View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority

V23SB

Form F. R. 567

END

SHEET

K IN D OF M A T E R IA L OR NUMBER

333*3^3

nam e o r s u b j e c t

Allocation of Participations in
System Open Market Account
Federal Open Market Committee

PART NUMBER




Part 2

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority fc.Q* VM 58

I iv

in F t i M

c
nrSf -i1}
n it
^^iftitfrHajig

jjJ^~'h
’

Deeeaiber

31# 1<&2*

Mr* Robert G. Rouse, Vice President,
Federal Reserve Bank of New York,
Hew York, New York*
Dear Mr. Rouse:
Ths re is enclosed a 8tatament, prepared in accord­
ance with the formula adopted by the Federal Open Market
Committee on December 18, 19UO, showing the changes necessary
in allocations of Government securities in the System Open
Market Account on January 1, 19^3•
Current earnings, exclusive of earnings on Govern­
ment securities, and current expenses have been estimated by
multiplying the actual amounts thereof July through November
by 2mh* Estimates obtained on this basis for current earnings
have been adjusted by deducting estimated net earnings on in­
dustrial advances and commitments attributable to funds received
from the Secretary of the Treasury*
Very truly yours.

X« L» Smead, Chief,
Division o f Bank Operations*

Steelssuhp#




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority 1E..Q* 12358

F o rm F . R .

1481>

» B 9 F U S S SECTION

TELEGRAM

I

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

I

OF THE

C:C3 11942
V
Yn.au■■-. riiiri.mr ; jr-Tgornmij i

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
LEASED WIRE SERVICE

WASHINGTON

51# 19h&

ftsoombor

Bout#’- How Toxic
*his will confirm understanding in tolsphono conversation
that adjnstmsnts of participations in Systo® Account will
bo ti follows, in thousands of dollars*




Inoroasosi
Vow York

70 .0U9

Philadoiphia

15,157

Cleveland

55, 182
928

Chicago
St. Louis
UnnoapoXis

IS.ShZ

Dsorsaso* >
Boston

i?,oal*

Richmond

2T,29i*

Atlanta

13,70b

Kansas City

8.83U

Dallas

8,370

San Fsmnoi soo

60,978

SMBAD
E D
E E

IT

16—4573

• P<

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority f c .Q* 12358

let I*RtcotossAit
APRi 91968
Fe d

era l
of

Re
Ne

se r v e
w

Yo

B

ank

rk

December 1, 194-2 •

Dear Mr* S^ead
We received your letter of November^ 30, 1942|^and have
today sent to the Reserve banks a :co|^S'^FccSpiHSfion showing
the adjustments to be made today in participations in the System
Open Market Account, pursuant to the plan adopted at the meeting of
the Federal Open Market Committee on December 18, 1940*
Enclosed herewith is a copy of the letter of transmittal

together with three copies of the computation, also copy of the
telegram which was sent to each of the Federal Reserve banks on
- November 30*
Yours faithfully,

Manager, System Open
Market Account"*
Mr- E* L. Smead, Chief,
Division of Bank operations,
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System,
Washington, D* C.
E n d s . (5)




R eproduced from the U nclassified

I D ecla ssified H o ldings of the N ational A rchives
F ~

D E C L A S S IF IE D

A u th o r ity £ . . Q ‘

securities i)tn

1^ 3 5 %

i m m
Hoveaber 3 0 # 1 W &

$ m m

send m

m i m m

t & x a m to p&esident

or m m w m m m mrnrn i basic as

IMDICATED I M }
la. accordance with action of

Federal Open Market 0«*ami‘l£e« ft it*

aeetinf Septeaber 2S, 1942, * readjustment of participation# in Government aecuritiea
held in the %»tei» Account ii called for on Deceaber X under the plan for reallocation
of Gorernaeat eecurltie?* adopted fey the Federal Open Market Committee Beeettber 18> 1940*
The coaputationa shoving adjuataenta to be ^ade in participetiona of the
aeveral Federal &ei»erve banka on December X wil>-^)e a
Deceaber 1,

ed to aXX Reserve banka m

Theae coaputatiooe indicate

in y & m

p*rti*4$*tie>a. on Deoeaber X*

1, 1942 tfc* d#iaiX*d

entri?» to be aade.




J

paddock

^

~

I

9,600,000

**

WILLIAMS

m ro u to ^ X A ■

FLatlMG

CL2YSLAHD

leach

KIOOiOlD

13,265,000

MoioA&Ui

ATLATA

13,363,000

I0UMG

CHICAGO

14,625,000

DAVIS

ST* LOUIS

23»?35,008

***

1,539,000

UIKKEAPOLIS
T.yienY

H im c m

OXUHKr

1AM.AS

161

m
.AMIT©A1&JWUfW
t

11,398,000

3,465,00)

16,771,000
9 ,m ,o o 0
A3,255,000
D M

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

"

d e c l a s s if ie d

Authority fc.Q* 1235%

MISC. !<SCA 75M-J2-41
F E D E R A L R E S E R V E B A N K O F H E W 'YORK

December 1, 1942#

Bear Mr* fllliiuaai
In accordaace with my telegram of yesterday, I
anclem herewith computation of the readjusteamts to b@
mdm today in the participations of tfaa Federal Rasarra bank#
la tha System Open Market portfolio*




Youra faithfully*

,

r - .....■■■■«■■■
I

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority E-.Q*

F o rm F . R .

‘ia;- ■} K FILES SECTION

118b

TELEGRAM

.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
L E A S E D W IR E S E R V IC E

£oY«sfeer

30.

ISkZ*

Ifew forte
? M * *111

^ © w m i l w that

!*9a%* ® t p a r t i a l i a

*4IX

*#

of dollarii




Atlanta

lf#5&3
ih jm

tm*** city
, .»

D*orea*«a t

B m 7&rk

St. Lonia
Minneapolis

61*135

1,559

,
j

OF TH E

WASHINGTON

1942

la

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority

1235B

r1*- , ■ 1.1miiiW>i ' r...

'--‘•-'-•.I.m....

l w ^!D IN FILES SECOXON

X**e«b«r 30, X9U2.

Mr* Robert
Reuse, Vioe President,
ffcdteyal Reserve lank of low fork*.
? # rk * law f #fit,*

Saar Hr* Rou«#»
Thare If enoloaed a statement # prepared in aooordance with the forwila adopted by tha Federal Open Market
Caaaittae o h Daoember 18 # 19l»G# showing the ohanges neoassary
in all^oation* of Qovorniasnt securities ia tha System Open
Market Aeoount on Tteoeaaber |,t 19^2.

Gurrent earnings.* exclusive ©f earnings on $Qvarn**
**at aeoviriti*** and current expenses have been ©stiia&ted by
sml-tiplylng./the aotual saaomnts theraof January through Ootofeer
by ^n© and one*»fiftli* Esti&atss obtained on thtt Mils have
bean adjusted in the sans manner a* ftr the previeus realloca­
tions this yeari na^ely^ by addift| fl^SG.OCJO to ourrent expenses
at few fork to oover extraordinary depreciation charge# on air**
oondittoning equipment and by deducting from current earnings
estimated net earning* on industrial advanoas and oo^sitmnti
attribmtable to funds received f r m the Secretary of the Treacnry.
Very truly f9Wt*t:

8. t* &*ead# $&&*£*
of Bank %#ra%i«n»*

Kncloeure




tm rn m n u *

ftEALLOCATIOH OF (JOVBRHOIirP SSCHRtTIHS IIf STSTSSI OFBI? HARKIT ACCOUNT, PECBMPSR 1, 19U2
(In thousands of dollar*)
0-4

ft-H --------------------------\
t
dU S3^*nso*
1* Jistlaatod w i « a l
\ 1942

sjim

r waatea j 'I?**
I B°,t0n 1 Tort

jAtlUlW [ ChlO»R» -“s n —
Looii

' " T O T [“CT«5="
! dalphl* i laud

$*0
]■ W m * - * I VlMMf I Btlltil
City
Pranoiseo
>P«U*

37.925

2.850

9.197

2.895

3.513

2.567

1.753

4.969

1.979

1.110

1.939

1,542

3.621

8.667

566

5.18U

706

886

3M>

593

955

269

183

280

266

717

W.598

3,416

22.381

3.603

MlOl

2*915

8.056

5.984

2.SW

1.293

2,209

1,808

4,338

166

126

98

35

35

180

35

19

169

18

75

44,632
i£,6U

25
3.500
3.323

12.158
12,324

3JW
3.563

k,m
4.576

2.748
8.785

1.9U6
1.981

5.572
5.75*

2.156
2.191

1,267
1,286

1,98b
2.153

1.737
1.755

981

93

57

io

25

132

75

172

57

7

56

53

?* Allooation rsqulrod (on basis
Of l#l499036< oarnlngt rsto
on Gov’ts) to produoo oamlng*
Deosjaber* *qual iso "S”

O
MHHIMk i»n>lf
770,506

73,045

Wt.7&9

31.417

19,636

103.677

58,907 135.094

iiU.769

5.1*96

43.984

41,628 168,082

U* AT«r«g« daily parti#ipattons*
par osafc, In Systoa. Aooom %
«inoo .hmo 30, 1936

*
100.

+
26^913

3.1910

9.9020

5 j*282

U*2i#J

U.60li7

3*0307

4.7852

3.8536

1 .^Itftiastod dividends, 1QU2
1j
*m Kstlaatsd oxponsos and dlTldacdi,
19^
J* Saralags
1# tstinstod ourronfe oaralngs*
*9^2 (oxolttsiiro of oara*
tugs on
2* Istlmtod oarnlngs ©a §©▼**
•oourltlof to Jhrr# 5®
5* Total

979

B. Sx o o m of **C" ov«r *T>3"

*

7.3105

11.4361

1* Allooatl on of reminder of
3y»t«® holdings (IU.929.529.000
loss 1770,506,000) on basis
*f *g*»
4,158,8^

30(4.0311.S3.220

340.619 101.807 aas/ftp

I* Total allocation of Go*»nas»nt
sooxnritios

4.99.39

377,076 1*237,909

372,066 U31,Ut3 329,426 255^26 610,701

J* Prosont allocations

4,929.329 388,474 1.899,122 381,666 U55.378 316.161

K. Chango in allooatlons



—

t a
214

8.5174
|

>11.398 "61.133

-9.600 -23.935

♦13.365

176.721 475.607 191.501 126.0l|2 199.« 8

256.270

131.540 242,992 201,892

222,265

596.076 237.809 135,005 286,821

♦13,363

♦14,625

-1.539

160,264 354,224

-3.465 ♦16,m

522,306

192,101 479.051
*9,791 ♦43.255

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives




D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority fc.Q* 12358

IB r S ' aortic

"sect^

APR L 9 \m
Fe d

eral

Re

ser v e

B

ank

of N e w Y o r k

November 2, 194-2.

Dear Mr. Sinead:
We received your letter of October 31/and have today
sent to the Reserve banks a copy of the computation showing
the adjustments to be made as of November 1 in participations
in the System Open Market Account today, pursuant to the plan
adopted at the meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee on
December 18, 194-0.
Enclosed herewith is a copy of the letter of transmittal
together with three copies of the computation, also copy of the
telegram which was sent to each of the Federal Reserve banks on
October 31*
Yours faithfully,

^

Manager, System Open
Market Account.
Mr. E. L. Smead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations,
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System,
Washington, D. C.
Ends. 5*

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

"

D E C L A S S IF IE D

Authority £..Q« 1235%

M1SC

! 40A 75M-1 2-41




F E D E R A L R E S E R V E BANK. OF N E W Y O R K

Morember 2, 1942*

Bear Hr, I#aaeht
In accordance nitii ay teiegr&a of October 31, I enclose
herewith cospwtation of the readjustments to be m im today as o.f
HoTeaiber 1, of th© participations of the Federal Beserve banks in
the System open Market portfolio*
lours faithfully,

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority fc.Q - 1235%

G
0
P
I

seg -r h b /jn /mh

October 31, 1942
PLEASE SEND THE FOLLOWING TELEGRAM TO PRESIDENT OP EACH FEDERAL RESERVE B A M AS
INDICATED BELCH* j

In accordance with action of the Federal Open Market Coaaittee at its
Meeting Septeaber 28, 1942, a readjustaent of participations in Government secur­
ities held in the Systea Account is called for on Noveaber 1 under the plan for
reallocation of Governaent securities adopted by the Federal Open Market Coaaittee
December 18, 1940*
The coaputations showing adjustaents to be aade in participations of
the several Federal Reserve banks on Noveaber 1 will be aailed to a U Reserve
banks on Noveaber 2*

These coaputations indicate an

^ncreases 0f
decrease
—

...

—

in your participation on Noveaber 1. We shall wire you on Noveaber 2, 1942 the
detailed entries to be aade as of Noveaber 1#
INCREASE

DECREASE

PADDOCK

BOSTON

WILLIAMS

PHILADELPHIA

FLEMING

CLEVELAND

4,733,000

-

LEACH

RICHMOND

2,697,000

-

McLARIN

ATLANTA

•

XOUNG

CHICAGO

•

DAVIS

♦23,988,000
mm

-

I

872,000

1 ,003,000
5,122,000

ST. LOUIS

6,340,000

mm

PEYTON

MINNEAPOLIS

1,263,000

-

LEEDI

KANSAS CITT

GILBERT
DAI



SAN FRANCISCO

-

3,120,000

-

3,155,000

6,487,000
ROUSE

mm

CONFIDENTIAL

System

Boston

UeiT
York

Phila- | Clove- | Rich*
dolphia! land
mond

Atlanta

Chicago

’■“St.
Louis

Minne­
apolis

Kansas
City

Dallas

~Si£---Francisco

A* Expenses
1.

Estimated ourrent ex­
penses , 19U 2

B.

Estimated dividends, 19^4-2

C#

Estimated expenses and divi­
dends , 19^2

D.

37,326

8,666

566

3,18U

708

888

U5.992

2 ,5 18

1.7H

U,872

1,951

1,097

1,882

1,508

3.513

5U8

303

95U

269

183

280

266

717

2,666

2,0lU

5,826

2,220

1,280

2,162

1.77U

U .230

Earnings
1. Estimated current earnings,

2*
3*

on Gov’ts)
Estimated earnings on Gov* t
securities to Oct# 31
Total

988

2k

166

128

99

36

35

181

3U

20

171

19

75

38.837
39,825

2,8U3
2,867

10,639
10,805

2,992

3,7^7

3,8146

1,685
1,720

U,859
5 ,0)40

1,875
1,909

1,109
1,129

1,720

3,12 0

2,37U
2 ,>410

1,891

1.5 1 2
1,5 3 1

3.1*82
3.557

3H

151

271

2)43

673

E.

Excess of "C" over wD3n

6,167

521

1,U82

U50

529

U56

29U

786

F.

Allocation required (on basis of
1 mhlU5^5% earnings rate op
Govfts) to produce earnings
November-Deoember equal to ”E” 2.502.597

211,142k

601,1402

182,612

21U,671

185,0U7

119,307

318,962

126,205

61,276

109,973

9 8 ,6 11

273.107

7.2953

28*75lU

8.2025

9.9190

5 .I4O29

I4.2U26

11.U193

U.5990

3.0382

U.7903

3.8525

8.14865

Allocation of remainder of System
holdings ($U,559,038,000 less
52,502,597,000) on basis of "G" 2 ,056.14)4!

I50t 03h

591.256

168,680

203,978

111,107

87 ,2)46 2314,831

9^,576

62,1479

98,510

79,2214

17U.520

Total allocations of Government
securities

14.559.038

361,^58 1 ,19 2 ,65s

351,292

1+18,6Li9

296,15U

206,553

553,793

220,781

123,755

208,1483

177,835

1447,627

Present allocation

U.559.033

337,1+70 1 ^ 2)4.,9^4

352,16 U

Ul3,866

293,U57

207,556

55^,915

2ii4,ma

122,[492

211,603

180,990

I4J41 ,1^0

-32,286

-872

+U,783

+2,697

- 1,003

-5 ,12 2

*6tik0

+1,263

-3,12 0

-3,155

*6,U87

6.

H.

I.

J*

Average daily participations, per
cent, in System Account since
June 30, 1936

Change in allocations
K. for FRASER
Digitized


100.

-

+23,968

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

REALLOCATION OF GOVERNMENT SECURITIES IN SYSTEM OHSN MARKET ACCOUNT, NOVEMBER 1, 19^.2
(In thousands of dollars)

>
C
i
r-f
l=r j
s
&'
^ ol
W:
»-r\ n
I t£> >
00
—- C/5
* 6
*«3
*<
w
o

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

"

D E C L A S S IF IE D

Authority £..C« 123 5 8

F o rm

>'D IN BUBS SSCTiaN

F. R. 148b




1942

" - ' • ' 2

TELEGRAM
BOARD OF GO VERNORS

d ~

OF THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
L E A S E D W IR E S E R V IC E

WASHINGTON

Tkls wl 11 ottsTlm
tlmi & 4>trWats trl
tbou*«d»
tm m m w *

tW

m * £#*$•

a** fm m k w m

Wm ?#*tr

I W lj
Utag
L*

£

OFT

for 7
S - ‘ E. i t
16— 4573

0

r0

j- '

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

‘

D E C L A S S IF IE D

Authority £..()■ 1 2 3 5 8

O•tobar 31 , 19 tt2 .

Hr* Robert 0* Rouse, Tlee President,
Federal Reserve Bank of Hew York,
lev York, Bew York*
Deer Mr* Rouse*
There I# enclosed a statement prepared in this
Division showing; the ohangea neeessary ia allocations of
Governaent securities In the System Open Mirk»t Aooount on
November 1, 19^2# prepared In accordance with the fonmla
adopted by the Federal Open Market Coraalttee on December 18,
19U0.
Current earnings, exclusive, of earnings on Govern-*
m a t securities, and ourrent expwasea have been eetlaated by
Multiplying tha aotual amounts thereof January through Sept*
enber by ease and one-third. Kstinates obtained on this baaia
have been adjusted in the sane manner aa for the previeua
reallocations this yeari namely, by adding #14&O,OO0 to our*
rent expenses at Bow York to oover extraordinary depreoiation
chargee on alr»eonditioning equipment and by deduoting from
current earnings estimated net earnings on industrial advaneee and ooamitaents attributable to ffende reeeived fra*
the Secretary of the Treasury* Estimated earnings m Treasury
bills held by the Keaerve Banka under reaale option have been
inoluded in the figures for itoa *D2*» eatlaated earnings on
Government seourities to Ootober 31*
Very truly yours.

S. L* insad, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations*
Enclosure

T
%

%




E

1-,.

w gnnw m xL
Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

REALLOCATIOM OF OOVlSSiBOT SBCTJUmHI IS SYSTEM O O T MAXIEJ^ACCOtJITT, «Ora»J» 1# l#4t
(la theutaade *f dollars)
04

cn
MHMMaiMMlM

System

o
£

tcpeases
1, Setlaated eurreati «•»
penB«8, 1$ M

| l9»t©a

MMf

fork

pmlu>

r 'c i v w r t o
delphl*} laad 1 — Pd

1*,872

1.951

1.097

1,882

305

95U

869

M3

280

i.5«e

5,826

2.220

1,280

2,162

1.771*

4.230

166

128

99

36

35

181

31*

20

171

19

75

2.8U3

10.639
10.885

2.992
3,180

2.371*
2.140

1.685

U,859
5.01*0

1,675
1,909

1.109
1.129

1,891

1.512
1,531

3,1*82
3.557

5a

1,1*82

1*50

766

311

151

271

2U3

673

45.992

3.388

12,887

D. laratage
1. Bstia*ted eurrent earnings,
19U2 (exolusiva of earnings
988
on Chwr*t*}
2. Estinatad earnings oa Qwr't
seearities to Oot* 31
38.837
39.885
3. Total

2b

6.16?

1.7U

Fraa«4**t

2.01U

3.18U

Ixeoes ef "C* eter *D3*

...

■"•
g
rr. •"”»
9Stt

2,866

566

S«

tglUi

naiM

1*,375

8,666

2,862
708

Bstlaated expenses aad dl*i*
deads, 19US

c w “ *»l LMl.

TBSnSw1

3.578

9.103

%

-m r

OOfi
900

2,822

Bstlmted diridanda, 19^2

.

2,518
3l*8

37.386

I.

Atlanta

2.867

3.1*87

3.71*7
3.81*6
5®

1*56

1,780
2?1*

1,720

M

3.513
717

>

C
c“f

F, Allocation required (aa basis ef
l*U7i*50^ earnings rate ea
Sotrabef^Ditafetr equal

0, Average daily participations, per
eenfc, la Systea Aoeowit sinee
100,

211,14244

60ljt0t 182,612

7.8958 88.751k

8-3025

150.03I* 591.256 168,680

214,671

9-919©

1
1

I* Allocation ef reaalador of Systea
holding. (♦14.559,038*000 !••«

^#^7

5-1*02?
111,107

U9*3®7

3*6525 8.U865

87.8U6 23U.831

94.576

62,479

96.510

79.82)4 174.588

220.781

Present allocation

337.1*70 l,22t*,9W* 352.161*

K#

Change la allocations

♦23,988 -32,286

-1,003

-5.122

<6,340

rn ^
I to
>
* uo

&

1*3.755 208,483 177.835 1*7.687
122.492 211,603

293.1*57 807,556 558.915
♦2,697

273.

fe.WJ

J*

«1*.783

96,611

3-°582

361.1*581.192.658 351.892 1*18.61*9 896,151* 806,553 553.793

-872

109,973

U -5990

fetal alleeatieas of Ctorernasat
seearities

1*13.866

126,205 61,276

11.1*193

M b

&6

318*9^

1.




]

I g!

*1 * t«|^J97

•to* 3©# 1936

jj

tr

♦1.863

-3.120

180.990 1*1*1 .11*0
-3.155

♦6.4BT
vaN

w>

>-<
W
o

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority fc.O* 12358

F

’D IS FILES SECTION

OCT 5
BD A RD

D F

1942

G D V ER N D R S

□ F THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
W A S HIN GTO N
ADDRESS

OFFICIAL C O R R E S P O N D E N C E
TO THE

BOARD

October 3j 1942.

Dear Sir:
This letter is for the purpose of formally advising'
you of the decision reached by the Federal Open Market Commit­
tee at its meeting on September 28, 1942, at which all of the.
Presidents were in attendance, to change the present procedure
with respect to the allocation of securities in the System
open market account to provide, in addition to the four quar­
terly allocations, for allocations as of November 1 and Decem­
ber 1 of each year on the same basis as the quarterly alloca­
tions are now being made.
As you know, this change, which will take effect
during the last quarter of this year, is for the purpose of
effecting a more even distribution among the 12 Federal Re­
serve Banks, in relation to their expenses, of the earnings
during a calendar year on the securities in the System account.
Very truly yours,

Chester Morrill, Secretary,
Federal Open Market Committee.

TO THE PRESIDENTS
FQ^/ICTORY
BUY




OF

ALL FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives




D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority fc.Q* 12358

•;

Fe d

era l

R

e ser v e

Bank

of N e w Y o r k

October 1, 1942.

Dear Mr. Sinead:

We received your letter .^September 29/and have today
sent to the Reserve banks a copy of the computation showing
the adjustments to be made in participations in the System Open
Market Account today, pursuant to the plan adopted at the
meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee on December IB, 1940*
Enclosed herewith is a copy of the letter of transmittal
together with three copies of the computation, also copy of the
telegram which was sent to each of the Federal Reserve banks
yesterday.
Yours faithfully,

Manager, System Open
Market Account.
Mr* B. L* Smead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations,
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System,
Washington, D. C.
Ends* 5*

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives




D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority fc.Q* 12358

OotetMHr 19 1 W

Dmt Mr* milUmt
la aceorcUxie* « lt h «jr t «l«* r M i o f y «* t ifd * y » 1
h#r*witk eoBjmtattoa o f th*
to 1*
tfc* p *rtic ip *tio o * osf
f i d i T i l it e w m beak# in th » % * t « i

Open Market portfolio*

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority fc.Q* 12358

SECOIITIBS 130*7
HHBififl

September 30, 1942
please m m r m w u m m
Under th* pim

t m j m m to m m

federal w a w m u r n m

isdicated bjsloi*

for reallocation of Gorornaent **curltie* adopted by th*

Federal Open Market Committee December 13, 1940, & readjustment of participation*
la Qcnrernment securities held in the System Account is called for October 1, 1942*
the computation* showing adjustments to be Bade in participative of the several
Federal Reserve beaks will be nailed to all Beserve bank* tomorrow,

these computations

Increase

o f _______ ......-.in your participation on October 1 * He
decree**
shall wire you on deltober 1 , 194t| the detailed en les to be aad* oa that date#

indicate ta




111&S1MEI

e
innw
fiwUwl

£&i£M£i&

113,000

TTTTllifl

FLBOTG

18,2^3,000

T+LfW

25,088,000

%LABpl

UtOXfOOO

xouso

£, 594,000

DATIS

,

pxnos

4 005,000

LlttftT

5.970.000

ftTIJHCBT

4.807.000

DAI

31>328,000

ftOIITWI

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority

12358

I HEO' -i i s w'tEs’licH o'fl
Form F.R. 118t>

TELEGRAM
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
O F TH E

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
L E A S E D W IR E S E R V IC E

WASHINGTON
September 30,

19142«

Ro h m • lew York
This will ooafirx understanding in telephone conversation
that adjustment# of participations in System account in
thousands of dollars will be as follows t




Increases s
Boston
Philadelphia

11,113
4,692

Richmond

25,068

Atlanta

11,
1*11

Kansas City

5,970

Pallas

U,807

San Franoisoo

31,328

Deoreasesii
l«v Tork

55,355

Cleveland

18,280

Chicago

8,594

St. Louis

8,175

Minneapolis

4 ,0 05

SS|^|fc

F

F

lft— 4578

« »

*

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives




D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority fc.Q* 12358

September 89* 19^2.

Kr* tofcort 0* louse, Vioo fcrosidoat,
federal Reserve lank of low fork,
Star York, low fork*
Dear Hr* X«ai»t
There li eaelosed * »tati*oat proparod in this
Division showing tho ehaagos aeoossary In allooatioas of
Oovoraasat ooooritios la tho iyotoa Opoa Market Aooount m
Ootobor l§ I9k2, proparod ia aooordaaee with tho fersaila
adopted by tho Federal Opoa Market Coaadttoo oil lN»oo«bor
18, 19140.

Current earnings, oxolusive of earnings oa
doveraiasnt seeurities, sad ourreat expenses have boon estiaatod by Multiplying tho aottial aaoants thereof Jaaaary
through August by 1*5* Estimates obtained oa this basis
have been adjusted ia tho saao asaner as for tho previous
roallooatioas this year, aaasely, tho additioa of |i*899000
to ourreat oxpoasos at low Tork to sever extraordiaary
dopreoiatioa eharges oa air-eeaditioaiag o$sip»at aad tho
doduotioa from ourreat e arelags of estimated aot earnings
on iadustrial advaaeos sad ooanttaoats attributable to ffcads
reeeived froa tho Soorotaty of tho treasury*
Toty truly yours.

1* t* 9h m £ # Chief,
Divisioa of Baak Operation*.

Inoloaure

^
I
’ y m n t m TIAL
s.
^ —

!

,................ ......... —
System

Boston

)
jSA:*

,t

M m %T ACCOST, OCTOBER X, X9L2

txp#nsas
(1) Estlmatad current axpansas, X9^2

< S» Erth.s*t«d divi dands, 19M*
C* Estimated axpansas and dividands,l$i2

u, Sanalegs
(X) Istimtad currant aaraingi, 19^2
(axelusiva of aarnln^s on Gov’ts)
(2) Estimated •a.mingi on Got*t
sseuritias to Sapt. 30
(5) fatal

8* Rxoass of "C* over "D^)*

In

Tork

Phila­ CXevedelphia Xand

Rich­
AtXant*
mond

Chicago

MnnSt.
Louis jaapoiis

Kansas
City DalU»

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

;l

mkLLOCAnCM OF GCmm'MEUT SBCTJRITI S Xr: SYSTEM O P M

San
Francisco

36,962

2,738

9,068

2.838

3,1^0

2,495

X,702

4,644

1,915

1,085

1,872

1 ,5 0 1

3,464

8,665

566

3,184

708

888

348

302

954

269

183

280

266

717

45.627

3.304

12 ,2 5 2

3.546 4,328

2,843

2$00h

5,798

2,X8l|

1,268

2,1*52

1.767

4,181

996

25

162

131

99

37

5T

193

32

22

X?X

17

72

53,887

2,1*77

9,325

2,616

3.308

2,o49

1.458

4,234

980

2.993

2,502

9.487

2,747

3,*407

2,085

1,49 5

4,427

1,002

1,49 2
1,663

1.316

34,885 -

1,61*0
1,6?2

1.333

3.065

10,742

R02

2.765

799

921

758

509

1.371

512

266

489

434

1,116

8,877,116

214.606

7^0,572

F. AXXoaaticn raquirad (on basis of
X Ji8X2©£ aaraings rata oa Gov’t*)

to produea wrningi Octobar-Dacamber
aqual to wg*

214,002 244679 303,021 136,330 367,306 137,133

0, Avarag;« dally participations, par
oant, in Systam account sinea

Juna 30, 1956
. A1X ©cation of raaaindar of Systam
holding® (13,358*765,000 iass
12*877,1X6,000) on basis of *G*

100.

