The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT O' BOR BULLETIN OF THE WOMEN’S BUREAU, A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS IN 23 CITIES \jwn3 'ho- 7 f l - A [Public—No. 259—66th Congress.] [H. R. 13229] An Act To establish in the Department of Labor a bureau to be known as the Women’s Bureau fV %nate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That there shall be estabWomen's BureauPartment °f ^ a bureaU to be as'the Sec. 2 That the said bureau shall be in charge of a director a woman, to be appointed by the President, by and with the advice of *5C000en ifshall bWft6’/!10 1lttll-,frivC “ &nnual compensation i11 K*he du,y of,said bureau to formulate standards and policies which shall promote the welfare of wage-earning women improve their working conditions, increase their cffiScy and advance their opportunities for profitable employment. The said bureau shall have authority to investigate and report to the said ******* the welfPam of'woment moustiy. I he director of said bureau may from time to time publish the results of these investigations in such a manner and to such extent as the Secretary of Labor may prescribe. tn 5 f itlLere+vha! be in saici bureau an assistant director, to be appointed by the Secretary of Labor, who shall receive an annual compensation of $3,500 and shall perform such duties as of l!aborPreSCnbed by the director and aPProved by the Secretary Sec. 4. lhat there is hereby authorized to be employed by said other Am ?hlCf C Cfk arJd such sPecial agents, assistants, clerks, and flfrLTP °yeeS f SUC,h rates 0± compensation and in such numbers " Q™ time to 'iIne Provide by appropriations. Sec. 5. That the Secretary of Labor is hereby directed to furnish tln?burcauUarterS’ °ffiCG furniture and equipment, for the work of affeHtepaSage*18 AC‘ Sh,“ Approved, June 5, 1920. 6fleC‘ “d be in for“ ^ UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR JAMES J. DAVIS, Secretary WOMEN’S BUREAU MARY ANDERSON, Director BULLETIN OF THE WOMEN’S BUREAU, NO. 78 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS IN 23 CITIES By ETHEL L. BEST and ETHEL ERICKSON UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1930 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C, Price 30 cents r 1 * CONTENTS i i- . V Letter of transmittal______ vii Introduction Purpose, method, and scope Purpose of the study Method Scope Summary 10 Working conditions 17 Ventilation and temperature, Local exhausts or other protection____ r 22 Lighting 23 Floors 24 Seating 25 Drinking facilities 26 Washing facilities 26 Toilet facilities 27 First-aid provision 28 Service facilities 28 Cloakrooms 29 Rest rooms 29 Lunch rooms 29 Uniforms 30 Employment machinery 30 Welfare provision 31 Hazards 31 Strain 35 Hours 37 Hour laws 38 Scheduled hours 39 Scheduled weekly hours____ : Weekly hours of laundries in State studies of the Women’s Bureau 44 Scheduled weekly hours of laundries in New York______________ Scheduled daily hours 46 Daily hours of laundriesin State studies of the Women’s Bureau. Scheduled daily hours oflaundries in New York________________ Saturday hours 52 Lunch period 53 Lunch-period legislation 53 Rest periods 54 Hours worked in holiday week'_______________________ __________ Actual hours worked 55 Full time, lost time, andovertime 55 Comments on hours worked in home visits_____________________ Night work . Wages . Week's earnings__________________________________________________ _ Earnings of all women 61 Median of the earnings____________ Full-time earnings 65 Median earnings for full-time laundry workers in other Women’s Bureau studies 69 Summary of findings of earnings in New York power-laundry study_______________________________________________________ Methods of payment 71 Earnings of timeworkersand pieceworkers______________________ Comparison of the median earnings of timeworkers and piece workers 72 - ni Page 1 6 6 6 7 18 39 46 51 52 55 60 60 61 61 64 70 71 IV CONTESTS Wages—Continued. Week’s earnings—Continued. Piecework and timework earnings in New York laundry study. _ Earnings by occupation 73 Range of earnings by occupation 75 Earnings of timeworkers and pieceworkers by occupational group-------------------------------------------------------Earnings and scheduled hours 77 Earnings and time in the trade 78 Earnings and time with the firm 80 Rates 82 Minimum-wage legislation 84 Rates and occupations 84 Rates and time with the firm 85 Changes in rates during the year preceding the survey_________ Rates and scheduled hours 86 The workers~ Nativity and race 87 Age.---------------- -------- ----------------------------------------------------- IIIIIII” Marital status______________________ Time with the firm 90 Age and occupation1 Reason for working 92 Time in the trade 94 Work experience 96 Type of work preferred__________ Appendixes: A.—General tables 102 B.—Schedule forms 159 Page 72 76 86 87 88. 89 92 97 TEXT TABLES Table 1. Number of establishments visited and number of men and women they employed, by sectionandcity___________________ 2. Scheduled weekly hours, by section and city__________________ 3. Scheduled daily hours, by section and city____________________ 4. Per cent of women who worked, during the week reported, under 44 hours, 44 hours and over, 48 hours and over, and 54 hours and over, by section and city_____________________ 5. Week’s earnings, by section and city 63 6. Median of the week’s earnings of full-time workers and of all workers for whom hours worked were reported, by section and city-----------------7. Median of the week’s earnings according to time with thejirm, by section____________________________________________ ____ 8. Weekly rates, by section and city 83 9. Median of the rates according to time with the firm, by section. 10. Median of the rates according to scheduled hours, by section.. 8 41 48 59 68 81 85 86 APPENDIX TABLES Table I. Dry-bulb reading near presses and flat-work ironers, by out side temperature 102 11. Wet-bulb reading near presses and flat-work ironers, by outside temperature 102 III. Wet-bulb reading near presses and flat-work ironers, by dry-bulb reading-----------------------------------------------------------------------------IV. Relative humidity near presses and flat-work ironers, by drybulb reading 103 V. Impression of agent as to temperature near presses and flat-work ironers, by dry-bulb reading 104 VI. Scheduled weekly hours of laundries in other Women’s Bureau surveys, by section, State, and date of survey______________ VII. Scheduled daily hours of laundries in other Women’s Bureau surveys, by section, State, and dateofsurvey________________ VIII. Scheduled Saturday hours, by sectionandcity_________________ IX. Scheduled lunch period, by section andcity 108 103 104 105 106 CONTENTS V Page Table X. Scheduled rest period, by section and city XI. Hours actually worked, by section and city 110 XII. Week’s earnings, by section and city 112 XIII. Median of the week’s earnings of undertime, full-time, and overtime workers, by section and city XIV. Extent of undertime, full time, and overtime, by section and city XV. Week’s earnings of full-time workers, by section and city______ XVI. Week’s earnings, by occupation 122 XVII. Median of the week’s earnings, by occupation and by section and city 124 XVIII. Extent of full-time work and median of the earnings in laundries reported in State surveys by Women’s Bureau, by State and year 127 XIX. Median of the week’s earnings of timeworkers and of piece workers in four occupations having most women, by section and city 128 XX. Median of the week’s earnings, by scheduled weekly hours and by section and city XXI. Median of the week’s earnings, by time with the firm and by section and city'XXII. Median of the weekly rates, by occupation and by section and city 136 XXIII. Median of the weekly rates, by time with the firm and by section and city XXIV. Median of the rates and earnings of timeworkers and of the earnings of all women, by section and city_________________ XXV. Marital status of the women who supplied personal informa tion, by section and city 143 XXVI. Nativity and race of the women who supplied personal in formation, by section and city 144 XXVII. Age of the women who supplied personal information, by section and city 146 XXVIII. Time with the firm of women who supplied personal informa tion, by section and city 148 XXIX. Occupation, by section 150 XXX. Occupation, by age 151 XXXI. Woman’s reason for working, by marital status--------------------XXXII. Mothers with children under 14 years of age, by marital status 153 XXXIII, Actual time worked in the laundry industry, by over-all time since first laundry job- - XXXIV. Industrial experience, by kind of work done and by section and city 154 XXXV. Preference for laundry work or for other employment, by kind of work and reason for preference XXXVI. Reason for leaving job, by kind of job left 109 116 117 118 130 132 140 142 152 153 155 150 ILLUSTRATIONS Facing page Plate 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. An airy, well-routed laundry _ The heat from the flat-work ironers is carried off------------------Natural ventilation; slat blinds; chair--------------A light and airy marking department 24 Presses operated by hand, making them easy and safe-----------A well-planned ironing department 87 CHARTS Scheduled weekly hours_____ Scheduled daily hours____________ Distribution of earnings Median of the week’s earnings (white women)--------------Median of the week’s earnings (negro women)---------------------------------------- 1 11 17 33 Page 37 47 62 66 67 m LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL United States Department of Labor, Women’s Bureau, Washington, February 25, 1930. I have the honor to submit herewith a report on the wages, hours, and working conditions of women in the laundry industry, covering 290 of the larger commercial laundries in important cities from coast to coast. The survey was made with the cordial cooperation of the Laundryowners National Association, and my thanks are extended to that organization and to the individual employers and employees whose courtesy made the survey possible. t The study was in charge of Ethel L. Best, industrial supervisor, and the report was written by Mrs. Best and Miss Ethel Erickson. Respectfully submitted. Mary Anderson, Director. Hon. James J. Davis, Secretary of Labor. Sir: VII EPi '>w 1 4A. ji. * ■y4.'0*~' PLATE 1.—AN AIRY, WELL-ROUTED LAUNDRY A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS IN 23 CITIES INTRODUCTION The laundry industry, like most of the fundamental or necessary services, is an outgrowth from a far older home industry. It might be even more accurate to think of it as a development of two lines of employment one the family washing done in the home and the other the lulimg of clothing done out of the home. Both these occupa tions are centuries old. Pictures from Egypt as early as the eight eenth century B. C. show fullers at work by hand, and many centuries later the Roman toga was made clean by the simple method of treadmg into the garment, in a large vessel of water, a cleanser such as iulier s earth.1 In the latter part of the thirteenth century a fullers’ guild was organized m England “by all the brethren and sistern of the fullers in .Lincoln. This organization established certain standards in the industry, passing a rule that “none of the craft shall work in a iTne Tn <'mpI°yers’ Suild was formed at Bristol, England, in MUb with tour commissioners to enforce good work and penalize bad, m order to save the good name of the town and the craft. Presses to smooth the clothing were used in the early days and out ol them has grown the present flat-work ironer, with its large padded roils Ihe early names for machines with rollers were “calender” which came by way of France from the Latin word “cylindrus” and mangle,” from the Dutch “mangelen,” meaning to roll with a rolling-pin. The first British patent on a washing machine was taken out as early as 1691 and that on a mangle in 1774. The washing machine can be called that only by courtesy, as its powers were far too numer ous lor any one term to define. It could be used for “the raiseing of watei, washing of cloaths, milling of sugar canes, pounding of min erals, and pounding and bruising of all sorts of seeds, pounding of charcoale to make powder of, and pounding and making raggs fitt to make paper, and the like, which said engine was never used in Eng land before.” 6 Not until the introduction of steam as a means of power did the laundry industry begin its development along present lines. Two laundries lor washing clothes with steam had been started by 1789 in .rrance, and m the United States some 200 patents on washing machines alone were issued in the first half of the nineteenth century. Ihe earliest record in the United States of a power laundry at all resembling the present commercial laundry was of the Contra Costa Laundry established in Oakland, Calif., in 1851. The gold rush of th,e brief historical sketch on this page are from Power Laundrie Hundred Million Dollar Industry, by Frederic H. Bradshaw. True, Webber & C The Story of a Five Chicago, 1926. 1 2 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS 1849 sent thousands of men without families to California, but they went there to dig gold, not to wash clothes, and something had to be provided to take the place of the washing ordinarily done by their women folk. To expedite the work, a carpenter built a 12-shirt washing machine, which was run by a 10-horsepower donkey engine. From that small beginning the laundry industry has grown until a business of $453,877,518 was done in power laundries alone m 1927. Not only has its growth been tremendous but the character of the industry has changed. Until 1915 it was chiefly a shirt-and-collar business, with a slowly growing commercial and family trade. Then came the home electric washer, and the laundryman, in order to com pete, provided a wet-wash service with a pound basis of charge. From this have developed the rough-dry and finished family services, frequently on the pound basis of payment. The need for these new services is plainly shown by their rapid growth. According to facts presented in the laundry owners’ magazine, The American Outlook, the family-bundle business in the group of laundries reported showed an increase of 10.9 per cent in the first six months of 1928 over the same period, in 1927. More than 70 per cent of the laundries reported an increase in this type of work.3 The following statement gives the number of laundries, number of wage earners, and amount taken in for work done reported by the United States Bureau of the Census in the past 20 years.4 Year Number1 3, 4, 4, 4, 5, 1909 1914 1919 1925 1927 845 639 881 859 962 Per cent of increase over last report 20. 7 5. 2 2.5 22. 7 Received for work done Wage earners Laundries reported Number 105, 126, 130, 169, 203, Per cent of increase over last report 216 665 489 200 215 20. 3. 29. 20. 4 0 7 1 Per cent of increase over last report Amount $100, 138, 233, 362, 453, 900, 373, 815, 294, 877, 182 117 827 749 518 37. 69. 54. 25. 1 0 9 3 1 Power laundries doing a business of $5,000 or more in a year. 2 In this case it was a decrease. The most striking fact brought out by these figures is the tre mendous increase during the period covered in the amount of work done, measured in dollars, and the markedly smaller increases m number of wage earners and number of establishments. Per cent of increase, 1909 to 1927 Amount received for work done Number of wage earners---------Number of laundries---------------- 349. 8 93. 1 55. 1 The figures illustrate the result of two marked changes in the laundry industry, one in the character of articles laundered and the* S t U. s. Department of Commerce. Census of Commercial Power Laundries, 1927. News release, Feb. 2nj The' American Outlook. American Laundry Machinery Co., of Cincinnati, New York, Chicago, and S™uTSABureau ofthe Census1.' Fourteenth Census: 1920, vol. 10, Manufactures, 1919, p. 1>S3’B[X“'1‘1 Census of Manufactures, 1925, p. 1,255; and Census of Commercial Power Laundries, 1927. News release, Feb. 25, 1929, INTKODUCTION 3 other in the way in which the work is done. The change in type of work, from men’s linen, chiefly collars and cuffs, to the inclusion of commercial work and family bundles that may be returned damp, rough-dried, or ironed, has greatly increased the volume of work with out a proportionate increase in wage earners or plants. The second change is that from an industry run on haphazard and individualistic lines to one operated on scientific and group methods. These changes could not have taken place without a transition in the social whole. A New York State report briefly enumerates the conditions that have played their part in the revolution of the laundry industry: A steadily increasing number of women are employed outside the home; those not so employed engage others to do their washing in greater numbers than ever before; servants are becoming increas ingly difficult to obtain and increasingly expensive; more people are living in apartments than formerly; apartments are becoming smaller with poorer facilities for washing and ironing.5 The laundry industry, unlike other factory work, does not create a commodity from raw material; rather, it renovates an already completed product and does not even own the material on which it works. In other words, it receives pay for service and it competes not so much with other laundries as with possible customers. In spite of these points on which it differs from other factory-run indus tries, however, the laundry industry has followed them in its devel opment. The best laundries are laid out on a production-line basis orv °Pera^ed much as highly specialized and systematized factories. Close attention is given to motion study and to time study. Every mechanical operation is carefully controlled as to time, as to tempera ture, as to materials, and as to other essential factors.” 6 This may be rather an efficiency goal than an actual accomplishment, but the laundry is one of the few industries that carry on laboratory studies not for the benefit of a single plant but for all in the industry, and the willingness to learn and to pass on information from one to all is a marked feature of the yearly meetings of the employers’ association. In considering the census figures another feature of the efficiency move is noted: The merging of several laundries, offering many kinds ol service, under one operating control. This consolidation ol a number of single laundries into corporations, in some cases privately owned and in some having many stockholders, was coinci dent with the requirement of much larger capital for the operation ot a laundry equipped with the latest and most up-to-date machinery, this necessary increase in invested capital made necessary also more expert management, wholesale buying of supplies, combined collec tion and delivery of goods—all part of sound and economic operating. the decrease in the proportion of owners and firm members to number of laundries gives a picture of the consolidation that is now going on of groups of laundries under one management. According Eflert uplntte H^h SwoS.^ectaf BuLlM^fp^00^^8 * St6am LaUndries and their Tme?Webbe?&dCa Chief goggle? Hundred Miili0’n Dollar Industry, by Frederic H. Bradshaw. 4 A SURVEY OP LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS to the United States census figures, the number of owners or firm members to a laundry changed over a period of years as follows:7 In In In In 1909 1914 1919______________________ 1925-_____________________ 1. 1. 1. . 1 0 0 8 Authorities consulted in the present survey spoke of one city in which all the laundries were corporation-owned and said that in certain others a considerable number were under one management. Combination is the trend of the times and it is being followed in the laundry industry. What effect has all this on the woman worker? Any careful and scientific study of undesirable conditions usually results in their betterment, especially when combined with the modern knowledge that bad conditions “don’t pay.” It used to be taken for granted that great irregularity of hours—very long ones on certain days in the week and short ones on others—was a necessary handicap of the industry. In 1912 a study of laundries showed 86.8 per. cent of the workers as having two or more short days in the week and others correspondingly long.8 In the present study there was little variation in daily hours except the Saturday half holiday. House wives are being educated to the fact that to insist on the completion of laundry work in the earlier part of the week means long hours for the workers and fatigue that is not compensated for by shorter hours later in the week. This education may be accomplished in different ways: Sometimes by a lower rate for bundles picked up after Wednesday, sometimes by an explanation to the housewife, and sometimes, as in one leading plant, by experiment. In the case last mentioned, the experiment was made necessary by a heavy snow that for some time made it impossible to visit each customer oftener than once a week, and the results were so satisfactory that the management decided to run the laundry on a weekly-service basis. When notified of the change less than 5 per cent of the customers withdrew, and for a number of years this laundry has operated on a 1-week-service basis. More scientific operation within the plant usually results in better arrangements and fewer steps for the worker. The new machinery is easier of operation and better guarded than the old, and if combined with this increased efficiency of operation there is cooperation and consultation with the employees, the results to the worker are better pay, better hours, and better working conditions. The aim of modern laundry management is well expressed by a prominent laundry owner: “There must be included as a means of arousing and retaining interest some plan which gives to the employee an opportunity to freely and frankly discuss with management on a man-to-man basis such matters as intimately affect the well-being of the worker.” 9 Certain conditions of the laundry industry must be kept in mind in the discussion of facts in the present study. 7 U. S. Bureau of the Census. Fourteenth Census: 1920. vol. 10, Manufactures, 1919, p. 1027; and Biennial Census of Manufactures, 1925, p. 1266. a U. S. Department of Labor. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employment of Women in Power Laun dries in Milwaukee. Bui. 122,1913, p. 74. s Laundry owners National Association. Advance report, Thirty-sixth Annual Convention, New York City, October, 1919, p. 6. INTRODUCTION 5 It is a year-round industry, not a seasonal one. Census figures of volume of business done in each month of 1925 by 3,568 power laun dries show an average variation of 3.6 per cent.10 This is supported by the variation in number of laundry employees in one State in 1927 reported by another authority, the per cent being almost the same—3. Furthermore, one laundry employing more than 400 people reports for 1926 an average variation of 3.6 per cent. These figures indicate remarkable steadiness in the industry. The laundry industry is very closely tied up with the textile industry. When garments are torn the housewife blames the laundry. This is not always just, as the fault may lie in the material itself, through imperfections that the dressing in the cloth concealed. If the material is at fault, the store where it was purchased receives complaint and the store, in turn, complains to the manufacturer. Thus the manufacturer, the merchant, and the laundry operator are beginning to realize that they are part of a whole and should work together to give satisfactory service. In one large city a conference of representatives of the three groups, with technical experts, was held recently to determine how they could insure to their joint customers good textiles and good laundering. Air conditions are a constant problem in the laundry industry. The washing and ironing generate heat and steam, and in too many laundries this condition is taken for granted, as was the irregularity of daily hours before that was found possible of correction. No matter how good, how expensive, the mechanical equipment may be, with temperatures of 80° and over no human machine can remain efficient for long or continue to produce good work. The industry employs large numbers of women, two-thirds of its operatives, according to the 1920 census, being females.11 Women are found in all the laundry processes, though in rare instances only do they operate the mechanical washers. When the clothes are brought to the laundry women mark them and in many cases sort them. They wash by hand the fine linen and silk. After the washing the starching is done, usually by a ma chine but sometimes by hand, and then the clothes must be dried. There are three different ways of drying. The flat pieces and com mon body clothes are put in an extractor, a spinning metal basket that, revolving within a container at great speed, forces through the holes almost all the moisture. Women sometimes operate these, but usually they are run by men, women having charge of the smaller starch extractors. Clothes are dried also in a tumbler, somewhat on the principle of the extractor except that it tumbles the clothes back and forth in a large container filled with hot air. The third method, used principally for collars but sometimes for body clothes, consists of hanging the articles on a rack that revolves or travels on moving hangers into a heated room. The clothes from the tumblers go direct to the ironer, but those from the extractor must first be shaken by hand. Frequently they are run through a cold tumbler so as to loosen those that are tightly wound. The ironing is done in three ways—by running the articles through flat-work ironers with steam-heated rollers, by placing them in steam-heated presses, and by the use of an iron by hand. The U. S. Bureau of the Census. Biennia] Census of Manufactures, 1925, p. 1259. Fourteenth Census; 1920, vol. 4, Population, Occupations, p, 43, 11 Ibid, 6 A SURVEY OP LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS ironing processes are done almost exclusively by women. The clothes are then folded and laid on tables or on moving belts to be sorted into their respective bundles. In almost every instance the sorting and bundling are done by women. The foregoing are the major processes on finished work. There are other kinds of services, such as “wet wash,” where the clothes are returned damp for the housewife to iron, “rough dry,” where the flat work is ironed and the wearing apparel starched and dried, and other variations of partly completed work. These different services are built on the needs of the communities and illustrate the primary function of the laundry to give service. The future of the industry may be summed up in the words of the progressive laundry owner who said: “We are not so much an industry as a public utility and as such should be classed with electric-light companies and telegraph and telephone services.” PURPOSE, METHOD, AND SCOPE Purpose of the study. In certain industries women play a far more important part than in others. Cotton-goods, clothing, candy, and paper-box factories, like laundries, employ large numbers of women, and in some of these the women actually outnumber the men. The knowledge of what is happening to these hundreds of thousands of women is the concern not only of their respective industries but of their communities and the country as a whole. The laundry. industry, though not so old as the manufacture of textiles and clothing, is rapidly becoming one of the major woman-employing industries. The number of women laundry operatives, according to the last occupational censuses greater than the number of women in paper-box and candy factories and more than half as many as those in cotton mills.12 The rapid growth of the laundry industry in size and efficiency and its importance to the woman worker and to the public were felt to warrant a survey of conditions within the industry by the Women’s Bureau. Accordingly, such a survey was made, the field work beginning in September, 1927, and ending in May, 1928. Method. The survey covered the hours, wages, and working conditions in laundries and the composition of the working force, including such facts as nationality, age, marital condition, and length of service. An effort was made, through home interviews, to learn of the advan tages and drawbacks in laundry work from the point of view of the employee, and this was done mainly through a comparison with work done by the woman herself in other industries. Further infor mation that threw light on this subject was obtained by learning the worker’s reason for leaving her previous job, whether in a laundry or in any other line of work. Information concerning the laundry practices was obtained through the cooperation of laundry owners and the assistance, freely given, of their national and local organizations. In the individual laundries an inspection of working conditions was made, scheduled hours were noted, a one week’s pay roll was copied and, wherever such records11 11V. S, Bureau of the Census. Fourteenth Census: 1920. vol. i, Population, Occupations, pp. 38-13. INTRODUCTION 7 were available, the actual hours worked by each woman during that week were recorded. Information concerning the workers was obtained from two sources: (1) Cards, with questions as to nativity, age, marital status, and length of service, were distributed to the women at work in the laundry, to be filled out by them; (2) visits were made to a number of women in their homes and questions were asked as to their present work, time in the laundry industry, past work history, preference as regards kind of work, reason for leaving previous job, reason for working, and, if married, number of children under 14 years of age. The women to be interviewed were selected by the sampling method, two or three different sections of the city being visited so that more than one type of worker and one land of laundry would be included. Scope. In the Census of Manufactures for 1925, the number of power laun dries reported was 4,859.13 This includes large and small, those in cities and in small towns, and those classified as wet-wash, familywork, and general commercial laundries. In the present study an effort was made to cover a cross section of the industry, with two conditions in mind—that only the larger and more representative cities should be surveyed, and that the laundries selected should be those in which a considerable number of women were employed. Naturally, the Women’s Bureau is most concerned with industry as it affects women workers, and with its limited resources the most efficient outlay could be made in the more populous centers. In consequence, the conditions, earnings, and hours reported cover large cities only and may not be representative of small towns. No laundry doing wet wash only was included in the study, as very few women are employed in that work. Records were obtained from 290 laundries in 23 cities. In the tabulations certain cities that are adjoining are treated as a unit, laundries in Minneapolis and St. Paul being thrown together, as are those in Jersey City and Newark and in St. Petersburg and Tampa. A further condensation was effected by combining the figures of cities in the same part of the country. The following table gives the laundries by section and shows the number and sex of the employees. 13 Ibid. Biennial Census of Manufactures, 1925, p. 1252. 8 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Table 1. Number of establishments visited and number of men and women they employed, by section and city Number of estab lishments visited Section and city All places____ _________ All employees White Men Negro White Women Negro White Negro 290 18,052 6,285 3,571 1,008 14,481 5,277 51 3,071 425 645 89 2,426 336 30 11 10 1,860 529 682 103 302 20 381 110 154 29 59 1 1,479 419 528 19 _ 127 7,338 2,505 1,412 489 5,926 2,016 Chicago.. ......... ................ . Cincinnati_____ _ Cleveland_______ ___ Dos Moines. Detroit..___ _____ ___ Indianapolis______ _____ Milwaukee_ ___________ Minneapolis and St. Paul.. 22 14 16 6 20 12 13 24 1,118 712 739 286 1,565 1,062 652 1,204 1,310 93 547 282 170 126 48 301 153 260 42 86 836 542 613 1,050 74 24 1,264 909 402 50 5 216 3 988 2 ________ _____ 65 6,753 29 1,186 13 5, 567 16 Los Angeles Portland________ _ San Francisco. Seattle........................... ........ 21 12 17 15 3,131 887 1,870 865 29 518 117 13 . 2,613 47 890 3,326 328 417 562 2,909 12 11 6 6 12 299 172 62 41 316 1,105 831 404 575 411 119 54 15 29 m 154 87 46 87 43 180 118 47 12 205 951 744 358 Eastern________ Boston.......... ............ .......... Jersey City and Newark__ Providence_________ ____ Middle western_____ _____ Western____ Southern _______________ Atlanta Birmingham Jacksonville Richmond_____ St. Petersburg and Tampa.. 476 74 368 Notwithstanding that only 23 cities in the entire country were visited and that in those cities all laundries could not be scheduled, the number of wage earners is more than one-seventh of the number reported for the entire industry in 1925. As all but three of the cities visited by the Women’s Bureau had a population in 1920 of over 100,000, it was to be expected that the 290 laundries would average a greater number of wage earners than did the 4,800 reporting for the census. The average number of employees per laundry in the present study wTas 83.9 and the average according to the 1925 census was 34.8. The larger average in the laundries selected by the Women’s Bureau may be partly due to the trend, already noted, for the laundry industry to develop larger and larger units. This trend is illustrated by the following brief summary from the Census of Manufactures.14 Number of wage earners Year Number of laundries Total 1914__________ . _______ 1919_______________________________ 1925____________________________ 6, 097 5, 678 4, 859 130, 641 131, 879 169, 200 Average per laundry 21. 4 23. 2 34. 8 INTRODUCTION 9 Here is shown a steady decline in the number of establishments together with an increase in the number of wTage earners. Unfortunately, there are no very recent census figures showing the proportion of men and women in the laundry industry. The Census of Occupations in 1920 shows two-thirds of the laundry operatives to be women, a very slight decrease from the figure reported in 1910.15 In the study by the Women’s Bureau the proportion of women was very much higher than the census figures, more than four-fifths of the workers being females. This difference in the proportion of women may be due to the fact that the laundries selected were the larger, general-commercial laundries, doing, as a rule, all varieties of work, while the laundries in the census records include many wetwash laundries where very few women arc employed and more small establishments. The proportion of women employed in different sections of the country shows no great variation. Section Per cent of women All places'81. 2 Eastern 79. 0 Middle western80. 7 Western82. 3 Southern;82. 3 There was, however, a wide variation in the proportion of white and negro women, as naturally would be the case with the much larger representation of negroes in the total population of some sections of the country than of others. As a whole, negro women composed a little more than one-quarter (26.7 per cent) of the women employed in laundries. In the South somewhat more than 4 in every 5 female workers were negroes, wrhile on the Pacific coast there were but 16 negroes in a total of 5,583 women. In different cities in the same section of the country the extent to which negro women were employed showed wride variations. None were found in the laundries visited in Milwaukee, though in Chicago, two hours away by rail, more than half of the women working in the laundries for which records were taken were negroes. In Detroit nearly one-fourth of the women were colored, while in Indianapolis there were only 5.2 per cent. Cleveland had a very much larger proportion of negro workers than had the more southern city of Cincinnati (42.9 and 8.6 per cent, respectively), while Jacksonville, which, according to the 1920 census, had a smaller proportion of negroes in the female population than had Birmingham, showed a larger per cent of negro women in laundries than did the Alabama city. Very few women were found who worked in laundries at night. Four plants reported a regular night shift, employing a total of 72 white and 16 negro women, and a fifth laundry had a shift of 15 women who began at 12.30 noon and worked until 11 o’clock at night. The laundry industry as a whole is essentially a daylight industry, as is shown by the fact that in 290 laundries visited, w'here employ ment was given to 19,758 women, only 103 women worked on an evening or a night shift. The range of women’s occupations in a laundry covers almost every variety of job but that of engineer and driver. Women were found 18 TJ. S. Bureau of the Census. Fourteenth census: 1920, vol. 4, Population, Occupations, p. 43. 103127°—30------ 2 10 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS operating presses, tumblers, blanket driers, and, more rarely, washing machines. They marked and sorted, starched and ironed, packed and wrapped, and did general cleaning. They superintended the work as forelady and, in at least eight cases, as superintendent. Apparently there was almost no laundry work that they could not do, but figures show that the great majority were massed in certain occupations. Nearly two-fifths of all the white women reported were on flat-work ironers, as shakers, feeders, or folders. Markers and sorters were the next largest group, comprising more than half as many white women as those on flat-ironing machines. Women operating presses and doing hand ironing were the only other groups with as many as 10 per cent of the total number. The smallest group was of women engaged on machine washing, with a total of only 12. Excepting superintendents, negro women were found in every occu pation where white women were employed, some even being foreladies, but their proportions in the various occupations were different. Their largest group was engaged in work on or connected with the flat-work ironers, as was the case with the white workers, but nearly one-half of the negro women compared to not quite two-fifths of the white were so employed. Pressing and hand ironing occupied large groups of negro women, while a much smaller per cent than in the case of white women were employed as markers and sorters. In actual numbers negro women exceeded the white in only two laundry pro cesses, hand and machine washing, and the numbers so employed were only 51 negro women on hand washing and 15 on machine washing. SUMMARY NUMBERS The survey included 290 power laundries in 23 cities situated in 17 States. It was begun in September, 1927, and ended early in May, 1928. The number of men and women workers in the laundries was 24,337, of whom 19,758 (81.2 per cent) were women. Negro women comprised a little more than a fourth (26.7 per cent) of the women employed. Women were found in all occupations except those of collection and delivery and of engineers. Negro women were employed in all occupations where white women were work ing, with the exception of superintendent. WORKING CONDITIONS Ventilation and temperature. In the temperature readings taken by means of a sling psychrometer, one-fourth of the dry-bulb readings were 80° and over. Of these dry-bulb readings of 80° and over, one-half had wet-bulb readings of 70° and over. A little more than a fifth of the dry-bulb readings of 80° and over had a relative humidity of 60 per cent and more. Nearly one-half (46.7 per.cent) of the readings were reported by the investi gator as being “comfortable” and about the same proportion as being “warm” or “hot.” One-half of the readings reported as “comfortable” were from 70° to 75° dry bulb and 60° to 65° wet bulb. More than three-fourths of the readings under “hot” had a dry bulb of 80° and over and all had a wet bulb of 70° and over. _ _ No artificial ventilation was found in one-third of the laundries visited. si ill iflM * -‘•in, | HI ■ t V ST*? “PtfV Siinr . PLATE 2.—THE HEAT FROM THE FLAT-WORK IRONERS IS CARRIED OFF 11 INTRODUCTION Local exhausts and protection. Of the 214 laundries for which this item was reported, 11.2 per cent had hoods with exhausts over all their flat-work ironers and a number of others had some of their machines so equipped. Of the laundries reporting, over four-fifths of those with hot tumblers and onesixth of those with drying rooms were equipped with outside exhausts. Lighting. Natural lighting was found satisfactory in half the laundries. was found satisfactory in more than three-fourths. Artificial lighting Floors. Floors throughout the entire plant were of cement in 60 and of wood in 50 of the 290 laundries visited. Seating. Seats for all employees were supplied by 19 laundries and for some workers by 118 others. Sanitation. More than half (56.2 per cent) of the laundries were equipped with bubble fountains, but only 27 had bubblers that were sanitary. A little over a fifth (21 per cent) of the laundries used common drinking cups. Special washing facilities were provided in all but 28 laundries. In two-fifths of the laundries toilet accommodations were insufficient in number, according to Women’s Bureau standards, and in 27 there was but one seat for 40 or more women. In more than a third (37 per cent) of the laundries the toilets had no outside ventilation. Toilet rooms were clean in about 60 per cent of the cases. First-aid provision. First aid was provided in all but 15 laundries and a special person to administer it in all but 58. Cloak rooms. Special cloak rooms were found in about one-half of the laundries. sion for wraps was recorded in 33 plants. No provi Rest rooms. Only 27 laundries had special rest rooms; 27 more had rest facilities in a cloak, lunch, or wash room. Lunch rooms. A lunch room was provided in 55 laundries and a gas or electric plate for the employees’ use in 99 others. Uniforms. Uniforms were required in 116 laundries and in 33 they were furnished by the management. As a rule uniforms were laundered free of charge to the worker. Employment machinery. Employment departments were found in five large laundries. the employing of labor was under a single person. In 198 plants Hazards. Seven laundries of the 290 had flat-work ironers without a guard, and 92 had extractors without guards. In 45 laundries extractors were operating with the covers fastened up. No guards on presses were reported in 44 laundries. Slippery floors in departments where women worked were found in 24 laundries. Handrails for stairs were lacking in 21 plants. Stairs were in bad repair in 30 plants, and the construction of stairways was unsatisfactory, because of high risers or narrow or triangular treads, in 76 laundries. Strain. In 166 laundries some presses operated with foot treadle were in use. Old-fashioned body ironers were found in a small number of plants. 12 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS THE WORKERS Nationality (18,369 women). Over four-fifths of the 18,369 women in the laundries were native born. and Canada furnished 28.2 per cent of the foreign-born women. Mexico Age (16,462 women). Women 40 years of age and over comprised 27.7 per cent of the white workers and 12 per cent of the negro. Women under 20 years of age comprised 13.4 per cent of the white workers and 15.1 per cent of the negro. Marital status (16,554 women reported). Married women composed the largest group, 43.1 per cent of the white women and 41.1 per cent of the negro women. The widowed, separated, and divorced women were nearly a fourth (23.3 per cent) of the white workers and 30 per cent of the negro women. Length of service (16,181 women). Over two-fifths of the women (43.1 per cent of the white and 42.8 per cent of the negro) had been from one to five years with the same laundry. A little less than two-fifths (37.2 per cent) of the white women and a little more than two-fifths (40.2 per cent) of the negro women had had less than a year of service, and 12.5 per cent of the white and 14.7 per cent of the negro less than three months of service. The group with service of 10 years and over included but 6.3 per cent of the white women and 4 per cent of the negro, and in the group with service of 15 years and over were 2.4 per cent of the white and less than 1 per cent of the negro women. Time in the trade (1,821 women). Over one-half of 1,296 white women interviewed had been in the industry off and on for five years and more, and 15.4 per cent of the women had worked off and on in laundries for 15 years or more. Only 4.4 per cent of the negro women had worked in laundries off and on for 15 years or more. A larger proportion than of the white women had been in the industry less than five years. Reason for working (1,850 women). Of 1,315 white women giving in the home interviews their reasons for working, 91.7 per cent reported “necessity.” Only 2 per cent gave as a reason the desire for “extras.” All but one of those who were single were working to support themselves or themselves and family. • The largest group of married women were working because of the failure of the husband to provide adequate support. _ Of the 535 negro women reporting on this subject, all but one of the single, ■widowed, separated, and divorced, worked from “necessity,” while 61.8 per cent of the married women were working to support self and family. A little over one-third of the mothers of both races had children under 14 years of age. Age and occupation (1,837 women). The largest proportion of white women shaking, feeding, or folding on the large flat-work ironers were 20 and under 40 years of age. A fifth were under 20 years. Nearly half of the white women doing hand ironing were 40 years of age and over. On presses nearly three-fifths of the workers were from 20 to 40 years of age. The markers and sorters had 70.2 per cent from 20 to 40 years of age. In each occupation, except hand ironing, more than half of the negro women were between 20 and 30 years of age. Of the negro women doing hand ironing, over a fifth were 40 years and over and a third were 30 and under 40 years of age. Work experience (1,858 women). A third of the white and a fifth of the negro women reporting had worked in laundries only. About 1 in 5 of the white women had worked in two or more industries besides laundries. 13 INTRODUCTION A tenth of the white and over two-fifths of the negro women had trieddomestie service and laundries, and manufacturing and laundry work had occupied 1 in 6 of all the women reporting. Reason for leaving last place (1,493 women). Separation from laundries for personal reasons had occurred in two-thirds_ of the cases of the white and in three-fifths of the cases of the negro women reporting on this. . Almost three-fifths of the reasons given by the white women for leaving manu facturing were connected with the industry, while stores and hotels and restau rants showed practically the same proportions to have left for industrial and for personal reasons. . . . Personal reasons were the most important for those quitting domestic service, but the per cent in this group was not so high as in laundries. Type of work preferred and reason given (740 women). Of 740 women expressing preferences, 587 preferred laundry work to that in other industries. Thirty per cent of those giving their reasons for preferring laundry work mentioned “better hours.” Nearly as many of the answers, 26.8 per cent, reported “better pay. Of. the women preferring other industries to laundries, 54.5 per cent gave as the reason “better pay.” A small proportion of the women (6.6 per cent) gave better hours as the reason for preferring other than laundry work, but “better working conditions” was given in 20.7 per cent of the answers. HOURS Weekly hours (19,481 women). The highest per cents of the women had scheduled weekly hours as follows: Per cent East, 48 and under------------------------------------- ---------------------- 80. 