View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

AUGUST 1956

J.

business

evi
view

FEDERAL RESERVE
0ANK OF
PHILADELPHIA




HW AYS: THE $33 BILLION W AY
OF THE MUDDLE?
ts a re a lre a d y p a y in g fo r $ 3 3 b illio n o f new highw ays
structed d u rin g the n e x t 1 3 years. It's not thje size
ta g th a t w ill b re a k up the tra ffic jams but
o f the rig h t am ounts a t the rig h t places.

TRICT BANKING
W h ile e a rn in g assets in cre a se d little in the p a st y e a r, there
was a m a rke d sh ift fro m investm ents to loans. This co n trib u te d
to a sub stantia l increase in ea rnin gs.

CURRENT TRENDS
Business a c tiv ity ran a t just a b o u t the speed lim it th ro u g h June.
For the rest o f the y e a r it looks as if m ore o f same is in o rd er.

Additional copies of this issue are available
upon request to the Department of Research,
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia,
Philadelphia 1, Pa.




OUT OF THE MUDDLE?
Late in June, Congress passed a monumental $33

are authorized to meet 90 per cent of the cost of

billion road-building bill. Sponsors of the bill

completing the interstate system over a period of

said that it sets in motion “ the greatest govern­

13 years. State highway departments will do the

mental construction program in the history of the

actual construction and states will bear 10 per

world,”

and the American people “ will ride

cent of the cost— almost $3 billion. The bill also

safely upon many thousands of miles of broad,

provides for a gradual step-up in the regular

straight, trouble-free roads, four to eight lanes

Federal-aid highway program by the authoriza­

wide, criss-crossing America from coast to coast

tion of $2V2 billion in the next three years. For

and border to border, built to the very highest

this part of the program, Federal outlays are

standards that our highway engineers can devise.”

matched dollar for dollar by the states.

Keystone of the program is a 41,000-mile net­

Construction of roads in national parks, forests,

work of modern highways linking 42 state capitals

and Indian reservations financed entirely by the

and 90 per cent of all the cities of more than

Federal Government involves additional outlays

50,000 population. Federal outlays of $26 billion

of almost a half-billion dollars over the next




b usin ess re v ie w

years. Altogether, the program adds up to $28

THE COLOSSUS OF ROADS

billion in highway outlays by the Federal Govern­

Most of the expenditures authorized in the new

ment and approximately $ 5 ^

bill are to be used for the improvement of existing

billion for the

states.

roads rather than for the construction of addi­

Before the ink had a chance to dry on the brand-

tional mileage. This is as it should be because

new bill, highway-user taxes were imposed to de­

we already have a vast network of roads and high­

The Federal gasoline tax was

ways, and our most pressing problem is not addi­

raised from 2 cents a gallon to 3 cents; the diesel
fuel tax was jacked up from 2 to 3 cents a gallon;

tional mileage but relief from the appallingly
overcrow ded con dition s on the most heavily

taxes on tires were jumped from 5 cents a pound

traveled sections of our road system.

fray the cost.

to 8 cents; a 3 cents-a-pound tax was imposed on

The street on which your front door faces is

rubber used for recapping and retreading tires;

part of a continental network of 3.4 million miles

the sales tax on the manufacturers’ prices of

of city streets and country roads— enough to en­

trucks, buses, and truck trailers was raised from

circle the world 135 times. Over 3 million miles,

8 to 10 per cent; and a tax of $1.50 per thousand

or about 90 per cent, are rural or country roads

pounds was imposed on motor trucks weighing in

and the remainder consists of city streets. Qual­

excess of 13 tons. The new levies, which went into

itatively, the network ranges from narrow and

effect on July 1, the beginning of the Govern­

winding, gravelly pathways to broad, smooth­

ment’s new fiscal year, were referred to by the

surfaced, high-speed expressways. On the basis of

press as “ pay-as-you-ride” tax provisions, but in

who builds, manages, and maintains the roads,
there are several well-defined systems of highways.

reality they are “ pay-before-you-ride” on the new
roads yet to be built. According to early estimates,
the average motorist will find his fuel and tire
costs increased $6 to $9 a year.

The Federal-aid primary system consists of
about a quarter-million

miles, predominantly

rural, connecting all of the principal cities,

The new highway bill represents a departure

county seats, ports, manufacturing areas, and

from traditional American highway policy in that

other traffic-generating localities. These are the

the bill provides for a much greater participation

main state trunk-line roads. Examples are U.S.

by the Federal Government than heretofore. To

Route 1 which runs from Maine through Phila­

be sure, the Federal Government has been making

delphia to Florida, and U.S. Route 30 which runs

substantial contributions for the construction of

from Atlantic City through Philadelphia to the

our road system, but never before on the grand

West Coast. The U.S. shield bearing the route

scale provided in the new legislation. The greatly

number of these roads has no particular signifi­

increased Federal participation is based, in part,

cance except that it aids the motorist to find his

on the huge construction job faced by the states

way through unfamiliar territory.