7.2931

26.7967

8.2145

9.9**02

5.^769 4.231*8

71,21*5 130,973 116,242 296,907

11.3982 *4*59^4 3.0)i70 4.7940

3 .8!.96 8.4566

—-

39,565 47,877

25,896

20.397

54.899

22,139 14,676 23.090

16.541

1(0,731

35,127

138,709

I. Total allocations of Government
securities

5,358,765' 249,933

879,281

253,5^ 294,556 226,919 156.727 422,105~ig9,272

8^,921 15l*,OS3 134.783 339.638

J. Present aXlocations

3.358.765

238,820

934.636

218,875 312^36 203.831 145.316 430,699 1^7,Wi7

89,926 11*8,093 129,976 308.310

♦11,113

-55.355

K* Change in aileoations




>
I
&
!
S'
i
§.
* w1
rT\ O
\
r
o
>
• uo

481,649

♦4,692-18.280 +25,088 ♦11,411

-8,594 *8,175

-4,005

♦5.970

♦4,807 ♦31,328

c/3

* 5
§ wo

R eproduced from the U nclassified / D eclassified H oldings of the N ational A rchives

jREC’D II FILES SECTION

I■

AUG 2 7 '.342 ,

! 7> h ?) . 3

:

Auguot 26, 19ii2

Syotoil OjMWI ia rk # t allocation*.
Hr* Tan Foa*on

l#£#rri**c to y # w p#mll wmtmwtomjf I do not find anything
la the r#f#rt m 1 th#
m : $ * M M m m m m in regard to th*
t m t M a t of lotati on O o r M w a t aoourltloa §ol«, Tho prooont pro- '
##dur#* of *«tur««» 1* t# #ll#©ai* nuey, ;i#o«o* ia proportion to arorag# '
participation* la tho 8yatem Opon Market aooount alnoe Juno 50, 1936,
i*#,f on tfe# ***o l>#iii§ on *&£#& 'profit# ar# *U4**t«d»
- th# $fonoa& fr®o#d»r# rogardiiif: fn**%orIy *&I#o*ti©»« **»&
tho troataant of prtfit* and I®**#* m i #4#fft#i #H t m m & m 1&# $9tt* ■
by tho WwtomX Open »ark#t 0««ii*itt#* at it a*«fe£*g *t »§i$#l* *tl #£ th#
Preoldente of tho Federal Reaerre Bank* wore ia attond*n»e. Aooordlag to tho pj#r^i„l#$t«*i .*£
..M*.
..$S4$# appro*** «f th# w m ■'.
proood\iro wae gir#a by til# J*r#i»M»liti *S **Ii ** % til* ?#$#r*X Opon ■
Market ■Puialtt##. P r f W « l ^ ***
ohange
th# ■.■
approrral #f tho F*d«rm3, & p m Httdwl $tf*&tt##.
4# 1 rweall th#ro M l *m undorstanding with Mr. Ii«*«# and '■
Mr. Mlllor that If la tho laot garter of any yoar It appoaro that
thore waa a likelihood that any Floral Rooorro Bank would not haro
eurront not .amlng* #nf#i#l*ill 't# ##*#r #*$#*»#* «**d dtvtd#«i»;* ti*#*#
would bo apodal roaUooationa of tho 8y»ta» Opoa Markot aooouafc on
lorort&or I and Dooombor U Tkoro I# no pr#*#iit life#iili##d #£ *ay
situation arioiag aad, accordingly, thoro dooo not appoar to bo any
neoosslty for * reallocation during th# current calendar yoar subsequent
to tho forthcoming Ootobor 1 reallocation. It is hollered, however, '
that it would bo doeirablo to got ao aoourato an estimate of probable
oxp«uoi during tho last four monfcha of tho yoar for uoo in this ro- '’■■:
allooatloa ao lo practicable. Wo oould, of oourao, aok tho Fodoral
t###rf* Banka again, ao wo did last yoar, to giro uo an estimate of
«n#|i expenses. I b#lim m * k m # m t §.m '****• 4# J»«t *# good a ,j#h and;
perhaps a fc#tt#r m m on th# fc#«i# #f MtfmX #xp#iM»# to th# ond ,##' •
''***
|r«i##ittsfm ii to add 50 |Nir
t# ^oi##nto# at tho .
ond of *ng»it to obtain th# #itimit#d onj*#*i§#ii tar m m in- th# t#t*ik#r 1
roaliooaticn. ln'vi«#' #f th#
i m r m m in #*p«io## &&&$.
tho fr#o^l" ^yo#r# I b#ii#f# it would bo proforalbi# m tlt-is ###«#'i#ii t#
uao oxponaoa to tho ond of Auguot pluo oacponooo for til# four month* ■
May to Auguot inolualro. Inaamuoh a# tho mothod of ootlmating oacpoaaa#* ..
ha§ »#t boon *^prw#4 fey th# ©£•** Hirk#t
it' i».# #f ##«ri»#
fooaibi# .for you «nd Hr. Kp w n i t#. adopt any *o^M»d #f ##ti*#tii^ .
•xpoiuos wi^out #Bteitt.i«g it t# m * 0 p m U m p M itaKitt## to* #ppr#f#l*
It i# IWti«W»t#d tli*t you diacmoo M U l m t t ^ with #r* »!«•#
at t i l # mooting |» low Swfa M M d w*«te mnA if It i»
to &#*# fm*
allooatloa# on Mvrmbmr X m & D^ortior 1 «iat an appropriate rooeeaonday

\JYv

tIon h#

Markot C
VF:seh




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority fc.Q*

BOARD DF GO V E RN O RS
□ F THE

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Office Correspondence
To_

M r . Smead

FronL

Mr. Van Fossen

REC’OINRCCQRHS
APR 1 9 !966
Date A igust 26. 19142_____

Subject; System Open Market allocations

Referring to your pencil memorandum, I do not find anything
in the report of the Committee on Self Insurance in regard to the
treatment of losses on Government securities sold. The present pro­
cedure, of course, is to allocate any losses in proportion to average
participations in the System. Open Market account since June 30, 193&,
i.e., on the same basis on which profits are allocated.
The present procedure regarding quarterly allocations and
the treatment of profits and losses was adopted on December 18, 19^0
by the Federal Open Market Committee at a meeting at which all of the
Presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks were in attendance. Accord­
ing to the Board’s letter of December 27, 191+0, approval of the new
procedure was given by the Presidents as well as by the Federal Open
Market Committee. Presumably any proposed change should have the
approval of the Federal Open Market Committee•
As I recall there was an understanding with Mr. Rouse and
Mr. Miller that if in the last quarter of any year it appears that
there was a likelihood that any Federal Reserve Bank would not have
current net earnings sufficient to cover expenses and dividends, there
would be special reallocations of the System Open Market account on
November 1 and December 1. There is no present likelihood of any such
situation arising and, accordingly, there does not appear to be any
necessity for a reallocation during the current calendar year subsequent
to the forthcoming October 1 reallocation. It is believed, however,
that it would be desirable to get as accurate an estimate of probable
expenses during the last four months of the year for use in this re­
allocation as is practicable. We could, of course, ask the Federal
Reserve Banks again, as we did last year, to give us an estimate of
such expenses. I believe, however, we can do just as good a job and
perhaps a better one on the basis of actual expenses to the end of
August. The usual procedure is to add 50 per cent to expenses at the
end of August to obtain the estimated expenses for use in the October 1
reallocation* In view of the continued increase in expenses during
the present year, I believe it would be preferable on this occasion to
use expenses to the end of August plus expenses for the four months
May to August inclusive. Inasmuch as the method of estimating expenses
has not been approved by the Open Market Committee, it is, of course,
possible for you and Mr. Rouse to adopt any method of estimating
expenses without submitting it to the Open Market Committee for approval.
It is suggested that you discuss this matter with Mr. Rouse
at the meeting in New York next week and if it is decided to have re­
allocations on November 1 and December 1 that an appropriate recommenda­
tion be prepared for submission by you and Mr. Rouse to the Federal Open
Market Committee at its next meeting.
|




j

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority fc.C* 12358

APR I 9

V

’-'..J' .&
}■
■
'

Fe d

eral

Re

se r v e

B

ank

of N e w Y o r k

June 30, 1942

Dear Mr. Smead:
We received your letter of June
29 land have today
.......^ ef
sent to the Reserve banks a copy of the computation showing
the adjustments to be made in participations in the System Open
Market Account on July 1, 1942, pursuant to the plan adopted
at the meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee on December 18,
1940*
Enclosed herewith is copy of the letter of transmittal
together with three copies of the computation, also copy of the
telegram which was sent to each of the Federal Reserve banks today*
lours faithfully,

Manager, System Open
Market Account*,^

Mr. E* L. Smead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations,
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System,
Washington, D* C.

Ends. 5.




J

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

_____ ____
d e c l a s s if ie d

Authority

V23SB

M IS C . 1 4 0 A 7 5 M -6 -4 1

FE D E R A L R E SER VE B A N K O F N E W YO R K

Juno 30, 1942•

Bear Mr. Flemings

In accordance w ith sy telegram of today, I sneloae
h e re w ith computation o f th e readjust&eats to be aade on
f*1? h
of the participations of th e Federal il©serve
banss ia 'the Systea Open Market portfolio.
lours faithfully,

Jpen
Jr. !'u. J* Flej&iiig;j. Prjga^tlesit$
Federal Reserve B a n ^ f C i ^ e l a n d ,
Cleveland, Ohio*
f
\
Ene.

MBfFD




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority fc.Q* 1235%

SECURITIES DEPARTMENT
RHBiFD
Ju n e 3 0 , 1 9 4 2 *

PLEASE S M B THE FOLLOWING TELEGRAM TO EACH FEDERAL RESERVE BANK AS INDICATED BELOW:
Under the plan for reallocation of

Government securities adopted fey the

Federal Open Market Committee December IB, 1940, a readjustment of participations

in Government securities held in the System Account is called for July 1, 1942*
The computations showing adjustments to be made in participations of the several
Federal Reserve banks is being mailed to all Reserve banks today* These
[LnOX*0£1*3©
computations indicate an
______ _____ _—
participation
decrease
on July 1*
However* these computations are based on holdings at close of
business June 2 9 , and are exclusive of purchases made for delivery today and
tomorrow.

Consequently our wire to you tomorrow will advise entries to be mad©

on that day covering both the quarterly reallocation and additions to holdings
since June 29#




Increase

Decrease

Paddock

Boaton

-

9,776,000

Williams

Philadelphia

-

20,519,000

Fleming

Cleveland

-

27,446,000

Leach

Richmond

9,761,000

~

McLarin

Atlanta

2,534,000

-

Young

Chicago

25,162,000

-

Davis

St. Louis

11,799,000

-

Peyton

Minneapolis

Leedy

Kansas City

3,082,000

Gilbert

Dallas

1,203,000

Day

San Francisco

-

21,231,000

ROUSE

10,288,000
-

-

mLLOCATICK OF GOVERNM5NT SBCTJRITIES P? SYSTBV OPEN MARKET ACCOTJFT, <OTT 1, 191*2

cmnmruis

A. I X M B N I
(l) Estimsted current expenses,19U?

B« Estiwated dividends,

G. Average daily participations, per
cent in System account since
June 30, 1936
A lloeation of remainder of System
holdings (| 2 ,617,083,000 less
#2 ,59*1,^63,000) on basis of "G"
I . Total allocation of Government
securities (*F* plus *HW )
J. Present allocations
K. Change in allocations

9 ,16 1

8,650

565

3.182

Us, 360

3*229

99®

Dalla*

lan
Fn»«l«oo

1 , 651.

I*,903

1,9 52

1,078

1,825

1 , 1*77

3 , 3&>

709

887

3^8

297

952

268

I83

279

265

715

12 , 3h3

3 ,KS8

bAi6

2,776

1,951

5,855

2,220

1,26 1

2,104

1,71*2

4,075

19

168

119

10.4

47

34

I 83

32

25

176

21,607

1 , 60S

*,912

1,710

2 , 16?

1,299

926

1,026

653

1,62*

6,060

1,829

2,271

1,34 6

960

1,058

678

952
1,128

841
860

1,863

22 , 6os

2.653
2,836

2^,755

1 , 60S

6,263

1,629

2,075

1,430

991

3,019

1,162

583

976

862

2 , llfO

2 , 59^ , 1*63

182,996

71^,090

185,73^ 236,586 l63,OU5

112,991

3l?4,218 I 32 J488

66,1*72

111,281

100 .

7.3057

28.8556

2 , 71#

8 . 2611* 9.97^1

5-3365

4.2295

11.3149 4.5737

3.0686 4.8167

2?,620

1,652

6,s27

2,617,083

181 *,650

720,617

187,603 238,^43 164,252

1 1 3 ,^

346,777 133,523

67,166 112,370

2,617,083

1 9 W i2 6

727,360

208,1>2 266,289 154,491

111,4.14

32l,6is 121,724

77

-9,776

“6 ,7^3

—

NOTE: Computations are based on holdings
in the Account June 29, 191+2.




Kansas

2 ,l*a8

C. Estimated expenses and dividends, 19^2

P. A ll 00ation required (on basis of
1*73963$ earnings rate on Gov’ ts )
to produoe earnings July-December
equal to *E*

2,64*

Mlnn-

tools eapo lis

3.J+99

19fj2

»• Earning*
( l) Estimated current earnings, 19^2
(exclusive of earnings o»n fle e ts)
(2) Estimated earnings on Gov*t
seeurities to June 30
(3 ) Total
E. Excess o f "C" over #D (3)"

5 6 ,7 1 0

“it.

1,869

2,257

- 2 0 ,519 - 2 7 ,4 1 ,6

1,207

+ 9 ,7 6 1

957

♦ 2,534

2, SS9

♦ 25,162

69L

1,035

1,089

109,288

+11,799 -10,2P8 ♦3 ,0 8 2

19

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

System ^ Boston

(in thousands of dollars)
New [P hils- T Cleve­ Richmond
YoA {delph ia 1 land

72

1,935

100,563 243,997

3.81,81*

871

8.1*11*6

1,903

101,1*31 21*5,900
100,231 224,669

♦1,203 ♦2 1 , 2 3 1

>
&
c
0r

f
rn
1
o
—
*

I
S

g!
^
r
>
I
C/A
3
5
w
©

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority

12358

RBC'O IN ' ItfS

'KGTXON

JU N ., 01942A

■

Aw* 39,

Mr. Robert G. Rouse, Ylo# President,
Federal Reserve Bank o f Hew York,
Sew York, *®W York.




Doar Mr. Mouse t

fh*t*o I* eaolooed a statement prepared 1m this
DlTlaien showing the changes nooesfary in allocations of
Gtorernaent #e«arltiet la 'tlx# Systesa Open Market Aoooimt on
July 1, 19U2, prepared in accordance with the formula adopted
by tha Federal Open Market CoBaaittee on Deee*ber 18. 19*40*
Currant tamings# exclusive ©f earnings :«n fkwera*
securities, and current expenses havs boon estimated fey
M u lt ip ly in g
the actual amounts tho roof January through l a y
2*1*. Estimates obtained on this basis hare been adjust## In
tho saas naaner a# for the January 1 .and April 1 reallooations,
naiaely, th© addition of tltB®,®©© to current expenses at Sew
York to oovor extraordinary depreciation charge* ea airoonditloning equipment and the deduction from ourrent earnings
of estimated net earnings on industrial advanoes and ooscnltwent* attributable to fuads reoeived from the focretary of th*
Treasury.
Very truly yours,

g. L. g*eadt Chief,
Division of lank Operations,

Snelosure

T

CCKFXBESTIAL

BSALLOCATIOK OF G O W m W * ? SECURITIES U

SYSTk Qf m MAHST ACCOUST, JULY I, 19**2

- - ..I —

I25
;
frt,.......... .

iO

Syeten

CM

^A.'txponsos
■g il) 8-tl-t.d oarrent .xp

Boston

low
York

Phila­ Clefcdelphia land

Rich- Atlanta
mend

3,182

709

887

U5,360

3*229

12,31*3

3.^58

l*,3i*6

2,776

998

19

160

119

loh

hi

2 1 ,60?

5,912

1,7 1 0

2 ,16 7

1,299

926

22,605

1,605
1 ,62^

6,080

1,829

2 ,2 7 1

1.& 6

22,755

1*605

6,263

1,629

2,0 75

P. Allocation required (on basis of
1*73983^ •**»!«£• rat# on Gov'ts)
to produce earnings July-December
equal to *S*

2,59W*63

182,996

71^,090

6. Average daily participations, per
cent, in Sjttes aocount sinee
June *50, 1936

100.

22,620

1,6 5 2

I. total allocation ef Government
securities (*f* pins *1*)

2,617,063

18^,650

J. Present allocations

2,617,083

n

Change in allocations




—

6,527

720*617
19i*,li26 727,360
-9.776

-6,7^3

I83

279

265

7 15

5.855

2,220

1,2 6 1

2 ,id*

1 ,71*2

1,075

I83

32

25

176

19

1,0 2 6

952
1,128

8ia
860

1.935

976

862

2, ll#0

1*95*

565

E. Allocation ef reminder of System
holdings (12*617*083*000 lose
|2, 5$*,1*63 ,000 ) so basis of *<f

268

952

8 ,6*30

38.8556

% 36o

297

3.^59

7.3037

1,177

1,9*2

2,71*9

*. Ixeess ef *C* over *8(3)*

1,8 2 5

J*,903

9,161

2M

1,078

1*6514

2,661*

^I^SstisAtsd dividends, 19 L2
a
_.
y}« Ssti«atod expenses and dividends, 1#;2
M
i
•V*
^-leittings
(1) Estimated current earnings, 19^2
(exclusive of earnings on 0ev* ts)
(2) Sstiaated earnings an Got*t
securities to June 30
(3) Total

Stllti

it.
Louis

36,710

2,1*36

Minn- Kansas
•apolls city

Chisaga

*

Francisco

72

960

2,653
2,836

1,058

653
676

1,1*30

991

3.019

1,162

5»3

185,73k 236,566 16 3 ,01*5

112,991

3Wi,218 132,li88

66,1*72 Hi.aBi

10C,563 21*3.997

l*.2295

ll*31ii9 i*-5737

3.0666 U .8167

3-81*81* 8.1*11*6

8.2611*

1,869

9 .9761* 5*3365

2,257

1,307

957

187,603 2«,8l*3 l6t*,252
308,122 266,289 15Wtfl

113.&8

<*30,519 •27,L?6

♦9,761

lll,lili*
♦2,531*

2,559

1.035

69L

1,089

&6.7T7 1*5,523 67,166 112,^70
321.615 1 2 1 ,721* 77 5^ 109,288
♦25,162 ♦11,799 -10,2F8

♦3,062

871

I.863

1,903

101,1*3^ 21*5,900
100,231 22jL,669

j

♦1.203 ♦2 1 ,2 3 1

'

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives




D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority E..O* 1235%

M RECORDS SECT
APRl 91968
*^

F e d e ra l R e s e rv e B ank
of

N

e w

Yo

r k

March 30, 19U2,

Dear Mr© Sinead:
We received your letter of March 28jknd have
today sent to the Reserve banks a copy of the computation
showing the adjustments to be made in participations in
the System Open Market Account on April 1, 19U2, pursuant
to the plan adopted at the meeting of the Federal Open
Market Committee on December 18, 19U0*
Enclosed herewith is copy of the letter of
transmittal together with three copies of the computation,
also copy of the telegram which was sent to each of the
Federal Reserve banks today*
Yours faithfully,

%

Manager, System Open
Market Account®
Mr# E* L* Smead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations,
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System,
Washington, D* C<>

Ends* (£)•

1

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

__________

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority

1235%

Mi SC. 140 A 75 M -6-41




FE D ER A L R E S E R V E BANK OF NEW YORK

March 30, 1942

Qmt Ur* i)ey:
In accordance1with agr teiegrius of tod&y, I enclose
herewith computation of tli© reacijttataents to be m d m on
April lf 194^ of the participations of the federal Reserve
b*mfca in the System. Open Market portfolio*

rnBtm

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

"

declassified

Authority

123SB

s t c s i t m a nsir*

mmm

ftroii SJ,

n * * m »«mI tt» m u r n i m

**ch V M M

M o m

t M «r t m Pirn t w x r n m & m m «C

r*«m a

a * ««r lu * »

Xi, 3MA» • w m kj& fitm *- «f

itevlwi ( M i d i

twiX*S. in ite Sjwtav

ia ^ w n m o t

ftMfc ft* ii*fc<»%«Kl M U w t

Tim

i# is*tXX**t fsar IprtX I* Xffit*

t» tot mdm in

r$dm*l

In M in e

In die*t*

m

* • ®h*JI

wtr* /ou

'

®f

t * a l l taMftrtt

____________________in.

«*i % r i l X* X&2 ih * 4#&aAX#tl

« f %hm m m m X
today.

H m m cM g^tftttoa*

fmat smrtl«igMtfUhm m

# r t X X*

to to* « i 4 » im th*t
nil

Zmm&

M t7 ,o c o
71,000

m

€ Z0

5,800,000

m

nrnmmtt.

S *»5,o o o

m

AtXftnU

3,106,000

m

7,283,coo

m

ktXXJ, ooo

m
m

i,75W ,coo

m

SiUJt®Bai
i*X#6|3Ul^

tmmg
tw*%»

tm % r

n u UmiM

m m m city

«*

fiJJtarfc

tm r




**

x#ate,ooo
*»

8 m 'Prwmimm

mmn

$»3n,ooc
m

ii#,ooo

REALLOCATION OF GOVERKkiil<T SECURITIES IH SYSTW OPEil MARiiBT ACCOUNT
________________ APRIL 1, 19U2________________________

cm n m r r u L

.... — —

Systa*
A. IzpiBtH
1 * Estimated currant expanses,
19^
B. Earnings
1 . Estimated currant earnings,
1942 (exolusive of earning*
on Got* ts)
2* Estimatad «train|f on Go t *t
securities to Mar. }1
3. Total
c. Excess of •A-l" o-rer "B-3"

36,631

Boston

2,802

York

8,925

(In thousand© of dollars
I M 1 T C T T" ....
j
Si.
!
!delphia jciawland iRichmond Atlanta* L
,Chicago ! Louis

2,898

3,666

2,391

1,659

u .700

kinneapolis

kansas
City

Sail "
Francisco

"

Dallas

1,894

1,190

1,642

1,486

3,178

*>

1,059

57

158

116

94

44

42

lbo

36

24

l>5

22

85

10,625
1 1 ,68^

782

2,933
3,091

839
955

1,0 5 1

452
494

1,292
1,478

502
536

321

>45

i+86
681

4m
436

1,003

1,165

3,222

1,356

645

1,161

1.050

2.175

918

5,84+

1,943

2,521

635
679
1 .7 1 2

136,537 1405,764

135,1^5

175.348

119.076

61,032

22^,106

94,317

56.774

80,753

73.033

151,282

3,133

711

686

345

296

950

267

lo2

276

265

715

509,047

33,415 185,620

42,124

52.4^3

20 ,u40

17,537

1^,61;

10,733

16,-,71

15 .7^0

42,361

2,244,236

169,952 591,404

177,269
177,196

227, &+1

139,518

98,569

260,3^0

69,557

97.22^

66,733

95,463

273,102

110,136
1 u 6,019

67.761

102,599

87.451
♦ 1 ,2 o2

1;3.&*3
l>3.e92

24,947

D. Allocation required (on basis of
1.90823$ earnings rata on Go t *ts)
to produce earnings Apr .-Dae*
equal to "C*
1#735#189
I. Estimated dividends, 1942

" »■—1

8,592

839
1,963

564

1,145

P. Allocation of remainder of Sys­
tem holdings ($2 ,244 ,236,000
less #1,735#189*000) on basis
of mE m

G. Total allocation of Go t *t
securities ("D* ♦ "F")
H. Present allocations
I. Change in allocations




2 ,24^,236
—

165,135 619,452
♦4,817 -28,048

♦71

221,>6l
+5*880

^34,203
♦5.315

♦ 3,106

♦7,266

♦•U.117

♦1,796

_c

/,7 c.

-249

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority

12358

o
lo

Haroh 28, 19142.

Kr. Ecbert 0. H o w , VIo* Prooidont,
Podaral Ho«.rro Bank of l w Tort,
low lork. Sow lork.
Dear Hr. Rousei
thoro 1* onoloood a i t a t w n t proparod lo thi»
Dlvi»ion showing tho ohangoo n»o»»«*ry in allooation* of
SoToramant .o o u rlti.* in tho S y .tm 0pm
Ao! ° ! “ V
on April X, 1942. pr«p»r»d in aooordanoo «ith tho
adoptad hy tho Fodoral Opan Uarkst Condttoo on Dooo»t>or
18, X9l»0.

Current earnings# txoluiivi of tiriilQiii on
Government *eouritiea, and current expen*** havo been
estimated by multiplying the aotual amounts thereof
October through February by 2.U* Estimates obtained on
thi# basi* hate been adjusted in the m m manner a* m i
done In connection nith the January 1 reallocation, namely, the addition of 1480,000 to current expense* at low
Tork to cover extraordinary depreciation charge* on airconditioning equipment and the deduction from current
earnings of eetimated net earning* on industrial advance*
and commitment* attributable to fund* reoeivod from the
Secretary of the Treasury.
Very truly your*.

So L. Smead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operation*.

Enclosure.

h \




MB: je=3

|

COPY

mkojookmm m

coif : m s t x a l

mmmnss in snrm ofbm umr&t accob*s

APRIL i, 1942

______

c i
C/ *

S/at—

:>• Efcponoaa
1 . latlnatad currant
1942
— #v Baraing*
1. Eatinatod currant aarttlngs,
l'^4£ (axoluaiva of earning*
oa Sevfta)
2* Batinated earning* an Gov’t
aeearitie* to STar. 51
i« Total
c. Exoeaa of "A-l* « i t r *8-3*

Boaton \ fork

(la thotjsa&d# of dollars)
T O t e n ------ =*p----- p ----- r
]— sir
‘delphia 'Cleveland *RlohaattdjAtlanta ']Chloago
IrOttla

! Mlaa**"™*

aapolla

ganaaa
City

MHMMMMNMtiMMMtMNNNMNaMfr'

Sflfcft

Dallaa

Fmnaiaaa

2,809

8,925

2,896

3#666

2,391

1.659

4,700

1,894

1.190

1.842

1.436

3,178

1,059 y

57

156

116

94

44

42

166

36

24

195

82

85

10,625y
11,684 '
24,947 J

788

8,933
3,091

1.051
1,145

452

502

321

486

494

1,892
1.478

538

681

414
436

1,003

5,834

2,521

345

1,963

839
955
1.943

635

839

1,712

1.16 5

3.222

1.356

845

1 .1 6 1

I .050

2,175

135*145

175.348

119,078

81,032

224.106

94.317

58.774

00,753

73.033

151,232

TU

836

345

296

950

267

188

278

265

715

42*124

52.4^3

20,443

17.537

56.284

15.819

10.783

16,471

15,700

42.361

887.841

139.518

96.569

280,590

110,136

69.557

97.824

88,733

193.643

177*196 281.961

134.803

95,463

873.108

106.019

67.761

102,599

87,451

193.898

♦5.315

♦3,106

♦7,288

♦4.117

♦1.796

-5.375

♦1,268

-849

at9

918

!5* Allocation required (oa baai* of

1 .90825$ earninge rot# oa ©ov’ta)
to produoo earning* Apr*•Dae*
equal to *C*
1 .735*189 ^ 136,537 405,764
S. latiaatod dividends, 1942
8,592 J
564
3,133
F. Allocation af remainder of Syeton holding* (.$2 , 2 *44,236,000

le*a 11 ,735,169,000) an baaia
of *»*
fetal allooatioa of 0o?*t
aeeuritiea (*n* ♦ ■**)
Preaant allocations
I. Change in alleeatieaa




509.01*7 v

33.415 135 , 6eo

2.8i*.236 y 169,958 531.404
2,244.836^ 165.135 619.458

~

♦4.817 •28, OI4.8

,*71

+5,680

s

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority £ . 6 - I M 5 8

fe l) IN RECORDSSHT

(

m

i

3 ,

d m

i,

F e d e ra l R e s e rv e B ank
v.




of

New Yo rk

December 30, 1941

Dear Mr. Smead:

sent to the Reserve banks a copy of the computation showing the
adjustments to be made in participations in the System Open
Market Account on January 2, 1942 as of January 1, pursuant to
the plan adopted at the meeting of the Federal Open Market
Committee on December 18, 1940.
Enclosed herewith is copy of the letter of transmittal
together with three copies of the computation, also copy of the
telegram which was sent to each of the Federal Reserve banks today.

Robert G. Rouse,
Manager, System Open
Market Account.

Mr. E. L. Smead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations,
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System,
Washington, D. C.

Ends. (5)

J

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
"

>»

-

Authority £..()■ 1235B

•* *.

'

® m m xm mm*
M g I M 'l

M i r Wm ftat f«r *^Xi«w*sti«asi e£ iifirvwiwmt WMttriU** j&4©$>U«i Igr Uni

fw&mmt Opm U w r ^ t

i w » i » r I f , 1$4® # * rm^pmfimmm « f j * r t l 4 * f * % i i f t f t tm
1# lf42«

■mm®?iMm& W ld ia th# %#*#* &mmm% i# «aU*a f«r

®MK^%&%lmM ■mmdm

1h*

t e * * **»*§# in p&rkl®lp*%im& # £ tfe * a te m rib ’l f t o 6 m i

li i WHTi Itaaka it &*4*m£ mm% to all &#t»*nr» taofca immj* thmm

M lM w «b

.v

ln e r * * * *
d ie * * * * *
uc

^

...

__ ____ __

1r

yn rM »lpfc1iili«ii «& J iR M ff 1*

'
2 , i$ 4 ? tto » t i s M l f t i « **fc ri# » t e b * mcm m t h a t l * t *

■m

Wrntm
f illis s s
y iir y t liig

ffiy p i^ b w w l
«fci tttkusmtxiiHfi

M * r i»

A tlm tJk

Wmk»

Mm IMtoX#

f if t H i

lam t?
&J11 MP%




CX^

6 6 ,0 0 0
«aMb
♦
2 3 1 ,3 0 0

i , 5 8 6 ,0 0 0
6 ,8 9 1 ,0 0 0
9 ,1 5 5 ,-;> jo
i JU JLJ300

igm

<1*11, .» r e jpmi

«,# o f l i M

f | ' 1#

# ,1 5 3 ,0 ®
!**
IS O ,96©
2 ,9 9 3 ,0 0 0
4»
n ^ 6 6 ,a c a
6 ,7 8 4 ,0 0 0

m
m

«**

m

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority fc.Q* 12-35%

M IS C . 1 4 0 A 7 5 M -6 -4 1




FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK

dftMrtmr 30, m i .

Dear Ir. Flemings
In accordtaaee with ay telegram df tocl&y, I
©nclos® bmrmlUi computation
b»

m£®

o®

Jmmry

to

pi

2,

pwttielp&ttcms ojM5b« Jtack*rat

X* of

tbs

banks $ft th#

System 0*nws lliirf«t nut t’

Uob9Tl 0*
M a n a g e r ,.

S y s te a

Sir^at Account*

ISy* I* J* Flaming,, Pr«#idoatf
Ftdor&l R«d«rv* Bank of Clevelsiad,
Cleveland, Ohio*

Q p m

CONFIDENTIAL

HS1LI/>CATI<* OF GOVERNMENT SECURITIES IN SYSTHI' OP15N LARKBT ACCOUNT ON JANUARY 1, 19^2

System
A. Expenses
Estimated current expenses,1942

(in thousands of dollars)
Phila­ Cleve­ Rich­
Boston I *"*'
mond
1 York delphia land

B. Estinated dividends, 1 Q[j2

5U.523
8,526

C. Estimated expenses and dividends,1942

1*3.01*9

3,113

11.790

3,423

4.249

1,016

20

191

105

92

12.033

3,093

11.599

3.318

4,157

D. Estimated earnings, 191+2 (exclusive

of earnings on Gov’ts)
E. Excess of •c * over nTf

2,549

8,682

2,709

3,371

564

3.108

714-

878

At­
lanta

2,222 1,52 0

Ifiinn- Kansas
Louis eapdia
City

Chicago St.

Dallas

Sar
Francisco

4,366

1.757

1,112

1,8 2 3

1,400

3 .0 12

293

935

264

180

276

262

710

2 ,56^ 1,813

5.V1

2,0 21

1,2 9 2

2,099

1,662

1.722

25

194

35

23

178

2[,

90

2 ,515 1,788

5,117

1,9 86

1,269

1,921

342

49

I .038

*, 6*r

F. Allocation required (cm basis of
1.88225$ earning rate on Gov’ts) to
produoe earnings equal to "B*

t

2, 23^,125

1^,325 616,230 176,278220,853^133,617

9l»,993

271,855 10S C12 67 , 1*19 102,0«3

87,021 192,<=6o

G* Allocation of remainder of System
holdings ($2,254,475,000 less
$2,23^,125,000) on basis of average

daily participations in System
Account since June
1936

21,3!®

1,557

6,189

1.770

2,129

1,127

902

2,397

973

656

1,036

821

1,793

H. Total allocation of Gov’ts

2,254,475 165,862 622,419 178,048 22^982 134,7U> 9^895 27L,252 104185 68,075 103,095 87,845 194 ,7 ^3 -

I. Present allocations

2,25^,475 17k,035 592,196 177,982 223,162 137,757 95*664 305,718 113*26? 66,509

J. Change in allocations




—

-6,153 *30,223

♦

66

-180

-2,993

*231 -31,466 -6,781+ *1,566

96,204 78,6*) 1 9 V W
*6,891 *9 , 1 5 5 ♦ 1 ,4^4

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority E..O* 12358

Deoember 29 , I 9J4I .

Mr. R. G . Rouse, Vice President,
Federal Reserve Bank of New York,
New York, New York.

Dear Mr. Rouse*
There is enclosed a oopy of the statement prepared
in this Division showing the changes necessary in allocations
of Government securities in the System Open Market Account on
January 1, 19o2* prepared in accordance with the formula adopted
by the Federal Open Market Committee on Deoember 18, 19^0*
Current earnings, exclusive of earnings on Government
securities, and current expenses have been estimated by multiply­
ing the actual amounts thereof from July through November by 2*1*.
To the estimates of current expenses obtained on this basis we
have added 11.130,000 for New York to cover extra depreciation
charges on air-conditioning equipment* We have adjusted the esti­
mates of current earnings obtained on this basis by deducting esti­
mated net earnings on industrial advances and commitments attribu­
table to funds received from the Secretary of the Treasury, which
of course are not available to cover Bank expenses, dividends, or
transfers to Section 7 surplus.

Very truly yours.

E. L. Smead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations.

Enclosure




b b c d in f u e s section

eovriccarYUL

■BALtocATiois or ooynmwrnt sictTKin^fi i i m u m apm w m & i acca m

SyitM iOOtOB |wwr
1f«rk
Am ISp««i«
Botiaatod current o*pon*ot,1^2
V* Kotinatod dividend*, I9kt
6* B*ti*ated exponeee and dividend*, 19^2
Botiaatod o«»iBg«> 19U* f•solsol**
of earning* on dor* to)
\
B* Ixmii of *C* over *1f

5U.5*57 2 , 5(49

8. 5* 6 x

5«.

