View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Title II of H+JU 7062 would impl3iaent the thiggy|t0l»t ln
the Presidents j ^ g r a m * This point.reads as fol? 'si ttI
recommend that t]\ Federal Reserve Board be given greater
authority to regulate inflationary bank credit
The expan­
sion of bank credit, except in the fields of consumer and
^
real estate financing, has not, in my opinion, been a major
contributing force to present inflationary pressures# We
must, however, attack the problem of inflation on ali fronts* !

V

I have always believed that our chief reliance for the
control of inflationary bank credit lies in the good judgment
of the individual bankers in the 15,000 banks in the United
States.# ^he Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation, and the Executive Committee of the National
Association of Supervisors of State Banks, representing the
Federal and State supervisory authorities, have urged bankers
to confine the extension of bank credit under existing con~
ditions, as far as possible, to loans that would help production
rather than increase consumer demandsf The banks, in general,
have been most cooperative# I should like to take this oc­
casion to commend their public spirit, and particularly to
commend the American Bankers Association for its program to
secure the maximum voluntary curtailment in the extension of
bank credit#
But, in the present situation, I think it is clear that
prudence requires that additional instruments
to supplement
the voluntary action of the bankers — be placed in the hands
of the Federal Reserve System0