View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Current Economic Conditions in the

Eighth Federal Reserve District
Louisville Zone
September 21, 2012

Prepared by the

Research Division of the
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Eighth
Federal Reserve
District
I
ILLINOIS
ILL NO
ILLINO S
ILLINOIS

IN IANA
IN IAN
INDIANA
ND
NDIAN

Columbia
Jefferson City

St. Louis

MISSOURI
ISS UR
SSOUR
S
SO

Louisville-Jefferson County

Evansville
Owensboro

Elizabethtown

KENTUCKY
KENTUCKY
KEN UCKY
EN UC
N
NTU

Springfield
Bowling Green

Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers
Jonesboro
Jackson

ARKA AS
ARKAN AS
RKANSAS
AN

TEN SSEE
TEN ESSEE
TENNESSEE
NNE
N

Fort Smith

Memphis

Little Rock-North Little Rock
Hot Springs
Pine Bluff

Texarkana

MISS SIPPI
MISS SSIPPI
SSISS PP

This report (known as the Burgundy Book ) summarizes information on economic conditions in the Louisville zone of the
Eighth Federal Reserve District (see map above), headquartered in St. Louis. Separate reports have also been prepared for the
Little Rock, Memphis, and St. Louis zones and can be downloaded from research.stlouisfed.org/regecon/.
The report includes government-provided data for Kentucky and the metro areas of the Louisville zone. These data are the
most recent available at the time this report was assembled.
NOTE: Metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) are larger geographic areas than cities, as defined by the Census Bureau.
For more information, please contact the Louisville office:
Maria G. Hampton, 502-568-9205, maria.g.hampton@stls.frb.org
Economist:
Kevin L. Kliesen, 314-444-8583, kevin.l.kliesen@stls.frb.org

Louisville Zone Report—September 21, 2012
By several metrics, Louisville is the top-performing zone in our District. Nonfarm payroll employment growth has been
appreciably stronger than the nation’s, as has the growth of housing permits. House prices are also increasing from a
year earlier, in contrast with many other areas of the District and for the nation. The following five points illustrate this
assessment:
Annual Changes in Employment: In July 2012, Louisville’s nonfarm payroll employment was 2.8 percent higher
than a year earlier. By contrast, the nation’s increase was half as much over the same period.
Short-Term Changes in Employment: Between April 2012 and July 2012, Louisville’s local employment increased by
an average rate of 0.1 percent per month, which matched the nation’s increase.
Unemployment Rate: In the Louisville MSA, the unemployment rate decreased by about 0.25 percentage points over
the past three months to 8.2 percent in July 2012. This rate was about equal to the nation’s 8.3 percent rate, but higher
than other key areas in Kentucky.
Building Permits: The number of building permits issued in Louisville from January 2012 through July 2012 was more
than 50 percent higher than the number issued during the same period in 2011. Overall, real estate activity (as measured
by building permit issuance) in the Louisville zone has been quite strong in 2012, having outpaced the nation’s in three of
five areas examined.
House Prices: During the second quarter of 2012, housing prices were 0.5 percent higher than a year earlier in the
Louisville MSA. For the five areas of the Louisville zone, prices increased by an average of 1.7 percent over the past year,
while U.S. house prices fell by 0.6 percent.

Anecdotal Information from the Beige Book
Agriculture and Natural Resources

Car Dealers

• Year-to-date coal production through August was
2.8 percent higher in western Kentucky and 1.5 percent lower in Indiana compared with the first eight
months of 2011.

• Overall sales were higher, with two of three contacts
reporting increased sales, one of six reporting no
change in sales, and one of six reporting decreased
sales in July and early August.

• Crop conditions in Kentucky and Indiana have declined
significantly since June. Soybean crops are in the best
shape, with just over 50 percent reported in fair or
better condition. Only about a quarter of pastureland
in Indiana and corn crops across both states are
reported in fair or better condition.

• Sales are expected to increase in September and
October when compared with the same time last year
for two of three contacts; one of six contacts expects
no change in sales; and one of six contacts expects
slightly lower sales.

• Crop yields and production are forecasted to be significantly below year-ago levels in both Indiana and
Kentucky. The most negative outlook is for corn crops
in Kentucky; yields and annual production are expected
to be around 50 percent below 2011 levels.

