View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

T----------------

-<ate Teachers College Library

I1133'•/£&*

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
FRANCES PERKINS. SECRETARY

WOMEN’S BUREAU
MARY ANDERSON, Director

BULLETIN

OF

THE

WOMEN’S

BUREAU,

NO. 105

A STUDY OF A CHANGE FROM
8 TO 6 HOURS OF WORK
By
ETHEL L. BEST

r^tNT

UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON : 1933

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C,




Price 5 cents

[Public—No.

259—66th

Congress]

[H. R. 13229]
An Act To establish in the Department of Labor a bureau to be known as the
Women’s Bureau

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled, That there shall be estab­
lished in the Department of Labor a bureau to be known as the
Women’s Bureau.
Sec. 2. That the said bureau shall be in charge of a director, a
woman, to be appointed by the President, by and with the advice
and consent of the Senate, who shall receive an annual compensation
of $5,000. It shall be the duty of said bureau to formulate standards
and policies which.shall promote the welfare of wage-earning women,
improve their working conditions, increase their efficiency, and ad­
vance their opportunities for profitable employment. The said
bureau shall have authority to investigate and report to the said
department upon all matters pertaining to the welfare of women in
industry. The director of said bureau may from time to time
publish the results of these investigations in such a manner and to
such extent as the Secretary of Labor may prescribe.
Sec. 3. That there shall be in said bureau an assistant director, to
be appointed by the Secretary of Labor, who shall receive an annual
compensation of $3,500 and shall perform such duties as shall be
prescribed by the director and approved by the Secretary of Labor.
Sec. 4. That there is hereby authorized to be employed by said
bureau a chief clerk and such special agents, assistants, clerks, and
other employees at such rates of compensation and in such numbers
as Congress may from time to time provide by appropriations.
Sec. 5. That the Secretary of Labor is hereby directed to furnish
sufficient quarters, office furniture, and equipment, for the work of
this bureau.
Sec. 6. That this act shall take effect and be in force from and
after its passage.
Approved, June 5, 1920.




CONTENTS
Page

rjH




m

(M

Letter of transmittal iv
Introduction
1
Summary
2
Facts reported by management______
Facts reported as to women workers
Preference for 6-hour or 8-hour shift_____
Hours preferred among the 6-hour shifts
5
Reasons for preferring 6-hourshift
6
Fatigue in 8-hour and 6-hour day______________
Use of leisure time______________________________
Arrangement of meals___________________________
Earnings_____________________________________ ____________________________
Marital condition and age_______________________

7
8
9
IX
13

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
United States Department of Labor,
Women’s Bureau,

Washington, January 27, 1933.
I have the honor to submit herewith a report on the effects on
women employees of a change from an 8-hour day to a 6-hour day
in a well-known industrial plant. This company, which changed from
three 8-hour shifts to four 6-hour shifts as much as two years ago,
has courteously supplied the Women’s Bureau with information and
allowed an examination of its pay-roll records under the two hour
schedules. Interviews were held also with 434 women employees to
obtain their conclusions and preferences regarding the change.
I believe the report will be of value in the present conditions. It
has been prepared by Ethel L. Best, industrial supervisor.
Respectfully submitted.
Mary Anderson, Director.
Secretary
IV




of

Labor.

