View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

AN AESTRACT OF
THE SENATORIAL CAREER OF ROBERT LATHAM OWEN
Robert Latham Owen, later to become one of the first
senators from Oklahoma, was born February 2, I856, at
Lynchburg, Virginia, of Scotch-Irish and Indian ancestry.
He was the son of Robert L. Owen, President of the Virginia
and Tennessee Railroad, end of Narcissa Chisholm, of the
Cherokee Nation.

He was educated in the private schools of

Lynchburg, and in Washington and Lee University, where he
received a Master of Arts degree in 1877.

He came to the

Cherokee Nation soon afterward.
Owen was the principal teacher of the Cherokee Orphan
Asylum, 1879-1SSO; and, secretary of the Board of Education
of the Cherokee Nation, 1881-1884.

He began the practice

of law in 1880; was president of the International Fair at
Muskogee, 1882-18S4; and, was editor and owner of The
Indian Chieftain, at Vinita, in 1884.

He served

8s

Indian

Agent for the Five Civilized Tribes from I885 to 1887;
organized the First National Bank of Indian Territory, at
Muskogee, August 1, 1890, and served as its president
until

1900.
i




ii

On January 14, 1890, he entered the service of the
Choctaws, as their attorney.

Later, he served the Western

and Eastern Cherokees in this seme capacity, and recovered
millions of dollars in claims for these tribes, from the
United States Government, the commission for his services
adding much to his private fortune.

As a director of

farming operations on a large scale, he handled thousands
of cattle.
The Act of Congress of March 3> 1901, giving citizen­
ship to every Indian in Indian Territory, was drawn by
Owen, and its passage was due in a large measure to him.
He was delegated to present a memorial to Congress, asking
for a deficiency appropriation for the Oklahoma Consti­
tutional Convention, and was instrumental in having the
Trans-Mississippi Congress adopt a resolution favoring the
removal of restrictions on all Indian lands, except those
Of full-bloods.

He was elected to the United States Senate on
December 11, 1907; was re-elected in 1912, and again in
1918, winning both elections by large majorities.

In 1920




iii

Owen was presented to the country as a Democratic candidate
for President of the United States.

On the fortieth ballot

he received thirty-three votes? and ranked fourth among the
candidates.

Efforts to secure his consent to accept the

nomination for vice-president failed.

His term of service

in Congress expired March 3> 1925*
The purpose of this study has been to trace briefly
the background of Senator Owen, the circumstances relating
to the union of two territories into the state of Oklahoma,
and Owen* s election as one of its first United States
Senators; then to determine from the records of Congress,
other government publications, and current periodicals,
what he said and did regarding Indian affairs) Federal
courts and constitutional amendments; tariff; rural
problems; the welfare of the wage-earners; health and edu­
cation; trusts; monetary problems; and foreign affairs,
during the time (1907-1925) that he served in the United
States Senate, as the representative of the state of
Oklahoma.
The Organic Act of 1S90 provided for a territory of
Oklahoma, which should include all of Indian Territory,




iv

except districts occupied by the Five Civilized Tribes, and
1
the seven small reservetions northeast of them. Provision
for the inclusion of these reservations and the Cherokee
Outlet into Oklahoma Territory, by executive action, as soon
as the tribal occupants or owners should give consent, was
2
also taken care of by this act. The Dawes Act of 1887 had
provided a way for the opening of the reservations in the
3
*
Territory of Oklahoma, while a subsequent act of 1893 pro­
vided for Commissioners to adjust the affairs of the tribes
4
so as to prepare the territory for admission into the Union.
The

Curtis Act of 1898 abolished tribal laws and courts,

and provided that the five tribal governments should end in
eight years.

This act made necessary ad; itional provisions

for governing the Indian Territory.