2 Middle West, 50 and under 54-------------------------------------------- 51. 7 West, 48 and under 97. 2 South, 54 and over------------------------------------------------------------- 48. 4 and over 50 and under 54 39. 7 Daily hours (19,478 women). For the scheduled daily hours the figures are— Per cent East, over 8 and under 9 58. 9 Middle West, 9------------------------------------------------------------------ 67- 9 West, 8_______________________________________ __________— 97. 2 South, over 9 and including 10-------------------------------------------- 82. 0 (Over 9 and under 10 hours, 42 per cent; 10 hours, 40 per cent.) Saturday hours (19,461 women). For Saturday hours they are— East, under 6_____________ Middle West, 5 and under 6 West, 8 and under 9______ South, 6 and under 8______ Per ■'ent . . _ 70.2 50. 3 99.3 47. 4 Lunch period (19,529 women). For 62.9 per cent of the women the lunch period was 30 minutes. per cent it was 1 hour. The remainder fell between. For 21.9 Rest periods. Only 2,216 women, in 32 plants, were allowed rest periods. Actual hours worked (12,822 women). The full scheduled hours were worked by 50.2 per cent of the white and 29 per cent of the negro women. Full time was greatest in the East and the West. Less than scheduled hours (time lost) was worked by 39.6 per cent of the white and 52.1 per cent of the negro women. It was greatest in the Middle West. More than scheduled hours (overtime) was worked by 10.2 per cent of the white and 18.9 per cent of the negro women. It was greatest in the South. 14 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS WAGES Week’s earnings (19,180 women). Per cent of women whose earnings were— White (14,104 women) Under $8 . _. __ _ ________ Under $10 . __ ______ _ Under $12___ ____ ____ _ _ Under $15._______ . . Under $18 _______ Under $20. ... ___ 3. 5. 12. 39. 69. 82. Negro (5,076 women) 4 9 8 0 5 7 43. 59. 72. 91. 97. 99. 3 2 9 8 9 0 The medians of the earnings—half the women receiving more and half receiving less—were— White All places. ..... East _ _______ Middle West__ ____ ... __ South_______ ... _ . . . $16. 14. 14. 17. 13. 10 50 75 90 95 Negro $8. 12. 12. 117. 7. 85 50 25 50 15 116 women. For the 5,983 women who worked the full scheduled week the medians were— W’hite All places____ _. .. ______ East_______ ... . . Middle West____ .. _ __ __ West .. . _____ __ South _ _ $17. 15. 15. 19. 15. 80 05 90 05 55 Negro $10. 13. 12. (') 7. 25 80 75 25 ■ Not computed, owing to the small number involved. Of the four lines of work employing the most women (16,277) the numbers of women and their median earnings were— White women Number Mark and sort.. Flat work Press operate__ Hand iron _ . ________ __ ________ . ______ _ _____ 2, 5, 1, 1, 914 296 711 883 Negro women Median $17. 14. 16. 16. 35 55 70 60 Number 241 2, 367 838 1, 027 Median $11. 8. 9. 7. 90 65 50 95 Only about 10 per cent of the women were pieceworkers. Earnings correlated with time with the firm (13,016 women) show medians for white women of $14.55 with service of less than a year, $15.65 with one and under two years, and a steady advance to $19.30 with service of 15 years or more. For negro women the medians are $7.90 with less than a year’s service, $8.70 with one and under two years, advancing to $10.65 with 10 and under 15 years and then falling slightly. 15 INTRODUCTION Weekly rates (15,873 women). The per cent distribution of women according to their weekly rates of pay is— White Under $10 _ _____ $15 and under $20_ $20 and over _ _ _ _____________ _ __ _ _ _ 0. 30. 51. 18. Negro 5 0 4 1 The highest rates were paid in the two California cities and in Seattle. 54. 36. 8. . 9 6 2 4 f .wm PLATE 3.—NATURAL VENTILATION; SLAT BLINDS; CHAIR WORKING CONDITIONS Probably only within the last 30 years have employers in general begun to realize that business and humanitarian conditions may go hand in hand. . It would have been admitted earlier that light airy rooms, with well-guarded machinery, seats, and good sanitary facili ties, constituted a better and more heathful place to work in than one with poor light, stuffy air, and inadequate comfort provisions. But only since management became to a greater degree scientific and less a matter of trial and error has it been discovered that good equipment and housekeeping in plants, other factors being equal, attract and hold the better workers and that the result also shows in dollars and cents. Any mechanism—an engine running in an automobile or one in a factory shows in results the care it receives, and this is true to almost as great an extent of the human being. One large plant experimentm0, m production found that merely moving a group of women into a bright sunshiny room incrGflsod their output. Although poor working conditions do not often create enough dissatisfaction to culminate in a strike, without doubt they do cause a low morale and occasion in dividual stoppages. Doctor Florence, in his book on fatigue and unrest, lists in the following order the factors most important to the human body in the physical environment of industrial establishments: Good air, good lighting, freedom from excessive noise, safety, sanitation and tidiness seating, and rest rooms.1 Good air, of course, implies healthful tem perature and humidity, ventilation (freedom from dust, fumes, odors) and space; sanitation includes cleanliness, drinking water, lavatories' The ease or difficulty of arriving at good conditions of air, of light of qmet would depend to a great degree on the industry. In a textile mill glass factory, candy-dipping or laundry plant air conditions ideal for the worker would be far more difficult to obtain than in a clothing shop, paper-box factory, or store. It is harder to have satisfactory lighting where there are many overhead belts and shafts and quiet is more difficult of attainment in a tin-can or nail factory ’ In laundries the large number of washing and drying machines and the wet or damp clothes render the problem of good air conditions exceedingly difficult. In the present study readings by a sling psychrometer of dry-bulb and wet-bulb temperatures were taken near the flat-work ironers and the presses and hand ironers. Readings of the outside air also were taken on the same day, so that some allow ance could be made for very hot or cold weather. The study was begun in September, 1927, and ended in early May, 1928. During several of the winter months the survey was carried on in California and m the South, so that extremes of outdoor temperatures were avoided as much as possible. iFtoM.f.SMgant, Economics of Fatigue and Unrest. George Allen & Unwin (Ltd.), London, 1924, 17 18 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Ventilation and temperature. The comfort and efficiency of the worker are very materially affected by the conditions of air in which she works. It has long been under stood that stale air is injurious and that air must be fresh or it will be harmful, but within recent years it has been shown that ill effects upon health and efficiency are noticeable when the air is hot, stagnant, and contains high humidity. Professor Winslow says that1 ‘ overheating is the most serious aspect of underventilating,”2 and in a more recent article on ventilation of the industrial plant the same fact is brought out in these words: “Present-day concern is not with the air that is breathed but with the air lived in.” The article referred to gives a definition of desirable air conditions to “live in.” To be refreshing to the skin and stimulating to the various parts of the body, air must be moderately cool, in gentle motion, moderately moist, and slightly variable in temperature, and an effort should be made to keep the air temperature between 66° and 68° F.3 This desirable standard of air not too hot, without too much moisture, and with sufficient move ment is, like all ideals, worth striving for but difficult of attainment. In each plant in the present study readings were taken with a-sling psychrometer near the flat-work ironers and presses. (See Appendix Tables I to V.) If the presses were in more than one department a reading was taken in each department. The wet-bulb readings probably err on the side of being too low, as there was some difficulty in keeping the cloth covering of the bulb fresh and clean and in some cases the time allowed for swinging may have varied The investi gator also noted her feelings—that is, whether the place where the readings were taken seemed cold, warm, or hot and these sensations have been correlated with the readings. Without doubt the in\ estigator’s sensations were not always those of the laundry workers, most of whom were engaged in considerable physical exercise but probably were acclimatized to a certain extent. How far a physical and psychological adjustment to heat or cold can be made it .is difficult to tell. Doctor Vernon found that “unendurable limits of air temperature are greatly affected by acclimatizations. Toward the end of an experimental series it was about 6° b. higher than in the experiments made a month earlier.”4 Even when an adaptation is made, as was found to be the case with a laundry worker whose reactions to high temperatures were compared with those of persons not accustomed to high temperatures, the results of the examinations are modified by the statement that while the workers in the ironing room appear to be able to adapt themselves remarkably well to the atmospheric conditions, this adaptation constitutes an undue strain upon them and must, therefore, be regarded as injurious to health. Thus, although the woman working constantly m warm, moist air may become to a certain extent immune as far as immediate bad effects are concerned, she nevertheless pays a price, according to Doctor Vernon, through the additional strain endured. i Winslow, C.-E. A. Effect of Atmospheric Conditions upon Fatigue and Efficiency. In Monthly L“wood'Tho’matm" a’nrt1Uendritsen, Ethel M. Ventilation of the Industrial Plant. In Industrial “.“‘ffs1.’ The'Effect Atmospheric Conditions on Health and Efficiency (with special reference to the cotton industry). In Journal of Industrial Hygiene, July, 1925, p. 330. , . , . a New York Department of Labor. A Study of Hygienic Conditions in Steam Laundries and their Effect upon the Health of Workers. Special Bui. 130, 1924, p. 15. WORKING CONDITIONS 19 In tests made by the New York State Commission on Ventilation which covered a 3-year period, it was found that in labor involving slight muscular activity, such as typewriting, the amount of work performed with the thermometer at 68° F. was 6.3 per cent greater than the amount with the temperature at 75° F. The results of the experiments are summarized in the following words: “The experiments cited 1 mulish very clear evidence that a temperature of 24° C. (75° F.l and still more one of 30° C. (86° F.) produces a marked disinclination to any form of physical work, even such light work as typewriting.”6 Near the flat-work ironers more than one-half of the dry-bulb readings (53.9 per cent) were 75° and over, with 3.5 per cent 85° and over Ihe temperature readings of the dry bulb near the presses were high m more instances than near the flat-work ironers, nearly three-1 ourths (72 per cent) being 75° and over and 7.5 per cent 85° and over, ihe combined dry-bulb readings of the flat-work ironers and presses showed 38 cases of 85° and over and only 9 below 65°, while the largest single group was from 75° to 80°. 'These figures differ widely irom desirable temperatures advocated in an article in Man agement Review: “For people normally clothed, and slightly active, m still air, the most favorable temperature conditions are 68° F on the dry bulb and 58° wet bulb * * * relative humidity of approximately 55 per cent.” The article continues, “as temperatures are higher * * * conditions are less favorable for efficient working. A temperature of 75° dry-bulb with the usual relative numidity, or wet-bulb reading, is likely to lower one’s efficiency or productivity as much as 15 per cent.”7 The majority of the readings of the wet bulb near the flat-work ironers and the presses were 60° and under 70°, with nearly three1 ourths (70.1 and 74.7 per cent, respectively) falling in this classifi cation. Readings of 70° and over were fairly frequent, a little more than an eighth of all the wet-bulb readings being in this high group. JDoctor Haldane, through experiments carried on in England, decided that the endurable limit of wet-bulb temperature was about 78° F. li a moderate amount of mechanical work was being done.8 This limit was seldom reached in the readings taken in the present study It is, however, a question whether the jobs in laundries would come under the classification umoderate amount of mechanical work.” Some ol them would seem, instead, to be fairly strenuous muscular work especially the jobs of shakers and folders. The combination ol high temperature with considerable moisture is fatiguing, without doubt. Doctor Pembrey and Doctor Collis state that “the prolonged exposure to the hot moist atmosphere would appear to be more injurious than exposure to even higher temperatures (wet-bulb) for a shorter time.”9 . The combination of dry-bulb and wet-bulb temperatures is far more important than either one, considered separately, except in the case of excessively high readings. Of the 66 dry-bulb readings of 80° and over near the flat-work ironers, 57.6 per cent had wet-bulb readings of 70 or more; near the presses, although the proportion was lower, the RevTiSf pp a“d &C0DditiOI1S UP°n PatigUe “d Efficiency' Iv Monthly Labo^ I w°Y?I In Management Reviewmanuury, 1827, pp. 6-7. , rhe Effect of Atmospheric Conditions on Health and Efficiency (with special reference to the cotton industry). In Journal of Industrial Hygiene, July, 1826, p. 322 P reierence to ’ I Did., p, o^o. 20 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS actual number of wet-bulb readings over 70° combined with the dry bulb of 80° or more, was about the same as in the ease of the flat-work ironers. Relative humidity of as much as 60 per cent combined with high dry-bulb temperatures was found in a greater proportion of cases near the flat-worlc ironers than near the presses. Nearly a third (31.8 per cent) of the dry-bulb readings of 80° and over near the flatwork ironers had a relative humidity of 60 per cent and over, while near the presses only 14.7 per cent had this relative humidity combined with dry-bulb temperatures of 80° or more. The combined readings near the flat-work ironers and presses recorded more than a fifth (21.1 per cent) of the dry-bulb temperatures of 80° and over with relative humidity of 60 per cent or more. . In spite of the fact that temperature readings were not taken during the hottest months, there was considerable variation in the out-of doors dry-bulb temperatures recorded. They had a wide range, 3 being 5° and under 10° and 15 being 80° and under 85°, with the majority (50.6 per cent) 50° and under 65°. The effect of the outside temperature on the dry-bulb readings is clearly reflected in the fact that with outside temperatures of 60° and over, 84.1 per cent of the inside readings were 75° or more. The temperatures of 75° and over inside the laundries, however, were not confined to days when the outside temperature was warm. Without doubt it is more difficult to keep temperatures low when the outside air is mild, but that the difficulty is still present in cool weather is apparent by the fact that nearly a sixth (15.7 per cent) of all the indoor readings of 75 and over occurred with outdoor temperatures at less than 45°; with 12 readings the outside temperature was below 30°. • The indoor wet-bulb readings are even harder to keep down when there is much dampness in the outside air than are the dry-bulb readings when it is warm out of doors. With outdoor wet-bulb read ings of 50° and over there was no indoor reading of less than 55°. However, when the moisture in the outer air was low the same con dition was not necessarily reflected indoors, for when outdoor wetbulb readings were under 45° more than 6 per cent of the inside readings were 70° and over. Each investigator as she went through the laundry and swung her psychrometer near the flat-work ironers and presses also made a note of her sensations of comfort or discomfort. These feelings were charted with the 604 dry-bulb readings and an interesting uniform ity of sensation with certain degrees of temperature was the result. When the records read- “comfortable” one-half of the readings were from 70° to 75° dry bulb and 60° to 65° wet bulb. The range of read ings when “comfortable” was tabulated was about the same for the dry and the wet bulbs; one agent reported it comfortable with the dry bulb between 60° and 65° and six readings of between 80° and 85° were so reported. No agent found it comfortable with the wet bulb below 50° or as high as 75°. In all, 282 readings were listed as comfortable. As would be expected, it was not commonly found to be too cool in laundries, but 42 readings were thus reported. Among these readings pronounced as cool a smaller proportion than in the group termed comfortable were between 70° and 75° dry and 60° and 65° wet, and a larger proportion were between 65° and 70° dry and 55° and 60° wet. More than one-half of the “cool” readings were under 70° dry and about two-fifths were below 60° wet. Where 21 WORKING CONDITIONS the sensation was put down as “warm” S7.1 per cent of the cases had a dry-bulb reading of 75° and over and 61.2 per cent of the wet bulbs registered 65° or more. The largest group of readings under “warm” were 75° to 80° dry and 65° to 70° wet. Under the heading “very warm” not many readings were recorded, probably because of the difficulty of determining when the sensation was “very warm” and when it was “hot.” Because of this diffi culty, the two classifications have been combined under “hot.” Three-fourths (75.5 per cent) of the dry-bulb readings under “hot” were 80° and over, and all these readings had a wet-bulb temperature of 70° or more. The highest temperatures were three with the dry bulb at 90° and over and seven with the wet bulb at 75° and over. Reviewing all the 604 readings, the following distribution is found: Per cent Cool_____ __________ Comfortable 46. Warm____________________________________________________ Hot__________________________________ 7. 0 7 29. 5 It must be emphasized again, however, that the sensations re ported were not of the laundry workers themselves but of the bu reau’s agents, passing through the plants and neither accustomed to the temperature through habit nor exercising as were the women at work. In most plants an effort had been made to insure moving air by natural or artificial means, and the provisions, both natural and arti ficial, were observed by the investigators when going through the plants. One-third of the 290 plants for which air conditions were reported had only natural ventilation throughout, while in 103 establishments some rooms had only natural ventilation and in others there was arti ficial as well. The dependence on natural means of ventilation was greater in some sections of the country than in others. The least artificial ventilation was found in laundries in the western group, and it was stated by employers here that because of the equable climate and cool winds in summer special ventilating facilities were not neces sary. About two-thirds of the laundries in this group had no artifi cial system of ventilation. Next to the western group, the southern showed the least artificial ventilation, nearly one-half (46.8 per cent) having nothing to supplement the window, door, or skylight. More than 80 per cent of the plants in the middle-western group of laun dries improved the ventilation by such means as wall fans or exhausts. Means for natural ventilation were reported good throughout 196 laundries of the total of 290 and in some rooms in 57 others. The proportion of establishments where natural ventilation was definitely unsatisfactory constituted a tenth of the whole, and in addition a number of plants were noted that had unsatisfactory conditions in certain rooms. The most usual form of artificial ventilation was the wall exhaust, found in 67 establishments and in certain rooms in 95 others. Some laundries had paddle or individual electric fans as well as wall exhausts, and some had fans but no exhausts. There seemed to be some question as to the effectiveness of the small fan for work ers on the large flat-work ironers. A number of women complained that it drove the hot air down on them and was worse than having 16 22 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS no fan. From the press operators and hand ironers, however, there was no such complaint. General systems of artificial ventilation were rather uncommon. Only nine laundries had a complete system installed, eight of these being in the middle-western group of laundries. Systems such as the carrier were much more frequently found in certain rooms than in entire plants. The greatest number of plants equipped with special artificial ventilation for single rooms or departments were found in the middle-western group of laundries and the next largest in the western group. An intensive study made in New York City 10 emphasized the vital importance to the laundry industry of controlling temperature, conditions. A resume of its findings as applying in a greater or less degree to all laundries is given here: 1. Natural ventilation alone is inadequate in practically every case. 2. Any attempt to combine natural with artificial ventilation must fail because the air currents within the room are too complex and seasonal variations in temperature too great to permit of sufficient flexibility in such a combined system. 3. A well-thought-out plan of artificial ventilation has been found in a few model laundries to be entirely satisfactory. In these places windows are opened when desired, but they are not a part of the ventilating scheme. 4. The number of ironing machines permitted on any single floor should bear definite relation to their heat-radiating capacity. 5. Special attention should be paid to drafts. 6. There should be properly constructed hoods, not only over the flat-work ironers but over all ironing machines giving off steam. These hoods should be provided with adequate exhaust fans (not too strong). 7. Ceilings should be high. 8. Since the temperatures and humidities at the flat-work ironers are considerably higher than elsewhere, special ventilating installation should be placed with reference to the comfort of the operators of these machines. Local exhausts or other protection. Many laundries with no general method of removing heated air from the workroom had hoods and exhausts over individual machines. On certain kinds of machines probably this is the most effective method. The New York State Industrial Commission, in a report published in 1924, advised, as steps in the right direction, the in stallation of adequate hoods over the flat-work ironers and the insula tion of the dry room.11 Some of the large flat-work ironers, where the articles are ironed as the rolls revolve, had hoods over them and exhaust fans to carry off the hot air and steam. (See pi. 2.) More than 10 per cent (11.2) of the 214 laundries reported had all their flat-work ironers so equipped, and a number had some machines with this protection and some without. In a few laundries hoods without exhausts were reported. This absence of exhaust fans probably would throw the steam down, and though it might make the air in the rest 10 New York. Department of Labor. A Study of Hygienic Conditions in Steam Laundries and Their Effect upon the Health of Workers. Special Bui. 130, 1924, pp. 45 and 48. u Ibid,, p, 45, . WORKING CONDITIONS 23 of the room better it would concentrate the heat and steam on the operator. Several plants had screens of heavy canvas before the workers on the flat-work ironers, which were of considerable benefit to the operators but allowed the heat and steam to escape into the room. Many establishments had skylights over the large ironers, and when the outside air was not too cold this answered fairly well. However, on very cold days the hot air was driven back into the room. Hot tumblers and, much less frequently, drying rooms were in some cases equipped with exhaust pipes that carried off the hot air directly from the drying chamber. More than 80 per cent of the laundries with hot tumblers had this system and it was found in about a sixth of the drying rooms. Handkerchief and collar ironers had hoods with exhausts in only a fewT cases and, in the opinion of many superintendents, the need for such equipment was a question. It would appear, however, that local hoods and exhaust fans, as in the case of the larger ironing machines, would prevent the heat escaping into the room. There were no local exhausts over presses, but the newer presses that were operated by electricity, steam, or compressed air had an asbestos pad or covering in the ironing head. This was supposed to prevent the dissipation of the heat and also to protect the worker, but it was impossible to find out to what extent the latter purpose was fulfilled. For the same reasons, pipes had been covered with asbestos in some laundries, and this was declared by the superin tendents as most effective in conserving heat and protecting the workers. Lighting. In some industries the lighting prolusions, both natural and arti ficial, always have been regarded as of the greatest importance. Where fine work is done, such as sewing, knitting, or assembling, lighting engineers have made experiments and ascertained the best lighting conditions under which the work should be done. The laundry indus try needs good general lighting but, except for the marking and mend ing, the work is not of a close or exacting nature, and therefore the need for engineers to plan the lighting installation has been realized only lately. Laundry owners building plants in recent years have been careful to arrange for good lighting because they realize that not only does it affect the quality of the work but it results in a healthier and happier work force. Among the recommendations passed at the thirty-sixth annual convention of the laundry owners is the following: “Fresh air and sunlight. Necessary from a standpoint of health and an important factor with the applicant for a position.”12 The natural lighting in 146 laundries, one-half of all visited, was reported as satisfactory, and in 134 laundries it was found to be good in some departments and poor in others. When the natural lighting was found unsatisfactory the trouble was not that insufficient light was furnished but rather that the conditions resulted in glare for the workers, who must face windows having no shades or awnings or work under a skylight allowing the sun to beat directly down on the machines. 12 Laundryowners National Association. Advance report, Thirty-sixth Annual Convention, New York City, 1919, p, 12, . 24 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Satisfactory natural lighting throughout the entire plant was found in a larger proportion of laundries in the East than in any other section of the country; the smallest .per cent with good lighting throughout was in the middle-western group. Good artificial lighting, although usually of less importance to the worker than is natural lighting, is more easily achieved; especially is this true in old or reconstructed buildings. It is not surprising, therefore, that good artificial lighting was found in more than three-fourths of the laundries visited. In 13 establishments the artificial lighting was insufficient, but in nearly three times that number (35) glare was reported from unshaded bulbs hanging on a level with the workers’ eyes. In 48 other laundries glare was reported in some departments. The best artificial lighting throughout the plant was in the group with the poorest natural lighting, the middle-western group, and this would, of course, compen sate to some extent for the less adequate natural lighting. In the western group, with shorter daily hours, and in the southern, with more daylight and sunshine, the use of artificial light would he less than elsewhere, but good artificial lighting was almost as common on the Pacific coast as in the Middle West. It was found less commonly in the South. Floors. The material of the floors in the different laundries visited depended largely upon whether or not the building had been erected especially for laundry purposes. When a building originally planned for another purpose was used, as a rule the floors were not changed except in the wash room, where cement took the place of wood. If the entire plant had cement floors they were kept, but rarely were cement floors laid throughout in an old building. Generally where a new building was erected cement floors were provided. Probably there is no question but that a cement floor is desirable in the wash room, but in the press and flat-ironing departments, where there is no problem of wet floors except around the starching table, the advantage of cement is open to question. It is likely to stand up better and to need less repair, but if satisfactory mats or platforms are not provided the hardness and lack of resilience make it exceed ingly fatiguing to the worker. Practically all laundry work requires constant standing, and when this is done on cement floors, without mats or wooden platforms, tired and aching feet are the result. How much this condition affects the work is difficult to determine, but in a study of another occupation where workers are continuously on their feet the discomfort was so pronounced that when rest periods were installed the whole attitude of the workers toward the job was altered, production increased, and turnover showed a marked decline.13 In 60 laundries floors throughout the entire plant were of cement, in 136 cement floors were found in some departments, and in 68 there were floors with cement around the machines. The women working on the large flat-work ironers more frequently were found standing on cement floors than were either the press operators or the hand ironers. In many cases the workers on cement floors were well supplied with wooden platforms and mats. Wooden floors throughout 13 Mayo, Elton. Revery and Industrial Fatigue. In Journal of Personnel Research, vol. 3, No. 8, December, 1924, pp. 273 and 278, m I r' PLATE 4.—A LIGHT AND AIRY MARKING DEPARTMENT fill,! j4 WORKING CONDITIONS 25 were found in 50 establishments, and in 158 others all floors were of wood except where the washing was done. Whether or not cement floors are more easily kept clean and in good repair, it is a fact that they were more generally reported good in these respects. As regards wet floors, however, a much higher proportion of wooden floors than of cement ones were found in good condition. Material of floors Per cent of establishments in which floors were— In repair Cement__ ____ Part cement___ Wood_______ __ . _ 91. 8 81. 4 74. 0 Clean Dry 87. 8 87. 1 80. 8 87. 8 95. 7 99. 5 The employers’ association advises “Clean floors, walls and win dows free from the accumulation of dust and dirt. The psychology of neatness and order has an undeniable influence on the mind of the worker.” 14 General arrangements good and aisles free from obstructions were found in a large majority of the laundries visited. In 43 laundries the arrangement might have been improved somewhat, and in 99 establishments all or some of the aisles were blocked by trucks, boxes, or other objects. Seating. The majority of occupations in a laundry require that the worker stand. However, some of the operations may be done either sitting or standing, and even with jobs that require standing there are times when a few minutes’ rest may be taken if seats are available. Chairs should be provided, therefore, as part of the necessary equipment in every plant. (See pi. 3.) The few minutes’ rest is not wasted time. Doctor Vernon has summed up the situation in the following words: “In any case the healthy worker has each day a certain supply of energy which he puts into his daily task, and it is evident that the more of this energy he expends in wasteful and unnecessary directions, the less he has for application to useful ends.” He goes on to say that a man’s work may be lightened by the adoption of labor-saving methods and devices, and that “Such devices leave him a greater stock of energy to expend m other directions, and he is thereby enabled to exert himself more vigorously, and to increase his productivity.” 16 The soundness of these findings by industrial physicians has been realized by certain laundry managers who have expressed their con viction by furnishing chairs and in some cases by installing rest periods. Nineteen of the firms visited furnished seats for all their employees and 118 supplied seats for some of the workers. In 153 establishments seats were supplied only for the few women whose jobs required sitting, such as the menders. iOrK ciiy, lyiy, p. 12. A®"ation' Advance report. Thirty-sixth Annual Convention. New u Vernon, H. M. Industrial Fatigue and Efficiency. Oeorge Routledge & Sons (Ltd.), London, 1921 pp. d-4. ' * 103127°—30------ 3 26 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS The best seating provisions were found in the eastern group of laundries. The poorest were in the southern group, where nearly three-fifths of the laundries had no seats. Where seats were furnished there was a wide variation in type. Some establishments provided chairs, some stools, and some wooden boxes, and frequently all these would be found in the same plant. In other words, seats were, as a rule, neither carefully placed nor of comfortable type, but were a haphazard afterthought in the equipment. Drinking facilities. In a laundry, where the processes of the industiy generate heat, it is very important to the worker that there should be a plentiful supply of cool drinking water. That this need is appreciated by the manage ment is evidenced by the fact that in more than one-half (53.4 per cent) of the laundries visited the water was artificially cooled through out the plant or in one or more departments. There is greater need for artificially cooled water in some sections of the country than in others, and in the South, where the outdoor temperatures are high over long periods, more than 90 per cent of the firms visited supplied cooled water. Of all the establishments visited the majority (56.2 per cent) had bubbler fountains, but in most instances these were of the insanitary type where the jet of water falls back on the orifice. The best ar rangements were in 27 laundries with sanitary bubblers and in 26 others with individual drinking cups. The common cup, the least desirable of all, was found in about a fifth (21 per cent) of the laundries visited. Its use was most prevalent in the southern group. In dividual cups were supplied to the greatest extent in eastern laundries and bubblers in the western group, while the laundries in the middlewestem States had the largest proportion of sanitary bubblers. The insanitary bubbler, like the individual drinking glass, has been found to be a carrier of infection,16 but this fact is not generally realized by employers, who feel that their workers are protected from risk of infection by the installation of bubblers of whatever type. It is becoming more generally known, however, that the jet of water should be projected not vertically but at an angle, and, according to the National Safety Council, an angle of at least 30° is desirable.17 Washing facilities. In a soap-and-water industry like the laundry it may sound absurd to discuss washing facilities, but that these are a necessity is shown by the fact that 262 of the 290 laundiies visited had made such provision. In most laundries the washing of clothes is done in machines, operated by men, and the only place where employees may wash, unless special provision is made, is in a tub where fine hand laundering is done. This tub seldom is conveniently placed and frequently is not available, so a special trough or basin is necessary. Less than half of all the laundries that had washing facilities furnished hot water; a little more than half furnished soap. In the majority of cases towels were not supplied, the management feeling that sufficient clean linen or rags were available. This arrangement would appear to be unsatisfactory from the viewpoint both of the •e Journal of American Medical Association, vol. 67, No. 20, Nov. 11,1916, p. 1451. 17 National Safety Council. Drinking Water, Wash and Locker Rooms, and Toilet Facilities. Safe Practices, No. 27. WORKING CONDITIONS 27 workers and of the customers. Common towels were found in more than a fourth of the laundries having special washing facilities. As a rule, when washing facilities were supplied they were found to be clean, only 50 of the 262 plants being reported as unsatisfactory in this respect. Toilet facilities. Many conditions in a plant may affect the worker and her work that apparently are without direct connection. In a study where the question was asked, “Why did you leave your previous job?” one answer was “The drinking water was kept in pails—that’s not healthy,” and another was “The toilets were a disgrace.” These physical conditions, not connected with the actual performance of work, had proved sufficiently irritating to cause the women to quit their jobs. In most plants superintendents and foremen are so busy that they feel they have little time for plant housekeeping, yet that may be the sore spot affecting their whole organization. In many States laws have been passed providing certain minima of comfort and decency in toilets. The number of seats that shall be furnished in relation to the number of women using them is one of the most frequent specifications. The standard number advised by the Women’s Bureau is one seat for every 15 women. According to this standard three-fifths of the establishments visited in the present study provided adequate facilities, the highest proportion of laundries with this satisfactory standard being in the South. _ A considerable number of establishments supplied too few seats, either for their whole force or in certain departments, and in over one-fourth of the 290 laundries there were more than 25 women to a seat. As many as 72 women in one laundry and 65 in another had but one seat provided, while in 27 plants the number of women to a seat was 40 or more. Two very important conditions that frequently are required by law are proper ventilation and lighting. For example, the New York State law requires either a window or a skylight opening directly to the outer air, its size regulated by the number of fixtures, or a mechan ical and regularly operated system of ventilation. Where the natural ventilation is inadequate the authorities may require that further measures be taken. The law demands that lighting shall be such that “ail parts of the room and compartment arc easily visible at all times during working hours.” 18 Either an outside window or a shaft leading to the outside air was found in 358 of 568 toilet rooms in the present study. The highest proportions of properly ventilated rooms were in the eastern and western groups. The smallest proportion was in the South, where nearly a third of the plants (31.4 per cent) were without adequate ventilating facilities. Lighting provisions were rather better than ventilating, with a little more than two-thirds of the toilet rooms properly lighted through out and less than 10 per cent (7.2) with wholly inadequate lighting arrangements. Some form of artificial lighting in addition to outside window or skylight is considered a necessity by the Women’s Bureau investigators, and where none was supplied the lighting was reported IS New York. Department of Labor. Industrial Code. Buis. 9 and 18. Rules Relating to Sanitation of Factories and Mercantile Establishments, pp. 12 and 13, 28 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS as unsatisfactory. The southern group of laundries failed in this respect more than did the other groups, about a fifth (19.8 per cent) of their toilets being unsatisfactorily lighted. Toilets separate for men and women are the rule in all well-kept establishments and the doors should be plainly marked. In the present study 189 rooms were not marked in any way to show whether they were allotted to men or to women. As a rule the toilets were in good condition, but in 55 rooms some seats were out of order and in 5 the plumbing systems were not working. On the door of one room was printed the following notice: “If toilet does not flush use a pail of water—otherwise offender will be discharged.” This is an extreme example of neglect on the part of management that most certainly would result in dissatisfaction on the part of the workers. Clean conditions were found in about 60 per cent of the rooms visited. The remaining 40 per cent were either unsatisfactory in some particular, such as floors wet, seats or plumbing dirty, or, as in 30 cases, the entire room was pronounced filthy. Usually there was a special person whose duty it was to sweep and scrub the toilets, and plants with this system generally had cleaner and better-kept rooms than where it was done in odd minutes by the workers or where no one was responsible. In only 30 plants was the cleaning left entirely to voluntary and haphazard service. First-aid provision. The importance of immediate attention for even slight burns and cuts is very generally realized. It is apparent in this study by the fact that all but 15 of the laundries visited had first-aid equipment to care for small injuries. A few large plants had hospital rooms with nurses in charge, but in most establishments the size of the laun dry and the small number of accidents make this unnecessary. In all but 58 plants a special person was designated to administer first aid—sometimes the forelady, sometimes a worker who had taken lessons. In the 58 laundries with no special arrangement the service was haphazard, done sometimes by one and sometimes by another. Service facilities. In every plant employing women there should be special places where they may change from street to work clothes, may rest if necessary, and may eat their midday meal if they wish to remain indoors. The extent of such provision and its type depend on the size and character of the establishment. Three separate places—a cloakroom, a rest room, and a lunch room—may be supplied in a large establishment, while a room combining the three services may be all that a small plant can afford and, in fact, all that is needed. If an industry is such that a change of clothing is necessary, as in the laundry industry, a place in which to change clothing is little short of essential. Where the work requires constant standing and where high temperatures sometimes occur a rest room or a cot in a cloak room should be as much part of the equipment as drinking water and washing facilities. In an establishment situated at a distance from the workers’ homes, or where the noon period is too short to allow for time going and coming, some place other than the workroom should be provided for the eating of lunch. WORKING CONDITIONS 29 Cloakrooms.—Special rooms in which wraps could be hung and clothing changed were furnished in about one-half of the laundries visited, while all but 33 of the remainder had cloak and rest services, or cloak and lunch, or all three, combined in a single room. In certain large establishments there were several cloakrooms, some equipped only for this purpose and some used as rest and lunch room also. Where no cloakroom was supplied (in 33 laundries) wraps were hung on hooks or nails around the workroom and dresses and shoes were changed in either the workroom or the toilet room. The equip ment in most of the cloakrooms consisted of hooks or nails around the walls, with a shelf above for hats. Lockers were provided in 67 establishments and racks in 88. The method last mentioned prob ably is the most desirable where the rooms are kept locked, because oi the better circulation of air in an open space than in a locker. Shoes almost invariably were changed before and after working, and where there were no lockers they generally were strewn around the room. In some cloakrooms there was a low shelf for shoes. The difficulty of keeping a room clean when used by so many persons is shown by the fact that the cloakrooms were reported clean in only two-thirds of the laundries. Usually the cleaning was done by a woman employed for the purpose, and where no one was made responsible the conditions generally made this fact apparent. Best rooms.—Rest-room provisions were not so general as cloak room, and only 27 of the laundries had special rooms for this pur pose. In an equal number of establishments rest-room provisions were combined with those of cloak or lunch room. The furnishings of the rest rooms showed wide variations, from a cot or comfortable chairs in a cloakroom to a separate room with couch, chairs, table, and magazines. A couch or cot, a necessary part of a rest-room equipment, was supplied in all but three of the fifty odd establish ments. As a rule the rooms were clean and well kept, but in over a fifth of the plants having rest rooms the places were reported as not clean. The value to the worker of a rest room, not only as a place in which to lie down if ill or exhausted but as a place for rest and relaxation during the lunch period, should be easily understood. This is especially true of a laundry, where the characteristics of the industry are likely to make the workrooms hot and humid. In spite of this, there was no rest room, either specially equipped or combined with another room, in 234 of the establishments. _ Lunch rooms.—The same considerations that make a rest room important to the laundry worker make a lunch room desirable. During the lunch period workroom windows should be opened and fresh air introduced, and that can best be done when the workers are absent. Furthermore, it is undersirable to have lunches eaten at the tables where clean clothes are handled. In 55 laundries there were special lunch rooms and in others a place for eating lunch was furnished in either the cloak or the rest room. When a laundry is in the business section of the town there are numerous lunch places and some women prefer to go out at noon. This is more expensive, though, than bringing food with them or buying it in the plant if there is a cafeteria, so from the viewpoint of the worker as well as the customer special provision for the lunch hour is important. 