View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

What Indian Independence Means to
America
EXTENSION OP REMARKS
or

HON. JOSEPH E. TALBOT
OF CONNECTICUT

IN THE HOUSE OP REPRESENTATIVES
Thursday, December 9, 1943
Mr. TALBOT. Mr. Speaker, under
leave to extend my remarks In the Rec­
ord, I desire to insert an address delivered
by Hon. Clare Boothe Luce, at the con­
ference on the Pacific area, sponsored by
: the Institute of Pacific Relations and the
1 University of Rochester, on November
I 18, 1943:
One-fifth of the human race lives In India.
One out of every five people Is an Indian,
Ho inhabits a country vast In size— all of
continental Europe, excluding Russia, would
tuck comfortably Into It. India is a country
of prodigious physical variety, like her neigh­
bor China, which Is also vast and houses one
more fifth of the human race. India has a
far-flung seacoast, studded with fine harbors,;
She has rivers nearly as great as our M is-'
sissippi. She knows torrential rains and d e v -!
astatlng droughts. She has Impenetrable
Jungles and deserts a3 flat, stale, and un-j
profitable as the Mojave. Her people live by!
low-lying swamps, on broad fertile plains, and'
In the rich soft valleys of mountains eternally'
crested with snow as mighty as our Rockies.
There are, broadly speaking, 12 major Indian]
dialects. Although some of the most learned)
men In the world are Indians, more than 83:
percent of the people are Illiterate. Some of'
the richest men in the world are Indians.




