View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Current Economic Conditions in the

Eighth Federal Reserve District
St. Louis Zone
December 23, 2010

Prepared by the

Center for Regional Economics—8th District (CRE8)
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Eighth
Federal Reserve
District
I
ILLINOIS
ILL NO
ILLINO S
ILLINOIS

IN IANA
IN IAN
INDIANA
ND
NDIAN

Columbia
Jefferson City

St. Louis

MISSOURI
ISS UR
SSOUR
S
SO

Louisville-Jefferson County

Evansville
Owensboro

Elizabethtown

KENTUCKY
KENTUCKY
KEN UCKY
EN UC
N
NTU

Springfield
Bowling Green

Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers
Jonesboro
Jackson

ARKA AS
ARKAN AS
RKANSAS
AN

TEN SSEE
TEN ESSEE
TENNESSEE
NNE
N

Fort Smith

Memphis

Little Rock-North Little Rock
Hot Springs
Pine Bluff

Texarkana

MISS SIPPI
MISS SSIPPI
SSISS PP

This report (known as the Burgundy Book ) summarizes information on economic conditions in the St. Louis zone
of the Eighth Federal Reserve District (see map above), headquartered in St. Louis. Separate reports have also been
prepared for the Little Rock, Louisville, and Memphis zones and can be downloaded from the CRE8 website
(research.stlouisfed.org/regecon/).
The first section of this report summarizes information provided by various contacts within the District and is
similar to the type of information found in the Fed’s Beige Book (federalreserve.gov/fomc/beigebook/2010/).
The period covered by this section coincides roughly with the two Beige Book periods immediately preceding this
report. The second section includes government-provided data for the metro areas and states of the St. Louis zone.
These data are the most recent available at the time this report was assembled.
For more information, please contact the St. Louis office:
Joel James, 314-444-8963, joel.h.james@stls.frb.org
Economist:
Alejandro Badel, 314-444-8712, alejandro.badel@stls.frb.org

St. Louis Zone Report—December 23, 2010
At the close of November, the annual growth of employment, building permits, and housing prices was 0.2 percent, 17.1 percent,
and –0.1 percent in the St. Louis MSA and 0.7 percent, 5.8 percent, and –1.2 percent in the nation. The annual growth of personal income was 1.4 percent in Missouri and 2.1 percent in the nation. In the past three months, local employment decreased by
an average of 0.1 percent per month, while the nation’s remained constant. The unemployment rate in St. Louis (9.7 percent)
was higher than the nation’s (9.5 percent). According to four out of six indicators considered, St. Louis has been outperformed by
the nation. This view is consistent with negative anecdotal reports from construction contacts but contrasts with mildly positive
reports from retailers, car dealers, and bankers.

General Retailers

Construction

• October and early November sales increased compared
with the same time last year for half of the contacts.
• Sales met or exceeded expectations for four out of five
contacts.
• Sales were expected to increase in this quarter relative to
the same time last year for half of the contacts.

• A contact in St. Louis reported a decrease in commercial
construction activity and scarceness of industrial construction
during the third quarter of 2010.

Car Dealers
• October and early November sales increased compared
with the same time last year for two out of three contacts.
• Sales were expected to increase in this quarter relative to
the same time last year for two out of three contacts.

Manufacturing
• Textiles and transformers contacts plan to expand operations
and hire workers.
• Containers, air conditioning, and chemicals contacts plan to
decrease operations and employment.

Services
• Government services and air transportation support contacts
plan to open facilities and hire workers.
• Education and entertainment contacts plan to decrease
operations and employment.

Real Estate
• Home sales for January through October were 11 percent
lower than last year’s.
• Single-family housing permits for January through October
were 7 percent higher than last year’s.
• Between the second and third quarters, industrial and
office vacancy rates decreased.

Banking and Finance
• Lending activity was relatively unchanged in the consumer
lending category despite tighter lending standards.
• Lending activity increased in the commercial and industrial
lending category, although new loan originations were
“restrained” because of borrowers’ “unwillingness to accept
lending terms.”
• Residential mortgage activity increased because of increased
financing activity but was “slightly restrained because of
tighter lending standards.”
• Deposit growth increased steadily in spite of a mild fall in
deposit rates.

Agriculture
• Weather conditions were warmer and drier this quarter in
the St. Louis zone.
• Crop harvests progressed ahead of schedule. Illinois and
Missouri farmers harvested at least 93 percent of the corn,
soybean, and sorghum crops by early November.
• Corn yields decreased in both states, while sorghum and
cotton yields increased by 5 percent or more from 2009.
• Winter wheat planting and growth was ahead of schedule,
with 85 percent or more of the crop classified as fair or
better.

