View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

a n eco n o m ic re v ie w b y th e r e d e ra l n e s e rv e B a n k or Um cago




Review and outlook: 1975-76
Last year the U.S. economy shook off
the forces that had led to the most
severe recession since World War II.
The expansion that began last spring
retained strong momentum early in
1976. Bountiful harvests o f the past
year replaced the disappointing
yields o f 1974. A record annual
foreign trade surplus succeeded a
large deficit. Businesses, financial in­
stitutions, and individuals rebuilt im­
paired liquidity positions and
prepared themselves for new ventures
in an environment o f restored
confidence.




The unresolved economic issues
early in 1976, in broad outline, are the
same as a year ago: inflation, un­
employment, pollution abatement,
access to raw materials, and uneasy
international relationships. Each o f
these problems, however, has
moderated in severity. Moreover,
trust in the future has been fortified
by the knowledge that the un­
precedented calamities o f 1974 and
early 1975 were weathered successful­
ly and were followed by a broad-based
recovery, with the basic strength and
resilience o f the U.S. economy intact.
Business: recovery well
under way

3

Agriculture: a year of contrasts

11

International: world economy
turns upward

15

Economic events in
1975—a chronology

16

Government: income supports

21

Finance: market pressures ease

24

Ahead: prospect for
expansion

31

Subscriptions to Business Conditions are available to the public free of charge. For
information concerning bulk mailings, address inquiries to Research Department,
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, P. O. Box 834, Chicago, Illinois 60690.
Articles may be reprinted provided source is credited. Please provide the bank’s
Research Department with a copy of any material in which an article is reprinted.

Business Conditions, February 1976

3

Review and outlook 1S
Business: recovery well under way
The business expansion that started in the
spring o f 1975 retained substantial
momentum early in 1976. Fears expressed
in December that the recovery was falter­
ing and might “ abort” appeared illfounded.
The recession that began on a broad
front in the fall o f 1974 proved to be the
deepest and most traumatic since the
1930s. The upswing that followed has been
rapid and pervasive. Virtually all sectors
have scored gains in the past six to eight
m onths—although o f widely varying
magnitudes—and look to further gains in
1976.
All business recessions since World
War II have been dominated by a shift
from inventory accumulation to liquida­
tion. Such a shift occurred in massive
proportions from the fourth quarter of 1974
to the first quarter o f 1975. In addition,
purchases o f many finished products by
consumers and businesses declined during
this period and construction activity, led
by residential building, also dropped.
Finally, many state and local govern­
ments were forced to curtail services to
the public.
Production and sales of both consumer
and producer durable goods outstripped
the general economy both in the boom of
1973 and in the subsequent recession. In
the current upswing, durables have lagged
the rest of the economy. These phenomena
are typical o f past business cycles.
Manufacturing in the Seventh District
states of Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan,
and Wisconsin is concentrated in durable
goods. With 16 percent of the nation’s pop­
ulation they produce 25 percent o f its




durable goods and about one-third of its
producer equipment. These states led the
nation both in prosperity and recession,
and major centers in these states con­
tinued to experience substantial un­
employment early in 1976.

Forecasters on target
In contrast to 1974 when most projec­
tions overshot the mark, the “ standard
forecast” offered at the start of 1975 proved
to be reasonably accurate, at least for
broad measures. Some sectors—notably
residential construction and steel—failed
to match expectations.
Department of Commerce estimates
show total output adjusted for price change
(real GNP) down 2 percent for 1975 as a
whole, about the same as the decline in
1974 and about as expected. Never before
since World War II has real GNP declined
in two successive years. Price inflation,
measured by the GNP deflator, was 9 per­
cent year-to-year, down from 10 percent in
1974. Unemployment averaged about 8.5
percent, up from 5.6 percent, and the
highest since 1941.
This y ea r’ s econ om ic forecasts,
whether based on relatively informal
judgments or on elaborate econometric
models, reveal an unusual tendency to
cluster in a narrow range. Substantial
growth is expected to continue through the
year, while inflation moderates further.
Unemployment is expected to decline
again but to remain uncomfortably high.
More specifically, real GNP growth is pro­
jected at about 6 percent, inflation at about
6 percent, and the average unemployment

4

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

Significant growth with less
inflation seen for 1976
GNP, percent change
from previous year

dollar
gain
real
gain

‘ Estimate

rate at about 7.5 percent.
While gratifying, this consensus
forecast for 1976 leaves the economy well
below levels associated with reasonably
full employment o f people and resources.
Moreover, the relative price stability of the
early 1960s remains an elusive goal.

Shortages change to surpluses
Throughout 1973 and most o f 1974
purchasing managers were plagued with a
long list o f items in short supply. Fuel,
metals, paper, plastics, chemicals, and
com ponents for equipment—virtually
everything—could be obtained only after
abnormally long waits, and premium
prices often were paid for immediate
availability. Problems snowballed because
many buyers duplicated orders and added
reserve stocks when possible. Efficiency of
production and distribution was under­
mined. These developments compounded
underlying inflationary pressures.
Complaints o f shortages diminished
rapidly in late 1974 and early 1975 as new
orders for manufactured goods dropped
sharply. The desire to obtain any available




supplies gave way to inventory liquidation
and hand-to-mouth buying. Lead times on
new orders declined drastically and many
items again were available o ff the shelf. By
the spring of 1975 the list o f items in short
supply was confined largely to natural gas
and a few materials and components.
Unplanned inventory accumulations
continued in many sectors in late 1974 and
early 1975, until production could be
brought into line. Then a broad inventory
liquidation began, which reached its
fastest pace in the second quarter o f 1975.
Production declined much more than sales
to final users. But general inventory li­
quidation can never continue indefinitely.
As industry after industry completed ad­
justments, laid-off workers were recalled
an d ou p u t w as increased. These
developments were evident in soft goods,
such as textiles and apparel, as early as
March and April. However, inventories
were still being pared in some lines,
notably steel, in early 1976.
The buyers’ market of 1975 was more
apparent at the wholesale level than at
retail. Rapid increases in worker compen­
sation, construction costs, insurance rates,
transportation charges, and prices o f other
services resulted in a further rise in the
general price level—less than in 1974 but
significantly more than in earlier years.

Consumer outlays boost activity
Consumption spending accounts for
almost two-thirds of GNP, and these out­
lays are closely related to current income.
Despite depressed economic conditions,
personal income was up 8 percent in 1975,
not much less than in other recent years.
Wages and salaries were up only 5 percent,
but transfer payments, which include
social security and unem ploym ent
benefits, were up 25 percent and accounted
for more than one-third of the rise in total
personal income. Disposable income, aided
by the tax reduction, was up 9.5 percent for

Business Conditions, February 1976

1975, even more than in 1974. In constant
dollars total disposable income hit a new
high last year after declining slightly in
1974 when inflation more than offset
nominal gains.
Increases in compensation and reduc­
tions in income taxes brought an 8.6 per­
cent rise in average spendable (after-tax)
weekly earnings o f workers in the private
nonfarm economy last year—the largest
rise in over 25 years, although slightly less
than the rise in consumer prices. Many
workers received increases in wages and
benefits o f 10 to 12 percent or more. Social
security recipients were granted an 8 per­
cent cost-of-living boost at midyear.
Consumption spending of individuals
did not rise as much as their spendable in­
come in 1975. The savings rate rose to 8.3
percent, up from 7.5 percent in 1974, and
the highest since 1946. The higher savings
rate also reflected a reluctance to use in­
stalment debt, usually associated with the
purchase o f autos, furniture, and
appliances. Unit purchases of these big
ticket items were down sharply last year.

Prices rise further
In December the Consumer Price In­
dex (CPI) was 7 percent above the yearearlier level and up 43 percent in five years.
It had doubled in 20 years and quadrupled
in 35 years. While far from a satisfactory
performance, last year’s rise in prices com­
pares favorably with the rise of more than
12 percent from December 1973 to
December 1974. Food and other com­
modities rose 6.5 percent during 1975,
about half as much as in 1974. Prices of ser­
vices rose 8 percent.
Although retail food prices declined
early in 1975, mainly reflecting lower meat
prices, the overall CPI increased each
month. The year as a whole averaged 9 per­
cent higher, less than the 11 percent for
1974 but much more than in any other re­
cent year. Trends suggest that price infla-




5

Consumer price inflation
moderated in 1975
percent, 1967=100

1969

1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

tion will moderate again in 1976. Most
forecasters expect consumer prices to
average 6 to 7 percent higher than last
year.
Prices of wholesale commodities were
only 4 percent higher in December than a
year earlier, compared to a 21 percent rise
in the previous 12 months. Farm product
prices were slightly lower, whole industrial
commodities were up 6 percent. The less
rapid rise in wholesale prices in 1975
reflected much larger crops, a smaller rise
in fuel prices, the shift from sellers’ to
buyers’ markets, and the fact that prices of
m any manufactured products surged
following the end o f price controls in May
1974.
Most wholesale markets continued to
be bu yers’ m arkets in early 1976.
Nevertheless, producers were raising
prices wherever possible to improve profit
margins despite substantial excess capaci­
ty in their industries because of rising costs
of labor and other inputs.
Both the CPI and the GNP deflator are
much less volatile than the wholesale price
index. The CPI and the deflator incor­
porate additional costs of transportation
and marketing, and they include prices of

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

6

Payroll employment rose
rapidly after midyear
percent, 1967=100

T in

............ .. . n 11 ■11 ■11 ■■■i ■■i ■■ 11111111 ■■111 ■11111 ■i ■

1969

1970

1971

1972

1973

i i 11 i n i i i n 11 i i i

1974

1975

services not covered in the wholesale in­
dex, which covers only commodities.

