View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

The Potato: Prince or Pauper of Vegetables?




The Innovation Industry

THE POTATO:
PRINCE OR PAUPER
OF VEGETABLES?
A lowly vegetable is the potato, but oh so ver­

were battled with frequent applications of Paris

satile! It can be boiled, baked and foiled; home

green. Irrepressible weeds were uprooted by

fried or French fried; creamed, diced, or riced;

means of a horse-drawn, hand-guided cultivator.

chipped or whipped, scalloped, souped, or sal-

In the fall when the potato vines died, the pota­

aded;

lyonnaised, julienned, or au gratined.

toes were dug with a potato hook and hand

Rare, indeed, is a full-course dinner without po­

picked into gunny sacks. That was about seven

tatoes in some form. Gastronomically, the potato
is the most popular member of the vegetable

or eight Presidents ago. How times have changed
-—potato times!

kingdom. Botanically, it is a berry-bearing herb,

Today, potato growing is big business. Most of

with esculent roots, winged leaves, and a bell

the potatoes are now grown in areas favored by

flower. Economically, the potato is wayward,

soil and climate, on farms of extensive acreage,

capricious, unpredictable.

cultivated with specialized and costly machinery

The potato is readily growable, gradable,

— the entire operation requiring a capital invest­

marketable,

ment that often runs into six digits west of the

processable— even hedgeable— but not always

decimal. To be sure, little potato patches are still

profitable. Between sowing and reaping (or as

an adjunct of many small general farms through­

the English say, between planting and lifting)

out the country; but “ small potatoes” is no longer

many things can happen. So much depends upon

an apt description of the potato business.

packable,

storable,

transportable,

the acreage planted, the weather, the bugs, the

Potatoes are grown in every state of the coun­

yield, the quality, and the carryover. All of these

try, which may give the impression that they

contingencies, in the face of a steady but in­

thrive anywhere. Their ancestry can be traced

elastic demand, conspire to make prices erratic.

back to the Bolivian and Peruvian Andes, where

Hence the potato farmer is likely to be a prince

close botanical relatives of the potato still flour­

one year and a pauper another.

ish at mile-high altitudes— indicative of the fact

The last time we planted potatoes we cut them

that the tuber tolerates a cool climate.

by hand with a little paring knife, making sure
each wedge had at least one eye. With a hand

The p o tato in Pennsylvania

hoe, each wedge was carefully covered with soil.

Potatoes are grown in all 67 counties of Penn­

During the growing season, pestiferous bugs

sylvania, including Philadelphia County, though

B U S I N E S S R E V I E W is produced in the Department of Research. Evan B. Alderfer was primarily responsible for
"The Potato: Prince or Pauper of Vegetables?” and Elizabeth P. Deutermann for “The Innovation Industry.” The authors will be
glad to receive comments on their articles.
Requests for additional copies should be addressed to Bank and Public Relations, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101.



business review

LEADING POTATO COUNTIES OF PENNSYLVANIA
1964 PRODUCTION— 1000 CWT.

a good many years have passed since potatoes

nearest big potato county; but distance lends

were cultivated at Broad and Chestnut. Last

enchantment, so let’s go northwest to Potter

year the Commonwealth produced $25 million

County, bordering New York State; then to

worth. Corn and hay were the only field crops

the western extremity of our district in Cambria

that yielded more money. New Jersey and Dela­

County, rich in both potato land and soft soal

ware also grow potatoes, but in this article spe­
cial attention is called to the Pennsylvania po­

beds.
Potter and Cambria counties are hilly. Pota­

tato.

toes have no objections to summits and slopes—
are

and there is where most of the potato fields are

shown on the map. The leading counties are

found, because only the higher elevations afford

Erie, Lehigh, Lancaster, York, Potter, and Cam­

sufficiently broad acreage to permit the use of

bria— in that order. These half-dozen counties

field machinery; the valleys are too narrow for

produced over half of the state’s 1964 crop.

mechanized potato culture.

Field notes

curvaceous sweeps of freshly cultivated brown

To understand potato farming, you ought to see

earth contoured between stands of green grass

it. Let us take you on an armchair tour into

on one side and greener oats on the other. The

Pennsylvania potato

foliage of newly sprouted potato plants is just

Pennsylvania’s

most

productive

areas

An early June landscape presents a view of




country. Lehigh is our

3

business re v ie w

beginning to pin-stripe the brown soil with

and all-around mechanic to make repairs rap­

green, and when the vines bloom the fields turn

idly when something goes wrong. Incidentally,

white. The interspersed oats and grass-legume

the mechanized planter plants with each potato

crops are part of the rotation plan to replenish

seed a systemic insecticide which finds its way

the soil with moisture and nitrogen; and the

up through the stalk to give instant battle to

gracefully curving contours help to prevent the

some of the attacking enemies.
The harvesting machine— drawn by a big cat­

soil from washing away.
A farm with 100 acres in potatoes, which is
about the minimum size for profitable commer­

erpillar or four-wheel-drive tractor— is a costly
and colossal newfanglement which unearths two

cial operation utilizing machinery, usually has a

rows of potatoes simultaneously, shakes out the

total of 300 to 400 acres for purposes of crop

soil, separates the rocks from the potatoes which

rotation. Land, buildings, and machinery— a

are delivered by moving belt to the accompany­

Potter County farmer told us— requires a capital

ing truck that hauls the potatoes to the potato

investment of $150,000 and up. On a large 1300-

barn where they are mechanically unloaded. In

acre Cambria farm with 350 acres in potatoes,

a Cambria County potato field, we came upon a

we counted 14 tractors, two potato harvesting

healthy stand of young potatoes in a field so full

machines (each worth about the price of three

of stone that we were moved to say, “ I never

Cadillacs), numerous plows, planters, cultivators,

knew potatoes could be grown in a rockery,” to

sprayers,

which the farmer’s only reply was, “ You should

and

miscellaneous

equipment.

The

owner-operator employs 14 full-time, year-round

see all the rocks we have already removed from

workers with, of course, a greatly augmented

that field.”

labor supply during harvest time.