1943

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— A P P E N D IX

A5793

has been able to hold Hong Kong, Burma,
national prudence require us first to ask an­
Singapore, control the whole Middle East
Among her 563 princes are rulers whose birth­
other. What would the Immediate loss—the
and the Arab worlds, dominate Suez and
day gifts from their subjects are their own
outright loss of India—in short, uncondi­
-the Mediterranean, and defend Australia and
weight in gold. But 61 percent of India's
tional Indian Independence at the victorious
Inhabitants live at a bare subsistence level;
New Zealand and her smaller, though also
close of the war, mean to the British Empire?
rich, possessions In the Southwest Pacific. In
25.4 percent at a semistarvation level. Sev­
It Is only fair to a s k t h i s q u e s t i o n b e c a u s e
enty-eight percent of the people of Bengal
short, the mere strategic loss of India as
t o d a y India belongs to t h e B r i t i s h Empire.
are undernourished. Great famines are the
a British-controlled sea and air base of mili­
Let
us
take
the
short
view
of
what
uncon­
frequent percursors of great plagues. And
tary operations and a vast recruitment center
ditional Independence might mean to the
yet the cruel economic paradox Is that this
for Empire troops, would not only split the
British Empire, if there were no compensa­
vast land of 390,000,000 souls, ruled today by
Empire structure in twain, It would shatter
tions for that loss of an economic, territorial,
not more than 150,000 white men, Is, next to
It to pieces. This, far more than the econom­
or
spiritual
nature.
While
it
Is
well
n.gh
the United States and the Soviet Union, the
ic liquidation involved, Is what Churchill
impossible
to
obtain
accurate
figures
on
India
country with the most abundant natural re­
meant when he said he did not Intend to
even from official sources, it is estimated
preside over the liquidation of the British
sources In the world.
that
before
the
war,
under
Imperial
prefer­
India has one of the greatest Iron-ore fields
Empire. , Any soldier will tell you that the
ence tariffs. 7.2 percent of United Kingdom
In tbe world, with conservatively estimated
day India becomes free of the British officer,
exports
went
to
India,
and
34
percent
of
reserves-of more than 3,000,000,000 tons, av­
even though the British banker should stay
Indian
experts—with
far
less
favorable
eraging more than 60 percent iron content.
and should even thrive, that day the sun
tariffs— went in turn to the United Kingdom.
Her coal resources range from thirty-six bil­
will set forever on a groat many places which
Fifty
and
eight-tenths
percent
of
the
mer­
lion to seventy-seven billion tons. She pos­
are now British soil. India Is the one and
chandise Imported Into India before the war
sesses large quantities of bauxite, manganese,
only indispensable strategic keystone of the
came from the rest of the Empire. Fifty-two
chromite, mica, and other minerals and
whole arch of the British Colonial Empire.
and
five-tenths
percent
of
all
Indian
exports
crude elements upon which industry de­
Churchill Is a soldier, a British soldier. That
went to the Commonwealth. It is safe to as­
pends Her potential hydroelectrical power
Is why he Is an unreconstructed and unresume
that
with
unconditional
Independence,
constructable Imperialist where matters con­
is second only to that of the United States,
India herself, so naturally endowed to do so,
though she uses only 3 percent of It. She Is
cern India.
would begin to manufacture many of the arti­
the world’s second largest cotton producer.
So here Is the problem which confronts
cles
she
imported
before
the
war
from
the
rest
every American who plunks for Immediate
She has almost a monopoly of Jute produc­
of the Empire. Certainly India would manu­
and unconditional Indian Independence: As
tion. She once grew the most tobacco, could
facture
at
home
all
her
own
cotton
goods,
a
things stand today, the outright severance of
rival the world In the production of sugar­
no more difficult matter for her than It was
India’s political ties with Great Britain could
cane has vast forests and wheat and rice
for Japan. In any case It Is reasonably cer­
fields, tea, linseed, rubber, coffee, Indigo,
do two things to the United Kingdom and
tain thatf, once free to manufacture and sell
Commonwealth: First, It would utterly col­
maize, barley, castor seed. She Is a leading
into her own markets, India would for some
producer of hides and skins, tanning mate­
lapse the British Empire structure strategi­
years
import
far
less
from
the
Commonwealth
cally: and, second, the loss of British eco­
rial turpentine, and bamboo pulp.
of anything she could manufacture at home.
Her people are historically exquisite crafts­
nomic control of India could seriously reduce
Commonwealth export trade would be cer­
men and hard workers. They were once
the living standards of many a Britisher.
tain to suffer.
great forgers of fine steel—from India came
Now there Is one thing which cannot be
Bsfore the war British capital investment
the Damascus blade. And yet this land of
said too often or too clearly In this historic
In India was estimated at approximately
incalculable potential wealth In manpower
moment
when Americans have at last decided
£1,000,000,000,.o r approximately one-quarter
and raw materials today houses one of the
not to bo Isolationists— that Is, when they
of Britain’s total overseas investments. Wltn
poorest people on earth. Sunk In a quag­
have
decided
to participate to a greater extent
Independence might come expropriation slow
mire of debt, disease, and poverty, 80 per­
In worjd politics and world business: The
or rapid/ Great Britain would certainly lose
cent of their work largely agricultural, the
United
Kingdom
has no choice If she wishes
some millions of pounds which she in the
