View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
W . N. DOAK, Secretary

BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS
ETHELBERT STEWART, Commissioner

CA C
IlOe D4-D

BULLETIN OFTHE UNITED STATES'!
BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS/ ’
M I S C E L L A N E O U S

fcT

S E R I E S

BUILDING PERMITS IN THE
PRINCIPAL CITIES OF THE
UNITED STATES IN 1930

DECEMBER, 1931

UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON : 1932

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. -




Price 20 cents




CONTENTS
Page

Introduction and summary_________________________________________
Building trend, 1929 and 1930__________________________________
Families provided for, 1929 and 1930-----------------------------------------Per capita expenditure for buildings, 1930_______________________
Building operations, 1921 to 1930___________________________________
Average cost of dwellings per family, 1921 to 1930_______________
Families provided for, 1921 to 1930_____ ________________________
Five leading cities, 1921 to 1930________________________________
Prices of building material, and wages, 1921 to 1930______________
Apartment-house living in American cities, 1930--------------------------------General table______________________________________________________
in




1
3
4
5
10
11
12
13
15
15
18




BULLETIN OF THE

U. S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS
No. 545

WASHINGTON

December, 1931

BUILDING PERMITS IN THE PRINCIPAL CITIES OF THE
UNITED STATES IN 1930
Introduction and Summary
The Bureau of Labor Statistics received reports of building per­
mits issued during the calendar year 1930 from 311 of the 319 cities
of the United States having a population of 25,000 or over. It
was necessary to send agents of the bureau to only six cities to com­
pile reports from the local records, all of the other 305 cities having
replied to questionnaires sent by mail. The eight cities omitted are
small and six of these have no building code. In collecting reports
for 1922, agents of the bureau had to visit 33 %per cent of the cities
to compile the data from local records; this proportion was reduced
to 6.1 per cent in 1928, to 2.6 per cent in 1929, and to 1.9 per cent in
1930. Thus it will be seen that local building officials are now fully
alive to the value of these figures and are lending their hearty assist­
ance to the bureau. The States of Illinois, Massachusetts, New
Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania, through their departments of
labor, are cooperating with the United States Bureau of Labor
Statistics in the collection of these data.
In studying the following tables it should be remembered that the
costs shown are for the costs of the buildings only and do not include
cost of land. The cost is estimated by the prospective builder at the
time of applying for his permit to build and is recorded on his appli­
cation. Furthermore, the costs are for buildings in the corporate
limits of the cities enumerated. Much building in the suburbs of
large cities is therefore not included in the figures shown.
Table 1 shows the total number of new buildings and the estimated
cost of the different kinds of new buildings for which permits were
issued in the 311 cities from which reports were received for the year
1930, the per cent that each kind forms of the total number, the per
cent that the cost of each kind forms of the total cost, and the average
cost per building.
Permits were issued during 1930 in these 311 cities for 210,141 build­
ings. Of this number, 73,201, or 34.8 per cent, were residential build­
ings and 136,940, or 65.2 per cent, were nonresidential buildings. Of
the residential buildings, one-family dwellings were the most numer­
ous. This class of building comprised 29.3 per cent of the total num­
ber of buildings for which permits were issued. Only two other classes
of residential buildings, two-family dwellings and multifamily dwell­
ings, accounted for more than 1 per cent of the total number of
buildings. Private garages were by far the most numerous class of
nonresidential buildings, accounting for 46.4 per cent of all buildings




1

2

BUILDING PERMITS IN PRINCIPAL CITIES

T able

1.— Number and cost of new buildings as stated by 'permits issued in 311
cities, 1980, by kind of building
New buildings for which psrmits were issued
Estimated cost

Kind of building
Number

Per
cent

Amount

Per
cent

Average
per
building

RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
1-family dwellings......................................................
2-family dwellings .... ______ _
. , ,
1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores com­
bined......................................................................
Multifamily dwellings________ ______ __________
Multifamily dwellings with stores combined..........
Hotels........................................... ...... ......................
Lodging houses.............................. ...........................
All others_____________________________________

61,656
7,187

29.3
3.4

$306,185,802
53,935,588

20.3
3.6

$4,966
7,512

874
3,019
205
79
11
170

.4
1.4
.1
0
0)
.1

6,985,654
193,174,494
12,249,912
24,777,624
219,000
28,322,912

.5
12.8
.8
1.6
0)
1.9

7,993
63,986
59,756
313,641
19,909
166,605

Total.................................................................

73,201

34.8

625,900,986

41.6

8,550

1,450
698
2,679
1,948
97,458
5,778
272
703
434
603
754
10,725
267
8,916
4,255

.7
.3
1.3
.9
46.4
2.7
.1
.3
.2
.3
.4
5.1
.1
4.2
2.0

43,375,341
29,575,418
109,491,239
26,827,939
33,723,157
21,869,134
58,258,336
160,741,404
85,820,846
45,237,457
126,908,372
3,864,937
438,425
127,832,430
5,913,967

2.9
2.0
7.3
1.8
2.2
1.5
3.9
10.7
5.7
3.0
8.4
.3
0)
8.5
.4

29,914
42,372
40,870
13,772
346
3,785
214,185
228,651
197,744
75,021
168,313
360
1,642
14,337
1,390

NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
Amusement buildings..............................................
Churches_____ ____ _______________ _______ ____
Factories and workshops____________
_ _
Public garages______________________ _ ________
Private garages...................... ........................ ..........
Service stations________________________________
Institutions___________________________________
Office buildings........................................................
Public buildings.......... ......... ...................................
Public works and utilities______________________
Schools and libraries___________________________
Sheds____ ____________________________________
Stables and barns_____ ________________________
Stores and warehouses__________________________
All other____________________________ ____ _____
Total____________________________________

136,940

65.2

879,878,402

58.4

6,425

Grand total.....................................................

210,141

100.0

1,505,779,388

100.0

7,166

1Less than one-tenth of 1 per cent.

or which permits were ssued in these cities. Of the other important
classes of nonresidential buildings, stores were the most numerous,
followed by factory buildings. In these 311 cities permits were
issued for 1,450 amusement buildings, but for only 698 churches.
The total estimated cost of all new buildings for which permits
were issued during 1930 in these cities was $1,505,779,388. For the
nrst time since the collection of these figures by the bureau the esti­
mated cost of new nonresidential buildings exceeded the indicated
expenditures for new residential buildings. Residential buildings
accounted for 41.6 per cent of the total estimated cost of all buildings
and new nonresidential buildings for 58.4 per cent.
One-family dwellings accounted for a larger proportion of the total
cost than any other class of buildings, while multifamily dwellings
were next in rank. Office buildings accounted for a larger percentage
of the total expenditures than any other class of nonresidential build­
ings, followed in order by stores and warehouses and schools and
libraries. Public buildings, buildings for public works and utilities,
schools and libraries, and institutions are usually erected from public
funds either National, State, county, or city. These classes of build­
ings together accounted for $316,225,011, or 21 per cent of the total
estimated cost of all buildings, for which permits were issued during




3

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

the calendar year 1930; in 1929, only 12.6 per cent was expended
for these types of all buildings.
The average cost per building of the new buildings for which per­
mits were issued during 1930 in these cities was $7,166. The average
cost of the new residential buildings was $8,550, and of the new nonresidential buildings, $6,425. Omitting private garages, sheds, and
stables and bams, the average cost of the remaining nonresidential
buildings was $29,549 per building. Hotels showed a greater average
cost than any other land of building. In the nonresidential group
office buildings had the highest cost per building, followed in order by
institutional buildings and public buildings.
Building Trend, 1929 and 1930
Table 2 shows the number and cost of the different kinds of build­
ings for 311 identical cities from which reports were received in 1929
and 1930 and the per cent of increase or decrease in 1930 as compared
with 1929:
2.— Number and cost of new buildings and of alterations and repairs for
which permits were issued in 311 identical cities, 1929 and 1980, by kind of
building

T able

Buildings for which permits were issued
1929

Kind of building
Num­
ber

1930

Per cent of
increase (+) or
decrease c—) in
1930 compared
with 1929

Cost

Num­
ber

Cost

Num­
ber

1-family dwellings............................ 104,798
2-family dwellings____ __________
12,990
1-family and 2-family dwellings with
stores combined..... ......................
1,501
Multifamily dwellings___________
6,662
Multifamily dwellings with stores
combined......................................
565
Hotels..............................................
275
Lodging houses .............................
23
All other..........................................
138

$516,296,140
99,140,941

61,656
7,187

$306,185,802
53,985,588

-4 1.2
-4 4.7

-4 0.7
-4 5.5

14,262,073
490,957,201

874
3,019

6,985,654
193,174,494

-41.8
-54.7

-5 1.0
-6 0.7

34,919,508
284,604,413
428,569
37,011,151

205
79
11
170

12.249.912
24,777,624
219,000
28.322.912

-63.7
-71.3
-52,2
+23.2

-6 4.9
-91.3
-4 8.9
-2 3.5

Total residential buildings___ 126,952

1,477,619,996

73,201

625,900,986

-42.3

-5 7.6

Amusement buildings......................
748
Churches--.....................................
855
Factories and workshops.................
3,927
Public garages...............................
4,071
Private garages................................ 135,637
Service stations................................
4,207
Institutions......................................
274
Office buildings-..............................
1,136
Public buildings..............................
327
Public works and utilities...............
629
Schools and libraries........................
753
Sheds................ .............................. 10,649
Stables and barns..... .......................
324
Stores and warehouses. ................... 12,085
All other..................-............ . .........
4,488

43,215,396
40,881,577
141,620,127
49,198,147
48,637,185
19,928,471
75,702,762
240,950,145
87,553,812
45,443,758
128,897,346
4,456,039
968,941
254,474,954
8,751,957

1,450
698
2,679
1,948
97,458
5,778
272
703
434
603
754
10,725
267
8,916
4,255

43,375,341
29,575,418
109,491,239
26,827,939
33,723,157
21,869,134
58,258,336
160,741,404
85,820,846
45,237,457
126,908,372
3,864,937
438,425
127,832,430
5,913,967

+93.9
-18.4
-3 1.8
-52.1
-28.1
+37.3
-0 .7
-38.1
+32.7
-4 .1
+ 0.1
+0.7
-17.6
-26.2
-5 .2

+0.4
-2 7.7
-2 2.7
-4 5.5
-3 0.7
+9.7
-2 .3
-33.3
- 2.0
-0 .5
-1 .5
-13.3
-5 4 .8
-4 9.8
-3 2.4

Total nonresidential buildings 180,110

1,190,680,617

136,940

879,878,402

-2 4 .0

-26.1

Total new buildings. ............. 307,062 2,668,300,613 210,141
Additions, alterations, and repairs.. 276,188
367,475,292 257,289

1,505,779,388
260,365,278

-3 1.6
- 6.8

-4 3.6
-29.1

1,766,144,666

-19.9

-41.8

Cost

RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS

NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS

Grand total, all building......... 583,250 3,035,775,905




467,430

4

BUILDING PERMITS IN PRINCIPAL CITIES

Comparing permits issued in these 311 cities during 1930 with those
issued during 1929, there was a decrease of 19.9 per cent in the
number of total building operations and a decrease of 41.8 per cent
in their estimated cost. New buildings decreased 31.6 per cent in
number and 43.6 per cent in estimated cost, while additions, altera­
tions, and repairs decreased 6.8 per cent in number and 29.1 per cent
in estimated cost.
Permits issued for residential buildings show a decrease of 42.3
per cent in number and a decrease of 57.6 per cent in indicated ex­
penditures. All classes of residential buildings showed a decrease
in estimated cost, ranging from 23.5 per cent for “All other” resi­
dential buildings to 91.3 per cent for hotels. The number of buildings
in the residential group showed decreases in all classes (except in
“All other” residential buildings, for which there was an increase of
23.2 per cent), the decreases ranging from 41.2 per cent for 1-family
dwellings to 71.3 per cent for hotels.
New nonresidential buildings showed a much smaller rate of de­
crease in 1930 as compared with 1929 than did new residential build­
ings, having decreased only 24 per cent in number and 26.1 per
cent in estimated cost. Ten classes of buildings in the nonresidential
group showed decreases in number ranging from 0.7 per cent for
institutions to 52.1 per cent for public garages. Increases in number
were registered in five classes of buildings in the nonresidential group,
these increases ranging from 0.1 per cent for schools and libraries
to 93.9 per cent for amusement buildings. Only two classes of
buildings in the nonresidential group showed increases in the indi­
cated expenditure, namely, amusement buildings and service stations;
the decreases for the other classes of nonresidential buildings ranged
from 0.5 per cent for public works and utilities to 54.8 per cent for
stables and bams. It will be noted that the estimated expenditures
for public buildings, public works and utilities, and schools and
libraries showed very small percentages of decreases in indicated ex­
penditures. On the other hand, commercial building, such as stores
and warehouses, factories and workshops, and office buildings, showed
relatively large percentages of decrease.
Families Provided for, 1929 and 1930
Table 3 shows the number and per cent of families provided for
by each of the different kinds of dwellings for which permits were
issued in 311 identical cities during the calendar years 1929 and 1930:
3.— Number and per cent of families to be housed in new dwellings for
which 'permits were issued in 311 identical cities, 1929 and 1980, by kind of
dwelling

T able

Kind of dwelling

Number of new
buildings for
which permits
were issued
1929

Families pro vided for
Number

Per cent

1930

1929

1930

1929

1-family dwellings....................... ................................ 104,798
2-family dwellings......................................... - ............. 12,990
1,501
1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores combined
6,662
Multifamily dwellings.................................................
Multifamily dwellings with stores combined............
565

61,656
7,187
874
3,019
205

104,798
25,980
2,324
111,910
7,754

61,656
14,374
1,195
50,299
2,979

41.5
10.3
.9
44.3
3.1

47.2
11.0
.9
3a 5
2.3

Total................................................................... 126,516

72,941

252,766

130,503

100.0

100.0




1930

5

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

During 1930 permits were issued for 72,941 dwelling houses of vari­
ous kinds to house 130,503 families. This compares with 252,766
families housed by the 126,516 dwellings for which permits were issued
in these 311 cities during 1929, a decrease of 48.4 per cent in the num­
ber of families provided for.
One-family dwellings provided 47.2 per cent of the living quarters
for which permits were issued during 1930 as compared with 41.5 per
cent of the family dwelling units provided during 1929. Multifamily
dwellings, in contrast, showed a decrease in the per cent of dwelling
units provided, dropping from 44.3 per cent of the total in 1929 to
38.5 per cent in 1930. The per cent of families provided for, to be
housed in 2-family dwellings, rose from 10.3 in 1929 to 11 in 1930,
while the proportion to be housed in one and two family dwellings with
stores combined remained the same for both years.
The size of apartment houses was practically the same in both years,
the average number of families per building being 16.8 in 1929 and
16.7 in 1930.
The average cost of these apartment houses during 1930, as shown
in Table 1, was $63,986. The average cost of the apartment houses
for which permits were issued during 1929 was $73,695.
Per Capita Expenditure for Buildings, 1930
Table 4 shows for 1930 the per capita expenditure for new buildings,
new housekeeping dwellings, repairs and alterations, and for all kinds
of buildings in each of the 311 cities for which reports were received
for the calendar year 1930, the total number of families provided for,
and the ratio of families provided for to each 10,000 of population in
these 311 cities.
Indicated expenditure for all building operations in these 311 cities
during the calendar year 1930 was $1,766,144,666. The total popula­
tion of these cities was 47,091,551; thus the per capita expenditure
for all building operations was $37.51. Of this amount, $31.98 was
for new buildings and $5.53 was for repairs and alterations. Of the
amount spent for new buildings, $12.16 per capita was for house­
keeping dwellings.
T able

4.—Per capita expenditures for new buildings and for repairs, and families
provided for, in 311 cities, 1980
Families pro­
vided for

City and State

Akron, Ohio______ _________
Alameda. Calif_____________
Albany, N. Y .........................
Allentown, Pa__________ __
Alton, 111.................................
Altoona, P a ./______________
Amsterdam, N. Y ..................
Anderson, Ind_____________
Asheville, N. C ____________
Ashtabula, Ohio......... ..........
Atlanta, Ga________________
Atlantic City, N. J................
Auburn, N. Y _____________
Augusta, Ga...........................




Population,
census of
1930
Num­
ber

253,653
34,392
127,358
92,052
30,142
81,503
34,683
39,788
50,167
23,301
266,557
65,748
36,736
60,204

372
145
311
97
58
75
26
51
23
29
714
29
39
124

Per capita expenditure

Per
10,000
popu­
lation

For
new
build­
ings

For re­
pairs
and ad­
ditions

14.7
42.2
24.4
10.5
19.2
9.2
7.5
12.8
4.6
12.4
26.8
4.4
10.6
20.6

$31.18
20.01
59.32
17.48
26.86
13.42
27.86
13.38
5.43
11.14
25.82
6.29
28.95
8.41

$3.42
8.52
11.38
7.18
9.52
3.38
.74
1.95
3.38
3.66
5.86
15.01
1.92
3.48

Total

$34.60
28,53
70.70
24.66
36.38
16.80
28.60
15.34
8.82
14.80
31.69
21.30
30.87
11.88

Per capita
expendi­
ture for
house­
Rank keeping
dwell­
of
city ings only
95
139
18
173
82
245
138
254
294
259
113
196
119
274

$7.67
13.56
22.26
9.33
7.58
5.86
3.69
3.41
1.49
4.54
6.30
2.27
13.51
5.58

6

BUILDING PERMITS IN PRINCIPAL CITIES

T a b l e 4 . —Per

capita expenditures for new buildings and for repairs, and families
provided for, in 3 1 1 cities, 1930—Continued
Families pro­
vided for

City and State

Aurora, 111..........................
Austin, Tex.............................
Baltimore, M d.......................
Ttangnr; Me
Baton Rouge, La___________
Battle Creek, Mich_________
Bay City, Mich________ ___
Bayonne, N. J_____________
Beaumont., Tax_____ ,
Belleville, 111...........................
Bellingham, Wash.................
Berkeley, Calif_____________
Bethlehem, Pa_____________
Binghamton, N. Y .................
Birmingham, Ala____ ____ ~
Bloomfield, N. J.....................
Bloomington, H I............ ......
Boston, Mass......... ...............
Bridgeport, Conn...................
Brockton, Mass____________
Brookline, Mass___________
Buffalo, N. Y ..........................
Burlington, Iowa....................
Butler, Pa...............................
Butte, Mont...........................
Cambridge, Mass......... .........
Camden, N. J.........................
Canton, Ohio..........................
Cedar Rapids, Iowa________
Central Falls, R. I _________
Charleston, S. C .....................
Charleston W. Va..................
Charlotte, N. C......................
Chattanooga, Tenn_________
Chelsea, Mass..................... .
Chester, Pa.............................
Chicago, 111________________
Chicopee, Mass......................
Cicero, 111.............. .................
Cincinnati, Ohio____ _______
Clarksburg, W. Va.................
Cleveland, Ohio.....................
Clifton, N. J....... ...................
Colorado Springs, Colo.........
Columbia, S. C ____________
Columbus, Ga........................
Columbus, Ohio.....................
Council Bluffs, Iowa..............
Covington, K y.......................
Cranston, R. I ........................
Cumberland, M d ............ ......
Dallas, Tex............................
Danville, 111...........................
Davenport, Iowa....................
Dayton, Ohio______________
Decatur, HI________________
Denver, Colo______________
Des Moines, Iowa__________
Detroit, Mich........................
Dubuque, Iowa................... .
Duluth, Minn........................
Durham, N. C........................
East Chicago, Ind..................
East Cleveland, Ohio_______
Easton, Pa.._.........................
East Orange, N. J__________
East Providence, R. I ______
East St. Louis, 111..................
Elgin, 111.................................
Elizabeth, N. J.......................
Elkhart, Ind_________ _____
Elmira, N. Y ...... ...................
El Paso, Tex_________ _____
Erie, Pa...................................
Evanston, HI____ __________




Population,
census of
1930
Num­
ber

46,568
53,118
789,921
28,749
31,465
43,301
47,350
85,848
57,483
28,308
30,602
81,543
57,773
76.601
257,657
38,070
30,915
783,451
147,206
63,695
47,488
572,217
26,719
23,568
39,540
113,650
117,172
105,524
56,078
25,928
62,419
60,411
82,645
119,539
44,827
58,963
3,373,753
43,981
65,776
449,331
28,863
901,482
45,673
33,223
50,195
43,122
289,056
42,023
65,247
43,914
37,713
260,397
36,646
60,728
200,225
57,511
287,644
142,469
1,564,397
41,678
101,231
52,026
54,660
40,279
34,328
68,227
29,995
74,024
35,912
114,551
33,195
47,381
101,975
115,875
61,766

Per capita expenditure

Per
10,000
popu­
lation

For
new
build­
ings

For re­
pairs
and ad­
ditions

82
493
1,484
46
73
72
54
104
267
107
108
345
69
161
166
334
68
1,415
353
69
231
1,072
18
21
67
159
159
95
91
22
56
217
317
223
6
34
2,741
57
57
1,693
18
1,176
247
56
152
91
575
32
67
273
47

17.6
92.8
18.8
16.0
23.2
16.6
11.4
12.1
46.4
37.8
35.3
42.3
11.9
21.0
6.4
90.4
22.0
18.1
24.0
10.8
48.6
18.7
6.7
8.9
16.9
14.0
13.6
9.0
16.2
8.5
9.0
35.9
38.4
18.7
1.3
5.8
8.1
13.0
8.7
37.7
6.2
13.0
54.1
16.9
30.3
21.1
19.9
7.6
10.3
62.2
12.5

$24.20
55.88
25.40
18.53
21.96
89.18
17.15
7.91
30.75
25.57
20.36
30.35
15.77
21.94
6.69
58.23
21.11
24.45
14.81
12.77
68.37
23.54
23.77
5.99
9.23
87.54
18.25
13.04
27.75
4.79
15.15
109.68
27.04
19.30
3.02
15.98
23.86
6.42
13.79
70.16
14.77
30.22
31.20
22.42
34.02
14.17
15.92
13.71
6.80
34.47
5.38

$5.90
6.90
9.82
.96
5.31
2.36
9.67
1.32
14.59
.89
3.93
6.27
2.67
7.50
2.70.
6.38
1.55
9.90
2.98
4.71
9.27
2.37
6.69
2.37
.79
9.80
3.79
1.98
8.49
1.56
2.52
4.21
4.27
5.24
1.50
3.34
1.56
1.65
3.20
3.64
3.05
5.90
1.48
5.46
3.89
2.33
3.51
4.60
2.84
1.89
1.26
6.84

168

27.7

996
47
213
79
613

225

4,084

62
82

114
37
56
15
85
133
207
72
222
43
40
470
209
63

38.2
12.8

35.50
7.79
33.11

10.6

25.84

15.8
26.1
14.9
8.1
21.9
6.8
13.9
4.4
12.5
44.3
28.0
20.0
19.4
13.0
8.4
46.1
18.0
10.2

20.58
26.16
26.74
31.67
13.49
18.44
29.39
19.81
10.65
32.24
34.33
16.73
16.70
20.58
12.45
33.87
25.05
21.04
36.38

13.7
21.3

32.78

2.53
7.43
3.92
1.84
6.01

1.99

4.18

3.85
7.92

1.68
3.56
1.13
5.92
6.26
8.14
1.70
3.78
.24
3.43
4.68
3.76
7.46
13.86

Total

$30.10
62.79
35.22
19.49
27.27
91.54
26.82
9.22
45.34
26.46
24.29
36.62
18.44
29.44
9.39
64.62
22.66
34.34
17.79
17.48
77.64
25.91
30.46
8.36
10.02
97.34
22.04
15.02
36.24
6.35
17.67
113.89
31.31
24.55
4.52
19.32
25.42
8.07
16.99
73.80
17.82
36.11
32.68
27.88
37.91
16.50
19.43
18.31
9.64
36.36
6.64

42.35
10.32
40.55

29.76
34.62

26.59
28.15

30.92
35.52

21.42
20.12
32.96
20.94
16.57
38.51
42.47
18.43
20.49
20.81
15.88
38.54
28.80
28.50
50.25

Per capita
expendi­
ture for
house­
Rank keeping
of
dwell­
city ings only

125
26
93
217
151
11
158
293
45
161
176
81
231
130
292
24
184
96
236
239
14
166
122
297
287
9
189
258
85
307
238
4
116
175
310
221
168
298
244
16
235
86
106
146
71
248
219
233
290
83
305

$8.84
20.03
9.17
5.39
6.11
6.27
5.82
2.69
12.57
17.02
8.81
17.21
6.56
8.45
1.48
38.97
12.10
7.95
9.83
6.21
48.32
6.11
3.10
2.68
.57
6.36
4.16
4.75
6.16
2.53
2.58
13.18
15.07
6.19
.59
2.11
5.68
3.80
5.18
22.39
1.44
6.60
23.82
7.51
9.38
6.32
11.00
2.64
4.18
27.83
4.17

128

12.42
4.56

160

8.67

118

12.43

210
104
202
246
66
*4
232
206
203
253
65
137
140
38

10.82
2.91
17.68
3.49
7.40
24.30
9.41
9.86
7.35
6.13
4.54
14.53
9.93
12.35

55
285
58

94

144

92
195

9.37
5.45

7.11
7.77

4.32
2.72

7

INTRODUCTION A.ND SUMMARY
T a b l e 4 . —Per

capita expenditures for new buildings and for repairs, and families
provided for, in 3 1 1 cities, 1980—Continued
Families pro­
vided for

City and State

Population,
census of
1930
Num­
ber

103,151
■Evansville, TncL .............
48,268
Everett, Mass_____________
30,498
Everett, W a sh ____________
Fall Rival*, M ass
114,348
Fitchburg, Mass___________
40,672
Flint, Mich............................
156,422
Fond du Lac, Wis__________
26,362
Fort Wayne, Ind___________
115,121
160,892
Fort Worth, Tex___________
Fresno, Calif
___
T
52,558
Galveston, Tex_____________
53,427
Gary, Tnd
100,426
Grand Rapids, Mich_______
168,234
Great Falls, Mont__________
28,553
Green Bay, Wis____________
37,353
53,422
Greensboro, N. C __________
Greenville, S. C____________
29,081
Greenwich, Conn__________
33,112
Hagerstown, M d___________
30,861
Hamilton, Ohio
52,108
Hammond, Tnd
^
64,523
Hamtramck, Mich_ .____ ___
56.283
Harrisburg, Pa_____________
80.284
Hartford, Conn____________
161,372
Haverhill, Mass____________
48,687
Hazleton, Pa..... ........... .........
39,078
Highland Park, M ich........ .
52,883
Hoboken, N. J_____________
56,523
Holyoke, Mass_____________
56,555
Houston, T e x .................. .....
289,428
Huntington, W. Va________
75,575
Hutchinson, Kans__________
27,080
Indianapolis, Ind___________
362,564
Irvington, N. J_____________
56,745
Jackson, Mich_____________
54,870
Jacksonville, Fla___________
129,682
Jamestown, N. Y __________
45,172
Jersey City, N. J___________
316,914
Johnstown, Pa_____________
66,983
Joliet, 111____________ ____
41,753
Joplin, M o________________
33,452
Kalamazoo, Mich__________
54,388
Kansas City, Kans..... ...........
122.327
Kansas City, M o___________
392,640
Kearny, N. J______________
40,724
Kenosha, Wis__.........- ......... .
50,242
Kingston, N. Y ._ ...................
28,166
Knoxville, Tenn___________
105,797
Kokomo, Ind_____ _________
32,680
Lakewood, Ohio___________
69,811
Lancaster, Pa______________
60,596
Lansing, Mich_____________
78,421
Lawrence, Mass___________
84,949
Lebanon, Pa_______________
25,568
Lewiston, Me______________
34,948
Lexington, K y _____________
45,723
Lima, Ohio________________
42,217
Lincoln, Nebr_____________
75,919
Little Rock, Ark___________
81,679
Long Beach, Calif__________
141,390
Lorain, Ohio_______________
44,483
Los Angeles, Calif__________ 1,231,730
Louisville, K y.......................
307,808
Lowell, Mass______________
100,300
Lynchburg, Va____________
40,559
Lynn, Mass_______________
102.327
McKeesport, Pa__ _________
54,631
Macon, Ga________________
53,866
Madison, Wis_____________
57,815
Malden, Mass_____________
58,143
Manchester, N. H ___ ______
76,834
Mansfield, Ohio____________
33,434
Marion, Ind_______________
24,329
Marion, Ohio______________
31,005
Medford, Mass.......................
59,700




174
53
71
33
22
360
37
313
626
107
127
131
231
103
113
61
72
203
43
81
152
21
77
61
38
27
5
4
37
2,227
56
105
615
102
61
186
93
238
18
88
36
102
187
864
103
78
41
238
17
248
43
137
19
12
31
85
11
98
283
1,993
83
11,437
428
42
114
103
83
45
179
99
86
97
18
14
249

Per capita expenditure

Per
10,000
popu­
lation

For
new
build­
ings

For re­
pairs
and ad­
ditions

16.9
11.0
23.3
2.9
5.4
23.0
14.0
27.2
38.9
20.4
23.8
13.0
13.7
36.1
30.3
11.4
24.8
61.3
13.9
15.5
23.6
3.7
9.6
3.8
7.8
6.9
.9
.7
6.5
76.9
7.4
38.8
17.0
18.0
11.1
14.3
20.6
7.5
2.7
21.1
10.8
18.8
15.3
22.0
25.3
15.5
14.6
22.5
5.2
35.5
7.1
17.5
2.2
4.7
8.9
18.6
2.6
12.9
34.6
141.0
18.7
92.9
13.9
4.2
28.1
10.1
15.2
8.4
31.0
17.0
11.2
29.0
7.4
4.5
41.7

$13.02
28.34
17.87
8.54
20.69
22.00
12.33
22.76
60.35
16.13
27.09
8.51
11.97
39.02
30.21
10.18
27.74
109.62
17.21
24.93
25.95
20.35
23.46
30.51
4.54
9.94
9.76
5.44
25.00
57.96
9.46
63.30
17.06
28.45
7.20
12.51
12.58
35.64
6.20
48.05
19.10
17.19
10.11
35.06
19.58
26.41
23.82
32.50
4.33
20.19
18.55
21.56
4.44
26.28
33.24
21.58
21.77
19.17
19.30
86.73
13.72
52.49
19.79
7.59
35.68
23.76
13.91
9.21
34.96
16.37
6.78
17.84
11.09
18.96
25.59

$4.05
3.39
9.36
1.86
.93
3.53
2.83
4.16
4.69
9.22
5.06
3.21
5.40
5.97
6.43
4.16
8.55
21.32
1.33
4.86
3.12
2.73
7.91
8.93
2.47
2.81
2.05
9.20
5.12
1.69
.72
6.64
3.49
1.51
5.51
6.08
4.75
2.75
4.19
11.13
6.13
4.35
.93
4.83
1.11
3.13
6.79
1.78
3.72
1.04
4.24
4.77
2.83
2.84
1.10
5.19
2.33
1.88
8.27
5.62
.94
8.69
2.75
3.84
4.65
5.28
5.34
5.21
5.65
3.12
3.17
3.63
5.07
.79
2.15

Total

$17.07
31.73
27.23
10.40
21.62
25.53
15.16
26.92
65.03
25.36
32.15
11.72
17.37
44.99
36.64
14.34
36.29
130.94
18.54
29.79
29.07
23.07
31.37
39.44
7.00
12.75
11.81
14.64
30.11
59.65
10.18
69.94
20.55
29.97
12.72
18.59
17.33
38.39
10.38
59.18
25.23
21.54
11.04
39.89
20.70
29.54
30.61
34.28
8.05
21.23
22.79
26.33
7.27
29.12
34 33
26.77
24.10
21.05
27.56
92.35
14.66
61.18
22.54
11.43
40.32
29.05
19.25
14.42
40.61
19.49
9.95
21.47
16.16
19.74
27.74

Per capita
expendi­
ture for
house­
Rank keeping
dwell­
of
city ings only
243
112
152
283
191
167
255
155
23
169
110
276
241
46
80
263
84
3
230
127
133
182
115
62
304
270
275
261
124
29
286
19
205
126
271
228
242
68
284
30
171
193
279
61
204
129
120
98
299
199
183
162
302
132
97
159
177
201
150
10
260
27
185
277
60
135
224
262
57
218
288
194
250
214
148

$6.47
3.80
5.86
1.04
2.67
10.64
8.02
13.50
14.06
7.52
7.87
5.18
5.12
13.86
11.30
5.34
9.26
86.38
7.55
6.95
9.25
1.40
6.80
3.86
2.30
5.39
.70
.49
3.68
33.13
3.22
14.49
7.55
7.93
5.22
3.76
9.21
2.80
1.37
13.78
4.39
8.62
4.27
7.69
9.92
15.07
7.73
6.10
1.50
14.85
9.31
6.80
.80
5.61
4.32
5.00
1.22
6.22
12.76
38.08
6.21
26.21
7.57
1.79
12.46
4.96
8.10
1.53
14.46
7.80
3.26
13.10
1.38
1.61
21.44

8

BUILDING PERMITS IN PRINCIPAL CITIES

T a b l e 4 . —Per

capita expenditures for new buildings and for repairs, and families
provided forf in 3 1 1 cities, 1980—Continued
Families pro­
vided for

City and State

Memphis, Tenn____________
Miami, Fla__________ ____ _
Milwaukee, Wis „
Minneapolis, Minn ,
Moline, Til
__ _
Montclair, N. J_________ _
Montgomery, Ala__________
Mount. Vernon, N, Y __
Muncie, Ind
Muskegon, Mich___________
Muskogee, Okla___________
Nashville, Tenn___________
Newark, N. J______________
Newark, Ohio ____________
New Bedford, Mass________
New Britain, Conn________
New Brunswick, N. J............
Newburgh, N. Y ___________
New Haven, Conn_________
New London, Conn„_ ..
New Orleans, La___________
Newport, K y ______________
Newport, R. I_ ____________
Newport News, Va_________
New Rochelle, N. Y ________
Newton, Mass_____________
New York Citv, N. Y ______
Niagara Falls, N. Y ________
Norfolk, Va________________
Norristown, Pa____________
Norwalk, Conn____________
Oakland, Calif_____________
Oak Park, 111..........................
Ogden, U ta h ______________
Oklahoma Citv, Okla______
Okmulgee, Okla___________
______________
Orange, N. J_______________
Oshkosh, Wis______________
Ottumwa, Iowa____________
Paducah, K y ______________
Pasadena, Calif____________
Passaic, N. J_______________
Paterson, N. J_____________
Pawtucket, R. I ___________
Peoria, 111 ________________
Perth Ambov, N. J_________
Petersburg, Va_____________
Philadelphia, Pa....................
Phoenix, Ariz______________
Pittsburgh, Pa_____________
Pittsfield, Mass____________
Plainfield, N. J.......................
Pontiac, M ich_____________
Port Arthur, Tex__________
Port Huron, M ich_________
Portland, M e____ __________
Portland, Oreg_____________
Portsmouth, Ohio__________
Portsmouth, Va..................
Poughkeepsie, N. Y ________
Providence, R. I ___________
Pueblo, Colo__ ____ ________
Quincy, 111_________________
Quincy, Mass______________
Racine, Wis............................
Reading, Pa...........................
Revere, Mass______________
Richmond, Ind____________
Richmond, Va_____________
Roanoke, Va_______________
Rochester, N. Y __.................




Population,
census of
1930
Num­
ber

Per
10,000
popu­
lation

Per capita expenditure
For
new
build­
ings

$31.62
1,057
252,049
41.9
15.86
64
38,452 Conn_____________
Meriden,
114
10.4
9.96
110,025
33.12
1,729
30.4
568,962
23.34
462,611
1,355
29.3
11.84
68,277
191
28.0
112
36.84
32,330
34.6
69
16.4
37.74
42,006
66,075
280
42.4
13.95
59.19
60,869
481
79.0
6.97
46, 517
47
10.1
41,338
81
19.6
23.12
24
16.26
32,006
7.5
31.67
23.4
153,153
358
22.96
444,170
750
16.9
6.63
29
9.5
30.471
112,804
15
1.3
6.89
10.57
42
68,095
6.2
21.24
21
6.1
34,280
23
31.95
7.4
31.243
49
9.26
48,705
10.1
162,650
238
93.51
14.6
29,794
70
23.5
102.78
455,792
258
5.7
11.82
5.92
17
29,740
5.7
16.4
31.57
27,430
45
91
29.23
34,285
26.5
191
35.3
89.00
54,055
74.89
65,295
346
53.0
36,182
6,968,792
52.0
50.80
218
75,398
28.9
37.22
220
17.2
18.10
127,808
80
22.3
31.04
35,837
35,961
165
45.9
56.53
1,231
284,213
43.3
27.02
55
25.99
63,819
8.6
40.243
113
28.1
21.68
182,845
2,005
109.7
138.48
1
17,097
.6
1.21
Omaha,
214,184 Nebr208
9.7
20.48
96
27.0
34.64
35,509
60
14.19
15.0
40,075
28,074
17.1
48
15.46
33,541
84
25.0
9.66
214
28.2
62.94
75,875
63,108
24
3.8
26.79
139
138,267
9.45
10.1
19.3
149
77,203
19.60
104,788
408
38.9
28.49
32
7.3
22.68
44,007
28,487
37
13.0
5.80
1,961,458
1,744
8.9
22,31
47,950
410
85.5
62.10
669,631
1,349
20.1
24.75
49,675
185
37.2
33.66
34,405
81
23.5
40.23
64,897
50
7.7
18.12
244
50,067
48.7
43. 73
10.3
31,176
32
3.40
16.54
70,810
110
15.5
299,122
866
29.0
30.80
31
7.3
7.69
42,536
71
15.7
8.68
45,353
40,123
48
12.0
10.36
252,029
17.7
446
30.92
61
12.2
6.41
50,102
68
17.3
25.44
39,221
288
33.24
71,965
40.0
174
25.8
50.53
67,515
110,289
119
10.8
17.51
35, 705
58
16.2
11.13
32,561
76
23.3
16.72
182,883
12.4
227
26.64
69,096
101
14.6
34.19
325,019
262
8.1
20.34

For re­
pairs
and ad­
ditions
$6.07
5.39
7.46
11.33
5.74
4.27
5.88
8.45
5.33
9.77
2.57
5.80
1.47
4.35
4.91
.76
1.82
2.59
7.07
7.03
1.45
4.40
2.55
2.41
1.27
11.69
9.17
15.87
15.02
8.15
12.33
2.27
6.10
9.25
4.94
3.18
3.41
5.97
1.10
3.43
8.38
4.44
3.33
.25
14.64
6.47
5.66
4.32
4.30
5.62
1.70
4.79
6.21
6.20
3.66
7.53
1.60
4.80
1.38
5.59
9.53
1.10
3.27
8.20
11.70
4.33
.86
4.61
7.60
4.92
8.53
2.37
5.90
3.53
4.31

Total

v Per capita
expendi­
ture for
house­
Rank keeping
dwell­
of
city ings only

$37.70
75
21.26 16.6
198
17.42 240
44.44
47
134
29.07
16.11
251
42.72
52
46.18
43
19.28
223
68.95
20
9.54
291
28.92
136
17.73
237
36.02
87
27.87
147
7.39
301
8.71
296
13.16
267
28.30
142
38.98
64
10.72
282
8
97.90
5
105.33
14.23
264
7.19
303
43.26
49
38.40
67
6
104.87
89.90
12
58.94
33
49.55
39
20.37
208
37.14
78
65.79
22
31.97
111
131
29.17
25.09
172
2
144.45
2.31
311
23.91
179
43.03
51
18.62
227
18.79
226
9.91
289
77.58
15
103
33.26
15.10
257
23.93
178
32.79
105
143
28.30
300
7.50
27.09
153
68.32
21
30.96
117
37.33
77
41
47.76
19.73
215
48.53
40
4.79
309
22.13
188
40.33
59
8.79
295
11.95
273
229
18.56
42.62
53
281
10.74
163
26.30
37.85
73
58.12
34
22.43
186
216
19.66
19.09
225
32.54
107
37.71
74
24.65
174

$13.14
7.36
4.25
12.18
10.71
5.30
16.42
22.16
8.52
48.02
3.27
5.67
1.64
6.54
7.97
2.49
1.09
4.61
2.84
4.92
6.67
8.16
15.33
1.91
2.28
20.55
7.21
57.58
56.15
24.68
12.01
6.70
13.37
36.06
13.81
7.13
6.48
40.85
.06
4.07
18.66
5.84
7.65
4.38
20.81
2.59
4.22
8.80
16.96
3.29
3.81
4.02
21.34
9.87
20.01
19.08
2.70
12.18
2.36
6.79
12.67
3.72
3.90
8.47
12.20
2.71
5.72
16.50
13.00
6.62
6.54
6.85
5.44
7.78
4.26

9

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
T a b l e 4 . —Per

capita expenditures for new buildings and for repairs, and families
provided for, in 311, cities, 1#30-—Continued
Families pro­
vided for

City and State

Rockford, 111...........................
Rock Island, 111......................
Sacramento, Calif..................
Saginaw, Mich.......................
St. Joseph, M o.......................
St. Louis, M o.........................
St. Paul, Minn__...................
St. Petersburg, Fla.................
Salem, Mass...........................
Salt Lake City, Utah.............
San Antonio, Tex...................
San Diego, Calif.....................
San Francisco, Calif..............
San Jose, Calif........................
Savannah, Ga........................
Schenectady, N. Y .................
Scranton, Pa...........................
Seattle, Wash.........................
Sheboygan, Wis.....................
Shreveport, La.......................
Sioux City, Iowa....................
Sioux Falls, S. Dak................
Somerville, Mass....................
South Bend, Ind....................
Spokane, Wash......................
Springfield, 111........................
Springfield, Mass...................
Springfield, M o......................
Springfield, Ohio....................
Stamford, C onn....................
Steubenville, Ohio.................
Stockton, Calif.......................
Superior, Wis.........................
Syracuse, N. Y .......................
Tacoma, Wash.......................
Tampa, Fla............................
Taunton, Mass__...................
Terre Haute, Ind__...............
Toledo, Ohio.......................
Topeka, Kans.........................
Trenton, N. J.........................
Troy, N. Y .............................
Tucson, Ariz...........................
Tulsa, Okla............................
Union City, N. J....................
Utica, N. Y ............................
Vallejo, Calif..........................
Waco, Tex..............................
Waltham, Mass......................
Warren, Ohio.........................
Washington, D. C..................
Water bury, Conn..................
Waterloo, Iow a.....................
Watertown, Mass...................
Watertown, N. Y ...................
West New York, N. J............
Wheeling, W. Va...................
White Plains, N. Y ................
Wichita, Kans........................
Wichita Falls, Tex.................
Wilkes-Barre, Pa.................. .
Wilkinsburg, Pa....................
Williamsport, Pa....................
Wilmington, Del............... .
Wilmington, N. C .................
Winston-Salem, N. C............
Woonsocket, R. I ...................
Worcester, Mass.....................
Yonkers, N. Y ........................
York, Pa.................................
Youngstown, Ohio..............—
Zanesville, Ohio.....................
Total, 311 cities............




Population
census of
1930

85,831
39,093
93,685
80,685
80,944
817,334
270,883
39,504
43,287
140,058
254,562
147,897
625,974
57, 547
85,007
95,652
143,428
363,134
39,249
76,659
79,212
33,360
103,604
104,193
115,514
71,857
149,861
57,507
68,406
46,282
35,418
47,951
36,100
207,007
106,837
100,910
37,288
62,543
290,787
64,005
122,610
72,350
32,198
141,281
58,588
102,633
14,476
52,825
39,425
41,054
485,716
99,902
45,969
34,913
32,088
36,916
61,752
35,604
109,832
43,614
86,507
29,631
45,695
104,941
32,167
75,288
49,585
196,395
135,123
55,237
170,004
36,439
47,091,551

Per capita expenditure

Num­
ber

Per
10*000
popu­
lation

For
new
build­
ings

For re­
pairs
and ad­
ditions

341
132
388
193
96
1,618
402
73
56
554
1,135
829
2,206
185
94
169
49
2,583
98
171
179
255
49
193
328
151
284
116
91
109
68
100
47
432
347
91
27
50
372
92
38
99
191
943
41
90
28
106
124
93
1,962
101
137
84
14
2
45
297
736
30
39
79
36
367
52
130
22
294
1,042
56
163
39

39.7
33.8
41.4
23.9
11.9
19.8
14.8
18.5
12.9
39.6
44.6
56.1
35.2
32.1
11.1
17.7
3.4
71.1
25.0
22.3
22.6
76.4
4.7
18.5
28.4
21.0
19.0
20.2
13.3
23.6
19.2
20.9
13.0
20.9
32.5
9.0
7.2
8.0
12.8
14.4
3.1
13.7
59.3
66.7
7.0
8.8
19.3
20.1
31.5
22.7
40.4
10.1
29.8
24.1
4.4
.5
7.3
83.4
67.0
6.9
4.5
26.7
7.9
35.0
16.2
17.3
4.4
15.0
77.1
10.1
9.6
10.7

$25.99
15.66
26.45
28.81
17.46
17.19
33.46
14.51
17.49
27.56
29.95
31.52
31.12
52.76
11.38
50.52
16.98
75.13
27.02
11.98
39.02
50.94
10.60
32.50
25.78
37.83
32.83
11.59
9.57
48.91
19.96
21.64
23.43
20.35
33.68
9.63
4.09
7.51
26.90
36.09
16.43
38.45
53.42
53.83
11.22
10.53
17.10
14.40
42.18
11.74
88.81
16.93
23.15
25.04
6.41
3.54
11.77
157.41
52.89
17.91
15.93
20.60
24.23
40.11
19.04
17.40
4.17
25.67
67.47
23.52
14.17
5.41

$7.88
18.31
5.88
4. t>3
2.55
4.01
5.98
5.67
9.37
2.96
3.39
5.17
4.69
6.38
1.19
5.29
5.26
8.46
8.83
8.13
4.06
9.05
2.72
3.09
5.74
6.42
5.23
7.80
1.79
7.73
3.62
5.40
3.41
5.73
4.42
3.28
11.92
3.47
8.88
1.80
3.54
3.34
9.75
5.31
3.93
2.62
6.22
7.45
3.63
4.78
11.70
3.46
2.77
2.58
7.14
2.99
6.37
16.15
4.54
7.42
3.36
7.82
3.75
6.75
2.51
3.88
2.12
6.62
5.71
6.87
2.31
.44

$33.88
33.98
32.33
33.34
20.01
21.19
39.43
20.19
26.85
30.52
33.34
36.69
35.81
59.13
12.57
55.82
22.24
83.59
35.85
20.11
43.07
59.99
13.32
35.59
31.52
44.25
38.06
19.39
11.36
56.64
23.59
27.03
26.84
26.08
38.09
12.90
16.01
10.98
35.78
37.89
19.97
41.79
63.17
59.15
15.14
13.15
23.33
21.85
45.81
16.52
100.52
20.39
25.92
27.62
13.55
6.53
18.15
173.56
57.43
25.33
19.29
28.42
27.97
46.86
21.55
21.28
6.29
32.29
73.18
30.39
16.48
5.85

27.7

31.98

5.53

37.51

130,503

Total

Per capita
expendi­
ture for
houseRank : keeping
dwell­
of
city ings only
100
99
108
101
212
200
63
209
156
121
102
79
89
32
272
37
187
13
88
211
50
28
266
91
114
48
70
220
278
36
180
154
157
164
69
269
252
280
90
72
213
56
25
31
256
268
181
190
44
247
7
207
165
149
265
306
234
1
35
170
222
141
145
42
192
197
308
109
17
123
249
76

$14.37
11.62
13.15
7.02
3.05
6.94
6.85
8.02
7.64
13.46
10.22
19.70
14.60
12.83
3.81
10.83
1.21
23.80
12.4®
5.47
7.83
27.95
1.60
9.27
10.62
9.10
8.01
5.34
4.68
16.70
8.48
7.29
4.18
11.84
9.78
1.50
2.57
3.01
5.00
6.67
1.66
7.49
16.68
27.42
2.90
5.10
6.46
6.07
14.66
7.39
28.59
4.75
9.46
12.52
1.83
.42
3.56
76.90
20.87
2.66
1.76
13.25
5.41
17.73
5.37
5.34
1.26
8.16
51.28
5.04
4.29
2.74
12.16

10

BUILDING PERMITS IN PRINCIPAL CITIES

Building Operations, 1921 to 1930
Table 5 shows for 257 identical cities the estimated expenditures
for new residential buildings, new nonresidential buildings, and total
new buildings; the estimated population as of July 1 each year, 1921
to 1929, and the census of population as of 1930; the number of fami­
lies provided for, the ratio of families provided for to each 10,000 of
population; the index number of each of these items, and the index
number of families provided for, weighted by population.
T a b l e 5 . — Estimated

expenditures for each class of new buildings, families pro­
vided for and ratio to population, and index numbers thereof, in 257 identical
cities, 1921 to 1930
New residential build­
ings

New nonresidential
buildings

Total new buildings

Year

1921.................................
1922..................................
1923.................................
1924.................................
1925..................................
1926.............................. . .
1928..................................
1929.....................- ...........
1930..................................

