View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

w w w. s t l o u i s f e d . or g

A CLOSER LOOK

Autumn 2007
A Closer Look takes topics from
previous and current issues of
Bridges and examines them
from a local perspective.

P u b l i s h e d Q u a rt e r ly By T h e C o m m u n i t y A f fa i r s D e pa rt m e n t
O f T h e F e d e r a l R e s e rv e B a n k O f S t. L o u i s

...AT THE Memphis REGION

Mixed-Income Housing in Memphis
Social, Financial Partnerships Foundation of Four Large Developments
The face of public housing in Memphis, Tenn., has
changed dramatically in
the last 10 years, primarily
as a result of the HOPE VI
program, an initiative of the
Department of Housing and
Urban Development (HUD).
HOPE VI grants were
funded to address severely
distressed public housing
projects occupied primarily
by poor families. A major
goal of the HOPE VI program
is to replace public housing
projects with mixed-income
housing and also to provide
housing vouchers to enable
some residents to rent apartments in the private market.
In Memphis in the early
1990s, many low- to moderate-income residents resided
in several public housing
developments operated by
the Memphis Housing
Authority. This concentration of residents with lower
incomes began to change
in 1996 as Memphis began
receiving Hope VI grants.
Since that time, the city of
Memphis has received four
grants totaling $124.6 million
which, along with private
funds, have resulted in the
development of four new
mixed-income communities: College Park, Uptown,
Legends Park and University Place.

From left, Ruby Bright, executive director of the Women’s Foundation; Susan Stephenson, board chair of the Women’s Foundation; and Karla Davis, project manager of
Memphis Hope in front of the construction site for Phase I of University Place, which
is almost complete.

The Early Developments
The city’s first public-private
HOPE VI development, LeMoyne Gardens, was renamed
College Park, a mixed-income
housing development that
has 40 homes and 371 rental
units. The portion of the
development costs funded by
the HOPE VI grant was $47.2
million. The LeMoyne Redevelopment LLC is responsible
for this development.
In 2000, the city was
awarded a second HOPE VI
grant, this time for $35 million for the redevelopment of
two public housing developments, Hurt Village and Lauderdale Courts. The resulting
mixed-income development
from these two areas was

renamed Uptown Memphis.
Approximately 1,000 mixedincome units—affordable,
public housing and marketrate—were created. With
funds from a public/private
partnership that included the
city of Memphis, the Memphis Housing Authority and
Lauderdale-Greenlaw, LLC,
a Belz-Turley Co., the HOPE
VI grant was leveraged into
$142 million of development
investment.
The Newest Developments
The newest developments
in the mixed-income housing
market are University Place
and Legends Park, with construction having begun
in 2006. The Lamar Terrace

and Dixie Homes public
housing projects were razed
to make way for these two
new developments.
The four phases for University Place will include 118
units of housing for senior
citizens, 287 multifamily rental
units and 68 single-family
home ownership units. Phase
I, housing for senior citizens, is
almost complete. The HOPE
VI grant for University Place
totaled $22.4 million.
The $20 million HOPE VI
grant for Legends Park, along
with private financial support,
will result in 430 market-rate
and income-based rental units
and 30 for-sale homes. Phase I
of four phases of the redevelopment plan will consist of
a home ownership program
for families with household
incomes of less than 80 percent
of the area’s median income.
University Place and Legends
Park, like the other HOPE VI
developments, involve a partnership between a developer
(in this case McCormack
Baron Salazar), the Memphis
Housing Authority and the
city of Memphis.
From Housing Project to MixedIncome Housing
The organization responsible for the well-being of
residents who have been
continued on Back Page

continued from Front Page

Vearlean Gibson at her residence in
Uptown Memphis.

