View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

The Enigmatic Consumer
An important key to business and prices in 1968

»»«.«.»
Chart 1

is whether American consumers will return to
their “ familiar” spending habits. Following an
unexpectedly

restrained

performance

during

1967, they have built up a sizable backlog of
spending power. Chart 1 shows how the gap be­
tween their income and spending widened in
1967. The slowdown in spending caused savings
to soar upward to nearly one-third above the 1966
level. As a consequence, the saving rate (the ratio
of personal savings to disposable personal in­
come) rose from 5.9 per cent in 1966 to over 7
per cent in 1967. Since a change of one percent­

cent versus 5 per cent in 1966. This kind of

age point in the saving rate is roughly equivalent

restraint was not uniform, however. While spend­

to $5.5 billion in spending, a decline in the rate to

ing for nondurable goods followed the same pat­
tern as the total, spending for services rose about

earlier levels would seriously aggravate inflation­
ary pressures already plaguing the economy.

the same in 1967 as it had in 1966— roughly 4
per cent. In spending for durable goods, however,

WHAT HAPPENED LAST YEAR?

consumer restraint clearly hit hardest. After a

Although consumer spending was restrained dur­
ing 1967, a noteworthy shift in behavior had
occurred in the fourth quarter of 1966 when the
saving rate rose by nearly one full percentage
point (see Chart 2 ). In fact, it was this pro­
nounced weakening in consumer spending which
contributed simultaneously to the spectacular
inventory buildup during that same quarter. And,
as subsequent events demonstrated, it was this
large inventory overhang which depressed the
level of economic activity during the first half of
1967.
Chart 2 also shows the pattern of spending in
current

dollars.

After

adjustment

for

price

changes total expenditures for 1967 rose by 3 per

BUSINESS REVIEW is produced in the Department of Research. Evan B. Alderfer is Editorial Consultant;
Donald R. Hulmes prepared the layout and artwork. The authors will be glad to receive comments on their articles.
for additional copies should be addressed to Bank and Public Relations, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia,
Digitized Requests
for FRASER
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101.


business re v ie w

7.5 per cent increase in 1966, spending in 1967
rose by little more than 1 per cent.
The sluggish behavior of spending on autos
and parts was most responsible for reduced con­
sumer buying. During the first quarter of last
year this was a key factor in the sharp rise in
saving rate. Similarly, the second-quarter recovery
of spending on autos partially reversed the earlier
rise in the saving rate. Spending for other dur­
ables meanwhile continued to advance.
The financial status of consumers in 1967
tended to reflect these developments in the nonfinancial sector. The slow-down in spending for
autos showed up not only as a reduction in the
growth of consumer installment credit, but also
as increased payoffs on existing debt. (See Chart
3; also pp. 8 and 9 ). Mortgage debt, although
substantially recovering late in the year, nonethe­
less advanced less rapidly than in earlier periods.
During 1966, as monetary conditions progres­
sively tightened, households increasingly became
direct suppliers of funds to the financial market,
circumventing such traditional financial inter­
mediaries as commercial banks and savings insti­
tutions. By increasing their holdings of bonds
they slowed the growth of other more liquid assets
such as time and savings deposits. In 1967, how­
ever, consumers rebuilt their liquidity, a move
which reflected the change in monetary policy
toward greater ease. Consumer liquidity was

these developments and dramatically pointed the
spotlight on the stimulative potential abuilding in
the consumer sector.1
WAS IT UNUSUAL?

It would be highly unreasonable to point out
that consumers saved 25 per cent of their incomes
in 1944, and conclude that last year’s 7.1 per cent
rate was “ low.” At the same time, when the 1967
saving rate is described as “ high,” it is meaning­
ful only in the context of some “ normal” rate of
saving. The problem arises in defining what is
normal. As Chart 4 shows, the saving record en­
compasses a period in which there was a major
economic-depression, a half-dozen economic re­
cessions, World War II, the Korean War, and the
war in Vietnam. An average annual rate of saving

enhanced in part by a shift in portfolios from less
liquid securities to more liquid time and savings
deposits. Although this did not itself produce a
change in rate of saving, the reduced rate of con­
sumer spending caused larger increments of in­
come to be saved. Thus, liquidity was additionally
strengthened by stepped-up deposits in commer­
cial banks and thrift institutions. As debt expan­
sion moderated in 1967 and liquidity was restored
and expanded, the rise in saving rate mirrored




1
A somewhat autonomous factor related to consumer
behavior in 1967 is cited in the 1968 Economic Report
of the President. The Council of Economic Advisers in­
cludes the Medicare program as one of the elements
which may have influenced the saving rate last year.
Introduced in mid-1966, it bolstered disposable income
in 1967 by $4 billion. To the extent that part of the cost
of covering health care could be met without having to
draiv down personal savings, it served to keep the saving
rate at a higher level than might otherwise have been
the case. Recognizing, however, the high propensity to
consume generally attributed to those who receive M edi­
care benefits, this program should not be overly stressed
in attempting to explain last year’s high saving rate.