30 A SURVEY OP LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Hot meals were provided at reasonable prices in 7 of the laundries and in 68 a hot drink was furnished either without charge or at a nominal price. In 99 establishments a gas or electric plate was sup plied where lunches could be heated or a hot drink made by the em ployees. In some plants one or two women made coffee for the others and sold it at a few cents a cup. The size of the laundry and its location, whether near the workers’ homes or at a considerable dis tance, would determine which of these different systems was the most desirable. The large majority—all but three—of the lunch places furnished were adequately lighted and 85 per cent were clean. Uniforms. There is no question that women in fresh white uniforms present a much better appearance in a work place than do women in cotton, wool, or silk dresses of various colors. It is not merely a matter of show, though white uniforms probably have a good effect when cus tomers visit a plant, but from the workers’ standpoint it is important. Probably no normal woman is indifferent to her personal appearance, and the good or bad effect increases or decreases her self-respect. This is true, of course, in all industries, but especially in laundry operations, where the worker may become much overheated, the effect on her and on her fellow employees of fresh white clothing is decidedly important. However, if the workers must buy and launder the uniforms themselves there is likely to be a feeling of protest that may react unfavorably on their attitude toward the management. Some firms, having tried both the method of supplying uniforms and that of having the worker supply her own, had compromised on furnishing them at cost and laundering them without charge. Some firms carried the entire cost. Of 116 laundries that required uni forms 33 gave them to the workers. In the others the workers sup plied their own. The custom of laundering the uniforms and not charging for the service was practiced in all but two laundries where uniforms were worn. In short, less than half the laundries visited required workers to wear uniforms, but where uniforms were worn the general custom was to launder them free of charge. Employment machinery. The value of a careful selection of workers and the increased steadi ness resulting has been demonstrated by employment departments in many plants. The overhead cost of maintaining such a department, however, is considerable, and for the establishment with comparatively few workers the expense xnay be prohibitive. In the present study of laundries the average size of the establishment was about 68 women. In most cases, therefore, a special employment organization was out of the question, as it could be afforded only by the larger laundries. Only five laundries employed their workers through a special depart ment. In 198 plants one person, usually the owner or superintendent, had charge of taking on and laying off help. This probably is the best plan in the smaller places, where employees may be transferred from one department to another without conflict of authority or methods. In 86 laundries the employing of the workers was done by each foreman for his own department, sometimes with the coopera tion of the superintendent and sometimes without. WORKING CONDITIONS 31 Welfare provision. In a little over one-half of the laundries visited the workers received some perquisite aside from the established business arrangement of wage payment. The most common “extra” was a lower rate to the employee than to the public for laundry work done. Sometimes the work was done for 10 per cent less and from that the reduction varied to as much as 50 per cent of the regular price. This was popular with the workers, and in many cases they brought not only their own but their family’s wash. Insurance for the employee in case of death was carried by 36 laundries. Sometimes this was a definite sum and sometimes it varied with the length of service of the deceased. Free medical service was provided in some cases and in a few laundries the manage ment set aside a certain amount each year to care for special cases of need. Ten laundries had employees’ benefit associations, the fund, as a rule, being carried by the employees themselves with a contribu tion from the management. A vacation with pay was given in two laundries, and in another a woman who was ill and unable to work received her full week’s pay. The importance of building up a good morale as well as a good physical condition had been recognized in 11 laundries by the establishment of an organization or club to con tribute to the social life of the employees. A number of these clubs, though inaugurated by the management, were managed by committees of the workers. On the whole, welfare work seems to be carried on to a less extent in laundries than in some other industries. This may be due partly to the smaller size of the average plant, where all workers naturally come into fairly close touch with the management. In the English report previously quoted 19 a statement is made that appears to be as true of laundries in this country as of those in England, that there exists “very good relationship between the proprietor and worker.” The proprietor frequently works with his employees and he is almost invariably known personally by them. With the new organization of many plants under one central management that is developing in the industry, referred to in the introduction, the personal contact is bound to be less. Whether employment relations will be the charge of paid subordinates or whether clubs and organizations among the workers will take a more important place, it is too early to determine. Hazards. In all walks of life there is danger of accident. The housewife crossing the street on her way to market, going down her own stairs, or cooking in her own kitchen may be run over, may fall, or may be burned, as the case may be. In most industries the risk is probably greater than that of the housewife, and this is certainly true where power machinery is used. In a Women’s Bureau study of accidents to women several years ago it was found from records in three indus trial States that power-working machines caused 42.3 per cent of all the accidents reported in the period taken. The next most important cause of accident was falls of persons. 16 Smith, May. Some Studies in the Laundry Trade. In Bui. 22, Reports of the Industrial Fatigue Research Board, London, 1922. 32 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS The figures for laundries in the report referred to include cleaning and dyeing establishments, but as the entire report deals only with women’s accidents and the number of women in cleaning and dyeing plants is small compared to the number in laundries, the figures may be considered to give a fair picture of the accident situation in laundries. The main cause of accidents in laundries, as in all industries, was power-working machines, responsible for 50.6 per cent of all the laundry accidents reported. The other two principal causes were the falls of persons and explosions, electricity, and hot substances. Falls of persons occasioned one-fourth of all the accidents to women in laundries, and explosions, electricity, and hot substances caused something over a tenth (11.5 per cent).20 In the present study it was not possible to obtain definite data on accidents, either cause or number, but the possible causes, such as unguarded machines, slip pery floors, stairs in bad condition or without handrail, and elevators operated by inexperienced persons or not properly guarded, were noted. When a single study covers a number of subjects and especially when the investigators are not engineers, comments on guarding necessarily are superficial. During the inspection of the plant, how ever, the fact of absence or presence of guards on certain machines was carefully noted. The machines selected for observation were those on or around which women work and on which an accident might occur. The guarding on the following machines was observed: Extractors. Elat-work ironers. Tumblers. Presses. Handkerchief ironers. Collar ironers. Cuff and neckband ironers. The liability to accident and its severity would vary greatly on these different machines and would decline in approximately the order in which they are listed. The number of women exposed or operating the various machines does not in the least follow the same order. This fact probably accounts for the finding of only 7 laundries of the 290 visited with no guards on flat-work ironers, where many women are employed, and 92 extractors with no guards, comparatively few women working on these machines. Women operating extractors usually were on the small starch extractors and not on the larger ones used for general washing.21 The extractors, which dry the clothes by forcing the water out of them in a rapidly revolving metal basket, usually were equipped with covers, and on well-guarded machines these covers could not be raised while the basket was revolving. Skill is required in the proper pack ing of the clothes in the baskets, and if an end is loose it may catch in the cover or between the basket and its container and the article be badly torn. For this reason the operator likes to see the inside of the basket as she starts up the machine, and she is tempted to throw off the guard in order to keep the cover up until the extractor is running satisfactorily. In 45 plants extractors were seen running with their covers up, which as far as risk to the operator is concerned would place them in the group of extractors with no guards. 20 U. S. Department of Labor. Women’s Bureau. Industrial Accidents to Women in New Jersey, Ohio, and Wisconsin. Bui. 60, 1927, p. 6. The washing machines were almost universally operated by men. Only 27 women operators were found, and for this reason guards on these machines have not been recorded. jppB1 ■ ■ ' " “it |Mt EAOLfc BUSS S a-lmilKi1 1 «j ■: PLATE 6— PRESSES OPERATED BY HAND, MAKING THEM EASY AND SAFE '"W WORKING CONDITIONS 33 The Laundryowners’ National Association has drawn up certain rules on various laundry machinery into a general safety code for the industry. Among its rules are the two following:22 Each extractor shall be equipped with a metal cover. Each extractor shall be equipped with an interlocking device that will prevent the cover being opened while basket is in motion and also the powder operation of the basket while cover is open. That this standard may become a general practice there appears to be a need of further education among laundry owners and further legislation along safety lines. . The necessity of guarding the large flat-work ironers was much more generally realized. Only seven plants were reported with no guards and the great majority of the machines were equipped with an excellent type of guard that throws off the power and causes the rolls to stop revolving when a hand pushes against the guard. In the days before these guards were in general use the danger of a worker’s hand being caught and crushed was always present. The following are the rules of the laundry owners’ “safety first” covering the flat-work ironers: Each flat-work or collar ironer shall be equipped with a bar or other approved guard across the entire front of the feed or first pressure rolls, so arranged that the striking of the bar or guard by the hand of the operator or other person will stop the machine. The pressure rolls shall be covered or guarded so that the operator or other person can not reach into the rolls without removing the guards. This may be either a vertical guard on all sides or a complete cover. If a vertical guard is used, the distance from the floor or working platform to the top of guard shall be not less than six (6) feet.28 Approximately half the establishments had no guards on drying tumblers operated by women. The danger of the hand of the operator being caught on these machines was not great, in the opinion of super intendents and women operators. Nevertheless, the newer type of tumbler is equipped with an interlocking device that prevents the starting of the machine until the doors of the outside case are shut. The code of safety of the laundry owners also has a rule covering drying tumblers. It reads as follows: Each drying tumbler shall be equipped with an interlocking device that wrill prevent the inside cylinder moving when the outer door on the case or shell is open and also prevent the door being opened while inside cylinder is in motion. Note: This should not prevent the movement of the inner cylinder under the action of a hand-operated mechanism or under the operation of an “inching device.” Each drying tumbler shall be provided with approved means for holding open the doors or covers of inner and outer cylinders or shells while being loaded or unloaded.24 The large number of women working on presses and the fact that, as a rule, the presses are power driven make their proper guarding a matter of importance although the accidents that may happen on them generally are not so serious as those on either the extractors or the flat-work ironers. The new hand-operated press has an automatic guard whereby both hands must press buttons or levers in order to bring down the ironing head over the buck or ironing pad. The older presses, operated by foot treadle, in many cases were equipped with a 22 American Laundry Machinery Co. The “Safety First” Features of “American” Laundry Equip ment, p. 6. 23 Ibid., p. 15. 2* Ibid., p. 10. 34 A SURVEY OP LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS wirc-mesh fence, attached to the ironing head. This projected below the head and therefore would hit the hand before the head descended on it. Evidently this form of guard was only fairly satisfactory, as several girls reported accidents where the hand was caught under the fence and between the hot pad and the head. The code of the laundry owners does not advocate any special type of guard, but merely specifies that “Each ironing press (excluding hand or foot power) shall be equipped with an approved guard or means that will prevent the fingers of the operator or other person being caught between the ironing surfaces.” 25 Of the establishments visited, 116 had all their presses guarded, 115 had some with guards and some without, and 44 were reported as having no presses guarded. Handkerchief and collar presses, in the largo majority of establish ments, were guarded either with a stationary bar or fence or with one that, as on the larger flat-work ironers, stopped automatically and threw off the power when struck. On some types of machines, such as a slow-moving drum type, a special guard was not necessary. Cuff and neckband presses were not guarded, as a rule, and on the footoperated machines it is difficult to see how a guard could be con structed. Aside from the question of unguarded machines, certain attendant hazards were noted. In two laundries where flat-work ironers were not equipped with automatic stop guards, the lever for throwing off the power and stopping the large machine was at some distance; in several others the lever was so high as to necessitate climbing to reach it. The probability of increased seriousness in case of accident, due to the delay in stopping the machine, is apparent. Especial danger of being burned was noted where stocking forms were very close together, and also from a gas collar ironer and a gas body ironer where the flame was not screened. Where many workers use the stairways, and especially when a quick exit may be necessary, as in case of fire, the importance of the proper construction and maintenance of stairs can not be overesti mated. In 62 laundries there was no problem of stairs, the entire work being done on the ground floor. In the other 228 laundries, the majority, whether of two or five stories in height, showed good con struction and upkeep of their stairways. The most common failure was in construction, with 54 laundries having narrow stairways or high risers and 22 having one or more winding stairways—that is, with triangular treads. In case of a hurried exit either of these con ditions might occasion accidents. Another possible cause of falling, even where there is no crowding, is the absence of a handrail, recorded in 21 establishments. The maintenance or upkeep was bad in 30 plants, where the treads were badly worn or, as in some instances, even broken in half. The condition last mentioned and the providing of a handrail could be attended to with very little trouble and expense. In most laundries elevators are used principally for the carrying of trucks, rolled on and off by men. However, where work is done on a number of floors, some establishments allow women to use the elevators. This was the case with 35 establishments in the present study. Usually there is no regular operator, so the women either must run the elevator themselves or must depend on some man who26 26 Ibid., p. 19. WORKING CONDITIONS 35 may or may not be experienced. Though elevator accidents are not common, they are likely to be very serious, and probably it would be wiser for women to use the stairs unless there is a regular elevator operator. . . A few laundries were found with elevators running m an open well or with safety doors tied up. This is a hazard for everyone in the plant and constitutes a risk that no employer can afford to take. In the laundry industry the danger of wet and slippery floors would appear to be considerable. This is true of certain departments, but in others there is no more danger of slipping than in a clothing or metal factory. The places where there is danger, unless special care is taken, are the wash room, around the starch machines, and near the hand tubs. Aside from these the floors are dry, and usually they are kept clean and free from grease because of the clean clothes being handled. According to figures previously quoted, from another survey, tails constitute the second most important cause of accident. It is im portant, therefore, that 24 plants in the laundry study were reported as having slippery floors in rooms used by women. In some cases the description merely states, “Wood floor wet and slippery, and in others, “Floors dirty and with a coating of starch.'1 That these con ditions were reported in only 24 of the 290 laundries shows that the laundry manager in most cases realizes the danger of slipping and takes special pains to guard against it. In some plants the floor around the starcher was cleaned three or four times a day and m many the rule was to wash and wipe up the floor twice a day. In a number of laundries pipes were run along the surface of the floor and girls had to step over them as they went about their work. These constituted a distinct hazard. Strain. It is very difficult to judge, merely by going through a laundry, whether or not there is strain in any given operation. Frequently it was possible for the investigator to operate a machine to ascertain the amount of strength required, but even in these cases it must be remembered that there is a knack acquired by practice that helps tremendously and, on the other hand, a motion performed continu ously is more fatiguing than when tried for a few times. Some in formation as to the difficulty or ease of laundry jobs was expressed by the workers themselves. Considering the different factors, it would appear that in practically all the body ironers of the old gas-heated construction there was considerable strain and resulting fatigue ot the operators. It is necessary to use two treadles, one to bring down the shoe and one to revolve the rolls, so there is considerable exercise with the same set of muscles all day. In some laundries an operator was not allowed to work all day on a body ironer but was shifted tor part of her time to other work. The body ironer of the type described is, however, fast becoming obsolete. This is true also of the press where the power releasing the head covering is applied by toot pressure. The ease or difficulty of operating this type of machine depends to a great extent on its balance or adjustment. Some ma chines need but a touch of the foot and others require considerable pressure The necessity of standing on one foot while stepping on the treadle would seem to be a strain on the worker, and presses re- A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS quiring this were found in 166 plants. The newer presses, that are being are operated by the nanas—pressing hands—pressing aa ,button & widely, ”or raising v. introduced, uy strength me a handle—and require little or effort. (See The old-fashioned types of bosom press and of cuff and neck press were very generally in use. They, too, require foot pressure to release the power, and therefore are a greater strain on the operator iu ?e7er, ,°Perated by pushing a button. In about three-tilths ol the laundries the foot-pressure type of machine was in use. In a pamphlet on certain aspects of the laundry industry in England it is stated that the best relief in monotonous processes is a change of work bringing into action another set of muscles.26 Such change of work is not uncommon with women working on the large flat-work ironers. Three groups of women work on these ironers: The first shake out the flat pieces, sheets, towels, pillow slips, etc., and lay them on a bar ready for the next group, the feeders, to place on the moving canvas that carries the pieces under the rolls. The third group of women take off the ironed pieces and fold them ready for the finished bundle. The shakers and folders probablv have the more fetio-nino- !r,h0 OD tion of this method of work. EesS^LonTon “ ta the Trade' In Bul- 22- of the Industrial Fatigue HOURS The development of modern machinery has made both necessary and practicable a shortening of the working day. The factors of speed, noise, and generally complex conditions under machine produc tion tend to the accumulation of fatigue on the part of the worker, SCHEDULED WEEKLY HOURS 19,481 East 48 and under Per cc-n> r Over 48, Including 50 20 Women 40 60 80.2 8.7 Over 50, including 54 il.l Middle West 48 and under 2 0.3 OveT 48, Including 50 44.9 Over 50, including 54 30.8 4.0 Over 54 West 48 and under Over 48, including 50 97.2 2.8 South 48 and under Over 48, including 50 6.7 5.2 Over 50, including 54 46.1 Over 54 4 1.9 (i. S. Dadti of L ahot-WevnOitd Bureau. and at the same time the output per employee has been so con siderably increased that a given amount can be produced in a shorter day than was possible under old conditions. _ An excessively long day is a social and industrial menace, and for years the principles of good management have been directed toward an 8-hour day. When the employees of an industry are largely women and the majority of them are or have been married, as is true 37 38 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS of the laundries included in this survey, the problem of working hours is of concern both to the community and to the industry. Most of the home makers who also work outside the home for wages have a full schedule of household duties and family responsibilities to face before and after working hours, and they can not carry out the tasks of either of their jobs successfully if they are forced to work unduly long hours. As a practical goal for a working schedule of hours, the Women’s Bureau has advocated an 8-hour day, one day of rest each week, a half holiday on Saturday, and no night work. HOUR LAWS To protect women against unreasonably long hours, all but a few of the States have set a legal maximum regulating daily and weekly hours. The standard of an 8-hour day in laundries has been given statutory backing in nine States—Arizona, California, Colorado, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Utah, and Washington. On theother hand, Alabama, Florida, Iowa, West Virginia, and Indiana have not regulated the daily or weekly hours of women workers in any way, and Georgia has done it only in certain industries. The scope and nature of hour laws vary in their application and detailed provisions, and in this study are considered only the basic regulations affecting the laundries in the cities visited, and these only briefly. The longest hours that it was legal to work daily, emergencies excepted, and the maximum set for the week were as follows:1 Maximum legal hours State City surveyed (3) (3) (3) (4) (3) (3) California__ __ __ _ Washington. _ Massachusetts ... __ Oregon __ _____ Ohio_________ Wisconsin ... .. Michigan 2_ Minnesota 2 _ New Jersey__ __ Rhode Island.. Illinois.. . _ . Virginia..__ _ Alabama _ _ __ Florida. __ _. .. (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) Georgia ________ Indiana. _ _ Iowa. _. _____ __ San Francisco; Los Angeles. Seattle. Boston. Portland. Cleveland; Cincinnati. Milwaukee. Detroit. Minneapolis; St. Paul. Jersey City; Newark. Providence. Chicago. Richmond. Birmingham. Jacksonville; St. Petersburg; Tampa. Atlanta. Indianapolis. Des Moines. Daily 8 8 9 9 9 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 \ Weekly 48 (') 48 48 50 50 54 54 54 54 1 No specific regulation, but week might not exceed 6 days. 2 9 hours was the basic daily standard, but 1 hour of overtime daily was allowed if the weekly limit of 54 hours was not exceeded. 3 No regulation. 4 No specific regulation, but Sunday work was prohibited. _ Summarizing the foregoing, it is apparent that for three of the cities included in the study the maximum legal day was 8 hours; for 1 U. S. Department of Labor. Women’s Bureau. State Laws Affecting Working Women. Bui. 63, 1927, p. 13 et seq. HOURS 39 five cities it was 9 hours; for eight it was 10 hours; and for seven there was no maximum. In addition to the limitations placed on daily hours, most of these States had set weekly limitations. Illinois, Virginia, and Washington had set a daily maximum but had not stipulated a weekly limit. In the case of Washington, however, one day of rest in seven was required, which in effect gave the women of the State a 48-hour week; and in Virginia Sunday work was prohibited. Where the State regulation set a high standard for daily or weekly hours, as an 8-hour day or a 48-hour week, the scheduled hours of the laundries reported tended to coincide with the legal limit; but in the cities where the statutory standard was less stringent, the pro gressive laundry managers frequently had adopted schedules below the legal boundaries for hours. Thus the effect of good legal regula tion in reducing the general level of hours is apparent, and it should be remembered in the following discussion of scheduled hours. For the progressive laundry manager a high legal standard means stabi lized competition as far as hours are concerned, while in a State with no regulation he must compete with the unscrupulous who make no effort voluntarily to stabilize and limit their employees’ hours of work. SCHEDULED HOURS Scheduled hours represent the standard that has been set by. the management as a normal day or week. They do not take into account overtime and undertime, and for this reason they vary to a considerable degree from the hours actually worked. However, they represent the most usual conditions and are the most satisfactory basis of comparison for the daily and weekly hours of the many plants visited. In addition to scheduled daily and weekly hours., the policies of the laundries with reference to lunch periods, rest periods, half holidays, and special arrangements of work in holiday weeks were recorded. Occasionally a laundry was found whose hours, both daily and weekly, varied so from day to day and week to week that it was impracticable to consider it as having any semblance of scheduled hours; but these were so few (only three) and employed such an inappreciable per cent of the women that it has been possible to record scheduled hours for more than 99 per cent of the women surveyed. Scheduled weekly hours. Taking the entire group of women for whom hours were reported, the most common schedule of weekly hours was 48. This was not typical of the country as a whole but was the prevailing schedule m the eastern and western sections, in which 44 and 96.5 per cent of the women, respectively, were reported as having such a schedule. The influence of 48-hour legislation in the western cities and in Boston is apparent here, but that many laundries voluntarily were operating 40 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS on an hour schedule less than the maximum allowed by law is equally apparent in the list following: y Per cent of women whose scheduled weekly hours were— Maximum egal weekly hours City Same as Less than State regu State regu lation lation 48 50 54 Boston____ _ Los Angeles . San Francisco1 Portland _ _ Seattle___ Cincinnati Cleveland. Milwaukee__ Detroit Minneapolis and St. Paul Jersey City and Newark Providence- 1 See footnote 3, Table 2, p, 42. 100. 0 37. . 1. . 6 5 7 1 41. 7 bo. 5 4. 9 21. 6 ©7. 1 Table 2.—Scheduled 103127 o weekly hours, by section and city Number of establishments and number and per cent of women whose scheduled weekly hours were— Total number reported Under 44 44 and under 48 1 48 Over 48 and under 50 50 Section and city Women Women Estab Estab Estab lish Women lishlishments ments Num Per ments Num Per ber cent ber cent o All places____________ Women Estab lishments Num Per ber cent Women lishments Num ber Per cent 19, 481 23 673 3.5 60 1,974 10.1 92 6,779 34.8 34 1,722 8.8 40 2,321 11.9 » 51 2, 738 5 132 4.8 18 858 31.3 21 1,206 44.0 3 146 5.3 2 91 3.3 Boston________________ Jersey City and Newark.. Providence......................... 130 11 10 1,546 645 547 4 1 2105 27 6.8 4.2 11 3 4 476 87 295 30.8 13.5 53.9 17 2 2 965 138 103 62.4 21.4 18.8 3 146 22.6 2 91 16.6 Middle western..... .................. i 125 7, 738 17 515 6.7 32 872 11.3 9 184 2.4 26 1,284 16.6 36 2,190 28.3 Chicago______ ________ Cincinnati....... ............. . Cleveland_____________ Des Moines___________ Detroit________________ Indianapolis___________ Milwaukee_____________ Minneapolis and St. Paul. 121 l 14 1 16 i6 i 20 12 i 13 123 1,742 587 1,074 238 1,665 959 536 937 4 2 4 41 22 213 3 3 5 76 39 68 4.4 6.6 6.3 1 21 3.6 347 10 147 185 20.8 1.0 27.4 19.7 2 60 3.6 2 4 20 83 3.7 8.9 8.8 27.8 25.3 4.2 7.8 21.5 32.3 18.9 21.6 58.3 48.5 8 1 5 7 153 163 272 10 130 206 173 177 376 342 521 217 11 11 4 3 2 1 5 2 5 4 4 8 8 5 1 1 2.4 3.7 19.8 13.6 1.1 2.1 1 4 5 6 53 401 185 312 3.2 41.8 34.5 33.3 Western................................... . Los Angeles____________ Portland..... .................. ...... San Francisco__________ Seattle..... ............ .............. i 65 21 i 12 117 15 5,583 2,629 770 1,434 750 4 1 1 2 40 14 1 25 .7 .5 .1 1.7 62 20 12 15 15 5.389 2, 615 769 1,255 750 96.5 99.5 99.9 87.5 100.0 1 154 2.8 31 154 10.7 Southern.............................. . Atlanta......... ....................... Birmingham____________ Jacksonville....................... Richmond___ __________ St. Petersburg and Tampa. 147 i 12 i 11 i6 i6 i 12 3,422 1,106 862 403 500 551 6 3 204 < 110 6.0 9.9 4 1 1 138 5 50 5 4.0 4.5 .6 2 1 1 40 38 2 1.2 3.4 .2 3 94 17.1 2 83 16.6 1 1 26 26 i ....... - > .8 2.4 HOURS 1288 Eastern.............................. ...... Footnotes at end of table. . Women Estab lishments Num Per ber cent Table 2. —Scheduled weekly hours, by section and city—Continued to Number of establishments and number and per cent of women whose scheduled weekly hours were— Over 50 and under 54 54 Over 54 and under 60 60 and over Women Estab lishNum Per ber cent Women Estab lish Per ments Num ber cent Women Estab lish NupiPer ments ber cent Women Estab lish NumPer ments ber cent All places.. 52 3,334 935 Eastern............... 3 166 139 Boston........... .................... Jersey City and Newark.. Providence____________ Middle western........................ Chicago.......... ................... Cincinnati______________ Cleveland______________ Des Moines.......................... Detroit............................ . Indianapolis____________ Milwaukee.____ _______ Minneapolis and St. Paul. Western............................... ...... Los Angeles__ Portland.......... San Francisco. Seattle.............. Southern___ _______________ Atlanta.............................. Birmingham_____________ Jacksonville_____________ Richmond.............. ............ St. Petersburg and Tampa. 23.4 575 7.4 32.1 351 20.1 142 644 331 59.7 38.7 34.5 48 130 20.2 111 649 3.3 16.7 10.6 14.3 39.7 61.8 41.8 9.2 33.2 20.1 46 221 218 2.8 90 I 1.2 90 5.2 16.0 5.0 7.8 6.5 5.8 41 ”IO' 116 ~21.T 25.6 134 326 112 251 53 559 16.3 169 213 19.6 52.9 12.1 37.8 27.8 50.2 9.6 73 177 1 Details aggregate more than total, because some establishments appear in more than 1 hour group. 2 A few women in 1 establishment were part-time employees, working 28 hours, but their number was not reported. 3 Thrown into the group of over 48 hours by counting the rest period as part of the working day, the rule in Women’s Bureau tabulations. 4 96 women in 1 establishment worked alternate weeks of 46J4 and. 48J4 hours. 8 Alternate weeks of 4814 and 50J4 hours. fl 10 women in 1 establishment took turns at a shorter week (3814 hours). 2 Some women, of 51 in 1 establishment, had a week of 58 hours instead of 61J4 hours. 9, 426 Per cent 48.4 Over 48 Num ber Per cent 10,055 51.6 542 19.8 1, 546 252 398 1, 571 100.0 39.1 72.8 20.3 393 149 6,167 60.9 27.2 79.7 117 82 281 6.7 14.0 26.2 93.3 624 37.5 178 268 5,429 33.2 28.6 97.2 1,625 505 793 238 1,041 938 358 2, 629 770 1, 280 750 230 100.0 100.0 21 4.9 64 Num ber 2,196 21.6 559 1,358 6 684 360 37 166 5.6 5.1 !. 108 58 1,810 134 21 1, 094 48 and under 2.2 86.0 73.8 100.0 62.5 97.8 66.8 71.4 2.8 89.3 154 10.7 6.7 , 192 970 862 403 500 457 93.3 87.7 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 82.9 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND TH EIR WOMEN W ORKERS Section and city Women whose hours were— 43 HOURS The solid massing of the western cities and of Boston and Provi dence on a schedule of 48 hours or less (see Table 2) is most signifi cant and tends to color the tabulations concerned with hours wherever the findings for the group as a whole are discussed. In the middlewestern cities more than half the women were reported as having a schedule of 50 and under 54 hours; and in the southern cities almost nine-tenths had a schedule in excess of 50 hours and more than fourtenths had a schedule in excess of 54 hours. Listing the cities in descending order in groups based on the scheduled week most frequently reported gives the following line-up: Prevailing scheduled weekly hours Over 44 and under 48. 48___________________ Over 48 and under 50 50___________________ Over 50 and under 52. 52....................... .............. Over 56 and under 58 60__________________ City Providence_______________ Seattle___________________ Portland_________________ Los Angeles______________ San Francisco____________ Boston_____________ _____ Jersey City and Newark,.. Cincinnati________________ Cleveland________________ Indianapolis______________ Milwaukee.______________ Minneapolis and St. Paul.. Atlanta__________________ Detroit___________________ Chicago__________________ Birmingham______________ Des Moines______________ Richmond________________ Jacksonville______________ St. Petersburg and Tampa Per cent of women reported as having such hours 53. 100. 99. 99. 87. 62. 22. 58. 48. 41. 34. 33. 36. 25. 22. 20. 45. 45. 52. 22. 9 09 5 5 4 6 3 5 8 5 3 3 2 3 2 0 09 9 The foregoing list shows the most commonly reported schedule in each city, and in most of the cases the group has less than a majority of the women. In some cities there was a fairly wide range of reported hours, while in others the similarity of scheduled hours from plant to plant was marked. The most characteristic week, by section, was as follows: Per cent of the women Western48 hours and under______________97. 2 Eastern. ________ ______ do 80.2 Middle western.. 50 and under 54 hours 51. 7 Southern54 hours and over 48. 4 Considering 48 hours as a practical goal for a reasonable week, the list following, that shows the per cent of women in each city who were on a schedule of 48 hours or less, indicates the ranking of the cities in the survey from such a standpoint. The western cities are at the top, the eastern and middle western make up the middle, and the southern fall at the foot. 44 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Per cent of women with sched uled hours of 48 or less City Boston. _ 100 . 100. _ _ 100. 100. 89. 72. 39. 37. Seattle Providence. . Jersey City and Newark____ Detroit 0 0 0 0 3 8 1 5 Per cent of women with sched uled hours of 48 or less City Milwaukee________ ______ Minneapolis and St. Paul____ Cleveland ______ St. Petersburg and Tampa. _ Cincinnati... Atlanta_______ ____ _ _ _ Indianapolis _ __ 33. 28. 26. 17. 14. 12. 6. 2. 2 6 2 1 0 3 7 2 A weekly schedule of more than 54 hours—of 55, 56, 58, or even 60 hours—is excessively long in the light of present-day standards, and although less than 10 per cent (8.9 per cent) of all the women were reported as having hours in excess of 54, when such schedules are traced to the cities of their source significant proportions of women have very long hours in at least four localities. The places reporting scheduled weekly hours in excess of 54 were as follows: Per cent of women with sched uled hours of more than 54 City Jacksonville__ ________ ____ Birmingham _ Richmond . _ _ St. Petersburg and Tampa_ _ 80. 57. 50. 41. 6 4 2 7 Per cent of women with sched uled hours of more than 54 City Des Moines Atlanta_______ _______ Chicago . Detroit_______ _______ _ 16. 12. 10. 5. 0 1 7 0 Weekly hours of laundries in State studies of the Women’s Bureau. Additional and supplementing data on scheduled hours in laundries are available from the State studies made by the Women’s Bureau in the past 10 years. In 15 such studies scheduled weekly hours are reported for 266 laundries, employing almost 9,000 women. Appendix Table VI summarizes the findings on scheduled hours under three captions—48 hours and under, over 48 and under 54 hours, and 54 hours and over. Comparing the proportions of women in the various groups in these studies and the present one gives results as follows: Per cent of women with scheduled hours as reported in— Scheduled hours Present study 48 and under _ ____ _____ Over 48 and under 54 _________ ____ __ ____ 48. 4 37. 9 13. 7 State studies 15. 6 43. 9 40. 5 45 HOURS The higher proportion of women working 48 hours and under in the present survey is due primarily to the Pacific coast cities, no Western State having been included” in the State studies. The large proportion of women in laundries with scheduled hours of 48 or less in Alabama probably was a temporary condition. It is explained by economic factors at the time of that study (1922), when Alabama was experiencing a depression in her mill industry and its effects were echoed in all public service and purely commercial industries. The laundry industry depends somewhat upon others for its pros perity and readily reflects general conditions. The only other State with a relatively significant proportion of its women on a schedule of 48 hours and under was Rhode Island, with few women reported. Forty per cent of the women in laundries in the State studies worked at least 54 hours a week, and in a number of the States the propor tion was much higher than this—in Arkansas with 88.7 per cent of the women in this group, in Tennessee with 84.3 per cent, in Missis sippi with 70 per cent, in Delaware with 62.8 per cent, in Oklahoma with 59.7 per cent, in Georgia with 54.9 per cent, and in Missouri with 51.6 per cent. In every State but Ohio, of those covered by the State studies, one or more laundries were operating on a schedule of 54 hours or more. Cities in several of the States surveyed earlier by the Women’s Bureau were visited for the present laundry study, and correlating the findings for laundries in the State as a whole with those of the present study of cities shows some quite marked differences. Again the reader is reminded that in the later study only the larger cities were visited. Furthermore, the State studies were all made from three to eight years before, and laundries as well as other industries have shortened their hours in recent years. The percentages of women having specified weekly schedules in the various cities in the present study and in their respective States in the earlier surveys were as follows: Per cent of women with scheduled hours of— State and city Over 48 and under 54 48 and under New Jersey _ ____ Jersey City and Newark Rhode Island _ Providence __ Ohio.________ Cleveland__ . Cincinnati.Illinois. _ . . Chicago__ ____ ______ Alabama ■_ _____ Birmingham____ . . Georgia2 . _ _ Atlanta __ ___ 1 See statement in text, p. 45. > Excludes Atlanta. 7. 39. 30. 72. 21. 26. 14. 20. 6. 46. 8 1 1 8 7 2 0 0 7 9 8. 3 3. 9 43. 39. 40. 27. 78. 73. 86. 56. 62. 32. 42. 36. 78. 9 4 4 2 3 8 0 9 5 3 6 9 2 54 and over 48. 3 21. 6 29. 5 23. 30. 20. 57. 54. 17. 2 8 8 4 9 9 46 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Scheduled weekly hours of laundries in New York. The following quotation from a survey of New York laundries made in 1926 summarizes the findings on scheduled hours in that State:2 Seventy-five per cent of the women employed in the laundries studied were scheduled to work more than 48 hours a week. Scheduled hours were longer in New York City than up State. They exceeded 48 hours a week for 79 per cent of the women studied in New York City, for 65 per cent of the worrwn up State. A schedule of 54 hours, the maximum permitted by law at the time of the investigation, was in effect for 11 per cent of New York City workers, for 3 per cent of the workers up State. Scheduled daily hours. To the employed woman the length of the working day is as impor tant as her weekly hours, and since there is a tendency for the work of the laundry industry to pile up on the first days of the week, because of the traditional “Monday wash,” stabilizing daily hours is one of the problems of the industry. Commercial laundries that derive their custom from hotels, restaurants, offices, or barber shops are not affected so much as are the general-family-service laundries. Many laundry owners have endeavored to spread the work more uniformly over the week by charging lower rates in the latter part of the week. Regular schedules and zoning for collection and delivery have done much to stabilize the flow of work in some sections. Probably there was considerable irregularity in actual daily hours, and over one-third of the laundries reported variations in the daily schedules of some or all of the women employed. Nevertheless, the majority of the plants had adjusted the volume of work by days and some had arranged different hours for different operations. In some instances the hours reported as the daily schedule were longer than the day customarily worked. This was done purposely, to provide for the irregularities in daily volume of work. In the tables showing scheduled daily hours the most common day has been taken as a basis. For some laundries more than one schedule of daily hours has been recorded because of the different hours on different jobs. Only three of the cities were limited by law to a day of not more than 8 hours, but slightly more than 30 per cent of the women worked for firms having a scheduled 8-hour day. The accompanying table of scheduled daily hours gives the details for the cities and sec tions included in the study, and the chart on page 47 is indicative of the days most common in the various sections. s New York. Department of Labor. Hours and Earnings of Women Employed in Power Laundries in New York State. Special Bui. 153, p. 13. 47 HOURS SCHEDULED DAILY HOURS 19,478 East 8 Per cevi> 20 Women '4 0 60 1 1.7 1 and under Over 8, under 9 5 8.9 9 2 2.2 7.2 | Over 9, under 10 Middle West e 1.7 j and under Over 8, under 9 15.1 9 67.9 Over 9, under 10 10 13.9 1.9 1 West 8 and under Over 8, under 9 9 7.2 1 2.8 | South 8 and under Over 9, under 10 4 2.0 10 4 0.0 Over 10, under II 6.6 U. 5. Dept- of Labor - Wo marT-S Bureau 4 Table 3.—Scheduled daily hours, by section and city 00 Under 8 Over 8 and under 9 8 Over 9 and under 10 9 Over 10 and under 11 10 Section and city Women Women Women Women Women Women Women Estab Estab EstabEstab lish Women lish lish lishlishlishlishlishments ments Num Per ments Num Per ments Num Per ments Num Per ments Num Per ments Num Per ments Num Per ber cent ber cent ber cent ber cent ber cent ber cent ber cent All places................... 1 288 19,478 50 2,938 15.1 101 6, 234 32.0 51 2,738 6 320 11.7 27 1,613 58.9 607 22.2 Boston_____________ Jersey City and New* ark _ _ _____ __ Providence................... 30 1,546 2 2 87 22 1,271 11 10 645 547 3 1 186 28.8 47 8.6 Middle western_____ ____ 125 7,737 5 130 Chicago. ................ ...... Cincinnati _ Cleveland____ __ Des Moines........... ...... Detroit _ ___ Indianapolis_________ Milwaukee_____ ____ M inneapolis and St. Paul__________ _ 121 i 14 116 6 120 12 i 13 1,741 587 1,074 238 1,665 959 536 23 937 Western. _____ __________ 65 Los Angeles.................. Portland San Francisco Seattle........................... 21 12 17 15 Eastern i 14 0.1 75 5,877 30.2 5.6 1.7 3 2 107 16.6 235 22 1,171 15.1 i 5 49 .9 i 28 1.7 1 1 5 1 3 i 19 3.5 2 i 2£ 3.1 S 398 42.5 5,581 64 5,427 97.2 1 154 2,629 769 1,433 750 21 2, 629 100.0 12 769 100.0 16 1,279 89.3 750 100.0 15 «1 i 10 19 3 2 419 39 0 57 23 9 188 11 3 80 2 8 154 10.7 14 6 188 4 244 37 8 81 5,252 67.9 3 1,478 548 12 11 606 4 143 9 4 872 9 799 437 10 44 2,709 13.9 4 198 1 108 16. 7 90 19 1,480 7.2 20 *1,074 13.9 93 4 1 143 15 8 2 2.6 52.4 83.3 81.5 8 3 38 577 34.7 160 16.7 369 39.4 3 141 15.0 110 7.6 3 226 1.2 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND T H E IR WOMEN W ORKERS Number of establishments and number and per cent of women whose scheduled daily hours were— Total number reported Southern.......................... St. P etersburg and 47 3,422 12 11 6 1,106 862 403 500 12 551 1 1 14 14 .4 2.5 C 375 11.0 1 1 1 1 161 14.6 49 5.7 37 9.2 86 17.2 2 42 7.6 20 1,437 42.0 17 1,370 40.0 3 226 12.7 31.4 76.9 79.4 1 112 13.0 9 6 1 1 805 72.8 430 49.9 56 13.9 17 3.4 2 3 4 4 140 271 310 397 3 129 23.4 4 i 252 45.7 6.6 2 6 114 20.7 1 1 Details aggregate more than total, because some establishments appeal* in more than 1 hour group. 2 A few women in 1 establishment were part-time employees (28 hours a week), but their number was not reported. 3 In 2 establishments many employees began work at noon on Monday. In 1 a number of these sometimes worked overtime. * In 1 establishment a number of employees began work at noon on Monday. s Thrown into the group of over 8 hours by counting the rest period as part of the working day, the rule in Women’s Bureau tabulations. 6 In 1 establishment a number of employees worked 7 hours on Monday. HOURS CO 50 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Due to the practice in most industries of giving a half holiday at the end of the week, Saturday hours have been treated separately. About four-fifths of the women who had a scheduled day of 8 hours or less were in the three cities with 8-hour laws. Legally Portland laundries could have been operated up to 9 hours, but none had a schedule in excess of 8 and if these laundries are added to the group of those with an 8-hour law, over nine-tenths of all the laundries with an 8-hour day were in the western cities. Selecting for each city the day most commonly reported, the one that appears most frequently is 9 hours, the schedule for 32 per cent of all the women. The prevailing days and the per cents of the women reported on these schedules in the various cities were as follows: Prevailing scheduled daily hours 8 Over 8 and under 9 Over 9 and under 10. 10 City Los Angeles_____________ Portland_____________.__ Seattle__________________ San Francisco 1__________ Boston__________________ Providence______________ Minneapolis and St. Paul. Cincinnati______________ Chicago_________________ Indianapolis____________ Milwaukee______________ Des Moines_____________ Cleveland_______________ Detroit_________________ Jersey City and Newark.. Atlanta______ :__________ Birmingham_____________ Richmond________________ Jacksonville______________ St. Petersburg and Tampa Per cent of women reported as having such hours 100. 100. 100. 89. 82. 43. 42. 93. 84. 83. 81. 60. 56. 52. 37. 72. 49. 79. 76. 45. 0 0 0 3 2 0 5 4 9 3 5 1 4 4 8 8 9 4 9 7 1 See footnote 5, Table 3, p. 49. By section, the prevailing day was as follows: Per cent of the women Western8 hours______________ ______________ _97.2 Easternover 8 and under 9 hours 58. 9 Middle western. _ 9 hours 67. 