Nonfarm Payroll Employment Growth
3-Month Average, SA, January 2006–November 2010
Percent
0.4
0.2
0.0
–0.2
–0.4
–0.6

United States
St. Louis MSA

–0.8
2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

St. Louis’s recession-related decline in employment, centered on January 2009, was slightly milder than in the nation overall. The
recovery started roughly at the same time in St. Louis as in the nation. However, the recovery seems to have stalled in St. Louis
since July 2010. Average monthly employment has contracted 0.1 percent in St. Louis during the past three months, while it has
grown 0.01 percent in the nation.

St. Louis MSA Employment Growth by Sector
Year/Year Percent Change, November 2009–November 2010
Percent
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
–1.0
–2.0
–3.0

Total
Trade,
Education
Nonfarm Transportation, and
100%
and Utilities Health
19%
17%

Government Professional Leisure Manufacturing
14%
and
and
9%
Business Hospitality
Services
11%
14%

Financial
Activities
6%

Natural
Resources,
Mining, and
Construction
5%

Other
Services
4%

Information
2%

Employment growth by sector during the past 12 months distinguishes general trends from sector-specific trends in St. Louis’s
economic performance. Annual employment increased by 0.2 percent in the St. Louis MSA, compared with a 0.7 percent increase
for the United States. The three largest sectors in St. Louis are Trade, Transportation, and Utilities; Education and Health; and
Government, accounting for 19 percent, 17 percent, and 14 percent of St. Louis MSA’s employment. Growth in these three sectors
was 0.04 percent, 2.2 percent, and 0.3 percent, respectively. Education and Health had the best performance in St. Louis.

St. Louis Zone—MSA Employment and Unemployment
Nonfarm payroll employment percent change,
November 2009–November 2010
Total
St. Louis
Columbia, Mo.
Jefferson City, Mo.
Springfield, Mo.
United States

Goods producing

Service providing

Unemployment rate
October 2010

0.22
–0.32
0.26
1.41
0.64

–0.74
2.86
1.12
0.48
0.34

0.37
–0.58
0.14
1.52
0.69

9.7
6.4
7.2
8.3
9.5

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Employment expansion in the St. Louis zone is substantial in the Springfield MSA for service-providing activities and the Columbia
MSA for goods-producing activities. The highest unemployment rate in the St. Louis zone was registered in the St. Louis MSA at
9.7 percent. This unemployment rate is still higher than the 9.5 percent registered for the United States.

St. Louis Zone—MSA Housing Activity
Total building permits,
units year-to-date
October 2010
St. Louis
4,861
Columbia, Mo.
454
Jefferson City, Mo.
163
Springfield, Mo.
950
United States
510,880

Percent change

House price index,
percent change,
2010:Q3/2009:Q3

17.1
–16.7
19.9
22.1
5.8

–0.11
1.14
0.77
–0.79
–1.19

SOURCE: Bureau of the Census, Federal Housing Financing Authority.

The 17.1 percent expansion of building permits in the St. Louis MSA contrasts with a contraction in the Columbia MSA. The
expansion was remarkable compared with a 5.8 percent expansion for the United States. The 0.1 percent house price decrease
in the St. Louis MSA contrasts with the house price increases in the Columbia and Jefferson City MSAs. This decrease was mild
compared with the 1.2 percent decrease for the United States. The highest increase in building permits was registered in the
Springfield MSA, while the greatest decline was registered in the Columbia MSA. The highest increase in house prices was registered in the Columbia MSA, while the greatest decline was registered in the Springfield MSA.

St. Louis Area Coincident Economic Activity Index
Index (Jan. 2008 = 100)
102
100
98
96
94
92
Illinois

90

Missouri
88

United States

86
2008
2009
SOURCE: Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.

2010

The Philadelphia Fed’s coincident index combines information on payroll employment, wages, unemployment, and hours of work
to give a single measure of economic performance. This index gives an idea of the state economic environment in which St. Louis
operates. Illinois’s and Missouri’s coincident indices reveal a stronger impact of the recession and a slower recovery compared
with the nation. The index bottomed at 90.3 for Illinois and at 87.0 for Missouri, while it bottomed at 92.6 for the United States.
Current values of the index suggest that economic activity in Illinois and Missouri are at 91.6 percent and 87.2 percent of their
pre-recession levels, respectively, while it is at 94.3 percent in the nation. In summary, the state economic environment of the
St. Louis zone should be worse than the nation’s.

St. Louis Area Real Personal Income Growth
Percent Change, Year/Year
Percent
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
–1
–2
–3

Illinois

–4

Missouri

–5

United States

–6
2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

SOURCE: Bureau of Economic Analysis.

In Illinois, personal income growth was below the nation’s several periods before January 2009, while Missouri’s was above. The
recession’s impact on St. Louis’s and Illinois’s personal income has been stronger and the recovery has been weaker compared
with the nation’s, although more volatile in Missouri. Between the third quarter of 2009 and the third quarter of 2010, personal
income grew 1.4 percent in Missouri and 1.7 percent in Illinois, while it grew 2.1 percent in the nation.