3

business re v ie w

1955 and 1959. On the other hand, during the
1960’s, the rate was higher than the postwar
average only in 1967. During these seven years
the average was 5.7 per cent. Taken within the
frame of reference of the current decade, there­
fore, consumer behavior during 1967 clearly was
off the norm. Compared with the 1950’s, however,
one might argue that the behavior of consumers
from 1960 through 1966 was abnormal, and that
1967 represented a return to normal. This sug­
gests that a closer look at the behavior of savings
during these two time periods may be helpful both
in judging the extent to which behavior of con­
sumers last year was unusual and in gauging
developments in 1968.
The 1 9 5 0 ’s

The most obvious single factor influencing con­
sumer behavior during the early 1950’s was the
for the period, therefore, is not very useful. The

outbreak of the Korean War, in June, 1950. The

period of the Great Depression as well as World

war introduced an element of uncertainty which

War II clearly are not typical. However, it does

induced a measure of natural restraint on the part

seem worthwhile to look at the postwar period,

of consumers. Selective credit controls also prob­

and particularly at the decade of the 1960’s, to

ably lowered the volume of spending on consumer

see whether the very recent behavior of the saving

durables and raised the saving rate from where

rate is unusual. This period, although marked by
periodic economic slack and military involvement

Chart 4. Consumers increased their rate of saving

of less than all-out nature, seems closer to normal.

sharply in 1951 and subsequently maintained it

In the postwar period, consumers have saved,

at an average of about 7.5 per cent from 1951-

it otherwise would have been. This can be seen in

on the average, 6.2 per cent of their incomes.

1953, Although saving moderated significantly in

Nearly half the time their actual saving rate has

1954, consumers still retained to some degree the

exceeded this average, reaching 7 per cent or

saving habits of the preceding three years. In

higher in eight years, including 1967. The 9.5 per

1955, however, they went on a buying splurge for

cent rate for 1946— the highest for the period—

durable goods, mainly autos. This followed a
major relaxation in the terms of auto installment

probably was the consequence of restricted avail­
ability of consumer goods following the end of

credit and produced a further decline in the sav­

World War II, as well as some degree of carry­

ing rate.
In 1956-1958 the saving rate moved up again.

over of the forced saving habits of the earlier war
years.

Consumer enthusiasm for durable goods, especial­

In the 1950’s, the saving rate fell below the
average of the postwar period in only two years—

ly autos, was lacking perhaps partly because

Digitized for
4 FRASER


prices were rising sharply. (See Chart 5.) Con-

business re v ie w

Chart 5
CONSUMER PRICE INDICES

from the relative price stability which had pre­
vailed through most of the first half of the 1960’s.
And perhaps an added fillip to consumer restraint
in late 1966 and 1967 was the growing uncertainty
about fiscal action to prevent the economy from
expanding too rapidly. All of these elements
helped to nudge the American consumer toward
greater restraint last year.
SOME ADDED CONSIDERATIONS

There is some reason to suspect, therefore, that
high saving rates are associated with reduced
levels of consumer durable sales and rising prices.
sumer prices rose following nearly five years of

But why is a higher saving rate seemingly mani­
fested in a reduced rate of spending on durables

virtual stability— a period in which prices for

rather than on other types of purchases? Why

consumer durables actually had been declining.

would high saving rates be related to rising

Price increases moderated in 1959. This, plus a

prices, since one would think that consumers

sharp rise in personal income, coincided with a

would purchase more goods before the value of

resurgence of consumer spending for durables
and the saving rate fell dramatically to the lowest
level of the 1950’s.

the dollar declined further? Finally, what is the
role of interest rates in influencing consumer
behavior?

The 1 9 6 0 ’s

The role of durables

Begining in February, 1961, the American eco­
nomy moved out of the trough of a very shallow

Unlike spending for nondurables or services
which are not so amenable to postponement, the

recession and embarked on the longest sustained
economic expansion in United States history. Un­

purchase of a durable good can be postponed.

like the 1950’s, the first half of the 1960’s was
marred neither by significantly rising prices nor

goods consumers have, the more likely they will

by a significant expansion in defense outlays. In
an atmosphere of relatively stable prices and

income become less favorable or if prices for dur­
ables are rising. But the growth of ownership of

steadily growing income, consumer confidence

durable goods contributes to growth of expendi­

was reflected in relatively low saving rates.