Potato storehouses— barn-like in appearance

To grow good potatoes, one must plant good

but commonly referred to as potato storage—

seed. Pennsylvania farmers import large quan­

are equipped with air ducts below the floor and

tities of certified seed potatoes from Maine.

gigantic blowers provide good circulation. These

Some are also grown in Potter County— the only

precautions, along with insulated ceilings, keep

place in Pennsylvania. Certified seed potatoes

the stored potatoes in good condition awaiting

grow best in low-temperature northern areas and

delivery which may be as late as the next year’s

assure the commercial potato grower the maxi­

planting time. The structures are always larger

mum protection against ravages such as ring

and, in many instances, better cared for than the

rot, infection by mosaics, leaf-roll disease, and

homestead because they are the base of opera­

other seed-borne diseases which cause losses up

tions in quest of potato profits. The potato stor­

to 20 per cent of the crop.

age is a multiple-purpose building which serves

The seed potatoes are machine cut, machine

not only to store seed potatoes, harvested pota­

loaded, machine planted, machine cultivated,

toes, and fertilizers but serves also as a place

machine sprayed, machine harvested, and ma­

for cutting seed, grading, sorting, packing, and

chine graded for size. Everything is done me­

often includes a machine shop and a telephone.

chanically except the eating thereof. The mod­

Sideline operations such as fattening hogs or

ern farmer must be not only a good manager,

breeding horses may also be under the same
roof.

but also must be or must employ a good welder

4




business review

LEADING POTATO STATES
1964 production.

Source: United States Department of Agriculture.

The a ll-A m e ric a n p o tato scene

points up the 20 leading states. Delaware doesn’t

Although Pennsylvania is representative of the

qualify because of its small size, but the little

way potatoes are grown, it is not to be inferred

state is not to be overlooked; it is among the

that the Commonwealth is a leader; in fact,

states that produce

Pennsylvania ranked twelfth in the 1964 inter­

which brings up another point.

state potato derby in which all fifty states par­

early-summer potatoes—

Almost three-fourths of the annual crop of
potatoes is grown in Northern states, including

ticipated. New Jersey ranked fourteenth.
Anyone who has ordered food from a printed

California, and is harvested in the fall. Some

and

states, however, harvest their potatoes in late

housewives, cruising through supermarkets, are
familiar with Maine potatoes whether or not

summer; others in early summer; others in late

they have heard of Aroostook County. Those

few states harvest winter potatoes— notably Flor­

two states, along with two others— California

ida and California. The accompanying panel of

and New York— produced half of the country’s

maps shows the origin of the six seasonal mar­

menu has come across Idaho potatoes;

spring, and still others in early spring; and a

1964 crop, which is indicative of the regional

keting areas. There is no month in the calendar

specialization. All the other states together pro­

without new potatoes originating somewhere.

duced the other half. The accompanying map

Remarkably accommodating is the potato.




5

IRISH POTATOES
Principal producing areas by seasons.
WINTER

EARLY SPRING

Source: United States Department of Agriculture.

Potato p roductivity

Never have so many potatoes been grown on so

The potato is a most accommodating vegetable

few acres as in recent years. Last year, acreage

in still another respect— its amenability to ex­

was down to almost 1% million— the smallest

pansive productivity. This feature of the spud

reported since 1867— and the yield per acre was

is graphically portrayed on the charts showing

close to the peak of 200 cwt. (hundredweight)

acreage planted and the yield per acre. Note the

per acre. These are national averages. Some in­

phenomenal decline in acres planted and the

dividual farmers do far better than twice the

equally phenomenal growth in yield per acre.

national average. Moreover, some of those top­

6



business re v ie w

flight farmers are in Pennsylvania (pardon the

The tr e k to m a rk e t

commercial). Noteworthy is the fact that recent

With increased regional specialization in potato

yields per acre are almost triple those of three

growing and increased urban and suburban con­

decades ago.

centration of population, potatoes have a longer

Rising productivity, as might be supposed, is

and longer trek to market. Formerly, most of

not fortuitous. It has come about through stead­

them went by rail but a rising tonnage is going

ily improved practices such as the use of cer­

by truck. The cost of moving potatoes from farm

tified seed, better strains obtained by cross­

to market has also been increasing, partly as a

breeding, improved disease and insect control,

result of longer hauls, partly owing to increased

irrigation, judicious use of fertilizer, and mois­

services incident to marketing, and partly be­

ture control. For example, some farmers, instead

cause of rising wages. In many instances there is

of cutting their grass for hay making, plow un­

also a middleman or two, or three, between the

der the entire crop of grass thus insuring ade­

grower and the ultimate consumer. As a conse­

quate moisture for the ensuing potato season

quence of these developments, consumers are

regardless of how niggardly the rainfall.

likely to pay more than formerly and farmers
are likely to receive less than formerly.

TOTAL ACREAGE PLANTED

Potatoes go to essentially two major markets:

M ILLIO N S OF ACRES

the fresh table market and the processing mar­
ket. The fresh table market is the larger, and it
has undergone some notable changes in recent
years. Potatoes for the fresh table market are
mass merchandised. Potatoes, like other vege­
tables, now reach consumers by way of big
shippers, big supermarkets and corporate chains.
There is more direct buying and less movement

1939

1944

1949

1954

1959

1954*

* Preliminary.
Source: United States Department of Agriculture.

through terminal markets. As a result, growers
and shippers must adjust their grading, packag­
ing, and other services to meet large-scale de­

YIELD PER ACRE

mands of the changing marketing structure;

cm.

however, the fresh table market is not growing.
Reasons for the languishing fresh table market
in the face of an ever-growing population will
be explored several paragraphs later in connec­
tion with the discussion of our changing dietary
habits.
Fortunately for the potato grower, the proc­
essing market is flourishing. A mere decade ago
about 14 per cent of the potatoes grown for food
was processed; now almost a third is being