whose programs were interrupted by World War

The Federal-aid secondary system, slightly over

II. Meanwhile the volume of traffic soared. An­

one-half million miles in length, consists of im­

other reason for the increased Federal participa­

portant feeder roads linking farms, factories,

tion is the need for a greatly improved highway

distribution outlets, and smaller communities of

system as part of the over-all national defense

the nation with the primary system. They are

program.

commonly

4




called

the

farm-to-market

system.

b usin ess re v ie w

Local examples are Route 3 out of Philadelphia

length, which in the language of the act would be

to West Chester, and Route 23 from Philadelphia

so located as “ to connect by routes, as direct as

to Lancaster via Phoenixville.

practicable,

the principal

metropolitan

areas,

Responsibility for construction of these two

cities, and industrial centers, to serve the national

Federal-aid systems traditionally has been shared

defense, and to connect at suitable border points

in about equal amounts by the Federal Govern­

with routes of Continental importance in the

ment and the states, in accordance with a formula

D om inion o f Canada and the Republic of

taking into account land area, road mileage, and

Mexico.” This system, which came to be known

population. Some sections of the primary system

as the National System of Interstate Highways,

are more important than others, from the stand­

joins 42 state capitals and 90 per cent of all cities

point of national interest.

over 50,000 population.

Consequently, Con­

gress, in 1944, authorized the selection of a

The interstate system of highways, which the

special network not to exceed 40.000 miles in

new bill extended to 41,000 miles, embraces only

THE INTERSTATE HIGHW AY SYSTEM

falls

sc/rre

mllings

GRAND FORKS
ILUTH

BISM A RC K

MlNNEAPOt

SHERID/

POCAT^LO

OMAH/
CHEYENNI

IORTH

^n c in n a ^'

denvei

TOPEK/

WICHI1

O KLAH O I
LITTLE R<
IIN G H AI
FORT WORTH

ORLEANS
rO NIO .

0 A r t O HA

GALVESTON

Source: A d a p te d from "Freedom o f the A m erican Road,"
published by the Ford M o to r Com pany, Dearborn, 1956




5

b usin est re v ie w

1.2 per cent of the total mileage, but carries about

Turnpike trends

one-seventh of all the traffic, serves 45 per cent of

Florence, N. J., and Edgely, Pa., were united in

the rural and two-thirds of the urban population.

turnpike matrimony on May 25, 1956 with guber­

Actually, the interstate system is the most heavily

natorial ribbon-cutting on the new bridge over the

traveled portion of the Federal-aid primary sys­

Delaware linking the New Jersey and Pennsyl­

tem. It is a basic network from the standpoint of

vania turnpikes. The press hailed the union by

Federal interest, interstate commerce, and na­

pointing out that it is now possible for a motorist

tional defense. Federal-aid highway systems make
up about one-fifth of all the mileage, so it is appar­

to drive from Augusta, Maine, to the Ohio-Indiana

ent that the great bulk of our highway mileage

stretch in Massachusetts.

border unimpeded by stoplights except for a short

consists of country roads and city streets that are

Just as glamor girls command attention out of

outside the Federal-aid system. They have been
constructed and are maintained and administered

all proportion to their importance among their
less well-favored sisters, so turnpikes— the glamor

by a great diversity of political units. This may

gangways— command attention out of all propor­

be illustrated with reference to Pennsylvania.
Pennsylvania has 100,000 miles of highways
and they are administered by more than 2,500

tion to their economic importance in our highway
system. Turnpikes are just a small fraction of our
highway mileage.

governmental units. The state administers 41 per

Pennsylvania, it was pointed out in the July

cent of the mileage, the counties administer about

Business Review, built the country’s first turnpike

1 per cent, cities 6 per cent, boroughs and towns

from Philadelphia to Lancaster in the late 18th

5 per cent, first-class townships about 2 per cent,

century, and Pennsylvania was also responsible

and second-class townships 45 per cent. ( A firstclass township is one with a population of 300 or
more per square mile; all others are second-class.)
For the country as a whole, we have about
35,000

governmental

units administering the

entire network of roads. Approximately 17,000
of these units are cities, boroughs, and villages
engaged in construction and maintenance of
streets and highways within their borders. More

for the revival of the turnpike movement in the
present century. The original 160-mile section of
the Pennsylvania Turnpike between Irwin and
Middlesex was begun in the fall of 1938, with the
help of an RFC loan, a PWA grant, and the
partially graded right-of-way of an abandoned
railroad, including tunnels bored through several
mountains. Completion of the turnpike was inter­
rupted by World War II, after which Pennsyl­
vania built the Philadelphia extension between

than 18,000 governmental units have some type of

Middlesex and King of Prussia. In 1951 the turn­

jurisdiction over the local rural roads.

pike was extended to the Ohio state line, and in

Local

road units vary in size from little districts that

1954 the eastern end was extended to the Delaware

take care of a mile or two to very large districts

River.

Construction costs ranged from a half­

like California’s San Bernardino County which is

million dollars per mile for the original section of

larger than New Hampshire and Vermont com­

the turnpike to $2 million a mile for the Delaware

bined.