A STUDY OF A CHANGE FROM 8 TO 6
HOURS OF WORK
INTRODUCTION
The trend to shorter daily hours has increased during the past
three years, largely because of overequipment and decreased demand.
In most plants curtailment has been necessary, and this has been
accomplished by two methods—reducing the number of employees
and shortening the hours of work. In many cases both these meth­
ods have been used. As there has been a decrease in employment
and a shortening of hours in so many plants, it is interesting to study
the methods of one plant to increase employment by shortening hours.
The problem in this plant was twofold: To give work to more people
without materially increasing the cost of operation, and to do this
without throwing the cost of shorter hours entirely on the employees.
This firm put into practice two years ago the plan later advocated by
a group of business and professional men and called “the New Hamp­
shire plan,” which aims to spread work by shortening hours and to
share the cost of such spreading of employment by management as
well as workers. In this plant the management bore the cost of
checking up and improving its operating methods and machinery so
that everything should run as perfectly as possible; they also in­
creased their wage costs by raising the hourly rates and by adding a
supervisory force for the extra shift.
In December, 1930, when the change to a 6-hour working shift was
made by this factory, the plant was running three shifts of 8 hours
each, operating continuously except that it shut down for 24 hours
once a week. With the exception of the general office and a few occu­
pations where the volume of production did not admit of continuous
operation, the entire plant was changed to four shifts of 6 hours each.
This necessitated the employment of more women, and the records
show that the average number on the pay roll during a 4-week period
just before the change and during a 4-week period one month after
the change increased from 298 to 415, or 39 per cent. At the same
time the hourly rates of pay for the women were increased 12^ per
cent, while the men were guaranteed a minimum of $4 a day. Prac­
tically all pay was on an hourly basis plus a production bonus. A
year later the women received a second increase in hourly rates of
12Jdj per cent, so at the time of survey there had been a total increase
of 25 per cent over the rates in effect before the change in hours.




l

2

A STUDY OP A CHANGE FROM 8 TO 6 HOURS OF WORK

Two questions are important in a change from an 8-hour to a
6-hour shift: (1) Are the shorter hours efficient from the standpoint
of management? and (2) Are they liked by the workers? The advan­
tages to the business are briefly summed up by the management in
the following statement:
Increased daily production from the plant as an operating unit,
due to increased production at every station or task, slight in itself
but considerable in the aggregate.
Elimination of meal periods, with their waste, and the expense of
a large cafeteria.
Increased return from the capital invested in plant and machinery,
owing to the increased rate of plant operation.
Opportunity for reorganizing the working force to rectify inequali­
ties and fit all “pegs” in appropriate “holes.”
Decreased overhead due to the fact that the factory produces more
goods per dollar of overhead than under the 8-hour shift.
To answer the second question, agents of the Women’s Bureau
visited 434 women and obtained from them information as to the
effects of shorter hours on their earnings, their fatigue, their home life,
and their leisure activities. These data constitute the basis of the
present study.
Of the 434 women, only 265 had worked at this plant under both
the 8-hour and the 6-hour schedule, so the comparison of the two hour
schedules is based on the smaller number. For these two single pay
periods, taken from the firm’s records, an even smaller number, 196
women, appeared in both periods and therefore could be compared as
to pay under the 8-hour and the 6-hour shift. From the women who
had experienced only the 6-hour shift in this plant, information was
obtained as to their domestic arrangements and leisure activities.
Many of these women had worked longer hours in other places of
employment and they compared their present work, with its short
hours, to that formerly done by tbem.
SUMMARY
FACTS REPORTED BY MANAGEMENT
Increased daily production from the plant as an operating unit.
Decreased overhead.
Increased return from the capital invested in plant and machinery.
Opportunity for reorganizing working force to fit all pegs in appropriate holes.
Elimination of cafeteria expense.

FACTS REPORTED AS TO WOMEN WORKERS
Effect of change on numbers.
Increased 39 per cent, or from 298 women (average of four pay rolls before change
to six hours) to 415 women (average of four pay rolls shortly after change).




A STUDY OF A CHANGE FROM 8 TO 6 HOURS OF WORK

3

Opinions on the 6-hour shift.
Of 405 women who were interviewed and expressed opinion on the short hours,
over four-fifths (84.9 per cent) liked the 6-hour shift.
Of 249 women who reported their preference, having worked under both the
8-hour and the 6-hour schedule, a little more than three-fourths (77.1 per cent)
preferred the shorter shift.

Reasons given for preference.
Principal reasons for preferring 6 hours—
More time for home duties.
More leisure.
Less fatigue.
Leisure and less fatigue.
Principal reasons for preferring 8 hours—
More pay.
Less fatigue.