Preliminary.
Source: United States Department of Agriculture.
*




processed. Processing consists of converting po-

7

business re v ie w

VOLUME OF POTATOES FOR FOOD PRODUCTS
SHOWS GAIN
MILLIONS OF CWT.*

Many chippers buy on contract, which has
both good and not so good features for the
farmer. The farmer who sells to a chipper is
assured a definite contract price, which is per­
haps to the farmer’s advantage in the long run,
but there are times when the farmer wishes he
had not been under contract. A Cambria County
farmer told us that last year he could have made
$60,000 more on his potato crop had he not
been under contract to a chipper. It is also al­

* Fresh equivalent basis.
Source: United States Department of Agriculture.

leged (and denied) that various clauses in the
contract allow more loopholes for the chipper

tatoes into various finished or semi-finished prod­

than the grower.

ucts for consumption. Potato chips and “ shoe

A controversial aspect of potato marketing is

strings” are the leading items; other are frozen

the futures market in New York City, which

potatoes, dehydrated potatoes, and canned pota­

deals in Maine potatoes. A futures market affords

toes. The growth in relative importance of these

the opportunity of buying or selling potatoes

items is shown in the accompanying chart. As

for future delivery. Some growers, dealers, and

many housewives know, particularly gainfully

others use the market for hedging purposes.

employed or bridge-playing housewives, proc­

Numerous farmers, however, believe that the

essed potatoes appear on the shelves of super­

futures market exerts adverse effect on the cash

markets in various attractive packages. There

market for potatoes.

are frozen fries, puffs, whole potatoes, and pre­
pared dishes such as scalloped potatoes and

G lo ry , w h a t prices I

others ready to put in the oven. Dehydrated po­

Never, or almost never, have potato prices been

tatoes take a variety of forms such as mashed

so high as they have been recently. Reason? A

potato flakes, mashed potato buds, and potato

short crop in 1964.

pancakes, which enable the housewife to as­
semble an instant dinner— almost.

The 1964 crop of 243 million cwt. is referred
to in a U.S. Department of Agriculture mono­

Whether a farmer sells to the fresh or proc­

graph as “ relatively small.” It was 11 per cent

essed market depends upon the type of potatoes

less than that of the preceding year. For the 1963

he grows, the length of the haul, prices offered—

crop, which was about “ normal,” farmers re­

in short, the market promising the best return.

ceived an average price of $1.77 per cwt. At this

Some Pennsylvania growers ship potatoes as far

writing, not all of the 1964 crop reports are in;

South as Florida and Texas— the potatoes going

but on the basis of recent and current prices, it

South on return trips of trucks that brought

appears that the average price that farmers will

citrus fruits North. The trend, however, is defi­

have received will be about double that of 1963.

nitely toward the processing market, not only

Thus an 11 per cent decline in production from

for Pennsylvania growers but also for growers

one year to the next caused almost a doubling

in the leading areas.

of the price. Such is potato economics.

8



business review

UNITED STATES PRODUCTION AND AVERAGE
PRICE RECEIVED BY FARMERS
MILLIONS OF CWT.

repeat, is usually either prince or pauper. He
seems doomed to ride the price roller coaster.

DOLLARS PER CWT.

The (insupportable price support pro g ram
A Potato Control Act was passed as early as
1935, but it ran into a legal snag. The objective
of the Act was achieved, however, by using
Section 32 funds for surplus removal. In 1940,
several million bushels were bought, most of
which were diverted to livestock feed and starch
production.
Subsequent to our involvement in World War
A somewhat longer-run picture of potato eco­

II, the Congress, anticipating heavy wartime de­

nomics is shown in the chart entitled “ United

mand for food, authorized outright support pro­

States Production and Average Price Received

grams and further specified that supports be at

by Farmers.” Production for the 30-year period

90 per cent of parity.

portrayed, it will be observed, has a sawtoothed

During the years of price support, 1943 to

contour; but the contour of prices is sawtoothier.

1950, tremendous gains were made in yield per

Irregularities of production are caused by sev­

acre, so that heavy production persisted in spite

eral things: changes in acreage planted, changes
in yield owing to the vagaries of weather, in­

of acreage cutbacks. Reduction of the support
level from 90 to 60 per cent of parity failed to

sects, diseases, the carryover and, of course,

prevent continued overproduction.

changes in price. Often, though not always, a

Inasmuch as potatoes are difficult to store over

large crop and low prices are followed the next

a year and are ill-suited for uses other than hu­

year by smaller acreage planted, a smaller crop,

man consumption and, above all, since large

and higher prices.

reductions in price bring about only minor in­

Weather is most unpredictable. Sometimes

creases in consumption, little could be done with

shortage of rainfall may result in smaller crops

the Government surpluses other than to destroy

in some areas, which redounds to the benefit of

them or feed them to cattle. The experiment cost

growers in other areas with adequate rainfall.

the Government over a half-billion dollars and

Last year, for example, potato growers in Potter

drew avalanches of criticism. Price support was

and Cambria counties encountered only minor

abandoned in 1951, whereupon the industry re­

shortages of rainfall, contrary to the experience

verted to the status quo ante; that is to say, the

throughout other areas of the state— with the

good old law of supply and demand.

result that potato profits are the source of some
nice new homes being built in those two coun­

The p o tato in our d ie t

ties. But, who knows? Next year some of these

Thus far we have explored potato economics

new “ potato” homes may have to be mortgaged

only in terms of production and price. There re­

to buy seed and fertilizer. Abnormality is nor­

mains demand, which cannot be ignored.

mal in potato growing. The potato farmer, to




Despite the widespread dietary utility of the

9

business re v ie w

potato, demand for the vegetable harbors a basic

is the popular misconception that consumption

infirmity. Demand is said to be inelastic, which

of potatoes causes obesity.

is the economist’s way of saying that price has

In defense of the potato it should be pointed

only a minor influence on consumption. People

out that to think of the vegetable as fattening is

eat what potatoes they like and pay little atten­

erroneous. All foods eaten to excess are fatten­

tion to the price. Potatoes are cheap even when

ing. Pound for pound, potatoes are less fattening

they are high priced. The diner will not order

than most items in the American diet. It is not

an extra helping of potatoes because they are
cheap, nor will he curtail his consumption be­

so much the ingestion of potatoes that causes
equatorial expansion of the human form as it

cause they are dear; at any price, they are an

is the butter, the sour cream, or the gravy with

insignificant proportion of the total tab.