River extension.

With such a diversity of governmental

road builders, our network of highways has a
surprising unity.

6




Despite the huge cost of construction, the Penn­
sylvania Turnpike operated at a profit from the

b usin ess r e v ie w

Outstanding bonds are being re­

to Sayre, from Norristown to the Delaware line,

deemed years ahead of schedule. Since the open­

from Gettysburg to the Maryland line, from Pitts­

ing of the original section of the turnpike, revenue

burgh north to Erie and south to the West Vir­

very outset.

from vehicular traffic has increased every year

ginia line, from the Pocono Mountains to the

except for two years during World War II when

Delaware Water Gap, and another turnpike all

gasoline rationing restricted civilian motoring.

the way across the state from Stroudsburg to

The success of the Pennsylvania Turnpike
started a stampede of toll-road construction. Over
1,800 miles of toll roads have been built. Most of

Sharon. But these plans may be altered as a result
of recent developments.
Prior to the passage of the 1956 highway act,

the mileage is in New York, New Jersey, Pennsyl­

investment ardor for toll-road bonds had already

vania, and Ohio. Almost 1,400 miles of toll roads

cooled off considerably because revenue on some

are in process of construction, and about 5,000

of the various issues did not come up to expecta­

miles were proposed or at least were under consid­

tions. Sales of toll-road bonds declined from $1.6

eration at midyear.

Among the toll roads in

billion in 1954 to less than half that amount last

operation, the Pennsylvania Turnpike is the old­

year. Even in Pennsylvania where the turnpike

est, New York’s 427-mile Thruway from New

boom started there is turnpike trouble. Despite

York City to Buffalo is one of the swankiest, New

continuing favorable earnings on the section of

Jersey’s 118-mile turnpike running almost the full

the turnpike from Valley Forge westward, which

length of the state is the most profitable, and West

is a good many years ahead of schedule on its

Virginia’s 88-mile turnpike from Charleston to
Princeton is most-often cited as a turnpike mistake

bond-retirement program, the Delaware River
extension and the uncompleted northeast exten­

because the road is losing money. Traffic on the

sion to Scranton have thus far failed to earn their

New Jersey Turnpike turned out to be more than
three times the pre-completion estimates of the
engineers. Ohio’s 241-mile turnpike, linking the
Pennsylvania and Indiana turnpikes, has not
had sufficient time to determine its profitability
but thus far the results have been somewhat
disappointing.
Much of the success of the Pennsylvania and
New Jersey turnpikes, and particularly the latter,
may be ascribed to their location right in the heart

sinking-fund reserve requirements. Consequently,
the Turnpike Commission recently announced a
system-wide toll increase of 41 per cent for pas­
senger cars and a 20 per cent cut in tolls for trucks
to generate more revenue. The action precipi­
tated a storm of protest, whereupon the new sched­
ule of tolls was withdrawn awaiting further study.
The new highway bill may well give the coup
de grace to the languishing toll-road construction

of the most heavily populated section of the coun­

boom. Under the new program, toll roads in use

try, which assures an abundance of motor traffic.

and those already under construction may be in­

Reinfected by its own success, Pennsylvania

tegrated into the interstate system if Congress so

drew up plans to add about 850 miles of toll roads

decides at a later date. But with respect to new

to its present 360-mile system. Presently under

toll roads contemplated, what state would assume

construction is the 110-mile extension from Phila­

the risk when, under the new highway act, states

delphia to Scranton.

can get 90 per cent of the construction costs from

Authorized or ready to

begin construction are extensions from Scranton




the Federal Government?

7

b usin ess re v ie w

THE ROAD TO CHAOS

decades, spending on the wrong roads in

Speaking before the 48th Annual Conference on

the wrong places in the wrong ways, to

Taxation, assembled in Detroit last October, Dick

The increase in demand for highway facilities is

said:

easily documented by citing the multiplication of
In the 50 years since the advent of the

motor vehicles on the highways. During the dec­

automobile, public agencies have spent

ade ending

close to $80 billion on improving and

doubled from 26 million to 52 million, and motor­

maintaining roads and streets. Despite

truck registrations also doubled from 5 million to

1955,

passenger-car

registrations

this vast outlay, correcting highway de­

10 million. Thus, total motor-vehicle registrations

ficiencies— that is, making possible the

doubled from 31 million to 62 million. These

cheap and rapid movement of passen­

doubles are the beginning of our troubles.

gers and freight our growing economy

The unusual lags in road outlays during the

requires— is now the nation’s most ex­

1940’s are clearly portrayed in the chart of high­

pensive governmental problem, aside

way-construction expenditures.

from defense.

Our present difficulties

War II, construction expenditures almost came to

are the result of a combination of fac­

a standstill. Increased outlays since the end of the

tors— unexpectedly large increases in

war did not accomplish as much as the rising

the demand for highway facilities over

curve might indicate because higher costs of labor

the past decade, unusual lags in road

and materials did not produce as much roadway

outlays during the 1940’s, and for most

as in former years. In real terms, the progress

governments during most of the past five

made in the post-war decade was scarcely better

HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION EXPENDITURES
B IL L IO N S

paraphrase General Bradley.

