The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
THE BUDGET SYSTEM AND CONCEPTS BUDGET OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Fiscal Year 2001 2 The Federal Government Dollar Fiscal Year 2001 Estimates Where It Comes From... Receipts $2,019 billion Corporate Income Taxes 10% Social Insurance Receipts 34% Other 4% Excise Taxes 4% Individual Income Taxes 48% Where It Goes... Outlays $1,835 billion 91% On-Budget Surplus 5% 9% Defense Discretionary 16% Medicare Solvency 8% Social Security 23% Medicare 12% Non-Defense Discretionary 19% Net Interest 11% Social Security Solvency Lock-Box 87% Medicaid 7% Other Means-Tested Entitlements 6% Debt Reduction $184 billion Table I–1. Other Mandatory 6% Budget Totals (In billions of dollars) 1999 Actual 2000 Estimates 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total 2010 2001–2010 Receipts .......................... Outlays ........................... 1,827 1,703 1,956 1,790 2,019 1,835 2,081 1,895 2,147 1,963 2,236 2,041 2,341 2,125 2,440 2,185 2,559 2,267 2,676 2,362 2,785 2,456 2,917 2,553 24,202 21,683 Total unified budget surplus ........................ 124 167 184 186 185 195 215 256 292 314 329 363 2,519 224 239 250 260 272 2,169 26 47 57 61 80 299 4 1 5 1 7 * 8 * 11 * 35 16 256 292 314 329 363 2,519 Debt Reduction: Social Security solvency lock-box ........ 124 148 160 172 184 195 214 Medicare solvency transfers ................. ............ ............ 15 13 ............ ............ ............ Reserve for catastrophic prescription drug coverage ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ On-Budget surplus ... 1 19 9 1 * * 2 Total debt reduction * $500 million or less. 124 167 184 186 185 195 215 BUDGET SYSTEM AND CONCEPTS AND GLOSSARY The budget system of the United States Government provides the means for the President and Congress to decide how much money to spend, what to spend it on, and how to raise the money they have decided to spend. Through the budget system, they determine the allocation of resources among the Government’s major functions—such as providing for the national defense, regulating commerce, and ensuring the availability of health care—and among individual programs, projects, and activities—such as building navy ships, issuing patents, and controlling diseases. The budget system focuses primarily on dollars, but it also allocates other resources, such as Federal employment. The decisions made in the budget process affect the nation as a whole, state and local governments, and individual Americans. Many budget decisions have worldwide significance. The Congress and the President enact budget decisions into law. The budget system ensures these laws are carried out. This chapter provides an overview of the budget system and explains some of the more important budget concepts. It includes summary dollar amounts to illustrate major concepts. Other chapters of the budget documents discuss these amounts, and more detailed amounts, in greater depth. A glossary of budget terms appears at the end of the chapter. Various laws, enacted to carry out requirements of the Constitution, govern the budget system. The chapter refers to the principal ones by title throughout the text and gives complete citations in the section just preceding the glossary. THE BUDGET PROCESS The budget process has three main phases, each of which is interrelated with the others: (1) formulation of the President’s budget; (2) congressional action on the budget; and (3) budget execution. Formulation of the President’s Budget The Budget of the United States Government consists of several volumes that set forth the President’s financial proposal with recommended priorities for the allocation of resources by the Government. The primary focus of the budget is on the budget year—the next fiscal year for which Congress needs to make appropriations, in this case 2001. However, the budget may propose changes to funding levels already provided for the current year, in this case 2000, and it covers at least the four years following the budget year in order to reflect the effect of budget decisions over the longer term. The budget includes data on the most recently completed fiscal year, in this case 1999, so that the reader can compare budget estimates to actual accounting data. The President begins the process of formulating the budget by establishing general budget and fiscal policy guidelines. This occurs not later than the spring of each year, at least nine months before the President transmits the budget to Congress and at least 18 months before the fiscal year begins. (See the Budget Calendar below.) Based on these guidelines, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) works with the Federal agencies to establish specific policy directions and planning levels for the agencies, both for the budget year and for at least the following four years to guide the preparation of their budget requests. During the formulation of the budget, the President, the Director of OMB, and other officials in the Executive Office of the President continually exchange information, proposals, and evaluations bearing on policy decisions with the Secretaries of the departments and the heads of the other Government agencies. Decisions reflected in previously enacted budgets, including the one for the fiscal year in progress, and reactions to the last proposed budget (which Congress is considering when the process of preparing the upcoming budget begins) influence decisions concerning the upcoming budget. So do projections of the economic outlook, prepared jointly by the Council of Economic Advisers, OMB, and the Treasury Department. In early fall, agencies submit their budget requests to OMB, where analysts review them and identify issues that OMB officials need to discuss with the agencies. OMB and the agencies resolve many issues themselves. Others require the involvement of the President and White House policy officials. This decision-making process is usually completed by late December. At that time, the final stage of developing detailed budget data and the preparation of the budget documents begins. The decision-makers must consider the effects of economic and technical assumptions on the budget estimates. Interest rates, economic growth, the rate of inflation, the unemployment rate, and the number of people eligible for various benefit programs, among other things, affect Government spending and receipts. Small changes in these assumptions can affect budget estimates by billions of dollars. (Chapter 1, ‘‘Economic Assumptions,’’ in the Analytical Perspectives volume of the 2001 budget provides more information on this subject.) 1 2 ANALYTICAL PERSPECTIVES Statutory limitations on changes in receipts and outlays through 2002 also influence budget decisions (see Budget Enforcement below). Thus, the budget formulation process involves the simultaneous consideration of the resource needs of individual programs, the allocation of resources among the functions of the Government, the total outlays and receipts that are appropriate in relation to current and prospective economic conditions, and statutory constraints. The law governing the President’s budget specifies that the President is to transmit the budget to Congress on or after the first Monday in January but not later than the first Monday in February of each year for the following fiscal year, which begins on October 1. This gives Congress eight to nine months before the fiscal year begins to act on the budget. For various reasons, some parts or all of the budget documents have been transmitted after the specified date. One reason is that the current law does not require an outgoing President to transmit a budget, and it is impractical for an incoming President to complete a budget within a few days of taking office on January 20th. President Clinton, the first President subject to the current requirement, submitted a report to Congress on February 17, 1993, describing the comprehensive economic plan he proposed for the Nation and containing summary budget information. He transmitted the Budget of the United States for 1994 on April 8, 1993. In some years, the late or pending enactment of appropriations acts, other spending legislation, and tax laws considered in the previous budget cycle have delayed preparation and transmittal of complete budgets. For this reason, for example, President Reagan submitted his budget for 1988 forty-five days after the date specified in law. In other years, Presidents have submitted abbreviated budget documents on the due date, sending the more detailed documents weeks later. For example, President Clinton transmitted an abbreviated budget document to Congress on February 5, 1996, because of uncertainty over 1996 appropriations as well as possible changes in mandatory programs and tax policy. He transmitted a Budget Supplement and other budget volumes in March 1996. Congressional Action 1 Congress considers the President’s budget proposals and approves, modifies, or disapproves them. It can change funding levels, eliminate programs, or add programs not requested by the President. It can add or eliminate taxes and other sources of receipts, or make other changes that affect the amount of receipts collected. Congress does not enact a budget as such. Through the process of adopting a budget resolution (described below), it agrees on levels for total spending and re1 For a fuller discussion of the congressional budget process, see Robert Keith and Allen Schick, Manual on the Federal Budget Process (Congressional Research Service Report 98–720 GOV, August 28, 1998.). ceipts, the size of the deficit or surplus, and the debt limit. The budget resolution then provides the framework within which congressional committees prepare appropriations bills and other spending and receipts legislation. Congress provides spending authority for specified purposes in several regular appropriations acts each year (traditionally thirteen). It also enacts changes each year in other laws that affect spending and receipts. Both appropriations acts and these other laws are discussed in the following paragraphs. In making appropriations, Congress does not vote on the level of outlays (spending) directly, but rather on budget authority, which is the authority provided by law to incur financial obligations that will result in outlays. In a separate process, prior to making appropriations, Congress usually enacts legislation that authorizes an agency to carry out particular programs and, in some cases, limits the amount that can be appropriated for the programs. Some authorizing legislation expires after one year, some expires after a specified number of years, and some does not expire. Congress may enact appropriations for a program even though there is no specific authorization for it. Congress begins its budget process shortly after it receives the President’s budget. Under the procedures established by the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, Congress decides on budget totals before completing action on individual appropriations. The Act requires each standing committee of the House and Senate to recommend budget levels and report legislative plans concerning matters within the committee’s jurisdiction to the Budget Committee in each body. The Budget Committees then initiate the concurrent resolution on the budget. The budget resolution sets levels for total receipts and for budget authority and outlays, both in total and by functional category (see Functional Classification below). It also sets levels for the budget deficit or surplus and debt. The statutory limitations on changes in receipts and outlays through 2002 that apply to the President’s budget also apply to the budget resolution. In the report on the budget resolution, the Budget Committees allocate the amounts of budget authority and outlays within the functional category totals to the House and Senate Appropriations Committees and the other committees that have jurisdiction over the programs in the functions. The Appropriations Committees are required, in turn, to allocate amounts of budget authority and outlays among their respective subcommittees. The subcommittees may not exceed their allocations in drafting spending bills. The other committees with jurisdiction over spending and receipts may make allocations among their subcommittees but are not required to. There is no allocation at the program level. However, the Budget Committees’ reports may discuss assumptions about the level of funding for major programs. While these assumptions do not bind the committees and subcommittees with jurisdiction over the programs, they may influence their decisions. The budget resolution may contain ‘‘reconciliation direc- 3 BUDGET SYSTEM AND CONCEPTS AND GLOSSARY tives’’ (discussed below) to the committees responsible for tax laws and for spending not controlled by annual appropriation acts, in order to conform the level of receipts and this type of spending to the levels specified in the budget resolution. The congressional timetable calls for the whole Congress to adopt the budget resolution by April 15 of each year, but Congress regularly misses this deadline. Once Congress passes a budget resolution, a member of Congress can raise a point of order to block a bill that would cause a committee’s allocation to be exceeded. Budget resolutions are not laws and, therefore, do not require the President’s approval. However, Congress considers the President’s views in preparing budget resolutions, because legislation