View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Magnetic Ink and the Paper Mountain
Is Monetary Policy Stifling Economic Growth?
W hat Should the Wage of Labor Be?

FE D E RA L




RESERVE

BANK

OF

PHILADELPHIA

A MESSAGE TO B A N K ER S AND BU SIN ESSM EN A BO UT

MAGNETIC INK
AND THE PAPER MOUNTAIN
The hanking system is facing a
“ check explosion. " Banks and busi­
nesses now can insure continued effi­
ciency in the handling o f checks by
printing magnetic ink characters in
specified locations on all check form s.
Inquiries concerning magnetic ink
check imprinting will be welcomed by
the Check Department o f this Bank.




Machines which read characters printed in magnetic ink
promise to enable banks to deal with an ever-growing
mountain of paper work. Late this year the banking sys­
tem will begin to realize tangible benefits from the new
equipment, as checks begin to clear through pilot installa­
tions in several Federal Reserve Banks.
These advances in the mechanization of check handling
do not come too soon. Th is year American banks will
handle well over ten billion checks; by 1970 it is expected
that number will at least double. Present machines and
methods fo r handling checks cannot cope with so pre­
cipitate a growth in volume without increases in costs and
serious declines in speed and efficiency. It is fortunate
indeed that electronic systems are coming into use that
promise to do the job without increasing costs or impair­
ing the expeditious check clearing we now enjoy.
W e must have more than machinery, however. Checks
have to be imprinted in a language which can be read by
the machines which sort the checks, as well as by people. It
was the development of such a common machine lan­
guage that made the new systems possible. The machine
language consists of characters and numerals printed in

(Continued on page 15)

•••

IS MONETARY POLICY STIFLING
ECONOMIC GROWTH?*

In recent years, we have become growth-con­

direct controls to prevent rising prices and

scious. The average annual increase in our total

inflation.

output of goods and services in real terms dur­

some rather strong medicine. Before ac­

ing the past 120 years has been estimated at

cepting such ideas we should make a

3.7 per cent. This means that output doubled

careful diagnosis of the relation of monetary

every 19 years. For the past 40 years the average

policy to our rate of growth.

These

suggestions

prescribe

annual increase was 3 per cent. This is a remark­

My primary purpose is to try to put monetary

able record, but many are apprehensive that our

policy in proper perspective— to show how it
fits in with the determinants of our rate of

rate of economic growth is not fast enough.
to

economic growth. To do this one needs to con­

increasing concern about our growth rate. Most

sider some basic questions. What kind of growth

Several

developments

have

contributed

important, perhaps, is Mr. Khrushchev’s state­

are we seeking? What are the more significant

ment that Russia will soon catch us and eventu­

determinants of our rate of economic growth?

ally bury us. This is regarded as a threat to our

Where do we place a more rapid rate of growth

security. Another development is the postwar rise

in our scale of economic and social values?

in the rate of population growth. Economic
growth is essential if we are to keep an increasing
population fully employed.

WHAT KIND OF ECONOMIC GROWTH?
The primary function of any economic system

Apprehension about our growth rate has fo­

is to produce goods and services for people to

cused attention on certain factors influencing

consume. In an economy such as ours, produc­

growth. “ Tight” money, in particular, has come

tion is for the market. The consumer is king. It

in for criticism. To avoid the alleged retarding

is the consumer who largely determines the

effects of credit restraint on growth, some have

types of goods and services produced. This is

suggested that we accept slowly rising prices as

quite different from a totalitarian system in

a necessary cost of a more rapid rate of growth;

which such decisions are made by a few top

others have suggested that we maintain low inter­

officials.

est rates to encourage investment and resort to
A talk by Clay J. Anderson, Economic Adviser, Federal Reserve
Bank of Philadelphia, to the Bank Management Conference,
Columbia, Missouri.




We should ever be on guard against permit­
ting the money and credit mechanism to obscure
this ultimate function of our economic system.

3

business review

Money is a means to an end, not the end itself.

ices, we must either increase the number of

Surely, the growth that we seek is in physical

hours worked or produce more per hour. There

quantity of goods and services— not in dollar

is no other way.

volume. More money contributes to more goods

The number of hours devoted to production

only to the extent that it brings an increase in

can be increased by enlarging the labor force,

physical output. And if we are to have a higher

or by the same size labor force working more

standard of living, we must have an increase in

hours. The size of the labor force usually ex­

output per capita.

pands as population increases; it may also be

In short, it seems that growth should meet

enlarged by a larger proportion of the popula­

three criteria: an increase in physical output,

tion being in the labor force. But gains in out­

not just dollars; the mix of goods and services

put per capita are more likely to result from

produced to be adjusted to consumer wants;

increases

and it should be achieved within the framework

worked and in the proportion of the population

of a reasonable degree of economic freedom.

employed.

in the average

number

of

hours

As we shall see later, the mix of goods and serv­

Improved productivity— more output per man­

ices we choose has a significant influence on our

hour— is one of the more promising ways of

rate of economic growth.

increasing our total production of goods and
services. Many factors influence productivity.

