View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FEB 2 :

REVIEW
FEDERAL

RESERVE

BANK

OF

PHILADELPHIA

'




MONEY UN EASILY GET OUT OF HAND
Many years of experience show that money,
while indispensable to modern society,
has been the root of some evils.
Chaotic currency was an early problem
which was corrected by legislation.
Bank notes and deposits could not always
be converted into cash, so laws were passed
requiring banks to keep minimum reserves.
The Federal Reserve System was established
to provide an elastic currency and,
by influencing the money supply,
to help smooth out business fluctuations.
This article, the first of a series of four
dealing with monetary policy,
traces the development of monetary problems
and the steps taken to solve them.

THE MONTH’S STATISTICS
Recovery in the heavy goods industries
gained momentum.
Considering the unseasonable weather,
sales in department stores held up well.

THE BUSINESS REVIEW

MONEY CAN EASILY GET OUT OF HAND
The hearings and report of the Subcommittee on
Monetary, Credit, and Fiscal Policies of the Joint
Committee on the Economic Report, of which Sen­
ator Douglas is Chairman, point up once again how
important the operation of our money and bank­
ing system is to our economic welfare. The prob­
lems analyzed by the Committee are only the more
recent of a long series we have encountered. Money
as the means of payment and as the common
measure of value of our economic activity has long
played a strategic role in the economy. But the
functions of money have not always been per­
formed as well as they should have been. Experi­
ence has taught us that the size of the flow of money
payments has an important bearing on whether we
have good times or bad times, progress or stagna­
tion. In order that the important role of money
in the economy may be fulfilled more effectively,
attempts have been made to develop a system which
will provide not only a convenient and uniform
medium of exchange but a flow of money payments
relative to the flow of goods that will help maintain
business activity stable at high levels of production
and employment.
This is the first of a series of four articles dealing
with some of the major problems of our monetary
and banking system—past and present—and the
attempts which have been made to solve them. This
article attempts to show why money has not man­
aged itself, and traces some of the steps taken to
deal with the major problems. The second will
deal with the objectives of Federal Reserve poli­
cies and their development. The instruments avail­
able to the Federal Reserve System and their use in
“managing” the money supply will be the subject of
the third article. The fourth will analyze some of
the current problems in the light of our experi­
ence and indicate the choices confronting us.
*•**#*

The statement that “money will not manage itself,” was
made by Walter Bagehot, a noted English writer, about
three-fourths of a century ago. That the statement is cor­
rect has been demonstrated by experience. For many years
there was a great variety of currency and coins in circula­
tion, differing in size, appearance, and value. Financial



crises were usually accompanied by a general suspension
of payments by the banks; in the early days, the problem
was inability to convert bank notes into specie (coins)
and later it was that of converting deposits into currency.
There have been wide fluctuations in business activity
and prices which emphasized the need for a mechanism
for better adjusting the supply of money to the production
of goods available for exchange.
1 hese and other defects revealed by experience convinced
the public that banking differed from other types of busi­
ness and that regulatory legislation was needed to have it
operate in the public interest. Laws were passed to estab­
lish a uniform currency. Legal reserve requirements were
enacted to prevent the suspension of payments which usu­
ally resulted from an over-issue of notes and an over­
expansion of bank deposits. The Federal Reserve System
was established not only to provide an elastic currency,
but to set up a central mechanism which could adjust the
supply of money to the supply of goods so that the monetary
system would not contribute to the wide swings in employ­
ment and business activity.
That money will not manage itself in the best interests
of the economy has been demonstrated with practically
all kinds of money and in many countries. In the days
when gold and silver coins were the principal medium of
exchange, the supply of money depended more upon the
discovery and exhaustion of gold and silver mines than
upon the needs of trade. Moreover, many abuses devel­
oped, such as debasing the coinage, “clipping” and counter­
feiting. The development of bank notes and deposits as the
chief parts of the money supply added to the evidence that
money will not manage itself.
Difficulties arose in western Europe, for example, long
before the United States became a nation. In 1716, John
Law was given a charter to incorporate a bank in France
and for a while it appeared that it might add materially
to the enrichment of the country. But before long the
enrichment was too much in the form of a production
of bank notes and too little in the production of goods, and
the inflationary boom collapsed in May 1720. Law made
strong efforts to stem the tide, attempting to reduce the
outstanding circulation by public bonfires of bank notes;
but he was unsuccessful and the bank was abolished by
edict in October 1720. A speculative bubble fed in part by
an excessive issue of bank notes also developed in England

Page 1

THE BUSINESS REVIEW
about this time, but the results were not as disastrous as
in France. These early incidents are cited only as frag­
mentary evidence that difficulties arose in other countries
as well as in the United States. Space, however, makes it
necessary to limit this analysis to the development of a
few major problems in the United States and to the
attempts which were made to solve them.
LACK OF A UNIFORM CURRENCY
One of the requirements of an efficient money system is
a generally acceptable, uniform currency which obviates
the delay, expense, and inconvenience of using a great
variety of coins and paper money circulating at different
values. This condition was not met during a major part
of the history of this country. In Colonial days the medium
of exchange consisted mainly of paper bills of credit issued
by the Colonies and some foreign coins. Over-issue of the
paper currency, depreciation and default were common.
With the development of banking, about the beginning of
the nineteenth century, bank notes became the major part
of the currency. Except for the periods 1791 to 1811 and
1816 to 1836, when the First and Second Banks of the
United States were in operation, state bank notes made
up the bulk of the currency in circulation until the Civil
War. The number of state banks increased from less than
100 in 1811 to about 1,600 in 1861.
The growth in the number of banks was accompanied by
an increase in the number and variety of note issues. In
some states, bank note issues were not regulated and in
the others regulation varied greatly. These state bank notes
were printed on a variety of paper, they differed in
size, and circulated at different values. In 1861 there
were 1,600 banks in 34 states and it was estimated that
they were issuing altogether about 10,000 kinds of notes.
Some of these notes were good and circulated at par; some
were redeemable in coin at the issuing bank but because of
slow transportation and the problem involved in pre­
senting them, circulated at a discount a few miles away;
some were heavily over-issued and circulated at a large
discount; and still others became worthless. The great
variety of state bank note issues led to widespread counter­
feiting, and the currency situation was complicated still
further by a variety of counterfeit notes in circulation.
The outbreak of the Civil War brought a flood of “green­
backs” in the North and Confederate paper money in the
southern states.
The chaotic currency situation imposed a heavy burden


