related

pete with mutual funds. It is especially significant

matter— the use of the discount window. Mem­

because it involves a very large business potential

ber banks recently received a new amendment to

and competition with very large nonbank fin­

Regulation D governing reserves. This puts re­

ancial institutions. Chairman of the Board of

serve periods on a weekly basis and requires the

Governors, William McChesney Martin, wrote

calculation of weekly average required reserves

to the Chairman of the House Committee on In­

based on average deposits and average vault

terstate and Foreign Commerce on this subject.

cash held, two weeks earlier. A two per cent

The Board continues to believe that the

carryover of excesses or deficiences is also pro­

principle of separation of commercial bank­

vided. In this way, member banks are given a

ing from investment banking, which was

stable target to meet, and an appreciable leeway.

recognized by the Congress in the Banking

Once this new procedure is adopted and shaken

Act of 1933, is a sound and significant one
\and] the Board recognizes that the opera-

down, reserve administration should be easier,
more efficient, and in tune with the times.

ation of collective funds by banks involves

This is only one step in a more comprehensive

elements of risk. This is true, however,
whenever banks-—or other organizations—

reform of the reserve structure proposed by the
Board of Governors. Its full implementation will

expand the services they offer. If the pos­

require passage of legislation now before the Con­

sibility of adverse consequences, however

gress. That legislation provides that the Federal

slight or remote, were regarded as sufficient

Reserve be given authority to set reserve require­

ground for prohibiting such expansion of

ments for all insured banks rather than only for

activities,

regulated industries could not

member banks in the Federal Reserve System,

adapt to changed circumstances and the new

and that all insured banks have equal access to

needs and demands of our economy. . . .

the Federal Reserve Banks’ discount windows. At

With respect to the instant proposal, the

the present time, as members of the Board have

Board of Governors concludes that the prob­

frequently pointed out, the various state require­

able benefits to the public from increased

ments create a hodge-podge pattern in which

competition are substantial and that the

some banks are given competitive advantages

risks are relatively less significant.

over their neighbors. Moreover— and this is

Thus, where expansion and diversification of

especially true during the periods of monetary

bank services are concerned, the weather vane at

restraint— efforts to moderate the growth of bank

the Board of Governors points in the direction

credit bear progressively heavier on member

of change and growth. Here, again, old doctrines

banks, since nonmember banks’ private demand




13

b u s in e s s r e v ie w

deposits do not respond as directly and quickly as

would not change the basic strategy of monetary

those of member banks to the Federal Reserve’s

policy, but it would make it more flexible and

general instruments of credit control. In a recent

would give member banks— all banks, if the uni­

speech, Governor Andrew F. Brimmer stated his

versal reserve requirements are enacted into law

personal convictions that a rational system of

— much greater flexibility in serving the credit

universal reserve requirements established by the

needs of their communities.

Board of Governors— and this means a graduated
system, with smaller reserve requirements for
smaller banks— might well lighten the reserve

Conclusion

burden on all insured banks, member and non­

has responded to the “ restlessness and question­

member, and eliminate discrimination among

ing” of which the President spoke in his annual

banks.
The discount window to which all banks would

message. No one would claim that it is a sufficient

These are some of the ways in which Washington

response: in an era of rapid change and strong

have access will probably soon be somewhat

social and political pressures, it is inevitable that

different than the present one. It has been pre­

Government regulatory policies will lag events.

viously reported to you that a large-scale reap­

Old rules and standards are not easily abandoned

praisal of the discount mechanism was under

— and should not be. But it is clear that monetary

way. That reappraisal has now been completed,

authorities are not hidebound, and that positive

and a report on it will be published soon. I do

and constructive changes are being made. As the

not want to anticipate the proposals which will
be set forth; but I can say that the redesigned

Federal Reserve System confronts the financial

discount window is intended to be more useful

of 1968, it seeks to shape their consequences in

and more frequently used; that its administration
will be somewhat more liberal in the sense that

the public interest, rather than to transmit them
through a rigid policy conduit. This posture

total credit outstanding probably will be greater;

demands no less discipline— though it is a differ­

and that there will be a provision of special

ent kind of discipline— than the old rules of the

repercussions of the tremendous issues and events

interest to rural banks and others whose normal

game. Its greater sensitivity to the economy’s

operations

needs augurs well for banking and for the

are

hampered

by

wide

seasonal

swings. Such a redesign of the discount window

14



Nation.