WHAT DETERMINES THE RATE OF GROWTH?

Only a few of the more significant ones will be

In a market economy, two basic conditions are

mentioned here.

essential for sustained economic growth. One

The quality and efficiency of the labor force

is an increase in capacity to produce goods and

have an important influence on productivity.

services; the other is a corresponding increase

Output per man-hour may vary widely among

in demand for the goods and services produced.

employees doing the same type of work even

If capacity outstrips demand— or is not geared

though equipment and working conditions are

to the kinds of goods and services people want—

identical. Some are more skillful than others,

idle plants and unemployed workers impede

and some are more diligent than others in using

further growth in output and capacity. If de­

their skills. In part, skill may be something we

mand

capacity,

are born with, but it can be improved by educa­

sooner or later prices rise, anticipatory spending

expands

more

rapidly

than

tion, training, and experience. Diligence in using

is stimulated, and waste, inefficiency, and specu­

skill is influenced by a host of things, such as

lative activities are encouraged. Sooner or later,

incentives, working conditions, union regula­

too, the boom ends in recession. The inefficien­

tions, intensity of desire for the goods that more

cies and distorted use of resources created by the

income will buy, attitudes toward the job, and

boom, as well as the unused resources created

home environment.

by recession, are barriers to a sustained and
high rate of growth.

A country’s stock of plant, machinery, and
equipment— quantity and quality— is a second
major

factor

influencing

productivity.

With

Increasing productive capacity

primitive tools even the hardest labor yields

To increase our total output of goods and serv­

only a meager output. The quantity and the

4




business review

quality of the machinery and equipment we have

ment of new products. A growing economy is

to work with are one of the principal reasons

dynamic— some industries expanding, others de­

for the high productivity and the high standard

clining. Anything which delays the shifting of

of living in the United States.

workers and productive facilities from declining

Research is a third factor contributing to an

to growing industries tends to prolong unemploy­

increase in productivity. Basic research pushes

ment and idle plant facilities. Delay in introduc­

back the frontiers of knowledge and provides the

ing

foundation for applied research and improved

methods of production retards an increase in

technology. Our scientific and research labora­

productivity.

tories are a principal source of innovations— new

prompt adoption of more efficient methods of

products, new machines, and improved produc­

production thus contribute to productivity and

tive processes.

a higher rate of economic growth.

improved

machines
Mobility

of

and

more

resources

efficient
and the

If the improved technology made possible by
discoveries and innovations is to be fruitful, it

Balance between capacity and demand

requires substantial sums for new plant and

For many years, economists stressed the fact that

equipment. The volume of saving and investment

production creates its own demand— that is,

is a fourth major influence on productivity. We

turns out enough purchasing power to buy back

can’t consume all that is produced and add to

all of the goods and services produced. More

our plant and equipment. Saving reduces con­

recently the trend has been toward tbe reverse—

sumption, and releases resources which, by way

spending creates its own output.

of investment, are used to increase productive

Neither of these generalizations is necessarily

capacity. We should not permit any illusion

true. Production does create enough purchasing

about money and credit to obscure this essential

power to buy all that is produced, and obviously

role of saving and investment. Money contrib­

we cannot buy more than is produced. But total

utes only to the extent that it facilitates the

spending and total output may temporarily get

saving-investment process. The proportion of our

out of balance. One reason for this is the use of

resources devoted to investment is a significant

credit, i.e., the spending of tomorrow’s income

determinant of the rate of economic growth.

for today’s purchases. Credit expansion may

The work of the entrepreneur is a fifth factor

cause total demand to rise beyond capacity to

that has a significant influence on productivity.

produce. When demand presses against capacity

He performs the essential function of bringing

to produce there is a tendency for prices to rise,

together and coordinating the use of labor, ma­

which in turn tends to generate an unsustainable

terials, plant and equipment in the actual produc­

boom. On the other hand, credit contraction—

tion of goods and services. Management makes

the use of today’s income to pay for yesterday’s

the decision whether to invest or not to invest,

purchases— may drag total demand below ca­

and managerial policies toward employees affect

pacity, resulting in a decrease in production,

worker morale and efficiency.

employment, and income. Too much demand

Mobility of resources is a sixth factor. In a

tends to generate rising prices and an unsustain­

free economy, the product mix is continually

able

being altered by changing wants and the develop­

recession, unemployment, and unused resources.