Page 2


on trade and business. It has been estimated that bank
failures prior to the Civil War resulted in losses of $100
million to holders of state bank notes. The dislike of the
people for bank note issues in this period is reflected
in the names given them, such as “wildcats,” “red dogs,”
and “stumptails.”
The need for establishing a stable and uniform currency
was very great. A first step in this direction was taken
with the passage of the National Banking Act in 1863.
All national banks had to meet uniform regulations. They
had to back their note issues by Government bonds, limit
the total amount issued to their paid-in capital, and main­
tain a fund of lawful money in the Treasury for their
redemption. The result was a safe and uniform national
bank note issue, but it did not solve the problem of lack
of uniformity among the other forms of currency. Another
step toward complete uniformity was taken in 1865 when
a law was passed placing a 10 per cent tax on state bank
notes. This made it unprofitable for state banks to issue
notes and this form of currency passed out of existence.
After 1865, all types of currency were under Federal
control and regulation. However, there continued to be
several different kinds of currency in circulation. United
States notes or “greenbacks” became the basic currency
for several years following the Civil War but usually cir­
culated at a discount relative to gold. Parity was restored
in 1879, however, when the Treasury began to redeem
“greenbacks” in gold. Silver certificates, gold certificates
and Treasury notes of 1890 were other types of currency
which made their appearance. The principle of uniformity
was firmly established in 1900. The Gold Standard Act not
only placed the United States on the gold standard but also
declared it to be the duty of the Secretary of the Treasury
to maintain all forms of money at parity with gold and
with one another. This solved the problem of uniformity
despite the fact that different kinds of currency continued
in circulation. Today we still have more than one kind
of currency in circulation, the bulk of it being Federal
Reserve notes issued by the Federal Reserve Banks, but
all kinds are uniform in size, general appearance, and value.
CONVERTIBILITY OF NOTES AND DEPOSITS
The Problem
An early defect of the banking system was the inability
of the bank to meet its liabilities on demand. The problem
appeared first with respect to bank notes, which exceeded
bank deposits in volume until just before the Civil War.

THE BUSINESS REVIEW
The difficulties holders experienced in exchanging bank
notes for specie stemmed from two different types of situ­
ations. One arose from the physical problem of actually
presenting the notes to the issuing bank where they were
payable. The holder might be many miles from the issuing
bank, so that it was very difficult to present the notes for
payment. It was cumbersome and expensive to mail the
notes to the bank and have the specie shipped back. As
a result, bank notes often remained in circulation for a
considerable period and circulated at a discount in dis­
tant places. The very fact that bank notes were not returned
promptly for payment removed an important restraint and
aggravated the problem of over-expansion.
A more serious problem, however, was the bank’s in­
ability to pay when notes were presented. This happened
all too frequently both for individual banks and the bank­
ing system. It was to be expected that incompetent and in­
experienced management would get some banks—as well
as any other business—into difficulty. Some managements
made so many loans and issued so many notes that they
were unable to convert their notes into specie on demand.
But this was only a part of the problem. There were
periods when all of the banks were forced to suspend specie
payments. Periods of economic expansion and speculation
were usually accompanied by an over-expansion in bank
loans and note issues. The failure or inability of some
banks to pay their notes on demand tended to undermine
confidence in other banks. Once started, fear tended to
spread, resulting in a general run of noteholders on the
banks. Since a larger amount of coins could not be made
available promptly, banks in general were soon forced to
suspend the redemption of their notes until the fear sub­
sided.
Before the Civil War, banks began making advances to
borrowers by crediting their deposit accounts instead of
by issuing them notes. Bank deposits, or checking accounts,
grew rapidly and in the latter part of the century, deposits
became the major part of the money supply. The problem
of convertibility shifted from bank notes to deposits. Again
this was a difficulty of both the individual bank and the
banking system. Over-expansion and unwise management
sometimes resulted in individual banks being unable to
get enough currency to meet the demands of their deposi­
tors, even though banks in general were experiencing no
difficulty. The more serious problem, however, was that
in certain periods—usually resulting from an excessive
expansion of credit—there was a general breakdown of




