View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

A review by the Federal Reserve Bank o f Chicago

Business
Conditions
1 9 6 4 June

Contents
The trend of business— Output
growth leads employment gains

2

Trends in banking and finance

8

Slowing in savings deposit
growth and turnover?

12

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

THE

OF

BUSINESS

O u tp u t g ro w th leads em ploym ent gains

Industrial production in the United States
averaged 6 per cent above the level of a year
earlier during the first quarter while total
spending on goods and services (GNP) was
up 4 per cent and nonfarm employment was
up almost 3 per cent. These increases were
larger than those recorded from the first
quarter of 1962 to the first quarter of 1963.
Expansion has continued in the second
quarter. Output of manufactured goods in
April was 5.8 per cent above the level of a
year earlier while total employment of manu­
facturing firms was up 1.5 per cent. Part of
the difference in the growth of output and em­
ployment reflects a somewhat longer average
week for production workers—40.6 hours
compared with 40.1—but the major factor
has been a continuance of the rapid increase
in output per man-hour that has been in evi­
dence for the past several years.
Increases in output during the past year
have occurred in virtually all industries, and
most manufacturing centers have reported
some rise in employment. Nevertheless, there

have been pronounced differences in trends
among industries and localities.
The m a te ria ls b re a k th ro u g h

Convenient “basing points” for longerterm comparisons are the first quarters of
1957 and 1960, both periods of record levels
of activity. The major “special” factor in
early 1957 was a high rate of crude oil output
associated with the Suez crisis while in early
1960 steel production was abnormally high
because of restocking following the 1959
strike. In neither case, however, did these
special factors dominate trends in the econ­
omy as a whole.
The first quarter of 1957 marked the be­
ginning of a new era for the economy. Before
then and as far back as Pearl Harbor, physi­
cal output had been limited in times of heavy
demand by the nation’s capacity to produce
steel, aluminum, copper, cement and other
basic materials. Major programs to expand
productive facilities for these goods were
nearing completion early in 1957. Total out-

BUSINESS CONDITIONS is published monthly by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. George W . Cloos was primarily
responsible for the article "The trend of business—Output growth leads employment gains," Dorothy M. Nichols for
"Trends in banking and finance" and Charlotte H. Scott for "Slowing in savings deposit growth and turnover?"
Subscriptions to Business Conditions are available to the public without charge. For information concerning bulk
mailings, address inquiries to the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60690.
2

Articles may be reprinted provided source is credited.




Business Conditions, June 1964

cluded only a very moderate re­
cession and no major strikes.

N o n fa rm w age and salary
employment in the United States

S e v e n y e a r s of p le n ty

First quarter average
1957-64
Total n o n fa rm ................

9.6

1960-64

1961-64

(per cent change)
6.7
8.3
— 13.9

— 7.8

4.1

7.3

11.0

Manufacturing .......... — 1.3

0.4

6.6

— 7.7

— 2.4

0.8

11.2

6.6

7.2

18.6

10.1

7.6

27.4

16.6

13.6

5.6

3.4

4.9

39.6

20.6

14.9

Mining

...................... — 25.0

Contract construction

—

Transportation and
public utilities . . . .
Wholesale and
retail t r a d e ............
Finance, insurance
and real estate . . .
Service and
miscellaneous

....

Federal Government .
State and local
government ..........

put of business equipment began to decline
in the second quarter of the year—several
months before a general recession began.
Large blocks of new capacity came “on
stream” in early 1957. Meanwhile, output of
most major materials had peaked in 1956
and the highwater mark for steel was—and
remains— 1955.
The overall performance of the economy
in the past seven years has not been com­
pletely satisfactory, with the period marred
by two recessions and an excessively high
rate of unemployment. Nevertheless, sizable
increases have occurred in output, employ­
ment and income while prices of commodi­
ties, overall, have been relatively stable and
the provision of additional “elbow room” has
helped most businesses to improve the quality
of their products and the efficiency of their
processes. The picture is even more impres­
sive for the period since 1959 which has in­



The rate of growth of the
American economy from the first
quarter of 1957 to the first quar­
2.8
ter of 1964 is almost exactly the
1.1
5.7
same whether measured by indus­
1.7
trial production (based on physi­
cal volume, output of factories,
1.6
mines and electric and gas utili­
ties)
or by deflated gross national
3.0
product (the value of total pur­
2.5
chases of goods and services ad­
justed for price changes). This
4.5
also holds true for the period from
0.4
early 1960 through the first quar­
4.3
ter of 1964. Over the seven-year
period the rise was 25 per cent;
in the shorter time span, 15 per
cent. Activity rose at an annual
rate of 3.2 per cent for the seven-year period
—2.9 per cent from 1957 to 1960, accelerat­
ing to 3.5 per cent from 1960 to 1964.
Nonfarm employment in the nation has
risen 9.6 per cent since 1957 and more
rapidly (6.7 per cent) since early 1960. Em­
ployment increases have been greatest in
state and local government, wholesale and
retail trade and service industries other than
public utilities (see the table on page 3). In
the case of manufacturing, employment aver­
aged slightly less in the first quarter of 1964
than seven years earlier while employment in
mining and the transportation and public
utility industries was substantially less.
Many manufacturing categories have had
substantial increases in output in recent years
with only modest increases and in some cases
decreases in employment. These develop­
ments imply rapid growth in output per
worker, resulting from new equipment, new

