View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FEBRUAR

1 9 5 9

C o n s u m e r A s p ir a t io n s : A n E x p e r im e n t a l S u r v e y
“ W hat would yo u do with $2,000?” we asked a
sam ple o f local consum ers. Their answers reflect
a disenchantm ent with “ big ticket” durables and
a desire to increase savings.

B a n k in g ’s F a s t -G r o w in g F a m ily
W e’ ve had a postwar boom in banking em ploym ent.
I t has increased three tim es fa ster than total n on agriculturalem ploym ent. This article explains why.

T h e L a g in F a c t o r y E m p lo y m e n t
In recession, fa ctory em ploym ent declined less in
this D istrict than in the United States. B ut recovery
has been at a slower pace locally than nationally.




Additional copies of this issue are available
upon request to the Department of Research,
Federal R eserve Bank o f Philadelphia,
Philadelphia 1, Pa.




CONSUMER ASPIRATIONS:
AN EXPERIMENTAL SURVEY
At the present time there is no more interesting
question being asked than “ How will consumer

course of consumer spending in the near future.
Some say that we have a “ new consumer,”

spending behave in the months ahead?” To some

somewhat older, better satisfied, and more sophis­

extent this is always the case. After all, despite

ticated than his immediate predecessor. This new

the tremendous increase in the importance of

consumer is not a spender— or at least he isn’t

Government spending, consumer spending still

the same kind of spender as his earlier postwar

accounts for about 65 per cent of total spending

counterpart. There will be no surge in the de­

or Gross National Product. But this year, meas­

mand for durables as we now know them, accord­

ures of the total and indications of the pattern of

ing to these analysts.

personal consumption expenditures are being

Others do not agree. “ Consumers will spend,

watched with possibly more interest than at any

and in general they’ll spend the way they always

time within memory.

have,” they say. Demand for houses is high and

One big reason for this intense interest is fairly

will go higher. Automobiles will zoom in the

obvious. There is sharp disagreement about the

spring. Appliances will come on as the year




3

b usiness re v ie w

progresses. Demand for durable goods will spark

pose?” “ In what form would you save?” “ What

a new boom, according to these analysts.

make car would you bu y?”

Who is right? We won’t know for some time.

The basic question, of course, is unrealistic—
how many of us ever get a windfall of $2,000?

What would you do with $2,000?

Also it’s unexpected and, therefore, to some extent

But the idea of a new consumer is fascinating,

disarming; answers have to be given rapidly, off

though disquieting too. It somehow seems a

the cuff. The first thing that comes to mind is

shame to have to wait to test it against actual

blurted. Perhaps after a few moments of sober

results. Possibly there is a way to get evidence
now that will help us size up the consumer— is he

reflection answers would be modified or even
changed somewhat. But the blurted answer is not

new, or the same fellow we’ve known the whole

without significance.

postwar period? What kind of spending mood
are consumers now in as compared with ten years
ago or even five years ago? Of course we can’t

I'd buy some savings
The preceding chart gives a picture of the over­

turn back the clock. But we can ask a random

all results of this survey. As can be seen, 24 per

sample— statistically speaking— of consumers in

cent of the households called said they would save

the Philadelphia area a question or questions that

the entire amount. (Perhaps, in part, because a

will help us get a feel of their present mood.

bank called.) The next most popular answer in­

To do this we decided to try a somewhat differ­

volved paying off bills. Twenty-three per cent of

ent type question. We called on the telephone and

the respondents would devote the entire $2,000

asked “ If you received $2,000 that you had not

to this purpose. Just 16 per cent said they would

expected, how would you use it?” Depending on

spend the entire amount.

questions.

The rest of the respondents said they would

“ Would you use the entire amount for that pur-

do some combination of the three basic answers.

the

answer,

we

asked

additional

Roughly 10 per cent said they would spend and

FIVE MAJOR CLASSES AS A PERCENT
OF ALL INTERVIEWS
400 Interviews

save, 6 per cent said spend and pay bills, 8 per
cent would pay bills and save, and 8 per cent
said save, spend, and pay bills. Charity and
church use would be made of the $2,000 by
4 per cent of those interviewed. The few re­
maining couldn’t think of what they would do
with $2,000.