For the economy as a whole, the more durable
defer replacement if their expectations of future

tures for nondurables and services as well. Thus,

From mid-1965 through 1966, however, the

it would be difficult to draw any conclusions as

dimensions of the American military effort in

to the nature of the overall relationship between

Vietnam grew larger. With growing inflationary

the stock of durable goods and the level of con­

overtones, consumers, as noted earlier, shifted

sumer expenditures at any given time. However,

late in 1966 toward moderation. In addition to
the war factor common to the 1951-1953 period,

in an economy such as ours, characterized by a

1966-1967 also was marked by a clear departure

devoted to the purchase of durable goods, the




sizable proportion of disposable personal income

5

business re v ie w

saving rate will show greater variability than in

Chart 6

circumstances where durables purchases are less
important. Similarly, the larger the stock of dur­
ables consumers have, the greater the variability
of saving and spending behavior.
The role of prices

On first inspection, it would seem that in a period
of rising prices consumers might be expected to
step up their purchase of goods in order to offset
the loss in purchasing power of their income. In
this connection, the role of price expectations may

4 and 6.) Saving rates have declined, risen, or

be of more significance to consumers than current
price developments. For example, if they felt as

remained unchanged when interest rates have
risen. The same holds true when interest rates

though future prices would be lower, they un­
doubtedly would postpone current spending; if
they expected higher prices, one would expect

have fallen. That savings show little predictable
response to interest-rate changes suggests that if
the level of savings should rise substantially dur­

them to spend a larger fraction of their income

ing a short period of time, the predominant rea­

on current consumption. Clearly, the outlook

son may likely be other than the favorable yield

throughout 1967 was for intensified inflationary

paid for saving. It is true, as the experience of

pressures; but instead of spending an increasing

1966 and 1967 demonstrated, that if individuals

share of income, consumers increased their rate

decide to save they will tend to seek out the

of saving. One probable explanation may be that

highest rate of return. This is different from say­

rising prices forced consumers to reassess their
capabilities for servicing fixed commitments. This

ing that rising interest rates induce them to save
more out of their incomes.3 Rate competition be­

concern on the part of consumers that income
gains may lag behind price increases has been

tween commercial banks and savings institutions
may only serve to reallocate the existing pool of

borne out by various consumer surveys, and sug­

savings without adding significantly to that pool.

gests that the negative impact of rising prices on
discretionary income may tend to outweigh the
advantage in moving from money into goods.2
Interest rates

Although interest rates are also prices, it is diffi­
cult to make any generalizations about the re­
lationship between them and saving. (See Charts
2
Although recent evidence appears to confirm this
view, it should not be assumed as invariable. The hyperinflationary experience of Germany during the 1920’s, for
example, provides clear evidence that there is a rate of
price increase which would alter the above pattern of
consumer behavior.

6 FRASER
Digitized for


CONCLUSIONS

It is difficult to establish a norm against which to
measure the behavior of consumers in 1967.
When viewed against the backdrop of the early
1960’s, however, last year’s performance was
restrained. Uncertainty over the cost and impact
of the war in southeast Asia, the threat of a tax
increase, and a continuation of rising prices were
all contributors to consumer restraint. As it has
3
This is a matter which remains the subject of ex­
tensive debate among professional economists despite an
already lengthy and impressive record of past debate and
analysis.

business re v ie w

been in the past, the rise in the saving rate was
associated with a softening in spending for con­

With recent improvement in the prospects for
peace in Southeast Asia, consumers may be

sumer durables. Although interest rates may not

moved to spend more freely, saving relatively less

have affected the level of consumer saving signi­

out of their current income. Although consumer

ficantly, rising interest rates and reduced credit

behavior can shift rapidly, nonetheless, circum­

availability may prompt consumers to shift the

stances still favor a high saving rate in the

composition of their asset portfolio back to less

months ahead relative to the standard of most of

liquid, higher-yielding financial assets, raising

the 1960’s. Given the outlook for continued up­

anew the possibility of some degree of financial

ward pressure on prices in 1968, this view tends

disintermediation.

to be reinforced.

Given the continued presence of many of the
same elements in 1968 which motivated consumer
behavior in 1967, the performance of the con­
sumer in the months ahead is not likely to depart
dramatically from that of last year. Any signifi­
cant decline in the saving rate will rest, in large
part, on a step-up in spending by consumers for
durable goods. Evidence available for the early
months of 1968 does indicate that consumer
spending, especially for durables, has picked up.