which potatoes are so often garnished. The

Per capita consumption has declined from

“ fattening” tendency of potatoes is one-tenth

about 200 pounds in 1910 to not much over 100

that of margarine, one-fifth that of dry cereal,

pounds currently. Why the slippage? Students

one-third that of bread, and one-half that of

who have given considerable attention to the

beef or hamburger. The case rests.

problem point out various reasons, such as the
virtual cessation of immigration, higher real in­

A salute to the chip

comes, increasing abundance and variety of

Potato people are hopeful that the declining per

other foods on the market, the growing ascend­

capita consumption has reached the end o f the

ancy of white-collar over blue-collar jobs, in­

road; indeed, the curve seems to have reached

creasing urbanized dwelling, greater girth-con­

bottom and is rising again. For that happy turn

sciousness— especially among women— and the

of events the growers can thank potato chips and

slowness of some potato merchandisers to doll

associated processed products— but chiefly the
chip.

up potatoes into fancy packages for the fresh
market.

No one stops with one potato chip, any more

There may also be psychological reasons. For

than one stops with one salted peanut. Chips and

example, for purposes of distinguishing it from

“ shoestring” consumption is already above the

the sweet potato, the white potato is commonly
called the Irish potato. The Irish are lovely
people and we have nothing against them, but
over a century ago they made the mistake of

PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION* OF POTATOES
IN THE UNITED STATES
PO U N DS

making the beautiful Emerald Isle a one-crop
country, against which they had been warned.
A potato famine caused by two successive bad
harvests resulted in widespread starvation, where­
upon Irish immigrants poured into this country
in great numbers. The misfortune was a poor
advertisement for potatoes— it gave rise to the
widespread impression that the potato is the
poor man’s diet. Perhaps worse for the potato

10



Source: United States Department of Agriculture.

business re v ie w

total amount of potatoes going to the fresh mar­

downhill. In 1946, the Commonwealth produced
13 million cwt.; last year, only half that amount

25 million cwt. range and takes one-eighth of the
ket and food processors. And frozen potato

— less than 7 million. Is it a case of opportunity

products are close on the heels of the chips.

cost, that Pennsylvania farmland can be used

Could it be that the future of the potato lies in

more productively otherwise; or is it a case

the chip, frozen, and other processed products

of opportunity lost— lost to Idaho, to Maine, to

yet to be devised by the ingenuity of man? We

Long Island?

are loath to predict, especially in print, but the

Pennsylvania grows quality potatoes and a

enthusiasm of processors is understandable, and

large proportion goes to the chippers and other

it is not unrealistic to anticipate additional new

processors who demand high quality. For the

potato products from experimental laboratories

fresh market, Pennsylvania might do better if

like the Eastern Utilization Research and Devel­

it adopted Idaho expertise in grading, packaging,

opment Division of the U.S. Department of Agri­

marketing, and advertising. The Idaho potato

culture, on Mermaid Lane on the edge of Phila­

isn’t a variety, like the Katahdin or Russet Bur­

delphia.

bank, or Red Pontiac, or Sebago, or Kennebec.
The Idaho potato is the potato grown in Idaho,

P ennsylvania re vis ited

and the Maine potato is the potato grown in

When we embarked upon this little survey of the

Maine. Perhaps the only thing the Pennsylvania

potato situation, we were chagrined to discover

potato needs to reverse the declining production

that potato production in Pennsylvania is going

trend is more Pennsylvaniaizing.




11

Daring ideas are like chessmen moved forward;
they may be beaten, but they may start a win­
ning game.

— Goethe

THE INNOVATION
INDUSTRY
Unique characteristics make research and development an industry in its own right— a big industry
that is growing spectacularly. While the impact of this innovation industry is all pervasive, it has
special implications for regional economic development. A region’s participation in this growth in­
dustry of the future will depend largely on the strength of its scientific manpower base. Within the
Third Federal Reserve District, Wilmington and Philadelphia so far have shown the greatest poten­
tial for becoming research complexes.
Just for a moment, try to recall 1955. Can you

in research and development— commonly known

remember that commercial jets had not yet

as R & D. A highly organized team effort of

flown the Atlantic? Could anyone have con­

scientists, engineers, and technicians was basic

vinced you then that ten years later a man would

to the re-entry success story. The proliferation

take a walk in space— and come back to tell

of such team efforts for complex problem-solv­

about it? For most of us, the answer is no. A

ing has made R & D one of the nation’s major

few scientists believed that a man in space was

employers. Secondly, the growth of a G. E. Di­

possible, but even they doubted he could come

vision from six people to 12,000 in ten years

back alive.

exemplifies the phenomenal growth of research

A decade ago a handful of men at the General

and development in the past decade. Thirdly,

Electric Company disagreed with those scientific

the nearly 10,000 new jobs generated by R & D

skeptics. They were convinced that a vehicle

in one company have a significant impact on the

could be developed to protect a rocket’s payload

economy of the Philadelphia area. Similar ex­

from the extreme impact and heat of atmos­

periences throughout the nation have stimulated

pheric re-entry. With a Government contract and

intense regional competition for research and

determination, they set out to solve the problem.

development activities.