1.016 '

2,709

5.571

3*106

711*

878

1*2,053

5.1*25 l*.at£

105

ao

5.095 U,!£9

u 19M

A

9a

3.5M JU.157

a.aaa 1.530

3fc2

893

a, 5a* 1.813
10

*5

2,515 1.788

A.

«n ii4

DEC 3 01941

" -ax: , At­
’1 m : w n i
m uii.
delphia l«nd mmi lanta Chioagc Loaio eapdfca Wty

6,662

U3.0ti9 v 5.115 11*790

ov m m m

i
S

Skila* - T K —
PnUMilM

3.012

ISO

1.8*5 1 ,1*0
962
276

5.501 2,021 l#29t

2,099 1,668

3.7*2

1*.366 1*7!? 1,112
<935

181*

23*

15

5.117 1*966 1.86?

710

17*

at*

90

1.921

1.658

3»6f2

t. AllooatioB rH «irad (on baoit of
I*882I9( Miftlsgi vmtt on 0ev*%o) to
produoo earning# equal to *1*
0. Allocation o f n n t s d t r o f Syotea
I t U l s f i f $2t2$*0h?%OQO
#2ft f 5 fX2%000) OB be*!# Of ftTOrfcgO
daily participation* in Syote*
looowst oioee <Nao 10, 195^
1 . Total allocation o f 0ov*t«
X. frooont allocations
J, Change In a l l 00atiant




/

a,fJMa«S 161*.3*5

616,230 176,278*30.95?

153.6X7 9l*.9» *71/55 »S512 «»M*19 103,099 87.03U 192.960

/

656 1,036 821 1,795
l,25l*.i*75 *65,888 683.109 17*.Ol,8 88*982 13lt.7Ut9S895 ^ 1,252 1041*85 66.075 103.095 87.81*5 191.755
2,**».1*75 im.055 992.196 177,908 22*163 157.7* 9* 66fc 305.718 11*269 66.509 96,O h 78.690 193.309
— / *8,153 '*3°.223 ^ ♦ 66 7 -H8o/ -a.995 **31/-31.W6 -6.7tt*yH , 566' *6,891 <9,155 ♦ U A k
1.557

6.1*9

1.770

8.139

1.1*7

908

2.397

975

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority fc.C* 12358

7E'

1/

//

e g-b a

::

jooard v;f Governors
of the

Federal Reserve System
Leased W ire Service

Roceived at Washington, D. C.

W28WASH B361 BOS 29-3.51P
MORRILL
~fb (Lt£j f C O

YOUR WIRE DECEMBER 24. W
E SEE NO OBJECTION TO OMITTING NET
EARRINGS ON INDUSTRIAL ADVANCES AND COMMITMENTS RE QUARTERLY
ALLOCATION OF GOVERNMENT SECURITIES
YOUNG.




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority fc.Q* 12.358

FfiJSS
k^ard of Governors

DEC 30194!

of tke

Federal Reserve System

i ■- -- __

Leased Wire Service

W48WASH B 2 7 1

N Y J M ^ I OP

Received at Washington, 0. C.

M O R R IL L

.

P<f a

&Mj

A N SW E R IN G YOUR W IR E WE APPROVE S U G G E S T IO N E A R N IN G S ON IN D U S T R I A L
ADVANCES AND C O M M ITM E N TS B E O M IT T E D
R E A L L O C A T IO N OF GOVERNMENT 4 O T M M W K




I N C A L C U L A T IO N FOR
S E C U R IT IE S
ROUNDS.

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority £..C« V23 5 8

x,.

^

"

..

. ••

-r?t
j - li

^
W28WASH C 4 6

P H IL A 2 4 - 2 5 1 P

r*^ ^ ;

.
:

■^

Federal Reset^e System ,P « C'C ?
Leased W ire .service
l> ' ’
Ronivcd at Washington, D. C.

M O R R IL L

RE TE L DECEMBER 2 4 .

/~v

'o - .j:-, ./ ■„ ,

A

IS

I

N n 5 £ siS S S 1
:) P f ;
:X'
•

1

y \ :

T H I S BANK

-,70

-

m

IN FAVOR OF TH E PRO PO SED CHANGE

THE B A S I S FOR Q UA RTERLY R E A L L O C A T IO N OF GOVERNMENT S E C U R I T I E S .




■,

IN

j

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

__________

^ D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority

‘o r
E G

j L'v

‘v

123 5 8

NBC'D IN FEUES SEOTOH

DEC 3 0 1941

Beard of Governors

or the
Federal Reserve System
Leased Wire Service
Received at Washington, D, C.

m

DEC 2 4

W98WASH G253 CLEV 24-146
MORRILL
RETEL 24TH
A>

AM

I HAVE NO OBJECTION TO ELIMINATION OF EARNINGS 13-B REFERRED TO
T IN YOUR TELEGRAM IN THE CONSIDERATION OF REALLOCATION OF
GOVERNMENT SECURITIES
FLEMING.




PH 2

06

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority fc.C* \2fl58

E L E G - R A M .

a*

IN

'Board of Governors
of the

DEC 3 0 1941

Federal Reserve System
Leased Wire Service
Received at Washington, D, C.

DEC 2 4

W91WASH RH 76
MORRILL
■

RICH 24-140

F I?finnfcs

RETEL. SEE NO OBJECTION TO OMITTING ESTIMATED EARNINGS
ON INDUSTRIAL ADVANCES AND COMMITMENTS IN QUARTERLY
REALLOCATION OF GOVERNMENT SECURITIES
WALDEN.




PM

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

__________

“ d e c l a s s if ie d
Authority fc.Q* 12358

mi f
3 L E G B \ "I
I
\\ v

Board of Governors
of the

^

Federal Reserve System

l/vL

Leased Wire Service
Received at Washington, D. C.

O h.
\9

IN FILES SBSmm

DEC 3 0 1941 >

W23WASH FI 22 ?8 ATLA
MORRILL - BOARD

24-317P

r

f c <>'( f t-t.H -•

, t :

AFTER CONSIDERATION OF YOUR WIRE ATLANTA OFFICERS FEEL THAT THE
PROPOSAL TOOMIT IN QUARTERLY REALLOCATION OF GOVERNMENT SECURITIES
THE NET EARINGS ON INDUSTRIAL ADVANCES AND COMMITMENTS ATTRIBUTABLE
TO TREASURY FUNDS SHOULD BE ADOPTED
BRYAN.




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority £ .0- I M 5 8

RB'D IN FH£S SHOT*

T E L E G R A M
.Board of Governors
of t&e

Federal Reserve System

WireService
Receivedat W
ashington, 0.0.
Leased

DEC 3 01941
>5

154

~Dr■-3 m

24

-

PM . 4

_____

'05

W44WASH G405 CGO 24-245
MORRILL BOARD
r

Aim, r

RETEL YOUR WIRE'THE PROCEDURE IN YOUR WIRE AS TO ESTIMATED EARNINGS ON
INDUSTRIAL -ADVANCES AND COMMITMENTS MEETS WITH OUR APPROVAL. WITH
REFERENCE REALLOCATION OF SECURITIES WISH TO ADVISE THAT SALARY
ADJUSTMENTS WILL NOT BE EFFECTIVE UNTIL JANUARY 1 BUT WILL AMOUNT IN
AGGREGATE $115,000
YOUNG.




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority fc.O* 12358

HL E . G- B A H
B o a r d o f Governors
of the

Federal Reserve System
Leased Wire Service
Received at Washington, 0, C.

W30WASH G 367 STL 2 4 - 1 ^ 5
MORRILL
:~hr 6. L tj

NO OBJECTION TO CHANGE SUGGESTED IN WIRE TODAY R E LATIVE TO
O M IT T IN G FIGURES IN CONNECTION WITH 13B A C T I V I T I E S FROM EARNINGS
IN A R R IV IN G -A T B A S IS FOR REALLOCATION OF GOVERNMENT S E C U R IT IE S




D A V IS .

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority £ ..()« 12358

tT E L E G R A M
jpoard of Governors
of the

Federal Reserve System
Leased W ire Service

Received at Washington, 0, C.

194!

24 PM

RBC'D B f FHJ3S SECHON

DEC 3 01941

W22WASH G } 4 2 MPLS 2 4 - 1 4 7
MORRILL
“th •*- a M ,1 h

RETEL 2 4 REALLOCATION WITH O M IS S IO N OF EARNINGS OF IN D U S TR IA L
ADVANCES AND COMMITMENTS SATISFACTORY TO US




PEYTON.

/f

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority fc.Q* 12-35%

-tPrf* •* .*•<*'

^■
>
.
,V»

L E G E \ r
rd of Governors
of t he

Federal Reserve System
Leased Wire Service
Received at Washington, D. C,

1 9 « DEC 2 4

PM

RBC'D IN F U S S SECTION

DEC 3 01941 /(
_

S > .X ' •

W25WASH G 355 KC 2 4 - 2 0 1
MORRILL

REPLYING YOUR WfRE WE SEE NO OBJECTION TO SUGGESTED CHANGE
IN REALLOCATION OF GOVERNMENT S E C U R IT IE S BY E L IM IN A T IN G
ESTIMATED EARNINGS ON IN DUSTRIAL ADVANCES AND COMMITMENTS
LEE D Y .




f\

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

“

d e c l a s s if ie d

Authority

V2358

v. / M f i H P o l i m a s

rr“ L E Q ’R A ! !
£o?.rd of Governors
o f the

W29WASH G 3 6 4 DLS 2 4 - 2
MORRILL

DEC 3 01941

!

Federal Reserve System
Leased W ire S ervice

[> C :’ A

Received at W ashington, 0= C.

REPLYING TELEGRAM D A TE . E L IM IN A T IO N OF ESTIMATED EARNINGS ON
INDUSTRIAL ADVANCES AND COMMITMENTS IN DETER M IN IN G
QUAARTERLY REALLOCATIONS OF GOVERNMENT S E C U R IT IE S IS
E N TIRELY SATISFACTORY AND WE TH IN K PROPOSED CHANGE SHOULD
BECOME E F F E C T IV E AT CLOSE OF YEAR




G IL B E R T .

s e c t io n i

:;i

>0

,

“

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

__ ___

D E C L A S S IF IE D
_

-

Authority E..O* 123 5 8

W43WASH G401 SF 2 4 - 1 2 2 4
BOARD
^Tb- aj£> f

a

REPLYING Y O U R W I R E DEC 2 4 UNDER PRESENT C O N D ITIO N S NO
OBJECTION TO O M IT T IN G EARNINGS ON IN DU S TR IA L ADVANCES AND
COMMITMENTS FROM CONSIDERATION IN MAKING REALLOCATION OF
GOVERNMENT S E C U R IT IE S .




Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

'

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority

£ .6.

TV
F o r m

F . K . 1 4 8 to

TELEGRAM
BOARD OF G O V E R N O R S
O F

T H E

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
L E A S E D

W IR E

S E R V IC E

WASHINGTON

Young - Boston
Sproul - Mew York
Williams - Philadelphia
FIOKing - Cleveland

Leach MoLarin
Young Barle -

Richmond
- Atlanta
Chicago
St. liouis

Peyton - Minneapolis
Leedy * Kansas City
Gilbert - Dallas
Buy - San Francis oo

Tinder present procedure, total estimated earnings on industrial
advances and oow&ltaents are taken into aeoount in quarterly
reallocation of Government securities*

Sinee net earnings m

industrial advanees and ooBBdtmaat* attributable to funds
received f r m Treasury are not available to cover Bank expenses
and dividends or for transfer to Section 7 Surplus, it has been
suggested that reallocation would be raore equitable i f such earn-*
ings
to




were omitted*

Please advise whether you see any objection

change*

m m iL L

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

12358

Fe d e ral R eserve Bank
of

N e w Yo r k

i




September 29, 1941

Dear Mr. Sinead:
We received your letter of September 27/and have today
sent to the Reserve banks a copy of the computation showing the
adjustments to be made in participations in the System Open
Market Account on October 1, 1941, pursuant to the plan adopted
at the meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee on December
18, 1940.
Enclosed herewith is copy of the letter of transmittal
together with three copies of the computation, also copy of the
telegram which was sent to each of the Federal Reserve banks today.
Yours faithfully,

Robert G. Rouse,
Manager, System Open
Market Account.

Mr. E. L. Smead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations,
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System,
Washington, D. C.

E n ds.

(5 )

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority JL.Q* 1235B

J40A

SUM

l;- 4 0




FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW

YORK

September 29# 1941.

Dear Ur* Gilbertt
In accordance with ay telegraa of today, X
enclose herewith computation of t&* readjustments to
be made m October 1 , 1 9 4 1 ,.pi the' fjarti^ipatione
of the federal EeserwlbaSt^^ the^yst«»\0pesi
Uarket portfolios.\
/
\
\

\\Y

'y

lou^H, faithfully,
\

i

Robert (I* Eouse,
Manager, §y»te» 0p©n
Market Account,

Hr* E» R. Gilbert, President,
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallaa,
Pallas, Texas*
%©#

from the Unclassified /Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

" -----------------------------------------------------------------------

D E C L A S S IF IE D
-4

MISC.

, >

Authority £ .0 * 1235B

14OA 13M 3-39
F E D E R A L R E S E R V E B A N K O F N E W YORK

g«ptoftboy * J t X9kl
Pie a m MUl lb* followInf telogrmjs to oottlt Kadorol Hoooroo Monk ao lodlMUd

bolovi
Undor tho plan for

of ^Jawnvsoii ooourltloo odoptod

by tho r#ri#r*l Opoii Market Coradttoo **ooe»ber 18,

o roodjootooot of

participation* la Qov«rwao«t ooourltloo hold in tt»« %«i«i Aooooat !• ooIXod
for otobor 1, 19UU

YHo o m ^ U U o m Stowing adjiotMiito to bo tmdm la

portlolpotlono of tho sovorol Potenl Heeeml Honks io being cent t<> oil keeerve
lnereaee
of
Thooo oeapBtiiloM JUaiieltto on'
deeraeee
wire you oft ictcbcr 1 U m do*
is yotur participation on O e to b o r 1.
Vo
tailed ontrioo to bo oaOo ojo liot <




jssaaaa
1 o m

lo ,3 U ,o o o
1 7 5 ,« »

|

m ilo a o
n
owl m
Loooh
^ o u u rla

C le v e la n d
R lchnoad
A

U

ia U

XOOHR
M

l

fa y to n
Laody
iU lb o r t
’*oy

i> t* L o a io
M tsm o ep o llo
Xanooo C ity
E aU a*
& » fw n e ie o e

ogBBgaat
m

l l #35of ooo
•

15,33?,ooo
l,l»»,0 t )0
3o( 795,ow

Oft

5 ,5 ^ ,o o o

Oft

3 ,3 ^ ,0 0 0
«o
Oft
1 4 ,0 5 3 ,0 0 0

kguss

-

•
I f l
O ft «
A M
X i» , « » A K ^ I I W
9 ,2 7 6 ,0 0 0

-

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority £..Q» 12358

1

<>■

September ^7^19Ul*

Mr. R. G. Rouse, Via# President,
Federal Reserve Bank of Hew York,
Hew York, Hew York*
Bear Mr* Rouses
There is enclosed a copy of a statement prepared
in tills Division showing the changes necessary In allocations
of (rorerment seeurities in the System Open Market Account
on October 1, 19^1* 1st aooordanoe with the fbnxnla adopted by
the Federal Open Market Conaittee on Deeemher IB, 19U0.
Current expenses for the year have been estimated by
taking aetual amounts for January through August plus estimates
for the renalnder of the year obtained frost the Federal Reserve
Banks, except that the estimate of original oost of Federal
Reserve currency was made by this Division* Hie have included
an additional #500,000 for New York and $120,000 for St. Louis,
as was done in connection with the previous allocations this
year* Current eaminps for 19Ul exclusive of earnings on
Government seeurities have been estimated by multiplying the
actual amounts thereof for January through August by 1*5*
Very truly yours.

1^"
1. L* Smead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations *

jgpeloaure




SffiS
|j ^

xuuooitio* or oovsnmnr sseintmxs » stbtbi onir nuns accomi octomr i, 19m
(In thMusda of dollara)

'

8*
7
4
2
L
1
.is
{# ®
"

J E

f &l

%

|

By+m

Borfcan

WWI
T*rk

~ H X & - “BSw5=” •Ha*.—
MBd
land
driphl»

Atlanta

Hhttigjn

wu
T— «.

H|NpXI#

Kancac
cmjr

IfcllM

Ha
FftaeUo*

’’

eerrea*
«xp«a**«» X 9 &

Stralngt
X* Isttaatod w m » oar**
lagf» 19^1 (m m tom im
of «imiB|i w <krt**«)
2. Sotlmtod «tnlfl|« mi
(3oY*t ••ourltlwi *0
Sopt.

31*168

i.iiu

8.1|80

e,W6

2.653

55

815

156

95

2,159 _

8^98

2,361

3,«*»

3.M

2,0i*

1A35

85

7

lf6ljfi _

1.70?

1 .0 K 7

1,812

1.389

t*75«

206

2U

29

166

27

1ST

1^63

? 1*66

i,iioe

883

1.M8

l.Mlv .$*433

MS*

Total

30.937

2 ,2 1 k

8.713

a, 5 1 7

3.099

1,785

1.270

3 .6 7 6

l.!02

912

1.628

1,211

2*5**

C.

Sx«#»« «f *A»I* «vir *B«J#

2,3*5

266

-2U7

136

195

583

165

555

277

135

lau

118

218

B*

Allocation r#<juir#d (on ba*l»
•f 1.8ii657< Mrai&gt r*to
•a <J*rft«) to pntett itn*
Ixigi Oot*•&•#. •qt»l to "C*

57.150 -53.060

S9^aa

ia.8 9 6

69,397

35.1*50

1 1 9 .8 U3

59.511*

29.005

39.533

25.353

1.6,838

3.097

714

8 70

388

889

895

*58

180

256

703

l,66l*,5<9 U8,196

619.3*9 1W.797

173.997

57.799

178.997

91,599

35,999

5U.399

51.199

U<0,597

<1 * fvMl allocation »f CNrr*t
••#orltio« (*©# ♦ •*•)

a.iau.ioo W 9 . 3 W

566,3*1

13^.996

93.81*

£9 6 ,8(10

1 1 1 ,1 1 3

6 5 ,00 b

93.938

76.558

187^35

9.

PPO*«*lt l l l M i U l M

2.18l»,100 159,006 615,11#

171.8ti8 887.2i*3 119*66$

9«.0<e

267,14*

105.5^6

61.680

186.ll*

85.830

178,588

X.

Chungo In allegation*

-11.350

*1.189

♦30.795

♦5,597

♦3,38b -12,212

-9,878

♦14,853

3-

«■*t K»tU*t*d dlvii«a*s, ISfel
r*

U99.53*
04^9

561

Aiiooation of naftiBdir
of 8ym%m h»l*ingt
9 2 #X8 ^ X 0 0 t000 I m
1^99.531,000) ill t*«l« of




—

♦10,5142 -U8.888

17®.01? 215,893

*175

Ag enft

♦15.333

m

R ep rod uced from the U nclassified / D ecla ssified H oldings o f the N ational A rchives

D ECLASSIFIED
A u th o r ity

t

111 F O J ?

.. .. ... . , 7^9 :
, 4 'JJ
\
■L> *’
#*pt«#&er JL>,

Governor 8*ymc*ak

*•

H .l,

|

Hr. Smead
Expenses ©f the Faderal lesenri !lft»te» h**» been going up
rapidly since the beginning of the presant flsofcl, yaar, July 1, and .■
it m m appears that the expenses for tha jrwn* a* * whole will ba
;
substantial ly t»
.4 & r m ,$ p & .In...ftTof Jtoly &$/-^Eg§iaa#« for both July and Auguat war# aubatantially in '
'K*»iiT"'"if thoae for previous month* and beoause of this we have Obt*dm»
ad from th# Fedoral lesarfO Banka thair oatisaatos of expeasea for tha
last four month# of this yaar for use in connection with tha hOotobOir 1
reallocation of securities In th* System Open Xsjrfcot Aooount.

$ , ?, ,

On tha basis of the as estimates, it appears that tofcsl currant
expenses of the Fsdaral Reeerve Ba&fc# for tha yaar I9I4I will aggragfttt
approximately #3 3 *300.000 or about #U,100,000 in exceas of tho tot*l'
for tha yaar 19^0. Dividend paymenta in.
«til totltl fctaufe #6 ,1400,000.
It is expeotad that totfcl e w m l oaspansas wad dividenda 'Will exceed
astlmatad. aarninga, #141,10 0 ,000, by about #600*000. Up to -tha' pjre*«ist.
tins tha Fedaral Reaerve Banks haw. raoaiTad profits aggregating #50U*000
on sale# .»f United itat** Q & w v m m fc aaourities, and it ii anticipated
that this amount, after adjustment for other credits and debita to. profit
and loss aooount, will ba juat about auffioient to offset the exoess of
expanses and dividends onrer earnings. Beoause of the 'two per cent pay­
ments to the f r m m & f on earnings on industrial advances, a few of th#
Banks my possibly hare to charge their Seotion 7 Surplus acoounts with
w all amounts at the end of the yw*i% For the System as a whole, how*
ever, it Is probable that Seotion 7 Surplus will inorease slightly.
Increased expsuaso# during recent months h a w been caused largely
'by increases in the following!

Salaries
T f f lt m m X , p r i m X p & l f ia th* Check Collection,
Ctart’ttMy *ttd Coin SJofarteaoat*, and in the
of Regulation W unit.
Shipping expense on #u*re»«y and coin to and
from member banks.
Cost of printing Fedomt. Reserve not** and shipping
the* to Federal Reserve Banks and Branches.
Postage and e*p*Osmg# in connection with installment
oredit and other activities.
Hne inorease .in demand for currency during recent months has been
such that wt have had to lucre*** our printing order for Federal Reserve
notes to- the smxlmmt extent the tuream of Engraving and Printing can produce
under the present setup. If the demand for ourrenoy continues to inorease,
it nay be n*e#»s*ry_for the Bureau to work Saturdays, as it is understood
it is h*c
e**v

J

E L S ; s e h


R eproduced from the U nclassified / D eclassified H oldings of the N ational A rchives

DECLASSIFIED
r- '

Authority

j* " D ™
|/V

OCT 1 -

1941

;

3 7 J

j
>* w

M p M w

Young - Boston
SpwiI * 9 m Torfc
V i U l M I • IttUWh&jtiS*
ftafrag - ClvveXaod

L«aoh * Rlahmnd
MoLsrla * Atlanta

Young * $hl*ig©
Daris * St* Loui*

P3i«if viff oatlaat#d oxpscsM of your
orlrlaal
Itsei ^
lwrti

oott

of

ttssorvs aurraMy.

23, ISto

P«QrUra - Minneapolis
Lsidy - Kansas 0 4 %
* DalUui
Day - Urn Franoisoo

cxoIuBiTd of
Itam 26 Im i

Pcr» P*R* f6* for Septeob^r «sad *1** fm t&m
tJis y^ar*

Xf is®t43Biiki^S®^l 83^si5flsj ara Hatsj^*

tally abova or MNpt awage

tor

paat tto* naBotha# plaaaa

•tst# Iscitii^&y ivtson fist* ohmyt*




8MRAD

For Fiief-

S. E. H*iuwi
HHI

^ l'.~ T1-^

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

V235B

f
\




APR1 91968

'A

Fe d e ral R eserve Bank
of

0

N e w Yo r k

June 27, 1941

Dear Mr. Smead
We received your letter of June 26/and have today
sent to the Reserve banks a copy of the computation showing the
adjustments to be made in participations in the System Open
Market Account on July 1, 1941, pursuant to the plan adopted
at the meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee on December
18, 19 4 0 .
Enclosed herewith is copy of the letter of trans­
mittal together with three copies of the computation, also
copy of the telegram which was sent to each of the Federal
Reserve banks today.
Yours faithfully,

Robert G. Rouse,
Manager, System Open
Market Account.

Mr. E. L. Smead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations,
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System,
Washington, D. C.

Ends. (5)

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority £..C« 1235%

MISC. H O A

1 5 M 9 31




FEDERAL RESERVE

BANK O F N E W YORK

3m® 27, 19a

Dear Mr. Flemings
Ia accordance wiih iaJ\teIeg*M of today, X
enclose herewith. Qompvt&lim of tfte readjkstaenta to be
\ /
aade on July 1, 194^* of tfais»^ticiprtio*ie of th® Federal
Reserve banks jfik

%ateis Open al&rket portfolio*
\
.f a i t h f u l l y ,

.Robert C*. Rous* |
Manager, %ete» Ojhmi
Market Account.

Mr* I* <T* Fleming, Presidentf
Federal lieserve Bank o f Cleveland,
Cleveland, Ohio*

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority fc.Q* \2358

MISC. H O A

15M

9 38

FEDERAL RESERVE

BANK OF N E W y y y j y ,

ivrMum

sw * n ,
¥%*&am ***£ tfe» fallals# Utlm&rsM %&
WwSiflP H w

MLtrvt

fitow^iswsiil.' s s ih iir S ^ S s s

Immfcm l i t l% 0 t *

rm lem l Ojwwsi 3§&rfc#t

19 a

teals:

f'&sr y*»»l 1

in Oofwu-ttBMWt • m r t t & M i fe*M In tfee % » i« *

fey

o f fK rtt«J4 *% lM *

ia

li# «*<*» in

-Car

1 # 194&*
#f t**» s«'WmX

f«d « n u l 8 » # « m WbJca in M a g went to *1 1 Bmmmm ternks

B u t**

iWBPMMMI

iiwSica.t^ *a
$&&U w ir *

M iic ’i -fc ir
* >&,1
WW3.
trtMMdi
fic U r iu
T<w »g
r*»y t '
I * * i 4 gr
O U lw rt
My




<MT v -

1

^

....

In. y$&f* |M>rlAi&i|MilloiR ok

X*

c« J«3k? X H i# t it t t t llt f i ta la r i* * te fe# $ *4 * m %h»% ^ .t« *

R U JU b d b X ^ JU
E4 d6WQWy|:
Chic« t* ta rt*
H liw xw i. Him I #
!& ***& # C i t y
J ftH ft*
S i s S^Psysciissfli

i j m j m
2^1109
*$03,000
4*
4.327.000
2.217.000
10,057,000

B V W ObEBVIIOMS

DIAISIOIA ot

iwczai
Hrn nArn

m&m

CONFIDENTIAL

REALLOCATION OF GOVERNMENT SECURITIES IN SYSTEM OPEN MARKET ACCOUNT ON JULY 1, I 9I4I

System
A. Expenses
Estimated current expenses, 191+1

8,176

8,l|05

2 ,3 1 1
561

1*0,032

2,872

31,627

B. Estinated dividends, 191+1
c . Estimated expenses and dividends, 19Ul

D. Earnings
(1) Estimted current earnings, 191+1
(exclusive of earnings on Gov'ts)

Boston

(In thousands of dollars)
Phila­ Cleve­ RichNew
York delphia land
mond

St,
Atlanta Chicag) Louis
.... i . .

2,505

3,181

1,901

1,361+

3,923

3,093

7114

867

326

288

11,269

3,219

U.OliB

2,227

Minn­ Kansas
eapolis City

Dallas

San
Francisco

1,618

986

1,793

1.311+

2,555

890

257

180

271

256

702

1,652

1+.813

1,875

1,166

2,061+

1.570

3,257

1+

215

23

29

159

26

109

1,11+5

1+9

212

ll+5

90

81+

(2) Estimated earnings on Gov*t.
securities to June 30

19, 61*1*

1,1+22

5,61+8

1.565

1,951

1,086

837

2,229

919

597

970

787

1.633

(3) Total

20,789

1,1+71

5,860

1,710

1,170

81*1

2.W+

9142

626

1,12 9

813

1. 71+2

19.21*3

1,1401

5,1409

1,509

1.057

811

2,369

933

51+0

935

757

1,515

E. Excess of "C" over "D-3"

2, 01*1
2,007

F. Allocation required (on basis of
' 8l|657# earnings rate on Gov*ts)

j produce earnings July-December
equal to "En

G« Average daily participations, per
cent, in System account since
June 30, 1936
H. Allocation of remainder of System
holdings ($2,181+, 100,000 less
$2,067,198,000) on basis of ”Gn

2,067,198 15 0 ,501+ 581,067 162,106

100.0 7.2732
116,902

8,502

215, 601* 113,5U9

29.15l|l 8.3285

9.9561

5.2298

3U,082

11,639

6,111+

9,736

87,123251+,1+92 100,228

58,010 100,1+1+3 81,322 162.750

1+.2231 11.0798 1+.5237 3.0882

i+,937 12,953

5,288

3,610

1+.8766

3.8562

8 .1+107

5,701

U,508

9,832

I. Total allocation of Government
securities ("Ftt plus "H")

2,181+, 100 159,006 6 15 ,li£ 171,8142 227 .21*3 119,663

92,060 267^4+5 105,516 61,620 106,ll4l+ 85,830 172,582

J. Present allocations
K. Change in allocations

2,1814-,100 157,817 623,1+75 173,137 218,51*1 121,1+86
—
-1,823
•♦■1,189 -8,326 -1,295 ♦

9i+,88l+ 250,6142 101^5
-2,821+ ♦16 ,8Q3 ^171




8,702

65,91+7 106,11+0
-i+,327

88,01+7 182,639

♦1+ -2,217 -10,057

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

12358

June 26, 191*1v
Mr. Smead

Earnings of the Federal

Mr, Van Fossen

Reserve Banks.

In the July 1, 19i&# reallocation of Government securities
in the System Open Market Account, the Federal Reserve Bank of
Chicago will receive the largest increase in allocation, approximately
117,000,000, and th® Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco will have
the largest decrease, approximately $10 , 000, 000.
Estimated current expenses for 19^1 a# used for the July 1
reallocation are lower for the Federal Reserve Banks of San Fr&noiseo,
Atlanta, and Minneapolis than the estivate used for the April 1 re­
allocation. These three banks and the New York, Philadelphia, Rich­
mond, and Dallas Banks, which had relatively small increases in
estimated current expenses, will all have smller participations than
they received on the April 1 reallocation.
The large increase in Chicago’ s participation is due to a
very substantial increase in estimated expenses. In this connection
you will recall that the Chicago Bank is the only one that will
probably not have sufficient earnings on June JO to cover dividends
for the first half of the year. There has been an increase in expenses
of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago each month during the year,
the Increase for May being exceptionally large. The principal items
showing an increase during that month were printing, stationery, end
supplies in which there was an increase of #22,000 to approximately
150 , 000, and in furniture and equipnent in which there was an increase
of about 117*000 to approximately $19,000. It is assuned that the
lnorease In furniture and equipment was due to the purchase of currency
counting Machines, which, it is understood, the Chicago Bank has pur­
chased in order to be able to furnish the Chicago banks certain eervioes
that have not heretofore been furnished* Following is a tabulation
showing estimated expenses for 19i*l for the Chicago and San Frsnelseo
Banks, and for all Federal Eeserve Banks combined, as estimated for the
January 1, April 1, and July 1 allocations of the System Account, also
actual expenses in 19 i|0j
Estimated Expenses for 191*1
Chloago

San Francisco

All
F.R.Banks

For January 1 allocation
For April I allocation
For July 1 allocation

13,508,000
3,685,000
3*923*000

*2,I|97.000
2,586,000
2,555.000

#30,017,000
30,931*000
31*627,000

Actual expenses In 19*40

3*1+71,000

2 ,1493,000

29,165,000




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives




DECLASSIFIED
Authority

V2358

'JvmA
wujLUr ir^y0 IQl.l

Hr* R. 0* Rous*, Vic# President,
Federal Reserve Bask of lew York,
V«v York, Bow York*
Dear Mr. tense*
There ia enclosed a copy of tho statenent
prepared in this Division showing the changes necessary
In allocations of Government securities in the System
Open Market Acoount on July 1, 19^*1* in accordance with
tho foraula adopted hy the Federal Open Miarket Committee
on Deoenber 1 8 , 19140.
Current expenses and current earnings* exclusive
of earnings on Governments, have boon estimated by Multiply­
ing the aottal anousta thereof frooi January through Idaty
1 % 1 hy 2JU. To the estimates of ourreot expenses obtained
on this basis, wo have added # 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 for Sew York and
$ 1 2 0 , 0 0 0 for St* Louis as was done in connection with the
January 1 and April 1 reallooations.
Very truly yours,

S. L* Snead, Chief,
Division of 9*ak Operations.
Snelosure

REfcLLOCATIOI OF QOmSMSVT SECURITIES IM SYSTEM OPEI MARKET ACCOUST OH JULY 1, 19l*l
(In thousands of dollars)
! x * * ! PhUa-i Clc.ve- lEloh-*
8ysts» Bo,ta* 1 Tork tdelphlal land Imond
_

A* £acpe*ues
(1) Esti*ated current sxpniMi, I9I4I
B ''stlasted dividends, 191*1

31,62?