Netzer of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

$

During World

than that prevailing during the 1930’s.
“ Spending on the wrong roads in the wrong
places in the wrong ways” has been hallowed by
tradition. In the July issue of the Business Review
it was pointed out how the advent of the auto­
mobile gave rise to the cause for good roads and
the great emphasis that was placed on getting the
farmer out of the mud. Most city streets had al­
ready been paved when the motor car appeared,
so huge sums of money were spent in surfacing
the vast network of rural roads, and the out­
moded area-and-population formula for sharing
costs among the various levels of government has
long survived its usefulness because it short­
changes metropolitan areas.

Source: "M o d e rn izin g the N ation's H ighw ays,"
Research and Policy C o m m itte e o f the
C om m ittee fo r Economic D evelopm ent, New York

8




The better-roads

argument always made good campaign material
for rural candidates to state legislatures.
It is now quite some years since farmers have

b usin ess re v ie w

been pulled out of the mud, but much of the

region, and the Pacific Coast.

thinking and planning and spending for highways

pected, traffic density coincides with population

As is to be ex­

continues to be “ mud bound.” Approximately a

density. It is the cities and their suburbs that are

million miles of local rural roads serve no more

choked with motor traffic. Here is where traffic

than about a dozen vehicles a day; they are, in

grinds to a stop-and-go crawl; here is where

effect, little more than public driveways. Yet they

fenders are bashed and bumpers are smashed;

continue to get almost as much attention as the

here is where the automobile becomes a great

major highways.

scientific frustration.

Someone has figured out that if all the country’s

Urban areas generate half or more than half of

motor vehicles were evenly distributed over the

all traffic; yet they have been receiving less than

country’s entire network of roads there would be

one-fifth of the highway-construction funds con­

one vehicle for every 650 feet on every lane in

tributed by motorists in the form of Federal, state,

both directions on all streets and highways. The

and local taxes and tolls. Since funds for highway

trouble is that cars are never so distributed. Too

construction are not unlimited, it would seem to

many of them crowd into too little of the mileage.

make sense that most of the expenditures should

Our major highway problems are no longer out

be applied to the most heavily traveled roads.

in the country but in the metropolitan areas. The

While it is true that urban vehicle owners often

unequal distribution of motor traffic on our over-

use main intercity roads, which justifies some di­

expanded highway mileage is portrayed, in part,

version of funds to the construction of these
roads, there is, however, little justification for the

TRAFFIC ON THE INTERSTATE ROUTES

heavy diversion to local rural roads which has

(Thick lines clustering around cities show where
needs are greatest)

been the practice for so many years.
Traffic surveys indicate that most of the con­
gestion in the big cities is caused by local traffic,
and in the smaller cities and towns most of the
difficulty is caused by through traffic. In many
instances, relief has been afforded for the smaller
communities by the construction of by-passes and
alternate routes so that the traffic is diverted from
“ Main Street,” to the satisfaction of both the local
communities and the out-of-town motorists. In
the big cities, however, traffic problems are really
acute.
The ebb and flow of city traffic are as regular as

Source: "F reedom o f the A m erican Road,"
published by the Ford M o to r Company,
Dearborn, 1956

the tides. In the morning, suburban and country

by the accompanying map showing traffic density

city and particularly upon the downtown business

on interstate routes. Note the heavy concentra­

district; and 5 o’clock in the afternoon touches

commuters from all directions converge on the

tion of traffic in southern New England, the

off the big stampede to get home in an even

Middle Atlantic states, the East-North-Central

greater hurry. In the summertime the daily cycle




9

business re v ie w

is supplemented by a weekly cycle to add to the

tions has glamor and dramatic appeal, but the

traffic confusion. On Friday night great hordes

records of toll collection on our turnpikes show an

of urban “ cliff dwellers” flee to the mountains or

overwhelming predominance of shorter trips. The

the seashore for a breath of air, and on Sunday

heaviest traveled section of the New Jersey Turn­

night or Monday morning they fight their way

pike is the 17-mile stretch between the tunnel and

back through the traffic tribulation and arrive too

ferry discharge points on the Hudson River and

fagged out to work.

the Secaucus interchange near Newark.

Traffic experts and highway engineers have re­
sorted to every conceivable means to alleviate the

short stretch accounts for almost half of the rev­

This

enue of the entire 118-mile-long toll road. Spot

chaos. The means are familiar to all motorists:

checks made by the Pennsylvania Turnpike Com­

traffic lights, traffic circles, clover leaves, multiple

mission indicate that the average trip is less than

lanes, overpasses, underpasses, divided highways,

100 miles.

stop signs, one-way streets, no left turns, no right

One of the major defects of our highway system

turns, no U turns, no parking, pigeon-hole park­

heretofore was the diffusion of highway-user

ing, underground parking, rooftop parking, park­

funds; that is, spending on the wrong roads. What

ing lots, parking

really happened was that the lightly traveled roads

counts,

meters,

parkaterias, traffic

origin-and-destination

traffic direction,

radar

were subsidized by the heavily traveled roads.

safety drives, traffic courts,

surveys,

The latter produced a “ profit” in the sense that

drunken-driver crusades, education, and exhorta­

they yielded user revenue in excess of their cost,

tion.