vast majority of Indians live on from 2 to 4
to maintain her present economic way of
past has received in annual payments, trans­
cents a day. Or rather they die. The aver­
life; to live by past living standards she must
ferred
in
one
way
or
another,
from
India.
age life expectancy of an Indian 13 about 25
export and export and export—sho must
England emerged from the last world de­
years compared to our 62. And In some cities
export comparatively more productlonwlse
pression in better shape than the rest of the
their Infant mortality rate is tho highest In
than any other great power In order to earn
world
This was managed partly because,
the world.
,
_
.
the money with which to Import food com­
from
1931
to
1935,
about
£203,000,000
In
gold
India can continue to be the world s most
modities, and still have a balance to pay for
went to London from India. England can.
tragic and gigantic economic paradox, or the
tho consumption at home of- her own manu­
and does, manipulate the exchange rate of
benevolent dynamism of modern Industri­
factured products. British domestic liv.ng
Indian
currency
because
she
almost
com­
alization can resolve that paradox In our
standards, yesterday, today, and tomorrow
pletely controls Its banking structure. In the
are almost wholly dependent on th3 volume
time.
last world depression millions upon millions
For here Is a country which beyond dispute
of her export trade and on how advantage­
of Indians sold even their tiniest gold trinkets
for those who bow only In argument to facts
ously It Is handled. I am told that the United
to pay their long-ln-arrears taxes. Naturally,
and figures, could not only feed and clothe
Kingdom has remaining today only 5 percent
most of this gold flowed Into the economic
and house herself, but with modern machine
of her pre-war world export trade. When the
blood stream of India, which Is largely British,
tools made by her own people In her own
war Is over she has somehow to get that other
and debouched eventually into the Thames.
95 percent back— and a large part of It she
factories, could possibly feed and clothe and
Come unconditional Indian Independence,
supply With commodities and manufactured
must necessarily be counting on getting back
Great Britain’s hold on India's banking struc­
via her preferential exports to India.
products much of Asia.
ture would be weakened to an Incalculable
What Japan did industrially, India can do
If Great Britain doesn’t get her Indian
extent. To reestablish herself from the eco­
on a hundredfold scale, since her natural
export trade back, where will she make up
nomic rigors of this war, she would have to
Industrial resources are far greater. The
the
difference In the years ahead? Will we
find her gold elsewhere.
successful Industrialization of India, which
Americans cheerfully allow Great Britain a
No argument the British can present
could surely follow Indian Independence,
still larger share than she has so far claimed
against immediate and unconditional Indian
could raise the living standards of the whole
of the potential post-war European and Afri­
Independence Is so sound and overwhelming
Orient unbelievably, and In so doing, raise
can and South American and Russian and
as the one they seldom offer—It could be a
the living standards, and therefore the buy­
Chinese markets? In the Halls of Congress
very serious economic blow to every Inhab­
today one hears many a complaint even now
ing power of the whole world.
itant of the United Kingdom and Common­
about Great Britain’s anxious efforts to de­
Quickly you ask, will only the Independence
wealth No less an authority than Winston
velop new export markets. Shall we Ameri­
of India guarantee the certain industrializa­
Churchill himself said in a broadcast on India
cans then say to Great Britain: ’’You must
tion of India? Again, you ask, can the Inde­
in 1935: ‘‘If we lose India, 2,000,000 bread­
givo up India now, and thus risk the loss of
pendence of India ever be .achieved short of
winners In this country would be tramping
one great and safe haven of export trade
revolution against the British Raj? Will only
the street and queuing up at the labor exyou had before the war; you cannot compete
bloodshed purge India’s backwardness from
In our domestic markets; and you must also
her before she, too, can rise, as Russia did
But there is one other aspect which, from a
fight us every inch of the way in the rest
after Its revolution against the Imperialist
British point of view, would be even more
of the world's markets, including India?" To
Czars, to become one of the mightiest coun­
serious than the economic one: The strategic
urge this harsh course upon her would surely
tries of the Far East, perhaps of the world?
aspect of unconditional Indian Independence.
doom Great Britain to a far worse Indus­
These are pregnant questions, fraught with
With the physical loss of India, Great Brit­
trial depression than the one she knew after
enormous historic meaning for tho whole
ain would lose her whole strategic base of
the First World War. Some economic ex­
world, and, therefore, for America. But they
global operations. India is the precious
tremists, arguing the British economic case
are not the question of the evening. For our
pivotal point of British dominance o f the
against Indian Independence, claim that Im­
topic is not how India gets her Independence
Near, the Far and the Middle East. It is
mediate Indian independence would result
but what would It mean to all of us If onefrom territorial India and Indian naval bases
not only In socialism In Great Britain but
fifth of the human race came Into Its own?
and ports, and In a great measure with In­
might even In the end reduce the whole
But, even before we can essay a partial andian troobs. that Great Britain In the past
that, nuestion. common courtesy and