In the process of solving it, G.E. grew. The six
men who initiated the re-entry project could not

R & D: big and gro w in g

have conceived that their effort would snowball

Research and development employs 800,000 sci­

into a Missile and Space Division 12,000 strong.

entists, engineers, and technicians. A substantial

Most of these employees are in the Delaware

but unknown number of craftsmen, secretaries,

Valley: 3,500 are at work in West Philadelphia;

clerks, laborers, and other personnel support the

6,000 are at the Space Technology Center at

innovative efforts of the 800,000. R & D today

Valley Forge, Pennsylvania.

employs more people than banking. It is four

This experience of one company illustrates

times the size of the air transport industry, one-

three important reasons for the current interest

third the size of the entire wholesale trade of

12



business review

A DECADE OF R & D GROWTH

the research and development function an inno­

INDEX 1 9 5 4 = 1 0 0

vation industry.
The 800,000 persons employed in R & D are
highly skilled, through education or work experi­
ence or both. They include scientists of all kinds,
such as chemists, physicists, mathematicians, life
scientists, metallurgists, and engineers. Each of
these professional cadres depends on the sup­
porting aid of technicians. A common attribute
of these R & D employees is their interchangeability between one traditional industry and an­
other. A professor at the University of Pennsyl­
vania’s Moore School of Engineering, for exam­
ple, may spend his scholastic year in full-time
research on advanced electronic devices. During
that time, a survey of the U. S. Department of
Labor would list him among those employed in

Source: National Science Foundation; McGraw-Hill Depart­
ment of Economics.

education. Should a survey be conducted during
the summer, when he is consulting for an elec­

the nation. It is nineteen billion dollars’ worth
of big business.

tronics firm, he would be classified as an em­
ployee of the electrical machinery industry. As

Expenditures on R & D have more than tripled

with other R & D employees, the professor is in­

in the past decade— from 5% to 19 billion dol­

tellectually and geographically mobile among

lars. R & D has grown three times as fast as the

any number of industries which can use his

gross national product. Aggressive companies,

talents and skills. He is really employed in the

out to beat their competitors in the race for “ the
new” or “ the better,” have expanded the re­

innovation industry.

search function in every major industry. Spend­

technician, the R & D employee pursues three

ing for R & D in manufacturing, for example,

types of work— usually one at a time. They are

grew 50 per cent faster than total manufactur­

basic research, applied research, or development.

ers’ sales over the past ten years. Research and

Basic research is original investigation to ad­

development has grown into a new industry in

vance scientific knowledge, without a specific

its own right— the innovation industry.

commercial objective in mind. Einstein’s theory

Be he a physicist, a chemist, or an electronics

of relativity is a product of basic research.
W h a t in n o vatio n industry?

Though basic research takes the smallest share

The research function is found in all of the tra­

of the R & D dollar, its relative importance is

ditional industries, but size and growth don’t

expected to increase in the coming decade. The

make it an industry. Its characteristics do. The

second R & D activity in size is applied research.

kinds of personnel required for R & D, the way

Applied research is directed toward discovering

they work, and the product they produce make

('Continued on Page 16)




13

SCIENTIFIC TALENT IN THE THIRD
FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT
Growth of the innovation industry in any one
region of the country is largely dependent on

of scientists in the nation approaches 215,000.
How does the Third District measure up in

the region’s scientific and technical manpower.

scientific talent?

Unfortunately, the geographic distribution of all
persons employed in research and development

Fairly well— primarily because of the desire
of scientists to work in Wilmington and Phila­

is not known. Through the efforts of the Na­

delphia. But the rating is not outstanding. Too

tional Science Foundation in Washington, how­

many small communities outside the Delaware

ever, the states and metropolitan areas where

Valley just don’t attract top R & D talent.

scientists are working have been pinpointed.1

There are about 12,000 scientists working in

Knowing where the scientists are is a good indi­

the metropolitan areas of the Third Federal Re­

cator of where the rest of the R & D personnel

serve District. This fact alone doesn’t tell us how

are located. California, New York, Pennsylvania

the area rates as a science center. But, using a

and New Jersey emerge as the leading science

measure designed to show the concentration of

states. The top fifteen metropolitan areas are

scientists here relative to the nation, the District

shown in the following table. The grand total

can count among its assets a specialization in
science. The measure of regional specialization

FIFTEEN TOP SCIENCE CENTERS, 1962

works like this: if scientists in the District are
the same proportion of its population as all sci­

Standard
Metropolitan Area

Number of
Scientists

Rank

Population
R a n k ,1960

New York, N. Y.
Washington, D. C.
Los Angeles, Calif.
Chicago, III.
Boston, Mass.
Philadelphia, Pa.
San Francisco, Calif.
Newark, N. J.
Pittsburgh, Pa.
Houston, Tex.
Minneapolis, Minn.
Denver, Colo.
Cleveland, Ohio
Wilmington, Del.
St. Louis, Mo.
U. S. Total

14,513
10,712
10,266
7,501
6,611
6,483
6,295
4,405
3,205
2,832
2,729
2,701
2,520
2,470
2,345
214,940

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

1
10
2
3
7
4
6
13
8
16
14
26
11
65
9

Source: National Science Foundation, American Science
Manpower 1962, Washington, 1964; U. S. Census of Popula­
tion, 1960.
Note: As explained in the text, available data do not permit
comparisons of total R & D personnel by metropolitan
areas. Hence the above rankings are for scientists only and
exclude engineers. Inclusion of the latter is necessary for
ranking “research complexes.”

i Surveys published by the National Science Foundation
do not, as yet, cover engineers. There is a very high correla­
tion, however, between the geographical location of scien­
tists and the resident states of engineers reported by the
U. S. Census for 1960. Engineers and scientists concentrate
in the same areas of the country.

Digitized for14
FRASER


entists are to the total U. S. population, the index
is 1. An index of 1 is frequently thought of as
indicating a fair share. The area which scores
over 1 gets classified as a scientific concentration.
An area under 1 doesn’t.
The Third District’s index is 1.25.2 The re­
gion ranks high as a scientific concentration be­
cause of three metropolitan areas: Wilmington,
Trenton, and Philadelphia, in that order. Their
indexes are 5.58, 3.83, and 1.25, respectively.
In those areas, scientists concentrate out of
2 This is a descriptive measure of concentration, usually
called a location quotient. It is a device for comparing a
region's percentage share of a particular activity (in this
case, science) with its percentage share of some basic
aggregate (e.g., population). As used here, the location
quotient for the concentration of scientists in a region is
stated by the formula
S r/P r
Sr/Sn
.
- ——- or
■ where:
—
Sn/P n
Pr/Pn
Sr = the number of scientists in the region; Pr = the popu­
lation of the region; Sn = the number of scientists in the
nation; and Pn = the population of the nation.

business review

proportion to population. Adding in the Allen­

research laboratory

town area, 90 per cent of the scientists in the

in

Montgomery

County,

Pennsylvania.