ability to convert deposits into cash. This was the same
old money panic in a new form—a scramble to convert
deposits into cash instead of bank notes into specie. This
problem could not be solved by a bank getting currency
from some other bank. It required a larger supply of cur­
rency so that banks in general would be able to meet the
enlarged withdrawals by depositors. The solution called
for a currency which would expand and contract in re­
sponse to changes in the public’s demand for cash.
Legal Reserves
Steps were soon taken to make bank notes and deposits
convertible on demand. In 1824 the Suffolk Bank of Bos­
ton agreed to redeem the notes of outlying banks at par if
they would maintain balances with it for that purpose.
This plan functioned successfully for many years, and the
notes of New England banks generally circulated at par
or face value. In 1829 New York passed the Safety Fund
Act which required each bank to contribute a certain
amount to a guarantee fund to be used in meeting the
liabilities of banks that failed. The fund continued in exist­
ence for many years, and in a sense was a forerunner of
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, established in
1933. In 1838 New York state passed the Free Banking
Act. This law enabled banks to be chartered without a
special act from the legislature provided they met certain
requirements, one of which was the deposit of specified
types of securities with the state comptroller which could
be sold to redeem notes in case a bank failed. It permitted
“free” entry into banking, but regulations were imposed
to make note issues safe.
The major action taken, however, to make bank notes
safe and always payable on demand was the enactment
of legal reserve requirements. It appeared quite logical
that if banks were unable to redeem their notes on demand,
the remedy was to require them to keep a certain reserve
of specie on hand for that purpose. Prescribing a minimum
reserve would also help prevent the over-issue of bank
notes.
Enactment of reserve legislation was stimulated by the
panic of 1837 which resulted in many bank failures and
large losses to noteholders. In 1838 New York passed a
law requiring its banks to maintain a specie reserve equal
to at least 12% per cent of outstanding notes. This was
one of the first laws requiring privately owned, chartered
banks to maintain a specific reserve back of note issues.
It marked the beginning of a long line of legislation by
the states setting up legal reserve requirements. Louisiana

Page 3

THE BUSINESS REVIEW
passed a law in 1842 requiring banks to maintain a reserve
equal to 33^ per cent of “cash responsibilities.” This had
the effect of including deposits but without specifically
naming them. The first specific mention of a required
reserve against deposits was contained in the Massachu­
setts law of 1858. This Act required banks to maintain a
reserve in specie equal to 15 per cent of their aggregate
liability for notes and deposits. However, except for Louisi­
ana and Massachusetts, banks prior to 1858 were required
by law to maintain minimum reserves against bank notes
only.
Notes issued by country banks tended to accumulate in
the cities through the normal course of trade. For this
reason, country banks began keeping deposits in banks
in key cities for the redemption of their notes. Banks in
key or “redemption” cities thus came to hold increasing
amounts of out-of-town bank balances left with them for
redemption purposes. Originally, legal reserves included
only specie in the bank’s own vaults, but country banks
particularly protested that their balances in the city banks
should count as a part of their specie reserve because most
of their notes were redeemed in these “redemption” cities
instead of over their own counters. As a result of these
protests the composition of legal reserves was broadened
to include deposits in other banks, and the principle of
redemption cities began to be recognized in reserve legis­
lation. In Massachusetts, banks were permitted to count
balances in other banks as a part of their specie reserve
although the state’s banking commissioners were strongly
opposed.
The National Banking Act was passed originally in 1863
but was almost completely revised in 1864. Reserve re­
quirements applied to both bank notes and deposits until
1874, when the law was amended to exclude notes. The
Act incorporated the principle of “redemption cities,” and
banks were classified into three groups for reserve pur­
poses according to their location. Banks in central reserve
cities were to maintain reserves of 25 per cent of lawful
money held in their own vaults; banks in reserve cities
were to maintain reserves of 25 per cent, one-half in the
form of cash in their own vaults, and one-half might be
deposited in national banks in central reserve cities; and
all other—the so-called country—banks were to maintain
reserves of 15 per cent, two-fifths in their own vaults, and
three-fifths might be deposited in national banks in reserve
and central reserve cities.
In the 60-year interval from the passage of the National

Digitized forPage
FRASER
4


Banking Act to the Federal Reserve Act, 40 states passed
legislation establishing or making major revisions in bank
reserve requirements. Certain innovations in this legisla­
tion are worthy of mention. An important one was the
distinction made between time and demand deposits. The
New Hampshire Act of 1874 was the first to definitely dis­
tinguish between demand and savings deposits and pre­
scribe a different reserve ratio for each—15 per cent
against demand deposits and 5 per cent against savings
deposits. Prior to the passage of the Federal Reserve Act,
11 states had made this distinction and fixed lower re­
quirements against savings deposits.
Another important innovation was the establishment of
a higher reserve requirement for banks acting as reserve
agents than for other banks. In 1889 the state of Nebraska
passed a law which required banks acting as reserve agents
to hold a 20 per cent reserve against demand deposits as
compared to a 15 per cent reserve against demand deposits
of other banks. A similar distinction was made in laws
enacted in Wisconsin in 1903, Rhode Island in 1908, Ne­
vada and South Dakota in 1909, and Colorado in 1913.
This legislation is noteworthy in the evolution of reserve
requirements in that it placed a higher requirement against
deposits of banks acting as reserve agents instead of against
deposits of all banks in “redemption” cities. It achieved
through classification according to character of business
what had been attempted through classification according
to mere location.
In 1913, the Federal Reserve System was established
and one of the purposes was to prevent the money panics
which had characterized financial crises in this country.
Two provisions particularly were designed to solve this
problem. Federal Reserve notes against which the Federal
Reserve Banks were required to maintain a gold reserve
of at least 40 per cent and collateral of eligible short-term
commerical paper of 100 per cent, were expected to be elas­
tic—to expand and contract as needed. A second provision
mobilized the legal reserves of all member banks in the
Federal Reserve Banks and permitted them to obtain addi­
tional funds by discounting eligible commercial paper. A
few years later the Act was amended to permit member
banks to borrow on their own notes secured by eligible
collateral. Thus the Federal Reserve System was designed
to supply an elastic currency—one which would expand and
contract in response to changes in the public’s demand for
cash—and to give member banks access to centralized
reserves in time of need.