boom ;

too

little

demand

brings

on

5

business review

Sustained economic growth requires that total

suing a policy of restraint. The objective is to

demand be geared closely to the rise in total

prevent total money demand from rising too

output.

rapidly; for if it does, the result is likely to be
another upturn in the price-wage spiral and the

ROLE OF MONETARY POLICY

development of an unsustainable boom. What

There are two principal avenues through which

the Federal Reserve is striving for is a sustained

monetary policy may contribute to economic

rise in total output and employment rather than

growth.

recurring booms and recessions. I believe that

Monetary policy has a primary responsibility

striving for sustained growth will result in a

to help keep total money demand in balance

higher average annual rate of increase than will

with capacity to produce. This means that mone­

a policy of permitting booms and recessions to

tary policy should be flexible. It should restrict

produce wide upward and downward swings in
total output and employment.

credit expansion when total demand threatens
to raise prices and generate an unsustainable

Monetary restraint has been criticized on the

boom; it should make credit readily available

ground that it retards business expansion and

and encourage expansion when a deficiency in

absorption of the unemployed. It is true that the

total demand is causing a decline in production

percentage of our labor force unemployed is

and employment.

other words, monetary

still somewhat above the postwar average. But

policy can contribute to economic growth by

would an easier money policy solve the unem­

helping to maintain price stability and a reason­

ployment problem? Available evidence suggests

ably full use of productive resources.

that a deficiency of total money demand is not

In

A second and related channel through which

the primary cause. A recent study of unemploy­

monetary policy may influence growth is in

ment during the period 1955-1957, made by the

helping to provide an environment favorable to

United States Department of Labor, found that

saving and investment. Experience demonstrates

approximately one-half of the unemployment

clearly that people are reluctant to save money

resulted from frictional causes such as the con­

that is expected to depreciate in value. Price

tinuing entry of new workers most of whom

stability encourages saving which is the principal

soon found jobs, voluntary shifting from one

source of funds for financing research and im­

job to another, and seasonal fluctuations in em­

proved plant and equipment. Price and business

ployment. Shifts in demand, improved tech­

stability, by creating confidence in the future,

nology which enables the same amount of goods

encourage a high level of investment. Monetary

to be produced with fewer workers, the reloca­

policy thus contributes to growth by: (a) help­

tion of industry, and other structural changes

ing to iron out upward and downward swings

temporarily displace workers. Such changes to­

in prices and total business activity, and (b)

gether with a rather high degree of immobility

providing an economic environment favorable to

of

a high level of saving and investment.

unemployment.

labor

have

created

pockets

of

chronic

Now let us turn for a moment to the “ tight

Easier money is not a remedy for these types

money policy” that some people fear is stifling

of unemployment. It would not reduce seasonal

economic growth. The Federal Reserve is pur­

fluctuations in employment, cause people to burn

6




business review

coal instead of oil, or shift workers and plant

Keeping total demand in balance with total

facilities from one type of production to another.

production

Monetary policy can only facilitate adjustment

monetary policy. But fiscal and debt manage­

to such shifts— shifts which are characteristic of

ment policies also play significant roles. A deficit

a dynamic economy— by helping to maintain

in the federal budget tends to put more funds in

stability and sustained growth.

the hands of the people and increase total demand;

is

a

primary

responsibility

of

An easy money policy might for a short time

a surplus absorbs spendable funds and reduces

accelerate somewhat the rate of increase in real

demand. Fiscal and debt management policies

output. But such a policy would involve serious

can either contribute significantly to keeping

risks. I doubt that those who urge easy credit

demand and productive capacity in balance or

at low rates until our resources are fully utilized

they can make the role of monetary policy more

would, for example, instruct the driver of their

difficult or even impossible.

automobile to hold his foot on the accelerator

The productivity of labor— ignoring for the

until he reaches the stop sign. Neither is it advis­

moment the machinery and equipment labor has

able to pursue an easy money policy right up to

to work with— is influenced by many things. A

the point where resources are fully utilized. To

simple one that was impressed upon me when

do so would likely result either in rising prices

I lived for a while in an underdeveloped country

and the development of an unsustainable boom;

is the intensity of one’s desire for goods and

or to avoid the boom, restraint would have to

services to consume. I recall, too, the reply of a

be applied so drastically that it might precipitate
a recession. Easy money too long maintained

high West German official when I asked him to
what he attributed West Germany’s remarkable

sows the seeds of another recession. Gradual

progress in the postwar period. He said, without

pressure on the credit brake as total demand
approaches a reasonably full use of resources

hesitation, “ The people wanted many things
they had been compelled to do without, and

is a much more promising way of preventing

they were willing to work hard to get them.”

an unsustainable boom and, in turn, of diminish­

Health, nutrition, and climate are other factors.

ing the severity of

a subsequent recession.