Employment and unemployment
Nonfarm wage and salary employ­
ment totaled almost 78 million in
December, up about 1.5 million from the
June low but still about 1 million short of
the record high reached in September 1974.
The failure of employment to regain the
earlier peak reflects the fact that economic
activity has not yet fully recovered ground
lost in the recession. In addition, employ­
ment gains were restricted by the lengthen­
ing of workweeks and by rapid increases in
output per man-hour associated with the
early stages of a recovery.
Unemployment was 7.7 million in
December—8.3 percent of the civilian labor
force. This was down from 8.3 million, or
8.9 percent, in May. For all of 1975 the un­
employment rate averaged 8.5 percent,
compared with 5.6 percent in 1974, and 3.5
percent in the late 1960s when job markets
were very strong. Last year’s unemploy­




ment rate was the highest since 1941,
before the demands of World War II
created a labor shortage.
Agricultural employment averaged 3.4
million in 1975, slightly less than in 1974
and only half the level o f 25 years ago.
Better equipment and improved techni­
ques have enabled farmers to increase
production with fewer workers to a much
greater extent than in other industries.
The armed forces averaged 2.2 million
last year, only slightly less than in 1974. In
1968, before the Vietnam war was scaled
down, the armed forces numbered 3.5
million. Unemployment rates since then
have partly reflected reduced requirements
of the armed forces.
Manufacturing employment averaged
18.3 million, compared to 20 million in both
1973 and 1974. Manufacturing employ­
ment reached an all-time peak in December
1973 at 20.4 million, nine months before
the high in total payroll employment. Its
low occurred in June 1975 at 18.1 million,
the same month that total payroll employ­
ment reached a low. Only about 500,000 of
the jobs in manufacturing had been
recovered by December. Each recession

Unemployment receded from
peak reached in May
percent

Business Conditions, February 1976

Productivity boost slowed rise
in costs and prices
percent change

has witnessed the retirement of older
facilities that typically require more
workers than newer installations.

Nondurables lead the upswing
Manufacturing output in physical
units, as measured by the Industrial
Production Index, was down 10 percent in
1975, the largest year-to-year drop since
the conversion to civilian output following
World War II. Factory output declined
about 1 percent in 1974. As in the case of
real GNP, the two-year drop in manufac­
turing was unprecedented in previous postWorld War II recessions.
The manufacturing index reached its
all-time peak of 127 (1967=100) in No­
vember 1973, just after the Arab oil em­
bargo was proclaimed. Through the first
nine months of 1974 manufacturing
remained within 2 percent o f the peak, but
a sharp decline began in the fourth
quarter. From September 1974 to March
1975 total manufacturing dropped 14 per­
cent, one of the most drastic six-month
declines on record, with durables off 15 per­
cent and nondurables off 13 percent.
From March to December last year




7

manufacturing rose 9 percent—a very
respectable recovery. The rebound was
steeper than had been expected, just as the
decline had been greater than expected.
Nondurables—including textiles, apparel,
paper, and food—led the upswing. By
December nondurable manufacturing was
within 1 percent o f its September 1974
level. However, durable goods—including
steel, vehicles, and equipment—were still
10 percent below September 1974, and total
manufacturing was still off 6 percent.
Virtually all manufacturers expect
gains in output next year. With inventory
liquidation programs already largely com­
pleted, it would be quite possible for new
highs in total factory output to be achieved
before the end of 1976 if, as expected, the
general expansion continues.

Steel hard hit
Few basic industries were affected as
severely by the recession as steel. In 1974
shipments of finished steel were almost
110 million tons, only 2 million tons below
the 1973 record. Steel imports added 16
million tons to domestic supplies.
Most forecasts at the end of 1974 es-

Soft goods led the rebound
in factory output
percent, 1967=100

T . ■ . i . . . i ■ .......... .. . . . i . . . i . . . i
1969

1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

8

timated steel shipments would decline only
about 10 percent in 1975. Forecasts of
shipments were revised downward in
several steps. Actual shipments totaled
only 80 million tons, down 27 percent to the
lowest level since 1963. Imports declined in
proportion to about 12 million tons. Output
of steel mills dropped only 20 percent
because the mills rebuilt inventories that
had been depleted in 1974 to satisfy user
demands.
In both 1973 and 1974 steel users in­
creased their holdings of steel substantial­
ly. Last year they liquidated steel inven­
tories at an even faster rate. Some users
were still cutting holdings early in 1976.
Demand for steel, at least for lighter
products, was stimulated artificially last
September in anticipation o f a price in­
crease that took effect October 1. As a
result, shipments dropped back in the
fourth quarter.
Early in 1976 steel producers reported
substantial increases in bookings, es­
pecially from manufacturers of motor
vehicles and other consumer goods. For the
year as a whole shipments are expected to
reach the 95 to 98 million ton range with
imports also increasing somewhat.
Profits of steel companies declined
sharply in 1975. Also, some estimates of
steel demand in the next few years have
been revised downward. As a result, a
number of companies, but not all, an­
nounced postponements of capital expen­
diture plans pending a clarification of pre­
sent uncertainties.

1973 to 7.3 million in 1974 and to 6.7 million
last year. Except for 1970, which was
depressed by the General Motors strike, car
output last year was the lowest since 1961.
Truck production dropped from 3
million in 1973 to 2.7 million in 1974 and to
2.2 million last year, which was the lowest
since 1971. Sales and production o f heavy
trucks and trailers were especially hard hit
last year, and had not recovered much by
year-end. Operators had purchased heavy
trucks in excess of their needs in 1974 in an­
ticipation of a federal regulation, effective
March 1, 1975, that required all newly
produced heavy trucks and trailers to be
equipped with expensive and complicated
new brake systems.
Inventories of cars and trucks had
been very large relative to sales at the end
of 1974, and production was cut sharply to
bring these stocks into line. Sales of
“domestic” cars, including net imports
from Canada, totaled 7.1 million in 1975,
down from 7.5 million in 1974 and a high of
9.7 million in 1973. Sales of imported cars,
led by Japanese models, rose in 1975 and
accounted for a record 18 percent of the 8.6
million cars sold in the United States.

Major midwest industries are
recovering from recession lows
percent, 1967=100
FRB index

m o to r

Motor vehicles down again
Sales and output of cars and trucks
declined sharply in 1975 for the second
straight year following the record levels of
1973. Nevertheless, the picture improved
substantially as the year progressed, and
further gains are expected for 1976.
Assemblies of passenger gars in the
United States slipped from 9.7 million in




X
H j

GM strike
1

1

1969

I

I

I

I

1970

I

I

I

I

1971

I

I

I

I

1972

l

I

I

I

1973

I

I

I

I

1974

I

I

I

I

1975

i

Business Conditions, February 1976

The auto companies are confident of
big gains in sales of both cars and trucks
next year with sales o f cars, including im­
ports, expected to total about 10 million,
while sales o f trucks approach 3 million.
All auto producers are engaged in vast
retooling programs to produce smaller,
lighter, fuel-conserving cars, some of
which are offered in the current model
year.

Lower spending on capital goods
Business outlays on new plant and
equipment increased 1 percent in 1975 to
$113.5 billion, extending a string of annual
gains starting in 1961. After adjustment
for higher prices, however, capital spend­
ing declined about 10 percent last year.
Thus, the capital goods boom that started
in 1972 came to an abrupt halt. A govern­
ment survey released in January indicated
that capital spending will rise 5.5 percent
in 1976 in current dollars. But if, as
respondents expect, prices rise almost as
much as last year, capital spending in real
terms will decline again in 1976—by about
4 percent.

Plant and equipment outlays
declined in real terms
billion dollars

9

In 1973 it appeared that the capital
spending upswing had enough momentum
to carry it for additional years. Most in­
dustries had broad plans to expand capaci­
ty to eliminate bottlenecks for the goods
and services they produced. In addition,
large appropriations had been made to
modernize and replace older facilities to in­
crease efficiency and profitability and also
to comply with regulations to reduce pollu­
tion and eliminate dangers to workers.
The energy crisis and the subsequent
business recession, which increased
margins o f unused capacity and reduced
profits, caused many firms to cancel orders
for equipment already booked, and to post­
pone or scale down future capital spending
plans. Cancellations and stretchouts of
capital spending plans were still being an­
nounced late in 1975, with the steel and oil
industries as prominent examples.
Plant and equipm ent spending
equaled 8 percent o f GNP in 1974, up from
7.6 percent in 1973. This ratio had been
about 8.5 percent in the mid-1950s and
again in 1966. Last year the ratio dropped
to 7.6 percent, and present prospects
suggest a further decline to 7.1 percent in
1976, the lowest since the early 1960s.
If the general expansion continues,
business executives may reinstate some of
the programs deferred over the past year
and a half. But a significant rise in real out­
lays does not appear likely until the second
half of 1976 is well along.

Construction and housing

1967 ’68 ’69 ’70 ’71 ’72 ’73 ’74 ’75 ’76*

‘ Estimate




Total construction outlays amounted
to $131 billion in 1975, down 3.5 percent
from 1974. Outlays on both residential and
nonresidential private construction were
sharply lower last year, while public out­
lays were somewhat higher. In real terms,
however, all the major sectors showed
declines. Costs rose about 9 percent for
residential construction and about 11 per­
cent for other construction, not as much as

10

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

Housing is expected to revive,
ending three-year slump
million units
3

■mobile
homes
apartments
single­
family
1967’68 ’69 ’70 ’71 ’72 ’73 ’74 ’7 5 ’76*

‘ Estimate

in 1974, but still very rapid rates by past
standards.
A fter adjustm ent for inflation,
residential construction outlays have
declined each year since the peak year
1972. Last year the adjusted value of
residential construction was down 18 per­
cent from 1974 and down 41 percent from
1972. Real outlays on other private struc­
tures were down 13 percent from 1974 and
down 18 percent from the peak year 1973.
Housing starts totaled less than 1.2
million last year, down from a record 2.4




million in 1972 and the lowest since 1946.
Apartment building was particularly
weak. Mobile home shipments, which have
sometimes partially offset declines in con­
ventional housing, dropped to 220,000 last
year, down from 570,000 in both 1972 and
1973 and the lowest number in a decade.
Employment in construction averaged
less than 3.5 million in 1975,14 percent less
than in the peak year 1973. Average
workweeks also were reduced. In some
areas, building trades unions reported 25
percent or more of their members un­
employed. Nevertheless, substantial in­
cre a se s in w ages are still being
implemented under three-year contracts.
The outlook for construction remained
bleak as 1976 began. Overbuilding in some
areas, especially o f office buildings and
condominiums, was still apparent. Heavy
inflows of funds to thrift institutions and
expanded government housing programs
suggested, however, that residential
m ortgage financing would be more
available. Most forecasts of housing starts
called for a significant gain this year, but
only to about 1.5 million. Prospects for in­
dustrial and commercial building remain
very poor. Public construction, especially
for sewer and water projects and
highways, will rise as present programs
are implemented.

