View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

A review by the Federal Reserve Bank o f Chicago

Business
Conditions
1964

Fe b ru a ry

Contents

Negotiable time certificates
of deposit— one year later

2

The trend of business—
A new look at the Sixties

5

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

Negotiable time certificates
of deposit— one year later
TJ_he outstanding volume of negotiable time
certificates of deposit was estimated at about
10 billion dollars at the end of 1963.1 Al­
though CDs, as they are popularly referred
to, have been a money market instrument for
only three years, their volume now exceeds
that of many older short-term securities. The
outstanding volume of commercial paper at
year-end, for example, was only about 9 bil­
lion dollars while bankers acceptances totaled
less than 3 billion dollars. This article re­
views the more important developments in
the CD market in the past year; earlier de­
velopments were described in the February
1963 issue of Business Conditions.
Briefly, CDs are receipts issued by com­
mercial banks for funds left on deposit for a
stated period of time and rate of interest.
Since the beginning of 1961, CDs issued by
large nationally known commercial banks in
‘In this article reference is made only to those
certificates in denominations of at least 100,000
dollars, the minimum unit which can generally be
traded on the secondary market.

large denominations have been traded on an
active secondary market. Thus, while the
issuing banks are assured that the funds will
remain on deposit until the date of maturity,
the holder of the certificate may reacquire his
funds at any time by selling it.
Since banks can vary the interest rates
offered on new CDs quite readily, they can
control quite closely the amount of funds ac­
quired in this way. By raising its rates above
current market rates, an individual bank can
attract additional deposits; by decreasing
rates, it can reduce deposit inflows.
The flexibility in selling CDs contrasts with
the relative inflexibility in acquiring both de­
mand and savings deposits. Demand deposits
are acquired largely through the concurrent
extensions of loans or purchases of invest­
ments, while passbook savings are normally
accepted continually at an advertised interest
rate that is changed only infrequently.
In addition, the development of the CD has
greatly increased the ability of large banks to
attract deposits from beyond their normal

BUSINESS CONDITIONS Is published monthly by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
George G. Kaufman was primarily responsible for the article "Negotiable Time Certificates of Deposit—One Year Later"
and George W . Cloos for "The Trend of Business—A New look at the Sixties."
Subscriptions to Business Conditions are available to the public without charge. For information concerning bulk
mailings, address inquiries to the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60690.
Articles may be reprinted provided source is credited.
CORRECTION: In "Banking Trends" on page 9 of the January issue of Business Conditions, it was incorrectly stated
that the increase in margin requirements from 50 to 70 per cent lifted "from 30 to 50 per cent the proportion of pur-

2

chase price provided by share buyers." This should read "lifted from 50 to 70 per cent."