'

Fatigue under 6 hours as compared to 8 hours (women on same work).
Per cent of women who reported—
Less fatigue25.2.
Same fatigue56.1.
More fatigue 18.7.

Use of extra time.
Family needs—
.
Better care of house and family.
Time for working in garden.
Can now do housework and have fun too.
Better buying for family because of shopping in uncrowded stores.
Recreation—
Can be outdoors in daytime.
Can play tennis.
Can play ball.
Can go swimming.
Can go motoring.
Rest.
Self-improvement.

Eating arrangements.
More than one-half (56.2 per cent) felt need of food during work period.
Nearly two-thirds (64.7 per cent) reported no inconvenience to home life or
meals under new schedule.
Work on the morning shift was most convenient and the afternoon shift
least convenient for the meal arrangements.

Effect of change on wages.
Basic hourly rates were increased—
12}^ per cent at date of change.
12J^ per cent one year later.
Production bonus was not changed.
From a pay-roll period in September, 1930, to one in April, 1932—
Earnings of 77 per cent of the women decreased under the 6-hour day;
those of 23 per cent increased.
10 and less than 20 per cent decrease in earnings was shown for over
one-half of the women whose earnings declined; in something over
one-third it was less than 10 per cent.




4

A STUDY OF A CHANGE FROM 8 TO 6 HOURS OF WORK

Marital condition and age.
Over one-half of the women (56.1 per cent) were married.
About the same proportion of married and of single women preferred the 0hour to the 8-hour day.
Home duties were mentioned as the reason for preferring the shorter day by
a very much larger proportion of married than of single women. The single
girl used her extra time for recreation and self-improvement more than did
the married woman.
The favorite shifts for all women were the day shifts, but a larger per cent
of married women than of single liked the evening shift.
Almost the
same proportion of single and married women preferred the night shift.
No woman visited was under 17 years of age and nearly one-fifth were 40
years and over.
A larger proportion of the women (70.9 per cent) were 20 and under 40
years of age.

PREFERENCE FOR 6-HOUR OR 8-HOUR SHIFT
Interviews were obtained from 434 women, and of these women
about three-fifths (61.1 per cent) had been with the firm during the
period of both an 8-hour and a 6-hour shift. These women were able
to compare the work under the two sets of hours, while the group
lacking experience under two sets of hours in the same plant made
the comparison between the present plant'with a 6-hour day and
longer hours in other establishments. In the former group, those
comparing 8 hours and now 6 hours in the same plant, a little more
than three-fourths of the women (77.1 per cent) preferred the 6-hour
shift.
Over one-half the women who did not like the shorter hours were
on the evening and night shifts, and without doubt what one woman
said was true: “There’s not much you can do with leisure time
between 12 and 1 at night and 6 and 7 in the morning.” Also, some
dissatisfaction may be accounted for by the fact that under the 8-hour
shift the hourly rates in the evening and at night were a little higher
than those for the day shift, while under the 6-hour system the rates
were the same, for the same work, on all the shifts.
The group of women who had worked at other places prior to the
introduction of the 6-hour shift in this plant were very enthusiastic
over the short day, and 106 of the 109 women reporting expressed a
decided preference for it. With this group may be included 47 women
who had never worked before or else had not worked for many years,
and with one exception these women were unanimous in their liking
for the 6-hour schedule.
If the interviewed women who were working six hours are com­
bined, well over four-fifths are found to prefer the 6-hour schedule.




A STUDY OF A CHANGE FROM 8 TO 6 HOURS OF WORK

5

HOURS PREFERRED AMONG THE 6-HOUR SHIFTS
The following percentages show how the women on the four shifts
reacted to the 6-hour day:
Shift

12 to 6 (afternoon)......................... .......................................................
6 to 12 (evening)........................ .............................................................
12 to 6 (night)......... ........................... ............ ........ ...................... ........