N ote: For those readers who would care to pursue this
subject in more detail, including such important consid­
erations as the long-run or secular relationship between
consumption and income, the relationship between the
stock of financial assets and spending habits, and the
impact of changing income distribution on spending,
several excellent reference sources are offered. See Robert
Ferber, “ Research on Household Behavior,” American
Economic Review, March, 1962, pp. 19-63; Edward
Shapiro, Macroeconomic Analysis, Harcourt, Brace &
World, Inc., New York, 1966, Chapters 10 and 1 1 ; James
S. Duesenberry, Income, Saving and the Theory of Con­
sumer Behavior, Harvard University Press, Cambridge,
Massachusetts, 1959.

7

> T ■r '' y

Consum e Credit
by Kathryn Kalmbach
Responsible for the slackening was a slowdown in installment credit . . .

Consumer credit outstanding continued to rise in 1967.

< •' i

' \ '

CONSUMER CREDIT OUTSTANDING

'

y A drop in automobile sales in 1967 resulted in a dip in credit extended, while
■ repayments continued to rise.

Billions of Dollars

Billions of Dollars

Recently, monthly gains in credit outstanding have grown larger . . .

MONTHLY CHANGE IN CONSUMER CREDIT OUTSTANDING

ANNUAL CHANGE IN CONSUMER CREDIT OUTSTANDING

Millions of Dollars

1967

1968

However, for the second straight year the rate of growth declined.
4

»On the non installment credit side, all major categories contributed to the
increase in its growth.

ANNUAL CHANGE IN CONSUMER CREDIT OUTSTANDING
Billions of Dollars_______

credit.'

tUm’ primarily re,lected a reduction in the erowth of automobile

f

}

ANNUAL CHANGE IN NONINSTALLMENT CONSUMER CREDIT
Millions of Dollars

CHANGE IN INSTALLMENT CREDIT OUTSTANDING

* • *

RATIO OF REPAYMENTS TO DISPOSABLE PERSONAL INCOME

Billions of Dollars

1961

1962




1963

1964

1965

1966

Per Cent

1967
Single-Payment Loans
Automobile

and the ratioof repayments todisposable personal income has fallen. Together
these may be indicating a change in trend for 1968.

Other
Consumer Goods

Home Repair and
Modernization

Personal

*

y

1Vf
t

i

r

Charge Accounts

Service Credit

Angling for Industry
by Evan B. Alderfer
The best single prescription for regional health is

industries there just had to be some success.

national prosperity. Or so it seems, because a

Moreover, they are all continuing to angle, each

period of expanding business activity marked by

in his own way— as we shall see.

receding unemployment permeates all areas. But

The state governments play prominent roles in

regional infirmities, momentarily obscured by

promoting industrial development. In New Jersey

national prosperity, may reappear when a reces­

the arm of government most directly concerned

sion sets in unless something is done in the mean­

is the Department of Conservation and Economic

time to fortify regional health. Much has been

Development. In Delaware it is the State Develop­

done to improve the industrial scene throughout

ment Department. In Pennsylvania it is the

the Philadelphia Federal Reserve District.
Anyone now getting around the region, after

the Department of Commerce. Indirect contribu­

Bureau of Industrial Development, a division of

an absence of five or ten years, would be sur­

tions are made by the state governments in their

prised to see the large number of modern indus­

expenditures— for construction and maintenance

trial plants. And what a contrast to the old multi­

of- highways, schools, hospitals, and other public

story, mill-type structures are the new factories
— neat and low, tidily tucked into their land­

services.

scaped settings! They are to be seen throughout

enterprise. What has come to be known as the

Pennsylvania assists in the financing of new

the coastal plains of Southern New Jersey and

“ Pennsylvania Plan” was the creation, in 1956, of

Delaware, in the valleys of the Schuylkill, the

the Pennsylvania Industrial Development Author­

Lehigh, the Susquehanna, the Juniata, and as far

ity to lend second mortgage money at interest as

away as Johnstown on the western slopes of the

low as 2 per cent to assist in the establishment of

Appalachian plateau.

industrial plants in high unemployment areas
throughout the Commonwealth. Through 1967,

Baiting the lines

Many of the new industries have come into the

P.I.D.A. has made about 700 loan commitments
for a total of almost $150 million which afforded

area in direct response to concerted efforts on the

an estimated 100,000 new jobs. On the wall of

part of numerous agencies, both public and pri­
vate. Active anglers for new industry are the state

the administrator’s office in Harrisburg hangs a
map of Pennsylvania with a dot at each place
where plants get P.I.D.A. help. The two dottiest
areas are the hard coal section in the east and the

governments, municipalities, counties, and town­
ships. Also numerous private agencies such as the
electric utilities, railroads, gas and water com­

soft coal area in the west.