developed to meet congressional budget allocations does require the President’s approval. In some years, the President and the joint leadership of Congress have formally agreed on plans to reduce the deficit or balance the budget. These agreements were reflected in the budget resolution and legislation passed for those years. Appropriations bills are initiated in the House. They provide the budget authority for the majority of Federal programs. The Appropriations Committee in each body has jurisdiction over annual appropriations. These committees are divided into subcommittees that hold hearings and review detailed budget justification materials prepared by the agencies within the subcommittee’s jurisdiction. After a bill has been drafted by a subcommittee, the committee and the whole House, in turn, must approve the bill, usually with amendments to the original version. The House then forwards the bill to the Senate, where a similar review follows. If the Senate disagrees with the House on particular matters in the bill, which is often the case, the two bodies form a conference committee (consisting of Members of both bodies) to resolve the differences. The conference committee revises the bill and returns it to both bodies for approval. When the revised bill is agreed to, first in the House and then in the Senate, Congress sends it to the President for approval or veto. The President can only approve or veto an entire bill. He cannot approve or veto selected parts of a bill. 2 If Congress does not complete action on one or more appropriations bills by the beginning of the fiscal year, it enacts a joint resolution, which is similar to an appropriations bill, to provide authority for the affected agencies to continue operations at some specified level up to a specific date or until their regular appropriations are enacted. In some years, a continuing resolution has funded a portion or all of the Government for the entire year. Congress must present these resolutions to the President for approval or veto. In some cases, the President has rejected continuing resolutions because they contained unacceptable provisions. Left without funds, Government agencies were required by 2 In 1996, Congress enacted the Line Item Veto Act, granting the President limited authority to cancel new spending and limited tax benefits when he signs laws enacted by the Congress. However, in 1998, the Supreme Court declared the authority provided by the Act to be unconstitutional. law to shut down operations—with exceptions for some activities—until Congress passed a continuing resolution the President would approve. Shutdowns have lasted for periods of a day to several weeks. As explained earlier, Congress also provides budget authority in laws other than appropriations acts. In fact, while annual appropriations acts control the spending for the majority of Federal programs, they control only one-third of the total spending in a typical year. Permanent laws, called authorizing legislation, control the rest of the spending. Such a large proportion of the budget is determined by such laws because they determine the amount of interest the Government pays on the public debt and the amounts spent by a few programs with large amounts of spending each year, such as social security. This chapter discusses the control of budget authority and outlays in greater detail under BUDGET AUTHORITY AND OTHER BUDGETARY RESOURCES, OBLIGATIONS, AND OUTLAYS. Almost all taxes and most other receipts result from permanent laws. The House initiates tax bills, specifically in the Ways and Means Committee. In the Senate, the Finance Committee has jurisdiction over tax laws. The budget resolution often includes reconciliation directives, which require authorizing committees to change permanent laws that affect receipts and outlays. They direct each designated committee to report amendments to the laws under the committee’s jurisdiction that will change the levels of receipts and spending controlled by the laws. The directives specify the dollar amount of changes that each designated committee is expected to achieve, but do not specify the laws to be changed or the changes to be made. However, the Budget Committees’ reports on the budget resolution may discuss assumptions about how the laws would be changed. Like other assumptions in the report, they do not bind the committees of jurisdiction but may influence their decisions. The committees subject to reconciliation directives draft the implementing legislation. Such legislation may, for example, change the tax code, revise benefit formulas or eligibility requirements for benefit programs, or authorize Government agencies to charge fees to cover some of their costs. In some years, Congress has enacted an omnibus budget reconciliation act, which combines the amendments to implement reconciliation directives in a single act. These acts, together with appropriations acts for the year, often implement agreements between the President and the Congress. They may include other matters, such as laws providing the means for enforcing these agreements, as described below. Budget Enforcement The Budget Enforcement Act (BEA), first enacted in 1990 and extended in 1993 and 1997, significantly amended the laws pertaining to the budget process, including the Congressional Budget Act, the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act, and the 4 law pertaining to the President’s budget (see PRINCIPAL BUDGET LAWS, later in the chapter). The BEA constrains legislation enacted through 2002 (2003 in certain cases) that would increase spending or decrease receipts. The BEA divides spending into two types—discretionary spending and direct spending. Discretionary spending is controlled through annual appropriations acts. Funding for salaries and other operating expenses of Government agencies, for example, is usually discretionary because it is usually provided by appropriations acts. Direct spending is more commonly called mandatory spending. Mandatory spending is controlled by permanent laws. Medicare and medicaid payments, unemployment insurance benefits, and farm price supports are examples of mandatory spending, because permanent laws authorize payments for those purposes. The BEA specifically defines funding for the Food Stamp program as mandatory spending, even though appropriations acts provide the funding. The BEA includes receipts under the same rules that apply to mandatory spending, because permanent laws generally control receipts. The BEA constrains discretionary spending differently from mandatory spending and receipts, as explained in the following paragraphs. The BEA defines categories of discretionary spending and limits (‘‘caps’’) the spending in each category by specifying dollar amounts for both budget authority and outlays for each fiscal year through 2002 (2003 in the case of spending for highways and mass transit). The following table lists the categories, which vary from year to year, and their caps. For 1998 and 1999, the BEA divided most discretionary spending between defense and non defense spending, excluding special categories. For 2000 through 2002, the BEA combines defense and nondefense spending, excluding special categories, into one category, which is shown as ‘‘Other discretionary.’’ For 1998 through 2000, the BEA provided a special category for violent crime reduction spending. The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) (Public Law 105–178) added special categories (applying to outlays only) for highway and mass transit spending for 1999 through 2003. The BEA requires OMB to adjust the caps up or down for certain reasons, such as to reflect conceptual changes or the enactment of emergency appropriations. The highways and mass transit caps, which apply to outlays only, were based on estimates at the time TEA21 was drafted of gasoline excise taxes and other receipts credited to the Highway Trust Fund each year. The TEA-21 amendments require OMB to adjust these caps up or down for the difference in the amount of receipts actually collected in the past year and for reestimates of the amount the Government expects to collect in the budget year. The table shows the adjusted caps. The Preview Report (described below) explains other cap adjustments proposed in this budget. ANALYTICAL PERSPECTIVES DISCRETIONARY SPENDING LIMITS (In billions of dollars) Defense: Budget Authority Outlays ................ Nondefense, excluding special categories: Budget Authority Outlays ................ Violent crime reduction: Budget Authority Outlays ................ Highways: Budget Authority Outlays ................ Mass transit: Budget Authority Outlays ................ Other discretionary: Budget Authority Outlays ................ Total discretionary: Budget Authority Outlays ................. 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 272 269 287 276 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 256 286 291 277 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6 5 6 5 5 6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 22 N/A 25 N/A 27 N/A 28 N/A 28 N/A N/A N/A 4 N/A 4 N/A 5 N/A 5 N/A 6 N/A N/A N/A N/A 567 565 541 547 550 537 N/A N/A 533 560 583 584 571 600 541 579 550 571 N/A 34 N/A means that this category was not applicable in the specified year. If the amount of budget authority provided in appropriations acts for a given year exceeds the cap on budget authority for a category, or the amount of outlays in that year estimated to result from this budget authority exceeds the cap on outlays for a category, the BEA requires a procedure, called sequestration, for reducing the spending in that category. A sequestration reduces spending for most programs in the category by a uniform percentage. The BEA specifies special rules for reducing some programs and exempts some programs from sequestration entirely. The BEA does not cap mandatory spending or require a certain level of receipts. Instead, it requires that all laws enacted through 2002 that affect mandatory spending or receipts must be enacted on a ‘‘pay-asyou-go’’ (PAYGO) basis. This means that if a law increases the deficit or reduces a surplus in the budget year or any of the four following years, another law must be enacted with an offsetting reduction in spending or increase in receipts for each year that is affected. Legislated increases in benefit payments, for example, would have to be offset by legislated reductions in other mandatory spending or increases in receipts. Otherwise, a sequestration would be triggered at the end of the session of Congress in the fiscal year in which the deficit would be increased. The BEA sequestration procedures require a uniform reduction of mandatory spending programs that are neither exempt nor subject to special rules. The BEA exempts social security, interest on the public debt, Federal employee retirement, Medicaid, most means-tested entitlements, deposit insurance, other prior legal obligations, and most unemploy- 5 BUDGET SYSTEM AND CONCEPTS AND GLOSSARY ment benefits. A special rule limits the sequestration of Medicare spending to no more than four percent, and special rules for some other programs limit the size of a sequestration for those programs. As a result of exemptions and special rules, only about three percent of all mandatory spending is subject to sequestration, including the maximum amounts allowed under special rules. The PAYGO rules do not apply to increases in mandatory spending or decreases in receipts that are not the result of new laws. For example, mandatory spending for benefit programs, such as unemployment insurance, rises when the population of eligible beneficiaries rises, and many benefit payments are automatically increased for inflation under existing laws. Likewise, tax receipts decrease when the profits of private businesses decline as the result of economic conditions. The BEA requires OMB to make the estimates and calculations that determine whether there is to be a sequestration and report them to the President and Congress. It requires the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to make the same estimates and calculations, and the Director of OMB to explain any differences between the OMB and CBO estimates. The BEA requires the President to issue a sequestration order without changing any of the particulars of the OMB report. It requires the General Accounting Office to prepare compliance reports. The BEA requires OMB and CBO to publish three sequestration reports—a ‘‘preview’’ report at the time the President submits the budget, an ‘‘update’’ report in August, and a ‘‘final’’ report at the end of a session of Congress (usually in the fall of each year). The preview report discusses the status of discretionary and PAYGO sequestration, based on current law. This report also explains the adjustments that are required by law to the discretionary caps and publishes the revised caps. (See Chapter 13, ‘‘Preview Report,’’ in the Analytical Perspectives volume of the 2001 budget.) The update and final reports revise the preview report estimates to reflect the effects of newly enacted discre- tionary and PAYGO laws. The BEA requires OMB and CBO to estimate the effects of appropriations acts and PAYGO laws immediately after each one is enacted and to include these estimates, without change, in the update and final reports. OMB’s final report estimates trigger a sequestration if the appropriations enacted for the current year exceed the caps or if the cumulative effect of PAYGO legislation is estimated to increase