View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

AGRICULTURAL NEWS OF THE WEEK
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF DALLAS
Number 268

Wednesday, February 16, 19.5.5

S UP P 0 RT P RI CES
The 1955 national average support prices for various commodities have
been reported in the "Agricultural News of the Week" as they became available from
the United States Department of Agriculture. In the table below are summarized the
national average support prices which have been announced for various commodities
to be produced in District states during the 195.5-56 marketing year, with comparisons
for

195L.
195L
Support
price

Commodity and unit
Wool, lb •••••••••••••.•.•••••••.•.•••
Mohair, 1b. • ••••••••.••• , •••.•••.•.••
Milk, cwt. • •••••••••••••••.•••••••• , •
Butterfat, lb. • •.•••••.•.•••••••.••••
Oats, No. 2 or better, bu ••••••••••••
Barley, No. 2 or better, bu. • ••••••
Rye, No. 2 or better, bu •••••••••••••
Grain sorghums, No. 2 or better, cwt ••
Wheat, bu. • ••••••••••.••.•••••••.••••

$.

$ .62

.10

3.15
.562
.61

.94

1.18
1.78
2.06

Percent
of parity

106
91
80
77

70
70
70
70
82.5

Support
price

$ .532

.607
3.15
.562

•75
1,15
1.43
2.23
2.2L

Percent
of parity
90

83
75
75
8.5

85
85
85
90

~~These are minimum support levels as announced.
The policy of the USDA is to
announce support levels as far in advance as is practical. If the factors used
to determine a dollar-and-cents support level provide a higher support price prior
to the beginning of the marketing season, the dollar-and-cents support level will
be raised, but in no case will the level be lower than the original announcement.

LIVESTOCK
Cattle, calf, and sheep numbers on the Fort Worth market for the week
ended Friday, February 11, were about the same as for the previous week-.-St'OCker
and feeder sales were aetive because of improved range moisture conditions and
improvement of winter grains in many areas. Good and Choice slaughter steers and
yearlinls sold from $20 to $2.5 per cwt., while the Conunon and Medium grades brought
$12 to 20. Fat cows were $11 to $13.50, and Canners and Cutters ranged from $7 to
$11.50. Good and Choice slaughter calves sold at $17 to $22; Common and Medium were
$12 to $17. Good and Choice stocker steer calves brought $18 to $22, while replacement cows were $8 to $13.
Good and Choice fat lambs sold'.from $18 to $21 in the wool; stocker and
feeder lambs were $17 to $20, while the lower grades brought $12 to $17.
Slaughter hog prices showed slight strength early in the week but failed
to hold the gain. Top-grade butcher hogs closed at prices ranging from $17.25 to
$17 •.50 per cwt. Buyers were paying premium prices for the superior meat-type hogs.
Cattle receipts at Fort Worth on Monday, February 14, were about the same
as on Monday of the previous week,-according to a report by the United States Department of Agriculture. Trading was slow on most classes, with yearlings accounting
for the largest proportion of the receipts. Good beef slaughter steers brought
$21 to $2L, while Utility and Commercial grades sold from $14 to $19. Commercial

cows sold at $13 to $13,50 per cwt., while prices of most of the Utility-grade cows
ranged from $11 to j~l2,50o Good and Choice slaughter calves were $17 to $21, while
Utility and Commercial calves brought $13 to $17. Medium and Good stocker and feeder
steers and yearlings were $15 to $21; Medium and Good stocker calves also brought
$15 to $21. Stocker cows sold at $10 to $12.
Monday's receipts of sheep and lambs at Fort Worth were the heaviest
since the first week in January; about 95% were lambs. Utility to Choice wooled
slaughter lambs sold from $20.50 to $21,50; Good and Choice shorn slaughter lambs
were $18 .50 to $20. 50. Good and Choice stocker and feeder lambs sold from $18 to
$.20.
Choice 190- to 240-lb. butcher hogs brought $17,25 to $17,50, while Choice
21.6- to 290-lb. hogs sold from $16 to $17:--Sows were mostly $13 to $15 .SO.
POULTRY
Broiler markets in Texas during the week ended February 11 opened firm and
closed at prices 1¢ per lb:-above closing prices of the previous week, according to
the Texas Department of Agriculture. Last Friday's closing prices were 25¢ per lb.
for all markets reporting. Prices of broilers on Monday, February 14, held steady
at 25¢.
Chicks placed on Texas farms in the week ended February 5 totaled
1,339 ,ooo. This is 2% less than in the previous week and 10% below placements
during the comparable week a year earlier.
C 0 T T 0 N

Middling 15/16-inch cotton on the Dallas market was quoted at 33.75¢
per lb. on Monday, February lL, compared with 33,60¢ a week ago and 34.05¢ a
year ago, according to the Agricultural Marketing Service.
Domestic and export inquiries were relatively few during the past week.
Most domestic mill purchases were for the better grades and staple lengths of
western-area cotton. Purchases of cotton grown in Oklahoma and Texas were small.
World cotton production for the current marketing season is estimated
at 36,2 million bales by the Foreign Agricultural Service. This compares with
38,0 million bales last season and 35.8 million bales 2 years ago,

MI S C E 1 1 A N E 0 U S
An ample supply of foodstuffs is in prospect for 1955, according to a
report released recently bythe USDA. Total meat production in 1955 is estimated
at 26 billion lbs. - 400 million lbs. above 1954 supplies. Most of the increase
in meat supplies will be accounted for by the 16% increase in the 1954 fall pig
crop. The total supply of dairy. products is expected to be the largest of record,
while supplies of each of the principal poultry commodities again will be large.
The supply of fresh fruits in prosp~ct this winter and spring may total larger
than in the first half of 1954, while the supply of processed fruit is expected
to be at least as large as in early 195L. It is estimated that fresh vegetable
supplies on hand on January 1, 1955, were only slightly smaller than supplies
last year. The supply of vegetables for fresh use probably will be somewhat
smaller this winter than last winter.
J, z. Rowe
Agricultural Economist