panies, telephone companies, industrial parks,
chambers of commerce, realtors, commercial
banks, and suppliers of building materials. With

With financial assistance from the Common­

such a multitude and variety of anglers for new

wealth,

10for FRASER
Digitized


Industrial development corporations

numerous

counties

in

Pennsylvania

business re v ie w

created industrial development corporations. The

times confine assistance to secretarial help. They

Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

all maintain files of available industrial land and

may be cited as an example of a large I.D.C.
P.I.D.C. is a nonprofit partnership of the City

buildings, and have budgets for some form of

of Philadelphia and the Chamber of Commerce

companies— as York County has obtained with

organized in 1958 to help Philadelphia industries

notable success— add luster to a county’s indus­

get more space and to attract new industries to the

trial roster. Among those that stress financial aid

advertising. Branch plants of nationally known

city. With funds contributed by the Chamber of

as an inducement, some turn to P.I.D.A. and

Commerce, by the state under the Industrial

others to the Small Business Administration.
It is not to be presumed that there is one best

Development Assistance Act, and by the city
government, P.I.D.C. assembles and develops in­

way either as to method of operations or form of

dustrial land for new industries seeking sites in

organization. In Southern New Jersey, county and

the city and for going concerns seeking room for

township Industrial Commissions appear to ac­

expansion. The corporation’s latest annual report

complish what industrial development corpora­

shows over 300 companies so accommodated.
Not industrial development corporations in the

tions achieve in Pennsylvania. However, the
public utilities are also very active promoters of

technical sense but with much the same purpose

industrial development in New Jersey, as well as

are the Pennsylvania Development Credit Corpor­

in Delaware and Pennsylvania.

ation and the Southeastern Pennsylvania E co­
nomic

Development

Corporation.

SPEDCO,

Industrial Parks

through its separately incorporated fund, makes

An industrial park is a more or less improved

loans for equipment or working capital to worthy

plot of land hopefully dedicated to occupancy
and use by industrial and commercial enterprises.

business applicants in the Philadelphia fivecounty

area

when

not

otherwise

available.

SPEDCO also lends on buildings; for example, it
joined with P.I.D.C. in acquiring and modern­
izing a 16-story building close to center city as the
first of several planned centers for apparel manu­
facturers. The same kind of financial assistance
is offered in the other Pennsylvania counties of
our District by the Pennsylvania Development
Credit Corporation.

Improvements sometimes include shell buildings
for prospective occupants. Financing is usually
done by either profit-seeking corporations or
community development corporations.
Well over 100 industrial parks are to be found
throughout the District, with a clustering in the
counties near Philadelphia. Bucks County, with
30 parks according to a recent count, is by far
the leading county, and Chester County with
eighteen ranks second. Montgomery County has

The smaller-sized and smaller-staffed industrial

fewer but among them are the big Fort Washing­

development corporations in the less highly indus­

ton (600 acres) and King of Prussia (over 700

trialized counties outside of Philadelphia differ

acres) industrial parks, both well-occupied with

from each other less in their statements of pur­
pose than in the means of attainment. Success in

industries.
Some industrial parks are still without occu­

obtaining new industry depends largely on the

pants. So it is not the number of parks that

experience, initiative, and resourcefulness of the

counts. Of greater moment are the number and

executive director because limited budgets some­

kind of industrial occupants, the number of em­




11

business re v ie w

ployed workers, stability of employment, size of

arrivals there were numerous major expansions

payrolls, and the buying power generated. The

by industries already in operation. Unemploy­

success of an industrial park turns on many
things. Does it have a good location; does it have

ment in the region declined from 17 per cent of
the labor force in 1958 to less than 4 per cent in

electric power, gas, water, sewers? What trans­

1967. In fact, there have been complaints of labor

portation facilities are available— rail, motor

shortages. Incidentally, since 1963 there has been

freight, highways, airport? The Labor supply?

no net outmigration.

The banking facilities? Lack of only one of these
essentials may cost the park a good prospect.

