View PDF

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

m m t im

<u

What la the policy with respect to the voluat* of money?
the policy of thft Federal Reserve System In this respect is to pro­
m t * a gradual growth in the money supply ia seeping vith the grovth ia the
monetary needs of the econosay.

this does ar t mean th&t the money ©apply must

necessarily grow precisely la proportion to the growth in the total output of
goods and services ia this country, &s changes in tha rat® of as* or turnover
of money affect the aaount of aoney needed.

that is especially true over short

[periods, but is also true over longer periods,

the rate of use of aoney has

'been subject ia the past to fairly wide fluctuations,

These changes in money

turnover prob&hly refleet a variety of influences, including especially general
eccnonic conditions and the level of interest rates.
For example, in period* of depressed business conditions «nd extremely
low interest rates, such a s the ' thirties, aaay individuals and business concerns
tend to hold idle aoney in preference to accepting the low rates o f return or
the risks o f investing their funds fully.

Consequently, the a v e ra g e rat® of

use of money tends to be very low and % relatively large isoney supply is needed
to do the *»or»ey~wor!c* of te e econossy.

On to e other h a n d , in boom periods, when

the dem ands f o r fund* a r e heavy and interest rr.te® tend t o fe relatively high,
e
the general tendency i s for individuals snd business concerns to employ their
fund® ftore fully, the average r a t * o f turnover o f m oney te n d s to Increase, and
the aoaey supply need not expand proportionately with the expansion in business
activity.
The latter type of situation is particularly likely to develop after
a period in vhich the growth in the aoney supply tea outrun the grovth in the
output of the country*




For example, at the ©ad of the war th? Increase ia the

ao&ey supply had eeaaitierably outrun the grovth la the gross national product,
sad b©th ladividuals and busineea eonceras held substeati&l &aouata of Idl*
m m y

«r*lfctag opportuaitie* to use It la meting the backlog ©f deaaad for

various types of goods that had &«eu&ulat*d during the

m r

.

1 repld iaersa**

la th® rat® o f « m o f i»on*y feAlws* daring the e a r ly postwar years, n d d o sp ito
the comparatively em«ll growth la th* aoa*y supply (less th«a 9 per sent J»
four y e a r # ), the amount ofaoney available proved aufficieat aot o n ly to finance
& strong growth la phyaicsil production, but a ls o to permit a eensiderabl* price
in fla tio n *
Because ©f f lu e t u a t io a s lift th# r a te o f use

of -aoaey, th erefor® , i t

i s to b* exp ected th a t th* aoaey supply w i l l fr e q u e n tly vary l e s s nrldsly fr« a
year to y e a r ttean th* t o t a l output ©f th® cou n try.

la th* lo n g rua, however,

i t i a a reason ab le e x p e c ta tio n th a t the aaouat o f aoaey needed v l l l *'rpv
i a proportion to the lo a f* t e r n grovth ©f th e economy.
1 tiott is su b je c t to some r e s e r v a tio n s .

roughly

But even t h is g en era l!a a ~

for sxsjapl*, a peralstMtt t#ati#asy t®w*rd

in te g r a tio n ia in d u str y ©r toward ait&pli floatio n of distributive chanaela m ight
reduce the washer of s te p s by which goods p&ss fr c * the production of raw M a teria ls
t*

th® delivety of finished goods to th e finel oosiomr*

Such tsaseatsle® alght

grad u ally r t t e e * th* bm 4 for mummy i a relation to th e aggregate volume of pro­
d u ctio n .

Oa the other hand, la e r e a s ia g c o a p le x ity of products sad g r e a te r

s p e c ia l is a t io n , in v o lv in g aware w ide-spread su b co n tra ctin g , might in c r e a se g ra d u a lly

the voluift* ©f momp tr a n s a c tio n s r ^ la tiv * to t o t a l production, and hence the um4
fo r oioaey.
At th e o p p o site

correspondence

between

production or ia




th*

«x^ « m ,

changes

fo r period®

as

sh o r t

as » fev month*,

a© © lose

in th e m m j supply sad changes in the volume o f

gen era l economic

activity is

to

be

ex p ected ,

th ere are f a i r l y

3-

regular s«&scnal variations in the

d m su a A

for b&ak credit, and consequently

ia the saoisey supply, which do not oorrespond closely to v&riation* ia aggregate
production.

A redaction in the aoney supply during tha first few aonths of

the year is usual, even la period* of rising business activity# while an inere&se ia the money supply practically always occurs ia the latter part of the
year, even ia period* of declining business activity.

The reduction ia the

aoney supply daring the first few months of If53, vhish was the subjaet of soae
consent in view of the continued rise in production at that time,
of till# seasonal tendency.
m

mm

Illustrative

the rate of turnover of money then v*s high, there

less than the usual seasonal contraction in bsnk loans (the redaction in the

privately owned stoney supply at that tiae being attributable mainly to reduced
bank investments in Governaent securities), »od there vaa no evidence that the
aoney supply v&s insufficient to carry ©a the large volume of business activity
at that time*
Conclusion
For these various reasons, although it is the general policy of the
Federal Reserve Systws to proaote e growth in the asone/ supply in keeping- with the
.
long-tern growth of the eecaoay, it is unnoessary and impracticable for tha
Systew to attempt to enforce * change in the

m nBj

supply aontb-by-n-iianth, and

year-by-year, either precisely parallel to the changes in over-all ecoao«aio
activity, or at a rate of growth equal to the assumed or expected long-tern growth
of the eeonoaiy.





Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, One Federal Reserve Bank Plaza, St. Louis, MO 63102