2,311

8,lj05^

19

Estimated expenses and dividends, l*l

1*0,032 A

P. «*raings
(1 ) Estimated current earnings, 19l*l
(exclusive of earnings on Govfts)
(2 ) Estimated earnings on Gov’t,
securities to June 30

1.H 6 '

3

( ) Total

I. Excess of "C* over wD-3*
F. Allooatlon required (on basis of
1.8ii657^ oarnings rate on a©v*ta)
to produce earnings July-Deceniber
equal to "E*
0.

erage dally partiolpations, per
cent, in System aooount since
June 30, 1936

H. Allooatlon of remainder of System
holdings (|2,181*,100,000 less
12,067,198,000) on basis of "a*

1. Total allooatlon of Government
securities ("F" plus "H")
J. Present allocations
I, Change In allocations




.

561
2,872

3,093

2,505

Tlk

11,269y 3,219

3,181

1,901

367

326

M l# *

1.361* 3,923
288

1145

90

81*

1*

1 1*22

5,6148

1,565

1.951

1,086

837

1,101

5.960'

1,1|01

5,l¥>9'

✓ ,

20,789

^

2,067,198 150,501+ 581,067 162,106 2 15 ,601* 113,5^

1 1 6 ,902 v 8,502

31*,082

9,736

11,639

5.2298

6,111*

966

1,793

1.311*

2,555

257

180

271

256

702

1 ,1 6 6 '

2, 061* -

890

215

2,229

23

29

159

919

597

970

9L2 '
935

87,123 Z5k,l&2 100,228

J

5.288

1,570 - 3.857

26

109

787

1.633

626 J 1,129 '

813

1.7142 '

5h$J

757 ' 1,515 '

9i5 -

58.010 100,143 8 1,322 162,750

U .2231 11.0798 U .5237 3.0882

1*,937 12,953

San
Francisco

1,618

1,710 2, 01*1 ' 1,170 v 8I4I v 2,l4ljll '
811 * 2,369 J
1,5097 2, 007' 1.057 '

100.0 7.2732 29 .1514! 8.3285 9.9561

Minn­ Kansas
eapolis JEJSL- Dallas

2,227 4 1,652 J 4.813 ' 1.875

212

18

19,61^

19,2143"

8,176

St,
Atlanta Chicagp Louis

3,6 10

1*3766

3*8562

8.1*107

5,701

1*,508

9,832

2 ,1814.,100 159.006 6 15 .11 *9 1 7 1 ,81^2 227 ,21*3 119 .6 6 3 ' 92 ,060J267,1*1*5 115,516 61,680 106 ,tlil*' 85,830'172,582 J
2,18l*,100157.817 623,1*75 173.137 218.51*1 121,1)86
♦1,189

-8,326

-1,295

*8,702

-1,623

9l*.88l* 250,61*2 »ljl*5

65,91*7 106,11fi 68,01*7 182,639

-2,821* +16,003 *1071

-1*,327

♦1* -2,217 -10,057

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

12358

/

r

IXPUiAf XO* O f COMPUTATION OF ITEMS INDICATED
(Reallooation of Government Securities July l0

A-l and D-l

19I4I)

2 * h tints aotual figure* January to May, 19l*l,
with A-l adjusted by adding #500,000 to Sow
York and #120,000 to St, Louis, as was dons for
th* January 1 and April 1 reallocations,

B. Aoorusd dividend* May 31 plus 3*5 P*r osnt of paid-in
oapital Juno 18.
D-2 and G

As telephoned fro* New York by Mr. Behrens June 23.

F« Earnings rats as of Juno 30 tslsphoned by Mr. Behrens
June 23* Aetna! rats used .9308736 por osnt (181*. X 365^h
of annual rats).




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

12358

lo tm V . B. 131
B O A R D

D F

G O V E R N □ RS

FEDERAL R ESERVE SYSTEM

Office Correspondence
Xo_____ Mr> Sinead
Vrntn

Mr. Van Fossen

APR1 91968
.

Df teJune 15, 19iil.
Subject: Losses and participations in
System account.

Beginning with the January 1, 19Ul, reallocation of the
System Open Market account, profits and losses on sales of Government
securities have been disregarded in the reallocation as approved by
the Open Market Committee. The procedure is to allocate to each
Federal Reserve Bank an amount of securities sufficient to cover its
estimated expenses not covered by earnings, if any, already accrued
on Government securities and estimated earnings from other sources;
next to allocate participations sufficient to cover dividend require­
ments, and finally to allocate the remaining securities in proportion
to average daily participations in the System account since June JO,
1936. Where a sufficient volume of securities are held to necessitate
a third step, the first and second steps can and
ombined
into a single step.
^
If it were desired to have the quarterly allocations of
the System account cover losses not provided for by insurance or
insurance reserves, it would be possible to do this in a number of
ways. For example, such losses could be included with expenses in
step one, or they could be provided for separately in a new step
following the provision for expenses b|^preceding the provision for
dividend requirements. The suggestion has been made that the entire
profit and loss account of each Federal Reserve Bank be taken into
consideration in making the quarterly reallocations. This could be
done very readily, of course, either by combining the profit and
loss account with estimated expenses or in a separate step. It
would seem that if the entire profit and loss account is to be taken
into consideration, it would be appropriate to modify the procedure
as regards any securities remaining after expenses, profit and loss,
and dividends have all been covered to allocate such remaining
securities on a basis designed to equalize the capital position
of the various Federal Reserve Banks. As you know, a number of
suggestions have been made as to how this might be accomplished. I
do not believe that it is worth while at this time to consider the
methods that would be most appropriate for the purpose.




\

j

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

"

d e c l a s s if ie d

Authority fc.Q* 1235%

APR 2 51968

Extract from Appropriation Aot of Kay
19-1+1# making
approprie fcions for the Treasury Department for the fiscal year
ending June JO, 1942t

"Expenses of loans*

The indefinite appropriation *Ex-

penses of loans, Act of September

2h$

1917»

amended and extended1

(31 U. S. C. 7<^» 76l), shall not be used during the fiscal year
1

to supplement tho appropriation herein node for the current

work of the Bureau of the Public Debt, and the amount obligated
under such indefinite appropriation during such fiscal year shall
not exceed

292,000: Provided, That the proviso in the Act of

June 16, 1921 (31

S* C. j6l), limiting the availability of

this appropriation for expenses of operations on account of any
public debt issue to the close of the fiscal year next following
the fiscal year in which such, issue was made, shall not apply to
savings bond transactions handled by the Federal Reserve banks
for account of the Secretary of the Treasury,”




A
/*• / ’3 /1^1/
“ I ' j t f

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives




DECLASSIFIED
Authority fc.Q* 1235%

« itc e fe s &•'

APRJl 9 f9B«
F e d e ra l R eserve Bank
of

N e w Yo r k

March 28, 1941.

Dear Mr, Van Fossen:
We received your letter of March 27\ and have today
sent to the Reserve banks a copy of the computation showing the
adjustments to be made in participations in the System Open
Market Account on April 1, 194-1, pursuant to the plan adopted
at the meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee on December
IB, 194-0.
Enclosed herewith is copy of the letter of trans­
mittal together with three copies of the computation, also
copy of the telegram which was sent to each of the Federal
Reserve banks today.
Yours faithfully,

Manager, System Open
Market Account.
Mr. John R. Van Fossen, Assistant Chief,
Division of Bank Operations,
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System,
Washington, D. C.

Ends. (5)

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

__

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

Siallar letter sent to




*
*
*

John S* Sinclair, Pres*, FEB of Philadelphia
II* J* Fleming,
*
* « Cleveland
Hugh Leach,
*
* » Richmond
William S.^.ltlcL^rln,Jr., First Vice President,FRB of Atlanta

* Clifford S. Young, »
*
» Chicago
* F*0uy Hitt, First »ice ^resident, FEB of St. Louis
* John N. Peyton,
Pres*, FRB of Minneapolis
11 Harold G* Leedy, First Vice ^resident, FEB of Kansas City
» E« R. Gilbert, Pres#, FRB of Dalla*
* W* A* Isay, Pres*, FEB of San Francisco

Hareh 2®, l$4l

Dear ir* Xotmgt
In accordance with agr telegraa of today, I
enclose herewith coapatation of the readjujstiaimis to he
aade on April X, 1941, of the participation* of the
Federal Beserre hanks in the %stssa Open Harket portfolio*
lours faithfully,

Robert
ia»af«r,

Bouae,
en Open

Market Account*

Honorable Soy A# Toung, President,
Federal Eoserve Bank of Boetea,
Boston, Ifiass#

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

12358

Bareh 28, 19*0.

PIm

m

mo£ the f oU oid sfi talegraja to e*ch J M w n i Km

w m

pisua for raJuJ.©c&ui<wi or {tovttnwttKre

mmwr

tfaa F tddral Oprn 'Market C oeaitiae

tmm&wr M $

b*nic as isdlctitad b «lo w i

adopted igr

* r«»djii*taw n t # f p a r it s t -

pfttioas ia Gov»rnaeat t#eurltl«» h « M In th# %»t#s Accomt Is called far
April lf 1$WU

*&• computations ahowia^ atdjn#t»eat» t© b® aade la partieipatiami

»£ tli# »*Feral

Imnot* banka i# feeing # m % to *11 l « » # m feaaks today.

$h#»* caaputatioiis todieate m
patioii on ipxil 1.

*f .
in yeaar particl<Ss#r<i*®#
Iii» eh&lX wire jw* m April I th# &etail©<S «ntri»s t© toe aad#

on that d&t*.
Isergasa
Xoufig ioatasi
Sinclair Pfcilatl*l|ihia
tjmuK
t _ai_Jfc.-LM.jlhi.
MvaCrfi

QiAwmjUHBm
iKSS
.Mr
kthkM
rvxc
onOMtiJkM
tik.jJl
tt

Mclarin Atlanta
Xcmag
Chicago

Bitt'

6^4,000
1,705,000

3,*5S,0»
1,510,000

3,775,«»
5,798,000

at* &mi§

905*006

Peyton
IdMwdiy

Ollfcart




Bern Fironetm

Deertaf#

1,212,000
2,163,000

3.555,000

CONFIDENTIAL

REALLOCATION OF GOVERNMENT SECURITIES IN SYSTEM OPEN EARKET ACCOUNT ON APRIL 1, 19^1
(In thousands of dollars)

8ystem Boston

New
York

-"San —
“TOla-l Cleve- ■RleV- ' Atlanta Chicego "ST."" Minn- Kansas
Louie eapolis _C_ity__ !1 Dallas
mond
delphia] land
____ Francisco

A* Expenses

(1) Estimated current expenses* 191+1

30*931

2*2148

8*019

2 ,14.53

3,060

1*877

1*373

3*685

l.5l«

1,004

1*767

1*310

2*586

8*380

561

3*091

713

863

325

287

880

255

179

270

256

700

39*311

2*809

11*110

3,166

3.923

2*202

1*660

4,565

1.804

1,183

2*037

1*566

3*286

(l) Estimated current earnings, 191+1
(exclusive of earnings on Gov’ts)

1,211

3k

205

145

124

19

211

26

30

170

32

111

(2) Estimated earnings on Gov’t
securities to March 31

9*676

702

2*802

775

954

531

1+01+

1,085

457

296

I486

385

799

10 *e8?

756

3*007

920

1,078

615

1423

1,296

U83

326

656

1*17

910

28,1|2U

2*053

8*103

2,2li6

2,81+5

1*587

1*237

3,269

1,321

857

1,381

1*11+9

2*376

B. estimated dividends, 19 J4I
C. Estimated expenses and dividends *19l+l
D« Earnings

(3)

Total

£♦ Excess of

"C» over "D -3"

81+

F. Allocation required (on basis of

1«83183^ •arnings rate on Gov’ts)
co produce earnings April-December
equal to nE"
2,059*1*86 1148,751 587*110 162,736 206,137 llU*988 89*628 236*858 95*7114- 62,095 10CV062 83*252 172,155
6* Average daily participations* per

oent# in System aocount since
June 30* 1936

100*0

7.275U 29*1821

8.31)69

9.9538

10,1401

12,1)01*

5*311+5 U.2175 11.0616 U.5183 3.0914 4.e774 3 .8I482 8.U129

H. Allocation of remainder of System
holdings ($2*1814-*ICO,000 less
$2 #059#i4fl6 *000) on basis of "G*

12i|,6li+

9*066

36*365

6*1+98

5*256 13,784 5,631 3,852

6,078

U*795 1 0 , 1*84

I* Total allocation of Government

securities (WFW plus nHn)
J. Present allocations

K. Change in allocations




2*18lj.,100 157*817 623*U75 173,137 218.5U1 121*1+86

9l+,88i+ 250 *6ii2 101*3^5 65,947 106,i4o 88*047 182*o39

2*18l|.,100 158*1481 632,503 i7U,eii2 215,303 119*976 91*109 2l4U,910 103,138 66,852 109,695
—

-66b

-9*028 -1,705

+3,238

+1*510

+3*775

+5,732 -1,793

80*835 180*456

-905 -3*555 +1*212

+2*183

CONFIDENTIAL

REALLOCATION OF GOVERNMENT SECURITIES IN SYSTEM OPEN MARKET ACCOUNT ON APRIL 1, 1941
Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

System Boston

(In thousands of dollars)
..-San ’'■
New “T E H a - Cleve-1 Rich­
Minn­ Kansas
Atlanta Chicago
!
Dallas
Francisco
delphia land
mond
Louis eapolis City J_
York
•
■p
CO

(

A* Expenses
30,931

2,21+8

8,019

2,14-53

3,060

1,877

1,373

3*685

1,5149

1,004

1,767

1,3 10

2,586

8,380

561

3*091

713

863

325

287

880

255

179

270

256

700

39*311

2,809

11,110

3*166

3*923

2,202

1,660

4,565

1,804

1*183

2,037

1*566

3,286

1*211

5U

205

145

124

84

19

211

26

30

170

32

111

9*676

702

2,802

775

954

531

4o4

1*085

457

296

486

385

799

Total

10,887

756

3*007

920

1*078

615

423

1*296

483

326

656

417

910

X* Exoess of "C* over ”D -3"

28,1421+

2,053

8,103

2,21*6

2,845

1*587

1,237

3*269

1,3 2 1

857

1,381

1*149

2,376

(1) Estimated current expenses, 1941
8* estimated dividends, 1941

C* Estimated expenses and dividends,1941
D* Earnings
(l) Estimated current earnings, 194l
(2) Estimated earnings on Gov’t
securities to March 31
(3)

P. Allocation required (on basis of
1*83183* earnings rate on Gov»ts)
to produce earnings April-December
equal to "E"

059*1+86 11*8,751 587*110 162,736 206,137 114*988

89,628 236,858 95*714 62,095 10U 062

G* Average dally partioipations, per
oent, in System aocount since
June 30* 1936

100.0

4.2175 11.0616 4*5183 3.0914 4.8774 3*81+82

7.275U 29.1821

8.3469

9*9538

5.33LU5

83*252 172,155

8.4129

>
S
c
or
t g
«-r\ O
! r
o
*

■
—

H* Allocation of remainder of System
holdings (#2 , 184 , 100,000 less
$2,059*1*86,000) on basis of "G"

121**611+

I* Total allocation of Government
securities ("P" plus *HW)

184*100 157*817 623*1+75 173*137 218,541 121,486

94*884 250,61*2 101,345 65*947 106,i4o

J* Present allocations

18l+*100 158,1+81 632,503 174,8142 215*303 119*976

9 1,10 9 21*4,910 103,138 66,852 109,695 86,835 180,456

K. Change in allooations




>

in

C/5
>«■*

—

9*066

36*365

•661+ -9*028

10,401

-1*705

12,1+04

♦3*238

6,498

+1,5 10

5*256

+3*775

13,784

5*631

+5,732 -1*793

3*852

6,078

-905 -3*555

m

4*795

10,1+84

88,047 182,o39

+1,212

+2,183

o

R eproduced from the U nclassified

I D ecla ssified H oldings of the N ational A rchives

DECLASSiFIED
A u th o rity £.6.

WVSi

:KSJ’B W W

i m 2 7 m

Hu-eh 27, 19U1.

Mr. t, S* Ro\i*e, Ti&#- President,
Federal Re*erve Bank of lew Tork ,
Bmr f o r k , Xm Tork*
D*#r Mr. Sosmi
Th«r« !• enoloaed * eopy of th* *tate»*itt prepared
in thi* Mvlftloa showing th* ohaag** neoeaeary In allocation*
of OonriDM«t **euritle* In th* Sy*te» Open Market lo count
an April 1, 19U1, la. aeoordenoe with th* fimtli adopted by
th* Federal Open Market Coaalttee an Beeodber 18, 19UO.

C m rrm t eacpenae* and current earning*, *xb1 u*1 t*
'Of Amins* 00 Ckrrernwant*, ham been eatinated by wnltlplylng
the aetual amount* thereof fro» October 19i|D thro«*gh February
19^1 by 2*1*. To th* «*£laa&«*. of oarrewfc expense* obtained
on tfel* b u l l , we have added $^00,000 .for low York wad
$120,000 .for St* Loui* a* was done In eoneetion with the
January 1 reallocation.
Very truly yo«r**

J. R. Van Pio***»# A**t. Chief,
Dlri*lon of Bank Operation*.
Enolo*or*




R eproduced from the U nclassified

I D eclassified H oldings of the N ational A rchives

D ECLASSIFIED
A u th o r ity ^ . 0 -

M R

2 7 18

m

m n m m m

#f

A *4 §»4 B * t

t Jk fc l* # *

m

or m m

doTTxamat

mwmrn

Airil.

%,

19i4l)

I 9 h& t #

J fip r * *
t $ i & * wiOk A *1

^

$500,000 $# I**' Tork *«i |lt0t.l500 %« tfe*
31

%m&M* ** *** tMfift# £e**' 'fefc# i i w y

§.

A w e m b g&vite** Fttes*t*f M

’t f m 5 I#**

##^1*1*1 HnftJi 19*
SM 8 «&& t
F*

tm m . I * # Tm?k lay H r * i# iiF * * s * U n ro ll $ 5 *

At

t e f i l a i * fm t# * • # f ***■*& 3 &
A#% m l




«§ # £

l * ; p o t f '$ « r # in t

fear fc*> W &vm m W tm h $ # *
{$ 7 5 I

-p^

'D IN FILES SECTION1

&

RBAXJUQCAT 10$ OF G m m w m t SECTXRXTI&S If? STSTS? OPEN MAHfEt ACCOUKT OH

& £Ll.

-------------------- r-----

Sy*t«ss jBoston

a >
hnt-

A«

) ^ « ‘treated ©arrant o%p«na««,l9^1

c« Ealimatfd expenses and dividends,I9I1I

0 . iSarnings
(1 ) fcstimated current oarning*, 19^1
(exclusive of earnings on Gorft«)
(2) Estimated earnings on Gor*t
securities to Kareh 3 1
(3)

Total

E. Exosis of "C" a r a r

*8 -3"

rm
"Wiim-*1' Kanaa*
At lanta fChifife o
ORPOIIg
Louie
1

Wolf

York

delphtall&sd

mond

1,310

2,566

%»k53

3 *0 6 0

1 , 87?

1*373

3*685

1 , 5*49

U O O li

1 , 76 ?

561

3 ,0 9 1

713

863

325

287

SSO

8 55

179

270

39*3 1 !^ 2,809

11,110

3.166

3.923

2,808

1,660

4.565

i,eo4

1.183

2.037

1,566

3,286

805

11*5

181*

84

19

811

86

30

170

32

111

4o4

1,085

457

896

I486

385

799

423

1,296

483

386

656

417

910

1.237

3.869

1.321

857

1,381

1,149

2.376

1,211

$1*

9,676 '

706

2 ,8£»

775

954

10,887 A

756

3.007

920

1.078

531
615

8,053

8,103

8,845

1,587

28,1*21*

8,21*6

f . Allooatlon required (on t»»la af
1.83183^ «*rn'ag* rat* on !?ov*t«)
to produo® earning* April-Daoaaibar
,
•qual to "E"
8,059.1*86 11*8,751 567.110 168,736 806,137 114,988 09.688 236,858 95.714 62.095 1C&062
0,

S»s
Dallaa Franoigoo

8 ,0 1 9

J
8,380'

dividends, 19Ul

(In thou«a»d» of dollar.)

2>2k8

50,931

Ia

APRIL X, 19*4

256

700

83.252 172.155

100*0 '

7.2754 29*1821

8.31*69

9*9538

5*2145

4.8175 11.0616 4.5183 3.0914 4.8774 3.8488

8.4189

5.256 13.784 5.631 3.852 6,078

I# Total allocation of Govoms«jt
securities (*F* plus **!")

2,184*100 157,81? 683.1475 173.137 218,51+1 121,1*86

94,884 250,6148 10.345 65,91*7 1C6,140

88,01*7 182,o39

J* Present allocations

2.184,100' 158,1481 632.503 174,842 215,303 119.976

91.109 2W+.910 10438 66,652 109.695

86.835 100,456

*3.775

+1,212




m
b

p
>

• uo
gJjg)tm
J

6,498

IT* Change In allocations

J1

C
r-f

# s

H. A llocation of rm &lnder o f SyatMi
holding* ($8.161*.100,000 le a *
*2.059.1*86,000) on buais o f *0*

>

t
or

rerape daily partie ipatIon *, per
cent, In System aooount alnoa
June 30, 1936

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

&

124.614'

— 7

9.066

*664

36.365 10,1*01 12,404

**9,028

-1.705

+3.236

+

1,510

+5.732 -1.793

-905 -3.555

4.795 io,4s4

+2,183

06 a

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives




DECLASSIFIED
Authority C..Q* 12358

C D ti

%
Fe d e ra l R eserve Bank
of

N e w Yo r k

December 28, 1940.

Dear Mr. Smead:
we received your letter of December, 26/and have
i'Vt f

today sent to the ileserve banks a copy q£,-%hs computation
showing the adjustments to be made in participations in the
System Open Market Account on January 2, 194-1? as of January 1,
pursuant to the plan adopted at the meeting of the Federal
Open Market Committee on December 18, 194-0.
Faiclosed herewith is copy of the letter of trans­
mittal together with three copies of the computation, also
copy of the telegram which was sent to each of the Federal
Reserve banks today,
lours faithfully,

Manager, System Open
Market Account.
Mr, iii. L. Smead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations,
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System,
Washington, D. C.

imcls, (5)

A
A

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

”

D E C L A S S IF IE D

Authority £..()■ 12358

MISC. l i O A

ISM

9 38

FEDERAL RESERVE

BANK O F N E W YORK

Similar letter written to the President of each Federal Reserve bank except New York




December 28# 1940

Bear Mr* Flemingi

/

In. accordance wi|,h my

today, £

•nolose herewith c o ^ p u ta tio h ^ ^ th ® readjustments to to
mad#

m

m

1, o f

tli® p a r t i c l e

t lo n i o f th# fe d e ra l fU»e®*3£© tayrfk* in th® System Gpan

Market portfolio,
"Yours faithfully,

Robert Gf Eouee,
Manager, %stem Open
Market Account.
Mr# M. J. Fleming, Prenideat*
federal Keaerve Bank of Cleveland*
Cleveland, Ohio*
Encl.

R ep rod uced from the U nclassified / D eclassified H oldings of the N ational A rchives

__
—

MISC.140A

I BM

^ D E C L A S S IF IE D

Authority

1235 %

9-38

FEDERAL RESERVE

BANK OF NEW

smmmzM jaa?t*

YO RK

- mb jm
Bmmimr ?£, i f | 0

¥ % m m *«n d
m l u d l c a t « d fc*tw r#

t mlrngprnm t# $b«

of

FediamX a®o^rv« benk

At tfe*
ef the Federal Opeo Sftriset fkms&i&Mm m December IS,
th« plec of *& *o «ti0 fli o f (kmrtmvnt «©curttie« M M in tit# $y«ta& '&pm italcet
Account imuv refleed effective &»&£?? X*
The
% M $st*<t at that
.it ae £«&&*«** ' * (1 }
aufflcient *ec*SJFitie# to «*«& bank to co^rer e**v
peaee* not oenrered by accrued •*mln£* on Government #ec**ritt«# anc estimted
froa
eonrce## f l j *lX»«te & #*afftd e **t aamint of
■
*e # *ifliie # to- eech benk to « w n ‘ iiirfJertd re^iireasiOEto, *»& (3 ) a llo c a te any
nwiaiMf eeourltle* aaong the talk* m the be«i# ■$£ m m m $ n 8*X3tf i»»3*tifii.p*itie*»
in the %*iem Attttmrai sine* June $&# 1936. Whan m t i m U d m m i M g w eftmX m
exceed eetiaated «k£*khmmi «nd
*t»£Ni 1 *»& &# indicated m b m m t w t H
mi., .-aI -Ufa# n,- .n .ft H . , . .
f .' ■.:.*> t fV T ii ' lr A V
—1 H
jfe,j . * • M
d* combined
totu 8-| ia
rljxying til# aJuLdC&tiOE.
USm egmrbm 3ty
accordance e ith th i* ?&*% *awi tlte

aad* la |mrfcicif»ti«*sii cf the *ew
■<iiX Eeeerve btaalg®;' today. Theee
in y e w f»rfeiciisattoii «n 3i

■laaaa&ry Xf iS&X i# in,
adjustments to be
~b«fi3e* i« btl&g Bent to

ItatiorB i n d i c t an Ir.crwtB*
decrease af ...........
I*!#* ywa on January

H m 4#t*i3Lid

entries to b* mid* m ©f «fi
Staapyefee
lOUXig

B o sto B

rxMLing
lii^tl:^
l^ n w r

Atlanta

SchAlXer
Ifertin
Peyton
H^alltgn
Gilbert

Chic^o




A,076,000
7.325.000
4^429,000

St* Loui*
^ n p aapnl f.fr

Kane&a City
'MMm
'$m

4.605.000
2*652*000
ly99&*000

CONFIDENTIAL
RKALLOCATiOL

1. Estimated dividends, 19 ^ 1
c . Estimated expenses and dividends,19’ •1

OPSr.

ilAPKET ACCOl'JT'01'

JA l^AFY

1, 19l*l

Dallas

■Tin"""
Franci sco

1,769

l.sat

2,197

179

2&f

250

(*7 l

1,781-

1,16 1

^ ,0 3 6

1 .5H 1

3,19li

2 10

31

28

173

39

137

M56

1,753

1,133

1 ,8 6 3

l.lj-75

3.057

6 3 ,5 5 1 10’ J °8

82,7*)'

171,L71

5,197

)-,100

8,v8 5

_ .
Boston

New j Phila-Jcieve--j P.ich- Atlanta
v ,
1 York |aelphiaj land | mond

30,017

2,188

7,895

2,396

2,901

1,800

1,281;

3,508

1,533

982

8,297

560

3 ,0 6 6

713

852

322

282

85$

251

2 ,7 )v8 1 0 ,9 6 1

3,109

3,753

2 ,12 2

1,5o 6

ll,366

2 U0

151

ldi

82

22

2,667 1 0 , 7 2 1

2,958

3,&S

1,0) Q

1 9$'h

Sys tem
A. Expenses
(l) Estimated current expenses,lc1-1

OF GOVE?3;liB:iT SECURITIES h. S*'STLii:

38,31^

ChicagoJ St. | 12.nn- ! Kansas
| Louis jeapolis] City

D . Estiinated eam.’ngs, I9I1 I (exclusive

of earnings on Gov’ts)
E. Excess of "C" over "D*
F. Allocation required Ton basis of
1»7B281/* earning rate on Gov1 ts)
to produce earnings equal to "E"
G. Allocation of remainder of System
holdings ($2,IB)', 100,0(0 less
§ 2 ,OJ7,39)',000) on basis of average
daily participations in System
account since June 30, 193&

1 ,2 7 8

37,036

61

2,077,391'. 150,717 601,35>; 1 6 5 ,9 18 2 0 !'*6 7 7 llJJ'26
V

106,706

7,73. 31,1’'9

8 opl 1 0 ,6 2 6

8 5,605 233,11?

98,328

11,79S

J-,811

5^0

*,*01

H. Total allocation of Gov*ts

2, IS)-, 100 158,1,81 632,<503 1 7 ’,8 )2 215,303 11^976

91,109 PJJ ,910 107,l^9

66,8R2 10°, P-

8 5,-^.

180,) 56

I. Present allocations

O
7 * 1 & 15 ,355 1*5,007 218*731 1 1 5 , c 00
u j 18)', 100 15 6 ,

83,781' 01,0 ^ 7 9

9)', ^76

6 2 ,2: 7 I07,a’'3

8 ):,9 22

132,515

+7 , 3 2 5

+R, 7 >*

+ ' , 60 ^

+1,91°

-2,1^9

J. Change in allocations




—

+1,700 -12,852

- 8 , 1 5 5 -3,;.?* ■^,076

+ 2,6 52

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

12358

J
|REi 0 IN FILES SECTI9W
BOARD OF GOVERNORS

i

I

DEC 3 0 1940

&?
F E D E R A L R E S E R V E S Y S T E M <335 *
□ F

T H E

W A S H I N G T O N
ADDRESS

O F F I C I A L J3 D R R E S P O N D E N C E
TO THE

BOARD

December 27, 194-0

Dear Sir:

All of the Presidents of Federal Reserve Banks were in
^attendance at the meeting of the federal Open Market Committee on
December IB, 194-0, and are familiar with the actions taken follow­
ing the consideration of the report submitted by Messrs. Smead and
Rouse under date of September 26, 194-0, with respect to the basis
for the allocation of securities in the System open market account
and the accounting procedures that might be adopted for the ac­
count. Therefore, this letter is written for the purpose of for­
mally advising your Bank of the actions taken.
Approval was given ly the Presidents and by the Federal
Open Market Committee to a basis for the quarterly allocation of
securities in the System open market account, as recommended by
■
Messrs. Sinead and Rouse, which would allocate (1) sufficient se­
curities to each Federal Reserve Bank to cover expenses not cov­
ered by accrued earnings on Government securities and estimated
earnings from other sources* (2) a sufficient amount of additional
securities to each Bank to cover dividend requirements, and (3)
any remaining securities among the Banks on the basis of average
daily participations in the System account since June 30, 1936,
which is the basis on which profits on sales of securities in the
System account are distributed among Federal Reserve Banks at the
present time. This action was taken by the Federal Open Market
Committee with the understanding that, if possible, the new proce­
dure would be followed in connection with the January 1, 1941, re­
allocation of securities in the System account.
The decision was also reached to recommend to the Board
of Governors that no change be made in the manner in which Govern­
ment securities held in the System open market account are shown in
the weekly statement of condition of Federal Reserve Banks, and
that for the current year profits on securities sold from the




'

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority E..O» 1235%

-

2-

System open market account should be transferred to reserves for
cont ingenc ie s.
Very truly yours,

Chester Morrill, Secretary,
Federal Open Market Committee.

TO THE PRESIDENTS OF ALL FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives
d e c l a s s if ie d

,

Authority £..Q« \2fl58

m o ' D in piles s E m m

&

DEC 2 7 1940

3_s J #

tooaribor

3

19ij0*

Mr. K.

Rouso, fioo Prosldsot,
JDfluliXb 4pX JMW» <EvwaC^
lew York, low York.