A5794

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— A P P E N D IX

United Kingdom to the status of an agricul­
tural community. England, they say, would
then become a little green Island with a_
vegetable vengeance.
To state the Indlan-independence problem
thus In realistic economic terms Is to cut
through all the sentimental persuasions by
which the British, In their natural pride, try
to conceal Its true nature from us. When
the British talk of their humanitarian obli­
gations to India, many of them are utterly
sincere. But I question deeply how seriously
Great Britain’s statesmen, or, for that matter,
the statesmen of any nation, Including our
own, ever accept sheer humanitarian obli­
gations toward people of another race and
culture If those obligations did not over­
whelmingly coincide with their nation's own
economic and political self-interest.
Therefore. I think the time has come to
state the facts as they are: If American
moral and diplomatic pressure helps 390,000,000 Indians to obtain their natural de­
sire— Independence—America risks condem­
ning 45,000,000 of the greatest people on
earth, In one of the greatest democracies on
earth. Great Britain, to a severe economic de­
pression. And If, furthermore, Indian In­
dependence results, as it must, In the retire­
ment of all British troops from India and
the end of British control of India as a base
of mllltury operations— we risk the accom­
plishment of what the Germans and Japs
failed to do— the destruction of the British
world power structure.
Dare we Americans who urge Indian inde­
pendence take this risk, even In the name
of freedom? And what do wo Americans
stand to gain-—what does the world stand*
to gain, which will olfset the physical and eco­
nomic dangers to Great Britain and the
Commonwealth Implicit In unconditional In­
dian Independence? Well, obviously we W1U
gain a better world—to the extent that it
will be a better world for one-fifth of the
human race, who will then bo free at long
last to work out their own cultural, spiritual,
and economic destiny. And If such nose­
counting of free men Is wrong, then there is
no morality on this globe, and the dream of
universal freedom, the Idea of raising woild
living standards is a mockery.
And yet and yet, this simple arithmetic of
how many men are free and thriving and
how many slaves and Impoverished is not an­
swer enough. It plainly Is not. For our own
self interest, we Americans dare not danger­
ously weaken the British Commonwealth.
We dare not destroy an economic and politi­
cal power structuro which, In spite of all the
evils of Its Imperialism, has helped to keep
order and decency In the* world, and spread
techniques of Industrialization. For tho Em­
pire has been not only a power structuro, but
u power line, on which has been transmitted
ideas of freedom and progress around the
globe.
What are the answers? There must be an­
swers; for the heart cries out, and the head
argues, too, 390,000,000 men who want to be
free and self providing and prosperous, must
be free and self providing. And If It Is not
good that they should be free and prosperous,
then all notions of progress and lreedom are
lies, and religion itself Is a He, and surely all
the great spiritual things we claim we are
fighting for in this war are lies. And that
- Just cannot be so.
I believe there are answers. But these an­
swers will be wholeheartedly Accepted only
by those who are sincere In their desire for
Indian independence as a means to a better
and more prosperous world. If we want In­
dian independence, and want that Indepen­
dence to be fruitful to ourselves and man­
kind, America must bo prepared to do three
things.
First, we must compensate Great Britain
for any Immediate and disastrous loss of ex­
port trade and revenue from India by open­
ing to her and to the Commonwealth far