Favorable

Not
favorable

83 5
90 6
84.4
80.5

13.3
13.8

No
preference

2.2
6.7

Because of varied home responsibilities and personal habits, the
women interviewed differed considerably as to which of the 6-hour
periods they preferred. The most popular shift was the afternoon
one, from 12 to 6. This shift allowed free time in the morning for
housework, shopping, or sleeping late, and also leisure in the evenings
for either rest or recreation. The least popular shifts were those of the
evening and night. Some women on the midnight shift complained
of difficulty in sleeping during the daytime, and some said that they
would rather work when others were working. It was surprising
that the difficulty of going to and from work at midnight was not
considered a drawback. A few employees had their own cars and
for a small sum took others to or from work, while some used jitneys
that cost the same as car fare. In a larger city or with more expen­
sive taxis the difficulty of midnight hours for women might be less
safely and less easily overcome.
The following table shows for 231 women the number working in
the morning, afternoon, evening, and night, and the shift for which
they expressed a preference:
.
Shift preferred

Total1...... ........ ................................. .
Morning. .....................................................
Afternoon.................................................... .
Night.............................................................

All women

Women on Women on Women on
on
morning
afternoon
evening Women
night shift
shift
shift
shift

231

53

68

49

61

63
79
29
28

50
2

1
64

3
4
26

0
9

28

1 Total Includes 28 women (12 on the evening shift, 12 on the night, and 4 working during the day) who
expressed a preference for day work but did not specify shift, and 4 on the evening shift who had no
preference
157613°—33----2




6

A STUDY OP A CHANGE FROM 8 TO 6 HOURS OF WORK

It is interesting to note that the shift on which they were employed
was the preference with 50 of the 53 morning workers and 64 of the
68 afternoon workers. On the other hand, 19 of the 49 on the even­
ing shift and 30 of the 61 on the night shift would rather have worked
by day. The principal reason why a day shift was preferred, as it
was by 170 women, was that the evening and some time during the
day were free. Some women wanted free time for housework, some
spoke of liking the evening for recreation, and 34 women preferred
day work for physical reasons, because they slept better at night or
found day work less tiring. Only one woman mentioned the difficulty
of transportation at night as an objection. The evening shift was
liked by some women because the whole day was free, and two women
remarked that you still could have your night’s sleep.
Women who preferred the night shift did so because they had more
time with their families and had leisure time in the afternoon and
evening. Three women gave physical reasons for preferring the night
shift: One said she was adjusted to night work, had always done it;
another added to the reason of being accustomed to night work that
she “was too ill to go anywhere, anyway”; while the third woman
declared that she “ slept badly at night and might as well be working.”
REASONS FOR PREFERRING 6-HOUR SHIFT
In giving the reasons why the women preferred the 6-hour to the
8-hour schedule, it must first be noted that the great majority of the
women (84.9 per cent) did prefer the 6-hour day to that of 8 hours.
The principal reasons given for such preference are the following:
Number of
women giving
reasons

More time for homeduties
More leisure
119
Less fatigue
31
Leisure and less fatigue

121

27

Naturally these reasons correspond very closely to the answers
given as to the use of the extra time, with home duties being the
most frequent and leisure, or time for recreation, being second.
However, the fact that 58 women liked the shorter hours because of
less fatigue may be due to either the shorter work period or the
greater amount of time for resting. Of the women whose first
employment in this plant was after the change to 6 hours, there were
larger proportions who expressed appreciation of the extra leisure
and who experienced less fatigue than among employees who had
worked on both 8-hour and 6-hour shifts. It is true also that women
who had not been with the company under the 8-hour shift had




A

STUDY OF A CHANGE FROM 8 TO 6 HOURS OF WORK

7

worked in other establishments for more than 8 hours, and therefore
showed special appreciation of their increased leisure under the
6-hour day.
The marked difference in the reasons given by the single and the
married women for preferring the shorter day is illustrated by the
following percentages:
Principal reasons for preference

More time for home duties............ ...... .................................................
More time for leisure...................................................................
Less fatigue........... ............................................................. .
Leisure and less fatigue..........................................................