9 Southernover 9 and including 10 hours 82. 0 Of the women who were reported as on a schedule of 10 hours a day or more, 90 per cent (1,596) were in the southern cities. Compiling and arranging the figures in a somewhat different way shows the daily hours of all women to have been these: 51 HOURS Per cent of women whose scheduled dally hours were— Section and city All places. ________ - -- Providence___ __ ____ Jersey City and Newark___ — Middle western. ______ _ ______ -- — Cincinnati_______________ Minneapolis and St. Paul. Milwaukee.. . .. — ____ ------------------- 30. 2 77. 3 22. 7 11. 7 92. 8 7. 2 5. 6 8. 6 28. 8 100. 0 83. 5 83. 3 16. 5 16. 7 1. 7 84. 7 15. 3 1. 4. . 3. 3. 7 6 9 1 5 97. 2 San Francisco 1 . .. — 100. 89. 100. 100. 0 3 0 0 0. 4 St. Petersburg and Tampa. . More than More than 10 9 9 or less 8 or less 2. 5 85. 65. 100. 97. 85. 100. 83. 84. 5 3 0 4 0 0 3 0 1. 2 14. 5 34. 7 2. 6 15. 0 16. 7 16. 0 100. 0 100. 100. 100. 100. 0 0 0 0 11. 4 88. 6 14. 5. 17. 10. 9. 85. 94. 82. 89. 90. 6 7 2 2 2 4 3 8 8 8 6. 6 13. 0 20. 7 . i See footnote 5, Table 3, p. 49. The short scheduled day of the western cities contrasted to the long day of the southern cities is the most striking feature of this tabulation. In the eastern and middle-western cities, the day of 9 hours or less was almost universal. Daily hours of laundries in State studies of the Women’s Bureau. Scheduled daily hours for the laundries included in 15 State studies are given in detail in Table VII in the appendix. The large proportion of Southern States (7 of the 15) among those surveyed tends to color the findings when considered together. As a group, only about 6 per cent (5.9) of the women had a scheduled day of 8 hours or less, and about a third (34.2 per cent) had a day of more than 9 hours. About two-thirds of the 111 laundries in the Southern States had a day of more than 9 hours, and in Mississippi 62.7 per cent, in Delaware 62.8 per cent, in Tennessee 55.3 per cent, in Kentucky 43.1 per cent, and in Georgia 41.8 per cent had a normal working day of 10 hours or In more. the Middle Western States (Missouri, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Ohio, and Illinois) and in the Eastern States except Delaware (Rhode 52 A SURVEY OP LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Island and New Jersey), the 9-hour day was the prevailing schedule. Where a State study had been made that included a city covered by the present study, it was possible to compare the daily hours of the city with its respective State as a whole. The following sets forth the findings in this respect. Per cent of women with scheduled hours of— State and city 8 and under New Jersey________________ Jersey City and Newark Rhode Island_______________ Providence_____________ Ohio_______________________ Cleveland______________ Cincinnati_____________ Illinois_____________________ Chicago-...___________ Alabama 1__________________ Birmingham____________ Georgia 2___________________ Atlanta________________ 1 See statement on p. 45. 28. 14. 8. 10. 4. . 11. 8 5 6 5 6 9 3 4. 6 Over 8 and under 9 1. 1 16. 6 43. 12. 39. 3. 13. 0 1 0 2 0 . 6 38. 1 3. 3 Over 9 and under 10 9 58. 37. 56. 32. 77. 56. 93. 49. 84. 16. 5. 27. 14. 1 8 0 0 5 4 4 2 9 1 7 2 6 38. 1 16. 7 10 Over 10 2. 7 29. 5 16. 5 2. 20. 8. 37. 49. 27. 72. 6 1 2 7 9 7 8 6. 6. 3. 31. 38. 12. 3 3 4 4 7 7 13. 0 3. 1 2 Excludes Atlanta. Jersey City and Newark, Cleveland, and Providence had larger proportions in the shorter-hour groupings than had their States as a whole. The women in Chicago massed more solidly at 9 hours than did the women in the State generally. The shorter hours indicated for Alabama laundries than for those in the city of Birmingham were due to the depressed condition of industry and trade in the State at the time of the earlier study. Scheduled daily hours of laundries in New York. A summary of the daily hours in the New York laundry study includes the following statement: Inasmuch as scheduled hours in laundries tended to vary on the different days of the week, the length of workday can not be shown as clearly as if daily hours were uniform. However, for a large group who had the same schedule on four or five days of the week the 9-hour day was most usual, in effect for more than two-thirds of the workers. Only 2 per cent had an 8-hour day; an additional 22 per cent an 8)4 or an 8)4 hour day; 4 per cent were scheduled to work for 9)4 or 9)4 hours, while the same proportion had a 10-hour day.3 Saturday hours. A half day on Saturday is practically an institution in the manu facturing industry, but it is not quite so general in the laundry indus try. Data on Saturday hours were recorded separately, and the compilations show that more than 66 per cent of the establishments and almost 60 per cent of the women had shorter hours on the last day of the week. (See Appendix Table VIII.) A free Saturday is a godsend to the married working woman who has an accumulation of household duties awaiting her week end. Of . 3 New York. Department of Labor. Hours and Earnings of Women Employed in Power Laundries m New York State. Special Bui. 153, p. 25. HOURS 53 the 288 laundries for which data on hours were available, one in eight gave the majority of their women employees an entirely free Saturday. However, this total is heavily weighted by the figure for Detroit, where conditions were somewhat abnormal on account of unemploy ment, caused by the temporary closing of one of the largest automo bile plants, resulting in decreased patronage of laundries at the time of the survey. Family laundries, in which much of the work is wet wash or rough dry in type, in many cases do not work on Saturdays, and most of the laundries with a free Saturday are in this class. In many plants there was considerable irregularity as to Saturday hours and statements such as the following were common: “If work is slack, do not run on Saturdays and close early Fridays;” “Do not work on Saturday in summer and not more than two hours the rest of the year;” “Saturday hours depend on the amount of work on hand.” Of all the women reported who worked on Saturday, fewer than 38 per cent had scheduled hours of less than 6. As many as 10 per cent had a Saturday of at least 9 hours. In the western cities, with their shorter daily hours, the scheduled day tended to be the same throughout the week, more than 95 per cent of the women having an 8-hour Saturday. In the eastern and middle-western sections more than half the women had a short Saturday, but in the South only a small proportion had a half holiday at the end of the week. Lunch period. Closely related to the scheduled daily hours are the policies with reference to lunch periods. A satisfactory time allowance for lunch varies with the location of the laundry and the habits of the workers. When the laundry is so situated that the majority of the employees live near by, the workers generally prefer to go home for the noon meal, and this can hardly be accomplished in less than an hour. However, when most of the employees carry lunch boxes or patronize restaurants, a shorter interval is preferred if it means a corresponding reduction in the working day. A half hour was the most common lunch period, being reported for more than 60 per cent of the women. (See Appendix Table IX.) Lunch-period legislation. A few States have legislation covering lunch and rest periods. Of the Eastern States, Massachusetts requires, except on a short day, an interval of three-quarters of an hour after six hours of work. In Boston, 18 of the 30 laundries reported had an hour off at noon, and even in the two eastern localities not affected by special legislation the noon interval generally was one hour. Milwaukee and San Francisco were the only other cities in which the most characteristic lunch period was an hour. Of the Middle Western States, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin have designated 60 minutes as the basic lunch period for women employees, but in each case there is a qualification of the provision allowing a shorter period. In Minnesota and Wisconsin special permission for a shorter time may be obtained from the labor commission; and in Ohio 30 minutes is allowed if a lunch room is provided in the plant. None of the other Middle Western States had legal regulation of the noon hour, and a half-hour was the rule. All the western laundries had legislation or industrial commission orders with reference to meal periods. In California the meal period for 54 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS women must not be less than 30 minutes. In Los Angeles 17 of 21 laundries had 30 minutes for their noon relief, and in San Francisco all but 1 of the 17 laundries had one hour. Oregon hour legislation requires at least three-quarters of an hour’s rest in any 6-hour period, and all but one of the laundries in Portland reported a lunch period of this length. The other had an hour’s recess at noon. The Wash ington law prohibits the employment of women in laundries more than six hours without a period of 15 minutes’ rest, and all lunch periods in Seattle were reported as half an hour. None of the South ern States visited had any legislation regulating lunch periods, and the most common time allowance was 30 minutes. The prevailing allowance, by city, was as follows: 30 minutes Chicago. Detroit. Cleveland. Cincinnati, Minneapolis and St. Paul. Indianapolis. Des Moines.' Los Angeles. Seattle. Atlanta. Birmingham. Richmond. Jacksonville. St. Petersburg and Tampa. 45 minutes Portland. 1 hour Boston. Providence. Jersey City and Newark. Milwaukee. San Francisco. Rest periods. The knowledge that about halfway through a work period there will be a short interval for rest tends to create a better attitude toward the work and by lessening fatigue may increase production to an extent more than commensurate with the time taken from the job. Where the worker is required to stand continuously, a rest period is especially welcome and beneficial. A common objection to definite rest periods on the part of management is that many occur unavoidably during the normal course of the work. However, the organization of the work so as to reduce to a minimum all such pauses and to allow definite intervals for rest had been found satisfactoiy in the few plants where it had been tried': In this study very little material concerning regular rest periods was gathered. Of all the laundries surveyed, 32, or slightly more than 10 per cent, reported definite rest periods. (See Appendix Table X.) Of these, one-half were in two cities, Boston with nine laundries having rest pauses and Milwaukee with seven. No other city reported more than two laundries with rest periods. Ten or fifteen minutes was the most common interval reported. Of the 32 laundries reporting rest periods, 4 reported 2 such intervals daily, 1 in the afternoon as well as 1 in the morning. When the workday is as long as 9 or 10 hours, a definite period of 10 or 15 minutes in the morning at least, when the women can relax and perhaps have a sandwich, in most instances has a beneficial effect on the worker and on her work. HOURS 55 Hours worked in holiday week. Since the laundry industry sells a service and not a concrete product, a holiday presents a special problem in the distribution of the work so as not to interfere with regular deliveries to customers. If a laundry closes for a holiday, the quantity of work to be done over the week remains the same and arrangements must be m ade to keep the delivery schedule as normal as possible. Thus holidays are not an unmixed blessing, and they are not observed so generally as in the manufacturing industries. About 10 per cent of the laundries reporting stated that they occasionally worked on holidays, and one reported that some of its force worked on all holidays. The most common arrangement—that of 60 per cent or more of the laundries reporting in the eastern, middle-western, and southern sections—was to increase the hours on other days, wherever there was a margin between scheduled hours and State regulation, and usually the shorter hours on Saturday were forfeited. ACTUAL HOURS WORKED The discussion of scheduled hours is concerned with the normal working hours in the laundries covered, and to supplement such information it was possible to record the actual hours worked by 10,680 white and 2,144 negro women. (See Appendix Table XI.) Almost always there are marked discrepancies between scheduled hours and actual hours because of the factors of undertime and overtime. Employees occasionally must remain at home because of illness, home duties, or other emergencies, or because the plant is not able to supply enough work to keep all busy, and at times, due to special conditions some or all employees are required to work over time. In accordance with the bureau’s custom, an effort was made in securing the hour and wage data for the laundry survey to select a week in which, from the standpoint of the plant, hours and earnings were normal. Sometimes this was almost impossible; for example, in Detroit, where many of the laundries were at a low ebb of business because of depressed conditions of trade. Occasionally pressure of work brought the hours above the regular schedule. As far as such records were available, data on hours actually worked were copied, but in a considerable number of laundries the time worked was recorded only in days or, as was sometimes the case with pieceworkers, was not recorded at all. Full time, lost time, and overtime. Comparing the week’s hours actually worked with the scheduled hours of the plants readily divided the workers into three groups— those who had worked the scheduled hours, those who had lost time, and those who had worked overtime. Table XIV in the appendix gives the numbers and proportions in each group, by city. Arranged 56 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS in descending order according to the proportion of women reported as working full time, the cities rank as follows: Per cent of white women who worked scheduled hours City All places _ __ __ _ Des Moines _ __ _ Boston _ _ _____ _ Los Angeles. _ __ ____ Providence____ ______ __ Seattle _ _ __ _____ _ San Francisco _ ______ _ Birmingham. __ ______ _ Cincinnati. ____ _ _ _ _ Chicago __ __ _ Atlanta._ _ __ _ __ Jersey City and Newark _ Cleveland _ _ __ Minneapolis and St. Paul___ Indianapolis St. Petersburg and Tampa___ Milwaukee__ __ Detroit __ __ __ Portland . ________ _____ Richmond _ _____ ____ Jacksonville _ _ _____ ______ 50. 2 83. 75. 75. 71. 70. 69. 66. 41. 41. 30. 27. 24. 18. 16. 16. 14. 9. 9. . . 1 1 0 3 0 8 7 3 0 8 City All places_______ Richmond _ Atlanta _ Indianapolis Detroit.________ St. Petersburg and Tampa___ Per cent of negro women who worked scheduled hours 29. 0 Sfi fifi fi3 29 24 9 9 8 6. 2. 4 1 2 1 7 4 0 3 9 7 i 5 6 1 0 0 6 5 0 0 A glance at the figures for white women shows that the cities with scheduled hours of over 56—Richmond, Jacksonville, and St. Peters burg and Tampa—all are at the foot of the list, and five with hours of 48 and under—Boston, Los Angeles, Providence, Seattle, and San Francisco—are in the first six of the list. It is apparent further that negro women worked full time less generally than did white women. Lost time was much greater in extent than was overtime. Arrang ing the cities in descending order by the proportion of women who lost some time gives the following result: 57 HOURS City All places Portland_____ ______________ Milwaukee Detroit Cleveland Indianapolis Cincinnati Jersey City and Newark____ St. Petersburg and Tampa__ Minneapolis and St. Paul____ Atlanta San Francisco Seattle Los Angeles Boston Chicago Providence Des Moines Birmingham Per cent of white women who worked less than scheduled hours 39. 6 85. 82. 73. 64. 54. 51. 49. 49. 38. 30. 29. 27. 25. 22. 20. 18. 14. 7. 5 1 0 8 5 4 2 1 9 8 1 5 0 4 3 8 6 6 Per cent of negro women who worked less than scheduled hours City All places __ __ _ Jersey City and Newark Richmond Detroit _______ St. Petersburg and Tampa... Cleveland _ _ Chicago ____ Indianapolis. __ Atlanta Jacksonville. ____ Birmingham____ Boston. ______ __ 52. 1 93. 89. 87. 69. 53. 52. 45. 42. 35. 16. 13. 3 1 5 2 8 3 8 4 6 3 6 On a sectional basis, the most lost time was reported in the middlewestern cities, with 54.3 per cent of the white women and 61.1 per cent of the negro women losing time. Full time was most prevalent in the eastern and western cities for the white women and in the eastern cities for the negro women, the per cents being respectively 68.9, 65.8, and 45.6 of the women. The per cents of the total working overtime were 10.2 of the white women and 18.9 of the negroes. By overtime is meant the time worked in excess of the scheduled hours. In certain cities considerable proportions of the women worked overtime, five having from a quarter to practically half of their women so reported. The cities in which overtime was recorded for more than 10 per cent of the women are these: City All places.. _ Minneapolis and St. Paul___ Chicago____________ Atlanta _ _ . St. Petersburg and Tampa__ Indianapolis __ Birmingham _______ Jersey City and Newark . Cleveland___ _____ 103127°—30——5 Per cent of white women who worked more than scheduled hours 10. 2 42. 38. 38. 34. 29. 25. 23. 10. 5 7 5 9 3 8 8 6 City Per cent of negro women who worked more than scheduled hours All places IS Q Atlanta _. _ St. Petersburg and Tampa Chicago ____ Birmingham Cleveland 48. 45 28. 23. 17 17. 6 8 0 0 ft 0 58 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Selecting for each section the city that reported the largest propor tion of women working full time, undertime, and overtime gives results as follows: WHITE WOMEN Section City Overtime Undertime Full time Per cent of women 75.1 Middle western__ Des Moines.. 83.1 Los Angeles. _ Birmingham. 75.0 66. 7 City Jersey City and New ark. St. Petersburg and Tampa. Per cent of women 49.2 82.1 City Jersey City and New ark. Minneapolis and St. Paul. 85.5 49.1 Per cent of women 23.8 42.5 4.9 38.5 NEGRO WOMEN 86. 4 29.1 66.1 ark. 93.3 87.5 89.1 Jersey City and Newark. 6.7 45.8 48.6 Full time, undertime, and overtime each was calculated on the basis of its relation to the plants’ scheduled hours. Considering hours worked irrespective of relation to scheduled hours shows that the largest group of white women (37 per cent) had worked 48 hours— the large number in the western cities who worked exactly 48 hours was the determining factor for the group as a whole—and the largest group of negro women (13.9 per cent) had worked over 50 and under 52 hours. Table XI in the appendix sets forth the per cents of women in each of the hour groups. More than three-fourths (78 per cent) of the white women and almost three-fourths (73.2 per cent) of the negro women had worked at least 44 hours in the week reported. The following table shows the per cents of women, white and negro separate, in certain groups of hours actually worked. V* 59 HOURS Table 4.—Per cent of women who worked, during the week reported, under 44 hours, 44 hours and over, 48 hours and over, and 54 hours and over, by section and city ■ WHITE WOMEN Per cent of women who worked— Section and city All places____ ______ __ __ Eastern. ____________ ___________ Boston . . ________ ________ Providence_____ .. ___________ Jersey City and Newark ________ __ Middle western _____ . ________ Chicago ___________ _____ ____ __ Detroit_____ __ . _ ______ _____ Cleveland __ .. _ _______ ____ Cincinnati _ _______ . ____ Minneapolis and St. Paul__ Milwaukee___ _____ __ . _______ Indianapolis_______________ ____ _ Des Moines____ _________ ____ Western . . ______ ______________ _ Los Angeles. _ __ ______ . San Francisco _ _______ ____ ____ Seattle____ __ ________ Portland____ ______ ____ . Southern1 . _ __ _ ______ __ Atlanta___ __ ______ _ _ Birmingham____ _ __ St. Petersburg and Tampa ________ Under 44 hours 44 hours and over 48 hours and over 22. 0 78. 0 59. 8 3.1 25. 25. 14. 42. 26. 14. 36. 41. 17. 14. 34. 22. 10. 17. 17. 15. 19. 22. 20. 19. 6. 28. 75. 74. 85. 57. 73. 86. 63. 58. 82. 85. 65. 77. 89. 82. 83. 84. 80. 77. 79. 80. 93. 71. 48 47. 51. 51. 55. 76. 46. 32. 55. 74. 25. 65. 87. 66. 74. 70. 72. 14. 72. 69. 93. 62. 3 . i 1. 3 0 2 3 5 5 0 7 5 6 6 7 7 1 6 0 8 8 7 9 2 1 3 0 8 7 5 5 0 3 5 4 4 3 3 9 4 0 2 2 3 1 8 9 7 5 2 3 4 0 7 1 1 7 6 9 7 6 7 6 9 5 5 6 2 9 3 54 hours and over 5. 15. 1. 3. 1. 6. . 4. 34 4 9 1 1 1 3 3 3 8 58. 57. 72. 50. 2 7 7 9 NEGRO WOMEN All places.. ...... _ Eastern___ __ _ ....____ Boston .... _ __ _____ Jersey City and Newark____________ Middle western ________ __ _ _ _ _ Chicago _____ ____ _______ . . Detroit__ __ _ ________________ _ Cleveland___ _ _ ___________ _ Indianapolis___ ____ _____ _______ _ Southern ______________ ____ ____ _ . Atlanta__ _____ _____ __ ____ __ Birmingham Richmond.. ______ .. . St. Petersburg and Tampa _ _ _ Jacksonville..______________ _ ._ 26. 8 73. 2 63. 8 48. 29. 82. 29. 15. 42. 56. 8. 19. 47. 5. 65. 17. 7. 51. 70. 17. 70. 84. 57. 43. 91. 80. 52. 94. 34. 83. 92. 40. 8 70. 5 5 5 2 9 6 9 5 3 9 3 5 6 0 8 5 5 8 1 4 1 5 7 1 8 5 4 0 2 57. 76. 34. 31. 79. 75. 50. 91. 20. 72. 92. 9 5 9 8 2 1 0 7 3 5 2 26. 8 12. 21. . . 25. 50. 20. 58. 10. 65. 67. 4 5 3 4 0 7 1 1 9 4 8 1 White women in Richmond and Jacksonville too few for the calculation of percentages. Only the southern section and one or two of the middle-western cities had any appreciable group working 54 hours or more. A higher proportion of negro women than of white women worked under 44 60 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS hours. Certain cities had especially high per cents of negro women working less than 44 hours a week. _ Where the only obtainable statement as to time worked was in terms of days nothing definite can be learned of overtime or under time. Of something over 5,000 women for whom there were no records as to hours worked during the week, 80 per cent had worked or were paid for 5% or 6 days. About 90 per cent were reported as working on 5 days or more. Comments on hours worked in home visits. During the home interviews about 1,500 women commented in some way on the hours worked. The most frequent comment was with reference to overtime. No effort was made to get statements on the extent of overtime and the comments were only suggestive of the worker’s reactions to hours. Of 843 women who reported on the subject of overtime, the statements have been classified as follows: Women reporting Extent of overtime Overtime around holidays only — — __ Some overtime—degree not indicated. _ ------ .. Number Per cent 403 223 175 42 47. 26. 20. 5. 8 5 8 0 A number of the women interviewed made the statement that in many cases they would rather give up a holiday than work the long hours that precede and follow it. All the joy of participation in a holiday is lost when the time must be made up. NIGHT WORK Night work for women laundry workers was prohibited in Cali fornia, Oregon, and Wisconsin. In California an order of the indus trial welfare commission prohibited night work between 10 p. m. and 6 a. m.; in Wisconsin a similar order prohibited work between 6 p. m. and 6 a. m.; and in Oregon the laundries were prohibited from employing women after 8.30 p. m. In this study little night work was found. Only four laundries visited—three in Chicago and one in Tampa—were employing women at night, and only 72 white and 16 negro women were so employed. The hours worked each night were scheduled as 9 to 10 or more. The total weekly hours differed for three of the four firms. The three Chicago laundries worked five nights a week, the Tampa laundry four nights. Another Chicago plant had an evening shift—a group of women who came on for flat work each day at 12.30 and worked till 11 p. m. This laundry also had women who worked Sunday after noons, and it was stated that the plant was in operation 365 days a year. Night work was encountered so seldom in this study that its extent was inappreciable. However, to work at night is considered bad for all persons, and it is especially dangerous for married women who, forced by economic necessity to become wage earners, must care for their families during the day with only a little rest sandwiched in before they go to their night jobs. WAGES Wages are a significant item in the cost sheet of the employer, but to the employee they are even more important, since in most in stances a worker’s earnings determine her economic well-being and her standard of living. A variety of factors, industrial, social, and personal, complicate the findings of a statistical study of wages. A few of the variables that influence and lead to fluctuations of the wages of any group are the nature and stability of the industry, the practices and policies of the trade with reference to wages, employees’ organizations, statutory regulations, cost of living in the community, requirements as to skill and experience on the part of the workers, tradition, and, in some instances, race. In this laundry survey no effort has been made to interpret or attach special significance to the underlying trends, the purpose being to present only the findings brought out by compila tions and correlations of the wage and other data secured in the various laundries. The information on earnings is based on the actual earnings, rates, and time worked, for one week and by depart ment or occupation, of all the women wage earners in 286 laundries visited. Usually a week in the fall of 1927 was chosen, one typical of the plant, without a holiday or other disturbing factor, and selected with the advice and approval of a member of the firm or official of the plant. In some instances data for the fall of 1927 could not be secured, but all records were taken in the late fall or the winter of 1927 or the early spring of 1928. WEEK’S EARNINGS Earnings of all women. Actual week’s earnings irrespective of the time worked represent the wage payments of the week under consideration and are signifi cant as a general showing of wages in the industry as a whole. They suggest the amounts on which the woman laundry worker must base her budget. Earnings records were copied for 19,180 women, 5,076 of whom were negroes. (See Appendix Table XII.) The earnings of the white and negro women are shown separately in this report, because of the marked differences in their wages, especially in the South. In a few tables they have been combined to give a summary view of the wage level for all the women in the industry in the various sections and cities. The statement first presented shows by section the distribution of the women in four groupings according to earnings: Under $10, $10 and under $15, $15 and under $20, and $20 or more. The massing of the women in the South in the group under $10 is due, of course, to the numbers and lower earnings of negro women. In general, the trend of earnings in the East and Middle West is similar, with the West decidedly higher and the South lower. Of the total number of women, slightly more than two-thirds fell in the midgroups of $10 61 62 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS DISTRIBUTION OF EARNINGS m,104 MM White women - 5,07 6 EZZ2 Negro women All Sections' UNDER 10 DOLLARS 59.2 WZZ7/////////////7A 10 AND UNDER 15 DOLLARS 15 AND UNDER 20 DOLLARS 20 DOLLARS AND OVER r A/V.2,306^ LAST^N - 246/ UNDER .10 DOLLARS 10 AND UNDER 15 DOLLARS 15 AND UNDER 20 DOLLARS 20 DOLLARS AND OVER Tzzzzm Middle WestCn.JJus) UNDER 10 DOLLARS 10 AND UNDER 15 DOLLARS 15 AND UNDER 20 DOLLARS 20 DOLLARS AND OVER 233 7ZZZZA ZZZZZa West1 (».'.“«) UNDER 10 DOLLARS 10 AND UNDER 15 DOLLARS 15 AND UNDER 20 DOLLARS 20 DOLLARS AND OVER c fW- 542^ OOUTH \_N— 2,876j UNDER 10 DOLLARS V//////////////'//Z777"/r/77l 10 AND UNDER 15 DOLLARS 15 AND UNDER 20 DOLLARS 20 DOLLARS AND OVER *Neqro women in We»r not shown (onl^ lb reported) but Included in foral of all secfion*. U S. Dept of Labor Wornen\s Bureau WAGES 63 and. tinder $20, with 33 per cent at $10 and under $15, and 34.1 per cent at $15 and under $20. The accompanying chart shows the earnings distribution in the same groups but by race of woman. Per cent of all women whose earnings were— Number of women reported Section All places _ _______ and un $15 and un Under $10 $10der $15 der $20 $20 and over 19, 180 Eastern _ __ _______ __ __ Middle western. _ _ _ _ __ Western.. ..... _ __ Southern .. __ __ _ _. _ . 2, 7, 5, 3, 552 630 580 418 20. 0 33. 0 34. 1 12. 9 7. 11. 3. 75. 51. 49. 11. 16. 31. 30. 57. 6. 9. 8. 27. 2. 6 2 5 8 3 9 9 0 7 4 3 1 4 5 2 1 Between 8 and 9 women of every 10 in the West, in contrast to between 8 and 9 of every 100 in the South, received as much as $15 for the week’s work. From the details by city in Table XII in the appendix it appears that women in San Francisco had the highest earnings, almost 60 per cent receiving at least $20 and practically 1 in 6 receiving as much as $25. The following table summarizes the earnings of white and negro women separately and presents the figures by city: Table 5.—Week’s earnings, by section and city WHITE WOMEN Number and per cent of women whose week’s earn ings were— Section and city All women reported Under $10 $10 and un $15 and un $20 and over der $15 der $20 Num Median Num Per Num Per Num Per Num Per ber ber cent ber cent ber cent ber cent All places_________ 14,104 $16.10 831 5.9 4,672 33.1 6,168 43.7 2,433 17.3 Eastern__________ _____________ 2, 306 14.50 166 7.2 1,135 49.2 771 33.4 234 10.1 Boston Jersey City and Newark Providence.......___..............._ .. Middle western____________ ____ 1,423 365 518 5, 692 14.60 14. 80 13.65 14. 75 90 32 44 404 6.3 693 8.8 162 8.5 280 7.1 2, 624 48.7 492 44.4 132 54.1 147 46.1 2,046 34.6 36.2 28.4 35.9 148 39 47 618 10.4 10.7 9.1 10.9 Chicago- .............. ......... _ Cincinnati____________ ____ Cleveland Des Moines Detroit. __.............. . ___ Indianapolis Milwaukee__ ... Minneapolis and St. Paul Western. _______ ______________ 746 539 608 238 1,245 900 529 887 5,564 16.65 14. 05 15. 25 14. 00 15. 35 13.45 14. 65 14.10 17.90 57 39 32 19 58 110 38 51 196 7.6 7.2 5.3 8.0 4.7 12.2 7.2 5.7 3.5 170 304 251 133 498 485 257 526 666 22.8 326 56.4 151 41.3 253 55.9 80 40.0 547 53.9 231 48.6 186 59.3 272 12.0 3,186 43.7 193 28.0 45 41.6 72 33.6 6 43.9 142 25.7 74 35.2 48 30.7 38 57.3 1,516 25.9 8. 3 11.8 2. 5 11.4 8. 2 9. 1 4.3 27.2 Los Angeles___ ___________ Portland____ _______________ San Francisco.. _ .. Seattle_________ _________ _ Southern ... 2, 613 768 1,434 749 542 17.00 15. 35 20. 70 18. 05 13.95 98 34 28 36 65 3.8 4.4 2.0 4.8 12.0 282 288 40 56 247 10.8 1, 749 37.5 401 2.8 537 7.5 499 45.6 165 66.9 52.2 37.4 66.6 30.4 484 45 829 158 65 18. 5 5.9 57.8 21.1 12.0 Atlanta______ _________ Birmingham__ ....... Jacksonville Richmond___________ St. Petersburg and Tampa....... _ 180 118 47 11 186 14.40 15. 80 15.40 <‘) 11. 95 8 9 2 1 45 4.4 7.6 4.3 0) 24.2 92 31 19 5 100 51.1 26.3 40.4 (i) 53.8 37. 2 44. 1 40.4 0) 13.4 13 26 7 3 16 7.2 22.0 14. 9 (!) 8.6 1 Not computed, owing to the small number involved. 67 52 19 2 25 64 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Table 5.—Week’s earnings, by section and city—Continued NEGRO WOMEN Number and per cent of women whose week’s earn ings were— All women reported Section and city Under $10 $10 and un $15 and un $20 and over der $15 der $20 Num Median Num Per Num Per Num Per Num Per ber ber cent ber cent ber cent ber cent All places______________— $8. 85 3,005 59.2 1,656 32.6 366 7. 2 49 1.0 Eastern.- _____ ________________ 246 12. 50 29 11.8 173 70.3 39 15.9 5 2.0 Boston_____________________ Jersey City and Newark_____ 67 160 19 13. 35 11.90 14.15 6 23 9.0 14.4 43 117 13 64.2 73. 1 68.4 16 17 6 23.9 10.6 31. 6 2 3 3.0 1.9 Middle western_________ ______ _ 1,938 12. 25 451 23.3 1,183 61.0 270 13.9 34 1.8 989 50 448 399 50 2 12.45 12. 10 10. 85 12. 55 12. 50 (i) 205 8 170 60 8 20.7 16.0 37.9 15.0 16. 0 64.7 68.0 50.0 62.2 74. 0 119 7 50 88 5 1 12.0 14.0 11.2 22. 1 10. 0 0 25 1 4 3 2.5 2.0 .9 .8 1 0 16 17. 50 13 81. 3 3 18.8 Chicago________ __________ Cincinnati Cleveland Detroit-- - _________ ____ Southern St. Petersburg and Tampa------- 5, 076 2,876 940 742 352 477 365 640 34 224 248 37 7.15 2, 525 87.8 300 10.4 44 1.5 7 .2 6.45 7. 00 6. 80 8. 20 9. 80 97.0 94. 5 97.4 79.0 52.6 26 40 8 86 140 2.8 5.4 2. 3 18.0 38.4 2 1 1 14 26 .2 .1 .3 2.9 7. 1 7 1.9 912 701 343 377 192 1 Not computed, owing to the small number involved. The proportion of white women receiving $20 or more was greater in the South than in the eastern and middle-western sections, due to the fact that the white women in the South were employed chiefly on the better-paid jobs of marking and sorting. The proportion of white women earning less than $10 is not especially significant and is accounted for by undertime, as a very insignificant proportion of white women had rates of less than $10 a week. For the negro women, however, weekly rates as low as $5.50, $6, and $7 were not at all uncommon. Median of the earnings. For all the women for whom earnings were reported the median was $14.65; for the white women it was $16.10 and for the negro women it was $8.85. The median serves as a simple and satisfactory measuring stick for evaluation of the earnings in the various cities covered. It represents the midpoint in a distribution from the lowest to the highest, half the women earning more than the median and half earning less. The medians for the four geographic sections were as follows: 65 WAGES Section Eastern __ _____ ________ Middle western. . _ ___ Western. __ __ ______ Southern __ __ All women $14. 14. 17. 7. 30 05 90 55 White women $14. 14. 17. 13. 50 75 90 95 Negro women $12. 50 12. 25 0 7. 15 Per cent negro women were of total 9. 25. . 84. 6 4 3 1 ■-Not computed, owing to the small number involved. Naturally, the group with the largest proportion of negro women shows the greatest discrepancy between the earnings of negro women and those of white women. When the cities are arranged in descending order according to the median for all women, the western cities are all at the top of the list and the southern cities are together at the foot. Median of the earnings of— City All women San Francisco ______ _____ __ _ _ Seattle.. ______ __ _ .. Los Angeles. _ Portland _ _ . Detroit__________ __ _________ Milwaukee . _ _ __ Boston _ _ __ Minneapolis and St. Paul ___ _____ Des Moines. _ _ •Jersey City and Newark Cincinnati _ Providence _ _ . Chicago Indianapolis.. _ _ Cleveland. ... St. Petersburg and Tampa Richmond . __ Birmingham ______ _ Jacksonville-______ ____ _____ . Atlanta __________________ _ $20. 18. 17. 15. 14. 14. 14. 14. 14. 13. 13. 13. 13. 13. 13. 10. 8. 7. 7. 6. 70 05 00 35 85 65 55 10 00 95 90 70 65 30 25 40 25 30 00 75 White women $20. 70 18. 05 17. 00 15. 35 15. 35 14. 65 14. 60 14. 10 14. 00 14. 80 14. 05 13. 65 16. 65 13. 45 15. 25 11. 95 0 15. 80 15. 40 14. 40 Negro women Per cent negro women were of total $17. 50 0. 6 12. 55 24. 3 13. 35 0 4. 5 11. 12. 14. 12. 12. 10. 9. 8. 7. 6. 6. 90 10 15 45 50 85 80 20 00 80 45 30. 8. 3. 57. 5. 42. 66. 97. 86. 88. 83. 5 5 5 0 3 4 2 7 3 2 9 1 Not computed, owing to the small number involved. The charts on pages 66 and 67 show in descending order the median earnings of white and of negro women as reported in this summary. The range of the medians of all women from $20.70 to $6.75 in a single industry is striking, and the range of white women’s earnings from $20.70 to $11.95 and of those of negro women from $17.50 to $6.45 seems worthy of note. Full-time earnings. The effect of lost time in reducing earnings is illustrated in the fact that the median of the earnings of the white women who worked full time was $17.80 in contrast to $16.30 for all the white women whose 66 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS MEDIAN OF THE WEEK’S EARNINGS 14,104 White Women dollars 5 San Francisco 820.70 Seattle 18.05 Los 17.00 Angeles Chicago 16.65 Birmingham 15.80 Jacksonville 15.40 Portland (OregJ 15.35 Detroit 15.35 Cleveland i 5.25 Jersey City and Newark 14.80 Milwaukee 14.65 Boston 14.60 Atlanta 14.40 Minneapolis StPaul 14.10 Cincinnati 14.05 Des Moines 14.00 Providence 13.65 Indianapolis 13.45 St Petersburg o^Tampa 11.95 U.s. Dept, of Lat>Qr~ Womerfs 5ureoo 10 67 WAGES hours were reported. (See Appendix Table XIII.) For the negro women a different condition was found to exist, but the lower amount for full-time workers ($10.25) than for all the negro women for whom hours worked were reported ($10.45) is not representative. The largest numbers of full-time negro workers were in the southern cities MEDIAN OF THE WEEK’S EARNINGS 5,076 Negro Women dollars 10 Los Angeles 617.50 Providence 14.15 Boston 13.35 Detroit 12.55 Indianapolis 12.50 Chicago 12.45 Cincinnati • 12.10 Jersey City ,„jNewark 11.90 Cleveland 10.85 St Petersburg Tampa 9.80 Richmond 8.20 Birmingham 7;0 0 Jacksonville 6.80 Atlanta 6.45 U.S. Dept, of Labor- Wonmi’j Bu and this tended to pull down the general figure for the total because of the lower wage scale prevailing there in Table 9 are the full-time earnings by city and section and the per cent of women receiving such earnings. ' (See also Appendix Table XV.) The general median for all women whose hours were re ported is entered in a third column as a basis of comparison. 68 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Table 6.—Median of the week’s earnings of full-time workers and of all workers for whom hours worked were reported, by section and city WHITE WOMEN Median of the Per cent of earnings of all Median of the women who women for full-time worked full whom hours earnings worked were time reported Section and city All places. ___ _ ___ - _ _ $17. 80 50. 2 $16. 30 _ __ 15. 15. 19. 15. 05 90 05 55 68. 23. 65. 34. 9 5 8 3 14. 14. 17. 13. 50 70 95 55 San Francisco _ ___ __ __ _ Seattle__ _ _ Portland _ __ ____ _ ________ Los Angeles __ __ _ ____ _ Chicago. _ _____ _ Detroit _ Jersey City and Newark __ _ _ Milwaukee _ _. _ _ Cleveland _ _ _ _ _ Birmingham _ ______ _ _ _ Indianapolis__ ____ __ __ ...__ __ Boston _ _ __ _ _________ Cincinnati__ _ _______ ____ Minneapolis and St. Paul. Des Moines_______ _ ______ _ — St. Petersburg and Tampa _ _ Providence, _____ __ ______ __________ Atlanta, _ ______ _ ___ __ _____ __ 21. 18. 18. 17. 17. 17. 17. 16. 16. 15. 15. 15. 14. 14. 14. 14. 13. 0) 10 45 00 60 60 25 05 65 00 85 45 15 85 60 30 25 90 69. 70. 9. 75. 41. 9. 27. 14. 24. 66. 16. 75. 41. 18. 83. 16. 71. 30. 8 0 5 0 0 6 1 0 5 7 1 1 3 6 1 0 3 8 20. 17. 15. 16. 16. 15. 15. 14. 15. 16. 12. 14. 14. 14. 13. 11. 12. 13. 70 95 15 95 95 00 00 55 25 20 55 65 20 00 80 55 95 50 Eastern _ - _ _ _ _____ Middle western __ _ _ Western _ _ ___ Southern _ _______ __ _______ __ _ NEGRO WOMEN $10. 25 29. 0 $10. 45 Eastern__________ _ __ _ Middle western__ ________ __ _ Southern. _ _ _ _________ __ _ 13. 80 12. 75 7. 25 45. 6 20. 8 38. 1 12. 85 12. 25 7. 25 Detroit __ _ ______ — --------Boston. _ __ Cleveland __ __ — _ Chicago___ _ Birmingham_______ _ ______ -_ Jacksonville______________ _ _ _ Atlanta _ ------Richmond.. _ ____ St. Petersburg and Tampa ----------- _ _ Indianapolis.--------------- 15. 13. 12. 12. 7. 6. (*) (>) C) (') 6. 86. 29. 24. 66. 63. 9. 9. 2. 8. 12. 13. 11. 12. 7. 6. 5. 6. 10. 12. All places - - __ __ 55 60 75 55 40 65 9 4 1 7 1 3 0 4 7 3 55 45 80 20 40 35 90 45 55 40 1 Not computed, owing to the small number involved. In general, the figures for white women show no marked differences between the general median and that of the full-time workers except in a few cities where the percentage of full-time workers was low, indicating considerable undertime, Portland and Detroit being the 69 WAGES most striking examples of this. For white women, Indianapolis, Portland, and St. Petersburg and Tampa show the greatest differences between the general medians and those of full-time workers. In 7 of the cities and in the eastern and western sections, more than 65 per cent of the white women had worked, or at least had been paid for, the full scheduled time. (See Appendix Table XV.) In general, the trend of full-time earnings for negro women was much the same as for white women, although smaller proportions were reported working full time. In St. Petersburg and Tampa over two-thirds of the women worked undertime, while practically all the others were employed overtime. Including as full-time workers the 2,125 white and 2,064 negro women who, though their hours worked were not reported, had worked the required number of days, the medians (from unpublished tables) are as follows: White women Negro women All women _ _ _ _ $16. 10 $8. 80 17. 30 14. 00 15. 75 8. 45 8. 80 11. 35 The less earnings of white women working overtime than of those working full time are due to the overtime workers being preponder antly (76 per cent) in the Middle West where the earnings of all women—regardless of time worked—had a median of $14.75, and the full-time workers having much their largest proportion (49 per cent) in the West, where the median was $17.90. Similarly for the negro workers, the fact that 67 per cent of the full-time workers were in the South, where the median of the earnings of all workers was $7.15, makes their median fall below even that of the women working undertime, half of whom were in the Middle West, where the median for all women was $12.25. On the whole, the laundry industry offers its employees fairly full time work unless there are unusual conditions in the community or an individual plant. The steadiness of the work was one of the reasons frequently given by the women interviewed in their homes for pre ferring laundry work to other jobs. Median earnings for full-time laundry workers in other Women’s Bureau studies. From State-vide studies of employed women made by the Women’s Bureau in the past 10 years supplementary data on the full-time earnings of women laundry employees in 13 States are available. (See Appendix Table XVIII.) In these studies full-time earnings are reported for 4,214 women in 221 laundries, 2,629 of the women (62.4 70 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS per cent) being white and 1.585 (37.6 per cent) being negroes. median earnings of the full-time workers were as follows: State and date of survey Number of establishments * Median of the earnings of— All women Ohio, 1922_____ _______ New Jersey, 1922____ _ ____ Rhode Island, 1920____ Oklahoma, 1924. _ _ __ _ Missouri, 1922___ ____ ____ __ Kentucky, 1921 Arkansas, 1922. _ __ . __ Delaware, 1924 _ Tennessee, 1925____ Georgia, 1920 and 1921 . __ Mississippi, 1925-.Alabama, 1922 _ _ _ South Carolina, 1921-1922 26 10 4 32 26 14 23 5 18 18 14 19 12 The $13. 12. 12. 12. 11. 10. 10. 9. 7. 7. 6. 6. 6. 40 95 30 15 95 80 10 95 60 15 75 55 20 White women Negro women $13. 13. 12. 12. 12. 11. 10. 9 10. 14. 10. 12. 12. 50 35 30 25 80 10 55 95 10 45 20 80 50 $11. 65 10. 75 9. 10. 9. 9. 25 35 45 45 6. 6. 6. 6. 5. 85 85 45 45 95 The rates paid in the western cities, the inclusion of more northern cities and of larger cities in general, and probably the factor of date tend to make the medians of the present study on a level higher than appears for the States surveyed. About two-thirds of the States listed could be classed as southern. Cities in Ohio, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Georgia, and Alabama were revisited in the present study of laundries only, and for four of these it is possible to compare the earnings in the State as a unit—including both large and small cities—with the laundries of the largest places in the State. It is apparent that all the medians of the present study are higher than the medians for the respective States. Median of the full-time earn ings of— State and city White women Negro women Ohio--__ ____ ____ Cincinnati___ _ . Cleveland ________ _ New Jersey.. _ . Jersey City and Newark... Rhode Island. . . Providence _. . Alabama . .. Birmingham . __ .. " . $13. 14. 16. 13. 17. 12. 13. 12. 15. 50 85 00 35 05 30 90 80 85 $11. 65 12. 75 6. 45 7. 40 Summary of findings of earnings in New York power-laundry study. Data on a week’s earnings of women employed in the power laundries in New York are summarized in the following sentences from the report previously quoted: Median earnings of all workers in the week studied were $14.67—$14 88 in New York City, $14.20 upstate. Excluding foreladics, median earnings ranged from $14.14 for flat-work oper ators to $16.40 for press operators.1 in N?w York State^sScTal Buhl^ pi^lMo"88 °f W°men EmpI°yed in Poww L“6S 71 WAGES Methods of payment. Payment of wages in the laundry industry was almost entirely on a simple time basis and calculated on hourly, daily, or weekly rates. Piecework had been adopted to only a small extent. However, many of the laundry managers evidenced considerable interest in telling of their own experience in paying on a pound or piece basis and frequently they inquired about the experience of others with special systems of payment. The industry seemed to be tending toward an increased use of the output system, but of the more than 18,000 women for whom method of payment was recorded only about 10 per cent were paid entirely by output. A small additional group, 2.3 per cent of the white women and 0.1 per cent of the negro, worked partly on piece and partly on time in the week taken. Weekly rates were most common. Earnings of timeworkers and pieceworkers. . The distribution of timeworkers and pieceworkers and those who worked on both time and piece was as follows: White women Negro women Per cent paid by— Section Number reported All places___ 13, 477 Eastern_________ 2, 282 Middle western____ 5, 185 Western_____ 5, 478 Southern___ ____ ' 532 Time Piece Both 87. 8 10. 0 2. 3 83. 88. 88. 97. 11. 9. 10. 3. 5. 0 1. 7 2. 0 7 4 0 0 3 9 1 0 Per cent paid by— Number reported Time Piece 4, 836 89. 5 10. 4 246 1, 730 16 2, 844 87. 88. 62. 90. 12. 11. 37. 9. 4 7 5 3 6 2 5 6 Both 0. 1 . l . i For white women piecework was much more general than elsewhere in Providence, Cincinnati, Milwaukee, Indianapolis, and Los Angeles. Omitting the western section, with only 16 negro women, piecework was more common for this race in Boston, Cleveland, Birmingham, and St. Petersburg and Tampa. The per cents of white and negro women on piecework in the various cities were as follows: City Boston Providence Jersey City and Newark Chicago Detroit Cleveland Cincinnati Minneapolis and St. Paul Milwaukee Indianapolis 1 1 Only 6 women, Per cent on piece work White women 10. 21. 2. 4. 2. 11. 23. 0 2 5 5 5 4 5 1. 7 18. 5 19. 4 Negro women 17. 15. 10. 11. 2. 17. 16. 9 8 0 4 0 2 3 .0 13. 5 Per cent on piece work City » White Negro women women Des Moines______ _ __ 5. 2 Los Angeles_ _____ _ 19. 4 San Francisco _ _ _ _ _ .0 Seattle_____________ 2. 5 Portland _ __________ 3. 9 Atlanta____ _____ _ 7. 2 Birmingham . _ 2. 6 Richmond . _ _ . 0 St. Petersburg and Tampa . 0 Jacksonville ____ __ . 0 1 37. 5 6. 3 17. 7 1. 7 17. 4 4. 0 72 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Comparison of the median earnings of timeworkers and piece workers. In most industries the earnings of pieceworkers are higher than those of timeworkers. The extent of this condition in the laundries sur veyed may be seen from the list following, which shows the median earnings of timeworkers and pieceworkers in the cities where the numbers of pieceworkers were large enough to justify the calculation of median earnings. The table is based on data as to piecework earn ings where 50 or more women were paid by output, WHITE WOMEN Number of women on piecework City Boston____ Providence__ __ Cleveland Cincinnati Milwaukee _ Indianapolis___ _ Los Angeles __ _ . 141 109 69 126 97 140 506 __ Median earnings for— Per cent by which piecework median ex ceeds time Piecework Timework work me dian $19. 16. 18. 15. 14. 18. 18. 25 50 30 65 65 60 05 $14. 13. 14. 13. 14. 12. 16. 35 40 95 50 60 85 85 34. 23. 22. 15. . 44. 7. 2 1 5 9 3 7 2 $14. 13. 8. 7. 7. 05 35 30 60 10 $12. 10. 6. 6. 10. 45 30 40 95 25 12. 29. 29. 9. 1 30. 