View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Volume 1, Number 2 * September/October 1994
EL PASO B R A NC H

The Changing
Dynamics of the
Maquiladora Industry
(Part 1 of a two-part series)

F E D E R A L R E S E R V E BAN K OF D ALLAS

The story of the industry in the 1990s
is not one of spectacular growth but of
consolidation. The explosive plant and
employment growth of the 1980s has
slowed to a more modest pace. However,
significant qualitative developments,
particularly in the border cities, are
shaping the industry’s new role in
Mexico’s modernization strategy.

T h e story o f
the maquiladora
industry in the
1990s is not one
o f spectacular
growth—as in the
1980s—but o f
consolidation.

lthough the Mexican maquiladora

A

program1has existed since 1965,
the industry is perhaps best known for its
spectacular growth during the 1980s. In
1985, for example, it drew national
recognition when then President Miguel
de la Madrid declared the industry a
national priority because of its high
foreign-exchange earning capacity. In
that year, the maquiladora industry
surpassed tourism as the second-largest
generator of foreign exchange in Mexico.
It continues to hold this rank today,
outperformed only by the petroleum
sector. It was also during the mid-1980s
that the industry enhanced its international
reputation as Asian companies, especially
Japanese firms, joined U.S. and European
companies in the Mexican maquiladora
program.
1 The maquiladora program allows manufacturers in
Mexico to import their inputs duty-free as long as 100
percent of the final product is exported from Mexico.
Another key incentive of the program is that it allows
100-percent foreign ownership.

The Maquiladora Industry’s Boom
During its 1983-88 boom, maquila­
dora industry employment grew an
average of 19.7 percent annually. By
year-end 1988, the industry employed
nearly 430,000 workers, up from 127,000
in 1982. The maquiladora industry’s
share in overall Mexican manufacturing
employment reached 15.2 percent in 1988,
up from just 5.1 percent in 1982.
Other measures of maquiladora
activity exhibited a similar pattern of
significant growth during 1983-88. The
number of maquiladora plants increased at
an average annual rate of 15.9 percent,
reaching a level of almost 1,400 in 1988.
The volume of imported raw materials
increased at an average annual rate of
27.7 percent and equaled almost $8 billion
in 1988, up from less than $2 billion in
1982. Value added reached a level of $2.3
billion in 1988, after growing at an

This publication was digitized and made available by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas' Historical Library (FedHistory@dal.frb.org)

average annual rate of 20.5 percent

MAQUILADORA INDUSTRY ACTIVITY

during 1983-88. Finally, gross
maquiladora production experienced

(Annual Growth Rate)

1970s the maquiladoras were clas­
sified as an unskilled, labor-intensive
industry with production processes

5 0 1-------------------------------

limited to assembly work, by the

average annual growth of 25.4
percent and was worth more than
$10 billion in 1988, up from less
than $3 billion in 1982.

1980s— especially the latter part of
the decade— the industry had incorpo­
rated higher levels of technology.

A Qualified Deceleration

Resurgence
IP Plants ~ Employment

During 1989-91, maquiladora
industry growth decelerated, especially
in the number of plants and the level
of employment. Thus, after increasing
21 percent in 1988, maquiladora
employment grew 16.3 percent in
1989,7.1 percent in 1990, and only

Production

|

'83 '84 '85 '86 '87 '88 '89 '90 '91 '92 '93

A slowdown in the U.S. economy
was largely responsible for the
downturn of plant and employment
growth in 1989, Since the great

1.6 percent in 1991. In terms of the
number of plants, 24.1-percent growth

majority of maquiladora production
is destined for the U.S. market, the
industry is particularly sensitive to

in 1988 was followed by growth rates

U.S. growth rates. Also, after

of 18.6 percent in 1989 and 17.1
percent in 1990. In 1991, the number
of plants declined 0.7 percent.

spectacular growth during 1983-88,
by 1989, the industry’s labor market

While the remaining measures of
activity also decelerated during
1989-91, the lessening of the rate of
growth was not as dramatic or as
sustained. For example, gross
production rose 23.2 percent in
1989, down from 41.3 percentgrowth in 1988. During 1990 and
1991, maquiladora production still
managed double-digit rates: 12.7
percent and 12.3 percent, respectively.
Similarly, value added in 1989 decel­
erated to a rate of 30.7 percent, down
from 43 percent in 1988. The next
two years, value added still showed
significant growth— 18.1 percent in
1990 and 14.2 percent in 1991.