J3oor Mr. Firriirot
Iktr* la onoloood a oopy of a t a t w i t profarod
in this Division Shoving th#
m t i iiKry in allocations
of aqyini— nf soouritlos 1a tto Systaa Opsa Markvt Acoouat
Ml Jiamary 1, 19i*l( in tMordaae# with 'tto r*il*#4 fonacala
adopted by tto Fedtrtl Open Muscat Coanaittco at lt« aootiiig
am Pscadiar 18, 19irf>.
Cwrrwt oxponaos aad eurrtat oaralags (oxoluaiTw of
o» Onrrrn— nt<) t o w boon ootiaatod by ■ultiplylng
th* aotwal sskkb&o ttoroof fro* July tta-o^gh Hwosfcor, 19l|0*
fcy 2*%* V# tovo addod 1500,000 to th# ostiaato of ©urront
oxpoasos for low Yorit, obtainod oa this basis, in Ti»t of a
prospootl?* iaoroaso 1b azunaal doproolaticsi charge* and Im
ropairs and alterations is oonMotioa with oir-ooodltiottiMg
'tto low York building, and $120,000 to tto ostiaata of' oarront
expsasos for St* Urn is to ooaplato tho porograa *f sotting
aoido a 100 poroostt roaoroo on flxad aachinory and o^uipMttt
In ooaaootion with air^ooadit loalng tho hoad offloo and b miioh
buildings, Wo b m m dodastod fro* tto ostiaato of ourrsat
oxpostaos for Chisago $70,000 in riow of o toaporary iaoroaos
for tho aonths of Saptsafeor to lirroriha r, inoluaivo, in doproolation ofcargos oa flxod aaohinory aad oqul|annt in tto Chicago
building*




Ttry truly your a,

E. L. 8a*ad, Chisf,
Diriaioa of Bank Oporatioas.

'

*2yuuu»AfioK of m vm m g m t s m m t r i m m srmai. orfi m m m accost ok jA m m t i, v&X

Syatcei
A* Ispeaftee
(1) Setlmted current ex?ext*e«,IQlsl

3©,oi? 2.W8

7,895

Stun "
yen— > Dellet
Fnucelsco
Sity

8,596 a ,901

1,800

l#*l»

5,506

1,533

982

1.769

1,26k

2,1*97

560 5,066

715

892

5M

882

858

*51

179

2«r

250

697

etli*te4 exwmeee and diridende, 19^1 58.51k 2,71# 10,961

5,109

5.755

2,128

1,566

li,566

l»78k

1*161

2,056

1.51k

5 ,1 *

ate

151

lflti

88

22

210

3*

28

175

59

137

57,056 8,487 10,721

2,958

a.oto

l,5*Ji

Is, 156

1*753

3**33

1,86?

1.1*75

5.057

itiattd dlvidende, I9hl
0

Cla thooeeiida ef &sllar»)
Cl#w*| Pdeh- Atlanta Chioftgo St'. '' Wlua**
1 Sblle* r
Boetoa
l»yyf 1 mflfi'Hl
jdelphie
Tort
Louie eepolic

»* Kotin* ted M »ingS| 19kl ( e*el»ei*e
ef mmiMg* on
B. Excee* ef *0* «t«p *P*

8,297

1,278

61

5 .«* »

r . Allocation required f<m beeie ef
WfcH&lg mirai»c rete ®b Set* te)
ie pretec* earning* equal te *S* £#077#3$i 19*7*7 40U3«£ l^ m ^ k ^ T T UkJM

Allocation of reminder ef Syete*
holding# (12,18l«,1G0#C>00 l«t«
#2,077,39^*900) oo be»it ef average
daily participation* In Syetea
eeoossst since June 30# 1936
106,706 7.7a» 51.H.9

8 , 92ft lo .& S

86,605 255.115 98,338 65*591 2 W M 9 *

5,550

11,795

kgtll

3#301

8S,75is 171.U71

5,197

li,100

8,985

fc* *otel allocation of Sot *te

2,18M00 l^i#! ^ 5 0 3 U M b f t 2*5,303

91,109 2M,910 105,159

66,852 1©9*695

86,85ft

180,(456

I. Preeent alleeattoite

2,18£ul00 1$^?§1 61*5,355 183,007 tt%731 UV-QO

85»78ti 21’9.559

62,^7 107,0li3

8li,922

182,615

4 s.,605 +2,652 ♦1,912

-a,159

4* Change in allocation*




—

♦1,700 - X
Ui'
B*52 *6,165 - 5 ,1*28 4,0 76
*3,u

♦7.5*5

*8*763

accoput cm 4*m m

1*

v&t

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

nhM&oe&TKm of OQtmmmm mmmfiBB m sysm? arm mmrs
thousands e f 6eliars)
Sew i m u * Cleve- j m *k < Atlanta
York [delphia land

Systeaa

Cl) Estimated eurreat e*peaaas#19iil

8,996 2,901

r
j ' H^T ISa***^
►SpoliS

[ Louis j<

Kansas Balias ~ ^ 5 » r ~
C ity

Francisco

1,800

i,aeU

3.506

1.533

982

1.769

1.261*

2.1*97

5,066

713

858

523

282

858

251

179

2<7

250

stlsate* expenses and dividends, 19l?l 38*$lJh 2,71(8 10,961

3.109

5.753

3,128

1,566

1».366

1,781

1.161

2.036

1.511*

3.19**

at*

151

idU

88

22

210

31

28

173

39

137

yr#c56 8,687 10.721

2,955

3.&9

?,oJo

i , 5Mt

(2.156

1.753

1.133

1,865

l.li75

3 .0 #

<77 UW<26

86,605 233.115

96.326

8,92li lo.&ii 5*550

k.5QIt 11.795

M il

stiaated dividends, I9^tl

0

3$*017 2,188 7,895

Chioago

8*297

Eetine ted earns ags, 19til (exclusive
•f earnings on Gev*ts)

1.278

B. £seessnef ”C* ever *P*

5*0

6i

r. All©©*tie required f on basis ef
taming irate es $*** ts )
te pre^»«e earnings equal te "£* 2.077.391. 154717
Allocation of remainder ef System
holdings ( iSS* 18??.»100*000 leas
$2,Q?7,?$i#000) en basis of average
daily participations in %atssi
aecetiist since June 30# 195&
1U Votal allocation of Gov* ts
I. Present allocutions

Change I n alloeaM aas




106,?q6 7.7& 31.H9

165,918

2,18?.,10015*181 6^505 ITJt.BJi*8^,503 111976
2.18li.l00 ig 6tf*l 6t»5»355 183 . 00? 84731 11*90©
—

♦1,700 -14B52

■6.165 -5,1»0S

4t,076

91.109 StfJ .910 105,139

63,551 10t>.L98 82,73);

3.301

5.197

It,100

66,852 109.695 86,8*

tm

171.1*71

>
C

I

j

r-f

8.985

180,(156

S’
2.

M i

«

ffl

85.781- 2^9.339 9k.S76 62,217 107,^5

8!i,922 182,615

jn p
ia >

♦7,325 •^4,1:29 ♦8,763 ♦It,605 ♦2,652

♦1,912

!S I

*

uo

05 M
06 0

-2.159
i

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority £..()» V235B

December 16, 1940.

Mr.' S^ead,
The attached represents my recommendation
to Mr. Harrison in connection with our report.




R.G.R.

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

12358

C44

/ s*//
"As you recall, the Committee on Accounting Procedure in connection
with the System Open Market Account (Smead-Rouse) filed a report at the
September 27th meeting which I understand is to be considered on Tuesday.

If

I ain called on for recommendations, I shall recommend (1)

No change be made in the form of the weekly press statement.

(2)

It should be regarded as System policy to transfer profits
realized on the sale of Government securities to reserves
for contingencies, however, without any binding resolutions
that might have to be revised in event of changes in cir­
cumstances.

If it were generally urged that profits arising

out of switches (particularly those involving the sale of
’’rights1’) be used to write down the cost of the replacement
securities, I would not oppose it.
(3)

The proposed formula for allocation of securities be adopted,
as it seems to me the best available.

Mr. Smead and I are in substantial agreement on these recommendations.

This

formula would tend to reduce the interest income of the New York, Philadelphia
and Cleveland banks, as their dividend ratios are in excess of their holding
ratios over a period of years.

However, the theory that the apportionment of

excess securities should bear a direct relationship to the profit and loss or
holding ratio, seems to me to be the governing principle.n

December 16, 194-0



R eproduced from the U nclassified




I D eclassified H oldings of the N ational A rchives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority E..O *

£EC ^ Xtf FILES SECTION j
v

OCT 2 - 1 9 4 0

6 6o m

October $ m/ 19bP.

Mr, Roy A. Young, Presidsot,
Federal Reserve Bank of Boston,
Boston, Massachusetts .
D#ar Ifor. Tomtgt
2fc accordance with * request received
ov*r the telephone trw m Hr* Rouse, I aa enclosing
herewith a copy of the^riliort aade by Mr. Rouse
•ad aysalf cm^a«»t«^er,%., :igiO^ to tha aofewr*
of the Federal Open Market Coonittee nynt th®
Presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks m acoountim g p m m & m m in connection with the Systea Open
Market Account.

t'ia&srsly yours.

J&m I>• ISnsad, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations.

Snolosure

t *

<

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives




DECLASSIFIED
Authority E..C* 1235%

IK-.. IN FILES SECTION

-

OCT 2 -1 9 4 0

3 J5 ®
J

Mr. R. 0. lottoe, V i m Praaident,
Fadwral I m m Bank of Sow York,
York, Mm fork.*

Baar Mr* SeuMi
In accordance with y'mat telephone
roqyoat, I aa enclosing herewith two additional

procedure Is ©onneotion with tha System Opon
Markwt Aeoount.

Sincerely youra.

E. L* &aead# Chief,
Dlriaion of Bank Operationa

teoloauraa 2

vl

v i _ __

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority fc.Q* 12358

/

/




F e d e ra l R e se rve Bank
of

N e w Yo r k

September 28, 194-0

Dear Mr. Smead:
We received your letter of September2£^ and have
today sent to the Reserve banks a copy of the computation
showing the adjustments to be made in participations in the
System Open Market Account on October 1, 1940, pursuant to
the plan adopted at the meeting of the Federal Open Market
Committee on November 30, 1937.
Enclosed herewith is copy of the letter of trans­
mittal together with three copies of the computation, also
copy of the telegram which was sent to each of the Federal
Reserve banks today*
Yours faithfully,

Robert G. Rouse,
Manager, System Open
Market Account,
Mr. E. L. Smead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations,
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System,
Washington, D. C.

Ends. (5)

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
C

Authority

12358

W SC 140A 13M 8 - » 9

FEDERAL RESERVE B AN K O F N E W YORK

SECURITIES DEPT, - RHB FMS

September 28, 1940

Please send following telegram to the President of each Federal Reserve bank
as indicated below:
Under the plan for reallocation of Government securities adopted by
the Federal Open Market Committee November 30, 1937, a readjustment of partici­
pations in Government securities held in the System Account is called for
October 1, 1940*

The computations showing adjustments to be made in participations

of the several Federal Reserve banks is being* sent to all Reserve banks today*
Increase
\
These comnutations indicate an
- of \
.in your participation on
decrease,
t
October 1.

We shall wire you on October % th'&\detailed entries to be made on

that date*




\
laargftMt

Young
Sinclair
Fleming
Leach
Parker
Schaller
Martin
Peyton
Hamilton
Gilbert
Day

Boston v \
tiladelbhia>levelan©
Ri^QOZMif
Atlanta
Chicago
St. J*ouis
Minneapolis
Kansas City
Balias
San Francisco

ROUSE

11, 699,000
3.571.000
2.976.000
16,090,000

Decrease
13,788,000

5,284,000

10,958,000
4 102,000
133,000
2.544.000

,

1.031.000

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

12358

FEDERAL RESERVE B AN K O F N E W YORK

Similar letter written to the President of each Federal Reserve bank except New York




Septonber 28f 1940

of today# I
tho readjustment* to bo
Jfcho porticlpatioiui of th*
st*w Opon J3*rk#t portfolio*
faithfully*

Bobort G
_^
MFPIv

Honorahl* 8ey A« Tcaing* Proaidoct,
rSnTlml DfllVl I* H R K Oi OOfWDi
Boston, XftM*

tod.

*9

DIAieiOMOk

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

CONFIDENTIAL
RLALLOCATJOH OF C-OVERlOff'NT Sb'CUHITib'S IN SYST ^ OPEN IvAHKET ACCOUNT OK OC GBiiK 1, I9ii0

System

A - Expenses
1. Estimated current expenses, 1940

Boston

Hew
York

Phila­
delphia

Cleve­
land

Atlanta Chicago

26,897

2,127

7.297

2,31-1

2,862

1*717

10)4

97

3.266
1,6 16
298 ___

Kansas

Minn-

St.

Louis

eapolis

Dallas

§an

Franoisoo

1.21-3 * 3,372

1,518

97b

1.731

1 .2)43

2,1*52

55

218

26

26

172

59

152

1.272

3»)jh 2
332

l,b*J6

9b9

1,250
l.ii92
lb7 __ 115

2 ,6bl

128

1 .&

1,069

1,811

1.58b

3 ,01*6

B - burnings
1* Estimated ourrent earnings, 19^0
(exclusive of earnings on Govts.)
2. Estimated earnings on Govts, to
September 30
3* Eat profits on Govts, to Sept. 26

l,).i20

*9

262

200

31.95^
3.003

2.3&
219

9.667
872

2,958

i*.

36,398

2,602

10,821

3.020

3,668

1,870

lJj.55

3,992

8,210

560

3,065

7li)

8)*1

318

279

825

2L?8

177

26^

2b?

e t2

7ii9

85

-J»99

35

55

165

67

205

U 16

82

iait

106

78

19,566- 105,658

8,057

12,061

37.982

15,b23

1*7.189

33.608 18,876

U2,355

2 b.b00

17.955

Total

C• Batinated dividends, 19)'0
D. Exoess of A-l plus C over B-Jj
E. Allooation required (on basis of 1*72353^
earnings rate on Govts.) to provide
earnings October-Dec ember equal to D

172,UlU

252

136 ___9b^

F. Allooation of remainder of System
holdings (#2 ,)j33 ,600,000 less
|172,Ii11l,000) on basis of C

2 , 26 1,18 6 15 t*,23li 8Ui,158 196,6k9

2 ^1,627

G, Total allooation of Govts.(E plus F)

2,^33.600 173.800 738,500 20)1,706

2W>,288 125.565 92,266 27L.K09 101,912 67.625 115,0 6 5

H. Pree+nt allocations

2 ,)j33 .6oo 177. ^

2L-9.572 121,99b

I* Change in allocations




—

-3.7*8

7Ui.996 193.007
-6 ,!i96 ♦11,699

-5,281.

87.583

♦3.571

76,8k3 227,220

253

68, 30b U8,7ii9 72.710 66,026 185,061
92,1*26 205,036

89,290 258,319 112,870 71,727 115.198 9ii,972 20U,067
♦2,976 +16,090 -10,958 -b,102

-133 -2,5bli -1,031

>
c
c
r
0
*-•
>5'
r\
'ey

|

0!
H
O
L
>
in
C
Z3
S 2
w
0

a

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority fc.Q* 12358

;Oi'FIDENTIAL
5 3

m

s y

?

September 26, 19UO.

REPORT TO MEMBERS OF THE FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE AND
PRESIDENTS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS ONyACCOUNTING FROCEDURE
IN CONNECTION WITH THE SYSTEM OPEN MARKET ACCOUNT

At the meetings of the Federal Open Market Committee in
Washington on March 20 and May 28, ItyliO, we were requested to study
the present basis for the allocation of securities in the System
Open Market Account and the accounting procedure followed in con­
nection with the Account, to make a report to the Federal Open
Market Committee and to the Presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks
which would include a statement of the various accounting procedures
that might be adopted for the System Account, and to be prepared to
make recommendations as to the procedure that should be followed.
As we see the problem, there are three main questions to
be considered:

(l) how should United States Government securities

owned by the Federal Reserve Banks be shown in the weekly press
statement, (2) what should be the disposition of profits on ss.les of
securities, and (3 ) should there be any change in the procedure under
which participations in the System Account are now allocated among
the Federal Reserve Banks?




^

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority £ .0 * VM58

-2-

Amounts at which securities are shown in published condition statements.
The Federal Reserve Act* section 11, paragraph 2 (a), pro­
vides:

"The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall be

authorized and empowered:

To examine at its discretion the accounts,

books and affairs of each Federal reserve bank and of each member bank
and to require such statements and reports as it m y deom necessary.
The said board shall publish once each week a statement showing the con­
dition cf-each Federal reserve bank and a consolidated statement for all
Federal reserve banks*

Such statements shall show in detail the assets

and liabilities of the Federal reserve banks, single and combined, and
shall furnish full information regarding the character of the money
held as reserve and the amount, nature and maturities of the paper and
other investments owned or held by Federal reserve banks.”
It is the present practice to show Government securities in
the statement at par and to include premium on securities purchased in
"Other Assets1* and discount on securities purchased in "Other Liabilities"
Two alternative methods have been suggested for showing the System* s
holdings of Government securities in the weekly Federal Reserve Bank
condition statement, as follows:

(l) show securities at book value,

i.e., at par plus premium and less discount, and (2) show the par value
of the securities as at present and show the amount of premium less
discount as a separate asset item in the statement.
With respect to tho current method, tho following comments
are offered:




It has been the practice since early in the history of

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority E..C* 12358

-3the System to show securities in published statements at their par
value,

A schedule is also appended to the weekly publication of the

statement of condition, showing at par value the maturity distribution
of U, S, Government securities.

Securities in the statement are shown

at par value principally, we understand, in order to indicate as clearly
as possible any increase or decrease in the System account, and to
obviate any possibility of tho public* s gaining tho impression that
there has been a change in the System* s holdings, when, as a matter of
fact, no change has taken place.

Par value is used in the maturity

schedule for the same reason and also to indicate as clearly as possible
in what maturity categories changes occur.

Changes in security holdings

as disclosed by the statement are likely to be interpreted by the public
as reflecting purchases and sales.

Under the present arrangement all

purchases and sales, except those that represent switches within a
given maturity group, are reflected in the statement.

Shifts of equal

amounts within a given maturity grouping would not be clarified by
either of the alternative methods.
With respect to tho first alternative method, i.e., that se­
curities be shovm at book value, reported holdings would fluctuate as
a result of the following, as well as through purchases, sales and
shifts:

(l) amortization of premium, which would reduce book value, (2)

accumulation of discount, which would increase book value, and (3 )
valuation reserves and charge-offs.




If United States Government securi-

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority E..Q*

•< *•

•ti­

t le s were shown among assets in press statements at book value, they

would normally be shown likewise in the maturity classification, but
if thought desirable, they could continue to be shown in the maturity
classification at par value.
With respect to the second suggestion, it would be a simple
matter to**show "Net premium on U* S, Securities" as an asset item, say,
following "Total bills and securities"•

Opinion has been expressed

^ that minor changes in book value brought about by amortization of prem­
ium, accumulation of discount, shifts within maturity categories and
application of reserves and charge-offs, should be shown clearly.

It

has also been suggested that if public attention were called to such
changes by inclusion of an item in the published statement, the public
might get an impression of a change in System holdings when no real
change has occurred#
No accounting difficulities would be involved in showing
United States Government securities in the weekly press statements in
either of the above alternative ways, and neither would involve any
material changes in the accounting procedure now followed.

What should be the disposition of profits on sales of securities?
Present Procedure
In accordance with the plans approved by the Federal Open
Market Committee on November 30, 1937* effective January 1, 193^*
profits on sales of United States Government securities have been dis­
tributed among the Federal Reserve Banks in proportion to their average




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
:s* "

Authority £.6* VMS8

-5daily holdings in the System Account since June 7)0, 193&* and are now
treated as an addition to current not earnings and used to cover ex­
penses or dividends, or are transferred to surplus, or to reserves for
contingencies through surplus, depending upon the situation at each
Federal Reserve Bank,
Reasons for Present Procedure
From 192U to 1929* inclusive, profits were distributed daily
^ on tho holding ratio.

From 1930 to 193&, inclusive, they were held by

the New York Reserve Bank in a suspense account and distributed at the
end of each year on ratios based on daily average holdings in the
Account for the last 12 months preceding.

In 1937 profits wore distri­

buted daily on ratios based on average daily holflings in the Account for
the last twelve months preceding*

Since January 1, 193&* as outlined

in the memorandum on accounting procedure for handling transactions in
the System Open Market Account adopted beginning January 1, 1958* pro­
fits have been distributed daily on ratios based on the average daily
holdings in the Account since June 30> 193&*

This relating of profits

and losses more nearly to the period over which securities are held by
lengthening the period over which the average holdings are figured in
distributing profits, largely removes the apprehension that a bank
might, in some time of emergency, find it necessary to take over from
other banks a substantial block of Governments on which, within a short
period, it might sustain serious loss, for the loss, if any, would be
distributed in accordance with the bank* s holdings of securities over
an extended period rather than for any short period.



Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority £ .6 * I2fl58

-6-

A change has been suggested in our accounting procedure
with respect to the treatment of profits realized on sales of securi­
ties*

The principal reasons advanced therefor* are that during the

generally rising market of tho past few years, principally through
switches, (l) the book value of the Account has been written up, and (2)
profits have been treated in a manner not in accord with the practice
which the System recommends to member banks#

The view has been ex­

pressed that the System* s "Reserves for Contingencies'* should be in­
creased at least to the point that they equal the net premium on securi- ties in the Account, and that the writing up of the Account by switches
should be minimized by the application of profits so realized to the
reduction of the book value of the replacement securities.
Reserves for contingencies now held by the Federal Reserve
Banks as a whole amount to t3U*627*03i», as compared with t38,13lb.,196
of premium carried in the System Account as of September lJj., 19U0,
Of the total contingent reserves, $3lJ±8l,9lj-6 were set up out of
current net earnings and #

3

#

out of surplus.

Reserves for con­

tingencies vary from slightly over 57 per cent of the premium account
at Boston to more than 100 per cont of the premium account at four .of
the banks.
Realized profits might be used as indicated in one of the
following alternative suggestions as to our accounting procedure:




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
v- "

Authority £.6* UflSB

Alternative Suggestions for Accounting of Security Profits
Profits on sales of securities could be—
1. Transferred to Reserves for Contingencies;
2, Set aside as a valuation reserve and deducted in the
balance sheet from premium on U. S* securities;
3* Used to write down the book value of the System Account#

Profits may be realized not only on outright sales of securi­
ties but also on switches, i*e#, the simultaneous sale of one security
and purchase of a like par value of another.

Under our present practice,

-when securities carried on the books at amortized price of, say, 101
are sold at a profit of 2 points and other securities are bought at 103 *
profits on securitios sold are increased and the net book value of the
portfolio is increased by a like amount.

Switches in the account might

leave the net book value of the account unchanged and at the same time
reduce current earnings*

The advisability of this so-called writing-up

of the portfolio as a result of sales and purchases may be questioned,
but if profits on switches or outright sales of securities, cr both,
are to be used to write down the book value of the System Account they
should, in our opinion, continue to be shewn as profits on sales of se­
curities in published statements of earnings and expenses of the Federal
Reserve Banks.
With respect to the first alternative, the transfer of profits
on sales of securities to roserves for contingencies would regularize




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority !L.C« VM58

*-

8-

a practice which has existed to a substantial extent for a number of
years*

Prior to 1937$ transfers to reserves for contingencies were

charged against the current year* s earnings*
have been charged to surplus.

Since that date, they

Reserves for contingencies are included

in the balance sheet of the Reserve Banks among "Other Capital Accounts”*
They are not shown as a reduction in the carrying value of assets#
With respect to the second alternative, that is, that profits
on sales of securities be set aside as a valuation reserve and deducted
in the balance sheet from the premium account, it may be pointed out
that if this were done and a substantial portion of our present contin­
gent reserves were also allocated for that purpose, the time vrould come
when tho valuation reserve would equal the value of the premium account*
In such case the amortization of premium would not have to be discontinued,
but the combined result of the valuation reserve and true amortization
of premium would reduce, in effect, the book value of the System Account
below par value.

The latter course would not be inconsistent, as there

is no particular connection between the amount of profits taken and the
premium account*

The amount of possible loss that might be realised

is not limited to the premium account.

It is regarded as sound practice

to set up such reserves when funds are available and to maintain them at
a point adequate for tho contingency*

That point obviously is a variant

and requires constant consideration*
The third alternative, i*e., the use of profits on sales of
securities to write down the book value of the System Account, would




Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED

j

Authority £ .6 * 12358______

-9 '

make it necessary to distribute these profits among the Federal Re­
serve Banks on the basis of their current participations in the System
Account*

It would not be practicable to apply them on the basis of

average participations in the System Account since June 30* 193&# an<*
retain the present set-up of the pool account.
We should like to point out that the use of profits to write
off premiums would probably result soon in losing sight of the true
earnings on any given issue and of the true profit and loss on a sale.
We assume that if profits were used to write down book value, such
action would be arbitrary and not involve the writing up of securities
if losses are sustained.
In the event that consideration is given to partial revision,
it may again be mentioned that switches in the Account that result in a
profit from the sale, often write up the account,

In such transactions

the sale and purchase are prfcticmlly simultaneous-, and it may be argued
that the profit realized is not a true profit until the replacement se­
curity is sold, and therefore the profit on the sale should be used to
write down the cost of the replacement security*

However, if the se­

curities sold and purchased are not of the same general maturity, the
switch may appear in a different light,

The sale of ”rightsfl and their

replacement with other securities represents perhaps the clearest case
arguing for application of the profit on the sale to reduce the cost
of the replacement security because the profit results primarily from
the exchange value of "rights” and because the replacement securities




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority £ .6 * 12358

•10*

purchased in the open market would produce a relatively lower yield
than if the "rights” had been exercised*
Should it be decided to reduce book value and charge off all
or a large part of the present premium account, the amount to be charged
off by each Federal Reserve Bank, in the absence of instructions to the
contrary, would be applied on the basis of its current participation in
the System Account in accordance with the present method of apportioning
accrued interest, premium and discount*
Should it be decided to allocate profits realized on sales of
securities to contingency reserves until further notice or until the
amount of such reserves bore some certain relation to the System
Account, such profits should be taken into the books of the several
banks on the basis of the present formula for distributing profits.
Had profits on sales of United States Government securities
been used during recent years to write down book value of the portfolio
or to establish valuation reserves, there would have been deficits in
net earnings of the Federal Reserve Banks, after dividends, in 1935*
1936, and 1938#

Quarterly allocations of securities among Federal Reserve Banks.
The procedure now followed in allocating participations in the
System Account among the Federal Reserve Banks provides, first, for
allocating a sufficient amount of securities to each Federal Reserve
Bank to cover its expenses not taken care of by other earnings, and,
second, to allocate the remaining securities in the System Account



Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

" d e c l a s s if ie d

"

Authority £.»Q»

- 11-

among the Federal Reserve Banks on the basis of their dividend re­
quirements,

The relationship between the expenses of individual

Federal Reserve Banks and total expenses of the System is quite different
from the relationship between dividend payments by individual Federal
Reserve Banks and total dividend payments by the System,

Since profits

on sales of securities are now taken into earnings and thus reduce the
amount of securities needed by the Federal Reserve banks to produce
sufficient income to cover expenses, it is apparent that as profits
increase, the amount of securities allocated to the Federal Reserve
Banks to cover their expenses decreases, and the amount of securi­
ties allocated to the Federal Reserve Banks on the basis of dividend
requirements increases*

%xen these profits are substantial there is a

substantial fluctuation in participations in the System Account on
quarterly reallocation dates.

These fluctuations could be materially

reduced if realized profits were not taken into account in making
allocations of securities among the Federal Reserve Banks.

There would

also be considerable merit in distributing securities not needed to
cover expenses and dividends on the basis of each Bank* s average partici­
pation in the System Account as, during periods when tho bulk of the
portfolios of the Federal Reserve Banks is made up of Government se­
curities, losses, if any, which the Federal Reserve Banks sustain, would
result principally from depreciation in market value of Government se­
curities*

This is tho basis on which profits on sales of securities in

the System Account are now distributed among the Federal Reserve Banks.



Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D ECLA SSIFIED
Authority £ . 0 * 1235*8

-

12 -

If this procedure were adopted, the quarterly reallocation would he
as fellows.*

fl') allocate sufficient securities to each Bank to cover

expenses not covered by accrued earnings on Government securities and
estimated earnings from other sources, (2) allocate a sufficient amount
of additional securities to each Bank to cover dividend requirements,
and (3) allocate any remaining securities among the Banks on the basic
of average daily participations in the.System Account since June 30,

193&*

Vihen estimated earnings equal or exceed estimated expenses and

dividends, steps 1 and 2, indicated above, could be combined thus
simplifying the allocation procedure.
If the Federal Open Market Committee desires, we shall be
prepared to make recommendation on points discussed above.




K. G, Rouse
E* L* Smead

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives




D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority E..O* 1235%

NOTE:
With respect to the last paragraph of the
attached memo rand-urn, my recommendations would, in
general, be as follows:
1.

Weekly press statements.

Recommend no change, but see no particular
objection to showing net premium as a separate item.
2.

Treatment of profits.

Recommend no change. Use of profits to
write down premium would increase current earnings and
thus give an exaggerated impression as to real earnings
on System Account and would make it impossible to determine
real earnings or real profits from the published statements.
3.

Allocations of securities in System Account.

Recommend that securities be distributed
as follows: (l) Allocate sufficient securities to each
bank to cover expenses not covered by accrued earnings on
Government securities and estimated earnings from other
sources, (2) Allocate a sufficient amount of securities
to each bank to cover dividend requirements, and (3)
allocate any remaining securities among the banks on the
basis of average daily participations in the System Account
since June 30, 1936.

E. L. Smead

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D ECLA SSIFIED
r-

If

Authority

1235B

t h i s p r o c e d u re w e re a d o p te d , t h e q u a r t e r l y r o a l l o c a t i o n w ou ld be

as f o l l o w s ;

fl)

a llo c a te

s u f f ic ie n t s e c u r it ie s to

oach Bank t o c o v e r

exp en ses n o t c o v e r e d by a c c ru e d e a r n in g s on Government s e c u r i t i e s and
e s t i m a t e d warnings from o t h e r s o u r c e s ,
o f a d d itio n a l s e c u r itie s

(' 2 ) a l l o c a t e a s u f f i c i e n t amount

to each Bank t o c o v e r d i v id e n d r e q u ir e m e n t s ,

and f 3 ) a l l o c a t e any r e m a in in g s e c u r i t i e s among th e Banks on th e b a s i c
o f average d a ily p a r t ic ip a t io n s
19-56,

ffhen e s t im a t e d e a r n in g s

d ivid en d s,

i n th e System Accou n t s i n c e June 7) Q,
e q u a l o r e x c e e d e s t i m a t e d exp enses and

s te p s 1 and 2 , i n d i c a t e d a b o v e ,

c o u ld be combined thus

s i m p l i f y i n g th e a l l o c a t i o n p r o c e d u r e .
If

t h e F e d e r a l Open M arket Committee d e s i r e s , we s h a l l be

p r e p a r e d t o make recomniend&tion on p o i n t s d is c u s s e d a b o v e .




R e p ro d u c e d from the U n cla ssified

I D ecla ssified

H o ld in g s of the N a tio n a l A rc h iv e s

[“ “

DECLASSIFIED

Authority E..Q* \235S

Hr* M*
“f&wi
F*i|«#«fc| tm m rm Wnmk *f Y*ir
¥#if
W&nt
&mt* Mr* law*#*
m

fl**## ,1*
l§ri«4«£i

wi

U k*

«&l<Hwfc&ttt« #f ftwrnnmmb t i w i l l i i
Wm&m%

m.

mmwmk

m&

%%#& m

Tb« #%* Susiii

th# 8$m%m -&$m

1*

m . i&m htmUm mt

JN$ewt*

l»

*##srtl&$#§ *sr*
mmrnfaygB £ m m xy through

tar

m S&&* %#*§• «*»
'Is ■frmtimm.




m, mm
$*»#*

I* 3W S m d ,
farfcirgtti* #f' %mk

R e p r o d u c e d fro m the U n c la s s ifie d




I D ecla ssifie d

H o ld in g s of the N a tio n a l A rc h iv e s

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

12.^5%

;‘D IN FILES SECTION

SEP 2 6 1940

dr oRii'H'' itchp l w §m

t#f timmu

-iD^sy*.Vwi*

m$mum#

addinc l i p ,000
M t i & p ft# M » | *# ter*#lloo«tionA bhl*
•

#*M»

'1HI

JWSI

S

i

B *£

«r
MrigsHi ii$ INmf

by twiijlwti .fin Mr*

pi^$ *n4 iwwii&.j,
fl plu*
%** £#r w m tt.vt
<*«$&«& *a
pu

X<rtu«Ll r<fc%# V # i *OOU5UU2.