District are in four of its 13 cities. Though these

Though Philadelphia tends to specialize in

four cities are major population centers of the

chemical and biological sciences, the proportion

District, they have a substantially greater share

of scientists working in physics, mathematics

of scientists than people.

and statistics, and psychology, closely resembles
the national scene. As is the case with industry,

P h ilad e lp h ia and W ilm in g to n le ad

Philadelphia is more scientifically diversified

In terms of absolute numbers of scientists, Phila­

than Wilmington.

delphia and Wilmington are the heavyweights.

Wilmington has all o f its eggs in one test tube

They employ 76 per cent of the District’s scientists.

— chemistry. A whopping 65 percent of its sci­

A look at the table on the preceding page shows

entists work in this one field. Research at Du

that they also rank high nationally as science cen­

Pont is, of course, no small factor. The impact

ters. Philadelphia, which has the fourth largest

of Du Pont on Wilmington is a well-known story;

metropolitan area population in the country, is

however, research at Du Pont tells other stories.

sixth on the list for scientists. Wilmington is in a

It provides a good example of the rapid change

contrasting position. By population size, it’s way

which characterizes the whole innovation indus­

down in 65th place. It ranks 14th as a science

try. R & D at Du Pont led to the development of

center. In fact, relative to population, more sci­

nylon. To produce their new product, the com­

entists work in Wilmington than in any of the
ten largest metropolitan areas in the country.

pany set up a plant in 1939. This, the oldest
commercial nylon plant in the world, is only 26

Compared to the nation, Philadelphia is a

years of age. R & D continued, and today the

specialist in chemistry and the biological sci­

company’s nylon products alone number over

ences. Research in these fields makes a major

1,000. Sixty per cent of these were introduced

contribution to the economic health of the area

in the last seven years. In a typical year, Du

and, in some cases, the physical health of the

Pont’s research results in 475 patents on new

world. Drug research at Smith Kline and French,

products and processes for apparel, household,

for example, has paid off for the company as

industrial, and defense uses. But chemical re­

well as for the Delaware Valley economy. SK&F’s

search in the area is by no means confined to

eight-man research staff in 1936 has grown to

Du Pont. Atlas Chemical has about 300 employees

850 scientists and supporting personnel today.
R & D at their Philadelphia laboratories is the

DISTRIBUTIONS OF SCIENTIFIC EMPLOYMENT

chief source of products sold throughout the

Field

world— 218 million dollars’ worth last year. For

Agricultural Sciences
Biological Sciences
Psychology
Earth Sciences
Meteorology
Mathematics and
Statistics
Physics and Astronomy
Chemistry
Other Fields
All Fields

the Philadelphia economy, SK&F’s investment in
research has increased area jobs, not just for
the 850 researchers but for all of the other em­
ployees required for production, marketing, and
administration. It has also resulted in increased
capital investments, the latest being a $5 million




Philadelphia Wilmington
1.3%
14.9
7.9
1.3
.7
8.0
11.7
36.5
17.7
100.0

.8%
3.9
2.8
.7
.1
2.5
3.9
65.2
20.1
100.0

Nation
5.8%
11.9
7.8
8.7
2.5
8.5
12.0
25.1
17.7
100.0

Source: National Science Foundation.

15

business re v ie w

in research and development. Hercules Powder

Wilmington doesn’t: its size can support a qual­

has 750 R & D personnel at its major laboratory

ity and variety of cultural assets, and personal

in Wilmington. And there are many others.

and professional services, which the smaller
community cannot; it is a major medical com­

How a bo u t th e futu re?

plex; it has many more colleges and universities.

In spite of its specialization in chemicals, the

But it falls short in trained R & D manpower.

Wilmington research outlook is good. For one

The proportion of scientists with Ph.D’s is not

reason, the chemical industry in general is the
biggest funder of its own research. Hence, 'it

so high as in the average large city. If scien­
tists with medical degrees are also considered,

does not have to worry so much about Govern­

the picture stays the same. Philadelphia is still

ment cut-backs as do communities with greater

below average. New efforts in Philadelphia to

dependence on defense contracts. More impor­
tantly, Wilmington has an extremely strong base

develop the University City Science Center and

of brainpower on which to build its research

Southeastern Pennsylvania Economic Develop­

future. Its R & D personnel are very highly

ment Corporation are both important moves in

trained. In the 25 major science cities, 32 per

creating a vigorous research community. Never­

cent of the scientists have at least a Ph.D. In

theless, the importance of improved graduate

to promote and attract research through the

Wilmington, the figure is 53 per cent. This is

and postgraduate education for the development

vitally important because such talented man­

of more topnotch Ph.D’s, and the nurturing of an

power in residence tends to attract more brains

environment to keep them in the afea, cannot

to the area.

be overstressed. Here lie the keys to Philadel­

Philadelphia has attractions for R & D that

(■
Continued from Page 13)

phia’s development as a research complex.

makes the R & D function an industry. Food is

new knowledge for specific marketable objec­

the product of the food industry. Chemicals are

tives. The work of General Electric in devising

products of the chemical industry. Innovation

the re-entry vehicle was applied research. The

is the product of the innovation industry.

third

pursuit— development— comprises

two-

thirds of the R & D effort. Development trans­

The im pact o f innovation

lates research findings into products or proc­

Innovation is inherently the most dynamic in­

esses. Every company that draws on basic or

dustry of all. Accelerated growth of research and

applied research to create new products or proc­

development generates dramatic changes in our

esses, or to improve existing ones, is involved to

economy— and in every facet of our lives. En­

some degree in development.

tire industries are created by R & D: television,

The end product of this total R & D effort is

plastics, synthetic fibers, computer services. We

newness and change. Whether the field is organic

are witness to a population explosion of new

chemistry, oceanography, or optics, the output
of the research and development function is in­

products. Teaching machines, transistors, Pola­
roid film, integrated circuits, dacron, Xerox, and

novation. It is this common end product which

polio vaccine were not in the vocabulary a few

Digitized for16
FRASER


business review

ucts and processes to keep competitive. By closely

years ago.
The rapid changes produced by research have

following technological change, surprising new

a double-barreled impact. The very nature of

markets can be found for present products. Re­

change creates both opportunities and problems

gardless of the method employed to be research-

for individuals, for industries, and for regions.

oriented, if a firm is to reap the benefits of the

O n people. The personal impact is demon­

research revolution, it has to know what’s going

strated by the impersonal computer.