Single
women

Married
women

Widowed,
separated,
or divorced
women

4.4

55.4

35.7

9 9
19.8

3.8

4.8

A comparatively small number of women, only 46, did not prefer
the 6-hour shift, and with almost all these women the chief reason
was the difference in earnings. Twenty-nine women spoke only of
the lower earnings on the 6-hour shift and 10 others spoke of the
lower earnings and the greater fatigue. Besides the 10 just men­
tioned, 6 women reported greater fatigue under the shorter than under
the longer hours.
Though the numbers are not large, it is significant that nearly 20
per cent of the women with broken marital ties, in contrast to only
about 10 per cent of the single and of the married women, did not
prefer the shorter hours. Possibly the greater economic responsibility
of the women supporting homes without the aid of their husbands
may have made the difference in earnings more important for them
than for either the married or the single women.
FATIGUE IN 8-HOUR AND 6-HOUR DAY
There has been some question whether a straight 6-hour day with
no lunch period to break it might not prove as fatiguing as the longer
work period of 8 hours with a 20-minute lunch period. In answer to
this question more than half (56.1 per cent) of the women who had
experienced both shifts in this plant on the same work said it made
no difference in their fatigue under which shift they worked, while
25.2 per cent declared they felt less fatigue under the 6-hour schedule
and 18.7 per cent thought fatigue was increased in the straight 6-hour
shift with no break. No comparison between the 8-hour and 6-hour
shifts was made by 14 women who merely stated that they did not
get tired on the 6-hour continuous1 shift, while 3 others reported
1Short relief periods are given when desired but no regular rest or lunch period.




8

A STUDY OS' A CHANGE FROM 8 TO 6 HOUES OP WORK

fatigue. A small group, 37 women, had worked in other establish­
ments on a daily schedule of more than 8 hours, and 32 of these
women stated that they were less tired under the straight 6-hour
day, 2 that it made no difference, and 3 that they felt more fatigue
with the unbroken 6-hour shift.
The difference in the comparative fatigue reported varied with the
shift on which work was done, with the evening shift showing the
least benefit in decreased fatigue from the shorter hours. The fol­
lowing figures show the number of women doing the same work as
before who compared fatigue on the present 6-hour and the earlier
8-hour schedule.
Amount of fatigue

Day shifts

Evening

Night

Total......................................

87

33

35

Less fatigue now
More fatigue now............ ...........
Same fatigue now........................

22
17
48

7
8
18

10
4
21

There is no doubt blit that shorter hours would, as a rule, mean
less fatigue, but the fact that the work is continuous, with no break
for lunch, might in some cases result in increased fatigue, especially
if the worker stands all day at her work. In the plant under dis­
cussion pains had been taken to so arrange each woman’s work that
she stood for an hour and a half and then shifted to a job where she
might sit at her work. Of 243 women, three-fourths worked under
this desirable condition. For the women in this group who made a
comparison of conditions, the change to a 6-hour continuous shift
resulted in less or no greater fatigue for more than four-fifths (84.5
per cent) of them. For the much smaller group, 35 women, who
stood continuously and compared fatigue on the two shifts, not quite
three-fourths said that they felt either less or no greater fatigue,
while those who sat all day showed much the same distribution as
those who alternated sitting and standing.
USE OF LEISURE TIME
It would be hardly fair, in any consideration of fatigue, not to
inquire into the use made of the 12 hours a week free time that the
change to the 6-hour shift gave to the women workers. The answer to
this question as to the use of increased leisure time was home duties in
well over one-half the cases. With some women this meant more time
in which to do the same work as formerly, while with others additional
duties were undertaken. Some women did more canning and preserv­
ing with the extra time, and others did their own washing, which they
had sent out when working 8 hours. Some reported that now they