Estimated ex­
penditure

Index
number

Estimated ex­
penditure

Index
number

Estimated ex­
penditure

$937,352,739
1,612,352,921
2,000,986,900
2,070,276,772
2,461,546,270
2,255,994,627
1,906,003,260
1,859,429,751
1,433,111,774
601,269,847

100.0
172.0
213.5
220.9
262.6
240.7
203.3
198.4
152.9
64.1

$635,775,199
876,276,713
1,070,596,718
1,137,631,080
1,343,880,884
1,300,840,876
1,231,785,870
1,135,549,986
1,146,958,101
849,386,873

100.0
137.8
168.4
178.9
211.4
204.6
193.7
178.6
180.4
133.6

$1,573,127,938
2,488,629,634
3,071,583,618
3,207,907,852
3,805,427,154
3,556,835,503
3,137,789,130
2,994,979,737
2,580,069,875
1,450,656,720

Population
Year

1921.
1922.
1923.
1924.
1925.
1926
1927.
1928.
1929.

As estimated
by Census
Bureau

36,575,118
37,511,516
38,447,913
39,384,311
40,320,708
41,257,106
42,058,897
42,767,125
43,665,235
144,850,467

Index
number
100.0
158.2
195.3
203.9
241.9
226.1
199.5
190.4
164.0
92.2

Families provided for

Index
number

Number

Index
number

100.0
102.6
105.1
107.7
110.2
112.8
115.0
116.9
119.4
122.6

224,545
377,305
453,673
442,919
491,222
462,214
406,095
388,678
244,394
125,322

100.0
168.0
202.0
197.3
218.8
205.8
180.9
173.1
108.8
55.8

Index
Batio to
each
number
10,000 of adjusted
popula­ to popu­
tion
lation
61.4
100.6
118.0
112.5
121.8
112.0
96.6
90.9
56.0
27.9

100.0
163.7
192.2
183.2
198.4
182.4
157.3
148.1
91.1
45.5

* Actual enumeration.

During 1930 permits issued for new buildings showed an estimated
expenditure of $1,450,656,720. This is less than the expenditure for
any of the other years since 1921. The index number of expenditures
for total new buildings stands at 92.2 for the year 1930, if the 1921
expenditures are taken as 100. The peak year was 1925, when the
index was 241.9. Expenditures for new residential buildings de­
creased much more rapidly than for new nonresidential buildings.
A peak of 262.6 was reached in 1925, followed by a gradual decline
to an index of 152.9 in 1929; an abrupt decline occurred during 1930
to an index of 64.1. New nonresidental buildings followed prac­
tically the same trend, the index number rising to a peak of 211.4
in 1925 and falling gradually to 178.6 in 1928. A slight rise, to
180.4, occurred in 1929; the 1930 index number was 133.6.



11

BUILDING OPERATIONS, 1921 TO 1930

The population of these 257 cities, according to the 1930 census,
was 44,850,467. In 1930, 125,322 families were provided with
dwelling places in new buildings. This is at the rate of 27.9 families
for each 10,000 of population. In 1925, 121.8 families were provided
for to each 10,000 of the population. The population of these 257
cities has increased 22.6 per cent since 1921, but the number of fami­
lies provided for has decreased 44.2 per cent. The index number of
families provided for, adjusted to the population, reached a peak of
198.4 in 1925, but fell to 91.1 in 1929 and then to 45.5 in 1930.
The index number of families provided for, adjusted to population,
is obtained by dividing the index number of families provided for by
the index number of the population. In other words, while 55.8
per cent as many families were provided with dwelling places in 1930
as in 1921, the population of these 257 cities increased 22.6 per cent
during this period, and therefore, in proportion to the population,
only 45.5 per cent as many families were provided for in 1930 as in
1921.
Average Cost of Dwellings per Family, 1921 to 1930
Table 6 shows the average cost per family unit each year, 1921
to 1930, of housing accommodations of each type for which permits
were issued in the 257 identical cities from which reports were received:
T able

6.— Average cost of new dwellings1 per family in 251 identical cities, 1921
to 1980
Average cost of new dwellings per family

Year

1921...............
1922...............
1923...............
1924...............
1925...............
1926...............
1927...............
1928...............
1929...............
1930...............

Index numbers of cost of dwellings per family

Multi­ All classes 1-family 2-family
Multi­
All classes
1-family 2-family
family
of dwell­ dwellings dwellings2 family
of dwell­
dwellings dwellings * dwellings
*
ings
dwellings8
ings
$3,972
4,134
4,203
4,317
4,618
4,725
4,830
4,937
4,915
4,993

$3,762
3,801
4,159
4,336
4,421
4,480
4,368
4,064
4,020
3,924

$4,019
3,880
4,001
4,418
4,289
4,095
4,170
4,129
4,402
3,857

$3,947
4,005
4,127
4,352
4,464
4,422
4,449
4,407
4,566
4,385

100.0
104.1
105.8
108.7
116.3
119.0
121.6
124.3
123.7
125.7

100.0
101.0
110.6
115.3
117.5
119.1
116.1
108.0
106.9
104.3

100.0
96.5
99.6
109.9
106.7
101.9
103.8
102.7
109.5
96.0

100.0
101.5
104.6
110.3
113.1
112.0
112.7
111.7
115.7
111.1

i Includes only cost of the buildings.
8Includes 1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores.
3Includes multifamily dwellings with stores.

The average cost of the 1-family dwellings for which permits were
issued during the year 1921 in these 257 cities was $3,972. There
was a slight increase in the average cost of 1-family dwellings each
year over the preceding year from 1921 to 1928, inclusive, a slight
drop in 1929, and another rise in 1930. The index number of the
cost of 1-family dwellings, based on 1921 equaling 100, stood at 124.3
in 1928, decreased to 123.7 in 1929, and rose to 125.7 in 1930.
The 2-family dwellings for which permits were issued during the
year 1921 cost $3,762 per family. The price increased until a peak of
$4,480 was reached in 1926, since which time a decline in the average
cost of this class of dwellings has taken place each year. In 1929 the
average cost was $4,020, and in 1930, $3,924. At the peak, in 1926,
the index was 119.1, in 1929 it was 106.9, and in 1930, 104.3.




12

BUILDING PERMITS IN PRINCIPAL CITIES

The curve of per-family cost in the erection of apartment houses
has been more broken than that for either 1-family dwellings or
2-family dwellings. The average per-family cost of the multifamily
dwellings for which permits were issued in 1921 was $4,019; it fell
slightly in 1922, rose for each of the years 1923 and 1924, fell again
in 1925 and 1926, slightly increased in 1927, fell slightly in 1928,
and rose sharply in 1929. The index number in 1929 was 109.5 as
compared with the peak of 109.9 in 1924. The average cost during
the peak year 1924 was $4,418 per family unit. During 1930 the*
average per-family cost of the multifamily dwellings for which
permits were issued in these cities was $3,857— the lowest shown
for any of the 10 years under discussion.
The average cost of all classes of dwellings for which permits were
issued in these 257 cities was $3,947 in 1921 and $4,464 in 1925, the
peak year. The 1930 cost in these cities was $4,385, which was less
than that for any other year since 1924.
Families Provided for, 1921 to 1930
Table 7 shows the number and percentage distribution of families
>rovided for in the different kinds of dwellings in 257 identical cities
rom which reports have been received each year from 1921 to 1930,
inclusive.

?

T a b l e 7*— Number and per cent of families providedfor in different hinds of dwellings
in 2 5 7 identical cities, 1921 to 1930
Number of families provided for in—•
Year

1921.......................
1922.............- ........
1923.......................
1924.......................
1925..................... 1926.......................
1927-....................
1928.......................
1929.......................
1930.......................

1-family
dwellings
130,873
179,364
207,632
210,818
226,159
188,074
155,512
136,907
98,164
57,318

Per cent of families provided for in—

Multi­
classes 1-family
2-family
family ofAll
dwellings1 dwellings
2 dwellings dwellings
38,858
80,252
96,344
95,019
86,145
64,298
54,320
43,098
27,813
15,145

54,814
117,689
149,697
137,082
178,918
209,842
196,263
208,673
118,417
52,859

224,545
377,305
453,673
442,919
491,222
462,214
406,095
388,678
244,434
125,322

58.3
47.5
45.8
47.6
46.0
40.7
38.3
35.2
40.2
45.7

Multi­
2-family
family
dwellings1 dwellings
*
17.3
21.3
21.2
21.5
17.5
13.9
13.4
11.1
11.4
12.1

24.4
31.2
33.0
30.9
36.4
45.4
48.3
53.7
48.5
42.2

i Includes 1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores,
aIncludes multifamily dwellings with stores.

Reports have been received by the Bureau of Labor Statistics from
257 identical cities continuously from 1921 to 1930. In these 257
cities 125,322 family dwelling places were provided in new buildings
during 1930. This is the lowest number provided for during any
calendar year since the collection of such data by the bureau. During
1925, the peak year, 491,222 family dwelling units were provided
in new buildings in these 257 cities, but there has been a gradual
decrease each year since that time.
The number of families provided for in 1-family dwellings also
reached a peak in 1925 and has been declining steadily since that
time.
The year 1923 saw the peak number of 2-family dwellings erected.
During 1930 the number of families provided for in 2-family dwellings




BUILDING OPERATIONS, 1921 TO 1930

13

was less than one-sixth of the number provided for in this class of
dwellings during 1923.
For the years 1921 to 1925, inclusive, a larger percentage of the
total number of family dwellings provided were in 1-family dwellings
than in apartment houses. During the years 1926 to 1929, however,
this situation was reversed, but, in 1930, 1-family dwellings again
provided for more families than the apartment buildings. In 1921,
58.3 per cent of all family dwelling units provided were in 1-family
dwellings, but this percentage decreased each year, with some fluctu­
ation, until 1928 when a low point of 35.2 per cent was reached.
In 1930, 45.7 per cent of all family dwelling units provided were in
1-family dwellings.
In 1921 only 24.4 per cent of the family dwelling units were in apart­
ment houses. In 1928, 53.7 per cent of all family dwelling units pro­
vided were in apartment houses. In 1930,42.2 per cent of the families
provided for were to be housed in multifamily dwellings. Twofamily dwellings provided for 12.1 per cent of the total number of
families housed in new buildings in 1930.
Duiing the 10 years 1921 to 1930, inclusive, dwelling places have
been provided in new buildings for 3,616,397 families in these 257
cities reporting. Of this number, 44.0 per cent have been housed in
1-family dwellings, 39.4 in multifamily dwellings, and 16.6 per cent
in 2-family dwellings.
Five Leading Cities, 1921 to 1930
The five leading cities in total building permit expenditure in 1930
were New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, and Washington.
In the 10 years 1921 to 1930, New York, Chicago, ajid Los Angeles
have been among the five leading cities each year. Philadelphia has
been included in the list of five leading cities for every year except
1921, when it was displaced by Cleveland. Detroit has been one of
the five leading dties each year except 1930, when Washington sur­
passed it in expenditures for total building operations.
Table 8 ranks the cities according to their total expenditure for
building construction of all kinds as shown by the permits issued.
Table 9 shows what has been done, in proportion to their size, in the
construction of family residential units, in the five cities leading in
this particular feature.
During 1930, permits issued for new dwellings showed that homes
were to be provided for 130,503 families, which is at the rate of 27.7
families to each 10,000 of population. Following is a list of the five
leading home-building cities in proportion to their population for the
years 1921 to 1930, inclusive. The figures show the number of
families provided for per 10,000 population, according to the latest
estimates available each year, except 1930, as prepared by the
Bureau of Census. The 1930 ratios are based on the 1930 census
enumeration figures.
66551°—32------ 2




14

BUILDING PERMITS IN PRINCIPAL CITIES

T a b l e 8 . —Five

cities leading in total expenditure each yearf 1921 to 1980

Year and city
1921
New York...... ........
Chicago—...............
Cleveland...............
Los Angeles...........
Detroit....................
1922
New Y ork..............
Chicago—...............
Los Angeles...........
Philadelphia-.........
Detroit....................
1923
New York..............
Chicago...................
Los Angeles............
Detroit..................
Philadelphia..........
1924
New York..............
Chicago...................
Detroit....................
Los Angeles............
Philadelphia—.......
1925
New York...... ........
Chicago...................
Detroit....................
Philadelphia..........
Los Angeles............

Total expendi­
ture

$442,285,248
133,027,910
86,680,023
82,761,386
58,086,053
645,176,481
229,853,125
121,206,787
114,190,525
93,614,593
789,265,335
334.164.404
200,133,181
129,719,831
128.227.405
836,043,604
308,911,159
160,547,723
150,147,516
141,402,655
1,020,604,713
373,803,571
180,312,528
171,034,280
152,646,436

Year and city
1926
New York...... ........
Chicago..................
Detroit....................
Philadelphia______
Los Angeles............
1927
New York..............
Chicago..................
Detroit...................
Los Angeles............
Philadelphia..........
1928
New York...... ........
Chicago..................
Detroit....................
Philadelphia—.......
Los Angeles............
1929
New York..............
Chicago..................
Philadelphia...........
Detroit........... ........
Los Angeles............
1930
New York..............
Chicago..................
Los Angeles............
Philadelphia...........
Washington...........

Total expendi­
ture

$1,039,670,572
376,808,480
183,721,443
140,093,075
123,006,215
880,333,455
365,065,042
145, 555,647
123,027,139
117,590,650
916,671,855
323,509,048
129,260,285
112,225,865
101,678,768
942,297,219
210,797,640
104,405,545
100,567,497
93,020,160
410,165,789
85,749,167
75,356,715
53,141,770
48,823,891

T a b l e 9 . —Families

provided for by residential construction, per 10,000 of popula­
tion, in the five leading cities each year, 1921 to 1980

Year and city

Families
provided for
per 10,000 of
population

1921
Long Beach, Calif—
Los Angeles, Calif___
Pasadena, Calif_____
Shreveport, La..........
Lakewood, Ohio........

631.9
320.9
251.7
249.8
191.3

1922
Long Beach, Calif___
Los Angeles, Calif___
Lakewood, Ohio........
Miami, Fla................
East Cleveland, Ohio

1,081.0
441.6
358.9
268.1
267.6

1923
Long Beach, Calif----Los Angeles, Calif___
Miami, Fla................
Irvington, N. J..........
Lakewood, Ohio........

1924

Miami, Fla.i..............
Irvington, N. J______
Los Angeles, Calif.3- San Diego, Calif........
Long Beach, Calif___

1925
Miami, Fla.*.............. .
San Diego, Calif........ .
Tampa, Fla............... .
Irvington, N. J.......... .
Los Angeles, Calif.2-..

1,038.1
657.4
611.1
432.1
381.5
2,248.9
601.2
448.3
378.0
347.6
1,342.0
392.0
379.3
374.6
331.0

Year and city

1926
St. Petersburg, Fla.—.
Mount Vernon, N. Y.
Irvington, N. J_........ .
White Plains, N. Y__.
San Diego, Calif.........
1927
Irvington, N. J______
White Plains, N. Y ._
Mount Vernon, N. Y.
Yonkers, N. Y ............
East Orange, N. J___
1928
Yonkers, N. Y ______
Mount Vernon, N. Y.
White Plains, N. Y ...
Long Beach, Calif___
Irvington, N. J..........
1929
Long Beach. Calif___
Phoenix, Ariz............ .
Houston, Tex............ .
Pontiac, Mich__....... .
Wichita, Kans............
1930
Long Beach, Calif___
Oklahoma City, Okla
Los Angeles, Calif___
Austin, Tex............... .
Bloomfield, N. J____

Families
provided for
per 10,000 of
population

700.3
644.7
398.6
367.2
339.5
740.6
419.5
414.8
349.0
338.1
347.6
299.1
298.3
297.4
295.4
306.9
211.6
208.8
159.1
141.0
109.7
92.9
92.8
90.4

i The ratio of families provided for in Miami in 1924 was based on the population as estimated by the
Census Bureau for that year. In the light of the actual census taken by the State enumeration in 1925, it
would seem that the estimate for 1924 was below the actual population for that year, hence the ratio here
shown for 1924 is probably higher than the actual population in that year would warrant.
3 Population not estimated in 1924 or 1925; 1923 estimate used.




15

APARTMENT-HOUSE CONSTRUCTION

Prices of Building Material, and Wages, 1921 to 1930
The Bureau of Labor Statistics collects monthly the wholesale price
of building material and from such figures computes index numbers.
Retail prices as paid by builders are not available, but it is believed
that the trend of retail prices follows closely that of wholesale prices.
The index numbers shown in Table 10 for wage rates in the building
trades are wage rates for union labor only. In many cities the build­
ing trades are highly organized, while in others there is much non­
union labor. Although the bureau has no data concerning the trend
of wage rates of nonunion labor in the building trades, it is thought
that it follows that of union wages. Based on 1921, the index number
of wholesale prices in the building trades reached a peak of 111.6 in
1923. It decreased each year thereafter until a low point of 95.8 was
reached in 1927. There wa» an increase in each of the next two years,
but a decrease again in 1930, when the index number stood at 97.2.
The index number of union wage rates in the building trades has
climbed steadily from a low point of 93.4, reached in 1922, to a high
of 136.2 in 1930, 1921 being the base or 100.0.
T able

10.— Index numbers of wholesale prices of building material and of union
wage rates in the building trades, 1921 to 1930

Year

1921..............................
1922..............................
1923..............................
1924..............................
1925..............................

Wholesale
prices of
building
material
100.0
99.9
111.6
105.0
104.4

Union wage
rates per hour
in the build­
ing trades
100.0
93.4
103.6
112.2
116.3

Year

1926 .............................
1927..............................
1928..............................
1929..............................
1930 .............................

Wholesale
prices of
building
material
102.7
95.8
96.2
99.7
92.7

Union wage
rates per hour
in the build­
ing trades
124.0
128.5
129.0
130.6
136.2

Apartment-House Construction in American Cities, 1930
Building permit reports have been received by the Bureau of
Labor Statistics from 257 identical cities having a population of
25,000 or over continuously since 1921 showing the number of
families provided for in new building construction and the class of
dwellings with which they were provided. The tables below show
the percentage of families provided for in each class of dwelling for
the years 1921, 1929, and 1930.
The dwellings are divided into three classes, 1-family, 2-family,
and multifamily. A 2-family dwelling is defined as one in which one
family lives above the other, or having two families on the same floor
using a common entrance. A semidetached dwelling is one of two
with a party wall between and having separate entrance. Each is
counted as a separate 1-family dwelling. A multifamily dwelling is
a dwelling accommodating three or more families. The term is
equivalent to the more generally used appellations apartment house
or tenement.
Table 11 shows the percentage of families provided for by the dif­
ferent types of dwellings in the above-mentioned years in 257 identical
cities by population groups.




16

BUILDING PERMITS IN PRINCIPAL CITIES
11.—Per cent of families provided for by the different types of dwellings
in cities having a population of 25,000 or over in 1921, 1929, and 1930

T able

Number
of cities

Year

500,000 and over......................... ................

14

100,000 and under 500,000...........................

75

50,000 and under 100,000.............................

86

25,000 and under 50,000..............................

82

Total.................................................

257

1921
1929
1930
1921
1929
1930
1921
1929
1930
1921
1929
1930
1921
1929
1930

Population group

Per cent of families provided
Total
for in—
number of
families
provided 1-family 2-family
Multi­
for
dwellings dwellings1 family
dwellings*
112,373
139,007
70,199
75,073
70,664
37,999
26,060
23,365
10,884
* 11,039
11,358
6,240
224,545
244, 394
125,322

44.2
25.3
32.0
72.0
55.8
59.0
74.9
65.3
69.6
68.7
72.3
77.8
58.3
40.2
45.7

21.7
10.3
12.2
12.0
13.1
13.0
15.0
11.0
9.7
18.2
14.7
9.4
17.3
11.4
12.1

34.0
64.4
55.8
16.0
31.1
28.0
10.2
23.7
20.7
13.1
13.0
12.9
24.4
48.5
42.2

1Includes 1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores.
2Includes multifamily dwellings with stores.

In these 257 cities, 125,322 families were provided with dwelling
places in the new buildings for which permits were issued in 1930;
45.7 per cent of the dwelling units provided were in 1-family dwell­
ings; 42.2 per cent, in multifamily dwellings; and 12.1 per cent in
2-family dwellings. This is a decrease in the percentage provided for
in multifamily dwellings as compared with the year 1929. Each of
the population groups, except cities having a population of 500,000 or
over, showed a larger percentage of families provided for by 1-family
dwellings than by apartment houses in each of the three years under
discussion.
There is a large difference in the relative percentage of families
provided for in 1-family dwellings to families provided for in apart­
ment houses in the different population groups. During 1930, in
the cities having a population of 500,000 and over, less than onethird of the family dwelling units were provided in 1-family dwellings,
while in cities having a population of 25,000 and under 50,000 over
three-fouxths of the families provided for were in 1-family dwellings.
In each of the population groups there was an increase in the per­
centage of families provided for in 1-family dwellings during 1930 as
compared with the percentage of families provided for in this class
of dwellings during 1929.
Table 12 shows the percentage of families provided for by the dif­
ferent types of dwellings in each of the 14 cities having a population
of 500,000 or over in 1921, 1929, and 1930.




17

APARTMENT-HOUSE CONSTRUCTION
T able

13.— Per cent of families provided for by the different types of dwellings in
cities having a population of 500,000 or over in 1921, 1929, and 1980

City, State, and year

Baltimore, Md.:
1921.....................
1929.....................
1930.....................
Boston, Mass.:
1921.....................
1929.....................
1930.....................
Buffalo, N. Y.:
1921.....................
1929.....................
1930.....................
Chicago, HI.:
1921_...................
1929.....................
1930.....................
Cleveland, Ohio:
1921................... .
1929.....................
1930.....................
Detroit, Mich.:
1921.....................
1929.....................
1930.....................
Los Angeles, Calif.:
1921.....................
1929.....................
1930.....................
Milwaukee, Wis.:
1921.....................
1929................... .
1930...................
New York City,
N. Y.:
1921.....................
1929.....................
1930.....................
The Bronx:
1921..............
1929..............
1930—..........

Total Per cent of families
provided for in—
num­
ber of
fam­
ilies 1-fam­ 2-fam- Multi­ City, State, and year
family
pro­
ily
iiy
vided dwell­ dwell­ dwell­
ings ings 1 ings *
for

2,176
3,022
1,484

85.0
92.7
97.0

4.5
.1

10.5
9.2
3.0

878
3,327
1,415

15.5
15.1
33.1

30.5
24.4
43.8

54.0
60.5
23.1

2,405
1,769
1,072

51.6
18.9
15.2

48.0
51.5
52.7

.4
29.6
32.1

12,252
18,837
2,741

37.9
14.9
38.9

17.6
7.2
18.3

44.6
77.9
42.8

4,084
2,143
1,176

35.5
54.3
60.2

40.5
19.4
14.8

24.0
26.3
25.0

6,743
12,151
4,084

46.9
48.8
55.4

17.9
26.5
30.5

35.2
24.7
14.1

19, 572 68.0
15, 234 34.8
11,437 36.8

16.9
11.7
12.1

15.2
53.5
51.1

2,212
3,848
1,729

44.9
24.3
26.2

38.2
26.0
27.9

16.9
49.7
45.9

51,360
58,320
36,182

31.6
10.8
18.3

24.2
6.2
8.2

44.2
83.0
73.5

14,037
13,978
7,012

11.7
4.9
9.3

11.9
3.9
3.6

76.4
91.2
87.2

Total Per cent of families
num­
provided for in—
ber of
fam­
ilies 1-fam­ 2-fam- Multi­
pro­
family
ily
iiy
vided dwell­ dwell­ dwell­
for
ings ings 1 ings *

New York City,
N. Y .—Contd.
Brooklyn—
1921.............. 16,636
1929.............. 11,224
1930.............. 9,275
Manhattan1921............. 4,837
1929.............. 18,067
1930.............. 8,669
Queens1921.............. 13,256
1929............. 13,861
1930.............. 10,495
Richmond—
1921.............. 2,594
1929.............. 1,190
1930.............
731
Philadelphia, Pa.:
1921..................... 2,406
1929..................... 7,098
1930.................... 1,744
Pittsburgh, Pa.:
1921_................... 1,335
1929-................... 2,153
1930.................... 1,349
St. Louis, Mo.:
1921_................... 2,072
1929-................. - 4,364
1930___________
1,618
San Francisco, Calif.:
1921. ............... 2,683
1929..................... 3,518
1930..................... 2,206
Washington, D. C.:
1921..................... 2,195
1929-................... 3,223
1930..................... 1,962
Total (14 cities):
1921..................... 112,373
1929..................... 139,007
1930..................... 70,199

24.1
9.7
12.8

44.0
12.2
10.6

31.9
78.1
76.5

.7
(3)
.1

3.7
(3)
0

95.5
99.9
99.9

60.0
27.2
43.6

24.4
10.4
12.3

15.6
62.4
44.1

100.0
61.6
27.9

22.1
62.1

16.3
10.0

93.3
57.1
69.8

3.2
5.8

6.7
39.7
24.4

59.3
60.1
66.1

26.8
9.5
13.0

13.9
30.4
20.9

49.0
28.5
51.8

24.1
12.1
11.6

26.8
59.4
36.6

37.6
35.1
53.2

17.0
5.9
5.9

45.4
59.0
40.9

75.4
42.3
49.0

.7
1.1

24.6
57.0
49.8

44.2
25.3
32.0

21.7
10.3
12.2

34.0
64.4
55.8

1Includes 1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores.
* Includes multifamily dwellings with stores.
3Less than one-tenth of 1 per cent.

In these 14 cities, only 70,199 families were provided with dwelling
places in new buildings according to permits issued in 1930. This
compares with 139,007 families provided for according to permits
issued in 1929. Both 1-family dwellings and 2-family dwellings
showed an increased percentage comparing 1930 with 1929. Multi­
family dwellings, however, showed a decreased percentage. There
was a marked difference in the proportion of families provided for in
apartment houses in the several cities in this population group. For
example, New York City provided family dwelling places in apart­
ment houses for 73.5 per cent of all the families during 1930. In
contrast, in Baltimore, Md., only 3 per cent of the total families
provided with dwellings places were to be housed in apartment build­
ings. Other cities providing for more families in apartment houses
than in 1-family dwellings were Chicago, Los Angeles, Milwaukee,
and Washington. Cities providing for the larger percentage of their




18

BUILDING PERMITS IN PRINCIPAL CITIES

families in 1-family dwellings were Cleveland, Detroit, Philadelphia,
Pittsburgh, St. Louis, and San Francisco. Boston and Buffalo were
the largest builders of 2-family dwellings.

General Table
General Table A, pages 19 to 94, shows detailed information for 311
cities in 1929 and 1930. The table is divided into three parts. Part 1
relates to new residential buildings, giving the number and cost of
each kind of dwelling, the number of families provided with dwelling
places in new buildings, and the ratio of families provided for to each
10,000 of population, for each city from which data were received for
both 1929 and 1930.
Part 2 gives the number and the cost of each of the different kinds of
new nonresidentia] buildings for each city from which reports were
received.
Part 3, shows the number and cost of additions, alterations, and
repairs to old buildings, the number and cost of installations and the
grand total of all buildings both new and old.
The number of installation permits and their construction cost was
obtained whenever such permits were issued by the building inspector.
In a number of cities, however, these permits were issued by offices
other than that of the building inspector and no data were collected
in such cities. In 1929 permits were issued for 108,458 installations to
cost $48,131,567, compared with 96,040 installations at an estimated
cost of $37,384,552 in 1930.
The bureau attempted to classify additions, alterations, and repairs
under the headings, repairs, etc., to housekeeping dwellings, to non­
housekeeping dwellings and to nonresidential buildings. However,
many of the cities winch reported by mail, grouped all repairs under
the heading “ Total repairs.”




T able A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1980, by intended use of buildings
PART 1.— NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
Housekeeping dwellings

City and State

Year

1-family dwellings

Num­
ber

$8,515,158
1,704,280
531 835
259,650
2,314,100
1,876,500
2,237,700
855,200
401,828
228,623
794,450
416,050
397,182
119,000
574,400
132,550
379,400
74,500
77,650
105,900
3,101,943
1,153,794
82,226
111, 150
218,470
486,150
529,032
323,910
935,172
411,594
1,202,610
978,116

Num­
ber

1,742
305
114
62
186
156
374
96
100
58
173
67
50
24
185
49
92
23
16
29
723
352
14
19
40
37
193
118
178
82
500
464

68
5
1
2
26
18

$536,500
30,800
4,500
13,000
427,000
386,700

136
10
2
4
52
36

1

5,000

2

4
2
1
1
1
1

25,000
14,000
11,000
9,000
6,500
3,000

151
76
3
2
5
1
7
3
3
5
7

Cost

Fami­ Num­
lies
ber

Cost

Fami­ Num­
lies
ber

3

$22,300

4

22
1

62,500
3,200

23
1

8
4
2
2
2
2

3
3

29,985
47,500

6
4

530.810
166,750
30.000
7,000
45,200
10.000
26,500
12,100
31,000

302
152
6
4
10
2
14
6
6

7
7
1

16,400
11,860
8,000

15,000
41,150

10
14

7
2

17,500
13,250

Cost

Fami­
lies

40
10
11
4
13
11

$1,041,000
147,250
584,000
171,500
843,000
571,500

293
44
288
75
147
119

1

5,100

3

4

96,500

28

6

49, 250

28

7
9
1

41
20
2
2

706,700
348,100
195,000
31,000

357
201
18
6

10
3

5
3

37,500
31,325

25
12

Num­
ber

Cost

Fami­
lies

3

$62,000

13

1

20,000

4

2

31,500

13

2

25,000

8

TABLE




1,742
305
114
62
186
156
374
96
100
58
173
67
50
24
185
49
92
23
16
29
723
352
14
19
40
37
193
118
178
82
500
464

Fami­
lies

Multifamily dwellings
with stores combined

Multifamily dwellings

GENERAL

Akron, Ohio.................. 1929
1930
1929
1930
Albany, N. Y ................ 1929
1930
Allentown, Pa________ 1929
1930
Alton, 111_____________ 1929
1930
Altoona, Pa....... .......... 1929
1930
Amsterdam, N. Y ____ 1929
1930
Anderson, Ind________ 1929
1930
Asheville, N. 0 ............. 1929
1930
Ashtabula, Ohio _____ 1929
1930
Atlanta, Ga__________ 1929
1930
Atlantic City, N. J___ 1929
1930
Auburn, N. Y __........... 1929
1930
Augusta, Ga__________ 1929
1930
Aurora, 111____ _______ 1929
1930
Austin, Tex.................. 1929
1930
Alameda, Calif_______

Cost

1-family and 2-family
dwellings with stores
combined

2-family dwellings

T able

A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1980, by intended use of buildings— Continued

to
O

PART l .—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
Housekeeping dwellings

Year

Num­
ber

Bangor, M e...................
Baton Rouge, La..........

Bay City, Mich........
Bayonne, N. J________
Beaumont, Tex.............
Belleville, 111.................
Bellingham, Wash........

Bethlehem, Pa..............
Binghamton, N. Y ____
Birmingham, Ala___
Bloomfield, N. J___
Bloomington, 111___
Boston, Mass.1.........




2,801
1,439
32
45
61
70
164
62
63
54
2
1
437
239
114
104
126
88
302
227
92
69
58
53
511
148
256
180
110
57
503

1

Cost
$7,000

Fami­ Num­
lies
ber

11,000
21,000

2
6

12
10

73,500
56,000

24
20

12
4

42,620
30,500

24
8

3
46

35,000
425,300

6
92

26
12
I

221,200
82,900
3,500
13,500
1C
nnn
•
lOA
Vf Uw
170
J
L4V, 500
uw
20,000
5*000
5
U) 410
TlAV/j 900
t»w
2,461,300

52
24
2
4
38
38
4
2
808
620

2

Fami­ Num­
lies
ber

Cost

Fami­
lies

3
3

$1,050,000
145,000

219
45

1
1
1

5,890
16,000
9,500

3
3
4

2
6

48,000
136,000

29
75

1

9,000

4

2
7

1
16
8
3

40,000
648,700
275,500
33,000

20
285
110
10

8,500
3.000
8.000
35,000

3
1
2
2

7
8
18
2
33
13

152.000
260.000
271,500
41,500
714.000
406.000

59
84
170
13
180
124

13.000
71.000

2
2

2
153
53

30,000
8.225.300
1.175.300

7
2,014
324

2

1
3

19
19
2
1
404
310

Cost

3
1
1

$12, 500
2,000
1,800

4
1
1

2
5

23.000
36.000

2
g

3
2

24,700
22,000

5
3

1
4

8,000
58,000

3
1
1
1
2
2

Num­
ber

Cost

Fami­
lies

1

$7,000

1

1

15,000

3

CITIES

Berkeley, Calif.............

2,801 $11,880,200
7,095,800
1,439
160,800
32
153,100
45
237,097
61
186,284
70
164
647,950
240.800
62
256,700
63
275,500
54
12,000
2
1
2,800
1,235,734
437
670,991
239
114
555,433
104
459,850
298.475
126
229,550
1,402,600
1,084,514
227
672.475
92
69
379,125
58
351.800
53
304,230
511
1,467,250
148
323,036
256
1,588,700
180
872.000
110
803.000
326.000
57
2,922,512
503
468
2,575,100

Num­
ber

IN PRINCIPAL

Battle Creek, M ich___

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

Fami­
lies

Multifamily dwellings
with stores combined

Multifamily dwellings

PERMITS

Baltimore, M d_______

Cost

1-family and 2-family
dwellings with stores
combined

2-family dwellings

1-family dwellings

BUILDING

City and State

1,147,910
797,275
496,200
374,400
1,949,400
1 318,500
2,261,500
960,965
164,800
82,730
161,100
41,800

175
162
93
64
91
79
334
163
52
18
28
11

64
48
2
2
22
17
434
279

561,500
375,200
17.000
15.000
237,080
171,000
1,892,620
1,329,200

128
96
4
4
44
34
868
558

1

8,000

63
22
12
252
64
303
88
109
75
7
3
91
56
183
118
362
167
192
134
7
2
94
34
2,804
1,066
66
38
98
24
1,243
998
47
15
1,163
708
212
200

20,373
261,500
150,643
843,100
273,500
1,675,965
479,000
568,664
315,700
34,700
11,500
259,825
161,068
561,435
492,783
1,471,786
881, 553
539,727
554,874
59,000
9,500
418,450
124,400
19,369,150
7,174,450
251,350
122,200
750,200
160,300
9,676,860
6,845,217
195,800
34,000
6,542,300
3,600,300
1,157,700
924,800

63
22
12
252
64
303
88
109
75
7
3
91
56
183
118
362
167
192
134
7
2
94
34
2,8(4
1,066
66
38
98
24 *
1,243
998 1
47
15
1,163
708
212
200

2
35
50
28
10
2
1
15
6

4
1

39,000
8,500

6
1

1

6,000

1

27
6

263,000
36,600

44
7

2

2
8

8,500
13,275

3
8

2,200
303,600
417,000
115,000
46,400
17,500
4,500

4
70
100
56
20
4
2

8
1

76,700
6,000

12
1

93,000
37,500

30
12

5

7,075

6

18
7
32
37
29
28
6
2
2

134,500
27,000
248,450
196,975
52,300
76,700
44,000
17,000
17,000

36
14
64
74
58
56
12
4
4

3
4

19,000
14,000

5
4

3
2
5

23,000
10,000
21,100

3
2
8

619
217
3
9
29
6
151
61

8,291,600
3,388,900
22,500
40,000
352,500
74,500
930,800
615,450

1,238
434
6
18
58
12
302
122

101
37

1,311,3C0
711,800

126
68

1
7

5,000
110,500

1
10

196
82
47
21

2,048,500
784,500
340,900
144,850

392
164
94
42

1
10
2
14
7
3
1

28,000
23,900
7,500
156,000
95,000
29,000
8,500

2
15
3
23
10
4
1

232 _ _ !
82
2

36
20

519,200
214,500

39
5
37
34

1,490,000
805,000
1,732,300
1,150,200

227
118
488
338

16
4

3,133,000
155,000

696
47

4
3
1
1
2
5
1

161,000
71,000
18,000
12,000
30,000
38,200
6,500

74
24
5
4
16
16
3

7
15
13
7
8
4
2

74,000
245,000
204,250
143,850
90,800
82,000
60,000

38
73
68
73
64
22
17

807
68
2

50,535,500
6,814,500
37,000

9
4
31
36
1

21

11
2
1

52,000

12

11
2

141,500
16,500

35
6

2
1

37,000
10,000

7
4

2
1

17,500
40,000

8
6

i
l

10,000
4,796

8
3

12,919
1,042
8

114
21

7,497,200
1,065,100

1,750
131

391,200
88,000
2,290,500
2,570,500
10,000

98
16
532
571
4

16
1

417,800
18,000

64
5

2,779,000
1,249,500
79,000
10,000

546
288
24
4

4
2
4

103,000
223,000
104,000

19
6
25

TABLE




175
162
92
64
91
79
334
163
52
18
28
11

GENERAL

Bridgeport, Conn......... 1929
1930
1929
1930
Brookline, Mass........... 1929
1930
Buffalo, N. Y ................ 1929
1930
Burlington, Iowa_____ 1929
1930
Butler, Pa------------------ 1929
1930
Butte, Mont......... ........ 1929
1930
Cambridge, Mass_____ 1929
1930
Camden, N. J________ 1929
1930
Canton, Ohio................ 1929
1930
Cedar Rapids, Iowa___ 1929
1930
Central Falls, R. I ....... 1929
1930
Charleston, S. C ______ 1929
1930
Charleston, W. Va....... 1929
1930
Charlotte, N. C_______ 1929
1930
Chattanooga, Tenn___ 1929
1930
Chelsea, Mass________ 1929
1930
Chester, P a ........... ...... 1929
1930
Chicago, 111................... 1929
1930
Chicopee, Mass............ 1929
1930
Cicero, HI...................... 1929
1930
Cincinnati, Ohio........... 1929
1930
Clarksburg, W. Va....... 1929
1930
Cleveland, Ohio______ 1929
1930
Clifton, N. J_________ 1929
1930
1Applications filed.
Brockton, Mass______

to

T able

—

Number and estimated cost of buildings ( new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1980, by intended use of buildings— Continued

JjO
^

PAR T 1,—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
—------------------------------Housekeeping dwellings

Year

Num­
ber

65
54
212
124
268
83
756
439
67
32
105
52
388
211
59
40
501
486
115
47
158
134
120
151
210
69
749
338
289
193
5,926
2,264

Cost

-Fami­ Num­
lies
ber

Cost

Fami­ Num­
lies
ber

1
9
4
2

$1,200
54,100
19,500
4,300

2
18
8
4

51
19

451,000
196,100

102
38

3
1
1

$16,500
30,000
3,000

3
2
1

11
5
30
6
1
1
160
146

48,500
34.000
222,100
44.000
8,425
3,000
797,623
680,824

22
10

4

28,500
43,000

7
5

12
2
2
320
292

2
1

31,697
2,500

2
1

2
3
12
2
1

11,000
16,300
88,560
15,000
6,650

4
6
24
4
2

36
12
5
4
1,577
604

263,500
75.000
29.000
36,500
11,294,124
4,694,020

72
24
10
g
3,154
1,208

1

43
26

5,100

627,100
242,000

Cost

Fami­
lies

4
1
1
70
17
1

$35,000
15,000
20,000
1,230,000
380,000
10,000

20
4
8
332
81
11

3

23,000

20

2

165,000

50

1
39
21

12,000
555,000
386,800

2

1
7
9
11

67
38

1
38
13
11
6
279
71

Num­
ber

Cost

Fami­
lies

3
4

$69,666
44,700

18
15

1

11,000

5

4
316
162

2
7

35,500
85,100

8
56

15.000
86.000
192,500
196,650

4
28
61
56

2

47,000

7

50,000
1,946,500
540,000
154,500
63,000
7,440,733
1,860,086

10
787
251
49
24
2,806
551

56
5

987,711
124,600

193
23

CITIES

$345,875
248,375
643,475
416,125
555,760
252,525
4,292,150
2,527,600
234.000
111.000
335.500
195.500
1,924,900
1.013.300
272,360
139,612
1,365,675
1,287,506
439,250
199,693
741,651
651,690
619,617
697,025
1.121.300
358,900
3,877,850
1,879,450
1,489,350
1,007,395
31,391,841
12,522,232

Num­
ber

IN PRINCIPAL




65
54
212
124
268
83
756
439
67
32
105
52
388
211
59
40
501
486
115
47
158
134
120
151
210
69
749
338
289
193
5,926
2,264

Fami­
lies

Multifamily dwellings
with stores combined

Multifamily dwellings

PERMITS

Colorado Springs, Colo. 1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
Columbus. Ga
1930
Columbus, Ohio______ 1929
1930
Council Bluffs, Iowa— 1929
1930
Covington, K y_______ 1929
1930
Cranston, R. I ________ 1929
1930
Cnrnhftrlarifl MH
1929
1930
Dallas, T ot . . . .
1929
1930
Danville, Til
1929
1930
1929
Davenport Iowa
1930
1929
Dayton, Ohio
1930
TiPf>fltnT Til
1929
1930
T^AnvAi* HaIa
1929
1930
TIag 1V/fniriAQ Tnwft
1929
1930
1929
Detroit,
,,
1930
Columbia, S. C

Cost

1-family and 2-family
dwellings with stores
combined

2-family dwellings

1-family dwellings

BUILDING

City and State

192,933
162,986
656,845
217,805
600,606
546,813
259,102
101,705
358,500
712,200
98,950
81,700
166,800
99,300
917,192
657,275
1,000,455
564,330
666,385
354,050
916,000
293,000
426,050
197,340
534,135
209,650
1,464,924
1,053,086
1,412,509
1, 012,200
1,529,000
636,000
1,788,900
663,650
110,300
58,400
176,240
166,100
157,150
106,050
184,600
101,500
6,521,591
1,467,923
175,180
211,500
2,758,708
1,449,925
3,667,221
1,828,962
559,325
390,050

56
56
107
62
176
108
47
20
30
56
16
11
25
16
171
115
298
170
138
72
123
44
107
40
67
38
386
270
285
175
121
48
386
172
23
15
73
64
37
29
31
21 .
1,534
304
47
37 .
541
285
960
474
145
106 .