11

Business Conditions, February 1976

Agriculture: a year of contrasts
Agricultural conditions changed markedly
over the course of 1975. Net realized farm
income fell to a low level during the first
half of the year, and the boom in farmland
values slowed appreciably. Livestock pro­
ducers remained in the midst of a prolong­
ed financial squeeze, in large part due to
the high feed prices that followed the
weather-plagued 1974 crop harvest. Crop
prices, although high at the start of the
year, trended downward during most of the
first half. Conditions changed abruptly by
midyear, however. Markedly lower meat
supplies stemming from earlier production
adjustments sent livestock prices to new
highs during the second half of the year.
Crop prices strengthened materially when
it became apparent that the impact from a
record domestic harvest would be cushion­
ed by a severe shortfall in Russia.

Farm prices and income
recovered in the second half
percent, 1967=100

billion dollars

40 f net realized farm income

Although farm prices retreated late in
the year, the more profitable developments
of the second half offset much of the
depressed first-half conditions. On bal­
ance, cash receipts from farm marketings
in 1975 were about equal with the 1974
record, even though prices received by
farmers averaged slightly lower. Increased
production expenses—in part reflecting
higher prices paid for chemicals, fertilizer,
and seed—lowered net realized farm in­
come to an estimated $23-24 billion, down
from $27.7 billion in 1974 but still the third
highest level on record.

Financial trends parallel income
The financial picture for farmers was
also characterized by marked contrasts
during the past year. During the first part
of 1975 conditions were extremely tight as
both the financially squeezed livestock
producers and the crop farmers who bore
the brunt of the short 1974 crop harvest
had difficulties meeting debt repayment
schedules. Their plight, however, was
eased somewhat by the sharp increase in
loan renewals and extensions accom­
modated by commercial lenders and the
marked expansion in emergency disaster
and livestock loans provided by the
Farm ers Home Administration. But
perhaps most significantly, the financial
squeeze was eased by the recovery in farm
prices and incomes during the second half.
Preliminary estimates indicate farm
debt outstanding rose nearly 11 percent
last year, reaching a new high of $91
billion. The rise in farm real estate debt
paced the overall increase, in part reflect­
ing the continuing strength in farmland
values. Although the rate of increase in

nl ili
i ini
I

II III
1973

IV

‘Estimate




I

II III
1974

IV

I

II III
1975

IV*

12

farmland values slowed appreciably dur­
ing the early part of 1975, sharp increases
during the latter half of the year boosted
the rise for all o f 1975 to an estimated 14
percent. Land values in district states
paced the overall gain, rising 22 percent.

Food price increases slow
Increases in food prices continued at a
rapid pace last year, but the rate o f gain
slowed substantially from that of the
previous two years. The 1975 index of retail
prices for food consumed at home rose 8.3
percent above the 1974 level, about onehalf the gains posted in the previous two
years. The increase reflected a combina­
tion of higher livestock prices, higher
processing and distribution costs, and
somewhat lower supplies of food. Paced by
the cutback in available meat supplies, per
capita food consumption declined 1 per­
cent last year.
Higher charges for labor and transpor­
tation continued to boost the costs of
processing and distributing food which,
overall, account for about two-thirds of
consumer food expenditures. Hourly earn­
ings of workers in both food manufac­
turing firms and grocery stores averaged
about 10 percent above the year-earlier
level during the first three quarters of 1975.
Evidence of higher transportation charges
was reflected in the more than 13 percent
rise in rail freight charges for food
products in 1975.

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

percent above the level in 1970. Most
observers had expected it would take a
minimum of two years to halt the growth in
the cattle inventory, but an unprecedented
volume of slaughter accomplished the feat
in one year. The number o f cows and nonfed steers and heifers slaughtered in 1975
exceeded the high year-earlier level by
more than one-half, while the slaughter of
calves was up by three-fourths. In contrast,
fed cattle slaughter fell to the lowest level
since the mid-sixties and accounted for
only about one-half o f total commercial
cattle slaughter as opposed to threefourths in a more typical year.
The drastically changed composition
of cattle marketed, coupled with the incen­
tive to economize on high-cost feed resulted
in markedly lower average slaughter
weights. As a result, beef production was
up less than 4 percent from the year-earlier
level, even though total cattle slaughter in
1975 was up 11 percent.
The marginal increase in beef produc­
tion was more than offset by a dramatic
cutback in pork production. Hog inven­
tories at the beginning of 1975 were at a
nine-year low and falling rapidly. Sharply
c u r ta ile d fa r r o w in g s reduced the
December 1974-May 1975 pig crop to a 40-

Livestock prices shot to new
highs after a depressive first half
dollars per cwt.

Major livestock adjustments
The short 1974 grain harvest man­
dated major adjustments in livestock
production. Nevertheless, most observers
were surprised by the rapidity and the
magnitude of the changes recorded during
the past year. The nation’s inventory of
cattle had been expanding rapidly during
the early seventies and at the start of 1975
numbered 132 million head, more than 17




1973

1974

1975

Business Conditions, February 1976

year low, setting the stage for exceptional­
ly short pork supplies in the latter half of
the year. Overall, the number of hogs
slaughtered in 1975 fell to a 35-year low,
reducing pork production some 17 percent
from the 1974 level.
R elatively h igh livestock prices
coupled with lower feed prices support
prospects for somewhat larger supplies of
both beef and pork in 1976. The movement
of cattle into feedlots picked up sharply
during the latter part of 1975, boosting the
year-end inventory of cattle on feed 28 per­
cent above the low year-earlier level. If the
trend continues, as expected, fed cattle
slaughter would register significant gains
throughout most o f 1976. Beef supplies will
continue to be augmented by a large
volume o f cow and nonfed steer and heifer
slaughter, although this component of
total beef production is expected to trend
downward from recent highs during most
of 1976.
Although pork production will remain
well below year-ago levels during most of
the first half, supplies will be more abun­
dant than during the summer of 1975.
Moreover, a recent report o f farrowing in­
tentions portends year-to-year gains in
pork production during the second half of
1976. Most observers anticipate the
second-half gains will more than offset the
first-half declines.
Dairy farmers were also confronted by
high feed prices early last year which, in
conjunction with seasonally declining
milk prices, squeezed operating margins.
But during the second half of the year, milk
prices received by farmers rose from the
June low o f $7.94 per hundredweight to
$10.20 by year-end, up from $8.25 a year
earlier. Total milk production for all of
1975 about equaled the comparatively low
levels of the previous two years.
D airy farmers can expect more
favorable returns in 1976 if feed prices re­
main relatively low. Although milk prices
will decline seasonally during the early




13

part of the year, the milk/feed price ratio
should hold well above year-earlier levels,
an occurrence that w ould support
prospects for marginal increases in milk
production.

Recovery in crop production
Feed grain and soybean supplies were
substantially below year-earlier levels
following the disasterous fall harvest in
1974. Com supplies were down 19 percent,
while soybean supplies were down 13 per­
cent. The reduced supplies necessitated
major reductions in both domestic utiliza­
tion and exports. For the marketing year
that ended September 30, 1975, domestic
utilization o f com fell 21 percent—
reflecting the cutback in livestock feeding
activity—while exports o f corn declined
nearly 8 percent. Domestic utilization of
soybeans during the year ending August
31,1975 declined 13 percent, while soybean
exports—in the face of relatively large
world supplies of competitive oilseeds—fell
2 2 percent.
Despite the short supplies crop prices
generally trended downward during the
first half. Evidence that the adjustments in
livestock production would be sufficient to
stretch the available feed supplies pro-

Prices strengthened at midyear
due to Russian crop failure
dollars per bushel

14

vided the bulk of the downward pressures
during the early part of the year. The down­
ward momentum was reinforced by an
ideal spring planting season that buoyed
early hopes for a record 1975 crop harvest.
The downtrend reversed abruptly
around midyear, however. Domestic crop
production prospects were scaled down­
ward—albeit somewhat excessively—as
much of the western Com Belt experienced
an extremely dry spell during July and
August. Moreover, evidence that the Soviet
Union would have another major crop
shortfall began to mount in early July—an
event that led to the following develop­
ments during the remainder o f the year:
• Soviet purchases of 13.2 million metric
tons of U.S. grains.
• Brief moratoriums on U.S. grain sales
to the USSR and Poland.
• The International Longshoremen’s
Association’s one-month boycott of
loading grain on ships destined for the
USSR.
• Agreements to revise and extend the
U.S./USSR maritime accord.
• A five-year grain agreement requiring
the USSR to purchase at least 6 million
metric tons of U.S. grains annually.
The Soviet crop disaster—which was
ultimately labeled the worst in a decade—
generated an aura o f uncertainty that
hung over domestic markets for several
months. Nevertheless, crop prices were in a
pronounced downtrend during the latter
part of the year. Year-end corn prices were
at a two-year low, while soybean prices
were the lowest in three years. Con­
tributing factors included the moratoriums
on grain sales and indications that Soviet
purchases of U.S. grains might fall short of
initial expectations. In addition, the com­
pletion of a record com harvest and a near­
record soybean crop was ample evidence
that supplies for the 1975/76 crop




Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

marketing years would be more than suf­
ficient to cover a record volume of exports
as well as provide a significant rise in
domestic consumption.
The 1976 crop outlook is highly ten­
tative at this early stage. Planted acreage
is expected to register a slight rise this
spring although weather conditions will
play an important role in determining ac­
tual plantings. A recent planting inten­
tions report indicated farmers intend to
boost planted com acreage 4 percent this
year, while cutting soybean acreage 7 per­
cent. Consumption of fertilizer, after
declining for the first time in many years
in 1975, is expected to be up in 1976.
Crop prices are expected to hold fairly
stable in the near term, since any signifi­
cant increase in domestic utilization will
be somewhat delayed until the current
recovery phase in livestock production has
progressed a little further. Export ship­
ments of grain, which were moving at a
record pace during the latter part of 1975,
will continue strong in the near term. Some
price strength could be triggered by
delayed foreign purchases of U.S. grains
and soybeans, although large pending
harvests in the Southern Hemisphere plus
a pickup in marketings by farmers could be
offsetting.
In addition to fundamental develop­
ments, crop prices throughout 1976 will be
heavily influenced by weather conditions.
Although domestic stocks have improved,
grain stocks worldwide remain at a
precariously low level. Adverse weather
conditions in any major grain-producing
area of the world would likely trigger
another round of upward pressures on
grain and soybean prices. For the time be­
ing, however, such concerns are held
somewhat in abeyance by preliminary
prospects for record or near-record crop
production in the United States in 1976.