a deficit or reduce a surplus. In addition, CBO estimates the effects of bills as they move through Congress for the purpose of the Budget Committees’ enforcement of the budget resolution within Congress. OMB provides advisory estimates on bills that might have significant consequences as they move through Congress. From the end of a session of Congress through the following June 30th, discretionary sequestrations take place whenever an appropriations act for the current fiscal year causes a cap to be exceeded. Because a sequestration in the last quarter of a fiscal year might be too disruptive, the BEA specifies that a sequestration that otherwise would be required then is to be accomplished by reducing the cap for the next fiscal year. These requirements ensure that supplemental appropriations enacted during the fiscal year are subject to the budget enforcement provisions. Budget Execution Government agencies may not spend more than Congress has appropriated, and they may use funds only for purposes specified in law. The Antideficiency Act prohibits them from spending or obligating the Government to spend in advance of an appropriation, unless specific authority to do so has been provided in law. Additionally, the Act requires the President to apportion the funds available to most executive branch agencies. The President has delegated this authority to OMB, which usually apportions by time periods (usually by quarter of the fiscal year) and sometimes by activities. Agencies may request OMB to reapportion funds during the year to accommodate changing cir- Budget Calendar The following timetable highlights the scheduled dates for significant budget events during the year. Between the 1st Monday in January and the 1st Monday in February ..... President transmits the budget, including a sequestration preview report. Six weeks later .................. Congressional committees report budget estimates to Budget Committees. April 15 .............................. Action to be completed on congressional budget resolution. May 15 ............................... House consideration of annual appropriations bills may begin. June 15 .............................. Action to be completed on reconciliation. June 30 .............................. Action on appropriations to be completed by House. July 15 ............................... President transmits Mid-Session Review of the budget. August 20 ........................... OMB updates the sequestration preview. October 1 ............................ Fiscal year begins. 15 days after the end of a session of Congress ........ OMB issues final sequestration report, and the President issues a sequestration order, if necessary. 6 ANALYTICAL PERSPECTIVES cumstances. This system helps to ensure that funds are available to cover operations for the entire year. During the budget execution phase, the Government often finds that it needs to spend more money than Congress has appropriated for the fiscal year because of circumstances that were not anticipated when the budget was formulated and appropriations enacted for that fiscal year. For example, more money might be needed in order to provide adequate assistance to an area stricken by an unusually severe natural disaster. Under such circumstances, Congress may enact a supplemental appropriation. On the other hand, changing circumstances may reduce the need for certain spending for which Congress has appropriated funds. The President may propose not to spend funds under procedures specified in the Impoundment Control Act of 1974. These procedures prevent the President from failing to spend the funds without Congress’ agreement. Otherwise, it would possible for the President to thwart Congress’ spending policies through inaction. Under the act, the President may pro- pose deferrals or rescissions. Deferrals, which are temporary withholdings, take effect immediately unless overturned by an act of Congress. The President may only defer funds to provide for contingencies, to achieve savings made possible through changes in requirements or greater efficiency of operations, or as otherwise specifically provided in law. He may not defer funds for policy reasons. In 1999, the President proposed a total of $1.7 billion in deferrals, and Congress overturned none. Rescissions, which permanently cancel budget authority, take effect only if Congress passes a law approving them. The law may approve only part of a rescission. If Congress does not pass such a law within 45 days of continuous session, the President must make the funds available for spending. The President may propose a rescission for any reason. In total, Congress has rescinded about one-third of the amount of funds that Presidents have proposed for rescission since enactment of the Impoundment Control Act. In 1999, the President proposed rescissions totaling $35 million, and Congress rescinded a total of $17 million. COVERAGE OF THE BUDGET Federal Government and Budget Totals TOTALS FOR THE BUDGET AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT (In billions of dollars) 1999 actual Estimate 2000 2001 Budget authority Total ......................................................... Off-budget ................................................ On-budget ................................................ 1,777 326 1,450 1,801 334 1,467 1,885 343 1,543 Receipts: Total ......................................................... Off-budget ................................................ On-budget ................................................ 1,828 445 1,383 1,956 477 1,480 2,019 500 1,519 Outlays: Total ......................................................... Off-budget ................................................ On-budget ................................................ 1,703 321 1,382 1,790 329 1,461 1,835 340 1,495 124 124 167 148 184 160 ............ 1 ............ 19 15 9 Surplus: Total ......................................................... Off-budget ................................................ Medicare Solvency Debt Reduction Reserve ..................................................... Remaining On-budget ............................. The budget documents provide information on all Federal agencies and programs. However, because the laws governing Social Security (the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and the Federal Disability Insurance trust funds) and the Postal Service Fund exclude the receipts and outlays for those activities from the budget totals and from the calculation of the deficit or surplus for Budget Enforcement Act purposes, the budget presents on-budget and off-budget totals. The off-budget totals include the transactions excluded by law from the budget totals. The on-budget and off-budget amounts are added together to derive the totals for the Federal Government. These are sometimes referred to as the unified or consolidated budget totals. In 2001, the surplus section of this table shows the effect of the Administration’s proposal to reserve part of the on-budget surplus for Medicare solvency and for catastrophic prescription drug coverage. Called ‘‘Medicare Solvency/Debt Reduction,’’ these amounts would not be available for spending under the budget resolution or on the PAYGO scorecard. They would be available only for debt reduction, pending their use for Medicare or the catastrophic prescription drug program. These proposals are part of a broader budget framework proposal discussed in chapter 13, ‘‘Preview Report,’’ of the Analytical Perspectives volume of the 2001 budget. Neither the on-budget nor the off-budget totals include transactions of Government-sponsored enterprises, such as the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae). Federal laws established these enterprises for public policy purposes, but they are privately owned and operated corporations. Because of their close relationship to the Government, the budget discusses them and reports their financial data in the budget Appendix and in some detailed tables. The Appendix includes a presentation for the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for information only. The amounts are not included in either the on-budget or off-budget totals because of the independent status of the System. However, the Federal Reserve System transfers its net earnings to the Treasury, and the budget records them as receipts. Functional Classification The functional classification arrays budget authority, outlays, and other budget data according to the major 7 BUDGET SYSTEM AND CONCEPTS AND GLOSSARY purpose served—such as agriculture, income security, and national defense. There are nineteen major functions, most of which are divided into subfunctions. For example, the Agriculture function comprises the subfunctions Farm Income Stabilization and Agricultural Research and Services. The functional classification is an integral part of the congressional budget process, and the functional array meets the Congressional Budget Act requirement for a presentation in the budget by national needs and agency missions and programs. The following criteria are used in establishing functional categories and assigning activities to them: • A function encompasses activities with similar purposes, emphasizing what the Federal Government seeks to accomplish rather than the means of accomplishment, the objects purchased, the clientele or geographic area served, or the Federal agency conducting the activity. • A function must be of continuing national importance, and the amounts attributable to it must be significant. • Each basic unit being classified (generally the appropriation or fund account) usually is classified according to its primary purpose and assigned to only one subfunction. However, some large accounts that serve more than one major purpose are subdivided into two or more subfunctions. Section V, ‘‘Improving Government Performance,’’ in the main Budget volume of the 2001 budget provides information on government activities by function and subfunction. Agencies, Accounts, Programs, Projects, and Activities Various summary tables in the Analytical Perspectives volume of the 2001 budget provide information on budget authority, outlays, and offsetting collections and receipts arrayed by Federal agency. Chapter 25 of that volume, ‘‘Federal Programs by Agency and Account,’’ consists of a table that lists budget authority and outlays by budget account within each agency and the totals for each agency of budget authority, outlays, and receipts that offset the agency spending totals. The Appendix to the Budget of the United States Government provides budgetary, financial, and descriptive information about programs, projects, and activities by account within each agency. The Appendix also presents the most recently enacted appropriation language for an account and any changes that are proposed to be made for the budget year. Types of Funds Agency activities are financed through Federal funds and trust funds. Federal funds comprise several types of funds. Receipt accounts of the general fund, which is the greater part of the budget, record receipts not earmarked by law for a specific purpose, such as almost all income tax receipts. The general funds also includes the pro- ceeds of general borrowing. General fund appropriation accounts record general fund expenditures. General fund appropriations draw from general fund receipts collectively and, therefore, are not specifically linked to receipt accounts. Special funds consist of receipt accounts for Federal fund receipts that laws have earmarked for specific purposes and the associated appropriation accounts for the expenditure of those receipts. Public enterprise funds are revolving funds used for programs authorized by law to conduct a cycle of business-type operations, primarily with the public, in which outlays generate collections. Intragovernmental funds are revolving funds that conduct business-type operations primarily within and between Government agencies. The collections and the outlays of revolving funds are recorded in the same budget account. Trust funds account for the receipt and expenditure of monies by the Government for carrying out specific purposes and programs in accordance with the terms of a statute that designates the fund as a trust fund (such as the Highway Trust Fund) or for carrying out the stipulations of a trust agreement where the Nation is the beneficiary (such as any of several trust funds for gifts and donations for specific purposes). Trust revolving funds are trust funds credited with collections earmarked by law to carry out a cycle of businesstype operations. The Federal budget meaning of the term ‘‘trust,’’ as applied to trust fund accounts, differs significantly from its private sector usage. In the private sector, the beneficiary of a trust usually owns the trust’s assets, which are managed by a trustee who must follow the stipulations of the trust. In contrast, the Federal Government owns the assets of most Federal trust funds, and it can raise or lower future trust fund collections and payments, or change the purposes for which the collections are used, by changing existing laws. There is no substantive difference between a trust fund and a special fund or between a trust revolving fund and a public enterprise revolving fund. The Government does act as a true trustee for some funds. For example, it maintains accounts on behalf of individual Federal employees in the Thrift Savings Fund, investing them as directed by the individual employee. The Government accounts for