1
2
1
7
3
16
1

7
21
30
15
43

17,000

6,000

18,000
9,000
31,150
15,950
547,150
8,500

1
2
1
40
45
36
16
5
1
12
1
21
17
4
1
4
2
1

3,300
17,300
5,500
183,300
223,844
183,700
97,700
72.000
22.000
76,000
3,400
161,000
113,200
32.500
5.000
38.500
13,440
6.000

183
28

1,112,150
196,740

62
50

358,375
324,158

11,000

49.000
92.000
64,650
48,821

15

9,418

38.000
262,500
62.000
175,300
71,500
154,000
87,400
331.000
197.000

12

10,000

56

23,000
1,600

2,367,200
217,000
20,300

48,950
31,200

42,700
13,500
45,000

56.000
69.000

708.000
265.000

70,000
125,000

15
5

279
105

76.000
18.000

15
4

255,900
199,572
66,000

190
103

36,000
5,000

26
7

1,579,000
105.000
130.000

243
13
47

140,000

12

2,800
6,000

12,700
17,000
40,500
2,000

1,500

34,500
12,000
50,000
6,000

8,500

56

7,000
113,496

405,384

147

40,000

14,500
102,665

90.000
90.000
363,215
109,379
121,500

31
25
127
52
42

55,000

17,000
124
100

5,000

TABLE




56
56
107
62
176
108
47
20
30
56
16
11
25
16
171
11*
29*
170
138
72
123
44
107
40
67
38
386
270
285
175
121
48
386
172
23
15
73
64
37
29
31
21
1,534
304
47
37
541
285
960
474
145
106

GENERAL

Dubuque, Iowa............ 1929
1930
Duluth, Minn............... 1929
1930
Durham, N. O________ 1929
1930
East Chicago, Ind........ 1929
1930
East Cleveland, Ohio.. 1929
1930
Easton, Pa___________ 1929
1930
East Orange, N. J_____ 1929
1930
East Providence, R. I .. 1929
1930
East St. Louis, 111_____ 1929
1930
Elgin, IU........................ 1929
1930
Elizabeth, N. J............. 1929
1930
Elkhart, Ind................. 1929
1930
Elmira, N. Y ................ 1929
1930
El Paso, Tex................. 1929
1930
Erie, Pa......................... 1929
1930
Evanston, 111_________ 1929
1930
Evansville, Ind............. 1929
1930
Everett, Mass________ 1929
1930
Everett, Wash............ 1929
1930
Fall River, Mass.......... 1929
1930
Fitchburg, Mass........... 1929
1930
Flint, Mich................... 1929
1930
Fond du Lac, Wis____ 1929
1930
Fort Wayne, Ind.......... 1929
1930
Fort Worth, T ex.......... 1929
1930
Fresno, C alif..._______ 1929
1930

12

fcO
CO

T a b l e A .—

Number and estimated cost of buildings ( new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1980, by intended use of buildings— Continued
PART 1,—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
Housekeeping dwellings

Num­
ber
Galveston, Tex.........
Gary, Ind................. .
Grand Rapids, Mich

Greensboro, N. C ___
Greenville, S. C.........
Greenwich, Conn___
Hagerstown, M d-----

Hammond, Ind.........
Hamtramck, M ich...
Harrisburg, Pa......... .
Hartford, Conn.........
Haverhill, Mass.____
Hazleton, Pa_______




261
81
259
122
2
138
57
54
33
37
30
12
8

9,500
758,000
438,750
640.400
504.400
104,800
90,975
81,170
82,261

103
170
114
534
209
157
92
133
107
203
59
91
57
250
145
261
81
122
138
57
54
33
37
30
12
8

Num­
ber

Cost
$14,500
70,400
180,200
65.500
19.500
173,325
40,650
182,000
5.000
24,100
5.000
10,000
42.500
139.000
125.000
53.500
14,000
51.000
32.000
30,700
7.000
15.000
319,100
118,900
26.000

Fami- Num­
ber
4
18
142

Cost

$22,000

2,400
1,000

10,500
6,000

Fami- Num­
ber

Cost

Fami­
lies

$85,000
4,000
136,500
15,500
71,000
44,800
286,600

Num­
ber

Fami-

22,000

17
5

54,000

10

39.000
65.000

25

Cost

$ 10,000

72,700

16,000
162,900
15.000
15,500
35.000
79.000
4,900
7,500

36,300
36.500
17.500

72,000
23,980
' 2i,'66o

8,000

45,000
435,300

6.000

15,000

33,558
18,840

56,081

"53,‘ §30

12
144

CITIES

Hamilton, Ohio....... .

$1,064,652
343,565
779,000
481.300
2,029,600
797,600
535,227
349,135
1,176,410
401.150
774,064
280.150
450,975
211,160
4,981,640
2,656,200
351,425
211,500
1,010,094
361,950
1,117,800
504.300

103
170
114
534
209
157
92
133
107
203
59
91
57
250
145

Fami-

Multifamily dwellings

IN PRINCIPAL

Great Falls, Mont__.
Green Bay, Wis____

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

Cost

1-family and 2-family
dwellings with stores
combined

2-family dwellings

1-family dwellings

PERMITS

Year

BUILDING

City and State

8,500
12,700

1
2

20
23
2,296
1,528
37
40
139

162,000
155,000
9,247,327
7,037,565
131,900
191,300
502,480
341,385
5,441,375
2,177,890
203,350
93,750
925, 550
279,700
1,117,225
439,175
714,450
365,500
63,380
27,000
168,550
85,800
1,187,400
427,000
168,750
140,700
549,390
449,725
588,350
479,300
3,542,300
2,222,500
397, 500
201,500
1,575, 628
336,030
281,000
205,800
1,830,575
491,468
173,300
49,070
447,300
306,800
745,950
564,300
2,661,183
487,189

20
23
2,296
1,528
37
40
139

86

1,052
420
34
15
181
59
430
167
158
83
9
4
28
16
154
62
51
35
118
94
259
173
830
496
64
33
206
48
51
39
448
147
55
17
52
36
156
43
533
122

86

1, 052
420
34
15
181
59
430
167
158
83
9
4
28
16
154
62
51
35
118
94
259
173
830
496
64
33
206
48
51
39
448
147
55
17
52
36
156
43
533

122

1

7,800

2

1
2
3
411
221
1

20,000
19.000
28.000
3,215,745
1,674,800
10,000

2
4
6
822
442
2

4
6
182
83
24
11
11
1
38
5
8
1
81
25
4
1
17
11
1

19,500
33,100
862,620
509,240
216,000
93,100
85,900
6,800
129,275
21,100
46,800
6,762
564,000
233,500
25,000
6,000
268,400
126,500
8,500

8
12
364
166
48
22
22
2
76
10
16
2
162
50
8
2
34

3
1

27,000
5,000

6
2

1
19
12
70
24
18
2
1
1
1
1
7

7,500
124, 500
71,000
478, 700
149,500
149,000
21,000
9,500
12,000
2,400
6,000
50,000

2
38
24
140
48
36
4
2
2
2
2
14

32
17

262,500
137,000

64
34

3

16,000

6

1
2
1

16.500
33.500
7,500

1
4
2

16
13
4
2
1
1

205,000
108,650
6,000
9.500
2.500
3,000

30
19
4
2
1
1

1
1
1

6,000
18,000
9,000

1
2
2

12
5

57,700
15,800

17
5

1
9

2

1
15

10

4,700
135,000
30.000
72.000

1

6,000

1

2
10

22
2

5
1
2

40.000
17.000
25.000

8
1
3

7

103,250

7

6,000
9,600

2
2

1
2

2
1

26,000
10,000

4
1

3

375,000

116

1

612,000

133

2
1
60
49

165,000
25,000
880,100
710,300

28
8
316
231

g

42,500

14

39.000
56,500
16.000

26
7
6

3

2
3

1
21
2
22
9
2

15,000
705,850
44,300
367,500
254,000
47,400

6
324
28
86
63
15

6

24,050

20

18
1
1
2
30
16

301,500
12,000
100,000
39,000
3,361,000
530,500

112
4
32
7
1,082
161

1

10,000

3

6
4

kU
ov
o/f VvU
non
U

67,000

120
21

1

22,000

4

1

20,000

10

6
1
2
1
48
15
5
4
3

91.000
14.000
70.000
35.000
3,220,000
690.000
123.000
53.000
51.000

36
6
12
12
1,308
332
54

1
1

100,000
20,000

50
11

15

2

250.000
400.000

32
26

6
1
1

153,000
5,999
4,800

20
5
6

2

132,600

82

7
10

400.000
593.000

87
178

i

20,555

8

22

1

TA B LE




1
2

GENERAL

Highland Park, M ich .. 1929
1930
Hoboken, N. J________ 1929
1930
Holyoke, Mass________ 1929
1930
Houston, Tex_________ 1929
1930
Huntington, W. V a----- 1929
1930
Hutchinson, Kans____ 1929
1930
Indianapolis, Ind.......... 1929
1930
Irvington, N. J............. 1929
1930
Jackson, Mich............... 1929
1930
Jacksonville, Fla______ 1929
1930
Jamestown, N. Y ......... 1929
1930
Jersey City, N. J______ 1929
1930
Johnstown, Pa.............. 1929
1930
Joliet, 111........................ 1929
1930
Joplin, M o..................... 1929
1930
Kalamazoo, M ich......... 1929
1930
Kansas City, Kans
1929
1930
Kansas City, M o _____ 1929
1930
Kearny, N. J................. 1929
1930
Kenosha, Wis________ 1929
1930
Kingston, N. Y ............ 1929
1930
Knoxville, Tenn........... 1929
1930
Kokomo, Ind................ 192»
1930
Lakewood, Ohio______ 1929
1930
Lancaster, Pa................ 1929
1930
Lansing, M ich________ 1929
1930

T able

A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction and repairst alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1930, by intended use of buildings— Continued
PART 1.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
Housekeeping dwellings

Year

Num­
ber

Lebanon, Pa.........
Lewiston, M e.......

Lima, Ohio...........
Lincoln, Nebr.......
Little Rock, Ark..
Long Beach, Calif.
Lorain, Ohio.........

Louisville, K y ----Lowell, Mass........
Lynchburg, Va__.
Lynn, Mass..........
McKeesport, Pa._
Macon, Ga............




$37,500
20,000
100,000
143,400
120,000
97,000
230,255
205,030
19,500
45,300
1,197,350
464,950
1,163,282
779,060
4,271,780
2,873,795
609,800
276,050
21,177,333
15,367,975
2,406,450
1,893,400
139,425
179,900
298,025
345,515
625,000
446,100
790,585
320,700
285,040
82,235

7
5
19
12
34
19
93
72
6
7
248
94
275
184
1,275
840
166
83
5,301
4,207
35
42
84
82
119
88
130
57
73
45

Cost

Fami­ Num­
lies
ber

1
5

$8,000
34,500

2
10

1

3
4

45.000
38.000

6
8

1

Cost
$3,000

1, 00<^

Fami­ Num­
lies
ber

Fami­
nes

1

2

$21,000

12

1

1
1
9
3

27.000
15.000
134,675
17,400

9
3
40
10

1
6
1
19
14
183
98
1

6,000
184,000
7,500
240,175
262,850
2,652,600
1,279,760
13,000

4
98
4
80
99
1,318
659
4

908
742
70
21

17,632,360
11,897,279
807,000
348,500

8,157
5,844
401
105

2
13
1
2

160,000
914,000
12,000
44,000

32
309
3
8

1

3,000

1

274
223

1,433,250
1,115,350

548
446

14
10

97,300
36,900

18
10

888
693
183
7

6,587,298
5,021,599
1,241,660
88,000

1,776
1,386
366
14

59

397,990

92

1

7,000

2

7

39,630

8

185,300
49.500
100,650
48.500

44
12
18
14

2

16,500

3

14
9

69,035
55,700

Is
9

22
6
9
7

Cost

Num­
ber

Cost

Fami­
lies

1

$13,500

4

1

6,000

3

8
6

98,500
79,000

39
38

11

257,500

73

1
1

17,000
17,500

3
3

CITIES

Los Angeles, Calif.

7
5
19
12
34
19
93
72
6
7
248
94
275
184
1,275
840
166
83
5,301
4,207
495
309
35
42
84
82
119
88
130
57
73
45

Num­
ber

IN PRINCIPAL

Lexington, K y ___

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

Fami­
lies

Multifamily dwellings
with stores combined

Multifamily dwellings

PERMITS

Lawrence, Mass—

Cost

1-family and 2-family
dwellings with stores
combined

2-family dwellings

1-family dwellings

BUILDING

City and State

1,227,550
654,050
470,100
317,000
337,335
225,060
654,830
379,850
90,050
19,450
190,450
49,800
1,600,900
1,041,000
2,792,565
2,401,530
549,900
282,900
637,420
467,650
5,197,300
2,740,250
3,832,855
3,326,615
644,722
361,775
663,300
467,770
2,095,400
914,150
1,247,070
518,200
1,386,700
1,799,400
878,205
120,670
457,660
234,450
95,050
50,600
1,413,079
904,500
965,700
648,050
297,400
75,900
116,400
123,000
583,000
291,100
255,750
69,400

226
128
87
63
82
78
113
79
38
10
69
14
263
189
752
759
105
64
105
114
936
453
821
748
299
191
130
107
137
65
468
258
108
169
308
41
157
81
44
22
466
313
132
88
89
29
18
15
81
36
40
15

10
7
22
5
9
4
1

91,000
48.500
178,300
36.500
58,700
25,200
5,000

15,500

237

761.000
99,000
612.000
100,000

201
26

43,000

14

315.000

78
25
316
116

130,000
19,000

16
3

15,000

12,000

48
17
91
7

322,100
115,500
656,800
614,900
50,000

484
234
115
87

3,756,750
1,770,466
687,255
557,590

12
2
2
1
19
10
4

119.500
16,800

34
178
182
14

5,000
3,700

120.000

799,500
295,100

7,700
500

1
1
14
14
61

3
15
2

230
174

303,800
134,500

27,230

5.000
2.000

60,418
73,500
688,680
412,950

158,000
22,500
111, 968
18,000

1,710
513
519

117,375

40

236,600
97,960

772,000
23.000
1,682,500
2,233,200
15.000

286
16
378
546
8

68,050

352,000

'i6 ’ 400'

2,000
1,000

977,700
989,054

280

194,000
63,000
16
20
178
229
3

12,000

2
2
28
28
122
78

4,709,9"2
1,297,062
1,702,900
1,072,000

40,000
42,500
832.000
818.000
6,620

6,000

2,500
327.500
131.500
18,467

35,000
113
30
48
42

TAB LE




226
128
87
63
82
78
113
79
38
10
69
14
263
189
752
759
105
64
105
114
936
453
821
748
299
191
130
107
137
65
468
258
108
169
308
41
157
81
44
22
466
313
132
88
89
29
18
15
81
36
40
15

GENERAL

Madison, Wis________ 1929
1930
Malden, Mass........ ...... 1929
1930
Manchester, N. H ........ 1929
1930
Mansfield, Ohio______ 1929
1930
Marion, Ind__________ 1929
1930
Marion, Ohio................ 1929
1930
Medford, Mass............. 1929
930
Memphis, Tenn............ 1929
1930
Meriden, Conn_______ 1929
1930
Miami, Fla___________ 1929
1930
Milwaukee, W is........... 1929
1930
Minneapolis, M inn___ 1929
1930
Mobile, Ala................... 1929
1930
Moline, HI___________ 1929
1930
Montclair, N. J ............ 1929
1930
Montgomery, Ala......... 1929
1930
Mount Vernon, N. Y__ 1929
1930
Muncie, Ind__________ 1929
1930
Muskegon, M ich.......... 1929
1930
Muskogee, Okla............ 1929
1930
Nashville, Tenn_______ 1929
1930
Newark, N. J_________ 1929
1930
Newark, Ohio________ 1929
1930
New Bedford, Mass___ 1929
1930
New Britain, Conn___ 1929
1930
New Brunswick, N. J.. 1929
1930

174,000
21,197

153.000
150.000

28

29,000
10,000

118

to

T a b l e A .—

Number and estimated cost of buildings ( new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1930, by intended use of buildings— Continued

to
00

PART 1,—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
Housekeeping dwellings

Year

Num­
ber

New Haven, Conn__

New Orleans, La____
Newport, K y ___ ____
Newport, R. I _______
Newport News, Va__.
New Rochelle, N. Y_.

New York City, N .Y .
The Bronx1_____
Brooklyn1............
Manhattan1------Queens1------------Richm ond1_____
Niagara Falls, N. Y „ .




$311,200
141,850
356,450
325.000
889,200
980,800
722,500
422,680
1,272,389
747,260
135,900
67,800
636,700
555,600
164,523
247,248
3,731,800
2,973,956
4,874,100
3,511,400

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

650
1,092
1,191
4
7
3,767
4,577
733
204
221
158

5,231,900
4,417,150
7.659.200
7.848.200
505.000
1, 210,000
21,203,110
24,478,760
3,723,190
986,985
1,255,474
717,375

51
21
63
49
119
120
92
61
370
214
29
17
60
43
55
91
194
166
410
312

Cost

Fami­ Num­
lies
ber

Cost

Fami- Num­
ber

Cost

Fami­
lies

Num­
ber

Cost

Fami­
lies

$14,500

$ 12,000

12,000

8,000
7
5
5
3
224
20
2

68,000
35.500
60,400
25.500
736,608
121,330
14.500

$35,400
12,000

14
10
10
6
*48
40
4

399,700
299,500
14,000
8.500
184,000
2.500

22,000

463,477

124

650
1,092
1,191

258
116
452
438
2

7
3,767
4,577
733
204
221
158

546
521
90
86
38
27

1

105.000
133,690
761,250
155.000

16
22
158
34

3,093,300
1,132,750
4,282,700
3,980,500
45,000
8,000
4,891,70Q
3,960,000
665,050
496,300
230,700
165,100

516
232
904
876
4
2
1,092
1,042
180
172
76
54

$14,000
23,100

20

13,000

8,000
8,000

11
79
17

136
107
4
3

16
10
234
54

251,250
134,500
3,214,700
609,000

228
164
51
251
3

1,991,300
1,355,500
366,075
1,346,840
48,500
7,300

1

24
17
468
108

322
123
312
219
224
86
249
104
9

1
1

25,000

12

327,000

94

406,000
5,000

51
3

50,496,700
21.505.500
31.942.000
26,939,900
163,065,000
52.211.000
27.526.500
14.092.000
529,000
60,000
38,000

11,962
5,713
7,435
6,699
18,059
8,660
7,897
4,318
194
19
6

4.041.000
2.159.000
6.338.000
1,667,500

796
400
1,325
401

3,066,500
863,000

757
314

272.000

54
14
5

100.000

16,000

CITIES

Newton, Mass........... .

51
21
63
49
119
120
92
61
370
214
29
17
60
43
55
91
194
166
410
312

Num­
ber

IN PRINCIPAL

New London, Conn_

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929

Fami­
lies

Multifamily dwellings
with stores combined

Multifamily dwellings

PERMITS

Newburgh, N. Y ____
New Castle, Pa_____

Cost

1-family and 2-family
dwellings with stores
combined

2-family dwellings

1-family dwellings

BUILDING

City and State

Oi
S*
Cn
t
to

I

co

988,375
692,270
536,530
400,200
1,664,600
1,241,750
2,977,527
1,892,799
1,104,060
335,300
186,700
197,375
6,409,845
4,751,425
10,000
1,000
1,452,700
728,275
163,000
239,750
415,825
233,955
222,500
214,800
178,145
146,940
2,877,690
1,488,561
357,750
113,500
566,500
323,250
1,048,675
592,100
1,664,083
1,639,150
154,790
90,650
128,545
104,175
17,151,635
5,031,450
1,581,587
731,750
7,776,050
4,919,985
1,065,600
912,650
880,256
623,534

209
173
101
55
227
153
690
435
79
26
72
77
1,549
945
1
1
299
162
10
15
112
60
41
48
89
84
333
172
47
14
113
60
215
123
335
345
36
19
42
33
4,054
1,217
501
216
1,294
892
186
167
110
73

5,700
12,550
72.000
116,000
55.000
66,700
87,450

274

5,000
36,500
1,690,800
1,545,900

68,800
149,000

2,000
9.000
7.000
59,000

33,000

63,000
34,035
12,500

3,057,700
1,909,850
1,493,500
120,000

1,173
756
212
29

19,000
1,969,000
1,057,500

14
812
467

385.000
89,000
489.000
251.000

142
34
115
61

232,250
70,100
165,000

30

128,800
18,000
4,500

330,000
36,000
35,100

113
15
12

3,400
90,275

95.000
107,500
10,680
15.000

8,000
4,150
33,500

548

86.500
54.500
39,000
131,750
5,200

18,000
40,000
9,000

3
103

13

29,285

11

140,000

“I§

178,000
80,500

41

26,000

3,000
8
6
11
5
69
19
43
13
3
3
10
3
2
2
113
51
97
39
96
81
11
5

52,400
20,200
109.000
50.000
455,200
142,700
261,850
87.500
30.000
27.000
69,780
19,300
19.000
4,500
1,632,050
721.000
344,015
123,565
791,900
716,500
91.500
46.500
55.500
24.000

5,500

16
12
22
10
138
26
20
6
4
4
226
102
194
78
192
162
22
10
12
6

20,000
1,000

33

48,325
7,050
81,000
90,000
13,000
8,800

14,092,000
1,589,000
350,225
160,850
1,993,700
859,150
12,000

2,818
317
234
108
561
278
3

25,837

8

48,000

16

47.000
63,550
18.000

’ 32
22
4~

20,000

"3

540,000

108

422,000
25,000

93
4

TABLE




209
173
101
55
227
153
690
435
79
26
72
77
1,549
945
1
1
299
162
10
15
112
60
41
48
89
84
333
172
47
14
113
60
215
123
335
345
36
19
42
33
4,054
1,217
501
216
1,294
892
186
167
110
73

GENERAL

1929
1930
Norristown, Pa........... . 1929
1930
Norwalk, Conn........... . 1929
1930
Oakland, Calif.............. 1929
1930
Oak Park, 111............... 1929
1930
Ogden, Utah......... ....... 1929
1930
Oklahoma City, Okla. 1929
1930
Okmulgee, Okla______ 1929
1930
Omaha, Nebr________ 1929
1930
Orange, N. J................ . 1929
1930
Oshkosh, Wis.............. . 1929
1930
Ottumwa, Iowa............ 1929
1930
Paducah, K y ................ 1929
1930
Pasadena, Calif........... . 1929
1930
Passaic, N. J________ _ 1929
1930
Paterson, N. J . . . ....... . 1929
1930
Pawtucket, K. I........... 1929
1930
Peoria, 111...................... 1929
1930
Perth Amboy, N. J___ 1929
1930
Petersburg, Va............ . 1929
1930
Philadelphia, Pa_____ 1929
1930
Phoenix, Ariz________ 1929
1930
Pittsburgh, Pa............ . 1929
1930
Pittsfield, Mass______ 1929
1930
Plainfield, N . J........... . 1929
1930
1Applications filed.
Norfolk, Va...................

35,000
6,000
to
CO

Table A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterationst and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1930, by intended use of buildings— Continued

CO

o

PART 1.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
Housekeeping dwellings

Year

Num­
ber

Port Arthur, Tex__

Num­
ber
49

$282,000

98

30

$1,014,080

374

9
13

27,353
39,645

18
26

8
1

115, 200
6,000

40
4

3
2
8

17,000
10,000
36,150

1
1
26
12

125,000
60,000
1,617, 500
1,030,200

31
19
548
302

2
1
1
1
23
11

17,900
40.000
13.000
15.000
909,500
334,000

16
18
4
6
188
64

1
1
36
27
18
5
1
1

12,000
10,000
649,200
254,800
443,600
149.000
25,000
125.000

4
4
229
106
133
39
5 !
25

812
50

214
53
32
125
85
940
493
94
31
48

564,414
100,375
73,550
541,692
397,480
4,647,995
2,540,395
348,950
158,150
137.800
134.800
625,350
312.400
2,933,900
1,881,700
415,900
135.800
347.400
214.400
1,637,150
888,125
1,515,686
455,045
1,317,075
590,250
312.800
212,000
554,300
223,050

214
53
32
125
85
940
493
94
31
48
52
58
38
366
223
174
61
82
64
251
226
91
138
76

Fami­ Num­
lies
ber

Cost

Fami­ Num­
lies
ber

1

$5,500

1

6
4
16

2

13,000

2

2

2,700

2

1

2,000

1

18
4
1

210,400
39.000
10.000

33
5
1

1

500

2

1

6,000

2

3
2
111
77
9

25,500
12,500
990,400
818,800
56,000

6
4
222
154
18

15
7
131
34

113,355
44,200
1,033,725
259,400

30
14
262
68

13
2

104,200
14,000

26
4

1

12,000

1

2

21,000

3

6

98,700

7

4
2

50.000
15.000

10
3

1

7,500

1

Cost

Num­
ber

Fami­
lies

Fami­
lies

Cost

j

15

2

$55,000

4
3

275.000
220.000

82
71

2

140,000

33

1
1

14,000
60,000

4
12

i

CITIES

$2,185,102
175,340

Cost

IN PRINCIPAL




Fami­
lies

812
50

38
366
223
174
61
82
64
288
168
251
63
226
91
69
53
138
76

Multifamily dwellings
with stores combined

Multifamily dwellings

PERMITS

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
Port Huron, Mich__
1930
1929
Portland, M e...........
1930
1929
Portland, Oreg.........
1930
1929
Portsmouth, Ohio...
1930
1929
Portsmouth, Va____
1930
Poughkeepsie, N. Y ___ 1929
1930
1929
Providence, R . I ___
1930
1929
Pueblo, Colo............
1930
1929
Quincy, 111................
1930
1929
Quincy, Mass...........
1930
1929
Racine, Wis..............
19$0
1929
Reading, Pa.............
1930
1929
Revere, Mass...........
1930
Richmond, Ind........
1929
1930
Pontiac, M ich..........

Cost

1-family and 2-family
dwellings with stores
combined

2-family dwellings

1-family dwellings

BUILDING

City and State

1,880,100
831,616
574; 087
400,410
2,592,363
1,285,548
1,582,200
662,200
564,100
441,600
1,677,104
938,583
1,385,680
397,517
317,850
201,550
4,948,190
3,557,020
2,350,332
1,490,112
276,200
308,200
317,350
237,100
1,748,560
939,950
4,355,469
2,006,507
3,918.392
2,336,175
6,063,211
5,248,126
947,265
632,155
490, 550
243, 650
1,507,400
915,800
411,340
137,190
5,971,710
3,898,685
644,200
465,300
1,144,599
359,299
582,300
538,000
565,975
640,767
78,000
7,500

374
175
124
69
434
219
368
158
174
124
387
199
489
126
110
68
1,242
838
461
297
65
69
48
36
416
222
1,706
861
975
592
1,236
1,173
237
144
133
70
244
147
92
37
1,703
1,176
116
92
415
146
154
152
131
151
15
2

31
14
8
1
7
2
70
47

268,364
88,800
56,000
7,000
69,400
16,000
444,500
319,500

56
11

296,500
73,000

1

4,000

255
88
18
11
1
2
23
10
26
20
124
57
27
44
94
61
3
5
11
12
6
8
15
5
11
7
5
2
31
8

1,631,250
582,500
172,680
113,040
2,000
8,500
186,500
93,500
109,750
128,850
688,763
306,965
118,500
211,950
796,490
539,400
18,500
21,250
76,500
80,500
53,500
64,000
96,100
28,785
37,200
27,300
32,200
13,000
116,502
35,100

4
3
35
23

35,625
20,000
274,500
155,000

62
28
16
2
14
4
140
94
112
22

.....
’Bio'
176
36
22
2
4
46
20
52
40
248
114
54
88
188
122
6
10
22
24
12
16
30
10
22
14
10
4
62
16

8
2
2

16,300

3

6

71,500

9

1

9,500

2

8

104,000

8

10
8
3

161,500
72, 500
59,400

18
12
3

8
2
15
10
11
5

21, 525
4, 500
135, 700
75. 700
104,500
44,800

8
2
30
17
18
8

1

8,820

1

6
5

67,200
56,500

8
6

2

7,150

1
1

10,200
8,200

1
2

1

7,800

2

1

4,375

1

1

3,000

i

130,500

154
24
30

1
26
20
3
2
8
6
1
1
8
6
272
69
6
8

50,000
269,000
251,500
52,000
12,500
256,000
116,100
9,000
65.000
155,000
45.000
5,158,800
1,458,500
226,800
233,280

28
104
89
26
s
138
109
4
15
95
28
2,382
592
91
75

2

105,000

21

10
13
46
24
45
17
119
61
5
1
13

717.000
696.500
562,625
242.325
518.325
268,950
6,904,000
3,307,900
199.500
60,000
101.000

231
262
219
130
256
126
2,076
903
89
26
40
14

i
13

510,250

180

3
2

124,000
33,400

45
11

4
g

206,500
104,300

54
58

1

100,000

50

14

584,000

212

2

19,800

8
*

1
6
6
1
1

120,000
66,875
41,375
18,000
21,000

30
52
28
3
6

1
1

9,000
16, 340

3
4

1

55,000

3

62,000

15

81
51

5,479,000
3,854,500

1,564
1,147

13

861,500

2,46

13
2
4
2
4
7
12

201,257
17,382
360.000
42,500
77,000
242,175
639.000

66
7
154
18
32
89
201

1

40,000

9

1

25,000

8

2

.....
6
70
46

6

380, 500
75,000

TABLE




74
175
124
69
434
219
368
158
174
124
387
199
489
126
110
68
1,242
838
461
297
65
69
48
36
416
222
1,706
861
975
592
1,236
1,173
237
144
133
70
244
147
92
37
1,703
1,176
116
92
415
146
154
152
131
151
15
2

GENERAL

Richmond, Va.............. 1929
1930
Roanoke, Va_________ 1929
1930
Rochester, N . Y ........... 1929
1930
Rockford, 111................. 1929
1930
Rode Island, 111............ 1929
1930
Sacramento, Calif........ 1929
1930
Saginaw, Mich.............. 1929
1930
St. Joseph, M o.............. 1929
1930
St. Louis, M o................ 1929
1930
St. Paul, Minn_______ 1929
1930
St. Petersburg, Fla
1929
1930
Salem, Mass.................. 1929
1930
Salt Lake City, U tah.. 1929
1930
San Antonio, Tex......... 1929
1930
San Diego, Calif........... 1929
1930
San Francisco, Calif___ 1929
1930
San Jose, Calif.............. 1929
1930
Savannah, Ga............... 1929
1930
Schenectady, N. Y
1929
1930
Scranton, Pa................. 1929
1930
Seattle, Wash................ 1929
1930
Sheboygan, Wis............ 1929
1930
Shreveport, La.............. 1929
1930
Sioux City, Iowa.......... 1929
1930
Sioux Falls, S. Dak___ 1929
1930
Somerville, Mass.......... 1929
1930

T a b l e A .—

Number and estimated cost of buildings ( new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1930, by intended use of buildings— Continued
PAR T

00

^

1 ,—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
Housekeeping dwellings

Year

1-family dwellings

Num­
ber

$2,690,080
952.450
1,298,420
1,079,500
727, 605
551,650
1,398,300
928,600
568,751
306,825
674,110
282,500
1,194,400
520,300
576,950
262,000
330,150
266.450
398,615
128,850
3,652,800
1,986,700
930.000
465.000
323,395
141,230
137,350
89 150
261*400
188,000
3,460,280
1,116,935

596
188
350
282
179
125
292
202
208
116
194
77
147
64
144
57
80
61
105
39
582
317
320
163
181
89
32
25
76
50
813
245

1
1

Cost

$3,500
5,000

Fami­ Num­
lies
ber

2
2

3

25*700

6

21
17
1

134,200
97,000
8,000

42
34
2

16
1
62
17
6
5
4
2

82,800
4,500
685,000
182,800
47.500
33.500
12,800
12,600

32
2
124
34
12
10
8
4

80
50

668,200
394,700

160
100

3
1
1

19,500
6,500
8,000

6
2
2

69
27

439,300
158,500

138
54

Cost

Fami­ Num­
lies
ber

2

$27,000

3

2

8,300

2

1

13,500

2

2

14,500

2

1
1
2
3

5,000
2,500
10,400
14,500

1
1
2
5

4
2

52,500
20,500

7
3

7
2

21,800
10,500

7
2

9
2

60,000
22,000

9
2

Cost

Fami­
lies

Num­
ber
1

$12,000

6

1
1
1

8,000
30,000
70,000

4
12
11
4

Cost

Fami­
lies

2
1
1
3
6
5
4
2
1

$155,000
10,000
225.000
147.000
162,000
102,500
410.000
175.000
30,000

56
3
65
46
42
26
132
48
8

4
2
3

48.000
25.000
129,000

16
8
32

4

85,000

25

4
2
3
2
5
3
4
4

98,800
60,000
92.000
22.000
150,000
50,000
475,000
580,000

58
33
24
8
37
12
182
184

1

25,000

2

30,000

7

1

75,000

13

38
3

303,570
87,000

188
31

10
1

529,000
70,000

162
40

CITIES




596
188
350
282
179
125
292
202
208
116
194
77
147
64
144
57
80
61
105
39
582
317
320
163
181
89
32
25
76
50
813
245

Num­
ber

IN PRINCIPAL

1929
1930
1929
1930
Springfield, 111
1929
1930
Springfield, Mass
1929
1930
Springfield, Mo
1929
1930
Springfield, Ohio
1929
1930
Stamford, Conn
1929
1930
Steubenville Ohio
1929
1930
Stockton, Calif_______ 1929
1930
Superior, Wis
1929
1930
Syracuse, N. Y ._______ 1929
1930
Tacoma, Wash
1929
1930
Tamna Fla
1929
1930
TonnfAn M qqq
1929
1930
TTft.iitA Tti#1
1929
1930
Toledo, Ohio____—___ 1929
1930
Spokane, Wash

Fami­
lies

Multifamily dwellings
with stores combined

Multifamily dwellings

PERMITS

South Bend, Ind

Cost

1-family and 2-family
dwellings with stores
combined

2-family dwellings

BUILDING

City and State

628,300
417,800
500,014
144,400
634,020
523,250
937,337
507,480
3,957,847
3,148,495
6,400

107
86
48
28
214
106
105
76
243
85
1,365
962
158
75
291
137
69
40
50
14
2
1
68
41
186
146
1,056
452
93
30
52
18
85
35
61
23
242
290
54
50

697,200
510,350
166,130
93,525
890,837
320,541
635,800
412,400
1,266,445
278,745
11,007,145
7,661,350
786,500
366,100
835,825
435,025
469,400
249,600
297,800
58,800
9,800
7,500
430,950
205,200
2,336,635
2,015,500
3,668,855
1,593,485
434,885
116,040
177,495
82,960
480,755
222,950
356,191
213,200
1,557,835
1,596,740
260,500
170,600

155
89 .
63 .
23 .
99
95
280
169
847
610
1
107
86
48
28
214
106
105
76
243
85
1,365
962
158
75
291
137
°

6
9
40

50
14
2
1
68
41
186
146
1,056
452
93
30
52
18
85
35
61
23
242
290
54
50 .

21,000

10,500

5
7
141
69
2
3
2

1

47.500
19.000
21,150
19,900
688,250
325,600
17.500
43.000
18.000
8,000

8
7
3
11
11
34
10

282,000
66,000
44,700
17,300
71,500
74.000
273,000
88.000

76
21

1

12
4
10
14
282
138
4
6
4
2

28,300
5,500
5,300
20,000
92,000

144,000

’ 155,'666'
80,000
4,500
971.000
353,300
247.000
35,000

8,000
7,200

105,000
91,500
15,000
7,199,000
6,151,650
194.000

18,500

72,000

14

112,550

66
34

392,500
170,250

5
2
20
18
17
5
13
12
6

34,800
16,000
151.000
119,800
91,300
31,500
109.000
91.000
32.000

14

47,000
125,000

20
4

26,700
1,478
978

2,500,000

358

195.000
300.000

56

20,000

152
42
2

14,450
38.000

45,000

186.000

100,000

8,000

1

S
12

5,000

665.000
169.000
5,000

2
2

32
6
517
175
112
22

9,000
31,000

table




155
89
63
23
99
95
280
169
847
610
1

general

Topeka, Kans..............- 1929
1930
Trenton, N. J________- 1929
1930
Troy, N. Y ................... 1929
193a
Tuscon, Ariz.............. — 1929
1930
Tulsa, Okla................... 1929
1930
Union City, N. J.......... 1929
1930
Utica, N. Y ................... 1929
1930
Vallejo, Calif................. 1929
1930
Waco, Tex___________ 1929
1930
Waltham, Mass............ 1929
1930
Warren, Ohio....... ........ 1929
1930
Washington, D. C____ 1929
1930
Waterbury, Conn......... 1929
1930
Waterloo, Iowa............. 1929
1930
Watertown, Mass......... 1929
1930
Watertown, N. Y ......... 1929
1930
West New York, N. J~ 1929
1930
Wheeling, W. Va.......... 1929
1930
White Plains, N. Y____ 1929
1930
Wichita, Kans.—......... 1929
1930
Wichita Falls, Tex....... 1929
1930
Wilkes-Barre, Pa_____ 1929
1930
Wilkinsburg, Pa........... 1929
1930
Williamsport, Pa.......... 1929
1930
Wilmington, Del.......... 1929
1930
Wilmington, N. C ........ 1929
1930

44

15,000
617,000
412,600
710,250
528,405
60,000

10.000

132
68
12,600
18,648
56.500
50,000
8,975
2,300
3,500
28,330
21.500
2,000

125
93
216
16

12,800

12,000
34,994
143,500

583.000
145.000

114,000

22

114
49

CO
CO

T a b l e A .—

Number and estimated cost of buildings {new construction, and repairs, alterationsy and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1930, by intended use of buildings— Continued

00

PART 2.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
Housekeeping dwellings

Year

Num­
ber

Woonsocket, R. I ___
Worcester, Mass........

York, Pa....................
Youngstown, Ohio__
Zanesville, Ohio..........




233
86
23
20
278
210
365
293
85
56
441
136
93

$1,020,495
338,700
89,950
57,850
1,762,600
1,298,025
4,256,677
2,996,000
436,325
278,300
2,234,375
647,405
294,160
99,750

233
86
23
' 20
278
210
365
293
85
56
441
136
93

1929
1930

104,798
61,656

516,296,140
306,185,802

104,798
61,656

Cost

•Fami­ Num­
lies
ber

$28,600
9,200
4,500
214,000
217,400
587,200
513,100
7,200

99,140,941
53,985,588

Fami­ Num­
ber
lies

16

52
58
110
86
2

11,000

41,"500
62,250
19,000

25,980
14,374

1,501
874

14,262,073
6,985,654

Cost

Fami­
lies

Num­
ber

Cost

Fami­
lies

$204,600
53,000

$1,500

273,700
63.000
29.000

12,990
7,187

Cost

155,300
57,000
6.307.000
3.151.000

49
18
1,228
619

$ 20,000

7
105

34,919,508
12,249,912

7,754
2,979

700.000
227.000

10,000

2,324
1,195

6,662
3,019

490,957,201
193,174,494

111,910
50,299

565
205

CITIES

Total:
311 cities___
311 cities___

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

Num­
ber

IN PRINCIPAL

Yonkers, N. Y ______

Fami­
lies

Multifamily dwellings

PERMITS

Winston-Salem, N. C

Cost

1-family and 2-family
dwellings with stores
combined

2-family dwellings

1-family dwellings

BUILDING

City and State

T able A .

-Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by
permits issued in 1 929 and 1 9 3 0 , by intended use of buildings— Continued
P ART J.— N E W RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued

Families provided for
City and State

Year

Population,
census of
1930

Hotels
Number

Alameda, Calif_______
Albany, N. Y ________
Allentown, Pa_______
Alton, 111____________
Altoona, Pa__________
Amsterdam, N. Y ____
Anderson, Ind_______
Asheville, N. O ______
Ashtabula, Ohio_____
Atlanta, Qa............ .
Atlantic City, N. J___
Auburn, N. Y _______
Augusta, Qa_________
Aurora, HI___________
Austin, Tex______ ____




1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1630
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

253,653

127,358
92,052

““§67142"
81,503
~§4,"683
39,788
50,"167*
23,301
’ 266,'557
65,748
"36,‘ 736
60,204
46,"568*

"53,"Ii§‘

2,171
372
404
145
385
311
397
97
105
58
191
75
52
26
215
51
120
23
16
714
52
29
50
39
207
124
192
82
545

Lodging houses

Other

Per 10,000
population

Number
Number

Akron, Ohio_________

Total new housekeeping
and nonhousekeeping
dwellings

Nonhousekeeping dwellings

85.6
14.7
117.5
42.2
30.2
24.4
43.1
10.5
34.8
19.2
23.4
9.2
15.0
7.5
54.0
12.8

23.9
4.6
6.9
12.4
52.1
26.8
7.9
4.4
13.6

Cost

Number

Cost

$1,500,000

Number

$1,475,000

149,000

400.000
250.000
90,000

190,000
’ 5,’ 309,'259"

$90,000
28,000

10.6

34.4

'53,'9§6'

20.6

41.2
17.6
102.6

92.8

Cost

Cost

400,0C0
68,240

1,850
326
126
71
225
185
396
97
102
59
181
72
51
25
191
52
99
23
16
29
927
455
34
23
46
38
201
121
183
82
518
488

$10,092,658
4,919,330
1,120,335
466,450
3,584,100
2,834,700
2,300,200
858,400
411,928
377,623
869,435
477,550
408,182
128,000
1,077,400
400,550
518,650
74,500
77,650
105,900
4,545,853
1,680,504
5,745,985
149,150
291,670
496,150
609,462
336,010
991,172
411,594
1,672,610
1,132,081

G

tel

I

w
&

e

00
O
i

T a b l e A .—

Number and estimated cost of buildings ( new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1930, by intended use of buildings— Continued

Cg

PAR T I ,—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Oontinued

Year

Population,
census of
1930

DonffAi* IVJa
HofAn P aiiota T.ft

■r av nitv Miph
T)oT7Annii XT T

'raHpviHa hi
"RaIIitktViam W ach

DlnO’Vl&TYl^ATI TSJ V
*Rii*minflrhom Alft

DlAAm{nflH*ATi Til
TtAQtATI M a.QSI




.............28,~749~
31 465
43,301
47,350
85 848
57 483
28 308
30,602
81,543
57,773

<
6U«f \fOI
............ 38,"070"
.............30,915”
783,451

3,022
1,484
36
46
62
73
169
72
63
54
58
104
437
267
127
107
126
108
587
345
201
69
169
161
686
166
476
344
114
68
3,327
1,415

38.3
18.8
12.5
16.0
19.7
23.2
39.0
16.6
13.3
11.4
6.8
12.1
76.0
46.4
44.9
37.8
41.2
35.3
72.0
42.3
34.8
11.9
22.1
21.0
26.6
6.4
125.0
90.4
36.9
22.0
42.5
18.1

1

Cost

Number

3

930,000
1,350,350

1

30,000

500,000

Cost

Cost

2

$365,000

1

75,000

1

31,000

1
2

52,775
318,000

1

1,500

5

4,060,735

$200,000

3

1

Number

2,807
1,442
36
46
62
71
167
66
63
55
19
22
437
252
121
106
129
89
322
241
145
69
91
74
534
153
309
213
112
62
1,068
832

$13,302,200
7,240,800
248,300
155,100
238,897
192,174
874,950
271,300
256,700
306,500
163,500
230,800
1,235,734
722,611
610,633
481,850
1,228,475
269,550
3,454,425
1,721,014
1,188,775
379,125
725,000
677,130
1,752,250
381,036
2,496,700
1,483,500
823,000
374,000
19,190,447
6,226,700

CITIES

"RafVilahAm P a

7QQ QOI

Cost

IN PRINCIPAL

Battle Creek, M ich___

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

INU.LLLUci
Number

PERMITS

Baltimore, M d -----------

Per 10,000
population

Other

Lodging houses

Hotels
Number

BTJILDING

City and State

Total new housekeeping
and nonhousekeeping
dwellings

Nonhousekeeping dwellings

Families provided for

Bridgeport, Conn.........
Brockton, Mass______
Brookline, Mass______
Buffalo, N. Y — ...........
Burlington, Iowa..........
Butler, Pa.....................
Butte, Mont.................
Cambridge, Mass.........
Camden, N. J...............
Canton, Ohio................
Cedar Bapids, Iowa___
Central Falls, R. I ____
Charleston, S. C ...........
Charleston, W. Va.......
Charlotte, N. C............
Chattanooga, Tenn____
Chelsea, Mass...............
Chester, Pa....... ..........
Chicago, HI__________
Chicopee, Mass............
Cicero, 111...................
Cincinnati, Ohio...........
Clarksburg, W. Va____
Cleveland, Ohio______
Clifton, N. J_________

1 Applications filed.




i«29
i930
1929
1930
1929
1930
192“
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

147,206
63,695
47,488
572,217
26,719
23,568
39,540
113,650
117,172
105,524
56,078
25,928
62,419
60,411
82,645
119,539
44,827
58,963
3,373,753
43,981
65,776
________
449,331
28,863
901,482
45, 673

541
353
97
69
362
231
1,769
1,072
52
18
31
21
0
67
788
159
320
159
331
95
113
•91
60
22
97
56
262
217
500
317
324
223
36
6
98
34
18,837
2,741
80
57
328
57
2,077
1,693
66
18
2,143
1,176
359
247

36.8
24.0
15.2
10.8
76.2
48.6
30.9
18.7
19.5
6.7
13.2
8.9
0.0
16.9
69.3
14.0
27.3
13.6
31.4
9.0
20.2
16.2
23.1
8.5
15.5
9.0
43.4
35.9
60.5
38.4
27.1
18.7
8.0
1.3
16.6
5.8
55.8
8.1
18.2
13.0
49.9
8.7
46.2
37.7
22.9
6.2
23.8
13.0
78.6
54.1

6

100,615

1

1

$5,500

1

8,500

3
12

3,540,000
4,824,500

400,000

2

179,000

3

17,000

28
8

4.144.000
3.317.000

1

12,500

2

4,211, S15
!

1
............L..:...............

1

7,000

1
11

135,000
26,205

1

25,000

i
2

16,000
3,400,000

1
1
4

32,500
150,000
1,002,500

3
1

326.000
250.000

279
233
95
67
152
101
843
484
52
19
30
20
6
66
76
78
288
79
309
90
110
77
29
11
96
56
211
147
408
2J*
233
188
15
4
97
34
4,475
1,419
71
48
159
36
1,426
1,102
58
17
1,401
811
268
223

2,267,610
1,447,475
513,200
395,400
3,676,480
2,294,500
6,25*0,920
3,493,465
164,800
91,230
169,600
63,075
100,615
28,073
7,238,100
5,547,143
1,034,800
486,900
2,164,465
501,500
580,664
345,700
202,900
65,500
266,900
161,068
788,935
803,283
1,964,486
1,245,378
837,827
961,675
163,000
26,500
460,450
124,400
91,177,250
25,871,750
310,850
167,200
2, 022,200
373,300
13,048,160
15,273,482
229,700
41,500
11,954,800
6,202,300
1,710,600
1,088,150

a
tef

3

W
>
t*
£
w

CO

T able

A.- -Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 198 0 , by intended use of buildings— Continued

00
00

PART 1.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—C ontinued

Year

Population,
census of
1930

Columbia, S. C ______
Columbus, Ga__......... .

Council Bluffs, Iowa—
Covington, K y ........
Cranston, R. I _____
Cumberland, M d.__
Dallas, Tex..............

Davenport, Iowa___
Dayton, Ohio...........
Decatur, HI..............
Denver, C olo-.........
Des Moines, Iowa—
Detroit, Mich.........Dubuque, Iowa.......