A Success Story
Ensuring that her three children
had a good education and a better
life have always been key goals for
Vearlean Gibson. While residing in the
Hurt Village public housing project,
she worked whenever possible, even
though she faced challenging child-care
issues. She often left home at 5 a.m.
daily with her small children to take
multiple buses to their day-care centers
and then to her job. She knew it was
important that her children participated
in meaningful activities and always
involved them in church programs or
after-school programs.
All of her children are now adults,
but two of them lived with her when she
initially moved to Uptown Memphis.
Children are permitted to live with
parents after age 18 if they are full-time
college students or employed. If a child
over 18 is not in school or working, 20
hours of community service must be
done each month.
Gibson’s hard work has paid off. Her
oldest daughter is employed at a local
day-care center, her younger daughter
has a Special Master in Education and
works for the Memphis City Schools, and
her son is working and going to college.
Because all three of her children now
have their own apartments, Gibson was
required to move from her three-bedroom
townhouse to a one-bedroom apartment
in another part of Uptown Memphis.
Gibson now has an automobile, but
she said she would take public transportation if it was necessary for her to
go to work and not jeopardize living in
her “new” community.

displaced as the new developments are being built is Urban
Strategies Memphis Hope.
Memphis HOPE is a nonprofit organization funded
by the Women’s Foundation
for a Greater Memphis. The
foundation raised $7.3 million
for Memphis HOPE to provide
case management services
to the nearly 1,200 residents
(600 families) who were displaced from Lamar Terrace and
Dixie Homes.
Ruby Bright, executive
director of the Women’s
Foundation, said the foundation decided to fund Memphis HOPE because “nearly
95 percent of public housing
households are headed by
women. The profiles of these
women align with those that
fit within our focus areas.”
As a model for social change
through community, public
and private partnerships,
Memphis Hope provides intensive case management to each
family. Karla Davis, senior
project manager for Memphis
HOPE, is responsible for establishing cooperative relationships with other organizations,
identifying funding opportunities and leveraging resources.
She says the organization’s goal
is to “serve the whole family,
by connecting adult residents
with employment preparation
and job training programs;
connecting youth with tutoring
and enrichment programs; and
connecting seniors and the disabled with service programs.”
The homes and apartment
units in all the new developments require all residents
between the ages of 19 and
62, whether they are paying a
subsidized rate or market rate,
to meet the following criteria:
1. They must be employed at
least 30 hours per week.
2. If not employed, they must
participate in educational
or work-related activities

on a full-time basis.
Residents over age 62
are exempt. Residents
between the ages of 19 and
62 who are disabled and
not employed for 30 hours
per week must perform
eight hours of community
service per week.
3. Residents must be in
good standing in their
current housing.
Residents who choose not
to return do so primarily
because they are unable to
meet one or more of the criteria. The challenges faced by
residents who desire to return
include transportation and
child care issues, which have
an impact on employment,
and criminal histories.
• Transportation is perhaps
the biggest challenge
because many residents
rely on public transportation. Memphis does not
have a public transportation system that permits
workers to travel to jobs
at varying hours of the
day and night.
• Applying for housing in
units reserved for senior
citizens presents some
challenges because some
senior residents are caretakers for grandchildren.
• Approval cannot be given
to anyone with a felony
criminal record regardless of the length of time
that has expired since the
crime was committed.
Lessons Learned
The scope of these development projects has given

Memphis officials the opportunity to track what works
and what doesn’t.
If occupancy rates are any
indication, the two earliest
Hope VI projects, College Park
and Uptown, are a success.
College Park is 100 percent
occupied, and Uptown is close
to 100 percent occupied.
Quality construction
work and location also have
been cited as key factors to
a successful mixed-income
community. The Memphis
projects are located in downtown and midtown near the
medical district and entertainment areas.
It is evident that the four
developments in Memphis
all share a common bond: a
strong public/private partnership. The city of Memphis
and the Memphis Housing
Authority are involved in all
of the developments. The
private component, the developer and volunteer community support may differ.
Funding for the projects
was one of the biggest challenges. The Hope VI grants
are very competitive, and
HUD initially denied Memphis’ application for Legends
Park and University Place.
In addition, Hope VI funds
must be leveraged with public
and private funds. Public
funds are often promised, but
if there are budget shortfalls,
they may be delayed.
Funding came from
multiple sources such as
Fannie Mae, city and county
governments and tax credit
programs. Banks included
Wachovia, First Tennessee
and NBC (now Sun Trust).

This issue of A Closer Look was written
by Martha Perine Beard, senior branch
executive, Federal Reserve Bank of
St. Louis, Memphis Branch.