1963-64

—

3

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

techniques, improved management and a bet­
ter trained, more experienced work force. For
manufacturing as a whole, a small part of the
rise in output has reflected an increase in the
average length of the workweek for produc­
tion workers. The average week in such major
Midwest industries as motor vehicles and
steel was not appreciably different in the
periods selected for comparison. These trends
are shown in the table on page 5.
In every major manufacturing industry,
output has risen strongly relative to employ­
ment whether comparisons are made for the
past year, the past four years or the past
seven years. Spectacular examples are found
both in hard and soft goods lines. Output in
the motor vehicle industry in the first quarter
of 1964 was 34 per cent above the level of
the same period of 1957 while total employ­
ment was 6 per cent less. Textile mills were
turning out 23 per cent more goods with 11
per cent fewer people. Nonelectrical machin­
ery output was 21 per cent higher while em­
ployment was off 4 per cent. The chemical
industry had increased employment 8 per
cent, but output had risen 66 per cent!

ception of Iowa, there is relatively greater
concentration in this region on durable goods
—mainly those made principally of wood or
metal.
United
States

First quarter average 1964
Ind.
Iowa
Mich.
Wis.
(per cent)
Manufacturing employment to total nonfarm
wage and salary employment
30
34
41
26
41
38
Manufacturing employment in durable goods
57
65
75
55
80
65
111.

The nature and importance of durable
goods production to the local economies var­
ies substantially among the states of the Sev­
enth District. No state approaches Michigan
in terms of dependence upon a single indus­
try. Motor vehicles directly account for 36
per cent of Michigan’s manufacturing em­
ployment and inclusion of workers in primary

O u tp u t o f goods
has risen more than employment
in goods producing industries

How fa re s th e M id w est?

4

Measures of physical output are not avail­
able for regions or states. Employment data
comparable to the national figures, however,
are published for all states. Because major in­
dustries in the Seventh Federal Reserve Dis­
trict include leading firms that have engaged
in large-scale expansions and renovations in
recent years, it seems plausible that changes
in output per man or per man-hour in the
industries of this region have been similar to
those for the nation.
Except for Iowa, the states of the Seventh
District have a relatively larger proportion of
employment in manufacturing than does the
United States as a whole. Also with the ex­




percent, 1st quarter 1957 =100

Business Conditions, June 1964

O u tp u t and em ploym ent
in selected United States
manufacturing industries
First quarter average
1957-64

1960-64

1961-64

1963-64

(per cent change)
Total manufacturing
Employment . . — 1.3

0.4

6.6

1.7

25.6

15.2

25.2

6.5

Employment . . — 19.2

— 15.6

7.6

4.7

Output .......... — 9.0

— 13.1

45.8

10.1

Output ..........
Iron and steel

Nonelectrical machinery
Employment . . — 4.3

3.2

10.5

3.8

21.0

22.6

33.2

9.8

Output ..........
Electrical machinery
Employment . .

15.5

5.1

8.0

— 1.8

Output ..........

29.0

14.7

22.9

3.1

Motor vehicles
0.5

24.0

5.7

33.5

12.1

58.6

7.2

2.0
23.2

0.1
11.9

7.7

3.9

20.0

8.3

Employment . . — 10.8

— 5.2

1.2

0.4

22.6

10.5

21.7

4.9

Employment . . — 6.1
Output ..........
Clay, glass and stove
Employment . .
Output ..........
Textile mills
Output ..........
Apparel
Employment . .
Output ..........
Paper and products

7.7

4.7

8.7

2.2

36.6

17.2

24.8

7.6

5.0
19.8

5.3

Employment . .

9.6

4.3

Output ..........

34.1

18.8

1.5

Chemicals and products
Employment . .

8.2

6.1

6.5

2.1

Output ..........