An active participant in the industrial develop­
ment of the area is the electric utility which serves
a large part of Northeastern Pennsylvania, though

"The New Northeast”

the company headquarters is in Allentown. The

The nine Northeastern counties of Pennsylvania

utility’s area development department, established

call themselves “ The New Northeast,” and a welldeserved appellation it is, for the region is under­
going an astonishing industrial transformation.

in 1929, now has a professional staff of 22 people,
including a forester. The company has a site
acquisition program, a shell building program,

These nine counties are Lackawanna, Luzerne,

and a community planning program. It conducts

Schuylkill, Carbon, Monroe, Pike, Wayne, Susque­

seminars on area development, publishes an area

hanna, and Wyoming. Perhaps such leading cities

news letter, maintains an active mailing list of

as Scranton, Wilkes-Barre, and Hazleton are more

21,000 business executives east of the Rockies,

familiar names. People outside the area remember

has four industrial development specialists who

the area’s quondam anthracite, the loss of mar­

personally follow up inquiries, and maintains a

kets, the ensuing hard luck— thousands of unem­

$4.5 million fund from which it lends without

ployed miners, men staying at home, women

interest to local communities for site acquisition

working in sewing factories, young people mov­

purposes.

ing out, Government handouts, despondent peo­

Why the forester? He is in charge of the com­

ple, disfigured countryside. Old images, never

pany’s “ Operation Trees”— a tree-planting pro­

die, they just ossify.

gram to cover and screen the eyesores left by open

Lots of things have happened since those evil

pits and spoil banks of strip-mining and the man­

days, 20 years ago and more. Citizens groups

made mountains of deep-mine waste. In four

throughout the area have raised over $21 million

years over a half-million seedlings were planted

out of their own none-too-adequate incomes. In­

on more than 300 sites by groups representing 37

dustrial parks were built and shell buildings were

communities.

erected to house new industries. Financial as­

Northeastern Pennsylvania is well-favored with

sistance for many of these projects was obtained

first-class highways. This is a major asset favor­

from the Pennsylvania Industrial Development

ing the industrialization program because trans­

Authority.

portation is always one of the first elements con­

For the decade 1958 through 1967, 547 new

sidered by a business manager in search of a site.

industries have located in Northeast Pennsylvania.

Running right through the heart of the region, as

They provided 39,814 jobs and $191 million an­

if expressly planned for it, is Interstate 80— the

nually recurring payrolls. In addition to the new

Keystone Shortway, an east-west superhighway


12


business re v ie w

nearing completion. Interstate Route 81 leads to

tive, despite its monstrous image of power, was

the South, Route 84 to New England, and the

none too efficient and required a lot of round­

Northeast Extension of the Turnpike to Philadel­

house nursing. The Diesel is more efficient and

phia.
Climate and geography work together for yet

the repair shop. That’ s what hurt Altoona, because

another industry of the region— recreation-tour­

a high proportion of its work force was employed

ism. Glaciers of the Ice Age did just enough
scraping and filling in the Pocono and Moosic

vania Railroad employment declined from over

runs ever so many more miles between trips to

in the car shops. In the Altoona area, Pennsyl­

mountains to make hundreds of lakes and slopes
for summer and winter sports. What’s more, this

17,000 in 1950 to slightly over 5,500 in 1966.

playland which is already grossing more than

merce inaugurated a financing plan known as

$90 million annually, is strategically located on

Altoona Enterprises, Inc. Money subscribed by

the edge of the great Boston to Washington

local business firms and individuals was used to

megalopolis.

As early as 1946 the Altoona Chamber of Com­

acquire land and to erect industrial buildings.

The Economic Development Council of North­

Additional funds were raised in a subsequent

eastern Pennsylvania was created in 1964, a non­
profit research and service organization. An

drive, known as “ Jobs for Joes,” in which em­
ployees participated— a dollar a month under a

“ Overall Economic Development Program” is the

payroll deduction plan. More recently, Altoona

title of one of the Council’s latest studies, which

Enterprises, Inc., has had the assistance of

contains a forthright analysis of the area’s

P.I.D.A. loans to help finance the establishment

strengths and weaknesses. Plans are afoot for

of new industries.

greater diversification of the industrial mix, for

In the Wall Street Journal last November 3 ap­

for creating

peared an ad by the General Public Utilities

more vocational-technical schools, for expanding

Corporation telling how Pittsburgh Plate Glass

the tourism-vacation industry, for making the

chose to build a new plant just a few miles north

area a more attractive location as a place to live.

of Altoona. The utility’s site-service specialists,

improving managerial practices,

working with the company’s Altoona subsidiary,
The Altoona story

Pennsylvania Electric Company, and Altoona En­

Going around the Horseshoe Curve, just a few

terprises, Inc., the industrial development organi­

miles west of Altoona, the railroad passenger on a

zation, helped the glass company find the right

day train sees a big black steam locomotive fenced

location close to their own raw glass sources.

in as a permanent outdoor exhibit. That old “ Iron

Through its industrial development efforts, the

Horse” retired in 1955 after almost 2 % million

Altoona area has made noteworthy progress from

miles was presented to Altoona by the Pennsyl­

almost complete dependence on railroad employ­

vania Railroad Company. That was a nice gesture,

ment to a healthier state of diversification. Manu­

for the Pennsy made Altoona; but, alas, the

facturing industries in 1950 employed only one-

Penn-Central superseded the Pennsy and the

eighth as many as the railroad; now they employ

Diesel superseded steam.

considerably more than the railroad. Moreover,

The shift from steam to Diesel locomotives was

the manufacturing mix isn’t too bad. The mixture

destined to be fast and sure. The steam locom o­

includes apparel, food, textiles, leather, electrical




13

business re v ie w

machinery, nonelectrical machinery, and paper
manufacturing.