60,195
43,122
289,056
"42,623
65,247
43,9l4
'37,"713
260,397
” 36,’ 646
60,728
"206’ 225'
" ‘ 57,‘“511
287,644
"i42,"469'
1,564,397
“" ‘ 41,"678

65
56
230
152
276
91
1,211
575
79
32
159
67
448
273
63
47
1,145
996
115
47
166
168
212
213
212
79
1,608
613
348
225
12,151
4,084
68
62

19.6
16.9
45.8
30.3
64.0
21.1
41.9
19.9
18.8
7.6
24.4
10.3
102.0
62.2
16.7
12.5
44.0
38.2
31.4
12.8
27.3
27.7
10.6
10.6
36.9
13.7
55.9
21.3
24.4
15.8
77.7
26.1
16.3
14.9

Number
Number

Cost

Number

Cost

Number

$10,000
$322,000
$46,000
""’ io '666'
90,000

81,466
210,000
20,000

747,500
452,000

124,000
41,000
570,000
199,000

Cost

Cost

58,000
3,312,300
140,000

65
56
221
133
271
84
884
481
69
32
125
60
418
219
63
43
704
661
115
47
161
145
144
165
211
70
825
364
307
203
7,885
2,980
58
58

$345,875
259,575
697,575
792,625
575,060
272,525
6,104,650
3,188,400
247,000
111,000
536,500
272,500
2,147,000
1,222,300
393,948
157,112
2,963,798
2,460,230
439,250
199,693
767,651
1,501,490
1,399,677
913,775
1,127,950
408,900
6,211,850
2,535,450
2,242,850
1,106,895
51,998,509
22,755,238
209,933
319,986

CITIES

Danville, HI_______

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

33,223

Other

IN PRINCIPAL

Columbus, Ohio...........

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

Per 10,000
population

PERMITS

Colorado Springs, Colo

Lodging houses

Hotels
Number

BUILDING

City and State

Total new housekeeping
and nonhousekeeping
dwellings

Nonhousekeeping dwellings

Families provided for

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
East Chicago, Ind____
1930
East Cleveland, Ohio.. 1929
1930
1929
Easton, Pa___________
1930
East Orange, N. J_____ 1929
1930
East Providence, R. I— 1929
1930
East St. Louis, 111_____ 1929
1930
Elgin, HI........................ 1929
1930
Elizabeth, N. J............. 1929
1930
Elkhart, Ind................. 1929
1930
Elmira, N. Y ................ 1929
1930
El Paso, Tex................. 1929
1930
Erie, Pa......................... 1929
1930
Evanston, 111_________
1929
1930
Evansville, Ind_______ 1929
1930
Everett, Mass________
1929
1930
Everett, Wash________ 1929
1930
Fall River, Mass______ 1929
1930
Fitchburg, Mass........... 1929
1930
Flint, Mich................... 1929
1930
Fond du Lac, Wis____
1929
1930
Fort Wayne, Ind_____
1929
1930
Fort Worth, Tex....... .
1929
1930
Fresno, Calif_________
1929
1930
Galveston, Tex_______
1929
1930

101,231

Durham, N. O ____




52,026
54,660
40,279
34,328
68,227
29,995
74,024
" 35,"912
...........114 551"
_

” 33,"195"
47,"381"

101^975"
________ _ _
115,875
61,766
103,151
48,298
30,498
114,348
_____ _
40,672
156,422
26,362
115,121
160,892
52,558
53,427

115
82
205
114
84
37
30
56
18
15
500
85
219
133
379
207
144
72
514
222
107
43
72
40
691
470
393
209
386
63
458
174
81
53
123
71
48
33
33
22
2,076
360
47
37
578
313
1,262
626
187
107
350
127

11.4
8.1
39.4
21.9
15.4
6.8
7.4
13.9
5.2
4.4
73.3
12.5
73.0
44.3
51.2
28.0
40.1
20.0
44.9
19.4
32.2
13.0
15.2
8.4
67.8
46.1
33.9
18.0
62.5
10.2
44.4
16.9
16.8
11.0
40.3
23.3
4.2
2.9
8.1
5.4
132.7
23.0
17.8
14.0
50.2
27.2
78.4
38.9
35.6
20.4
65.5
23.8

95,300
6,480

125,000

525,000

1,390,000
176,000

40,000

110
66
187
114
69
25
30
56
17
14
77
32
194
124
339
190
139
72
240
95
107
42
70
40
458
335
326
193
148
52
401
173
48
33
78
67
42
31
32
22
1,767
332
47
37
546
288
1,078
538
153
107
318
114

684,845
275,805
819,056
569,243
880,402
159,026
358.500
712,200
108,368
244,700
2,889,500
504,900
1,112,792
728,775
1,246,105
696,430
711,385
354.050
2.085.000
842.000
426.050
203,440
557,435
740.150
2,577,824
1,481,502
1,679,209
1,150,400
4.710.000
939.000
1,996,900
667.050
305,800
183.600
258,740
178.600
204.150
119,490
190.600
108.500
8,202,365
1,664,663
175,180
211.500
2,905,708
1,554,425
4,546,476
2,262,499
680,825
395.050
1,196,152
420,365

T a b le A .—

Number and estimated cost of buildings {new constructiont and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 193 0 , by intended use of buildings— Continued

O

PART 1.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued

Year

Population,
census of
1930

Grand Rapids, M ich ...
Great Falls, M ont._
Green Bay, Wis.......

Greenwich, Conn__
Hagerstown, M d___
Hamilton, Ohio.......

Hamtramck, Mich__
Harrisburg, Pa.........
Hartford, Conn........
Haverhill, Mass.......
Hazleton, Pa............
Highland Park, Mich—
Hoboken, N. J.........




168,234
” 28,~553
37,353
53,"422
29,081
’ §3,'112
30,861
~52~l08
64,523
56,"283
80,284
"161,372
48,687
39,078
52,883
56,523

375
131
589
231
293
103
185
113
268
61
97
72
282
203
90
43
261
81
312
152
8
21
140
77
281
61
45
38
18
27
250
5
4
4

Number

Cost

Number

37.3
13.0
35.0
13.7
102.6

36.1
49.5

50.
11.
33.
24.
85.
61.
29.
13.
50.
15.
48.
23.6
1.4
3.7
17.4
9.6
17.4
3.8
9.2
7.8
4.6
6.9
47.3
.9
.7
.7

Cost

Cost

$4,000

$ 10,000

$600,000
300,000

300,000

258
119
551
214
205
98
159
109
218
60
93
63
266
161
79
41
261
81
275
137
6
10
140
63
101
47
41
32
15
16
5
5
2
2

$1,168,400
519,800
2,166,100
861,900
1,005,652
395,785
1,358,410
422,150
961,064
285,150
475,975
269,160
5,159,640
2, seo, 200
409,825
233,000
1,010,094
361,950
1,294,800
596,580
46,500
78,700
1,365,000
845,750
1,459,800
623,300
130,800
111,975
114,728
210,512
995,500
337,000
33,500
27,500

CITIES

Hammond, Ind........

100,426

Cost

IN PRINCIPAL

Greensboro, N. C ._ .
Greenville, S. C .......

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929

Number
Number

PERMITS

Gary, Ind.......... ......

Per 10,000
population

Other

Lodging houses

Hotels
Number

BtJILDXNG

City and State

Total new housekeeping
and nonhousekeeping
dwellings

Nonhousekeeping dwellings

Families provided for

Holyoke, Mass________
Houston, Tex_________
Huntington, W. Va___
Hutchinson, Kans____
Indianapolis, Ind_____
Irvington, N. J_______
Jackson, M ich.__.........
Jacksonville, Fla...........
Jamestown, N. Y _____
Jersey City, N. J_____
Johnstown, Pa..............
Joliet, HI________ _____
Joplin, M o___________
Kalamazoo, M ich.........
Kansas City, Kans.......
Kansas City, M o .........
Kearny, N. J..... ...........
Kenosha, Wis_________
Kingston, N. Y _______
Knoxville, Tenn______
Kokomo, Ind_________
Lakewood, Ohio______
Lancaster, Pa_________
Lansing, M ich________
Lawrence, Mass______
Lebanon, Pa__________




1929
1930
56,555
1929
1930
289,428
1929 ______ _
1930
75,575
1929 ___ _
1930
27,080
1929
1930
362,564
1929
1930
56,745
1929
1930
54,870
1929
1930
129,682
1929
1930
45,172
____
1929
316,914
1930
_ _
1929
1930
66,983
1929
1930
41,753
1929
1930
33,452
1929
1930
54,388
_
1929
1930
i22,327*
1929 ____ ___
1930
392,640
1929 __ __ __
1930
40,724
1929 __ . n__
1930
50,242
1929
1930
28, i66‘
1929
1930
105,797
1929 ___ _ ____
1930
32,680
1929
1930
69,811
1929
1930
60,596
1929
-----1930
_________
1929
1930
84,949
1929
193ft
25,568

52
37
3,490
2,227
49
56
148
105
1,760
615
170
102
218
61
638
186
206
93
1,388
238
46
18
188
88
63
36
160
102
271
187
2,234
864
261
103
296
78
53
41
472
238
75
17
203
248
156
43
537
137
22
19
19
12

9.2
6.5
120.6
76.9
6.5
7.4
54.7
38.8
48.5
17.0
30.0
18.0
39.7
11.1
49.2
14.3
45.6
20.6
43.8
7.5
6.9
2.7
45.0
21.1
18.8
10.8
29.4
18.8
22.2
15.3
56.9
22.0
64.1
25.3
58.9
15.5
18.8
14.6
44.6
22.5
22.9
5.2
29.1
35.5
25.7
7.1
68.5
17.5
2.6
2.2
7.4
4.7

1

65,000

1

175,000

1

15,000

1
1

37,000
1,005,000

1
1

15.000
50.000
2

1

1

18,000

2

7,000

20,000

1

1

310,000

114,500

525,000

I

110,000

1
1

298,200
6,000

1

3,000

1

70,000

1

2,000

24
27
2,789
1,815
45
47
145
94
1,261
506
81
36
194
60
499
178
167
87
135
51
42
17
172
75
53
* 36
127
96
261
175
905
526
141
61
237
51
53
40
457
157
63
17
91
64
156
44
535
127
11
12
19
12

346.000
208.000
13,602,172
9,702,815
163,900
553.300
699,480
392,485
7,033,895
2,737,430
804.850
449.850
1,059,850
286.500
1,615,700
488,075
861.250
415,962
4,623,380
888,000

265,550
91,800
1.462.800
590.500
197.250
146,700
667,390
468,725
658,350
521.800
7.083.800
4,025,500
1,024,200
404.000
2,653,878
757,030
400.500
217.800
2,290,175
784,167
228,100
49,070
1.109.800
1.039.800
745,950
634.300
2,687,183
533,189
69,500
70,000
100.000
143,400

§

w

T a b l e A .—

Number and estimated cost of buildings {new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1980, by intended use of buildings— Continued

^

PART U—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued

Year

Population,
census of
1930

Lexington, K y _______
Lima, Ohio__________
Lincoln, Nebr________

Long Beach, Calif-___
Lorain, Ohio_________
Los Angeles, Calif____
Louisville, K y -_______

Lynchburg, V a_______
Lynn, Mass________
McKeesport, Pa-----Macon, Ga.________
Madison, Wis---------Malden, Mass______
Manchester, N. H__




45,723

42^217
75,*'919
81,”679

i4i;390
44,483
”1,‘ 231,’ 730
307,808

"155,“300*
40,559

"152,"327
54,631
‘ 53‘ 866*

1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

57,” 815
58,143
76,"834*

49
31
133
85
6
11
346
98
356
283
3,198
1,993
170
83
15,234
11,437
1,427
428
37
42
92
114
475
103
174
83
73
45
499
179
332
99
100

Number

Cost

Number

14.
18.

1.

2.
45.
12.
43.
34.
226.
141.
38.
18.
123.
92.
46.
13.
3.
4.
22.
28.
46.
10.
31.
15.
13.

$108,000
80,000
$397,000
278,500
28 j
21

1,512,100
881,050

$30,000

Cost

Cost

33,460

125,332

250.000
250.000

38
25
102
76
6
8
257
97
.295
198
1,761
1,182
167
83
7,126
5,665
818
337
36
42
91
85
156
95
156
74
73
45
248
144
117
69
91
82

$192,000
151,000
364,930
228,430
19,500
51,300
1,489,350
552,450
1,406,457
1,041,910
8,950,430
5,663,305
622,800
276,050
46,939,091
33,201,363
5,110,600
2,329,900
146,425
179,900
337,655
630,847
1,740,800
507,600
1,021,270
442,400
285,040
82,235
2,459,550
1,086,050
1,260,400
453,500
396,035
250,260

CITIES

Lowell, Mass-------------

34,948

Cost

IN PRINCIPAL

Little Rock, Ark_____

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

Number
Number

PERMITS

Lewiston, Me________

Per 10,000
population

Other

Lodging houses

Hotels
Number

BUILDING

City and State

Total new housekeeping
and nonhousekeeping
dwellings

Nonhouskeeping dwellings

Families provided for

Mansfield, Ohio__.
Marion, Ind_____
Marion, Ohio_______
Medford, Mass______
'Memphis, Tenn_____
Meriden, Conn______
Miami, Fla_________
Milwaukee, Wis____
Minneapolis, Minn___
Mobile, Ala_____
Moline, HI____________
Montclair, N. J_______
Montgomery, Ala_____
Mount Vernon, N. Y _
Muncie, Ind__________
Muskegon, Mich______
Muskogee, Okla______
Nashville, Tenn______
Newark, N. J_________
Newark, Ohio___
New Bedford, Mass___
New Britain, C onn .New Brunswick, N. J
Newburgh, N. Y ____
New Castle, Pa----------New Haven, Conn.__




1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

33,434
24,329
31,005

___

59,700

___

252,049"
38,452
_____ _
110,025
568,962
462,611
________

68,277
32,330

______

42,006
' 66,075~

_

60,869
__

"’ 46,’ 517"
41,"338”

32,006
_____ _
153,153
_
"444,176”
30,471
112,804
.
_____

68,095
34,280
31,243

___

48, 705
162,650

115
97
38
18
69
14
438
249
1,246
1,057
120
64
112
114
3,848
1,729
1,570
1,355
299
191
163
112
165
69
488
280
325
481
319
47
197
81
46
24
781
358
693
750
97
29
18
15
130
42
195
21
57
23
65
49
276
238

114

551,200

35,000
521,200

66,500
30,000
107.000
170.000

550,000
20,000

15,000

240,000

1,660,000
260,000

15
69
14
315
208
881
867
113
64
108
114
1,585
741
987
191
133
108
153
67
471
264
134
188
313
44
161
81
45
23
487
331
319
163
90
29
18
15
104
39
65
18
53
22
64
49
154
138

659,830
437.850
90,050
33,550
190.450
49,800
2.243.000
1,280,200
4,248,865
3,862,730
607.600
282,900
672,920
467,650
15,047,002
6,961,332
6,851,210
5,126,205
644,722
361,775
857,300
530,770
2,242,130
930,950
1,293,070
563,200
2,558,200
2,922,900
903,292
152,267
575,035
234.450
100,050
52,600
2,797,497
1. 002.000
3,761,480
3,542,190
312.400
75,900
116.400
123.000
770.000
313.600
1,027, 768
97.400
337,700
153.850
364.450
325.000
3,052,300
1,587,800

O
&
2ZS
H
W
l>

§

CO

T a b l e A . — Number

and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1930, by intended use of buildings— Continued

£

PART l .—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued

Year

Population,
census of
1930

New Orleans, La___
Newport, K y ---------Newport, R. I ________

New Rochelle, N. Y __
Newton, Mass_______
New York City, N. Y .:
The B ronx1______
Brooklyn 1________

Queens1----------Richm ond1---------Niagara Falls, N. Y ----Norfolk, Va-----------Norristown, Pa------Norwalk, Conn____
Oakland, Calif.........




'455,'792
29,"740"
27,430*
34,285*
54,055"
65,295*

6,958,792

75,398
*127,'808*
35,837
"35,961
'284,"213

112
70
1,060
258
35
17
62
45
67
91
355
191
568
346
13,978
7,012
11,224
9,275
18,067
8,669
13,861
10,495
1,190
731
320
218
233
220
103
80
262
165
1,904
1,231

Number
Number

Cost

Number

Cost

37.6
23.5
23.3
5.7

Number

$306,700

11.8

5.7
22.6
16.4
19.5
26.5
65.7
35.3
87.0
53.0

83.8
52.0

42.4
28.9
18.2
17.2
28.7
22.3
72.9
45.9
67.0
43.0

90,000
'40,'000'

1
1
1

116

$27,350,000
500,000
222,645,000
3.250.000
1.500.000

14,808,000
2,590,000
450,000
30,000
7,000
$176,500

$8,300

311,489
240,900

Cost

Cost
102
65
704
238
32
17
62
44
56
92
210
178
489
329

$832,900
456,680
2,679,574
1,177,790
163,400
67,800
734,700
563,600
189,523
287,248
4,629,800
3,112,646
5,635,350
3,666,400

1,296
906
2,155
1,921
360
105
4,825
5,376
883
545
265
187
212
179
103
68
245
159
778
490

63,114,150
29,348,900
80,786,600
41,545,100
401,068,000
59,269,000
60, 629,110
44,779,260
5,283,315
3,169,125
1,849,174
905,775
1,062,875
855,820
553,830
479,200
1,872, 600
1,296, 750
6, 505,701
4,165,034

CITIES

Manhattan 1______

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

29,794

Other

IN PEINCIPAL

Newport News, Va_.

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

Per 10,000
population

PERMITS

New London, Conn___

Lodging houses

Hotels
Number

BUILDING

City and State

Total new housekeeping
and nonhousekeeping
dwellings

N onhousekeeping dwellings

Families provided for

Oak Park, 111................
Ogden, U tah................

66551°— 32*

Oklahoma City, Okla__
Okmulgee, Okla...........
Omaha, Nebr................
Orange, N. J.................
Oshkosh, Wis................
Ottumwa, Iowa......... .
Paducah, K y.................
Pasadena, Calif.............
Passaic, N. J.................
Paterson, N. J..............
Pawtucket, R. I ...........
Peoria, 111............ .........
Perth Amboy, N. J___
Petersburg, Va..............
Philadelphia, Pa...........
Pheonix, Ariz..............
Pittsburgh, Pa_............
Pittsfield, Mass............
Plainfield, N. J.............
Pontiac, M ich...............
Port Arthur, Tex..........
Port Huron, M ich........
Portland, M e_________
*Applications filed.




1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1029
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

63,819
40,243
182,845
17,097
214,184
35,509
40,075
28,074
33,541
............ 75,‘ 875’
63,108
138,267
77,203
104,788
44,007
28,487
1,961,458
47,950
669,631
............ 49,"675”
-------- - - - - 50,067
31,176
-------

310
55
74
113
3,023
2,005
1
1
461
208
136
96
115
60
41
48
91
84
401
214
115

24
435

48.6
8.6
18.4
28.1
165.3
109.7
.6
.6
21.5
9.7
38.3
27.0
28.7
15.0
14.6
17.1
27.1
25.0
52.9
28.2
18.2
41.2

66
32

15.0

16.5

36.2

995

211

185
128
81

1,284
50
58
244
54
32

172

110

30,000
500,000

.
.

35,000

.
.
,
.
13,600

585,000

327,000

230,000

55,500

7.3

47

410
2,153
1,349

2,575,000
650,000

19.3
34.9
38.9

7,098
1,744

37

290,000

3.8
31.5
10.1

139
318
149
366

408

.
.

13.0 .
93,000

8.9

207.5
85.5

40,000

32.2
20.1

42.5
37.2
37.2
23.5

197.9
7.7 .
11.6

48.7
17.3 .
10.3
24.3
15.5

22,000
1,080,000
1,020,650

9,500
125,000

262,500

99
28
73
91
1,967
1,300
1
1
317
171
19
30
114
60
41
48
90
84
356
188
62
19
215
89
264
136
345
354
53
25
45
36
4,250
1,285
671
276.
1,434
1,006
198
173
119
78
891
50
19
228
54
32
131
90

3,040,060
455,300
191,700
260,875
12,856,795
8,618,825
10,000
1,000
1,924,200
906,775
735,000
662,500
430,025
233,955
222,500
214,800
181,145
146,940
3,207,277
2,163,861
1,006,750
163,500
1,527,500
583,500
1,368,125
679,600
2,039,083
1,832,550
325,525
144,750
148,545
130,675
34,048,685
8,902,100
2,364,152
1,023,215
11,064,650
6,620,135
1,169,100
994,150
1,079, 756
656,334
3,481,182
175,340
405,053
610,059
105,875
73,550
738,692
480,480

T a b l e A .—

Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1 98 0 , by intended use of buildings— Continued
PART 1,—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued

Year

Population,
census of
1930
Number

Portland, Oreg.........

Portsmouth, V a___
Poughkeepsie, N. Y ___
Providence, R. I ___

Quincy, 111________
Quincy, Mass...........
Racine, Wis_______
Reading, Pa_______
Revere, Mass...........

Richmond, V a_____
Roanoke, Va_______
Rochester, N. Y ----Rockford, 111............
Rock Island, 111____
Sacramento, C a l i f -




*42," 536
"'45,’ 353
"‘ 40,’ 123
252,029
*50,"102
39,221
“'7l,‘ 965
“~67,~5l5
”116,289
35,705
32,” 561
182,883
*69,096
’ 325,"019
” 85,’ 831
~ 39,093
” 93,’ 685

1,586
866
98
31
66
71

68

550
288
653
174
253
119
95
58
138
76
590
227
320
101
496
262
621
341
200
132
693

Cost

Number

Number

Cost
$299,000

$ 110,000

500

68

48
842
446
193
61
87

Number

$12,000

122,000
400,000

791,000

445,552
10,000

200,000

1,753,000
971,992

133,000

227,500

980.
509
97
32
51
54
62
42
520
315
185
61
84
66
341
202
406
103
237
95
82
56
138
76
415
191
145
76
452
230
470
225
177
126
457
222

Cost
$6,875,645
3,900,595
352,150
158,650
161,700
176,800
663,850
351,900
5,184,200
3,073,500
603,900
135,800
371,400
624,400
2,420,650
1,187,125
3,091, 711
877, 445
2,688,627
740.250
417,000
233,500
554,300
223,050
2,728,964
995,416
1,140,337
537,910
4,555,063
2,356,940
2,367.200
1,233,200
616,100
454,100
2,578,604
1,459,483

CITIES

Richmond, Ind____

299,122

Cost

Other

IN PRINCIPAL

Pueblo, Colo_______

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1830
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929

Lodging houses

Hotels

PERMITS

Portsmouth, Ohio—

Per 10,000
population Number

BUILDING

City and State

Total new housekeeping
and nonhousekeeping
dwellings

Noxthousekeeping dwellings

Families provided for

Saginaw, Mich.......
St. Joseph, M o____
St. Louis, M o_____
St. Paul, Minn___
St. Petersburg, Fla.
Salem, Mass______
Salt Lake City, Utah.—
San Antonio, Tex____
San Diego, Calif_____
San Francisco, Calif...
San Jose, Calif............
Savannah, Qa............ .
Schenectady, N . Y — .
Scranton, Pa.............. .
Seattle, Wash............
Sheboygan, Wis_____
Shreveport, La______
Sioux City, Iowa____
Sioux Falls, S. Dak___
Somerville, Mass.
South Bend, Ind.
Spokane, W ash..
Springfield, 111___
Springfield, Mass.
Springfield, M o ...
Springfield, Ohio.




1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1QOQ
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

80,685
80,944
817,334
270,883
39,504
43,287
140,058
254,562

____ 147,897
625,974
___ _
_ _ 57,547
____ 857557"
___
___ 95,652
143,428
________
363,134
-- - - - - -

___
__ _76,659
79,212"
__
33,360
’ 163,"65T

_
___

104,193
U5,~5i4’
"n,"857‘

__

149,861
57,"557“
68,406

501
193
205
96
i, 364
1,618
591
402
67
73
115
56
699
554
2,233
1,135
1,318
829
3,518
2,206
335
185
195
94
278
169
137
49
3,289
2,583
1
0*7
\Z(
98
543
171
308
179
171
255
286
49
661
193
419
328
229
151
466
284
218
116
244
91

~
3

1,535,500

3
1
3

974,400
45,000
96,000

1

324,000

1

675,000

1
2
7
1
1
1

159,455
75,000
1,399,500
304,860
96,000
363,400

1
1
3

55,000
40 nnn
w,
uuu
an
0
v, 400
mu
!
1
j

4

1
j
i
15, 525
...........*'"!
I
_____ i1
5"
l

---------- --------------

1

1,000,000

—

-- - - - - 59,374

ii
2
1
1

2

' "

4
7

*19 000
Kftj non
i/U
vUv
315,000
200,000
220,000
1,992,000

498
129
118
74
1,797
1,004
491
321
67
74
73
46
453
256
1,895
950
1,064
666

1,472
1,302
247
153
157
84
258
161
110

45
1,799
1,256
122

1
2

1,395,000

1

425,000

1

100,000

51,323

95
459
158
158
157
139
163
62
26
601
191
354
285
189
130
317
221
211

21

89,556

116
216
83

1,498,680
566,517
472,850
246,550
14,014,240
5,710,520
2,889,612
323,200
412,700
608,850
330.600
2,899, 310
1.885.300
6,385,782
2,601,672
4,818,317
2,988,774
15,345,025
9,504,560
1,270,265
1,101,965
668,050
343.150
1,739,100
1.351.300
569,440
373,125
11,707,910
11,633,985
686.600
486.500
1,462,358
470,904
942,300
2.015.500
678,600
932,317
991, 500
165.500
2,884,080
1,390,950
1,536,720
1.226.500
•928,805
654.150
1.942.500
1,200,600
706,751
306,825
819,410
409.500

a
§i>
&

Table

A.—Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1930, by intended use of buildings— Continued

00

PART 1.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued

Families provided for
City and State

Year

Number

Steubenville, Ohio.

’ §5,'4l8
47,”951
36,100
"207’ 007
106,837
'm m
37,288
62,543
290,787

122,610
” 72,"350‘
32,198
‘ i4i,'281
58,588
102,633
” 14,476

23.
51.
19.
31.
20.
37.
13.
38.
20.
48.
32.
18.
9.
10.
7.
12.
8.
45.
12.
29.
14.
7.
3.
15.
13.
105.
59.
116.
66.
21.
7.
10.
8.
33.
19.

Number

Cost

Number

Cost
$198,000

$7,500
14,600
’ 50,"656"

17,000
423,000

$27,500
5,000
12,000

35,000
219,588

40,000

Number
213
83
154
63
91
67
111
42
673
373
325
167
188
91
35
26
77
50
939
278
164
90
66
26
106
97
297
191
1,032
702
10
13
109
89
48
28

Cost
$2,038,400
971,100
709.450
300,500
476,750
349.450
505,115
165.450
4,553, 500
2,501,900
1.480.000
1.045.000
345,195
151,730
156,850
95,650
269,400
188,000
4,792,150
1,454,435
803.800
426.800
655,014
203,700
698,520
542,250
1,574,487
761,768
5,629,097
3,874,395
415,900
170,000
715,200
563,350
166,130

CITIES

"’ 64,005’

315
109
181
68
151
100
134
47
793
432
515
347
188
91
38
27
78
50
1,310
372
191
92
87
38
111
99
340
191
1,646
943
125
41
111
90
48
28

Cost

Other

IN PRINCIPAL




46,282

Lodging houses

Hotels

PERMITS

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
Stockton, Calif____
1930
1929
Superior, W is_____
1930
1929
Syracuse, N . Y ____
1930
1929
Tacoma, Wash____
1930
1929
Tampa, Fla_______
1930
1929
Taunton, Mass___
1930
1929
Terre Haute, In d ..
1930
1929
Toledo, Ohio..........
, 1930
Topeka, Kans............... ! 1929
1930
1929
Trenton, N. J
1930
1929
Troy, N. Y ______
1930
Tucson, Ariz_____
1929
1930
1929
Tulsa, Okla..........
1930
1929
CJnion City, N. J_
1930
1929
Utica, N. Y ..........
1930
Vallejo, Calif........
1929
1930
Stamford, Conn....-

Per 10,000
population Number

BUILDING

Population,
census of
1930

Total new housekeeping
and nonhousekeeping
dwellings

Nonhousekeeping dwellings

Waco, Tex__________
Waltham, Mass..........
Warren, Ohio............
Washington, D. C ___
Waterbury, Conn.......
Waterloo, Iowa_ .........
Watertown, Mass.......
Watertown, N . Y .......
West New York, N. J.
Wheeling, W. Va____
White Plains, N. Y„___
Wichita, Kans..............
Wichita Falls, Tex___
Wilkes-Barre, Pa_____
Wilkinsburg, Pa......... .
Williamsport, Pa_____
Wilmington, Del..........
Wilmington, N. C ____
Winston-Salem, N. C_.
Woonsocket, R. I .........
Worcester, Mass_____
Yonkers, N. Y _______
York, Pa____________
Youngstown, Ohio___
Zanesville, Ohio______
Total:
311 cities____
311 cities____




1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1980
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

52,825
________
39,425
41,054
485,716
99,902
45,969

_

34,913”
32,088
36,916

. ___
61,752’
______
35,604’

109,832

_____43,614

86,507’

29,631
_____

45,695’

104,941

___ 32,167
75,288'
_
49,585'
_____
196,395'

135,123
_ ___
_____55,237'
_
____170,004
36,439

47,091,551

214
106
205
124
269
93
3,223
1,962
262
101
357
137
221
84
52
14
82
2
72
45
345
297
1,580
736
109
30
70
39
199
79
103
36
383
367
74
52
317
130
23
22
379
294
1,808
1,042
87.
56
525
163
103
39
252,766
130,503

40.5
20.1
52.0
31.5
65.5
22.7
66.4
40.4
26.2
10.1
77.7
29.8
63.3
24.1
16.2
4.4
22.2
.5
11.7
7.3
96.9
83.4
143.9
67.0
25.0
6.9
8.1
4.5
67.2
26.7
22.5
7.9
36.5
35.0
23.0
16.2
42.1
17.3
4.6
4.4
19.3
15.0
133.8
77.1
15.8
10.1
30.9
9.6
28.3
10.7

67, 500
18,667

24,867

800,000

7,000
1.070.000
1.100.000

50,000

500

400,000

75,000
563,000
800,000

5,000

173,000

329,500
53,000

219
107
145
91
253
90
1,427
1,037
206
87
301
138
145
62
51
14
21
43
193
152
1,168
533
95
31
61
24
121
57
84
30
262
308
64
52
255
94
23
21

600,000

1,085,000
150,000

321
248
477
363
86

56
487
151

1,200,000

275
79

284,604,413
24,777,624

428,569
219,000

138
170

37,011,151
28,322,912

126,952
73,201

983, 204
339,208
1,022,800
577,900
1,352,845
310,245
22,747,645
14,987,000
1,253,500
474.100
1,021,825
485,025
1,134,400
437.100
302,800
58,800
294,350
16,000
445,950
219,650
3,186,635
3,138,100
4,846,605
2,855,140
494,885
121,040
1,049,695
152,602
945,755
392,750
456,466
247.000
2,426,335
1,861,070
314.000
172,600
1,583,195
455,400
89,950
62,350
2,132,900
1,603,425
13,535,877
7,078,600
443,525
278,300
3,780. 325
729,405
323,160
99, 750
1,477,619,996
625,900,986

&

CD

T a b l e A* — Number and estimated cost

of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to aid buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1980, by intended use of buildings— Continued

Cm
O

PART 2.— NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
Amusement and
recreation places

Albany, N. Y ______
Allentown, Pa_____
Alton, 111__________

Amsterdam, N. Y__.
Anderson, Ind_____
Asheville, N. C_......
Ashtabula, Ohio___
Atlanta, Ga_______

Auburn, N. Y _____
Augusta, Ga_______
Aurora, 111............... .
Austin, Tex_______
Baltimore, M d ____
Bangor, M e_______




Office buildings

$35,000
7,200
32,100
2,400

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

Cost

Num­
ber

Cost

Num­
ber

Cost

$190,000
126,200

$911,750
282,010
27,970

1,453,000
224,000

500.000
175.000
100,800
223.000

117,346
4% 945
174,000

40,056

16,000
50.000
262,050
111, 675
500
70.000
10,355
2,150
240,000

500
1,150
8,850
264,000
OKft
109,500
9,500
20,000
8,000
475
90,000

200,000
44,000
18,402
12,500
3,000
650,311
404,850
80,543

92,500
55,000
500

2,000

19,500
223,200
26,300
65,800
169,975
12,775
200

52,000
1
1
12
3
6

229,000
500,000
455,059
83,000
1,398,000

138,000
31,717
522.000
395.000
10,000

8,100
107,500
8,100
52,600
3.648.000
1.191.000
17,300

Num­
ber

Cost

$184,700
204,800

Num­
ber
2,373
992
162
101

218
179
504

6,000

700

30,000
20,350
407,400
151,264
5,000
26,000
2,900
4,000
44,400
20,000
17.500
71.500
606,000
30.500
26,600

30
363
283
93
75
102

48
123
74
116
91
301
347
45
47
162
151
92
61
192
158
360
304
1,978
1,980
73
52

Cost

$509,037
176,560
39.480
21,684
192,778
171, 523
291,815
128,100
11,266
8,086
102,870
75,722
47,050
36,200
27,009
9,142
15.481
10,065
22,354
18,480
34,804
22,595
24,658
64,751
44,720
17,079
11,502
110,014
41,686
30.000
37,447
1,376,400
1,926,810
21.000
11,810

Num­
ber

Cost

$104,
141,
1,
4,
87,
41,
79,
53,
6,
37,
107,
29,
17,
3,
29,
132,
11,

35,

11,

134,
164,
43,
12 ,
54,
32,
4,
74,
35,
65,
257,
431,
15,
8

,

Num­
ber

Cost

$58,000

Num­
ber

Cost

$2,200,000

2,086,000
297,000
78,000

1M05

2,800
75,000
210,000
60,000
5,000
71,700
40,000
24,800
310,000

80,000
485,000
2,884,000
257,884
17.000
15.000
10,862
204,000

250.000
50,000
9,750
375.000
950.000

275,000
” ’ 363,"666
1, 612,000
24,000

CITIES

Atlantic City, N. J.

Institutions

IN PRINCIPAL

Altoona, Pa_______

Gasoline and
service stations

PERMITS

Alameda, Calif_____

Garages (private)

Year
Num­
ber

Akron, Ohio_______

Factories, shops, Garages (public)
etc.

BUILDING

City and State

Churches

Baton Rouge, La.........

1

800

Battle Creek, Mich___
Bay City, M ich______

Beaumont, Tex______

Bellingham, Wash____
Berkeley, Calif.............
Bethlehem, Pa........... Binghamton, N. Y ___

8,750
21,210

2
2
1

24.000
36.000
1,000

1

12,873

3
2
4
21

Bloomfield, N. J_____

40,000
7,500
118,685
129,754

Bloomington, 111_____
Boston, Mass.1_______

790,000
1,113,200
136, 000

2
3

70,600
31,275

1
1
1

2,000
54,200
100,000

8
2
3

10,750
2,545
1,244,000

2

254,400

Brockton, Mass______
Brookline, Mass....... .
Buffalo, N. Y ...............
Burlington, Iowa_____
Butler, Pa....................
Butte, M ont_________
Cambridge, Mass.........
Camden, N. J____ ___
Canton, Ohio________
Cedar Rapids, Iowa—
* Applications filed.




2

6,855

85,000

3
5
1

19,500
10,900
6,000

1
3
1
4
2
1
19
15

5,000
34,500
34.000
269,000
42.300
18.000
447,678
93.300

1

15,000

8
2
2
3
1

563.000
124.000
86,000
187.000
75,000

1

64,000

1
1

27,000
8,000

1

50,000

2
2
3

85.000
30.000
115,000

20,300
8,750
786,050
950
92,700
250
413,270
168,500

1
6
7
7
6
7
5
6
6
14
3
19
16
3
1
4
2
15
13
1

2,500
18,425
62,450
16,230
95,700
166.500
20,250
501.000
55,800
211.501
10,500
292,990
182,925
193.000
8,000
62,000
6,000
379,200
343,400
8,000

2
8
9
1
55
25
1
1
1

3,200
4,550
30,730
3,000
1,848,700
2,533,200
145,000
4,500
21,000

2
3
23
14
19
18
11
6
3
4

7,500
1,710
461,100
565,550
215,400
824.000
108.000
64,700
29.000
89.000

7,185
" 33,750"
32,305
i'OOO*
6,000

15.000
~~12,306"
20.000
8,000
55,850"
"“ 58,"287~
12.500
9,800
11,000
1,250
135,950
21,100
370,000
MOO'
"l27,"000"
67,625
40,800
15,150
” l5^000"
30.000
60.000
317,410
492,640
14.000
16.000
"167665"
8,350
15,000
’ ”29,"556’
12.500
“‘ 77,’ 155"
7,300

100

113
229
152
236
135
47
37
157
91
95
65
68
54
307
176
235
180
283
297
267
189
354
287
30
28
1,060
804
404
352

221

188
81
65
1,805
1,408
50
18
66
100
148
125
216
177
554
312
348
278

7,499
7,487
58,000
55,600
51,881
25,855
27,525
15,950
248, 573
10,183
12,812
8,502
11,620
64,090
81,849
52,124
121,275
76,795
88,180
77,357
33,084
21,223
139,925
97.500
15.500
15,700
756,222
525,270
168,148
153,898
84,053
68,980
101,980
94,880
508,167
402,013
26,303
11,545
30,875
7,950
16,584
21,494
115,075
96,858
98,765
53,460
108,805
56,829
73,106
76,712

7,206
5,750
44,100
99,050
132,800
22,150
21,800
19,000
75,582
13.000
13,100
75,980
53.500
20,050
41,250
32,450
24,800
155,450
92.000
105,830
177,608
15.000
24.000
75.000
78.000
136,225
100,125
113,800
76,375
28,150
38,750
157,000
24.500
2,000
35,440
10,000
8,200
29,050
16,836
13,000
78,800
32,900
88,400
72,750
59,550
27,500
97,300

---- --------200,000
54,400

1
1

---------

3
30,413
3
17,500
4
189,450
7 . 2,505,750
3

20,500
--

2

102,252

1
2

181,572
73,000

_
_

300,160

7
2
1
2
1

"’ 679667566"
1,416,000
14,400
3,000

_

185,279
80,000

---- --- -----27606"

2

10,300

4

1,961,080

2

230,000

---- ---------

157665

14’

44,''995

i6"

60,960

3
1
10
8

15,200
852.000
500.000
445,721
54,900

--

13"
7
8
6
1

578617566
5, 652,400
906,650
152,200
50,000

1
1

18,000
224,000

___ ____

1

40,000

2
9
1
1
2
6
2
2
3

32,000
59,150
20,000
50,000
10,000
184,045
130,000
40,000
25,550

I"

200,666

TABLE

Bridgeport, Conn____

4
18
1

1

3
1
14
3
10
1
9
7

GENERAL

Birmingham, Ala........

i
5

252,100

ill!

Belleville, 111................

25.000
10.000
23,000

29,500

3

!l!"

Bayonne, N. J_______

1
1
4

3

Cn
to

2.—iVJEtF NONRESIDENTIAL B UILDINGS— C ontinued
lement and
ition places
Cost

1

2*

17,"556'

1

’a
l

18,000
9,912
3.106.500
3.946.500

150.000
145.000
631,650

37.000
300.000
75.000
383.000
711.000
2,000

202,500
5,101,000
6,000
50,000
1,200
500
9,700
230,000

843.000
280.000
25.000
57.000
7,950
215.000
135.000
130.000

1,400
4,000

4,000
35,000
562,250

1
5
3
5
1
8

4
11
19
3
1
10
7
187
106
7
3
14

Cost
$230,500
14.000
11,650
89,700
43,400
500
118,550
74.000
80.000
290.200
109,000
8,000
151,600
133.200
15,621,900
19,592,400
95,750
8,650
438,650
76,900
2,527,500
737,590
31,505
1,078,500
719,900
198,200
63,950
3,700
20,000
90,000
100,000
221,400
94,100

Num­
ber

Cost

400
25,500
1,100
31.700
42,750
20,000
30,660
45,000
12.700
108 4,176,600
30 1,281,500
10,000
1
300,000
279,800
329.000
18, 500
2,925
834,500
153,600
41,800
14,000
34,500

2,000
21,000
58.000
22.000

Num­
ber
91
23
23
12
185
84
62
55
176
24
35
22
123
93
4,071
2,982
168
111
184
91
1,171
1,129
104
67
3,576
2,388
437
311
191
151
71
34
72
33
1,482
1,035

Cost
$45,975
10,950
4,255
2,165
149,764
34,205
9,985
6,439
19,176
9,110
19,865
8,695
70,860
45,350
1.539.400
1.087.400
54,900
33,090
71,667
35,248
531,540
468,950
29,735
30,380
1,062,275
537, 650
141,820
96,020
34,885
22,673
10,890
4,755
6,769
2,102

449,450
317,050

Gasoline and
service stations
Num­
ber

Cost

$2,500
43,100
72,800
49,897
40,700
137,300
117,500
11,850
77,895
76,000
400
4
120
221
6

8
4
3
15
42
5
2
83
105
9
9
5

6

3
6

4
2
34
33

11,575
181.400
062,500
6,700
13.300
17.300
22,600
69,900
179,050
29,800
25.000
363,750
282,100
20.500
19,895
22.700
11,836
9,500
41.700
17.500
15.000
211,450
150.400

Institutions
Num­
ber

Cost

Office buildings
Num­
ber

Cost

$19,250
$45,000
650,000
5.000
214,950
21,100
5.000

975

6,000

20,000

5,700,400
3,843,000
800,000

3,203,000
1,051,450
60,000
350,000

44

20,000
413,000
25,033,800
1,312,500
36,500
7,000
125,000
9,589,900
69,800
4,667,100
3,096,500

298,050
” 22,'660

5,500
220,000
225,000
27,400

CITIES

2

$42,000
12,000
2,500
158,275
97,020
2,000
112,800
110,000

Num­
ber

Garages (private)

IN PRINCIPAL

13

3,351,500

4
7
1
1
1
1

Cost

Factories, shops, Garages (public)
etc.

PERMITS

14,000
12,900
42,500
1,650
68,350
18,161
1,750

2
L5

Num­
ber

$100

T
4
4
2
7
9
1

t

Churches

BUILDING




wated cos* of buildings (new construction, <m<2repairs, alterations, anti additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1980, &?/ intended use of buildings— Continued

2,000
12.500
79,300
30.500

Council Bluffs, Iow a-Covington, K y _______
Cranston, R. I _______
Cumberland, M d ........
Dallas, Tex__________
Danville, 111_________

4,000
2
3
30

Davenport, Iowa.........
Dayton, Ohio________
Decatur, 111__________
Denver, Colo—.............

Detroit, M ich..............
Dubuque, Iowa........ —
Duluth, Minn....... ......

6,000
121,300
213,100
6,000

12,600
99,500

102,000

107,100

14,000
9,000

185,400
126,000
437.000
700
10,560
369.000
94,050

60,000
90,000
170,000
175.200
104.200
1,347,300
1,232,430

187,100
40,000
31,325
41,000

East Chicago, Ind.......

3,000
1,500
4,950
64,379

East Cleveland, Ohio..
Easton, Pa................ .

49,200

East Orange, N. J........

24,000
103,846

East Providence, R. L .

65, tOO

East St. Louis, HI........

"~7~525

Elgin, 111.......................

175
202,000
7,000
9,925
2,600

Elizabeth, N. J_______
Elkhart, Ind........ ........
Elmira, N. Y ...............
El Paso, Tex................




341,000
125,000
6.500
1.500
90,500
25,000
174.000
261.000
31,665
46,500

4
13

270,500
115,629

7,800
44,800

....
10
4
1
2
2
42
30
5
5
16

184
105
13
3
2
1
1
1
200
26
1
3
2
2
5

40.000
12,900
10,885
27~306"
67,580
172.800
45.000
68.500
40.000
2,085,482
576,624
119.000
648.000
986.500
20.500
46.500
150,300
9,582,837
3,509,655
35,767
6,500
28.000
1,200
75.000
30.000
3,608,757
1,061,050
25.000
12,400
23,965
13,269
19,375
1,550

79,304
12,879
2,190
9,352
104,900
4,500
240,645
48,900
35,000
592.000
175.000
117,200
94,800
1,796,232
583,011
136.000
12,000

25.000
60.000
17,760
9,000
50,400

22,300”
77.000
49,550
70.000

20,500
3,579
13,550
15,000

239,"o55~
196.000
136.500
32,175
31,950
13.800
72,350
42,725

63.000
164,000
33.000
2,000
2,550
2,500
25,525
31,400

90
17,850
50
12,650
121
55,300
77
35,100
463
170,668
317
102,860
103
31,283
62
14,329
153
38,738
221
50,674
10
5,057
11
3,833
275
59,332
281
60,716
780
400,614
312,629
605
392
88,085
191
38,945
576
263,100
517
218,000
432
69,939
410
63,803
10,419 2,551,797
5,684 1,236,707
132
29,872
77
17,964
109,596
328
262
55,471
4
5,750
1
8,000
76
26,374
27,643
76
70
20,576
57
10.894
78
55,993
52
28,188
247
246,263
159
118,982
280
11S, 986
197
84,665
280
43,564
139
30.895
265
79,663
184
56,958
419
142,200
279
88,700
246
51,446
153
24,649
216
44,316
184
43,834
144
39,207
159
35,816

6
8
4

17,000
17,500
27,200

5
11
5

11,200
23,150
13,122

41
47
8
7
6
9
17
13

242,350
264,186
49,760
12,150
41,600
42,925
146, 721
85,000

21
17
72
23
46
120
199
1
8
12
15
2
2
2
5
5
4
2
4
13
9
6
15
11
17
6
14
33
25
2
7
3
10
12
13

118,800
47,800
215,900
69,495
170,775
426,800
624,450
3, 500
40,500
17, 775
28,100
9,800
12,300
7,000
27,620
9,400
26,500
6,770
31,400
61,600
46.000
11,600
36,100
60,885
51.500
21,800
99.000
86.500
86.000
3,700
11,900
9,200
62,600
33,763
52,708

2
1

90,200
25,000

2
1

16,000
2,000

9

2,496,302

3

1,225,000

1
3
2

1
3
1

35,000
1,639,870
1,005,000

100,000
250.000
120.000

2
1
5

334,200
75,000
1,163,000

2
1
1
2
21
22

79.000
20.000
8,000
1,012,000
4,540,684
1,752,116

1

7,000

1

750,666

1

2

3

171,000

21

362,846

2

662,300

6
3

582.000
349.000

1

10,000

2

37,000

30,000

6
2

206,000
500,000

3,300

1
2
1
2

12,000
50,000
450,000
364,200

TABLE

Durham, N. C _______

2
1
23

575
16,500
827,445

1
2
4

10,000
40.000
9,100
12.000
17,700
4,610

GENERAL

Des Moines, Iowa____

41.000
17,200
40.000

126,000
30,000

Cn
00

T able

A*— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings)

covered by permits

Cm

issued in 1929 and 1930, by intended use of buildings— Continued
PART 2.— NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued

Amusement and
recreation places

Office buildings

Institutions

Cost

Num­
ber

Cost
$1,041,300

$603,000
75,000

32,000
8,000

312.000
512.000
10,700
16,600
’ 178,166'
21,645
3,500
15,000

62,700
800

75
3,250
50.000
34.000
28.000
9,200
65,020
500.000
150.000
60,000

52,000
9,960

Cost
$166,040
31,800
12,000
60,000
101,000
211,485
417,700
447,300
2,500
28,375
20,690
6,380
15,780
641,600
750,510
7,000
85.500
15.500
491,750
117.100
281,900
284,565
50,808
34,790
7,900
83,528
264.100
149,500
20,700
29,650
1,500
185,332
30,500

Num­
ber

Cost

$257,500
16,000
100,000
206,500
121,700
12,500
9,800
18,000
"” 14,’ 166'
15,675
24,950
15,000
87,535
20.900
18,000
16.500
158,486
26,160
161,925
189,837
5.000
67.900
11,260
15,200
9.000
2,500
396,675
188,000
65,806
24,800
35.500
31,000
35.500

Num­
ber
616
519
245
155
268
221
120
86
154
133
147
109
68
46
1,772
685
122
107
852
511
193
127
158
132
134
155
382
225
1,284
707
212
148
240
182
70
46

Cost
$193,032
124,096
213,450
101,750
38,420
29,406
36,475
22,625
9,465
14,040
39.095
24,280
41,957
15.095
565,705
199.334
20;487
15,361
251,771
130,590
48,109
23,944
55,020
24,001
16,683
15,982
108,645
63,450
287,585
141,480
70,301
31,720
42,155
29,615
7,008
4,305

Num­
ber

Cost

Num­
ber

Cost

Num­
ber

$45,900
9,995
97.500
36,000
92.500
41, 250
5,200
16,000
71,800
43,500
15, 700
32.850
114,894
99,240
55,965
27,250
113,450
126,300
229,619
172,776
26.759
43,315
2,000
72,100
34.450
77,400
68,200
49.760
15.450
22,050
17.850
107,470
26,650
60,713

Cost

$53,250
250,000
845,000
$327,000 j

1

"loo,‘ 656...........