Despite all these and other devices, the

and the “ profit” was used for the construction and

swarming mob of motor cars continues to grow,

maintenance of the lightly traveled roads that

and traffic queues get longer and longer because

operated at a “ loss.”

of the elementary law of physics that no two ob­

The heavily traveled roads will continue to be

jects can occupy the same space at the same time.

those in our metropolitan areas, and they are the

BREAKING THE BOTTLENECKS

They are also the roads that will be the most

The question is, will $33 billion and 13 years

costly to rebuild because of the high cost of mov­

break the traffic ja m ?

ing public-utility installations, building bridges

ones that should receive the major overhauling.

This depends upon

whether the money is spent at the right places. If

and overpasses, and acquiring the more expensive

most of the money goes into the construction of

rights-of-way.

great intercity super-expressways without opening
the congested streets and highways in metropoli­

In 1969

tan areas, we shall be little better off than we are
now.

While the roadbuilders are busily calculating the

We do not need high-speed, transcontinental

the man-hours of labor required to perform the

highways nearly so much as we need wider streets

$33 billion road-building job, we, the people who

millions of tons of cement, steel, and stone, and

and open roads in and around our cities where

drive on the roads, may be prone to look upon the

most of the motor traffic is constantly milling

job as 13 years of detours while the reconstruction

around. The possibility of long-distance motor

is in progress, after which we shall emerge in 1969

trips unobstructed by traffic signals and intersec­

with handsome highways and no more traffic

10




b usin ess re v ie w

problems! That is probably expecting too much.
In the next 13 years the motor industry can put

are creating cross-country expressways that dump
more traffic into them.” *

a great many additional vehicles on the roads.

In other cities, traffic conditions are essentially

During the past 13 years the number of motor-

like those in New York except that they are not

vehicle registrations increased 100 per cent. Con­

quite so acute. In Philadelphia, for example, we

tinued growth at that rate would give us 124

haven’t gone skyscraper mad but we have our full

million registrations by 1969; sustained growth

share of traffic troubles. Even here bulldozers are

at only half the rate would give us 93 million

chewing away at the edges of Fairmount Park to

motor vehicles. That would be bad enough even

make way for another major traffic artery that will

with a $33 billion improved highway system.

feed more traffic into the narrow downtown streets
overrun with private motor cars, trolleys, buses,

SKYSCRAPERS AND ROADSCRAPERS

and great motor trucks hauling squealing pigs and

Look at New York City where people are piled

cackling chickens to market. Some day we may

higher than anywhere else in the world. What a

have to adopt the proposal that downtown Chest­

traffic tangle! Cross-town motoring in Manhattan

nut Street be closed to vehicles and reserved en­

is frequently slower than walking.

tirely for pedestrian traffic— as New York has

Incoming

trains often pour people into the stations faster

done in the Wall Street district.

than the taxis can take them away, whereupon the

The common carriers— the street railways and

astute traveler checks his bag on arrival, walks

bus lines— are an integral part of the entire met­

out along the avenue to capture a taxi discharging

ropolitan network of transportation.

its fare, and then returns to the station to pick up

instances the common carriers are fighting a los­

his bag and goes on his way. Nothing but sheer
brute strength prevents the subway commuter

ing battle with the private motor car. The common
carriers face ever-rising costs of operation and

from being shoved into the wrong train by the

they are constantly losing traffic to the private

surging mob during the rush hour. Anyone who
has ever been caught in the Manhattan maelstrom
of motor cars, trucks, buses, taxis, pushcarts, and
pedestrians will avoid driving through the city if
possible.
Basically, it is the mass of skyscrapers that
makes the mess of traffic. The higher the sky­
scrapers go the more people they accommodate
and the farther out into the country the road-

In many

motor car, with the result that they are forced
either to raise fares or curtail service— policies
ill-designed to attract traffic. Strategically located
bus garages, truck terminals, railway stations,
street-car and bus lines, and transfer points are at
best temporary palliatives. The skyscrapers are
too far ahead of the road scrapers.
What shall we do then— tear down our cities
and rebuild them to accommodate the motor age?
That is obviously impossible, but it does raise

scrapers must go to build roads to accommodate

some very basic questions. Should new urban

the commuters. “ It would take a great mind in­

buildings be required to provide parking facilities

deed,” said Lewis Mumford, “ to decide which set

for the motorists they will be housing? Do new

of planners is more irrational— the people who

facilities like vehicular tunnels, off-street parking,

are piling up high structures in the overcrowded
business districts of our cities, or the people who




* “ From the Ground Up,” by Lewis Mumford (Harcourt, Brace and Company, Inc., New York, 1956).