THE BUSINESS REVIEW
These provisions were inadequate, however, to assure full
convertibility of deposits into cash in the severe depres­
sion of the early ’thirties. It was not possible to expand
the issue of Federal Reserve notes sufficiently to meet the
wave of withdrawals by depositors because of a limited
supply of eligible commercial paper. Runs on the banks
increased during the depression when member banks held
a relatively small quantity of eligible paper. To meet this
difficulty, the Act was amended so that Government securi­
ties could also be used as collateral against Federal Re­
serve notes. The small amount of eligible paper and securi­
ties also limited the ability of member banks to obtain
additional funds from the Federal Reserve Banks by dis­
counting or borrowing. To correct this defect, the Act was
amended so that banks could borrow on their own notes
secured by any sound asset, but the rate of interest was y2
of 1 per cent higher than if secured by eligible commercial
paper or Government securities.
ECONOMIC INSTABILITY
Wide swings in business activity, employment, and prices
have presented a major problem to be solved. Another
requirement of an efficient money system is that it should
mitigate instead of aggravate business fluctuations. This
means that an increase in the money supply should not be
allowed to become excessive so that it helps to generate
over-expansion, rising prices, and inflation. Neither should
contraction in the money supply continue until it tends to
intensify and prolong periods of depression. The solution
requires action on a broad front, but the efficient operation
of our monetary system can be helpful.
Changes in Purchasing Power of Dollar
Business fluctuations are usually accompanied by changes
in prices. The “basket” of goods a dollar would buy has
varied widely and each change brought a redistribution of
income which worked a hardship on some groups. The
chart shows wholesale prices from 1808 to 1949. The fact
which stands out most clearly is the price peaks which
accompany wars. Fluctuations in the purchasing power
of the dollar are not limited to war periods, however.
From 1808 to 1814, in part because of the War of 1812,
the amount of goods a dollar would buy dropped 39 per
cent. From 1815 to 1834, prices dropped sharply and the
purchasing power of the dollar more than doubled. The
Civil War, which was financed partly by the issue of paper
money, brought another sharp rise in prices, and the
amount of goods that a dollar would buy dropped 70 per




WHOLESALE PRICES 1808-1949
Index: 1926 = 100

SOURCE- US BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS

cent. Following the Civil War, prices dropped and the
buying power of the dollar nearly doubled by 1879. World
War I brought another sharp decrease in the buying power
of the dollar, but during the depressions of 1921-1922 and
1930-1933 the value of the dollar increased substantially.
Again, during and following World War II, prices rose
sharply and the buying power of the dollar declined.
Some of the more important changes in the purchasing
power of money are given in the accompanying table.

CHANGES IN THE PURCHASING POWER OF THE
DOLLAR - SELECTED PERIODS, 1808-1949*
Period

Per cent
change

1808-1814
1815-1834
1835-1836
1840-1843
1861-1865

— 39
+134
— 23
+ 32
— 70

Period

Per cent
change

1866-1879
1397-1910
1915-1920
1921-1922
1929-1932
1940-1948

+ at
— 40
— 73
+ 58
+ 43
— 71

’"Raged on wholesale price index, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Why has the buying power of the dollar been so unstable?
A short, simple answer to this question is not possible; but
the various forces work through the flow of spending in
relation to the flow of goods. If the money flow expands,
demand increases and the tendency is to increase produc­
tion and the flow of goods available for purchase. But as
full employment is reached production cannot increase,
prices rise, and a dollar buys less. Conversely, if the money
flow becomes too small in relation to the flow of goods,
prices fall and the dollar buys more. If money is to have

Page 5

THE BUSINESS REVIEW
a stable value and contribute to economic stability, one
requirement is that the money flow and the goods flow be
kept in proper relation to each other. The flow of goods is
determined basically by the amount and quality of pro­
ductive resources and the use millions of independent
producers decide to make of them in view of market con­
ditions. The flow of money represents the combined
effects of the volume of money in the hands of the public
and how rapidly it is spent.
Despite the fact that the supply of money has an impor­
tant influence on prices and the volume of production,
there was no central agency before the Federal Reserve
System which could exert any influence over total deposit
expansion and contraction. Periods of business expansion
were accompanied by an increase in bank loans and the
money supply, and also by a rise in prices. The boom
usually continued with increased momentum until some­
thing like inability to get more credit or loss of confidence
brought it to a halt. Then there usually followed a period
of contraction—in production, prices, and bank credit.
Although not the only factor, an excessive expansion and
contraction of bank credit and the money supply con­
tributed to these wide fluctuations in prices and the vol­
ume of business activity.
Inherent Instability of Money Supply
In the operation of the banking system there has been an
inherent tendency for the total money supply to fluctuate
widely. The price-cost-profit mechanism which tends to
adjust the supply of individual commodities to the market
demand for them does not work successfully in the case of
money. If the producers of any commodity expand their
output too much, the price will fall, profits will decrease,
and lower profits or losses will force them to curtail pro­
duction. On the other hand, if the production of any
commodity is low in relation to demand, the price will
rise, profits will increase, and the above-average profit is
an incentive to increase production. The price-cost-profit
mechanism thus acts as a governor tending to regulate the
supply of a single commodity in accordance with the
amount demanded by the people.
The profit and loss mechanism does not prevent as
effectively excessive expansion and contraction in the
money supply. Banks, as other private businesses, are in
business to make a profit, and their chief source of income
is from loans and investments. The incentive, therefore,
is to keep loans and investments at the highest level con­
sistent with safety. The demand for bank credit depends


