View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

TREASURY DEPARTMENT

6

INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION

DATE Ja n 4

1949

NOTED
to

Secretary £

fro m

Mr. Haafi

Subject:

der
JAN 6-

f. do
CommeniiPof Federal Reserve Banks on Current Business Situation

You asked me to summarize the replies to a letter sent by Mr. McCabe
to the directors of the Federal Eeserve Banks, asking for their comments
on current conditions in businesses of which they had first-hand knowledge.
The seven questions asked by Mr. McCabe are listed below, with a
summary of the opinions of the directors expressed in their replies to
each question.
(l) In the case of the company or companies with which you are most
familiar, has there been any substantial change In the plana for
investment in new facilities (plant or equipment) since October 31,
19^8? Do you feel that expenditures of this type in 19^9 will run
ahead of or behind expenditures in 19




It is the belief of nearly all directors that the
election,results have had no noticeable effect on
capital expenditures for which plans had already been
made. These will be completed as planned, which will
help maintain capital expenditures at a high level
during the first quarter or first half of 19^ 9 Greater caution, however, will be shown in new
capital investment that is still in the discussion
stage, and many of these will now be held in abeyance
pending a clearer picture of prospective profits, of
Congressional action — particularly on taxes and
labor laws, and of the trend in construction costs.
The very general belief is that capital expendi­
tures in 19^9 will be noticeably less than in 19^8 ,
to some extent because of the hesitation mentioned
above, but more largely because of the completion of
postwar expansion programs. The reduction is expected
chiefly in the second half of 19^9. However, a large
volume of capital expenditures will continue. The bank
directors expect a shift in the character of capital
expenditures from expansion of plant to modernization

Secretary Snyder - 2
of equipment. No reduction is expected in utilities,
nor perhaps in the railroad and oil industries, while
Federal, state, and municipal construction is expected
to continue at a high level.
(2) Do you feel that there is a noticeable effort on the -part of most
companies with which you are familiar to Increase or decrease
commitments to purchase raw materials and other supplies?
The majority believes that most companies are
tending to operate on a hand to mouth basis for most
raw materials and other supplies, and that there has
been a noticeable effort to decrease commitments.
This is not true, however, of certain materials that
are in short supply, such as steel and other metals.
The attempt in these cases is to build up stocks.
Some mention is made, however, that the influence
on raw material inventories is not marked, because of
previous attempts to curtail* Some report that de­
creases in commitments are partly due to the knowledge
that supplies (particularly in soft goods lines) can
be readily obtained when needed.
(3) What is the inventory policy of concerns of which you have knowledge?
Are they planning to. (a) increase, (b) decrease, or (c) hold inven­
tories constant? Do you know of cases where inventories are increas­
ing where the increase is involuntary, i.e., due to unexpected falling
off in sales?




The general policy of most companies is to decrease
inventories. In view of the possibility of price de­
clines, many are attempting to hold them to the lowest
practicable working levels. An exception is noted in
the case of scarce goods, where an attempt is being
made to increase inventories, and some increases of a
seasonal nature are mentioned.
Unsatisfactory sales levels have been responsible
for some involuntary increases in inventories, as
mentioned in about half of the reports. Cases cited
are in the textile industry, the Pennsylvania petroleum
industry, and in retail markets for clothing, shoes,
furs, furniture, and various household appliances. In
the Minneapolis district, a few firms are reported to
have become so over-extended that corrective action by
the banks has been necessary.

Secretary Snyder - 3
(*!■) Are you aware of any -pressure In your district as yet for a fourth
round of wage increases? Do you feel that such -pressure is imminent«
even if the Bureau of Labor Statistics1 cost of living index remains
constant or recedes slightly?
There was a divided opinion on this question. Some
reports indicated heavy current pressure for a "fourth
round”of wage increases, notably in the San francisco
end Chicago districts. Perhaps the majority indicated
no appreciable current pressure, hut an expectation that
an increase would eventually he granted, probably smaller
in scope than previous increases, and concentrated more
largely in fringe benefits. In the South, it was generally
believed that wage trends would follow wage developments
in the key industries.
In the lew York district there was general agreement
that wage demands were easing somewhat. It was believed
that pressure for increases would be softened by a
decline in living costs, possible rising unemployment
in certain lines, and by the desire of labor leaders to
obtain and hold public sympathy pending Congressional
action on the Taft-Hartley law.
It was quite generally felt that, while living costs
would be a factor in wage demands, some wage increase
would be granted even if living costs declined, unless
the decline were precipitous.
(5) Do you anticipate any increase in prices by the companies with which
you are familiar within the next six months even if there is not a
further rise in wages?