A STUDY OF A CHANGE FEOM 8 TO 6 HOUES OF WOBK

9

had time for a garden, and a number spoke of the better care they
could give their children. One woman who formerly had worked
from 3 to 11 p. m. and now was on the shift from 12 noon to 6, said
that with the 0-hour arrangement she could do her housework in the
morning and go out in the evening with her husband, a thing she had
not done in 12 years. This woman was one of a rather large number
(69) who said that now they had time to do their housework and
have some fun too. Nearly as many other women reported spending
their time in recreational activities, such as tennis, swimming, motor­
ing, playing ball, and even flying. Among these the recreation last
named might almost be termed vocational, as the woman hoped some
day to become a pilot. One young girl summed up her recreational
activities by saying, “They are interesting, along with your work.”
A number liked the shorter hours because they could rest more, and
a smaller number were trying to improve themselves by study and
new avocations.
The free time during the day when they could be out of doors was
much appreciated; and a saving in money as well as in strength was
reported, through being able to shop in the daytime and on week
days when stores were not so crowded. One woman said, “ I do much
more careful shopping now.”
As would be expected, the married women and those with broken
marital ties used much more of their increased leisure in their home
duties and the single women in recreation. Additional time in which
to rest was appreciated especially by the single women and those
who were widowed, separated, and divorced. The opportunity to
take courses and study was utilized principally by the single women.
No married women appeared in this group. Very few women, only
five, reported outside paid employment in their spare time, and these
consisted of store jobs, sewing, housework, and singing over the
radio.
Principal uses of leisure time reported

Home duties
224
Recreation and homeduties
69
Recreation___________________________________ _______ ____
Rest
41
Self-improvement(includesnew avocation)_________________

Number of
women

49
16

ARRANGEMENT OF MEALS
It has become the custom with most people in the United States
to eat three meals a day at intervals varying from 4 to 6 hours. With
the 24 hours divided into 6-hour shifts and no lunch period, a longer
time than this must elapse between two meals. There is much adapta­
bility in human beings and without doubt many could adjust their
lives to different eating hours and feel no ill effects, but others might




10

A STUDY OS' A CHANGE FROM 8 TO 6 HOURS OF WORK

experience more difficulty in going from 7 to 8 hours without food.
Because of the character of the work in this factory no food could be
eaten in the workrooms, and in most cases distances in the plant were
too great for women to go to the rest rooms to eat a sandwich. Of the
413 women who reported, a little over one-half (56.2 per cent) spoke of
the need of food during their work period. There was a marked dif­
ference among the four shifts in the proportions who felt the need of
food. The largest proportions of women who spoke of such need were
on the shifts from 12 to 6 in the afternoon and from 12 midnight to
6 in the morning. Many of the women on the afternoon shift ate a
combination breakfast and lunch between 10 and 11, and as they did
not eat their supper until 6.30 or 7.30 it made a long stretch. Those
on the night shift usually ate a hearty supper at 6 and frequently a
sandwich or fruit before going to work at midnight, but this was
inadequate to last through the night.
Shifts

6 a. m. to 12 noon-----12 to 6 p. m_________
6 p. m. to 12 midnight
12 to 6 a. m_________

Number of
women
reporting
96
119
91
87

Per cent
needing
food

Per cent not
needing
food

49.0
63.9
48.4
60.9

61.0
36.1
61.6
39.1

The management felt that it would be possible to arrange for milk
to be served if enough women wanted it, so when 38 per cent reported
that they would be glad of milk if it were available, the service was
installed. After the installation, the number of half pints sold
increased over a 3-week period from 169 on the first day to 616 on
the last day, indicating a decided appreciation of the service.
The dislocation of the arrangement of meals and the inconvenience
that might have been experienced under the 6-hour shift were inquired
into. Nearly two-thirds (64.7 per cent) of the women reported no
inconvenience or upset in the arrangements. Where it was difficult
to arrange the meals, 116 women (27 per cent) solved the problem
by eating only two meals and 5 women declared they usually ate but
one, and this from choice rather than necessity. Seventeen women
ate one or more meals separate from the family and 14 women ate
irregularly, sometimes at one time and sometimes at another. The
amount of adjustment necessary depended to a great extent on the
shift on which the woman worked. The shift from 6 a. m. to noon
was the most convenient for arrangement of meals and the afternoon
shift was the least convenient. Of those working in the afternoon,
43.7 per cent ate but two meals a day, which may account for the
large number on this shift who felt the need of food during the work
period.