Business Conditions, February 1964

service areas thus reducing their
dependency on local areas for de­
M a xim u m and quoted
posit growth.
interest rates on new CDs1
Since CDs generally are issued
December 31, 1963
December 31, 1962
in denominations of 1 million dol­
Maximum Quoted"
Maximum Quoted"
lars while deposit insurance is
(per cent)
limited to 10,000 dollars of the
Initial maturity:
account of any one depositor,
30-89 days ..............
1
1
holders of CDs have a strong in­
90 days but
under 6 months . . 2Vi
2Vi
4
3%-%
terest in the financial strength of
6 months but
the issuing banks. As a result,
31/2
3-%
4
3%
under 1 y e a r ......
CDs are issued primarily by the
1 year or m o r e ......
4
314-%
4
3%-4
larger, more widely known banks
'Official foreign deposits are exempted from interest rate
in major financial centers.
ceilings.
Large banks in the Second Fed­
'Large New York City and Chicago banks.
eral Reserve District, which in­
cludes New York City, accounted
for 44 per cent of the CDs out­
standing at the end of 1963. Large Seventh
Since CDs do not have the absolute secur­
District banks—primarily in Chicago and
ity of U. S. Governments and are a relatively
Detroit—accounted for another 13 per cent,
new type of money market instrument, they
while banks in the Fourth (Cleveland and
yield somewhat higher interest rates than
Pittsburgh), Eleventh (Dallas) and Twelfth
Government securities of comparable ma­
(San Francisco and Los Angeles) Districts
turity. For CDs issued by the country’s very
accounted for 26 per cent. The remaining 17
largest and best known banks, this spread
per cent of the outstanding CDs were scat­
generally averages from 20 to 40 hundredths
tered among large banks in the other seven
of a per cent.
Reserve Districts.
With the increase in the Federal Reserve
Banks continued to make increasing use of
discount rate from 3 to 3 Vi per cent in midCDs during 1963 to acquire time deposits.
1963 and the concurrent sharp rise in short­
The volume of outstanding CDs issued by
term interest rates, the CD market received
large banks in leading United States cities in­
its first major test in its short three-year his­
creased 4.2 billion dollars in 1963, or more
tory. The rise was accompanied by an in­
than 75 per cent. By year-end, CDs, which
crease in the maximum interest rates com­
had accounted for only a negligible percent­
mercial banks were permitted to pay on 3 to
age of deposits three years earlier, accounted
12 month deposits to 4 per cent, the same
for 16 per cent of time and savings deposits
limit as existed on funds on deposit for one
year and over.
at these banks and 7 per cent of their total
deposits. For large New York City banks, the
Maximum permissible interest rates at the
increase in CDs during the year represented
end of 1962 are shown in the accompanying
about three-fifths of the rise in all time and
table. Because yields on Treasury bills with
savings deposits at these banks and almost
less than six months to maturity exceeded the
half of the increase in total deposits.
ceiling rates banks were permitted to pay,




3

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

banks were effectively precluded from selling
CDs in this maturity range. The interest rate
structure did, however, permit banks to issue
CDs with six or more months to maturity and
at the end of 1962 almost 90 per cent of the
certificates outstanding had been issued with
maturities of from 6 to 12 months.
Although CDs of less than six months to
maturity could not be bought directly from
banks at competitive interest rates, passage
of time made such CDs available on the
secondary market at interest yields above
those banks were permitted to pay. Investors
who did not wish to buy CDs with over six
months to maturity could therefore purchase
shorter-term issues on the secondary market.
Transactions involving such short-term CDs
accounted for a large proportion of the vol­
ume of trading on this market.
Trading on s e c o n d a ry m a rk e t fa lls

4

Raising the interest rate ceiling on threeto-six-month deposits to the same level as on
longer-term deposits permitted banks to offer
CDs of short maturities and eliminated the
need of investors to go to the secondary mar­
ket. In addition, the rise in market interest
rates had the effect of reducing the market
values of outstanding CDs and some investors
who normally would have sold CDs before
maturity chose instead to hold them to ma­
turity rather than accept a loss. As a result,
the volume of trading on the secondary mar­
ket declined sharply after midyear.
The adjustment of the CD market to the
abrupt rise in interest rates was, as may have
been expected from its brief existence, some­
what more sluggish than that of the Treasury
bill market. The spread between interest rates
on three-month CDs on the secondary mar­
ket and rates on Treasury bills narrowed
sharply in July and remained narrow until
October. During these months, the volume of