Education and training are becoming increas­

Monetary policy alone cannot eliminate booms

ingly important as professional,

semi-profes­

and recessions, but it can significantly reduce

sional, and highly skilled jobs

constitute a

their intensity.

growing proportion of the total. Yet, there seems
to be general agreement that there is a serious

OTHER POLICIES AFFECTING GROWTH

shortage of qualified teachers and educational

When one considers the range of influential

facilities. Reports indicate that Russia is placing

forces— total demand geared to productive ca­

great emphasis on the education of scientists,

pacity, size and efficiency of the labor force, the

mathematicians,

composition of output, especially as between

Moreover, the high esteem in which these pro­

consumption and investment, the role of manage­

fessions are held is a strong incentive for young

ment, the mobility of resources— it is apparent

people to choose them.

that many policies other than monetary policy
affect the rate of economic growth.




engineers,

and

technicians.

Another important influence is worker morale.
Wars and emergencies indicate what we can do

7

business review

when we really put “ our shoulders to the wheel.”

great sacrifices in terms of consumption goods.

That most of us work considerably below our

In a totalitarian system, such as Russia’s, the

capacity, I believe few would deny. To find

division of output between investment and con­

incentives and to achieve a morale that will lift

sumption goods is determined by those in charge

the output of people engaged in economic pur­

of economic planning. In a free economy, such

suits closer to their potential capacities present

as ours, the choice ultimately resides with the

an

Employer-

people. Spending, in effect, is casting dollar votes

employee relations, wage and salary administra­
tion, and personnel policies are among the

for production of the goods and services we
purchase. If we spend practically all of our in­

policies that have an important influence in this

come for consumption, then nearly all of our

area.

opportunity

and

a challenge.

Despite the high level of investment in the

resources will be used to produce consumer
goods and only a small amount will be devoted

postwar period, substantial sums are needed to

to the production of capital goods and an in­

modernize our business plant and equipment.

crease in our productive capacity. Maybe we

One study shows that the average age of our

need an advertising campaign to promote saving

business plant is 24 years, and the average age

and make businessmen unhappy with obsolete

of equipment is approximately nine years. In

plant and equipment, instead of one to make

terms of 1959 prices, over $140 billion would be

consumers dissatisfied with last year’s model

required to replace plants over 30 years old,

even though functionally it may still be as good

and over $110 billion to replace equipment over

as a new model.

10 years old. If old and obsolete plants and

Many policies other than monetary policy

equipment could be replaced with the more

influence saving and the allocation of resources

modern ones that research and technological

between consumption and investment. Tax poli­

progress have made possible, the result would

cies in particular affect incentives both to save

surely be a sizable increase in productivity.

and to invest. Policies designed to stimulate both

Russia’s economic challenge is not so much

saving and investment are one of the more prom­

in terms of growth in total output as in the

ising avenues to increased productivity and a

amounts being devoted to research and invest­

more rapid rate of growth.

ment. It has been estimated that industrial in­

Mobility of resources contributes to a high

vestment takes 21 per cent of Russia’s total

rate of growth in a dynamic economy. Laborers

output of goods and services as compared with

and resources idled by production shifts from

9 per cent in the United States. As a result of

goods in less demand to those in greater demand

this emphasis, Russia, with a total output 40

will remain unused longer the less their mobility.

per cent of ours, invests 90 per cent as much

Pockets of chronic unemployment in hard coal,

in industrial plant and equipment. The high

textile, and similar centers are a stark reminder

proportion of output devoted to investment prob­

that labor does not shift readily from declining

ably reflects, in part, the fact that Russia has

to expanding industries. The farm price support

just moved into the industrial stage; it reflects

program and similar “ prop-up” policies retard the

also a determination of that country’s leaders to

shifting of resources in accordance with human

expand industrial capacity even though requiring

wants. Monopolistic power dulls the incentive for

8




business review

efficiency that derives from competition, and

inimical to sustained growth.

sometimes enables producers to delay the intro­

Economic growth is not unique in that it can

duction of newer, more efficient techniques and

be achieved without giving up something in

equipment in order to protect existing invest­

return. It carries a price tag. Our growth rate

ments.

is determined largely by our scale of values—

CONCLUDING REMARKS

of how we choose among such basic alternatives

It would be unfortunate if preoccupation with

as more work or more leisure, diligence or

“ tight” money should divert attention from the

indifference in applying our talents to the job

fundamental

economic

at hand, using more of our resources for re­

growth. The role of monetary policy is chiefly

search and investment or more for consumption,

factors

influencing

one of helping to maintain an economic environ­

and policies that promote or policies that impair

ment conducive to growth; it is not an impor­

efficiency and productivity.

tant motive force determining the rate of increase

In a totalitarian system, these decisions are

in productivity and our capacity to produce. The

made by a few top officials in charge of economic

current policy of restraint instead of stifling

planning. A free economic society affords us

growth is stifling the development of inflation

the privilege of making the decisions; and it also

and an unsustainable boom both of which are

places squarely on us responsibility for the results.




