View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ST. LOUIS

MONTHLY REPORT ON
GENERAL BUSINESS AND AGRICULTURAL CONDITIONS
IN FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT No. 8
R E L E A S E D FO R P U B L IC A T IO N O N A N D A F T E R T H E M O R N IN G
W IL L IA M
C H A IR M A N

OF TH E

O F J U L Y 2 5 , 1919

M C C . M A R T IN

BOARD AND

FEDERAL R E S E R V E A G E N T

The business situation in this District has not materially changed since the last report. Wholesalers and retailers
in most lines are doing an active, in some instances a record, business. There are complaints of difficulty in obtaining
raw materials and skilled labor.
The harvesting of winter wheat is general throughout the District and there is still promise of a large crop, although
it will not be as large as was expected. A larger com crop than last year is anticipated.
Collections are reported excellent and the amount of indebtedness unusually low.
merchandising conditions and promises continued activity.

This indicates very satisfactory

M AN U F A C T U R IN G — A large shoe manufacturer reports a good volume of orders on hand, but says there is
difficulty in obtaining raw materials and skilled female labor.
A woodenware manufacturer says restored confidence has resulted in better business and that orders on hand for
future delivery are “ very heavy.”
High crop prices and an abundance of money in the hands of the farmer have created a strong demand for stoves,
and ranges. One stove manufacturer says: 4‘We shall sell all we can make, unless there should be an extraordinary
slump in farm crop prices.” A manufacurer of boilers says most manufacturers deferred purchasing or repairing during
the war and are now in the market. The hardware line generally is showing greatly increased activity.
Flour mills say the outlook is good for the summer and fall and that the new crop movement is a favorable factor
affecting their business.
Manufacturers of electrical supplies report increases in the amount of their business as high as 20% over June a
year ago and 27% over M ay this year. Increased building and more activity on the part of public utilities in building
extensions, also the growing demand for electrical specialties such as heating appliances, electrical ranges, washing
machines, etc., are factors stimulating the demand.
Clothing manufacturers still complain o f a shortage of desirable woolens, and say the demand for their products
is beyond the normal footing.
Manufacturers of clay products say building materials are in fair demand and are optimistic for the future.
A candy manufacturer complains o f the railroad accomodations which he says are poor and result in damage to
perishables through delays in shipping.
•
W HOLESALE A N D JOBBING— A wholesale dealer in shoes says his business increased 61J^% over June
last year, and 95% over M ay this year. The uncertainty o f the crop situation in the South, he says, is a disturbing
element.
A large dry goods house states that its business increased 59% over June last year and continued to gain during
the past month as compared with M ay this year. A wholesale dry goods man says retailers are now buying without
hesitation.
Cotton factors say the poor cotton crop in the South is partly offset, in so far as their business is concerned, b y the
rising market. Foreign trading, however, is “ made difficult by the reduced value of the pound sterling, which creates
a margin between the local and the Liverpool markets which is not taken care of by the difference in prices.”




A wholesale grocery concern reports an increase of 23% over June last year and reports that the demand has gone
beyond normal. One wholesale grocer states that there is a slight hesitation on the part of some purchasers who feel
that the agitation against the high cost of living may result in some reductions. There is also an inclination to wait
for new packing before placing orders for canned goods.
Hat and millinery houses had an excellent June. One concern says its orders for future delivery are, “ The biggest
in our experience of many years.” Another company reports the astonishing gain of 400% as compared with June a
year ago.
R ETAIL— Department store's and general stores throughout the district again report increases in business over
last year. In some cases, increases as high as 75% are claimed for June over the corresponding month last year. Retail
dry goods men state that they are not only buying now for the present, but that they are buying liberally in advance.
During the early part of July retail purchasing was greatly stimulated by the holidays. Jewelry is very active.
AG RICU LTU R E— Harvesting is in full swing, but the expected yield of winter wheat is considerably cut down
b y the fact that the grain is not properly headed. It is shrivelled and there has been considerable lodging.
The harvesting o f oats followed closely that of wheat, and now meadows are ripe. All of those duties, including
the cultivation of com , coming about the same time, crowded the farmer, particularly so this season, because of the
scarcity of capable help.
Cotton and com are very late, but indications are that the com yield will be larger than last year.
a slight improvement, but the crop will be considerably short of last year’s.