8 4 5 1 7 NEGRO WOMEN Chicago Cleveland Atlanta __ Birmingham St. Petersburg and Tampa 97 77 59 129 62 1 In this case the timework median is the higher. In all but one of the localities listed the median for piecework exceeds that for timework. The lower earnings of the pieceworkers in St. Petersburg and Tampa were due to the fact that 58 of the 62 were hand ironers averaging only $7. Since their time worked was not reported, there may have been considerable undertime. In the same locality 90 negro hand ironers who were paid by the week and a number of whom worked overtime had a median of $10.25. Piecework and timework earnings in New York laundry study. In the New York study of power laundries it was found that 93 per cent of the workers were paid on a time basis and only 7 per cent on output. Press operators in New York City were most commonly found on piecework. This was'the method of payment of hand ironers to a less extent, and only occasionally were flat workers paid by the piece. In other cities and towns the classifiers and starchers were on a piece rate. “Earnings of piece workers, who were 7 per cent of all workers and were concentrated largely among press operators and hand ironers, were much higher than earnings of time workers. 73 WAGES In fact, there was a difference of almost $5 between the median earnings of piece and time workers.” 2 Earnings by occupation. The figures on wages thus far presented have been concerned with the prevailing earnings for women in the industry without reference to the occupation or department in which they were engaged. The wage scale shifts about, rises and falls considerably, when the range of earnings in each department or occupation is considered separately. In some plants there was difficulty in correlating earnings and occu pation, as in the smaller laundries especially the women shifted, about on a variety of jobs and it was not possible to attribute their earnings to any one occupation. It was found impossible to divide up the flat-work department into the various jobs, as shaking, feeding, taking off, since the women usually shifted about on these jobs. The same was true of the marking and sorting departments. In large plants the shirt work usually was a distinct unit, but in some of the smaller plants pressing and hand ironing on shirts was part of the general run of hand ironing and pressing and could not be separated. For this reason, all work of this nature has been thrown together into the two respective groupings of hand ironing and press operating. Altogether earnings were correlated with department or occupation for 18,748 women, 5,000 of whom were negroes. (See Appendix Tables XVI and XVII.) Below are listed the groups in which fell 1 per cent or more of the women and the median earnings for each group. Department or occupation Flat work _ Mark and sort Hand iron _ __ _ Press operate __ _______ _ Mend, seamstress______ _ __ Starch and dampen _______ Collar or collar starch _ _ _ Foreladies ^____ __ ____ Bundle, wrap, pack _ _ ___ General ____ _ ___ Hand wash _____ __ Press and hand iron White women Negro women Median of Per cent in the earn this job ings Median of Per cent in the earn this job ings $14. 17. 16. 16. 16. 16. 16. 23. 15. 16. 55 35 60 70 35 55 30 70 20 20 14. 65 38. 21. 13. 12. 2. 2. 2. 1. 1. 1. 5 2 7 4 6 3 1 6 3 3 .5 $8. 11. 7. 9. 12. 8. 8. 65 90 95 50 00 90 80 47. 4. 20. 16. 1. 2. 1. 3 8 5 8 1 3 2 7. 95 1. 0 9. 85 7. 85 1. 0 1. 2 The first four of these groups comprise about seven-eighths of the women for whom department or occupation and earnings were cor related. Flat workers constitute the largest group, and they were the lowest paid of the white women and one of the lowest of the negro women. Of the four large groups the markers and sorters were the most highly paid, and this group had the lowest proportion.of negro 2 New York. Department of Labor. Honrs and Earnings of Women Employed in Power Laundries in New York State. Special Bui. 153, pp. 26 and 30. 103127°—30- -6 74 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS women. The table following summarizes the median earnings of the four chief occupation groups by section and city: Median of the earnings, by occupation WHITE WOMEN Mark and sort % Section and city All places________ ________ __ - $17. 35 Press op erate Hand iron $16. 70 $16. 60 $14. 55 Flat work Eastern__ ________ ____ ______ __ _ _ __ 16. 20 16. 35 15. 80 13. 10 Boston _ __ _ __ Providence-. _ _ _ __ ____ Jersey City and Newark. Middle western _ _ . __________ . 15. 16. 17. 16. 85 55 60 45 16. 15. 16. 15. 55 30 25 70 15. 16. 15. 15. 85 00 40 30 13. 12. 13. 13. 30 35 85 15 Chicago_____ _________________ ____ Detroit _ . _ _ _ _ Cleveland __ _. . _ Cincinnati ______ _ .. Minneapolis and St. Paul__________ Milwaukee.. _________ . .. Indianapolis___ _____ ____ _____ . Des Moines _. ________ ____ ______ Western.. ___ _ _ _... 20. 16. 16. 15. 15. 18. 15. 15. 20. 45 90 65 15 95 50 40 45' 15 18. 16. 16. 15. 14. 14. 15. 14. 18. 10 15 00 80 50 90 30 60 45 18. 15. 15. 14. 14. 15. 14, 14. 18. 95 30 40 75 85 45 60 40 40 15. 14. 13. 13. 12. 13. 11. 12. 16. 00 20 40 10 95 60 85 45 90 Los Angeles _ _ __________ ____ . San Francisco. _ ... ___ . Seattle _ _ ____ ... Portland__ ... __ . . Southern1 __ ____ __ . _ __ _____ . 19. 25. 20. 16. 15. 00 25 70 85 10 17. 35 21. 55 18. 35 15.55 (2) 17. 50 22. 45 18. 35 15. 15 (2) 16. 19. 17. 14. 11. 65 40 45 75 05 14. 15. 13. 16. 15 90 50 00 (2) (2) (2) (2) 11. 20 (2) St. Petersburg and Tampa NEGRO WOMEN All places 3____ ________ $11. 90 $9. 50 $7. 95 $8. 65 Eastern_______________________ Boston___________________ Jersey City and Newark.._ Middle western_______________ (2) (2) (2) 14. 55 15. 15 16. 15 12. 50 (2) 10. 15 7. 30 7. 70 11. 65 (2) (2) 13. 85 14. 15 13. 65 13. 95 14. 65 12. 95 13. 65 (2) 7. 85 7. 30 7. 35 9. 25 9. 85 7. 60 13. 30 13. 75 12. 65 12. 95 13. 55 12. 75 12. 95 (2) 7. 30 6. 40 7. 00 8. 85 8. 95 7. 15 11. 90 12. 75 11. 65 11. 35 12. 15 11. 90 9. 85 10. 30 6. 50 6. 00 6. 50 7. 40 10. 25 6. 35 Chicago__________________ Detroit___________________ Cleveland________________ Cincinnati________________ Southern______________________ Atlanta__________________ Birmingham______________ Richmond_______ ,_______ St. Petersburg and Tampa. Jacksonville______________ 1 Includes 10 women in Richmond, not shown separately. a Not computed, owing to the small number involved. 3 Includes 16 negro women in the western section, not shown separately. 75 WAGES Among the white workers, markers and sorters were the most highly paid group in nearly all cases. In the southern group this was the only job in which the numbers and earnings of white women were significant. In the East most of the negro women were employed on flat work and their median was lower than the corresponding figure for the white women. The earnings of the negro markers and sorters in Richmond were higher than those in other southern cities. For both white and negro women flat work constitutes the largest group, having about 40 per cent of the women. Generally it was the lowest paid of all the types of work. The earnings of press operators were next in rank to those of markers and sorters. A considerable number of pieceworkers on press jobs—especially on the pressing of coats and uniforms in strictly wholesale or commercial laundries—tended to raise the earnings. The range of the medians for press jobs was from $7.30 for negro women in Atlanta to $21.55 for white women in San Francisco. The highest earnings for negro press operators were in Chicago, with a median of $14.65. Almost every woman who seeks employment in a laundry has had some experience in hand ironing. The proportions of press operators and hand ironers varied decidedly from city to city with the customs and practices of the trade. In general, the proportion of hand ironers was highest in the South, where over 25 per cent of all the negro women were employed on this job. Work that is hand ironed or at least hand finished is demanded by southern trade, and if it is not offered by the laundry it can be obtained easily from the home laundress. The large potential supply of negro hand ironers undoubtedly is an element in tending to keep the wages of hand ironers in the South only a slight degree above those of flat workers. Range of earnings by occupation. The following summary shows the range of earnings in the four principal occupations or departments for white and negro women separately: WHITE WOMEN High me dian City Low me dian San Francisco___ $13. 50 Press operate____ 21. 55 _____do..................... 14. 50 Hand iron _____ Flat work __ 22. 45 _____do__________ 19. 40 _____ do__________ 14. 40 11. 20 Occupation Mark and sort___ $25. 25 City St. Petersburg and Tampa. Minneapolis and St. Paul. Des Moines. St. Petersburg and Tampa. NEGRO WOMEN Mark and sort___ $16. 15 Detroit__ __ Press operate____ 14. 65 Chicago, _ _ _ Hand iron 13. 75 Boston______ Flat work. _ 12. 75 _____do__________ $7. 7. 6. 6. 30 30 40 00 Atlanta. Do. Do. Do. 76 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Earnings of timeworkers and pieceworkers by occupational group. Comparing the earnings of timeworkers and of pieceworkers in the chief occupations reveals that the greatest differences were in the earnings of press operators. Table XIX in the appendix sets forth the details by city, and in the following summary is given, for each section, the per cent by which pieceworkers’ earnings exceeded those of timeworkers: Per cent by which -piecework median exceeds timework median White women Negro women Section Mark and sort Flat work Hand iron Press operate Flat work Hand iron 13. 0 14. 8 8. 2 15. 9 36. 1 9. 6 53. 4 Eastern _ _ 21. 1 Middle western.__________ 10. 9 Western __ ____ 2. 7 Southern . __ 8. 3 17. 2 9. 9 2. 4 12. 4 14. 6 ‘2. 1 23. 8 21. 9 3. 5 19. 6 !13. 9 4. 7 11. 4 16. 2 2. 1 20. 6 All places _ _ Press operate 1 In this case the timework median is the higher. Somewhat along the same line is the following, which points out the city in each section that had the largest number of pieceworkers reported and compares the earnings of timeworkers and of piece workers in the main occupational groups: —---------- Per cent piecework median exceeds Timework Piecework timework median Median of the earnings City and occupation Eastern—Boston (white women): Mark and sort _ ________ Hand iron___ __________________ _ Flat work _ ________ _ _ . Press operate_ __ Middle western—Indianapolis (white women): Mark and sort . Hand iron _____ Flat work.__ ____ ________________ __ __ Press operate. ._ _ _ Western—Los Angeles (white women): Mark and sort . Hand iron__ _. _ .. __ Flat work Press operate _ _______ __ ... Southern—Birmingham (negro women): Mark and sort _____ __ __ _ Hand iron__ __ Flat work______ _ Press operate__ _ ______ i Not computed, owing to the small number involved. $15. 15. 13. 15. 60 75 20 75 $19. 60 19. 50 (!) 19. 90 25. 6 23. 8 15. 13. 12. 14. 00 10 05 65 20 30 18. 55 0 18. 30 35. 3 41. 6 18. 17. 16. 16. 65 45 55 80 20. 18. 17. 18. 10 6 4 11. 7. 6. 6. 7. 95 90 40 30 65 50 30 70 0 7. 85 7. 55 (') 26. 3 24. 9 7 0 5 3 13. 8 18. 0 77 WAGES With the higher wage scale of the western cities it is not surprising that Los Angeles shows the least difference in the earnings of timeworkers and of pieceworkers. Of the four cities having the largest numbers of pieceworkers, Indianapolis shows the greatest degree of difference. Only one flat worker, however, was reported on piece work in the Indianapolis laundries visited, but Cincinnati, another central city, had 35 women doing flat work on a piece basis and their median earnings were 15 per cent in excess of those of the timeworkers. Earnings and scheduled hours. That plants with long hours pay no more than do plants with short hours is an industrial truism. High wages and long hours seldom are partners. Selecting the scheduled-hour groups in which the largest number of women appeared in the reports for each city and correlating them with the median earnings for their respective classifications brings out something of the relationship of hours and wages in the present study. The first of the summary tables that follow is based on the earnings of all women, without regard to race, while the next two are supplementary for the cities in which negro women represented more than 1 per cent of the number of women employed. Median earnings and prevailing scheduled hours, all women Prevailing scheduled hours 44 and under 48 __ 48- _ .. ______ Per cent Median negro earnings, Number of women in women all women the group City Providence .. __ __ Seattle. ... _ ____ Los Angeles. _ _ Portland___ _ Boston __ __ Jersey City and Newark___ Over 48 and under 50. Milwaukee _ _ 50„ _ Chicago _ _ _. Indianapolis .. _ Cleveland.. . ... Minneapolis and St. Paul__ Cincinnati.. _____ ______ __ Over 50 and under 52. Detroit. ___ ... . Birmingham __ _ ._ Atlanta _ . ______ ____ 52 Des Moines______ ______ Over 56 and under 58. Richmond . . . _ _. St. Petersburg and Tampa. _ 60 Jacksonville . _ $13. 21. 18. 16. 15. 14. 15. 15. 15. 14. 14. 14. 13. 15. 7. 6. 14. 8. 10. 7. 60 05 05 95 35 25 55 70 25 80 75 70 95 55 40 35 70 85 65 20 290 1, 255 749 2, 615 767 935 146 182 376 396 512 214 341 414 174 397 107 0. 0 .0 .0 .5 .0 6. 0 7. 5 .0 31. 1 2. 8 20. 3 .5 14. 7 1. 2 92. 5 85. 6 .0 220 100. 0 126 209 83. 3 90. 4 From these figures it is evident that there is little or no relation between hours and earnings, the factors influencing the medians being locality and race. The negro and white women’s prevailing hour groups are correlated with earnings in the lists next presented. 78 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Median earnings and prevailing scheduled hours, by race NEGRO WOMEN Prevailing scheduled hours City Median of Number of the earn women ings 48_______________ _______ Over 48 and under 50__ 50 Over 50 and under 52 . $13. 20 _ Cleveland . __ _____ _____ 9. 75 Cincinnati _ 12. 10 Atlanta_________ __ 6. 05 Birmingham _ _ ____ _ _ 7. 25 52_______ _ 12. 45 Over 52 and under 54 _ Detroit____________ _____ ____ 12. 50 Chicago _ 54 10. 30 Jersey City and Newark __ _ 12. 50 Over 56 and under 58___ __ _ Richmond 8. 85 60.................. .. ............ . _ 7. 05 St. Petersburg and Tampa___ 10. 50 56 198 50 340 161 20 168 240 74 220 189 105 WHITE WOMEN (IN THE SAME CITIES) 48___________________ Over 48 and under 50 50........... ................. ........ Over 50 and under 52 54___________________ 60___________________ Boston.. ____ _ ... $14. 35 Jersey City and Newark _ 15. 70 Richmond . . .. _ (>) Chicago . 16. 90 Cleveland _______ _ . . 15. 45 Cincinnati.. . .. ________ 14. 20 Indianapolis _____ ___________ 15. 00 Atlanta___ _____ _____ _____ 14. 40 Detroit . _ __ 15. 60 St. Petersburg and Tampa.,.. 11. 00 Birmingham.______ _____ __ 16. 50 Jacksonville _ _ .... 14. 50 879 135 5 259 408 291 385 57 409 50 31 20 1 Not computed, owing to the small number involved. In Jersey City and Newark and in Chicago, northern cities, the prevailing scheduled hours were decidedly longer and the earnings quite decidedly less for negro women than for white women. The same was true, but to a much less degree, of Detroit and Indianapolis. It was true of hours in St. Petersburg and Tampa, but here the differ ence in earnings was slight. Cleveland and Birmingham laundries reported shorter prevailing hours for negro women, and here the difference in earnings was very great. In the other cities—Boston, Cincinnati, Atlanta, and Jacksonville—prevailing scheduled hours were the same but earnings were lower for the negro workers. (See Appendix Table XX.) Earnings and time in the trade. How much is experience in the laundry industry worth in monetary terms to the employee? A normal supposition is that experience in a trade should make workers more efficient and of greater service to their employers and that the employees should be rewarded for their continuance in an industry by increased earnings. In the home visiting, data on time in the laundry industry were secured, and corre lating this with the median of the week’s earnings for the women supplying this information gives the following tabulation of earnings: 79 WAGES Median of the earnings of White women Years in the laundry industry Amount 1 and under 2__ _____ __ _ 3 and under 4 4 and under 5_ _ _ _ _ 5 and under 10 _ _ _ $12. 13. 14. 15. 15. 15. 17. 18. _ __ _ 85 85 60 80 10 50 10 85 Negro women Per cent of increase over me dian for under 1 year 7. 13. 23. 17. 20. 33. 46. 8 6 0 5 6 1 7 Amount Per cent of increase over me dian for under 1 year $7. 25 8. 50 8. 90 9. 85 11. 30 10. 80 9. 15 (2) 17. 22. 35. 55. 49. 26. 2 8 9 9 0 2 1 Earnings are based on the reports of 1,076 white and 442 negro workers. 2 Not computed, owing to the small number involved. The median of the earnings of the white women who had worked from 5 to 10 years in the industry was slightly more than 20 per cent higher than the median of those who had been in the trade less than a year, while for the negro women, with a much lower beginning rate, the median of those who had worked from 5 to 10 year's was about 50 per cent above the figure for beginners. Considering the major occupations on which the white women 3 were employed at the time of the interviews gives the following result: Median of the earnings of white women who were— Markers and sorters Years in the laundry industry 1 and under 2___ 2 and under 3___ 3 and under 4___ 4 and under 5___ 5 and under 10__ 10 and under 15-_ Press operators Flat workers Ironers Per cent Per cent Per cent of in of in of in crease crease crease over over over Amount median Amount median Amount Amount median for un for un for un der 1 der 1 der 1 year year year $13. 14. 15. 16. 14. 17. 17. 20. 50 40 75 40 50 50 50 10 6. 16. 21. 7. 29. 29. 48. 7 7 5 4 6 6 9 $13. 50 14. 25 15. 75 16. 50 16. 50 18. 15 (*) (“) 5. 16. 22. 22. 34. 6 7 2 2 4 $12. 50 13. 30 13. 80 13. 65 14. 50 14. 30 14. 50 (“) 6. 10. 9. 16. 14. 16. “Not computed, owing to the small number involved. 3 Number of negro women reporting is too small to justify similar tabulation. 4 4 2 0 4 0 $14. 05 (“) « C) (») 16. 10 C) 18. 50 Per cent of in crease over median for un der 1 year — 14. 6 31. 7 80 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS The groups are quite small when separated by occupation and such figures as the foregoing must be considered only indicative. For the markers and sorters and the press operators the progression was somewhat similar, but the increase for flat work, the least skilled job, with experience of little value, was small. Earnings and time with the firm. Information in regard to time with the firm is available for a larger group, and it has been correlated with earnings for 9,707 white women and 3,309 negro women. Is it worth more to stay on with the same employer year after year than to shift around in the industry? Expe rience not only adds to a worker’s skill and efficiency in performing her job but makes her familiar with the standards, policies, and practices of the management, thus increasing her value to the em ployer. This should be recognized by an increased wage as an in centive to remain. Table XXI in the appendix shows, by section and city, the per cent of women in each length-of-service group and the median of their earnings. The table following is a summary of these figures by section only. Table 7.—Median of the week’s earnings according to time with the firm, by section WHITE WOMEN All places Time with the firm Total._______ __________ Median earnings Number of Per cent women of in report ing time Amount crease over with the median firm for under 1 year 9, 707 $16.15 2,972 1,80R 1,308 795 694 1, 439 418 273 14. 55 15.65 16. 40 17.00 17. 35 17. 90 18. 30 19.30 Middle western Median earnings Of Per cent women of in report ing time Amount crease over with the median firm for under 1 year 11.0 1, 336 $14.70 7.6 12.7 16.8 19.2 23.0 25.8 32.6 261 216 188 106 91 278 112 84 12.95 13.95 14.00 15.15 15. 55 15. 75 17. 40 18. 35 Western Median earnings of Per cent women of in report ing time Amount crease over with the median firm for under 1 year Southern Median earnings of women report ing time with the firm Median earnings Number of Per cent Per cent of in women of in report crease ing time crease Amount over with the Amount over median median for under firm for under 1 year 1 year 13.5 4,455 $14.95 8.7 3, 528 $18. 25 8.6 388 $14. 05 15.6 7.7 8.1 17.0 20.1 21.6 34.4 41.7 1, 637 ’845 532 348 282 530 165 116 13. 75 14. 75 15. 30 15.95 15.95 16. 95 17.15 18.60 7.3 11.3 16.0 16.0 23.3 24. 7 35.3 937 658 534 305 299 597 130 68 17. 80 18. 50 18. 60 19. 35 19. 35 6.0 10.1 10.7 15.2 15.2 89 54 36 22 34 13. 50 14. 55 16. 70 16. 40 18.00 11.1 19.8 37.4 35.0 48.1 22. 25 32.4 5 4.1 16 $17.50 WAGES Under 1 year........... ............... ............. 1 and under 2 years____ ____ 2 and under 3 years ... 3 and under 4 years____________ 4 and under 5 years______ ... _ 5 and under 10 years___ ... 10 and under 15 years.................. ...... 15 years and over________ Eastern 0 NEGRO WOMEN Total_____________________ Under 1 year........................................ 1 and under 2 years. __ _______ . 2 and under 3 years 3 and under 4 years______________ 4 and under 5 years______ _ ___ 5 and under 10 years..___ ____ ___ 10 and under 15 years ____ _____ 15 years and over 3, 309 $9.10 1,176 551 450 298 233 462 110 29 7.90 8.70 9.20 9. 30 10. 55 10. 50 10. 65 10. 40 15.2 66 $13. 70 1, 262 $12. 60 10.1 16.5 17.7 33.5 32.9 34.8 31.6 11 10 4 7 9 18 5 2 (i) (!) (!) (!) (') 14.00 0) c) 458 230 170 92 106 185 21 12.10 12. 50 12. 65 13. 45 13. 55 14.20 13.70 1, 965 $7.30 11.5 27 lo! 15 55.0 (l) 4. 5 11 2 3 (I) 0) 17.4 13.2 5 1 (1) (■) 1 Not computed, owing to the small number involved. oo 82 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS The beginners' earnings in this table are at a higher level then are those in the tables on general experience in the industry, probably due to the fact that many women already were experienced when they began employment with the present firm. A progression in earnings is apparent, but it is quite gradual, the median of all white women who had been with the firm 5 and under 10 years being only $3.35 more than the median of less than a year’s employment. More than 60 per cent of all the women were in the groups who had been less than three years with the firm. The in crease was a bit faster in the East than in the middle-western and western sections, and there was a larger per cent of women with service of five years and over, more than a third of the women having this record. In the middle-western section less than one-fifth of the women, 18.2 per cent, had been with the firm five years and over. The higher initial earnings in the West probably are the reason for a slower progression. The western median is the highest in each experience group. Sufficient numbers of negro women to allow for a calculation of medians by time with the firm were found only in the middle-western and southern sections. A slightly smaller per cent of negro than of white women had been with the firm as much as five years. The progression of increase for the negro women was greater in the southern than in the middle-western cities, but their basic earnings were so low that a small increase had more significance than where wages were higher. RATES What does the laundry industry offer the woman who works full time? Rates show what the industry expects to pay and they are the bases of anticipated earnings, although, because of undertime and overtime, they do not always coincide with actual earnings. Any marked deviation of earnings below rates usually entails hardship, especially when the compensation can at best provide only the neces sities. On the whole, weekly rates and earnings in the laundry industry show less variation than is found in industry generally, and many of the women interviewed said that they preferred a laundry to a manu facturing plant because of the steady work and the probability of looking forward to a definite wage each week. Rates of payment may be based on time worked, output, or some special system, but it is not feasible to estimate rates for persons paid by output, and the rate figures in this report refer only to data for timeworkers. Rates for 11,670 white women and 4,203 negro women are included in the compilations in this section. Similarly to the general tabulation of earnings, the dispersion of rates has been grouped by city in four classes: First, under $10; second, $10 and under $15; third, $15 and under $20; and fourth, $20 and over. The distribution of rates by section and city, white and negro women separately, appears in the table following; 83 WAGES Table 8.—Weekly rates, by section and city WHITE WOMEN Section and city All women for whom rates were reported Number and per cent of women whose weekly rate was— Under $10 $10 and under $15 $15 and under $20 $20 and over Num- Median Num- Per Num- Per Num- Per Num- Per ber ber cent ber cent ber cent ber cent $1S. 60 63 0.6 3,500 30.0 5,997 51.4 2,110 18.1 Eastern.......................................... All places.............................. 11,670 1,935 14.70 11 .6 1,037 53.6 754 39.0 133 6.9 Boston.............. ....................... Jersey City and Newark____ Providence 1, 251 357 327 14.70 15.45 13. 50 3 1 7 .2 .3 2.1 680 148 209 54.4 41.5 63.9 487 172 95 38.9 48.2 29.1 81 36 16 6.5 10.1 4.9 Middle western............................. 4,442 15.20 19 .4 2,064 46.5 1,933 43.5 426 9.6 Chicago.................................. . Cincinnati.............................. Cleveland___________ _____ Des Moines... Detroit—____ ___________ Indianapolis... Milwaukee...............................: Minneapolis and St. Paul___ 560 396 532 218 1,141 '535 316 744 16.45 13.80 15.60 14.05 15.80 13.55 15. 85 14. 40 1 .2 5 .9 12 1 2.2 .3 152 261 190 143 398 359 98 463 27.1 65.9 35.7 65.6 34.9 67.1 31.0 62.2 282 115 281 70 599 146 187 253 50.4 29.0 52.8 32.1 52.5 27.3 59.2 34.0 125 20 56 5 144 18 30 28 22.3 5.1 10.5 2.3 12.6 3.4 9.5 3.8 Western.......................................... 4, 809 18. 55 159 3.3 3,151 65.5 1,499 31.2 Los Angeles....... ...................... Portland___________ ______ San Francisco.......................... Seattle..................................... 2,002 657 1,425 ' 725 17.20 16.00 21.20 18.30 25 134 1.2 20.4 1,623 480 494 554 81.1 73.1 34.7 76.4 354 43 931 171 17.7 6.5 65.3 23.6 484 14.05 33 6.8 240 49.6 159 32.9 52 10.7 167 97 47 12 161 14.85 15. 65 15. 65 0) 12.20 2 5 1.2 5.2 84 26 19 4 107 50.3 26.8 40.4 0) 66.5 68 49 20 3 19 40.7 50.5 42.6 0) 11.8 13 17 8 4 10 7.8 17.5 17.0 <') 6.2 0.4 Southern Atlanta Birmingham........................... Jacksonville.......... .................. Richmond St. Petersburg and Tampa... 1 ■ 0) 25 15.5 NEGRO WOMEN All places......................... Middle western........................... . Cleveland____ ___________ Southern__________ ________ _ St. Petersburg and Tampa... 4,203 $9.25 1,535 36.6 345 8.2 16 221 13. 30 176 79. 6 41 18.6 4 1.8 61 144 16 13.50 13.10 14.50 46 119 11 75.4 82.6 68.8 13 23 5 21.3 16.0 31.3 2 2 3.3 1.4 1,498 12. 75 8.8 1,087 72.6 270 18.0 9 .6 725 42 378 324 28 1 12.75 12. 30 10.95 14. 55 12. 70 0) 9.5 33.9 594 31 219 217 26 81.9 73.8 57.9 67.0 92.9 126 7 29 105 2 1 17.4 16.7 7.7 32.4 7.1 (!) 5 .7 2 2 .5 .6 10 0) 8 (l) 2 (i) 26 1.1 1 (!) 2 .2 1 21 2 .3 4.4 .8 2,474 881 515 340 477 261 2, 307 54.9 132 4 128 7.35 2,175 87.9 272 11.0 861 493 330 364 127 97.7 95.7 97.1 76.3 48.7 18 22 9 92 131 2.0 4.3 2.6 19.3 50.2 6.70 7. 05 6. 90 8.55 10.05 i Not computed, owing to the small number involved. 1 2 Less than 0.05 per cent. .4 84 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS At first glance the most striking thing in this table appears to be the influence of race, almost 70 per cent of the white women having a rate of $15 and over and well over half of the negro women having a rate of under $10. A second glance shows, however, that the influ ence of locality is even stronger. The omission of the far West leaves only 50.4 per cent of the white women with a rate of as much as $15 and the omission of the South leaves only 7.6 per cent of the negro women with a rate below $10. In Detroit 1 in 3 of the negro women had a rate of $15 or more, while in Providence, Cincinnati, Indianapo lis, and Des Moines the proportion of white women with such a rate also was about 1 in 3. Minimum-wage legislation. Minimum-wage legislation has been advocated as a means of keep ing wages from falling below a decent subsistence level. In four of the States in the present laundry study minimum-wage standards had been set. In Massachusetts the rates specified were $13.50 a week for experienced women and $11 a week for those inexperienced. In California there were required rates of $16 a week for experienced and $14 a week for inexperienced women. In Oregon the compulsory rates were $13.20 for all experienced females of 18 years and over and $9 for the inexperienced, and in the State of Washington $13.20 was required for women in laundries.4 In considering the distribution and median of the rates in the present study it is interesting to bear in mind the minimum standards and their possible relation and effects. It is plain that considerable proportions of women are paid at rates higher than those required by law. Rates and occupations. Of the white women whose rates were under $10 about two-thirds were flat workers; and of those whose rates were $20 and over, more than 40 per cent were markers and sorters. These jobs represent the extremes in the range of rates of the chief occupations of the women in laundry work. (See Appendix Table XXII.) The medians of the rates in the occupations having 1 per cent or more of the women were these: Median of the rates, by occupation and section WHITE WOMEN All places Eastern Middle western Western Mark and sort _ __ $18. 00 Flat work __ _ _ __ 15. 45 Starch and dampen _ 16. 85 Collar or collar starch . 16. 65 Press operate __ _ _ _______ 16. 80 Hand iron _ ________ 16. 80 Mend, seamstress _ 16. 75 Bundle, wrap, pack__ ____ _ 15. 35 Forelady _ _____ _ 23. 70 General _ _ 16. 85 $16. 30 13. 50 15. 85 15. 30 16. 00 15. 95 15. 25 15. 40 22. 80 (°) $17. 13. 15. 16. 15. 15. 15. 14. 22. 16. $20. 17. 18. 19. 18. 19. 19. 18. 25. 17. Occupation 10 85 80 10 65 50 85 95 65 60 65 35 75 90 70 25 70 00 15 00 Southern $15. 10. (*) 14. («) (“) 14. « 21. 25 85 15 15 00 ° Not computed, owing to the small number involved. * U. S. Department of Labor. Women’s Bureau. The Development of Minimum-Wage Laws in the United States, 1912 to 1927. Bui. 61, 1928. 85 WAGES Median af the rates, hy occupation and section—Continued NEGRO WOMEN Occupation All places Mark and sort_______ Flat work___________ Starch and dampen _ Collar or collar starch Press operate________ Hand iron_______ ____ Mend, seamstress____ Bundle, wrap, pack__. Forelady____________ General_____________ $12. 90 9. 55 8. 80 8. 60 8. 70 7. 90 12. 85 8. 45 0 7. 15 Eastern Middle western Western 0 $14. 90 12. 20 13. 85 (!) 14. 55 14. 40 13. 95 0 (!) 0 0 $12. 80 0 0 14. 15 14. 15 (>) 0 Southern $10. 75 6. 85 7. 70 8. 00 7. 7. 8. 7. 70 40 40 70 06.) 65 0) 0 1 Not computed, owing to the small number involved. Rates and time with the firm. Correlating the rate with length of service in the laundry shows what, the industry offers in the way of expectancy of increased earnings to its women workers. Table 9.—Median of the rates according to time with the firm, by section WHITE WOMEN All places Years with the firm 1 and under 2_____ 2 and under 3 3 and under 4 .. .. _ 4 and under 5 5 and under 10 10 and under 15 15 and over____ _ Eastern Middle western Per Per cent of cent of increase increase over Median over Median Median median median for for under under 1 year 1 year $15. 30 16. 00 16.70 17. 05 17. 50 18.05 18.40 20.05 4.6 9.2 11.4 14.4 18.0 20.3 31.0 $13. 05 14. 15 14. 20 14. 75 15. 30 15. 65 17.55 18. 40 8.4 8.8 13.0 17. 2 19.9 34.5 41.0 $14. 30 14.90 15.60 15.90 16. 20 17.00 17. 30 19.40 Western Per cent of increase over median Median for under 1 year 4.2 9. 1 11.2 13.3 18.9 21.0 35.7 $17.50 18.40 19. 10 19. 30 19. 60 19. 80 21. 45 22.85 Southern Per Per cent of cent of increase increase over over median Median median for for under under 1 year 1 year 5.1 9.1 10.3 12.0 13.1 22.6 30.6 $12. 30 13. 85 14. 85 16.20 16. 85 17. 65 12.6 20.7 31.7 37.0 43.5 $6.85 7.25 7.65 7.60 7.75 8.00 9.50 10.15 5.8 11.7 10.9 13.1 16.8 38.7 48.2 NEGRO WOMEN $7.95 8. 55 9.45 8.65 10.90 11. 00 10. 55 10. 50 7.5 18.9 8.8 37.1 38.4 32.7 32.1 $12. 40 12. 70 13. 50 13.65 14. 10 14. 70 14. 50 2.4 8.9 10.1 13.7 18.5 16.9 The foregoing summary of rates and time with the firm is based on the earnings of 7,950 -white women and 2,719 negro women. (See Appendix Table XXIII.) The progression of rates is, of course, much the same as that shown in earnings and time with the firm, the rates rising steadily though not rapidly. 86 A SURVEY OE LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Changes in rates during the year preceding the survey. A week’s pay roll, one year before the survey, was examined wherever such record was available and the women’s rates of pay were noted. Of the women for whom rates at dates a year apart were obtainable, the vast majority, almost 73 per cent, had the same rate on the current pay roll as at the earlier date; about 23 per cent had an increase in their weekly rates and somewhat less than 5 per cent were on a lower rate. The tendency for negro and white women was the same and the condition was much the same in all sections except that in the South a relatively larger number of white women than elsewhere had received an increase in rates. Rates and scheduled hours. As was found to be true of actual earnings, there was little relation between the compensation and the hours of work required. Table 10.—Median of the rates according to scheduled hours, by section WHITE WOMEN Section All places Middle western___________ Southern........... ........... .......... Over 50 Over 52 Over 48 Under and and and Over 54 48 hours 48 hours under 50 hours under 52 hours under 54 hours hours 50 hours 52 hours 54 hours $15. 05 $17. 85 $15.80 $15. 20 $15. 40 $14.30 $15.30 $14. 20 $13.65 15.15 14. 95 21.70 12. 90 14.30 15.40 18. 40 16.15 15. 25 18.65 w 12. 55 15.35 13. 55 15.65 15. 75 14.10 15.55 14. 55 14. 45 13.00 w 14.80 15.15 14.45 12.25 14.30 NEGRO WOMEN $12. 60 $13. 95 $9.50 $12. 65 $7.50 $8. 25 $9.90 $11.00 $7.80 13.00 13. 50 0 5.90 13.35 w « W 10.10 12.90 11.85 13.95 0 12.60 14.10 13.70 11.70 12.50 7.60 7.25 6.60 8.00 7.30 7.80 7.40 1 Not computed, owing to the small number involved. Policies with reference to overtime payments varied greatly. Most overtime payments where the unit was an hourly rate were on straight time, with only a few cases of an extra rate such as time and a half. Many employers who based their wage payments on a daily or weekly rate reported the absence of any policy with reference to payment for overtime, but implied that if deductions were not made when time was lost because of plant conditions the worker could hardly expect to be paid extra for an occasional hour beyond the regular schedule. In a few laundries a special attendance bonus was paid if a worker had 100 per cent attendance and no tardiness during the week. In a number of plants penalties in the form of a deduction equivalent to the earnings for 15 or 30 minutes or even an hour were exacted for tardiness. The earnings of all women reported are compared with (1) the earn ings of those who were timeworkers and (2) the rates of the timeworkers for whom this information was obtainable in Appendix Table XXIV. r, |_ .9m-m PLATE 6.—A WELL-PLANNED IRONING DEPARTMENT THE WORKERS The value of knowing one’s employees has been increasingly realized during the past 10 years. In 1918 a well-known economist wrote that management, though constantly improving its nonliving machines and its processes, was in the grip of tradition in its utiliza tion of its living machines.1 This “grip of tradition” is weakening and more and more are employers anxious to know not only what work is produced but by whom it is done. They have learned that it does matter whether a worker is native born and speaks English or is foreign born and does not. One superintendent who was asked whether he had any preferences as to native or foreign workers replied, “Well, on a single machine it doesn’t matter much, but if you have to shift them around to different kinds of work you can explain a lot better in the English language than in dumb show.” On some work there is a marked preference for women of a certain age group, “because they learn faster.” Not only the employer but the community is interested in learning about the woman who leaves home each morning and goes out to work. Is she young? Is she married? Has she children? Why is she working? These and many other questions are asked because the public, like the employer, has awakened to the fact that the worker is a neighbor and fellow citizen and that the old words are true, “For none of us liveth to himself, and no man dieth to himself.” Therefore, in any study of an industry facts must be given not only about the plants and their processes but about the workers themselves. Nativity and race. In the present laundry survey the large majority of the women workers were found to be native born. Over four-fifths of the 18,369 women who reported the country of their birth had been born in the United States. (See Appendix Table XXVI.) Per cent of the women— Section Native bom White Eastern. ________ ______________________________ Foreign bora Negro 48. 8 32. 4 18. 7 55. 55. 64. 13. 14. 29. . 86. 30. 14. 35. . 1 7 4 2 4 9 4 3 5 4 2 5 i Lee, Frederick S. The Human Machine in Industry. In Columbia University Quarterly, January, 1918, Vol. XX, No. 1, pp. 3-4. 87 88 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Among the native-born women the number of negroes was con siderable—two in every five women. Taking the country as a whole, the negro woman plays a far more important part in the laundry industry than does the foreign-born. This is evident from the figures of the last occupational census, which showed that more than a fourth (26.1 per cent) of the women laundry operatives were negro and 15.7 per cent were foreign born.2 In the present study both negro and foreign women constituted per cents greater than those of the census figures. It must be remembered, however, that large cities only were surveyed in the Women’s Bureau study, and besides having more foreign-born women than have the smaller cities and towns included in the census figures they have more avenues of employment for the white women of native birth. In the different sections of the country there was considerable variation in nativity and race. The States on the Pacific coast had the highest proportion of native white women and of foreign-born white; the Southern States had the lowest per cent in each of these groups, with negro women forming more than four-fifths (86.3 per cent) of the total. The largest numbers of foreign-born women had come from Mexico and Canada, the countries of origin of nearly 30 per cent (28.2) of all reporting. The Mexicans were found almost exclusively in the Western States and the Canadians in the Eastern and, to a much less degree, the middle-western groups. After Mexico and Canada, Italy supplied the most foreign bom, and w-omen from Germany, Ireland, and Poland comprised groups of between 200 and 300 each. The two cities with the highest per cents of foreign born were both coast cities—San Francisco with 44.9 per cent and Boston with 35.8 per cent. Outside of the southern cities, where negro women naturally were in a large majority, Chicago and Cleveland had the greatest propor tions of negro women. In Chicago negroes comprised more than three-fifths (62.9 per cent) of all the women workers and in Cleveland nearly one-half (49 per cent). It is of interest to note that the cities of Jersey City and Newark, combined, although north and near the seaboard, employed a much larger number of negro than of foreignborn women workers. " Age. The laundry industry has never been considered a young girl’s field of employment. The older woman, experienced in housework or for some time out of industry, is more likely to be found in a laundry than is the young girl beginning work. In the 1920 census of occupations, girls under 20 comprised a fifth (20.2 per cent) of the women laundry operatives, while in manufacturing and mechanical industries they comprised more than a fourth (26.8 per cent) of the women.3 The contrast is even more striking in the case of the women under 25, who constituted 36.7 per cent of the women in laundries and46.6 per cent of the women in manufacturing and mechanical industries.4 In the Women’s Bureau study the largest group of the white women reported, 27.8 per cent, were 30 and under 40 years of age, and there was also a large per cent 40 years and over. The extent to which 3 U. S. Bureau of the Census. Fourteenth Census: 1920, vol. 4, Population, Occupations, pp. 358-359. 3 Ibid., pp. 378-379 and 394-395, * Ibid., pp. 394-395, THE WORKERS 89 older women are in the industry is illustrated further by the fact that 1,090 women (8.9 per cent) were 50 years and over and 235 women (1.9 per cent) were as much as 60 years of age. (See Appendix Table XXVII.) The age distribution of white women in laundries is in marked contrast to that in cotton mills as shown in a Women’s Bureau study a few years ago. There nearly one-half (48 per cent) of the women were under 25 years of age and about a fifth (19.3 per cent) were 40 years and over.5 In different sections of the country the age groupings of the white women show some variation. The South had the largest per cent of workers under 20 years of age and the East the largest per cent of women 40 years and over. The negro women were, on the whole, younger than the white women. A larger proportion were in the groups under 20 years and a considerable smaller proportion were in the groups 40 years and over. Per cent of women— Section Under 20 years White All places___ Eastern______ Middle western Western Southern Negro 40 years and over White Negro 13. 4 15. 1 27. 7 12. 0 18. 15. 8. 18. 16. 5 11. 5 32. 27. 27. 16. 16. 13. 35. 10. 1 2 5 8 17. 3 3 2 8 2 0 2 0 8 The relatively higher proportion of white workers than of negroes 40 years of age or more was found in each section except the West where very few negro women were reported. Marital status. The knowledge of a woman’s maritai status is becoming of more and more interest to the employer and to all persons concerned with economic and social problems. For many years the single woman has had her place in the'economic world. It has been understood also that if a woman married and her husband died or left her, naturally she would go to work, wherever she could find a job. But that a woman with a husband should seek work outside her home is a more recent and less readily accepted condition. Nevertheless, married women in increasing numbers have had to go to work to help in the support of their families. In 1890, according to census figures, the per cent of gainfully employed women who were married was 13.9; in 1900, 15.4; in 1910, 24.7; and in 1920, 23.6 In a study made by the Women’s Bureau several years ago it was found that practically all the women who had husbands working contributed all their earnings to the family.7 That there is, as a rule, very real 5 U. S. Department of Labor. Women’s Bureau. Lost Time and Labor Turnover in Cotton Mills. Bui. 52, 1926, p. 26. 6 U. S. Bureau of the Census. Fourteenth Census: 1920, vol. 4, Population, Occupations, p. 693. 7 U. S. Department of Labor, Women s Bureau. The Share of Wage-Earning Women in Family Support. Bui. 30, 1923, p. 12. 103127°—30-----7 90 A SURVEY OP LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS necessity that forces the women to work, whether they are married or single, is shown by the agents’ interviews with the workers in their homes and the reasons for working they reported. (See p. 92.) In the present survey married women were the largest group. (See Appendix Table XXV.) A summary of the figures by sections follows. Per cent of women— Section Single White All places____ Eastern ._ _ Middle western_ _ Western Southern__ ____ Widowed, separated, or divorced Married White Negro White Negro Negro 33. 6 28. 9 43. 1 41. 1 23. 3 30. 0 49. 35. 24. 38. 43. 26. 5. 29. 32. 43. 49. 33. 40. 43. 57. 39. 18. 21. 26. 28. 16. 29. 36. 31. 5 1 5 3 4 7 3 3 2 0 0 8 4 9 9 4 3 9 5 9 2 5 8 3 It is probable that this is a slightly lower proportion of married women than was actually the case, as in the home visits several women who had reported themselves single on their factory cards admitted to the investigators that they were married. They were afraid to let it be known that they were married because there was so much talk about married women losing their jobs and employment was necessary. The census figures of 1920 show a smaller proportion of laundry operatives who were married women (32.8 per cent) 8 than do the Women’s Bureau figures (42.7 per cent). There may have been such a change since 1920 but it is much more probable that the census inclusion of small cities and towns, with fewer opportunities of em ployment for women, results in a higher proportion of single women in laundries. The largest proportions of married women were in the West and the lowest in the East and South, while larger proportions of widowed and separated women were found in the West and South. Time with the firm. There appears to be a fairly uniform opinion among employers that a changing labor force is not an efficient one. Not only is it expensive to train new workers but the amount of work produced is less. Among manufacturing plants in one large city it was found that every establishment that had decreased its labor turnover during a year’s time had increased its output.9 An analyst of labor problems says “separations are significant because indicative of causes of discontent, of low industrial morale, and of defects in managerial policies.” 10 One laundry manager went so far as to say that he assumed all labor turnover to be the fault of management, or at least its concern, s U. S. Bureau of the Census. Fourteenth Census: 1920, vol. 4, Population, Occupations, p. 693. 9 Fisher, Boyd. Industrial Loyalty. London, George Routledge & Sons (Ltd.). 1918, p. 24. Slichter, Sumner H. The Scope and Nature of the Labor Turnover Problem. In Quarterly Journal of Economics, February, 1920, p. 343. 91 THE WORKERS and acted on that assumption. This is a good policy for action, but without, doubt a certain amount of change is unavoidable and probably it is beneficial. Nevertheless, any firm or industry in which many of the workers remain over a period of years can feel that its condi tion is to that extent healthy. According to plant records, about one-half of the white womeai had been on the pay roll for at least a year at the time of the survey, and as many as 39.7 per cent of the negro women had this record. From cards filled out by the workers themselves more details were obtained as to length of service in the present place of employment. (See Appendix Table XXVIII.) From these cards it appears that the proportion of white women was greatest in the group of workers who had remained with the same laundry one and under five years, a little more than two-fifths (43.1 per cent) of the women being in this group. Almost as many women (37.2 per cent) were reported as having worked less than a year. The majority of these had had less than six months’ experience, this group of beginners comprising 22.9 per cent of all the white women reported. The long-time service group reported to have been with the same firm 15 years and over contained less than 3 per cent of the women. This is a considerably smaller per cent than was found in the Women’s Bureau cotton-mill study, where 9.7 per cent of the women workers reported service of 15 years or more in the same mill.11 Per cent distribution of— Years with the firm (all places) White women Negro women Under 1 __ ____ 1 and under 5 5 and under 10 and under 15 15 and over____ __ ______ _ _______ _ __ _ _ __ _____ __ 37 43 13 3. 