O mDE KTIA L
R1ALL0GATXOI OF GOVKKWJ'UT SECURITIES IH SYSTEfc OPIH MARKET ACCOUMT OB ©CIOBM 1# 19b0

cn
CD

QJ-

CL

Systo®

Ul

P
g

- %poaaoa
j 1* Batlaatad atirraiit exponsas, 1939
1
B -Earnings
1* Estimated aurront oarnings, 19b0
( sotclusive o f earnings on Govts*)
2* latlaatad earnings on Oorts* to
Saptaabar 30
3* Bat p ro fits cm Oorts* to Sept* 26
iw

Total

C* Estimated dlrideads, 19^0

28*897

2.127

7.297

1,1*20

(f)

26e

31#955
3.005

2.3U*
219

9.667
a

5M 99 2,602
8,210 960

P. Mt q m i o f A -l plus C w ar B-l*
E« Allocation required fan teals of 1*72353^
earnings rata on Gorts.) to proride
earnings 0©tober~Dee«»ber equal to 0

(i n thousands o f d o llars)
Phila- Clara*
Boston Tork
Ipynl

7lt9

172.1illi

85

87

10,821
5.065
-<i 59

19, 566- 105,658

2.511

2.882

Riohmmd

|Atlanta Chicago

1.717

lGk
200
97
2.568 3,266 1,616
2^2
398
157
3.020 3.668 1.870
8l (l
71f)
518
165
35
55

8.057

12.661

57.982

231.627

87.583

1. 21.3

.3.572

55

218

1.272
126

3JJi2

14 i 55

3.992

279
67

15J«25

332

St*

Klim*

1.518

26
ljt5 8
156

1.620
829 2)i8
205 U.6

li7.189

Kansas

Louis
97l

26

1.751

Dallas

1, 21)3

172

39

l^i9 2
1U7

1.230
115

1,069

1.811

1.38L

177

26ti

« (7

82

181*

106

9t«9

33.608 18,876

1*2.555

3lj00

Pranoisoo
2.U52

152
2,< l»l
*55

3. 0ti6
67a
78

17.955

F• Allooatlon of reneinder of System
holdings ( |2 #J;3% 600,000 less
1172*1*5? ,000) on baaia of C

2, 261,186 l* .2 3 k

6* Total allocation of $oTts*fl plus F)

2.^53.500 175,800 738,500 30fi,706

alii ,388 125.565

76.SI13 227,220 66. 50k !t8,7li9 72.710 68,028 185,081
92,266 27W 1O9 101,912 67.625 115.065 93. 1i28 205.056

B. Present allocations

2J453.600 117.588 7W».996 195.007

2ii9.572 121.99li

89,290 258,319 112,870 71.727 115.198

9l».972 20^,067

♦2,976 ♦16,090 -10,958 -Jl.102

-2 ,5 U j

I* Chango In allocations




_

-5.788

66 9

8Ut,158 W . L

61*96♦11.699

- ,

*5(26li

♦3.571

-133

-1.031

R e p r o d u c e d from fh e U n c la s s ifie d / D e c la s s ifie d H o ld in g s o f th e N a tio n a l A rc h iv e s

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

A.%

o f tiik*

12.^58

Ops* lfericart CtiBLltrto** lji

■h1rnJt»n tax ttarok 30 m m L May 26 # 1 9 ^ # # # HI#1
# t
nr< w t

» f « r th *

Iferkat i n m r t

1

uk4 tha i m i m l ini

1f

M «u r 1

%

rtu^T'
l a ■$&* B i i t ■■ C m

i r » < i < 1 i n fa llflw * # l a aoaM M 'tiaa v l t k

th* Jtoaovrt # ## Bak* a in — I ta th* r*d*ral #(*## Martel Co m k 1% W « lEffft
%• l b * r r »«1 d— ^< « f tb a f » 6 f a l T T » i » r n l M k j
rh** — at * f t k * m

r l«

a*a<nart i a * I***# # *# *# # tfaat

v »u l4

la a la d * a
b * a d a jt**!

far SB#
## W » y#i#i|#y» itn# *b#s&4 fc# ^4Siiwi*
,
Hr-

m

^

iitafc

tA ^ra a ra tfcra* Mula auavfeLiaM 1w> ba

Ta i * i b m w >
|('l
# |) IfuHik AjwrftA lM lt«<i "tt>
'P1^ t<
W-*>W- -WW

a a a u r lt ia a^ wmtadSfP: trr

‘th* fa A a r a i S a a a rra Bank* ba #fe#tiii la tha waaJdy praac • ,W 1ja*#frt, (2 )

hAmk% ik#«i# Ini Hi# A|jif##iili#ii %$ p * M k $ m M m
(J )

««i

rtwruld %i»aira 1b# ■ */ aliaj»^a l a IS # p f a a ^ y r a untfac #&lah p»**ti 1 « lya

t i« i

in tK * 9rataai A.aao*imt a ra Hit# ■ 11 i — t i l m m u idhs F a d *ra l j i n r i i

BaakaT

9 / i^ t >



R e p ro d u c e d fro m the U n cla ssified

I D e cla ssifie d

H o ld in g s of the N a tio n a l A rc h iv e s

F

DECLASSIFIED
Authority E ..O - 12-35^5

Amoimts at whloh securities are shoum ia published oandIt Ion rtateaassxts .
th® Federal Eeaerve Aot# section 11# paragraph 2 (a ), provide®*
*fhe Board o f Gorernors o f tha N « f H
and empoweredt

Re—rva Systs* sh all fee authorised

To srramine a t its diaeretion tha aooow ta, books and

a ffa ir s o f oaoh Fadaral reserve bank and o f each tm tbr bank and te re­
quire suoh statements andreporta as tt nay daen neoessary.

Tho said

board sh a ll publish onoe eaoh week a statensnt showing tha condition of
aaoh Fadaral raaarrs bank and a ooneolidated statsmant fo r a l l Fadaral
reserve banks.

3uoh statsosute sh all Show in d a ta il tha assat* and l i a -

b i lit is s o f tha Fadaral reserve banka* single and ooutoined, and ahall
furnish f u ll information regarding. tha oharaoter o f tha aonay hald aa
reserve .and tha aaomit* nature and’ w aturities o f tha paper and other in rastaaaxits oaaad or held by Federal reaerve banks."
It ia the present practice to show Oovewossnt securities in the
stat—snt at par and to include preniuei

m

securities purohased in "Other

Assets** and diaooxnt on seouritiea purchased in "other L ia b ilit ie s ".

Two

alternative nethod* bar® been suggested for showing the System’ s holdinga
■o f (Jovernasot seouritiea In the weakly Faderal Reserve Bank condition
stateosnt, aa follow s*

(1 )

show seouritiea at book value, i , e M at par

plus prosiiisa and le ss discount, and (2 ) show tha par value of the securi­
tie s aa at preesnt and show the aaoiaxt o f premium le ss dieoount aa a
separate asset item in the atatansot.




With reepeet to the ourrsnt Method, the following oosmsnts are

R e p r o d u c e d fr o m the U n c l a s s i fi e d / D e c l a s s i fi e d H o l d i n g s of the N a t i o n a l A r c h i v e s

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

12-35%

lft.1

J-t"*V

* 3 •

offered i

I t haa boon tho praotioo aiaoo aarly la the hiatory o f th *

Syoto* to ahow aoouritloa In pt£>llaho4 a t a t * * * «t a at thoir par walua9

A aohodulo

alao appwdod to 'tho waakly publication o f th * s t a t w e t

o t condition, «ho«ing at -pur valua tho Maturity distribution o f u. S*

Ggvarr— nt eocuritlaa.

Soouritloa In tho rtatoauct aro thown at par

*a lu * p rin c ip a lly , wo uadoratand, l a ordor to indloato a * o lo a rly aa

poaalblo any lnoroaao o r dooroaaa in th© Syataa aoootast* and to obvlato
any p o aaib ility o f tho jn & llo ’ a gaining tho inproaaioa that tfaaro has

boon a ehan^o l a tho B y ata^ a holding«#
ohaaga has talnwri plaoo.

on, -as a aattor o f fao t, no

Par Taluo la uaod l a tho M aturity aohodulo

for tho aaaa roaaon and also to iadloato aa oloarly aa poaalblo l a '*iat
Maturity oatogorloa ohaagoa ooour.

Chaagoa la aoourity holdiaea aa

diaoloaod by tho atatowottt aro llk o ly to bo intorprotod by tho pt& llo aa
roflootlag purobaaoa and aaloa.

Utodor tho proaont arran^aoont a l l pur-

ohaaoa and aaloa, oxoopt thoaa that roproaoxt awitohoa w lth la a gliract

Maturity group, aro roflootod la tho atatam nt*

Shlfta o f equal aaeuata

w lth la a Klvwn Maturity grouping would not bo o la rifio d by either ©f
tha alternative nothoda«
With roapoot to tho flr a t alternative aothod, i , o (| that ao-

ourltioa bo ^*oott a t book ^raluo, roportod holding a would fluctuate aa a
roault o f the follow ing, aa w a ll aa through purehaaoe, aalea aad a h lfta «
(1 ) aaeortixation o f premim, whloh would reduo© book value, (2) aoounula*

5

tlo a o f ila o o u n t, whloh would laoroaao book v alu e, aad ( ) valu ation r o aervea aad charge-off» .




I f 7Jnltod Statoa Gorernaaot securities war*

R e p r o d u c e d from th e U n c la s s ifie d

I D ecla ssified

H o ld in g s of th e N a tio n a l A rc h iv e s

'd e c l a s s i f i e d
Authority £ -.0 - 1235^$

m

*

whom, among assets ia press statiewnfrs at book rn lm , they mould normally
be iihocn likew ise la the maturity c la ssific a tio n , but i f thought desirable
they oould continue to be tfiaein In tho Maturity c la ssific a tio n At par
value*
With respect to tho second suggestion, It would be « simple
wetter to ehow "Hot p m i a i on U. S« Seeurities* ms *n asset item, say,
following "Total b i lls end *eo\xrltiesn •

Opinion has been expressed that

minor ohanges la book value brought about by tao rtlsaticn o f prcndtsa,
accumulation of discount, sh ifts within maturity categories sad applica­
tion o f reserves aad oharge-offs, should be sheen o le a rly .

It has a lso

been suggested that i f public attention were called to suoh changes by
Inclusion o f an i t s * la the published stateswat, the public might get aa
Impression o f a change la System holdings *h*a a© re a l shaage lias occurred
Ro accounting d iffic u lt ie s would be involved la showing United
states Government securities la the weekly press statements ia either o f
the above alternative ways, aad neither would involve any m aterial changes
ia the accounting procedure a m followed.
What rfiould be the disposition o f p ro fits on sales o f se c u ritie s?
Present Prooedure
In accordance with the plaas approved by the Federal Open Market
Committee on lloveriber 30, 1937# e ffect I t s January 1, 193®# p ro fits on
sales of Baited States Government seeurities have been distributed amoag
the Federal Reserve Beaks ia proportion to th eir average d a ily holding#




R e p r o d u c e d from the U n cla s sifie d

I D ecla ssified

H o ld in g s of the N a tio n a l A rc h iv e s

.

„

D e c l a s s if ie d

Authority

12/35%

m

In th* Syston Aooottttt *inoo Juno 30, 1936, and aro now troatod aa an

addition to ourront a rt earning* and u*od to oovwr oaqpMoso* or dividend* #
o r a r * tra n *f# rr»d to ot*rplia*# o r to

fo r eontingoneios through

•urplu*, d*p*ndln£ upcn th* situation at oaoh Fodoral F ***rr* Bank.
»*a*0tt* fo r Pr*—nt Procedurw

nr<* 192U to 1929# lAolu«lva, p ro fit* w *r* distributed d aily
Oft tho

holding ra tio .

T r m 1930 to 1936, in o lu *iro , tboy nor* hold by

tho Sow York Ro*orwo Bank in a suspons* aooount and distributed a t tlso
ond o f oaoh yoar on ra tio * ba*od on d a ily aworago holding* la tho Aooount
fo r tho
on

la s t 12 nonth* proooding,

In 1937 p ro fit* woro d irtrib u t*d d aily

ra tio * ba*od on average d aily holding* in th * looo\*at fo r tho la s t

tw olr* south* prooodlng.

Sinoo January 1, 193®# * * o \itlin *d in tho imbo-

randun on aooounting proooduro fo r handing transaction* in th * §y*t**i
Op*n Martcot Aooount adoptod beginning January 1, 1938* p r o fit * har* boon
d i*trib u t*d d a ily on ra tio * ba**d on tho awora^o d a lly holding* in tho
M o mmto sine* Jvam 30# 1936.
n early to

Thi* relating o f p ro fit# and lo**o« aero

tho porlod o w vfcioh *o o i*ritio * a r* hold by X«a&gth4tting tho

poriod f u r whioh tho a w rago h oldin g* aro figured i s di*tribufcing p ro fit# ,
iargoiy rm o fo * xn* apprononaian xaat a oazuc m gnx, in.

tm

or

*aorg*noy, fin d i t nooooaary to tako o r*r from othar bank* a substantial
bleok o f Oo^onoBMit* on which, w ithin a short p erio d , i t nigfet sustain
soriou* lo * * , fo r tho loas, i f any, would bo distributed in aooordsnoo
with th * bunk** holding* of ooouritio* o r*r an oactondod period rath or than




R e p r o d u c e d fro m fh e U n c la s s ifie d / D e c la s s ifie d H o ld in g s o f th e N a tio n a l A r c h iv e s

DECLASSIFIED
A uthority £ . . £)» 12/^5%

m

fo r any short

m

period.

A Change

has bosn suggested in our accounting prooedure with

respect t o th * treetaasnt o f p ro fits realised on tales o f se c u ritie s*
Th# principal reasons advanced th erefor, aro that during th# generally
risin g aark#t o f th# pact f#w y ears, p rin cip ally through switches,
(1 ) the
have

book y/mlm o f the Aooount has be*n w ritten up, and (2 ) p ro fits

been treated in a. wanner not in accord with th * practice which

the System reeensmdS to wmkwr bank*.

The r i m ha* been expressed

that the System's "Reserves fo r Contingencies* should be inoroase* a t
le a st

to the point that they c$wal tho net prsmius an 'secu rities in

the Aooount, and that the w riting up o f the Aooount by snitches ahould
be

minimised by the application e f p ro fit* so realised to the reduction

o f the beck

value of the replacement secu rities#

Reserves fo r contingencies sow held by the Federal Reserve
Banks as a whole amount
premium

to $$kg687,01h» * s ocsqpared w ith $38,131^196 of

carried in the System Aooount as of Septssfeor Ih$ 19lj0.

t o t a l ocntiagsot reserves, $31#l*81,9l|6

Of the

wer# set up out o f current net

earnings and $3,li£*068 oat o f surplus. Reserves fo r oonting*noie* vary
from s lig h tly over 57 per cent o f the pr*m ii*i aoooiaat at Boston to more
than 100 per cent o f the premium account at four o f the banks.
Realised p ro fits might be used a s indicated in one o f tho
following altern ative suggestion* as to our accounting procedure*




R e p r o d u c e d from the U n cla s sifie d

I D ecla ssified

H o ld in g s o f the N a tio nal A rc h iv e s

„
C

d e c l a s s if ie d

Authority L..O - 1 2 3 5 ?

m- *J m

JLltornati^o SMEgostloas fo r Appointing of Soourlty P ro fits
P ro fit* m

00X00 « f

soouritios oould bo *

It

T rw if«rr# d to Kooortos fo r Cootlngsnoiosj

2*

Sot maid* a* a n du atloa rosorvs and doduotod ia th#
balanoo A e t t from proodm on U. 8, soouritiosj

5*

UMd t o w rit* down th# book **lu o Of tho Syoto* Aooo\*nt.

P ro fit* *ay bo roalisod not only on outright sal os of soouritio s but also on svitohos, i * o * # tho siaaultanoous sals o f oao soourlty
»yy4 purohaso of n lik o par' valuo o f anothsr.

Utodor our prosoot praotioo,

uM b soouritios oarriod on tho books at anortisod prioo o f, say, 101

aro sold at a p r o fit o f 2 point* aad othor soouritios aro bought a t 103#
p ro fits on soouritios sold aro lnoroasod and tho not book valuo o f tho
p o rtfolio it lnoroasod by a lik o aaouot.

Switohoo in tho aooow t sdg&t

loa*r» tho mot book m lu o o f tho aooouo* unchsngod and a t tho m m tlao
roduoo ourrsnt earnings.

Tho ad v isa b ility o f th is so -o all«d w ritin*-up

o f tho p o rtfo lio ao a rosult o f salss aad jaarohaoo* mar bo quostionod,
but i f p ro fit# on svitohoo o r outright solos of soouritios, or both, aro
to bo "Hood to o rito down tho book vmluo o f tho Bysto* Aooovsrt thoy should,

in our opinion, continue to bo shorn as profit s on saloo o f soouritios
In p*toli#ied statonsaots of sam lngs and oxponsos of' tho Podoral Fosorvo

Banks.
With roopoot to tho f ir s t altoraativo , tho transfor o f p ro fits
on sales o f soou ritioo to rooorrso fo r oontingsnoloo would rogularlso




R e p r o d u c e d from the U n cla s sifie d / D e c la s s ifie d H o ld in g s o f th e N a tio n a l A rc h iv e s

DECLASSIFIED
Authority E .O * 12.35%

* 8 *

* praotieo whloh haa m lotod to * *\£>st**itial oxtont for a nsttfcor o f
years*

Prior to 1957# tn m «f*r* to rooortoo for oootine*nei*s woro oharc*d

against th* otarrottt ywar's *arnlngs«
«har£*4 to surplu*,

$1M l that d*to, th*y bar* bosn

R ***rr** fo r c o n t in u a l* * aro iaoludod in th* boiftsioo

Shoot o f th* Ro*orv» Bazik* taocg "Oth*r Capital Aoeounta" *

Th*y aro not

ahovn 09 * roduotian in th* carrying valu* of a ss*ts,

With rospoot to tho tooood a lto rn a tiv *, that io t that p ro fit*
on aaloo of s **u riti*s bo * * t asldo a* * valuation rosorvo and d*duotod
in tlko bal ano* sh**t fr*a& tho ir o d w a**ouat, i t n»y bo p o in ts out that
i f th is woro 4mm and a o ub*t*ntial portion of our p r***n t *ootia^*at r * o*r**s woro also allocated fo r th at purpofto, th* tia * would om m whoa tho
valuation r***rv * would oqual th * m l m of th * pr*Miu* aooouxt.

In *u*h

•as* tit* *»© rti»atico of p t m Im would not hav* to bo diooontinuod, but
tho oo»feta*d r* *u lt of tho valuation rooorv* *nd tru * amortisation o#
proaiu* would roduoo, In o ffo o t, tho book valu* of th * Syotoa Aooount bolow par valu**

tho lo tto r oour** would not. bo in o o n *i*t*n t, a* thoro is

'no p articular o«m>*otien botwoon tho snowt o f p ro fit* takon and tho- p r*a lw

aoooomt.

Th* awtixii* o f possible lo t* that night b* roallsod Is not l i a i t *

od to tho 'prflBdUR acoount.

I t is rognrdod at sowkd fraotlo o to sot up

suoh r**«rv*« wh<m fmtds aro a m ila b l* and to Maintain thaaa at a point
adoquato fo r tho ocsKtlnc*tt*y# that point obviously is o variant sad ro*
qulr*s ooastaafc consideration.
Th* th ird altornativo, i» o « , tho uoo of p ro fit* on saloo o f ooourit i* s to w rit* doaa th* book valu* o f th* Syston Aooount, would wmkm i t




R e p r o d u c e d f r o m th e U n c l a s s i f i e d

I D ecla ssified

H o ld in g s o f the N a tio nal A rc h iv e s

f~~~~~ DECLASSIFIED
'

Authority

1235%

* 9 -

nooossary to distribu te these p ro fit* among the fed eral HeSmnrm Bank* o®
the baaia of th eir currant partioipationa in tho System Account .

It

would lioi be practicable to apply thaw m the baala o f average participa­
tion* in tho Syaten Account einoe Jun* J0# 1936, and retain tho present
eet-up o f tho pool aooount*
Wo should lik e to point out that tho uoo o f p ro fits to w rit# o ff
pfOttttins would probably resu lt soon in lealn g a i ^ t o f the tru e earalnga
on any given laeue aad of tho true p ro fit and loas m a aalo.

ft# aastaae

that i f p ro fit* w o used to w rit# dawn book value, oooh action would bo
arb itrary and aot involve tho w riting up o f aoouritioa i f loaaoa aro
austalned*

In tho evant that consideration ia given to p a rtia l reviaion,
i t nay again

bo mentioned th at eadtehas in th® Aooount that re su lt in a

p ro fit froai tho aalo, often w rito up tho aoeo\srt*
tha

In such tranaactione

o ali and purehaao aro p ra c tic a lly T^F"*l t anamT y

th at tho

it

'nay bo argued

p ro fit roalisod ia not a tm e p r o fit u n til tha roplaooawnt eeourity

la aold, and thoroforo tho p ro fit on tho aalo ahould bo used to w rito down
tha cost o f tha

replan waait aecurity. Bowever, i f tho sse u ritic e aold and

purchased aro not of tho aana general M aturity, tho awltoh nay appoar in a
difforont lig h t*

Tho aalo o f ^righ ta* and. th o ir roplaoonont with othor

aoouritioa roproaonta porhapa tha oloaroat oaao arguing fo r ap p lication
o f tha

p ro fit on tho aalo to roduoo tho coat o f tho replaeensttt secu rity

booauao tho p ro fit re m its p rin a rlly from tha whangs value of "righte"
and because the replaosnaBt




aoouritioa purchased in tho span narkct would

R e p r o d u c e d fro m th e U n c la s s ifie d

I D ecla ssified

H o ld in g s of the N a tio nal A rc h iv e s

DECLASSIFIED
j A uthority £ ..£ )• 12 -^5%

• 10 •

produco a r e la t iv e ly lower y ie ld than I f th# ’’rig h t*" had bees exercised,

. Should I t be doeldod te roduo* book value and charge o f f a l l
or a largo part o f th* present prtmiua account, the anottst to be charged

o ff by eaoh Fedoral Eeoorvs Bank, in tho abssnoe ©f in struction s to the
contrary, would bo applied on tho baolo o f it s current participation in
th* Syetsn Aooount in accordance with the proooBt nsthod o f apportioning
aoorued i a U r v f t , premim *nd 41*OOtmt«

Should It bo dcoidod to allocate p r o fit * realised on sale* o f
se c u ritie s to contingency reserves u ntil further n o tie* or u n til tho

aaount o f snoh ro s e n e s bor* sea* certain relation to tho Systen Aooomzt,
such p ro fits would be taken Into tho book* o f tho coronal banks on tho
basis o f the prcccnt forvula fo r distributing p ro fit*.
Sad p ro fits on s a l os o f United State* Goremnent **o u rltl**
boon need during recent years to w rite dona book m in e o f tho p o rtfolio

or to e sta b lish valuation rceorvca, there would have bosn d e fic it* in
not earnings o f th* Fodoral Resort* Banka, a fte r dividends. In 1935, 1936,

ond 1936♦

Quarterly allooatloa* of soourltlcs onong r*d *ra l Reeonrs Bank*.
Tho prooedur* now followed in allocating participations in the
System Aooount aasng -the fe d e ra l Re**rv* Banks proride*, f i r s t , fo r allocat*

lng a s u ffic ie n t araount o f *eouritios to sash Federal Reeervc Bank to cover
Its expenses not taken care o f by other earnings, and, seeend, to alleeate
the renalnlng se c u ritie s in tho Systsn Aooount sneog the Federal Seserws
on the




1* of tfeeir dividend requlreancnt* •

The re la tio n sh ip

mmmmsmmmmtw*
R e p r o d u c e d fro m the U n c la s s ifie d

I D ecla ssifie d

H o ld in g s of the N a tio n a l A rc h iv e s

j“

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

* u

12/^5%

•

bsteesn tho expenses o f In dlrldual Federal Reeerre Banks and to ta l expenses
o f th* fiysten it quit# differen t fr o * th* relationship between diridsnd
paynents by indiTidm l Federal K tw rvt Sonks and to ta l dividend payssnts
by th* S y sts^
earnlncs

61*o* p ro fit* on s a ls * o f soouritios are m m taken Into
rodnoo th* i b m b I' o f * * * u r lt l* * needed by the Federal R*-

* *r r* bonk* to prodneo so ffle lsB t Inset* to oerer expenses, i t i s apparent
that &• p ro fits Increase, th* a sro it o f eeeurlties alloeeted to tho Federal
S o so m Bonk* to ««T *r th o lr expenees deereases, and th* aaoiant o f securi­
t ie s allocated to tho Federal Reserve Bonks an tho basis o f dividsnd ro f a l r n n t o inoreasee*

l&sn those p ro fits aro substantial th *r* is * sub­

stan tial fluctuation in participations in th* Systen Aooount on quarterly
reellooation dates.

Theee fluctuations eould bo n a to rla lly reduced i f

United States soouritios In Systen Aooount not needed to corer expense
sad diridsnd rogu lr— its were allocated a*gng tho Federal Reserve Banks
on tho basis of th e ir a*ora«e dally participation in the Aooount •inoe
Jxme

30#

1936*

this is tho basis on uhieh p ro fits on sales o f soouritios

in tho Syotsu Account are now distributed mmmg tho Federal ke*erre Banks *
During periods idvea tho bulk of tho p o rtfo lio o f tho Federal toserwt Banks
is nade tip o f Oercransnt seouritiec, losses, i f any* uhleh the Federal Res e m Banks sustain would resu lt prin oipally freia depreciation In narkot
tnloo o f Qo'rcm— nt soouritios and, oonsequently# there iwuld appear to ho
considerable n orlt in distribu tin g seourities not needed to oorer expense
and dividend rcgMlrnccntc on tho basis of oaoh bank's average participation
in *fco System Aooount,




I f th is were done, an additional th ird stop would

R e p ro d u c e d from the U ncla ssified

I D ecla ssified

H o ld in g s of the N a tio n a l A rc h iv e s

f

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

•

12.^5%

12 m

b# lmrolv#4 im th# qm rb*rly roa lloca tion #£ th# SjwUm Aooowrt. 2b#
roallooation would bo a# follow# i

(1)

allooato ouffioiont #oow lti## to

oaoh B#mk to ©off#** iT]i#iT#i not oororod by >oon»d earnings on Hinoi iiii#nt
•#o u rlti### ##tlm#t#d #arnimg# froa ott*#r •oiaro##, *m dprofit»t (2) allooat#
#

MMWtt o f a d d iti« a l ••c u r iti** to #Mh Bank to oor#r diridoad

roqtiironoata, #md (3) allooat# any r — Inliy^ a#o\irltioa aawwg th# Banks <m
tho baala o f « m ft(# d aily p articipation* Im th# Syrfcoea Aooount alnoo
Jin# 30* 1936.

I f th# Fodoral Opon Market Coomitt## d #«ir#a, wo »h a ll b# pr#~
parod to aak# r#oo*aemdati«ie with roapoot to th# point# dl#ou###d ab#v«.




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D ECLA SSIFIED
Authority

3 i-3

Fe

d e r a l
of

R
N

e s e r v e
e w

Y

B

a n k

o r k

September <4, 194-0

Dear Mr. Smead:
Enclosed is a new draft of our pending joint report to the
Federal Open Market Committee on the subject of allocation of securities
in System Open Market Account and the accounting procedure in connection
with it.

I had hoped to prepare a letter to go along with it, but there

was not an opportunity today and there will not be tomorrow.

Accordingly,

it seems better to let it go to you Bas isfl rather than to hold it up for
comment or farther editing.
In accordance with our recent telephone conversation, I suggest
that after you have had a chance to check the report, you spend a day
here so that we may have whatever discussion is necessary as to the report
and our recommendations.
With kind regards, I am
Very truly yours,

Robert G. Rouse,
Vice President.

Mr. Edward L. Smead,
Chief, Division of Bank Operations,
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
Washington, D. C.




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
r

Authority f c .Q* 1 2 3 5 8

REVISED DRAFT OF MMORANDPM TO FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE

September

3, 1940•

At the meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee in Washington on
March 20, 194-0, ins were requested to study the present basis for the allocation
of securities in the System Open Market Account and the accounting procedure
followed in connection with the Account, to make a report to the Federal Open
Market Committee and to the Presidents of the Federal Reserve banks which
would include a statement of the various accounting procedures that might be
adopted for the System Account, and to be prepared to make recommendations as
to the procedure that should be followed.
As we see the problem, there are three main questions to be considered)
(1) how should United States Government securities owned by the Federal Reserve
banks be shown in the weekly press statement, (2 ) what should be the disposition
of profits on sales of securities, and (3 ) should there be any change in the
procedure under which participations in the System Account are now allocated
among the Federal Reserve banks?

Amounta at which securities are shown in published condition statements#
The Federal Reserve Act, section 11, paragraph 2 (a), provides*

*The

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall be authorised and empower­
ed!

To examine at its discretion the accounts, books and affairs of each Federal

reserve bank and of each member bank and to require such statements and reports
as it may deem necessary.

The said board shall publish once each week a state­

ment showing the condition of each Federal reserve bank and a consolidated state­
ment for all Federal reserve banks.

Such statements shall show in detail the

assets and liabilities of the Federal reserve banks, single and combined, and
shall furnish full information regarding the character of the money held as re­
serve and the amount, nature and maturities of the paper and other investment*
 owned or


held by Federal reserve banks*"

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings o f the National Archives

D ECLA SSIFIED
Authority

- 2 -

1235B

9/3/40.

It Is the present practice to show Government securities In the state*
meat at par and to Include premium on securities purchased in "Other Assets11 and
discount on securities purchased in

"Other Liabilities*. Two alternative methods

have been suggested for showing the Systems holdings of Government securities in
the weekly Federal Reserve bank condition statement, as followsi

(l) show se­

curities «t book value, i#e,, at par plus premium and less discount, and (2 ) show
the par value of the securities as at present and show the amount of premium less
discount as a separate asset item in the statement.
With respect to the current method, the following comments are offered*
It has been the practice since early in the history of the System to show securi­
ties in published statements at their par value,

A schedule is also appended to

the weekly publication of the statement of condition, showing at par value the
maturity distribution of 0* 8 . Government securities*

Securities in the state­

ment are shown at par value principally, we understand, ih order to indicate as
clearly as possible any increase or decrease in the System account, and to
obviate any possibility of the public1s gaining the impression that there has
been a change in the System*s holdings, when, as a matter of fact, no change has
taken place. Par value Is used in the maturity schedule for the same reason and
also to indicate as clearly as possible in what maturity categories changes occur*
Therefore, all. eweurity changes

tbs aeeeunt are indicated, with the exception

of Shifts of equal amounts within a given maturity grouping, wkieh would not be
clarified by either of the alternative methods.
the present method is well understood by the public and is simple in
operation.

It also appears to meet the requirements of the statute.

With respect to the first alternative method, i.e., that securities be
shown at book value, reported holdings would fluctuate as a result of the




Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings o f the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

\235B

- 3 -

9/3/40.

following, 00 well as through purchases, sales and shifts!

(l) amortisation of

premium, which would reduce book value, (2 ) accumulation of discount, which would
increase book value, and (3) valuation reserves and charge-offs.

If United

States Government securities were shown among assets in press statements at book
value, they would normally be shown likewise in the maturity classification, but
if thought desirable, they could continue to be shown in the maturity classifi­
cation at par value.
With respect to the second suggestion, it would be a simple matter to
show "Wet premium on. U. S. Securities11 as an asset item, say, following "Total
bills and securities* • Opinion has been expressed that minor changes in book
value brought about by amortisation of premium, accumulation of discount, shifts
within maturity categories and application of reserves and charge-off®, should
be shown clearly.