65.9

34.7

33.4

8.8

Employment . . — 4.6
23.7

— 3.0
13.2

— 2.5

— 0.7

10.0

3.8

Foods and beverages
Output ..........

metals, fabricated metals and machinery
firms—products utilized in large part by the
motor vehicle firms—would greatly increase
this proportion. In Illinois, 30 per cent of all
employees in manufacturing are in electrical
or nonelectrical machinery. More than 45 per



cent of all manufacturing workers in Indiana
are in three groups: primary metals (mainly
steel), electrical equipment, and transporta­
tion equipment (mainly motor vehicle parts).
In Iowa more than 20 per cent of all manu­
facturing workers produce nonelectrical ma­
chinery (mainly agricultural equipment).
The heaviest concentration in Wisconsin also
is in nonelectrical machinery (especially
heavy capital goods) which accounts for over
20 per cent of the state’s total manufacturing
employment.
Seventh District states have some relatively
important nondurable goods industries. These
include food processing in Illinois, Iowa and
Wisconsin; paper products in Wisconsin and
printing in Illinois. These industries are not
greatly influenced by general business fluctu­
ations. Most of the durable goods industries
important to the District, however, are highly
volatile fluctuating markedly over the busi­
ness cycle.
From the recession low in early 1961 to
the first quarter of 1964, employment in­
creases were greater in Michigan and Indiana
than in the nation. During the past year,
moreover, employment increased about as
rapidly in these states as in the nation. In
Illinois, Iowa and Wisconsin, however, in­
creases—both from the 1961 low and from
the year-ago level—have been somewhat less
than for the nation.
When comparisons of recent levels of total
nonfarm employment are made with the cor­
responding periods of 1957 or 1960, it ap­
pears that each of the five District states has
lagged the national growth of employment.
For Indiana, Iowa and Wisconsin growth
over the past seven years was not far behind
the national increase of 10 per cent. In Illi­
nois, however, employment in the first quar­
ter averaged only 1 per cent above the 1957
level while in Michigan—despite relatively

5

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

6

large gains in the past three years—employ­
ment averaged 4 per cent lower than in the
earlier period.
For the most part, employment changes in
individual manufacturing lines in the Mid­
west have followed national trends during the
past seven years. One reason for the relatively
slower growth of the Midwest is found in the
fact that durable goods manufacturing is rela­
tively more important here. During the past
seven years, employment in durable goods
manufacturing for the nation has declined 3
per cent while nondurable goods firms have
increased their employment by about onehalf of 1 per cent. Another factor is the shift
in defense work from the more prosaic prod­
ucts of the Midwest to the electronics-spacemissile complexes of the West, East and
South. But some important Midwest indus­
tries also in non-military lines have lost posi­
tion during the past several years.
Employment in Michigan’s motor vehicle
industry was 18 per cent below the level of
seven years ago in the first quarter, compared
with a 6 per cent decline for the nation. The
downtrend in Michigan’s share of auto indus­
try employment appears, however, to have
been interrupted. In early 1957 Michigan
accounted for 52 per cent of employment in
the motor vehicle industry; by 1960, this
share had dropped to 44 per cent, but thus
far in 1964 has been 46 per cent.
Food processors in Illinois reduced em­
ployment 13 per cent from early 1957 to
early 1964, as against a decline of only 5 per
cent for the nation, mainly because of a con­
tinued exodus of meat packing from Chicago
and East St. Louis. Illinois also has substan­
tial employment in furniture, building materi­
als, electrical equipment, apparel and print­
ing. In each of these lines employment, na­
tionally, now is appreciably above the level of
early 1957. For Illinois, however, employ­




ment in these industries is below the level of
seven years ago, except for printing where the
number of workers has been approximately
stable.
The other important industrial states of the
District, Indiana and Wisconsin, have lost
some ground relative to the nation since
1957, but in the vital machinery industries
their declines have not been of great signifi­
cance. Indiana’s proportion of employment in
motor vehicles has slipped since 1957, but
Wisconsin’s has increased considerably. In
recent months, however, layoffs have been
announced in Wisconsin by the state’s prin­
cipal manufacturer of autos even though the
industry in general has been maintaining pro­
duction and employment.
In Iowa, employment in both electrical
and nonelectrical machinery is up more than
20 per cent from seven years ago—a much
stronger performance than that for the na­
tion. Relative improvement has not continued
in the past year, however, when employment
changes in these industries have been very
close to those of the nation. Manufacturing in
Iowa continues to be relatively small, ac­
counting for only 26 per cent of nonfarm
wage and salary employment. This compares
with 41 per cent in both Michigan and
Indiana.
One promising note for the Seventh Dis­
trict states is the relative growth of the pri­
mary metals industries, which include both
iron and steel and nonferrous metals. In the
first quarter of 1964, employment in primary
metals was below the level of seven years ago
almost everywhere, mainly because of pro­
ductivity gains. Declines ranged from 7 per
cent in Indiana to 10 per cent in Wisconsin.
But for the nation the reduction during this
period was 16 per cent.
All District states have improved or at
least held their positions in the primary met-

Business Conditions, June 1964

proportion of the nation’s steel
production will continue to grow
and thus the great steel consum­
ing industries of the region will be
served with increasing efficiency.