Cotton shows

According to Government reports, the level of prices paid producers in the United States for the principal crops
increased about 1% during June; in the past ten years the price level decreased about 0.4% during June. On July 1
the index figure of prices was about 13.7% higher than a year ago.
L IVE STOCK— The report of the St. Louis National Stock Yards for June, 1919, shows increases in the receipts
o f hogs, sheep and horses and mules, but a decrease in the receipts of cattle as compared with the corresponding month
last year. There were decreases in all shipments as compared with June, 1918. The comparative figures are as follows:
Cattle
June
Receipts..............................................................................................
Shipments...........................................................................................

1919

Hogs
1918

1919

Sheep
1918

85,371 113,427 305,495 223,335
20,098
27,118
83,835
90,435

Horses and Mules

1919

1918

1919

1918

83,36JL
10,223

68,312
10,518

11,328
8,343

6,035
6,203

A new high price for hogs in this locality was established at the St. Louis National Stock Yards on July 9th, when
a top price of $22.75 per 100 pounds was reached.
LABOR— The unemployment of labor continued to decrease during the past month. There is a strong demand
for competent farm labor in the South and for skilled labor in many industries. High prices and the warm weather have
resulted in some labor unrest, but, with the exception of a telephone strike which shows some indications of spreading
sympathetically to other lines, no serious labor troubles are apparent.
BU ILD IN G — The increase in building operations continued with marked acceleration during June.
figures for June arc as follows:
1919
Permits
Cost
.St. Louis................................................................................................................................725
Louisville........................................................................................................................... ...239
Memphis............................................................................................................................ ...237
-LittleRock...........................................................................................................................102

June

$2,016,711
473,503
524,390
358,927-

Comparative

1918
Permits
Cost
514
137
48
53

$891,863
178,512
150,607
59,240

This increase in building activity is making itself felt in stimulating the trades and industries which supply its
demands.
POSTAL RECEIPTS— Postal receipts for the quarter ended June 30th, 1919, show decreases for Louisville
and Little R ock and increases for St. Louis, Memphis and Evansville, in comparison with the corresponding quarter
last year. Comparative figures follow:

St. Louis................................................................................................................................................................
Louisville..........................................................................................................................:•••.................................
Memphis................................................................................................................................................................
LittleR ock...........................................................................................................................................................
Evansville.............................................................................................................................................................




Quarter Ended
June 30,
1919

Quarter Ended
June 30,
1918

§1,864,531.78
441,005.15
344,o 74./0
158,588.05
99,788.2o

$1,721,848.80
459,965.58
293,300.92
197,725.87
93,741.21

B A N K IN G — The financing of the crop movement resulted in a slightly better demand for money during the past
month, but there has been no radical change in the rates. The high, low and customary discount and interest rates
prevailing in St. Louis, Louisville, Memphis, and Little Rock from June 16th to July 15th, as reported by banks located
in those cities, were as follows:
St. Louis
Customers’ prime commercial paper:
30 to 90 days.............................................
4 to 6 months............................................
Prime commercial paper purchased
in open market:
30 to 90 days .........................................
4 to 6 months............................................
Loans to other banks......................................
Bankers’ acceptance of 60 to 90 days:
Endorsed.....................................................
Unendorsed................................................
Loans secured bv prime stock exchange
collateral or other current collateral:
Demand......................................................
3 months.....................................................
3 to 6 months............................................
Cattle Loans.......................................................
Commodity paper secured by warehouse
receipts, etc................................................
Loans secured bv Liberty Bonds and
Certificates.................................................