On tka oiker hma&j m xcfr ehwagas., if public attention wore

called to tfeeft by meost# qpf such a balance sheet item* carry tfee poggt M H &y of
* public impression of a change in System holdings when no real change has
occurred* a**4 in themselves do

ciar£#y

statement.

No accounting difficulties would be involved in showing United States
Government securities in the weekly press statements in either of tho above
alternative ways, and neither would involve any material changes in the account­
ing procedure now followed, although the present method is somewhat simpler to
handle.

What should be the d isp osition o f p ro fits on sa le s o f securities?

Present Procedure
In accordance with the plans approved by the Federal Open Market
Committee on November 30, 1937, effective January 1, 1938, profits on sales of
United States Government securities have been distributed among the Federal Re­
serve banka in proportion to their average dally holdings in the System Aecount




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

~

r

D E C L A S S IF IE D

Authority

- A -

12358

9/3A O .

since June 30, 1936^ and are now treated as an addition to current net earnings
and used to cover expenses or dividends, or are transferred to surplus, or to
reserves for contingencies through surplus, depending upon the situation at
each Federal Reserve bank*
Reasons for Present Procedure
J'rom 1924 to 1929, inclusive, profits were distributed daily on the
holding ratio*

From 1930 to 1936, inclusive, they were held by the New Xork

Reserve bank in a suspense account and distributed at the end of each year on
ratios based on daily average holdings in the Account for the last 12 months
preceding*

In 1937 profits were distributed daily on ratios based on average

daily holdings in the Account for the last twelve months preceding*

Since

January 1 , 1938 , as outlined in the memorandum on accounting procedure for
handling transactions in the System Open Market Account adopted beginning
January 1 , 1938, profit® have been distributed daily on ratios based on the
average daily holdings in the Account since June 30, 1936* on the theory that
under thi-a pl&n Reserve banks are less affected as to any profits or losses
by current readjustments i» the amount ef their holdings * this relating ef
profits and losses to the period over which securities are held by lengthening ,
the period over which the average holdings (profit and loss fatlb) are figured,
largely removes the apprehension that a bank might, in some time of emergency,
find it necessary to take over from other banks a substantial block of Govern­
ments on which, within a short period, it might sustain serious loss, for the
loss, if any, would be distributed in accordance with the bank1s holdings of
securities over an extended period rather than for any short period.
A change has been suggested in our accounting procedure with respect
to the treatment of profits realised on sales of securities and the principal




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

_

r

d e c l a s s if ie d

Authority

12353

- 5 -

9/3/40,

reasons advanced therefor, are that the System Account, during the generally
rising market of the past few ymmvm through switches, (1) has written up the
book value of the Account, and (2) has treated profits in & manner not In
accord with the practice which th. System reoo«m.nd» to *«ber b u * 8 . The
view haa been expressed that the System* s "Reserves for Contingencies* should
be increased at least to the point that they equal the net premium on securities
in the Account and that the writing up of the Account by switches should be
minimised by the application of profits so realized to the reduction of the
coat of the replacement securities on our bosks.
Reserves for contingencies now held by the Federal Reserve banks as
s whole amount to $

, as compared with |

in the System Account as of September
$

, 1940#

of premium carried

Of the total contingent reserves,

were set up out of current net earnings and $

surplus*

ftm System could us* $

out of

-ef contingent reserves set aside out

of earnings as a» offset to the premium carried on itr books*

si any time it

should determine that these reserves are in reality reserves for the contingen­
cies related to our securities rather than "capital accounts*• Such application
might be along the line indicated in #2 or #3 of the following alternative
suggestions as to our accounting procedure*
Alternative Suggestions for Accounting of Security Profits #
Profits on sales of securities could be 1.

Transferred to Reserves for Contingencies*

2 . Set aside as a valuation reserve and deducted in the
balance sheet from premium on U* S. securities in
the Item "Other Assets*!
3.




Used to write down the book value of the System Account.

Keproauced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives"

-----------------------------------

DECLASSIFIED
r

■.

Authority

- 6 -

*

12353

9/3/40.

P ro fits nay be realised not only on outright sales of securities but also

on switches, i.e., the simultaneous sale of one security and purchase of a lik e
par value of another.

Under our present practice, when securities carried oa

the books at amortised price of, say, 101 are sold at a profit of 2 points and
other securities are bought at 103 , profits on securities sold are Increased
and the xvkL book value of the portfolio la increased by a l£ke amount.
writinfH*P ooeM ebizsist of
* e a tfttft.

Thi«

ehaage 4*i net book value ttfc*h a Eaduc&Lat |n

the advisability of this so-called writing~up of the portfolio

M a result of atlch sales and purchases may be questioned, tfea two swErees of
p ro fits may be eeaeiderwc^ separately in studying th is problem

If profits on

switches or outright sales of securities, or both, sbevetd be used to write
down the book value of the System Account, in our opinion, they should coa~
tiaue to be shown as profits on sales of securities in published statements
of earnings and expenses of the Federal Reserve banks.
With respect to the first alternative, the transfer of profits oa
sales of securities to reserves for contingencies would regularise a practice
which has existed to a substantial extent for a number of years*

Prior to

1937, transfers to reserves for contingencies were charged against the current
year*a earnings. Since that date, they have been charged to surplus.

Reserves

for contingencies are included in the balance sheet of the Reserve banks among
"Other Capital Accounts*.
value of assets.

They are not shown as a reduction in the carrying

The current ptacn up to this tine has been regarded as sound

from an accounting standpoint, and is flexible in that it can meet changing
condition*,

The prtnptpal er£t£o£«*0 have bean, those stated above.

With respect to the second alternative, that is, that profits on
sales of securities be set aside as a valuation reserve and deducted in the




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority £..Q« 12.35B

9/3/40.

- 7 -

balance sheet from the pyeaen t

*®ti*sr hmwetB*, it may be pointed out that

if th is were done aad a su bstan tial portion of our present contingent reserves
were also allocated for that purpose, the time would come when the valuatioa
reserve would equal the value of the premium account,

la such case the amorti­

sation of premium would not have to be discontinued* but the combined result

of the valuation reserve and true amortisation of premium would reduce, in
effect, the book value of the System Account below par value*

the latter course

would not be inconsistent, as there is no particular connection between the
amount of profits taken and the premium account,

the amount of possible loss

that might be realised is not limited to the premium account*

It is regarded

as sound practice to set up such reserves -when funds are available and to main­

tain them at a point adequate fo r the contingency#

That point obviously is a

variant and requires constant consideration.
The third alternative, i.e,, the use of profits on sales of securi­
ties to write down the book value of the System Account, would make it
necessary to distribute these profits among the Federal Reserve banks m
basis of their current participations in the System Account*

the

It would not be

practicable to apply them on the basis of average participations in the System
Account since June 30, 1936;and retain the present set-up of the pool account.
We should like to point out that the arbitffwy W£ite**dom of book
would probably result soon in losing sight of the
©■£ any giverf
and
issue i* tesms- *£ a**3*r«at book v»£ae/of the true profit and loss on a sale.
We assume that if profits were used to write down book value, such action
would be arbitrary and not Involve the writing up of securities if losses are
sustained.
In the event that consideration is given to partial revision, it may
again be mentioned that switches in the Account that result in a profit fro*




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

_

r

D E C L A S S IF IE D

Authority £ .0 * 1235B

- 8 -

.
1
the sale, often write up the account.

j

9/3/40.

In such transactions the sale and purchase

are practically simultaneous, and it m y be argued that the profit realized
is not a true profit until the replacement security is sold, and therefore the
profit on the sale should be used to write down the cost of the replacement se­
curity.

However| if the securities sold and purchased are not of the same

general maturity, the switch may appear in a different light,

fhe sale of "rights*

and their replacement with other securities represents perhaps the clearest case
arguing for application of the profit on the sale to reduce the cost of the re­
placement security because the profit results primarily from the exchange value
of "rights* and because the replacement securities purchased in the open market
would product a relatively lower yitld than if the "rights* had been exercised*
Should it be decided to reduce book value and charge off all or a large
part of the present premium account, the amount to be charged off by each Federal
Reserve bank, in the absence of instructions to the contrary, would be applied
on the basis of its current participation in the System Account and not on the
ratios based on average daily participation in the Account since June 30, 1936
in order to avoid (l) changing the present method of treating the Account as a
pool account, and (2 ) changing the present method of apportioning of accrued
interest, premium and discount.
Should it be decided to allocate profits realised on sales of securi­
ties to contingency reserves until further notice or until the amount of such
reserves bore some certain relation to the System Account, such profits would be
taken into the books of the several banks on the basis of the present formula
for distributing profits.
Had profits on sales of United States Government securities been
used during recent years to write down book value of the portfolio or to




Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority

- 9 -

V23SB

9/3/4-0.

establish valuation reserves, there would have been deficits in net earnings of
the Federal Reserve banks, after dividends, in 1935, 1936 and 1938*
Quarterly allocations of securities among Federal Reserve banks#
The procedure now followed in allocating participations in the Systea
Account among the Federal Reserve banks provides, first* for allocating a sufficient
amount of securities to each Federal Reserve bank to cover its expenses not taken
care of by other earnings, and,second, to allocate the remaining securities in
the System Account among the Federal Reserve banks on the basis of their dividend
requirements.

The relationship between the expenses of Individual Federal Re­

serve banks and total expenses of the System is quite different from the
relationship between dividend payments by individual Federal Reserve banks and
total dividend payments by the System*

Since profits on sales of securities are

now taken into earnings and thus reduce the amount of securities needed by the
Federal Reserve banks to produce sufficient income to cover expenses, it is
apparent that as profits increase,the amount of securities allocated to the
Federal Reserve banks to cover their expenses decreases, and the amount of se­
curities allocated to the Federal Reserve banks on the basis of dividend require­
ments increases*

fhen these profits are substantial there is a substantial

fluctuation in participations in the System Account on quarterly reallocation
dates*

these fluctuations could be materially reduced if profits on sales of

securities were set aside as realised as a protection against future losses and
if our formula for allocating securities among the Federal Reserve banks were
expanded to embrace three steps instead of the present two.
be as follows1

these steps might

(l) allocate sufficient securities to each Federal Reserve bank

to cover expenses not taken care of by other earnings, (2 ) allocate to each




R e p r o d u c e d from the U n c la s s ifie d

I D ecla ssified

H o ld in g s o f the N atio nal A rch iv e s

DECLASSIFIED
cT

Authority £..0*

_________________

Federal

"\&mk *

m w m % of

% m i a n d

(3 ) illa&at# Hh» -«p|^toag s*duriti»i among 1fo* federal Reserve

bank* in proportion to 'ikeir #«%£!& *ad
Vould fratbar ndtwatU* th# «t*a

$#taX

expenses and dividends

would fee justified in

to cover 4t*i&*Ktd W**

tor Ufcr Sra^em
Id

w*ra ®0»b&tiit*t in i#

!%'•
if

*mti# 'in. y**r# M

earnings equal to or in

m

of

TWW&MWmtA* ■

la
n# have assumed that *xggr
could be

various idtamaiivt suggestions girea In tkli r«f#rt'
idal^t $ m night ad©$t would be t&*3#* i & M
^tajugh changing condition# and which would r«~

quire simplicity ef
If the y*d*r*X $$1 $ lariat $®a«i4tt*e &»«!#«## «§ shall be prapir*4
to

r»®#a»iaiditi®»i *lt3a r**f»©t to t&# points dis#u»«*<t above.

/

&*#* !»«#**




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

REC’D IN FILES SECTION
v
JU L 1 2 1940 ^

J'

Fe d e r a l R e s e r v e B a n k
jf




o f N e w Y o rk

July 1, 1940,

Dear Mr* Smead:
Receipt is acknowledged of your letter of June 28/
enclosing statement showing changes in allocations in System
Open Market Account as of July 1 on the basis of estimated
expenses and earnings of each Federal Reserve bank during
1940.
The statement is in agreement with the one which
we prepared on June 28 on the basis of figures received by
telephone from Mr. Van Fossen and which, with your approval,
was mailed to the Reserve banks on that day*
Yours faithfully,

Market Account.

Mr. £• L. Smead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations,
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System,
Washington, D. C.

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified H oldings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority

12358

v

Fe d e r a l R e s e r v e B a n k
of

N

e w

Yo

r k

June 28, 1940.

Dear Mr. Sinead:
In accordance with the figures received over the
telephone from Mr. Van Fossen this morning covering the
quarterly reallocation of securities in the System Open Market
Account, we have today sent to the Reserve banks a copy of the
computation showing the adjustments to be made in participa­
tions in the System Open Market Account on July 1, 1940, pur­
suant to the plan adopted at the meeting of the Federal Open
Market Committee on November 50, 1957.
Enclosed herewith is copy of the letter of trans­
mittal together with three copies of the computation, also copy
of the telegram which was sent to each of the Federal Reserve
banks today.
Yours faithfully,

Robert G. Rouse,
Manager, System Open
Market Account

Mr. E. L. Snead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations,
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System,
Washington, D. C.
Ends. (5)



R e p r o d u c e d fro m th e U n c la s s ifie d

I D e cla ssifie d

H o ld in g s o f the N a tio n a l A rc h iv e s

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

M1SC, 1 4 0 *

1A M

12*35%

8-39

FEDERAL RESERVE B A N K O F HEW YORK
S&ttlar Itfttftf sent to tho Proaidant of each Federal Reserve bank «xoapt Saw Yaifc,

Juna 28, 194.%

Daar Hr* Immgt

\
\

tm m&Q'X&mm with

of %od*$r# I enclos#

herewith oa*pttt*tion #f %hm \ ^ d $ a l ^ « K ^ to In® ttfcd* m
l$
\ \
J
\
1940, of tho participation#
banka %n tb«

S^atan

O pm

tfrk a i |»©f%f«li#* \ \

\ \

) Your « £*ltl»ikl3y*

Rob*rt

Bouaa,

i a i t a g # * * * fyniem Open

Merkot Account

Boaorabl© Roy A*
Fadaral $ta0# m Bank of Boston,
'Boston* Moas.




R e p r o d u c e d fro m th e U ncla ssified / D ecla ssified H o ld in g s of th e N a tio n a l A rc h iv e s

DECLASSIFIED
A uthority £..£>-

MIS C. 140 A

1Q M

0- 3S>

FED ERAL RESERVE

r

BANK OF NEW

SECURITIES DKPARTWfflT

YORK

- X i IKS

f l m m aend following telegraa to th* Preflidant of eaoh fa&tral S«mtp« bank
a# Indlcatad below j
tfnder th* pint im? raal&<SC«tt<® o f Government *ecuritie* adopted by
tha fa d a ra l Open Market Committee Hore»ber J0f

a readjustment o f p a rtiti-*

pation* in Government aa^uritiail held &» tha Syatem Account ia c&llad tv*
July 1 , X940#

The computations ifeowtng adjmatmanta to ba mada In partl#ij>at&®mii

of tha gavarfcl Fadaral Reeerve banka 1# baitig * a » i to a l l Raaorve bank* today#
ixicr
Thai*

indicate am

patio©.

fu ly l.«

ia yomr fa r t le i* .

decrease

fa afaftlX wire you on

d etailed antri©* to ba aad#

on that data*

Ina^reaa^

|

fmaaf
Sin^aJbf
#

Leach
Jr(fc3E^jywr
.Aa -Wa ^S' ^

Itartia
Payton

Hafll1,
G ilb ert
©iy




Deflreaae

711,000

Ri

Ablauts
Chicago
St. fe u i*
Jitesaapoli#
Kaaaaa $ ity
D allaa
fiut franc-!###

769.000
a»4flQ»o0o

959.000

*,919*000

RODSE

21,000

X#075*000

**<99*000
33«^flar«ooo
i tl f o #oo@

x9.M$»oee

CONFIDENTIAL

REALLOCATION OF GOVFRNVtEKT SECURITIES IN SYSTEM OPEN MARKET ACCOUNT ON JULY 1, 1940

System
A - Expenses
1. Estimated current expenses, 1940

(In thousands of dollars)
New
Phila­
Cleve­
delphia
Boston
_ York
land

Rich­
mond

Atlanta Chicago

St.
Louis

Minn­
eapolis

Kansas)
San
City it Dallas Francisco

28,569

2,111

7,283

2,285

2,869

1,679

1,221

3,261

1,529

973

1,697

1,231

2,430

1,477

72

261

229

104

105

70

218

20

29

171

39

159

21,372

1,543

6,451

1,730

2,183

1,087

884

2,321

969

638

993

818

1,755

1,555

113

451

131

154

81

67

172

70

49

76

60

131

24,404

1,728

7,163

2,090

2,441

1,273

1,021

2^711

1,059

716

1,240

917

2,045

4,165

383

120

195

428

406

200

550

470

257

4^7

314

385

477,851

43, 942

13,768

22,372

49,104

46,580

23,946

63,102

53,923

29,486

52,432 36,025

44,171

8,195

560

3,064

715

840

316

278

818

247

177

247

670

F - Allocation of remainder of System
holdings ($2,466,276,000 less
#477,851,000) on basis of "E”

1,988,425 135,878

743,445

173,487

203,817

76,674

67,453

198,478

59,932

42,947

G - Total allocation of Government
securities (WDM plus "F")

2.466.276 179,820

757,213

195,859

252,921

123,254

90,399

261,580 113,855

72,433 116,246 95,957 206,739

H - Present Allocations

2.466.276 179,841

739,335

196,934

252,210

125,853 104,181

269,930 113,086

74,262 113,846 94,998 201,800

-21

+17,878

-1,075

+711

-2,599 -13,782

T

Earnings
1. Estimated current earnings, 1940
(exclusive of earnings on Govts.)
2. Estimated earnings on Govt,
securities to June 30
3. Net profits on sales of Govt,
securities to June 28
4.

Total

C - Excess of ”A-ln over wB-4”
D - Allocation required (on basis of 1.729016%
earnings rate on Govts*) to produce
earnings July-December equal to "C"
E - Estimated dividends

I - Change in Allocations




-8,350

+769

-1,829

263

63,814 59,932 162,568

+2,400

+959

+4,939

CONFIDENTIAL
REALLOCATION OF G O V E R N M T SECURITIES IN SYSTEM OPEN MARKET ACCOUNT ON JULY 1> 1940
,
System
A - Expenses
1. Estimated current expenses, 1940

_______ (In -thousands of dollars)
New
ClevePhilaBoston
York
. delphia .land

___________________
Rich­
Atlanta Chicago
mond

St.
Louis

Minn­
eapolis

Kansas!
San
City , Dallas Francisco

28,569

2,111

7,283

2,285

2,869

1,679

1,221

3,261

1,529

973

1,697

1,231

2,430

1,477

72

261

229

104

105

70

218

20

29

171

39

159

21,372

1,543

6,451

1,730

2,183

1,087

884

2,321

969

638

993

818

1,755

1,555

113

451

131

154

81

67

172

70

49

76

60

131

24,404

1,728

7,163

2,090

2,441

1,273

1,021

2,711

1,059

716

1,240

917

2,045

4,165

383

120

195

428

406

200

550

470

257

497

314

385

477,851

43, 942

13,768

22,372

49,104

46,580

23,946

63,102

53,923

29,486

52,432 36,025

44,171

8,195

560

3,064

715

840

316

278

818

247

177

247

670

I?" - Allocation of remainder of System
holdings ($2,466,276,000 less
#477,851,000) on basis of ”E"

1,988,425 135,878

743,445

173,487

203,817

76,674

67,453

198,478

59,932

42,947

G - Total allocation of Government
securities ("D” plus tfF")

2.466.276 179,820

757,213

195,859

252,921

123,254

90,399

261,580 113,855

72,433 116,246 95,957 206,739

H - Present Allocations

2.466.276 179,841

739,335

196,934

252,210

125,853 104,181

269,930 113,086

74,262 113,846 94,998 201,800

-21

+17,878

-1,075

+711

-2,599 -13,782

Earnings
1. Estimated current earnings, 1940
(exclusive of earnings on Govts*)
2. Estimated earnings on Govt,
securities to June 30
3. Net profits on sales of Govt,
securities to June 28
4.

Total

C - Excess of "A-l" over nB-4”
D - Allocation required (on basis of 1.729016$
earnings rate on Govts.) to produce
earnings July-Deeember equal to "C”
E - Estimated dividends

I - Change in Allocations




-8,350

+769

-1,829

263

63,814 59,932 162,568

+2,400

+959

+4,939

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives




D E C L A S S IF IE D

r

Authority

V23SB

K?

"> I U Fii: KS SEC TION

m

#

......

June 28, 19^0 •
^ ^ '

Mr* R* G* Rous©Manager,
System Open Market Account,
c/o Federal Reserve Bank of New York ,
Wow York, New York*
Dear Mr* Houses
there is enclosed a statement prepared from avail­
able information showing changes in allocations necessary ia
the System Open Market Aocount as of July 1 on the basis of
our estimates of expenses and earnings of each Federal Reserve
bank during 19fj0*
In estimating current earnings and current expenses*
actual earnings (other than earnings on Governraent socuritios)
and actual expenses for January through May of the current year
have been used as a base, in accordance with the formula.
Estimated current exponnes arrived at on this basis have been
adjusted for all of the banks by making allowance fbr the pro­
ration in June and December of the net expense of the New York
Bank in handling foreign accounts and transactions and by addinn* 1150,000 for St* Louis, as was done at the tine of the
last reallocation*
Very truly yours.

B* L* Smead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations•

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority E..Q* 12358

Explanation of basis for items indicated *
A-l

2.U times actual current expenses January to Mayadjusted byi
31* Adding 1150*000 at St. Louis as in
previous real locations this year,
and
2# Adding for 11 banks and deducting th#
total thereof from the Now York
figure, estimated portion of net ex­
pense of foreign dapartment of Hew
York Bank for year, using estimates
for first six months obtained from
New York by telephone June 26*

B-l

2*4 times actual earnings, exclusive of earnings on
Governments, January to May.

8-2 and B-3

Obtained by telephone from Mr. Behrens at New York,
June 28*

D

Actual rata usod, .0087161

E

Accrued dividends at May $1 plus 3*5 times paid-in
capital on May 31, adjusted by addition of 128,000
at San Francisco to cover increase of t910#000 in
paid-in capital at San Francisco during week ended
June 19.




X 1.72901^).

REALLOCATION OF O O r a a ilfta iT S E C U R IT IE S I E SYSTEM OPEM i:A R K ?T ACCOUKT OK JULY 1 ,

System

|Boston

Bmr
Y o rk

Phil*- Cleve­ Bioh**
delphia land
mond

Atlanta jChioago

19bO

Minn­
Kansas
eapolis City

St.
Louis

San
Franoisoo

Balias

A.

(1} Fatimatod currant expenses, 19?j0
V

36,5^9 / 2,111

(2) Estimated earning* on Govern­
ments to Jvtm 30
{3 ) Het profits ©a Government*
t© thane 28
(!* )

T otal

E x c e ss

of

A~1 o v e r

f

6*

latissated

^

21,372
*,555

8-I4,

d iv id e n d s ,

4,165

/

3#261

1,529

973

1.697

1,231

2,1*30

lOii

I05

70

21S

20

29

171

39

159

1*730

2,183

1,087

88li

2,321

9^9

638

993

818

1 ,7 5 5

131

15U

81

67

70

te

60

131

2 ,0 9 0

2,1(1:1'

172
2 ,7 11

/ 1*059

aoo

55®

1*6,580 22 , 9li 6

65,102

72

261

229

1 ,5 ^ 3

6, 1*51

113

1*51

1 . 726'

'

ft?7,85X

19&)

.llooation o f remainder o f Systs®
holding* (#2,fi66,2?6 ,OOO le t s
lit??,851,000) on basis o f *1*

2 ,8 6 9

8 ,1 9 5 J

7 »1 6 3 ''

383

120

195

1(26

it?,9it2

13,768

22,372

t o .io it

560

3.06*4

7X5

at*o

1.273 /"
l'Q>S

3X6

1,021

278

*

818

716 '

76
1 , 21x0 /

917 s

li?0

257

hW

3iit

385

53,923

29,1iB6

524 i32

36,025

U i,1 7 1

177

263

r

(no

2h7

Shi

2. ob5«

,k 2 5

135.878 ?1*3.W»5 1 7 3 M 7

203. 81? 76, 67!* 67,^53 198, 1.78 59,932

It2,9ii7

63. 8SI,

59,952 162,566

2,U 6 6 ,a ? 6

179 ,8 20 7 5 ? ,2 1 3 195 .8 59

252,921 123 . 2&

?2,1«53

116 . 2W ,'

9 5 ,9 5 7 306,739

1 .9 S

T o t a l a l l o c a t i o n o f Governments

("D* plus nfn)
H* Present allooatlon*
I.

u m

2W i < & v

D# A l l o o a t l o n r e q u i r e d
( on
b a s i s o f 1 .729016^ p e r aimuxa e a r n ­
in g r a t e o s Gov’ t s ) t o p r o v id e
e a r n in g s J u ly-D eoom ber e q u a l to ^ C *
E.

1,221

2.385

lA R M M S

\l) Fstixastsd current earning8,19?4©
(exclusive of sarniags o n
Governments)

C,

1,679

7 ,2 8 3

C hang# i n




a llo o a tio n e

9 0 ,3 9 9

261,580 1 1 3 , 855'

2 ,1 ,6 6 ,2 7 6 179.81*1 7 3 9 ,3 3 5 19o,95?> 253,210 125.853 101 .1 8 1 269 ,9 30 113 ,0 6 6
-2 1

♦ 1 7 ,8 7 8

- 1,0 7 5

*711

-2 ,5 9 9

-1 3 ,7 8 2

-6 ,3 5 0

*769

? i*,2 62 I1 3 ,e fi6
- 1,8 2 9

^ .L o o

9k,9 9 8 201,800
+999

«t* ,9 3 9

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority fc.Q* 12358

*

^
MEMORANDUM

FILES SECTION

MAY 211940

ft

.{ ^ 3
9 J (/ >
^
--- ---7 *'

Tot

Messrs* Van Fossen and Smead

From*

Mr# Daniels

May 20, 19^0
Svbjeoti Estimates of Earnings
and Expenses In Reallocations ef
System Open Market Acoount #

There are attached two tables comparing changes in participations
in the System Open Market Aocount at the last three real locations with changes
whioh would have resulted (1) had "Furniture and equipment” and "Depreciation
on bank building” been excluded from estimated esqpenses and (2 ) had earnings
and expenses on industrial advances and commitments been excluded from
estimated earnings and expenses#
Table I indicates, if proof were needed, that we should not exclude
depreciation and furniture and equipment from expenses In making these esti­
mates, but rather continue to make adjustments as they appear necessary in
view of anticipated or reoent abnormal oharges to expense for depreoiation and
furniture and equipment#
Table II shows that the changes in allocations caaitting industrial
loan earnings and expenses would generally have been in the same direetion#
New York and Cleveland, especially, would have received saaller participations,
due primarily to the fact that the part of the total account allooated in pro­
portion to expense requirements would have been larger# Philadelphia would have
gained considerably, and Atlanta and Minneapolis would have gained to a lesser
extent, owing mainly to relatively large net earnings on industrial advances.
These are the principal differences.
I believe we should in the future omit earnings and expenses of
industrial loans and commitments in estimating earnings and expenses, especially
since only Cleveland, Atlanta, and San Francisco now have any Federal Reserve
bank funds Involved in industrial loans# At Cleveland industrial loan earnings
and expenses are running about equal to one another, and at San FrancIsoo all
current net earnings are being appropriated to cover estimated losses# This
leaves Atlanta as the only bank for which it would be appropriate to include
industrial loan earnings and expenses (about 12 per cent) in making the esti­
mates of earnings and expenses in the reallocations#

Attachments 2




Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings o f the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority fc.O* 1235B

nLv u

its

(*«.*»

-SEC 4.**

APR! 91968
K E M 0 R A S D lT K

To:

Messrs. Van Fos sen and Smead

From:

Mr* Daniels

May 20, lQqO
Subject: Estimates of Warnings
and Expenses in Reallocations of
System. Open Market Account •

There are attp.ched two tables comparing changes in participations
in the System Open Market Account at the last three real locations with changes
■which would have resulted (l) had rfFurniture and equipment” and "Depreciation
on bank building" been excluded from estimated expenses and (2) had earnings
and expanses on industrial advances and commitments been excluded from
estimated earnings and expenses.
Table I indicates, if proof were needed, that we should not exclude
depreciation and furniture and equipment from expenses in mailing these esti­
mates, but rather continue to make adjustments as they appear necessary in
view of anticipated or recent abnormal charges to expense for depreciation and
furniture and equipment.
Table II shows that the changes in allocations omitting industrial
loan earnings and expenses would generally have been in the same direction.
New York and Cleveland, especially, would have received smaller participations,
due primarily to the fact that the part of the total account allocated in pro­
portion to expense requirements would have been larger. Philadelphia would have
gained considerably, and Atlanta and Minneapolis would have gained to a lesser
extent, owing mainly to relatively large net earnings on industrial advances.
These are the principal differences.
I believe we should in the future omit earnings end expenses of
industrial loans and commitments in estimating earnings and expenses, especially
since only Cleveland, Atlanta, and San Francisco now have any Federal Reserve
bank funds involved in industrial loans. At Cleveland industrial loan earnings
and expenses are running about equal to one another, and at San Francisco all
current net earnings are being appropriated to cover estimated losses. This
leaves Atlanta as the only bank for which it would be appropriate to include
industrial loan earnings and expenses (about 12 per cent) in. making the esti­
mates of earnings and expenses in the reallocations.

A11aebment s 2




,/ 3 '/6~

X
o
♦EH
-t
Ol o
W
W
a H
~
♦J
E C*
w. >“*

TABUS I

(In thousand* of d o lla r*)
October 1 ,

S W ««i
!

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

CHANGES IU RSCHfT ALLOCATIONS Of SYSTSM OPKS MARKET ACCOBHT CC&fPARSD
WITH CHAJIGES HAD DBFRBCIATIOH ASD FORWITURB AID ®qpiBffi!!T BBEW SXCLTOKD FROK ESTIMATED SXFSKBS*

serf®
Bank
“1

Btoluding
tJnder preaent j depreciation
forwula
I and furniture
(a

January L 19«o
Szoli^ing
Under preaeot < q rw )> tla i
and fu rn itu rt
formula
and •quipM xt*

A p ril 1 , 1 $ 10
Under present
fonaala

1,1 r 1

InHndlag

{•p rao iatlo a
and h n lt a n
and eqalpeent*

- 2 ,1 1 1

■*4,605

-2,736

-191

♦3.U28

*5»m

♦Uj.226

♦113 , 3m

-16.566

♦623

-8.873

♦20,192

♦2,009

-3,816

-8,91^

-8,901

..»» orr*

*4#|6 0

U0.l|D5

-775

-5,fll»2

-8,298

♦671*

RlohMsi

-9.7iK>

-17,705

-3.005

-k.’W

*695

Atlanta

-h.m

-llt.07 9

♦285

-3,825

♦U.lU*

Chicago

*k.(>70

*10,186

-5^*30

-5,661

♦u.006

-50.050

-35.277

♦27,079

Bo«toa
Warn York

Philadelphia
Cleveland

- 1.7 0 1
>

St* Louis
Minneapolis
C ity

~£#879
~ io ,ia 9

Dallae
San Francisco

♦U.128

-5,018

♦6,015

♦2.328
♦u.9 31

♦1.195

-1.333

-Wi.299

♦3,9*i6

- 3.298

-1.729

- 11,9 6 7

-H ,U 6

♦U.527

♦2,607

♦967

~£*ti27

♦3.9U3

♦633

*692

-1,550

-1,9^2

♦ feut not excluding apeelal adjustment* oa aooount of depreciation os fixed machinery and equipment •




♦1,017

I
t

§!

r

o >
*

in

fo £2

A

W
o

TABLE II
CHANGES IN RBCKfT ALLOCATIONS OF SYSTEM OPSN MARKET ACCOUNT COMPAH.SD WITH CHAHGSS HAD
m v m s A ^ SXPBHSES OK IWDOSTRIAL LOANS 8ES9 IPK2L0M© FROM SSTIMAT2D EARHIHGS AMD W B S I S , IBSFSCTim Y.
(In thmasaiaAs o f d o lla rs )
October 1.