transactions on the secondary market de­
clined to a very low level. Since October,
volume has picked up somewhat with most of
the activity concentrated in time certificates
with less than three months to maturity.
In contrast to the fall-off in trading on the
secondary market, the volume of CDs out­
standing rose sharply following the midyear
hike in the rate ceiling and a concurrent
strengthening of loan demand. CDs outstand­
ing at large New York City banks, for exam­
ple, increased 57 per cent in the second half
of 1963, compared with an increase of only
17 per cent in the first six months. By the end
of 1963, large New York City and Chicago
banks were again quoting rates on CDs very
close to the 4 per cent maximum rate per­
mitted on time deposits.
If short-term interest rates were to climb
further and the present maximum rates on
time deposits were to remain in effect, banks
could be expected to experience difficulty in
selling additional CDs and in “rolling over”
maturing CDs. First to feel such effects
would be the banks large enough to issue
CDs in denominations of 1 million dollars
(the standard trading unit) but not large
enough to have a nationwide reputation
among investors.2 These banks must gener­
ally offer somewhat higher interest rates on
their CDs than the very largest banks. Con­
tinued increases in interest rates without a
change in the ceiling rate, however, would
reduce the ability of all banks to acquire time
deposits through the sale of CDs.
Developments in the CD market during
1963, including the adjustment to shifts in
interest rates, reflect both continued strength"’Because large corporations, the chief buyers of
CDs from the banks, rarely hold large balances at
small banks, small banks have been little effected by
the introduction of negotiable CDs. CDs have
tended primarily to increase the competition for
time deposits among the larger banks.

Business Conditions, February 1964

ening and broadening of the market. The
instrument has attained an important and
seemingly permanent position as both a
source of bank deposits and a high-grade
money market instrument. Last year’s article
concluded that
. . the dollar amount of
CDs outstanding may be expected to expand

HETrend

at a rapid pace until either banks no longer
wish to attract additional deposits or market
interest rates rise to a level where banks are
effectively precluded by legal interest rate
ceilings from offering competitive rates.”
Events in the past year give little reason to
alter this conclusion.

OF

BUSINESS

A new look a t the S ix tie s

TX he

current economic expansion is three
years old this month—relatively long-lived as
compared with most upswings of activity in
past decades. Nevertheless, the common ex­
pectation is that the business trend will con­
tinue upward for a large part, perhaps all, of
this year.
Extravagant projections for economic
growth in the Sixties had been publicized
widely just before the period began. But a
general business downturn developed unex­
pectedly in the very first year of the new
decade after the shortest expansion of the
post-World War II period. Despite an early
and vigorous reversal of the 1960-61 reces­
sion, it has been common ever since to lament
the “failure of the soaring Sixties” to materi­
alize. But an examination of evidence now
available suggests that this assessment was
premature.
The end of the current year will mark the
midpoint of the Sixties. Although the statis­
tics are not complete for 1963, an evaluation




of the first four years of the decade is now
possible. Analysis of the period is facilitated
by the fact that the initial year, 1960, pro­
vides a good base for comparison because it
was characterized by neither boom nor de­
pression. Most measures of activity rose in
the first half of 1960 and declined moderately
in the latter months of the year. The pattern
was similar to those of 1948, 1953 and 1957.
Each of these years was generally prosperous
and witnessed new record highs for economic
activity, although recessions of greater or
lesser severity were in progress well before
year-end. In each case the downswing was
arrested and reversed in the following year.
Comparisons of economic change over
given time spans are subject to question if
starting and closing dates are arbitrary in
some degree. Activity may be artificially high
or low at a given time for a variety of reasons
—strikes, war scares and the like—with
compensating developments in succeeding
months. Moreover, there are difficulties in

5

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

adjusting data adequately for seasonal pat­
terns that may shift over time. When yearly
totals or averages can be used for compari­
sons, these data problems are mitigated sub­
stantially.
It is possible now to compare changes in
economic measures between the whole years
1960 and 1963 with developments in the
comparable periods 1948-51, 1953-56 and
1957-60 (see the table on page 7).
It will be noted that output and employ­
ment increased substantially more in the
1960-63 expansion than in either of its two
immediate predecessors. There was a larger
increase in the 1948-51 period, but this was
accompanied by war and inflation.
There is little difference among the four
expansion periods in terms of increases in
output per man-hour in manufacturing. Sub­
stantial increases in corporate profits after
taxes in the 1953-56 and 1960-63 periods
contrast with declines in 1948-51 and 195760. The record for price stability is favorable
for the recent period, especially wholesale
prices.
The persistence of relatively high unem­
ployment in the recent expansion is well
known. There has been a trend toward higher
rates of unemployment in each of the four
expansion periods except the first. In 1951,
with the Korean War in process, the unem­
ployment rate averaged 3.3 per cent com­
pared with 3.8 per cent in 1948. For the
other periods under review the percentages
were as follows:
First year Last year
(per cent)
1953-56 ..................
2.9
4.2
1957-60 ..................
4.3
5.6
1960-63 ..................
5.6
5.7

