View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

AGRICULTURAL NEWS OF THE WEEK
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF DALLAS

umber 502

~1 Jednesday,

Au

•u~

12) 1959

T E XAS
F ARM P R I CE 3
UP
The index of prices received by Texas fari.11ers aud ra chers r r
products advanced 6% during the month ended July 12., reports the A ric l
ke ia~ Service. The L.1dex was 293% of the 1910-lL} average, co.1pare<l
year ago.
The all-crops index ~ sharply fro1n the mid-June level l
idual crop prices showed mixed trends during the month. Higher cotto
reflected the good quality of new-crop offerings. Slightly higher pri
oats, and barley also contributed to the rise in the index. Partial y
these advances were sharply lower potato prices and slightly louer feed
hay prices.
The livestock and livestock products index on July 15 ;as abo
1'% hi~her
h > l! of
than a month earlier. Prices of meat animals, except sheep, were belo
mid-June . However, these decreases were slightly more than offset by dva1ces iu
prices of poultry and eggs, dairy products, wool, and rnohair.
A G R I C U L T U R A L E X I! 0 R T S
Reflecting a 6% decrease from fiscal 1958, .!:!_. ~. _agricultural e poc s
totale d an estimated $3.7 billion durir1g the fiscal year ende d June _.Q. 195~, 1..eports the Foreig~ Agricultural Service. Declines in exports of cotto11, iruits,
dairy products, and hides and skins more than offset increases in ship el
of
graias, vegetable oils, oilseeds, vegetables, and meat. The principal d cl11~
was i1 cotton, which was down 51%. Exports of tobacco and animal facs ece about
unchange d from a year earlier while feed grain and soybean exports \lere Re peak
levels. In contrast to the decline in exports, the value of Q. Q. a 1 ric~lLural
imports during fiscal 1959 was up 1% from the preceding year.
VAL UE
0 F
F ARM AS 3 E T S
AT
E
The value of the Nat ion's farm assets and proprie tors'
L1 L.hese
assets reached new peaks of about ~203 billion aL1d $180 billion, respecti ely, on
January 1, 1959, according to a recent report of th;-u-: S. Department of ~riculture .
About one-half of the $17 billion gain in farm asset values dur ing 195 re ulted from
the rising value of farm real estate. Livestock on farms showe d the r atest perceL.tage increase in value, with the major part of the gain res ulting [
· i,.;her
cattle prices. Farm debts rose about $3 billion in 1958. Gro ss farm 11co1e ceache d
a record high of $39. 4 billion while net income frorn agricul ture
d to ~lo. 7
billion - up 16% over 1957.
U N D E S I R A B L E

\J H E A T

T 0

B E

D I S C 0 C

The USDA recently named 37 wheat varieties which
per bu. in price support rates on the 1960 wheat crop because of l.l [er.· )
or baking qualities. The list includes the 33 varieties desi gnated
for the 1959 wheat price-support program and four additional varietic
Cache, and Yogo of the hard red winter class aod C.T. 231 of the h .... d
class. Beginning with the 1956 wheat crop, discounts to disco ura~e
undesirab le wheat varieties have been included in the price-s ~pport

L l v~ S T 0 CK
Accordiug to the f\l·I:=: > cattle marketii.1~s at Fort Worth duriug the weel·
ended Thursday> August 6, totaled 7,900 head - up 36% over the limited supply of
·the previous week and L~% above the year-earlier figure. Trading on slaughter
steers and heifers was slow, aLtd prices were mostly SOC per cwt. lower than L1 th
preceding week. In coatrast, trading on stockers and feeders was moderately acti,
and prices generally were steady to weak. Standard 900- to 1,150-lb. slaughter
steers sold at $2j to $25 per cwt.; Commercial cows, $16.50 to $17.50; and 550- o
700-lb. stocker and feeder steers, $23 to $28.
Calf receipts were an estimated 2,300, compared with 1,700 a week earli
and 3,300 a year ago. Oa Monday, demand for slaughter calves was good and tradil g
was active, with prices fully steady with those in the latter part of the previous
week, However, trading was slower during the remainder of the period, and prices
declined SOC or more during the week. Good and Choice killing calves closed at 2
to Q27.50; and Good 350- to l~75-lb. stocker and feeder steer calves cleared at 29
to $33.
A total of 2, L~OO hogs was received at Fort Worth during the week of Aug
6 - 600 fewer than in the preceding week but 500 more than in the corresponding
period of 1958. Trading was fairly active, aad Thursday quotations were steady
those of a week earlier. U. S. clo. 1 through No. 3 Grades of 180sold at $14.25 to ~14.75.
Sheep and lamb offerings were 6,800, reflecting gains of 26% over the pr
vious v-1eek and l'.i-5% over a year ago. Demand for ·i:uost slaughter classes was fair y
broad early in the week but was poor the remainder of the period. As compared wit
the latter part of the previous week, prices of slaughter spring lambs and yearli
were $1 to 02 lower. Good and Choice 75- to 85-lb. slaughter spring lambs were
quoted at $21 to $21.50.
POULTRY
During the week ended Fridays f<,.ugust ]_, the Texas commercial broiler ~­
kets opened steady, according to the State Department of Agriculture. However, th
east Texas market became unsettled on Tuesday as the Southwest foultry Exchan!J,e E_gan operations, The south Texas market felt the effects of the unsettled conditi
and the closing undertone was u~settled in both areas. Closing prices were mainl
16C per lb. in south Texas and 14¢ to 15~ in east Texas, although 57% of the sales
in the latter area were at uadetermined levels. During the correspo~ding week in
1958, closing prices were: South Texas, 19¢ to 20¢, mostly 19C; and east Texas,
17~¢ to 18c.
Commercial broiler markets were weaker in south Texas and unsettled itl
~Texas on Monday, August 10.
Quotations were: 3outh Texas, 15¢, with a very
few 1¢ higher; and east Texas, 14¢ to 15¢, with 43% of the sales at undetermine d
prices.

BROILER CHICK
PLL\CEHENTS

Percentage
Previous
week

fr
Comparable
week, 195

chaa~e

Area

Week ended
August 1, 1959

Texas ...•.
Louisiana ..

2,250,000
363,000

5
-14

-17

22 states ..

30,963 000

-5

-5

J. Z. Rowe
Agricultural Economist

-L~