Page 6


largely on the volume of business activity, rising and fall­
ing with production and trade. A rise in business activity
tends to be accompanied by an increase in total commer­
cial bank loans and purchases of securities (investments).
The result is a corresponding rise in deposits and the
money supply. The increase in deposits gives the borrowers
more money to spend, and the total demand for goods and
services expands. As long as there are unused resources,
the enlarged demand tends to increase the total production
of goods and services. But the expansion process does not
check itself when full employment is reached. Instead, an
increase in demand tends to raise prices. Either a larger
physical volume 6f business or a rise in prices results in a
larger dollar volume of business. Thus more money is
needed to carry on this enlarged volume and the demand
for bank credit tends to rise still further, each increase
tending to generate another. As bank credit expands it
does not become unprofitable to make additional loans and
investments. The only restraining force is that the banker
may screen his loans more carefully as the expansion con­
tinues and his reserves become low. The tendency, there­
fore, is for expansion to continue until checked by some
external force.
A contraction in the money supply also tends to be
cumulative. Borrowers usually pay off their loans and
corporations retire their securities by writing checks on
their deposit accounts. A general repayment of loans and
securities, therefore, results in a decrease in both total
deposits and total loans and investments. Thus a decline
in business activity is usually accompanied by a decrease
in the total volume of bank loans and investments and the
money supply. Less money available for buying tends to
decrease the demand for goods and services, resulting in a
further decrease in business activity. Each decrease,
whether in the volume of business activity or in the money
supply, tends to generate a further decrease. As excess
reserves pile up in the banks there is an added incentive to
expand loans and investments through more liberal credit
terms. Such efforts, however, are not likely to be sufficient
as long as business firms find it unprofitable to borrow.
DEVELOPMENT OF CENTRAL BANKING
Recapitulating, experience has revealed three important
problems with respect to the functioning of our monetary
system. First, mainly because of too many issuing agencies,
the currency consisted of a great variety of notes, differing
in size and value. Second, bank note holders and depositors
suffered heavy losses and inconvenience during those pe­

THE BUSINESS REVIEW
riods when they were unable to redeem their notes or con­
vert their deposits into cash. Third, the purchasing power
of a dollar has fluctuated widely and the flow of money all
too frequently has been such that it has intensified instead
of mitigated business fluctuations.
State and national legislation prior to the Federal Re­
serve Act of 1913 remedied some of the major defects. The
different types of currency were made uniform in size, and
all types of currency and coin were maintained at parity
with one another. Financial crises, however, usually were
accompanied by a temporary suspension of payments by
the banks and little progress had been made in smoothing
out business fluctuations and in stabilizing the purchasing
power of money.
The panic of 1907 convinced the people that further ac­
tion was necessary. A National Monetary Commission was
appointed in 1908 to make a thorough study of our mone­
tary and banking system and to make recommendations
for remedying the defects which were revealed. In 1913 an
Act was passed establishing the Federal Reserve System.
There was a general move during the first part of this cen­
tury to establish central banks, and today practically all of
the major countries have one. The primary function which
has been given these institutions is to “manage” the total
money supply in the interest of maintaining general eco­
nomic stability. It represents a widespread recognition of
the statement made long ago that “money will not manage
itself.”
The Federal Reserve System was established, in the
words of the preamble, “to furnish an elastic currency, to
afford means of rediscounting commercial paper, to estab­
lish a more effective supervision of banking in the United
States, and for other purposes.” A currency which would
expand and contract in response to the demand for cash
and a method whereby member banks could obtain addi­
tional cash when needed were expected to assure the con­
vertibility of bank deposits into cash at all times. This
aspect of System operations and the amendments to the
Act which became necessary in the severe depression of the
early ’thirties, have been explained above.
It was also intended that the Federal Reserve System
should deal with the broader problem of helping stabilize
business activity. One type of evidence of this broader
purpose is that Federal Reserve authorities were given
certain tools for influencing the volume of member bank
reserves and the money supply. Another type of evidence
is statements made when the bill establishing the Federal




Reserve System was being considered. These statements,
being couched in the language of that period, emphasize
mainly the prevention of “excessive expansion” of currency
and credit, financial “stringency,” and “panics.” The pre­
vention of excessive expansion and inflation and financial
stringency is an important part of any program for achiev­
ing economic stability.
One of the best statements of the broader objectives the
Federal Reserve System was expected to accomplish was
that of Senator Robert L. Owen, Chairman of the Senate
Committee on Banking and Currency. He stated: “Senate
bill number 2639 is intended to establish an auxiliary
system of banking, upon principles well understood and
approved by the banking community, in its broad essen­
tials, and which, it is confidently believed, will tend to
stabilize commerce and finance, to prevent future panics,
and place the nation upon an era of enduring prosperity.”
(Senate Document No. 117, 63rd Congress, First Session,
p. 1. Italics supplied.) Another statement which was in­
cluded in a report on the bill adopted at a conference
attended by members of the Currency Commission of the
American Bankers Association, the presidents of fortyseven state bankers’ associations, and representatives of the
191 clearing houses indicates the opinion of bankers. The
report states: “we recognize the imperative necessity of in­
corporating into the banking and currency system of this
country those proven principles which will provide the
most ample credit facilities with greatest safety and a cur­
rency based on gold which automatically adjusts its volume
to trade requirements, in order that the highest stability
may be attained for our commerce, thereby assuring con­
tinuity of employment for the laborer and favorable mar­
kets for the producer—the fundamental basis of general
prosperity. . . .” (Senate Document No. 232, 63rd Con­
gress, First Session, p. 5. Italics supplied.)
Thus it is clear that one of the objectives was the achieve­
ment of greater economic stability. This was one of the
major tasks of the Federal Reserve System. The methods
by which stability could best be accomplished and the
guides that should be followed in determining its actions,
have not always been so clear. They have been influenced,
naturally, both by knowledge gained from experience and
the great development in our general knowledge and under­
standing of the business cycle since 1913. The development
of objectives and guides to Federal Reserve policies will be
considered in the next article.