conditions had tightened, especially
in the more popular border locations.
The price of labor, therefore, rose
substantially. The average wage
paid in the maquiladora industry in
1988, for example, rose 23.2 percent
in dollar terms; the following year, it
rose 17.9 percent. Thus, as labor
rates rose and U.S. market conditions
turned recessionary in 1990 and 1991,
maquiladora employers became more
conservative in their hiring.
Despite the U.S. recession,
productivity gains resulting from
growing technological sophistication
enabled the industry to maintain
growth in the other measures of
activity. Whereas in the 1960s and

In 1992-93, the maquiladora
industry experienced a resurgence as
all measures of activity rebounded
from their 1989-91 levels. For
example, employment grew 8
percent in 1992, up from 1.6-percent
growth the previous year. Employ­
ment growth of 7.1 percent followed
in 1993. The number of maquila­
dora plants rose 7.8 percent in 1992
and 4.5 percent in 1993, after having
contracted 0.7 percent in 1991. The
gross production growth rate re­
bounded to 19.7 percent and 20.7
percent in 1992 and 1993, respec­
tively, up from 12.3 percent in 1991.
It is clear, then, that the maquila­
dora industry of the early 1990s is
undergoing consolidation yet thriv­
ing. Dramatic employment increases
have slowed to single-digit yet stable
growth rates. Production, on the
other hand, has registered strong
gains despite the smaller increases in
employment. In essence, the maqui­
ladora industry’s productivity is
improving with the growing use of
state-of-the-art technology by an
increasingly skilled labor force.
Moreover, emphasis in the industry

<
no longer seems to be strictly on

increased as its employment share

quantitative performance. Qualita­
tive developments have assumed

has grown to 28.2 percent in 1993
from 11.4 percent in 1984. All 31

greater importance, especially in
light of the new rules dictated by the

states in Mexico now have at least
one maquiladora plant, and some

The stronger production perfor­
mance and slower employment

North American Free Trade Agree­
ment (NAFTA). (Part 2 of this series

interior cities now have an estab­
lished and growing maquiladora

growth seen in the industry as a
whole in the 1990s is also evident in

will elaborate further on this subject.)

industry. But although the interior is
becoming a region of growing

those individual border cities. This
is especially true in the two top ones,

On the Border

importance for the industry— and
certainly developments there should

Ciudad Juarez and Tijuana, which
combined hold a 38.7-percent share

The story of the maquiladora
industry’s growth and change is

not be disregarded— the border
remains the site of most maquiladora

in maquiladora employment. Ciudad
Juarez, for example, which employs

really one of industry developments
on the U.S.-M exican border. Al­

activity.

about one-fourth of all maquiladora
workers in Mexico, registered a

though the border’s share of maqui­

Along the border, the cities that
have the greatest and most extended

significant production gain of 8.3
percent in 1990, despite an employ­

maquiladora presence are Ciudad
Juarez in the state of Chihuahua;
Tijuana and Mexicali in Baja

ment increase of only 1.7 percent.
The following year, production

ladora activity has been decreasing,
it continues to hold the majority. In
1993, the border was home to 71.8
percent of maquiladora workers and
72.7 percent of the industry’s plants.

industry performance in these cities
during 1990-93.

growth was even more vigorous as it
registered a 15-percent increase,

California; Nogales, Sonora: and

In 1984, the border’s share of maquila­
dora employment was higher at 88.6

Matamoros, Reynosa, and Nuevo
Laredo in the state of Tamaulipas.

percent; it had an 88.5 percent share
in the number of plants.

In 1993, these seven border cities
were home to 62.4 percent of

despite a 2.3-percent decrease in
maquiladora employment. In 1992­
93, maquiladora production in
Ciudad Juarez maintained its

maquiladora workers and 57.8
percent of the industry’s plants. The

dynamism, while employment
recovered with low single-digit

table below shows maquiladora

growth rates. At year-end 1993,

Correspondingly, the maquiladora
industry’s presence in the interior has

MAQUILADORA INDUSTRY ACTIVITY
National and by Major Border City
(Annual Growth Rate)
1990
Plants* cmplt.*

I

%
NATIONAL
Juarez
Tijuana
Mexicali
Nogales
Matamoros
Reynosa
N. Laredo

17.1
£1.1
5.2
2.7
-5.5
4.6
13.3
12.5

7.1
1.7
93
1.6
-12.6
.7
3.9
9.6

1992

1991

Proa.* "Tlanu

%

12.8
8.3
16.3
35.9
-8.5
31.6
2.9
-.9

%

-.7
-9.3
-7.4
-13.3
-5.8
1.1
13.2
-4.8

cm p lt.