Lines, Public Service Electric and Gas, the Read­
ing, South Jersey Gas, Southern New Jersey Devel­

Altoona Enterprises, Inc., is fully aware of the

opment Council, and at least

16 additional

area’s handicaps. To improve higher educational

organizations— all of which are members of the

facilities, the Pennsylvania State University was

New Jersey Industrial Development Association.

invited to establish a local campus. Efforts are
also being made to promote construction of an

Furthermore, the nine counties have 23 industrial

Appalachian Throughway which would give the
city a halfway position between the Keystone

parks and a large number of real-estate offices
active in seeking new industries.
The electric utility, with headquarters in Atlan­

Shortway and the Pennsylvania Turnpike. Mean­
while, still more industries are being sought be­
cause metropolitan Altoona’s unemployment rate,

tic City, has an area development department
which is a mine of up-to-date regional informa­

though much improved, is still too high.

prospect might want to know. For example, the

tion on any conceivable subject an industrial
department has prepared a handbook of com­

Southern New Jersey

munity profiles which contains for each of 120

The nine counties, here designated as Southern
New Jersey, taken together form a kind of penin­

communities in the region information such as
population, housing, government services, taxes,

sula— for they all have water frontage, either

utilities, labor, transportation, banks, medical

riparian or oceanic. The counties of Mercer, Bur­

facilities,

lington, Camden, Gloucester, Salem, and Cumber­

churches, schools, recreational activities, cultural

land front on the Delaware River; Atlantic and

facilities, and industries. The utility’s role in pro­

newspapers,

radio

and

television,

Ocean counties front on the Atlantic Ocean, and

moting Bayside— a vast industrial tract on the

Cape May on both.

Cumberland County shore of Delaware Bay— and

Its peninsularity once shielded all but a small

in fostering site improvements at the Lindenwold

part of this region from industrialization. But no

terminal of the Southern New Jersey Rapid

longer. Industries favor the Delaware for its navi­

Transit Line are typical of the area development

gability and ocean shipping, and upstream the

activities.
High priority is given to higher education in

river is bridgeable.
All this area needed to make it a part of mega­

Southern New Jersey. Two-year colleges have

lopolis was transportation. Transportation it now

been or are being established in Atlantic, Cum­

has— the New Jersey Turnpike, the Garden State

berland, Gloucester, and Camden counties. Salem

Parkway, the Atlantic City Expressway, and con­

County now has a vocational technical school,

necting cross-stream

another is being built in Cape May County, and

links— the bridges

with

which the Delaware is already spanned and new

Glassboro State College is in the midst of a large

ones planned, Chester-Bridgeport and Brides-

expansion program.

burg-Delair.
Southern New Jersey is vibrant with industrial

Down Delaware way

development and with organizations promoting it.

Delaware’s three counties are likely to be thought

Among them are Atlantic City Electric, Delaware

of as industrial New Castle in the north, political

Valley Council, Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore

Kent in the middle, and agricultural Sussex in


14


business re v ie w

the south. With the passage of time the image

activity there is a tendency to accept with open

changes.

arms any and all comers. That is likely to lead to

Wilmington’s industrial expansion is filling up

lopsided industrialization with a preponderance

New Castle and spilling into the lower counties.

of low-wage-paying industry largely dependent

Illustrative of the continuing southward trend are

upon employing female workers. For example,

Kent’s new advanced circuitry plant and a big

apparel and textile plants accounted for 49 per

office machinery manufacturing installation in

cent of all the manufacturing employment in 1960
in the Wilkes-Barre-Hazleton area, which was in

lower Sussex.
Delaware is advantageously located for indus­

marked contrast with the 16 per cent for the

try, has deep-water sites, and attractive incorpor­

Philadelphia metropolitan area. Since that time,

ation laws. However, the scarcity or infrequency

dependence upon those two industries in the up­

of vacant industrial buildings is a drawback to

state region has been reduced, and continued

the area’s industrialization.

efforts are being made to attain still greater in­
dustrial diversification.