11

b usiness re v ie w

limited-access expressways, and parkways relieve

have not built in Philadelphia, but in the outlying

traffic congestion in urban areas, or attract more

districts. Examples of firms that came into the

traffic making for bigger traffic jams in the

area but not into town are the steel mills, rubber

future? Are we spending too much for roads and

tire manufacturers, office machinery builders,

not enough for other forms of transportation?

scientific laboratories and research organizations.

The motor car is one of the most powerful

Still more recently, the big downtown depart­

forces hastening the obsolescence of cities. The

ment stores have joined the out-of-town movement

evidence is readily apparent on comparing the

by establishing suburban branches. The dozen

stunted growth of cities with the lush growth of

suburban branches already established are pros­

their suburbs. Since 1920, the population of
Philadelphia grew 18 per cent, but the population

downtown. Suburban customers prefer to do their

pering more than their parental headquarters

o f the seven surrounding counties grew by

shopping at the neighborhood branches which

amounts ranging from 54 per cent in Chester

offer parking facilities rather than become em­

County to 183 per cent in Delaware County. Com­

broiled with downtown traffic where parking is-

mercial and industrial activities are also spilling

inconvenient, costly, and sometimes impossible to

over the city limits.

Industries that formerly

flourished in the city, increasingly cramped for

find. The situation in Philadelphia is not unique;
it is typical of all big cities.

space, moved out into the neighboring counties

The planning of urban highways and ap­

where there is more “ elbow room.” First to move

proaches cannot or should not be considered

were the heavy industries, like the manufacturers

apart from the over-all problem of city planning.

of locomotives and some of the printing and pub­

The street system, which ordinarily takes up about

lishing concerns, which needed more space and

one-third of a city’s land area, is part of the larger

found it more economical to move their heavy

problem of land use. A city, however, is more

metal presses and printing presses out into the

than a heap of concrete, steel, and glass. It is also

country rather than upstairs on their city prem­

a heap of living together with diversified activities

ises. More recently, manufacturers of scientific

— industrial, commercial, financial, cultural, civic,

instruments, storage batteries, radio, etc., joined

religious, educational, and political. But in giving

the industrial migration into the suburbs. New

maximum expression to all of these activities, the

firms that have come into the area in recent years

street system plays a very essential role.

THIRD DISTRICT B A N K IN G
Banking operations in the Third District over the

$4,046 million was one of the largest in any twelve-

year ended June 30 show substantial changes in

month span on record. Approximately two-fifths

the composition of bank assets; little change in

of this increase was in accommodation to business

the over-all volume of deposits; higher earnings;

concerns. Growth in business loans doubtless re­

pressure on reserve positions; and numerous bank

flected a need for funds to help pay the costs of

mergers.

modernization and additions to plant and equip­

Member bank loans expanded month by month

ment, carry larger inventories, and meet other ex­

and the aggregate increase of $486 million to

penses incident to high level operations. Details

12




b usin ess r e v ie w

provided by a group of large banks indicate that

responding period last year.

expansion was concentrated in loans to manu­

also rose considerably, but not as much, so that

Current expenses

facturers,, but included substantial increases in ad­

earnings after current expenses moved up $7.4

vances to utilities and trading concerns. Sizable

million, or nearly 14 per cent, to $62.1 million. An

increases also were reported in loans to finance

increase of several millions of dollars in net losses

real estate and in consumer instalment paper, al­

and transfers to reserves reflected in part the

though growth in the latter slowed materially in

building up of valuation reserves on loans. Income

the first half of 1956.

tax payments changed little. After all of these

Sharply rising loans were accompanied by

transactions are taken into account, the prelimin­

heavy sales of securities, with the result that total

ary record showed net profits of $29.3 million

earning assets of member banks in this district

available for distribution, a figure $4 million

show an increase over the twelve months of only

higher than in the first half of 1955. Dividends

Si 15 million to $7,089 million. Holdings of Fed­

were larger, but absorbed little more than one-half

eral Government securities declined $294 million

of the net profits.

and other investments, $77 million. The over-all

At mid-year, 553 commercial banks in this dis­

level of deposits was up even less than earning

trict were members of the Federal Reserve System.

assets, showing an increase of only $45 million to

Over the twelve months from June 1955, 7 non­

$8,011 million.

member banks merged into member institutions,

Some pressure on reserve positions was evi­

while only 3 members merged into nonmembers.

denced in this district by a lower volume of excess
reserves than in the preceding year and borrow­

There were 21 instances of mergers or consolida­
tions between member banks.

ings from the Reserve Bank in greater amount
than excess reserves. This “ net borrowed reserve”
position was due chiefly to reserve city banks,
located in Philadelphia, the money center of the
district. Semi-monthly averages for the “ country”
banks of the district show lower excess reserves

MEMBER BANKS
Third Fed. Res. D istrict
(M illio n s $)

June 30,
1956*

Loans ............................................
U .S . G o v 't se cu ritie s..................
O th e r securities ........................

4,046
2,269
774

+486
— 294
— 77

Total earning a s s e ts .........
Deposits, to ta l
..........................