Plans for both single

and double statehood were presented in Congress, and had
support in the territories, but were tied up with the
fortune of Arizona and New Mexico, and progress was slow.
In accordance with the recommendation of President
1
2
3
4
5

2b U. S. Stat.,
26 U. S. Stet.,
24 U. S. Stat.,
27 u. s. StiT.,
30 U. S. Stat.,

6l, May 2, 1890.
82.
388-391> February 8 , 1887*
645, March 3, 1893495-518, June 28, 1898.

i




V

6
Theodore Roosevelt, an Enabling Act providing for joint
statehood of the two territories was passed June 16, 1906.
Provision for a Constitutional Convention and for the
election of Representatives and Senators was also made in
this act.
The constitution adopted by the Convention was accepted
by both territories, on an election September

17 , 1907,

whereupon, President Roosevelt, by proclamation, November 16,

1907,

6

declared Oklahoma to be a state.

The Oklahoma Consti­

tution provided that the legislature should adopt a primary
system for the nomination of all candidates for state
9
elective offices, including United States Senators.
Previous to the adoption of the constitution, the Demo­
cratic Party, which had been successful in the election of
delegates to the Constitutional Convention, called a primary
Election for June g>, 1907, to nominate candidates for the
office of United States Senator.

The two candidates

receiving the largest number of votes in this election were

6 Cong. 'Record, 59 Cong. 1 Sees. Vol. 40, December 5 ,
1905, Message to 59th Congress, p. 105 .
7 34 U. S. Stat., 267, June 16, 1906.
6 35 U. S. StaT., Part II, 2160-2161, November 16, 1907.
9 Constitution of Oklahoma, Article III, Section 5 .




vi

Robert Letham Owen and Thomas P. Gore.

The nominations of

both candidates were subsequently ratified by the Demo10
cratic Convention.
As a candidate, Owen declared that he was in favor of
the initiative and referendum; approved the mandatory
primary; favored the removal of restrictions on the sale
and lease of Indian lands; more free rural routes; and the
immediate payment, by the United States Government, of
money due the Indians.

He vigorously attacked monopolies;

urged uniform freight rates; the adoption of woman suffrage;
and argued for uniform taxation of lands in Indian Terri­
tory and Oklahoma Territory.

The Republican Press declared

that a Republican legislature should be elected to prevent
Owen and Gore from going to the Senate.

Owen was accused

of being unfriendly to labor unions, of being a professional
lobbyist, and a millionaire.

However, the legislature that

was elected September 17> 1907> was overwhelmingly Demo­
cratic .
The state was admitted November 16 , 1907*

After

Governor 0. N. Haskell had finished making his inaugural
10 The Daily Oklahoman> Oklahoma City, Oklahoma,
June 19>1907.

T




vii

adaress, he announced the appointment of Owen and Gore as
United States Senators from Oklahoma.

Both were present at

the opening of the Sixtieth Congress, but were not received
because they had not been elected by their state legislature.
This, however, was done on December 11, 1907.

After

election, the question of who should serve the long, and
who the short term, was decided by lot.

Owen was successful

in drawing the six-year term.
During his career in the Senate, Owen had been able to
fulfill his campaign promises of getting the restrictions
removed from most of the Indian lends, and his efforts to
settle the controversy over the segregated coal and asphalt
l&nds of the Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations brought satis­
factory results.

Most of his many bills to settle claims of

the various tribes against the United States Government
never got out of the Committee on Indian Affairs," but small
amounts of money for the actual needs of the Indians were
granted by the Senate.

His efforts to commemorate the life

of a great Indian were crowned with success when the statue
of Sequoyah was.placed in Statuary Hall of the National
Capitol.




viii

Attempts to transfer the Chilocco Indian School and
lands to the state of Oklahoma failed, as did his efforts
to establish a home for aged and infirm Indians.

The

position he took regarding the Osage Indian oil lands indi­
cated that he favored the independent oil operators, but
subsequent bills providing safeguards for incompetent
Indians and minors of this tribe did much to protect their
fortune in later years.

His knowledge of Indian affairs

and his fairness to all tribes was recognized by the Senate,
and he was rewarded by appointment to one or more of the
committees dealing with Indian affairs, for practically his
entire tenure in the Senate.

Owen*s purpose seems to have

been to do all possible for the Indians; to develop the
natural resources of their reservations; and, in this way,
develop the new state which he represented.
The attitude he took regarding Federal courts and
constitutional amendments indicate that Owen was indeed a
Progressive.