N o n fa rm w age and salary
employment in the United States
and Midwest

F u rth e r g ro w th n e e d e d

First quarter average
1957-64

1960-64

1961^64

1963-64

Increases in employment are
projected for most Midwest areas
2.8
6.7
8.3
Total employment
9.6
in the months ahead. Some areas
Goods producing1 .. — 1.5
0.8
6.7
2.1
will benefit from the fact that
3.2
10.3
9.2
Service producing2
17.0
capital goods firms are increasing
Illinois
output more rapidly than total
2.4
5.0
2.0
Total employment
1.0
output in the nation. In many
Goods producing1 .. — 9.4
— 3.6
3.9
2.0
Service producing2
8.9
6.6
5.7
1.9
cases these firms are handicapped
Indiana
by a lack of trained personnel
6.8
5.2
9.2
2.6
Total employment
needed to perform skilled tasks.
Goods producing1 . . — 2.9
0.6
10.5
2.6
Shortages of semi-skilled and
Service producing2
16.3
9.4
2.5
8.2
unskilled workers are reported in
Iowa
7.5
4.5
3.9
2.1
Total employment
some instances. At least one large
2.1
Goods producing1
1.5
3.0
3.0
steel firm, for example, has found
Service producing2
9.5
6.4
4.1
1.9
it difficult to hire all the semi­
Michigan
skilled men it requires.
2.4
10.6
2.7
Total employment .. — 3.7
Where local co n d itio n s are
Goods producing1 .. — 13.8
— 2.2
15.7
2.9
Service producing2
6.5
6.3
6.5
2.3
heavily influenced by trends in
Wisconsin
motor vehicles, the prospects for
6.8
3.7
6.9
1.9
Total employment
further gains are less favorable
Goods producing1 .. — 3.1
— 2.5
7.2
1.0
because output now is at a very
2.9
Service producing2
15.2
8.7
6.8
high level and is not likely to be
includes manufacturing, mining and contract construction.
exceeded
appreciably through the
'Includes transportation, public utilities, trade, finance, other
remainder of the year. Seasonal
services and government.
reductions are in prospect for
July and August when model
als industries since early 1960 and also dur­
changes begin. On the other hand, virtually
ing the past year. A major element in this
all centers report that the supply of suitable
development has been the relative growth in
office and service workers is relatively tight.
steel output in the Chicago and Detroit areas.
Despite the slower growth in employment
In 1957 these steel centers produced 27 per
during the past several years, labor depart­
ments of all Seventh District states estimate
cent of the nation’s total. By the first quarter
of 1964 this proportion had risen to 31 per
their unemployment rates to be less than the
national average. In April only one Midwest
cent. Large-scale expansion and moderniza­
area, South Bend, was classified as having a
tion plans now under way in both the Chicago
“substantial labor surplus” (more than 6 per
and Detroit areas indicate that the District’s
(per cent change)

United States




Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

cent of the labor force unemployed) while
there were 38 such areas elsewhere in the
nation. Moreover, seven of the nation’s 17
centers with unemployment rates below 3 per

cent were in the District. These were the
Davenport-Rock Island-Moline area, Cedar
Rapids, Des Moines, Flint, Lansing, Muske­
gon and Madison.

in banking and fi nance

C^ommercial bank loans have risen roughly
40 billion dollars—an increase of almost onethird—in the past three years of business
expansion. If there is an acceleration in the
expenditures of businesses and consumers
during the second half of 1964, the accom­
panying demands for credit will be added to
the normal seasonal increases. Loan expan­
sion during the second half of each of the past
three years has averaged 9.5 billion dollars.
Both the magnitude of loan demands and
the ease with which the banks are able to
meet them will have an impact on the credit
and securities markets. Should banks find it
necessary to liquidate a sizable amount of in­
vestments in order to meet loan demands,
upward pressure on interest rates would be
likely to develop.
Liquidity a fa cto r

8

Ability to mobilize funds quickly to meet
either loan demands or deposit withdrawals
is the essence of bank liquidity. Liquidity can
come from many sources—short-term invest­
ments that mature soon or can be sold with
little market loss, inflows of cash from loan
repayments and new deposits, cash assets in
excess of required amounts and even the




ability to borrow. While the individual bank
possibly can construct a reasonable picture of
its own liquidity position, liquidity is very
difficult to measure for the banking system.
Two ratios often used as approximate meas­
ures are shown in the top panel of the ac­
companying chart. The upper line represents
the relation of loans to deposits and the lower
line the ratio of short-term U.S. Government
securities to deposits for all commercial
banks. The loan ratio is plotted on an in­
verted scale so that both lines reflect the
direction of change in liquidity.
The loan-deposit ratio is related to liquid­
ity only in an indirect way. On the assump­
tion that loans are nonliquid assets, a pro­
portionate rise in loans implies a proportion­
ate decline in other items assumed to be more
liquid. There is clearly an upward long-term
trend in loans as a percentage of deposits;
temporary shifts have been attributable more
to periods of rapid increase in deposits than
to reduction in loans.
Not all non-loan items are, in fact, liquid,
but Government securities maturing within a
year can be easily turned into cash through
either sale or redemption. In addition, such
items as Federal funds sales and one-day