Construction
• Contacts in Louisville noted new speculative construction plans in Jeffersonville, Indiana.
• With demand for multi-family units remaining strong,
plans for apartment construction continued to increase.

General Retail

Real Estate

• July and early August sales increased compared with
the same time last year for two of three contacts;
sales were flat for the remaining contacts.

• A contact in Louisville reported that office leasing
activity declined in the central business district, while
it remained strong in the suburban area.

• All contacts reported that sales met expectations.

Services

• Sales are expected to increase in September and
October when compared with the same time last year
for five of six contacts; the remaining contacts expect
sales to remain constant.

• Business support, medical, healthcare information
technology, environmental consulting, and personal
care services firms plan to expand operations and hire
new employees. In contrast, an educational organization plans to lay off workers.

Manufacturing

Banking and Finance

• Firms in automobile, appliance, poultry processing,
wall coverings, food, construction machinery, and
packing and label manufacturing plan to hire new
workers and/or expand operations. An appliance
manufacturing firm, however, plans to lay off workers
and close a plant.

• All contacts expect loan demand to stay the same.
• Two of three contacts find that loan delinquencies are
getting worse; the remaining contact finds that loan
delinquencies are improving.

Detailed Indicators: Employment, Unemployment,
Personal Income, and General Economic Activity
Nonfarm Payroll Employment Growth—Louisville MSA
Percent
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
–0.2
–0.4
–0.6
–0.8
2006

United States
Louisville MSA
2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

NOTE: 3-Month moving average, seasonally adjusted, January 2006–July 2012. See the narrative with the St. Louis charts for descriptions and definitions of the series
that are also used in the Little Rock, Louisville, and Memphis charts and tables.
SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Payroll employment growth in the Louisville MSA measured on the basis of a three-month moving average has slowed
modestly over the past several months. (Earlier in 2012 and extending back to late 2011, Louisville was experiencing
relatively faster growth than the nation.) Despite this slowing, employment growth in Louisville, as well as for the nation,
remains positive. Between April 2012 and July 2012, Louisville’s employment rose by an average rate of 0.1 percent per
month, which equaled the nation’s growth rate.

Employment Growth by Sector—Louisville MSA
Percent
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
–1.0
–2.0
–3.0

6.7

6.3
4.2

2.8

3.0
2.2
0.4
–0.1

–0.2
–1.2

Total Nonfarm
Trade,
100%
Transportation,
and Utilities
22%

Education
and Health
14%

Government Professional and Manufacturing
13%
Business Services
11%
13%

Leisure and
Hospitality
11%

Financial
Activities
7%

Other Services
4%

Natural
Resources,
Mining, and
Construction
4%

–2.1
Information
2%

NOTE: Percent change with respect to one year ago, July 2011–July 2012.
SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Smoothing through the volatile month-to-month gains from the previous report shows that Louisville’s economy has seen relatively strong employment growth over the past 12 months. Since July 2012, MSA payroll employment increased by 2.8 percent.
This percentage increase is double the nation’s 1.4 percent increase. The two largest sectors by employment in Louisville are
Trade, Transportation, and Utilities (TTU) and Education and Health, followed closely by Government and Professional and
Business Services (PBS). Employment in Manufacturing and Leisure and Hospitality also account individually for more than 10
percent of the nonfarm jobs in the Louisville MSA. Louisville’s brisk growth over the past year stems from strong gains in nearly
all of these sectors. In particular, employment growth has been exceptionally brisk in PBS, Manufacturing, and Leisure and
Hospitality. The main exception has been the Government sector, which has contracted slightly over the past year. Three months
earlier (see the June 2012 Burgundy Book), the Natural Resources, Mining, and Construction sector had the largest declines in
the Louisville MSA (–3.2 percent). Three months later, this sector has exhibited slightly positive growth.

