Full text of Agricultural Survey : Second Quarter 1996
The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
STATISTICAL F E D E R A L R E S E R V E RELEASE B A N K 0 F D A L L A S Agricultural Credit Conditions at Survey Banks in the Beventh District Quarterly Survey of Agricultural Credit Conditions in the Eleventh Federal Reserve District Demand for Loans Twenty-six percent of respondents report a decline in loan demand. Percent 100 80 Second Quarter 1996 60 40 20 The second-quarter Survey of Agricultural Credit Conditions indicates increasing stress on the Eleventh District agricultural community. Agricultural bankers report weak land values, continued declines in the rate of loan repayment and increases in renewals and extensions. Compared with the first quarter, a greater percentage of agricultural bankers report that they have increased their collateral requirements. Quarterly Suroey of Agricultural Credit Conditions is compiled from a survey of Eleventh District agricultural bankers. This Here are additional details from the survey: • Land values continue to decline, and 33 percent of responding bankers expect farmland values to drop even more in the third quarter. 0 1990 1991 1992 Less 1993 •Same 1994 1995 1996 • Greater Funds Available for Additional Lending Seventy -seven percent of respondents report no change in availability of funds for lending. Perce nt 100 80 60 40 20 publication is prepared by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas and is available without charge by writing to the Research Department, • Nearly 60 percent of responding bankers report a decrease in the rate of loan repayment. In the Southern High Plains, Southern Low Plains, and Trans-Pecos and Edwards Plateau regions, over 70 percent of bankers report a drop in the loan repayment rate. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, P.O. Box 655906, Dallas, TX 75265-5906, or by telephoning (214) 922-5254. For questions regarding information in the release, contact Michelle Burchfiel, (214) 922-5178. • Sixty percent of responding bankers report an increase in renewals or extensions, nearly three times the number who reported an increase a year ago. • Sixty percent of responding bankers expect the volume of feeder cattle loans to decline during the third quarter, while 40 percent expect the volume of farm machinery and non-real-estate farm Joans to decline. 0 1990 1991 1992 Less 1993 Same 1994 1995 1996 • Greater Rate of Loan Repayment The rate of loan repayment decreases for 59 percent of second-quarter respondents. Percent 100 80 60 40 20 0 1990 1991 1992 Less 1993 •Same 1994 • Greater 1995 1996 STATISTICAL RELEASE Agricultural Credit Conditions at Survey Banks in the Eleventh District Renewals or Extensions of Loans Sixty percent of respondents report an increase in renewals or extensions. Percent 100 Loan-Deposit Ratios at Survey Banks Average actual and desired ratios 80 Percent 60 60 55 40 50 20 0 1990 45 1991 1992 Less 1993 •Same 1994 1995 II Actual Ratio - Desired Ratio 40 1996 • Greater 35 1995:2 1995:3 1995:4 1996:1 1996:2 Amount of Collateral Nearly 40 percent of survey respondents report an increase in collateral requirements. Percent 100 DISTRIBUTION OF LOAN-DEPOSIT RATIOS 80 Banks Reporting (Percent) 60 Ratio Less than 41% 41%to 50% 51% to 60% 61% to 70% More than 70% 40 20 0 1990 1991 1992 Less 1993 • Same 1994 1995 1996 1995 Jul. 1 Oct. 1 39 17 18 15 11 Millions of dollars {seasonally adjusted) 4,400 4,200 1996 Apr. l 34 23 14 21 9 37 24 20 14 5 Jul. 1 29 24 15 22 11 INTEREST RATES-FIXED • Greater Total Agricultural Loans at Eleventh District Agricultural Banks Lending continued to decline slightly in first-quarter 1996, after strong growth throughout most of 1995. 31 22 18 14 14 Jan. 1 Average Rate (Percent) Ratio Feeder cattle Other farm operating Intermediate term Long-term farm real estate 199 5 Jul. 1 Oct. 1 Jan. 1 1996 Apr. 1 Jul. 1 11.04 11.10 11.12 10.78 10.68 10.84 10.79 10.55 10.40 10.58 10.43 10.04 10.45 10.55 10.44 10.05 10.77 10.86 10.71 10.47 INTEREST RATES-VARIABLE Average Rate (Percent) 4,000 Ratio 1995 Jul. 1 Oct. 1 Jan. l 1996 Apr. 1 Jul. 1 11.08 11.16 11.13 10.74 10.56 10.70 10.56 10.39 10.35 10.50 10.25 10.13 10.45 10.54 10.37 10.14 3,800 3,600 3 •400 +-.-86..,.-'- 87-.-'88-.--' 89 - r-,90 -,.--·9-1-.--.92.--'9-3.--'9_4,.....'-95..,.-'~ 96 Feeder cattle Other farm operating Intermediate term Long-term farm real estate 10.74 10.88 10.82 10.49 STATISTICAL RELEASE CROPLAND-DRYLAND Rll'al Real Estate Values July 1, 1996 Region Number of banks reporting land values. Nominal dollars per acre. n.r.