15

Business Conditions, February 1976

International: world economy
turns upward
The world economy experienced a deep
recession combined with a high level of in­
flation in 1975. Virtually no country was
spared this experience; the in ter­
dependence among nations that provided
a mutually reinforcing mechanism for
sharing in economic progress during the
y e a rs o f p rosp erity provided the
m echanism o f transmitting adverse
economic trends in 1974 and early 1975. In
many countries the levels o f economic
stagnation and unemployment were the
deepest since the thirties.
G o v e r n m e n ts r e s p o n d e d w ith
domestic programs and policies designed
to restore noninflationary economic
growth. Significantly, these measures
evolved within a spirit o f international
cooperation rather than being self-serving,
“beggar-thy-neighbor” actions that con­
tributed to the downslide and prolongation
of recession in the thirties. For example:
• Only a few countries have introduced
import restrictions and multilateral
trade negotiations launched last year
brought 87 nations together in an effort
to reduce barriers to trade—in contrast
to the proliferation o f protectionist
policies in the thirties;
• The vast international network of
private financial intermediaries, but­
tressed by cooperative policies of
national authorities and international
financial institutions, weathered the dif­
ficulties experienced by a few in­
stitutions and continued to provide
financial resources to businesses and
countries in need—in contrast to inter­
national financial panics that accom­
panied such difficulties in the thirties;
• Officials representing the member




nations of the International Monetary
Fund continued their efforts to develop
an international monetary system that
would serve the commercial needs of all
nations—in contrast to widespread com­
petitive devaluations of the thirties.

Upturn in the industrial economies
The decline in economic activity that
began in late 1973 and ultimately led to the
most severe recession in the postwar era
bottomed out in some industrial nations by
mid-1975 and in virtually all by year-end.
The combined gross national product of
the 24 major industrial countries that com­
prise the Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD)
was estimated to have registered an in­
crease in real terms at an annual rate of
3.75 percent in the second half, compared
to a 5.1 percent seasonally adjusted annual
rate drop in the first half and a decline for
1974 as a whole.
The 1974-75 recession was noteworthy
for the similarity with which the com ­
ponents that contributed to its depth and
duration recurred in the industrial nations
of the free world. Growth in consumption
expenditures, which typically had been a
major source of growth in real GNP in the
industrial countries, dropped sharply in
early 1974. Private residential construc­
tion, already suffering from the conse­
quences o f the restrictive monetary
policies followed by most countries in ef­
forts to contain inflation in 1973, was hard
hit. Faced with declining overall demand,
businessmen in major industrial countries
responded almost uniformly by cutting
back capital investment and by adjusting
inventories.

16

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

Business Conditions, February 1976

17

Economic events in 1975—a chronology
JAN 2
The Dow industrials close at 632, low
for the year. (See July 15.)
JAN 6
Federal Reserve Board reduces the
discount rate from 7.75 to 7.25 percent.
JAN 7
Chrysler offers rebates to new car
buyers— other makers follow.

M AR 7
Federal Reserve Board submits draft
legislation to establish federal chartering and
control of foreign banks operating in United
States.
M A R 1 0 Federal Reserve Board reduces dis­
count rate to 6.25 percent.

JAN 8
New claims for unemployment com­
pensation reach record level.

M A R 2 4 Federal Open Market Committee
agrees to publish its domestic policy directive 45
days after adoption instead of 90 days later.

J A N 1 0 American Beef Packers’ bankruptcy
leaves farmers with uncollected checks.
J A N 1 4 Prime rate is reduced to 9.75 percent
by major New York bank.
J A N 1 5 State of the Union message calls for
substantial tax cuts.
J A N 1 7 Major countries propose a fund to aid
participating countries in financial difficulties
caused by high oil prices.
J A N 1 9 Chemical Bank acquires troubled
Security National Bank of Long Island.
J A N 2 0 F ederal Reserve Board reduces
reserve requirements on demand deposits.
J A N 2 4 Prime rate is reduced to 9.5 percent.
J A N 3 0 Fidelity Mortgage Investors files un­
der Chapter 11, second sizable REIT to do so.
FEB 3
Administration budget shows fiscal
1975 deficit at $35 billion and fiscal 1976 deficit
at $52 billion. (See M ay 30.)
FEB 5
Federal Reserve Board reduces dis­
count rate to 6.75 percent.
F E B 1 4 Multilateral Trade Negotiations to
reduce barriers to international trade begin.
F E B 2 5 New York State’s Urban Develop­
ment Corporation defaults on notes.
F E B 2 8 New York City cancels a $260 million
issue of tax-anticipation notes.
M AR 6
Voluntary prior-approval controls
on grain exports cease after five months.




JUN 4
Ford signs Securities Reform Act ex­
panding powers of the SEC.

SEP 9
Longshoremen end month-long re­
fusal to load ships carrying grain to Russia.

JUN 5
Suez Canal is opened to traffic for the
first time since the 1967 war.

S E P 12 New Illinois law permits N O W ac­
counts (Negotiable Orders of Withdrawal) at
state S&Ls effective January 1, 1976.

— British referendum strongly
membership in Common Market.

supports

OCT 2
W.T. Grant Co. files bankruptcy
proceedings under Chapter 11.

JUN 6
U.S. unemployment rate hits 9.2 per­
cent in May, highest since 1941, but employ­
ment rose substantially.

O C T 1 4 Canada imposes selective price and
wage controls.

M A R 2 9 Bill is approved to cut individual and
corporate income taxes by $22.8 billion.

— Usury rate of 9.5 percent on Illinois home
mortgages is extended to January 1, 1977.

O C T 1 5 Federal Reserve Board announces
reduction in reserve requirements on deposits
with original maturities of four years or more.

APR 7
Federal Reserve Board authorizes
member banks to permit phoned withdrawals
or transfers from savings accounts.

JUN 9
A New York bank reduces prime rate
to 6.75 percent— low for the year.

APR 9
Federal Reserve Board announces a
reduction from 8 to 4 percent in the reserve re­
quirement on foreign borrowings.

J U N 1 0 New York legislatu re creates
Municipal Assistance Corporation (Big M AC)
to issue bonds to redeem New York City debt.

A P R 1 4 Implementation of new beef grading
standards is postponed pending litigation.

J U N 3 0 Treasury completes mailing $8
billion in income tax rebates and $1.5 billion in
special social security payments.

A P R 2 9 Saigon surrenders to Viet Cong, end­
ing 30-year war.

JUL 1
Social security payments are boosted
8 percent in cost-of-living adjustment.

M AY 1
Trading under SEC-ordered negoti­
ated broker fees begins on N Y S E .
— President Ford vetoes emergency farm bill
that calls for higher support prices for grains.
— Federal Reserve Board reports moneygrowth targets for the coming 12 months to the
Senate for the first time.
M AY 5
Ford requests additional $1 billion
for the rapidly expanding food stamp program.
M A Y 1 4 Congress adopts first concurrent
resolution specifying budget targets under the
Congressional Budget Act of 1974.
M A Y 1 6 Federal
rate to 6 percent.

Reserve reduces discount

JUL 2
Emergency Housing Act of 1975
authorizes G N M A to buy an additional
$10 billion in below market rate mortgages.
J U L 1 5 The Dow industrials close at 882, high
for the year. (See* Jan. 2.)
J U L 1 7 U.S. grain companies announce large
sales to Russia.
— U.S. and U SSR space ships hook up.
J U L 1 8 “Dumping” charges are filed with the
U.S. Treasury against foreign auto producers.
A U G 11 Moratorium
grain sales to Russia.

is placed

O C T 2 0 U .S ./U S S R grain agreement ends
moratorium on sales to Russia.
O C T 2 2 American City National Bank (Mil­
waukee) is declared insolvent.
O C T 2 8 Equal credit opportunity regulations
become effective.
NOV 3

President Ford reshuffles cabinet.

N O V 1 0 The Federal Reserve Board permits
member banks to offer business corporations
savings accounts up to $150,000.
DEC 8
Federal Home Loan Bank Board per­
mits S&Ls to offer variable rate mortgages on
multifamily and commercial properties.
D E C 11 U S D A estimates Soviet grain produc­
tion at 137 million metric tons— lowest in a
decade.
D E C 12 Second concurrent Congressional
resolution on the budget targets a deficit of $74
billion for fiscal 1976.
— Ford signs bill repealing federal
supporting state “ Fair Trade” acts.

law

on further
D E C 1 5 Industrial Production Index rises in
November for the seventh straight month.

M A Y 2 2 Senate launches an investigation of
corruption in grain export inspections.

SEP 2
Federal Reserve Board permits pre­
authorized transfers from savings accounts for
any bill payments.

D E C 2 3 Last minute compromise bill extends
1975 tax cuts for six months.

M A Y 3 0 Midyear budget review projects fiscal
1975 deficit at $43 billion and fiscal 1976 deficit
at $60 billion. (See Feb. 3.)