More specifically I would . . .
Of the 400 interviewed, 168 households would
save all or part of a windfall of $2,000. A savings
account at a commercial bank, savings bank, or
savings and loan association was mentioned by
116 respondents. Stocks would be purchased by
32 families. The rest— 20 families— would buy

4




b usiness re v ie w

150 FAMILIES OF THE 400 INTERVIEWED SAID THEY WOULD REDUCE
THEIR DEBT, . . .
PAY BILLS
95

MORTGAGE PAYMENT
55

AND 168 FAMILIES MENTIONED SAVINGS, . . .
SAVINGS ACCOUNT
116

OTHER
20

STOCKS
32

AND 243 FAMILIES WOULD SPEND SOME OR ALL OF IT.*
HOME REPAIRS
57

BUY FURNITURE
39

PURCHASE
NEW HOME
25

VACA­
TION

18

CAR
15

EDUCATION
23

ALL OTHER SPENDING
(INCLUDING NOT CLASSIFIABLE)
58

•These figures do not add to 400 because we tabulated all the uses among which those interviewed would d ivide the $2000.
••Appliances including television

bonds or add some part of the funds to cash re­
serves, invest in real estate, etc.
There were 150 families who would use all or
part to pay bills. Mortgage-debt reduction was

What does it mean?
It is difficult indeed to draw conclusions from an
experimental survey such as this. For one thing

specifically mentioned by 55 households. The

our sample is small— 400 households. Secondly,

others would payoff outstanding debt on auto­

we have no previous survey with which to com­

mobiles, appliances, home repairs, etc.

pare. Finally, and perhaps most importantly,

Those who would spend all or part of the sum

mistakes in interpretation easily can be made.

number 243. Home repairs, including painting,

What follows then, can be only an opinion about

were mentioned by 57 families, or 14 per cent of

the results of this survey.

all those called. Thirty-nine households— one shy

It is possible to draw from this survey the con­

of an even 10 per cent— would use all or part of

clusion that some catching up has to take place,

the funds to buy furniture. All or part of the sum

that scars from the recession haven’t healed com­

would be used as a down payment on a new house

pletely. This conclusion may be inferred from:

by nearly 6V2 per cent. About 6 per cent of the

( 1 ) the large proportion of people to whom pay­

respondents said they would apply the funds to

ing off bills came immediately to mind, and,

purposes of education. Nearly 5 per cent would

( 2 ) perhaps from the fairly significant number

take a vacation. Just 15 families or 3.8 per cent

who would use a windfall for savings.

of those called mentioned using the funds to pur­

If getting rid of current bills is the first thing

chase an automobile. Eight households mentioned

that comes to mind when a windfall of $2,000 is

appliances, including television sets. Five house­

mentioned, it is pretty obvious that you are not

holds said clothes would be purchased with a

in a really good “ buying mood.” Some of those

part of the $2,000.

who mentioned saving may well have been re­




5

b usiness re v ie w

plenishing their bank accounts after the recession
depleted these accounts.
The recession did not seem to be a logical ex­

ture attention has to be particularly disappointing.
The small number of respondents who would
buy appliances was disappointing, too. After a

planation of why saving was mentioned so fre­

few years of falling sales it is hoped that this area

quently, however. Most of those who said they

of spending will come on strong in 1959.

would save seemed to live in the more expensive

Home buying and expenditures on housing

sections of the Philadelphia area— sections that

repairs were fairly numerous among the replies.

are normally not too adversely affected by a re­
cession such as the one just passed. Savers in

Indirectly, at least, this might suggest some
spending on appliances that isn’t fully reflected

these areas seemed to be saying that there were
no “ big ticket” items that excited them.

in this survey. It is somewhat surprising that
more families would use the $2,000 toward the

