The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
American officers — and civilians — now learn difficult foreign tongues in a few weeks c7i/y^3 Teaching Languages in a Hurry Condensed from School and Society Charles R um ford W alter o f Americans — many of them in uniform — are learning plain or fancy foreign languages four times as fast as was thought possible before the war. We’re doing this because we have to. Naval units need officers who can speak Japanese, Malay, or what have you; on land we need men able to get along in Fanti, Hausa and a dozen strange tongues Americans never knew existed. We need lin guists for lend-lease missions to Rus sia and China, for technical under takings in Iran and Iraq. When war broke out we were dangerously short o f linguists, even in Spanish and Portuguese, which are among the easiest languages for us to learn. The Board o f Economic Warfare, for example, combed the nation for trade experts who also spoke Spanish, and dug up only 1 15 . New teaching methods are over coming this shortage with dramatic speed. After nine weeks o f intensive ^instruction in the language school at Laramie, Wyoming, one graduate was sent on a mission to South Amer ica. 7 wo months more in a Spanish speaking country, and he was giving T h o u sa n d s a course of lectures in Spanish on United States civilization, / Inspecting a class in Siamese at the V University of Michigan, an army colonel who had spent 22 years studying languages in the FarEast found the students in a brisk giveand-take conversation. They had been in the class only three months. “ I don’t believe my ears,” he said. “ They’re talking like native Sia mese! An educated Russian, visit i n g a six-weeks-old intensive Russian class at Yale, exclaimed: “ How gifted Americans are at languages!” O f course, we are not gifted. The success of these classes is the result of hard work and keen interest, har nessed to a method which combines science and common sense. The method includes the use of a native as well as a teacher in the classroom. The native often knows little Eng lish. His job is to give sounds and words for the students to imitate. Later the native is questioned and tells stories, just as if he were a Japa nese prisoner or a Swahili chieftain and the students were members of an American expedition — which is exactly what they may be when the course is over. Published by The Society f o r the A dvancem ent o f Education, I n c , 5 2 5 W . 1 2 0 St., N . Y . C. (S ch ool a n d Society, A p r il 3, ’43) T E A C H IN G L A N G U A G E S I N A H U R R Y The teacher guides the class, shows how vocal cords can be made to produce difficult sounds, explains only as much grammar as is neces sary to speed progress. The object o f these courses is not to pass an exami nation but to understand natives, and be understood by them, as rap idly as possible. In an intensive -/bourse at Columbia last summer, stu dents mastered 2000 Persian words and phrases in nine weeks. Hausa is a language spoken by some 5 ,000,000 people in West Af rica. Last autumn, only a few weeks ^rfter Professor Zellig S. Harris had VNtarted his intensive course at the University o f Pennsylvania, a new native teacher arrived and called him up. The professor was out, and a student answered the telephone. During a 15 -minute conversation in Hausa, he was able to give the native all the information he wanted. You never hear exercises like “ The nephew o f my aunt walks through the good baron’s garden” in these practical classes. Visit the University iS o i Pennsylvania class in Fanti, the African commercial language spoken on the Gold Coast. You will find one student pretending to be a farmer, while a second is looking for a job. They are bargaining with each other in Fanti. At another university the native speaker assumes the role o f a landed proprietor, a student that of an American task force officer. They have a lively argument in Arabic about buying food for transport pilots. 4* A cynical scholar has said that Americans may possibly learn Japa nese before the outbreak of the next world war. Memorizing several thou sand pictographs is, of course, almost a life’s work. But speaking the lan guage is a different story. Its struc ture is simple. Within the past year American students have gained a good working knowledge of spoken Japanese in three months or less. Here are 20 students of Japanese in a room with a native speaker and an American professor. The profes sor begins the first class by making the students pronounce a short list o f wwds that contain all the sounds in the Japanese language. Only two of these do not occur in English. The professor has the native repeat the two sounds over and over, and the students mimic him. In the second or third lesson the students begin to memorize simple tool sentences, like “ What is the word for that in Japanese?” These sentences, memorized until they are second nature, enable the learning process to proceed largely in the language being taught. After six wreeks of an intensive course a teacher sprang the following test without warning. “ You are now in the Solomons,” he explained, “ and have just captured a batch of Jap prisoners. You are to question one o f them. The native speaker will act as your prisoner. Go ahead!” After a 15 -minute grilling in Japa nese the students reported: “ The prisoner says they have no tea, meat 42 T H E R E A D E R ’ S D IG E S T or vegetables, but there is some fish. However, it is in the river and we will have to catch it ourselves. There is a mountain which must be crossed to get to the Japanese airfield. There is a road, impassable for a car, but practicable for a horse. We went to the top of the mountain,” the stu dents continued, “ and sighted ships, which the prisoner identified as Japa nese. He also told us the size o f the army facing us — 500,000 men.” /U n der the auspices o f the Interf/A m erica n Training Center, 1200 government employes in Washing ton are learning Spanish from native speakers. The list ranges from army officers to stenographers, and in cludes experts from many govern ment departments. Here you may study a language four hours a week or 15 hours a day, according to your need. All children master the funda mentals o f a language by the time they are five. Which suggests there isn’t anything very abstruse about language learning. They all learn to speak before they learn to read. In traditional language courses, about three fourths o f the student’s time is spent learning rules o f grammar and applying them by conscious logic. This leaves far too little time for practice. The habit o f searching 3 in the files o f one’s mind for rules kills both interest and native linguis tic ability. In learning a language, everlasting practice and repetition are the most important factors. These war courses may well revo lutionize language teaching in Amer ican colleges. They’ve already begun to do so. For instance, in the new “ Foreign Areas” program at Yale , all language courses are taught by ' the new method. Students from the intensive classes go right on learning in their leisure hours. Many practice on each other at meals and invite the native, speaker to join them. Last summef J the boys at Penn took their Moroc can on a tour of Philadelphia, ex plaining the mysteries of a night club to him in Arabic. In a student hangout near Brown University, a professor found most of his class drinking beer and lustily singing the Japanese version of Mademoiselle from Armentieres. Graduates of the intensive courses are demonstrating that they can talk and be understood by natives in I any corner of the world. They are giving us new weapons to help win a global war. And when the time comes these weapons will be even more valuable in winning a global peace.’ e w o f u s c a n s ta n d p r o s p e r ity . A n o t h e r m a n s , 1 m e a n . — M ark Twain
@FedFRASER