It has

on. The difference between company prosperity

spawned countless new job opportunities and

or failure in ten, or even two, years is in some

destroyed many traditional jobs. This process

laboratory today.

will continue— at an accelerated rate. In 1946

Note how R & D brings both hopes and head­

the first electronic computer was unveiled in

aches to industry. The birth of the transistor,

Philadelphia. The first installation by private

for example, not only made the modern-day com­

business took place only 11 years ago. Today

puter a reality but revolutionized the electronics

23,000 computers are installed in this country,

industry. Many producers of vacuum tubes were

and 20,000 more are on order. Their use re­

caught napping. As fast as possible, they switched

quires systems analysts, keypunch operators,

to transistors. At the moment, the small firm

data processing maintenance workers, magnetic

producing electronic components is suffering a

tape librarians, and programmers. In five years

migraine headache from the pressure of new in­

the U. S. Department of Labor estimates that

tegrated circuits. The story is similar in the

over 200,000 programmers will be needed by
business and government. These are good oppor­

plastics industry. Polyethelene research fathered
it. A proliferation of plastic products followed

tunities for those who qualify.

which hurt many markets for glass and metals.

But turn the coin, and someone else has a

Now metals are fighting back. Through a new

problem. Particularly vulnerable to displacement

forming process, an alloy of zinc and aluminum

by computer use in the office are bookkeepers,

can be molded and shaped in ways previously

accounting clerks, typists, file clerks, and ac­

possible only with plastics.

counting-machine operators. Moreover, the rela­

One of the latest miracle devices of science is

tively new keypunch operator isn’t safe either.

the laser, a highly intensified light beam capable

He can expect competition from optical scanners

of producing flashes 100,000 times stronger than

and other electronic devices which “ read” the

light at the sun’s surface. One application of the

printed word and automatically translate it into

laser replaces a surgeon’s scalpel ill delicate eye

electronic machine language.

operations. Another welds and cuts difficult mate­

O n industries. Research, similarly, is both a

rials with minute precision. Wide-ranging laser

threat and a promise to business: a competitive

applications already are expected for commu­

threat to the firm out of step with the times and

nications, computers, medicine, and weaponry.

a promise to the research-oriented company. The

Each new use speeds the obsolescence of some

latter may invest heavily in R & D to prosper.

other device. Will this kind of technological his­

It doesn’t necessarily have to— as long as it

tory repeat itself? Undoubtedly. In no industry

“ thinks research.” A firm can adapt the fruits

can a company be research-ignorant and survive.

of another industry’s research to its own prod­

In every industry R & D is becoming almost a pre­




17

business re v ie w

taken, who does it, and where it is performed.

requisite for success.

O n regions. The spectacular growth of the

Most of the remainder of the research bill is paid

innovation industry provided a major economic

by private industry. Universities and other non­

boost to some regions of the country. Others

profit institutions pay only a tiny share of the

have received little or no benefit. To a large

$19 billion total.

degree this is because of a unique industry char­

The distribution of work differs greatly from

acteristic. That is, for the most part, those who

the funding.

pay for R & D don’t perform the work. And
those who pay decide in which regions of the

tions do 14 per cent of the job. Government
laboratories account for 19 per cent. Sixty-seven

Colleges

and nonprofit institu­

country the work will be performed. Who pays?
Who performs? What are the regional implica­

per cent of all R & D is performed by private
industry. Largely because of defense require­

tions?

ments, three industries do the bulk of the work:

Most of the nation’s research and develop­

aircraft and missiles, electrical and communica­

ment is performed by private industry, but the

tions equipment, and chemicals. They are re­

biggest single spender is the Federal Govern­

sponsible for 65 per cent of all industrial R & D.

ment. The Government tends to concentrate its

And the big researchers are getting bigger.

R & D spending in relatively few industries, com­

Not only is research volume concentrated in a

panies, universities, and geographical regions.

few industries, but in a few companies as well.

The basic factors underlying this concentration

National defense needs are again an important

are the special research needs of Government

influence. Since most federally sponsored re­

and its knowledge of the ability of performers to
meet those needs.

search is for defense, a look at defense con­

Uncle Sam pays for 70 per cent of all R & D.

centration. Of the 500 prime industrial contrac­

Obviously Governmental decision-making has a

tors for defense R & D, eight companies were

tracts provides an indication of company con­

big impact on what type of research is under-

awarded 50 per cent of the total value of con­

FOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

tracts between 1961 and 1963. Similarly, most

WHO PERFORMS?

university research is done by a small elite. Last
year 38 per cent of Government R & D contracts
to universities went to ten schools, led by the
University of California and the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology.
It just so happens that the industrial, com­
pany, and university concentrations of research
tend to be in the same geographical areas. The
San Francisco Bay and Boston metropolitan
areas epitomize such regions— now known as re­
search complexes. Why does research just hap­

GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRY COLLEGES
AND
INSTITUTIONS

GOVERNMENT

INDUSTRY COLLEGES
AND
INSTITUTIONS

Source: National Science Foundation; McGraw-Hill Depart­
ment of Economics.