Prod

Plants

%

%

%

1.6
-2.3
^ t.l
-4.3
-6.7
-3.2
12.1
-.2

12.3
15.0
9.4
-4.3
6.0
1.0
9.2
17.4

7.8
4.7
10.5
6.1
0
4.3
15.6
-3.3

1 Figures show average annual growth in the number of maquiladora plants.
1 Figures show average annual growth in the number of maquiladora workers.
3 Figures show annual growth in maquiladora production stated in billions of U.S. dollars.

Emplt

%
8.0
4.6
13.4
-3.7
3.7
.8
12.0
1.8

Prod.

%
19.7
20.5
28.3
-21.2
12.2
-.6
22.7
38.8

Plants

1993
Emplt.

Prod.

4.4
-4.9
7.6
7
-4.6
-1.0
2.3
-5.2

7.1
2.3
11.9
2.5
-1.2
14
11.2
-3.4

20.7
16.0
22.1
36.1
21.4
5.2
34.4
10.5

tm

%

%

%

<

254 maquiladora plants in Ciudad Juarez employed more

spectacular growth in 1990. Matamoros holds the third-

than 132,000 workers, and gross production totaled some
$5.8 billion.

largest share of maquiladora employment. At year-end
1993, it employed 38,000 workers in 96 plants, and maqui­
ladora production was worth $2.1 billion.

Although Tijuana's concentration of maquiladora
workers— about 14.3 percent of the total—is second only to
that of Ciudad Juarez, Tijuana has the largest share of

Conclusion

plants, with slightly more than 25 percent. Maquiladora
production growth in Tijuana exceeded employment growth

The maquiladora industry has become an important
component of the Mexican economy. In 1993, it contributed

throughout 1990-93, posting double-digit increases for all
years except 1991. Production growth was especially
robust in 1992, increasing 28.3 percent, followed by 22.1percent growth in 1993. Although employment increases

$5.5 billion in foreign exchange to Mexico, making it the
country’s second-largest source of international reserves.

were more modest throughout 1990-93, in contrast to
Ciudad Juarez, Tijuana’s employment registered double­

from just 5.1 percent in 1982.

digit increases during 1992-93, after a 4.1-percent decrease in
1991. At year-end 1993, Tijuana employed more than

The industry’s performance in the early 1990s was
characterized by dynamism in production and stabilization in

77,000 workers in 554 maquiladora plants, and maquila­
dora production was worth $4.1 billion.

employment. In 1990-93, very low and even negative
growth rates for plants and employment replaced the boom­

Maquiladora growth patterns conformed, with some

Also, the maquiladora industry’s share in overall Mexican
manufacturing employment reached 23 percent in 1993, up

ing rates of the 1980s. Looking solely at these two vari­
ables, one would conclude that the maquiladora industry’s

individual variations, to those of Ciudad Juarez, Tijuana,
and the country, as a whole, in 1990-93. Matamoros,

performance in the beginning of this decade was disappoint­
ing. However, the strong performance of maquiladora

however, seems to present a unique case. It registered the
largest production gain in 1990 but failed to sustain dy­
namic growth in the subsequent years. Production there

production during this period indicates that the industry is,
in general, thriving and gaining productivity. This overall

rose almost 32 percent in 1990, yet only 1 percent in 1991.
In 1992, production contracted 0.6 percent but recovered to
5.2 percent-growth in 1993. Employment’s performance in
Matamoros followed the pattern seen in the other cities
during 1990-93, with mostly low single-digit gains and

picture of the industry is supported, to varying degrees, by
trends in the major border cities.
The next issue of Business Frontier will discuss the
industry’s 1994 performance and the new rules for maquila­
doras under NAFTA.

negative growth in 1991. It seems, then, that production in
Matamoros underwent a consolidation during 1991-93 after

Business Frontier is a bimonthly publication o f the El Paso Branch o f the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
The views expressed are those o f the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions o f the
Federal Reserve Bank o f Dallas or the Federal Reserve System.
Subscript], ns are available free o f charge. To be placed on the mailing ust, please write to
Lucinda Vargas
El Paso Branch - Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
P.O. Box 100 El Paso, Texas 79999
Tel: (915) 521-8233 Fax: (915) 521-8284
Articles, or portions thereof, may be reprinted on the condition that the source is credited and a copy of
the publication containing the reprinted material is provided to the Research Department, El Paso Branch
Federal Reserve Bank o f Dallas.

— Lucinda Vargas
Economist