A STUDY OF A CHANGE FROM 8 TO 6 HOURS OF WORK

Per cent
Number of reporting
women
no
incon­
reporting
venience

Shifts

97
126
96
91

80.4
52.4
68.7
60.4

11

Meals sep­
arate from
family or
irregular
4.1
4.0
10.4
12.1

EARNINGS
The records of weekly earnings of the women under the 8-hour and
under the 6-hour schedule came from two sources: From the pay-roll
books two periods were taken, one in September, 1930, before the
change to 6 hours, and one in April, 1932, after the change was well
established and the hourly rates had been increased 25 per cent above
those current under the 8-hour shift. The other source was the
women themselves, who were asked to give their average earnings
under the 8-hour and under the 6-hour schedule.
The pay was affected not only by the decrease in daily hours but
by the bonus, which varied with the amount produced, the extent of
spoiled work, and the degree of machinery breakdown. It is inter­
esting to note here that women frequently expressed the opinion that
spoiled work and machinery breakdowns had decreased with the
6-hour shift, largely because of the elimination of the lunch period,
during which the machinery had been kept running but without a
sufficient number of operators to care properly for the product.
The number of women visited for whom pay-roll records were
secured at both dates, before and after the change in hours, was 196,
and for 77 per cent the amount received was less under the 6-hour
than under the 8-hour schedule. In just over one-half the cases of
decrease the extent was 10 and under 20 per cent; in wTell over onethird it was less than 10 per cent. Of the 45 women whose earnings
were larger at the latter date, one-half had less than a 10 per cent
increase. In short, the difference in earnings, increases and decreases
combined, between the 8-hour and the 6-hour day was less than
20 per cent in the case of about nine-tenths of the women and less
than 10 per cent in the case of two-fifths.
There had been some changes in job, which may have affected
earnings between the two periods. Four women had been promoted
to supervisory work, 2 had been demoted from such work, and 49
other women reported a change in the kind of work done. However,
141 women were doing the same work as before and for 110 of these
(78 per cent) the records show decreased earnings, such decrease being
in most cases 10 and less than 20 per cent.




12

A STUDY OF A CHANGE FROM 8 TO 6 HOURS OF WORK

The reports of the women of their average earnings under the two
sets of hours give a larger per cent (89.8) with decreased earnings
under the 6-hour day than does the pay-roll information just discussed,
a not unnatural discrepancy, considering that one was an actual pay­
roll record, the exact figures for certain dates, and the other included
a loose “average,” remembered after the lapse of a year and a half.
Only 16 women reported an increase in their average earnings under
the 6-hour day.
Taking as the base the total number, instead of the number with
decreased earnings, the changes after the reduction in hours are made
clear in the following:

Change in earnings

Total...................................................................
Increase__________________ _____ _
Less than 10 per cent..........................
10 and less than 20 per cent_____
20 per cent and more............................. ................

Women for whom pay­
roll earn ings were
obtained

Women who reported
average earnings in
interviews

Number

Number

Per cent

Per cent

196

100.0

257

100.0

45

23.0

16

6.2

23
14
8

11.7
7.1
4.1

5
8
3

1.9
3.1
1.2

151

77.0

231

89.9

57
79
15

29.1
40.3
7.7

47
106
78

18.3
41.2
30.4

No change........................ ........... ...........
Decrease_______ _____________________
Less than 10 per cent_____________ _________
10 and less than 20 per cent....... ................................
20 per cent and more.............. ..............................