such funds in deposit funds, which are not included in the budget. (Chapter 15, ‘‘Trust Funds and Federal Funds,’’ in the Analytical Perspectives volume of the 2001 budget provides more information on this subject.) Current Operating Expenditures and Capital Investment The budget includes all types of spending, including both current operating expenditures and capital investment. Capital investment includes direct purchases of land, structures, equipment, and software. It also includes subsidies for capital investment provided by direct loans and loan guarantees; purchases of other financial assets; grants to state and local governments for purchases of physical assets; and the conduct of 8 ANALYTICAL PERSPECTIVES research, development, education, and training. (Chapter 6, ‘‘Federal Investment Spending and Capital Budgeting,’’ in the Analytical Perspectives volume of the 2001 budget provides more information on capital investment.) RECEIPTS, OFFSETTING COLLECTIONS AND RECEIPTS, AND USER FEES The budget records money collected by Government agencies two different ways. Depending on the nature of the activity generating the collection, they are recorded as either: • Receipts, which are compared in total to outlays (net of offsetting collections and receipts) in calculating the surplus or deficit; or • Offsetting collections or offsetting receipts, which are deducted from gross outlays to produce net outlay figures. and outlays so that the budget totals measure the transactions of the Government with the public. A table in Chapter 20, ‘‘Outlays to the Public, Net and Gross,’’ in the Analytical Perspectives volume of the 2001 budget, shows the effect of offsetting collections and receipts on gross outlays for each major Federal agency. Although they both offset gross budget authority and outlays, the budget accounts for offsetting collections differently from offsetting receipts, as explained in the following sections. Receipts Offsetting Collections Receipts are collections that result from the Government’s exercise of its sovereign power to tax or otherwise compel payment and gifts of money to the Government. Sometimes they are called governmental receipts. They consist mostly of individual and corporation income taxes and social insurance taxes, but also include excise taxes, compulsory user charges, customs duties, court fines, certain license fees, and deposits of earnings by the Federal Reserve System. Total receipts for the Federal Government include both on-budget and offbudget receipts (see the table, ‘‘Totals for the Budget and Federal Government,’’ which appears earlier in this chapter.) Chapter 3, ‘‘Federal Receipts,’’ in the Analytical Perspectives volume of the 2001 budget provides more information on receipts. Some laws authorize agencies to credit collections directly to the account from which they will be spent and, usually, to spend the collections for the purpose of the account without further action by Congress. Most revolving funds operate with such authority. For example, a permanent law authorizes the Postal Service to use collections from the sale of stamps to finance its operations without a requirement for annual appropriations. The budget records these collections in the Postal Service Fund (a revolving fund) and records budget authority in an amount equal to the collections. Some intragovernmental collections are recorded in this manner. For example, the budget records the intragovernmental collections of the Federal Buildings Fund (mentioned earlier) in the same manner as the Postal Service Fund. In addition to revolving funds, some agencies are authorized to charge fees to defray a portion of costs for a program that are otherwise financed by appropriations from the general fund. In such cases, the budget records the offsetting collections and resulting budget authority in the program’s general fund expenditure account. Sometimes appropriations acts or provisions in other laws limit the obligations that can be financed by budget authority from offsetting collections. In those cases, the budget records budget authority in the amount available to incur obligations. Where accounts have offsetting collections, the budget shows the budget authority and outlays of the account both gross (before deducting offsetting collections) and net (after deducting offsetting collections). Totals for the agency, subfunction, and budget are net of offsetting collections. While most offsetting collections credited to expenditure accounts result from business-like activity or are collected from other Government accounts, some are governmental in nature but are required by law to be treated as offsetting. The budget labels these ‘‘offsetting governmental collections.’’ In General Offsetting Collections and Receipts Offsetting collections and receipts result from either of two kinds of transactions: • Business-like or market-oriented activities with the public. The budget records the proceeds from the sale of postage stamps, the fees charged for admittance to recreation areas, and the proceeds from the sale of Government-owned land, for example, as offsetting collections or receipts. They are deducted from gross budget authority and outlays, rather than added to receipts. This treatment produces budget totals for receipts, budget authority, and outlays that represent governmental rather than market activity. • Intragovernmental transactions. The budget also records collections by one Government account from another as offsetting collections or receipts. For example, the General Services Administration records payments it receives from other Government agencies for the rent of office space as offsetting collections in the Federal Buildings Fund. Intragovernmental offsetting collections and receipts are deducted from gross budget authority 9 BUDGET SYSTEM AND CONCEPTS AND GLOSSARY Offsetting Receipts Collections that are offset against gross outlays but are not authorized to be credited to expenditure accounts are credited to general fund, special fund, or trust fund receipt accounts and are called offsetting receipts. Offsetting receipts are deducted from budget authority and outlays in arriving at total budget authority and outlays. However, unlike offsetting collections credited to expenditure accounts, offsetting receipts do not offset budget authority and outlays at the account level. In most cases, they offset budget authority and outlays at the agency and subfunction levels. Offsetting receipts are subdivided into three categories, as follows: • Proprietary receipts from the public.—These are collections from the public that arise out of the business-type or market-oriented activities of the Government. Most proprietary receipts are deducted from the budget authority and outlay totals of the agency that conducts the activity generating the receipt and of the subfunction to which the activity is assigned. For example, fees for using National Parks are deducted from the totals for the Department of Interior, which has responsibility for the parks, and the Recreational Resources subfunction. Proprietary receipts from a few sources, however, are not offset against any specific agency or function and are classified as undistributed offsetting receipts. They are deducted from the Government-wide totals for budget authority and outlays. For example, the collections of rents and royalties from outer continental shelf lands are undistributed because the amounts are large and for the most part are not related to the spending of the agency that administers the transactions and the subfunction that records the administrative expenses. • Intragovernmental transactions.—These are collections from expenditure accounts that are de- posited into receipt accounts. Most intragovernmental transactions are deducted from the budget authority and outlays of the agency that conducts the activity generating the receipts and of the subfunction to which the activity is assigned. In two cases, however, intragovernmental transactions appear as special deductions in computing total budget authority and outlays for the Government rather than as offsets at the agency level—agencies’ payments as employers into employee retirement trust funds and interest received by trust funds. The special treatment for these receipts is necessary because the amounts are large and would distort the agency totals, as measures of the agency’s activities, if they were attributed to the agency. • Offsetting governmental receipts.—These are collections that are governmental in nature but are required by law to be treated as offsetting and are not authorized to be credited to expenditure accounts. User Fees In the budget, the term ‘‘user fee’’ refers to fees, charges, and assessments the Governemnt levies on a class directly benefiting from, or subject to regulation by, a Government program or activity, to be utilized solely to support the program or activity. It does not refer to a separate budget category for collections. The budget records user fees as receipts or as offsetting collections or receipts, depending on whether the fee results primarily from the exercise of governmental powers or from business-like activity. See Chapter 4, ‘‘User Fees and Other Collections,’’ in the Analytical Perspectives volume of the 2001 budget, for a more detailed discussion of user fees and offsetting collections and receipts. BUDGET AUTHORITY AND OTHER BUDGETARY RESOURCES, OBLIGATIONS, AND OUTLAYS Budget Authority and Other Budgetary Resources Budget authority is the authority provided in law to enter into obligations that will result in immediate or future outlays of Government funds. Government officials may obligate the Government to make outlays only to the extent they have been granted budget authority. The budget records budget authority as a dollar amount in the year when it first becomes available. Under the circumstances described below, unobligated balances of budget authority may be carried over into the next year. The budget does not record these balances as budget authority again. They do, however, constitute a budgetary resource that is available for obligation. In some cases, a provision of law (such as a limitation on obligations or a benefit formula) precludes the obligation of funds that would otherwise be available for obligation. In such cases, the budget records budget authority equal to the amount of obligations that can be incurred. In deciding the amount of budget authority to request for a program, project, or activity, agency officials estimate the total amount of obligations they will need to incur to achieve desired goals and subtract the amounts of unobligated balances available for these purposes. The amount of budget authority requested is influenced by the nature of the programs, projects, or activities being financed. For current operating expenditures, the amount requested usually covers needs for the year. For major procurement programs and construction projects, the Government generally applies a full funding policy. Under this policy, agencies must request an amount to be appropriated in the first year that they estimate will be adequate to complete an economically useful segment of a procurement or 10 project, even though it may be obligated over several years. This policy is intended to ensure that the decision-makers take into account all costs and benefits fully at the time decisions are made to provide resources. It also avoids sinking money into a procurement or project without being certain if or when future funding will be available to complete the procurement or project. Budget authority takes several forms: • appropriations, provided in annual appropriations acts or permanent laws, permit agencies to incur obligations and make payment; • authority to borrow, usually provided in permanent laws, permits agencies to incur obligations but requires them to borrow funds, usually from the general fund of the Treasury, to make payment; • contract authority, usually provided in permanent law, permits agencies to incur obligations in advance of a separate appropriation of the cash for payment or in anticipation of the collection of receipts that can be used for payment; and • spending authority from offsetting collections, usually provided in permanent law, permits agencies to credit offsetting collections to an expenditure account, incur obligations, and make payment using the offsetting collections. Because offsetting collections and receipts are deducted from gross budget authority, they are referred to as negative budget authority for some purposes, such as Congressional Budget Act provisions that pertain to budget authority. Authorizing statutes usually determine the form of budget authority for a program. The authorizing statute may authorize a particular type of budget authority to be provided in annual appropriations acts, or it may provide one of the forms of budget authority directly, without the need for further appropriations. Most programs are funded by appropriations. An appropriation may make funds available from the general fund, special funds, or trust funds, or authorize the spending of offsetting collections credited to expenditure accounts, including revolving funds. Borrowing authority is usually authorized for business-like activities where the activity being financed is expected to produce income over time with which to repay the borrowing with interest. Contract authority is a traditional form of budget authority for certain programs, particularly transportation programs. Annual appropriations