-Not reported. 1 2 NOTE: Regional land values based on a small number of reporting banks should be used with caution_ All figures are preliminary. Beventh Federal Reserve District Percent Changes in Values from Previous Previous Quarter Year DISTRICT 155 544 - 1.0 -3.6 TEXAS Northern High Plains Southern High Plains Northern Low Plains Southern Low Plains Cross Tunbers North Central Texas East Texas Central Texas Coastal Texas South Texas Trans-Pecos and Edwards Plateau 145 19 17 11 13 13 26 9 14 8 5 540 282 325 296 390 546 769 685 812 792 414 -1.0 -3.5 -2.4 -4.0 1.9 7.1 5.0 -6.2 -8.2 3.0 -6.4 -3.5 -7.0 -7.1 -2.5 -1.7 15.5 4.0 -5.3 -8.3 -1.2 -25.6 10 490 .8 -9.0 8 2 632 227 -1.7 - 1.2 -4.8 -9.1 Northern Louisiana Southern New Mexico CROPLAND-IRRIGATED 12 N EW Average Value 2 Banks' Second-Quarter 1996 M E X IC O Region DISTRICT 1 Northern High Plains 2 Southern High Plains Coastal Texas 10 South Texas 11 Trans-Pecos and Edwards Plateau 12 Southern New Mexico 13 Northern Louisiana 3 Northern Low Plains 4 Southern Low Plains 5 Cross Timbers 6 North Central Texas 7 East Texas Average Value2 Banks' Second-Quarter 1996 Percent Changes in Values from Previous Previous Quarter Year 103 719 .3 -1.4 TEXAS Northern High Plains Southern High Plains Northern Low Plains Southern Low Plains Cross Tunbers North Central Texas East Texas Central Texas Coastal Texas South Texas Trans-Pecos and Edwards Plateau 89 19 17 6 10 7 4 4 6 1 5 625 570 609 432 634 699 n.r. 833 1,131 607 623 -.8 .3 -2.4 -1.8 2.6 -.9 n.r. 1.3 -8.9 5.6 -3.0 -4.6 -.4 -.8 1.6 1.0 4.2 n.r. -10.l -2.5 n.r. -32.8 10 886 -.1 14.4 Northern Louisiana Southern New Mexico 8 6 891 1,578 -1.2 5.2 -.3 4.5 RANCHLAND Eleventh District Land Values Real land values continue to decline in the second quarter of 1996. Region 1992 dollars per acre 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 ~ ,, -- ..... ' .... 400 Ranch land 200 0 Dryland ---- ---'92 '93 '94 '95 '96 Percent Changes in Values from Previous Previous Quarter Year DISTRICT 168 314 -2.2 -1.1 TEXAS Northern High Plains Southern High Plains Northern Low Plains Southern Low Plains Cross Timbers North Central Texas East Texas Central Texas Coastal Texas South Texas Trans-Pecos and Edwards Plateau 156 17 13 11 13 14 27 16 17 6 7 393 180 140 154 232 473 705 724 828 533 391 -2.2 -1.2 1.3 -.9 -1.6 -4.1 -8.5 -3.0 -.5 14.2 9.9 3.1 -.3 -9.0 -7.9 15 338 .2 -5.1 7 5 392 85 -2.7 -1.8 -12.6 6.6 Northern Louisiana Southern New Mexico '82 '83 '84 '85 '86 '87 '88 '89 '90 '91 Average Value2 Banks' Second-Quarter 1996 1.7 8.0 6.7 -24.2 -5.1 -1.0 -2.0 STATISTICAL Second-Quarter Comments RELEASE Region 5-Cross 'limbers Region 8-Central Texas Livestock and dairy producers are showing marginal profits, with high feed costs and low beef prices. Hay farmers have a good flfSt cutting. Crops are a total loss. Pasture conditions worsen by me day. Hay is selling at the highest price it ha ever brought; no hay is being baled, and prices are too high to purchase and truck in. Drought has caused many cattle producers to sell out or severely reduce the size of their herds because they cannot afford to feed their cattle. Some are selling at a loss. Auction barns are having their biggest run of cattle ever. Everyt11ing mat could go wrong went wrong for our cow/ calf producers mis year. Please let it rain. Region 6-North Central Texas District bankers were asked for any additional comments concerning agricultural land values or credit conditions. These comments have been edited. Region I-Northern High Plains Many farmers and ranchers are already experiencing financial difficulties resulting from 1994 and 1995 production. Cattle prices are not high enough to offset increased feeding costs. Farmers are not receiving any of the increased commodity prices and have dim prospects for a good wheat crop. Lack of moisture has resulted in higher irrigation costs, and repairs to machinery and equipment have been higher than normal. FmHA programs are difficult to get approved. The Noninsured Assistance Program will offer some relief for cattle producers, but the farmer is hurt as well. Multiperil crop insurance is too expensive and for irrigated crops does not insure against drought. If the year continues to be dry, many farmers will face serious bank debt problems come January. Region 2-Southern High Plains Drought, low cattle prices and high feed costs are causing severe economic hardship. In 1997, many farmers will exhaust tl1eir eligibility with FmHA and will no longer qualify for its services. This could be a big deal. Large