2. 2 1 4 9 4 40 42 13 3. . 2 K 1 1 9 The proportion of negro Women in each length-of-service group followed very closely that of the white women. The greatest differ ence was in the period 15 years and over, with a smaller per cent of negroes than whites; and a larger per cent of negroes were found with experience of less than a year. To see a plant in operation is to have a picture of the work and the conditions under which it is done, but not of the extent to which differences in the woman herself may determine the kind of work in which she is successful. If young, does she do certain kinds of work? If old, others? What are her reasons for working if married and if single? Has she been doing tins kind of work long? Has she tried other work and does she prefer some kinds of jobs to others? These were the principal subjects on which information was sought through talks with the women workers themselves. For this purpose 1,859 home visits were made, 1,322 on white women and 537 on negro. Occasionally the women were willing to give information on some subjects and not on all, but that these cases were the exception is 11 U. S. Department of Labor. Women’s Bureau. Lost Time and Labor Turnover in Cotton Mills. Bui. 52, 1926, p. 99. 92 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS shown by the fact that to the question of age'—sometimes a sensitive point—only 16 white and 3 negro women were unwilling to answer. Age and occupation. Four occupations included 86.9 per cent of all the women for whom occupation was reported; these were flat-work ironing, marking and sorting, pressing, and hand ironing. (See Appendix Tables XXIX and XXX.) The largest proportion of young girls, those under 20 years of age, were on flat-work ironing—shaking, feeding, or folding. This naturally would be the case, as an inexperienced worker usually is started on this job. In spite of the fact just mentioned, a rather high proportion of white flat-work ironers, nearly a fourth (23.9 per cent), were at least 40 years of age. The women marking or sorting had the largest pro portion of workers in the middle group, 20 and under 40 years. This work probably is the most popular of the four jobs, whether due to the work itself or to the higher pay that generally accompanies it. Hand ironing is an old occupation for women, so it was not surprising to find that nearly one-half (46 per cent) of the white women in this occupation were 40 years and over. Only 6.2 per cent of the girls doing hand ironing were under 20. About three-fifths of the white women on presses were 20 and under 40 years, with a considerably larger group 40 years and over than under 20. Per cent of womenOccupation Marking and sorting.. Flat-work ironing Pressing Hand ironing________ Number of women reporting Under 20 years 20 and under 40 years 40 years and over White Negro White Negro White Negro White 245 507 189 161 42 222 80 125 14. 7 21. 5 11. 1 16. 7 23. 9 10. 0 6. 2 8. 8 70. 54. 59. 47. 81. 68. 83. 69. 15. 23. 29. 46. 2 6 3 8 0 0 8 6 1 9 6 0 Negro 1 2. 8. 6. 21. 4 1 3 6 11 woman. The negro women had about the same proportions as the white in flat-work ironing and in pressing, but comparatively few were markers and sorters and a larger proportion did hand ironing. The age dis tribution was quite different for the two races, the white women having considerable proportions at least 40 years of age, while only among hand ironers were any considerable number of negroes as much as 40. The proportions under 20 years of age were fairly alike for the two races, but only in one occupation—flat-work ironing—was the number of negro girls significant. Of the middle group—20 and under 40 years of age—a much larger proportion of the negroes than of the white women were under 30 Reason for working. The question “Why are you working?” was answered in various ways by 1,315 white women visited in their homes, but in 91.7 per cent of the replies necessity was the reason. (See Appendix Table THE WORKERS 93 XXXI.) Usually the response was brief—“Because I have to”— and then more details would be given, such as “I have only myself and I must live,” or “I have children and no husband and what else can I do?” Even with the remainder of the reasons given, it is a question whether some of them might not be classed as necessity rather than choice. Such answers as “To pay doctor and hospital bills,” “To educate the children,” “To save for the future” might properly be classed under necessities and not luxuries. A very small number of women—26, comprising only 2 per cent—were working quite frankly for extras, including cars, and another 26 reported that they worked because they wanted to and were “used to it.” All the single women, with one exception, were working to support themselves or to support themselves and help their families. A much larger proportion, 72.4 per cent, were working solely for their own support than were working for themselves and others, although the latter group comprised more than a fourth—27.4 per cent—of the single women. Most of the widowed, separated, and divorced women also showed support of self and families to be the reason for their working, but a smaller per cent than of the single women were working for themselves only and a larger group had dependent families. Over one-half were working for their own support, and 45.2 per cent had family responsibilities. dhe group of married women gave far more reasons why they were working, but the pressure of actual need, as shown by the reasons, was almost as great as among the single women or the group without the husband. More than a third (36 per cent) of the married women interviewed reported quite simply that they were working to support themselves and their families, and another 10.1 per cent were working for a temporary need, such as the high cost of living, or to pay accumulated bills, to educate the children, or to keep up payments on the house or furniture. The largest group, however, stated that they were working because of failure on the part of the husband. In the largest proportion of cases (18 per cent) the hus band s work was slack or not steady and the woman’s earnings were the source of the steady family income. Another reason probably connected with the industrial situation was that the husband was out oi work. Slightly less than a tenth of the answers gave this as the cause. A larger proportion of answers than those giving “out of work,” as a reason, laid the necessity to the husband’s incapacity through illness, accident, or old age. Of 495 women, 64 (12.9 per cent) were supporting or assisting with the support of their families with the husband unable to work. In a study made several years ago of the woman worker and the disposition of her earnings, the following sentence was one of the conclusions reached: “In general, women are wage earners not only for their own entire support but to meet a very definite responsibility as sharers in the support of others or the maintenance of higher standards of living in their families.”12 The truth of this statement, as applied to laundries, is illustrated by the fact that 9 of every 10 married women reported that they were working to help in the support of their families. The reasons for working given by the negro women were very similar to those given by the white. No single women reported any other ouppori. of Women’s Bureau. The Share of Wage-Earning Women in Family 15Ul. 30, 1923, pp. 21-22. 94 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS reasons than self-support or support of self and family, and the same was the reply made by all the widowed, separated, and divorced negro women with the single exception of a woman “working from choice.” Married women comprised a rather larger proportion of the negro women than they did of the white, but over three-fifths (61.8 per cent) were working to support themselves and families. A considerably smaller per cent of women referred to the husbands as the cause of their working, whether incapacitated, out of work, or working short time. A smaller proportion of negro women than of white reported working for a definite object, such -as buying a home or furniture or saving for the future, and none said they were working to educate their children. With the negro woman, as with the white, the need of support for herself or herself and family was the principal reason for her working. It would be reasonable to suppose that when a married woman, or one that had been married, was working to help support her family, that family would be composed of young children. It was surpris ing, therefore, to find that only a little more than two-fifths of the white women who were married and less than a third of those living apart from their husbands reported any children under 14 years of age. (See Appendix Table XXXII.) More of the married women than of the widowed, separated, or divorced had children under 14, and a considerably larger proportion of the married women also had more than one child (21.3 and 11.4 per cent, respectively). More than 68 per cent of those who had been married and 58 per cent of the married women had no children under 14. The proportion of married negro women who had children under 14 was a little over one-third (34.1 per cent), and the per cent was about the same for those women who at some time had been married. A slightly smaller proportion of women had more than one child under 14 years in the married group than among the widowed, separated, or divorced, and the proportion of such women was about a sixth of all the negro women who were or had been married—somewhat above the proportion of the white women with a similar marital status who had more than one child under 14. Time in the trade. The laundry industry is one that requires considerable skill in some of its occupations, but in others a few weeks will make a fairly good operator. Even in work where skill is required, such as hand ironing, in many cases a woman’s experience in the home makes her already trained when she applies to the laundry for employment. Because of this, women of all ages who have never worked outside the home turn to the laundry for work. If a woman finds it neces sary to work only every now and then, the laundry is available even though she moves from city to city, and its work continues year in and year out. The woman who has once done laundry work is reasonably sure of a job if, after several years at home or engaged in other kinds of work, she wishes to return to the laundry. It is not surprising, then, to find a considerable number of women whose experience in the industry extends over a good many years. (See Appendix Table XXXIII.) Even the fact that 15.4 per cent of the 1,296 white women reporting in the present study had worked off and on in laundries for 95 THE WORK EES 15 years or more does not give a fair picture of their length of service. The laundry industry has grown rapidly in the past few years. From 1925 to 1927, according to census figures, the number of laundry employees increased by 19.7 per cent.13 Therefore, wdien the propor tion of employees with long years of service is figured on totals that include large numbers of workers added recently because of industrial expansion, the employees of long standing do not show the important part that they actually play in the industry. More than one-half of the white women interviewed had an over-all period of less than five years, and this large number may indicate a growth in the industry. If absences of three months and over are considered as separations from the industry the proportion of women actually at work for long periods naturally is less than when such absences are counted as time lost. Only 7.8 per cent of the white women reporting had actually put in 15 years or more of work, com pared to twice their number who had worked off and on during so long a period. Nevertheless, it is interesting to find that half of the women with an over-all of 15 years or more actually had worked for 15 or more years and that they constituted nearly a sixth of all the workers. Per cent for whom time specified was— Years in laundry industry Actually worked (1,29(5 white women reporting) Over-all1 Under 1_ 5 and under 10 10 and under 15 15 and over 16. 38. 21. 7. 15. 7 3 8 7 4 19. 45. 20. 6. 7. 3 3 8 9 8 Over-all1 15. 46. 25. 8. 4. 4 3 3 6 4 Actually worked (525 negro women reporting) 21. 52. 19. 4. 1. 7 6 4 8 5 i Period elapsed since entering laundry work. The majority (55.1 per cent) of the white women had an over-all of less than five years, but those who actually had worked less than five years constituted nearly two-thirds (64.6 per cent). As before suggested, this very large grouping of women with less than five years’ experience probably indicates the growth of the industry, though very much the same proportion of women in all the various Women’s Bureau studies combined have reported less than five years in their respective trades.14 Naturally, more women had begun laundry work as much as 10 years before than had worked continuously in the industry for as much as 10 years, and the number of women who had actually worked less than 5 years is greater than the number with so short an over-all period. Negro women have much smaller per cents than white in the group with service of 15 years or more. Women who had worked off and on during 15 years or more comprised but 4.4 per cent of the negro 13 U. S. Department of Commerce. Census of Commercial Power Laundries, 1927. News release. Feh. 25, 1929. i* Uniiublished data compiled from Women’s Bureau bulletins. 96 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS women compared to 15.4 per cent of the white women. Conversely, the proportion of negro women with experience of less than five years is greater than the proportion of white women. Work experience. It has already been seen that an over-all period in one industry of a number of years may include months and even years not actually employed at that work. During these periods of absence the worker may be in her own home, busy with household duties, or she may be employed in other industries. Two-thirds of the 1,322 white women interviewed had, at some time since first going to work, done other work than laundering, and about 1 in 5 had been employed in more than one other industry. (See Appendix Table XXXIV.) The largest number of white women (21 per cent) reported having worked in manufacturing establishments and about a tenth (10.7 per cent) had been in domestic service. Sixty-four women (4.8 per cent) had worked in stores, and smaller numbers in hotels or restaurants and offices or professional work. The 536 negro women reporting showed a larger per cent than did the white who had worked in other industries besides laundries. Four of every five women had worked outside of laundries. The largest group had been employed in domestic service, these comprising more than two-fifths (43.5 per cent) of all the negro women reporting. A third of the white women and a fifth of the negro had worked solely in laundries, but many of these women had worked in more than one establishment. The reasons for shifting from one job to another may be grouped under three general headings: Personal reasons, such as illness, mar riage, or home duties; industrial reasons, such as insufficient earn ings, too long hours, slack work, or discharge; and general reasons, such as weather, or strike. (See Appendix Table XXXVI.) The fol lowing brief summary of the principal industries classifies the reasons for leaving jobs given by the white women interviewed. Separations of white women from— Type of reason for leaving and Manufactur Other laundry Domestic job serv ing (1524 sepa (1,157 sepa personal ice (358 sepa rations) rations) rations) Stores (151 separations) Hotels and restaurants (204 sepa rations) NUMBER Personal-___ — Industrial__________ General.. 781 302 74 208 147 3 256 362 6 75 74 2 101 101 2 49. 7 49. 0 1. 3 49. 5 49. 5 PER CENT Personal_____ Industrial _ General_____ . __ 67. 5 26. 1 6. 4 58. 1 41. 1 .8 41. 0 58. 0 1. 0 1. 0 THE WORKERS 97 The reasons given by white women for leaving other laundries show that much the highest per cent had quit for personal reasons, and this was the case, though to a less extent, of domestic and per sonal service. Of the other three groups, stores and hotels and restaurants show that practically the same proportions of women had left for industrial and personal reasons, but almost three-fifths of the women who had been in manufacturing had left for reasons connected with the industry. Certain special reasons within these groups stand out prominently. Among personal reasons for leaving work, marriage and change of residence were very important in each industry group. Of the women who had been in domestic and personal service, more than a fourth had left because of marriage; of those in laundries, about a fifth had left because of change of residence. “Earnings insufficient” and “laid off” were the two principal causes of change under industrial reasons. The former was most prominent in laundries, and more women had been laid off in manu facturing establishments. Certain reasons that were not especially important in all industries combined were important in a single in dustry; for example, “dispute” in laundries, “no work” in domestic and personal service, and “work too hard” in hotels and restaurants. Nearly one-third (31.9 per cent) of all the reasons given for leaving work in hotels and restaurants were “work too hard,” “hours too long,” or “dissatisfied with conditions.” Under domestic and per sonal service the two industrial conditions “hours too long” and “no work” comprised nearly a fifth of the reasons given, while under manufacturing “laid off” and “insufficient earnings” were more than one-fourth of all the reasons given. Type of work preferred. “All work carries with it mental and physical reactions, and it is the nature of these reactions which make work a pleasure or a burden,” was said by a man experienced in handling thousands of workers.15 16 The truth of this statement is apparent, and the question as to the nature of the reactions is the first step in throwing light on the subject. In order to do this, information must be obtained from the worker, and this was one of the subjects taken up with the 1,859 women, white and negro, in the home visits. As has been shown, the majority of women had not confined them selves to one kind of work. They had gone from one industry to another, and in many cases the same woman had had experience in family, hotel, and factory work as well as in laundries. An effort was made to find out, as a result of each woman’s experience, how other work that she had done compared with what she was doing in a laundry. (See Appendix Table XXXV.) A preference for laundry work as contrasted with that in other industries was expressed by 587 of the 740 women, in 14 different cities, who stated their prefer ences for one kind of work or another. These 587 women not only reported a greater liking for laundry work but, in all but 9 cases, stated why they preferred it. Reasons for their preference were 15 Scheflel, Carl. The Mental Hygiene of Industrial Workers. In Journal of Industrial Hygiene, September, 1920, p. 182. 98 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS given also by 121 of the 153 women who preferred other jobs to laundry work. About three-tenths (29.9 per cent) of the women preferring laundry work gave as their major reason “better hours”—better, that is, than those they had found in domestic and personal service, hotels and restaurants, stores, factories, or cleaning office buildings. It is especially interesting to find so large a group preferring laundry work because of better hours. For years the laundry industry has struggled to combine the service demanded by the housewife, which was to send her work to the laundry on Monday and have it returned promptly, with keeping an even flow of work for the employees each day through the week. In a report made of laundries in a large city in 1916 the following general statement is made of conditions then existing: An outstanding feature of the study of the laundry industry is that both men and women work long hours for three or four days a week and then there is a let-up for the remaining days of the week. The physical examinations proved that these long days often strain the health and vitality of the workers beyond the power of recovery during the shorter days.” 10 From the emphasis by the workers in this study on the better hours m laundries it would appear that excessively long daily hours early in the week had been eliminated, to a considerable extent, and a better distribution of the work had been accomplished. Better pay was given as a reason for preferring laundry work in something more than a quarter (26.8 per cent) of the answers. About half these replies were from workers who had been in factories and a little more, than a fifth were from those formerly in domestic and personal service. Other comparisons were that laundry work was easier, the comment of a good many women who had been in fac tories., restaurants and hotels, and domestic service; it was steadier, especially so in comparison to factory work; it was cleaner than factory and domestic work; and in the opinion of a considerable num ber it was likely to have better working conditions—including such factors as constant standing, temperature, contact with the public, ’wcuking alone than other places where they had been employed. .Explanations or additional details of the expressed preference frequently were given. The question of “better pay” often was coupled with that of shorter hours and no Sunday work when compared with domestic service or restaurants and hotels, and the late Saturday evenmg work was mentioned as against store work. Some rather surprising reasons were given; for example, that of the woman who preferred laundry work to domestic service because she did not like working m water all the time” and of the women who preferred a laundry to a cotton mill because “hours were shorter and it was cooler. Both restaurant work and stores had the disadvantage to some and the advantage to others that clothes were important and you had to meet the public.” In general, the women pre ferring laundry work seemed to believe that the hours were better than in domestic work, in hotel and restaurant work, and in some cases m stores; that the pay was better and steadier than in factories and domestic service; the conditions of work were less hard than in Dep?rtmentLoflHeaitaiin.d [my/f' p'^/ Th6 C°St °f Ctam Clothes in Terms of Health- New York City, THE WORKERS 99 factories; and unpublished details show that it was less confining than domestic service and hotels and restaurants. Another side of the picture is given by the women—one in five— wjio preferred other work to that of laundries. It must be remem bered that all women from whom answers were obtained were at the time of the interview at work in laundries. Undoubtedly this would weight their replies, to a certain extent, in favor of laundries, and women disliking laundry work probably would be found hi greater numbers in other industries. The largest number of those stating reasons for preferring other work gave “better pay” as their reason, and most of these comparisons were between factories and laundries. Working conditions in other industries were pre ferred to those in laundries in a number of cases and most of these were in favor of factory work. “Better hours,” the most important point expressed in favor of laundries, was mentioned by very few women as a reason for preferring other work to that in laundries. Some of the women said that pay was better in restaurants than in laundries, because meals were supplied, and the same reason, with lodging sometimes mentioned, was given for preferring domestic service to laundry work. Several women preferred factory work because it was cooler and because they could sit at their work, and others preferred store or restaurant work because they liked meeting the public and could wear better clothes. Perhaps the oddest preference was expressed by the woman who favored the position of attendant in an insane asylum to work in a laundry because it was “less monotonous and more restful.” On the whole, “better pay,” especi ally in factory work, was the most important reason given for pre ferring other work to that in laundries. APPENDIXES APPENDIX A—GENERAL TABLES APPENDIX B—SCHEDULE FORMS 102 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS APPENDIX A.—GENERAL TABLES Table I.—Dry-bulb reading near presses and flat-work ironerst by outside temperature Dry-bulb temperature out of doors Total....................... 5° and under 10° ____ 10° and under 15°_._ 15° and under 20°_. _ ___ 25° and under 30° 30° and under 35° 45° and under 50°__ _ 76° and under 80°.................. Number of dry-bulb readings near presses and flat-work ironers Num that were— ber of drybulb and 60° and 65° and 70° and 75° and 80° and 85° and read 55° under under under under under under under 90° and ings over 60° 65° 70° 75° 80° 85° 90° 672 1 7 3 3 1 2 46 2 12 13 37 19 53 55 138 85 117 37 37 46 15 2 1 3 4 1 6 6 12 10 1 I 4 1 ......... 196 256 1 1 2 9 3 2 19 10 16 23 56 25 28 1 3 2 128 33 5 1 6 11 2 4 23 18 48 39 54 4 4 16 5 8 10 26 1 4 22 10 15 2 15 25 3 7 11 8 1 6 Table II.—Wet-bulb reading near presses and flat-work ironers, by outside temperature Wet-bulb temperature out of doors Number of wet-bulb readings near presses and flat-work Num ironers that were— ber of wetbulb and 55° and 60° and 65° and 70° and 75° and read 50° under under under under under under 85° and ings over 55° 60° 65° 70° 75° 80° Total. ggg&ggggg 10° and under 15°. 15° and under 20°. 0 and under 25° 0 and under 30°. ° and under 35°. ° and under 40°. ° and under 45°. ° and under 50°. 0 and under 55°. ° and under 60°. ° and under 65°. 65° and under 70°. 70° and under 75°. 80° and over......... 78 ........ 1 __ . 11 ...... 41 2 2 22 2 48 97 137 127 83 56 13 25 3 3 3 1 ......... . ______ ______ ............ ______ ............ 51 8 7 4 17 17 11 6 1 270 212 1 1 3 18 5 31 45 69 61 24 2 12 11 2 5 9 24 36 47 39 31 3 3 1 1 3 2 4 2 1 103 APPENDIX A—GENERAL TABLES Table III.—Wet-bulb reading near presses and fiat-work ironers by dry-bulb ■ reading .........wr----- --........... 1 ' Number of wet-bulb readings near presses and flat-work ironers that were— Num ber of read 50° and 55° and 60° and 65° and 70° and 75° and 85° and ings under under under under under under under 65° 70° 80° 90° 55° 60° 75° Dry-bulb reading 65° and under 70°_________ 703 14 1 8 1 47 208 263 138 33 5 3 6 4 85 281 4 23 38 18 121 2 227 82 1 13 1 18 104 35 2 44 124 50 9 1 17 45 16 3 6 1 5 2 Table IV.—Relative humidity near presses and flat-work ironers, by dry-bulb reading Number of cases where relative humidity near presses and flat-work ironers was— Total num ber of cases Dry-bulb reading Total_____ ____ 55° and under 60°. _ 60° and under 65°. ___ 702 ____ 1 8 70° and under 75° 75° and under 80° ________ 80° and under 85° ____ 85° and under 90°__ __ __ _ 90° and over . 47 208 203 137 33 5 15 and 20 and 25 and 30 and 35 and 40 and 45 and 50 and under under under under under under under under 20 per 25 per 30 per 35 per 40 per 45 per 50 per 55 per cent cent cent cent cent cent cent cent 2 5 2 1 1 2 . 1 17 4 6 6 1 37 53 83 94 3 9 13 7 3 2 6 22 20 23 29 23 ' 29 44 2 3 90 2 ' 29 1 Number of eases where relative humidity near presses and flat-work ironers was—Continued Dry-bulb reading Total 55° 60° 65° 70° 75° 80° 85° and under 60°_________ and under 65° and under 70° _ _ _ _ . and under 75°_____ _ and under 80° and under 85°--- ___ and under 90°.. 55 and 60 and 65 and 70 and 75 and 80 and 85 and 90 and 95 per under under under under under under under under cent 60 per 65 per 70 per 75 per 80 per 85 per 90 per 95 per and cent cent cent cent cent cent cent cent over 110 83 2 1 1 6 9 27 51 18 3 28 33 12 2 58 39 18 7 3 17 3 3 5 4 2 2 5 21 21 8 1 4 1 1 3 1 1 1 12 5 2 6 1 1 104 Table A SURVEY OP LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS V.—Impression of agent as to temperature near presses and flat-work ironers, by dry-bulb reading . Total number of cases Dry-bulb reading Total............. ... .............. 55° and under 60°_______________ 00° and under 65° ________ 65° and under 70®__ ________ _ _ 70° and under 75°_________________ 75° and under 80°______________ _ 80° and under 85°_ _________ 85° and under 90°. ___________ 90° and under 95°____________ Number of cases with dry-bulb reading as specified where temperature seemed— Comfort able Cool 604 42 1 8 1 42 185 230 109 26 3 Warm 282 7 15 24 2 109 Very warm 178 Hot 37 65 1 100 Table \I.—Scheduled weekly hours of laundries in other Women’s Bureau surveys, by section. State, and date of survey f Number of establishments and number and per cent of women whose scheduled weekly hours were— Total number reported 48 and under Section, State, and date of survey Over 48 and under 54 54 and over Women Women Women Estab Estab Estab Establish Women lish lish lishments ments Num Per ments Num Per ments Num Per ber cent ber cent ber cent All places Eastern. _____________ Rhode Island, 1920__ New Jersey, 1922 Delaware, 1924 North Central.__ ... _ _ Ohio, 1922__ ............. Illinois, 1921____ ____ South Central Arkansas, 1922......... Missouri, 1922__ Oklahoma, 1924___ Southern_________ _____ Georgia, 1921 * Kentucky, 1921__ Maryland, 1921. . South Carolina, 1921-22. Alabama, 1922____ Mississippi, 1925__ Tennessee, 1925 . _ i 266 8,959 119 1,107 5 108 9.8 10 467 42.2 6 532 48.1 4 i 10 5 166 745 196 2 50 58 30.1 7.8 1 6 67 327 73 40. 4 43.9 37.2 1 3 2 49 3fi0 123 62.8 i 66 2,312 23 480 20.8 MO 1, 542 66.7 9 290 12.5 i 24 i 42 1,060 1, 252 9 14 230 250 21.7 9 i 73 2,035 10 286 i 19 2 i 32 363 965 707 1 108 14 17 i 17 13 17 i 12 18 22 67 1,401 3 15.6 112 3,933 3 43.9 108 3, 625 40.5 20.0 19 2 21 830 712 78.3 56.9 290 23.2 14.1 21 507 24.9 53 1,242 61.0 3 5 30 175 81 8.3 18. 1 11.5 1 6 11 14 292 204 3.0 30.3 28.9 17 13 20 322 498 422 59.7 3, 505 29 527 15.0 41 1,417 40.4 43 1, 561 44.5 350 522 693 233 467 263 977 3 3 9 29 91 103 26 219 30 29 8.3 17.4 14.9 1 8 3 2 11.2 46.9 11.4 3.0 5 9 9 5 6 3 4 129 283 578 103 151 49 124 36.9 54.2 83.4 44.2 32.3 18. 6 12.7 6 5 192 148 7 3 9 104 97 12 824 84.3 1 Details aggregate more than total, because some establishments appear in more than 1-hour group. ’ Includes 1 establishment (32 women) that worked every other Sunday, alternating weeks of 51 hours and 72 uuui a. 3 Exclusive of Atlanta. Table VII.—Scheduled daily hours of laundries in other Women’s Bureau surveys, by section, State, and date of survey 103127° — 30 Number of establishments and number and per cent of women whose scheduled daily hours were— number reported Under 8 Over 8 and under 9 8 Section, State, and date of survey Over 9 and under 10 9 Over 10 and under 11 10 oo 7 i 273 9,247 14 481 5.2 25 678 7.3 Eastern., 19 1,107 1 24 2.2 1 8 .7 New Jersey, 1922. _ Delaware, 1924___ North Central_____ 4 166 745 196 2, 386 1 10 24 n. 5 1 8 1.1 Ohio, 1922_______ Illinois, 1924_____ South Central........... Arkansas, 1922___ Missouri, 1922____ Oklahoma, 1924__ Southern.................... Georgia, 1920 and 1921 ......................... Kentucky, 1921 Maryland, 1921 South Carolina, 1921-22 Alabama, 1922. ......... Mississippi, 1925___ Tennessee, 1925 5 167 24 143 76 19 25 32 111 15 17 20 13 16 12 18 1 4 1, 060 67 27 1,326 2,208 363 1,138 707 3, 546 3 40 390 522 752 2 1 233 409 263 977 4 27 0.7 1.1 8 234 9.8 11 301 12.6 2.0 3 5 3 111 10.5 4 7 3 128 173 12.1 68 13.0 3.1 141 4,862 10 52.6 599 54.1 93 2 5 433 73 3 35 1,474 56. 0 58.1 37.2 61.8 17 821 18 653 70 1,979 18 346 23 995 29 638 810 26 77.5 49.2 89. 6 95.3 87.4 90.2 9.3 7 3 4.7 1.1 1 1 1 2 123 161 17 92 52 62 7.4 1.7 1 2 10 51 17 301 4. 5 2.4 8.5 2.8 2 62 8.2 1 1 2 13 30 40 3.3 5. 7 5.3 4 21 5 106 233 254 27. 2 44. 6 33.8 4.6 ... 1 4 26 156 36 11.2 19 38.1 13. 7 4 3 4 66 2 62 89 38. 2 16.1 23. 6 8.1 1 6 1 22.8 44 1, 709 18.5 43 1,438 15.6 192 17.3 49 4 123 83 29. 5 2. 7 62. 8 3.5 4 83 6.3 35 1,163 32.8 3 284 25.7 4 3 284 38.1 1 1 2 7 267 11.2 267 20.1 34 1,158 32.7 108 34 352 27. 7 6.5 46.8 5 9 5 6 73 154 31.3 37. 7 3 4 11 437 1 7 20 151 225 23 38. 7 43.1 3.1 45 14 7 3 165 7 540 19.3 3.4 62. 7 55.3 2 2 1 12 0.1 1 12 0.3 12 3.1 1 Details aggregate more than total, because some establishments appear in more than 1 hour group 2 Includes 9 women in 1 establishment having a 5-hour day on Monday. 3 Includes 11 women in 1 establishment having a 5-hour day on Monday, 18 in 1 establishment having a 7-hour day on Friday, and 22 in 1 establishment having an 8-hour day on Friday. * Includes 5 establishments working 8 to 9 hours on Monday and 1 establishment working 9 hours on Monday and Tuesday APPENDIX A— GENERAL TABLES Women Women Women Women Women Women Women Estab EstabEstabEstabEstabEstabEstabEstablish- W omen lishlishlishlishlishlishlishments ments Num- Per ments Num- Per ments Num- Per ments Num- Per ments Num- Per ments Num- Per ments Num- Peiber cent ber cent ber cent ber cent ber cent ber cent ber cent 123 O Or 106 A survey of laundries and their women workers Table Total number reported VIII.—Scheduled Saturday Number of establishments and number and per cent of women whose scheduled Saturday hours were— None Under 5 5 and under 6 Section and city Women Women Women Estab Estab EstabEstablish Women lish lishlishments ments Num Per ments Num Per ments Num Per ber cent ber cent ber cent All places. i 288 19, 461 5.6 50 2,111 10.8 80 5,159 26.5 Eastern._ _ ................ ........ 151 2,738 7 143 5.2 20 1,055 38.5 15 867 31.7 Boston_____________ i 30 11 10 1,546 645 547 6 134 8.7 1 10 6 9 1.6 4 2 212 342 32.4 32. 9 62.5 9 3 3 572 176 119 37.0 27.3 _____ . i 125 7,720 26 833 10.8 25 962 12.5 57 3,884 50.3 Chicago................ .......... Cincinnati Cleveland__ _______ Des Moines. __ _______ Detroit........ .......... ...... Indianapolis______ ____ Milwaukee___________ Minneapolis and St. Paul. i 21 1 14 16 i6 i 20 2 35 37 219 2.0 2 3 4 6.3 20.4 3 867 440 821 49.8 75.0 76.4 13 470 28.5 6 32.0 40.5 5 5 429 512 30 5 3 5 5 s 101 8.1 3.9 3.2 115 45 34 10 1331 307 217 10 8 11 i 13 i 23 1, 741 587 1,074 238 1, 648 959 536 937 65 5, 581 21 12 17 15 2,629 769 1,433 750 147 3,422 3 108 3.2 5 94 2.7 7 384 11.2 i 12 i 11 1 28 2.5 1 2 12 1.1 15 1.7 3 6 6 1,106 862 403 500 « 304 23 27.5 2.7 1 53 10.6 55 11.0 l 12 551 2 1 14 2.5 2 .4 Providence .. Middle western Western Los Angeles.._ Portland__ ... San Francisco. Seattle___ _ _ ... ... ______ Southern Atlanta_____ ______ Birmingham__________ Jacksonville____ ______ .Richmond St. Petersburg and Tampa________ _________ 12 36 1,084 2 1 1 21 21 80 2.2 14.5 1 1 501 6.6 7.7 3.2 4 2 10.8 21.8 12 614 26.0 53.4 37.5 65.5 1 24 1.7 1 201 1 Details aggregate more than total, because some establishments appear in more than 1 hour group. 2 9 women in 1 establishment had a Saturday never exceeding 2 hours and no work on Saturday in summer. 107 APPENDIX A—GENERAL TABLES hours, by section and city Number of establishments and number and per cent of women whose scheduled Saturday hours were—-Continued 6 and under 7 7 and under 8 8 and under 9 9 and under 10 10 Women Women Women Women EstabEstabEstabEstabli6hlishlishlishlishmenfcs Num- Per ments Num- Per ments Num- Per ments Num- Per ments ber cent ber cent ber cent ber cent 26 1,568 8.1 19 1,440 7.4 72 6,135 31.5 5 279 10.2 3 137 5.0 1 118 4.3 1 139 5.1 3 202 13.1 3 137 8.9 2 77 14.1 1 118 18.3 1 139 21.6 12 636 8.2 5 319 4.1 3 89 1.2 12 907 1 1 20 1.1 11.1 1 167 9.6 5 447 3 289 48 1 1 1 1 50 21.0 21 3 3 108 306 45. 4 18.6 1 46 4.9 65 2 70 29.4 1 19 3.5 99.3 5 146 17.5 5.0 12.7 15.6 1 14 .3 63 5, 543 1 14 .5 20 12 2,615 99.5 769 100.0 1,409 98.3 750 100.0 1 1 68 71 10 1.3 7.4 1.9 16 15 8 639 18.7 11 984 28.8 5 385 11.3 3 356 42 37 4 3 1 2 330 276 57 289 29.8 32.0 14. 1 57.8 1 3 76 217 6.9 25.2 86 32.2 4.9 9.2 17.2 118 21.4 1 32 5.8 1 1 1 1 2 92 16.7 21 1,383 7.1 ber cent 7■ 581 11.7 1 90 1.2 25.7 1 90 5.2 3.0 — 8 337 9.8 2 1 1 120 13.9 17 3.4 4 144 26.1 3 62 women in 1 establishment occasionally worked longer but never in excess of 6 hours. < 146 women in 1 establishment worked alternate Saturdays of 7 hours. Women 6 491 14.3 2 169 253 19. 6 62.8 1 69 12.5 108 Table IX.—Scheduled lunch period, hy section and city Number of establishments and number of women whose scheduled lunch period was— Section and city All places.. _______________ _____________ Per oent distribution. __ ______________________ _ Over 30 and under 45 minutes 30 minutes 1 hour Estab lish ments Women Estab lish ments Women Estab lishments Women Estab lish ments Women Estab lish ments Women Estab lish ments i 289 19, 529 176 12,292 62.9 2 257 1.3 32 2. 360 4 336 1.7 76 4,284 21.9 10 695 3 182 34 1, 795 7 2 515 3 182 18 19 3812 496 487 834 i 15 100.0 51 . 2,738 4 30 1,546 645 547 7,787 2 1 1 11 10 i 126 99 17 2,088 12 11 6 6 12 1,106 862 403 500 551 21 12 9 6,266 592 2, 838 2, 629 769 1,434 750 3,422 13 24 65 20 17 32 17 15 47 6 20 12 37 20 10 21 14 16 ------- ■----66 1, 727 533 835 119 1, 666 794 1, 742 587 1,074 238 1, 666 959 536 985 5, 582 1 21 13 15 3 15 41 750 3,122 12 1,106 698 366 500 452 9 5 6 9 1 Details aggregate more than total, because 1 establishment appears in more than 1 group. 2 59 women in 1 establishment had a half hour on Friday. 3 59 women in 1 establishment had a half hour on Monday and Saturday. 4 A half hour on Saturday * 1,182 women in 12 establishments had a half hour on Saturday Over 45 minutes and under 1 hour 45 minutes 7 129 51 430 1 54 2 95 1 24 80 2 12 165 456 174 1, 519 2 1 2 257 1 239 1 1 18 12.1 Women 201 3 13 1,071 2 11 475 596 2 164 2 164 8 8 1 154 3 19 1 * 154 16 3 1, 280 4 136 1 37 3 99 2 1 66 173 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND TH EIR WOMEN W ORKERS Total number re ported Table X.—Scheduled rest period, by section and city Number of establishments and number of women having— Total number having a rest period Section and city Total number All places Per cent distribution_________ ________ Middle western. _______________ _ 8 387 65 1 1 1 1 34 15 120 3 1 129 49 1 92 1 92 6 99 15 1 1 6 1 130 23 275 49 1 1 3 90 23 146 1 154 1 3 154 1 23 294 1,934 100.0 120 2 281 2 281 1 189 1 1 189 92 1 1 189 92 1 1§9 147 women in 1 establishment had 10 minutes on Monday. 324 711 15 1 76 1 1 188 2 139 139 14 111 1 466 8 1 2 7 74 5 3 11 2 150 2 788 434 139 215 966 815 3 12 12 2 1 2 2 1 3 1,133 58.6 28 17 Total number 20 minutes 629 32.5 13 2,216 1 15 minutes Estab Wom Estab Wom Estab Wom Estab Wom lish lish lish lish en en en en ments ments ments ments 32 9 10 minutes 10 minutes each Duration not reported Estab Wom Estab Wom Estab Wom lish lish lish en en en ments ments ments 220 282 3 1 178 1 178 1 178 1 178 3 104 2 42 1 23 1 23 I 19 62 1 19 172 8.9 4 3 172 3 1 172 100.0 1 62 22.0 78.0 1 62 1 62 40 2 In June, July, and August only. 1 A PPEN D IX A— GENEKAL TABLES Estab Wom lish en ments 2 rest periods 1 rest period 3“5 0r 10 minutes if they care to take it.” O CO 110 Table XI.—Hours actually worked, by section and city Section and city Under 30 hours Negro 30 and under 33 hours Negro 1.8 1.8 1.2 2.5 2.2 3.8 • 1.6 3.9 1.3 11.7 2.0 10.7 5.0 6.8 2.2 1.4 26.7 1.7 4.4 24.4 All places......... ............... ........ ..........-.................... ........ 10,680 2,144 4.3 6.2 1,697 103 4.8 2.9 1,102 .8 6.7 3.5 Negro White White White -- 36 and under 39 hours Negro White White Negro Eastern....... ......................................................................... 33 and under 36 hours 39 and under 42 hours White 42 and under 44 hours Negro White Negro 7.6 7.6 4.9 5.0 7.3 7.8 8.1 11.7 6.7 17.1 3. 5 2.3 15.6 11.1 20.5 6.7 ---------- ' 181 314 44 45 14 11.6 Middle western. _ ---------------- ------ ------- --------------- -- 3,908 1,189 4.4 6.8 1.1 1.6 2.3 1.5 3.4 4.5 7.7 10.3 7.7 5.0 571 370 554 89 896 440 386 602 648 4 223 4.6 5.1 3.8 4.5 4.0 6.3 1.1 1.1 1.1 .6 .5 .3 .5 1.9 2.5 2.8 4.8 3.2 3.8 14.6 5. 6 10.8 .2 6.0 1.2 4, 974 9 4.1 2.3 .3 2,484 ' 546 1, 434 510 9 4. 3 3.5 3.0 7.1 2.4 2.4 1.9 2.9 201 843 26 144 363 90 64 182 Jersey City and Newark---------------------------- Southern.........................................................-............................. 66 2 1 106 i Not computed, owing to small number involved. 289 24 5.1 6.8 3.9 3. 7 9.0 6.2 8.3 4.0 5.7 (>) 16.0 1.9 4.4 10.9 3.8 6.6 1.6 1.6 3.8 1.6 1.8 (0 1.8 2.2 1.6 5.6 10.3 3.8 3.6 3.2 3.5 3.7 4.1 6.7 5.2 1.3 2.0 1.1 1.3 2.2 22.9 12.2 1.1 .9 10.4 13.8 .8 11.7 5.9 7.3 3.8 1.2 8.0 p) 1.7 .2 .6 « .9 .3 3.1 8.7 5.9 7.2 .7 7.0 2.0 3.0 3.4 3.0 4.3 5.6 .6 3.8 1.5 5.6 11.5 1.5 9.7 .3 6.3 (i) 10.9 4.9 1.9 20.3 3.3 1.6 .6 1.8 2.0 2.7 3.5 1.4 3.8 1.5 6.9 .3 1.9 9.4 3.3 7.8 5.1 14.8 3.3 .6 7.0 1.5 (>) 11.3 9.6 5.0 1.8 .6 8.6 1.6 2.8 1.1 1.1 2.2 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND TH EIR WOMEN W ORKERS Per cent of women who worked during the week— Number of women re ported Per cent of women who worked during the week—Continued 44 and under 48 hours Section and city Eastern___________________________ --------- -------------- White Negro White Negro White Negro White Negro White Negro White Negro White 18.2 9.4 37.0 4.0 6.5 4.6 6.1 7.4 7.1 21.1 0.7 3.6 1.9 12.1 0.5 11.1 26.5 10.7 36.3 30.1 2.9 1.0 6.3 2.7 9.7 .1 70.5 .3 21. 5 1.3 14.9 23.2 .1 2.2 12.1 4.3 .2 2.2 6.9 .2 3.9 18.5 9.3 17.1 T \ _______ 12.3 7.9 15.7 4.8 4.0 .4 1.6 .9 22.2 1 l 2.9 7.3 15.6 12.5 (o 64.1 1 St. Petersburg and Tampa---------- -_ 6.5 5.0 11. 5 2.8 2.8 9.4 10.4 1 Not computed, owing to the small number involved. (i) 6.1 6.3 5.1 4.5 19.9 17.3 19.4 9.0 13.9 37. 5^ 23.8 17.1 5.9 25.0 6.0 12.0 13.3 7.1 11.8 13.3 20.6 2.8 17.7 10.5 20.4 2.0 11.5 27.8 29.0 16.7 6.3 4.4 .1 .1 0) .l 4 4 .8 1.5 1.0 2.1 1.9 7.2 1.1 3.0 33.7 .5 2.9 .3 4.7 20. 8 .8 30.9 24.8 .7 1.4 57.7 28.7 19.4 .9 .4 3.5 4. 2 1.1 .3 .4 .1 .2 .5 .6 6. 2 1 2 6.1 8.6 10.6 1.2 2.4 .6 5.9 (‘> (0 3.0 1.7 1.1 41.1 .2 1.3 22.7 10.4 29.2 4.5 .3 (o 35.5 2.1 2.8 Negro .1 16.8 4.3 5.2 47.2 16.2 24.7 8.1 64 7 70.0 Southern---------- ----------—......................... 60 hours and over Negro C1 TiUumtll _ - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Western____________________ Over 54 and under 60 hours 54 hours White 13 4 Middle western.- Over 50 and under 54 hours 50 hours 1.4 1. 6 2.2 3.0 .6 2.3 2.8 12.1 7.8 1.6 .5 9.4 27.1 7.7 25.3 25.0 43.9 29.7 60.0 20.8 26.4 11.0 3.8 .5 26.4 38.5 A PPEN D IX A — GENERAL TABLES All places Over 48 and under 50 hours 48 hours 112 Table XII.—Week’s earnings, by section and city WHITE WOMEN Eastern section Middle-western section Week’s earnings All places Total..___ ___________ Median.____ ___________ Under $1 $1 and under $2_____________ $2 and under $3___ _ $3 and under $4__________ $4 and under $5_____ _ $o and imder $6_____ . $6 and under $7..... .................. $7 and under $8 _________ . $8 and under $9... ... $9 and under $10--... $10 and under $11_____ $11 and under $12____ _______ $12 and under $13 ... $13 and under $14.................... $14 and under $15......... ... $15 and under $10 ______ _ . $16 and under $17......................... $17 and under $18 . $18 and under $19$19 and imder $20_ $20 and under $21 $21 and under $22 ................... ... $22 and under $23........................ $23 and under $24__________ $24 and under $25.................... $25 and under $30.............. . $30 and under $35 $35 and under $40___ $40 and over ..................... .......... 14,104 $16.10 7 40 78 56 47 82 81 85 144 211 427 545 1,135 1,207 1,358 1,360 1,772 1,164 1,040 832 703 396 418 164 155 482 85 23 7 Boston Jersey City and Newark Provi dence 2,306 $14.50 1,423 $14. 60 365 $14.80 518 $13.65 5,692 $14.75 11 5 7 2 1 4 4 5 3 4 4 6 2 17 32 26 26 37 36 49 76 104 227 290 704 654 749 721 530 332 298 165 208 76 82 57 35 Total 14 12 8 11 19 16 28 45 93 166 276 312 288 259 2C9 131 111 61 72 44 39 18 10 32 14 4 1 6 4 5 9 10 14 29 44 93 146 220 190 170 131 82 74 35 40 30 26 14 7 21 8 1 1 3 6 4 8 34 30 38 52 49 39 20 18 3 8 12 41 39 100 54 46 40 39 29 19 6 20 14 3 2 Chicago Cincin nati Cleve land Des Moines Detroit Indian apolis Mil waukee 746 $16.65 539 $14.05 608 $15.25 238 $14.00 1,245 $15. 35 900 $13.45 529 $14.65 4 7 1 1 1 1 4 3 3 4 3 3 5 12 2 1 4 7 3 4 9 10 12 1 18 4 8 1 1 2 Total 10 5 3 2 9 3 1 122 32 4 2 2 6 8 3 5 4 5 13 3 8 18 19 38 46 49 96 77 55 69 29 62 23 27 17 13 36 13 1 1 2 2 9 13 19 56 62 90 77 60 42 22 9 18 16 12 5 8 4 1 1 4 4 3 7 7 20 30 72 86 43 92 62 37 40 22 24 5 8 12 2 18 2 1 1 3 4 3 2 2 22 6 41 31 33 43 15 12 7 3 2 2 6 8 19 36 50 110 94 208 202 144 95 68 38 49 23 3 887 $14.10 1 12 1 Minne apolis and St. Paul 4 30 5 2 24 32 68 61 179 74 103 66 68 36 44 17 19 14 3 8 8 13 15 25 44 84 89 42 46 44 32 22 4 19 5 7 3 14 3 4 8 11 1 2 8 4 6 4 4 7 4 7 5 10 29 43 158 149 147 120 76 31 29 16 17 5 4 4 2 5 1 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND TH EIR WOMEN W ORKERS Number of women with earnings as specified in— Number of women with earnings as specified in—Continued Western section Week's earnings Los Angeles Total 768 $15. 35 4 3 7 19 7 5 3 12 . 13 34 27 54 49 74 207 282 319 999 675 602 591 399 272 282 85 107 316 38 14 3 1 1 3 2 10 2 22 8 4 33 23 • 25 116 85 93 850 343 349 114 162 9 13 33 74 159 182 97 51 39 32 17 68 74 38 41 80 9 9 3 6 6 8 6 10 4 3 5 Seattle 749 $18.05 2 8 7 3 3 2 2 2 8 6 3 1 10 4 3 4 3 6 10 11 11 5 9 29 24 19 235 168 53 55 30 20 33 46 46 392 165 168 176 36 52 207 21 6 22 7 11 24 8 1 1---------------- Atlanta Birm ingham Jackson ville 542 $13. 95 180 $14.40 118 $15.80 47 $15.40 2 1 1 Total St. Peters burg and Tampa Rich mond 11 m 1 1 3 1 4 6 1 7 6 35 40 81 34 39 61 34 26 29 15 24 4 15 4' 3 12 1 1 1 4 18 13 30 14 17 20 18 11 12 6 4 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 5 o 13 4 9 24 6 10 6 6 9 3 186 $11.95 3 1 7 5 4 3 6 5 © 1 2 1 1 2 7 2 31 11 9 9 3 7 4 2 A- 30 20 $25 and under $30. _. 1,434 $20.70 2,613 $17.00 10 $20 and under $21________ ______________________________ San Fran cisco 5,564 $17.90 31 15 $12 and under $13__---------------------------------------------- ------- -$13 and under $14__________ _____ _________ ___________ $14 and under $15 - . . ... _________________ $15 and under $16 . -______________ .. ... Port land A PPEN D IX Total..___________ _______________________________ Median. _________________ _____________ . --------------- Southern section 2 7 a w> t-1 n w on 10 1 1 3 2 1 5 1 1 CO 114 Table XII.—Week’s earnings, by section and city—Continued NEGRO WOMEN Eastern section Middle-western section Week’s earnings All places Total Median _____________ .. Total 5,076 $8.85 246 $12.50 Boston Jersey City and Newark Provi dence 67 $13. 35 160 $11.90 19 $14.15 Total 1,938 $12.25 13 66 61 76 147 441 677 716 411 397 377 316 519 242 202 183 85 39 38 2 1 1 2 6 4 13 18 56 39 33 27 20 11 6 2 21 16 10 8 3 4 8 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 4 1 8 3 9 17 13 16 5 23 14 18 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 4 8 1 10 1 1 2 1 2 • Cleve land 989 $12.45 50 $12.10 6 2 12 26 23 28 50 75 190 216 209 406 190 162 154 58 24 19 4 14 13 17 27 41 56 84 238 115 5 101 66 22 12 2 4 6 1 13 11 8 13 7 5 7 3 4 3 3 5 2 Detroit Indian apolis 448 $10.85 399 $12. 55 $12. 50 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 5 5 1 1 1 7 1 12 1 5 11 21 6 2 102 11 2 1 Cincin nati 24 17 12 1 6 Chicago 25 103 63 57 58 27 19 25 8 6 7 4 1 2 1 1 Des Moines Milwau kee Minne apolis and St. Paul (>> 2 1 1 11 22 39 56 80 38 35 57 23 3 3 4 1 7 18 8 3 3 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Number of women with earnings as specified in—Continued Number of women with earnings as specified in—Continued Southern section Western section Week’s earnings Los Angeles Total 16 $17.50 San Fran cisco Seattle Total 2,876 $7.15 7 42 42 63 120 1 1 5 4 5 4 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 8 11 5 13 7 2 Birm ingham Jackson ville 940 $6. 