Page

7

THE BUSINESS REVIEW

THE MONTH’S STATISTICS
Industrial recovery in November, as operations were resumed in the coal and steel industries, continued into December.
Employment, production, income, and trade again rose to levels above those of the previous month.
While increases in employment, pay rolls, and output occurred in the automobile, machinery, and nonferrous metal indus­
tries, the greatest gains were made in the iron and steel industries. Improved operations in these basic lines contributed to
the substantial advance in the durable goods industries as a group. Output of durable goods industries rose 20 per cent while
nondurable output declined slightly. Employment in December was below year-ago levels in all major categories except
apparel. While contract awards for building and construction declined from November, they remained above those of
December 1948.
Although department store sales did not duplicate the all-time peak attained in December 1948, they nevertheless made a good
showing. Dollar volume in December 1949 was 3 per cent below the corresponding month of the previous year, and total
sales for the year were 5 per cent lower due primarily to lower prices. Because of unseasonable weather, the December decline
in women’s apparel store sales, compared to a year ago, was considerably greater than the decline at department stores.
Purchases of Government securities by the banking system during December and an increase in loans were reflected in an
expansion in the privately owned money supply to a level approximating the record high point first reached two years earlier.
In the Third Federal Reserve District the increase in private deposits at reporting banks in leading cities in December was
followed by some decline in January. Business loans also decreased somewhat in the opening month of the year, and con­
tinued smaller than a year ago.

SUMMARY

Third Federal
Reserve District

United States

Per cent change

Per cent change

Dec. 1949
from
mo.
ago

OUTPUT
Manufacturing production.
Construction contracts. . . .
Coal mining.............................
EMPLOYMENT AND
INCOME
Factory employment. . .
Factory wage income.. .

year
ago

12
mos.
1949
from
year
ago

Dec. 1949
from
mo.
ago

+ 10* -16* -14* + 3
- 2
-10
-20
-42 -38 -26 -27

+ 2

6* -14*
+ 12* -15*

-11*
-11*

+

2

TRADE**
Department store sales.......... + 3
Department store stocks. . .. + 4
BANKING
(All member banks)
Deposits.......................................
Loans............................................
Investments........... .. .................
U. S. Govt, securities..........
Other...........................................
PRICES
Wholesale. .
Consumers.
OTHER
Check payments.........
Output of electricity.

year
ago
- 6
+ 50
-31

2

LOCAL
CONDITIONS

+ 11

Employ­
ment

Check
Payments
Payrolls

Sales

Stocks

Per cent
change
Dec. 1949
from

Per cent
change
Dec. 1949
from

Per cent
change
Dec. 1949
from

Per cent
change
Dec. 1949
from

Per cent
change
Dec. 1949
from

mo.
ago

mo.
ago

year
ago

mo.
ago

mo.
ago

+ 2

- 9 + 7

- 3

+ 14

-18

+ 56

-31

+ 101 -38

+ 11

-10

+ i

— 8 +

4 -14

+ 13

0

+ 2

-11 +

9 -11

+ 21

-14

year
ago

mo.
ago

year
ago

year
ago

year
ago

-26

- 9

- 3
-

6

Lancaster............................

+ 3
+ 3

+ 2

-27

- 1

+n

0

4

-20

- 4

+22

+ 3

+ i

-20

- 5

+ 5

+ 3

+ 10

+ 2

- 2

- 9 +

2 -13

+ 44

Philadelphia....................... + i

-11 +

3 -10

+23

-

Reading................................ - 1

-11 +

1 -13

+ 34

— 2

—

1 — 8

Wilkes-Barre......................

-11

+ 42

+ 3

-19

+ 1

+ 8

- 9

+ 42

- 2

-22

- 9

If - 2f
+ 20 +
1
+ 2 - 3

- 3
- 3

-

2

+ 19

-

2

York..................................

5

0

-14 +

5 -14

+n

-

0

- 8

+

1 — 7

+ 15

- 1

+ 7

- 7 + 13 - 9

+ 47

+ 4

+ 4

-10 +

+ 4

-20

- 7
- It

‘Pennsylvania. ‘‘Adjusted for seasonal variation. tPhiladelphia.


Page 8


12
mos.
1949
from
year
ago

0 + 2 + 2
+ 4
+ 1 100
+ 1
+ 1 + 88
0 + 1 +
0 +10
0
+ 01 +
+ 13
+ 5 + 1 + 14

+

Department Store

Factory*

9 -12

+ 57

- 2

-25

+ 5

*Not restricted to corporate limits of cities but covers areas of one or more counties.

THE BUSINESS REVIEW

MEASURES OF OUTPUT

EMPLOYMENT AND INCOME
Per cent change
December 1949 12 mos.
from
1949
from
month
year
year
ago
ago
ago

MANUFACTURING (Pa.)*...................
Nondurable goods industries..............

+ 10
+ 20
- 1

— 16

-14
-18

-14
-16
+ 7

Paper..................................................................
Petroleum and coal products. . .

Transportation equipment (excl. auto).

9
5
3
1
2
4
7
3

+ 39
+ 9
+ 18
+ 6
+ 4
+ 16
— 2

— 2
- 3
+ 1
— 15
- 2
1
4
-17
-24
-38

-10
-16
-11
— 5
-14
-20
-21

-34
— 5
-16

-12
- 9
— 23
— 15

COAL MINING (3rd F. R. Dist.)f. .

-42
46
-10

-38
-39
-35

-26
-25
-33

CRUDE OIL (3rd F. R. Di»t.)ft....

+ 1

-12

-12

CONSTRUCTION — CONTRACT
AWARDS (3rd F. R. Dist.)**.........