acts generally make budget authority available for obligation only during the fiscal year to which the act applies. However, they specify many exceptions that allow budget authority for a particular purpose to remain available for obligation for a longer period or indefinitely (that is, until expended or until the program objectives have been attained).Typically, appropriations acts make budget authority for current operations available for only one year, and budget authority for construction and some research projects available for a specified number of years or indefinitely. Many appropriations of trust fund ANALYTICAL PERSPECTIVES receipts make the budget authority available indefinitely. Only another law can extend a limited period of availability (see Reappropriation below). Budget authority provided in authorizing statutes usually remains available until expended. Budget authority that is available for more than one year and that is not obligated in the year it becomes available is carried forward for obligation in a following year. In some cases, an account may have carried forward unobligated budget authority from more than one year. The sum of such amounts constitutes the account’s unobligated balance. Budget authority that has been obligated but not paid constitutes the account’s obligated balance. For example, in the case of salaries and wages, one to three weeks elapse between the time of obligation and the time of payment. In the case of major procurement and construction, payments may occur over a period of several years after the obligation is made. Obligated balances of budget authority at the end of the year are carried forward until the obligations are paid or the balances are canceled. (A general law cancels the obligated balances of budget authority that was made available for a definite period five years after the end of the period, and then other resources must be used to pay the obligations.) Due to such flows, a change in the amount of obligations incurred from one year to the next does not necessarily result from an equal change in the amount of budget authority available for that year and will not necessarily result in an equal change in the level of outlays in that year. Conversely, a change in the amount of budget authority available in any one year may change the level of obligations and outlays for several years to come. 3 Congress usually makes budget authority available on the first day of the fiscal year for which the appropriations act is passed. Occasionally, the appropriations language specifies a different timing. The language may provide an advance appropriation—budget authority that does not become available until one year or more beyond the fiscal year for which the appropriations act is passed. Forward funding refers to budget authority that is made available for obligation beginning in the last quarter of the fiscal year (beginning on July 1st) for the financing of ongoing grant programs during the next fiscal year. This kind of funding is used mostly for education programs, so that obligations for grants can be made prior to the beginning of the next school year. For certain benefit programs funded by annual appropriations, the appropriation provides for advance funding—budget authority that is to be charged to the appropriation in the succeeding year but which authorizes obligations to be incurred in the last quarter of the current fiscal year if necessary to meet benefit payments in excess of the specific amount appropriated for the year. 3 A separate report, ‘‘Balances of Budget Authority,’’ provides additional information on balances. The National Technical Information Service, Department of Commerce, makes the report available shortly after the budget is transmitted. 11 BUDGET SYSTEM AND CONCEPTS AND GLOSSARY Provisions of law that extend the availability of unobligated amounts that have expired or would otherwise expire are called reappropriations. Reappropriations count as new budget authority in the fiscal year in which the balances become newly available. For example, if a 2001 appropriations act extends the availability of unobligated budget authority that otherwise would expire at the end of 2000, new budget authority would be recorded for 2001. For purposes of the Budget Enforcement Act (discussed earlier under ‘‘Budget Enforcement’’), the budget classifies budget authority as discretionary or mandatory. Generally, budget authority is discretionary if provided in an annual appropriations act and mandatory if provided in authorizing legislation. However, the BEA requires the budget authority provided in annual appropriations acts for certain specifically identified programs to be treated as mandatory. This is because the authorizing legislation in these cases entitles beneficiaries to receive payment or otherwise obligates the Government to make payment, even though the payments are funded by a subsequent appropriation. Since the authorizing legislation effectively determines the amount of budget authority required, the BEA classifies it as mandatory. As discussed later, the discretionary and mandatory classification applies to the outlays that flow from budget authority, according to the classification of the budget authority. The budget also classifies budget authority as definite or indefinite. It is definite if the legislation that provides it specifies a dollar amount (which may be an amount not to be exceeded). It is indefinite if, instead of specifying an amount, the legislation providing it permits the amount to be determined by subsequent circumstances. For example, indefinite budget authority is provided for interest on the public debt, payment of claims and judgments awarded by the courts against the U.S., and many entitlement programs. Many of the laws that authorize collections to be credited to revolving, special, and trust funds make all of the collections available for expenditure for the authorized purposes of the fund, and such authority is considered to be indefinite budget authority. In some such cases, only some of the amount of collections otherwise available is counted as budget authority, because the rest is precluded from obligation in a fiscal year by a provision of law, such as a limitation on obligations or a benefit formula that determines the amounts to be paid (for example, the formula for unemployment insurance benefits). Obligations Incurred Following the enactment of budget authority and the completion of required apportionment action, Government agencies incur obligations to make payments. Agencies must record obligations when they enter into binding agreements that will result in outlays, immediately or in the future. Such obligations include the current liabilities for salaries, wages, and interest; and contracts for the purchase of supplies and equipment, construction, and the acquisition of office space, buildings, and land. For Federal credit programs, obligations are recorded in an amount equal to the estimated subsidy cost of direct loans and loan guarantees (see FEDERAL CREDIT below). Outlays Outlays are the measure of Government spending. The budget records outlays for payments that liquidate obligations (other than the repayment of debt), net of refunds and offsetting collections. They are recorded when obligations are paid, in the amount that is paid. The Government usually makes outlays in the form of cash (currency, checks, or electronic fund transfers). However, in some cases agencies pay obligations without disbursing cash and the budget records outlays nevertheless. For example, the budget records outlays for the full amount of Federal employees’ salaries, even though the cash disbursed to employees is net of Federal and state income taxes, retirement contributions, life and health insurance premiums, and other deductions. (The budget also records receipts for the deductions of Federal income taxes and other payments to the Government.) The budget records outlays and an increase in debt when debt instruments (bonds, debentures, notes, or monetary credits) are used to pay obligations. For example, the budget records the acquisition of physical assets through certain types of lease-purchase arrangements as though an outlay were made for an outright purchase. Because no cash is paid up front to the nominal owner of the asset, the transaction creates a Government debt. In such cases, the cash lease payments are treated as repayments of principal and interest. The measurement of interest varies. The budget records outlays for the interest on the public issues of Treasury debt securities as the interest accrues, not when the cash is paid. Treasury issues a kind of security that features monthly adjustments to principal for inflation and semiannual payments of interest on the inflation-adjusted principal. As with fixed-rate securities, the budget records the interest payments on these securities as outlays as the interest accrues. The monthly adjustment to principal is recorded, simultaneously, as an increase in debt outstanding and an outlay of interest. The budget normally states the interest on special issues of the Treasury debt securities held by trust funds and other Government accounts on a cash basis. When a Government account is invested in Federal debt securities, the purchase price is usually close or identical to the par (face) value of the security. The budget records the investment at par value and adjusts the interest paid by Treasury and collected by the account by the difference between purchase price and par, if any. However, two trust funds in the Department of Defense, the Military Retirement Trust Fund and the Education Benefits Trust Fund, routinely have relatively large differences between purchase price and par. For these funds, the budget records the holdings of debt at par but records the differences 12 ANALYTICAL PERSPECTIVES between purchase price and par as adjustments to the assets of the funds that are amortized over the life of the security. The budget records interest as the amortization occurs. For Federal credit programs, outlays are equal to the subsidy cost of direct loans and loan guarantees and are recorded as the underlying loans are disbursed (see FEDERAL CREDIT below). The budget records refunds of receipts that result from overpayments (such as income taxes withheld in excess of tax liabilities) as reductions of receipts, rather than as outlays. The budget records payments to taxpayers for tax credits (such as earned income tax credits) that exceed the taxpayer’s tax liability as outlays. Outlays during a fiscal year may liquidate obligations incurred in the same year or in prior years. Obligations, in turn, may be incurred against budget authority provided in the same year or against unobligated balances of budget authority provided in prior years. Outlays, therefore, flow in part from budget authority provided for the year in which the money is spent and in part from budget authority provided in prior years. The ratio of the outlays resulting from budget authority enacted in any year to the amount of that budget authority is referred to as the spendout rate for that year. As mentioned earlier, the budget classifies budget authority as discretionary or mandatory for the purposes of the BEA. This classification indicates whether appropriations acts or authorizing legislation control the amount of budget authority that is available. Outlays are classified as discretionary or mandatory according to the classification of the budget authority from which they flow. This classification of outlays measures the extent to which actual spending is controlled through the annual appropriations process. Typically, only onethird ($575 billion in 1999) of total outlays for a fiscal year are discretionary and the rest ($1,128 billion in 1999) consists of mandatory spending and net interest payments. Such a large portion of total spending is nondiscretionary because authorizing legislation determines net interest payments ($230 billion in 1999) and the spending for a few programs with large amounts of spending each year, such as Social Security ($387 billion in 1999) and Medicare ($188 billion in 1999). Outlays for an account are stated both gross and net of any offsetting collections credited to the account, but function, agency, and Government-wide outlay totals are only stated net. (See Chapter 20, ‘‘Outlays to the Public, Net and Gross,’’ in the Analytical Perspectives volume of the 2001 budget.) Total outlays for the Federal Government include both on-budget and offbudget outlays. (See the table, ‘‘Totals for the Budget and Federal Government’’ above.) FEDERAL CREDIT Some laws authorize Government agencies to make direct loans or loan guarantees. A direct loan is a disbursement of funds by the Government to a nonFederal borrower under a contract that requires the repayment of such funds with or without interest. The term includes equivalent transactions such as selling a property on credit terms in lieu of receiving cash up front. A loan guarantee is any guarantee, insurance, or other pledge with respect to the payment of all or a part of the principal or interest on any debt obligation of a non-Federal borrower to a non-Federal lender. The Federal Credit Reform Act prescribes the budget treatment for Federal credit programs. This treatment is designed to measure the subsidy cost of direct loans and loan guarantees in the budget, when the loans are disbursed, rather than the cash flows over the term of the loan, so direct loans and loan guarantees can be compared to each other and to other methods of delivering benefits, such as grants, on an equivalent basis. The budget records the estimated long-term cost to the Government arising from direct loans and loan guarantees in credit program accounts. The cost is estimated as the present value of expected disbursements over the term of the loan less the present value of expected collections. 