68,000
418,137
1,"500"
10,850
11,500

423,222
669,000

126,160
80,000
35,000
1,174,969
115,000
1,024,202
1,977,244
2,106,104
16,000
31,065
1,700

34,620
5,000
1,119,000
4,250

172,550
43,000
128,000
208,000

3,500
30,000

330,837

CITIES

81,400
593,731
573,132
57,800

63,814
32.499
100,000
20,000
40,600
92,250
729,650
38,850
30.500
6,000
74.000
50.000
149.000
13.500
193,250
141,545
15.000
300
184.000

Num­
ber

IN PRINCIPAL




Gasoline and
service stations

PERMITS

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
Evansville, Ind____
1930
1929
Everett, Mass.........
1930
1929
Everett, Wash........
1930
1929
Fall River, M ass...
1930
1929
Fitchburg, Mass___
1930
1929
Flint, M ich.............
1930
1929
Fond du Lac, Wis._
1930
1929
Fort Wayne, I n d ...
1930
Fort Worth, Tex__
1929
1930
1929
Fresno, Calif______
1930
1929
Galveston, Tex_____
1930
1929
Gary, Ind................
1930
Grand Rapids, M ich .. 1929
1930
1929
Great Falls, M o n t1930
1929
Green Bay, Wis----1930
1929
Greensboro, N . C ...
Evanston, 111......... .

Garages (private)

Year
Num­
ber

Erie, Pa__________

Factories, shops, Garages (public)
etc.

BXJILDING

City and State

Churches

1
1
2
1
2

1,000
140,000
483,000
300,000
96,911
26,500
500.000
500.000
18,000
234.000
2,000

44,000
5,250
90.000
69.000
33.000
16,500
107.000
115.000
65,000
385,000
127,099
52,332

2,652
5,000
47,600
4,000
88,800
120,535
35,000
13,000
4,900
28,400
200,000
111, 921
7,000
2,000
22,500
12,000
18,900
135,500
17,000
183,000
’ l25,"666‘

128,650
4,000

1,613,281
276,600
5,000
500
289,307
192,000
54,950
87,000
2,000
14.000
90.000
5,000
933,800
311,040
80,000
10,000
25,500

1
5
3

800
247,920
26,500

2
1
1
1
12
6

92,000
6,000
12,916
12,000
1,399,000
66,500

3
2
6
12
10
3
1
2
4
3

71,000
43,000
90,500
274,785
498,047
1,150
400
8,688
36,370
23,000

1
2
3

22,000
220,400
165,000

36
27
4
1
3
3
22
11
2
2
3
2
4
5
4
1
17
4
6
4
3
1

695,350
1,059,518
50,000
23,000
6,650
25,000
719,700
202,900
28,000
20,000
120,000
18,500
84,500
53,600
311,200
10,000
257,800
96,000
29,750
92,800
427,000
12,500

1
6
4

800
189,000
20,800

5,200
39,750
194,340
116, 700
3,000

29,000
9.500
58,450
212,000
57,460
23,200
34.800
7,864
7,540
295.000
’ *38, ooo"
27.800
18,900
15,700
207,600
111, 500
"22,“666"
3.500
"635,'’087"
133,047
75.000
§,"666"
19,156"
13.000
5,"556"
710.000
600
136,200
32,500
6,000
~~25,620~

19
27
114
94
106
113
198
157
218
11
239
63
241
190
237
166
113
83
41
50
124
92
8
6
57
62
135
111
150
86
104
129
1,468
1,518
289
176
409
224
236
173
247
147
349
188
133
88
37
55
57
30
214
153

3,725
4
12,870
2
76,990
4
218,905
4
25,850
1
24,785
2
48,954
2
45,408
8
118,650 _____
64,509
25
52,300
1
16,360
1
158,235
4
118,750
11
204,338
15
148,371
29
34,070
14
21,410
7
55,307
1
56,755
2
46,160
6
31,175
9
11,400
1
8,900
1
24,775
2
27,895
6
89,420
62
104,550
72
47,400
15,522
14
15,443
7
21,282
4
660,831
80
347,529
64
156,855
5
102,393
38
104,958
2
44,167
13
37,353
20
26,345
19
78,570
4
47,760
1
315,936
11
174,160
14
79,119
5
48,875
8
22,860
23,565
6
14,475
8
12,600
7
35,467
10
11
28,759

22,500
15,500
7,650
8,000
7,000
7,000
6,800
36,600
133,000
2,000
3,500
18,500
61,800
131,150
93,582
19,615
32,600
718
7,482
21,000
43,400
7,000
1,000
2,550
24,800
292,390
295,843
89,000
31,750
20,000
249,490
223,649
17,400
81,307
16,500
27,450
174,650
88,850
54,900
4,000
10,115
87,600
14,500
41,100
36,850
26,200
19,500
47,300
53,500

100,200
78,000

500.000
200.000
8,000

91,445
43,000
769,085

51.000
50.000
307,400
"6,"739,*450
946,000
13,725
279,500
"225,"666
13,000

750.000
220,130
283,557
291.000

145.000
420.000
315,000
252,000
34,000
150,000

1,255,250
665,155
206,000

TABLE




16,570
223,500
137,000

GENERAL

Greenville, S. O______ 1029
1930
Greenwich, Conn_____ 1929
1930
Hagerstown, M d _____ 1929
1930
Hamilton, Ohio---------- 1929
1930
Hammond, Ind______ 1929
1930
Hamtramck, M ich___ 1929
1930
Harrisburg, Pa............. 1929
1930
Hartford, Conn______ 1929
1930
Haverhill, Mass........... 1929
1930
Hazleton, Pa_________ 1929
1930
Highland Park, Mich _ 1929
1930
Hoboken, N. J_______ 1929
1930
Holyoke, M ass.-—___ 1929
1930
Houston, Tex...........
1929
1930
Huntington, W. Va__ 1929
1930
Hutchinson, Kans....... 1929
1930
Indianapolis, Ind......... 1929
1930
Irvington, N. J_______ 1929
1930
Jackson, Mich....... ...... 1929
1930
Jacksonville, Fla.......... 1929
1930
Jamestown, N. Y ......... 1929
1930
Jersey City, N. J......... 1929
1930
Johnstown, Pa__......... 1929
1930
Joliet, 111....................... 1929
1930
Joplin, M o___________ 1929
1930
Kalamazoo, M ich____ 1929
1930

700.000
"loo,"565
200.000
75,000
10,500
180,900
168,590

50.000
70.000

60,000

19.000
60.000

" 121,"565
645,186
6,000

Or
Ot

T able

A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits

g*

issued in 1929 and 1930, by intended use of buildings— Continued
PART 2.— NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued

Amusement and
recreation places

Garages (private)

Gasoline and
service stations

Year
Num­
ber

Cost

Num­
ber

Cost

2
1

125.000
118.000

4,920
1,200

11
9
1

199,500
517,000
40,000

4
11

20,500
13, 575

1

130,000

1

75,000

2

176,000

x
x
1

10,000
75, 750
7,000
125,000
1,500

3
2

92,000
42,600

1

7,000

1
1

x

3,500

4
7

600
27,500

2
15
47

110,000
112,300
159,900

5

113,650

3
5
4
5
1

358,000
45.000
55,800
87.000
2,000

20
2
9
7
19
1
3
1

$457,800
250,000
239.000
70,000
2, 564,645
1,700
113,000
31,000

3
15
2
2
1

2,600
323, 547
15.000
145,000
55.000

1

70

18
4
2
2
2
13
4

3,044, 045
60,400
12,150
9,390
75,000
468,700
178,000

2
2
4
2

21,200
23,000
27,300
1,250

1
72
140

1,500
683,705
1,984,610

Cost

1
X
6
2

$3,500
3,000
264,000
6,000

X
x
2
X
19
16
1

3.600
5.000
2.600
2.000
619,800
60,930
500

1
2
2
2
3
X
15
27

3,500
12,000
8,000
10,000
42,028
20,000
15,675
73,022

1

7,000

5
4
1

29,850
25.000
10.000

9
8

112,650
152,400

21
22

108,800
78,600

Num­
ber
204
105
355
280
209
113
359
167
109
94
128
32
278
106
313
217
120
122
225
240
66
41
83
113
17
20
104
108
106
109
461
270
175
152
1,345
946

Cost

$22,171
19,320
145,000
83,900
73,839
31,871
88,822
53,808
38,290
38,035
27,090
5,728
55,311
11,907
70,700
57,588
76,528
70,025
91,661
40,510
29,165
21,000
30,000
26,175
6,300
8,400
81,340
11,995
24,475
14,850
92,318
45,792
22,866
18,880
499,035
336,660

Num­
ber

Cost

1
Num­
ber

3
2
36
86
6
4
3
6
7
4
25
25
17
3
12
11

$10,800
12,800
279, 700
426,700
12,500
4,300
14,500
53,750
24,550
6,700
17,497
22,050
36,230
4,750
58,500
60,260

2
2
17
3
10

4,500 !
3,100 !
108,800 j
3,700
19, 350

3

21,000

6
4
9
9
9
7
6

27,000
15,000
42,900
31,650
56,800
17,075
18,100

10
34
33

27,600
65,090
63,030

Cost

Num­
ber

Cost

1

$100,000

1
2

$40,000
490,000

5
22

2,125,000
5,297,000

1

2,000

1

135,000

1
1
1

213,000
208,800
10,000

4
4
1

728,948
79,800
250,000

5

138,000

4
1
1

1,003, 000
7,000
90,000

1
3
3

300,000 _____ __________
41,100
228,000

1

95,000

8

49,838

2
3

215, 000
85,225

2

1,160,000

CITIES

$2,800
30,500
162,500
137,000
4,000

$3,000
20,700
18,000
400

Num­
ber

Cost

Office buildings

IN PRINCIPAL

2
4
6
3
1

1
12
1
1

Num­
ber

Institutions

PERMITS

Kansas City, Kans----- 1929
1930
1929
TTfvnftis
Mo
1930
1929
Keamv, N. J __ __
1930
Kenosha, Wis
_____ 1929
1930
Kingston, N. Y ___ - _ 1929
1930
Knoxville, Terrn, ___
1929
1930
Kokomo, I n d . __ - ___ 1929
1930
Ohio
1929
1930
Lancaster, Pa
_
1929
1930
Lansing, M ich_______ 1929
1930
Lawrence M!ass
1929
1930
T.fthrninn Pa
1929
1930
1929
Lewiston Ale
1930
Lexington, K y _ - _____ 1929
1930
Lima Ohio
.
1929
1930
Lincoln, Nebr ____ __ 1929
1930
1929
Little Rock Ark
1930
Long Beach, Calif........ 1929
1930




Factories, shops, Garages (public)
etc.

BUILDING

City and State

Churches

Lorain, O h io ........... . .
Los Angeles, Calif........
Louisville, K y________

48
157
1
14

Lowell, Mass............ —

3,617,410
1,597,376
6,000

313,250
2,650
12,000
178,735
325,000

Lynchburg, Va......... —
Lynn, Mass.............. —

Macon, Ga...................

66,000
150,000

Madison, W is________

2,000

Malden, Mass........

Mansfield, Ohio...........

6,000

Marion, Ind.............. .
Marion, Ohio............ .

26,700

Memphis, Tenn...........

84,500
65,000

Minneapolis, Minn___
Mobile, Ala__________

1
37
53

2

5
1
10

1,600
392,980
105,560
29,100
1, 551,372
10,000
17,500

Moline, 111....................

24,974

Montclair, N. J . . ........

15,000
1,000
131,300
500
140,000

Montgomery, Ala........
Mount Vernon, N. Y._
Muncie, Ind___ _____




58,220
235

24.000
5,500
53.000
36.000
45,069
160,000
12,000
5,500
25,000

371,800
39,500
21,400
450,000
408,075
126,960
224,870
48.000
2,000

37.000

4,000

’ 26,'666'

10

9

12,000
47,550
13,750
86,375
52,850

5
81
116
7
24
1
2
1
2

8

10
1

49,000
11,450
50.150
3,500
61,800
26.150
7,025
1,850
20,300
12,000
32,250
10,000
8,250
29,200
608,400
91,000
270,975
34.750
75,850
17.750
2,287,750
2,337,260
705,570
221,020
15,000
161,700
152,500
60,000
6,400
419,100
13,000
120,807
3,700

10

19
15

211
34,411
159
24,328
7,265 2,091,326
5,751 1,710,495
544
221,715
121,530
357
159
46,310
120
24,795
73
9,175
59
13,357
342
102,173
244
71,479
174
69,735
146
53,005
35
4,320
27
4,280
320
74,432
245
56,666
143
74,793
127
51,955
209
57,409
162
43,285
214
45,478
160
28,948
65
11,460
47
10,725
208
24,295
121
14,200
348
174,535
201
88,560
760
182,812
704
221,650
165
63,035
120
44,774
195
62,498
235
58,255
2,831 1,017,597
1,571
507,566
2,067
549,540
1,653
383,490
10
4,965
9
8,250
188
57,633
184
51,494
223
142,029
143
89,920
21
2,845
60
13,480
102
56,980
73
37,663
438
65,197
181
25,819

2
5
281
584
8
38
7
10
5
8
5
7
2
5
7
8
11
10
8
4
14
9
11
S
4
5
3
55
4
1
3
45
2
10
28
27
21
57
55
70
2
13
2
7

3,700
12.500
265,651
466,531
35.300
184,700
15,125
36.000
39.000
39.350
23,225
18.650
14.000
11,850
42.500
47,260
62,800
133,900
50.000
11.500
32, 750
30.650
62.950
34.800
27.500
29,100
21.000
165.500
13.800

4
4
23
7
3
3
U

23,366"
24.350
39,475
19.000
60.000
12,911
18.950

2,000

27.300
217,850
4,500
33,750
230.400
107.500
50.000
224.400
207,250
282,125
4,987
66,8C0
21,600
35.800

15 * 1,94^800
13
430,953

__

45,000

„
1
2

--

--

89/787"
70,000
339,000

15,"655"
is,"555"

-----------4

67,000
22,500

2 “ "'370,'’555"

1
2

87,384
771,000

-----------3

50,000

2

13,250

1
60
51

13,000
5,557,023
8,396,572

4

1,683,255

2

400,000

2

£65,‘ 665

1

36,000

1
4

550.000
325.000

------ -----------3

..

58,900
45,500

"~~2

21
11
21
11

21,000
3,223,375
3,659,533
5,090,625
631,590

3
1

288,000
8,200

1
2
2
3
1

607555
30.000
24.000
379,500
25.000

TABLE

Medford, Mass............

Milwaukee, Wis______

2,000

239

4,401,269
3,052,390
876,000
73,500

GENERAL

25,000
200,000
1,950

Manchester, N. H ____

Miami, Fla__________

35,500

1,000

McKeesport, Pa...........

Meriden, Conn_______

236.000
698,564
1,080,467
115.000
194.000
34,500

O*
00

PART 2*— NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
ement and
ition places

il*
1

$305,000
103,794
3,000
266,500
463,000
122,875

600

*2
3
1

40,000
4,646,000
600

2
3

43,650
24,150

Y
5

110,500
95,700

T
3
7
1
3

1,471
117,000
455,932
25,000
88,800

Num­
ber

$24,000
90.000
10.000
109,400
211,800
6,950
108,000
87.000
84.000

474,050
36,700
1,437,900
124,000
25,000
15,500
5,000

103, 600
20,000
136, 750
301,400

130,000
20,000

3
4
7
1
2

91,000
283,779
138,870
5,000
38,000

110,000

16,"5o5‘

Cost

$12,525

9,000
29,500
11,000
36,000

16,000

16,150

Num­
ber

$287,900
105,000
19,000
14.500
219,950
366,255
1,427,820
794,200
106,750
825
43.500
3,000

40,000
5,000

194,000
9.000
59,000
549. 500
179,982

Cost

10,200
1,200

318
181
40
37

122

85
793
486
105
67
120
94
155
78
72
46
79
49

211

154
337
297
120

41

210,520
I 'm
2,500
41,600

1,000
52,340
7,000

Num-

231,300
5,600
9,000
19,500

107
79
78
19
24
152
114
93
91
159
98
373
265

Cost
$145,830
87,972
7,970
6,325
13,640
14,835
767,125
413,676
17,870
11,570
74,085
56,875
68,073
33,856
27,185
14,390
40,500
33,752
47,780
44,445
223,500
180,355
61,775
49,205
35,710
74,170
9,475
13,100
65,930
53,790
11,077
8,219
149,326
72,674
228,237
137,878

Gasoline and
service stations
Num­
ber

Cost
$8,200
50,735
38.000
43.950
74,050
110,575
487,400
254,950
17,925
2,600
23,300
52,750
18.000
21.950
27,000

20,300
19,200
41,900
46,600
52,500
56,100
248,881
79,635
11,100
11,100
7,000
24,000
8,553
110,500
42.500
64,600
60.500

Institutions
Num­
ber

Cost

Office buildings
Num­
ber

Cost

$15,000

$259,250
67,000
5,000

90,000
1,623,000
443,000

8,000
74,000
10,145,885
1,037,000

80,000
100,000

35,000

50,000

“ 12,"666

60,000
643,000
7,000

213.000
192,700
5,200
*233,~6o5
46,000

50,000
40.000
350,000
70.000

--

"§9,"800
445.000

CITIES

T

Cost

Garages (private)

IN PRINCIPAL

4
1
1
1

40.000
23,300
5,000
400,000
60.000

Num­
ber

Factories, shops, Oarages (public)
etc.

PEBMITS

’e
1
4
6
20

Cost

Churches

BTJILDING




mated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, <md additions to old buildings) comredl>y permits
issued in 1929 and 1930, by intended use of buildings— Continued

New York City, N .Y .:
The Bronx1______
Brooklyn i.............
Manhattan1_____
Queens 1_________
Richmond 1______

16
14
8
12
8
37
37
8

Niagara Falls, N. Y__.
Norfolk, Va..................

1,600
37,300

Norristown, Pa............
Norwalk, Conn............

Oklahoma City, Okla.
Okmulgee, Okla...........
Omaha, Nebr...............
Orange, N. J................

1
3
30
6
7

800
88,300
9,110
776,000
193,500
61,000
17,500

357 2,205,640
45 1,156,650
156 6.948.400
78 2.233.500
41 5.478.500
29 3,519,000
146 3,220,350
95 3.498.400
262,500
11
22
50,800
167,935
18,500
30,000
48,000
112,000
51,600
361,250
85,940
18,000

26,"6c6"
180,785
54.000
80.000
475.000
80,000
11

12

55,000

" 128,500”
177,650

215.500
450.500

4,500
14.000
20.000
167,400

121,000
625,700
16,950

Oshkosh, Wis..............

6,000

Ottumwa, Iowa...........
Paducah, K y................
Pasadena, Calif...........
Passaic, N. J_________

73,223
63,462

11,600
7,200
443,970

9
5
4
153

27,000

'l76,'600‘

Pawtucket, R. I...........

~6i~m

30,000

100

36.000
30.000
46,198

Peoria, HI.....................

1 Applications filed.




l i ’ooo'

2

'483,'TOO'

Paterson, N. J..............

Perth Amboy, N. J___

2,500

175,000

2

20,000
25,570
64,899
64,300
10,600
86,150
14.500
11.500
2,000
24.000
10.000
62,000

632
507
3,130
2,350
195
230
5,697
4,948
790
669
371
315
435
310
137
108
204
144
1,018
633
279
142
4
9
1,299
422
2
4
310
253
75
81
177
136
31
17
14
1
372
190
159
101
153
210
372
215
405
392
117
78

232,260
128,570
1,752,370
1,101,515
47,450
46,880
2,055,194
1,727,146
216,260
255,685
123,866
84,842
71,693
51,438
85,674
59,205
140,375
76,470
318,389
171,848
140,595
58,050
500
1,950
373,540
189,690
450
810
87,622
54,159
129,657
82,020
43,835
42,566
14,650
5,600
2,525
50
80,743
36,656
106,425
70,175
97,836
142,306
156,305
85,540
125,670
111,870
47,950
32,646

35
17
142
80
23
12
162
134
52
22
8
7
11
29
4
4
5
7
23
69
5
7
10
7
39
67
8
4
32
33
6
2

178,400
75,500
513,755
341,600
81,050
46,700
755,893
368,000
244,450
41,350
14,610
7,700
36,728
217,150
11,350
9,400
13,000
18,900
59,840
168,375
87,000
62,000
19,550
7,200
195,100
332,800
49,000
14,000
131,500
98,900
16,450
14,000

5

25,000

4
3
6
12
17
2
4
5
14
10
13
7
11
5
2

11,000
9,500
28,550
17,629
19,205
14,000
31,000
16,200
39,000
27,700
40,250
66,000
41,300
20,000
19,500 .

1.900.000
1.094.000
25,820,000
11,790,740
990.000
3,084,801
250.000
1,053,200

45

1,599,200
659,700
5,565,000
630,000
74,063,000
51,718,650
2,918,725
1,286,740
81,560

30,400
33,000

275,340
4,000
75,000

52,000
137,474
35,000

330,932
52,500
450,000
50,000

266,050
332,000

96.000
94.000

55,000
800; 000

455,500
1,614,000
69,000
300,000

TABLE

Oak Park, 111________

10
728.000
6
596.500
13 1,710,000
12
825.500
2
484.000
3
460.000
13 1.517.500
20 1.332.500
4
145.000
3
143.300
3
71,990
2
61,000
2
101.500
2
28,200
1
2,000
153.300
2

GENERAL

312,900
8,600
5,000
146,200
788,294

Oakland, Calif.............

Ogden, Utah................

4,486,800
1.658.500
619,800
814.000
2,899,700
755.000
2.288.500
1,332,035
487,500
104,050
2,700

85,000
21,390
300,000
66,550
5,500
409,000

520,875
390,200
235,000
787,947
103,814
15,500
7,000
232,250
249,100
542,231
Ol
CD

T a b le

A .—Number

and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, a n d additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1930, by intended use of buildings— C o n t in u e d

o

PART 2.— NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
Amusement and
recreation places

Garages (private)

Gasoline and
service stations

Institutions

Office buildings

$159,125
14,147,950
7,132,105
238.000
650.000
568,600
4,750,000

PERMITS

Year
Num­
ber

Cost

$500
5,255,660
904,080
27,800
306,630
1,115,000
18,450
21,500
4,750
800
150,000
3,000
500
247,000

1,550

1,500
20,000
50,575

Cost

$976,100
439,750
170.000
60,883
333.000
320.000
85,000

Num­
ber
5
2
122
75
2

Cost
$35,648
11,485
5,136,055
3,789,990
10,000
385,700
581,600
37,200

Num­
ber

Cost
$8,000

7
4
19
59
3
1
2
1
18

117,400
60,783
238,750
217,745
19,500
10,000
80,000
25,000
50,250

15.000
272,684
428,807
29.000
18,400
39,350
5,000

50,000
41,150
80,500
367,500
5,000
6,500

40,000

233,300

5.000
2,150
497, 500
243,855
9.000

47,185
34,000
395,150
393,800
23,500
8,500
12,400

96,000
4.000
1.000

16,000
6,800
194,000

40,000

55,000

1,357,100
249,150
11,200
17.000
25.000

78,000

26,200
191,580

90.000
55.000
40.000

17

34,000
226,600
202,500
35,000
7,500
6,000

Num­
ber

Cost

28
2 1,225
21,130
69
44
1,516
1,098
246
224
209
175
655
147
142
107
11
12
194
180
1,680
1,277
95
62
79
77
64
60
839
621
202
196
138
102
633
423

$5,300
2,790
2,635,175
2,282,400
37,200
10,975
813,902
514,460
107,750
112,175
71,835
99,968
190,598
25,595
56,740
32,334
1,985
2,140
60,448
52,585
262,910
195,850
16,062
8,222
7,715
6,880
25,875
21,157
552,200
538,980
40,321
32,763
26,955
17,674
195,985
135,335

Num­
ber

Cost
$11,000
14,500
48,720
35,960
467,700
305,550
34,900
59,500
25.000
14,740
788,000
70.000
11,980
12,100
15.400
17,275
63,368
53,220
120,785
12,850
26,024
8,000
36.500
20,700
21,200
43.000
101,200
74.500
3,250
10.000
31,300
46.500
18.400

Num­
ber

Cost

$2,625,000
1,209,900
24,600
319,500
150,000

Num­
ber

Cost

3,400
14,350

1.55.000
286.000

448,200
124,800

19.000
75.000

102,700
8,000
43.000
22.000
25.000
42.000

400.000
290.000

493,100
153,350
66,000
25,000

188,000
124,000

140,750
50,000

CITIES

1,200
284.000
150.000
493.000
75,000
31,300

Num­
ber

IN PRINCIPAL

Petersburg, Va............. 1929
1930
Philadelphia, Pa_____ 1929
1930
Phoenix, Ariz________ 1929
1930
Pittsburgh, Pa............. 1929
1930
Pittsfield, Mass ........... 1929
1930
Plainfield, N. J............. 1929
1930
Pontiac, M ich.............. 1929
1930
Port Arthur, Tex......... 1929
1930
Port Huron, Mich....... 1929
1930
Portland, M e............... 1929
1930
Portland, Oreg_______ 1929
1930
Portsmouth, Ohio....... 1929
1930
Portsmouth, V a........... 1929
1930
Poughkeepsie, N. Y.__ 1929
1930
Providence, R. I _____ 1929
1930
Pueblo, Colo_________ 1929
1930
Quincy, 111— .............. 1929
1930
Quincy, Mass________ 1929
1930




Factories, shops, Garages (public)
etc.

BUILDING

City and State

Churches

Racine, W is.................
Reading, Pa.................
Revere, Mass...............
Richmond, Ind_______
Richmond, Va.............
Roanoke, Va_________
Rochester, N. Y ...........
Rockford, 111................
Rock Island, 111______
Sacramento, Calif____

St. Joseph, M o_______
St. Louis, M o...............
St. Paul, Minn............

Salem, Mass.................
Salt Lake City, Utah..
San Antonio, Tex____
San Diego, Calif..........
San Francisco, C alif...
San Jose, Calif..............
Savannah, Ga..............
Schenectady, N. Y ___
Scranton, P a_________
Seattle, Wash__...........

* Includes public garages.




48,000

384.400
67,500
361.400
43,700
14,000
65,900

2,500
163.000
258,457
99,797
7.000
280,482
70,000
206.000
3.000

34,400
66,650
19,304
3,700
220,037
1,786,261
688,075
225,000
18,000

30,050
133,200
65,000
2,500

7,000
17.000
10,239
96.000
22,200

55,000
301,625
100
55,500
2,700
24,700
140,075
500
723,000
408,610
24.000
21.000
38,532
4,670
60,000
22,000
64,100
204,600
172,800
37,100
2,800
500,000
25,000
58,150
94,500
96,250
711,000
96,305
26,300
786,391

260,000
411,700
61,680
103,800
288,000
15,700

1,117,
1,658,
593,
82,
2,
25,

100,000
189,000
40.000
99,925
497,200
140,700
47.000
301,000
16,500

45,
69,
57,
458,
257,
12,
60,
1,001,
406,
226,
104,

128,475
4,900
66,700
11,025
8,000

18,000
92.000
71.000
133.000
35.000
1,145,000
177.000

279,500
236,000
88,050
10,400
807,660
5,072,635

5
1
40
22

92,000
4,000
97,425
59,700

2
2
12
6
8
9
5
2
11
2
1

21,800
18,000
220,500
73,073
60,480
145,950
83,050
4,000
276,000
49,100
10,000

3
8
13

18,785
148,685
138,700

1
1

2,000
10,000

9
16
1
2
5

87,640
384,360
5,000
12,000
67,500

16
9
2
28
100
7
7

363,100
208,800
85,000
3,810
35,520
31,250
94,000

1
2

30,000
52,000

3
4

63,000
56,100

5
18
24

27,318
395,000
355,250

413
252
238
202
90
65
106
59
485
499
187
108
1,313
905
553
319
222
194
214
209
470
297
131
130
3,003
2,216
1,177
955
147
107
96
79
122
152
573
378
462
426
80
90
142
136
24
24
412
406
239
265
1,482
1,225

155,032
100,893
133,245
106,281
27,810
20,830
26,859
14.300
255,394
167,562
18,845
9,914
433,283
280,645
170,932
88,310
50,250
42,741
41.301
33,463
118,765
54,649
24,546
26,661
768, 513
552,686
299,136
230,016
32,800
39,450
54,425
48,590
23,983
26,825
162,891
58,473
102,238
103,054
81,193
116,655
19,580
18,880
6,870
5,265
175,650
165,300
142,205
62,156
210,730
151,420

27.000
32.000
266,000
597,925
46,200

48,
41,
177,
147,
36,
70,
5.000
58,325
108,083
44.000
77,180
37.000
23.000
12,750
11.000
129,420
208,140
47.500
20,400
15.000
8.000
119,400
38,700
273,190
205,272
70,794
109,950
108,350
191,907
53,970
37.000
120.650
60.500
56.000
103,500
24,550
178,150
160.650
210,300

422,784
138.500
243.500
•50,000

2,507,400
625.000
278.000
700.000
1,116,550
46,460
161,450
440,500

24,283
145,000
1,151,000
1,770,000
50,000
102,000

268,500
345.000
25,300
700.000
1,849,554
85,000

1.404.000
1.374.000
1,291,680
3.420.000

5,000
63.000
25.000
5,693,300
258,750
900,070
51,775
2,965,450
1,804,185

TABLE

St. Petersburg, Fla___

50,500

GENERAL

Saginaw, Mich_______

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

23,300
144,600
7,200
35,000
2,629,500

75,000
151.000
580.000
3,952,350
2,158,850
CD

T able

A.—

Number and estimated cost of buildinqs (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1980, by intended use of buildings— Continued
PART 2.—NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
Amusement and
recreation places

Sioux City, Iowa—
Sioux Falls, S. Dak.
Somerville, M ass.—

Spokane, Wash____
Springfield, 111_____
Springfield, M ass...
Springfield, M o ----Springfield, O h io ...

Steubenville, Ohio..
Stockton, Calif-----Superior, Wis...........
Syracuse, N. Y ____
Tacoma, Wash____
Tampa, Fla_______




Office buildings

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

Cost

$44, 000
7,700
3,500
385

35

51,900
461,450

1,450
800
114,000
90,200
608,450
365,000
240, 500
63,200
19,800
250,000
1,700
500
85,000
90,694
89,026

Num­
ber

Cost

Num­
ber

Cost

$120,000
73,000

$22,400
81,800

10,000
2,800
20,000
27,500

64,500
117,750
138,100
26,875
624,400

100,000
70.000
2,000
85.000
350,000
3,000
57.000

1,502,500
918,100
48,400
122,000
5.000
85,000
34,600
1.000

21,300
26,000
4,000
3,300
60,000
36.000
40.000

500,275
750
196,725
41,500

78,000
23,400
165,000

41,900
18,700

230,000
80,000
46.000
17.000
6,000
2,500

53.500
58.500
252.000
228.000
69,200
50,000

Num­
ber

Cost

$1,000
2
3
3
4
1
4
897
5
10
13
3

105, GOO
23.000
14,300
11,250
85.000
47,800
271,710
11,500
99,700
115,500
172,000
36,000
21,500
21,300
103,000
43,300
16,250
22,600
72.000
2,500
746,500
239,000
223,700
19.000
2,000

Num­
ber
213
171
198
177
347
269
126
113
144
99
172
452
622
554
309
226
540
402
61
75
386
212
306
122
91
73
185
155
113
115
1,007
557
382
374
199
162

Cost
$53,585
42,302
31,177
28,135
51,188
36,130
38,600
44,499
107,066
70,980
71,100
94.140
67,403
62,359
67,428
47,388
187,543
149,190
12,440
20,665
72.400
40, 750
182,198
63,095
21,125
17,370
22.140
17,755
20,133
19,480
363,985
206,860
48,835
48,885
25,035
12,076

Num­
ber

Cost

Num­
ber

Cost

Num­
ber

Cost

$25,760
17, 800
400
20,700
95.450
11,500
84,000
44,200
42.450
87.800
33,000
88,330
14.200
78, 758
53,410
120,100
117,250
136,000
26,125
91,825
21.200
33. 550
2.500
19,600
44,275
60,175
11,920
3.500
25.800
39,200
48.800
20,500
89,074
66,197

$7. 584
16,"665'

30,000
‘ 25’ 666'

.,000,000
’ ii2,*56o

620,000
9,500
250.000
190.000
980.000
648,700

2,209, 400

>8,000

27,200
30,000
761,000
35,500

4,900
258.000
75,000
100.000
39,000

145,100
75,225
1,101,500
180,000
160,000

CITIES

Stamford, Conn___

Institutions

IN PRINCIPAL

South Bend, I n d ...

Gasoline and
service stations

PERMITS

Shreveport, La........

Garages (private)

Year
Num­
ber

Sheboygan, Wis-----

Factories, shops, Garages (public)
etc.

BUILDING

City and State

Churches

1,450
350

Taunton, Mass............

3
2
50,000

Terre Haute, Ind_____
124,000
412,100

Toledo, Ohio................

81,500
1,000
84.000
18.000
248,000
69,600
63.000
19.000
94.000
16.000
24,700
131,800
2,000

Topeka, Kans____•----Trenton, N. J-----------Troy, N. Y __________
Tucson, Ariz_________

1
1
4
12

Tulsa, Okla........... ......

5,000
74,000
297,000
51,100
"333,’ 345"

Union City, N. J.........

"250,”565'

Utica, N. Y ..................

205,500

3,000

20,000
7,000

13,550
407,700

Waco, Tex___________

72,267

"157,’ 345
75

Waltham, Mass...........
Warren, Ohio...............

Waterbury, Conn........

19,000

Waterloo, Iowa............

10,000

Watertown, Mass........

10

530,500
1,460,500
163,000
20,000
4,000
43.000
50.000

Watertown, N. Y ........
West New York, N. J.
3.000
7.000
58,000
6,900

Wheeling, W. Va.........
White Plains, N. Y __
Wichita, Kans_______
Wichita Falls, Tex___
Wilkes-Barre, Pa.........
Wilkinsburg ,Pa_____




23

....
"T

18,730
~30,' 150'
500

170,000
"23,766
154,625
15,000
19,650
367,840
211,665
” 60,’ OOO'

25,000
910,148
311,135

30
20
1
4
9
1
28
9
4
2
8
4

457,140
702,385
16,800
1,140,800
46,150
500
260,450
41,350
31,000
17,500
281,500
14,100

5
2
2
5
4
1
1
7
13
15
3
3
5
1
1
1
4
2
3

13,100
26,667
45,333
69,450
6,750
50,000
10,000
677,800
529,800
298,450
98,500
408,075
42,350
40,000
150,000
300
19,550
110,000
6,500

1
2
3
16
5
3
2
24
16

16,000
5,500
30,400
242,400
131,748
9,700
2,300
80,663
93,522

‘ 45,'800’
32.000
7,000
96,560
27,823
35.600
6,100
"49,'W
’ 92,l o o ’
53,450
40.000
14.000
60.600
27.000
40,466
1,000
47565“
1,000
216,"280"
624,200
' ’ 25,’ 966’

81,000
90,250
"44,866"
51,800
436,850
173,550
198,950
79,300
96,440
79,902
3,500
75,000

118
98
319
261
1,992
1,101
366
278
302
178
114
109
261
174
1,155
506
33
29
155
215
68
48
16
17
186
124
329
194
1,521
1,100
241
133
418
273
167
90
153
109
26
13
137
128
146
91
396
291
17
6
129
131
145
80

43,045
22,960
54,374
37.675
442,323
215,726
78,299
38,162
118,260
69,723
56,734
52,510
71,656
38,650
419,974
174,781
55,585
29,750
60,275
100,995
13,721
12,576
5,562
7,993
92,865
48,995
57.675
30,790
437,260
269,410
165,700
84.700
79,355
47,795
108,955
52,450
51,805
18,975
33.700
7,350
52,481
45,537
115,000
61,889
71,545
54,210
4,597
6,107
38,368
30,132
67,505
42,539

7
5
9
22
61
33
11
18
9
12
9
12
13
18
5
27
2
2
12
15

21,900
7,150
41.300
30,350
143,950
101,450
39.700
76.300
47,100
53,015
45.700
55.500
13,976
50,174
18,000
108,550
1,430
9,000
88,600
59.501

8
6
20
7
2
6
5
43
55
11
12
8
8
6
3
7
5
2
4
11
8
6
3
19
31
10
2
14
24

18,175
55,041
113,866
25,060
5.000
45,950
16,050
281,200
485,980
44.250
25.250
30.600
20,400
48.600
19.500
38,000
8,450
6.000
61,350
67.500
123,075
55,200
44.000
49.000
74,800
26,300
2,200
17,059
51,554

4

18,025

3
1
1
1

..

850,000
261,393
27,000
249,173

....... H550"
5
318,851

1

70,000

2
1

1,003,400
92,728

7

108,100

4
1

614,000
4,800

2

76,000

382.000
888.000
3,800

1

100,000

1

20,000

7
2

378,457
109,456

1

1,500

7
4
3
1

523.500
2,970,000
221,000
358.500

1

20,000

1
1
1
1
4
5
2

60,000
18,000
40,000
222,000
932.000
301,500
400.000

2

24,199

2

50,500

1
1
1

105.000
32,500
120.000

1

239,000

5
4
1

2
3
1
1
1

266,565
564,500
49,350
160,000
10,000

4

583,000

TABLE

55,000
107,656
112,600

Washington, D. C .......

17,000

2
45
28

9,800

GENERAL

Vallejo, Calif................

3,150
5,400

G>
OO

T a b le

A*—

Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1980, by intended use of buildings— C o n t in u e d

C&

P A R T 2.—NEW NONREStDENTJAL BUILDINGS— Continued
Amusement and
recreation places

Garages (private)

Gasoline and
service stations

Institutions

Office buildings

Year
Num­
ber

Cost

Num­
ber

Cost
$2,600

2
1

195,000
43,500

1
1
3
1
1
2
9
2
1
1
2
6
o
Z

2,500
725.000
17,500
2,000
7,000
120.000
46’ 500
27.000
15.000
3,000
130,000
124,300
28,000

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
Wilmington, N C
1930
Winston-Salem, N. C . 1929
1930
W
PV* T
TVaAnCAplrAt X
i . . . . . . 1929
1930
W AmAcfoii* TVyTaco
1929
1930
1929
Y onkers N Y
1930
1929
York, Pa
1930
Youngstown, Ohio___ 1929
lO
QaA
J
LU
u
OhtA
1929
1930

3

$i9,550

2
1
2
1

2,000
5,000
75.000
80.000

5
11
3
12

319,500
3,245
64,000
86,450

2
15

43,700
646,850

43,215,396
43,375,341

Num­
ber

5
3
3
4

$131,390
3,800
42,100
120,900

2

5
g
2
4
28
10

39,275
37,495
24,000
24 550
630’ 925
23, 710

11

1
3
5
3
2
5

2,500
113,500
113,800
351,000
8,600
6,450

1
65
33
21
12
2
2
7
5
1
1

Cost
$7,000

79,575
250
215,423
49,768
386,400
219,000
11,600
59,000
53,900
21,300
700
3,000

Num­
ber
146
113
541
477
39
39
345
205
92
68
364
326
375
312
217
108
832
448
76
47

Cost

$57,375
19, 783
194, 748
142, 624
16,350
16,700
64,312
27,285
31,512
20,540
165,099
136,427
232,843
195,450
149,416
45,139
155, 772
70,292
9,622
7,039

Num­
ber
5
6
12
10
10
1
8
21
8
4
35
18
38
33
4
9
9
15
4
2

Cost

$10,400
44,100
122,840
49,300
70,000
1,000
32.300
58.300
22,750
27,500
93,600
90,450
185, 240
63,905
50,000
85,900
82,900
97,600
6,000
1,500

855 40,881,577 3,927 141,620,127 4,071 49,198,147 135,637 48,637,185 4,207 19,928,471
698 29,575,418 2,679 109,491,239 1,948 26,827,939 97,458 33,723,157 .5,778 21,869,134
1

Num­
ber

Cost

1

$50,000

4
1

15,925
9,540

1

Cost

1

$15,000

3
6
1

J, 369,000
1,678,032
15,000

3

274,150

1

450,000

2

105,400

5
4
3
2
6
3

2,063,000
220,137
65,000
185,000
88,850
585,000

1

65,000

75,702,762 1,136
703
58,258,336

240,950,145
160,741,404

1

470.000
295.000
380,000

1

20,000

274
272

Num­
ber

CITIES

Total:
748
311 cities____ 1929
311 cities....... 1930 1,450

Cost

IN PRINCIPAL

2

T>a1

Num­
ber

PEBMITS

IXTillifi.TnQ'nfirf* "Pa.




Factories, shops, Garages (public)
etc.

BUILDING

City and State

Churches

T a b l e A ,—

Number and estimated cost of buildings {new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1980, by intended use of buildings— Continued
PART 2.—NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
Public build­
ings

City and State

Alameda, Calif___
Albany, N. Y .........
Allentown, Pa....... .
Alton, 111.................
Altoona, Pa........... .
Amsterdam, N. Y .
Anderson, Ind....... .
Asheville, N. O___
Ashtabula, O hio...
Atlanta, Qa........... .
Atlantic City, N. J.
Auburn, N. Y ....... .
Augusta, Ga______
Aurora, 111________
Austin, Tex........ ....
Baltimore, M d____
Bangor, M e........... .




Schools, libraries,
etc.

Stables and
barns

Sheds

Stores, ware­
houses, etc.

All other

Total new nonresi­
dential buildings

Year
Num­
ber

Akron, Ohio............

Public works
and utilities

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

Cost

$45,000
40,526
"16,400

Num­
ber

Cost

Num­
ber

$500,270
198,100

Cost

$905,000
1,209,168

85,500
10,000
480,000
25,000

37,000

32,668

168, 750

10,000
602,000
214,650

7,000
88,000

340,000

5,500
11,700

72,500
1,000

600,000
12,569
1,117,000
211,000
151.000
300.000

15

1,000,000
352,288
1.255.000
2.913.000

Cost

Num­
ber
194
150
6

4

200

8,500
12,130
219
247

150

26,620
20,486

27
9
7
4
151
178
8
25
9
16
43
10
11
7
8
15

10,285
1,320
1,205
3,700
22,911
47,882
2,710
11,320.
5,495
1,095
3,885
2,125
5,750
1,160
1,000
4,565
575
3,640

6
9

14
2

3,575
1,350

3,000

610,600
18,000

Num­
ber

10

732,500

30,000

Cost

$8,778
8,412
2,587
800

5,000
110,000
1,850,000
207,700
50.000
82.000

10,000
57,800

35,000
639,690
325,000

Num­
ber

2

2,200
155“

47

21,633

400
210
50
800
24,000
7,000
500
300

9
5
25
18
7
7
120
88

38
4
1
6
30
19
7
8
40
39
72
41
4
1

Cost

$5,027,998
530,580
55,077
30.300
428,800
312,500
31.000
51,200
40,276
163.100
83,130
203,921
28.000
42.000
40,625
11,600
430.100
124,200
92,900
22.300
2,213,422
758,175
238,900
‘ 133,920
70.000
63,800
147,651
51,040
280,000
66.300
123,851
156,423
2,235,000
1,185,375
64,500
10.000

Num­
ber

Cost

Num. ber

$106,950
1,450
183

2,715
1,301
195

1,200
1
18
3
1
4
155
1

32
79,300
3,000
71,000
9,185
372,092
400

2,800
18,000
100
8,175
3,000
3,245
500
75
425

1,500
"i,’ 500‘

120

249
217
572
307
52
54
766
563
103
92
129
67
193
124
140
120

646
744
117
88
198
187
187
104
217
195
458
404
2,168
2,172
89
73

Cost
$10,684,269
2,989,455
160,885
221,610
3,536,578
4,720,555
1,782,065
750,855
241,192
432,017
756,203
616,503
546,850
838,175
314,684
131.844
1,452,266
198,060
493,909
153,730
4,758,198
5,203,175
625,164
264,615
872,984
567,290
226.845
170,094
853,264
715,296
2,670,651
1,836,681
11,651,900
12,826,185
318,575
377,650

6

a
I

T a b le

A*— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1980} by intended use of buildings— Continued
PART 2.— NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
Public build­
ings

Stables and
bams

Sheds

Stores, ware­
houses, etc.

All other

Total new nonresi­
dential buildings

Year
Num­
ber

Cost

Baton Rouge, La_-_.