SEP 5
The IM F announces agreement on
steps to eliminate the role of gold in inter­
national finance.

D E C 2 6 Federal Reserve Board lowers reserve
requirements on time deposits with original
maturities of 180 days to four years.

18

The bottoming in the decline of private
residential construction and the pickup in
private consumption expenditures com­
bined with a resumption of business inven­
tory accumulation were the major sources
o f strength that turned around the
economies of the United States, Canada,
France, Germany, Japan, Italy, and the
United Kingdom in the second half of 1975.
The upturn was the strongest by far in the
United States, where real GNP was es­
timated by the OECD to have risen at an
annual rate of 8 percent. In Canada,
Japan, France, and Germany the rise was
between 2 and 3 percent, while in Italy it
was less than 1 percent. In the United
K ingdom , how ever, the decline in
economic activity continued through the
second half.

Price pressures moderate
Sluggish economic activity in 1975
helped dampen the inflationary pressures
that had plagued the industrial countries
mentioned above for several years. The an­
nual rate of consumer price increase in
these seven countries slowed to about 9 per­
cent in the six months ending October
1975, compared to a 15 percent increase in
the same period in 1974.
Several developments accounted for
this price trend. Commodity prices, which
rose sharply in the face o f short supplies
and boom demand in 1973 and early 1974,
dropped in 1975. The price index (1970=100)
of industrial materials (excluding fuels),
which stood at 97 in 1972, rose to a high of
204 by April 1974 and then declined steadi­
ly to 125 by October 1975. Food com­
modities prices, which rose to 281 on the in­
dex scale by November 1974, declined to a
low of 194 in June 1975. Even a subsequent
rebound in food prices (largely due to the
Russian crop failure that boosted the world
demand for wheat and frost in Brazil that
reduced the expected coffee crop) left the in­
dex well below the 1974 high. Energy




Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

prices, which were led up by the fourfold in­
crease in the price o f oil by OPEC in late
1973 and early 1974, rose only moderately
in 1975. Finally, the depressed state o f the
economies o f the industrial countries, and
in a few instances—for example, the Uni­
ted Kingdom and Canada—the imposition
of government controls, resulted in some
moderation o f wage-cost pressures reflect­
ing a marked change in wage bargaining
attitudes.

International payments positions
The OPEC quadrupling o f crude oil
prices in late 1973 and early 1974 produced
a massive deficit in the international
payments position o f industrial nations in
1974. The current account balance (which
measures international flows of goods, ser­
vices, and transfer payments) o f the 24
OECD countries deteriorated sharply,
from a $2.5 billion surplus in 1973 to a $33
billion deficit in 1974. In 1975 the deficit
was reduced to a mere $ 6 billion. The most
important factor in this swing was the
reduction in the counterpart current ac­
count surplus o f the oil-exporting coun­
tries. Their surplus declined as demand for
oil eased in the face o f declining economic
a c t iv it y w orld w id e and consum er
resistance to high prices, and as their im­
ports from industrial countries increased.
The deepening of the current account
deficit o f the developing countries also con­
tributed to the improvement in the current
account balance of the industrial coun­
tries. The deterioration in the current ac­
count deficit o f developing countries—
from $2.5 billion in 1973, to $17.5 billion in
1974, and to $27 billion in 1975—was
related to higher prices for oil and in­
dustrial goods needed for their economic
development, coupled with declines in the
prices o f the raw commodities that typical­
ly represent the major source of revenue for
these nations. Given the low level of finan­
cial reserves of these countries, the deficits

Business Conditions, February 1976

19

The U.S. trade surplus hit
a record level in 1975
billion dollars
30 Tseasonally adjusted census basis

exports1
imports2
20

10

-

oL

ll

III

IV

1973

II

III IV

II

1974

III IV3

1975

billion dollars
4 “

“ balance
2

-

2L

I

II

III IV

1973

..-•HI
II

III

1974

IV

I

II

III IV3

1975

'D om estic and foreign merchandise excluding
m ilitary grant-aid shipments.
im p o rts are customs value basis fo r 1973 and
f.a.s. value basis in 1974and 1975.
3Fourth-quarter figures based on Oct.-Nov. data.

were invariably financed by borrowing
abroad. As a result, the already heavy ex­
ternal debt burden o f these countries in­
creased further in 1975, thereby imposing
an additional constraint on the financing
of the economic development of the
countries.
R e fo rm in g the p aym en ts system
The joint efforts of nations to restruc­
ture the international monetary system,
which began in 1971 following the demise
of the Bretton Woods arrangements, con­
tinued in 1975. The continued, relatively
smooth functioning of the floating ex­
change rate regime adopted by many coun­
tries as an ad hoc response to un­
settlements in the foreign exchange
market apparently softened the opposition




of some countries to the adaptation of such
a system on a more permanent basis.
Following extensive negotiations during
1975 within the Interim Committee of the
IMF com prisin g representatives of
member nations, an agreement was reach­
ed in early 1976 to formalize such a system
in the Articles of Agreement, thus laying a
foundation for a future monetary system.
It is expected that a system where
countries are authorized to “float” their
currencies in response to supply and de­
mand conditions in the foreign exchange
markets, and as a reflection of basic
economic trends within their economies,
will be better able to accommodate the
needs of international commerce. Other
elements of the reform included steps to
reduce the role o f gold in international
monetary arrangements. The plight of the
developing nations received special atten­
tion during the negotiations. Measures
were adopted to increase the flow of finan­
cial assistance to them.
The U.S. r o le in the w o r ld econ om y
The U.S. international trade position
changed abruptly as the nation’s merchan­
dise trade balance shifted from a deficit in
1974 to a record high surplus in 1975. The
shift occurred as the value o f exports ex­
panded by over 1 0 percent, while imports
declined by over 6 percent from 1974 levels.
Nonpetroleum imports fell consistent­
ly from a peak reached in October 1974,
and petroleum imports (in terms of both
value and volume) began to slacken early
in 1975. The advance in the value of ex­
ports continued during the year despite
widespread recession in most industrial
markets abroad. Exports to developed
areas in 1975 increased by less than 5 per­
cent over 1974 levels—most of the increase
taking place in higher shipments to
Canada. The largest increase, both in
percentage and value terms, occurred in
shipments to the petroleum-exporting

20

countries, up 25 percent in 1975. These
countries increasingly used their high oil
revenues to expand consumption and build
up industrial foundations. This was
reflected in strong U.S. exports of capital
g o o d s ( e s p e c i a l l y n o n e le c t r ic a l
machinery).
The strong trade balance was reflected
in the U.S. current account balance trade
in goods and services, including net in­
come from foreign investments, private
transfers of remittances and pensions, and
U.S. government nonmilitary grants.
Following a deficit of $3.4 billion in 1974,
the current account showed a surplus of
$9.3 billion during the first three quarters
of 1975.
The depressed credit demand in the
United States and relatively high levels of
credit demand in foreign markets led to a
$15.2 billion increase in the net claims of
U.S. banks (including branches and agen­
cies of foreign banks in the United States)
on foreigners (including foreign branches
of U.S. banks) in the first ten months of
1975. Placement of funds in the Eurodollar
market, either directly or via related in­
stitutions such as overseas branches, have
been a prime channel for movement of
funds out of the United States. U.S. bank
liabilities to foreigners (excluding custody
holdings of Treasury bills and certificates)
fell $5 billion through October 1975. O f this
decrease $ 2 billion represented a reduction
in foreign-owned demand deposits. The net
result of these foreign transactions was a
reversal of the system’s historic debtor
position. At the end of October 1975 the net
creditor position of the U.S. banking
system in relation to foreigners stood at
$800 million.
Other capital flows reflected in the
U.S. balance-of-payments accounts also
were significantly influenced by world
economic conditions. U.S. direct invest­
ment abroad slowed, as did foreign invest­
ment in the United States. But the unusual­




Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

ly strong performance o f the U.S. current
account in the first nine months led to a $ 2
billion surplus in the “basic” balance (the
balance on current account and long-term
capital)—the first in recent history.
The improvements in the U.S. balanceof-payments position, combined with im­
proved prospects for the U.S. economy in
the latter part of 1975, led to a considerable
strengthening of the exchange value o f the
dollar relative to major currencies. By
year-end the value o f the dollar in terms of
a trade-weighted average o f 14 major
currencies was some 3.5 percent above the
level at the beginning of the year.

Prospects
As 1976 began the world economy
appeared well on the road to recovery from
the deepest recession and most widespread
inflation in over thirty years. For the major
industrial countries the OECD has
forecasted a 4 percent real rate of growth
and moderation in the rate of inflation (as
measured by the rate of change in con­
sumer prices) from 10 percent in 1975 to
about 8 percent in 1976. This represents a
considerable improvement over the ex­
perience of the past two years—but still
below the historical standards established
by these countries. The growth will be in­
sufficient to create enough employment op­
portunities for those currently out o f work
and for the entrants into other labor
markets. In 1976 the industrial world will
be confronted with the task o f coping with
the social and political consequences of
relatively high unemployment.
The developing countries will benefit
from the increased imports of the in­
dustrial world as their recovery progresses
in 1976. However, for a great majority of
developing countries (particularly those
saddled by large international in­
debtedness) many severe problems will
remain.

2
1

Business Conditions, February 1976

Government: income supports
In 1975 the federal government acted to
speed the recovery from the recession and
relieve the hardships associated with the
highest unemployment rates since World
War II through tax cuts, greater spending
on existing social programs, and new and
broader income-support programs. Both
corporations and individuals benefited
from the tax cuts. For corporations the ma­
jor changes were reduced taxes on the first
$50,000 of profits and an increase in the in­
vestment tax credit from 7 to 10 percent.
For individuals a broad spectrum of
changes reduced payroll withholding
schedules about 1 0 percent from previous
levels. In addition to “normal” refunds of
$26 billion in overwithheld payroll taxes,
individuals received rebate payments
totaling nearly $ 8 billion—up to $ 2 0 0 per
return on taxes paid during 1974. A special
tax credit for purchasers of new homes was
designed to stimulate the housing market.
T h is credit, a p p licab le a g a in s t th e 1975 ta x
liability, was 1 0 percent o f the cost of the
home, up to a maximum of $2 ,0 0 0 .
Taken together, the tax rebates,
re fu n d s, and low ered w ith h old in g
payments undoubtedly played a major role
in supporting consumer spending during
the second half. At the same time these
changes lowered federal tax revenues
about $ 2 0 billion below what they
otherwise would have been, and caused the
first year-to-year decline, about $5 billion,
since 1970. Lowered receipts and record
federal expenditures produced a $73 billion
deficit for calendar 1975 on the national in­
come accounts basis (NLA), the accounting
system consistent with gross national
product and national income measures.