Business Conditions, June 1964

"L iq u id a s s e t" ratios
near mid-1959 levels

per cent

per cent




loans to securities dealers as well as the
ability to buy Federal funds, borrow and even
offer negotiable certificates of deposit at rates
that will attract time money are important
elements of liquidity to some banks. These
may move inversely with holdings of short­
term Governments, especially over fairly
short periods. For the banking system as a
whole, however, the effects of these factors
tend to cancel out or be fairly constant over
time so that they do not importantly distort
short Governments as a measure of changes
in the liquidity of the banking system.
The center panel of the chart compares
the short-term Government securities ratio
for the weekly reporting member banks in
leading United States cities with a measure
that includes certain other identifiable sources
of liquidity—the latter consist of loans to
securities dealers, loans to domestic commer­
cial banks (Federal funds sales) and bal­
ances held with other commercial banks less
borrowings both at the discount window and
from other sources. For all weekly reporting
banks, movements of the two liquidity meas­
ures are strikingly similar and the spread be­
tween them fairly constant.
At the end of April both of these measures
were at levels near those prevailing about the
middle of 1959. The low point was reached
almost simultaneously with the upper turning
point of the last business cycle in mid-1960.
Both ratios rose rapidly in the following year
of reduced business activity and have gradu­
ally declined throughout the past three years
of business expansion.
The bottom panel of the chart shows
monthly variations in the broader liquidity
measure for New York and Chicago banks
since mid-1959 and for country banks on
midyear and end-of-year call dates. For banks
in other leading cities, this ratio is less vola­
tile but has the same general pattern and

9

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

10

average level as New York and
D eposit g ro w th exceeded
Chicago. For all country member
loan expansion at all commercial
banks the ratio is virtually identi­
banks since mid-1961
cal with that shown for the
Seventh District. Country banks
change june 1958-june I960
change june 1961-march 1964
show much less cyclical variation
billion dollars
billion dollars
•HO
+20
+30
440
+50
as well as a generally higher level
of these assets relative to deposits
than the city banks. The higher
level reflects, in part, larger inter­
bank balances; but their holdings
of short-term Governments at the
end of last year were also propor­
tionately greater than those of the
large banks.
Although the liquid asset ratio
at the city banks has declined
quite sharply from the 1961 peak,
deposits
it has changed very little in the
I
past year, remaining at a level
Treasury securities in bank portfolios.
well above the 1960 low. Moreover, there is
Other elements of liquidity are to some
substantially more liquidity in other parts of
extent offsetting. Acceptances held in bank
loan and investment portfolios and more
portfolios are almost five times the 1959 vol­
flexibility in reserve and earning asset man­
agement. These factors have made it feasible
ume. The amount of commercial paper out­
for city banks to operate with smaller “sec­
standing is more than double that of 1959 of
ondary” reserves, while increased costs on
which an undetermined proportion is held by
time and savings deposits provided a strong
banks. On the other hand, there is evidence
incentive to do so.
that many banks have increased their long­
All commercial banks hold about the same
term loans to business. Even these provide
inflows of funds through amortization.
amount of total U. S. Governments as in
mid-1959 but with a larger proportion in
R elatio n to in te re s t ra te s
short-term issues. Their holdings of state and
Trends in the actual liquidity position of
municipal securities are 75 per cent higher
the commercial banking system could be ex­
than five years ago, and available data on the
pected to be reflected in interest rates. But
composition of these securities indicates that
the relationships between the “liquidity ra­
for most banks 10 to 25 per cent mature
tios” and yields in the securities markets have
within a year, with the proportion of short
not shown consistent patterns either with re­
municipals highest at the large banks where
spect to levels or direction of change, as the
liquid asset ratios are lowest. Estimates of
table below illustrates. The overall ratio of
holdings of short state and local and U. S.
loans to deposits, for example, which stood
Government agency issues suggest that these
may now be equal to half of short-term direct
at 54 per cent at the end of 1959 when inter-




Business Conditions, June 1964

est rates were at a peak for that cycle, is
currently near 60 per cent despite a consider­
ably lower rate level.
While swings in short-term Governments
in relation to deposits correspond somewhat
more closely to rate changes, there is sub­
stantial variance in the rate levels associated
with a given liquid asset ratio and even in the
short-run direction of change. This is evi­
denced by the sharp decline in rates in the
first six months of 1960 when the ratios were
indicating a further decline in liquidity. With
approximately the same relationship be­
tween short Governments and deposits as ob­
tained late in 1959, rates are currently at
much lower levels.
Ratio to
Yields on
deposits
U.S. securities
Short Long 3-mo.
Loans Govts bonds bills
(per cent)
4.57
December 1959 54.0
7.4
4.32
4.2
2.39
56.7
3.97
June 1960
12.0
3.90
2.31
June 1961
55.3
3.50
6.5
4.20
March 1964
59.3
D ep osit tre n d im p o rtan t