Num­
ber

Cost

$48,500

25,000

Cost

Num­
ber

$25,300
223,051
453,500
547,000

1,000

6.000
39,575
28,000
2,233,000

2,800

64,000
9,469,063
1,663,462

991.000
317.000
17,200
4,000
25,000

1,779,000
384,960
22,000
12

586,233
467,000

67,000
354,000

147,400
500
49,500
224,350
122,000
252,057
249,855
131,000
22,600
$75

loo'
100

200

1,000
6,000

203
229
19
8
64
52
2

473,446
367,199
26,325
4,500
9,795
8,491
200

6,080
6,500

Cost

Num­
ber

1,900

10

5
10

108
130

79,850
180,890
69,605
85,900
39.500
39,670
48,745
682,582
298,893
54.000
29.000
41.800
15.500
3,424,595
1,194,650
50,450
61.800
291,855
28,975
101,000
66,600
4,362,175
4,877,560

Cost

$971
740
184,200

$82,059
183,829

208
13,695
6,840
562

6,000

2,947,300
1,180,025

Num­
ber

100

235
650
300
3,355
5,800
9,600

6,000

158,000
78,000

730,749

Cost

24

4,462

2
79
132

10

154
174
321

197
133
62
203
"3,166"
166
131
95
16,400
336
1,645
130
391
3,625
12,048
276
267
3,900
202
1,300
432
11,889
8,139
471
29,000
501
445
378
* 306
50
52
1,500
1,484
164,430
1,219
477
1,250
414
2,700
317
695
274
105
5,205
98
2,294
1,860
500

215
11
10

Num­
ber

Cost

$218,488
498,858
2,006,025
3,590,215
361,426
505,342
753,945
448,050
562,780
1,044,986
374,887
241,952
354,575
353.510
2,249,514
753,847
915,277
531,770
2,211,297
1,003,563
5,362,880
1,342,847
832,487
733,500
209,300
278,648
24,032,418
12,927,294
1,564,573
732,573
673,753
417,720
589.510
952,460
16,511,595
9,975,375

CITIES

92,000
161,948
518.000
524,500
14,000
60,200
125.000

350
58,500
165,332
350,104
60,000

Num­
ber

$7,255
3,251
4,875
2,160
4,145
3,965

150,000
3.000

Cost

IN PRINCIPAL

$652,439

38,000
107,100
10,500
182

Num­
ber

PERMITS

1929
1930
Battle Creek, Mich___ 1929
1930
Bay City, M ich___
1929
1930
Bayonne, N. J..........
1929
1930
Beaumont, Tex____
1929
1930
Belleville, 111...........
1929
1930
Bellingham, Wash..
1929
1930
Berkeley, Calif____
1929
1930
1929
Bethlehem, Pa........
1930
Binghamton, N. Y ----- 1929
1930
1929
Birmingham, Ala.—
1930
Bloomfield, N. J___
1929
1930
1929
Bloomington, 111___
1930
1929
Boston, Mass.1........
1930
1929
Bridgeport, C onn...
1930
1929
Brockton, Mass----1930
1929
Brookline, Mass___
1930
1929
Buffalo, N. Y ..........
1930




Schools, libraries,
etc.

BUILDING

City and State

Public works
and utilities

Burlington, Iowa____
Butler, Pa__________
Butte, M o n t.—_____
Cambridge, Mass----Camden, N. J______
Canton, Ohio.............
Cedar Rapids, Io w a Central Falls, R. I__
Charleston, S. C ........
Charleston, W. Va__.
Charlotte, N. C .........
Chattanooga, Tenn__
Chelsea, Mass............
Chester, Pa_________
Chicago, 111_________
Chicopee, Mass_____
Cicero, 111..................
Cincinnati, Ohio____
Clarksburg, W. V a ...
Cleveland, Ohio.........
Clifton, N. J...............
C olorado Springs.
Colo.........................
Columbia, S. C ..........
Columbus, Ga______
Columbus, Ohio.........
1Applications filed.




1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

1,662
87,500

400
1,000

4,915

5,000
25,000

£853,*130

142,000
24.000
10.000
450,000
16,100

8,000

4,831,662
203,000

2,540
15,200
95,653
13,740
176,311

303,800

978,000
1,368,330
563,343
10,000
150.000
391,797
200.000
175,000
339,500
130,997
212,634

100,085
90,422

~~857666‘
45,000
529,160
7,300

539.500
557.500

2,364,500
5,342,000

120,000
12,073,500
7,132,000

800
101,000

35,000
3,444,000
459,170

3,225,000
909,000

278,500
1,430,000
120,567

12,600
1,564,400
75,000
129,000

532,500
2,134,000

33,744
400

2,000

76,138

1,600
640,000

83,000
202,000
50,200
15,000
4,200

125,000
642,500

2
10

2,350
4,800

13
18
3
9

1,359
2,560
3,830
7,205

2
21
38

2,400
3,087
17,135

35" ....... 7,'365'
2
250
2
2,200
10
1,540
9
1,235
2
300
5
1,350
11
2,805
16
8,305
50
9,167
3

2,700

6
153
100
47
45
4
3
79
145
11
11

3,155
56.900
27.900
6,275
7,920
2,330
4,100
24,505
54,895
1,215
2,055

5
6

3,550
1.700

31
36
25
22
5
1
69
88

5,592
6.700
4,950
2,690
275
1,000
52.200
31.200

1

1

500

1
47
11
5
1

100
14,240
3,600
1,250
1,000

1
1

500
500

1

12,000

2

13,400

1
1
2

200
7,050

600

200
500
1,100

1

12,500

i

560

7
3
23
8
27
19
50
41
46
24
8
3
9
2
719
457
8
3
5
11
31
40
6
15
369
119
10
24

12,850
104,934
202,997
294,535
284,724
6,650
286,612
214.750
459.150
647,530
498,937
18,600
18,600
97,825
176,925
400,485
21,550
260,855
337,635
219,170
158.151
151,000
70,000
88,150
81,444
37,685,175
9,335,550
19,500
2,000
44.650
126.300
1,165,000
1,128,015
19.650
32,690
3,388,600
8,183,750
101.750
34,205
3,050
152.300
78,075
63,800
46,515
17,275
489,450
180,550

2,390

10

6,474
242,500
2,000
1,660
"77223*
1
13

350
2,417
200
2,500
250
4,200
150
6,000
61,000
94,500
14,800
693
34.000
3,300
10.000
750
5,500
250

600

3

24,000

33
141
165
220
200
265
232
651
404
441
383
109
36
87
54
241
134
178
157
311
143
58
35
144
117
5,556
4,020
240
174
217
119
1,362
1,443
138
114
4,168
2,692
481
359

195,905
543,935
249,775
78,000
237,677
336,831
3,192,540
4,402,047
4,401,233
1,651,272
963,492
874,674
1,748,173
1,210,337
471,575
58,680
182,977
784,525
9^,196
5,822,841
1,146,781
989,224
635,892
1,345,759
520,065
108,895
348,610
817,636
112,504,075
54,615,250
1,010,625
115,360
1,225,897
533,641
15,258,245
16,252,970
212,205
384,900
16,027,325
21,037,067
668,970
336,770

239
205
130
89
114
62
1,669
1,203

409,927
485,207
362,915
914,945
175,559
338,577
3,043,450
1.413,650

151

T a b le

A .—

Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterationst and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1980, by intended use of buildings— C o n t in u e d

00

PART 2.— NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
Public build­
ings

Cranston, R. I............
Cumberland, M d.......
Dallas, Tex.................

Davenport, Iowa.......
Dayton, Ohio.............
Decatur, HI.................
Denver, Colo..............
Des Moines, Iowa___

Dubuque, Iowa_____
Duluth, Minn............
Durham, N. C ...........
East Chicago, Ind .._.
East Cleveland, Ohio.
Easton, Pa..................




Total new nonresi­
dential buildings

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1933
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

Cost
9,000
39,000

Num­
ber

Cost

$10,000
64,000

Num­
ber

Cost
$38,000
4,000
201,000

500
1,023,650

9,500
2,465

Num­
ber

480,095
72,000

$2,400
2,800
2
12
5
3
66
101

62,000
190,600
40.000
65.000
20.000

150,000
391,400
635,500

195,000
51,000
428,412

1,336,949
346,850

4,000
2,275,940
5,634,928
100,000

1,200,000
22,000
176,100
123,650

326,264
37,062
116,000
16,000
35,500
26,093

272,500
199,181
45,000
125,000
1,014,642
710,000

450
2,635
935
260
35,401
66,450
1,800
3,365
7,265
9,410
7,943

483,300

58,480
1,500
4,267,000
909,350

Cost

465
409
40
26
3

82,250
69,500
10,877
8,485
2,700
70
1,775
29,325
16,750
950
1,065
2,020
515
390

Num­
ber

Cost

$400
1,500
750
3,900
1,022
4,400
702
1,700

4,000
145
25,700
5,000
75
5,005
5,400
13,000

Num­
ber
10
14
11
22
17
9
5
6
145
113
5
5
22
10
15
6
60
19
72
32
23
14
562
319
1
9
11
6
8
5
11
9
6
3
3

Cost

$87,500
199.000
107.100
69,850
161.000
113,925
7,350
24,650
2,881,800
2,257,033
26,900
9,300
324,050
249.100
143.600
183,400
1,058,350
98,000
783,500
188,200
431,550
327,962
8,491,311
2,372,991
225.000
740,025
489,700
590.000
283.600
72,483
73,727
46,955
119, 200
8,700
5,230

Num­
ber

Cost

$23,750
10,400
125
4,980
46,500
1,500
405
5,380
476
3
363
141
40
54
10
5

600
400,700
182,500
82,020
118,860
182,250
91,000
6,127

175
14.000
30.000

Num­
ber
122
97
163
111
497
368
140
74
475
585
34
30
326
346
916
720
463
251
1,547
1,199
583
585
11,506
6,475
155
114
430
356
25
19
314
120
91
74
94
64

Cost

$222,750
465,250
711,900
171,050
419,818
291,470
68,810
45,814
4,497,845
6,786,709
336,207
85,835
1,200,052
509,386
3,076,650
4,259,166
2,519,515
1,476,245
8,424,250
3,385,450
1,011,626
2,620,645
33,029,800
19,074,600
530,209
1,000,066
2,194,901
1,090,010
799,343
390,112
4,270,804
1,447,418
1,215,976
85,689
1,587,973
121,007

CITIES

Detroit, M ich.............

All other

IN PRINCIPAL

Danville, 111................

Stores, ware­
houses, etc.

PERMITS

Covington, K y ...........

Stables and
barns

Sheds

Year
Num­
ber

Council Bluffs, Iowa.

Schools, libraries,
etc.

BUILDING

City and State

Public works
and utilities

East Orange, N. J_.

1929
1930
East Providence, R. I . 1929
1930
East St. Louis, 111___ 1929
1930
Elgin, 111..................... 1929
1930
Elizabeth, N. J........... 1929
1930
Elkhart, Ind............... 1929
1930
Elmira, N. Y .............. 1929
1930
El Paso, Tex............... 1929
1930
Erie, Pa_____ _______ 1929
1930
Evanston, 111.............. 1929
1930
Evansville, Ind........... 1929
1930
Everett, Mass_______ 1929
1930
Everett, Wash............ 1929
1930
Fall River, M ais........ 1929
1930
Fitchburg, Mass____
1929
1930
Flint, M ich................. 1929
1930
Fond du Lac, Wis___ 1929
1930
Fort Wayne, Ind.......
1929
1930
Fort Worth, Tex........ 1929
1930
Fresno, Calif............... 1929
1930
Galveston, Tex........... 1929
1930
Gary, Ind...................
1929
1930
Grand Rapids, M ich. 1929
1930
Great Falls, Mont___ 1929
1930
Green Bay, Wis......... 1929
1930
Greensboro, N. C ____ 1929
1930




2

2
1

3

52,850

48,000
27,000

1,500

3
3

26,431
31,700

2

77,000

1
7

80,000
195,823

2

166,700

3

584,455

2

731,390

1

36,402

......
i

i§2,252"

31,615

1

373,000

4
1
1
2
2
2
3
1

725,000
40.000
8,500
2,384
35.000
700
25,269
5,000

2
14

200,000
511,650

1

13,000

2
2
2
5

100,834
10,550
1,000,747
721,382

8

9,555

1
1

1,000
25,000

1
7
3
1

40,000
32,300
75,800
43,085

2
1

74,700
6,000

2

31,915

i

14,"089

i

53,666

1

720,000

2

185,000

3
1

532,300
260,000

1
2
2
2

80,000
125.000
73,648
341.000

8
5
2
1

59,983
362,030
170,200
245,770

3

150,000

1

42,000

3
1
1

840,960
40,000
46,980

2
3
2
3

36,500
252,200
36,255
52,124

3
2
4
4

692.400
30,000
501.400
194, 775

1
3
2

146,000
779,980
95,240

50
4,400
1,000
11,600
8,710
1,900
4,500
2,950
130
2,863
2,732
1,740
2,807
1,905
33,100
24,875
4,000
4.500
10,995
5,495
2,100
5.300
4,815
5,335
5,485
11,046
7,992
6,420
16,016
15, 562
3,790
2,145
4.500
1,225
22,142
20,203
4,868
3.300
3,867
250
3,375
6,310
41,795
25,670
90,380
1,077
3,530
4,487

2

290

5

1,700

1

200

1

350

1

4,000

19

8,110

1

9
' 17
2

65,000

925
4,490
15,416

7
10
27
14
31
26
10
9
5
7
4
10
3
10
36
31
4
10
10
10
15
7
2
8
12
15
19
13
8
5
64
31
5
9
22
22
104
200
36
40
13
15
12
19
35
26
17
15
15
13
23
8

486,500
643,385
308,200
58,300
203,459
109,940
119,300
13,200
145.000
57,000
4,700
45,095
22,800
287.000
458,544
348,415
23.275
19,425
1,518,500
185.000
127,800
163,400
11,455
55,500
113,600
134,330
119,542
99,675
23,987
36,985
615,970
198,906
15,400
14,375
254,560
173,700
642,319
131,569
236,863
232,945
., 535,570
81.275
10,900
106,100
783.100
257,050
593,605
283,765
633.100
166,750
376,374
17,100

11
9

24,300
4,375

1
9
18

1,700
8,250
14,250

— ...

.........475"
1

5,000

1

500

3
5
2
7
21
7
1

2,250
28,943
340
117,300
82,250
39,500
2,500

2
5
1

20,200
650
40

170
23
3

115,517
13,230
10,800

1
15

2,250
6,000

54
4
3
3
13
17
7
1
4
2

2,613
3,715
10,000
1,100
113,160
34,365
15,772
168
2,360
71,900

299
214
318
252
363
232
292
216
491
336
267
194
279
244
254
267
714
618
285
185
387
284
152
123
250
225
246
246
111
88
2,178
896
168
143
946
602
479
468
262
242
258
208

851
287
191
284
218
135
91

2,574,228
1,694,938
1,500,786
301,065
954,238
542,310
437,763
245,758
2,009,700
1,514,900
404,566
209,814
587,898
864,424
1,422,622
1,072,468
2,047,647
1,287,461
2,621,950
1,308,250
2,097,875
675,959
509,530
1,185,385
351,925
366,330
352,327
856,786
120,416
732,950
4,541,590
1,776,198
471,922
113,431
2,888,053
1,065,377
5,723,641
7,446,738
483,618
452,871
2,077,190
1,026,915
1,358,570
334,360
2,845,460
1,151,835
2,199,880
718,450
1,675,297
706,235
1,732,379
258,894

T a b le

A .—

Number and estimated cost of buildings ( new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1930, by intended use of buildings— Continued

o

PART 2 -NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
Public build­
ings

Stables and
barns

Sheds

Stores, ware­
houses, etc.

All other

Total new nonresi­
dential buildings

Year
Num­
ber

Cost

1

$15,000

2

31,921

5
2
1

Cost
$86,800
39,866
44,000

1

9,000

1
1
1
7
6

4,000
16.500
16.500
750,516
148,803

1,000
4,650

1

3,000

2
5

31,843
192,985

1
3
6

60,000
668,000
780,000

2

356, 690

1
1
5
2

87,000
550.000
163.000
5,100

i

8,000

2

114,350

Cost

3
3
2
2
1
2

$115,000
74.000
168,000
112,000
65.000
189,859

1
2

65,000
518,821

1
1

810,000
155,500

2
6

595,000
1,172,532

1
1
14
13

5
5
1
3

100,656
370,000
947,140
162,700

232, 938
341,314
500,000
840,470

Num­
ber

Cost

8
19
1
8
16
27
16
16
3
23
1
2

$1,055
1,695
140
4,600
2,901
6,770
6,454
3,135
1,700
6,290
300
550

16
41
42
11
14
2

10,900
23,445
5,716
1,380
3,575
3,497

7
8
1

7,600
5,550
500

12
17

6,900
8,825

25
16
15
23
18
58
6

21, 250
2,000
2,800
1,859
1,450
8,199
5,700

Num­
ber

Cost

2
5
3

$30
60,450
34,000

1

4,000

1

850

3
1

48,025
175

1

1,800

2

1,000

1

1,500

Num­
ber

Cost

7
10
12
4
2
7
9
11
42
20
21
6
16
8
24
18
8
6
1
7
10
4

$101,400
68,975
84,616
20,900
10.300
24,650
20,540
108,500
454,000
38,580
376,100
83,700
562,645
19.300
1,570,310
138,320
11,020
13,050
32,112
60,089
238,850
89,-200

2
3
5
165
132
6
3
24
7
168
109
5
5

4,275
14.500
4,400
8,454,201
3,383,768
24,000
7,900
277,025
404,800
1,889,567
722,035
49.500
78,800

Num­
ber

Cost

3
7
25
22

$1,200
15,150
100,775
27,500

1

1,000

1
4
23
2
3
3
1
2
1

1,000
135
35,475
3,050
1,200
61,263
7,056
2,255
900

130
121

407,288
341,285

2
5

20,500
5,050

335
17
28

183,611
37,068
32,310

Num­
ber
56
94
182
147
130
156
228
199
279
295
264
80
275
250
359
324
166
126
59
69
163
116
15
20
99
100
652
561
188
124
169
174
1,838
2,081
325
254

Cost

$481,880
537, 576
1,079,961
769,605
275,051
298,064
735,664
937,064
2,453,350
1,077,611
546,700
1,066,410
5,669,130
1,037,681
10,789,997
4,299,898
95,485
108,835
183,174
177,944
1,042,015
179,225
304,900
280,025
383,225
1,205,620
14,992,868
7,072, 791
1,249,400
161,722
813,417
1,321,789
6,151,062
3,447,740
1,156,823
1,164,780

CITIES

i
1

Num­
ber

IN PRINCIPAL

1
800
1 3,512,000
5
69,036
1
52,744

Num­
ber

PERMITS

Greenville, S. C ______ 1929
1930
Greenwich, Conn......... 1929
1930
Hagerstown, M d_.
1929
1930
Hamilton, Ohio_____
1929
1930
Hammond, Ind______ 1929
1930
Hamtramck, M ich___ 1929
1930
Harrisburg, Pa_____
1929
1930
Hartford, Conn
1929
1930
Haverhill, Mass____
1929
1930
Hazleton, Pa___ _
1929
1930
Highland Park, Mich _ 1929
1930
Hoboken, N. J____
1929
1930
Holyoke, Mass_______ 1929
1930
1929
Houston, Tex __ _
1930
Huntington, W. V a_-. 1929
1930
1929
Hutchinson, Kans
1930
Indianapolis, Tnd
1929
1930
Irvington, N. J _ ____ 1929
1930




Schools, libraries,
etc.

BUILDING

City and State

Public works
and utilities

Jackson, Mich.........
Jacksonville, Fla__
Jamestown, N. Y__.
Jersey City, N. J—
Johnstown, Pa------Joliet, HI— -----------Joplin, M o...............
Kalamazoo, M ich ..
Kansas City, Kans.
Kansas City, M o ...
Kearny, N. J......... .
Kenosha, Wis..........
Kingston, N. Y ___
Knoxville, Tenn___
Kokomo, Ind______
Lakewood, Ohio___
Lancaster, Pa_____
Lansing, M ich_____
Lawrence, Mass___
Lebanon, Pa______
Lewiston, M e .........
Lexington, K y _____
Lima, Ohio..........
Lincoln, Nebr.........
Little Rock, Ark___
Long Beach, Calif. .




1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

34,830
56,545

830,000
9,640
100,550

22,000
89,000

827,300
9,282,803
10,000
17,000

52,000
14,550

272,000
15.000
66,941
5,800
32.000

2,115,000
180,000
5,000
62,000
2,000

45,000
15,600
1,208,333
17,500

386,000
21,564

6,795
4,000
200,000
""15,"600'
14.000
612,000
62.000
140,868
345.000
76.500
96.500
300.000
2,188,000
50.000
554,000
65.000
90,000
449,752
205,000

6,500

125,000
62,200

186,240
10,000
144,000

43
35
128

301,751
61,541
300,000

6,662
6,448
33,768
21,590

182,200
6,835
559, 575
259,475
65.715
39,500
5,008,650
277,417
34,300
32,650
759.600
429.000
199.500
8,250
5,850
79,340
140,750
94,525
1,427,500
701.600
46.000
57,800
129,800
224.500 ' "
96,075
138,850
360, 760
212,022
149,510
19,830
328.000
84,415
58,265
54,400
992,852
437.000
48,100
24.715
60.000
10,150

3,000
1,200

6,500
138,345
7,055
2,095
2,545

200

4,000
20,000
900
205

25

2,002
3
37
6
7
5
2
5
35
41
146
115
17
23
5

4,500
10,700
3,100
7.350
16,356
2,400
4.350
7,105
6,030
50,748
35,123
895
842
2,390

100

500
"6,556

525
160
7,835
1,675
585
10,000
1,000

400,000
746,800
3,750

109, 000
240,000

54,946
182,630
1,545,100

516,882
120,000
5,200

10

2,090,150
498,085

260,000
36,500
781,930
750,260

200
6,000

21,732
200
1,265
950
525
7,185
7,740

7,000
15,000

47
19
6
4
26
26
69
41
291
117

275.000
372,104
177,225
69,700
14,550
298,327
321.000
892,635
226,300
2,483,985
990, 710

5
52
31

3,350
5,550
57,955

1
1

6,555
3,000

7
2

5,400
250

3
37

26,455
69,000

22'

5,435

3

900

37

9,636

2
13
57
37
1
1
3
6

1,500
3,490
625,815
99,255
15,000
200
5,200
8,075

484
287
539
373
272
161
453
268
188
159
74
83
94
58
266
209
272
149
551
500
255
140
389
213
171
162
401
294
336
144
342
269
197
178
111

98

100

1

3,000

5

6,400

7

2,325

19

98,666

144
23
35
190
178
126
139
524
330
250
226
1,897
1,410

1.653.320
108,750
2,015,092
1,134,200
724,935
152,260
8,821,846
10,407,265
203,264
323,170
1,455,560
1,415,915
370,675
492,318
1,364,303
466,451
1.106.321
714,645
6,852,800
9,740,041
2,737,134
393,427
1,031,022
569,843
169,120
453,115
3,033,210
2,654,138
899.946
92,329
621,590
369,398
768,608
489,705
5,503,086
1,157,696
385,556
307,137
600,000
528,525
194,300
1,010,600
1,299,194
758,152
157,225
867.947
840,008
902,692
1,220,501
534,376
8,476,810
6,599,920

T a b le

A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings {new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1930, by intended use of buildings— Continued

to

PART 2.— NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
Public build­
ings

Louisville, K y___
Lowell, Mass....... .
Lynchburg, Va__

McKeesport, Pa._.
Macon, Ga........... .
Madison, Wis-----Malden, Mass____.
Manchester, N. H

Marion, Ind_____
Marion, Ohio........
Medford, Mass___
Memphis, Tenn...
Meriden, Conn___
Miami, Fla.......... .




Total new nonresi­
dential buildings

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

Cost

$195,000
2,620,000

353,485
50,000
270,000
40,000
5,000

Num­
ber

Cost

$776,700
1,294,670
1,214,000
4,000

"no,'666'
32,000
3,300

78,000

17,500
1,432, 524

$2,404,950
2,616,805
1,324,750
500.000
30.000
130.000
130.000
20.000
1,350,000

131,176

3,200
10,000
60,000
61,000

16,900
26,000
6,000

1,850
1,000

Cost

51,500
158,100

58,000

47,500
6,500

Num­
ber

2,200

4,950

Num­
ber

1,354
1,508
154
253
17
25
4
16
38
32
18
24
16
8
6
2
7
10
37
46
9
17

$250
2.300
534,102
459,839
25,010
106,600
2,265
1,530
450
5,335
2,960
3,262
1,188
1,878
4,800
2,070
3,920
350
950
3,600
3,445
4,465
1,855
3,035
1,725
613
1,175
1,050
4,075
1,560
4,420

181,822
300.000
237,400
110.000
925,600
100,000
114,458
76,500

Cost

21
173
169

2,565
46,550
55,175

Num­
ber

Cost

$12,250
20,600
300
405
500
4,025

Num­
ber
8
10
555
499
158
39
5
1
8
12

19
6
11
11

42,600

19
16
23
22
10

1,825

7
14
3
3
12

4
7

Cost
$32,300
45,550
9,968,700
5,648,628
2,036, 525
416,500
13,800
7,000
44,300
99,375
133,920
225, 700
186,000
247,875
102,777
76,345
617,475
145,132
80,200
41,100
14,160
3, 250
58,040
29,700
4,680
18,075
23.600
42.600
25,100
1,458,860
704,990
11,000
1,093,000
191,560

Cost

Num­
ber

64
171

$923,317
777,114

” io ‘

19,’ 325
4,125
5,270

185
10, 238
9,243
921
763

Num­
ber

7
10
1

1,000

40,950
19,000
3,000
1,965
1,350
4, 540
3,650

201

177
108
114
436
310
209
187
90
69
382
296
175
154
287
242
239

201
200

1,300
10,500
26,375
30,600
45,400

77
89
235

210

381
222
828
842
179
182
524
570

Cost
$70,661
334,373
33,880,140
31,451,568
5,945,400
3,761,060
152,125
581,530
480,880
816,152
1,144,778
1,924,066
284,723
317,608
316,862
413,605
1,826,777
935, 361
407,812
498,305
488,679
270.925
203,323
158,767
136,140
236,375
301,230
537.925
588,685
247,660
2,416,032
4,107,634
466,010
327,122
2,081,928
628,550

CITIES

Mansfield, Ohio—.

All other

IN PRINCIPAL

Lynn, Mass......... .

Stores, ware­
houses, etc.

PERMITS

Los Angeles, Calif.

Stables and
barns

Sheds

Year
Num­
ber

Lorain, Ohio_____

Schools, libraries,
etc.

BUILDING

City and State

Public works
and utilities

Milwaukee, Wis.........
Minneapolis, M in n ...
Mobile, Ala................
Moline, 111__________
Montclair, N. J______
Montgomery, Ala___
Mount Vernon, N. Y__
Muncie, Ind............ .
Muskegon, M ich__
Muskogee, Okla___
Nashville, Tenn___
Newark, N. J______
Newark, Ohio_____
New Bedford, M ass...
New Britain, Conn___
New Brunswick, N. J ..
Newburgh, N. Y __
New Castle, Pa____
New Haven, Conn___
New London, C onn ..
New Orleans, La.........
Newport, K y________
Newport, R. I_______
Newport News, Va___
New Rochelle, N. Y ...
Newton, Mass........




1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

i, 640,360
143,000
168,700

10,000
91,500
3,700
690,700

700.000
692,387
197.000
1,128,000
103.000
228,141

250

346,444
22,000

' ” 4,'500*

122,503

66
182
32
31

370,000
126,500

22,887
105,000

160,000
158,000
92,000
170,000

2,500
7,000

79,750
18,000

25.000
328.000
107.000
10,359

75,400
223,140
180,450
995

" 'm m
753.000
1,050,087
2,039,638
90.000

40,000

15,500
248,728

10,000
9,000
24,200
78,000

"160,"660

2

3

10
44
32
17
24

2

2
81
111

26,583
1,821,000
2,825,000
258,800

529,902
305,000
18,000
2,650
828,004
1,500

300
10,533

1,693,598
1,399,529

60,000

“ii'OOO

396,825
60,000
800,000

400,000

7,000
1,052
1,525
28,676
12,195
19,800
44,775
700
325
10,295
19,490

4,315
1,840
48,520
45,460
1,500
4,100
9,846
30,322

3,300,000
6,423,227
175,000

55,000
143,675

650

10
10

4,810
5,050

140,000

100,000
1,289, 558

580

57
57
119
80
34
17
12
4

3,350
2,540
1,578
1,283

350,000
128,000

29,265
110,542
4,875
18,235

16
17
101

125
8
5
34
26

16,500
26,620
7,860
5,863
1, 550
1, 570
12,384
6,570

200

150

14,415
200

.......350'
1,665
254,550
500
1,000

8
21
29
7
12
13
2
8
18
5
43
31
130
116
8

3

300

9
10
5
14
6
4
10
15

43,946
5,350

2
13
17
5
5
53
39
10
8
4
5
13

6

1,500
1,500
422

8

24
14

1,606,400
1,897,619
1,819,715
1,684,675
726,791
77,800
535,657
17,690
155,000
200,297
321,200
112,900
613,150
21.350
44,925
70,730
10,100
126.400
70.350
10,250
403,600
410,230
3,135,617
1,379,850
23.100
1,650
89.600
228.750
33.000
89,094
238.500
21.000
192.500
165,265
116, 575
17.000
350,260
249,381
39,200
27.000
291,422
311,554
59.100
43.600
32.000
52,500
167.750
333,800
619,300
222,106
102.400
91,060

311

227,175

21
8

35,250
7,425

3

13,350

1

1,000

3
53

4,000
33,625

5
10

6,750
3,160

3,387
1,944
2,378
1,922
47
54
210

1

12,000

6
3
1
6
1
19
13
2
2

52,750
12,000
150
13,600
5,000
195,920
8,724
325
3,100

6
3
1
1
1

3,265
65
5,000
16,630
3,000

1
11

1,500
6,050

3
2
84
116

35,000
1,000
9,201
10,509

2
1
2

850
3,500
3,800

205
236
168
101
124
176
112
569
261
358
225
81
78
286
207
1,167
757
138
81
230
237
168
133
98
57
109
66
251
191
463
414
141
138
315
252
198
150
293
358
211
141
429
313

17,237,422
11,880,438
9,639,150
5,668,910
839,743
446,841
981,464
660,158
334,029
654,170
1,053,320
358.592
1,987,430
679,713
693,412
172,132
1,496,280
721,382
253,681
467,894
1,858,715
3,848,305
20,159,244
6,657,138
342,165
126,070
446,780
654.593
161,573
406,310
357,235
630,590
514,520
844,417
629,435
126,050
8,540,820
13,621,153
500,558
2,605,555
7,308,356
4,209, 552
96,375
108,300
701,530
302,410
267,038
714,763
2,032,476
1,69S, 479
515,321
1,2

<1

00

T a b l e A .—

Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1980, % intended use of buildings— Continued
PART 2.— NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
Public build­
ings

Manhattan 1_____
Queens1.................
Richm ond1______

Norfolk, Va..................
Norristown, Pa............
Norwalk, Conn...........
Oakland, Calif.............

Ogden, U t a h .............
Oklahoma City, Okla.
Okmulgee, Okla...........
Omaha, Nebr...............
Orange, N. J _ .............
Oshkosh, Wis...............
Ottumwa, Iowa...........




Total new nonresi­
dential buildings

1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

Cost

Num­
ber

Cost

Num­
ber

Cost

$481,412
7,177,819
12,435,000
1,860,000
132.000
12,609,748
503.000
1,090,000
590.000
292,300
26,000

$148,000
44,000

101,200

$8,429,000
4,786,720
7.253.000
4.640.000
4.702.500
450.000
5.426.500
7,586,700
730.000
207.000

3,785
3,737
785,000

8,000
23,900

1,214,275
154,000
21,000

473,600
487,400
46.000
15.000

6,500
96,000
44,610
941,102
343,307

150.000
341,842
130,670
166,400
1,012,425
278.000

172,500
279,818
914,000
1,135,532

150,000
2,269,450
4,028,000

25

1,573,864
65,000
308,000

140,000
8,415
87.000
50.000
40.000

65.000
105,175
60.000

Num­
ber

Cost

$10,545
5,200

65
238
31
33
33
26
37

47,850
140,406
27,622
12,760
3,500
2,122
8,490
9,695

11

6,200

21

17
42
38
37
118

5,175
12,835
12,900
32,700
57,175

2

675
32,600
45,340
105,220
425
300
7,800
11,185
3,200
2,600
500

4
62
207
2
1
19
26
2
4
1
4

300

Num­
ber

Cost

$110,500

2,500
1,783
31,500
150
540
1,810
450
4,000

Num­
ber

110
59
208
118
55
22
340
266
64
72
58
61
19
26
5

2

3,800

1,200

13
9
95
61
5

2

1,600

150

26
23
150
105
11
1
56
91
1

Cost

$2,820,500
1.315.700
4.571.700
1,587,125
12,324,000
3,785,500
4,715,665
3,705,240
669.000
510,912
653,520
81,849
668,600
771,660
19,750
3,700
469,200
85.600
2,444,313
1,032,367
627.000
64,000
75,470
32.600
2,220,785
776,500
24,325
125
388,050
526,333
13,775
55,950
128,000
58,200

Num­
ber

Cost

2
$2,300
13,900
19
646 1,088,589
614,300
151,665
48
209,770
117,994
230
20,125
13
60,485
85
62
56,136
1
2,000
14
6,270
12

14,810

500
55,0(47
16,353
35,000
8,000

300
995
34,600
186.700
79,620
950
17.700

Num­
ber

1,333
806
4,528
3,438
479
454
6,833
5,921
1,094
935
529
442
505
426
173
139
294
217
1,319
989
296
165
49
81
1,635
1,012
23
11

472
447
103
100
184
158
44

Cost

$26,366,557
19,563,659
49,308,609
18,761,510
147,270,865
107,533,888
26,124,503
26,357,323
4,411,497
3,156,563
2,517,681
1,900,533
1,120,246
1,457,030
1,027,974
633,255
1,249,110
736,222
5,955,306
3,515,231
2,450,020
1,203,350
319,495
611,578
7,621,260
16,702,356
74,200
19,735
1,818,672
3,479,797
1,217,382
567,620
135,750
334,541
427,650
219,100

CITIES

Oak Park, 111....... ........

All other

IN PRINCIPAL

Niagara Falls, N. Y . . .

Stores, ware­
houses, etc.

PERMITS

Brooklyn1..... .......

Stables and

Sheds

Year
Num­
ber

New York City, N. Y.
The B ronx1..........

Schools, libraries,
etc.

BUILDING

City and State

Public works
and utilities

Paducah, K y.............. . 1929
1930
Pasadena, Calif............ 1929
1930
Passaic, N. J_________ 1929
1930
Paterson, N. 1_______ 1929
1930
Pawtucket, R. I______ 1929
1930
Peoria, 111_____ ______ 1929
1930
Perth Amboy, N. J___ 1929
1930
Petersburg, Va............. 1929
1930
Philadelphia, Pa.......... 1929
1930
Phoenix, Ariz............... 1929
1930
Pittsburgh, Pa_______ 1929
1930
Pittsfield, Mass........... 1929
1930
Plainfield, N. J............ 1929
1930
Pontiac, M ich.............. 1929
1930
Port Arthur, Tex......... 1929
1930
Port Huron, M ich....... 1929
1930
Portland, M e............... 1929
1930
Portland, Oreg............. 1929
1930
Portsmouth, Ohio....... 1929
1930
Portsmouth, Va........... 1929
1930
Poughkeepsie, N. Y___ 1929
1930
Providence, R. I _____ 1929
1930
Pueblo, Colo................ 1929
1930
Quincy, 111................... 1929
1930
Quincy, Mass.............. 1929
1930

6,200
168,328
867,000
163,000
3,000

45,000
22,950
57,700
179,850
128,000
1,058
5,000
100,0300
261,000
26,423
1,700

5,469,424
276.000
268.000
2,113,000
15,000

180,000
1,721,000
169,600
6,400
3,843,640
501,200

136,193

250,000
4,700

86,000

66,000

70,000
457.000
1,172,229
230.000

6,550
1,325
15

332.000
230.000
183.000

30,986
185,000

172, £00
101,400
155,000

215,000

26,000
18,500
300
20,000

5,~70d

3,100
20,000

15,000

7

150

7,161

2

625

2
2

’ ""814,"995
360,000
1,100,000

290
67,500
4,000
100
4,000
55,000

9,845
7,585
765

1,545,000
374,000

20

40

1,000
9,452,610
2,871,800
79,770

54
50
243
213

2,886

8,787
204,4C.0
109,935

11

1,100

12

eoo

16
3
4

200
100

8
68
49
132
8
8

11

7,500
80,940

20

16
11
6
6
4
3
207
137
135
77
72
69
15
17
5
12
61
22
53
24

2,000
1,095,955

15,850
4.500
8,791
6,312
1,280
2,405
590
26,620
9,320
8.500
3,225
190
324,820
14,590
11,540
3,425
7,765
13,735
4,925
24,175
100

6,400

11

7
31
44
25
3
42

1,000

5,318
2,450

16,000
225,000
2.291.000
2.510.000
20, f 00
190.000
180.000
452,500

6,000

119
104
*7

98,400
104,575
7,442
13,125
2,100
8,612
2,663

12

10

24
18

11.350
2,250
412,634
512,198
365,725
29,000
305,608
236,550
32,200
108,900
59.525
75.400
267.350
47,650
9,986
3,750
19,699,420
8,445,980
1,245,400
231,125
2,303,677
2,089,365
35.400
73.525
137,723
124,200
538,685
199,195
552,952
97,150
1,150
4,500
75,450
32,485
2,422,550
2,943,120
109,450
31.350
21,169
39,100
140,000
20,925
735, 700
514,225
249, 500

21, eoo

47,3£0
117, COO
365.350
148,910

1
331
473

750
114,869
103,389

1
8
10
1

98.000
19.000
15,475
50

4
2

73,200
6,300

74
71

619,115
565,040

9
49
31

992
106,262
118,400

1
3
1

400
1,250
100

46
21
13

13,345
10,087
2,607

......

” ” 9,l o o ’
10
23,550
3
625

1

8,600

14

14,450

.........675"
1,475
4
2,700
2
1
2

3,200
3,460

35
26
785
782
215
119
398
295
408
273
449
457
152
118
65
41
1,746
1,502
267
172
1,799
1,383
299
286
229
202
774
200
24
28
289
263
2,096
1,729
118
94
104
112
93
76
1,124
896
414
266
164
125
697
497

43,025
177,125
2,280,958
2,611,916
3,376,490
1,526,972
2,205,399
722,619
334,045
833,745
1,095,985
1,152,840
956.841
853,227
232,284
34,505
61,205,405
34,850,059
2,455,030
1,954,673
17,445,091
9,955,505
1,446,175
678,118
507,408
727.842
2,259,035
1,000,720
1,086,379
1, 579,302
151,535
32, 565
568,994
690,586
5,790,190
5,311,345
270,862
168,496
71,602
216,820
704,075
63,582
6,536,550
4,720,480
518,438
185,588
394,205
373,474
995,597
1,204,848

1Applications filed.




Or

T a b le

A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings {new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1930, by intended use of buildings— Continued
PART 2.— NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
Public build­
ings

Stables and
barns

Stores, ware­
houses, etc.

All other

Total new nonresi­
dential buildings

$1,878,000

Cost
$128,500
76,100
467,000

198,000
7,000
187,500

452,009

62,000
400,000

11, C24
173, 537

100,000
12,500
5,250

Num­
ber

Cost

Num­
ber

$223,000
150,000
473,750

1,184,253

789,387
1,824,848
435,000

Cost

$9,400
10,325
2,595
18,175
2,300
5,820
1,400
218
3
2
13
73
76
3

Num­
ber

Cost

Num­
ber

Cost

Num­
ber

$131,
63,
542,
7,
27,
14,
116,
13,
594,
1,284,
334,
172,
688,
47li
319,
236,

$51,500
500

50,089
5,000
88
1,030
28,100
46,027
13,350

$3,000
350
9,540
3,200
11,836
5,591
21,419
27,500
21,000

114,989

15,000
853,125
46,580

4,200
17,000
43,750

119,000
11,500
1,130,000
520,675
2,863,993

14,320
3,310
19,985
7,506
8
632
460
259
48
7
25
6
3
46
68
2
7

1,650
97.399
67,855
119,087
16,589
1,000
7,300
1,015
10,025
43.400
31,130
4,375
9,565

23,955
9,610
3,000
'" ilo

36
33
18
9
19
10
184
199
28
40
15

54
54
128
56

321
277,
479,
177,
261,
43,
2,249,
1,603,
257,
602,
119,
7,
34,
88,
850,
325,
1,462,
725,

6,446
3,"650
103
198

97,109
261,.097
4,400
2,000
11,900
1,700

Num­
ber
462
304
349
290
126
103
136
96
794
600
271
178
1,529
1,132
628
362
226
202
333
325
591
395
166
182
4,006
3,030
1,635
1,317
198
159
117
99
318
331
840
570

Cost
$1,211,832
2,533,968
2,430,215
1,190,406
120,935
163,950
224,189
321,340
5,192,511
3,877,266
843,942
1,824,294
6,650,169
4,252,329
1,894,982
997,560
184,239
158,141
1,087,011
1,018,835
1,151,420
1,758,291
383,296
1,166,861
8,089,367
8,336,667
4,197,074
6,232,388
607,000
160,650
672,890
426,415
1,774,088
1,974,970
10,019,391
5,023,175

CITIES

136,2C0
211,856

30.000
7,500
768,000
2,760
66,800
26.000

3,400

523, 550
96,448
250.000
60,000
1,044,000
302, 500
2,394,850
81,000
708.000
6,500

Cost

IN PRINCIPAL

833,732

Num­
ber

PERMITS

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
Revere, Mass..........
1930
Richmond, Ind.......
1929
1930
Richmond, V a____
1929
1930
1929
Roanoke, V a...........
1930
Rochester, N. Y ___
1929
1930
Rockford, Hl__.......
1929
1930
Rock Island, HI___
1929
1930
Sacramento, Calif-_
1929
1930
Saginaw, M ich........
1929
1930
St. Joseph, M o____
1929
1930
St. Louis, M o .........
1929
1930
St. Paul, Minn.......
1929
1930
St, Petersburg, Fla___ 1929
1930
Salem, Mass............... . 1929
1930
Salt Lake City, Utah.. 1929
1930
San Antonio, Tex....... 1929
1930

Cost

Racine, Wis_______




Sheds

Year
Num­
ber

Reading, Pa............

Schools, libraries,
etc.

BUILDING

City and State

Public works
and utilities

San Diego, Calif........

1929
1930
1929
1930
San Jose, Calif............ 1929
1930
Savannah, Ga_______ 1929
1930
Schenectady, N. Y.__ 1929
1930
Scranton, Pa________ 1929
1930
Seattle, Wash_______
1929
1930
Sheboygan, Wis_____ 1929
1930
Shreveport, La........... 1929
1930
Sioux City, Iowa____ 1929
1930
Sioux Falls, S. Dak__. 1929
1930
Somerville, Mass____ 1929
1930
South Bend, Ind____ 1929
1930
Spokane, Wash..........
1929
1930
Springfield, HL........... 1929
1930
Springfield, Mass......... 1929
1930
Springfield, M o____
1929
1930
Springfield, Ohio___
1929
1930
Stamford, Conn____
1929
1930
Steubenville, Ohio...
1929
1930
Stockton, Calif____
1929
1930
Superior, Wis............
1929
1930
Syracuse, N. Y ____
1929
1930
Tacoma, Wash_____
1929
1930
Tampa, Fla_____ ...
1929
1930
Taunton, Mass____
1929
1930
San Francisco, Calif_.

66551°— 32-




197,860
209,770
83,767
344,876

24,200
2,'542,"280
1,445,078
2,000

35,635
528, 725
100,000
2,066,440
4,200
1,000,000
66,000

275,983

40,000

93,500
28,700
100,000

43,500
500,000
228,710
25,000
40,000

10,000

369,000

14.000
9.000
114,400

206,000
31,150
28,000
81,200

573,417
240,000
84,350

10,000
201,000

40,000

1,300
15,000

70,000

656,600
259.000
5,245
334.000

2, 025,591
290,467
2,186,120
2, 003,368
155,000
1,007,610

791,154
921,000
1,037,000
306,500
208,531
1,500
240.000
145.000
30.000
40.000
638,382
518.000
675.000
26.000
150.000
160.000
740,268

25,000
181,000

1,000

119,500
113,000
1,500
56,860
34,500
125,000
6,300
3,595
41,500
8,000

60,400
1,157,012
509, 293
39.000
30.000
100,000

195
261
28
29
19
35

78,010
75,445
22,240
13,630
5,200
10,610

23
22
22
233
225
18
11

500
1,575
13,700
12,175
4,225
34,075
32,445
2,365
1,265

1

1,000

4
1
6

32,700
16,000
765

2
1

200
200

2

400

8
6

1,575
432

13,455
6,670
16
7
86
42
94
96
9
2
9
6
11
11
10
30
27
18
6
7
37
35
28
32
9
21
343
10
135
109
35
31

18,665
1,255
13,480
3,620
14,298
8,840
11,325
300
12,500
2,575
11,150
3,250
5,300
2,230
19,825
9,875

1

5,250

10

1,500

1

2,500

4

15,850

1
2
3
7

12,080
2,350
135
715

31

3,340

1,200

2,000
34,385
28,770
2,995
3,065
10,135
29,700
49,020
5,500
14,040
14, 775
4,216
4,284

94
25
19
15
4
12
16
5
5
143
130
21
13
131
39
32
43
22
19
13
10
38
42
56
33
16
13
37
18
37
22
7
29
21
10
8
4
18
21
1

1.198.375
571.200
3,267,550
979,057
275,070
514,285
39,100
9,700
240,750
581.200
91,300
45,146
2,755,825
3.049.375
11,370
25,920
873,356
344,787
453,110
498.400
430.300
125,900
858.000
97,035
407.000
95,175
1,135,705
345,920
988, 000
127.300
522,115
122.250
356,100
135,225
25,000
44,225
419,025
150.300
299,700
2,600
62,950
256,091
300
569,500
990,125
357,140
436.000
604.400
449.250
42,906
74,885
1,075

8
6

2,045
1,445

1
2
7

1,200
550
10,250

2
40

8,000
5,300

20

21,195

6
3
5

7,100
4,600
32,875

2

4,590

47
20
16
27
14
28
1
2
21
2
16
23

20,700
13,860
7,350
18,800
33,175
67,875
200
650
1,400
7,100
23,750
21,975

5
1

5,150
600

12
10

13,450
3,700

4
2
1
2

800
5,500
1,000
7,500

994
924
331
412
266
234
69
42
473
490
289
339
2,025
1,737
270
211
332
241
437
394
169
176
195
134
1,251
592
871
823
360
285
629
488
142
134
442
297
405
204
108
93
277
262
158
165
1,133
662
853
469
407
320
175
142

5,842,358
1,672,216
13,412,415
9,973,490
854,770
1,933,980
311,220
1,107,625
3.481.290
1,437,634
2,061,820
10,540,090
15,649,758
465,765
574,019
1,114,064
447,601
1,797,953
1,075,000
914,900
767,149
1,780,831
932,877
3.725.290
1,995,485
1,561,606
1,751,359
1,805,303
2,063,963
1,995,043
3,719,508
519,890
359,740
775,700
245,180
1,918,223
1,292,545
379,525
406,570
558,630
688,041
385,483
680,460
4,300,467
1,709,818
1,964,795
2,552,785
967,638
819,575
291,146
56,719

T a b l e A .—

Number and estimated cost of buildings (■new construction and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1980, by intended use of buildings— Continued

-I
00

PART 2.— NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
Public build­
ings

Topeka, Kans.......
Trenton, N. J____
Troy, N. Y ............

