View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

F E D E R A L R E S E R V E BANK
O F N EW Y O R K
f Circular No. 5 7 6 7 "I
L January 26, 1966 j

Misuse of Check Forms By Drawers

To All Banks in the Second
Federal Reserve D istrict:

We urge your cooperation in assisting the banking system to reduce the check collection
problems arising from the following practices of drawers:

Use o f “ m ade-over” checks. “ Made-over” checks result from the practice of crossing out
the name and address of the drawee bank printed on a check and substituting the name and
address of another drawee bank, without effectively voiding the MICR transit-routing num­
ber of the original drawee bank or the account number of its depositor. When such a check is
processed on high-speed equipment, the original magnetically inscribed transit-routing num­
ber is automatically read, with resultant misrouting of the item, delay in presentment, and
possible loss or embarrassment. In addition, the check may inadvertently be charged to the
account of the wrong drawer.

Use of checks written on blank check forms. Checks written on blank check forms
generally do not bear the transit-routing numbers of the drawee banks either in the conven­
tional or MICR form. Such checks cannot be processed 011 high-speed equipment, and when
handled manually, must be removed from the normal work flow to determine and insert the
proper transit-routing numbers of the drawee banks, thereby causing extra handlings and
possible delays in processing and presentment. Moreover, when received by the drawee
banks, they may require handling as “ exception items” at extra cost by other than normal
procedures.
W e should very much appreciate any efforts you can make to discourage the use of
“ made-over” checks and blank check forms by your customers or others. If any “ made-over”
MICR check is deposited with you, we request that you effectively void the incorrect MICR
transit-routing number and the depositor’s account number before entering the item into
check collection channels. This can be done by heavy overscoring of the original encoding
with a magnetic ink pencil. Ordinary pen and ink or paste-on labels are ineffective for this
purpose.
We are sure that banks generally will benefit from the efforts that each bank makes in
helping to eliminate these very troublesome and costly types of items from the check collec­
tion system.




A

lfred

H

ayes,

President.