9

The steel strike is settled and fast
becoming just another historical dip
in our index o f industrial production
But the basic question it raised is far
from answered.

.

WHAT SHOULD THE WAGE
OF LABOR BE?

Ever since some men began working for others

novel. Over the course of time people have peri­

in return for a money wage, there have been

odically grown uncomfortable with the level of

disagreements over the amount. Perhaps disa­

wages and how they were set. Other societies in

greement isn’t a strong enough word. Throughout

other times have asked these same questions.

the world the issue of wages has provoked men

Scholars have spent long years reflecting on

to anger, violence, cruelty, and revolution, as well

them and innumerable hours in research before

as work stoppages and peaceful picketing.

coming

In the United States today there seems to be

up

with answers.

Others

have

had

answers ready and waiting. All were trying to

widespread dissatisfaction with wage disputes

meet the labor problems of their day. Many

that idle key industries for long periods. Our so­

published their ideas widely, propagandized and

ciety doesn’t like running on four cylinders when

agitated for change. Many of these ideas have

it seems awfully important to get the maximum

helped shape our current attitudes and laws.

performance out of all eight. This strike is

Many of them are still knocking about in the

settled-—fine. But what should the wage of labor

press, on television and radio, in the halls of

be anyway? And can’t it be arrived at with a

Congress, and on the streets of Pittsburgh.

little less sound and fury?

If, today, idle men, damped furnaces, and

This article will not answer these compelling

smokeless chimneys demand a new approach, it

questions. Frankly we don’t know anyone who has

is absolutely necessary to know how the old

the answers. But we do know the questions aren’t

approach developed. The past won’t tell us what

10




business review

the wage of labor should be, but it will help us

able commercial possibilities. The distinctive

clear the underbrush of old worn-out answers

feature of the sixteenth through eighteenth cen­

that were, at best, passing-good when they were

turies was the growth of commerce. This was

formulated and which are of little use now.

accompanied by the growth of new economic
ideas known as mercantilism.

WAGES IN THE MIDDLE AGES

The mercantilist pamphleteers dealt with a

The past begins, for our purposes, in the Middle

very modern objective— economic growth. They

Ages— that dim, overcast period that stretches

believed the economic growth of a nation de­

about a thousand years from the collapse of the

pended on its ability to bring about an inflow of

Roman

gold; and they knew that a country could do this

Empire to

the great discoveries

of

Columbus and Vasco da Gama.

by exporting more goods than it imported. To

We don’t have to pause here long. There is no

promote an inflow of gold they recommended,

burning wage issue because there is only a small

lobbied for and to a certain extent successfully

wage-earning class. There is no industrial war­

achieved a planned economy.

fare to speak of because there is no industry to
speak of.

Working people were of central significance
in their plans. They argued that a low wage in­

There is, however, an idea. It’s promulgated

creased the worker’s contribution to national

by the scholars of the Church— Thomas Aquinas,

wealth. A high wage, they believed, would induce

and others. The Church is the one international

the worker to spend some of his time in idle­

influence that pervades the everyday activities of

ness; it would also increase costs of production

baron and serf, peddler and tradesman.
The idea is simply this: It’s right for a man
to seek the wealth he needs to maintain his cus­

and weaken the competitive position of the na­
tion in international trade. They concluded that
the

government

should

generally

administer

tomary station in life. To seek more, however,

wages at levels just high enough to permit the

is avarice, and avarice is a deadly sin. A just price

worker to maintain his health and raise a

and a just wage permit the seller, be he merchant

family— future workers.

or craftsman, to maintain his customary station

Many in Europe and its possessions chafed

in life. “ Give me neither riches nor poverty,” said

under the harsh mercantilist restraints— none

the Book of Proverbs, “ but enough for my sus­

more, we might add, than the Englishmen in the

tenance.”

thirteen original colonies.

Thus the conclusion: prices and wages should
be fixed by public officials with a view toward

THE FREE MARKET

justice. This was no more than any energetic

1776 was a momentous year. A statesman in

mayor would happily do before breakfast.