FOR THE RECORD
INDEX

•

5
mos.
1968
from
year
ago

May 1968
from
year
ago

May 1968
from
mo.
ago

year
ago

5
mos.
1968
from
year
ago

LO C A L
C H A N G ES
Metropolitan
Statistical
Areas*

MANUFACTURING
0
0
+ 3
0

+
+
+
+

8
2
2

+ 10
+ 1
+ 2
+ 6
+36
- 1

+ 5

Employment

Payrolls

Per cent
change
May 1968
from

Check
Payments**

Per cent
change
May 1968
from

Total
Deposits***
Per cent
change
May 1968
from

Per cent
change
May 1968
from

mo.
ago

year
ago

mo.
ago

year
ago

mo.
ago

year
ago

0

+ 8

+ 9

+ 11

+50

+ 4

+ 10

mo.
ago

year
ago

0

+ 4
Wilmington ....
Atlantic City ....

+26
- 2

+ 17
+ 1

+ 2
+ 1
+ 1
+ 1
0
+ 5f

+ 9
+ 9
+ 14
+ 8
+20
+ 17t

+ 10
+ 8
+ 18
+ 10
+26
+ 12t

0
+ 1
0
+ 1
- 1
+ 2

+ 6
+ 8

+ 9
+ 8

+ 11
+ 7
+ 15
+20

+ 14
+ 8
+ 20
+ 16

+ 2

+ 4

+ 1

+ 3

-

2

+ 3

+ 4

+ 48

+ 18

-

+ 10

Altoona ..........

+ 15
0

0
0

+ 3

+ 4

+ 13

-1 0

+ 8

+ 3

+ 10

0

+ 1

0

+ 5

+ 3

+ 8

+ 4

+ 14

Johnstown .....

9
+76
+ 3

Trenton .........

Harrisburg .....

+ 4
+ 66
- 4

BANKING
(All member banks)
Deposits ......................
Loans ...........................
Investments ..................
U.S. Govt, securities ....
Other .........................
Check payments*** .......

Banking

Manufacturing
Per cent change

mo.
ago

CONSTRUCTION** ............
COAL PRODUCTION ........

MEMBER BANKS. 3RD. F.R.B.

United States

Per cent change

Electric power consumed
Man-hours, total* .......

•

BILLIONS $

Third Federal
Reserve District

SU M M A R Y

•

0

+ 2

8

+ 5

+ 2

0

+ 2

+ 10

Lancaster .......

0

0

+ 4

+ 6

-

2

+ 10

+ 2

+ 8

Lehigh Valley ..

0

0

0

+ 7

+ 2

+ 10

+ 2

+ 11

-

1

Philadelphia....

0

0

+ 4

+ 6

+ 2

+ 12

+ 2

+ 8

Reading .........

0

+ 2

+ 7

+ 10

— 4

+ 19

+ 3

-2 6

Scranton ......... — 1
Wholesale ....................
Consumer .....................

Of

•Production workers only
••Value of contracts
•••Adjusted for seasonal variation




+ 5|

+ 4t

0
0

+ 3
+ 4

4- ?
+ 4

tl5 SMSA’s
^Philadelphia

+ 1

+ 4

+ 7

+ 2

+ 4

+ 1

+ 12

Wilkes-Barre .... + 1

PRICES

+ 1

+ 7

+ 6

+ 2

+ 8

+ 2

+ 13

0

+ 6

+ 8

— 8

+ 9

+ 4

+ 6

York .............

0

•Not restricted to corporate limits of cities but covers areas of one
or more counties.
**AII commercial banks. Adjusted for seasonal variation.
•••Member banks only. Last Wednesday of the month.