Louisville

Memphis

Little Rock

H

L

C

H

L

C

H

L

C

H

L

C

6
6

5
5U

m
5

e
6

5
5

6
6

6
6

5
5

6
6

7
§y2

6
6

6
6

5V2

6

5
5H
5

5
r>%

6
6
6

b}/2
bV2
5

6
6
5}^

6

5'A

6

5%
5J^

m

5

5

5^
5J^
5

4H
4H

0

4x
4M

4H
4H

4H
4H

6

5

6

5

6
6
6
6

5
5
5H
5%

5H
5 V?,
6
6

6
6
6
6

5
5
5
5

6
6
6
6

6
6
6
6

6
5
5
5^

6
6
6
6

7
7 y2
8
8

6
6
6
7

6
6J4
7
8

6

oJ
A

6

6

5

6

6

6

6

8

6

7

6

4%

5K

c

4H

5

c

m

o'A

8

6

6

Dealers in commercial paper state that the demand is larger than they can supply. June, they say, was a record
month. Owing to the excellence of collections, firms are in funds and are not large borrowers. Rates are 0 ^ 2 for good
to 534 for the best, grades of paper.
The condition of the banks in this District at the present time and the changes during the past month are reflected
in the following comparative statement showing the principal resources and liabilities of member banks in St. Louis,
Louisville, Memphis, Little Rock and Evansville:

Number of Banks reporting........................................
United States bonds to secure circulation..............
Other United States bonds, including Liberty Bonds .
United States Victorv notes........................................
United States certificates of indebtedness..............
Total United States securities owned.............
Loans secured by United States bonds and certificates
All other loans and investments................................
Total loans and investments..............................

July 3, 1919

June 6, 1919

36

36

$ 17,156,000
15,421,000
16,544.000
30,931,000

$ 17,056,000
16,566,000
22,660,000
49,905,000

80,052,000

106,187,000

28,682,000
390,064,000

26,366,000
386,813,000

498,798,000

Reserve with the Federal Reserve Bank.................
Cash in vault....................................................................
Net Demand deposits on which reserve is computed
Time deposits...................................................................
Government Deposits....................................................

39,235,000
9,544,000
300,388,000
98,145,000
22,688,000

519,366,000
39,885,000
10,398,000
289,862,000
97,930,000
55,153,000

The volume of banking business transacted in this District during the past month is indicated by the following
comparative table compiled from information received from the Clearing Houses in the cities shown:
Debits to Individual Accounts, week ending:
St. Louis..............................................................................
Louisville........ ’...................................................................
Memphis.............................................................................
Little Rock.........................................................................
Evansville...........................................................................

Debits to Bank Accounts, week ending:
St. Louis.............................................................................
Louisville.............................................................................
Memphis.............................................................................
Little Rock.....................................................................
Evansville........................................................................




June 18

June 25

July 2

July 9

$176,876,000
39,193,000
34,282,000
6,310,000
4,468,000

$133,861,000
34,687,000
27,544,000
5.291,000
5,111,000

$160,725,000
35,884,000
29,609,000
6,616,000
5,524,000

$104,527,000
35,330,000
26,531,000
6,418,000
3,934,000

June 18

June 25

July 2

July 9

$138,267,000
37,990,000
23,398,000
4,968,000
3,729,000

$126,522,000
33,820,000
20,800,000
4,192,000
2,916,000

$119,138,000
30,257,000
21,414,000
4,220,000
1,411,000

$120,669,000
36,560,000
19,818,000
4,745,000
1,872,000

In June the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis discounted a total of $171,043,610.21 of paper for 168 different
member banks, which is a decrease of $34,121,933.64 from the amount of paper discounted during M ay and a decrease
of 23 in the number of banks accomodated. There was no change in the discount rates of the Federal Reserve Bank dur­
ing the past month. The rates in effect on July 18, 1919. were as follows:
15 days
and loss

M E M B E R B A N K S 'C O L L A T E R A L NOTES:
Secured by Liberty Bonds or Treasury Certificates.....................................................................
Secured by War Finance Corporation Bonds.................................................................................
Secured by Bills Receivable................................................................................................................