45 742 $7, 00 352 $6. 80 477 $8. 20 4 14 4 116 190 214 71 48 9 13 57 108 90 49 5 3 3 4 7 27 39 131 96 64 36 4 28 1 5 1 19 15 32 71 197 293 199 62 23 13 8 4 1 1 1 12 10 22 22 6 6 3 3 8 1 1 6 11 6 1 10 1 1 1 365 $9.80 2 2 3 6 7 21 17 26 54 54 69 26 32 10 3 5 A- 418 647 660 332 194 143 51 74 19 13 St. Peters burg and Tampa Rich mond Atlanta APPENDIX 16 $17. 50 Port land Q tel 2 tel a > te1 4 11 6 2 3 3 1 1 i te tel m 1 1 Not computed, owing to the small number involved. Oi Median of the week's earnings of undertime, full-time, and overtime workers, by section and city Number of women and their median earnings where week worked was— Less than scheduled hours All places____________ White women Negro women White women Negro women Scheduled hours White women More than scheduled hours Negro women White women Eastern___ ________________ 1,597 14. 50 103 12.85 395 12.00 52 11.15 1,101 15.05 47 13.80 101 15.65 Boston_______ ________ Jersey City and Newark... Providence_____________ 1,102 181 314 14.65 15.00 12.95 44 45 14 13. 45 11.10 247 89 59 12.20 6 12.50 10.65 42 4 0 11.00 15.15 17.05 13.90 38 13.60 27 15. 90 « 828 49 224 to 31 3,906 14.70 1,189 12.25 2,122 13.60 727 11. 50 919 15.90 247 12.75 865 Chicago_______________ Cincinnati_____________ Cleveland______________ Des Moines___ _________ Detroit________________ Indianapolis____________ Milwaukee_____________ Minneapolis and St. Paul. 571 368 554 89 896 440 386 602 16. 95 14.20 15.25 13.80 15.00 12.55 14. 55 14.00 648 4 223 12.20 (0 11.80 12.00 339 4 10.70 (■> 10.15 221 65 12.75 14.45 10.80 14. 30 12.85 253 11 12.30 to 20 2 15. 55 (0 156 129 15 17.60 17.40 16. 75 (i) 16. 60 13.50 112 17. 60 14.85 16. 00 14. 30 17.25 15.45 16.65 14.60 12.55 12.55 12.40 234 152 136 74 160 289 24 116 189 359 13 654 240 317 234 Western..................................... 4, 974 17. 95 1, 644 15.35 2 (0 3, 272 19.05 7 (>) 58 19.35 Los Angeles____________ Portland_______________ San Francisco............. ........ Seattle........................... ...... 2,481 546 1,434 510 16. 95 15.15 20.70 17. 95 620 467 417 140 14. 40 14. 90 18. 95 14.95 2 (■) 1,862 52 17.60 7 (>) 2 0) Southern. ................................... 201 13. 55 843 7. 25 68 11.05 335 6.60 Atlanta__ ____ _____ ___ Birmingham____________ Jacksonville____________ Richmond_______ _____ St. Petersburg and Tampa. 26 13.50 16.20 0 0) 0) 0) 61 59 32 57 126 4.25 (0 0) 11.55 5.90 7.40 6. 35 6. 45 10. 55 8 1061 144 363 90 64 182 Middle western. __________ 66 2 1 Not computed, owing to the small number involved. Negro women Num Median Num Median Num Median Num Median Num Median Num Median Num Median Num Median earn earn earn ber earn ber earn earn ber ber earn ber ber earn ber ings ber ings ings ings ings ings ings ings 10,678 $16.30 2,144 $10.45 4,229 $14.15 1,116 $10. 25 5,361 $17. 80 622 $10.25 1,088 $15.85 406 $11.80 0) 0) (0 0) 5 2 1 52 12.90 13. 90 10.25 120 6.10 5. 45 6.25 10.15 86 71 54 9 1,001 18. 00 21.10 357 18. 45 69 15. 55 321 8 (■) 15.85 13 240 57 44 17 14.25 6 5 27 59 2 4 (o 12. 80 1 « 15. 75 215 12.85 149 12. 85 38 12.15 16 16. 60 (>) 11 0 27 16 13 (l) 7.25 64 13. 85 187 8.25 « 7.40 6. 65 (l) « 10 (0 17 18.15 70 64 6.80 8.30 37 12.15 51 14.50 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Total for whom time worked was reported Section and city 116 Table XIII. Table XIV.—Extent of undertime, full time, and overtime, by section and city Women who worked during the week— Number of women reported Less than scheduled hours Scheduled hours More than scheduled hours Section and city Number __ __ ___________________ . Negro White Negro White 10,678 2,144 4,229 1,116 1,597 103 395 52 1.102 247 89 59 6 2,122 _ .. . 181 314 44 45 14 Middle western_____ ____________________ ____ _______ 3,906 1,189 Providence______ _______________ ___ _____ Chicago. _____________ __________________ ______ Cleveland................................................................. ............ Detroit... ... ____________ ___ ______ _ Indianapolis.. _____ ___________ _________________ Atlanta_____________ _____________________ _____ Birmingham........................................................................ St. Petersburg and Tampa............................. .................. . 1 Not computed, owing to the small number involved. 648 4 223 4,974 10.2 18.9 4 6.3 3.9 86.4 9 75.1 27.1 71.3 27 43 31 3 1 2. 5 23. 8 9.9 6.7 (>) 247 23.5 20.8 865 215 22.1 18.1 24.7 221 149 38.7 7.3 23.0 622 50.2 1,101 47 68.9 42 4 22.4 49. 2 18.8 13.6 93. 3 « 828 49 224 38 727 54.3 61.1 919 1 1,644 2 33.1 0) 3,272 2,484 ' 546 1,434 '510 9 620 467 417 140 2 25. 0 85. 5 29.1 27.5 « 1,862 ' 52 201 843 68 335 33.8 39.7 69 26 144 363 90 64 182 8 61 59 32 57 126 30.8 7.6 42.4 16.3 35. 6 89.1 69.2 8 52 406 101 5,361 50.5 9 106 1,088 45.6 52.1 24.7 253 5 29.0 39.6 20.3 51. 4 64.8 14.6 73.0 54.5 82.1 38.9 2 1 White Negro 339 4 66 2 1 Negro White 116 189 359 13 654 240 317 234 289 24 Wrhite Negro 120 11 0 0) 49.1 52.3 0) 53.8 87.5 45.8 234 152 136 74 86 71 54 160 65 20 2 112 _ 41.0 41.3 24.5 83. 1 9.6 16.1 14. 0 18.6 29.1 6.9 8.3 65.8 27 59 2 156 129 15 256 38 16 11 1 10 6 2. 2 17.4 29.3 3. 9 42.5 58 1.2 2 .1 4.9 17.0 5.5 45.8 <■) 0) 321 34.3 38.1 64 187 31.8 22.2 13 240 57 30.8 66.7 9.0 10 17 70 64 38.5 25.8 48.6 17.6 5 16.0 37 51 34.9 28.0 '357 6 17 « Negro 75.0 9. 5 69.8 70.0 1,001 44 White Negro 66.1 63.3 9.4 2.7 27 16 13 1.1 2.5 1 1 1.1 1.6 TABLES Southern......... ......................... ................................. ........... 571 368 554 89 896 440 386 602 Per cent Number A-— GENERAL White Per cent Number APPENDIX All places____ Eastern___________________________ ______ _ __ . Per cent 118 Table XV.—Week’s earnings of full-time workers, by section and city WHITE WOMEN \ Eastern section Middle-western section Week’s earnings All places Total ___________ _________ Per cent of total number reported_____ Median of the earnings___ ___________ $7 and under $8_ ______ _____ $8 and under $9_ _ $9 and under $10.... ........ . $10 and under $11 ______ ______ _ $11 and under $12.. ___ $12 and under $13_______ _____ $13 and under $14 ______ ______________ $14 and under $15_ ____________ $15 and under $16_________________ $16 and under $17. ______________ $17 and under $18_____ . __ $18 and under $19 ____ ___ $19 and under $20 .......................... $20 and under $21________________ $21 and nn^er $22. ____ _________ $22 and under $23____ ____ $23 and under $24.____ ________ $24 and under $25 ________ ___ $25 and under $30. ___ _ $30 and under $35...... ........... .......... $35 and under $40______ __ $40 and over___ ________ ______ 5,361 50.2 $17. 80 1 2 8 39 63 235 285 285 323 976 590 566 541 401 254 279 82 90 281 42 14 4 Total Boston 1,101 68.9 $15. 05 828 75.1 $15.15 1 1 2 3 29 39 134 174 165 150 123 77 75 31 33 19 15 9 4 14 4 1 1 Jersey City Provi and dence Newark 49 27.1 $17.05 3 22 77 151 141 128 93 57 56 21 25 14 13 9 7 3 3 5 6 7 6 2 6 1 1 2 1 9 3 1 1 Minne Cleve Des Detroit Indian Mil apolis Total Chicago Cincin nati land Moines apolis waukee and St. Paul 224 71.3 $13.90 919 23.5 $15.90 234 41.0 $17. 60 1 1 1 4 26 17 50 20 21 17 24 13 13 8 2 4 1 8 21 96 104 95 143 107 76 76 38 48 14 1 22 10 11 5 39 1 6 152 41.3 $14. 85 136 24.5 $16.00 74 83.1 $14.30 9.6 $17. 25 1 21 1 2 5 11 10 10 10 2 86 10 14 19 20 24 29 30 8 20 6 11 5 9 14 3 54 14.0 $16. 65 112 18.6 $14. 60 4 8 3 71 16.1 $15. 45 14 22 22 21 25 17 8 1 12 5 1 2 1 1 5 14 7 42 17 8 7 8 9 13 7 13 4 5 5 3 2 2 2 12 1 8 11 15 13 16 1 6 1 4 1 2 3 1 4 7 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 12 4 7 3 8 6 4 2 1 2 3 32 13 19 15 17 3 4 2 4 1 2 A STJRVET OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Number of women with earnings as specified who had worked the firm’s scheduled hours in— Number of women with earnings as specified who had worked the firm’s scheduled hours in—Continued Southern section Western section Week’s earnings Los Angeles Total 2 1, 862 '75.0 $17. 60 1,101 69.8 $21.10 357 70.0 $18. 45 12 2 742 433 411 470 314 219 240 62 75 227 32 13 3 738 295 291 91 136 67 63 36 39 75 6 8 3 10 4 5 9 6 2 1 4 2 2 30.8 pi 1 1 2 I 8 5 2 131 111 346 141 140 160 19 33 137 19 4 27 35 11 13 5 3 13 7 1 8 69 34.3 $15. 55 3 5 5 2 17 12 52 9. 5 $18.00 Jackson Atlanta Birming ham ville Total 18 4 4 4 2 6 2 2 1 1 44 66.7 $15. 85 Rich mond St. Pe tersburg and Tampa 17 16.0 $14. 25 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 4 14 4 4 1 2 1 4 3 2 2 3 5 2 2 1 1 APPENDIX A— GENERAL TABLES 3,272 65.8 $19. 05 Fran Seattle Portland Sancisco i Not computed, owing to the small number involved. O XV.—Week’s earnings of fulUtime workers, by section and city—Continued 120 Table NEGRO WOMEN Eastern section Middle-western section Week’s earnings All places Total..________________________________________ 622 Per cent of total number reported____________ __________ 29.0 Median of the earnings .. ..........._.................. $10. 25 $4 ahd under $5___________________ _ $5 and under $6____ ______________________ $G and under $7____________________ ________ $7 and under $8........... . $8 and under $9_____ . $9 and under $10___ _______ ______ $10 and under $11... ... ___ _ _ $11 and under $12_______ _____ $12 and under $13____________________ _ $13 and under $14. _____ ____________ ___ $14 and under $15... _______________ ___ $15 and under $16. ____ ____ $16 and under $17_______ ______ ________ _ $17 and under $18__________________ ___ _ $18 and under $19__ .. ......... ........... . ......... $19 and under $20. _____ ___ ____ ____________ $20 and under $21_____ __________________________ $22 and under $23 1 Not computed, owing to the small number involved. Total Boston 47 45.6 $13. 80 38 86.4 $13. 60 Jersey City Provi and dence Newark 9 (>) Minne Cleve Des Detroit Indian Mil apolis Total Chicago Cincin nati land Moines apolis waukee and St. Paul 247 20.8 $12. 75 160 24.7 $12. 55 65 29.1 $12. 75 20 6.9 $15. 55 2 8.3 0) 7 1 123 122 35 14 36 49 78 43 33 43 15 4 4 17 7 7 15 3 5 10 6 1 3 3 5 1 1 1 6 2 6 1 1 1 1 27 43 24 26 51 17 15 13 68 2 4 2 1 25 24 36 12 3 3 1 2 1 1 8 2 1 1 1 3 16 17 7 7 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 14 3 1 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Number of women with earnings as specified who had worked the firm’s scheduled hours in— Number of women with earnings as specified who had worked the firm’s scheduled hours in—Continued 103127°—30- Southern section Western section o $5 to 10 Week’s earnings San Fran Seattle Los cisco Angeles Portland Total Jackson Atlanta Birming ville ham Total St. Pe tersburg and Tampa Rich mond CO 7 Median of the earnings----------------------------------------------------- 0 0 0 7 321 38.1 $7. 25 7 1 123 122 34 13 9 2 4 1 2 * 0 13 9.0 240 66.1 $7.40 57 63.3 $6. 65 75 110 30 12 9 1 1 45 11 1 0 6 9.4 7 3 1 1 1 0 5 2.7 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 $18 and under $19_________ _______ -........... -............................ 4 1 4 1 $20 and under $21............................................................................... 2 2 i Not computed, owing to the small number involved. 2 2 APPENDIX A— GENERAL TABLES o to XVI.—Week’s earnings, by occupation 122 Table WHITE WOMEN Week’s earnings Total....... ..................... ............ 13, 748 2,914 33 Per oent distribution _ 100.0 21.2 0.2 Median_______________ ______ *16.05 $17.35 $15.30 Under $1__ ____ _ ______ _ $1 and under $2________ _______ $2 and under $3___________ __ $3 and under $4______ _____ _ $4 and under $5____ $5 and under $G__ _________ $6 and under $7___... _ __ $7 and under $8___ . ___ __ $8 and under $9 . $9 and under $10______________ $10 -and under $11_____________ $11 and under $12 ... $12 and under $13................ $13 and under $14_____ ... $14 and under $15_____ ______ $15 and under $16.. ___________ $16 and under $17______________ $17 and under $18_____ _______ $18 and under $19 .. $19 and under $20__..................... $20 and under $21_____________ $21 and under $22__..................... . $22 and under $23__________ $23 and under $24......... $24 and under $25............ $25 and under $30__ _ $30 and under $35__ $35 and under $40__ $40 and over___ ... 7 36 76 53 43 75 76 85 143 206 421 532 1,113 1,194 1,347 1,344 1,735 1,134 1,013 799 671 376 398 158 142 458 84 22 7 4 4 6 4 8 15 10 21 40 64 75 147 179 230 281 287 234 268 157 233 97 137 67 66 244 31 4 1 Fore lady Shirt 12 316 30 5, 296 1,711 1,883 74 83 290 172 362 93 221 178 0) 2.3 0.2 38.5 12.4 13.7 0.5 0.6 1.3 2.1 1.3 2.6 1.6 0.7 (!) $16. 55 $16.65 $14. 55 $16.70 $16. eo $14.65 $15. 75 $16.30 $15. 20 $16.35 $16.20 $23. 70 $18.85 6 22 1 3 4 4 4 5 5 3 4 1 Cur tain Collar Bun Mend; and or col dle, Gen blan lar wrap, seam eral ket starch pack stress dryer 1 i 1 1 3 4 8 1 1 29 24 38 8 4 8 7 51 76 118 240 9 8 19 21 40 13 1 1 2 1 4 1 2 5 6 585 446 729 162 195 220 195 201 258 11 A 8 11 14 8 31 42 40 15 29 21 36 52 43 14 21 38 2 3 2 1 37 26 2 1 203 374 174 92 184 81 6 6 8 2 25 19 9 10 40 13 11 5 12 7 9 9 3 1 16 49 7 3 30 58 11 1 1 1 1 67 0.5 $16.25 1 4 ------- - 7 1 13 0.1 1 27 39 32 41 1 1 Clean Other 1 ---- 3 3 3 2 11 1 18 1 3 4 6 15 7 3 29 9 9 2 1 1 1 10 1 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Number of women earning each specified amount whose occupation was— Num ber of women Ma Starch Elat- Press Hand Press report Mark and Tum work and and Hand oper iron hand ed wash chine wash damp bler ironer ate sort iron en NEGRO WOMEN Total_____ ______ _______ Per cent distribution....................... Median_________ _______ _ $22 and under $23.............................. $25 and under $30_____ _____ 11 56 55 71 141 435 676 709 403 393 374 309 511 241 201 183 84 39 37 22 14 12 8 3 4 8 1 1 1 4 7 16 27 7 12 24 23 25 13 21 18 23 6 4 2 2 1 2 49 1.0 $9.85 15 0.3 $9.75 114 2.3 $8.90 14 0.3 (2) 1 1 3 5 10 3 3 3 1 6 4 4 1 3 1 i Less than 0.05 per cent. 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 18 23 13 3 7 7 11 6 5 6 7 2 1 1 ____ 1 4 1 1 2 1 2 2 2,367 47.3 $8. 65 5 32 32 37 84 275 339 285 145 187 210 178 265 135 82 47 12 7 5 2 1 1 1 838 16.8 $9.50 1,027 20.5 $7. 95 4 6 5 14 34 93 133 93 74 50 30 97 35 42 53 22 10 10 8 6 6 4 2 2 5 6 16 14 22 35 99 148 179 106 89 52 42 66 31 28 44 13 11 12 4 4 1 2 1 1 1 58 22 1.2 0.4 $7. 85 $12.15 62 1.2 $8. 80 1 1 1 1 3 19 6 11 2 3 3 4 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 6 2 2 1 1 51 56 1.0 1.1 $7. 95 $12.00 34 0.7 $7.65 1 2 9 14 6 5 3 5 3 2 1 (>) (2) 2 18 0.4 $11.00 28 0.6 $12. 25 1 4 2 2 2 1 1 3 6 14 9 4 9 4 3 1 2 3 1 1 4 0.1 (2) 3 2 5 4 2 7 10 3 5 3 1 2 2 2 1 Not computed, owing to the small number involved. 1 •3 10 3 1 1 5 3 2 3 3 4 l_i 1 1 1 1 4 4 6 1 APPENDIX A— GENERAL TABLES $17 and under $18__ _ $18 and under $19....... ..................... . 5.000 241 100.0 4.8 $8.85 $11. 90 XVII.—Median of the week’s earnings, by occupation and by section and city 124 Table WHITE WOMEN Section and city AU Cur women Mark Ma Starch Flat- Press Hand Press tain Collar Bun Mend; re and Tum work and and dle, Gen or chine ported and Hand oper iron hand blan collar wrap, seam eral sort wash wash damp bler ironer ate iron ket starch pack stress en drier All places: Number of women i 13,748 i 2,914 33 Median earnings_______ _____ $16.05 $17.35 $15.30 Fore lady Shirt Clean Other 12 316 30 5, 296 1,711 1,883 74 290 i 172 362 221 83 178 93 « $16. 55 $16. 65 $14. 55 $16. 70 $16. 60 $14. 65 $15. 75 $16.30 $15.20 $16. 35 $16. 20 $23. 70 $18.85 13 to 67 $16. 25 « TO c!> TO 4 Eastern: 2,302 421 Median___________ ______ $14.50 $16.20 (s) Boston— 1,421 286 Median $14.60 $15.85 Jersey City and Newark— ' Number _ 365 44 Median. _ _ ____ ______ $14.80 $17.60 Providence— 516 91 Median_____________ $13.65 $16. 55 Middle western: Number____ Median _ _______ 3 Cincinnati— Number___________ ____ Cleveland— 0) 4 4 44 $15. 75 209 1 038 323 $13.10 $16.35 $15.80 $14.00 (=) 33 $16.65 128 604 214 $13. 30 $16. 55 $15.85 to 3 25 222 42 $13. 85 $16. 25' $15. 40 o 8 56 212 6% $12. 35 $15.30 $16.00 $13.35 to « (?) « C) 4 154 $15.40 737 122 $16. 70 $20. 45 22 $19. 25 539 97 $14.05 $15.15 12 « 608 148 Median.......... ........................ $15.25 $16.65 Des Moines— 238 37 Median...................... ........... $14.00 $15. 45 » « 2 5, 623 1.195 23 $14.80 $16. 45 $15.10 Chicago— Number____ ___________ (2) 5 * (>) w 2 1 12 to « 7 12 (!)' to to « $15.39 2 $14. 85 TO « $14.90 to 4 « « (!) « m 222 72 62 $13.10 $15.80 $14. 75 . 7 « 1 193 82 79 $13.40 $16.00 $15.40 c) 1 77 68 29 $12. 45 $14.60 $14. 40 5 to to to 7 3 9 5 19 $19.50 12 « 7 c) 5 to to TO to 3 (?) $20.00 (s> to TO « (!) to « r (’) 10 « $15.85 to 23 23 $15.15 $14.50 $17. 65 5 TO $22.60 2, 006 751 834 48 42 136 106 149 54 74 $13.15 $15. 70 $15. 30 $15.00 $15. 30 $15. 55 $14. 65 $15. 80 $15. 90 $23. 35 289 125 97 $15.00 $18.10 $18. 95 1 $15.30 $13.75 $14. 75 $13. 50 $22. 80 3 (!) 3 * (!) m 9 23 $13. 85 « « 1 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND TH EIR WOMEN W ORKERS Number of women and their median earnings where occupation was— Detroit— 2 344 1, 241 $15. 35 $16.90 Indianapolis— 229 897 $13. 45 $15. 40 Milwaukee— Minneapolis and St. Paul— 69 529 $14. 65 $18. 50 8 . (2) (2) 149 834 $14.20 $15. 95 0 957 5, 282 Median________________ - $17. 85 $20.15 0 Western:^ Los Angeles— Portland— San Francisco— 3 7 5 0 0 767 166 $15. 35 $16.85 0 1 139 749 $18. 05 $20. 70 Southern: Median----- ------ ------------Atlanta— i 541 i 341 $13. 95 $15.10 37 $13.90 24 109 131 300 $11.85 $15. 30 $14.60 $15.00 3 0 25 $15. 65 17 $20.85 31 $18. 95 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 63 215 $13. 60 $14.90 $15. 45 e 161 281 $12. 95 $14.50 $14.85 96 118 $15. 80 $15.90 Jacksonville— 121 286 $14. 75 $15. 55 $15.15 168 234 515 $19.40 $21. 55 $22. 45 98 298 103 $17. 45 $18.35 $18.35 95 $11.05 0 36 47 $15.40 $16. 00 St. Petersburg and Tampa— 186 56 $11. 95 $13. 50 0 9 0 0 0 0 i Includes Richmond not shown separately. 21 36 28 $16.15 $15.00 $16.00 0 19 $23.75 15 $14.15 0 0 21 0 $14. 65 0 0 0 0 $11.20 0 0 0 16 28 24 $15.35 $15.00 $14.60 14 0 0 0 0 0 27 $21. 85 15 $18. 70 0 0 15 $15. 35 54 $20. 45 0 0 0 0 $20. 80 00 $18. 20 1 12 $23. 50 20 $21.00 0 37 $14.10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 $16.65 34 $16.55 0 20 0 15 $14.15 14 0 0 32 16 $25.85 $20.90 22 0 0 0 33 20 32 84 29 $18. 50 $17.00 $18. 45 $16. 45 $25. 20 $18. 30 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 76 108 123 31 83 25 $18.30 $19. 25 $17.50 $18. 75 $16. 50 $25.10 0 0 0 0 89 0 0 5 378 263 1,058 $16. 65 $17. 35 $17. 50 179 143 $14. 40 $14.15 Birmingham— 0 120 831 628 17 2,157 117 $18.60 $17.85 $16. 90 $18. 45 $18.40 44 $18. 25 2 2,457 436 $16. 95 $19.00 145 144 429 $14. 20 $16.15 $15.30 $14. 95 0 12 33 $16.40 0 1.309 216 $20. 65 $25. 25 Seattle— 0 0 0 2 Not computed, owing to the small number involved. 0 0 126 Table XVII.—Median of the week's earnings, by occupation and by section and city—Continued NEGRO WOMEN Section and city All places: Number of women.. All Cur women Mark Hand Ma Starch Flat- Press Hand Press tain Collar Bun Mend; re and Tum and and dle, Gen ported and wash chine or work oper iron hand blan collar wrap, seam eral sort wash damp bler ironer ate iron ket starch pack stress en drier 3 5, 000 4 241 $8. 85 $11.90 Eastern: Number. _____ ________ 9 239 Median__________ _____ $12. 60 Boston— Number.______ Median. ___ Jersey City and Newark— Number __________ Median__ ____ _ ___ s 49 *9.85 e 15 $9. 75 4 m 153 $11.95 « 8 14 ?2,367 $8. 65 »3 m 67 $13. 35 $8.90 0 3 1 7 838 31,027 $9.50 7 58 s 137 9 40 9 47 $11.90 $13. 85 $13. 30 91 0 3 22 $1— lu 1 Chicago— Number______ _________ Median. _____ Cincinnati— Number_____________ Median Cleveland— Number_______ Median___ _____________ Detroit— Number________ Median.................................. 929 37 $12. 55 $15.15 50 $12.10 62 5 38 (2) $13. 65 7 0 1 0 399 15 $12.55 $16.15 17 $10. 30 0 0 4 1 0 3 10 7 0 13 3 0 (2) 0 (2) 5 14 (2) 3 13 (2) (2) 0 0 0 12 10 0 279 58 47 $9. 85 $13. 65 $12. 95 0 0 , 22 0 610 132 71 $12.15 $14. 65 $13. 55 0 0 11 22 448 $10.85 $12. 50 01 31,108 3 287 10195 $11. 35 $13. 95 $12. 95 0 201 80 58 $11.90 $12.95 $12. 75 0 0 318 $11.00 28 $12. 25 1 1 103 17 28 $11. 65 $13. 65 .$12. 65 io 1,878 5 88 5 23 $12. 30 $14. 55 $13.15 34 $7. 65 0 Middle western: Median___________ 51 4 56 $7. 95 $12. 00 93 0 31 15 16 $12. 75 $14.15 *13. 75 0 7 62 $8. 80 Fore Shirt Clean Other lady 0 1 0 0 (2) 0 0 01 0 01 6 (2) 3 35 $12. 85 (2) 19 $14.15 (2) 1 10 1 (2) 3 10 0 (2) 24 $12. 75 (V (0 $11.50 10 01 0 0 (2) 1 1 (2) 0 0 A SURVEY OP LAUNDRIES AND TH EIR WOMEN W ORKERS Number of women and their median earnings where occupation was— Southern: Median.................................. Atlanta— Number. ................ ............. Birmingham— Jacksonville— St. Petersburg and Tampa— Number. _ ______ ... Median 39 $7.70 0 « 352 $6. 80 (2) (2) (!> 64 476 $8.25 $11. 65 0 (!) 12 (2) (!) 364 $9. 85 7 3 389 $6.00 182 $7. 30 225 $6.40 24 $6.90 (2) 8 297 $6.50 112 $7. 35 194 $7.00 17 $6. 80 0 0 0 11 (2) 0 0 1 (!) 163 $6. 35 $7. 00 90 $7.15 0 (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) $8. 50 185 $7.40 68 $9.25 110 $8. 85 6 7 88 $10. 25 83 $9. 85 154 $8.95 (2) (s) p) 9 1.122 13 12 0 (2) 3 (2) (2) 10 • 12 0 0 4 (2) 3 0 2 0 1 (2) 3 8 C2) 0 8 0 4 (2) 1 0 8 0 4 0 1 0 4 2 1 2 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 — 7 Includes Providence and Indianapolis, n. s. s. 3 Includes Los Angeles, n. s. s. 9 Includes Providence, n. s. s. i° Includes Indianapolis and Minneapolis and St. Paul, n. s. s. 2 Not computed, owing to the small number involved. 3 Includes Providence, Indianapolis, Minneapolis and St. Paul, and Los Angeles, n. s. s. 4 Includes Indianapolis and Los Angeles, n. s. s. 6 Includes Indianapolis, n. s. s. 6 Includes Minneapolis and St. Paul, n. s. s. Table 1 1 (2) XVIII.—Extent of full-time work and median of the earnings in laundries reported in Stale surveys by Women’s Bureau, by State and year * State and year Tennessee, 1925_____________ _____ ____ ________________ Number of women for whom it was possible to determine whether working full time Number of estab lishments reported Negro All White women women women 5 10 4 26 23 26 32 19 18 14 14 12 18 196 733 142 1,076 383 968 694 448 643 426 280 233 948 196 585 142 1,005 183 616 643 66 100 351 61 28 329 148 71 200 352 51 382 543 75 219 205 619 Full-time workers Negro women All women White women 134 497 92 446 250 436 489 234 424 288 177 148 599 134 410 92 431 123 304 469 30 79 251 47 21 238 Number Per cent 87 17.5 15 127 132 20 204 345 37 130 127 361 3.4 50. 8 30. 3 4.1 87.2 81.4 12. 8 73.4 85. 8 60.3 Median earnings of— All women White women $9.95 12.95 12.30 13. 40 10.10 11.95 12.15 6. 55 7.15 10.80 6. 75 6. 20 7. 60 $9.95 13. 35 12. 30 13. 50 10.55 12.80 12. 25 12.80 14. 45 11.10 10.20 12.50 10.10 Negro women A PPEN D IX A — GENERAL TABLES Richmond— 742 $7.00 13 (2) 1 15 $7. 70 0 10 (2) 0 1 11 0 23 $6. 65 45 $6. 90 31 $6. 90 26 $7. 30 19 $8.15 773 $7.30 3 933 $6. 45 36 $7.45 511 $7.85 73 $7.65 26 $7.60 46 $7. 95 $6.50 13 « 2,867 148 $7.15 $10.15 ____ ___ $10. 75 11.65 10.35 9.25 6. 45 6.85 9.45 6.45 5.95 6.85 to -1 Median of the week’s earnings of timeworkers and of pieceworkers in four occupations having most women, by section and city WHITE WOMEN Section and city Number All places............................... Providence_______ Middle western....... ......... Cleveland____ ______ Indianapolis . ___ Milwaukee. ................. Western....................... Southern______ Flat work Per cent Timeworkers Per cent Pieceworkers by which by which piecework piecework median Median exceeds Number Median Number Median median exceeds timework timework median Pieceworkers Median Number 1 2,500 352 249 59 974 67 135 147 64 850 352 324 $17. 30 15. 85 15.60 16. 05 16.45 15.05 16. 40 15.00 18. 45 20.15 18.65 15.10 l 1, 250 204 $16. 35 15.75 15. 75 15. 00 15. 30 17.50 14. 50 15.50 16.00 14. 65 14. 70 18.40 16.80 15.55 i 229 50 27 23 80 22 10 35 1 83 82 16 $19. 55 19.20 19.60 18. 25 18.25 15. 65 (2) 20.30 (2) 20.70 20.65 16.35 2.7 10.7 8.3 $18. 95 19. 50 19.90 16.75 18.65 18.50 19. 75 17. 65 18.85 18.30 17.15 19.05 18.70 15.9 23.8 26.3 11.7 21.9 5.7 36.2 13.9 17.8 24.9 16.7 3.5 11.3 13.0 21.1 25.6 13.7 10.9 4.0 35.3 i 4,669 _ $14.50 927 13. 10 560 13. 20 146 12.35 1,721 13.10 179 12. 70 174 13.40 226 12.05 181 13.60 1, 935 16.90 863 16.55 86 10.80 Press operate All places___________ Providence_______ Middle western....... .......... Cincinnati.. .. Cleveland_____ Detroit_______ Indianapolis. Milwaukee___ Western.......... . Portland.............. —_— - - - " ‘ " 36 520 68 31 55 119 61 34 517 176 78 i 348 110 81 27 145 15 29 22 19 37 23 93 87 i 292 22 14 8 81 35 18 1 27 189 189 $16.65 15. 35 .« 14.40 14.60 17.00 (2) 13. 95 17. 30 17. 30 14.8 17.2 9.9 15.0 26.9 2.6 2.4 4.5 Iron i1,314 151 110 18 579 72 37 68 137 43 58 575 163 94 $16. 40 15.70 15.75 15.35 15.10 17. 65 13.85 15.10 15.40 13.10 15.15 18.80 17.45 15.05 i 364 49 16 31 165 11 33 11 3 53 . 43 150 118 19 $17. 75 17. 65 19. 50 17. 50 17.30 (2) 15.90 (2) (2) 18.55 15. 65 18.40 18. 50 16.20 8.2 12.4 23.8 14.0 14.6 14.8 41.6 3.3 3 2.1 6.0 7.6 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND TH EIR W OMEN W ORKERS Mark and sort Timeworkers 128 Table XIX. NEGRO WOMEN Flat work Mark and sort Median Number i 232 $12. 05 *3 i 95 $11. 50 11.20 58 13.40 19.6 495 257 12.15 9. 75 36 22 13.75 12. 30 13.2 26.2 949 1 14. 55 $8.45 i 2,160 36 22 15.10 12. 50 142 10.30 2 1,074 6.50 37 7.55 16.2 33 7.95 2 255 6.40 37 7.55 18.0 Iron Press operate Cleveland........................-.................... -...................................................... Atlanta.............. .............. -------------------- ------------------------------------- $13. 35 i 668 $8.70 i 141 27 13.30 13 w 179 13.55 84 15.10 53.4 11.4 i 771 $7.80 i 230 $8. 55 9.6 30 13. 65 17 11. 75 3 13.9 12.90 43 13.50 4.7 141 4 90 22 14. 35 12. 85 39 36 15. 40 14. 00 7.3 8.9 47 28 13. 90 12. 40 20 18 13.25 14. 00 3 4.7 12.9 462 7. 75 44 9.35 20.6 594 7. 30 164 7.45 2. 1 7. 00 7. 30 9. 90 28 9 4 9. 40 (*> 34.3 205 120 90 6. 40 6.90 10. 25 20 67 58 7.00 7. 85 9.4 13.8 101 77 1 Totals for sections include cities not shown separately because numbers too small for the computation of a median. 2 Not computed, owing to the small number involved, s In this case the timework median is the higher. 36.1 -------:—- A PPEN D IX A— GENERAL TABLES Number 85 Pieceworkers Timeworkers Per cent Per cent by which by which piecework piecework median median exceeds Number Median Number Median exceeds Median timework timework median median Pieceworkers Timeworkers Section and city 130 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Table XX.—Median of the week’s earnings, by WHITE WOMEN Women for whom hours and earnings were reported Section and city All places.. .. . __ ... Eastern_________________ Boston............. . Jersey City and Newark.......... Providence__________ Middle western_________ . Chicago. _______________ Cincinnati_____ _________ Cleveland.__ ____ Des Moines ____________ Detroit............................. . Indianapolis. _______ Milwaukee__________ Minneapolis and St. Paul____ Western....... ............. ............. Los Angeles______________ Portland______ _____ San Francisco__ Seattle___ _____ . . Southern _ _ ______ _ Atlanta _______ . Birmingham__________ . . Jacksonville______ ___ _ Richmond . St. Petersburg and Tampa___ Num ber Me dian 11,009 2,306 Number of women and their median earnings where scheduled weekly hours were— Under 44 44 and under 48 48 Num ber Me dian Num ber Me dian Num ber Me dian $16. 10 478 $14. 80 1,629 $14. 60 6,540 $17.30 14.50 83 14.50 834 14. 65 994 14.40 1,423 365 518 14. 60 14. 80 13 65 80 3 14. 60 (>) 464 80 14. 95 14. 60 879 20 17 50 5, 020 14. 75 392 14. 80 717 14.50 174 14. 65 734 533 008 238 1,244 900 529 834 16. 60 14.05 15. 25 14.00 15. 35 13. 45 14. 70 14. 05 41 22 102 17. 85 13. 85 15.15 37 32 13. 85 15.45 21 13. 25 205 11 11 14. 65 0) C1) 237 8 147 14. 70 (l) 13. 65 51 16.10 22. 00 5, 372 17.85 5,561 17. 90 38 2,613 ' 768 1,434 749 17. 00 15.35 20 70 18. 05 12 519 13. 80 3 157 118 47 11 186 14.15 15. 80 15.40 0 11.95 3 n nm 25 22.25 (■) 40 12. 15 0 11 0 749 18. 05 1 29 NEGRO WOMEN All places....... ............. Eastern............................. . Boston_________ . Jersey City and Newark___ Providence.. ______ _ Middle western______ _ Chicago_____________ . Cincinnati________________ Cleveland_______________ Detroit.. ________ Indianapolis_________ Minneapolis and St. Paul. _ Western—Los Angeles................... Southern. _________ Atlanta______________ Birmingham________ Jacksonville. _......... ...... Richmond___ ___ St. Petersburg and Tampa _ . 5,018 $8. 75 177 $11.40 213 246 12.50 35 11. 50 5 67 160 19 13. 35 11.90 14.15 11 24 0) 11.20 5 1,880 12.15 117 12.10 138 931 50 448 399 50 2 12. 35 12.10 10.85 12. 55 12. 50 w 111 6 11. 90 0 100 16 17.50 2,876 7.15 25 4. 65 68 940 742 352 477 365 6. 45 7.00 6.80 8. 20 10. 80 25 4.65 3 1 Not computed, owing to the small number involved. 1 65 $11. 30 85 0 62 13.00 56 13.20 12.80 9 0) 14.55 9 0 14 0 0 $14. IS 0 8.40 0 8.30 131 APPENDIX A—GENERAL TABLES scheduled weekly hours and by section and city WHITE WOMEN—Continued Number of women and their median earnings where scheduled weekly hours were—Continued Over 48 and under 50 Over 50 and under 54 50 Over 54 and under 60 54 Num Median Num Median Num Median Num Median Num ber ber ber ber ber 1,303 $15.10 1,871 $15.10 1, 514 $14. 70 411 $13. 20 135 15.70 90 12. 55 105 13. 55 65 14. 25 135 15.70 12. 75 14.70 14. 25 12. 55 62 43 65 90 1,000 14.55 1, 778 15.20 1,210 14.85 279 130 15. 75 259 291 408 16.90 14. 20 15.45 161 15.45 55 142 308 14. 65 15. 70 12. 60 134 199 0) 213 154 19.30 154 19. 30 14 0) 3 15. 70 14. 70 « 40 5 6 44 o Num ber Me dian $15. 40 171 $12. 95 92 13. 40 67 12.70 3 to 12.70 5 (■) 3 (>) 48 130 13.20 ;3. 75 38 24 12. 75 11. 60 14. 45 46 13.35 14.50 67 12.20 104 13.50 89 15. 45 « 22 42 15 12. 35 15. 45 14. 85 31 20 16.50 14.50 11.00 25 12.40 38 13. 50 915 $7. 35 552 $7. 95 (•) (>) Me dian 60 and over 16.50 Q) 0) 11. 50 7 50 NEGRO WOMEN-Continued 1, 828 $7.85 468 $9. 85 11 <*) 59 11.95 74 12. 50 11 0) 46 13 11. 60 (l) 74 12. 50 447 $9. 35 333 $12. 45 266 10.05 296 12. 65 576 12. 70 240 10.30 151 11. 80 87 12.35 16 12.60 117 50 104 12. 77 12,10 12. 70 0) 380 12. 90 240 10.30 91 12. 35 87 12. 35 11 1 12. 55 12.30 11.10 w 173 23 60 14 170 7. 25 37 7.10 1,193 6. 85 154 8.35 764 6.95 465 7. 65 90 2 6.55 « 37 7.10 54 7.60 8.00 9. 70 5. 85 6. 55 6.20 8. 95 9.15 7.25 7. 05 66 110 283 97 246 28 137 189 8.10 6. 45 7. 20 5.50 7.80 8.35 34 78 621 320 32 153 67 139 10.90 132 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Table XXI.—Median of the week’s earnings, WHITE WOMEN Section and city All women reporting time with the firm Numher Number and per cent of women and their median earnings where time with the firm was— Under 3 months Me- Num dian ber Me- Num dian ber All places.___ __________ - 9.707 $16.15 Per cent distribution.___ _____ . 100.0 441 $13. 20 4.5 Eastern_______ _____ ________ Per cent distribution______ 15 1.1 14. 75 10 1.1 2 4.8 3 .8 (■) 1,336 100.0 14. 70 Boston.______ ___________ 922 Per cent distribution___ 100.0 Jersey City and Newark____ - 42 Per cent distribution___ 100.0 Providence 372 Per cent distribution..... 100.0 14.90 14.00 14. 30 Middle western____ ____ ______ Per cent distribution 4.455 100.0 14. 95 Chicago Per cent distribution___ Cincinnati Per cent distribution___ Cleveland_____ __________ Per cent distribution___ Des Moines Per cent distribution___ Detroit Per cent distribution___ Indianapolis Per cent distribution___ Milwaukee______________ Per cent distribution___ Minneapolis and St. Paul___ Per cent distribution____ 544 100.0 428 100.0 469 100.0 145 100. 0 1,061 100.0 704 100. 0 417 100.0 687 100.0 16. 95 Western Per cent distribution Los Angeles Per cent distribution___ Portland Per cent distribution____ San Francisco Per cent distribution____ Seattle_________ __________ Per cent distribution____ 3, 528 100.0 15.40 14. 35 15.45 13. 90 14. 90 14.15 47 1.3 1,487 17. 35 100.0 570 15. 35 100.0 985 _____ 20. 75 100.0 486 18.25 100.0 12 .8 20 3.5 5 .5 10 2.1 134 100. 0 86 100.0 17 100. 0 6 100.0 145 100.0 « 13.10 Me- Num dian ber 985 $14. 25 10.1 77 5.8 12. 75 53 5.7 5 11.9 19 5.1 12.95 583 13.1 (■) 11.25 995 $15.15 10. 3 112 8.4 12. 75 83 9.0 2 4.8 27 7.3 12. 85 4.3 37 4.0 3 7. 1 17 4. 6 13. 50 13. 85 0) 12.50 14.10 264 5.9 14. 45 88 16. 00 16.2 63 13.60 14.7 56 12.95 11.9 9 ra 6.2 107 14. 45 10. 1 101 12.25 14.3 61 13.80 14. 6 98 13. 20 14.3 62 11.4 32 7.5 51 10.9 12 8. 3 98 9. 2 85 12.1 40 9. 6 61 8.9 15.95 29 16. 25 13. 35 19 4 4 24 15.15 16. 45 399 11. 3 (o 145 9.8 55 9.6 46 4.7 43 8.8 16. 55 19. 75 186 12. 5 57 10.0 109 11. 1 47 9.7 o 12.45 551 $15. 40 5.7 441 9.9 289 8. 2 0) 0 Median 13. 60 15. 30 13. 65 Me- Num dian ber 14. 40 17. 50 13. 75 (■> 5 15.00 « 15.20 12. 85 84 7 9 57 14. 00 22 13. 80 13. 30 24 3. 5 12. 65 17.05 202 5.7 17.15 14. 80 12.85 16. 65 91 16.90 14. 65 41 7.2 33 14. 55 17. 65 37 7.6 17.90 28 7.2 13. 50 19. 75 19. 80 14.05 30 7.7 10.65 36 9.3 12.00 43 11.1 12. 55 14. 45 5 3.7 1 1.2 (*) 7 5.2 7 8.1 2 11.8 0) 11 8.2 6 7. 0 6 35.3 c) 6 0) o (■) 8 (9 <■) 1 5.9 (*) 20 13.8 11.50 13 9.0 12.40 15.80 14. 50 (>) 12. 30 24 16.6 1 Not computed, owing to the small number involved. (■) 50 14.15 9.2 53 11. 95 12.4 29 13.85 6.2 11 m 7. 6 68 14.20 6.4 49 12.05 7.0 23 13. 65 5.5 66 13. 35 9.6 18.25 Southern_________ ____________ 388 Per cent distribution 100.0 Atlanta_________________ Per cent distribution____ Birmingham Per cent distribution___ Jacksonville Per cent distribution____ Richmond Per cent distribution___ St. Petersburg and Tampa... Per cent distribution____ 14. 00 349 7.8 3 and under 6 and under 9 months and 6 months 9 months under 1 year 10.80 20 13.8 0) (■) 11.50 133 APPENDIX A—GENERAL TABLES by time with the firm and by section and city WHITE WOMEN—Continued Number and per cent of women and their median earnings where time with the firm was—Continued 1 and under 2 years 2 and under 3 years Number Median Number 1,808 18.6 $15. 65 216 16.2 13.95 188 14.1 142 14. 20 Median 3 and under 4 years Number Median 4 and under 5 years Number Median 5 and under 10 years Number Median 1, 439 $17.90 14.8 10 and under 15 years 15 years and over Number Median Number 418 $18.30 4.3 273 2.8 119. 30 Median 795 $17.00 8. 2 694 $17.35 7.1 14.00 106 7.9 15.15 91 6.8 15. 55 278 20.8 15.75 112 8.4 17.40 84 6.3 18.35 120 13.7 4 9. 5 58 15. 6 14.20 77 8.4 2 4.8 27 7.3 15.35 59 6.4 2 4.8 30 8.1 15.40 192 20.8 11 26.2 75 20.2 15. 80 91 9.9 2 4.8 19 5.1 17. 30 52 5.6 18. 50 18.50 32 8.6 17.75 1,308 $16.40 13.5 0 o « 65 13.40 845 19.0 14.75 532 11.9 15. 30 348 7.8 15.95 282 6.3 16. 96 530 11.9 16.95 165 3.7 17.15 116 2.6 18.60 85 15. 90 61 11. 2 47 11.0 56 11 9 27 18.6 141 17.80 18.90 63 11.6 42 9.8 59 12.6 20 13.8 129 12.2 70 9.9 48 11.5 99 14.4 20.30 22 4.0 11 2.6 18 3.8 4 2.8 32 3.0 31 4.4 19 4.6 28 4.1 19. 50 19 3.5 17 4.0 12 2.6 2 1.4 15 1.4 18 2.6 17 4.1 16 2.3 22.50 14. 25 32 5.9 33 7.7 38 8.1 18 12.4 62 5.8 23 3.3 22 5.3 &4 . 7.9 20.00 63 8.9 54 12.9 83 12.1 33 6.1 33 7.7 45 9. 6 12 8.3 84 7. 9 - 69 9.8 30 7.2 42 6.1 22. 25 78 14.15 (>) o 9 13. 30 14.45 16.00 14. 25 15. 75 15.80 0 16. 65 14.40 15.90 15. 85 15.40 18. 20 0 16. 50 17.50 0 0 81 15.20 25 13. 75 241 15.20 138 14.40 81 14.45 116 14.05 658 18.7 17.80 534 15.1 18. 50 305 8. 6 18.60 299 8. 5 19.35 597 16.9 19.35 130 3.7 20.80 68 1.9 290 16.95 18. 05 52 3.5 11 1.9 53 5.4 14 2.9 20.15 20.50 227 15.3 103 18.1 192 19.5 75 15.4 18. 60 98 115 7.7 45 7.9 94 9.5 45 9.3 18. 50 172 139 9.3 42 7.4 91 9.2 33 6.8 17. 80 15.15 216 14. 5 83 14. 6 163 16. 5 72 14.8 17. 70 98 14 .9 15 2.6 27 2.7 12 2.5 89 22.9 13.50 54 13.9 14. 55 36 9.3 16.70 22 5.7 16.40 34 8.8 18. 00 11 2.8 (0 5 1.3 0 30 22 4 24 27.9 13. 25 20 14. 9 11 12.8 14.00 12 9.0 10 11.6 0 12 9.0 5 5.8 0 23 17.2 8 9.3 16. 50 6 4.5 3 3.5 0 2 1.5 3 3.5 0 3 0 2 1.4 0) 15.15 (>) 12.65 15.80 16. 25 14. 25 15. 60 20. 95 18.40 (0 0 16. 70 15.05 17.80 14. 35 15. 75 21.10 18.90 0 15.00 17.00 14. 25 16.15 14.60 16. 65 21.10 19.60 0 16.50 17.40 16. 70 16.40 15.30 16.10 21.15 18. 70 0 0 18. 25 16.60 16. 65 16. 90 0 22. 35 0 0 (>) 17.6 32 22.1 14. 25 1 (l) 17 11.7 « 13.90 (i) 14 9.7 0 2 1.4 0 2 (>) 1 .7 0 0 17.75 17.50 19.75 17.35 0 20.85 24.50 0 0 134 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Table XXI.—Median of the week’s earnings, by NEGRO WOMEN Section and city All women reporting time with the firm Number and per cent of women and their median earnings where time with the firm was— Under 3 months 3 and under 6 and under 9 months and 6 months 9 months under 1 year Num Me Num Me Num Me Num Me Num Me ber dian ber dian ber dian ber dian ber dian 409 12.4 $8.40 353 10.7 $7.90 147 4.4 $9.45 13.70 2 3.0 (0 4 6.1 («) 5 7.6 (‘) 13. 60 1 2.0 (0 3 6.1 (') (‘) 1 0) 1 <0 2 4.1 1 0 2 (0 3,309 100.0 $9.10 66 100.0 49 100.0 3 100.0 Providence_________ 14 Per cent distribution. _ . 100.0 Jersey City and Newark__ Middle western . Per cent distribution... 267 8.1 $7.15 o) « (0 0 0 « 1, 262 100.0 12. 60 87 6.9 11.35 178 14.1 12.05 132 10.5 12. 25 61 4.8 12.35 Chicago. _______ 647 Per cent distribution... . 100.0 Cincinnati__ 39 Per cent distribution._ _. 100.0 Cleveland____ 269 Per cent distribution. _ 100. 0 Detroit_____ 276 100.0 Indianapolis___ 30 100.0 Minneapolis and St. Paul 1 Per cent distribution _ 100.0 Western—Los Angeles. ___ 16 Per cent distribution 100.0 Southern______ 1, 965 Per cent distribution___ 100. 0 12. 75 65 10.0 11.20 12.30 31 4.8 12.50 o 67 10.4 4 10.3 34 12.6 26 9.4 1 3.3 12.50 10 3.7 10 3.6 2 6.7 103 15.9 5 12.8 32 11.9 34 12.3 4 13.3 11 4.1 13 4.7 6 20.0 w 1 6.3 (0 Atlanta______ ___ Per cent distribution Birmingham ___ Per cent distribution._. Jacksonville_______ Per cent distribution.. Richmond____________ Per cent distribution___ St. Petersburg and Tampa. _. Per cent distribution___ 636 100.0 501 100.0 184 100.0 374 100.0 270 100.0 12. 30 11. 55 12.85 12. 85 « (0 10.15 12. 35 <0 w 10.25 13.00 <0 17. 50 7.30 180 9.2 6.25 229 11.7 6. 60 63 9.9 38 7.6 21 11.4 18 4.8 40 14.8 5. 95 57 9.0 72 14.4 27 14.7 40 10.7 33 12.2 7. 20 6. 65 8. 30 10.15 1 Not computed, owing to the small number involved. (0 o 5.85 6.15 7. 35 8. 20 (‘) 0 6.60 217 11.0 6. 65 80 4.1 7.05 6.25 81 12.7 63 12.6 18 9.8 38 10.2 17 6.3 6.15 24 3.8 20 4.0 9 4.9 12 3.2 15 5.6 6. 55 6.40 6.05 7.55 8.65 6.95 6.15 7. 55 9.50 6.00 (0 0) 9. 80 135 APPENDIX A—GENERAL TABLES time with the firm and by section and city—Continued NEGKO WOMEN—Continued Number and per cent of women and their median earnings where time with the firm was—Continued 2 and under 3 years 2 years 3 and under 4 years Me- Number dian 4 and under 5 years Me- Numdian ber Median 5 and under 10 years Number Median 10 and under 15 years Number no S10. 65 3.3 29 0.9 $10.40 p) 2 3. 0 P) p> 1 2. 0 P) 1 (0 her 551 16.7 $8. 70 450 13.6 $9.20 298 9.0 $9. 30 10 15.2 («) 4 6.1 0) 7 10.6 P) 9 13.6 P) 18 27.3 14. 00 5 7. 6 8 16.3 (>) 4 (>) 6 12. 2 1 « (l) 8 16.3 P> p). p) 5 10. 2 1 Pi 11 22.4 1 0) 6 p) P) 233 fio. 55 7.0 0) 462 &10. 50 14.0 Median Median Number Median her 15 years and over p) p) 23Q 18.2 12.50 170 13.5 12. 65 92 7.3 13.45 106 8.4 13. 55 185 14.7 14.20 21 1.7 13. 70 107 12. 70 80 13. 45 42 6 5 13.50 56 8.7 13. 60 12. 60 16 2. 5 1 2.6 3 1.1 1 .4 14.00 24 8. 9 25 9. 1 1 3.3 80 14. 55 12.4 p> 9 23.1 12. 75 42 15.6 14.45 50 18.1 p) 3 10.0 p) 1 100.0 2 12.5 p> 5 31.3 p) 1 6.3 p) 197 10.0 116 5.9 7. 75 254 12.9 9.00 83 4.2 9. 75 27 1.4 6.85 94 14.8 69 13.8 19 10.3 53 14.2 19 7.0 7. 30 29 4. 6 13 2.6 4 2.2 32 8.6 5 1.9 7. 75 9 p> 3 .6 1 .5 10 2. 7 4 1. 5 p) 38 14.1 48 7.5 22 4.4 7 3.8 21 5. 6 18 6. 7 <>) 48 11. 00 41 10. 70 60 12.45 41 12.50 7 o) 0) 2 12.5 ---- ---7. 20 309 15.7 3 10.0 o 3 TO 18.8 — 7.65 273 13.9 105 6. 55 71 6. 70 76 7. 25 72 7.50 40 6. 65 20 6.80 53 7. 75 64 8.25 35 10.30 46 10. 25 I 1X0 17. 9 24 8 9 16 5 8 3 10.0 2 12.5 (•) 12. 65 15.15 o p> 7.70 ..... .... 6. 80 55 8 6 7.50 53 10. 6 7.20 18 9 8 8. 80 33 12. 00 15.05 p) 8.00 p) 8.65 12.00 8.20 7.80 9. 05 13.25 w p) p> p> p) 11.20 p) 10.15 p) (0 p) Table XXII.—Median of the weekly rates, by occupation and by section and city OJ WHITE WOMEN Section and city Number of women and their median rates where occupation was— Mark and sort Hand wash Machine wash Num Me Num Me Num Me Num ber dian ber dian ber dian ber All places _ 11,326 $16.45 2,447 $18.00 Eastern_______ 1,930 Boston_______________ Jersey City and Newark! Providence..... ........... ...... Middle western. Chicago__ ____ _______ Cleveland_____ IIIIIIIII Des Moines_________ Detroit_____________ Indianapolis___________I Milwaukee________ _ ~ Minneapolis and St. Paul" Western. Los Angeles__ Portland_____ San Francisco.. Seattle_______ Southern.. Atlanta_________ ___________ Birmingham_____ Jacksonville___________ III” RichmondIIIIIIIIIIIII St. Petersburg and Tampa___ III •p 359 16.30 0 0 0 14. 70 15.45 13.50 253 45 61 16.00 17.90 16.05 4, 380 15.20 932 17.10 15.00 16.50 13.80 15. 60 14.05 15.80 13. 50 15. 85 14* 45 89 68 135 32 313 134 48 113 20. 60 15.30 17.25 15.70 18.10 15.40 20. 00 16. 35 4, 533 18.50 1,848 657 1,303 725 17.10 16. 00 21.15 18.30 352 144 216 138 18.95 18.20 25.40 483 14.05 306 15.25 I 166 97 47 14.80 15. 65 15. 65 130 78 36 14.65 15.85 16.15 I......... 161 12. 20 12 0) 8 20.65 21.10 11 51 (0 13.90 $16.85 43 15.85 33 3 7 16.65 128 15.80 0 0 (0 f‘) 0 16.15 14. 65 (') 15.50 0 18.75 0 18. 15 16.50 21.15 19.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (■) 0 17 (<) 233 181 176 74 406 207 157 232 17.85 1,935 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Me- Num dian ber Iron Me- Num dian ber Median 30 $16.70 4,618 $15.45 1,248 $16.80 1,301 $16. 80 938 13.50 209 16.00 151 15. 95 570 13. 55 132 15.80 110 16.10 222 14.40 40 16. 55 23 15.80 146 12.30 37 15.25 18 15.20 0 1,666 13.85 515 15.65 569 15.50 18.50 0) (0 0) 0) FJat-work Press operironer 1 ate Me Num Me Num Me Num ber dian ber dian ber (0 1,248 357 325 Tumbler dian $15.20 0) (0 ~W 550 396 532 218 1,137 532 316 699 Cincinnati_______ 14.70 Starch and dampen 15.15 13.15 14. 70 12.75 14. 50 12.40 15.10 13. 15 68 31 56 68 119 64 26, 83 17.40 15.30 15.85 14. 75 16. 35 15.00 15.80 14.85 72 37 68 25 138 41 48 140 17. 65 14. 55 15.95 13.85 15.90 13. 95 16. 65 14. 75 Press and hand iron ber 29 Median $15. 25 11 (>) 6 0 5 16 0 15.50 1 5 (i) 5 5 (i) 0 0 17. 35 515 18. 70 572 19.25 2 0 863 259 515 298 16.70 15.40 19. 60 17.60 176 78 166 95 18.05 16. 55 21.65 18. 50 163 94 231 84 18.00 15. 75 22.60 18. 45 2 0 79 10.85 9 0 2 4 0 0 1 0 73 10. 95 8 0 9 (>) -....... 9 0 — — A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND TH EIR WOMEN W ORKERS Women for whom occu pation and rate were reported cv Number of women and their median rates where occupation was—Continued 103127 Mend; seam Bundle, Curtain and Collar or col wrap, pack stress blanket drier lar starch t-l Section and dty m to 10 General Forelady Shirt 01ean Other Me Num Me Num Me Num Me Num Me Num Me Num Me Num Me Num Me Num dian ber dian dian ber dian ber dian ber dian ber dian ber dian ber dian ber ber All places hJL Eastern o Boston Jersey City and Newark------------------------------Middle western Cincinnati--------------------- --------------------------Des Moines Detroit _ ------------------ ---- ---------------------- Western--------------------------------------------------------- 75 $16.75 11 7 2 © « (0 . « 260 $16.65 51 30 6 15 15.30 15.35 (0 14. 40 154 $15.35 23 10 9 15.40 a (0 0) 330 $16. 75 49 41 15. 25 15.45 13 © 59 $16.50 14 « 48 22.80 6 (>) 3 « 5 « 10 © 1 31 1 ft 3 « 4 « 12 22.65 « « 69 22.65 3 « 0) 0) 0) 23. 50 0) 0) 0) 158 $16.85 8 209 $23. 70 40 15.40 116 16.10 93 14.95 126 15. 85 42 16. 60 5 3 9 5 11 1 1 5 © 0 (1) « © m m © 16 11 23 5 19 16 5 21 18. 50 0) 15. 75 (0 17. 50 15.00 (0 15. 90 6 10 23 © (0 15.10 18 18 14 3 34 9 4 26 20. 15 16.00 (>) 0) 16.15 0) 0) 14. 55 9 8 (>> © 9 10 3 © (0 0) 0) 18 25 4 9 16 © (*) 14. 65 8 6 75 $20.05 1 « « 9 © 18 2 4 © © 7 © 2 « 2 « 4 3 « « « « 15.00 w 24 18.70 78 19. 90 28 18.00 121 19.70 102 17.00 74 25.15 66 20.25 1 (>) 36 16.85 3 5 7 9 0) © © © 26 10 27 15 18. 65 © 22.15 18. 90 19 1 7 1 17.15 « w « 32 14 53 22 18. 60 0) 20. 60 18. 35 78 9 16. 90 (0 0) t1) 31 7 16 25. 30 to 26 18.25 (0 22. 00 (0 1 © 33 16.80 (0 21.00 15 14.15 10 © 34 14.15 18 Atlanta..................................................................... B irmingham------------------------- ------ -............. . 10 3 (0 w 3 1 © « © (0 © Richmond________________________________ St. Petersburg and Tampa---------------------------- 2 « 1 5 « « © «' 9 5 1 © © 14 7 5 3 © 8 32 1 (0 A PPEN D IX A— GENERAL TABLES o 1 Not computed, owing to the small number involved. CO Median of the weekly rates, by occupation and by section and city—Continued 138 Table XXII. NEGRO WOMEN Number of women and their median rates where occupation was— Mark and sort Hand wash Machine wash Starch and dampen Tumbler Flat-work ironer Press operate Iron Num Me Num Me Num Me Num Me Num Me Num Me Num Me Num Me Num Me ber dian ber dian ber dian ber dian ber dian ber dian ber dian ber dian ber dian All places___________ 4,179 $9.20 2,116 $9.55 650 $8.70 738 $7.90 215 13. 35 4 © 4 (■) 141 12.80 28 14.15 30 14.15 61 138 16 13.50 13.15 14.50 3 1 0) © 2 0 2 0 35 103 3 12.95 12. 70 0) 12 10 6 0 0 0 8 20 2 0 14.00 0 Middle western____ _________ 1,489 12.75 84 14.90 16 13. 80 28 13.85 4 0 935 12.20 172 14.55 136 14.40 Chicago_______________ Cincinnati ___ ___ Cleveland_____ _____ I>etroit _____ _ __ Indianapolis _____ ___ Minneapolis and St. Paul ... 716 42 378 324. 28 1 12.75 12. 30 10.95 14. 55 12. 70 0) 35 9 .22 16 2 15.05 0 13. 80 18. 00 0 5 (■) 0 o) (0 « 1 9 2 (>) (■) C1) (>) (■) 1 4 1 6 6 ai 3 0 490 17 263 165 12.50 10. 50 10.10 14.30 83 5 24 54 6 14.85 0 14.00 14.65 0) 42 5 28 53 7 1 14.85 0 12.15 14.75 0) 0 1 0 7.60 13 0 71 7.70 5 0 1,040 6.85 450 7. 70 566 7.40 Sft 3 1 1 2 6 0) 31 13 5 15 7 7.05 0) 0) 8.75 0) 1 4 0) 0 384 226 165 189 76 6.40 6.60 6.55 7.75 9.45 157 91 63 69 70 7. 30 7.35 7.60 9. 45 9.90 208 99 79 103 77 6.65 6. 95 7. 20 9.10 10.10 Eastern.____ _____ Boston ______ _ Jersey City and Newark________ Providence________ Western—Los Angeles_____ Southern________ Atlanta..___________ Birmingham____________ _ „ Jacksonville______ Richmond_________ _ St. Petersburg and Tampa........ 10 0) 225 $12.90 1 41 $9.75 14 1 0 0 0 103 $8.80 0 2,465 7.35 136 10.75 25 875 515 340 475 260 6.70 7.05 6.90 8.55 10.05 26 27 7 64 12 7. 50 7.90 0) 12. 65 0) 11 8 2 2 2 IS1) 1 10 0) 6 0 A STJKVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND TH EIR -WOMEN W ORKERS Section and city Women for whom occu pation and rate were reported Number of women Section and city Press and hand iron Collar or Curtain and blanket drier collar starch and their median rates where occupation was—Continued Bundle, wrap, pack Mend; seamstress General Foreiady Other Clean Shirt Me* Num Me Me Num Me Num Me Nnm- dian Me Num Me Num Me Num dian ber dian Num Me Num Me Num dian ber dian ber dian ber ber dian ber dian ber ber dian ber dian ber $13.00 8.60 $8.45 (*) 0 Eastern.............. $12.85 $7.15 (0 (0 (0 « $12. 90 18 $12. 25 (0 w Boston________________ Jersey City and Newark.. Providence-------------------- 0) 0 Middle western. Chicago______________________ Cincinnati-----------------------------Cleveland Detroit------ ------------------ ---------Indianapolis--------------- -----------Minneapolis and St. Paul........ — "«?r (0 w m 0 (> 0 0 T1)' 13.95 (0 0 14.50 (>) 0) CO (0 (') « 33 10 0 0 (0 (’) 23 co « (') CO 14.15 12.60 0) (>) Western—Los Angeles.. Southern.......................... Atlanta------------ ------- -----Birmingham------------------Jacksonville-------------------Richmond---------------------St. Petersburg and Tampa. > Not <>> 18 0 0 0) 0 to (') 44 8.00 7.70 (0 0) CO 0 (>) 0) 0 8 8.40 (>) CO (') (0 « 6.65 CO (0 (') l1) (0 (0 (') (>) n(0 (0 (0 (>) (■) A PPEN D IX A — GENERAL TABLES $6.90 All places. CO computed, owing to the small number involved. CO CO 140 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Table XXIII.