He fought for years, against great odes, for

equal suffrage for the women of the country, and was finally
successful.

Having faith in the common people, he believed

in and worked for the election of United States Senators by




direct vote of the people, and also for the adoption of a
Federal income tax.

Re delayed the admission of New Mexico

as a state, because he wanted Arizona admitted also, and
because he wanted to put the responsibility of rejection
upon the Republican Party.
His long agitation for the passage of a Federal
initiative, referendum, and recall was not successful.

This

was also true of his attempts to get constitutional majority
rule; to reform the Federal Judiciary; and to eliminate
"lame ducks" from Congress.

All of these reforms seemed to

have one purpose, which was to give the common people more
power in their government.
Throughout his entire senatorial career Owen
consistently fought for a lower tariff.

He never wavered

from his contention that a high tariff helped monopoly.

He

made many speeches favoring a tariff to provide for the
difference in the cost of production at home and abroad.
The criticisms of Democratic tariffs reveal that he favored
lowering the tariff below the rate set by his party, and he
had even voted for a reduction of tariff rates on agri­
cultural products produced in his home state.

His long




X

speeches and the many tables he prepared to show the results
of an excessive tariff prove that he had made an exhaustive
study of the problem; while his prediction, that an
excessive tariff would set up obstructions to international
commerce, and delay the payment of European debts, have
been borne out by present facts.
The early attempts of Owen to provide experimental
stations, and establish extension departments in connection
with Agricultural Colleges, had failed, but his ideas were
larer included in the Smith-Lever Agricultural Act, which
11
became a law. He helped pass the "Good Roads Act", which
provided for Federal co-operation with the states in the

12
building of hard surfaced roads.

The attempts to prevent

the transportation by interstate commerce, of adulterated
commercial feeding materials for domestic animals, ana his
attempts to establish an interstate marketing system failed.
Legislation to protect the oil industry, and government
ownership of pipe lines was recommended by Owen.

He opposed

discriminative practices of all kinds, whether it be done
11
J
E.
U s. Stet., 1086, March 4-, 1915.
12 39 U- S. Stet., 355 , July 11, 1916.

T




by meat packers, oil companies, or any other company.
Speculation, exorbitant profits, and stock manipulation on
commodities were also opposed by him.

The J'arm Loan Act

originated in the Committee of which Owen was chairman, and
contained provisions that he had presented to the Senate

13

before.

He voted for measures for the conservation of our

natural resources, but did not take an active part in
promoting them.
Although Owen was accused of being unfriendly to labor
when he first sought election to the Senate, he helped to
14
establish a Department of Labor in the Presidents Cabinet.
His efforts to help the chilaren of the United States had
been temporarily successful, with the passage of the Keating15
Owen Bill, which forbade interstate commerce in the products
of child labor, but which later was declared unconstitutional.
The labor unions found him ready and willing to come, to
their defense at all times.

Attempts to prevent the prose­

cution of labor unions and farmers' organizations under the
16
Sherman Act aided the passage of the Clayton Anti-Trust Act.
13
14
15
16

39
37
39
38

n.
U.
UU.

S.
S.
S.
S.

Stat., W 5 7 July 17, 1916.
Stat., 736, March 4, 1913.
Stat .1 673
>September 1,
Stat., 731, October 15 , 1914.

1916.




xii

His efforts to have industrial conditions and disasters
investigated were unsuccessful.

The reasons he gave for

labor unrest were varied and numerous.

The neutral atti­

tude that he took regarding the restriction of immigration
was inconsistent with his other acts pertaining to labor
problems.
In the face of great opposition, some of which had
come from his own state, Owen unsuccessfully carried on a
long fight for the creation of a Department of Health in
the Presidents Cabinet.

His arguments in favor of the

establishment of a Children* s Bureau in the Department of
Commerce helped pass this bill through the Senate.

Many

long speeches favoring the improvement of general health
conditions in this country helped to keep this problem
before the Senate.