areas of canon were lost to wind and hail. Replantings are a mixture of very late cotton, milo and peanuts. Expect cotton production to decline by at least 30 percent in our area. We will need an excellent growing season and a late fall to prevent a very bad year. Region 4-Southem Low Plains ,_ Crop insurance appears to be the main source of income for 1996. Grass is in poor condition, and rancl1ers are selling older stock and trying to keep younger anin1als. Equity built up in previous years has disappeared. Corron and peanuts have been planted. With wind and storm conditions, some of the crops have been destroyed. Farmers will try to replant, but these crops will be late and will need a late fall to mature. Livestock loans will be down for several reasons: cattle values are lower; there is less hospitable pasture and little hay; higher grain prices mean that more grain is sold and less fed; less equity is available to buy cattle. Cattle numbers are shrinking overall and locally. Crop production loans will be up in areas with irrigated farms as farmers seek to maximize production to take advantage of good crop prices. In some parts of the state, the phaseout of government payments will lessen economic stability and lower land values. Agriculture real estate prices will seek a true value from a production standpoint if there is little recreational or metropolitan influence. The average values are going to have a greater range of values in the mix. More productive ground will begin to command a higher premium and less desirable ground a lower value. Drought has had a devastating effect on many farm relationships with this bank. Approximately 50 percent to 75 percent of our customers will not be able to continue farming without help from some government agency. Wheat prices made farmers a profit, even though yields were down. Com is a big question mark. Moderate yields with current prices could be a real bonus for farmers. Milo looks very good. Cotton is looking good. Cattle prices are low; some farmers have sold out but many are trying to hold on with moderate culling. Hay is like gold. Most farmers are round baling anything mat could be used for feed-a few are even looking at com stalks. Region 7-East Texas The drought is so severe, we expect at least one-third of the dairy farmers to be out of business or in bankruptcy by September. Hay production is less than half mat of normal years, and feed costs are 50 percent higher. Cow sales are as much as 200 percent above normal, with price being 30 percent to 50 percent of what it was two years ago. The Fam1 Service Agency (FSA) is being cautious with further guarantee exposure in the poultry industry, which is limiting opportunities for bankers. Producers are anxious about feed grain costs, but the hay harvest will have a more critical impact in the latter part of the year. Region 10-South Texas Pasture conditions are extremely poor, and many have no option except to sell. Drought is affecting the price of all commodities, and the real estate market is depressed. Region 11-Trans-Pecos and Edwards Plateau The situation is very serious. Crop failures have driven prices for commodities up, but with less production, me farm sector is eroding financially. This is creating pressure on lenders to properly advise borrowers, and on borrowers to understand me options available to avoid bankruptcy. Land owners who rely on agriculture are being forced to consider real estate liquidation, and bankers cannot justify loaning additional funds without guarantees. FSA guarantees may not always be the ultimate answer to a farmer's heavily leveraged situation. The cattle market is very weak, and this reduced income stream is resulting in many extensions and/or renewals. Margins have eroded, but with proper debt management, depending on the amount of existing real estate debt, borrowers have a chance. Producers are replacing old herd cows with young stock, which delays calf production and directly affects cash flow. Sheep and goats arc a valuable alternative, but nothing works well without rainfall. Extended drought and weak cattle markets are a disaster for farmers and ranchers, although some operators with sheep are in better shape. Irrigated crops look good. Dryland crops are pathetic. Region 12-Southern New Mexico Cattle prices are low, drought conditions are extreme, and feed prices are high. These factors arc having a significant effect on dairy operations as well as cow/calf ranching operations. If me drought does not break soon, many ranchers will have to liquidate their herds.