In conclusion

Another aspect of industrial development that

Industrial development activities differ from

is gaining wider appreciation is the need to make

one section to another, but perhaps the differences

the community an attractive place to live. Attrac­

are more one of degree than of kind. Some

tiveness has many facets, such as physical ap­

stress advertising more than others. Some devote

pearance, cleanliness, educational facilities in­

practically all their efforts to getting in new
industries, whereas others divide their efforts
between getting new firms and helping established
concerns to expand. There are also different prac­

cluding higher education, hospitals, police and
fire protection, cultural and recreational activ­
ities.

tices with respect to giving financial assistance.

To a certain extent, the regional growth and
development is tied to that of the national econ­

Some offer little or no such help and others do all
they can to get a newcomer established. The more
financial assistance you offer, said one industrial

omy, but to a certain extent only. Regional
development is also a matter of internal influences

development official, the more likely you are to

ment in productive and cultural facilities. In final

attract marginal firms with little staying power.

analysis, much depends upon the caliber of com­

In the early stages of industrial development




— managerial talent, initiative, education, invest­

munity leadership.

15

FOR THE R E C O R D . . .
INDEX

SUMMARY

BILLIONS $

Third Federal
Reserve District

United States

Per cent change

Per cent change

Feb. 1968
from
mo.
ago

MANUFACTURING
Production .........................
Electric power consumed — 2
Man-hours, total* ......... + 1
0
Employment, total ...........
+ 1
CONSTRUCTION**............... + 3
COAL PRODUCTION ........... + 7
BANKING
(All member banks)
Deposits ............................. — 1
0
Loans ...................................
Investments .......................
0
U.S. Govt, securities .... — 1
Other .................................
0
Check payments*** ......... + 2f
PRICES
Wholesale ...........................
Consumer ...........................

year
ago

2
mos.
1968
from
year
ago




mo.
ago

year
ago

2
mos.
1968
from
year
ago

Manufacturing

LOCAL
CHANGES
Metropolitan
Areas*

+ 2
+12
+ 4
+ 2
+ 9
+ 14
-12

+10
+ 1
+ 2
+ 6
+ 17
-1 3

+ 3

Banking

Employment

Payrolls

Check
Payments**

Total
Deposits***

Per cent
change
Feb. 1968
from

Per cent
change
Feb. 1968
from

Per cent
change
Feb. 1S68
from

Per cent
change
Feb. 1968
from

mo.
ago

year
ago

mo.
ago

year
ago

-

+ 1

+ 8

Wilmington ..... - 2

1

Atlantic City ....
0
+ 6

+ 12
- 1

+
+
+
-

1
0
1
2
1
1

+ 1
0

+ 11
+ 8
+ 17
+12
+22
+ 15

+ 2
+ 4

mo.
ago

year
ago

mo.
ago

year
ago

+ 2

+21
- 4

+ 12
+ 8
+ 18
+ 12
+24
+ 15

+ 1
+ 4

tl5 SMSA’s
^Philadelphia

+ 12

+13

- 7

+ 8

+ 3

+20

-

1

-

+34

+41

0

+ 12

+ 1
0

+ 14

1

Trenton ...........

- 1

-

1

- 5

Altoona .............

+ 2

+ 2

+ 7

+ 16

4" 5

+12

Harrisburg ....... - 1

0

0

+ 10

+ 8

+ 7

1

- 4

+ 4

—8

+ 9

0

+ 10

+ 5

—5

+ 9

0

+ 9

Johnstown .......
+ 11 + 12
+ 9 + 8
+20 +21
+12 + 14
+29 +30
+121 + llt

ot + 41 + 41

‘ Production workers only
“ Value of contracts
‘ “ Adjusted for seasonal variation

Feb. 1968
from

MEMBER BANKS. 3RD. F.R.B.

+ 1

Lancaster .........

-

+ 4

+ 11

+ 1
Lehigh Valley ..
0

— 1
0

+ 2

+ 7

—6

+ 6

0

+ 11

Philadelphia.....

0

0

+ 1

+ 8

—2

+ 11

— 1

+ 12

Reading ...........

+ 1

+ 1

+ 3

+ 12

0

+ 19

+ 1

—5

Scranton______

0

-

1

+ 3

+ 6

+ 5

+ 11

+ 2

+ 14

Wilkes-Barre .... + 1

0

+ 6

+ 10

-1 1

+ 2

0

+ 14

York ................. - 2

- 2

0

+ 6

- 3

+ 8

+ 1

+ 6

+ 1

‘ Not restricted to corporate limits of cities but covers areas of one
or more counties.
“ All commercial banks. Adjusted for seasonal variation.
‘ “ Member banks only. Last Wednesday of the month.