Philadelphia wrote the Declaration of Independ­
ence;

THE COMMERCIAL REVOLUTION
The feudal society of the Middle Ages gradually

a

practical

Birmingham

engineer

constructed

the

at

Soho

first

near

successful

steam engine; a scholar residing in Kirkcaldy,

faded before the growing power of kings and

Scotland published An Inquiry Into the Nature

merchants for whom the discoveries of America

and Causes of the Wealth o f Nations.

and sea routes to the Far East opened unbeliev­




Adam Smith wanted exactly the same thing

11

business review

as the mercantilists— economic growth. But he

tion. . . . However much the market price

advocated exactly opposite ways of achieving it.

of labour may deviate from its natural

His policies for increasing the wealth of nations

price, it has . . . a tendency to conform to it.”

can be summed up in two words— laissez faire.
Smith, it has been said, saw a Scotsman inside

Others took up the theme: the total amount

everybody— a person who could shrewdly decide

of wages, they argued, is fixed by the amount

how to best pursue his economic ambition. He

of savings already accumulated for the purpose

wanted to give this inner-man free reign, and

of paying wages— a wage fund. If workers or

argued that each man, pursuing his own self

governments are temporarily successful in forc­

interest, “ is led by an invisible hand to promote

ing up wages, profits will fall, saving will be

an end (economic growth) which was no part

discouraged, and the wage fund— the demand for

of his intention.” Smith’s “ invisible hand” was

labor— reduced. Moreover, temporarily higher

free, competitive markets.

wages will encourage working people to marry

Smith didn’t take it upon himself to say what

earlier and raise more children. This will in­

the wage of labor should be. He contented him­

crease the supply of labor. A decrease in demand

self with saying that wages should be determined

and an increase in supply will automatically

competitively. As the wealth of nations increased,

reduce wages to their natural level— subsist­

he visualized real wages rising also.

ence.

Smith called the turn in 1776; and the econo­

“ Against these barriers,” said the prominent

mies of the Western World, rolling along at high

economist J. E. Cairnes in 1874, “ trade unions

speeds, went screeching around it on two wheels.

must dash themselves in vain. They are not to

But once the turn was made, many of Smith’s

be broken through or eluded by any combination

expositors and supporters forgot what had been

however universal; for they are the barriers set

around the corner. They began to assume that

by Nature herself.”

free markets were natural and permanent; and
they found it hard to conceive of any other way

WAGES AND PRODUCTIVITY
It wasn’t until the latter part of the nineteenth

of organizing economic activity.
As a result they developed some pretty stiff-

century that an earlier idea— forgotten for 50

collared ideas about wages and also a belief that

years— was revived by the American economist,

all attempts by governments and trade unions to

John Bates Clark. With careful logic he showed

improve the lot of the workingman were doomed

that the wage of labor under competitive condi­

to failure.

tions is related to the productive contribution

David Ricardo, wealthy financier, landowner,

of the individual worker. Now this seemed rea­

and member of Parliament— master of long

sonable in a fast-growing industrial economy. To

chains of deductive thinking and intricate sen­

many, including Clark, it seemed not only rea­

tence structure, set the tone:

sonable but eminently fair and just.

“ The natural price of labour is that . . .

However,

the

phrase

“ under

competitive

the

conditions” was one fly in this particular oint­

to subsist and perpetuate

ment. It’s one thing to argue that a just wage

their race, without either increase or diminu­

is determined by competition when the worker

which

is

necessary

labourers . . .

12




to

enable

business review

is a journeyman and the employer a master

OLD IDEAS AND NEW

craftsman. It’s quite another thing when the

Today, both management and labor agree that

employer is a large, impersonal corporation.

the wage of labor should be just— as did the

Adam Smith had seen that laissez faire could

medieval schoolmen. “ The men who make steel,”

not work when some had more economic power

the United Steelworkers said this past July,

than others. He had bet everything on competi­

“ want . . . fair wages, a just share of the indus­

tion and he had boiled over at monopoly. John

try’s wealth. . . .” Industry spokesmen responded

Bates Clark, moved by the same feelings, became

that they also wanted only a fair share for their

a vigorous opponent of both business and labor

stockholders. To the nation’s regret, labor and

practices that limited competition.

industry could not agree on a definition of
“ fair.”

A BARGAINED WAGE
Competition, however, did not present an alto­

The old definitions certainly don’t help much.
We cannot say in 1960 A.D. that the wage of

gether rosy picture in an imperfect world. Care­

labor should be only enough to permit each man

ful observers of actual conditions such as John

to maintain his station in life. Nor can we say

R. Commons in the United States and Sidney

it should be only enough to permit the worker

and Beatrice Webb in England argued effectively

to sustain his health and raise a family. The

for labor laws to protect the individual worker

modern

from fierce rivalry among employers to lower

“ fairness” complicated, if not impossible; he

costs— child labor, women’s hours, industrial

has retreated from earlier attempts to picture

safety laws, and others.

any particular wage as just.

economist

finds

attempts

to

define

These writers also pointed out that the indi­

The truth of the matter is, that we cannot say

vidual worker is at an inevitable disadvantage

what the wage of labor should be without saying

when bargaining with a large business. A busi­

why it should be. Our ideas of “ fairness” are in­

ness may not lose any income when it loses a

evitably related to our objectives. In 1960 A.D.,

worker; a worker generally loses all income

from the public’s point of view, there are certain

when he loses a job.

limits to a “ fair wage.”