6

Estimates of unemployment for Seventh
District states are available for the recent expansion period. In each state the estimated




rate of unemployment was lower on the aver­
age in 1963 than in 1960 in contrast with the
national experience.

Illinois ..........................
Indiana ........................
Io w a ...............................
Michigan ......................
Wisconsin ....................

.........
.........
.........
.........
.........

1960 1963
(per cent)
4.6
4.4
5.3
4.1
3.1
2.7
6.8
5.3
4.1
4.0

This improvement in District unemploy-

ment since 1960 apparently reflects out­
migration and withdrawals from the labor
force, as well as increased employment, since
the rise of employment has not been as great
in this region as in the nation as shown in
the table on page 8.
While growth in nonfarm employment has
lagged the national rate in all District states
in recent years, the difference has been rela­
tively small in Indiana, Iowa and Wisconsin.
In Illinois and Michigan average employment
in 1963 was only slightly higher than six
years earlier.
Slower employment growth in the Midwest
may result from larger increases in output per
man-hour in the major industries of this area
than in the economy as a whole. The five
Seventh District states, with 17 per cent of
the nation’s nonfarm employment, have 62
per cent of the motor vehicle workers and
about one-third of those producing steel, ap­
pliances and television, and business equip­
ment, including farm and construction equip­
ment. Except for steel, increases in output of
these industries prominent in the Midwest
have compared favorably with those for total
manufacturing.
Has th e g ro w th ra te slo w e d ?

The decade of the Sixties may be com­
pared with the earlier postwar periods in
terms of compounded percentage rates of

Business Conditions, February 1964

growth. In this manner the average perform­
ance of the 1960-63 period can be measured
against the longer span, 1948-60. The reason
for selecting 1948 rather than 1946 or 1947
as the starting point is that the earlier years
were distorted by sharp price inflation and
shortages and maladjustments resulting from
the turmoil of conversion from war produc­
tion and military service to civilian needs.

farm employment has increased slightly more
rapidly. Certainly the nation has its problems
in 1964, but these cannot be attributed to
slower economic growth in the Sixties. In
fact, growth appears to have accelerated. If
optimistic forecasts for the current year are
achieved, the record of the first half of the
current decade will appear even more favor­
able.
One little noticed factor that has aided
Compounded annual growth rates
growth in output and output per man-hour in
1948-60 1960-63
recent years has been the absence of major
(per cent)
strikes. In the years 1948 through 1959 an
Gross national product
annual average of 39 million man-days were
in constant d o lla rs......... . . 3.4
3.9
lost because of strikes, not counting sec­
Industrial production......... . . 3.9
4.6
Nonfarm wage and
ondary layoffs by firms that buy or sell goods
salary employment . . . . . . 1.6
1.7
and services to those involved in labor dis­
Output per man-hour in
putes. In the four-year span, 1960-63, the
m anufacturing................ . . 3.3
3.7
annual number of idle man-days caused by
strikes averaged less than 18 million.
Judged in this manner the decade of the
The data on idle man-days understates the
Sixties thus far shows an appreciably higher
importance of the improvement in laboraverage growth rate for output and output
per man-hour than the 1948-60 period. Non­
management relations in recent years. First,
since em ploym ent
averaged 23 per cent
more in the recent pe­
Selected economic measures in five business cycles
riod than in the earlier
one,
the ratio of man1948-51
1953-56
1957-60
1960-63
1948-63
days
lost because of
(per cent change)
strikes to total manGross national product
days worked declined
in constant dollars.........
67.9
16.6
8.6
7.7
12.1
almost 60 per cent.
Industrial production.........
18.9
9.4
14.4
7.9
81.7
Second, when there
Nonfarm wage and salary
were long strikes in
employment...................
6.6
4.3
2.8
27.3
5.1
basic industries such
Output per man-hour in
as steel or railroads, a
manufacturing................
10.4
11.5
64.7
10.8
11.6
large but unknown
Consumer prices................
8.0
5.2
3.5
27.3
1.6
number of additional
10.0
-0.4
14.1
Wholesale prices..............
1.7
3.8
man-days were lost be­
Corporate profits
cause
of secondary
16.7
19.7*
60.6*
Before tax..................... . 27.9
2.5
layoffs
caused by
After tax......................... - 3.9
31.2*
22.3*
29.8 - 1.3
shortages
of supplies
*Adjusted for introduction of fax credit on equipment purchases and new depreciaor services.
tion guidelines.