Because actual sales figures for 1959-model

purchase of a house than a car.
It may be significant that education, furniture,

automobiles are inconclusive, the responses con­
cerning cars are very interesting. A hard reading

and vacations were particularly popular in the

of this survey suggests that the 1959 models

so-called “ high-rent districts.” Education and all

have not “ caught on.” Certainly it would be diffi­

that goes with it could be back in style. The

cult to take heart from the proportion of the

“ egghead” is coming into his own. Could furni­

sample saying they would use the $2,000 toward

ture be providing a means to express oneself in

buying a car. In addition, examination of the

a tasteful, satisfying way and, therefore, be in

individual replies revealed no concentration of

tune with this emphasis on culture? Vacation and

attention on particular makes. In fact, it is re­

travel expenditures have always seemed to have

markable that no particular new car was named

overtones of culture and sophistication. Perhaps

by more than one respondent. Since some cars

this is some sort of evidence to sustain the idea

underwent extensive restyling, this failure to cap­

of a new sophisticated consumer.

6




BANKING’S
FAST-GROWING
FAMILY
A middle-aged man in a dark suit— is that how
you visualize the typical banker?
If it is, your mental image needs dusting.

growth in banking employment is noteworthy in
an era when growth often has been taken for
granted.

You’re behind the times. Picture instead a pretty

Somewhat more than 540,000 people now work

girl in her late teens or early twenties. Look

in banks compared to about 330,000 in 1946.1

closely and you might see her toe tapping to some

This is an increase of 63 per cent. In contrast,

remembered rhythm while she sorts checks and
posts accounts.

total non-agricultural employment has increased
but 20 per cent in the same period.
The labor force in commercial banks has grown

Or picture a crew-cut executive behind a desk.
Though obviously not many years on the job, he

even faster than employment in the remainder of

handles his work capably and with confidence.

the financial sector. This seems surprising. Non­

Banking’s family has taken on a decidedly

bank financial institutions — insurance compa­

youthful character. Contemporaries of our mythi­

nies, mutual savings banks, investment firms,

cal miss and her young boss have entered the

savings and loan associations, and the like— have

profession by the hundreds of thousands in the

gained great new importance since World War II.

past decade. Taken together, they outnumber the

Measured by means other than employment, their

remaining “ oldtimers.”

growth rate often well outstrips that of banking.

The younger generation has been attracted to
banking by a postwar boom in job opportunities.
And we use the word “ boom” advisedly. The




1 In th is article, "b a n k s" and "b a n k in g " refer to all insured com­
mercial banks. Employment figures include officers and supervisory
personnel. Banking employment inform ation was taken from annual
reports o f the Federal Deposit Insurance C orporation— the latest
being fo r the year 1957.

7

b usiness re v ie w

Some idea of the force behind banking’s ex­

THE BOOM IN BANKERS

pansion is apparent when one realizes that it was

December Employment

achieved in spite of a general shortage of clerical
workers. Banks, whose jobs are two-thirds cleri­
cal, have met stiff competition from business,

INDEX
(

1946 - 100 )

industry, and government in the market for office
workers. At the same time, the supply of clerks
has been slim. Low birth rates during the depres­
sion plus earlier marriages have reduced the
number of young girls seeking employment.
The need for extra bankers has been strong.
But why? What are the reasons behind banking’s
personnel performance?

EXPLAINING TH E EXPANSION
Banks are catalysts of commerce. They partici­
pate in most business transactions in one way or
another. Increasing economic activity in the post­
war period by swelling the demand for banking
services has added to the banking workload. With

Important changes also have taken place within

more to do, banks have had to hire more people.

the investment portfolio itself. Banks now own

But the explanation of employment expansion

relatively fewer U. S. Government securities and

goes far beyond just being busier.

more state and local government issues. The latter

The character of the industry itself has changed

are much more difficult to handle. The vast con­

significantly. Banks have added different dimen­

glomeration of towns, school districts, authori­

sions to their services since the end of the war.

ties, etc., make careful and detailed analysis a

In so doing, they have shifted toward activities

necessity.

that require relatively more labor.