D ecember 9

In the end not only they, but we shall benefit.
freer markets than ever before in our own
For Indian Independence, peacefully con­
■country, and we must aid her to share in all
summated and guaranteed for a decent
the new markets that can be opened else.-,
length
of time by the great nations who will
where on the most generous terms.
win this war, would mean they really had
Are Americans prepared to do this? I be­
won
the
greatest war In the world for de­
lieve Americans should be prepared to do so,
mocracy, and that* we had at last taken a
wherever, and however it does not depress
'great step in raising the living standards of
our own living standards, for It Is my unthe world by helping one-fifth of the human
shakeable credo that any policy .which weak­
race to help itself out of its own economic
ens America, weakens the world.
quagmire.
Secondly, if we want the independence of
If America has neither the wish nor the
India— and I repeat I think we should want
will to play her part In this noble and also
it, because nothing else Is consonant with
American ideas of expanding areas of politi­ 'profitable venture, then Insensibly America
will be conspiring in the continuation of
cal freedom and the benevolent dynamism of
human slavery and exploitation and in the
the industrial age— we must aid the Com­
depression a wide area of economy. We will
monwealth to the utmost to accomplish the
be condoning what we claim to hate— po­
achievement of Indian Independence by
litical and economic imperialism, simply be­
means as peaceful and smooth as possible.
cause we have not the brains nor the will to
I believe that this could best be done by giv­
liquidate It Intelligently.
ing India a date line in the not too distant
In the final analysis, the future physical
future for complete Independence, as we gave
safety, the spiritual safety and the economlo
the Philippines.
safety of America rest in a great measure on
It must have none of the tricky strings
America’s ability to help In the creation of a
tied to it, such as have been tied to every
strong, progressive China and a strong,
offer of self-government which the British
progressive India—in order that almost onehave made to India, because she feared
half o f the world’s population may be, In
Indian independence for the two reasons I
the years to come, friendly to America’s wide
have outlined.
and prosperous Pacific shores and able to
And thirdly, we must guarantee Jointly
traffic profitably with her, as Is the custom of
with the Commonwealth the continuation
free men, with money of their own making
of the strategic and political independence
in their pockets.
of the free India we so profoundly want.
Are we up to this vast task of constructing
We must be willing to guarantee conjointly
a better and a safer and a vastly more pros­
with the Russians and Chinese, that a free
perous world? I do not doubt it, if wo will
India shall not fall a prey to aggressive and
see the problem without racial prejudice or
greedy powers, while in her early stages she
national passion or blind sentiment or eco­
is working out her economic and political
destiny. America must, in short, take over
nomic selfishness.
the* problem of keeping the military peace
in tho whole Pacific.
Short of such participation on our part,
the consummation of unconditional Indian
Rural Electrification
independence would merely destroy Great
Britain and the Commonwealth strategically
and economically, and short of it we would
EXTENSION OP REMARKS,
have no certainty that in the end we would
or
not be helping to create in a free .India a
political and Industrial Frankenstein such
as we helped to create when we set mili­
o r M is s is s ip p i
taristic, totalitarian, and undemocratic Japan
on the road to Industrialization a century
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
ago.
Wednesday, December 8, 1943
I leave this great problem, having, at best,
skimmed Its surface more lightly than any
Mr. RANKIN. Mr. Speaker, under
bird ever skimmed the shark-infested waves
permission granted me to extend my re­
of the Indian Ocean. Essentiallylt is the
marks in the R ecord, I am inserting the
problem of how America can help to pass
address of Hon. Clyde T. Ellis, a former
on to one-fifth of the human race the great
torch of freedom, while not, at the same time,
Member of this House, and now executive
causing that great torch of freedom, which
manager of the National Rural Electric
has never burned brighter anywhere In all
Cooperative Association.
the world In all history than in the British
As every Member of the House knows,
Isles themselves, to flicker and die down.
rural electrification has been my dream.
How to help give 390,000,000 Indians the great
In my opinion, it is one of the greatest
chance to be self-supporting and self-gov­
economic movements of modern times.
erning without damaging material safety and
the living standards of 43,000,000 Britishers?
Its development will mark a turning
In short, America’s problem in the so-called
point in the history of our civiUzatlon,
Indian question is how to help spread eco­
and will have a more far-reaching ef­
nomic unlversals everywhere without curtail­
fect on the future of this Nation than
ing them anywhere, Including our own dear
any of its advocates originally contem­
country.
Meanwhile, let us have an end to the cant,
plated.
I hope every Member will take the
whether expressed by British or American,
of ’’the white man’s burden,” and of our hu­
time to read Mr. Ellis’ speech, and that
manitarian obligations to rule people who
we may have the full cooperation of every
plainly wish to rule themselves. Let us all
Member of this body in the promotion of
have the courage to say that we must find
our program for rural electrification, now
other ways to keep our Industrial machinery
and in the post-war period.
at home going at Its highest level of efficiency
The matter referred to follows:
than by oiling It with the sweat and blood
of millions of men of other races overseas.
T h e R u r a l E l e c t r ic C o - o p s a t W a r a n d A f t e r
And let us agree that if we urge upon our
America’s rural electric cooperatives are
friends of the United Kingdom and the Com­
playing a major role In one of our most dra­
monwealth that they take the great risk, em­
matic
war production records. For ‘‘food will
bark on the great adventure of giving India
be the dominant world problem In 1944."
her freedom, that we must then play our
It
cannot
be said that food is more essential
part and pay our share in underwriting for
than bullets, any more than 'it can be said
them the great transition period from im ­
that oil U more essential than battleships,
perialism to world democracy in order that

HON. JOHN E. RANKIN