At the time, however, collective bargaining

In the past two decades rising prices have in­

was under a legal cloud. Labor unions could be

flicted hardships on large groups of people in the

prosecuted as illegal conspiracies; and, in the

United States. Today, many people feel a wage

United States, under the antitrust laws as well.

so high that it pushes up costs and prices is

In addition, employers could easily obtain in­

an unfair wage. On the other hand, in any de­

junctions against strikes to prevent “ irreparable

pression, with men out of work and resources

damage” to their businesses.

going to waste, a wage so low as to drastically

Big markets and big technology seemed to

curtail consumption similarly would be unfair.

demand big business. John R. Commons and the

Collective bargaining, some have pointed out,

Webbs recommended that workers be permitted

may produce a fair wage within these limits;

to organize to enable them to bargain with man­

but perhaps only at a very high cost. We have

agement on an equal footing. Big labor was just

equalized bargaining power in many important

a step behind; and sometimes a step ahead.

industries and permitted both labor and manage­




13

business review

ment sufficient economic power to hold out for

Yet the public does have a legitimate concern

long periods. When the giant steel industry and

with wages and how they are set; wage policies

the giant steelworkers’ union disagree about the

of management and unions can sometimes con­

wage of labor, the prosperity of the economy and

flict with public interest. Somehow, it is clear, the

the security of the nation can be put in jeopardy.

public concern must make itself known and ef­

The pat answers of the past don’t tell us how
to procure fair wages at a minimum cost— but

fective.
Many have expressed dissatisfaction over the

they do tell us how not to. The mercantilists,

recent steel strike settlement. Yet the way the

with their direct controls, made a good many
people miserable in sacrificing individual welfare

settlement came about is particularly interesting.
From mediation, to fact-finding studies, to inquiry

to what they believed was national expediency;

boards, to direct intervention by public repre­

after 180 years of relatively free markets, a

sentatives in high office— the public’s concern

planned economy would no doubt be misery

was presented first in one way then in another.

compounded. On the other hand, the labor market

It seems, we are currently passing through a

competition of the late nineteenth century seems

period of trial and error— groping at alterna­

no more desirable today than do mercantilist-type

tives. It is conceivable that historians 100 years

controls. Both detailed regulation and intensive

from now will look back on the steel settlement

competition have been tried and found wanting.

of 1960 and mark it as one of the key events in

Neither has filled the bill as handmaiden to the

the reshaping of collective bargaining to meet

public interest in labor markets.

the problems of our day.

14




business review

( Continued from Page 2)
ink which contains particles of iron oxide. As

check forms. One has to do with costs. Costs of

checks imprinted with this ink enter one of the

magnetic ink check imprinting are negligibly

new sorting systems, they go through a device

higher than for present methods. There may be

which magnetizes the ink. Then they pass a

an additional cost at the time of changeover, if

reading head which reads the magnetized char­

check forms must be redesigned to free space

acters. A computer performs the necessary listing

for the magnetic ink imprinting. This cost, how­

and arithmetic operations, controls the high­

ever, is non-recurring, and when allocated to

speed sorting of the checks, and feeds a high­

quantities of checks should not be large per check.

speed printer which prints out the required
records at rates up to 900 lines per minute.
With such systems, we can conquer the paper
mountain. But it won’t

A more general question concerns the benefits
to be expected by the individual bank or business
which puts magnetic ink characters on its checks
but does not expect to in­

THE CHECK OF 1960

happen until the checks

stall any of the compati­

going through the collec­

ble accounting equipment

tion system are imprinted

which accepts input data in

with the proper characters

magnetic ink. The benefit

in magnetic ink, in the

to

proper space. That space,

must be expressed in terms

set aside by agreement
among

the

American

these

organizations

of the system of which
they are a part. Accurate
and fast check handling at present costs cannot

Bankers Association, office equipment manufac­
turers, and the check printers of the country,

long continue without automation. Magnetic ink

extends five-eighths of an inch up from the bot­

encoding makes automation possible. If banks

tom edge of the check. In it a specific location is

and their customers are to continue to have effi­

provided for the routing symbol and transit num­

cient handling of checks, magnetic ink encoding

ber which now appear at the upper right of every

is a necessity.

check. The fact that these numbers are known

Banks

and can be imprinted in advance is what makes it

Publication

have

possible to have check-handling systems which

Association, The Common Machine Language for

147

received
of

the

Bank

Management

American

Bankers

accept checks directly, with no necessity for time-

Mechanized Chech Handling. It contains a com­

consuming and costly preparatory processing.