Clearly, the need to convert liquid assets
into cash to meet loan demand depends in
large part on the trend of deposits. Individual
bank ratios are affected by the shifting of de­
posits among banks, but for all banks to­
gether deposit trends reflect the effects of
monetary policy and preferences of the pub­
lic for time deposits. So long as reserves ex­
pand sufficiently so that loans can be financed
by new deposit creation, liquidation of other
assets is not necessary.
Deposit growth has more than matched the
increase in loans at all commercial banks for
the current expansion period as a whole.
From mid-1961 through last March, deposits
rose more than 45 billion dollars— 5 billion
more than loans — although the relative



growth in loans was faster, as reflected in the
rising loan to deposit ratio. Although Gov­
ernment security holdings declined about 6
per cent in the final year of this period, this
was accompanied by a rise in holdings of
other securities as well as loans.
The current experience stands in sharp
contrast to the 1958-60 period of business
expansion (see chart). In the two-year
period ended in June 1960, the rise in loans
amounted to 20 billion dollars compared with
deposit growth of only 5 billion, a liquida­
tion of 10 billion dollars in Governments and
virtually no change in other securities. The
leveling off and decline in deposits in 1959
and early 1960 was a major factor that caused
a squeeze on banks in meeting their loan de­
mand. In part, this reflected the necessity to
limit bank reserves to keep yields from falling
below levels competitive with those abroad
for balance of payments reasons.
Largely because of deposit growth, but
also because of other sources of liquidity
(for example, large holdings of short-term
U. S. Agency and municipal securities), the
shrinkage in standard liquidity ratios is pro­
bably not indicative of the same pressure on
banks as when they were faced with the need
to reduce their investments sharply in order
to finance loan expansion in 1959-60.
During the past three years, total deposits
have risen at an annual rate of about 7 per
cent, even with the constraints placed on
monetary expansion by the deficit in the bal­
ance of international payments. If deposits
were to continue to rise at this rate, it would
be possible to accommodate a 12.5 per cent
loan growth in the next 12 months without
any absolute reduction in other assets—
roughly equal to the rise that has occurred
during the past year. Such a development
would, of course, result in a further decline in
the liquidity measures.

11

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

Slowing in savings deposit
growth and turnover?
ersonal savings deposits rose 3 per cent
at urban banks in the Seventh Federal Re­
serve District during the first quarter of
1964.1 While this gain was virtually the same
as that recorded during 1963, performance
among the areas of the Seventh District dif­
fered considerably. Banks in urban areas of
Indiana registered a deposit gain of 7 per
cent in the first quarter of this year, com­
pared with only 2 per cent in early 1963. In
the other four states, however, savings de­
posit growth during the first quarter of 1964
not only was much slower than in Indiana,
but it dropped to 2 per cent compared with 3
per cent during the same period of last year.
The sharp pick-up in growth of personal
savings deposits at Indiana banks is attrib­
utable mostly to recent increases in interest
rates. Since January 1 of this year, when the
state regulation was liberalized and brought
close to alignment with the limits applicable
elsewhere, nearly 80 per cent of the urban
banks in Indiana have announced rate in­
creases. Typically this has meant a move to
3V2 per cent on passbook accounts and 4 per
cent on time certificates of deposit (CDs)
from 3 per cent on both types of account.
Elsewhere in the District the number of banks
changing rates has been small, a comparable
wave of increases having taken place in 1962.
Personal savings deposits at Indiana banks

12

’In this article, unless stated otherwise, savings
deposits refer to individuals’ combined holdings of
“passbook” savings accounts and time certificates
of deposit at commercial banks in 51 metropolitan
and smaller urban centers in the Seventh District.




rose 3.1 per cent in January 1964 as against
0.4 per cent in January 1963. In March the
rise had dropped to 1.7 per cent but this was
still above the 1.3 per cent increase during
March 1963. If the pattern observed at other
times and in other areas following rate in­
creases develops, deposit gains will taper off
somewhat further in coming months.
In the 43 urban areas in Illinois, Iowa,
Michigan and Wisconsin, growth in personal
savings deposits during January also ex­
ceeded—on balance—the year-earlier rate.
The growth rates in February and March,
however, were below those of the same 1963
months.
Changes in deposits reflect the net effects
of deposit inflows and deposit withdrawals.
At times it is helpful to know whether a
change in balances has resulted largely from
changes in one or the other and if these
changes have been complementary or par­
tially offsetting.
In the 43 District areas outside of Indiana
gross inflow in March was down 1 per cent
from the 1963 month, while withdrawals
were up 9 per cent. This general pattern held
by and large in the major cities; declines in
gross inflow from a year earlier were reported
at 8 per cent in Chicago, 6 per cent in Mil­
waukee and 3 per cent in Detroit. These de­
creases in inflow occurred despite the boost
in personal disposable income resulting from
the income tax reduction.
On the other hand, at banks in most of the
smaller urban areas outside Indiana (31 of