1C to 60
days

Cl to 90
days

4H %
5% %
4% %
4H
%%
c/o
''
4X %

4H %
6«%
4 H 7o
4 j|
%%
4.......
y2%.

91 days to
C months

4%
5%
4%

R E D ISC O U N TS:
Secured by Liberty Bonds or Treasury Certificates.....................................................................
Secured by War Finance Corporation Bonds...............................................................................
Commercial Paper....................................................................................................................................
Agricultural or Livestock Paper..........................................................................................................
Trade Acceptances...................................................................................................................................

4%
5%
4%
4%
4 /o'

§ V i%

Bankers’ Acceptances purchased at the market rate, subject to agreement.

The resources and liabilities of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis on July 11, 1919, as compared to a month
ago and a year ago, are shown in the following statement:
RESO URCES:

June 13,1919

July 11, 1919

July 12, 1918

Gold coin and certificates.................................................................................
Gold settlement fund— F. R. Board............................................................. ..........

$3,786,000
26,712,000

S 3,535,000
26,720,000

Total gold held bv bank..........................................................................
Gold with foreign agencies...............................................................................
Gold with Federal Reserve Agent.................................................................
Gold Redemption Fund.................................................................................... .........

30,498,000

30,255,000

56,528,000
5,520,000

62/259,000
3,363,000

27,059,000
620,000
31,599,000
1,946,000

Total gold revenue.....................................................................................
Legal tender notes, silver, etc......................................................................... .........

92,54C,000
2,047.000

95,877,000
3,561,000

61,224,000
1,039,000

Total reserves.............................................................................................. .........

95,193,000

99,438,000

62,263,000

Bills discounted— Secured by Government war obligations..................
Bills Discounted— All other.............................................................................
Bills bought in open market............................................................................ .........

62.903.000
10.436.000
4,108,000

47.711.000
10.490.000
8,973,000

25.315.000
28.212.000
2,962,00

Total bills on hand.....................................................................................
LT. S. Government bonds..................................................................................
U. S. Certificates of Indebtedness................................................................. .........

77,447,000
1,153.000
16,182,000

67.174.000
1,153,000
17.068.000

56,489,(MX)
2,233,000
321,000

Total earning assets................................................................................... .........

94,782,000

85,395,000

59,043,000

Bank premises.......................................................................................................
Uncollected items and other deductions from gross deposits................
5 % redemption fund against F. R. Bank notes........................................
All other resources............................................................................................... .........

541,000
57,731,000
570,000
476,000

692.000
50,004,000
812.000
469,000

TO T A L RESOU RCES............................................................................. .........

249,293,000

236.810,000

S
.

1,799,000
25,260,000

33,736,000
1,071,000
156,113,000

L IA B IL IT IE S:
Capital paid in................................................................................................................
Surplus...............................................................................................................................
Government deposits....................................................................................................
Due to members— Reserve Account.......................................................................
Deferred availability items.........................................................................................
Other credits....................................................................................................................

3,867,000
1,603,000
24,332,0000
59,089,000
40,653,000
878,000

Total gross deposits.............................................................................................
F. R. Notes in actual circulation.............................................................................
F. R. Bank notes in circulation— net liability.....................................................
All other liabilities.........................................................................................................

124,952,000
110,285,000
83,073,000
103,159,000
103,883,000
67,932,000
14,341,000 15,691,000
.......................................
1,371,000
500,000
1,500,000

TO T A L LIABILITIES.




249,293,000

3,862,000
3,608,000
2,589,000
........................................
8,474,000
13,774,000
64,915,000
47,698,000
36,414,000
21,452,000
482,000
149,000

236,810,000

156,113,000