Digitized for18
FRASER


pen to concentrate in, for example, these two
areas? Most other parts of the country wish
they knew.

business review

C om petition fo r research

how each area goes about it. As with the fight

Companies have always fought to be competi­

for industry, different tools are being tried to

tive. Regional competition for growth, however,

encourage research. M ajor metropolitan areas

is a relatively new fact of economic life. It is

where universities, culture, good schools, and

more intense daily. States and communities in­

good living abound have a head start over their

creasingly muster new forces to make their re­

less-endowed brethren. But these assets aren’t

spective economies healthier. They are fighting

enough. The competitors recognized this and

for a larger share of the nation’s economic ac­

seized first upon the research park. Aesthetically

tivity. As the battle escalates, one weapon after

appealing campus-like settings marked “ research

another is employed to hold old industry and to

companies only” were expected automatically to

entice plants from other areas. Free land, planned

attract R & D. They weren’t very successful. The

industrial parks with built-in amenities, low-

currently fashionable key to building a research

interest financing, tax benefits, political influence,

complex is a research institute. The institute can

promotion campaigns, and other levers are all

provide an important link between university

used to aid and abet local economic growth. The

research and the business community. Companies

tendency of such gambits is merely to move the

can make better and quicker use of the latest

economic pieces around the big U. S. chessboard.

scientific findings of university laboratories by

With the rapid growth of research and devel­

consulting the institute. The Stanford Research

opment, combined with the desire of all com­

Institute is one prototype, among many, for this

munities for “ nice clean industry,” a new set
of weapons is being devised. It is aimed at the

kind of undertaking.
But without a more fundamental asset, a re­

latest panacea for economic advantage of one

search institute may be just as sterile as some of

area over another— becoming a research com­

those research parks. That asset is top-quality

plex. Hence, communities are looking hard at

scientific and technical brainpower. While no

existing R & D concentrations for clues to suc­

one weapon is sufficient to trigger the develop­

cess. The economic implications of this new

ment of a research complex, the necessary one

drive to develop research complexes should be

is brainpower.

very different from the earlier indiscriminate

A community that grows talented scientific

competition for industry. Successful efforts to

and technical Ph.D’s and provides a receptive

increase research and development will create

climate for the use of their talent has the best

a bigger economic pie. More R & D means new

base for growing research. Brains like compan­

techniques and processes and more efficient in­

ionship; they attract other brains. This is the

dustry. These are the major factors behind in­

beginning of the chain reaction which sets off

creased productivity. And increased productivity

the research complex. Brainpower is the only

contributes about half of the nation’s economic

source of research and development. It is the

growth. The more every community does to pro­

source of vitality for a research institute. The

vide an environment in which new ideas are born

more outstanding the brains, the richer the re­

and nurtured, the greater the national wealth.

gion. A community’s investment in developing

How can community competition for research

and nurturing topflight talent is an investment in

contribute to national growth? It all depends on

its own economic growth as well as the nation’s.




19

FOR THE R E C O R D . . .
BILLIONS $

2 YEARS
AGO

YEAR
AGO

MEMBER BANKS, 3RD F.R.D.

JUNE
1965

Third Federal
Reserve District

United States

Per cent change

Per cent change

Factory*
Department
Store Salesf

Check
Payments

Per cent
change
June 1965
from

Per cent
change
June 1965
from

Employ­
ment

Payrolls

Per cent
change
June 1965
from

Per cent
change
June 1965
from

mo.
ago

mo.
ago

year
ago

+ 6

+

1

+12

+

2

+17

+

+

5

+ 8

+

5

+29

SUMMARY

mo.
ago

year
ago

6
mos.
1965
from
year
ago

mo.
ago

year
ago

6
mos.
1965
from
year
ago

+

June 1965
from

1

+

8

5

+

3

+

2

+ 8

LO CA L
CH AN GES

+ 9

June 1965
from

MANUFACTURING
Electric power consumed. . . .
Man-hours, to ta l* ....................
Employment, to ta l......................
W age income*..........................

+ 5
+ 2
+ 1
+ 2

+10
+ 7
+ 4
+ 11

CONSTRUCTION” ...................

-1 3

+23

+17

-

+

+ 5

+

COAL PRODUCTION.................
TRADE” *
Department store sales.............
BANKING
(All member banks)
Deposits......................................
Loans...........................................
Investments.................................
U.S. Govt, securities...............
O ther........................................
Check payments........................

+

6

7

+ 9
+ 8
+ 4
+ 10

Lehigh V a lle y .. .

+

1

2

Harrisburg.........

+

2

+ 7

Lancaster...........

+ 4

4

+

2

+

5

+ 9 + 8
+ 10 +11
+ 2 + 2
- 6 - 4
+ 16 + 14
+ 2 3 t + 15+

+ 4
+ 2
+ 1
0
+ 3
+11

12
15
3
5
16
18

+
+
+
+
+

10
14
3
4
14
11

+

+ 5
+ 3
- 1
- 2
+ 1
+ 2t

+
+
+
+
+

+ 3
+ 2

+
+

1
1

’ Production workers only
’ ’ Value of contracts
’ ’ ’ Adjusted for seasonal variation




year
ago

+ 9

-1 2

+ 4

+ 2

+10

-

4

1

+ 6

+

+11

-

6

1

+ 4

+ 4

-

3

1

-

+

4

-

3

+

+

1

+

+ 6

Scranton............

+

1

-

Trenton..............

+

1

+

1

1

mo.
ago

year
ago

1

+

3

+17

0

+

+

4

+ 19

1

+

1

+ 10

0

-

2

+15

6

+

6

+40

3

+ 3

+

4

+20

+

+

n

+ 2t +

U

1
0

f2 0 Cities
^Philadelphia

Wilkes-Barre. . .

+

1

+ 3

+

2

+

5

-

W ilmington. . . .

PRICES
Consumer...................................

1

mo.
ago

+ 3

Philadelphia.. . .
Reading..............

-

year
ago

+

1

+ 4

-

1

+ 11

-

6

+

8

-

6

+48

+13

-

6

+

7

+ 4

+ 18

York...................

+ 3

+

6

+ 3

’ N o t restricted to corporate limits of cities but covers areas of one or more
counties.
fAdjusted fo r seasonal variation.