Business Conditions, June 1964

the remaining 40 areas), gross inflow in
March was higher than in March 1963. In a
majority of them (35 of 43), withdrawals in
March exceeded the year-ago amounts.
Personal savings deposits at District banks
have at times been greatly affected by changes
in interest rates paid on these deposits (see
Business Conditions, May 1962). Some hold­
ers of savings deposits are responsive to rela­
tive yields. Therefore, a question arises:
were net inflows into savings accounts down
in March because of increased personal

spending or because of rate-related switches
into other assets?
S a vin g s d e p o sits v s. o th e r savin g s

Total individual holdings of liquid saving
include not only savings deposits but hold­
ings of currency, demand deposits, mutual
savings bank deposits, savings and loan and
credit union shares, postal savings certifi­
cates, savings bonds and short-term Govern­
ment securities. Total personal financial sav­
ing includes, in addition to liquid saving, net
acquisitions by individuals of
shares of stock, build-ups of
equity in life insurance and pen­
C om position of financial
sion plans and net reductions in
saving of individuals
mortgage, instalment and other
indebtedness (see chart).
Net inflow into liquid assets
change during 4 th guarter 1963
billion dollars,seasonally adjusted annual rate
held
by all individuals in the
-5
0
+5
+10
+15
+20
---------- ----------------1--------“ I--------------- 1-------------1-----------1
United States was at a seasonally
1208
Financial A ssets:
adjusted annual rate of 31 billion
358
liquid saving
dollars during the fourth quarter
77
demand deposits & currency
of 1963; this compares with 39
90
savings accounts at commercial
billion dollars in the fourth quar­
142
savings accounts at savings institi
ter of 1962. The averages for the
49
U.S. savings bonds
first three quarters of 1962 and
1963 were close—around 27 bil­
850
non-liquid saving
lion.
103
life insurance reserves
The proportion of liquid saving
118
pension fund reserves
represented by additions to sav­
25
U.S. Government securities*
ings accounts at banks dropped
32
state and local obligations
from 27 per cent in late 1962 to
523
corporate bonds and stocks
17 per cent in the fourth quarter
49
other financial assets
of 1963—lower than in any quar­
275
Financial Liabilities:
ter since mid-1956. The decline in
individual preferences for savings
181
mortgage debt
deposits relative to other forms of
70
consumer credit
liquid saving was accompanied by
8
security credit
a rise in the proportion of liquid
15
other financial liabilities
saving channeled into savings and
933
Net Financial Saving
loan asso ciatio n s and cred it
*lncludes short-term issues which may be classified as "liquid".
unions (see chart on page 14).
to ta l

at

year-end 1963

i




(billion

dollars)

13

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

Net additions to life insurance and pension
reserves changed only slightly during 1963.
Net acquisitions of securities and mortgages
moved irregularly, and in the final three quar­
ters of 1963 were somewhat above early
1963 and most of 1962. This increase in sav­
ing in non-liquid assets was in contrast to the
decrease in saving in liquid form. Amounts
added by individuals to all financial assets,
including the liquid component, were at a
seasonally adjusted annual rate of 49 billion
dollars in the fourth quarter of 1963, down
from the 56 billion dollar annual rate in the
fourth quarter of 1962 but slightly higher
than the average rate for all of 1963.
Borrowing by individuals to purchase
homes, automobiles and other goods and
services rose during 1962 and remained at a

D ifference between liquid saving
and net financial saving larger
in 1963 than in most earlier years

high level during most of 1963. Individuals
thus continued to borrow heavily while add­
ing less to financial assets. As a result, net
financial saving dropped to 17 billion dollars
in 1963 from 22 billion the year before.
As a ratio of disposable income, financial
saving also was lower in 1963 than in the pre­
ceding year. The ratio in 1962 was as high as
7 per cent—in the first and fourth quarters—
but it did not go above 5 per cent during
1963. Hence the residual factor, the propor­
tion of income spent, went up. Increases in
the spending rate often occur during periods
of rising business activity.
These developments in late 1963 suggest
that recent changes in savings deposit net in­
flow may have resulted as much from shifts
in saving among different types of assets as
from variations in cash flows from income
and spending. The combination of increased
confidence in the stability of income and an
increase, albeit moderate, in market rates of
interest, have undoubtedly continued to exert
a downward pull on savings deposits, as in
1963.

billion dollars

T u rn o ver re m a in s low

1953

14

1955

1957

1959

1961

1963

^Revision of regulation permitting higher rates to be
paid on time deposits.