Employment and Unemployment by MSA
Nonfarm payroll employment percent change,
July 2011–July 2012
Total
Louisville, Ky.-Ind.
Bowling Green, Ky.
Evansville, Ind.
United States

Goods producing

Service providing

Unemployment rate
July 2012

2.82
–1.85
0.63
1.40

4.55
–2.68
–2.02
1.52

2.52
–1.66
1.42
1.38

8.2
7.3
7.4
8.3

NOTE: Sector-level employment data are not available for Elizabethtown, Ky., or Owensboro, Ky; as a result, these MSAs are not included in this table.
SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Labor market conditions in the Louisville zone have mostly improved over the past year. Employment growth has been
the strongest in the Louisville MSA, as nonfarm payrolls have increased by 2.8 percent over the 12 months ending in July
2012. Louisville has seen exceptionally strong gains in goods-producing industries, but also healthy growth in the serviceproviding industries. Employment increases also occurred in the Evansville area, as positive growth in service-providing
employment more than offset a decline in goods-producing employment.1 Employment in the Bowling Green area has
declined over the past year, as both goods-producing and service-providing industries have experienced job loss. Despite
weaker employment conditions in Bowling Green and Evansville, their unemployment rates remained appreciably lower
in July 2012 than both the Louisville MSA’s rate and the nation’s rate.
1

Although the percentage decline in goods-producing employment was larger than the positive increase in service-providing employment, there was a net increase in
jobs because the service-providing sector is considerably larger than the goods-producing sector.

Coincident Economic Activity Index—Louisville Zone
Index (Dec. 2007 = 100)
102
100
98
96
94
92

Indiana
Kentucky

90

United States

88
2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

SOURCE: Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.

The Philadelphia Fed’s coincident index showed that the contraction in economic activity in Indiana and Kentucky during the
previous recession was significantly deeper than for the nation as a whole—which is similar to the cases for Arkansas, Missouri,
and Illinois. Whereas economic activity in the United States declined by about 5.5 percent, the decline in Indiana was closer to
12 percent; Kentucky’s decline was a little less than 10 percent. At the same time, the index also shows that the recovery in
economic activity in Indiana and in Kentucky has been stronger than the nation’s. Since their index’s trough in 2009, activity
has increased by 11 percent in Indiana and 7.5 percent in Kentucky. These gains—which are the strongest among all Eighth
District states—have outpaced the nation’s increase (6.6 percent) as well. However, the current index reading in July 2012
indicates that the level of activity has not yet returned to its pre-recession peak, as it has for the nation.

Real Personal Income Growth—Louisville Zone
Percent
6

4

2

0

–2

–4

–6
2006

Indiana
Kentucky
United States
2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

NOTE: Percent change with respect to previous year.
SOURCE: Bureau of Economic Analysis.

Personal income (PI) growth for Kentucky and Indiana generally tracks the nation’s. However, their growth rates diverged
sharply during the previous recession. Consistent with the coincident index, personal income for Indiana declined more sharply
than Kentucky’s during the recession. Indiana’s growth of PI during the previous recession closely followed the nation’s PI
growth. More recently, though, PI in these two states increased rapidly and outpaced the nation’s growth. Since 2011, though,
these growth rate differences have narrowed dramatically. From the first quarter of 2011 to the first quarter of 2012, Kentucky’s
PI increased by 1.0 percent, while Indiana’s PI has increased by 0.8 percent. Meanwhile, the nation’s PI increased by 0.6 percent over the same period.

Residential Real Estate Activity by MSA
Total building permits, units year-to-date
July 2012
Louisville, Ky.-Ind.
Bowling Green, Ky.
Elizabethtown, Ky.
Evansville, Ind.
Owensboro, Ky.
United States

2,034
449
254
320
162
454,275

Percent change

House price index, percent change,
2012:Q2/2011:Q2

56.7
72.0
64.9
21.2
20.0
31.1

0.5
1.3
3.0
1.6
2.2
–0.6

SOURCE: Bureau of the Census, Federal Housing Financing Authority.

Of the four zones, Louisville has been the strongest in real estate activity year-to-date. The pace of building permit issuance
has exceeded the nation’s in three of the five areas we examined. Growth has been especially robust in Louisville, as
permits thus far in 2012 are running more than 50 percent higher than the same period in 2011. Permit issuance in the
Bowling Green and Elizabethtown areas has also been growing briskly and above the nation’s growth. Double-digit permit growth thus far in 2012 has also occurred in the Evansville and Owensboro areas, though these gains have not been
as strong as the nation’s growth (31.1 percent year to date). House prices have also been increasing in the Louisville
zone, in contrast with the modest decline seen for the United States over the most recent four quarters. From the second
quarter of 2011 to the second quarter of 2012, house prices in the Louisville zone have increased on average by 1.7 percent across MSAs, versus a decline of 0.6 percent for the nation. The strongest gains in house prices over the past year
have occurred in Elizabethtown and in Owensboro.