-20
— 24
— 8
-29

+ 2

- 2

+ 22
— 9

15
-24

♦Temporary series—not comparable with former production indexes.
♦♦Source: F. W. Dodge Corporation. Changes computed from 3-month
moving averages, centered on 3rd month.
fU.S. Bureau of Mines, ft American Petroleum Inst. Bradford field.

Employment
Per cent
change
from

Dec.
1949
(In­
dex)

mo.
ago

year
ago

All manufacturing. . . .
Durable goods
industries...................
Nondurable goods
industries...................

111

+ 6

124

+ 12

98

Foods............................
Iobacco.......................
Textiles.........................
Apparel.........................
Lumber.........................
Furniture and
lumber products. . .
Paper.............................
Printing and
publishing..................
Chemicals....................
Petroleum and coal
products.....................
Rubber..........................
Leather.........................
Stone, clay and
glass .............................
Iron and Steel............
Nonferrous metals..
Machinery (excl.
electrical)...................
Electrical
machinery.................
Transportation
equipment
(excl. auto)...............
Automobiles and
equipment.................
Other manufacturing

122
81
78
90
87

Indexes
(1939 avg. =100)

- 6

— 12
0
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

Pennsylvania
Manufacturing
Industries*

Average
Weekly
Earnings

Payrolls
Per cent
change
from

Average
Hourly
Earnings

%
chg.

%
chg.
from
year
ago

Dec.
1949
findex)

mo.
ago

year
ago

1949

year
ago

-14

260

+ 12

-15

$52.64

- 1

$1,342

0

-20

279

+22

-22

58.28

- 2

1.476

+i

— 1

- 5

237

0

- 3

46.29

+ 2

1.188

+i

_ 3
— 9
— 1
0
+ 4

- 6
-23
- 7
+ 4
- 5

253
181
203
229
196

- 3
-11
0
+ i
+ 9

- 4
-23
- 8
+ 7
- 9

46.41 + 2
29.46 - 1
46.63
0
35.99 + 3
41.80 - 4

1.133
.790
1.198
.942
1.097

+2
+2
—1
-1
+i

93
119

+ 3
+ 1

- 4
- 2

234
281

+ 6
+ 2

- 3
+ 3

46.53 + 1
51.29 + S

1.042
1.209

-1
+7

131
108

— 1
+ 1

- 1
-16

289
241

+ 1
+ 1

+ 4
-12

62.20
53.21

+ 5
+ 4

1.644
1.323

+5
+4

149
122
87

+ 3
— 1
0

- 3
-12
- 1

319
254
189

+ 4
+ 5
+ 3

- 1
- 3
- 1

64.87
51.76
37.16

+ 2
+ 10
0

1.653
1.413
1.038

+1
+2
+i

115
111
89

0
-f-23
+ 4

-15
-22
-37

256
249
200

+ 1
+ 41
+10

-17
-23
-40

51.22
60.55
58.45

- 2
- 2
- 4

1.272
1.558
1.413

0
+1
-3

160

+ 9

-23

349

+ 13

-24

55.21

- 1

1.432

+3

209

+ 4

-10

455

+ 6

-13

60.69

- 3

1.515

-2

167

5

-33

346

+ 4

-33

63.25

0

1.590

+i

119
120

+ 10
6

- 6
-12

271
245

+ 20
- 3

+ i
-14

62.68
42.71

+ 8
- 2

1.561
1.157

+6
+i

Dec.
1949

♦Production workers only.

TRADE
Per cent change
Third F. R. District
Indexes: 1935-39 Avg. =100
Adjusted for seasonal variation
SALES
Department stores........................
Women’s apparel stores..............
STOCKS
Department stores........................
Women’s apparel stores..............

Dec.
Dec. 1949 from
1949
(Index)
month
year
ago
ago
276
230

+ 3
- 3
+ 31*

- 3
- 9
+ 10*

240p

+ 4
+ 9
-11*

- 3
- 3
-14*

213

Recent Changes in Department Store Sales
in Central Philadelphia

Week ended Jan. 21..........................................................................

♦Not adjusted for seasonal variation,




Sales
12 mos.
1949
from
year
ago
- 5
- 7
0*

Per
cent
change
from
year
ago
-30
- 7
- 1
0

Departmental Sales and Stocks of
Independent Department Stores
Third F. R. District

Stocks (end of month)

% chg. % chg. %chg.
Dec. 12 mos. Dec.
1949
1949
1949
from
from
from
year
year
year
ago
ago
ago

Ratio to sales
(months’
supply)
December
1949

1948

Total — All departments...............................................

- 5

-6

- 6

1.3

1.3

Main store total............................................................
Piece goods and household textiles..........................
Small wares...............................................................
Women’s and misses’ accessories..............................
Women’s and misses’ apparel.....................................
Men’s and boys’ wear...................................................
Housefurnishings........................................
Other main store..............................................................

- 4
-10
- 6
- 5
- 7
- 2
0
- 4

-6
-8
-4
-5
-6
-3
-8
-7

- 6
0
0
+ 1
+ 1
0
-14
-15

1.4
2.8
1.2
1.1
1.3
1.1
2.2
0.5

1.4
2.6
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.1
2.6
0.6

Basement store total........................................................
Domestics and blankets...............................................
Small wares...................................................
Women’s and misses’ wear..........................................
Men’s and boys’ wear........................................
Housefurnishings.............................................................
Shoes.....................................................................................

-10
- 8
- 6
-13
- 3
- 5
-15

-6
-4
-4
-7
-5
-6
-7

- 7
- 4
- 1
- 4
- 8
-15
- 8

0.9
2.0
0.6
0.8
0.8
1.3
1.4

09
1.9
0.5
0.7
0.8
1.5
1.3

Nonmerchandise total........................................