plete account of the program and explains the

Banking this year can take a long step forward

new check forms. Copies can be obtained for

toward keeping pace with the growing demands

$1.00 from the American Bankers Association,

of commerce and industry, if only each bank

12 East 36th Street, New York 16, New York.

will print its routing symbol-transit number in

Firms which stock their own check forms should

magnetic ink in the proper place on its check

consult their banks concerning magnetic ink

forms, and insure that its customers who use

printing and the possibility that some redesign

specially designed forms do the same.
Questions naturally arise when organizations
are requested to put magnetic ink characters on




of check forms may be necessary in order to
clear the space set aside for the machine lan­
guage symbols.

15

FO R TH E R E C O R D . . .
M EM BER B A N t S 3RD F.R.D.

BILLI ONS $

B A N K IN G

1
1

10 "

1

\

/s

J /TV

D EPO SITS

^ W
v/|

A/
j

W

T / V
\/ V
V *

7i *

(20 CITIES)

\

LO A N S
_______B —

3 “
IN V E STM E N TS

YE AR
AC3 0

2 YEARS
AGO

Third Federal
Reserve District

United States

Dec. 1959
from
mo.
ago

year
ago

12
mos.
1959
from
year
ago

Dec. 1959
from
mo.
ago

year
ago

12
mos.
1959
from
year
ago

1
+ 18
+ 5

2
+ 1
1
- 7

+

+

-

4
0
5

+

3

— 6
2

+10

Sto cks

Per cent
change
Dec. 1959
fro m

Per cent
change
Dec. 1959
fro m

Per cent
change
Dec. 1959
fro m

year
ago

m o.
ago

year
ago

+
+

0

+

3

+

i

2

+

9

+

0

0 +

4

0

3

1
+
La n c a ste r . . . .

1
2

+
+

7

+
+

2

2

+
+

2
6

3

+
+

2
9

+

+

+
+

4

+
+

1

+

3

m o.
ago

year
ago

year
ago

m o.
ago

Per cent
change
Dec. 1959
fro m

m o.
ago

year
ago

+ 12

+

+

5

i

+23

+ 15 +

2

-

3

+

2 +

6

+

6 +

3

+

7

+

+

4

+

1 +

8 +

3

+

1 +

3

+

7

+ 19 +

5

+

8 +

5

0

3

+

7

+ 16 -

1

0

+

3

+

3

9

-

8

4

-

6

+

5

0

-

4

+ 12

-

1

+ 18

+ 14

— 3

+

EM PLO YM ENT AND
IN C O M E
Factory employment
(Total) ...............................
Factory wage income.......

Sa le s

mo.
ago
+

Check
Paym ents

P a y ro lls

Per cent
change
Dec. 1959
fro m

LO C A L
C H A N G ES

OUTPUT
Manufacturing production.
Construction contracts . . .
Coal mining ......................

D e p a rtm e n t S to re f

Em p lo y ­
m ent

Per cent change

Per cent change
SUM M A RY

F a c to ry *

DEC.
1959

+

4

+

4
P h ila d e lp h ia

.

9

9

TRADE*
Department store sales . . .
Department store stocks ..

4

7

1

+
+

+

+

+
+
+
+

4
2
2
2
0
I8{

1
+ 13
- 7
— 9
— 3
+ 5{
+

4
+ 9
— 1
— 1
4" 1
+ Mt
+

+ 3
+ 2
0
0
+ 1
+ 20

0
+ 14
- II
— 14
— 1
+ 9

+ 3
+ 1
1
- 2

+

3 +

4

+

2

0

-

2

-

2

Tre n to n

...........

W ilk e s- B a rre

+

1 +

1

9

+

9

+ 19 + 18 +

3

. -

+

2

+

3

+

3

+

1 +

6

+44

U

{20 Cities

0
0

+

0
1

+

0
1

1 -

1 +

4

+ 14 + 11

{Philadelphia

+

7

-

3

+

8

0

+

1 +

2

0

0

2 +

1 -

W ilm in g to n ..

-

2

-

5

+

1 +

1

..................

+

1 +

Y o rk

0{ + 2{ +

‘Adjusted for seasonal variation.




.........

— 4

+ 4
+ 10

PRICE S
Wholesale ..........................
Consumer ...........................

.........

+

7

BANKING
(A ll member banks)
Deposits .............................
Loans ...................................
Investments ........................
U.S. Govt, securities.......
Other .................................
Check payments ...............

Rea ding
Sc ranto n

3

+

+ 13

+

*Not restricted to corporate lim its of cities but covers areas of one
or more counties.
{Adjusted for seasonal variation.