—Median of the weekly rates, by WHITE WOMEN Section and city Number of women and their median rates where time with the firm was— Total for whom rates and time with firm Under 3 months 3 and under 6 and under 9monthsand 6 months 9 months under 1 year Num- Me- Num- Me- Num ber dian ber dian ber All places. 7,950 $16.50 Eastern 1,065 Boston 787 Jersey City and Newark 42 Providence 236 Middle western____ 3, 484 Chicago 407 Cincinnati 311 Cleveland______ 415 lies Moines 129 Detroit 986 Indianapolis 409 Milwaukee 258 Minneapolis and St. Paul.......... 569 Western 3, 061 Los Angeles._ 1,129 Portland 484 San Francisco__ 981 Seattle 467 Southern 340 Atlanta 123 Birmingham___ 69 Jacksonville 17 Richmond 6 St. Petersburg and Tampa___ 125 356 $14. 00 14. 65 14.80 12 9 Me- Num- Me- Num dian ber dian ber 798 $15. 00 « 0) 69 47 12. 95 13.40 830 $15. 85 93 73 Median Under 1 year ber dian 447 $15. 90 2,431 $15. 30 12. 75 12. 85 47 32 13. 65 13. 90 221 13. 05 161 13. 30 14. 65 13. 95 15. 25 16.65 13. 75 15. 70 14. 25 15.85 13. 65 16.10 2 (•) C1) 1 271 13. 90 36 15. 00 39 12.90 24 14. 45 » 10 62 14. 55 33 12. 55 16 15.20 5 17 439 65 39 54 9 101 58 31 m 11.40 14.05 15. 50 13. 40 14. 60 o 14. 95 12. 60 15.20 2 m 18 12.20 346 14. 60 55 15. 85 24 13. 20 50 15. 00 o 12 95 15.20 39 13. 05 18 15.35 3 12 201 19 12 20 5 78 29 16 0) 12 0) 0) 48 12. 05 14. 90 1, 257 14. 30 15. 90 175 15. 55 (') 114 13. 30 14, 90 148 14. 75 (■) 36 13. 60 15. 45 336 15.10 12.70 159 12. 70 15.00 81 15. 20 14. 35 18. 85 17. 50 15. 95 21.25 18. 45 14. 05 14. 75 15. 60 14.50 51 45 12 18 5 10 28 5 82 200 129 43 46 42 30 7 5 2 13. 35 17. 05 16. 70 14. 95 20. 20 17. 85 12. 10 0 (■) (■> 53 352 147 49 109 47 39 10 6 6 13. 60 17. 90 16. 75 15. 30 19. 90 18.00 12. 45 <■> w 0) 22 174 72 33 33 36 25 5 7 1 14. 00 17.80 17.00 15. 55 19.90 18. 15 14. 15 0) <<) 0) 10.85 17 11. 15 12 m 0) 12. 35 13. 95 16. 55 0) 14. 85 a C1) 10. 80 C1) 23 | 10. 80 16 1 208 831 360 143 193 135 122 27 18 9 13. 55 17. 50 16. 75 15. 25 19. 95 18. 00 12.30 12.45 15.20 « 68 11. 40 NEGRO WOMEN Section and city All places Eastern_____ Boston_______ Jersey City and Newark Providence . Middle western___ Chicago_______ Cincinnati.. Cleveland__ Detroit. _____ Indianapolis___ Minneapolis and St. Paul Western-Los An geles________ Total for whom rates and time with firm were reported Number and per cent of women and their median rates where time with the firm was— Under 3 months 3 and under 6 and under 9monthsand 6 months 9 months under 1 year Under 1 year Num ber Me Num dian ber Me Num Me Num Me Num dian ber dian ber dian ber Me dian Num Me ber dian 2, 719 $9. 15 *7.55 $9.50 57 42 13. 85 13. 65 979 $7.95 10 UT 5 « 2 13 979 484 31 225 219 19 1 10 1, 673 Atlanta__ 595 Birmingham____ 321 Jacksonville ... 184 Richmond___ 376 St. Petersburg and Tampa___ 197 223 340 2 1 {') P) 303 4 3 $7.75 (>) (>) 8 13.00 12.95 12. 50 11.65 14.65 12.65 113 4 1 « 1 2 46 26 w (0 12.65 12.75 9 6 5 (’> >) (>) 1 4 359 198 7 78 64 12 12.40 12. 50 (0 11.10 14.35 0) 1 (") 610 212 129 76 108 6.85 6.30 6.60 6.40 7.85 8.75 85 9.30 W (0 (■) 1 141 78 4 28 27 4 0) 12.40 12.55 (0 11.10 14.05 0) 1 107 49 3 30 24 1 (0 12. 30 12. 35 (0 10.35 14. 55 0) 63 21 22 18 6.35 6.40 6.40 7.60 197 51 56 27 40 6.85 6. 35 6.50 6.30 7.95 192 79 44 18 38 6.80 6. 25 6. 85 6. 40 7.85 63 19 8 9 12 7.30 6.25 (>) 34 9. 45 23 9.15 13 (0 15 65 45 12. 35 12.40 11 7 2 0) 7.40 6.70 7.20 6.80 8. 60 10.10 8 0) 1 Not computed, owing to the small number involved, $8. 80 141 APPENDIX A—GENERAL TABLES time with the firm and by section and city WHITE WOMEN—Continued Number of women and their median rates where time with the firm was—Continued 1 and under 2 years 2 and under 3 years Number 3 and under 4 years Me- Numdian ber Median 4 and under 5 years Number her Median 1, 501 $16.00 184 126 14.15 14.30 146 110 14.20 14. 45 77 62 14.75 15.05 69 50 9 49 664 57 52 73 23 229 82 51 0) 13. 60 14. 90 15.50 13. 70 15.50 13.95 15.45 13. 65 15.45 4 32 418 49 32 45 25 131 34 38 (0 12.90 1'5.60 17.10 14.00 15.95 13.90 16. 25 14. 00 16. 70 2 13 256 23 25 37 11 76 36 15 h 15.90 18. 60 15. 30 15.85 c) 16. 90 14. 65 16.85 0 2 17 219 20 25 31 14 55 16 13 97 573 225 81 172 95 80 26 21 3 14.10 18.40 17. 30 15. 65 20.80 18. 25 13. 85 13.00 15.10 o 64 454 154 70 161 69 46 18 8 14.90 19. 10 18.00 16.15 21.40 18. 55 14.85 14. 35 ro (i) 33 274 115 36 91 32 27 12 6 14. 25 Id. 30 17.90 16. 35 21. 55 19. 60 16.20 0 <>) 45 263 86 41 94 42 20 10 5 30 12.90 14 1,064 $16. 70 634 $17.05 (l) 0 9 « Median 571 $17. 50 5 and under 10 years Number 10 and under 15 years Median Number 349 $18.40 227 $20.05 17. 55 17.45 63 41 18.40 18.15 22 99 17 16 12 1 12 14 15 19.00 19. 40 21.75 17.00 Me- Numdian ber 1,173 $18.05 15.30 15. 30 214 159 15.65 15.65 91 78 0 11 44 434 47 37 51 15 119 46 33 0 15.80 17.00 20. 05 15. 25 18. 60 16. 25 17. 55 15.65 16.95 2 11 137 19 10 18 4 28 22 12 0 0 86 494 143 91 190 70 31 22 7 15. 70 19. 80 18.50 16.95 22.10 18.85 17. 65 17. 35 24 111 35 10 53 13 10 6 2 3 0) 2 2 (1) 15.50 16. 20 19.00 13. 95 16.50 0 16.85 14. 25 0 14.90 19. 60 18. 65 16.85 21.30 19.40 16.85 0 15 years and over 0 0 17.30 19.40 0) 17.35 0 18.00 16.85 0 16.90 21.45 19.50 (0 22. 65 0 0 0 0 Median 0 0 0 0 20.50 12 61 11 12 27 11 4 2 2 0 22.85 0 0 24.90 o 0 0 (■) 0 2 0 NEGRO WOMEN—Continued Number and per cent of women and their median rates where time with the firm was—Continued 1 and under 2 years Median ber 446 6 5 $8.55 <0 0 2 and under 3 years 3 and under 4 years 4 and under 5 years Number Number Median Number Median 367 $9. 45 243 $8. 65 5 5 (0 0 7 6 0 0 0 (l) 12.70 12.80 1 169 83 134 57 13. 50 13. 65 70 27 36 43 10. 90 14.25 36 35 11.35 14.40 20 15 13. 65 13. 65 (i) 12. 75 15. 40 0 0 0 Median 186 $10.90 5 and under 10 years Number 26 Me- Numdian ber 374 $11.00 Number 96 $10. 55 28 $10.60 3 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 17 11 14.50 to 3 3 0 0 1 82 42 (!) 14.10 13. 70 (!) 14.70 14. 95 17 14 Ii 50 19 21 13. 30 15.35 6 148 63 8 34 40 2 12. 90 15.20 2 1 0 0 9.50 7.75 0 0 0 15 years and over Median 6 5 1 1 270 103 49 40 52 10 and under 15 years 0 _____ 0 0 7.25 6.65 7.35 6. 75 7.85 3 225 63 45 20 63 7. 65 6.80 7. 40 7.10 8.45 1 165 . 51 38 18 33 7. 60 6. 85 7.35 7.40 8.90 1 97 45 14 7 22 7. 75 7.06 0 0 9.15 4 205 87 35 18 64 8.00 7.45 7. 90 7. 80 9.85 76 25 10 4 34 12.36 25 9 1 1 10 10. 45 34 10. 55 25 10.40 9 0 11 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 Median 0 0 10.15 0 0 0 0 0 -Median of the rates and earnings of timeworkers and of the earnings of all women, hy section and city Section and city White women Earnings of timeworkers Negro women Number Median Number All places. 14,104 $16.10 5,076 $8.85 Eastern_______ 2,306 14.50 246 12.50 1,423 365 518 14.60 14.80 13.65 67 160 19 5,692 14.75 746 539 608 238 1,245 529 887 16. 65 14.05 15.25 14.00 15.35 13.45 14.65 14.10 5,564 17.90 16 2,613 1,434 749 17.00 15.35 20.70 18.05 542 180 118 47 11 Boston____ ___________ Jersey City and Newark. Providence____________ Middle western. Chicago_______________ Cincinnati_____________ Cleveland______________ Des Moines____________ Detroit________________ Indianapolis____________ Milwaukee_____________ Minneapolis and St. Paul.. Western.. Los Angeles__ Portland_____ San Francisco.. Seattle_______ Southern.. Atlanta_________________ Birmingham____________ Jacksonville.......................... Richmond______________ St. Petersburg and Tampa.. White women Median Number Rates of timeworkers Negro women White women Median Number Median Number Median Number 11,827 $16.00 4,328 $8. 60 11,670 $16. SO 4,203 $9.25 1,910 14.30 215 12.45 1,935 14.70 221 13.30 13.35 11.90 14.15 1,231 355 324 14.35 14.70 13.40 55 144 16 13.35 11.85 14.25 1,251 357 327 14.70 15.45 13.50 61 144 16 13.50 13.10 14.50 1,938 12.25 4,582 14.65 1,534 12.20 4,442 15.20 1,498 12.75 989 50 448 12.45 12.10 10.85 12.45 12.05 10. 30 725 42 378 12.75 12.30 10.95 339 31 12.65 12.55 560 396 532 218 1,141 535 16.45 13.80 15.60 12. 55 12.50 15.80 13.55 324 28 14.55 (■) 16.40 13. 50 14.95 13.85 15.35 12.85 14.60 14.15 751 41 370 399 50 558 393 528 218 1,146 570 392 777 2 p) 744 14.40 1 p) 17. 50 4,819 17.95 10 p> 4,809 18.55 10 p> 16 17.50 2,002 658 1,434 725 16.85 15.30 20.70 18.00 10 p) 2,002 17. 20 10 p) 13.95 2,876 7.15 516 13.95 2,569 7.10 484 14.05 2,474 7.35 14.40 15.80 15.40 <■) 11.95 940 742 352 477 365 6.45 7.00 6.80 8.20 9.80 167 114 47 11 177 14.40 15.70 15.40 (0 11.90 875 595 338 466 295 6.40 6.95 6.75 8.20 10.25 167 97 47 12 161 14.85 15.65 15.65 (1) 12. 20 881 515 340 477 261 6.70 7.05 6.90 8. 55 10.05 2 ‘ 1 Not computed, owing to the small number involved. Negro women r Median A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND TH EIR WOMEN W ORKERS Earnings of all workers 142 Table XXIV. a# Table XXV.—Marital status of the women who supplied personal information, by section and city Number and per cent of women whose marital status was— Section and city Number of women reporting marital status Negro Number Per cent Number Per cent Number Per cent Number Per cent Number Per cent Number Per cent t All places.............. -.................. 12,371 Eastern.......................-....................... 2,000 4,183 4,158 198 990 33.6 49.5 1,209 86 28.9 43.4 5, 333 644 43.1 32.2 41.1 2,880 23.3 1,253 30.0 80 40.4 366 18.3 32 16.2 212 73 81 17.4 23.4 17.1 ■ 15 16 1 20.0 15.0 6.3 1,721 Boston______________ _______ Jersey City and Newark--------Providence 1,215 312 473 75 107 16 621 134 235 51.1 42.9 49.7 31 44 11 41.3 41.1 68.8 382 105 157 31.4 33.7 33.2 29 47 4 38.7 43.9 25.0 Middle western.. --------------- ------ 5,220 1,523 1,834 35.1 406 26.7 2,247 43.0 668 43.9 1,145 21.9 449 29.5 132 133 101 51 185 294 72 177 19.3 26.4 18.4 30.4 15.5 35.6 15.4 21.2 265 5 88 33.8 10.9 26.3 77 14 23.9 37.8 36.8 Chicago Cincinnati----------------- ------ — Cleveland___________________ Detroit. -------- ------ ----------Indianapolis-------------------------Minneapolis and St. Paul........... Western-----------------------------------Los Angeles....... ........................... Portland Seattle_____ ____ ___________ Southern____________ ____-........ . Atlanta........... -.................-.......... Birmingham.............................. Jacksonville----- ----------- -------Richmond--- -----------------------St. Petersburg and Tampa......... 684 504 549 168 1,191 827 467 836 4,610 2,044 645 1,311 610 535 191 106 30 7 201 49.7 36.5 43.5 58.9 41.1 47.4 46.7 34.1 322 19 160 148 18 I 46.0 48.6 5.3 2,261 49.0 II 57.9 1,220 26.5 7 5.6 875 318 704 364 42.8 49.3 53.7 59.7 10 55.6 520 176 371 153 25.4 27.3 28.3 25.1 7 33.8 962 39.4 149 27.9 765 31.3 29.8 31.1 23.3 0) 40.3 339 231 84 153 155 42.6 37.7 32.1 34.6 47.0 46 40 9 1 53 24.1 37.7 30.0 O') 26.4 245 205 81 119 115 30.8 33.4 30.9 26.9 34.8 31.0 37.1 38.1 10.7 43.3 17.0 37.9 44.7 196 22 86 25.0 47.8 25.7 97 5 30.1 13.5 1 212 187 209 18 516 141 177 374 19 1,129 24.5 1 18 649 151 236 93 31.8 23.4 18.0 15.2 1 783 46 334 322 37 1 2,443 796 613 262 442 330 1 Not computed, owing to the small number involved. 340 184 239 99 490 392 218 285 41.1 41.3 47.9 205 88 33 14 3 67 38.3 46.1 31.1 46.7 (*) 33.3 716 212 177 97 170 60 29.3 26.6 28.9 37.0 38.5 18.2 181 57 33 7 3 81 1 0) 0) 38.9 — A PPEN D IX A— GENERAL TABLES White Negro White Negro White Negro White Widowed, separated, or divorced Married Single 144 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Table Section and city XXVI.—Nativity Number of women Num reporting nativity ber of and race for eignborn Native born wornen For- reportW hite Negro horn and race of the women who Number of foreign-born women whose country of birth was— Aus- Bel- Can- Den- Eng- Fintria gium ada mark land land try of birth All places____________ Per cent distribution.............. 8,971 48.8 5, 954 32.4 3, 444 18.7 3, 402 70 26 413 33 Eastern___________________ 1, 290 336 714 713 1 1 197 Boston________ ____ ____ Jersey City and Newark. __ Providence_____ _______ 747 200 337 97 218 21 471 105 138 471 104 138 1 1 179 Middle western____________ 4,172 2, 240 1, 075 1,036 47 10 Chicago...... ......................... Cincinnati_____________ Cleveland______________ Des Moines____________ Detroit............................ . Indianapolis____________ Milwaukee_____________ Minneapolis and St. Paul. 398 480 404 157 .846 818 368 701 1,156 50 525 281 25 135 14 334 11 101 135 13 1 11 2 10 2 290 25 143 14 350 11 106 136 Western.............. ....................... 2,995 20 1,635 Los Angeles_______ _____ Portland_______________ San Francisco___________ Seattle_________________ 1,334 509 725 427 19 Southern__________________ Atlanta..... ............... ........... Birmingham___________ Jacksonville____________ Richmond........ ......... ........ St. Petersburg and Tampa 160 34 4 35 4 2 2 22 3 10 3 120 6 49 5 1 6 91 1 10 2 1 4 8 1 3 4 2 9 1 31 1 1 1 1 7 1 9 1, 633 22 15 96 23 74 25 1 721 137 591 186 719 137 591 186 3 6 11 2 1 5 9 37 22 12 25 4 5 8 6 29 8 20 17 5 9 11 514 3, 358 20 20 186 107 30 7 184 1,090 861 433 546 428 3 3 17 17 444 57 18 2 2 1 2 1 145 APPENDIX A—GENERAL TABLES supplied personal information, by section and city Number of foreign-born women whose country of birth was—Continued Poland Portugal Eussia Scotland 90 255 60 199 98 168 139 3 15 55 10 29 12 48 66 2 9 3 '3 1 10 26 2 1 4 2 6 34 3 11 24 38 69 35 77 3 19 3 23 2 12 5 2 2 5 1 2 38 8 1 14 2 20 2 3 13 gary land Italy 86 258 46 238 338 4 19 2 135 14 3 141 26 22 68 59 96 41 33 5 n li 7 2 23 6 48 46 8 27 ID 2 10 7 3 55 153 43 Swe- Yugo- Other den slavia foreign way many France 4 111 4 ico 557 54 15 33 226 8 7 121 2 13 1 66 1 6 2 5 2 22 20 5 2 8 541 53 14 516 24 1 3 10 11 29 4 3 7 1 1 7 27 1 38 11 235 5 165 30 85 3 99 4 1 19 12 125 9 9 3 8 10 13 14 21 37 3 18 10 62 9 1 2 11 1 1 a 1 1 1 11 XXVII.—Age of the women who supplied personal information, by section and city 146 Table WHITE WOMEN Number and per cent of women whose age was— Number of porting age Section and city Num ber All places_______ ____________ Eastern____ ____ ______ Boston_____________ Jersey City and Newark___ Providence....... .................. M iddle western ............ Chicago____ _ Cincinnati .............. Cleveland____ •_____ Des Moines_______ Indianapolis___________ Milwaukee___ ___ Minneapolis and St. Paul__ Western___ ___________ Los Angeles________ __ Portland.. ___ __________ Seattle______ Southern _ ___ ___ ......... ........ Atlanta________ Birmingham__________ Jacksonville.. _ _ Richmond. ______ St. Petersburg and Tampa... * Per cent 16 and under 18 and under 18 years 20 years 20 25 and under years 25 and under 30 and under 40 and under 50 and under 30 years 40 years 50 years 60 years 60 years and over Num ber Per cent Num ber Per cent Num ber Num ber 2,170 17.7 1,643 Per cent Num ber 3.5 1,211 9.9 8.8 6.2 17.9 185 9.2 9.7 114 26 45 9.4 8.3 9.5 198 27 84 173 3.3 620 11.9 950 41 9 6.3 72 71 75 12,260 426 2,004 177 100.0 100.0 1,217 312 100.0 475 100.0 100.0 5,219 100.0 685 100.0 505 100.0 548 171 100.0 1,193 100.0 827 100.0 477 100.0 813 100.0 100.0 4,501 100.0 2,036 641 100.0 100.0 1,222 602 100.0 100.0 536 100.0 191 107 100.0 30 100.0 7 100.0 100.0 201 100.0 75 56 46 12 60 3 13 33 37 21 10 6 1.8 2.2 1.2 5.0 2.7 4.1 .8 1.0 1.6 37 51 82 14.1 13.7 4.1 4.5 10.7 10.1 ^22 113 191 8.7 17 66 18 21.3 __ 141 19* 3 65 23.5 114 11.2 11.6 5.4 13.9 Num ber Per cent Num Per ber cent 3,408 27.8 2, 312 18.9 855 462 23.1 418 20.9 175 300 24.7 57 18.3 105 • 22.1 256 76 Num Per ber cent 21.0 24.4 86 18.1 105 40 30 7.0 235 1.9 8.7 — 54 — 2.7 8.6 12.8 63 28 13 13 2.3 4.2 2.7 2.1 2.2 5.5 12.5 1,407 27.0 913 17.5 393 7.5 112 12.2 9.7 32.8 26.9 23.6 29.4 27.9 25.1 135 82 87 45 162 192 81 129 19.6 16.2 15.9 26.3 13. 6 23.2 17.0 15.9 47 53 35 25 57 6.9 10. 5 6.46 14. 4.8 15 28 4 13.6 14.0 224 115 160 46 282 243 133 204 11.5 10.5 11.8 14.3 22.8 29.2 Per cent 10127 12.2 5.7 48 5.9 6 12 20 15 12 .7 3.5 1.0 2.4 3.1 1.5 344 17.6 680 15.1 1,397 31.0 916 20.4 277 1.3 22.4 318 13.7 11.3 197 72 15.6 14.5 16.1 6.2 57 232 41 52 19 547 182 433 235 26.9 28.4 35.4 339 148 286 16.7 23.1 23.4 23.8 99 49 73 56 4.9 7.6 23 18 7 9 1.1 2.8 .6 1.5 22.0 88 16.4 142 26.5 65 12.1 10 1.9 12 29 4 18.8 27.1 13.3 9.4 9.3 6.7 C1) 16.9 3 L6 .9 3.3 0) 5 2.2 2.6 .9 9.5 24.1 29.9 30.0 0) 25.9 18 19 46 32 9 3 52 3.2 39 7.3 13 6.8 10.’0 8 7.5 10.4 28 13.9 21 Ii d-. 4< Per cent 68 1 -i n 22.4 6 20.0 (l) 372 18.4 10 2 341 1 1 41 6.0 9.3 2.0 1 6 3.0 A SURVEY OP LAUNDRIES AND TH EIR WOMEN W ORKERS * a# NEGRO WOMEN Jersey City and Newark......................... Providence------------- ------- -.................. Minneapolis and St. Paul----------------- 100.0 148 3.5 200 100.0 13 6.5 76 108 16 100.0 3 3.9 100.0 1 « 1, 634 100.0 17 799 46 324 37 1 20 Seattle .................................................— St. Petersburg and Tampa.................... 20 1 2 160 11.5 10.0 1.3 (0 10.4 10.4 26.1 89 11.1 36 .6 2 100.0 100.0 _____ — — — 100.0 — — — 100.0 100.0 100.0 14 19 1 100.0 100.0 2,448 100.0 118 800 616 262 439 331 100.0 100.0 100. 0 100.0 100.0 54 24 23 1 16 1 Not computed, owing to the small number involved. 1.1 485 1.8 4.8 6.8 3. 9 8.8 .2 4.8 83 12 305 12.5 91 11.4 67 15.3 1,176 66 28. O' 33.0 963 | 22.0 925 14.5 29 22.9 40 1 20.0 405 20 9.6 10.0 87 10 2.1 13 0.3 5.0 2 1.0 6.6 3.7 C1) 2 2.6 1 .3 5 40.8 27. 8 (>) 12 13 4 15.8 12.0 (■) 17 21 2 22.4 19.4 « 5 14 1 6.6 13.0 (0 5 4 1 430 28.0 368 24.0 357 23.3 165 10.8 36 225 28.2 177 22.2 189 23.7 90 21 2.6 97 87 29.7 26.9 79 95 24.2 29.3 72 75 22.0 23.1 41 23 9 1 11.3 2.2 12.5 7.1 24.3 100.0 7 2.1 2 5.4 31 680 195 27.8 24.4 2 0) 100.0 10 (>> 525 21.4 556 22.7 25.6 205 75 1 22.7 185 150 55 89 77 <■) « 10 3 23.1 24.4 21.0 20.3 23.3 4 216 0 8.8 7.0 56 8.9 55 8.8 23 49 1 11.2 10.0 33 — 3 — c) 38 1.6 10 .4 10 12 2 8 6 1.3 1.9 .8 1.8 1.8 4 1 1 2 2 .5 .2 .4 •5 •6 — — A PPEN D IX A— GENERAL TABLES Cincinnati-------- ------ ---------------------Cleveland....... ...............-........................- 4,202 ' with the firm of women, who supplied personal information, by section and city 148 Table XXVIII.—Time WHITE WOMEN Section and reporting time with Under 3 the firm months All places........................ Per cent distribution________ Eastern__________ ________ Boston___ ____________ Jersey City and Newark.. Providence___ _________ Mi ddle western____________ Chicago_______________ Cincinnati_____________ Cleveland______ ______ Des Moines____________ Detroit________________ Indianapolis____________ Milwaukee_____________ Minneapolis and St Paul. 12,115 100.0 Westem...___ ____________ Los Angeles____________ Portland_______________ San Francisco....... ........... . Seattle.................................. Southern__________________ Atlanta________________ Birmingham_______ _____ Jacksonville____ _______ Richmond______________ St. Petersburg and Tampa. II 3 and under 6 months 6 and 9 months 1 and under 9 and un under 2 months der 1 year years 1,517 12.5 1,262 10.4 1,124 9.3 1,737 193 137 1, 217 55 465 148 3 42 94 6 37 5, 243 716 694 500 544 168 1,199 826 474 838 103 98 62 21 136 135 48 113 4, 606 2,047 642 1,309 608 529 184 107 30 7 201 41 2 and under 3 years 3 and under 4 years 4 and under 5 years 5 and 10 and under 10 under 15 15 years and over years years 605 5.0 2,075 17.1 1,466 12.1 899 7.4 778 6.4 1,622 13.4 473 3.9 294 2.4 135 66 249 211 117 101 313 124 91 99 4 32 44 4 18 165 13 71 144 5 62 82 3 32 64 2 35 220 11 82 102 2 20 34 637 486 288 941 580 386 310 584 188 127 100 65 67 9 118 103 67 108 70 36 62 14 106 93 42 63 35 21 25 5 92 60 23 27 105 84 85 30 251 148 90 148 76 52 59 28 148 67 57 93 39 38 49 16 89 70 33 52 35 33 41 19 69 25 24 64 80 43 64 20 136 73 51 117 27 13 18 4 36 33 22 35 24 17 12 531 439 452 221 771 605 353 339 678 147 70 250 52 139 90 234 56 98 51 215 61 127 49 103 41 36 41 349 110 207 105 253 89 185 78 169 46 102 36 142 47 103 47 260 111 223 84 57 14 61 15 15 15 28 12 77 49 51 30 114 70 43 28 47 14 6 24 7 5 9 10 4 12 8 8 7 8 1 17 6 27 9 2 7 4 3 3 23 14 26 11 5 1 27 13 13 26 39 28 5 1 41 •> 17 2 7 3 55 19 17 18 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND TH EIR W OMEN W ORKERS Number of women whose time with the firm was — 4 NEGRO WOMEN Per cent distributioni---- ------- ----------------- 4,066 100. 0 95~ 599 14.7 455 11.2 411 10.1 168 4. 1 627 15.4 503 12.4 345 8. 5 266 6. 5 531 13.1 125 3.1 36 0.9 3 10 5 4 6 13 6 8 11 23 6 Boston--------- ------- ------ ------------------------------Jersey City and Newark------------------------------- 76 3 16 10 4 3 10 6 7 10 1 1 15 1 7 6 1 3 1 2 Middle western..---------------- ----------- ------------------ 1, 531 195 200 155 66 261 195 108 115 210 25 Chicago.................................................................... 796 44 333 320 37 1 131 1 30 28 5 114 77 4 42 30 2 32 1 13 14 6 129 9 53 62 8 98 5 44 44 4 47 7 33 18 58 91 11 48 19 1 4 2 3 2 2 1 3 3 2 5 1 Eastern------------------ ~------ ------------------------------- Western____________________________ -.................. 1 20 1 27 2 1 1 1 1 Los Angeles.................................................-........... Seattle................................................................. —— 19 1 Southern....... ................................................................... 2,420 394 249 252 94 350 299 226 138 293 93 32 775 618 262 434 331 143 93 45 41 72 59 77 29 42 42 89 72 27 42 22 28 24 12 14 16 118 83 52 58 39 80 81 28 64 46 58 60 28 38 42 56 26 11 R)8 82 25 64 19 31 15 10 5 21 35 8 A PPEN D IX A — GENERAL TABLES Indianapolis ____________________________ ___ Minneapolis and St. Paul------------------------------ 39 38 4 3 by section 150 Table XXIX.—Occupation, WHITE WOMEN Mark and sort Hand wash All places... 13, 925 2,942 33 12 316 432 1,204 957 349 5 23 5 4 4 3 1 44 154 117 1 Section Eastern___ _____ Middle western... Southern.... ........ . 2,348 5,731 5,285 561 Ma Starch Tum chine and wash dampen bler Flatwork Press ironer operate Iron Cur Collar Press tain and or col Bundle, Mend; Gener and wrap, seam hand blanket lar al pack stress iron drier starch Fore lady Shirt Clean Other 30 5,406 1, 733 1,890 77 84 290 174 362 178 223 94 13 68 12 17 1 1,057 2,083 2,160 106 334 762 628 9 211 839 831 9 31 44 2 11 48 25 56 136 83 15 23 108 31 12 53 149 123 37 16 54 108 51 75 76 21 11 3 80 3 9 1 6 24 38 57 34 4 2 20 28 1 10 1 2 11 24 23 3 9 4 NEGRO WOMEN All places... 5,076 242 Eastern. _. ____ Middle western... Western Southern._ ___ 246 1,922 16 2,892 4 89 1 148 51 « 15 115 24 2 4 38 27 13 73 14 4 1 9 N 2,408 855 1,037 58 23 62 51 141 1,136 41 296 1 12 15 3 13 3 12 1,131 518 48 197 12 780 45 8 46 36 * 36 2 19 f A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND TH EIR WOMEN W ORKERS Number of women whose occupation was— Num ber of women report ing oc cupa tion ¥ Table XXX.—Occupation, by age WHITE WOMEN Number Number of women with occupation as specified whose age was— reporting age and Under occupa 16 years tion Occupation All occupations. _____ _____________ ______ _________ ____ 9 2 57 10 31 4 4 1 5 1 1 139 24 236 59 167 42 340 71 3 1 71 17 6 1 1 5 6 1 1 1 1 103 25 18 1 3 64 24 15 2 7 10 1 3 3 3 4 2 3 5 12 1 110 63 44 1 1 5 10 8 2 11 2 2 1 1 1 213 29 106 7 1 5 1 67 35 45 2 6 1 3 4 10 37 1 1 38 18 20 1 4 1 16 3 9 12 3 2 1 5 1 1 1 1 47 1 3 3 12 3 1 1 13 3 21 1 1 4 2 5 1 1 NEQEO WOMEN All occupations —------------------------------------------------------ -- -- Flat-work ironer--- -------------------------------------------- ---------- ----------- 533 42 8 12 1 222 80 125 10 5 7 8 5 7 1 2 21 1 63 6 156 17 2 3 116 11 1 1 1 14 3 2 38 5 8 1 1 2 1 1 1 70 20 25 4 2 3 4 1 4 1 49 23 21 3 1 1 1 2 2 1 113 6 2 3 1 32 24 41 1 1 1 1 A PPEN D IX A — GENERAL TABLES 1.304 245 1 2 25 7 507 189 161 5 15 22 39 38 12 25 1 2 6 2 50 and 25 and 30 and 40 and 16 and 18 and 20 and 60 years under 18 under 20 under 25 under 30 under 40 under 50 under 60 and over years years years years years years years 1 1 Ol 152 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Table XXXI.—Woman’s reason for working, by marital status WHITE WOMEN Number and per cent of women giving reason as specified who were— Reason for working Women re porting reason for working Single Married Widowed, separated, or divorced Number Per Num- Per Num- Per Numcent ber cent ber cent ber cent Total............. ................................... 1,315 100.0 468 100.0 495 100.0 352 100.0 To support self..... ........ ........ .................. . To support family or self; to help family. High cost of living__________________ Choice or habit........... ........ .................... To pay bills (doctor, hospital, passage) To educate children_________________ To buy home or furniture____________ To save for future___________________ Husband ill, injured, or too old_______ Husband’s work not steady____ _____ Husband’s work slack_______________ Husband out of work - _______________ Husband will not work, no good, etc__ To buy car_________________ ______ To buy extras.____ ________________ 535 459 5 26 12 11 22 12 64 79 10 43 11 6 20 40.7 34.9 .4 2.0 .9 .8 1.7 .9 4.9 6.0 .8 3.3 .8 .5 1.5 339 128 72.4 27.4 1.2 34.7 1. 0 4. 6 2. 4 2. 2 4.4 2. 4 12.9 16.0 2.0 8. 7 2.2 1. 2 3.8 190 159 54.0 45.2 1 .2 6 172 5 23 12 11 22 12 64 79 10 43 11 6 19 L .9 NEGRO WOMEN Total................................................. 535 100.0 132 100.0 225 100.0 178 100.0 To support self_____________________ To support family or self; to help family. High cost of living________________ Choice or habit_________ ______ _____ To pay bills (doctor, hospital, passage) To buy home or furniture___ ________ To save for future___________________ Husband ill, injured, or too old............ Husband’s work not steady__________ Husband’s work slack_______________ Husband out of work.._____ ________ Husband will not work, no good, etc___ To buy car______ __________________ To buy extras.......................................... 176 272 32.9 50.8 .2 1.7 .4 .9 .4 1.7 6.0 76 56 57.6 42.4 14 125 1 8 2 5 2 9 32 6 16 2 1 2 6.2 55.6 .4 3.6 .9 2.2 1.9 4.0 14.2 2.7 7.1 .9 .4 .9 86 91 48.3 51.1 1 .6 91 2 5 2 9 32 6 16 2 21 1.1 3.0 .4 .2 .4 4 % 153 APPENDIX A—GENERAL TABLES Table XXXII.—Mothers with children under 14 years of age, by marital status Mothers reporting num ber of children under 14 years Number and per cent of mothers with children under 14 as specified who were— Widowed, separated, or divorced Married Number of children under 14 years White Negro White Negro White Negro Num Per Num Per Num Per Num Per Num Per Num Per ber cent ber cent ber cent ber cent ber cent ber cent Total___________ None____________ _____ 1____ _________ ______ 2_____ _________ 3___________ __________ 4 5 ___ __ _________ G 7__________________ 849 100.0 401 100.0 498 100.0 226 100.0 351 100.0 175 100.0 531 171 90 34 16 5 1 1 264 69 42 16 7 2 1 291 101 56 29 15 5 58.4 20.3 11.2 5.8 3.0 1. 0 149 41 20 9 6 240 70 34 5 1 115 28 22 i 65.7 16. 0 12.6 4.0 .6 1 .2 62.5 20.1 10.6 4.0 1.9 .6 .1 .1 65.8 17.2 10.5 4.0 1.7 .5 .2 65.9 18.1 8.8 4.0 2.7 68.4 19.9 9.7 1.4 .3 Table XXXIII.—Actual time worked in the. laundry industry, by over-all time since first laundry job Over-all period Number of women reporting time in the in dustry Number of women with overall as specified whose actual time worked was— Under 1 year 1 and under 5 years 5 and under 10 years 10 and under 15 years 15 years and over White Ne White Ne White Ne White Ne White Ne White Ne gro gro gro gro gro gro Total_____________ 1,296 Under 1 year 1 and under 5 years___ 5 and under 10 years 10 and under 15 years. ___ 15 years and over 217 497 283 100 199 103127°—30------- 11 525 250 114 587 276 269 102 89 25 101 8 81 243 133 45 23 217 26 4 1 2 81 25 5 1 2 471 88 10 18 218 49 7 2 191 40 38 79 20 3 49 40 17 8 101 8 Number of women who had been employed in Number of women reporting Laundry and Laundry and Laundry and Laundry and Laundry and industrial Laundry and Laundry and Laundry and office or more than hotel or one other experience Laundry only domestic other service factory store professional kind one other service restaurant of work work kind of work White Negro White Negro White Negro White Negro White Negro White Negro White Negro White Negro White Negro White Negro 1,322 536 441 141 233 8 Eastern.... ............................... 305 10 122 22 7 1 108 Boston______ _______ Jersey City and Newark. Providence....................... 118 107 80 1 6 3 50 43 29 9 9 4 1 5 1 1 32 44 32 1 1 4 3 6 606 202 165 53 75 64 121 20 30 Chicago.............................. Cincinnati Cleveland Des Moines________ Detroit_________ ____ Indianapolis_____ Milwaukee__ Minneapolis and St. Paul. 56 57 67 39 85 74 93 135 123 18 31 13 19 23 8 30 17 24 31 39 2 6 5 7 4 4 10 4 19 22 32 9 10 12 12 9 g 17 19 26 18 17 Western........ ........................... 378 2 140 44 1 2 Los Angeles. ..................... Portland .. San Francisco Seattle....................... ........ 119 77 102 80 2 57 25 43 15 8 6 10 20 1 1 33 322 14 61 161 11 12 2 91 72 52 52 5 4 2 11 13 11 20 | 60 34 20 18 55 3 6 29 Southern....... ......................... Atlanta.............................. Birmingham..................... Jacksonville____ Richmond____________ St. Petersburg and Tampa........................... 8 28 2 114 6 12 1 1 2 1 7 1 1 1 2 278 33 64 2 54 31 3 4 31 43 17 18 13 14 10 6 4 2 9 11 4 5 1 1 3 1 2 1 2 1 lu 9 4 3 8 2 2 13 284 32 110 ■ 18 1 9 1 1 6 21 *. 3 2 6 4 2 6 2 21 13 3 1 1 18 2 8 1 1 1 13 2 1 1 2 5 1 6 2 10 155 38 11 23 10 16 22 17 42 6 1 91 1 21 26 15 29 1 6 70 15 20 14 9 1 1 3 12 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Section and city 154 Table XXXIV.—Industrial experience, by kind of work done and by section and city 155 APPENDIX A—GENERAL TABLES Table XXXV.—Preference for laundry work or for other employment, by kind of work and reason for preference Reason for preference Number of women contrasting laundry work with— Number of women Clean report Domes Restau ing ing pref tic rant or Store Factory office Home Other erence service hotel build work ings 740 211 1?3 587 186 94 45 155 173 99 67 10 53 21 9 35 94 24 14 1 6 7 5 13 52 18 22 12 Other work preferred to laundry: All reasons_______ ______ 153 25 29 Better pay.............. ............... Better hours_________ Easier____________ Working conditions better. Other__________ Not reported........... 66 8 15 25 7 32 7 16 3 4 4 7 4 1 16 16 45 216 15 20 77 6 6 Laundry preferred to other work: Better pay. _____________ Better hours_______ Steadier______________ Cleaner__________ Working conditions better Other. _ ________ Not reported__________ 47 6 3 2 1 3 -------- 8 27 8 8 60 25 38 1 3 11 1 1 156 Table XXXVI.—Reason for leaving job, by kind of job left WHITE WOMEN Reason Total Personal: Illness of self............ —........ . Pregnancy and confinement. Illness of others-—................. Accident................................ . Death..____ _____________ Marriage____________ _____ Home duties-....... ......... ....... Education...___ _________ Rest____________________ Vacation_____ ___________ Business-------------------------Distance too great_________ Change of residence-______ Desired a change__________ Another job______________ Not necessary to work_____ Personal reason not specified. Industrial: Accident............................ ...... Illness due to job___ _____ WTork too hard.___________ Dissatisfied with conditions.. Hours too long—__________ Earnings insufficient-______ Work slack..._____ _______ No work_________________ Shutdown.-______________ Laid off__________________ Replaced by men_________ Discharged................. ............. General: Dispute___________ _____ Strike___________________ Weather________ ________ Miscellaneous..-__________ * 110 47 39 4 6 325 64 20 29 23 2 30 297 86 77 41 39 125 49 43 4 6 333 90 24 33 37 2 31 421 109 105 54 48 73 29 14 2 6 88 52 6 25 21 1 18 168 38 59 32 27 81 30 14 2 6 90 71 7 26 26 1 18 222 45 69 42 31 12 22 104 100 74 184 49 96 84 122 11 32 13 23 123 118 76 216 54 127 89 144 11 36 3 4 34 41 11 73 10 12 24 33 1 21 3 4 38 47 11 78 10 68 6 2 9 76 6 2 9 56 6 1 5 2 68 79 2 55 64 18 10 16 1 18 10 17 1 5 2 4 5 2 4 4 1 5 4 1 5 6 6 3 3 82 6 7 1 2 82 6 8 1 2 62 4 6 1 4 63 5 6 1 4 23 3 3 1 1 23 3 3 1 1 31 4 31 4 29 1 29 1 15 15 1 1 1 2 1 1 47 26 13 2 3 9 77 15 7 4 8 9 85 15 8 4 10 1 18 1 20 2 2 1 1 1 43 25 8 2 3 2 2 1 7 3 2 7 3 2 26 13 3 3 2 26 17 3 3 2 2 11 1 4 2 12 1 4 7 4 1 9 5 1 8 14 31 20 3 74 38 37 37 91 7 2 5 11 19 2 13 10 10 1 2 5 12 19 2 13 10 10 1 2 2 21 18 19 14 1 4 9 1 3 24 22 19 15 1 6 9 1 1 2 1 2 7 7 5 1 2 5 1 2 2 3 2 3 1 5 3 2 2 3 2 3 1 5 4 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 i 1 1 1 2 27 19 29 20 25 39 1 24 39 3 1 1 4 7 13 30 20 3 69 35 33 35 80 7 2 62 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 5 Num Num Num Num ber of ber of ber of ber of separa women separa tions women tions 8 6 3 2 6 Other work 8 6 3 26 19 29 19 2 32 3 1 1 4 22 Office or pro fessional work 2 9 2 1 A SURVEY OP LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Women who for reasons specified left— Domestic and Hotels and personalFactory work Stores restaurants service work Num Num Num Num Num Num Num Num Num Num Num Num ber of ber of ber of ber of ber of ber of ber of ber of ber of ber of ber of ber of separa separa separa separa separa women separa tions women tions women tions women tions women tions women tions 11,065 2,637 2 645 1,157 2 296 358 2 433 624 2136 151 2163 204 Women report ing on leaving Other laundries jobs NEGRO WOMEN Total----------------------------------------Personal: General: 858 2 273 428 2 215 236 2 65 78 6 6 2 78 95 50 19 10 1 1 34 6 16 44 19 14 101 37 33 7 20 60 24 11 1 1 34 6 21 47 25 14 112 42 36 7 23 36 15 7 1 38 19 7 1 12 2 12 2 4 1 3 4 1 3 2 1 2 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 9 6 10 29 15 9 44 15 26 3 16 9 6 12 31 21 9 45 19 29 3 18 1 21 1 21 1 1 2 2 3 7 2 2 41 15 6 3 3 3 7 2 2 42 15 6 3 3 3 5 1 2 4 4 4 5 1 2 5 4 1 4 1 4 1 11 3 1 1 2 1 11 3 1 1 2 6 2 27 38 47 53 14 73 27 40 7 13 6 2 27 43 50 62 15 76 30 41 7 16 5 2 14 17 6 25 7 16 13 21 5 . 2 14 19 6 28 8 16 15 21 1 1 9 9 25 16 4 46 2 3 3 10 10 9 9 25 15 4 46 2 3 3 1 6 1 12 2 5 5 13 2 1 1 6 1 12 2 5 5 13 2 1 3 8 16 5 1 9 7 4 1 2 3 8 17 6 1 9 8 4 1 4 14 4 1 14 4 1 12 4 1 12 4 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 5 10 10 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 5 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX A— GENERAL TABLES Industrial: 3 428 1 Details aggregate more than total, because some women gave more than one reason or had left more than one job. Of the total number reporting, 118 failed to give details for all jobs. » Details aggregate more than total, because some women gave more than one reason. .. . . 3 Details aggregate more than total, because some women gave more than one reason or had left more than one job. Of the total number reporting, 224 failed to give details for all jobs. Oi <1 APPENDIX B.—SCHEDULE FORMS Schedule I This schedule was used for recording the firm’s schedule hours, the number of employees, and information on working conditions. Women's Bureau, United States Department of Labor LAUNDRY SCHEDULE City,................................. 1. Name of laundry, .......................... ...................................... Address,................................................. 2. Type,................. ............... .......................................... ...... ........ ........................... ............. ........ ............ . 3. Person interv.,....................................................... ................... Position,....... .................... ..................... Person mterv.,............................................................................ Position,................... ........... ................... Numbers employed: White Colored Total Men____ _________________ ____ Women____ __________ _____ Total_________________________ Number employed one year or more: . 6. Firm’s scheduled hours: Begin End Lunch Rest Total Maj. daily hrs. Monday___ Tuesday___ Wednesday. Thursday. _Friday____ Saturday___ 6. Seasonal, overtime, holidays, etc.: . 7. Wages: Overtime pay, Deductions or bonuses, Vacation without pay, .............. ...... ................................... ; with pay, 8. Employment policy: Emp. mgr. _____ _______________ Other centr. method, Other------------------------------------------------- Records kept, 9. Description of buildings,______ _______ _________________________________ 10. Stairways: Loca tion Mat. Windg. Light o. k. nd. rail Nar. Stp. Rpr. Notes Agent, Date, . 11. Elevators:................................................................................................ . 12. Workrooms: Workroom Floor Material Repair Clean Wet Good arr. Obstructions Special conditions, 159 160 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Schedule I—Continued Women’s Bureau, United States Department of Labor—Continued laundry schedule— continued 13. Cleaning: Swept,..................................... By whom,.............................. Freo., Scrubbed, ---------- -------------- By whom,....... _ _ Frea Notes: ________ ____ ___________________ _____ _______ " 14. Ventilation—Natural: _____________________ 15. Ventilation—Artificial: Fans Workroom Port. Pad. Mangle hoods Wall exhausts Sup. Loc. Exh. fan Special systems No. Notes: 16. Temperature readings: Near Time of day." Dry Wet Rel. Near Dry Wet Rel. a. Large flat-work ironers______ b. Small ironers___ c. Presses________ d. Driers and tum blers........ ........ e. Other___ ______ f. Outdoor temper ature________ 17. Natural lighting: a. Source, b. c. d. e. Adequacy,........... Glare or reflection, __ Shades, __________ Remarks,_________ 18. Artificial lighting: a. Source, b. c. d. e. Adequacy,________ Glare or reflection, ___ Shades, __________ Remarks,_________ 19. Seating: Occupations Num ber of Sitting Stand ing women Mark and sort_____ Flat work... Starching... Press oper ating........ Collar mch. Hand iron ing— Packing___ Notes: prov. Sit or stand Platforms Height 161 APPENDIX B—SCHEDULE FORMS Schedule I—Continued Women's Bureau, United States Department of Labor—Continued —continued laundry schedule 20. Machines: Extractors (guarded),................................................................................................ Driers and tumblers,____________________________________________________________ Starcbers,____ ___________________ _____________________________________________ Flat-work ironers,_____ ______ ___ _______________ ________ ______________________ Small presses and ironers: Nature of power Machines Nature of heat Auto. Semi auto. Method of operation Guarded Other Hand Other Heat pro tection Presses. Ironers. Notes: 21. Other strains and hazards: 22. Heating: Heat of industry,................................... Special system, 23. Drinking facilities: 24. Washing facilities: Towels provided No. Kind Shared Clean by men <» Faucet_____ Other___ _ Cooled____ Cup indiv._ Cup common Convenient _ Notes Hot water Soap Com Indi mon vidual 162 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Schedule I—Continued Women’s Bureau, United States Department of Labor—Continued laundry schedule—continued 25. Toilets: No. using Fir. Plumbing Ventilation Lighting No. No. Privy Auto. per Worn- Men seats seat Hand Seat Out. Out. flush flush wind. Art. Oth. wind. Art. Repair Cond. Fir. Room ceiled fir. Seat Cleanliness Plbg. Room Seat Plbg. Swept By Freq. Seat Seat incl. sern. Scrubbed By Freq. Paper suppl. Room needs desig nation i Notes: . 26. Service facilities: Lighting Room Fir. Comb. with— Cln. Other Toilet Cafe vents Superv. teria Out. into— Hot Hot Cooking Art. wind. Tab. Seats food drink conven iences Lunch Rest Cloak Notes:. 27. Uniforms: 28. First aid:______________ By whom administered, Where administered, . _. Cot Chairs Comf. ch. Bench Lkrs. Shivs. RacksHngrs. Wall hks. Seats 163 APPENDIX B—SCHEDULE FORMS Schedule I—Continued Women’s Bureau, United Slates Department of Labor—Continued laundry schedule—continued 29. Routing and other methods ot stabilizing flow of work:........ ............. .................. .................. 30. Other welfare provisions: Schedule II i Pay-roll information was copied onto this card, one card being used for each woman employee. Certain information from Schedule III was added later. 7 U. S. Department of Labor, Women’s Bureau Establishment Employee’s No. Department Name Male Address Female Age Conjugal condition Occupation S Rate of pay Piece Days worked Regular weekly hours Hour Day Week $0. $ $ Hours worked this period Overtime hours Undertime hours H month $ Began work W D Month $ Earnings NR Additions $ Deductions This period Computed for regular time $ Country of birth M Time at work $ In this trade $ This firm Age At home Board Pay-roll period ___days ending Schedule III This schedule was distributed in the laundry to be made out by each woman employee. Certain information was later transferred to Schedule’ll. U. S. Department of Labor, Women’s Bureau 1. Firm,.......... ............................................................................................... 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Name,_____ __________________ _____ ______ __________________ Address,___ _______________ _______________ __________________ In what country were you born? ................................ ................................ Age,------------------------- ------ ------------------ White or negro? _______ Are you single, married, separated, or widowed? ____ ______________ What is your job in this laundry? ___ ___________________ ________ How long have you been with this firm? ................................................... 164 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS Schedule IV This schedule was used for the information secured during home visits to the women employed in the laundries surveyed. U. S. Department of Labor, Women's Bureau PERSONAL INTERVIEW, LAUNDRY STUDY 1. Firm,...................................................... 2. Name,________________ 3. Length of time in industry, Overall,....... ............. ........... ... 4. Present job,_______________ ......... 5. Length of time on present job,___II””"! 6. Other jobs with present employer, 7. Comparison of present job with other work,' 8. Hours, overtime, seasonal, etc_________ 9. Reason for working,__ ________________ 10. Number of children under 14 years of age” 11. Industrial history: Industry Occupation City, Actual, Date begun Duration Reason for leaving PUBLICATIONS OF THE WOMEN’S BUREAU [Any of these bulletins still available will be sent free of charge upon request] *No. i T 1. Proposed Employment of Women During the War in the Industries of Niagara Falls, N. Y. 16 pp. 1918. No. 2. Labor Laws for Women in Industry in Indiana. 29 pp. 1919. No. 3. Standards for the Employment of Women in Industry. 8 pp. Third ed., 1921. No. 4. Wages of Candy Makers in Philadelphia in 1919. 46 pp. 1919. *No. 5. The Eight-Hour Day in Federal and State Legislation. 19 pp. 1919. No. 6. The Employment of Women in Hazardous Industries in the United States. 8 pp. 1921. No. 7. Night-Work Laws in the United States. (1919.) 4 pp. 1920. *No. 8. Women in the Government Service. 37 pp. 1920. *No. 9. Home Work in Bridgeport, Conn. 35 pp. 1920. *No. 10. Hours and Conditions of Work for Women in Industry in Virginia. 32 pp. 1920. No. 11. Women Street Car Conductors and Ticket Agents. 90 pp. 1921. *No. 12. The New Position of Women in American Industry. 158 pp. 1920. No. 13. Industrial Opportunities and Training for Women and Girls. 48 pp. 1921. *No. 14. A Physiological Basis for the Shorter Working Day for Women. 20 pp. 1921. No. 15. Some Effects of Legislation Limiting Hours of Work for Women. 26 pp. 1921. No. 16. (See Bulletin 63.) No. 17. Women’s Wages in Kansas. 104 pp. 1921. No. 18. Health Problems of Women in Industry. 11 pp. 1921. No. 19. Iowa Women in Industry. 73 pp. 1922. *No. 20. Negro Women in Industry. 65 pp. 1922. No. 21. Women in Rhode Island Industries. 73 pp. 1922. *No. 22. Women in Georgia Industries. 89 pp. 1922. No. 23. The Family Status of Breadwinning Women. 43 pp. 1922. No. 24. Women in Maryland Industries. 96 pp. 1922. No. 25. Women in the Candy Industry in Chicago and St. Louis. 72 pp. 1923. No. 26. Women in Arkansas Industries. 86 pp. 1923. No. 27. The Occupational Progress of Women. 37 pp. 1922. No. 28. Women’s Contributions in the Field of Invention. 51 pp. 1923. No. 29. Women in Kentucky Industries. 114 pp. 1923. No. 30. The Share of Wage-Earning Women in Family Support. 170 pp. 1923. No. 31. What Industry Means to Women Workers. 10 pp. 1923. No. 32. Women in South Carolina Industries. 128 pp. 1923. No. 33. Proceedings of the Women’s Industrial Conference. 190 pp. 1923. No. 34. Women in Alabama Industries. 86 pp. 1924. No. 35. Women in Missouri Industries. 127 pp. 1924. No. 36. Radio Talks on Women in Industry. 34 pp. 1924. No. 37. Women in New Jersey Industries. 99 pp. 1924. No. 38. Married Women in Industry. 8 pp. 1924. No. 39. Domestic Workers and Their Employment Relations. 87 pp. 1924. No. 40. (See Bulletin 63.) _ _ No. 41. Family Status of Breadwinning Women in Four Selected Cities. 145 pp. 1925. . . No. 42. List of References on Minimum Wage for Women in the United States and Canada. 42 pp. 1925. No. 43. Standard and Scheduled Hours of Work for Women in Industry. 68 pp. 1925. No. 44. Women in Ohio Industries. 137 pp. 1925. ‘Supply exhausted. 165 166 A SURVEY OF LAUNDRIES AND THEIR WOMEN WORKERS No. 45. Home Environment and Employment Opportunities of Women in Coal-Mine Workers’ Families. 61 pp. 1925. No. 46. Facts about Working V omen—A Graphic Presentation Based on Census Statistics. 64 pp. 1925. No. 47. Women in the Fruit-Growing and Canning Industries in the State of Washington. 223 pp. 1926. *No. 48. Women in Oklahoma Industries. 118 pp. 1926. ' No. 49. Women Workers and Family Support. 10 pp. 1925. No. 50. Effects of Applied Research upon the Employment Opportunities of American Women. 54 pp. 1926. No. 51. Women in Illinois Industries. 108 pp. 1926. No. 52. Lost Time and Labor Turnover in Cotton Mills. 203 pp. 1926. No. 53. Tho^ Status of Women in the Government Service in 1925. 103 pp. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. Changing Jobs. 12 pp. 1926. Women in Mississippi Industries. 89 pp. 1926. Women in Tennessee Industries. 120 pp. 1927. Women Workers and Industrial Poisons. 5 pp. 1926. Women in Delaware Industries. 156 pp. 1927. Short Talks About Working Women. 24 pp. 1927. Industrial Accidents to Women in New Jersey, Ohio, and Wisconsin. 316 pp. 1927. No. 61. The Development of Minimum-Wage Laws in the United States, 1912 to 1927. 635 pp. 1928. Price, 90 cents. No. 62. Women’s Employment in Vegetable Canneries in Delaware. 47 pp 1007 x 1 No. 63. State Laws Affecting Working Women. 51 pp. 1927. (Revision of Bulletins 16 and 40.) No. 64. The Employment of Women at Night. 86 pp. 1928. *No. 65. The Effects of Labor Legislation on the Employment Opportunities of Women. 498 pp. 1928. No. 66. History of Labor Legislation for Women in Three States; Chronological Development of Labor Legislation for Women in the United States. 288 pp. 1928. No. 67. Women Workers in Flint, Mich. 80 pp. 1928. No. 68. Summary: The Effects of Labor Legislation on the Employment Op portunities of Women. (Reprint of Chapter II of Bulletin 65.) 22 pp. 1928. No. 69. Causes of Absence for Men and for Women in Four Cotton Mills. 24 pp. 1929. No. 70. Negro Women in Industry in Fifteen States. 74 pp. 1929. No. 71. Selected References on the Health of Women in Industry. 8 pp. 1929. No. 72. Conditions of Work in Spin Rooms. 41 pp. 1929. No. 73. Variations in Employment Trends of Women and Men. 143 pp. 1929. No. 74. I he Immigrant Woman and Her Job. 179 pp. 1929. No. 75. What the Wage-Earning Woman Contributes to Family Support. 20 pp. 1929. No. 76. Women in 5-and-10-cent Stores and Limited-Price Chain Department Stores. 58 pp. 1929. No. 77. A Study of Two Groups of Denver Married Women Applying for Jobs. 10 pp. 1929. No. 78. A 1930ey °f Laundries and Their Women Workers in 23 Cities. 166 pp. No. 79. Industrial Home Work. 18 pp. 1930. No. 80. Women in Florida Industries. (In press.) No. 81. Industrial Accidents to Men and Women. (In press.) Annual reports of the Director, 1919*, 1920*, 1921*, 1922, 1923, 1924*, 1925, 1926, 1927*, 1928*, 1929. 'Supply exhausted. * o i