Support for people and governments
Social security beneficiaries received a
one-time $50 special payment in June as a
result of legislation enacted along with the




tax cut. They also got an 8 percent increase
effective in July to conform with the
change in the Consumer Price Index. The
maximum income against which the social
security tax is collected was raised to
$14,100 for 1975, up $900 from the 1974
level, partially offsetting the effect of the
income tax cuts for some individuals. The
tax base for 1976 is $15,300.
Unemployment insurance was ex­
panded to include previously uncovered in­
dividuals, and the benefit period was ex­
tended from 52 to 65 weeks. Unemploy­
ment benefits paid during 1975 totaled
nearly $17 billion, about two and one-half
times as much as in 1974. As more in­
dividuals became eligible, spending for the
food stamp program was about $5.5 billion
in 1975, 50 percent higher than the 1974
level.
The reductions in taxes and expansion
of income-support programs combined to
affect p erson al in co m e in tw o unusual

ways. First, disposable income, that por­
tion of income left after taxes, increased by
$93 billion, almost $2 billion more than the
increase in gross personal income. The
share of total income going for taxes
declined from 14.8 percent in 1974 to 13.6
percent in 1975. Second, federal govern­
ment transfer payments supplied nearly
14 percent of disposable income in 1975, up
from about 1 2 percent in 1974. The
$32 billion year-to-year increase in these
payments provided over one-third the total
increase in disposable income for 1975.
The sharp increase in federal assis­
tance to individuals was paralleled by
rapid growth in the level of grants-in-aid to
state and local governments. These grants
totaled $54 billion in 1975, up almost 24
percent from the 1974 level. The $10 billion
increase in grants provided nearly half the
total increase in state and local revenues
that occurred during the year.

22

Federal expenditures
The federal government expended a
total of $357 billion during 1975 (NIA), up
$57 billion from 1974. Eighty percent of
this increase was for nonpurchase expen­
ditures such as assistance to individuals
and state and local governments, but also
including such things as grants to foreign
governments and interest costs. The impor­
tance of these nonpurchase expenditures
has been growing, while the importance of
government purchases of goods and ser­
vices has trended downward since World
War II. In 1975 purchases of goods and ser­
vices amounted to only slightly more than
one-third of all federal expenditures—
$123 billion, about $11 billion above the
1974 level. After allowing for inflation,
there was probably a slight decline in the
real level of federal spending for goods
and services.
Historically, the largest portion of
federal purchases of goods and services
has been for defense. The combined
civilian and military employment of the
Defense Department accounts for about 75
percent of total federal employment, and
most of the equipment the federal govern­
ment purchases is for military use.
However, the defense share of purchases
has been declining steadily from nearly 41
percent of total expenditures in 1969 to
about 23 percent in 1975. As a result of this
declining trend, defense spending has held
at less than 6 percent of gross national
product since 1973 while, in 1975, total
federal government expenditures were 24
percent of GNP.

Congressional budget reform
A major innovation in the planning of
the federal budget became operative in
1975 with the implementation o f the Con­
gressional Budget Reform Act of 1974. Un­
der the provisions of the act Congress is re­
quired to examine the budget as a whole, to




Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

set revenue and spending objectives, and
to adjust taxes and appropriations to con­
form with the objectives. The act also
moved the start of the fiscal year from July
1 to October 1 beginning with fiscal 1977—
allowing Congress nine months to carry
out the budget process each year. Fiscal
1976 (July 1 , 1975 through June 30, 1976)
was to be used as a trial period prior to full
implementation for fiscal 1977. Congress,
choosing to proceed as if the act were bind­
ing for fiscal 1976, set spending and
revenue estimates both for fiscal 1976 and
the interim quarter that precedes the start
of fiscal 1977. The actions taken by Con­
gress under the new procedures specified a
total deficit of about $95 billion for this 15month period on a unified budget basis, the
accounting system used in the budget
process.
Late in December Congress passed a
bill extending the tax reductions of 1974
through the first half of 1976. The bill in­
cluded a statement that spending in fiscal
1977 would be held to a minimum practical
level, with resulting savings used for
further tax cuts. In January 1976 the Presi­
dent proposed a fiscal 1977 budget o f $395
billion in expenditures and further tax cuts
leading to a $43 billion deficit. Whether
these goals can be achieved is uncertain,
but most observers believe that, at the
least, the present tax reductions will be ex­
tended for the full year.
The outlook for federal government ex­
penditures in calendar 1976 is clearer than
usual because plans and proposals are
already defined for nine months. It is
generally expected that spending will ap­
proach the $400 billion level and the deficit
will be close to the 1975 level—$73
billion (NIA).

State and local governments
The aggregate figures for receipts and
expenditures of state and local govern­
ments make 1975 look typical. Total expen­

Business Conditions, February 1976

ditures, $ 2 2 2 billion, were larger than in
1974 but grew slightly less than the 11 per­
cent rate that has been the norm for the
past decade. In a typical year over 90 per­
cent of state and local expenditures are ear­
marked for purchases of goods and ser­
vices; this trend was repeated last year
when $208 billion went for such purchases.
Revenues grew to keep pace with spending,
leaving an operating surplus of $ 1 0 billion.
However, this was not enough to cover the
$ 1 1 billion needed for contributions to
social insurance, which includes public
em ployee medical and disability in­
surance, and reserves for pension plans.
Behind these totals lie some serious
financial problems for many state and
local governments. Only the large in­
creases in federal grants-in-aid prevented
either sharp expenditure reductions or sub­
stantial tax increases. If grants-in-aid
grew only as fast as other sources of
revenue, these jurisdictions would have
faced an aggregate deficit of $ 8 billion
rather than the $ 1 billion deficit they ac­
tually experienced. Virtually every source
of state and local tax revenue was adverse­
ly affected by 1975’s unfavorable business
conditions. Even with a strong upturn in
business activity the lag in collections of
property taxes will have a depressing
effect on revenues well into 1976.
Virtually every state now faces
problems related to unemployment com­
pensation. When a state has exhausted its
reserves to make these payments, it
borrows from the federal government, but
these borrowings must be repaid in later
years. The high levels of unemployment
that prevailed during 1975 all but ex­
hausted reserves. In 1976 most states will
have to raise the tax rate for this insurance
to restore reserves to adequate levels.
Most state and local governments are
required by law to operate with balanced
budgets, and many jurisdictions raise tax­
es or pare expenditures to meet this require­
ment. However, accounting and financing




23

procedures that would not be acceptable in
the private sector occasionally have been
used to satisfy statutory requirements. The
use of such procedures came into sharp
focus in 1975 with the news that New*York
City would be unable to meet its needs for
operating funds or to pay off outstanding
notes as they came due. Officials from both
New York State and New York City made a
determined effort to obtain massive federal
assistance. Only after the state offered sub­
stantial help to the city, and after the city
promised to curtail expenditures sharply
did the Administration approve federal
assistance in the form of a $2.3 billion,
three-year loan against which the city
could draw, with the provision that the
borrowings be repaid by the end of each
fiscal year. It remains to be seen whether
drastic new taxes and cuts in expenditures
can return the city to a sound fiscal basis
over the next three years.
New York City was not the only
governmental unit that faced massive
problems in 1975. The government of
Massachusetts, for example, was forced
to place its full faith and credit behind its
housing agency to obtain refinancing and
also had to make drastic expenditure cut­
backs. Philadelphia had difficulty in
floating a financing issue; Detroit ex­
perienced serious problems in obtaining
financing. Richmond, Virginia, a com­
munity with sound financing practices
and a good record, received no bids on a
relatively small bond issue because of a
law suit over an annexation action that
had been pending for years and had not in­
terfered with borrowing in the past.
The revelation of financial problems
in so many jurisdictions undoubtedly
played a major role in the elections in
November when voters across the country
defeated referendums for many new bond
issues. The failure of voters to approve
these issues may slow state and local
governm ent capital expenditures for
several years to come.

24

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

Finance: market pressures ease
Reduced credit demands and a more
stimulative monetary policy combined to
ease overall pressures on the financial
markets in 1975. Many specific credit
problems remained, however, especially in
real estate and municipal finance areas.
Efforts to revive the economy through
monetary stimulation helped to lower
short-term interest rates, but easing ac­
tions had to be tempered by the overriding
need to avoid setting o ff a new wave of in­
flation and subsequent economic decline.
The public’s holdings o f demand deposits
and currency (the money supply, narrowly
defined) grew at a pace generally believed
consistent with the long-run growth poten­
tial of the economy. Time and savings
deposits, except negotiable certificates,
grew quite rapidly for the year as a whole.
Because of changes in practices and
regulations affecting their use, such
balances now can perform many o f the
functions ascribed to checking accounts.
The total volume o f funds raised in the
credit markets was about the same as in
1974, but the composition changed greatly
as the recession drastically reduced
private credit demands and produced a
record federal budget deficit. State and
local new financing was moderately below
the 1974 peak level, partly due to special
problems in that market caused by New
York City’s difficulties.
The pattern of credit flows reflected ef­
forts by both businesses and households to
strengthen financial positions strained by
the rapid inflation and high interest rates
that preceded the recession. Consumers
reduced debt and increased savings
relative to income. Businesses improved liq u i d i t y b y r e p a y in g sh o rt-te rm
borrowings, partly by refinancing bank
loans in the capital markets. With market




interest rates down sharply from last
year’s peak levels, personal savings were
channeled to financial intermediaries in
record volume. Residential mortgage loans
rose more than in 1974 although less than
the very large increases in the two previous
years. Lenders and investors continued to
pay close attention to credit quality. The
improved liquidity of consumers and many
businesses, including banks, helped to
restore a firmer basis for future growth.