To the extent that savings deposits repre­
sent an accumulation of long-term savings,
their turnover could be expected to be fairly
low. In March 1964, personal savings de­
posits at banks in the District’s urban areas
turned over at a seasonally adjusted annual
rate of 0.49, or about once in two years. This
contrasts with the markedly greater rate of
30.1 times per year for demand deposits at
337 urban centers in the nation (outside New
York).
Moreover, savings deposit turnover at the
Seventh District banks was lower in 1963 and
in early 1964 than in most other recent years
(see chart). Thus, the sizable transfers of
funds from demand deposits to savings ac-

Business Conditions, June 1964

T u rn o v e r of savings deposits
has remained low in 1964
annual rate

annual rate

further support to the notion that total sav­
ings deposits include large idle balances to
which depositors are willing to give up im­
mediate accessibility in return for a higher
rate of interest.2
Turnover of savings deposits
(annual rate, n o t seasonally adjusted)
March
March
1963
1964
8 Indiana areas
P assbook........................... 0.328
0.398
Time C D s ......................... 0.330
0.097
Total, savings deposits . . 0.328
0.360
43 areas outside of Indiana
P assb ook ........................... 0.494
Time C D s ........................ 0.454
Total, savings deposits . . 0.492

^Reflects in part debit and inflow transactions from
transfers from time certificates to savings accounts after
several banks in Detroit began to offer the same maximum
rates on both types of account.

counts that occurred in 1962 evidently in­
volved mainly balances that had been sub­
stantially “idle” and did not lead to any rise
in the overall rate of savings deposit use.
Lower turnover in 1963 and early 1964 is
in part a reflection of the increase in the pro­
portion of individuals’ savings in the form of
time certificates. For banks in all 51 urban
District areas combined, the ratio of time cer­
tificates to total personal holdings climbed
from 3 per cent at the end of 1961 to 8 per
cent at the end of 1963. Gains recorded in
some areas were substantially greater than
the average—several in Iowa and Wisconsin
went from 3 per cent or less to more than 20
per cent over this period. The shift from pass­
book accounts to time certificates lends



0.481
0.510
0.484

The transfer of funds out of passbook ac­
counts into time CDs to obtain higher interest
shows up in the March 1964 turnover figures
for Indiana banks. Turnover of passbook ac­
counts at these banks was greater this March
than a year earlier, while the turnover in time
CDs was down substantially from the 1963
month.
Outside of Indiana turnover trends ran
just the opposite to those within that state.
Time certificates held by individuals at banks
in the 43 areas turned over in March at a
higher rate than in March 1963, while turn­
over in passbook accounts declined. The rate
of turnover in the combined total of the two
types—passbooks plus CDs—was also down.
The performance of personal CDs in
March is especially interesting in view of the
1.2 billion dollar sale of American Telephone
and Telegraph Company stock and the possi­
bility that some portion of the increase in
turnover of CDs can be traced to this source.
2For further explanation of types of time accounts
see Business Conditions, May 1962 and October
1963.

15

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

Certificates of deposit
purchased by individ­
Pe rso n a l sa ving s deposits at banks in urban areas
uals are often of large
of the Seventh District
size and may be more
51
sensitive than “pass­
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Michigan
Wisconsin
Urban Areas
b o o k ” deposits to
(million dollars)
yield differentials on
G r o s s in f lo w , first quarter
alternative assets. The
1961
102
509
581
50
114
1,356
March results for CDs
1962
101
893
78
895
165
2,133
appear to confirm
1963
111
105
62
730
137
1,811
bankers’ reports that
1964
849
191
72
738
151
1,999
savings deposit activ­
W i t h d r a w a l s , first quarter
ity during the month
40
1961
531
78
455
118
1,222
was affected markedly
1962
595
58
81
707
151
1,592
by the AT&T stock
620
1963
86
53
610
121
1,490
sale.
1964
130
736
57
588
1,644
133
One immediate ef­
B a l a n c e s , December 31
fect of the recent re­
1961
4,390
790
341
3,173
920
9,614
duction in F ed eral
1962
5,377
389
843
3,666
1,017
11,293
personal income taxes
6,052
1963
885
421
4,052
1,108
12,518
apparently has been to
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
,
change
December
31
to
March
31
spur debt repayments.
(per cent
While individuals have
1.2
1961
3.2
2.9
1.9
0.4
1.5
been in cu rrin g new
1962
5.9
6.8
2.5
5.9
1.6
5.6
debt, they have chosen
1963
2.9
2.1
2.3
3.3
1.6
2.8
to clear up, to an even
1964
1.9
6.9
3.5
2.9
3.7
1.6
greater extent, certain
*lncludes "passbook" savings accounts and individuals holdings of time certificates of
of their outstanding
deposit.
o blig atio n s. Also it
seems that in April, in­
dividuals responded to
the added income from
their March level. Over the long pull, the tax
the tax reduction by stepping up additions to
cut should, among other things, bolster confi­
time CDs; savings deposit growth at large
dence in the further growth and stability of
Seventh District banks had slackened during
March but in April it accelerated. While de­
personal income and hence lead to some low­
ering in the share of saving in liquid form. If
posit flows during April tend to be markedly
past experience is a guide, the addition to in­
affected by divergent seasonal influences, they
usually are down during the month. Total re­
come attributable to the tax cut will flow
predominantly into current spending.
tail sales in April remained approximately at
*

)

—

16