Banks are doing an increasing amount of real-

Since 1946, banks have cut back on their in­

estate lending. The growth of time deposits and

vestments in bonds and have built up their loans.

the extra liquidity imparted by the federal mort­

Loans accounted for 21 per cent of total assets

gage programs have cast real-estate lending in a

in 1946, having dropped to this figure during the

more favorable light. As for the manpower in­

depression and World War II. Loans had risen

volved in mortgages, suffice it to mention: ap­

to 43 per cent of assets by 1957. Per dollar of face

praisals, inspections, monthly payments, taxes,

value, it takes much more labor to make and

insurance, and escrow accounts.

administer a loan than to buy and hold a bond.
Credit investigations must be made, statements

Consumer banking creates extra jobs

analyzed, payments recorded, and so on. Bonds,

Perhaps the most important reason for the rapid

on the other hand, usually do not require such

growth of banking employment is what has been

complicated processing.

called the shift from class to mass banking. Since

8




business re v ie w

the war banks have been ardently courting the

ing facilities, and other services. Keeping up with

average consumer.

the consumer creates a mountainous workload

Bank installment loans to consumers have in­

and jobs for more bankers.

creased seven-fold since 1946. This is a laborious
kind of lending and the key to success is mass

Branches add to personnel needs

production with a large, specialized work force.

Banks often tag along when their customers move

Related to consumer credit operations is the

to the suburbs. Many new branches have been

growth of “ floor plan” inventory financing for

opened in edge-of-town shopping centers. This

auto and appliance dealers. This too, is an intri­

branch movement (as distinct from mergers) has

cate and time-consuming type of lending.

increased the over-all demand for bank workers.

Personal checking accounts are another fast­

Since branches are often miniatures of the main

growing service. Up-to-date figures are not avail­

office, offering many of the same services, a cer­

able but it seems safe to say there are at least

tain amount of staff duplication is inevitably

15 million more accounts now than at the end

involved.

of the war. The result is a billion more checks a

Centralized accounting has reduced— but not

year for banks to process. In addition, there has

offset— the impact of branches on personnel re­

been a steady increase in time deposits, safekeep-

quirements. Some of the larger banks have set

OUR BRANCH OF THE
BANKING FAMILY

high-rent central business districts. Here, routine

up paper work “ production lines” outside the

W e've had a local boom in bankers, too. But
it hasn't been quite so hefty. Commercial
bank employment in the Third District states
of Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania
has increased 50 per cent since 1946. The
rate fo r the whole country is 63 per cent.
Th is lag reflects national patterns of eco­
nomic growth. Population, personal income,
and production have increased more rapidly
in other regions — particularly the South­
west and W est. Banking tends to grow as
its customers grow.
Banking employment is slightly less impor­
tant locally than nationally. According to
recent figures, 0.98 per cent of all nonagricultural job holders in our three-state
area work in banks compared to a national
figure of 1.03 per cent. One explanation fo r
the difference may be that banking meets
more competition from other financial in sti­
tutions in this mature, heavily populated
section of the country. Another could be the
larger average size of our banks which might
permit certain personnel economies.




clerical operations for all the branches are per­
formed under one roof. High volume permits
specialization and the bank’s total labor force
often can be reduced somewhat.

Less mechanization means more manpower
Modern banks use many machines to speed their
work flow. Indeed, some of the bigger institutions
have recently installed electronic computers. Yet
one wonders if mechanization has proceeded as
fast in banking as in the rest of the economy. A
relatively slower rate of mechanization would
help explain banking’s greater-than-average need
for workers. There are reasons to believe this has
been the case.
Banking, a clerical-service industry, is not so
well suited to mechanical operations as is manu­
facturing. In many modern factories, there are
machines that can run other machines but proc­
essing paper work still seems to require more
human thinking-power.