5 For most credit programs, as with most other kinds of programs, agencies can incur 5 Present value is a standard financial concept that allows for the time value of money, that is, for the fact that a given sum of money is worth more at present than in the future because interest can be earned on it. costs only if Congress has appropriated funds sufficient to cover the costs in annual appropriations acts. When an agency disburses a direct loan or when a non-federal lender disburses a loan guaranteed by an agency, the program account outlays an amount equal to the cost to a non-budgetary credit financing account. For a few programs, the computed cost is negative, because the present value of expected collections over the term of the loan exceeds that of expected disbursements. In such cases, the financing account makes a payment to the Treasury general fund where it is recorded as an offsetting receipt in an account identified to the program. In a few cases, the receipts are earmarked in a special fund established for the program and are available for appropriation for the program. The agencies responsible for credit programs must reestimate the cost of the outstanding direct loans and loan guarantees, normally each year. If an agency estimates the cost to have increased, the agency must make an additional outlay from the program account to the financing account. If the agency estimates the cost to have decreased, the agency must make a payment from the financing account to the program’s receipt account, where it is recorded as an offsetting receipt. The Federal Credit Reform Act provides a permanent indefinite appropriation to pay the increased costs resulting from reestimates. If the Government modifies the terms of an outstanding direct loan or loan guarantee in a way that 13 BUDGET SYSTEM AND CONCEPTS AND GLOSSARY increases the cost, as the result of a law or the exercise of administrative discretion under existing law, the agency must record an obligation in the program account for an additional amount equal to the increased cost and outlay the amount to the financing account. As with the original costs, agencies may incur modification costs only if Congress has appropriated funds to cover them. The Government may reduce costs by modifications, in which case the agency makes a payment from the financing account to the program’s receipt account. Credit financing accounts record all cash flows to and from the Government arising from direct loan obligations and loan guarantee commitments. These cash flows consist mainly of direct loan disbursements and repayments, loan guarantee default payments, fees, and amounts recovered from disposing assets acquired as a result of defaults. Separate financing accounts record the cash flows of direct loans and of loan guarantees for programs that do both. The budget totals exclude the transactions of financing accounts because they are not a cost to the Government. Financing account transactions affect the means of financing a budget surplus or deficit (see Credit Financing Accounts in the next section). The budget documents display the transactions of the financing accounts, together with the related program accounts, for information and analytical purposes. The budget continues to account for the transactions associated with direct loan obligations and loan guarantee commitments made prior to 1992 on a cash flow basis. The budget records these transactions in credit liquidating accounts, which, in most cases, are the accounts that were used for the programs prior to the enactment of the Credit Reform Act. BUDGET DEFICIT OR SURPLUS AND MEANS OF FINANCING When outlays exceed receipts, the difference is a deficit. The Government finances deficits by borrowing and, to a limited extent, with the other means of financing discussed under this heading. The Government’s debt (debt held by the public) is approximately the cumulative amount of borrowing to finance deficits, less repayments. When receipts exceed outlays, the difference is a surplus. The Government uses surpluses to reduce debt and applies it to the means of financing. Most of the other means of financing may be either positive or negative; that is, they may increase or decrease the Government’s borrowing needs or its ability to reduce the publicly held debt. Borrowing and Debt Repayment The budget treats borrowing and debt repayment as a means of financing, not as receipts and outlays. If borrowing were defined as receipts and debt repayment as outlays, the budget would be virtually balanced by definition. This rule applies both to borrowing in the form of Treasury securities and to specialized borrowing in the form of agency securities (including the issuance of debt securities to liquidate an obligation and the sale of certificates representing participation in a pool of loans). In 1999, the Government repaid $89 billion of debt held by the public. This was the result of a $4 billion surplus in that year. The rest of the surplus was needed to finance direct loans disbursed in credit financing accounts, which are discussed below, and for smaller changes in the other means of financing. At the end of 1999, the debt held by the public was $3,633 billion. In addition to selling debt to the public, the Treasury Department issues debt to Government accounts, primarily trust funds that are required by law to invest in Treasury securities. Issuing and redeeming this debt does not affect the means of financing, because these transactions occur between one Government account and another and thus do not raise or use any cash for the Government as a whole. (See Chapter 12, ‘‘Federal Borrowing and Debt,’’ in the Analytical Per- spectives volume of the 2001 budget for a fuller discussion of this topic.) Debt Buyback Premiums and Discounts The Treasury Department plans to buy back outstanding U.S. notes and bonds as part of its efforts to manage efficiently the reduction of the publicly held debt. The Treasury has made no firm decisions about the timing or the amount of the buybacks at this time. Because interest rates are now lower than the coupon rates on most of the notes and bonds that Treasury might buy, the government will have to pay a premium over the book value of these securities. However, because any new securities issued to finance these purchases would carry a lower coupon rate, these transactions would involve no net long-term cost to the taxpayer; in fact, if the liquidity of all new issues of Treasury securities is enhanced by the buybacks, as expected, total interest costs should be reduced. This raised a question about the proper budget treatment of any purchase premium. There is no precise precedent for the budget treatment of debt buybacks, in that the Treasury has not entered into the market to buy outstanding Federal securities for cash during the past century. The buyback premium is part of the cost of borrowing money for the period in which the debt was outstanding, like a coupon interest payment. Interest payments are normally recorded as budget outlays over the period in which the debt is outstanding, but buyback premiums present special problems, in that they would be paid when the debt is repaid. In similar past circumstances (in particular, the small amounts of unamortized original-issue discount that remained on several issues of Treasury bonds that were called), the practice has been to record any premium as interest at the time of the buyback—in the year the premium was paid in cash. However, this shows the cost at a time different from when it was incurred, and makes it appear that the buyback itself results 14 in an additional cost to the government. It also has the effect of reducing the budget surplus, which could discourage buybacks, even though they impose no additional cost to the government. Moreover, under this accounting, the budget would record receipts if securities were bought at a discount (which would be the case when current interest rates were higher than the rates on outstanding securities). This would create a perverse incentive to buy back securities that were available at a discount to increase the recorded surplus, even though such transactions would yield no long-term gain to the government. There are three alternatives to recording buyback premiums and discounts in the year of the buyback. Like immediate scoring, each has advantages and disadvantages—no option is perfect. Premiums and discounts could be spread retroactively over the years when the securities were outstanding, by adjusting the historical interest outlay figures. This would reflect the cost in the period in which it was incurred, and would eliminate the perverse incentives created by recording the premiums or discounts in the year of the buyback. However, this method would record the interest cost for securities that are bought back differently from that of otherwise identical securities that remain outstanding. It would also require changes to historical data every time Treasury bought back more securities, making those data less useful and reducing their credibility. The outlays for premiums or receipts for discounts could be amortized in future years—for example, over a period equal to the remaining lives of the securities when they were bought back. This would reduce the perverse incentives of the current treatment. However, it would record outlays for premiums or receipts for discounts much later than the period in which the costs were really incurred. It would lead future recorded interest outlays (net of receipts from discounts) to be inconsistent with the terms and amount of the debt outstanding in future years. In the extreme, the budget could show interest outlays (because of amortized premiums) after all debt had been retired. There are many possible variations of these alternatives that would record premiums (or discounts) over shorter or longer periods in the past or the future. None of them would significantly alter the pros and cons identified above. A third alternative is to record payments for premiums or collections for discounts not as outlays or receipts, but as a means of financing the surplus or deficit, in the year of the buyback. This is the way that borrowing and repayment of debt are treated. Under this accounting, premiums would decrease the Treasury’s cash balance, and discounts would increase it, in the year of the buyback. Because the premiums or discounts would not be recorded as outlays or receipts, this would avoid the perverse incentives associated with recording outlays or receipts all in the buyback year. It would not require repeated changes to the historical data. It would not distort outlays in ANALYTICAL PERSPECTIVES the current year or future years as a measure of the costs incurred in those periods. A disadvantage is that the budget would not record buyback premiums as interest outlays or buyback receipts as interest receipts in any period (though the premiums and discounts would be presented in the Budget table on the Federal debt), and thus the budget would permanently misstate the cumulative interest outlays over time. After consulting with the Congressional Budget Office and the House and Senate Budget Committees, the Administration has concluded that, on balance, the best option is to account for buyback premiums and discounts as a means of financing (although, like all of the other options, it does have some disadvantages). However, this treatment clearly would not be appropriate for any non-financial Federal transaction. Debt buybacks would not use or transfer the control of real resources, would not change the net worth (in economic terms) of the Federal government or the private sector, and would not change net credit flows. In contrast, any government transfer payment, or any purchase of a good or service, would so allocate Federal resources, and so must be recorded as a budgetary outlay. Most Federal financial transactions, including the payment of coupon interest on outstanding securities and the subsidy conveyed by direct loans and loan guarantees, also impose a cost on the government and allocate resources, and therefore must also be recorded as outlays. This is so even though a government purchase might be deemed to have long-term benefits for the Nation (in fact, all government purchases are deemed to be beneficial), or might be undertaken under a legal obligation (such as the payment of coupon interest on outstanding Treasury bonds, notes or bills). The Treasury will begin conducting debt buybacks in the next few months, and expects to conduct several such operations in the first half of calendar year 2000. Based on the results of these first operations, the Treasury expects to develop a plan for debt buybacks as a part of its ongoing cash- and debt-management operations. Because it is impossible to develop a firm plan prior to completion of the initial operations, this budget includes no estimate of future buyback premiums. When the buybacks do occur, future budgets will record any premium payments or discount collections as a means of financing, and will present them in a separate entry in the tables on the Federal debt that show the means of