Treasury the major borrower
Federal government net borrowing ex­
ceeded $80 billion in calendar 1975, accouting for roughly 40 percent o f the funds
raised in the domestic credit markets. This
compares with a 5 percent share in the
previous year. Inclusion o f sponsored
agency borrowing, largely in support of the
housing market, would raise the federal
component to 43 percent in 1975 against 15

Funds raised in credit markets
shift from business to Treasury

1974
1975
Source: F low offunds, 1975 partly estimated.

Business Conditions, February 1976

percent in 1974. Concern that so huge a
financing operation might either require
excessive money creation or “ crowd out”
private sector financing needed to spur the
recovery proved largely unfounded. The
successful placement of Treasury issues at
declining interest cost and without in­
flationary money growth evidences the
weakness of business and consumer expen­
ditures and related credit demands.
The greater Treasury borrowings took
up the slack left mainly by the business
sector. Nonfinancial businesses reduced
total funds raised by 60 percent compared
with 1974 as nearly one-third of the growth
in longer-term obligations and equities
was offset by repayment of bank loans.
Because of the high returns demanded by
investors on truly long-term obligations,
an unusually large share of new corporate
debt issues carried maturities in the five- to
ten-year range. Postponements and
withdrawals were frequent, especially of
issues carrying less than top credit ratings.

25

decline on record. The federal funds rate,
which is very sensitive to Federal Reserve
operations, already had fallen from a mid1974 peak above 13 percent to around 8 V
2
percent at the start o f the year. By early
March it dropped below 5 V percent—the
2
lowest level in more than two years. It con­
tinued to edge down toward 5 percent
through most of the second quarter.
M eanw hile, the basic discount rate
applicable to advances to member banks
was reduced in four steps from 7% percent
to 6 percent by mid-May. Reserve re­
quirements on demand deposits were
reduced V percent on all strata o f demand
2
deposits in January and on longermaturity time deposits later in the year.

Broad money grew faster than
M i or bank credit
percent

Aggregates and money rates
The Federal Reserve System sought to
ease conditions in the credit markets to the
degree consistent with a monetary growth
adequate to support recovery while reduc­
ing the rate of inflation. The Federal Open
Market Committee (FOMC) continued to
try to achieve growth rates in the monetary
aggregates consistent with these objec­
tives. Besides the narrowly defined money
supply (Mi), attention is also given to M2 ,
which adds savings and time deposits at
com m ercial banks other than large
negotiable certificates of deposit to the Mj
components, and to M 3 which also adds in
deposits at savings and loan associations
(S&Ls) and mutual savings banks (MSBs)
and credit union shares.
As the year began, all the aggregates
were relatively weak, mainly reflecting the
demand deposit component. Short-term in­
terest rates were in the midst of the steepest




1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

NOTE: M i = currency and demand deposits held
by the nonbank public, M2 = M-| plus commercial
bank savings and tim e deposits other than
negotiable certificates of $100,000 or more. Annual
changes based on daily averages fo r final quarters.
Q uarterly changes based on averages fo r months
in quarter. Bank credit = loans (including loans
sold to affiliates and excluding domestic interbank
loans) and investments of all commercial banks on
last Wednesday of year or month.

26

Eurodollar reserve requirements were
reduced from 8 percent to 4 percent in May
in order to make the cost o f these funds
more comparable with alternative sources.
Early in the second quarter, the FOMC
specified target growth rates (annualized
and seasonally adjusted) of 5 to IV2 percent
in Mjj, 8 V to IOV2 percent in M2 , and 10 to 12
2
percent in M 3 . These ranges, applicable
over a 12 -month horizon reaching to the
second quarter of 1976, were considered
consistent with objectives on the basis of
developments at that time.
The rise in M^in May and June seemed
much greater than could be explained by
the income tax rebates and supplementary
social security payments. Evidence of a
revival of economic activity suggested that
the demand for money would strengthen,
and the Treasury’s estimates o f financing
needs continued to be revised upward. Tak­
ing account of these factors, in late June
the Federal Reserve adopted a somewhat
less accommodative posture, permitting
the federal funds rate to rise to around 6
percent. It remained in a narrow 6 to 6 V
4
percent range throughout the summer.
Most other market interest rates moved ap­
preciably higher in response to the higher
funds rate, heavy Treasury borrowing, ef­
forts to prevent default on New York City
obligations, and expectations that
strengthening activity would require ad­
ditional monetary restraint.
Despite the strong upsurge in GNP in
the third quarter, there was little further
expansion in M^. The average level in the
three months, however, was about 7 per­
cent (seasonally adjusted annual rate)
higher than the second-quarter average.
Savings flows also slackened late in the
third quarter as higher offering rates on
Treasury issues again attracted small in­
vestors. Almost half of the two-year 8 % per­
cent notes sold in September was allotted
to noncompetitive bidders—mostly small
banks and individuals—despite the $5,000
minimum denomination.




Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

In early October the FOMC acted to
ease money market conditions in order to
stim u la te renewed grow th in the
aggregates and also in recognition of the
possible adverse effects o f unsettled finan­
cial markets on the economic recovery. Suf­
ficient reserves were provided to lower the
federal funds rate back to the 5 to 5V per­
4
cent range where it remained through
year-end. Meanwhile, the 12-month target
ranges for the monetary aggregates were
updated to a third-quarter base. The Mi
range was unchanged, while the M2 and
M3 ranges were widened to V/2 to IOV2 per­
cent and 9 to 12 percent, respectively.
Savings deposits strengthened again
as rates on market instruments declined,
but demand deposits, as measured by
available statistics, followed an unusually
erratic path with only a modest gain on
balance. Fourth-quarter annual growth
rates (based on quarterly averages of daily
figures) were about 2 x percent for M i and 6
h
percent for M2 —both short o f the desired
pace. Expansion in bank credit, which is
an important factor in money creation,
rose only 4 percent in 1975—the smallest
gain since 1969.
After adjustment o f the data for
deposits at nonmember banks and based
on revised seasonal adjustment factors,
December to December growth was 4.2 per­
cent for Mi, 8.3 percent for M2 and 11.2 per­
cent for M3 . Bank time deposits other than
money market certificates of deposit (CDs)
rose 12 percent, savings at S&Ls and
MSBs rose 16 percent, and credit union
shares were up 2 0 percent compared with
1974 growth of 9 , 6 , and 12 percent, respec­
tively.

New payments practices
Both measurement and interpretation
of the monetary aggregates have had to
take account of the increased use of
interest-bearing deposits for transactions
purposes. Installation of electronic funds

27

Business Conditions, February 1976

transfer equipment and other efforts by
banks, often in cooperation with nonbank
thrift institutions, to improve customer ser­
vices have increasingly blurred the func­
tional distinction between checking and
savings balances.
This trend w as facilita ted by
a m e n d m e n ts to F e d e ra l R eserve
regulations intended to remove restric­
tions that put member banks at a disad­
vantage compared with their competitors.
During the year member banks were per­
mitted to pay bills for their customers
through preauthorized transfers from
savings accounts, to accept telephone re­
quests from customers to transfer funds
from savings to checking accounts, and to
open savings accounts for profit-making
organizations to a maximum of $150,000.
The latter grew very rapidly from
November 10, when the new rule became
effective, through year-end.
Other developments that may result in
further shifts from cash to savings-type ac­
counts include the increasing number of
states permitting negotiable orders of

withdrawals (NOWs) on savings balances
at both banks and S&Ls, and the direct
deposit of social security checks.

Long-term interest rates stay high
In contrast to the significant decline in
money market interest rates, yields on
most categories of long-term bonds and
mortgages remained within a fairly
narrow range, less than one percentage
point below 1974 peaks.
The financial problems of New York
City and the efforts to resolve them
dominated the tax-exempt market. A ma­
jor municipal yield index hit a temporary
all-time high o f 7.67 percent in late
September, la rgely reflectin g price
declines on obligations with less than top
quality ratings. Some municipal issuers,
caught in the backlash o f New York’s
financial problems, had to pay un­
precedented rates and a number of planned
issues were withdrawn. In response to in­
vestor concern issuers began to disclose
their financial condition in greater detail,

Bond and mortgage yields did not parallel
money rate declines during 1975
percent

~ 11111111111111111111111111111111111
i
1973
1974
1975
Note: Market rates are m onthly averages of daily figures.




percent

Ti 11111111111111111111111111111111111
1973

1974

1975

28

and in some localities planned expen­
ditures were cut severely.
Both corporate and municipal gross
issue volume set all-time records. The
stickiness of yields evidenced investors’
reluctance to lengthen the maturity of their
portfolios despite a wide yield advantage.
In part this reflected continued concern
about the effect of future inflation on the
value of long-term fixed-return assets.
Yields on most Treasury coupon issues
were a little higher at the end o f the year
than at the start, although these also show­
ed a declining trend in the fourth quarter.
To stabilize this sector o f the markets, a
larger-than-usual portion o f Federal
Reserve System reserve supplying
operations was effected through purchases
of coupon issues. Of a $7.2 billion net in­
crease in securities held outright by the
Federal Reserve, $6.2 billion were Treasury
coupon issues and the rest were agencies.
In 1974, when housing agencies were
heavy borrowers, the System bought less
than $2 billion in coupons and $3 billion of
agencies.
With strong savings flows into
m ortgage lending institu tion s and
moderate housing demand, mortgage loan
rates softened, but not as much as cor­
porate yields. These patterns worked
toward a restoration of a more normal rate
relationship between these investment sec­
tors and thus toward a better supply of
mortgage funds. At year-end the HUD
n ation a l avera g e rate on c o n v en tio n a l n ew

home loans was still above 9 percent, but
lo c a l com m itm en ts were reported
available at 8 3 percent.
A