9

b usiness re v ie w

The use of machinery in banking, however, also

over alone will create a yearly replacement de­

may have lagged behind other clerical indus­

mand for 100,000 banking employees. In this

tries during the past decade. There are a few

total will be jobs for 1,000 presidents and 5,000

“ giants” but the vast majority of our 13,000

vice presidents.

banks are small. When you exclude the largest

Yet we can expect more than just a need for

250 banks (only two per cent of the total num­

replacements. Banking’s family will keep on grow­

ber), the average bank employs about 20 people.

ing. The U. S. Department of Labor predicts that

Small size has made rapid mechanization difficult
in many banks. They just don’t do enough busi­

total banking employment will be greater in 1965
than it is now.

ness to carry the overhead of a large investment
in machinery. Insurance companies, investment

determinant of the industry’s personnel needs.

firms, and many other clerically focused institu­

Here the outlook is especially bright.

tions are relatively larger and therefore have been
better able to use machines to save labor.

income will mean many new customers for exist­

Consumer banking will continue to be a key

Our growing population plus rising personal

There are two other special obstacles to bank­

ing services, such as installment loans, and check­

ing mechanization. First, nobody has yet invented

ing and savings accounts. But banks are not likely

a machine that can count money by itself. Many

to rely solely on broad national trends to make

people are still required to handle this basic raw
material of banking. Second, the lack of stand­

customers for them. Latecomers in the consumer
field, banks have recently become important in­

ardization in checks has limited mechanical

novators. They’ve thought up a number of

processing. Checks— a large part of any bank’s

changes in their service mix to stimulate their

workload— come in a number of sizes and are

consumer business.

printed in many different ways. This variety is
hard for machines to digest.
Considerable progress,

however,

has

been

made toward a system of uniform checks in the
past several years. In fact, the whole picture of
bank mechanization is brightening fast. Machines
that “ read” are already a reality; they get their
instructions from printed figures rather than
magnetic tape or holes punched in a card. But
like other important mechanical developments,
these machines are not yet widely used. The next
decade promises much more mechanization than
the last delivered.

The Family's Future
In spite of advancing mechanization, banking
should be an industry of employment opportunity
in the foreseeable future. Experts say that turn­

10




Chargeplate systems are now offered by several

BRANCHING OUT
The Number of Insured Commercial Banks
Operating Branches

business re v ie w

BANKING'S CHANGED WORKLOAD
Percentage Change 1946-1957 in Selected Indicators of Commercial Banking Activity

of the nation’s largest banks. People who qualify

volving credit plan for consumers that resembles

may charge purchases at any participating retail

the commercial line-of-credit arrangement is an­

store. The merchant then turns the account over

other new idea.

to the bank which handles all billing and collec­

These are just a few illustrations— there are

tion matters. Some banks now operate a form of

many others. Banking’s young and growing

credit union for employees of other firms. A re­

family seems to be planning a big future for itself.




11

THE LAG IN
FACTORY EMPLOYMENT
Recovery in factory employment from a reces­

sion and the degree of recovery achieved so far.

sion low reached around last midyear has con­

As

tinued to lag behind the improvement shown by

declined less locally than nationally and is recov­

the

following

chart

shows,

employment

most other measures of business activity. And

ering more slowly. This was a repetition of what

persistent stickiness in manufacturing employ­

happened in the recession of 1953-1954.

ment has been more apparent in the Philadelphia

From August 1957 to May 1958, the number

Federal Reserve District than in the country as

employed in District factories declined a little

a whole.

over 8 per cent. But in the United States the loss

Of course, employment is only one measure
of labor input, and in times of declining business

TOTAL FACTORY EMPLOYMENT

activity and smaller profits special efforts are
made to reduce labor costs. Another measure of
labor input is the number of hours worked. Some
of the lag in factory employment may be ex­
plained by the more rapid rise in average weekly
hours, as this analysis reveals.
Comparing factory employment trends of 19571958 in this District with those in the United
States, we found considerable disparity in the
magnitude of both the decline during the reces­

12




UNITED STATES
MILLIONS

THIRD DISTRICT
MILLIONS

business re v ie w

in manufacturing employment over these nine

TOTAL FACTORY EMPLOYMENT

months ran to more than 11 per cent. So far in

Index 1953 — 100

the recovery period the disparity between local
and national trends has grown even more pro­
nounced. Thus, from May to November 1958 a
rise of scarcely 2 per cent in employment at Dis­
trict factories has been less than half the increase
experienced by establishments in the country
as a whole.