7,089
8,01 1

+ 115
+ 45

E a r n in g s , e x p e n se s an d p ro fits

First half
1956*

Changes in
one ye a rf

and somewhat larger borrowings from the Re­
serve Bank than in the preceding year, but in all
of the periods excess reserves were larger than
borrowings from the Reserve Bank.
The natural result of the substantial growth in
loans and somewhat higher interest rates was a
material rise in income from this source. Higher
earnings also were reported from service charges,

Changes in
one ye a rf

Earnings:
On securities ......................
On lo a n s ...............................
Service chgs on deposits. .
Trust d e p a rtm e n t .............
O th e r earnings ..................

36.6
98.6
5.9
12.2
6.7

— 0.1
+ 16.9
+ 0.6
+ 1.4
+ 0.4

Total earnings ...............
C u rre n t expenses ..................

160.0
97.9

+ 19.2
+ 1 1.8

N e t current e a rnings.............

62.1

+

7.4

N e t losses and transfers to
reserves ...............................
Taxes on in c o m e ....................

1 1.0
21.8

+
—

3.5
0.1

this district reached $160 million in the first half

N e t profits ...............................
Cash dividends de cla red. . . .

29.3
15.3

+
+

4.0
0.9

of 1956, an increase of $19 million over the cor­

*P relim in ary tab ulatio ns.
fA d ju ste d for m ergers, e tc.

trust operations, and miscellaneous sources, but
not from investments.

Preliminary tabulations

show that the total earnings of member banks in




13

business re v ie w

CURRENT

TRENDS

It’s been quite a year so far! For a while, busi­

shipments declined at the same time while busi­

ness analysts couldn’t tell whether the economy

ness activity, on the whole, zoomed along at the

was still booming or undergoing a mild recession.

speed limit.

Activity in two or three industries, which have

These three industries have been important in

been bellwethers of the post-war business boom,

the post-war business boom. In fact they have
been used, to some extent, as barometers of busi­

was falling noticeably short of year-ago levels.
Conversely, other industries felt a reassuring

ness activity. With automobile production 25 per

surge of demand for their products over the first

cent below 1955 levels, housing starts 18 per cent

half of the year. There was uncertainty in the

down, television and radio shipments off 10 per

minds of many as to whether increases or de­

cent, it is no wonder that many business analysts

Recently, however, the

were surprised to find gross national product run­

question was resolved. The increases were larger

ning at so high a rate in the second quarter of this

than the decreases. The Commerce Department

year.

creases were dominant.

reported successive rises in total spending over

Obviously, some areas of business were running
very fast to make up for the lagging sectors. Busi­

the first two quarters of 1956.
Gross national product in the second quarter of

ness spending on plant and equipment was con­

1956 approximated $408.5 billion at an annual

siderably up from a year ago, and might possibly

rate. This was $5 billion higher than in the first

have been higher still were it not for shortages of

quarter— an all-time high. An average of about

some strategic materials. State and local govern­

64 million people were working over the first half

ment spending, mainly on highways and schools,

of the year out of a civilian labor force of 67 mil­

continued upward. This kind of spending has gone

lion. This represented an all-time record for em­

up each year since 1944. Consumer spending on

ployment, and meant that just 4 per cent of the

services, another old stand-by of strength, in­

labor force couldn't fin'd work.

In short, our

creased for at least the 68th and 69th consecutive

economy ran at the speed limit over the first half

quarters. Consumer spending on food and cloth­

of 1956. But we did it the hard way. We did it

ing has been strong, too.

despite a few knocks in the engine.

All in all, the pluses have been larger and the

The year through June probably was not the

economy generally has not had to even slow down

first six-month period during which we had a de­

for repairs. Now the big question is, how does

cline in the demand for automobiles and a sizable

the second half of the year shape up?

rise in business activity. Nor was it the first time

In December 1955, this Business Review made

that new housing starts ran below year-ago levels

its annual forecast for 1956, called “ 1956: Driv­

in the midst of a general boom. And sometimes

ing at the Speed Lim it?” At that time the Review

in the past, television and radio sales have not

looked for G.N.P. in the fourth quarter of 1955

followed the general trend upward; but try to find

to be about $400 billion, and said that a speed-

a previous peacetime period when automobile

limit rate for the four quarters of 1956 would be

sales, new housing starts, and television and radio

$404 billion, $408 billion, $412 billion, and $416

14




b u sin ess re v ie w

billion. The projection for the year of a G.N.P. of
$410 billion was considerably higher than most

ment spending will be somewhat larger over the

other forecasts.

diminution in state and local government expend­

latter half of 1956. And who would look for any

Actually, according to the revised series, G.N.P.

itures? Pressures from all sides for bigger and

was $401.9 billion in the fourth quarter of 1955,

better-equipped schools and more and wider high­

and $403.4 billion and $408.5 billion, respectively,

ways seem to assure further hikes in government

in the first two quarters this year. Is it too much to

outlays.

believe that total spending in the final two quarters

Finally, it is altogether possible that some of

of the year will approximate $412 billion and $416

the industries that have been suffering by year-

billion, or that for the year as a whole spending

ago comparisons will improve their positions later

will total $410 billion? Maybe not.