Bills by Owen, for the enactment of a

legislative reference bureau; for a research bureau of the
Senate; for an authorized publicity pamphlet; and, for a
national information bulletin received no consideration by
the Senate.
The introduction of many bills to create a Department
of Education; his defense of the newspaper press; arguments




for a continued free press; arguments for visual education;
and, efforts to remove illiteracy in this country, even
though unsuccessful, prove that he was friend of better
education in this country.
Owen kept up a.verbal attack on trusts throughout hie
senatorial career.

His greatest efforts were directed

against the Standard Oil Company, and in favor of the
independent oil producers.

His opposition to the "meat

packers trust" was of interest to his home state as well as
to all the country.

He advanced the theory that monopoly

could only be controlled by the selection, by the people, of
Representatives and Senators unfavorable to it, and that the
remedy would not be provided until political parties and
public opinion demanded the reform.
During the time that the Democrats had control of the
Senate, Owen served as the chairman of the Banking and
Currency Committee. He advocated the establishment of the
17
Postal Savings Banks. He helped write, and successfully
piloted the "Owen-Glass Bill", (the Federal Reserve'Act),
17 3fe U. S. Stet., 814, June

25 , 1910.




IS
through the Senate.

He admitted that this bill had defects

but sought to correct them by the introduction of amend­
ments, many of which were not passed.
He carried on a successful fight for a progressive
19
inheritance tax, and supported the excess profits tax, but
later thought it should be repealed, when it was evident
that the tax was being passed on to the consumer.

Many

efforts to pass bills to provide for a guarantee of bank
deposits were not successful during the time he was in the
Senate.

He supported all the administration*s monetary

bills for financing the World War, and his bills permitting
national banks to contribute to the Red Cross and other
charity organizations became laws.

His efforts to provide

a Federal Reserve Foreign Bank were not successful, because
he was unable to convince the Senate of the value of the
so-called "commodity secured currency".
The granting of loans to European Oountries after the
war was favored by him, as was the reduction of interest
rates on these loans.

He firmly refuted all arguments that

1& 38 U- S- Strt., 251 , December 23 , 1913.
19 39 U- S. Stat., 1091, September g, 1916.




XV

the European countriee could not. repay, and opposed repudi­
ation of these debts.

His long arguments for economy in

government did not convince a Republican Congress.

Hie many

warnings of the possible result of a policy of fast
constriction of credits were not heeded at that time, but
later depressions proved that which he had anticipated.
Before the World War, Owen had been for peace, and had
introduced resolutions favoring an international peace
conference.

He opposed increasing our navy; subsidizing

our merchant marine; and unsuccessfully sought to have
international law defined.

His opposition to the Panama

Canal tolls exemption helped repeal that measure.

He

supported Philippine independence, and even advocated the
independence of. Puerto Rico.
When the 7/orld War seemed inevitable, he supported
President Wilson in all of his war measures.

He con­

sistently opposed secret alliances and treaties, and thought
that treaties should be considered in open session of the
Senate.

After the war was over he favored sending food to

the Germans, ana at all times insisted that we had been
fighting to break down the military dynasty of Germany,




xvi

rather than the aowntrodaen German people.
America's participation in the League of Nations was
favored by him, and he insisted that we join the League with
or without the suggested reservations.

An advocate of

government economy at all times, Owen held that the
Republican victory in 1920 was due to the people's disap­
proval of the great expenditures during the war.

He

objected to the English protectorate over Egypt, and thought
that the Turks, too, should be given the right to enjoy
liberty.

He contended that the treaty of Versailles had not

been drawn according to the principles of the fourteen
points, and that Woodrow 7/ilson had been wronged whtn the
Entente leadership had extorted concessions from him; also,
that the treaty of Versailles provided the way for future
trouble in Europe.

The origin and causes of the World War

aroused his curiosity, and he studied for years trying to
solve the question, finally reaching the conclusion that
Germany was not the sole instigator of the war (as he had
formerly believed), but that it was started by the leadership
of Russia and of France.

He closed his senatorial career

with peaceful gestures to Japan, who, he claimed, had
fulfilled all our requests, and who desired peace as much
as we did.

i