financing. Exercise of Monetary Power Seigniorage is the profit from coining money. It is the difference between the value of coins as money and their cost of production. Seigniorage adds to the Government’s cash balance, but unlike the payment of taxes or other receipts, it does not involve a transfer of financial assets from the public. Instead, it arises from the exercise of the Government’s power to create money. Therefore, the budget excludes seigniorage from receipts and treats it as a means of financing other than borrowing from the public. The budget treats prof- 15 BUDGET SYSTEM AND CONCEPTS AND GLOSSARY its resulting from the sale of gold as a means of financing, since the value of gold is determined by its value as a monetary asset rather than as a commodity. Credit Financing Accounts The budget records the net cash flows of credit programs in credit financing accounts, which are excluded from the budget totals and are called net financing disbursements. (See FEDERAL CREDIT above.) Net financing disbursements are defined in the same way as the outlays of a budgetary account and are therefore a means of financing other than borrowing from the public. Like outlays, they may be either positive or negative. The net financing disbursements result partly from intragovernmental transactions with budgetary accounts (the receipt of subsidy payments and the receipt or payment of interest) and partly from transactions with the public (disbursement and repayment of loans, receipt of interest and fees, payment of default claims, etc.). An intragovernmental transaction affects the deficit or surplus and the means of financing in equal amounts but with opposite signs, so they have no combined effect on Treasury borrowing from the public. On the other hand, financing account disbursements to the public increase the requirement for Treasury borrowing in the same way as an increase in budget outlays. Financing account receipts from the public can be used to finance the payment of the Government’s obligations and therefore reduce the requirement for Treasury borrowing from the public in the same way as an increase in budget receipts. Deposit Fund Account Balances The Treasury uses deposit funds, which are nonbudgetary accounts, to record amounts held temporarily until ownership is determined (for example, earnest money paid by bidders for mineral leases) or held by the Government as agent for others (for example, State and local income taxes withheld from Federal employees’ salaries and not yet paid to the State or local government). Deposit fund balances may be held in the form of either invested or uninvested balances. Changes in deposit fund balances affect the Treasury’s cash balances, even though the transactions are not a part of the budget. To the extent that deposit fund balances are not invested, changes in the balances are a means of financing other than borrowing from the public. To the extent that the balances are invested in Federal debt, changes in the balances are reflected as borrowing from the public. Exchanges with the International Monetary Fund Under the terms of its participation in the IMF, the U.S. transfers dollars to the IMF and receives Special Drawing Rights in return. The SDR’s are interest-bearing monetary assets and may be exchanged for foreign currency at any time. These transfers are like bank deposits and withdrawals. Following a recommendation of the 1967 President’s Commission on Budget Concepts, the budget excludes these transfers from budget outlays or receipts. The budget does record interest paid by the IMF on U.S. deposits (as an offsetting collection). It also records outlays for foreign currency exchanges to the extent there is a realized loss in dollars terms and offsetting collections to the extent there is a realized gain in dollar terms. FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT The budget includes information on civilian and military employment and personnel compensation and benefits. It also compares the Federal workforce, State and local government workforces, and the United States population. The budget provides two different measures of Federal employment levels—actual positions filled and full-time equivalents (FTE). One FTE equals one work year or 2,080 hours. For most purposes, the FTE measure is more meaningful, because it takes into account part-time employment, temporary employment, and vacancies during the year. For example, one fulltime employee and two half-time employees would count as two FTE’s but three positions. (Chapter 10, ‘‘Federal Employment,’’ in the Analytical Perspectives volume of the 2001 budget provides more information on this subject.) TOTAL FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT 1999 actual 2000 estimated 2001 estimated Total FTE’s ......................... 4,113,481 4,182,925 4,086,227 Federal Executive Branch civilian employees per 1000 U.S. population ....... 9.7 9.8 9.4 Percent change 1999 to 2000 –0.7 –3.1 BASIS FOR BUDGET FIGURES Data for the Past Year The past year column (1999) generally presents the actual transactions and balances as recorded in agency accounts and as summarized in the central financial reports prepared by the Treasury Department for the most recently completed fiscal year. Occasionally the budget reports corrections to data reported erroneously to Treasury but not discovered in time to be reflected 16 ANALYTICAL PERSPECTIVES in Treasury’s published data. The budget usually notes the sources of such differences. Data for the Current Year The current year column (2000) includes estimates of transactions and balances based on the amounts of budgetary resources that were available when the budget was transmitted, including amounts appropriated for the year. This column also reflects any supplemental appropriations or rescissions proposed in the budget. Data for the Budget Year The budget year column (2001) includes estimates of transactions and balances based on the amounts of budgetary resources that are estimated to be available, including new budget authority requested under current authorizing legislation, and amounts estimated to result from changes in authorizing legislation and tax laws. The budget Appendix generally includes the appropriations language for the amounts proposed to be appropriated under current authorizing legislation. In a few cases, this language is transmitted later because the exact requirements are unknown when the budget is transmitted. The Appendix generally does not include appropriations language for the amounts that will be requested under proposed legislation; that language is usually transmitted later, after the legislation is enacted. Some tables in the budget identify the items for later transmittal and the related outlays separately. Estimates of the total requirements for the budget year include both the amounts requested with the transmittal of the budget and the amounts planned for later transmittal. Data for the Outyears The budget presents estimates for each of the four years beyond the budget year (2002 through 2005) in order to reflect the effect of budget decisions on longer term objectives and plans. Allowances The budget may include lump-sum allowances to cover certain transactions that are expected to increase or decrease budget authority, outlays, or receipts but are not, for various reasons, reflected in the program details. For example, the budget might include an allowance to show the effect on the budget totals of a proposal that would actually affect many accounts by relatively small amounts, in order to avoid unnecessary detail in the presentations for the individual accounts. Congress does not enact the allowances as such. Baseline The budget baseline is an estimate of the receipts, outlays, and deficits or surplus that would result from continuing current law through the period covered by the budget. The baseline assumes that receipts and mandatory spending, which generally are authorized on a permanent basis, will continue in the future as required by current law. The baseline assumes that the future funding for discretionary programs, which generally are funded annually, will equal the most recently enacted appropriation, adjusted for inflation. The baseline represents the amount of real resources that would be used by the Government over the period covered by the budget on the basis of laws currently enacted. (Chapter 14, ‘‘Current Services Estimates,’’ in the Analytical Perspectives volume of the 2001 budget provides more information on the baseline.) The baseline serves several useful for purposes: • It may warn of future problems, either for Government fiscal policy as a whole or for individual tax and spending programs; or it may show the resources available for future use to reduce the publicly held debt, increase spending programs, or cut taxes. • It provides a starting point for formulating the President’s budget. • It provides a ‘‘policy-neutral’’ benchmark against which the President’s budget and alternative proposals can be compared to assess the magnitude of proposed changes. • OMB uses it, under the BEA, to determine how much will be sequestered from each account and the level of funding remaining after sequestration. PRINCIPAL BUDGET LAWS The following basic laws govern the Federal budget process: • Article 1, section 8, clause 1 of the Constitution, which empowers the Congress to collect taxes. • Article 1, section 9, clause 7 of the Constitution, which requires appropriations in law before money may be spent from the Treasury. • Antideficiency Act (codified in Chapters 13 and 15 of Title 31, United States Code), which prescribes rules and procedures for budget execution. • Chapter 11 of Title 31, United States Code, which prescribes procedures for submission of the President’s budget and information to be contained in it. • Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (Public Law 93–344), as amended. This Act comprises the: —Congressional Budget Act of 1974, as amended, which prescribes the congressional budget process; and —Impoundment Control Act of 1974, which controls certain aspects of budget execution. 17 BUDGET SYSTEM AND CONCEPTS AND GLOSSARY • Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Public Law 99–177), as amended, which prescribes rules and procedures (including ‘‘sequestration’’) designed to eliminate excess spending. This Act is commonly known as the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act. • Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 (Title XIII, Public Law 101–508) significantly amended key laws pertaining to the budget process, including the Congressional Budget Act and the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act. The Budget Enforcement Act of 1997 (Title X, Public Law 105–33) extended the BEA requirements through 2002 (2006 in part) and altered some of the requirements. The requirements generally re- ferred to as BEA requirements (discretionary spending limits, pay-as-you-go, sequestration, etc.) are part of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act. • Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (as amended by the Budget Enforcement Act of 1997), a part of the Budget Enforcement Act of 1990, which amended the Congressional Budget Act to prescribe the budget treatment for Federal credit programs. • Government Performance and Results Act of 1993, which emphasizes managing for results. It requires agencies to prepare strategic plans, annual performance plans, and annual performance reports. GLOSSARY OF BUDGET TERMS Agency means a department or establishment of the Government. Allowance means a lump-sum included in the budget to represent certain transactions that are expected to increase or decrease budget authority, outlays, or receipts but that are not, for various reasons, reflected in the program details. Balances of budget authority means the amounts of budget authority provided in previous years that have not been outlayed. Baseline means an estimate of the receipts, outlays, and deficit or surplus that would result from continuing current law through the period covered by the budget. Budget means the Budget of the United States Government, which sets forth the President’s comprehensive financial plan for allocating resources and indicates the President’s priorities for the Federal Government. Budget authority (BA) means the authority provided by law to incur financial obligations that will result in outlays. (For a description of the several forms of budget authority, see Budget Authority and Other Budgetary Resources earlier in this chapter.) Budget totals mean the totals included in the budget for budget authority, outlays, and receipts. Some presentations in the budget distinguish on-budget totals from off-budget totals. On-budget totals reflect the transactions of all Federal Government entities except those excluded from the budget totals by law. The offbudget totals reflect the transactions of Government entities that are excluded from the on-budget totals by law. Under current law, the off-budget totals include the Social Security trust funds (Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and Federal Disability Insurance Trust Funds) and the Postal Service Fund. The budget combines the on- and off-budget totals to derive unified or consolidated totals for Federal activity. Budgetary resources mean amounts available to incur obligations in a given year. The term comprises new budget authority and unobligated balances of budget authority provided in previous years. Cap means the legal