Under the old schedule of 8 hours, women who worked on the
afternoon shift (3 to 11 p. m.) and the night shift (11 p. m. to 7 a. m.)
received a slightly higher hourly rate than did those working on the
shift from 7 a. m. to 3 p. m. With the introduction of the 6-hour
shift, the special allowance for evening and night work was discon­
tinued and the hourly rates for similar work were the same regard­
less of the shift. For this reason the decrease in hours affected the
earnings of the women formerly on the evening and night shifts
more than those of the women formerly on the day shift.
That this was an important factor in the decreases is evident from
the figures. When the day shift alone is considered, the pay-roll
figures show but two-thirds of the women (65.7 per cent) with lower
earnings, compared to between 80 and 90 per cent of the workers on
the other two shifts.
The following shows the percentage of women on each of the
8-hour shifts whose earnings decreased on the 6-hour schedule:




A STJJDY OF A CHANGE FROM 8 TO 6 HOURS OF WORK

Shift

Day

_

______

Night.....................................................

13

According According
to pay
to inter­
rolls
views
65. 7
82.6
88.7

80 0
92 9
97.3

In addition to the fact that more women who had worked on the
evening and night shifts than on the day shift showed reduced earn­
ings, the degree to which they were reduced also was greater for the
evening and night workers. The proportion of women having de­
creases of 10 per cent and more was considerably less among the
women who had worked on the 8-hour day shift.
Little dissatisfaction with the lower earnings resulting from the
decrease in hours was expressed, although in the majority of cases
very real decreases had resulted. Some of the workers seemed to
feel that everyone these days was getting cuts, and that after all
they were being given time off for their reduced pay and were not
required to work the same hours, as were many of their friends.
MARITAL CONDITION AND AGE
It has already been stated that a large majority of the women pre­
ferred the shorter workday and that the most important reason for
this preference was that it gave more time for household duties.
Without doubt the large proportion of women to whom the accom­
plishment of household tasks was important was affected by the
unusually high per cent of married women. In nearly every case
these women were responsible for their homes, and when it is found
that somewhat over three-fifths had the care of children in addition
there is certainly good reason for their preference for a 6-hour day in
the factory. The census of 1930 reports 32.4 per cent of the women
in manufacturing and mechanical industries as married, but in the
plant under consideration the proportion was much higher, namely,
56.1 per cent. In addition to the 243 married women, 66 were wid­
owed, separated, or divorced, and a large proportion of these, like
the married women, had homes and children and were, therefore,
glad of the 6-hour day.
These same reasons, homes and families, occasioned the preference
of women for certain shifts. A larger proportion of the married
women than of the single women preferred the evening shift and a
smaller proportion preferred day work.




14

A STUDY OF A CHANGE FROM 8 TO 6 HOURS OF .WORK

Per cent of women preferring—
Marital status
Day

Married___ __________________________________

78.9
72.3

Evening

7.0
16.1

Night

12.3
10.9

No pref­
erence
1.8
.7

A number of the married women with children expressed a prefer­
ence for the evening or night shift, indicating the desire, mentioned
specifically, to be with their children during the day.
No women visited were under 17 years of age and nearly one-fifth
were 40 years and over. Well over two-fifths of the women were 20
and under 30, and more than one-fourth were 30 and under 40. Thus
women of 20 and under 40 years comprised more than 70 per cent of
the workers.
With the large per cent of women in this middle group, and with
the high per cent of married women, it is not surprising to find that
three-fifths of the women had been with the firm for 18 months and
over. This per cent probably would have been higher if many new
workers had not been added because of the extra shift. In all, 38.9
per cent of the women reported entering the firm’s employment after
the change to a 6-hour day, but it is not possible to tell how many of
these replaced old employees who left for one reason or another
or how many were hired to care for the extra shift; certainly the
majority must have belonged to the latter group.




o