this year. The automobile industry, by cutting

The figures look high but they don t look as

back production, has helped its dealers to trim

high now as they did last December. The steel

inventories. The prospect is for an orderly intro­

strike, of course, took something out of the third

duction of 1957 models. Style changes are ex­

quarter but it may put more back into the final

pected to be more extensive, so that sales could

part of the year. A shakedown in steel inventories

spurt in the final months of the year. Appliance

was coming in any event. The strike caused the

makers seem to have a good thing going for them

paring-down process to take place much more

in portable television sets. A second set that can

rapidly than otherwise would have been the case.

be moved from recreation room to bedroom to

Certainly, on the basis of the McGraw-Hill and

patio is becoming “ a must” for many middle-

S.E.C.-Commerce Department surveys, it is ex­

income families.

pected that business spending on plant and equip­

It is still— as it was in December— difficult to

ment will continue strong for the foreseeable

see how the economy can drive at the speed limit

future. The present shortage of steel may put a

for the entire year. But this trick was pretty much

little crimp in this spending in the third quarter

accomplished over the first part of the year. A

of the year, but expenditures over the final months

total spending figure for 1956 of $410 billion

of 1956 may more than make up for this.
Nearly everyone expects that Federal Govern­




looks a lot more possible in August than it did
last December.

15

F O R THE R E C O R D . . .
1 INDEX

BILLIONS $

MEMBER B A N K S 3R D ER.D.

B A N K IN G .

D|
EP0SITS

J ± j

/\X/ \ _J \f

X J i
t

CHECK PAYME NTS
(2 0 CITIES)

IN VESTM EN T!

-------------------~ V ^
.

"""

|
_______
LOANS

2 YEARS
AGO

Third Federal
Reserve District

Factory*
Per cent change
LOCAL

June
19 5 6 from
mo.
ago

year
ago

6
mos.
195 6
from
year
ago

June
19 5 6 from
mo.
ago

year
ago

6
mos.
195 6
From
year
ago

Employ­
ment

EM PLOYM ENT A N D
IN C O M E
Factory employment ( T o ta l)...
TRADE**
D epartm ent store sales............
B A N K IN G
( A ll member banks)
D e posits.......................................
Loans............................................
Investments..................................
U.S. G o v t, securities.............
O t h e r .........................................
C heck paym ents........................

- 2
+ 3
+19

+ 2
+ 3
+13

0
-1
-1

+ 1
+ 4
+14

+10
+16

0
+1

+
+

2
9

0

+

1

+

3

+

0
6

+3
+4

+10
+ 8

+

7

+2
+2

+
+

8
7

+

6

+1
+2
-1
-1
-2
-4 t

+ 1
+15
-1 1
-1 2
- 9
+ 4f

+ 1
+17
-1 2
-1 2
-1 2
+ 9f

+1
+2
-1
-1
0
+1

+ 2
+17
-1 0
-1 2
- 4
H~ 5

+ 2
+17
-1 1
-1 2
- 3
+ 9

+1t

+

ot

0
+1

-f 4
+ 2

-f 3
+ 1

Per cent
change
June
19 5 6 from

‘ Based on 3-month moving averages.
“ A d juste d for seasonal variation.

16




1t

f 2 0 C ities
tP hiladelphia

Check
Payments
Payrolls

Sales

Stocks

Per cent
Per cent
Per cent
Per cent
change
change
change
change
June
June
June
June
19 5 6 from 1 9 5 6 from 1 95 6 from 195 6 from

year mo.
ago ago

+4

+ 1

0
0

year mo.
ago ago

year mo.
ago ago

year mo.
ago ago

+14

+2

+6

L an caster. . . .

0

+1

-1

+

3 -1 5

P h ila d e lp h ia ..

0

-1

+2

+

+17

R e a d in g ..........

-2

-2

-2

+

S cranton.........

+1

year
ago

-

3 +

9

-

2 +

3

9

-6

+

7 +

1 +11

6 -

4 +10

-8

+

9 -

6 +

5

5 -

4 +

9

-9

+

1 -

5 +

1

3 +

1

+6

+3

+15

+

9

-6

+

8 -

0

+2

-2

+10 +

9 +

7

+2

-

1 -2 4

W ilk e s -B a rre

0

-6

+1

-

2 -

4

0

-6

-

3 -

-

1

0 +16

-6

+12 +23 +

1

+

6 +11

-1

+ 11 +

3

Y o r k .................

0

-4
0

0
+1

-1 0

+

T re n to n ...........

W ilm in g to n .. . - 1

PRICES
C o nsum er....................................

Department Store

CHANGES

mo.
ago
O UTPUT
M anu fa ctu rin g production . . .
0
C onstruction con tra cts*........... - 3
C o a l m in in g ................................ + 2

JUNE
1956

U n ite d States

Per cent change
SUMMARY

YEAR
AGO

+24

-

3

5 -

7

4 +

‘ N o t restricted to corporate limits o f cities but covers areas of one or
more counties.