Tulsa, Okla...........
Union City, N. J—
Utica, N. Y ...........
Vallejo, Calif.........
Waco, Tex_______

Warren, Ohio------Washington, D. C.
Waterbury, Conn..
Waterloo, Iowa___
Watertown, Mass.
Watertown, N. Y_




Total new nonresi­
dential buildings

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

Cost

Num­
ber

Cost

Num­
ber

Cost

Num­
ber

Cost

Num­
ber

Cost

Num­
ber

Cost

Num­
ber

Cost

$77,000
$328,850
875,950
29,580
273,629
635,446
31,000
413,300
161,550
23,300
663,720

$ 100,000
160,000
28,000
50.000
101,000

55.000
2,200

163,150
952,”6o5

"i,"n2’ 605
2,724,965
17,750
1,073,637
532,000
460,800
222,040
1,299,838
61,985

$1,300
10,675
100
4,335
11,765
1,190
22,700
24,090
9,498
26,412
17,625

$500
1,500
■"'750'

1,000

227,000
” 72,"658
40,486
250,534
39,500
1,500
14,900
19,366,000
15,548,242

11,300
26,700
25,000
21,067
"M oo­
se,000
183,189
342,000
468,324
1,500
40,000

250,000

2,000

3,750
336,433
72,788
25.000
64.000
2,597,989
4,290,845
138.000
39,000
800
180.000
150.000
66,700
175.000
64,500

800
1,900
8,125
160
965
4,506
1,434
5,450
13,490
4,145
2,540
40,735
20,185
4,050
14,200
7,640
5,275
1,350
320
500

1,333
25
65
7,800

4,030
425

7
150
71
43
22
16
14
9
7
32
38
139
138
4
6
13
10
5
4
21
28
19
2
13
1
120
95
12
7

$12,025
479,010
842,412
240,150
107,200
57,173
78,830
87.800
63.500
338, 250
140,699
814,917
065,385
40.000
88.500
179,400
54.800
28,600
13.500
173,950
84,154
367,300
48.000
147.500
6,500
447,320
388,520
124.000
67,400
111.000

263,585
93.000
22,300
85.500
35.000

$5,540
500
800
600

1,685
1,300
1,750

5,950

700
120,000

1,000
15,050
4,960
3,620

Num­
ber
333
337
2,314
1,254
465
378
377
242
146
144
369
291
1,472
794
48
47
199
259
85
94
65
81
243
168
405
243
1,811
1,372
299
250
483
355
186
111
167
122

Cost
$232,474
281,890
6,679,361
6,367,638
762, 207
1,882,853
2,237, 259
1,810,527
959,684
2,239,961
1,459,722
958,361
5,626,391
3,731,226
172,315
487,300
1,104,775
517,821
161,839
154,052
1,300,859
421,235
1,149,470
1,085,110
532,595
171,845
29,796,686
28,151,738
1,158,450
1,217,324
666,460
578,950
501,905
437,270
650,605
147,005

CITIES

Waltham, M ass...

All other

IN PRINCIPAL

Tucson, Ariz_____

Stores, ware­
houses,, etc.

PERMITS

Toledo, Ohio_____

Stables and
barns

Sheds

Year
Num­
ber

Terre Haute, In d ..

Schools, libraries,
etc.

BUILDING

City and State

Public works
and utilities

West New York, N. J.
Wheeling, W. Va....... .
White Plains, N. Y.__.
Wichita, Kans_______
Wichita Falls, Tex___
Wilkes-Barre, Pa....... .
Wilkinsburg, Pa_____
Williamsport, Pa........
Wilmington, Del.........
Wilmington, N. C.......
Winston-Salem, N. C_.
Woonsocket, R. I........
Worcester, Mass..........
Yonkers, N. Y ___.......
York, Pa......................
Youngstown, Ohio___
Zanesville, Ohio..........
Total:
311 cities......
311 cities......




1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

357,494
110,000
1,312,812
10,000
156,487
500,000
51,475
6,561

15,000

2,000

100,000

8,500
150.000
345.000

1,070,000
712,000
234,034
245,215

250,000
8,000

49,000
49,234

139,410
573,683
1,500
3,993

1,700
250,900
116,000
300,000
954,965
220,980

75,000
690,500
155.000
225.000

6,350
271,640
93,600
2,250
342,700
127,500
417,000
27,690

149,500
1.625.000
1.505.000
50,000

20,700

32,300
24,990

367.000
344.000
4,000

327 87,553,812
434 85,820,846

629 45,443,758
603 45,237,457

753 128,897,346
754 126,908,372

10,649
10,725

12,216
10,867
8,135
550
6,625
5,000
3,860
950
300
980
2,410
5,075
3,886

5,000

8,570
9j 165
2,233
4,305
10,256
13,137
10,275
8,150
50
3,029
2,850
2,600
3,392
700

2,325
50

4,456,039
3,864,937

125

100
7,000
145

4,000
150"

324
267

1
15
15
111
91
20
16
15
10
1

52,
21,
152,
42,
508.
546,
1,138,
479,
302,
426,
124,
55,
5,
5,
19,
104,
78,
135,
60,
102,
304,
125,
103,
54,
162,
160,
878,
500,
28,
25,
402,
164,
98,
14,

3
3
1

3,155
6,300
32,684

1

150

5

6,700

4
140
214
1
1

1(5,555
37,866
109,521
4,300
4,700

1
1
1
4
7
2
29
16

300
1,940
50
3,575
1,621
1,000
11,058
40,125

3

6,350

1
2
2

4,000
5,300
675

23
163
144
193
153
632
490
59
35
241
233
152
97
340
406
593
520
60
53
453
314
138
117
607
496
542
462
240
144
912
542
101
61

351, 950
114, 700
462, 181
507, 412
3,354, 105
2,466, 249
3.225, 682
2,953, 415
528, 447
660,
1,552,
1.225, 594
134, 955
217, 714
427, 957
860, 117
2,263, 763
2,347, 741
211, 350
439, 700
2,512, 897
854, 755
809, 495
144, 220
2,391, 074
3,437, 872
6,230, 016
2,037, 532
421, 296
1,020, 718
1,702, 172
1,678, 782
129, 664
97, 414

O
3
H
W

&

968,941 12,085 254,474,954 4,488 8,751,957 180,110 1,190,680,617
438,425 8,916 127,832,430 4,255 5,913,967 136,940 879,878,402

«<r
co

T a b le

A.—Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1980, by intended use of buildings— Continued

00

PAR T a.— REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS, AND ADDITIONS TO OLD BUILDINGS, AND GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PERMITS
Repairs, etc., on residential buildings a

Number

A11an+/Yixm Po

Altoona, Pa____ - _____
ATncfai*Hom *NT V
An^ArcATi TtiiI
Asheville, N. C ___ __

Atlantic City, N. J----Auburn N Y

_

Augusta, Ga_________
Aurora 111_

___

Anijtin T at
TtflltimorA




Num­
ber

Cost

398
599

$106,881
144,883

18
36

$16,315
148,195

325
174
220
187
847
760
7
11
185

271,389
132,542
121,539
111, 171
187,475
186,755
87,400
13,825
111, 134

3

$3,876

14

37,624

1

4,000

95
93
55
67
124
86
3
6
47

156,000
528,625
140,361
175,886
133,178
88,651
9,000
7,900
237,080

176
147
155
108

68,635
50,202
61,170
39,980

1
2
2

2,500
1,097
1,100

130
88
40
43

196,737
117,020
16,933
44,125

334
306
103
94
1,222

325,297
340,649
252,428
51,985
147,115

15
14

79,000
192,028

3

1,134

201
162
35
23
271

707,692
454,165
73.345
18,588
152,105

349
357

232,285
136,434

72
58

160,600
138,438

265

152,934

77

213,531

Number
995
794
416
635
1,310
1,210
420
267
278
254
985
846
10
18
232
36
306
236
197
153
1,373
1,844
550
482
138
117
1,496
764
421
415
163
342
14,357
13,329

Cost
$862,716
867,969
123,196
293,078
1,914,312
1,449,018
427,389
661,167
265,776
287,057
358,277
275,406
96,400
25,725
348,214
77,768
265,372
169,722
79,200
85,205
3,259,804
1,562,181
1,111,989
986,842
325,773
70,573
300,354
209, 226
392,885
274,872
133,852
366,465
8,220,800 •
7,753,800

Grand total of all per­
mits—new construc­
tion and repairs, etc.

Number

5,560
2,421
737
826
1,784
1,612
1,388
671
432
367
1,932
1,481
164
135
552
155
598
383
353
302
2,946
3,043
701
593
382
342
1,884
989
821
692
1,139
1,234
19,332
16,943

Cost
$21,639,643
8,776, 754
1,404,416
981,138
9,034,990
9,004,273
4,509,654
2,270,422
918,896
1,096,697
1,983,915
1,369,459
1,051,432
991,900
1,740,298
610,162
2,236,288
442,282
650,759
344,835
12,563,855
8,445,860
7,483,138
1,400,607
1,490,427
1,134.013
1,136,661
715,330
2,237,321
1,401,762
4,477,113
3,335,227
33,174,900
27,820,785

Rank
in
cost
of
con­
struc­
tion

20
36
220
223
49
35
94
119
258
212
178
171
251
221
196
273
166
287
286
295
38
38
57
167
210
203
235
258
165
166
96
79
12
10

Installation
permits

Num­
ber

Cost

585
793

$244,566
507,907

222
1,172

241,084
349,240

122
78
61
32

39,254
23,461
13.396
4,198

81
98
56
28
324
432
317
173
5
29
40
7
3
12

24,424
21,217
11,585
4,936
648,756
479,239
227,777
306,562
455
7,990
6,135
2,270
920
33,550

CITIES

Ashtabula, Ohio______
Atlanta Ga

Cost

Total repairs, etc.’

IN PRINCIPAL

Alton, III_____________

Num­
ber

Repairs, etc., on non­
residents build­
ings 3

PERMITS

Alhanv NT Y

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

Cost

N onhousekeeping
dwellings

BUILDING

Year

City and State

Housekeeping
dwellings

Bangor, Me________

12,755
20,750
61,207
70,151

1,057
718
175
140

261,965
166,582
157,685
89,900

11
12
114
140

7,250
25,090
82,018
61,585
141
78
665
748
1,672
1,648
51
53

156,390
92,730
205.767
176,141
377,919
322,565
40,360
65.000
34.000

3,800
3,520
274
354
398
322
142
129
831
1,003

1,859,140
1,787,477
185,574
271,152
148,821
101,952
418,238
343,769
492,000
496,936

21.000

45,085
20,770
14,810
104
371
301
423
390
334
271

1Applications filed.

20,186
334,603
233,677
192,004
148,195
112,345
75,045

23

18,135
6,875
63,964
96,981

39
26
476
514
198
170
1,105
802
177
142
1,212
1,143
9
46
378
365
1,093
1,024
192
110
2,224
2,269
2.036
1,944
59
70
35
16
5,617
5,445
416
493
515
431
222
181
1,189
1,419
157
65
40
32
51
126
645
495
578
521
547
436

288
30,890
164
597,765
27,625
278
145
560,375
125,171
289
25
692
582,556
4,212
167,132
759
232
858,164
26
6,932
121,160
686
139
3,002,135
102,090
465
3,963,605
69
428,880
690,845
1,457
1,308,971
225
291,440
458,022
1,054
1,269,864
188
32.000
189,685
329
1,107,130
243
23.000
112,900
226
791,750
243
783,132
1,852
2,581,646
150
125
73,971
838,534
1,561
2,606,131
172
101
40,331
75
7,325
261
992,845
255
25,090
247
748,892
251
2
800
116
112,250
194,268
843
1,777,318
191
1,600
118
57,080
120,265
584
743,325
255
2
450
665,161
1,806
6,369,100
66
510,928
1,541
2,985,789
89
16,925
40
627,825
801,140
604
2,905,192
144
35
7,795
25
21,300
40,475
154,505
381
1,065,400
214
30
10,121
1,559
845,845
1,051,612
2,747
3,987,909
876
107
184,424
1,521
398,365
574,506
2,814
2,255,199
82,661
460
120
745
359
740,131
1,118,795
3,071
8,233,925
52
296
373,535
696,100
2,542
2,419,983
114
599
250,385
8
329.000
369,360
746
3,698,547
1
112
50
9
7,000
171.000
243,000
589
2,460,000
8
5,000
110
12
52.000
86,000
197
1,118,300
240
7
27.000
48,000
700,648
130
261
736,210
1,722
8,016,256
10,611,606
8,169
53,834,471
7,538
7
6,974,203
1,841
253,200
5,711,629
7,752,306
7,496
26,906,300
11
142
224,565
410,139
1,172
4,242,322
100 .........47" ....... 27,"950
53,085
116
114,075
438,312
1,140
2,618,360
65
100
23,645
117
131,060
279,881
927
1,466,834
213
109
198,345
300,297
772
1,113,417
208
80
337,375
755,613
479
5,021,603
86
52
96,332
440,101
380
3,687,061
73
358
832,985
1,324,985
4,326
24,127,500
18
416
859,085
1,356,021
3,763
14,824,861
4
5,100
20
210,592
360
571,297
292
25,961
75
23
133,625
178,710
182
813,875
241
112
53,563
12
19,550
40,320
130
459,695
298
17
41,137
55,947
85
197,022
308
51
109,180
109,180
198
447,472
302
20
20,000
1,038
18
9,920
31,144
357
396,048
290
274
1,400,597
1,735,200
941
12,165,840
39
194
879,844
1,113,521
773
11,062,711
26
155
535,754
727,758
1,131
6,163,791
70
131
295,730
443,925
832
2,582,097
105
213
215,895
328,240
1,507
3,456,197
124
83
26,725
165
133,977
209,022
930
1,585,196
155
24,575
90
3For years in which figures are shown for total repairs, etc., only, no details were reported.

TABLE




28
14
362
374

GENERAL

1929
1930
1929
1930
Battle Creek, M ich___ 1929
1930
Bay City, Mich____
1929
1930
Bayonne, N. J_____
1929
1930
Beaumont, Tex____
1929
1930
Bellsville, 111.............
1929
1930
Bellingham, Wash........ 1929
1930
Berkeley, Calif__.....
1929
1930
Bethlehem, Pa_____
1929
1930
Binghamton, N. Y__
1929
1930
Birmingham, A la ...
1929
1930
Bloomfield, N. J___
1929
1930
Bloomington, HI___
1929
1930
Boston, Mass.1_____
1929
1930
Bridgeport, C o n n ...
1929
1930
Brockton, Mass.......
1929
1930
Brookline, Mass___
1929
1930
Buffalo, N. Y ...........
1929
1930
Burlington, Iowa___
1929
1930
Butler, Pa_________
1929
1930
Butte, M ont....... .....
1929
1930
Cambridge, M ass...
1929
1930
Camden, N. J______
1929
1930
Canton, Ohio______
1929
1930
Baton Rouge, La___

00

T a b l e A .—

Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1980, by intended use of buildings— Continued

00

to

PART 3.— REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS, AND ADDITIONS TO OLD BUILDINGS, AND GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PERMITS— Continued
Repairs, etc., on residential buildings

Year

Number

375
327
1,901
1,790
133
133
65
70
3,488
3,080
74
69
179
77
4,733
3,773
106
93
1,622
1,542
171
158
219
209
224
273

236,256
122,827
264,990
380,494
59,201
37,020
179,600
94,050
2,374,295
1,897, 542
47,000
40,425
329,971
125,313
2,318,510
1,034,660
34,195
43,470
1,191,550
952,900
85,895
67,515
105,528
86,512
133,965
115,500

101
160

$4,510

825
”80

107,500
2,600
40,000
13,750

Cost
$390,991
239,621
12,150
11,360
94,820
62,805

125
126
760
857
86
72
37
31
2,330
1,861
32
20
7
8
1,450
349
25
32
2,672
2,584

381,322
230,201
517,647
246,222
59,955
30,120
110, 750
102,975
4,742,020
3,364,625
73.350
31,125
31.350
85,015
412,150
599,497
21,855
44,600
8,608,825
4,254,700

107
102
45
38

166,096
55,028
60,250
65,940

Number

665
767
65
70
490
328
267
175
500
453
2,674
2,647
219
205
102
101
5,818
4,941
106
93
186
86
6,183
4,122
131
125
4,294
4,134
171
158
328
312
269
313

Cost

$577,132
476,176
51,922
40,365
220,927
157,097
529,855
254,382
617,578
353,028
787,147
626,716
119,156
67,140
290.350
197,025
7,116,315
5,262,167
120.350
72,375
361,321
210,408
2,730 660
1,634,157
56,050
88,070
9,800,375
5,315,100
85,895
67,515
274,224
181,540
194,215
195,190

Grand total of all per­
mits—new construc­
tion and repairs, etc.

Number

1,216
1,227
203
117
673
438
719
456
1,086
824
3,218
2,978
292
244
343
252
15,849
10,380
417
315
562
241
8,971
6,667
327
256
9,863
7,637
920
740
632
573
620
535

Cost
$2,905,969
2,032,213
726,397
164,545
670,804
1,102,690
2,240,986
6,880,506
3,728,845
2,587,630
2,260,866
2,934,150
802,221
202,535
1,099,410
1,139,061
210,797,640
85,749,167
1,441,825
354,935
3,609,418
1,117,349
31,037,065
33,160,609
497,955
514,470
37,782,500
32,554,467
2,465,465
1,492,435
1,030,026
926,322
1,254,705
1,902,760

Rank
in
cost
of
con­
struc­
tion

143
128
276
309
285
210
164
44
111
104
163
92
265
307
246
202
2
2
217
294
117
206
13
7
296
284
9
8
154
161
253
227
229
133

Installation
permits

Num­
ber

Cost

$300
13,515
17,020
10,956
36,908

427

100,978
85,137

20
76
795
372

27,020
30,200
3,180,500
1,488,000

7,932
9,538
28
31

5,087,057
6,908,173
5,319
3,587

78

29,130

2,245

CITIES

$186,141
236,555
39,772
29,005
126,107
94,292

Num­
ber

Cost

Total repairs, etc.

IN PRINCIPAL




564
607
56
37
389
230

Num­
ber

Repairs, etc., on non­
residential build­
ings

PERMITS

Cedar Rapids, Iowa___ 1929
1930
1929
Central Falls, R. I . .
1930
Charleston, S. C „ ........ 1929
1930
1929
Charleston, W. V a „
1930
1929
Charlotte, N. C.......
1930
Chattanooga, Tenn___ 1929
1930
1929
Chelsea, Mass..........
1930
1929
Chester, Pa..............
1930
1929
Chicago, 111..............
1930
1929
Chicopee, Mass____
1930
1929
Cicero, 111.................
1930
1929
Cincinnati, Ohio___
1930
Clarksburg, W. V a..
1929
1930
1929
Cleveland, Ohio.......
1930
Clifton, N. J ............
1929
1930
Colorado Springs, Colo. 1929
1930
Columbia, S. C ........
1929
1930

Cost

Nonhousekeeping
dwellings

BUILDING

City and State

Housekeeping
dwellings

80,595
33,077
461,700
304,550
140,800
86,500
65,075
81,050
79,490
82,785
37,932
23,097
672,279
664,372
49,532
24,903
258,227
208,544
293,264
194,389
151,550
71,945

167
235

139,289
125,955

951
729
42
61
142
215
27
41
194
162
234
271
444

372,091
251,337
34,525
42,610
156,132
168,947
35,550
24,010
158,191
88,111
203,332
197,828
176,604

75

71,887

4

4,900

1

8,000

8
3
2

112
138

70,440
93,273

4

283
318

93,813
73,222

30
91
344
308
38
33
42
56
1

123,797
67,017
1,001,350
709,500
63.500
103,700
lfi5,950
102,300
3,000

26
11
531
628
42
32
77
104
301
274
25
29

42.935
23,230
1,525,738
1,116,235
300,537
59.936
69,001
236,910
1,573,084
590,944
91,200
33,925

114
90

687,863
157,658

134
239
26
39

362,005
550,802
205,189
44,845

6,440
10,800
8,506

6
50
34
86
79
159
161
32

17,754
48,327
15,065
139,419
106,657
278,630
229,570
114,527

815

77
6

120,256
32,600

2
99
54

27,000
136,208
40,798

1
2

300
1,900

5

3,100

1

2,000

4
2

6,875
1,200

4
5
62
1

4,450
7,980
46,825
6,000

207
269
1,004
910
156
128
121
172
73
140
100
73
2,072
2,079
79
62
1,002
1,066
957
812
165
126
3,739
3,480
281
325
7,163
5,858
580
334
1,160
968
72
100
142
222
77
83
283
243
393
432
476
588
193
144
356
337

204,392
100,394
1,464,950
1,014,050
204.300
193.300
231,025
185,350
82,490
82,785
87,742
47,527
2,198,017
1,780,607
354,519
92,819
374,053
451,454
1,866,348
785,333
242,750
105,870
1,940,150
1,727,550
827,152
283.613
15, 539,188
6,539,455
93,568
160,317
805,983
802,139
244.614
87,455
156,132
194,701
83,877
45,515
308,410
203,274
481,962
427,398
291,131
244,098
191,511
125,873
231,211
135,908

2
382
372

27,000
230,021
114,020

415
3.557
2,594
347
257
409
343
988
727
303
190
3,251
3,325
228
139
1,489
1.557
2,017
1,697
839
447
6,111
5,043
1,171
1,113
26,554
15,313
793
507
1,700
1,390
284
233
525
367
198
213
394
321
769
678
988
964
895
566
787
625
731
433
756

955,011
711,496
10,613,050
5,616,100
674,050
769,550
1,479,425
628,900
2,649,308
1,596,555
550,500
250,453
9,659,660
11,027,546
1,129,976
378,347
2,341,756
2,462,330
6,342,675
5,958,274
3,890,215
1,991,015
16,576,250
7,648,450
4,081,628
4,011,153
100,567,497
48,369,293
833,710
1,480,369
3,685,729
2,167,954
1,863,013
1,046,810
5,307,338
1,801,145
1,658,353
843,404
2,004,751
568,981
5,945,690
2,627,236
2,904,709
1,273,938
2,391,854
1,364,613
1,380,359
735,716
4,094,700
2,383,900
1,060,637
527,274

257
259
45
56
284
248
211
268
149
154
293
301
46
27
237
292
160
109
67
50
109
130
25
41
105
67
4
6
263
164
113
122
187
217
81
141
201
234
176
276
74
98
145
187
158
173
221
256
104
116
250
282

13,383
9,046

2,236,049
1,215,485

5

3,000

11

5,890

1
281
451

600
114,753
118,365

61

666

79
213

33,150
132,650

623

1,959

85
37
54

79,575
20,286
46,202

1

4,800

16
8
108
149
215
273

47,265
1,155
7,440
15,210
31,368
28,195

6
283
89

346
79,857
27,946

66

20,172

TABLE




177
177
658
602
118
90
79
115
72
140
70
60
1,541
1,451
33
25
863
961
656
538
140
97

GENERAL

Columbus, Ga.............. 1929
1930
Columbus, Ohio........... 1929
1930
Council Bluffs, Iowa__. 1929
1930
Covington, K y „ ........... 1929
1930
Cranston, R. I ._ ........... 1929
1930
Cumberland, M d ......... 1929
1930
Dallas, Tex______ ____ 1929
1930
Danville, 111__________ 1929
1930
Davenport, Iowa.......... 1929
1930
Dayton, Ohio................ 1929
1930
Decatur, 111__________ 1929
1930
Denver, Colo................ 1929
1930
Des Moines; Iowa......... 1929
1930
Detroit, Mich............... 1929
1930
Dubuque, Iowa............ 1929
1930
Duluth, M inn........... . 1929
1930
Durham, N. C.............. 1929
1930
East Chicago, Ind......... 1929
1930
East Cleveland, Ohio.. 1929
1930
Easton, Pa.................... 1929
1930
East Orange, N. J_____ 1929
1930
East Providence, R. I__ 1929
1930
East St. Louis, 111......... 1929
1930
Elgin, 111....... ........ ........ 1929
1930
Elizabeth, N. J ............ 1929
1930
Elkhart, Ind......... ........ 1929
1930

OO
CO

T a b le

A .—

Number and estimated cost of buildings {new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1930, by intended use of buildings— Continued

00

PART 3.— REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS, AND ADDITIONS TO OLD BUILDINGS, AND GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PERMITS— Continued
Repairs, etc., on residential buildings

Year

Number

El Paso, Tex......... .
Erie, Pa............. .......
Evanston, 111----------

Everett, Mass..........
Everett, Wash.........
Fall River, Mass___
Fitchburg, Mass___

Fond du Lac, Wis__.
Fort Wayne, Ind----Fort Worth, Tex___
Fresno, Calif....... .....
Galveston, Tex------Gary, Ind..................
Grand Rapids, Mich




$129,656
90,139
144, 267
191,197
271, 548
272, 783
559,400
526,250
146,068

194
204
169
369
176
154
63
56
2,006
1,315
160
118
295
294
1,456
1,491

51,000
64,475
59,935
51,625
73,088
47,574
44,323
19,865
651,369
278,353
83,300
57,940
186,217
188,069
708,303
625,576

572
1,123
949
375

124,979
181,913
173,323
494,500

2,093
1,382

494,470
344,385

$2,875
3,050
875

26,000

2,500

187
26

4,800
20,600
220,748
16,570

55

43,050
146,865

Num­
ber

Cost

203
164
166
124
192
174
83
85
73

$240,833
128,410
179,263
191,938
2,432,634
591,809
304.950
329.950
179,817

24
22
193
105
143
121
24
14
766
561
70
27
137
158
37

258,202
73,030
537,335
233,810
162,691
162,341
191,021
18,005
1,289,169
274,494
64,645
16,737
1,054,514
270,615
62,878
112,026

575
196
97
25

359,814
157,907
53,807
78,000

166
193

580,955
563,855

Number
552
424
469
521
654
669
303
276
566
1,182
218
228
362
474
319
284
87
70
2,772
1,876
230
145
435
461
1,680
1,610
1,369
1,147
1,319
1,054
455
326
2,259
1,575

Cost
$373,364
221,599
324,405
383,135
2,704,182
864,592
864,350
856,200
325,885
418,175
309,202
163,505
597,270
285,435
235,779
212,415
235,344
37,870
1,940,538
552,847
147,945
74,677
1,245,531
479,284
991,929
754,172
534,330
484,793
339,820
270,180
619,365
322,680
1,075,425
908,240

Grand total of all per­ Rank
mits—new construc­
in
tion and repairs, etc. cost
of
con­
struc­
tion
Number
Cost
901
708
1,181
1,123
1,694
1,480
736
513
1,354
1.639
418
384
690
766
607
561
230
180
6,717
3,104
445
325
1,927
1,351
3,237
2,616
1,784
1,496
1,895
1,376
1,162
743
4,415
2.640

$1,518,697
1,826,173
4,324,851
2,937,105
6,431,038
3,302,453
8,196,300
3,103,450
4,420,660
1,761,184
1,124,532
1,532,490
1,207,935
830,365
792,256
1,188,691
546,360
879,320
14,684,493
3,993,708
795,047
399,608
7,039,292
3,099,086
11,262,046
10,463,409
1,698,773
1,332,714
3,613,162
1,717,460
3,146,335
1,176,840
6,086,985
2,921,975

139
99
91
65
80
53
85
97
142
238
159
231
238
268
195
294
230
31
68
267
289
60
86
44
30
197
176
116
143
133
197
73

Installation
permits

Num­
ber

Cost

208

$20,380

122

16,665

2,472

406,043

16,430

1,675
75
157
140

53,904
314,448

51
59
22
19
651
675

5,926
33,253
11,410
14,120
128,065
151,509

CITIES

Flint, M ich------------

345
256
300
397
462
495
220
191
493

Cost

Total repairs, etc.

IN PRINCIPAL

Evansville, Ind........

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

Num­
ber

Repairs, etc., on nonresidential build­
ings

PERMITS

Elmira, N. Y ----------

Cost

Nonhousekeeping
dwellings

BUILDING

City and State

Housekeeping
dwellings

Great Falls, M ont........
Green Bay, Wis______
Greensboro, N. O _____
Greenville, S. C_______
Greenwich, Conn_____
Hagerstown, M d______
Hamilton, Ohio_______
Hammond, Ind_______
Hamtramck, Mich.......
Harrisburg, Pa_______

Haverhill, Mass............
Hazleton, Pa.................
Highland Park, Mich._

Holyoke, Mass_______
Houston, Tex________

192
192
102
62

187,442
113,501
128,720
48,400

22
120
106

12,060
15,100
53,875
55,637

10
8
18

80,785
56,241
151,222
90,843
313,205
252,950
95,072
86,780
367,133
266,292
110,517
118,530

42
31
126
79
604
595
164
129
328
292
67

Huntington, W. Va___
Hutchinson, Kans........
Indianapolis, Ind..........
Irvington, N. J _______
Jackson, M ich..............
Jacksonville, Fla...........
Jamestown, N. Y _____
Jersey City, N. J_____
Johnstown, Pa________




119
124
423
310
915
910
332
315
225
176

2,390
"167500

12.500
5,750
54.500
57,650
61,225
800

700

21,205
36,000

55
40
14
28
115
100
99
43
15
20
117
119
26
54
5
37
137
114
708
405
58
63
3
7
56
57
73
61

230
196
251
223
357
320
344
288
177
198
53
52
267
222
223
272
373
232
363
363
1,732
968
129
136
63
61
215
114
248
250
175
123
531
365
73
30
138
144
3,686
2,332
161
155
549
389
1,519
1,552
497
444
631
516
292
236

251,130
170,457
295,118
240,173
440,422
222,141
213,248
248,539
602,040
706,015
72,070
40,954
665,594
253,139
406,150
201,542
472,415
153,426
923,400
635,377
3,894,557
1,441,540
164.355
120,050
150,345
109,822
289,855
108,215
409,477
520,238
527,070
289,375
538,214
489,387
42,060
54,600
73,585
179,737
1,658,626
1,266,123
172,570
85,850
778,873
302,542
949,345
787,990
341,018
214,632
1,139,578
871,987
213,527
280,550

722
485
694
550
710
471
493
445
625
506
262
249
756
5V2
777
704
643
322
778
676
2,192
1,339
336
294
137
146
383
235
265
272
298
250
3,972
2,741
306
201
452
412
6,785
4,919
567
445
1,227
736
2,557
2,103
936
692
1,219
835
522
412

3,456,662
1,284,692
3,328,825
1,368,558
3,133,865
766,185
1,171,103
1,055,275
6,841,641
4,335,820
756,946
572,018
2,411,352
1,552,153
4,154,300
1,875,733
1,065,615
1,298,536
7,957,530
2,518,808
16,144,354
6,364,738
390,640
340,860
448,247
498,278
2,327,370
624,440
747,877
827,763
1,256,295
1,702,995
29,133,254
17,264,993
1,455,360
769,622
1,586,482
1,894,011
14,843,583
7,451,293
2,134,243
1,700,480
3,492,043
697,792
4,580,137
2,410,265
1,927,203
782,854
14,584,804
12,167,252
682,341
695,520

123
183
130
172
94
134
249
234
215
64
63
273
275
156 .
157
102
135
11
148
181
55
106
1
444
26
341
46
306 .
296
301
285
162
269
274
239
228
144
14
17
215
247
205
134
904
30
42
1,096
170
145
121
262
1
92
1,201
115
1,202
183
244
32
266
24
282
263

103,161
39,49a
11,175
9,575

77

619,022
27,395

16,606

TABLE

Hoboken, N. J________

108.165
69,529
185,808
122,580
100,591
90,592
67,404
108,029
544,705
540,765
16,470
18,620
45,200
55,949
202,450
142,617
270,265
94,328
222,675
155,664
813,172
501.166
72,435
52,010
91,474
87,450

GENERAL

Hartford, Conn_______

175
156
237
195
242
220
239
220
128
145
38
32
150
103
192
216
354
195
218
235
1,024
562
71
73
60
54

766,203
649,653

1,000
220,220

177,706
60,026
90,853
400

oo
Crt

T a b le

A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new constructionyand repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1980, by intended use of buildings— Continued

00

P A R T 3.— REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS, AND ADDITIONS TO OLD BUILDINGS, AND GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PERMITS— Continuedi
Repairs, etc., on residential buildings

Year

Number

$202,795
54,955
40,096
197,352
111, 914

9

236
93
75

186,950
61,619
37,290

308
299

140,684
84,542

219
167
100
98
254
264

82,830
48,944
55,490
42,744
151,093
174,416

149
30
83
14
6
291
392

Num­
ber

Cost

$2,800

81
35
46
39
144

$261,830
22,300
162,025
180,540
124,460

2
6

435
1,150

241
21
13

1,711,000
24,140
6,965

1

150,000

33
46

275,160
106,675

55
55
17
23
49
27

137,015
72,622
43,500
29,850
311,025
74,655

74,747

116

299,115

38.000
33,950
80.000
10,000
83,818
128,902

19
10

54,000
38,750

4
162
152

15,300
367,610
108,335

2
15
7

2

200
5,020
7,900

13,000

Number

329
279
166
138
956
668
334
349
490
477
116
94
319
258
342
345
362
216
274
222
117
123
318
298
471
265
119

126
49
93
14
12
453
544

Cost
$415,332
464,625
77,255
204,921
377,892
236,374
79,740
113,608
907,950
1,897,950
86,194
45,405
892,174
157,034
565.844
191,217
175,467
188,463
219.845
121,566
98,990
72,794
467,138
256,971
547,625
373,862
399,440
240,785
92.000
72,700
80.000
38,300
451,428
237,237

Grand total of all per­
mits—new construc­
tion and repairs, etc.

Number

575
437
313
232
1,349
973
867
673
1,946
1,503
512
295
945
522
566
547
1,220
667
673
383
550
456
671
520
1,308
722
241
236
168
249
75
72
745
798

Cost
$3,333,682
2,471,040
645,180
843,939
2,409,585
1,171,550
1,844,411
1,350,053
14,844,550
15,663,491
3,847,528
842,832
4,577,074
1,483,907
1,135,464
862,132
5,498,852
3,626,768
1,347,891
262,965
1,830,380
1,481,992
1,981,696
1,380,976
8,737,894
2,064,747
854,496
617,922
792,000
744,625
466,300
1,199,900
2,115,552
1,223,819

Rank
in
cost
of
con­
struc­
tion

jLUOl/tlliaiilVU
permits

Num­
ber

Cost

129
3
108
$8,500
287
233
157
198
94
189
10,450
174
448
310,250
29
124
29,800
19
3,610
110
58
8
8,240
235
253,953
401
93
162
382
135,006
236
231
80 .........25" ....... 46,"378
68
75
35,346
222
300
160
115,200
190
187
163
33,200
179
169
50
125
262
271
269
254
297
192
2,145
7
172
71
21,347
190

CITIES

198
131
83
917
524

Cost

Total repairs, etc.

IN PRINCIPAL




Num­
ber

Repairs, etc., on nonresidential build­
ings

PERMITS

_____
1929
1930
. . . . . . . . . 1929
1930
Kalamazoo, M ich__ __ 1929
1930
Kansas City, K an s..._ 1929
1930
Kansas City, M o _____ 1929
1930
Kearny, N. J . . . . . . . . . . . 1929
1930
Kenosha, W is _______ 1929
1930
Kingston N. Y
1929
1930
Knoxville, Tenn___ __ 1929
1930
Kokomo, In d .. . . . . . . _ 1929
1930
Lakewood, O h io ....._ 1929
1930
Lancaster, Pa . . . . . . . . 1929
1930
1929
Lansing, Mich . . .
1930
1929
Lawrence, M!ass
1930
1929
Lebanon, Pa
1930
1929
Lewiston, IVIe
1930
1929
Lexington, K y .
1930

Joliet, Til

Joplin, M o

Cost

Nonhousekeeping
dwellings

BUILDING

City and State

Housekeeping
dwellings

Lima, Ohio........... ........
Lincoln, Nebr________
Little Rock, Ark...........
Long Beach, Calif.____
Lorain, Ohio_________
Los Angeles, Calif........
Louisville, K y ..............
Lowell, Mass................
Lynchburg, Va........ .
Lynn, Mass.......... ........

Macon, Ga___________
Madison, Wis________
Malden, Mass________

Marion, Ind..................
Marion, Ohio................
Medford, Mass_______
Memphis, Tenn............

92
47

37,990
21,955

589
419
258
272
192
180
366
386
796
818

122,640
206,755
81,510
84,830
75,783
65,954
278,591
348,480
207,602
210,733

430
326
170
174
421
523
106
106
167

219,8§i
176,891
161,976
97,420
98,403
133,516
37,412
59,721
64,460

2

950

. 11

52
164
169

13,885
80, 505
101,041

328
1,043
1,305

101, 318
336, 628
403,508

2,575

1,027, 420

586
490

147,518
91,531

42
40
39
34
176
245

197,550
34,377
129,835
69,130
388,896
463,461

45
36

166,670
19,755

138
237
179
172
73
72
175
250
159
152

2,026,270
639,390
320,715
300,649
108,459
122,570
777,730
192,055
160,613
80,792

7,0C0

95
79
72
78
245
246
59
55
12

468,325
149,550
63,760
84,050
258,136
109,151
216,390
61,500
4,650

3

3,750

12
44
23

10,500
571,305
23,415

30

21,412

56
836
1,043

84,644
523, 540
417,177

553

1, 626,805

127
131

231, 962
98,695

3

• 1,475

4

1,800

2

2,800

Meriden, Conn........ .
Miami, Fla....................
Milwaukee, W is...........
Minneapolis, Minn___
Mobile, A la..I________
Moline, 111___ ________




7

6, 275

265
236
199
182
831
1,072
1,291
1,910
137
83
14,358
15,706
727
656
439
444
265
252
541
636
955
970
1,253
560
525
405
242
252
666
771
165
161
190
276
53
64
208
195
1,469
1,984
477
414
1,879
2,348
2,529
2,254
2,689
3,128
709
425
720
621

254,390
98,259
230,740
142, 592
641,259
675,151
616,575
794,810
204,660
41,710
12,200,929
10,703,784
2,148,910
846,145
405,025
385,479
184,242
188,524
1,056,321
540,535
368,215
291, 525
385,723
280,687
688,156
326,441
225,736
181,470
356,539
243, 617
253,802
121,221
76,110
123,279
15,490
24,385
651,810
128,206
1,396,649
1, 531,117
204,670
207,374
860,168
820,685
5,662, 819
6,443,552
4,469,775
2,654,225
182,423
291,604
385, 755
190,226

397
383
980
609
1,376
1,496
4,949
4,502
526
351
31,722
30,614
2,466
1,756
676
663
464
451
1,133
1,041
1,320
1,231
1,416
674
1,155
845
534
475
1,044
1,095
518
444
305
380
357
288
904
625
3,178
3,693
769
660
2,511
3,032
7,501
4,939
6,054
5,932
1, 055
680
1,063
934

431,115
1,017,506
2,560,098
1,597,734
3,268,217
2,251,437
18,043,815
13,058,035
898,121
652,133
93,020,160
75,356,715
13,204,910
6,937,105
703,575
1,146,909
1,002,777
1,635,523
3,941,899
2,972,201
1,674,208
1,051,533
987,625
776,527
4,974,483
2,347,852
1,893,948
1,133,275
1,241,253
764,802
1,116,955
717,838
302,300
393,204
507,170
612,110
3,483,495
1,656,066
8,061,546
9,501,481
1,278,280
817,396
3,615,016
1,916,885
37,947,243
25,285,322
20,960,135
13,449,340
1,666,888
1,100,220
2,224,519
1,381,154

303
219
151
153
131
121
24
22
259
267
5
3
36
43
279
201
254
150
108
90
198
216
256
246
88
118
184
204
230
250
241
257
309
291
295
272
122
148
54
33
227
240
115
132
8
13 "
22
21
200
211
167
168

689
597

105,770
122,345

8,940
5,052

3,326,747
1,138,741

12
12

4, ioo
1,413

531
406
125
1,981

192,567
131,359
26,913
389,687

1

3,752

1,197

678,801

6
510

266,381
171,871

TABLE

Manchester, N. H ........
Mansfield, Ohio....... .

56,840
62,407
100,905
71,662
252,363
211,690

GENERAL

McKeesport, Pa...........

223
193
160
144
655
827

21,122 "~7,"082,'375

00

T a b l e A .—

Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1980, by intended use of buildings— C o n t in u e d

00
00

PART 3.— REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS, AND ADDITIONS TO OLD BUILDINGS, AND GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PERMITS— Continued
Repairs, etc., on residential buildings

City and State

Year
Number

Montgomery, Ala.......
Mount Vernon, N. Y_
Muncie, Ind____ ____

Newark, N. J________
Newark, Ohio..... ........

New Britain, Conn___
New Brunswick, N. J_
Newburgh, N. Y _____
New Castle, Pa...........
New Haven, Conn___

1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

New London, Conn__
New Orleans, L a........




1929
1930

1,097
157
163
1,273
743

257,507
238,270
159,844
387,229
85,208

$4,000

70
110
133
81
168

662, 332
1,191, 709
653,258
21,895
21,265
113,150
90,495
294,197

64
75
77
41
101

82,646
125,426
77,700
28,300
42,310
26,445

146
74

260,020
121,670
43,556

$90,773
1,395,343
434,707
77,234
34,256
57,290
23,220

15,140
23,840
1,520
769
552
53
46
226
177
573

Cost

3,550

4
508
410
3
6
107
83
206

4,400
3,725,787
1, 526,608
1,100
1,980
112,225
110,825
22,229
91,970
89,144
172,427
191,280
73,590
44,400

1,000

27,700

302
44
. 31

455,170
156,030
32,325

Number

292
216
1,748
1,170
267
296
1,354
911
527
471
41
50
1,555
1,524
1,277
962
56
52
333
268
779
420
116
124
123
87
130
100
706
641
190
105
914
737

Cost

$793,812
354,747
422,209
352,280
1,633,613
594, 551
464.463
119.464
404,089
239,591
72,430
47,060
1,038,833
666,732
4,917,496
2,179,866
22,995
23,245
225,375
204,870
316,426
176,172
175,616
242,270
250,127
219,580
115,900
70,845
1,169,126
715,190
277,700
75,881
1,982,920
1,099,776

681
451
2,320
1,558
577
596
2,236
1,216
1,046
777
167
151
2,327
2,062
2,763
1,882
284
162
581
520
1,051
592
279
199
285
175
445
340
1,323
1,193
433
308
1,933
1,227

$3,369,971
1,939,867
2,768,599
1,274,102
6,179,243
4,197,164
2,061,167
443,863
2,475,404
1,195,423
426,161
567.554
5,695,045
5,517,037
28,838,220
12,379,194
677,560
225,215
788.555
982,463
1,247,999
896,082
1,560,619
970,260
1,102,347
1,217,847
1,109,785
521,895
12,762,246
15,924,143
1,611,158
3,138,116
11,970,850
6,487,118

128
131
146
186
69
65
173
286
153
193
304
277
77
57
16
303
270
222
244
228
207
224
245
191
342
283
37
18
204
84
40
45

Installation
permits

Num­
ber

Cost

1,521

*6,461

214

57,'201

4,075

1,019,3

64

6,942

1,130
"58,"620
200
"i,’ 535

c it ie s

New Bedford, Mass___

$354,747

Num­
ber

Grand total of all per­ Rank
mits—new construc­
in
tion and repairs, etc. cost
of
con­
struc­
tion
Number
Cost

principal

Muskogee, Okla______
Nashville, Tenn_____

216

Cost

Total repairs, etc.

in

Muskegon, Mich.........

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929

Num­
ber

Repairs, etc., on nonresidential build­
ings

permits

Montclair, N. J ...........

Cost

N onhousekeeping
dwellings

building

Housekeeping

Newport, K y ................ 1929
1930
Newport, R. I ________ 1929
1930
Newport News, Va___ 1929
1930
New Rochelle, N. Y __ 1929
1930
Newton, Mass..............

36
51

26,675
31,065

5
8

4,300
6,700

122
773
874

234,950
75,470
85,190

54
399
414

85,585
237,596
229,272

468,704
332, 737

1929
1930
Brooklyn1________ 1929
1930
Manhattan 1......... 1929
1930
Queens1.................. 1929
1930
Richm ond1_______ 1929
1930
Niagara Falls, N. Y ___ 1929
1930
Norfolk, Va................... 1929
1930
Norristown, Pa_______ 1929
1930
Norwalk, Conn_______ 1929
1930
Oakland, Calif________ 1929
1930
Oak Park, HI................ 1929
1930
Ogden, Utah___......... . 1929
1930
Oklahoma City, Okla_ 1929
1930
Okmulgee, Okla............ 1929
1930
Omaha, Nebr_________ 1929
1930
Orange, N. J_________ 1929
1930
Oshkosh, Wis................ 1929
1930
Ottumwa, Iowa............ 1929
1930
Paducah, K y _________ 1929
I 1930

493
467
4,826
4,419
1,254
1,372
3,000
3,993
563
619
693
735

1,442,934
1,790,718
5,044,095
4,149,110
6,858,925
5,337,188
1,473,888
1,593,905
451,270
373, 578
251,039
251,487

218
191
268
234

94,288
64,678
269,060
209,745

116
83
30
50
540
737
14
4
129
120

130,715
66,175
37,750
38,275
323,930
385,774
12,830
3,100
126, 195
72.049

143
181
79

86,149
87, 571
47,375

1Applications filed.