The feeling is general among the bank directors
that there will be few price increases in the next
six months unless forced by large wage increases. A
few increases may be made in some metals and hard
goods, and perhaps in the utility and transportation
industries. In other fields, however, the development
of stronger competitive conditions has made it diffi­
cult to increase prices even with higher wages.
Directors in the Chicago district report an in­
creasing reluctance among business managements to
increase prices. Severe! companies in this district
say that they can absorb some higher costs next year
because new plants will be operating at greatly im­
proved efficiency, labor productivity is increasing,

Secretary Snyder - k
and material costs have “
been reduced "by fewer gray
market purchases. The increase in labor productivity
is also mentioned by the St. Louis district, and
greater efficiency is mentioned by the Minneapolis
district, as contributing to an absorption of higher
wage costs by manufacturers.
(6) Are there any elements in the economic situation today which you
regard as especially significant or critical from the point of
view of business?




The business elements viewed as especially significant
or critical cannot accurately be ranked in order of
importance, since many of the letters gave no indica­
tion of their relative importance in the minds of
businessmen. It is fairly clear, however, that
businessmen were most concerned about two elements:
Uncertainty over Government policies, and appre­
hension over the effect on business of the return
to buyers1 markets.
In the following list of the more important
factors, an attempt has been made to rank them
roughly in the order of frequency with which they
were mentioned:
(a) Uncertainty over Government policies, with
considerable apprehension over the high level of
Government expenditures, the extent of possible
direct Government controls, and the prospect of
higher taxes — particularly fear of an excess
profits tax.
(b) Concern over the return to buyers1 markets,
together with increasing consumer resistance to
price increases. Mention is made that the present
markets are over-shadowed by price-conscious con­
sumers, expecting lower prices.
(c) The present high break-even points, with
increased rigidity of cost factors. This is
believed to be an especially important problem for
the smaller and the less efficient companies.
(d) Difficulty of obtaining equity capital,
particularly in view of the greater need for ample
working capital under present conditions.

Secretary Snyder - 5
(e)
General uncertainty over the future, 'both
in the domestic situation and in international affairs.
' (f) Miscellaneous elements — The high level of
prices, fear of price control, high inventories, high
industrial capacity, probable decline in capital
expenditures, and imminence of agricultural surpluses.
(*7) What would you say are the major "question marks11 in the business­
m e n 1s minds today in making critical decisions related to expansion
or contraction of their activities?




The same difficulty of ranking appeal's in the
answers to this question, which is closely related
to the preceding one. An approximate ranking of
the major question marks in the minds of businessmen
today,,as revealed in the bank directors* reports, is
given in the following list:
(a) Uncertainty over Government policies, par­
ticularly policies toward business — including the
extension of direct controls (especially price
control) if expenditures increase sharply — and
policies toward labor which will directly affect
business* Probable revision of the Taft-Hartley Act
that will be detrimental to business is mentioned in
several letters. "After January 1, 19*49* "business
will be operating under an unknown set of rules.B
(b) Uncertainty over taxes — whether, how soon,
and how much corporate taxes will be increased, and
what form they may take.
(c) General uncertainty over the business situa­
tion, the probable duration of the boom and extent of
subsequent decline. “
Have we passed the peak?11
(d) Uncertainty over the outcome of the tense
international situation and the possibility of war.
(e) Uncertainty as to how business can cope with
the problem of high break-eVen points under conditions
of rising wages, rigid cost structures, and increasing
consumer resistance to price increases.
(f) Miscellaneous questions — Decline in demand
for capital goods, possibility of strongly deflationary
monetary actions by the Government, apprehension over
Administration shift to “
pro-labor and anti-business”
attitude, possibility of imminent surpluses of agri­
cultural products and decline in farm income.