7

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

8

G ro w th r a te can be a c c e le ra te d
ernment expenditures, not deemed to be
sufficiently productive, also would aid effi­
Although the record of the Sixties com­
ciency if any resulting slack is taken up by
pares favorably with the earlier postwar
private outlays. Perhaps the most likely de­
period, further improvement is both possible
velopment in the sphere of Government
and desirable. Some factors are almost cer­
tain to work to this end; others will do so if
would be a reduction in military outlays and
personnel.
circumstances are favorable.
Growth in production would be promoted
Output is determined by the degree to
by measures that help maintain or establish
which our potential labor force and facili­
ties are utilized and the efficiency with which
competitive conditions and thereby broaden
markets for both goods and labor. Competi­
these resources are employed. Employment
tion may be encouraged also by removing or
can rise through a reduction in unemploy­
mitigating barriers to trade between nations.
ment to more acceptable levels and, even
Domestically, benefits can accrue from meas­
more, by an increase in the participation rate
ures to help upgrade skills, increase mobility
of the potential labor force which has been
and reduce hurdles that impede employment
declining since 1956. Reduction of the rate
because of age, sex or race.
of unemployment from the 5.7 per cent aver­
Many of the paths to more rapid growth
age of 1963 to the commonly accepted goal
are difficult to follow. But it is clear that the
of 4 per cent would have increased average
number of young people reaching working
employment by 1.2 million. An increase in
age is increasing. Between 1950 and 1960 the
the labor force participation rate to the 1956
number of persons 18 to 25 years of age rose
level would have added 2.6 million workers,
about 100,000. In the decade of the Sixties
mainly in the youngest and oldest groups.
the number in this age bracket will increase
In part the reduced labor force participa­
more than 8 million. If the economy can pro­
tion rate reflects longer schooling and earlier
vide training and jobs for these individuals,
retirement. Moreover, changes in production
total employment and total output will ac­
techniques have increased the difficulties of
celerate. If not, unemployment will grow sub­
matching workers’ skills and employers’
stantially, and billions of dollars of potential
needs. Nevertheless, many persons, not now
output will be lost.
counted as unemployed, would obtain jobs if
effective demand increased rap­
idly.
The vastly expanded outlays on
research and development and
N o n fa rm wage and salary employment
training of technicians in the past
u. s.
Indiana
Iowa Michigan W iscon
Illinois
10 to 15 years is paying off in­
(per cent change)
creasingly in terms of improved
6.6
10.3
5.9
8.2
1948-51___
2.8
5.5
production processes and better
1953-56___
4.3
2.8 -1 .1
2.7 - 0 .7
4.6
products. And the proportion of
1957-60___
1.6
2.8 -1 .1
3.8 -1 .1
3.5
total resources devoted to re­
4.6
2.9
1.2
3.4
1960-63___
5.1
2.6
search and education continues to
1957-63___
8.0
1.5
6.3
6.9
0.1
7.0
rise.
Efforts to reduce those Gov1948-63___ 27.3
22.0
17.3
12.5
13.6
21.5