26
15

16,515
7,105

128
106

45
34
246
173
13
123

102,175
52,450
8,331,576
1,005,815
76,650
394,373

62
14
14

100,050
20,560
7,483

9

12,385

1
17
1

5.000
8.740
3.000

13
5

i

436, 525
25,900

4,689
5,328
1,717
1,691
1,353
1,292,
1,481
2,170
328
378
304
262

109
114
419
370
1,521
1,738
740
609

290,750
213,865
1,646,975
1,186,545
769,627
1,316,473
7,584,939
5,668,994

310
304
202
196
372
179
56
55

237,670
747,692

469
406

706,374
980,429

1,387
1,048

6,857,045
5,870,127

63
53

4,742,533
5,412,365
10, 774.185
6,123,736
31,992,659
25,299,540
6,205,516
4,219,100
437,607
829,533
432,138
670,370

5,182
5,795
6,588
6,144
2,853
2,837
4,494
6,286
891
1,059
1,011
1,011
468
487
322
311
369
317
2,167
1,675
134
122
50
85
678
958
31
18
257
236
370
298
167
209
80
68
32
19

6,185,467
7,203,083
15,920.455
10,325,296
47,183,160
31,642,543
7,756,054
6,207,378
888,877
1,303,161
703,737
929,340
547,085
290,477
298,255
218, 597
408,035
332, 751
1,935,181
1,404,973
230,815
202,805
189, 500
137,125
2,022, 575
1,090,919
57,750
18,805
1,838,625
734, 654
413,715
297,727
214,869
177,801
67,375
93,560
120,890
8,405

7,811
7,507
13,271
11,503
3,692
3,396
16,152
17,583
2,868
2,539
1,805
1,640
1,185
1,092
598
518
908
693
4,264
3,154
529
315
172
257
4,280
3,270
55
30
1,046
854
492
428
465
427
165
151
157
129

95,666,174
56,115,642
146,015,664
70,631,906
595,522,025
198,445,431
94,509, 667
77,343,961
10,583,689
7,628,849
5,070,592
3,735,648
2,730,206
2,603,327
1,880,059
1,331,052
3,529,745
2,365,723
14,396,188
9,085,238
5,720,895
1,861,455
700,695
1,009,578
22,500,630
26,412,100
141,950
39,540
5,581,497
5,121,226
2,366,097
1,527,847
780,644
746,297
717,525
527,460
345,060
332,470

104
111
101
83

203,967
141,534
138,975
123,006

17
22
19
35
125
216
%7
14
128
116

95,100
127,890
148,750
98,850
1,262,120
679,245
44,920
15, 705
1,712,430
662,605

24
28
1

128,720
90,230
20,000

6
4

104,375
1,300

1
1

85
71
147
103
186
177
120
117
33
34
76
136
280
220
19
12
311
311
79
61
9
160
271
252
278
281
307
298

8

1,382

255

103,093

2,444

847,645

6,463

2,960,132

1,044

489,368

68

4,480

637

51,453

302

56,380

36

15,796

666

199,520

2

21

179

41,715

69

22,432

10

3,235

65

15,805

TABLE

341
300

30,975
37,765
210,745
320,535
313,066
314,462
922,663
857,869

GENERAL

1929
1930

New York City, N .Y .:
The Bronx1______

41
59
159
176
1,172
1,288
319
290

OO
CD

T a b le

A .—

Number and estimated cost of buildings ( new construction, and repairs, alterations, one? additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1980, by intended use of buildings— Continued

CD
O

PAR T 3.— REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS, AND ADDITIONS TO OLD BUILDINGS, AND GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PERMITS—ContmnfA
Repairs, etc., on residential buildings

Year

Number

Cost

Num­
ber

873
320
285

$667,024
192, 762
140,156

164
124

99,645
81,950

114
49

111, 745
27,556
16,782

341
199
2,269
2,022
134
186
116
187
514
186

123,450
90,528
2,498,646
1,184,829
109,255
104,625
111,628
126,115
270,093
54,681

‘ Iso,"666'

27
19
456
498
3,145
2,536

19,875
18,825
111, 550
106,949
1,178,335
1,051,855

2,885
900

$443,5 7
293, 747
268,070
193,110
246,830

$5,000

135,555
41,768
31,705

5,500

167
146
626
704
64
64
143
78
120
73

292,145
201,936
4,630,480
2,969,258
529,150
77,278
311,231
124,721
208,605
49,380

14
10
327
318
1,425
1,267

46,565
24,350
711,067
288,241
1.659.510
1.799.510

Number

2,693
3,070
699
571
1,510
1,401
232
188
413
339
159
143
76
64
4,392
3,643
508
346
2,895
2,726
189
250
259
259
730
642
41
29
794
820
4,570

Cost
$1,498,469
1,110,551
486,509
408,226
1,138, 710
782,074
292, 755
333, 780
468,592
451,105
388,760
247,300
69,324
48,487
9,151,455
9,389,611
415,595
297,964
7,129,126
4,164,087
788,405
181,903
422,859
259,119
478,698
104,061
487,147
240,359
66,440
43,175
825,502
396,090
2,837,845
2,851,365

Grand total of all per­ Rank
mits—new construc­
in
tion and repairs, etc. cost
of
con­
struc­
tion
Number
Cost
3,834
4,040
976
709
2,123
1,785
904
597
1,207
1,150
186
131
10.388
6,430
1,446
794
6,128
5,115
686
709
607
546
2,299
572
972
1,070
119
89
1,214
1,173
7,646
6,041

$6,986,704
5,886,328
4,869, 749
2,098,698
4,871,609
2, 088,193
1,994,925
1.847.125
3, 603,660
3,436,495
1.671.126
1,245,477
450,153
213,667
104,405, 545
53,141, 770
5,234,777
3,275,852
35,638,867
20,729,727
3,403,680
1,854,171
2,010,023
1,643,295
6,218,915
1,280,121
1,978,579
2,429,720
323,850
149,290
2,133,188
1,567,156
15,503,680
12,063,305

Installation
permits

Num­
ber

Cost

62
52 1
90
$56,444
123
578
89
124 ......... 63’ ....... 45,‘ 40i
177
138
118
76
199
189
300
72
19,200
305
O
6
4
2~57S~ 2,179,825
82
13,214
90
81
10
15
127
137
175
149
38,890
204
68
9,405
184
37
180
112 .........48’ .........7^430
308
310
171
156
27
1,944
561,075
25

CITIES

2,197
379

Cost

Total repairs, etc.

IN PRINCIPAL




Num­
ber

Repairs, etc., on non­
residential build­
ings

PERMITS

Pasadena, Calif---------- 19 '9
1931
Passaic, N. J------ ------ - 1929
1930
Paterson, N. J.............. 1929
1930
Pawtucket, B. I _ . ....... 1929
1930
Peoria, 111.......... - ......... 1929
1930
Perth Amboy, N. J----- 1929
1930
Petersburg, Va.............. 1929
1930
Philadelphia, Pa........... 1929
1930
Phoenix, Ariz................ 1929
1930
Pittsburgh, Pa............ - 1929
1930
Pittsfield, Mass............. 1929
1930
Plainfield, N. J - - ......... 1929
1930
Pontiac, M ich------------ 1929
1930
Port Arthur, Tex-------- 1929
1930
Port Huron, M ich........ 1929
1930
Portland, M e .—........... 1929
1930
Portland, Oreg.............. 1929

Cost

Nonhousekeeping
dwellings

BUILDING

City and State

Housekeeping
dwellings

49,635
41,686
101,630
97,763
53,188
38,990
1,310,145
1,163,593

44
801
641

23,100
246,685
216,493

200
1,450
1,575
216
191
192
143
590
556
238
177
636
538
278
251

138,188
416,440
293,225
163,690
109,030
82,165
58,527
285,669
248,033
62,355
62,862
298,432
250,833
136,855
132,365

67
843
525
376
131
2,500
3,074
369
301
420
335
190
206
1,622
1,315

25
6
36
46
73
64
736
778

45,449
5,110
70,445
50,652
201,075
290,195
1,912,600
1,784,761

5
81
98

10,700
553,610
115,175

108
439
416
28
49
74
22
346
321
46
68
812
588
276
201

365,282
544,425
223,865
28,750
194,921
202,598
18,735
936,131
830,485
173,195
180,808
1,799,597
1,060,151
684.405
544.405

280,850
257,070
234,052
157,754

244
246
187
154

434,924
293,368
236,620
207,861

37,338
1,027,662
1,067,833

83
1,213
1,003

168,76'2
3,545,790
2,190,647

409,966
150,250
494,303
265,495
146,118
166,448
1,216,287
447,956
______I____

1

2,000

8
8
41

9,325
30,859
25,825

2

700

6

2,950

2

17
9

85,000

396,610
16,165

129
101
94
135
128
155
193
399

105,800
73,800
109,165
139,930
871,075
247,775
448,890
414,916

205
124
231
255
127
105
3,402
3,624
682
701
73
49
882
739
396
316
1,897
2,032
244
242
266
165
942
877
284
245
1,448
1,128
554
452
1,127
740
311
1,0!
712
530
274
214
3,730
4,086
2,929
2,142
498
402
514
470
318
361
1,815
1,714
1,753
1,629

95,084
46,796
174,075
148,415
254,263
329,185
3,222,745
2,948,354
450,117
216,834
66,145
33,800
800,295
331,668
479,234
512,795
991,724
542,915
192,440
304,651
284,763
77,262
1,224,750
1,078,518
235,550
243,670
2,098,029
1,401,984
821,260
676,770
2, 111, 311
715,967
715,774
550,438
470,672
365,615
548,299
206,100
4,970,062
3,274,645
2,278,589
1,619,019
515,700
224,050
603,468
405,425
1,017,193
414,223
1,665,177
862,872
754,158
764,931

420
250
386
421
282
223
5,046
4,835
1,281
1,028
321
240
1,920
1,438
1,264
723
2,483
2,417
452
401
540
337
2,151
1,668

700
499
3,429
2,490
1,652
1,039
1,530
1,068
1,101
1,636
1,801
1.054
558
470
9,533

8,120

5.055
3,780
763
635
704
615
1,089
948
4,550
3.234
3,811
3,219

718,096
373,942
407,377
542,035
1,622,188
744,667
14,943,495
10, 742,334
1,572,455
538,222
831,750
1,031,674
4,216,542
2,723,641
4,782,777
3.924.208
6,110,566
2,473,571
730,375
702,101
1.063.252
621,652
9,146,225
5,951,200
2,219,829
2,605,874
13,303,261
8.011.253
5,083,442
2,907,530
2,911,650
1.328.208
4,381,389
3,028,756
3,120,772
2,690,423
1,404,445
1,619,511
27,073,669
17.321.832
9,365,275
10,682,039
1,445,900
797,400
1.885.208
1,162,440
5,690,591
4,274,493
18,070,350
8,487,719
11.414.833
5,425,922

293
305
279

28
206
280
264
218

-

....

21

3,355

984

146,498

101

96
91
70
72
107
275
260
249
270
48
51
168
102

35
40
84
94
142
178
98
87
136
97
219
151
17
16
47
29
216
242
185
199
78
64
23
37
42

2

26,000

41

13,390

3

675

10

2,580

153

55,539

TABLE




180
118
194
209
54
41
2,666
2,846

GENERAL

“Portsmouth, Ohio_____ 1929
1930
1929
1930
Poughkeepsie, N. Y ___ 1929
1930
Providence, R. I ______ 1929
1930
Pueblo, Colo_________ 1929
1930
Quincy, HI___________ 1929
1930
Quincy, Mass................ 1929
1930
Racine, Wis. ............ 1929
1930
Reading, Pa__________ 1929
1930
Revere, Mass_________ 1929
1930
Richmond, Ind............. 1929
1930
Richmond, Va________ 1929
1930
Roanoke, Va_________ 1929
1930
Rochester, N. Y ______ 1929
1930
Rockford, 111.......... ...... 1929
1930
Rock Island, HI_______ 1929
1930
Sacramento, Calif_____ 1929
1930
Saginaw, Mich________ 1929
1930
St. Joseph, M o________ 1929
1930
St. Louis, M o_____ . . . . 1929
1930
St. Paul, M inn_______ 1929
1930
St. Petersburg, Fla____ 1929
1930
Salem, Mass__________ 1929
1930
Salt Lake City, U tah .. 1929
1930
San Antonio, Tex_____ 1929
1930
San Diego, Calif______ 1929
1930

Portsmouth, Va______

1

175

53

9,279

104

26,033

99

364,550

60

13,200

855

155,241

CD

T a b le

A*

Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1980, by intended use of buildings— C o n t in u e d

CD

to

PART 3 — REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS, AND ADDITIONS TO OLD BUILDINGS, AND GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PERMITS— Continued
Repairs, etc., on residential buildings
Year

Number
San Francisco, Calif...

Savannah, Ga________
Schenectady, N. Y ___
Scranton, Pa____ ____

Sheboygan, Wis______
Shreveport, La_______
Sioux City, Iowa_____
Sioux Falls, S. Dak___
Somerville, Mass_____

Spokane, Wash______
Springfield, 111_______
Springfield, Mass____
Springfield, M o...........
Springfield, Ohio_____
Stamford, Conn______




$1,419,606
992,067
131,975
89,815

381
603

232,650
241,866

331

202,264

462
430
1,499
1,126
108
114
115
85
262
286
548
811
767
756
467
393
189
171
107
106
270
187
153
117

162,519
136,914
337,404
234,644
51,490
44,180
173,590
89,041
140,373
122,194
187,260
189,859
300,389
236,424
204,468
234,210
169,140
105,450
68,550
71,385
103,340
51,070
232,225
99,443

$386,105
84,150
54,175

176,210

Num­
ber
1,280
1,140
151
161

$2,853,164
1,860,182
171,175
222,905

229
136

351,475
264,450

76

376,129

175
140
548
399
45
40
21
26

153,114
209,732
621,555
388, 680
338,625
277,195
185,850
212,856
163,450
159,835
218,075
132,315
518,365
387, 525
173,430
218,951
623,706
499,505
221,180
253,275
51,971
71,405
316,100
258,370

120

230,780
39,035
6
33
47
7
1

8,150
364,660
178,200
8,150
124,000

Cost

109
45
166
244
295
85
150
199
135
55
69
78
84
111
86

Number
3,702
3,237
424
368
91
61
610
739
481
442
4,100
3,684
627
570
2,047
1,525
153
154
136
111
382
395
593
977
1,016
1,061
552
549
421
353
169
176
348
271
264
203

Cost
$4,668,875
2,936.399
303,150
366,895
142,742 !
101, 570 I
584,125 '
506,316
940,190
754,603
6,853,450
3,072,230
315,633
346,646
968,959
623.324
390,115
321,375
359,440
301.897
303,823
282,029
405,335
322,174
1,049,534
662,984
377.898
461.311
1,157,506
783,155
297,880
448,660
166.311
122,475
548.325
357,813

Grand total of all per­ Rank
in
mits—new construc­
tion and repairs, etc. cost
of
con­
struc­
Number
Cost
tion
5,505
4,951
937
755
317
187
1,341
1,390
880
826
7.924
6,577
1,019
876
2,838
1.924
748
705
444
450
639
555
2,445
1,760
2,241
2,169
1,101
964
1,367
1,062
522
426
1,006
651
882
490

$33,426,317
22.414.449
2,428,185
3,402,840
1,122,012
1,063,610
3,430,850
5,338,906
% 947,264
3,189, 548
29.101.450
30,355,973
1,467,998
1,407,165
3,535,381
1,541,829
3,130,368
3,411,875
1,952,940
2,001,363
3,076,154
1,380,406
7,014,705
3,708,609
4,147,860
3,640,843
3,112,006
3,179,424
5,095,049
5,703,263
1,524,521
1,115,225
1,750,421
777,155
4, 504,948
2,621,458

11
14
155
78
239
213
125
60
141
82
15
9
212
165
119
158
135
77
182
129
138
170
61
72
103
74
137
83
83
54
208
207
195
245
95
99

Installation
permits
Num­
ber

1,594

Cost

$334,352
” ‘ 47,"OOO

10,000
” ’ 400

7,475
182,149
92

” i7,883

401

107,835

24

106,945

95

14,557

CITIES

South Bend, Ind_____

2,346
2,066
273
206

Cost

Total repairs, etc.

IN PRINCIPAL

Seattle, Wash________

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

Num­
ber

Repairs, etc., on non­
residential build­
ings

PERMITS

San Jose, Calif.............

Cost

Nonhousekeeping
dwellings

BTJILDING

City and State

Housekeeping
dwellings

Steubenville, Ohio___

ISS99

Stockton, Calif............
Superior, Wis..............
Syracuse, N. Y ............

0 Tacoma, Wash___.......

Jo Tampa, Fla.................
to
1 Taunton, Mass........
I Terre Haute, Ind........
Toledo, Ohio...............
Topeka, Kans.............

Troy, N. Y ..................
Tucson, Ariz...............
Tulsa, Okla_________

Utica, N. Y _________
Vallejo, Calif...............
Waco, Tex.............. .
Waltham, Mass_____
Warren, Ohio..............
Washington, D. C ___
Waterbury, Conn____
Waterloo, Iowa_.........
Watertown, Mass____
Watertown, N. Y ____
West New York, N. J




53,025
38,325
96,395
74,060
103,427
51,477
358,460
225,680
255,475
186,350
211,359
159,922
56,174
68,409

1,197
744
200
161
267
260

781,459
427,468
66,950
53,640
147,086
157,484

316
268
298
493
632
335
327
91
251
222
147
120
129
123
145
363

132,042
235,130
89,698
288,998
218,129
181,858
121,215
87,060
98,425
70,876
54,969
161,494
130,118
131,405
57,476
74,820
91,145

173
146
172
162
94
97

213,550
129,350
88,014
71,725
70,185
50,765

20,250

81,600

"i’sio’

121

110

32
21
156
139
40
32
263
203
316

125

44,000
87,950
227,013
161,904
180,529
71,484
1,290,594
873,086
352,780
285,383
334,228
170,861
68,732
376,063

8,325

350
360
68
49
114
52

1,243,170
2,154,930
118,510
53,520
635,645
277,030

27,810

120

81,530
147,117
224,167
173.345
532.345
85,050
108,750
590,100
164,821
60,176
35,117
254,468
263,494
36,480
76,725
207,940
105,105

2,000
73,300
22,840
8.710
230
763,684
88,100

211

578
607
111

11,100
300

36

'38,“800'

125
174
151
232
69
110

5,500

87
89
117

i, 800

37
36
138
135

68

400

58
74
49
33
18

373.250
216,600
177,500
55,685
58,150
38,825
147,925

153
90
341
319
288
173
706
497
1,360
985
1,810
1,926
258
296
779
492
1,549
1,105
268
216
381
312
529
472
393
472
657
864
404
437
178
204
368
291
202
172
166
161
283
498
2,403
2,196
241
204
258
211
127
117
385
476
170
160

97,025
128,275
396, 708
258,804
292,666
123,191
2,412,738
1,186,866
608,255
471,733
545,587
330,783
124,906
444,472
297,455
216,720
2,035,729
2,582,698
185,460
115,485
782,731
434,514
379,063
241,382
382,247
313,865
501,143
750,474
266,908
229,965
677,160
268,746
131,052
90,086
415,962
393,612
167,885
143,001
282,760
196,250
3,583,588
5,685,153
586,800
345,950
285,764
127,410
128,335
89,990
136,197
229,020
231,335
110,325

415
246
709
648
557
380
2,512
1,532
2,538
1,621
2,405
2,337
468
464
1,189
879
4,802
2,637
897
684
824
580
781
713
1,059
954
3,161
2,360
462
497
486
552
501
413
486
360
554
420
941
831
5,641
4,605
746
541
1,042
704
458
290
603
612
233
186

1,186,000
835,345
1,432,088
1,296,295
1,183,264
969,101
11,266,705
5,398,584
4,053,050
4,069,518
1,858,420
1,302,088
572,902
596,841
799,329
686,610
13,507,240
10,404,771
1,751,467
2,425,138
3,675,004
2,448,741
2,037,267
3,023,593
3,416,456
2,033,994
11,756,631
8,356,095
855,123
887,265
2,497,135
1,349,917
459,021
337,663
2,700,025
1,154,055
2,340,155
1,806,011
2,168,200
678,340
56,127,919
48,823,891
2,998,750
2,037,374
1,974,049
1,191,385
1,764,640
964,360
1,089,602
434,825
877,635
241,025

232
237
218
182
233
225
43
59
106
66
188
180
291
274
266
265
34
31
194
113
114
111
174
88
126
127
41
39
261
229
152
175
299
297
148
200
161
140
169
266
6
5
140
126
181
194
193
226
247
288
260
302

83

21,233

146

58,310

9

3,525

734

229,825

213

32,863

222

36,039

39

21,520

3

10,530

141

33,251

6

20,500

153

34,151

1

1,000

54

11,485

TABLE

Union City N. J____

67
177
169
244
137
436
289
1,044
774
1,232
1, 319
147
171

GENERAL

Trenton, N. J..............

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

2,610 | 1,299,650
3 |

850

I |

190

i
i
j
136 i

17.853

CO
CO

T a b le A .—

Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits
issued in 1929 and 1980, by intended use of buildings— Continued

CO

PART 3.— REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS, AND ADDITIONS TO OLD BUILDINGS, AND GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PERMITS—Continued
Repairs, etc., on resident ial buildings
Year

Number
Wheeling, W. V a_____

Wichita, Kans________
Wichita Falls, Tex.......
Wilkes-Barre, Pa--------

Wilmington, N. C ____
Winston-Salem, N. C.

Worcester, Mass--------Yonkers, N. Y _______
York, Pa.................... .
Youngstown, Ohio-----Zanesville, Ohio---------Total:
311 cities.......
311 cities.......




1929
1930

134
84
93
84
227
195
57
53
13
15
$93,890
33,000
8,258

167
135

115

90,750

29

740
679
81

177,255
155,368
46,621
40,866
618,217
359,899
217,956
295,385

120

240

275
225
71

113,483
115,462
23, 736
j 3, 200

11,100

62,250
4,000

Cost
$662,963
262,061
483,017
488,500
254,613
305,716
204,671
228,996
273,850
30,288
93,422
5,600
270,440
86,532
66,500

130
91
87
529
456
154
97

726,820
136,925
103,284
64,380
2,108, 774
939,867
1,382,200
464,735

91
101
13
3

236,090
273, 785
101,620
2,675

Number

Cost

Number

Cost

563
517
131
176
533
454
682
579
144
106
860
809
172
156
997
919
394
309
648
630
388
336
84
42

393,542
654,227
574,970
579,295
499,062
314,005
323.519
574,552
290.520
254,385
231,751
399,142
171,185
1,452,567
708,201
157,250
80,850
904,075
292,293
149,905
105.246
2,726,991
1,299,766
1,600,156
771,220
593,648
379,718
411,823
393.247
125,356
15,875

528
580
471
2, 712
1,762
415
278
865
774
404
330
957
890
1,537
1,407
268
1,568
1,217
333
294
1,925
1,663
1,413
1,134
974
830
1,787
1,029
283
142

$1,768,019
1,120,604
7,194,967
6.179.319
8,651,582
6,307,617
1,337,337
1,104,822
3,176,932
1,668,716
1,335,095
842,215
1,283,565
1,278,302
6,142,665
4,917,012
682,600
693,150
5,000,167
1,602,448
1,049,350
311,816
7,250,965
6,341,063
21,366,049
9,887,352
1,458,469
1,678,736
5.894.320
2,801,434
578,180
213,039

276,188
257,289

367,475,292
260,365,278

583,250
467,430

3,035,775,905
1,766,144,666

437
341
194
166
912
739
261
212

211

192
205
59
49
51
48
223
20'.)
132
47
14
224
236
226
185
71
62
281
264
87
152
252
299
58
47

Installation
permits

Num­
ber

I
1
j
I
!
!
!.
!

Cost

$24,837

102

35,177

165

23,238

153

76,726
5,900

1, 260

21

32
214
146
75
95
290
30u
____ 108,458
96,040

48,131,567
37,384,552

CITIES

Woonsocket, R. I_.......

$196, 925
131, 481
171, 210
86, 470
324, 682 i.
193, 346 1
109, 334
94, 523
300, 702
260, 232
160, 963
132, 261
95, 702
76, 395

Num­
ber

Rank
in
cost
of
con­
struc­
tion

PRINCIPAL

Wiliamsport, Pa______
Wilmington, Del..........

303
257
101
82
685
544
204
159
550
502
123
158
361
316

Cost

Grand total of all per­
mits—new construc­
tion and repairs, etc.

IN

Wilkinsburg, Pa______

1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930
1929
1930

Num­
ber

Total repairs, etc.

PERMITS

White Plains, N. Y . _ „

Cost

Repairs, etc., on nonresidential build­
ings

BUILDING

City and State

Housekeeping
dwellings

N onhousekeeping
dwellings

LIST OF BULLETINS OF THE BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS
The following is a list o f all bulletins o f th e Bureau o f Labor Statistics p ublished since July,
1912, excep t that in th e case o f bulletins giving th e results o f periodic surveys o f th e bureau
only th e latest bulletin on any o n e s u b ject is here listed.
A com p lete list o f th e reports and bulletins issued prior to July, 1921, as well as th e bulletins
published since th a t date, will be furnished on application. Bulletins m arked thus (*) are
o u t o f p rin t.
Conciliation and arbitration (Including strikes and lockouts).
*No. 124. Conciliation and arbitration in the building trades of Greater New York. [1913.]
♦No. 133. Report of the industrial council of the British Board of Trade on its inquiry into industrial
agreements. [1913.]
No. 139. Michigan copper district strike. [1914.]
♦No. 144. Industrial court of the cloak, suit, and skirt industry of New York City. [1914.]
♦No. 145. Conciliation, arbitration, and sanitation in the dress and waist industry of New York
City. [1914.]
♦No. 191. Collective bargaining in the anthracite-coal industry. [1916.]
♦No. 198. Collective agreements in the men's clothing industry. [1916.]
No. 233. Operation of the industrial disputes investigation act of Canada. [1918.]
No. 265. Joint industrial councils in Great Britain. [1919.]
No. 283. History of the Shipbuilding Labor Adjustment Board, 1917 to 1919.
No. 287. National War Labor Board: History of its formation, activities, etc. [1921.]
♦No. 303. Use of Federal power in settlement of railway labor disputes. [1922.]
No..341. Trade agreement in the silk-ribbon industry of New York City. [1923.]
No. 402. Collective bargaining by actors. [1926.]
No. 468. Trade agreements, 1927.
No. 481. Joint industrial control in the book and job printing industry. [1928.]
Cooperation.
No. 313. Consumers' cooperative societies in the United States in 1920.
No. 314. Cooperative credit societies (credit unions) in America and in foreign countries. 11922.]
No. 437. Cooperative movement in the United States in 1925 (other than agricultural).
No. 531. Consumers’, credit, and productive cooperative societies, 1929.
Employment and unemployment.
*No. 109. Statistics of unemployment and the work of employment offices in the United States.
[1913.]
♦No. 172. Unemployment in New York City, N. Y. [1915.]
♦No. 183. Regularity of employment in the women’s ready-to-wear garment industries. [1915.]
♦No. 195. Unemployment in the United States. [1916.]
♦No. 196. Proceedings of Employment Managers’ Conference, held at Minneapolis, Minn., January
19 and 20,1916.
♦No. 202. Proceedings of the conference of Employment Managers’ Association of Boston, Mass.,
held May 10,1916.
♦No. 206. The British system of labor exchanges. [1916.]
♦No. 227. Proceedings of Employment Managers' Conference, Philadelphia, Pa., April 2 and 3,1917.
♦No. 235. Employment system of the Lake Carriers’ Association. [1918.]
♦No. 241. Public employment offices in the United States. [1918.]
♦No. 247. Proceedings of Employment Managers’ Conference, Rochester, N. Y., May 9-11,1918.
♦No. 310. Industrial unemployment: A statistical study of its extent and causes. [1922.]
No. 409. Unemployment m Columbus, Ohio, 1921 to 1925.
No. 520. Social and economic character of unemployment in Philadelphia, April, 1929.
No. 542. Report of the advisory committee on employment statistics. [1931.J
No. 544. Unemployment-benefit plans in the United States and unemployment insurance for
foreign countries.
Foreign labor laws.
♦No. 142. Administration of labor laws and factory inspection in certain European countries. [1914.]
No. 494. Labor legislation of Uruguay. [1929.]
No. 510. Labor legislation of Argentina. [1930.]
No. 529. Workmen’s compensation legislation of the Latin American countries. [1930.]
Housing.
♦No.
No.
No.
No.

158.
263.
295.
524.

Government aid to home owning and housing of working people in foreign countries.
Housing by employers in the United States. [1920.]
Building operations in representative cities in 1920.
Building permits in the principal cities of the United States in [1921 to] 1929.

[1914.]

Industrial accidents and hygiene.
♦No. 104. Lead poisoning in potteries, tile works, and porcelain enameled sanitary ware factories.
[1912.]
No. 120. Hygiene of painters’ trade. [1913.]
♦No. 127. Dangers to workers from dusts and fumes, and methods of protection. [1913.]
♦No. 141. Lead poisoning in the smelting and refining of lead. [1914.]
♦No. 157. Industrial accident statistics. [1915.]




in

Industrial accidents and hygiene—Continued.
*No. 165. Lead poisoning in the manufacture of storage batteries. {1914.]
•No. 179. Industrial poisons used in the rubber industry. [1915.]
No. 188. Report of British departmental committee on the danger in the use of lead in the painting of
buildings. [1916.]
♦No. 201. Report of the committee on statistics and compensation insurance cost of the International
Association of Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions. [1916.]
♦No. 209. Hygiene of the printing trades. [1917.]
♦No. 219. Industrial poisons used or produced in the manufacture of explosives. [1917.]
No. 221. Hours, fatigue, and health in British munition factories. [1917.]
No. 230. Industrial efficiency and fatigue in British munition factories. [1917.]
♦No. 231. Mortality from respiratory diseases in dusty trades (inorganic dusts). [1918.]
♦No. 234. The safety movement in the iron and steel industry, 1907 to 1917.
No. 236. Effects of the air hammer on the hands of stonecutters. [1918.]
No. 249. Industrial health and efficiency. Final report of British Health of Munition Workers*
Committee. [1919.]
♦No. 251. Preventable death in the cotton-manufacturing industry. [1919.]
No. 256. Accidents and accident prevention in machine building. [1919.]
No. 267. Anthrax as an occupational disease. [1920.]
No. 276. Standardization of industrial accident statistics. [1920.]
♦No. 280. Industrial poisoning in making coal-tar dyes and dye intermediates. [1921.]
♦No. 291. Carbon monoxide poisoning. [1921.]
No. 293. The problem of dust phthisis in the granite-stone industry. [1922.]
No. 298. Causes and prevention of accidents in the iron and steel industry, 1910-1919.
No. 306. Occupation hazards and diagnostic signs: A guide to impairments to be looked for in hazard­
ous occupations. [1922.]
No. 392. Survey of hygienic conditions in the printing trades. [1925.]
No. 405. Phosphorus necrosis in the manufacture of fireworks and in the preparation of phosphorus.
[1926.]
No. 427. Health survey of the printing trades, 1922 to 1925.
No. 428. Proceedings of the Industrial Accident Prevention Conference, held at Washington, D. C.,
July 14-16, 1926.
No. 460. A new test for industrial lead poisoning. [1928.1
No. 466. Settlement for accidents to American seamen. [1928.]
No. 488. Deaths from lead poisoning, 1925-1927.
No. 490. Statistics of industrial accidents in the United States to the end of 1927.
No. 507. Causes of death, by occupation. [1929.]
Industrial relations and labor conditions.
No. 237. Industrial unrest in Great Britain. [1917.]
No. 340. Chinese migrations, with special reference to labor conditions. [1923.]
No. 349. Industrial relations in the West Coast lumber industry. [1923.J
No. 361. Labor relations in the Fairmont (W. Va.) bituminous-coal field. [1924.]
No. 380. Postwar labor conditions in Germany. [1925.]
No. 383. Works council movement in Germany. [1925.]
No. 384. Labor conditions in the shoe industry in Massachusetts, 1920-1924.
No. 399. Labor relations in the lace and lace-curtain industries in the United States. [1925.]
No. 534. Labor conditions in the Territory of Hawaii, 1929-1930.
Labor laws o f the United States (including decisions o f courts relating to labor).
No. 211. Labor laws and their administration in the Pacific States. [1917.]
No. 229. Wage-payment legislation in the United States. [1917.]
No. 285. Minimum wage laws of the United States: Construction and operation. [1921.]
No. 321. Labor laws that have been declared unconstitutional. [1922.]
No. 322. Kansas Court of Industrial Relations. [1923.J
No. 343. Laws providing for bureaus of labor statistics, etc. [1923.]
No. 370. Labor laws of the United States with decisions of courts relating thereto. [1925.]
No. 408. Laws relating to payment of wages. [1926.]
No. 517. Decisions of courts and opinions affecting labor, 1927-1928.
No. 528. Labor legislation, 1929.
Proceedings o f annual conventions o f the Association o f Government Officials in Industry o f the United
States and Canada. (Name changed in 1928 from Association o f Governmental Labor Officials o f the
United States and Canada.)
*No. 266. Seventh, Seattle, Wash., July 12-15, 1920.
No. 307. Eighth, New Orleans, La., May 2-6,1921.
♦No. 323. Ninth, Harrisburg, Pa., May 22-26, 1922.
♦No. 352. Tenth, Richmond, Va., May 1-4, 1923.
♦No. 389. Eleventh, Chicago, 111., May 19-23,1924.
♦No. 411. Twelfth, Salt Lake City, Utah, August 13-15, 1925.
♦No. 429. Thirteenth, Columbus, Ohio, June 7-10, 1926.
♦No. 455. Fourteenth, Paterson, N. J., May 31 to June 3,1927.
♦No. 480. Fifteenth, New Orleans, La., May 21-24, 1928.
No. 508. Sixteenth, Toronto, Canada, June 4-7,1929.
No. 530. Seventeenth, Louisville, Ky, May 20-23, 1930.
Proceedings o f annual meetings o f the International Association o f Industrial Accident Boards and
Commissions.
No. 210. Third, Columbus, Ohio, April 25-28, 1916.
No. 248. Fourth, Boston, Mass., August 21-25,1917.
No. 264. Fifth, Madison, Wis., September 24-27,1918.
♦No. 273. Sixth, Toronto, Canada, September 23-26, 1919.
No. 281. Seventh, San Francisco, Calif., September 20-24, 1920.
No. 304. Eighth, Chicago, 111., September 19-23, 1921.
No. 333. Ninth, Baltimore, Md., October 9-13,1922.
♦No. 359. Tenth, St. Paul, Minn., September 24-26,1923.
No. 385. Eleventh, Halifax, Nova Scotia, August 26-28, 1924.




(a )

Proceedings o f annual meetings of the International Association of Industrial Accident Boards and
Commissions—Continued.
No. 395. Index to proceedings, 1914-1924.
No. 406. Twelfth, Salt Lake City, Utah, August 17-20, 1925.
No. 432. Thirteenth, Hartford, Conn., September 14-17,1929.
•No. 456. Fourteenth, Atlanta, Ga., September 27-29, 1927.
No. 485. Fifteenth, Paterson, N. J., September 11-14,1928.
No. 511. Sixteenth, Buffalo, N. Y., October 8-11,1929.
No. 536. Seventeenth, Wilmington, Del., September 22-26, 1930.
Proceedings o f annual meetings o f the International Association o f Public Employment Services.
No. 192. First, Chicago, December 19 and 20,1913; second, Indianapolis, September 24 and 25, 1914;
third, Detroit, July 1 and 2,1915.
♦No. 220. Fourth, Buffalo, N. Y., July 20 and 21,1916.
No. 311. Ninth, Buffalo, N. Y., September 7-9,1921.
No. 337. Tenth, Washington, D. C., September 11-13,1922.
No. 355. Eleventh, Toronto, Canada, September 4-7, 1923.
No. 400. Twelfth, Chicago, 111., May 19-23, 1924.
No. 414. Thirteenth, Rochester, N. Y., September 15-17, 1925.
No. 478. Fifteenth, Detroit, Mich., October 25-28,1927.
No. 501. Sixteenth, Cleveland, Ohio, September 18-21,1928.
No. 538. Seventeenth, Philadelphia, September 24-27, 1929; eighteenth, Toronto, Canada, Septem­
ber 9-12, 1930.
Productivity o f labor.
No. 356. Productivity costs in the com bos brick industry. [1924.]
No. 360. Time and labor costs in manufacturing 100 pairs of shoes, 1923.
No. 407. Labor cost of production and wages and hours of labor in the paper box-board industry.
[1926.]
♦No. 412. Wages, hours, and productivity in the pottery industry, 1925.
No. 441. Productivity of labor in the glass industry. [1927.]
No. 474. Productivity of labor in merchant blast furnaces. [1928.]
No. 475. Productivity of labor in newspaper printing. [1929.]
Retail prices and cost o f living.
*No. 121. Sugar prices, from refiner to consumer. [1913.]
•No. 130. Wheat and flour prices, from farmer to consumer. [1913.]
•No. 164. Butter prices, from producer to consumer. [1914.]
No. 170. Foreign food prices as affected by the war. [1915.]
No. 357. Cost of living in the United States. [1924.]
No. 369. The use of cost-of-living figures in wage adjustments. [1925.]
No. 495. Retail prices, 1890 to 1928.
Safety codes.
*No. 331.
No. 336.
No. 350.
•No. 351.
No. 375.
No. 382.
No. 410.
•No. 430.
No. 433.
No. 447.
No. 451.
No. 463.
No. 509.
No. 512.
No. 519.
No. 527.

Code of lighting: Factories, mills, and other work places.
Safety code for the protection of industrial workers in foundries.
Rules governing the approval of headlighting devices for motor vehicles.
Safety code for the construction, care, and use of ladders.
Safety code for laundry machinery and operations.
Code of lighting school buildings.
Safety code for paper and pulp mills.
Safety code for power presses and foot and hand presses.
Safety codes for the prevention of dust explosions.
Safety code for rubber mills and calenders.
Safety code for forging and hot-metal stamping.
Safety code for mechanical power-transmission apparatus—first revision.
Textile safety code.
Code for identification of gas-mask canisters.
Safety code for woodworking plants, as revised 1930.
Safety code for the use, care, and protection of abrasive wheels.

Vocational and workers* education.
•No. 159. Short-unit courses for wage earners, and a factory school experiment. [1915.]
•No. 162. Vocational education survey of Richmond, Va. [1915.1
•No. 199. Vocational education survey of Minneapolis, Minn. [1917.]
No. 271. Adult working-class education in Great Britain and the United States. [1920.]
No. 459. Apprenticeship in building construction. [1928.]
Wages and hours o f labor.
•No. 146. Wages and regularity of employment and standardization of piece rates in the dress and
waist industry of New York City. [1914.]
•No. 147. Wages and regularity of employment in the cloak, suit, and skirt industry. [1914.]
No. 161. Wages and hours of labor in the clothing and cigar industries, 1911 to 1913.
No. 163. Wages and hours of labor in the building and repairing of steam railroad cars, 1907 to 1913.
•No. 190. Wages and hours of labor in the cotton, woolen, and silk industries, 1907 to 1914.
No. 204. Street-railway employment in the United States. [1917.]
No. 218. Wages and hours of labor in the iron and steel industry, 1907 to 1915: With a glossary of occu­
pations.
No. 225. Wages and hours of labor in the lumber, millwork, and furniture industries, 1915.
No. 265. Industrial survey in selected industries in the United States, 1919.
No. 297. Wages and hours of labor in the petroleum industry, 1920.
No 356. Productivity costs in the common-brick industry. [1924.]
No. 358. Wages and hours of labor in the automobile-tire industry, 1923.
No. 360. Time and labor costs in manufacturing 100 pairs of shoes, 1923.
No. 365. Wages and hours of labor in the paper and pulp industry, 1923.
No. 394. Wages and hours of labor in metalliferous mines, 1924.
No. 407. Labor cost of production and wages and hours of labor in the paper box-board industry.
[1926.]
•No. 412. Wages, hours, and productivity in the pottery industry, 1925.




(n i)

Wages and hours of labor— Continued.
No. 416. Hours and earnings in anthracite and bituminous coal mining, 1922 and 1924.
No. 484. Wages and hours of labor of common street laborers, 1928.
No. 497. Wages and hours of labor in the lumber industry in the United States, 1928.
No. 498. Wages and hours of labor in the boot and shoe industry, 1910 to 1928.
No. 499. History of wages in the United States from colonial times to 1928.
No. 502. Wages and hours of labor in the motor-vehicle industry, 1928.
No. 503. Wages and hours of labor in the men’s clothing industry, 1911 to 1928.
No. 504. Wages and hours of labor in the hosiery and underwear industries, 1907 to 1928.
No. 513. Wages and hours of labor in the iron and steel industry, 1929.
No. 514. Pennsylvania Railroad wage data. From Report of Joint Fact Finding Committee in
wage negotiations in 1927.
No. 516. Hours and earnings in bituminous-coal mining, 1929.
No. 522. Wages and hours of labor in foundries and machine shops, 1929.
No. 523. Hours and earnings in the manufacture of airplanes and aircraft engines, 1929.
No. 525. Wages and hours of labor in the Portland cement industry, 1929.
No. 526. Wages and hours of labor in the furniture industry, 1910 to 1929.
No. 532. Wages and hours of labor in the cigarette manufacturing industry, 1930.
No. 533. Wages and hours of labor in woolen and worsted goods manufacturing, 1910 to 1930.
No. 534. Labor conditions in the Territory of Hawaii, 1929-1930.
No. 535. Wages and hours of labor in the slaughtering and meat-packing industry, 1929.
No. 537. Wages and hours of labor in the dyeing and finishing of textiles, 1930.
No. 539. Wages and hours of labor in cotton goods manufacturing, 1910 to 1930.
No. 540. Union scales of wages and hours of labor, May 15, 1930.
Welfare work.
♦No. 123. Employers’ welfare work. [1913.]
No. 222. Welfare work in British munition factories. [1917.]
♦No. 250. Welfare work for employees in industrial establishments in the United States. [1919.]
No. 458. Health and recreation activities in industrial establishments, 1926.
Wholesale prices.
♦No. 284. Index numbers of wholesale prices in the United States and foreign countries. [1921.]
No. 453. Revised index numbers of wholesale prices, 1923 to July, 1927.
No. 493. Wholesale prices, 1913 to 1928.
No. 543. Wholesale prices, 1930.
Women and children in industry.
No. 116. Hours, earnings, and duration of employment of wage-earning women in selected industries
in the District of Columbia. [1913.]
*No. 117. Prohibition of night work of young persons. [1913.]
*No. 118. Ten-hour maximum working-day for women and young persons. [1913.]
No. 119. Working hours of women in the pea canneries of Wisconsin. [1913.]
♦No. 122. Employment of women in power laundries in Milwaukee. [1913.]
♦No. 160. Hours, earnings, and conditions of labor of women in Indiana mercantile establishments
and garment factories. [1914.]
♦No. 167. Minimum-wage legislation in the United States and foreign countries. [1915.]
♦No. 175. Summary of the report on condition of woman and child wage earners in the United States.
[1915.]
♦No. 176. Effect of minimum-wage determinations in Oregon. [1915.]
♦No. 180. The boot and shoe industry in Massachusetts as a vocation for women. [1915.]
♦No. 182. Unemployment among women in department and other retail stores of Boston, Mass.
[1916.]
No. 193. Dressmaking as a trade for women in Massachusetts. [1916.]
No. 215. Industrial experience of trade-school girls in Massachusetts. [1917.]
♦No. 217. Effect of workmen’s compensation laws in diminishing the necessity of industrial employ*
ment of women and children. [1918.]
♦No. 223. Employment of women and juveniles in Great Britain during the war. [1917.]
No. 253. Women in the lead industries. [1919.]
No. 467. Minimum wage legislation in various countries. [1928.]
Workmen’s insurance and compensation (including laws relating thereto).
♦No. 101. Care of tuberculous wage earners in Germany. [1912.]
♦No. 102. British national insurance act, 1911.
No. 103. Sickness and accident insurance law in Switzerland. [1912.]
No. 107. Law relating to insurance of salaried employees in Germany. [1913.]
♦No. 155. Compensation for accidents to employees of the United States. [1914.]
♦No. 212. Proceedings of the conference on social insurance called by the International Association
of Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions. Washington, D. C., December 5-9,
1916.
♦No. 243. Workmen’s compensation legislation in the United States and foreign countries, 1917 and
1918.
No. 301. Comparison of workmen’s compensation insurance and administration. [1922.]
No. 312. National health insurance in Great Britain, 1911 to 1921.
No. 379. Comparison of workmen’s compensation laws of the United States as of January 1, 1925.
No. 477. Public-service retirement systems, United States and Europe. [1929.]
No. 496. Workmen's compensation legislation of the United States and Canada as of January 1,1929.
(With text of legislation enacted in 1927 and 1928.)
No. 529. Workmen’s compensation legislation of the Latin American countries. [1930 ]
Miscellaneous series.
♦No. 174. Subject index of the publications of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics up to
May 1,1915.
No. 208. Profit sharing in the United States. [1916.]
No. 242. Food situation in central Europe, 1917.




(IV)

Miscellaneous series—Continued.
No. 254. International labor legislation and the society of nations. [1919.)
No. 268. Historical survey of international action affecting labor. [1920.]
No. 282. Mutual relief associations among Government employees in Washington, D. C. [1921.]
No. 319. The Bureau of Labor Statistics: Its history, activities, and organization. [1922.]
No. 326. Methods of procuring and computing statistical information of the Bureau of Labor Sta­
tistics. [1923.]
No. 342. International Seamen’s Union of America: A study of its history and problems. [1923.1
No. 346. Humanity in government. [1923.]
No. 372. Convict labor in 1923.
No. 386. Cost of American almshouses. [1925.]
No. 398. Growth of legal-aid work in the United States. [1926.]
No. 401. Family allowances in foreign countries. [1926.]
No. 461. Labor organization in Chile. [1928.]
No. 462. Park recreation areas in the United States. [1928.]
No. 465. Beneficial activities of American trade-unions. [1928.]
♦No. 479. Activities and functions of a State department of labor. [1928.]
No. 483. Conditions in the shoe industry in Haverhill, Mass., 1928
No. 489. Care of aged persons in United States. [1929.]
No. 491. Handbook of labor statistics, 1929 edition.
No. 505. Directory of homes for the aged in the United States. [1929.]
No. 506. Handbook of American trade-unions, 1929 edition.
No. 518. Personnel research agencies, 1930 edition.
No. 541. Handbook of labor stat istics, 1931 edition.




(T)