Bank loans and CDs drop
After more than a decade of very rapid
growth, 1975 was a year of pause and con­
solidation for the banking industry. The
1974 concerns about a possible liquidity
crisis in the banking system were largely
dissipated, but many bankers still had to




Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

deal with problems in construction and
land development loans, and charge-offs of
loan losses were unusually large. To cope
with these problems, most banks took
steps to build their liquidity and capital
positions. Improved earnings contributed
to these efforts.
Outstanding loans at domestic offices
o f the major city banks declined more than
$18 billion, or 6 percent. Smaller banks,
where cyclical fluctuations are normally
less, reported only very modest gains in
loans. Total loans of all commercial banks
dropped over 1 percent for the year—the
first decline for any year since World War
II. The bulk of the decline was due to net
repayments by commercial, industrial,
and financial businesses—firms which
had relied very heavily on bank loans in
1973 and 1974. Consumer and real estate
loans also were much weaker than usual.
This weakness persisted through much of
the year, although it was less apparent in
the fourth quarter.
The major factor in the liquidation of
business loans was reduced demand stem­
ming from declining inventories, lower tax
liabilities, and funding of debt in the
capital market. But conservative bank
lending policies also restrained new loans.
With widespread concern about loan losses

CDs reflect business loan
demand at large banks
billion dollars

Business Conditions, February 1976

and erosion in the market value of some im­
portant state and municipal securities,
most banks continued to keep credit stan­
dards tight.
During the early part o f the year many
bankers were content to see loans fall from
the extremely high levels built up over the
two previous years. By the fourth quarter
there was evidence of renewed interest in
expanding loans, but not at the expense of
earnings margins or credit standards. The
net increases in business loans that were
reported in November and December
(seasonally unadjusted) were due entirely
to the acquisition of bankers’ acceptances,
which, though classified as business loans,
are effectively short-term money market
investments. Reductions in the prime lend­
ing rate of the major banks, which closed
the year at 7lA percent, lagged the decline
in other short-term rates, restoring a better
margin over the cost o f funds.
Sources o f bank funds last year con­
trasted sharply with 1974. With savings
flows generally strong and the need for
loanable funds declining, the major banks
permitted a significant runoff of maturing
negotiable CDs. These obligations of the
large banks declined almost $ 1 0 billion net
during 1975. Nonnegotiable CDs in $ 1 0 0 ,000 denominations declined almost $4
billion. Average maturities o f negotiable
CDs were extended to a modest degree. At
year-end 9 percent o f outstandings had
maturities o f six months or more, com­
pared with 4 percent at the end o f 1974.
Those due in three months or less declined
to 72 percent o f outstandings from a 1974
peak of 84 percent.
In the fourth quarter, in order to en­
courage banks to improve liquidity by
lengthening the maturities o f interestsensitive deposit liabilities, the Federal
Reserve Board reduced reserve re­
quirements on time deposits maturing in
four years or more from 3 percent to 1 per­
cent and on 180-day to four-year maturities
from 3 percent to 2Vi percent, so long as




29

average reserves on all time deposits do not
fall below the legal 3 percent minimum.

Investment securities up sharply
B a n k a c q u i s i t i o n s o f U .S .
Governments and other securities more
than offset the contraction in loans.
Holdings of Treasuries at all commercial
banks rose almost $30 billion—a 60 percent
increase and roughly 35 percent of the net
increase in federal marketable debt. Bank
demand for government securities was an
important element in the successful com­
pletion of Treasury financings.
Although banks’ Treasury portfolios
have trended downward since World War
II, they generally have shown a contra cyclica l pattern, w ith increases
replenishing liquidity between periods of
strong loan demand. This pattern also
reflects opportunities for trading profits

As commercial bank loans shrank,
billion dollars
520 last Wednesday of
500 - m onth figures

holdings of Treasuries rose sharply,

but other investments slowed

1973

1974

1975

30

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

when interest rates decline. An additional
factor in 1975 was the incentive to upgrade
investment quality in the face of historical­
ly high loan losses. Perhaps most impor­
tant of all was the fact that the Treasury
was the principal source of credit demand
in the economy. In line with liquidity objec­
tives banks generally stayed with short
maturities. Data from the Treasury
ownership survey indicate that, through
November, maturities within one year rose
from 35 to 44 percent o f bank holdings,
while the proportion five years or more to
maturity dropped by about one-third.
Three-fourths o f the year’s net increase in
Treasuries held by the major city banks
matured in less than a year.
By contrast, bank acquisition o f taxexempt securities, which were almost dou­
ble Treasuries in bank portfolios as 1975
opened, was well .below normal. This
reflected less need for tax-exempt income
at some banks as well as general concern

about the quality of state and municipal
obligations. The major city banks reported
a $5 billion decline in their total loans and
investments.
Seventh D istrict b a n k in g

Although contraction in loans was
reported by the large banks in the district’s
major cities, smaller banks in Illinois, In­
diana, and Iowa continued to show
r e la t iv e ly g o o d g a in s , reflectin g
agricultural credit needs. In the aggregate,
member banks increased investments by
three times as much as loans declined. U.S.
Treasury securities accounted for threefourths of the investment expansion, but
unlike the national experience, holdings of
municipals rose faster than in 1974. Many
smaller banks shifted some funds they had
been placing in the fed funds market into
Treasuries as the sharp decline in the fed
funds rate made sales less attractive.
The district data il­
lustrate the greater im­
Banks in most district areas improved
pact of cyclical fluc­
liquidity in 1975
tuations on large city
banks compared with the
Loans as
percent of
smaller institutions. At
U.S. Govt. Other
Total
deposits
Loans1 securities securities deposits
the large banks loans de­
(percent change, Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 1975) 1/1 12/31
clined more and deposits
rose less or not at all.
Large banks2
Savings inflows were
- 3.4
73.4 67.1
U.S. total
6.8 + 68.4
+ 1.9
- 7.1
Chicago
84.0 83.6
+ 71.4
+ 6.1
- 6.6
substantial, but some
Detroit
3.2 + 29.1
+ 8.2
72.7 69.8
+ 0.7
l a r g e - d e n o m in a t io n
Indianapolis
- 3.1
80.9 72.9
+ 4.7
5.6 + 42.5
deposit certificates were
Milwaukee
-12.8
- 0.4
6.0 +307.8
80.9 76.3
not replaced at maturity.
- 2.5
+10.2
Des Moines
+11.1
57.3 50.3
As measured at year-end,
Other member
total deposits at all dis­
banks
trict member banks were
+ 4.4 + 38.8
77.8 77.8
U.S. total
+ 6.6
+ 4.4
up only 1 percent in 1975,
+ 4.7
Illinois
+11.5
56.5 54.8
+ 7.9
+ 37.6
compared with 8 percent
- 0.2 + 40.1
Michigan
+ 6.6
+ 4.4
67.9 64.9
+ 4.7 + 56.9
Indiana
+ 8.3
57.9 56.1
+ 8.1
in the previous year. For
Wisconsin
67.2 62.2
+ 7.6
3.3 + 48.3
+ 4.3
most banks the ratio of
+13.4
Iowa
+12.2 + 35.6
+12.2
56.6 56.5
loans to deposits, often
used as an inverse in­
‘ Less than .05 percent.
d ic a to r o f liquidity,
’ Excludes federal funds sold and dom estic interbank loans.
2Weekly reporting banks.
declined.




-

-

-

-

*

-

Business Conditions, February 1976

31

Ahead: prospect for expansion
Aided by a major tax reduction, larger
government transfer payments to in­
dividuals, and a stimulative monetary
policy the U.S. economy shook off the
forces of decline in the spring o f 1975 and
began a new expansion that continued in
early 1976. Bountiful harvests replaced the
poor yields of 1974 and assured an ample
supply of food for the new year. The huge
foreign trade deficit of 1974 was replaced
last year by a record surplus. Many
businesses, financial institutions, and in­
dividuals improved their eroded liquidity
situations last year. Early in 1976 interest
rates were generally lower than a year
earlier. Lenders remained cautious, but
new loans were increasingly available.
Prospects are favorable that the expansion
would continue throughout the year.
As usual, doubts are being expressed

plete accord among leaders in government,
finance, and industry that the United
States cannot afford a new recession
before the wounds of the recent decline are
healed.
The consensus forecast suggests
reachievement of the levels of real GNP
reached in the fourth quarter of 1973 by the
fourth quarter, possibly by the third
quarter, of 1976. Sales of most types of
equipment purchased by both consumers
and producers, however, probably will not
achieve 1973 highs this year, but their
climb back should be well advanced.
The record level of activity reached in
the fourth quarter of 1973 represented a
“ superboom” and predated the energy
crisis. The following recession was long
and severe. If the fourth-quarter 1973 level
is reachieved by year-end, the “round trip”

abou t th e d u rab ility o f th e current ex p a n ­

w ill h a v e tak en three y e a r s— tw ice a s lo n g

sion. Confidence is still a scarce commodi­
ty despite three quarters o f real growth.
Few prognosticators are prepared to
predict, however, that the uptrend will give
way to a new decline before the year is out.
The shortest expansion since World War
II, following the 1957-58 decline, lasted two
years. The others lasted three years or
more. Apparent letdowns early in the ex­
pansions that started in 1949 and in 1970
reflected the temporary effects of major
strikes in basic industries. Vigorous
debates are in progress concerning the
most appropriate fiscal and monetary
policies to promote maximum growth
while avoiding a reacceleration of infla­
tion. While policy views differ, there is com­

as in earlier post-World War II recoveries.
Even so, margins of unused resources of
workers and facilities will be sizable late
this year.
The unresolved economic issues in ear­
ly 1976 in broad outline are much the same
as a year ago: inflation, unemployment,
pollution abatement, access to sufficient
raw materials, and uneasy international
markets—all are still present. Progress has
been made, however, toward moderating
these problems. Hope for the future has
been buttressed by the knowledge that the
unprecedented calamities of 1974 and ear­
ly 1975 were followed by a broad-based
recovery with the basic strength and
resiliency of the economy intact.