In recession, industry trends followed
the over-all pattern
Recession losses in both durables and nondura­
bles followed the over-all employment pattern,
showing smaller declines in this District than in
the United States. And this consistently carried
over into all but a few of the individual lines
making up these two major industry groups. The
principal exceptions occurred in stone, clay, and
glass products and instruments among the dura­
bles, and in textiles and chemicals in nondurables.
It was chiefly in these lines that employment
losses during the recession were more pronounced
locally than nationally. In the case of printing
and publishing, employment in Third District
plants showed a small increase in this period
compared with a fractional decline in the country
as a whole.

. . . and a similar situation persisted
during recovery
Through six months of recovery to November
1958, Third District industry lines with only
three exceptions experienced appreciably smaller
employment increases locally than nationally. The
principal exceptions to this over-all pattern in
the recovery period were transportation equip­
ment, textiles, and printing and publishing.
Comparing the spread of employment recovery
in individual lines, we find it has been on a nar-




13

business re v ie w

TOTAL FACTORY EMPLOYMENT
Index 1953 = 100

rower front in this District than in the United
States. Locally, there still were five industry lines
where the downtrend of late 1957 and early 1958
had not yet been reversed. Employment losses
continued through November in primary metals,
non-electrical machinery, instruments, petroleum
products,

and

miscellaneous

manufacturing,

which includes ordnance. Nationally, job totals
in the recovery period to November 1958 showed
little or no improvement in non-electrical ma­
chinery and petroleum products but in most other
lines upward trends seemed to have firmed.

Third District heavy goods areas were
severely affected
Within the Philadelphia Federal Reserve District,
regional differences in factory employment trends
continued pronounced in both the decline and
early recovery phases of the recent recession.
The accompanying series of charts show these
variations in ten of our largest industrial areas.
It is not hard to generalize as to the factors
behind some of the wide employment swings at
local levels. There was a decided tendency for
employment declines to be more severe and pro­
longed wherever primary steel, fabricated metals,
machinery, or transportation equipment were
relatively important lines. And with a few excep­
tions these heavy industry areas seem to be
experiencing the greatest delays in recovery.
Employment swings in recession and recovery
tended to be less pronounced in areas where non­
durables are more important.
Trenton and Harrisburg were the areas hardest
hit by employment declines centering in metal
industries. And severe losses in one or more
heavy goods lines important in the Lehigh Valley,
Reading, and Wilmington were in large part re­
sponsible for pronounced downtrends in these
areas. One of the longest employment declines

14




b usiness re v ie w

factories declined somewhat more in this District

AVERAGE WEEKLY HOURS OF
FACTORY PRODUCTION WORKERS

than in the country. Recovery so far has been
somewhat more pronounced locally than nation­

42

ally. The shortening in hours of work began at
about the same time as the decline in employ­
ment, but percentage-wise it was less severe. In
this District, durables and nondurables declined
about proportionately but in the country durables
seemed to show more weakness. In the recovery
phase, working time in nondurables made a
1954

1955

1956

1957

1958

sharper comeback locally than nationally. As the
accompanying chart shows, the recession losses

occurred in York, having started in the late fall

in average weekly hours had been very largely

of 1956 with cutbacks in metal fabricating and

made up both here and in the United States by

machinery.

November 1958.

In Lancaster and Wilkes-Barre, where textile

Within the Philadelphia Federal Reserve Dis­

mill products, apparel, and some other nondura­
ble goods carry considerable weight in the area

trict the length of the work week has increased
considerably in all but four of our major indus­

employment totals, recession losses were com­

trial areas. The

paratively light. Philadelphia, with its highly

Wilkes-Barre, and Wilmington are the areas

diversified manufacturing economy, seems to
have experienced about the same percentage

where recovery in hours has shown a pronounced
lag. In Lancaster and York, average working time

decline as the total District and also, like the

has risen above the pre-recession levels of early

District, has regained only a small part of these
losses.