limits on the budget authority and outlays for each fiscal year provided by discretionary appropriations. Cash equivalent transaction means a transaction in which the Government makes outlays or receives collections in a form other than cash. (For a examples, see the section on Outlays earlier in this chapter.) Credit program account means a budget account that receives and obligates appropriations to cover the subsidy cost of a direct loan or loan guarantee and disburses the subsidy cost to a financing account. Deficit means the amount by which outlays exceed receipts in a fiscal year. It may refer to the on-budget, off-budget, or unified budget deficit. Direct loan means a disbursement of funds by the Government to a non-Federal borrower under a contract that requires the repayment of such funds with or without interest. The term includes the purchase of, or participation in, a loan made by another lender. The term also includes the sale of a Government asset on credit terms of more than 90 days duration as well as financing arrangements for other transactions that defer payment for more than 90 days. It also includes loans financed by the Federal Financing Bank (FFB) pursuant to agency loan guarantee authority. The term does not include the acquisition of a federally guaranteed loan in satisfaction of default or other guarantee claims or the price support loans of the Commodity Credit Corporation. (Cf. loan guarantee.) Direct spending—See mandatory spending. Discretionary appropriations means budgetary resources (except those provided to fund mandatory 18 spending programs) provided in appropriations acts. (Cf. mandatory spending.) Emergency appropriation means an appropriation that the President and the Congress have designated as an emergency requirement. Such spending is not subject to the limits on discretionary spending, if it is discretionary spending, or the pay-as-you-go rules, if it is mandatory. Federal funds group refers to the moneys collected and spent by the Government other than those designated as trust funds. Federal funds include general, special, public enterprise, and intragovernmental funds. (Cf. trust funds.) Financing account means a non-budgetary account (its transactions are excluded from the budget totals) that records all of the cash flows resulting from post1991 direct loan obligations or loan guarantee commitments. At least one financing account is associated with each credit program account. For programs that make both direct loans and loan guarantees, there are separate financing accounts for the direct loans and the loan guarantees. (Cf. liquidating account.) Fiscal year means the Government’s accounting period. It begins on October 1st and ends on September 30th, and is designated by the calendar year in which it ends. General fund means the accounts for receipts not earmarked by law for a specific purpose, the proceeds of general borrowing, and the expenditure of these moneys. Liquidating account means a budget account that records all cash flows to and from the Government resulting from pre-1992 direct loan obligations or loan guarantee commitments. (Cf. financing account.) Loan guarantee means any guarantee, insurance, or other pledge with respect to the payment of all or a part of the principal or interest on any debt obligation of a non-Federal borrower to a non-Federal lender, exept for the insurance of deposits, shares, or other withdrawable accounts in financial institutions. (Cf. direct loan.) Mandatory spending means spending controlled by laws other than appropriations acts (including spending for entitlement programs) and spending for the food stamp program. Although the Budget Enforcement Act use the term direct spending to mean this, mandatory spending is commonly used instead. (Cf. discretionary appropriations.) Intragovernmental fund—see revolving fund. Obligated balance means the cumulative amount of budget authority that has been obligated but not yet outlayed. (Cf. unobligated balance.) ANALYTICAL PERSPECTIVES Obligation means a binding agreements that will result in outlays, immediately or in the future. Budgetary resources must be available before obligations can be incurred legally. Off-budget—See budget totals. Offsetting collections mean collections that are deducted from gross budget authority and outlays, rather than added to receipts, and, by law, are credited directly to expenditure accounts. Usually, they may be spent for the purposes of the account without further action by Congress. They result from business-type or market-oriented activities with the public and other Government accounts. (Cf. receipts and offsetting receipts.) Offsetting receipts mean collections that are deducted from gross budget authority and outlays, rather than added to receipts, and are not authorized to be credited to expenditure accounts. Instead, they are credited to offsetting receipt accounts. The legislation that authorizes the offsetting receipts may require them to be appropriated in annual appropriation acts before they can be spent. Like offsetting collections, they result from business-type or market-oriented activities with the public and other Government accounts. (Cf. receipts and offsetting collections.) On-budget—See budget totals. Outlay means a payment to liquidate an obligation (other than the repayment of debt). Outlays are the measure of Government spending. Except where they are labeled as gross, they are stated net of any related refunds and offsetting collections or receipts. Outlays generally are equal to cash disbursements but also are recorded for cash-equivalent transactions, such as the subsidy cost of direct loans and loan guarantees, and interest accrued on public issues of public debt. Pay-as-you-go (PAYGO) means the requirements of the Budget Enforcement Act that result in a sequestration if the estimated combined result of legislation affecting mandatory spending or receipts is a net cost for a fiscal year. Outyear estimates means estimates presented in the budget for the years beyond the budget year (usually four) of budget authority, outlays, receipts, and other items (such as debt). Public enterprise fund—See revolving fund. Receipt means a collection that results from the Government’s exercise of its sovereign power to tax or otherwise compel payment and gifts of money to the Government. They are compared to outlays in calculating a surplus or deficit. (Cf. offsetting collections and offsetting receipts.) 19 BUDGET SYSTEM AND CONCEPTS AND GLOSSARY Revolving fund means a fund that conducts continuing cycles of business-like activity, in which the fund charges for the sale of products or services and uses the proceeds to finance its spending, usually without requirement for annual appropriations. There are two types of revolving funds: Public enterprise funds, which conduct business-like operations mainly with the public, and intragovernmental revolving funds, which conduct business-like operations mainly within and between Government agencies. Scorekeeping means measuring the budget effects of legislation, generally in terms of budget authority, receipts, and outlays for purposes of the Budget Enforcement Act. Sequestration means the cancellation of budgetary resources provided by discretionary appropriations or mandatory spending legislation, following various procedures prescribed by the Budget Enforcement Act. A sequestration may occur in response to a discretionary appropriation that causes discretionary spending to exceed the discretionary spending caps or in response to net costs resulting from the combined result of legislation affecting mandatory spending or receipts (referred to as a ‘‘pay-as-you-go’’ sequestration). Special fund means a Federal fund accounts for receipts earmarked for specific purposes and for the expenditure of these receipts. (Cf. trust fund.) Subsidy means the same as cost when it is used in connection with Federal credit programs. Surplus means the amount by which receipts exceed outlays. Supplemental appropriation means an tion enacted subsequent to a regular annual tions act, when the need for funds is too be postponed until the next regular annual tions act. appropriaappropriaurgent to appropria- Trust fund refers to a type of account, designated by law as a trust fund, for receipts earmarked for specific purposes and the expenditure of these receipts. Some revolving funds are designated as trust funds, and these are called trust revolving funds. (Cf. special fund and revolving fund.) Trust funds group refers to the moneys collected and spent by the Government through trust fund accounts. (Cf., Federal funds group.) Unobligated balance means the cumulative amount of budget authority that is not obligated and that remains available for obligation under law. User fee means a fee, charge, and assessment levied on a class directly benefiting from, or subject to regulation by, a Government program or activity, to be utilized solely to support the program or activity. Need Additional Copies ??? Copies of the Budget and related Office of Management and Budget documents may be purchased at any of the GPO bookstores listed below. (Paper copies only.) GPO BOOKSTORES ALABAMA DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA O’Neill Building 2021 Third Ave., North Birmingham, Alabama 35203 (205) 731-1056 FAX (205) 731-3444 U.S. Government Printing Office 710 North Capitol Street, NW Washington, DC 20401 (202) 512-0132 FAX (202) 512-1355 1510 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20005 (202) 653-5075 FAX (202) 376-5055 CALIFORNIA ARCO Plaza, C-Level 505 South Flower Street Los Angeles, California 90071 (213) 239-9844 FAX (213) 239-9848 FLORIDA Marathon Plaza, Room 141-S 3C3 Second Street San Francisco, California 94107 (415) 512-2770 FAX (415) 512-2776 100 W. Bay Street Suite 100 Jacksonville, Florida 32202 (904) 353-0569 FAX (904) 353-1280 GEORGIA First Union Plaza 999 Peachtree Street, NE Suite 120 Atlanta, Georgia 30309 (404) 347-1900 FAX (404) 347-1897 COLORADO Suite 130 1660 Wynkoop Street Denver, Colorado 80202 (303) 844-3964 FAX (303) 844-4000 ILLINOIS Norwest Banks Building 201 West 8th Street Pueblo, Colorado 81003 (719) 544-3142 FAX (719) 544-6719 One Congress Center, Suite 124 401 South State Street Chicago, Illinois 60605 (312) 353-5133 FAX (313) 353-1590 MARYLAND Retail Sales Outlet 8660 Cherry Lane Laurel, Maryland 20707 (301) 953-7974 FAX (301) 498-8995 OHIO TEXAS Room 207, Federal Building 200 North High Street Columbus, Ohio 43215 (614) 469-6956 FAX (614) 469-5374 Texas Crude Building 801 Travis Street, Ste 120 Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 228-1187 FAX (713) 228-1186 Suite 160, Federal Building 477 Michigan Avenue Detroit, Michigan 48226 (313) 226-7816 FAX (313) 226-4698 OREGON WASHINGTON MISSOURI 120 Bannister Mall 5600 E. Bannister Road Kansas City, Missouri 64137 (816) 765-2256 FAX (816) 767-8233 PENNSYLVANIA NEW YORK Federal Building, Room 2-120 26 Federal Plaza New York, New York 10278 (212) 264-3825/2922 FAX (212) 264-9318 Room 118, Federal Building 1000 Liberty Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222 (412) 395-5021 FAX (412) 395-4547 Room 1653, Federal Building 1240 East 9th Street Cleveland, Ohio 44199 (216) 522-4922 FAX (216) 522-4714 MASSACHUSETTS Thomas P. O’Neill Fed. Bldg. 10 Causeway Street, Rm. 169 Boston, Massachusetts 02222 (619) 720-4180 FAX (617) 720-5753 MICHIGAN 1305 SW. First Avenue Portland, Oregon 97201 (503) 221-6127 FAX (503) 225-0563 Room 1C50, Federal Building 1100 Commerce Street Dallas, Texas 75242 (214) 767-0076 FAX (214) 767-3239 Room 194, Federal Building 915 Second Avenue Seattle, Washington 98174 (206) 553-4270 FAX (206) 553-6717 Robert Morris Building 100 North 17th Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 (215) 636-1900 FAX (215) 636-1903 WISCONSIN The Reuss Federal Plaza 310 West Wisconsin Avenue, Ste 150W Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203 (414) 297-1304 FAX (414) 297-1300 There is a 25% discount on all orders for 100 or more copies of a single title mailed to a single address. No discount is allowed if such orders are mailed to multiple addresses. Superintendent of Documents Publications Order Form Order Processing Code: *8163 All prices include regular domestic postage and handling and are good through July 2000. After this date, please call the Order and Information Desk at (202) 512–1800 to verify prices. To fax your orders and inquiries—(202) 512–2250. Qty. Stock Number Title 041-001-00533-1 Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2001 041-001-00534-0 Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2001—Appendix 041-001-00535-8 Analytical Perspectives, Fiscal Year 2001 041-001-00536-6 Historical Tables, Fiscal Year 2001 041-001-00537-4 A Citizen’s Guide to the Federal Budget, Fiscal Year 2001 041-001-00538-2 The Budget System and Concepts, Fiscal Year 2001 041-001-00539-1 The Budget on CD-ROM, Fiscal Year 2001 (International customers—please add an additional 25%.) Please Print or Type Price Each $38.00 $72.00 $54.00 $28.00 $3.75 $3.25 $17.00 Total for Publications Please choose method of payment: (Company or personal name) Check payable to the Superintendent of Documents (Additional address/attention line) GPO Deposit Account (Street address) Total Price – VISA or MasterCard Account (City, State, ZIP Code) (Daytime phone—including area code) Mail To: Superintendent of Documents Mail To: Government Printing Office, Mail To: Washington, DC 20402–9325 (Credit card expiration date) (Signature) Thank you for your order!
@FedFRASER