- 6

-3

p-preliminary.

Page 9

THE BUSINESS REVIEW

BANKING

CONSUMER CREDIT
Receiv­
ables
(end of
month)

Sales

Sale Credit

% chg. % chg. % chg.
Dec. 12 mos.
Dec.
1949
1949
1949
from
from
from
yearago yearago yearago

Third F. R. District

MONEY SUPPLY AND RELATED ITEMS
United States (Billions $)

Changes in—

Dec.
28.
1949

four
weeks

year

Money supply, privately owned.............................................

170.1

+ 1.5

+ 1.0

Demand deposits, adjusted....................................................
Time deposits................................................................................
Currency outside banks............................................................

86.7
58.4
25.0

+ 1.2
+ .4
- .1

+ .9

20.0*

+ 4.7*

-4.8*

+ 1.2
-1.1

Department stores
- 9
0
+ 18

-8
-2
+1

-13
+ 3
+ 11

-3
-9
-5

+ 2
+ 15

Turnover of demand deposits..................................................
Commercial bank earning assets.............................................

120.8

+ -i

+ 6.5

U.S. Government securities....................................................
Other securities............................................................................

43.3
67.3
10.2

+ .4
+ .2
+ .1

+ 8
+ 4.6
+1.1

Member bank reserves held......................................................

16.3

+ .3

-3.9

Required reserves (estimated)...............................................
Excess reserves (estimated)....................................................

15.4
.9

+ -I
+ .2

-3.7
- .2

Furniture stores

Loans made
Loan

Credit

+ 8

Loan
bal­
ances
out­
standing
(end of
month)

Changes in reserves during 4 weeks ended December 28,
reflected the following:

Third F. R. District
% chg. % chg. % chg.
Dec.
Dec. 12 mos.
1949
1949
1949
from
from
from
year ago year ago year ago

Effect on
reserves
Increase in Reserve Bank holdings of Governments.
Net payments to Treasury.................................................
Decrease in Reserve Bank loans......................................
Increase of currency in circulation...................................

+1.1
— .4
— .2
— .2

Change in reserves.............................................................

+ .3

Consumer instalment loans
Industrial banks and loan companies..........................

+ 46
-23
+ 22
- 4

+ 16
- 8
+ 11
+ 12

+ 18
- 1
+ 12
+ 20

♦Annual rate for the month and per cent changes from month and year ago
at leading cities outside N. Y. City.

PRICES
Per cent change
from
Dec.
1949
(Index)

Index: 1935-39 average =100

Wholesale prices — United States.....................................
Farm products.......................................................................
Foods........................................................................................
Other.........................................................................................
Consumer prices
United States.........................................................................
Philadelphia............................................................................
Clothing.................................................................................
Housefurnishings................................................................

month
ago

year
ago

188
204
197
179

0
-1
-2
0

- 7
-12
- 8
- 5

168
167
194
184
121
146
192
152

-1
-1
-2
0
0
-1
0
0

-

2
2
3
6

+ 2
- 5
0

_______________________ / A . ---------------------------------------

03A!.': ,... ' * / i
Weekly Wholesale Prices—U.S.
All com­
modi­
(Index: 1935-39 average =100)
Cn
ties
SJ
6/
f)
Week
Week
Week
Week
Week

ended
ended
ended
ended
ended

Jan. 3..................................Wi
Jan. 10........................................
Jan. 17........................................
Jan. 24......................................
jaq/^L^...
..............

187
188
187
187
187

+
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.


Page
10


-/Q3j

Oa
prod­
ucts

202
+ 204
302
202
205

Foods

Other

195
197
196
195
196

179
179
179
179
179

OTHER BANKING DATA

Jan.
25,
1950

Weekly reporting banks—leading cities
United States (billions $):
Loans—
Commercial, industrial and agricultural....................
Security....................................................................................
Real estate..............................................................................
To banks.................................................................................
All other...................................................................................

13.9
1.9
4.4
.3
4.4

Total loans—gross.............................................................
Investments............................................................................
Deposits...................................................................................

24.9
43.2
76.6

Third Federal Reserve District (millions $):
Loans—
Commercial, industrial and agricultural....................
Security....................................................................................
Real estate..............................................................................
To banks..................................................................................
All other...................................................................................

Changes in—
four
weeks

year

0
.3
0
0
0

- 1.5
0
+ .3
+ .1
+ .5

.3
.7
.4

- .6
+ 5.7
+ 2.4

466
32
113
7
315

_
—

6
4
0
— 11
+ 4

- 46
+ 4
+ 17
- 6
+ 38

Total loans—gross.............................................................
933
Investments............................................................................ 1,857
Deposits................................................................................... 3,095

_ 17
+ 8
10

+ 7
+ 241
+ 159

+

.1
1.0
0
— .9
.4
—

+
-

100
— 47
+ 4
— 5
+ 1-4%

-330
- 32
-172
+ 106
+ 8.295

Member bank reserves and related items
United States (billions $):
Member bank reserves held............................................
Reserve Bank holdings of Governments....................
Gold stock...............................................................................
Money in circulation..........................................................
Treasury deposits at Reserve Banks...........................

16.4
17.8
24.4
26.9
.5

Federal Reserve Bank of Phila. (millions $)
Loans and securities............................................................ 1,189
Federal Reserve notes........................................................ 1,596
Member bank reserve deposits.......................................
769
Gold certificate reserves.................................................... 1,278
Reserve ratio (%)................................................................ 51.7%

—

_
+
+

3.6
4.3
.2
.6
.6