1957. In the remaining areas, including Philadel­

Since the beginning of recovery, Reading

Lehigh Valley,

Harrisburg,

phia, hours have recovered all, or very nearly all,
of their earlier losses.

seems to have made the most substantial progress.
And it has been an improvement in the heavy

In summary

industries that contributed substantially. Reading

The record shows that during the recent reces­
sion, factory employment declined less in this

employment is rising with increases in machinery
and transportation equipment.

Factory working time has recovered
much more than employment
Unlike employment, average working time at




District than in the United States and so far, local
employment has also recovered less. With respect
to working time, however, both the decline and
subsequent recovery were sharper locally than
nationally.

15

FOR TH E R E C O R D . . .

Th ird Federal
Reserve D istric t

United States

Per cent change

Per cent change

SUM M A RY
Dec. 1958
from
mo.
ago

year
ago

12
mos.
1958
from
year
ago

Dec. 1958
from
mo.
ago

year
ago

Factory*

12
mos.
1958
from
year
ago

LO C A L
CH A N G ES

EM P LO Y M EN T A N D
IN C O M E
Factory employment
(Tota l) ................................
Factory wage income . . . .
TR A D E *
Department store sales ..
Department store stocks .
B A N K IN G
(A ll member banks)
Deposits ................................
Loans ......................................
Investments ........................
U .S. Govt, securities . . . .
O ther ..................................
Check payments ................

0
— 5
— 3

— 4
+23
— 1

-n
+ 7
-2 0

— 3
— 12
0

+ 5
+ 15
0

— 6
+ 9
— 18

Payrolls

Per cent
change
Dec 1958
from

Per cent
change
Dec 1958
from

Lehigh Valley. — i
H a rrisb u rg . . . +

+

0
1

+ 5
— 1

+

3
0
- 1
- 2
+ 1
+271

— 5
— 1
+
+

+
+
+
+
+
+

7
3

- 7
— 8
+

2

0

+ 5
— 2

— 4

+

4
0

9 + 5
2
13 + 10
12 + 8
16 + 17
I7t + 4f

+ 4
+ 2
— 1
- 2
+ 1
+31

+
+
+
+
+
+

10
3
16
16
16
8

+ 2t

0
0

+
+

I
2

-

+

8

1

+ 6
+ 2
+ 14
+ 13
+ 16
+ 4

Lancaster . . . .

Consumer

............................

ot

’ Adjusted fo r seasonal variation.




+

U

f20 C itie s

^Philadelphia

I
3

— 10 +

— 1 -

2

1 +

4 +50

+ 16 - 2 2
+

7 -2 2

1 +34

Reading . . . .

0 — 2 — 1 +
-

Trenton ........

+1

1 — 5
- II

W ilke s-Ba rre . — 1 — 4
W ilm ing to n ..
Y o r k ..............

-

— 3

year
ago

mo.
ago

year
ago

+23

-|_ 6

+20

+12

+ 19 + 1 0

+u
+

change
1958
from

2 +27

+ 17

4 +38

+

7 -2 6

— 3 +26

0 — 1 +59

+

3 — 24

+2

+26

+6
+8

0 -

+

3 -1 7

+ 12 + 3 4

+28

0 -2 1

-

2 +23

+7

+

4 +40

+34

+ 12 + 2 5

+5

1

1 + 51

+1

0 — 4 — 1 -

+1

mo.
ago

2 -

1 +

Scranton . . . .

year
ago

Per cent
change
Dec. 1958
from

1 — ii

0 -

3 +

Stocks

Per cent
change
Dec 1958
from

year mo. year mo.
ago ago ago ago

1 — 5 +

— i

Sales

Philadelphia .

P R IC E S
+
+

Check
Payments

Employ­
ment

mo.
ago
O U TP U T
Manufacturing production
Construction contracts . . .
Coal mining ........................

Department Store

+59

5 +40

+2 + 1

+61

+
+6

9 — 21
-2 3

*N o t restricted to corporate lim its o f citie s but covers areas of one
o r more counties.