Fodoral
Rooorw
Book

tfndor prosontj
forsnla
j

Boston

1939

January

.
mm* ad ta g

industrial
$OSUB
oporations

Ondar present
formula

0

ia] ,
Sxcludii^j

Industrial
loan
operations

13

A r .il 1. 19iiD..... ........ .....
ffg
industrial
TSndmr ; N M i t
fonsula
loan

operations

-2,786

-2,876

16,568

-21,261

♦18,465

-a ,9 ii*

-4,603

-5.255

«96l

10, 1(05

♦1,475

-5,842

-7.1*86

♦67b

-2.099

HwllMKIlril

-9 .ThO

-lD .llQ

1,863

♦695

♦2,775

A tlan ta

-4,793

♦1.729

♦1.567

M^llh

♦7.183

vhioago

♦4,670

♦1,10?

-5,1*30

-6,280

-34,183

♦27,079

♦36,095

♦2*328

♦688

♦

6,015

♦7,535

♦1.195

♦2,200

-2,111

X«v Tort:

♦26,439

Philadelphia
Cleveland

S t* Louis

♦ S it

♦2,009
♦

-

30,050

-

3.005

-

—

♦3,032
-

8,873

-12,627

+1.943

Xinneapolis

-2,879

♦3,673

Kansas C ity

-10,419

-11,919

♦3.946

♦ 3 ,U a

-1.72?

-3.044

-3,224

♦4.527

♦4,685

*9&?

♦863

*6,973

*633

♦i,al*6

-1.550

-1,875

D allas
San Franoisoo




♦4,128

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives




D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority fc .Q *

j**"'
... ■ -■■■
I!
,
'SC»D IN FILES SECTION

.
J

MAY 6 - 1940^
33 i 9 2 U A

v h .m °

Mr* R* G* Rouse, Vice President,
Federal Reserve Bank of New York,
"lew York, H. Y.
Dear Mr. Rouse:
As I told you over the telephone on Thursday,
we have prepared a draft of the report that might be
subraitted to the Federal Open Market Committee on ac­
counting connected with the System Open Market Account*
This draft is, of course, in preliminary fora and in any
case would need considerable editing* You may have an
entirely different way of approaching the problem than
is followed in the attached draft, and, if so, I shall
be very glad to have you rewrite the report accordingly*
I am also enclosing a copy of a memorandum from Mr. Van
Fossen with regard to the formula for reallocations of
the System Account* This takes a sonewhat different
view than is enbodied In the draft*
The draft of the report, as enclosed, isay be
so worded as to enable one to infer the kind of recom­
mendations I would be in favor of, but in any case I
assume we will have to get together to agree upon what
our reoosnendati ons will be if w® are called upon by
the Corariittee to raako them*
Sincerely yours,

E. L* Sraead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations*

Enclosures 2

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority fc-Q* 12358

TH FILEK ACTION
i

'V A Y f i . 1940
...

DRAFT OF W M M m tm TO FEDERAL OFEI MARKET COMITT HE
May I*, 19&>*

At the mooting of tho Federal Open Market Comraittee in
Washington on M*j*ch 201 19)40, we were requested to stud^y the present basis
for the allooation of seourities in the System Open Markst Acoount and
the accounting procedure followed in connection with tho Account, to make
a report at the next meeting of the Federal Open Market Coomittee which
would include a statement of the 'various accounting procedures that might
be adopted for the System Aocount, and to be prepared to m k e recommendations
as to the proeedure that should be followed*
As we see the problem* there are three main questions to be oonsideredt

(l) how should United States Government seeurities owned by the

Federal Reserve banks be shown in the weekly press statement, (2) should pro­
fits on sales of securities be used to write down the book value of security
holdings, and (3 ) should there be say change in the procedure under which
participations in the System Account are now allocated among the Federal Re­
serve banks?
Amounts at which securities are shorn in published condition statements«
With respect to the first question, it is the present practice to
show Government securities in the statseaent at par and to Include premium on
securities purchased in ”Other assets” and discount on securities purchased
in "Other liabilities".

The premium is currently mortised into earnings to

the call date of the securities and the discount is accumulated into earnings
to the maturity date of the securities#




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority £..6* 1235%

Tot

Federal Opsn Market Canalttee

- 2 -

Two alternative methods have 'bees suggested for showing the
System*« holding# of Governs)*ob seeurities ia the weekly Federal Reserve
bexik condition statmont, as follow*!

(1 ) show securities at hook valu e,

l*e*, et per plus proRium and less discount, end (2 ) show the per value of
the seeurities as at present and show the amount of premium less disoount
as a separate asset item In the statement*
With respeet to the first suggestion^ i*e*, that seeurities be
shown in the weekly statement at hook value* the fallowing consents are of­
fered*

It has been the praetlee since early in the histozy of the Systea to

iioff seeurities in published statements at their par value, principally, we
understand, in order to obviate any possibility of the public1 s gaining the
impression that there has been a ohango in the Systemfs holdings, when, as
a natter of faot, no ohange has taken placo*

Should seeurities be shown at

book value in published statements, reported holdings would fluctuate as a
result of the following, as well .as through purchases and salest

(1 ) amortixa-

tien of premium, whioh would reduce book value, (2 ) accumulation of discount,
which would inorease book value, and (3 ) valuation reserves an<1 charge-offs*
If United States Government securities were shown among assets in press state­
ments at book value, they would normally be shown likewise in the maturity
classification, but if thought desirable they eould continue to be shown in
the maturity classification at par value*
With respeet to the seeond suggestion, it would be a siiaple natter
to show "let premium on U* S* Securities” as an asset item, say, .following
"Total bills and seeurities**




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority £ ..6 « 12358

Tot

* 3 "

Federal Open Market Cosaaittee

16 accounting difficulties would be inirolved in showing United
States Government securities In the weekly pross statements in either of
the above ways, and neither would involve any mterial changes in the
accounting procedure now followed*
Profits on sales of United States Government securities*
Profits on sales of United States Govermaont securities are m m
treated as an addition to current net earning* and are used to ©over «at»
pauses or dividend* op are transferred to surplus, or to reserves for contin­
gencies through surplus, depending upon the situation at eaoh Federal Reserve
bank*

In aeoordanoe with the plan approved toy the Federal Open larlast Com­

mittee on November 30, 1937, profits on sales of United States Oovernment
securities beginning January 1, 1938, have been distributed among the Federal
Reserve banks in proportion to their average holdings in the System Aocount
since <Jon» JO, 1936*
Instead of accounting

fbr

profits on sales of United States Govern­

ment securities as at present they could (a) toe used to write down the book
value of the System aocount, (to) toe set aside *s a valuation reserve and
deducted in the balance sheet from "Prewlua on securities**, or (0) be trans­
ferred to reserves for contingencies *
With respect to (a) under our present practice idien securities
carried on the books at an amortised price of, say, 101 are sold at a profit
of two points and other securities are bought at 103* profits on securities
sold are increased and the net book value of the portfolio is increased by
a like amount*




The advisability of this so-called writing up the port*

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings o f the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority fc.Q* 12358

Tot

Federal Open Market Copwittee

- 1* •

folio as a result of mioh sales and purohasos raay bo questioned.
Should profits on solos of soourlttos* either on so-called
switches or on outright sales, ho used to- writ* down th* hook m l m of
tho System Account it would ho necessary to distribute profit* among tho
Fodoral Boservo hanks on tho basis of their current participations in tho
Sy* % m Account*

It would not ho praotlo&blo to distribute th«a aiaong th*

Fodoral Reserve banks on th® bos Is of average participations In tho System
Aocount since June ^0# 1936*
If profits on switch*# or outright solos of securities aro usod
to write down th© book value of th* System Account they should, in our
opinion, continue to bo shown as profits on salos of securities in publish*
od statements of earnings and expenses of tho Fodoral Reserve banks*
With respect to th® second alternative, i*e*# tho use of profits
on sales of securities to ostabllsh valuation reserve# which would be do*
duoted from the prmtvm aocount* It may bo pointed out that if thia woro
d©as, and a substantial portion of our prosont contingent reserves woro aloo
allocated for that purpose* th* tlao would presumably oewo in the course of
the n»xt fow ysars when ths valuation reserve would equal tho amount of the
premium account.

In suoh oase tho amortisation of prmixm would have to bo

discontinued unless a portion of the valuation reserve woro either returned
to profit and loss or used as a reserve to reduoe tho book value of tho
System Aocount below par value*

The purpose sought to be acooi^plished by

this method, i«e«, reduction in the preiaiuia account, could be achieved
equally as well and more siraply by using profits to write off premium as




Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D

r

Toi

Authority fc.Q* 12358

Federal Open Market Cowaittee

-

5-

outlined in a lte rn a tiv e ( a ) *
la d p ro fits on sa le s of United States Ctovennsnfe so o u ritio s been
used during reoent years to w rit© down tha book m ine o f the p o rtfo lio or
to e sta b lish valuation reserves* there would havw boon d e f i c i t * in not
earnings o f the Federal Reserve bank®, a ft e r dividends, in 1935*
X93&*

Tho th ird a lte rn a tiv e mentioned above, i * e * * tho tra n sfe r o f
p r o fit * on sa lo s o f so o u ritio s to reserves fo r contingencies,would regular­
is e a praotioe #vich has existed to a su bstan tial extent fo r a number o f
years*

P rio r to 1937 tran sfers to reserves fo r contingencies were charged

again st the our rent year* a earnings*

Since that date they have been charged

to surplus*
Reserves fo r oont infancies now held by the Federal Reserve banks
as a whole amount to

11 596*606 o f

$3k 062J9Qlh, as compared w ith - * ,

carried on the System Acoount as o f A p ril 22* 1 ^ 0 *
reserves* t

31*l*8l * 9k6 were

out o f surplus*

premium

Of the to ta l contingent

3 $*068

set up out o f current net earnings and $ #li

The System oould* o f course* a t any tin e i t saw f i t * use

the t31,ij31,9i.i6 o f contingent reserves se t aside out o f earnings to w rite
o f f an equal amount of the premium now carried on United States Goveraasnt
se c u ritie s*

I f suoh were done* however* the rate o f earnings on Government

se c u ritie s as shown in the earnings reports o f the Federal Reserve banks
would be suoh nearer the coupon ra te than a t present* as the premium amor­
tisa tio n charge again st earnings would be g re a tly reduced*

Should i t be

deelded to oharge o f f a l l or a la rg e part o f the present praalum acoount.




Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority

Toj

Federal Open Market Coawittee

1235%

- 6 -

the amount to be charged off by each Federal Reserve bank, in the absence
of instructions to the contrary, mould be based on its
tions in the System Account*

current participa­

If desired, however, the amount of the

ehargc-off to be aade by each federal Beserve bank could be based on its
average daily participation in the Account since Juns 50, 1936*
Quarterly allocations of securities among Federal Reserve banks*
The procedure now fb1 1 owed in allocating participations In the
System Account among the Federal Reserve banks provides first tor allocating
a sufficient amount of securities to each Federal Reserve bank to cover its
expenses not taken care of by other earnings, and second to allocate the
remaining securities in the Systea Account among the Federal Reserve- banka
on the basis of their dividend requirements*

the relationship between the

expenses of individual Federal Reserve banks and total expenses of the Systea
is quite different from the relationship between dividend payments by indivi­
dual Federal Reserve banks and total dividend payments by the System* Since
profits on sales of securities are now taken into earnings and thus reduce
the amount of securities needed by the Federal Reserve banks to produce
sufficient income to cover expenses, it is apparent that as profits increase
the amount of securities allocated to the Federal Reserve banks to cover
their expenses decreases, and the amount of securities allocated to the Fed­
eral Reserve banks on the basis of dividend requirements increases*

#fhen

these profits are substantial there is a substantial fluctuation in participa­
tions in the System Account on quarterly reallocation dates*

These fluctua­

tions could be materially reduced if our formula for allocating securities




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority

Tot

Federal Open Market Committee

1235B

- 7 -

enong the Federal Reserve banks were expanded to eiabrae® three steps Instead
ef the present two*

These steps might be as follows:

(1) allooate sufficient

securities to each Federal Reserve bank to oover expenses not taken oare of
by other ineoras, (2) allocate to each Federal Reserve bank a sufficient amount
of securities to cover dividend requirements, and (3 ) allooate the rwaaining
securities a wmg the Federal Reserve banks in proportion to their combined
expense and dividend requiresisnts.
If the Federal Open Market Comittee desires t ire shall be prepared
to sake reoowoendations nith respect to eaoh of the points discussed above*




Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified H oldings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

To:

Federal Open Market Committee

- 2 -

Two alternative methods have been suggested for showing the
System*s holdings of Government securities in the weekly Federal Reserve
SL-

bank condition stal^ment, as follows:

(l) show securities at book value,

i.e*, at par plus premium and less discount, and (2) show the par value of
the securities as at present and show the amount of premium less discount
as a separate asset item in the statement*
With respect to the first suggestion, i*e*, that securities be
shown in the weekly statement at book value, the following comments are offered#

It has been the practice since early in the history of the System to

show securities in published statements at their par value, principally, we
understand, in order to obviate any possibility of the public’s gaining the
impression that there has been a change in the System*s holdings, when, as
a matter of fact, no change has taken place*

Should securities be shown at

book value in published statements, reported holdings would fluctuate as a
result of the following, as well as through purchases and sales:

(l) amortiza

tion of premium, ^friich would reduce book value, (2) accumulation of discount,
which would increase book value, and (3) valuation reserves and charge-offs#
If United States Government securities were shown among assets in press statei

&
r *■

ments at book value, they would normally be shown likewise in the maturity
classification, but if thought desirable they could continue to be shown in
the maturity classification at par value*
With respect to the second suggestion, it would be a simple matter
to show MNet premium on U« S* Securities” as an asset item, say, following
ttTotal bills and securities”.




Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

To:

1235B

Federal Open Market Committee

folio as a result of such sales and purchases may be questioned.
Should profits on sales of securities, either on so-called
switches or on outright sales, be used to 'write down the book value of
the System Account it would be necessary to distribute profits among the
Federal Reserve banks on the basis of their current participations in the
System Account• It would not be practicable to distribute them among the
Federal Reserve banks on the basis of average participations in the System
Account since June 30, 193&®
If profits on switches or outright sales of securities are used
to write down the book value of the System Account they should, in our
opinion, continue to be shown as profits on sales of securities in publish­
ed statements of earnings and expenses of the Federal Reserve banks *
*/ith respect to the second alternative, i.e., the use of profits
on sales of securities to establish valuation reserves which would be de­
ducted from the premium account, it may be pointed out that if this were
done, and a substantial portion of our present contingent reserves were also
allocated for that purpose, the time would presumably come in the course of
the next few years when the valuation reserve would equal the amount of the
premium account*

In such case the amortization of premium would have to be

discontinued unless a portion of the valuation reserve were either returned
to profit and loss or used as a reserve to reduce the book value of the
System Account below par value.

Tbe purpose sought to be accomplished by

this method, i.e., reduction in the premium account, could be achieved
equally as well and more simply by using profits to writ© off premium as




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority £..Q« 1235%

^ORKlfcCTiON
APR1 9 1968
To:

Federal Open Market Committoe

among the Federal Reserve banks were expanded to embrace three steps instead
of the present two*

These steps might be as follows:

(l) allocate sufficient

securities to each Federal Reserve bank to cover expenses not taken care of
by other income, (2) allocate to each Federal Reserve bank a sufficient amount
of securities to cover dividend requirements, and (3 ) allocate the remaining
1

securities among the Federal Reserve banks in proportion to their combined
expense and dividend requirements.
If the Federal Open Karket Committee desires, we shall be prepared
to make recommendations with respect to each of the points discussed above*




y

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority

RKC'D IN FILES SECTXOK

-'MAY 6 -1940 a
>t A
/ '% Z

^

/ /

J

f >

Dr

April 50, V $ P
Mr* Smead

Allocation of the

Mr. Van Fossen

Si’& t m Aacaunt

iA, ■

r*v ■

are
the
and
ing

In connection with the memorandum which you and Mr. Rouse
to submit in regard to profits on sale of Government securities,
method of reporting security holdings in the weekly statement,
the method of allocating the System Account, I have the follow­
suggestions:

In accordance with long established oustom, the Federal
Reserve banks will undoubtedly continue to pay the regular dividend
even though not earned so long as they have sizable surplus accounts,
Accordingly, it is suggested that in allocating the System Open
Market Account, the first step be to allocate a sufficient amount
of securities to cover estimated expenses and dividends after isaking
allowance for earnings from other sources. Under the present for­
mula any remaining securities would be allocated in proportion to
capital or to its equivalent, dividends. In support of this pro­
cedure it m y be pointed out that if earnings over a period af years
averaged just about sufficient to cover expenses and dividends,
this method of allocating the System Account would result in the
accumulation by each Federal Reserve bank of excess earnings in pro­
portion to their respective capital accounts and the drain on such
accumulated earnings in years ■when earnings were insufficient to
cover dividends would likewise be in proportion to capital. Accord­
ingly, over the entire period the effect would be virtually the same
as we would have if earnings in each year were just sufficient to
cover earnings and dividends.
In further support of this method of allocating securities
in excess of amounts needed to cover expenses and dividends is the
fact that earnings of th© Federal Reserve banks are applied first
to cover expenses, losses, etc., and only such earnings as remain
are available for dividends. Inasmuch as it is likely that the Federal
Reserve banks will ordinarily have at least sufficient earnings to
cover expenses, there does not appear to be any reason for allocating
securities remaining after expenses and dividends have been provided
for on the basis of combined expenses and dividends as has been sug­
gested. In this connection it should also be borne in nind that one
of the criticisms of our present formula is that a bank which reduces
its expenses gets very little benefit therefrom and a bank 'which
spends money freely gets an allocation sufficient to cover its expenses
so that so far as the allocation of the System Account is concerned
there is no inducement for a bank to keep down its expenses. To
allooate securities remaining, after expenses and dividends have bssu




R e p ro d u c e d from the U ncla ssified

I D ecla ssified

H o ld in g s of the N a tio n a l A rc h iv e s

DECLASSIFIED
A uthority

tot

Mr. Snead

12 -^ 5 8

- 2 -

provided for, in proportion to expenses and dividends combined
would is. addition give a larger share of excess earning* to tho
bank that does not hold down Its expense*.
IBtlle in norm! oiro«s*tanoo* the only drain upon *urpin* is likely t o be to pay a portion of dividend* in year* when
earning* are low, it i* posaible, of oourse, for the Federal Re­
serve bank* to sustain hea-ry loss#* on investments which Blight
necessitate a substantial charge to surplus or to reserves for
contingencies. Accordingly, there is something to be said in
favor of allocating securities regaining, after expenses and div­
idend* have been provided for, in such a way as to equali£e the
position of the varlou* Federal Reserve bank* in respect to *urplus and reserve* for contingencies 1 aa in fact inclined to
favor a formula whioh will aooooplish thi* objective. If such a
formula 1 * to be adopted the first con*ideration would be to
decide upon a ba*i* of comparison. For thi* purpose, 1 would
suggest total deposits of sienfeer banks in each Federal Reserve
diatriot on the theory that this represents as good a neasure a*
ww e*a find of the potential relative risk to each Federal Re­
serve bank of granting d ia o o u n t aoeawaodatlon t o it# iwwfeer bank*.
My *uggestion would be that after allocating a sufficient anount
of *ecuritie* to cover expenses and dividends, the remaining
securities be divided equally among the Federal Reserve bank*
that have a ratio of aurplu* (Section 7) plu* other oapital
aocount* to total deposits of its mewber bank* less than the
similar ratio for the System as a whole, with the provision that
thla special allocation *ball not exceed $50,000,000 for any bank*
I would then allocate any securities still remaining in propor­
tion to capital.
Following is a table showing the amount of surplus
(Section 7) plus other oapital aocount* of each Federal Reserve
bank, total ®eaber bank depoeit*, the ratio of the former to the
latter, and the ratio of dividend* of eaoh bank to the Sy*tea
total and of expen»e* and dividend* of each bank to the Sy*tem»




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

_
r

to*

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority

Mr, Snead

1M 58

~ $ -

(In t t o a m d i)
... l u M a t .fS ™ ? ! Y .....

Federal
Reserve

ItmmV

pltxa "other cap ital"
accounts
M ultiple*
Amount | o f < H
T M r 'i
dividend*

12,231

21.8

l6.l&h

20.9
23.1

Boston
lew York
Philadelphia

63.946

Cleveland
Richmond
Atlanta

18,153
6,808
7.474

Chloage
S t, Locals
Minneapolis
Kansas City
B alias
San Frenelseo

to ta l

21.6
21.5
26.9

Total

member
depoaits

Ratio o f
Ratio o f Ratio o f expenaea
C o l*l to
d iv i­
and
d iv idends
Col* 3
to
denda
(percent)
to to ta l
to ta l

2,767.556
18.011,692
3,256,029

.355
.507

3,882.686
1,958,959
l,7l<9.278

•2j£3
.& 8
Ji27

6,977,1(1)5
1,732,025
1,134,6 lit,

Jm

*U&

29,866
6,250

36.6
21.2

5,215

29.5

4,909
5,861*

12.1&0

18.7
23.8
19.5

4.928,038

.571
*253

189,700

23.2

49.31(0.152

.384

1, 858,726
1, 582,112

.361

MO

6.87
37.56

7.25
27.95
8.19

10.29
3.87
3.140

10.05

8.76

9.98
3.02

2.17
3.21
3.01
7.86
100.00

4.37

11.23
4.76
3.20
5.26
3

8.34
100*00

I t w ill bo noted that surplus (Section 7 ) plus other capital
accounta fo r the System aa a i&ole ia su fficien t to cover dividends at
the present rate fo r slig h tly over twenty-three years and that in the
ease o f the Chicago, Hixme^polis, Atlanta* and D allas banks the ra tio
ia higher than fo r the twelve banks combined, It w ill a lso be noted
that fa r the 9ysteai aa a whole surplus (Section 7 ) plus other capital
accounts la equal to .581+ e f one peroent o f to ta l wambmt bank deposits
and that th is percentage la higher than fo r the System at the Federal
Reserve banka e f Philadelphia* Cleveland* Minneapolis* Boston* Chieago*
and A tlanta. Allooation o f the Syataai Account in accordance with the
proposed plan would* o f course* tend to reduce the percentage fo r these
t lx banka and increase that o f the other six .




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority

Toj

Mr.

12358

-l4-

19

Below is a oanparison using t o m r y 1#
I # , fig u re s o f
the d istrib u tio n o f the ^62*973*000 o f se c u ritie s remaining a ft e r
expenses sad dividends have been provided fort

Federal
Reserve
Bank

Boston
I m York
Philadelph ia

(in thousands)
A llo catio n or rem in der or account
On i t i i i o f
Under present la proportion
surplus n d
formula* i te M to dividsnda
in proportion •ad •acponaM other e *p it«J
to dividends
•M o n ti

41,396

33.349
133.055
37.194

11,284
111,273
14,571

Cleveland
Riohaond
A tlan ta

47.259
17.651
15.658

47.211
24,783
19,473

16,636
56,213
5,512

Chisago
S t. Louis
MlfinespoT 1a

46.006
13.893
10,021

50,782
22,311
14,530

16,195
54,891
3,528

Kansas C ity
D allas
San Frans iseo

l4,7fc?
13.894
36.30B

23,226
18,479
38,580

55,191
54,891
62,788

462.973

462,973

462,973

T otal

32,057

1714,061

la colons 1 is the d istrib u tio n under the present form ula,
as a c tu a lly aside m J u n sry X* In ooltaas 2 Is the d istrib u tio n that
would have besn made i f these se e u ritie s had been allo eated in pro*
portion to dividends and expenses, and in oolxaa 3 1* the d istrib u ­
tio n that would have been nade i f the Federal Reserve banks o f le v
York, Richmond, S t, Louis, Kansas C ity , D a lla s , and San Franciseo
had eaoh been a llo e a te d 150,000,000 and the remaining #162,973*000
had then been allo eated to the twelve banks in proportion to c a p ita l*




R e p r o d u c e d fro m the U n c l a s s i fi e d

I D e c l a s s i fi e d

H o l d i n g s o f th e N a ti o n a l A r c h i v e s

DECLASSIFIED
uthority £..£)« 12^5%

To*

Mr* Smead

- 5 -

fh e following observation# appear to be la order:
Boston, Philadelphia* Cletolaild* Atlanta* Chicago, aad
Minneapolist ... .
According to the above mentioned standard, the surplus plus
th* r « t « m for contingencies at oach o f these banka is too largo and
tha proposed forwala would substantially reduoe it# participation.
low York i
Surplus is too sn a il. Proposed formula would tend to build
it up but net aa rapidly ft# present fom u la.
Klohmond, St. Louis, lanaas C ity, Dallas, and San Francl#oot

Surplus too n a i l *
increase partioipation*

Proposed formula mould substantially
'^

Attention A# ealled to the faot that i f the plan o f a llo c a t­
ing exness seeuritiea in proportion to dividends and expenses were
adopted, the e ffe e t on the allocation of the Sy#t«m Acoount would be .In
the wrong direotioa im the ea#e of the liohaagjag * Atlanta* Chieago,
H I l i * and Minneapolis Banks and in -.all the other oase# the- change in
the bank#* participation, while in tfee righ t direction* would be mswh
less substantial than it would be under the other proposal.
In order not 'to take away on one allocation shat is granted .in
the preceding allocation , it i# reooousaded th at -each quarterly allo ca­
tion be made a#- .if it were fo r ft 12 r a t h period* just as the January 1
allocation now i s , or that the allocation be made but omee a year here­
a fte r. Instead o f estimates based on figures fo r 5 months, t b e lie v e it
wonld be preferable t o '«*## actual fig u re # fo r the preceding 12 months
both in the ea*e e f expanses and of earning# other than on Government
secu rities.




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives




D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority E ..0 * 1 2 3 5 8

XH FILES SECTION

MAR 3 0 1940
1. liiflrnii ---- -

Fe d e r a l R e s e r v e B a n k
o f N ew Y ork

March 29, 194-0

Dear Mr. Smead:
We received your letter of Marches jmd have today
sent to the Reserve banks a copy of the computation showing the
adjustments to be made in participations in the System Open
Market Account on April 1, 194-0, pursuant to the plan adopted
at the meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee on November
30, 1937.
Enclosed herewith is copy of the letter of transmittal
together with three copies of the computation, also copy of the
telegram which was sent to each of the Federal Reserve banks
today*
Yours faithfully,

Robert G. Rouse,
Manager, System Open
Market Account.
Mr* E. L* Smead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations,
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System,
Washington, D. C*

*

nuassiTied / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority

E.0« 12358

M IS C . 14 0 -B -1 5 M-10 3 8




March

29# 1940

D»ar Mr* S in clair t
In tccordtoc* with my

f today, 2 end***

herawlth conputAtion o f tb#

bs anaiift cm April

l f 1940, o f th* participate

Basarve banka

In th* fi^staa

Hobart G * B o o s e ,
8am g«r, Strata® Open
Market Aceount*
l r » John S« S in c la ir, Pr*aidant#
Fadaral Bftstnt Bank otf Philadelphia,
Philadelphia* Ft*

Sa d *

produced from the U nclassified / D ecla ssified H oldings o f the N ational

--------------------------------

DECLASSIFIED
>

;SC

UOA

13 M

Authority

12.358

a-3^

FEDERAL.

RESERVE

BANK

OF

NEW

YORK

SECURITIES DEPT* - HAH/JV

March 29, V&O
Please fin i following t i l i g r a to tha President « f aach Federal Reeerve bank
as indicated below:

Under tb* plan for reallocation of Qovarawnt eecuritie s adopted by
the Federal Open Market Gasmittee Itam ber 30, 1937» a readmetaent of partici­
pations In Qorenu*nt securities held In the Staten Aocount le eel led fo r A pril
1, 1&0.

the computation* ehoTring adjustments te be made In partial potions of

the eereral Federal Reeerre banks is betpg sent to a l l Reserve banks today#
increase
These ooaptjtationa Indicate m .
of
In your participation
daoreaae
on

l j r 11 ! ♦

l a shall wire

you an A prp X th ^ di

d entries to he aad* on

that date«

Toung
Sinclair
Flexing
Leach
Paricar
Schaller
Martin
Nytifi
Has&lt**
Oilbart
Day




Boston
^phla
ClaTalm
Ridurad
Atlanta
Ohio ago
5t« Louie
Minneapolis
Kansas City
Dellae
San Francisco

*3^28,000
5,255,000
6 7 k ,0 0 0
695.000

U,lU4#000
U, 006,000
2,328,000
1,195,00©

1,789,000

967.000

1 , 550,000

HDUSK

DSFIDENTIAL

(In thousands of dollars)
System

A - Expanses
1. Estimated current expenses, 19^0
B - Earnings
1. Estimated ourrent earnings, I9I4O
(exclusive of earnings on Govts.)
2. Estimated earnings on Govt*
securities to March 31
3. Net profits on sales of Govt*
securities to Maroh 28
U.

Total

C - Exoess of "A-l" over nB-Uw

Boston

New
York

Phila­
delphia

Cleve­
land

Rich­
mond

Minn­

Atlanta

e a p o lis

7,270

2,316

2,879

1,700

1,338

3,337

1 ,5 1 3

1,007

1,682

1,217

2 .1M

1,590

79

305

2iil

108

112

73

2 17

'^1

55

187

36

156

10 ,76 3

770

3,268

883

1,098

51j6

U36

1,16 0

1483

318

50U

I4IO

887

571

A<2

165

U3

57

30

2h

63

26

18

28

22

1£

12.921*

891

3,738

1,172

1,263

688

533

1,1*140

530

391

719

1)68

1.091

15,1398

1,228

3,532

l.lU;

1,6 16

1 ,0 1 2

805

1,897

983

616

963

71*9

1,353

8 ,16 6

561

i,2r/->,6RQ

270

7 3,8 16

57,142

103,710

177

262

2146

6/42

38,010 27,238

1<0,319

37,857

98,797

253,136 126,201 10 U ,/-£6

270,828 113,359 7U,U56 Hl+,135

95.269

202,507

2 5 2 ,^ 2 125,506 100,372

266,822 1 1 1 , 0 3 1 73,261 1 1 5 ,861+ 9U, 302

201+,057

97,690

123,869

77,572

61,705

1^5,^408

3,067

715

8!j0

316

278

815

96,332

U71,978

110,031

129,267

148,629

1*2 ,7 8 1

125,1420

G - Total allocation of Government
securities ("D" plus "F")

2.J+75.270 130,lj60

7i-i2,7l2

197,721

H - Present allocations

2.U75.270 177,032

751,585

202,976

-3,873

-5,255

I - Change in allocations




San

Fria ciiflfl

2,119

9U,129

- Allocation of remainder of System
holdings ($2 ,^7 5 ,270,000 less
♦1,218,611,000) on basis of "E"

Dallas

28, 8° ?

D - Allocation required (on basis of 1.73156$
earninga rate on Govts.) to produce
1 ,2 1 a ,6 11
earnings April-Deoember equal to ”C"
£ - Estimated dividends

Kansas
City

-

+3J429

+67U

+695

♦U,nU

+U,006

75,31+9 147,218
2l+7

♦2,328 +1,195

-1,729

♦967

-1,550

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

REALLOCATION OF GOVERNMENT SECURITIES IN SYSTEM OPEN MARKET,ACCOUNT ON APRIL 1, I9I4O

>
C
i
&
!
§•
* w
r t\ O
r
o >
*
— in
&
'« %
W
O

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D ECLA SSIFIED
Authority

12358

j REC'D IN FILES SECTION

I d - MAR 2 9 1940
[ 3

33r

March 28f 19140.

Hr, R. 0. Rouse, Vie® President,

4 Federal Reserve Bazik of Hew York,
Hew York, Hew York*




Dear Mr. Route *
There is enclosed a oopy o f tho table
showing ohaages accessary la holdiagS o f JEJaited
State* government securities o f the various Fed­
eral Reserve banks oa A p ril 1, 19lj0, under the
formula for reallooatioas of the ^System Opea
Market Aooount.
Current expeases sad ourreat earalags
(exelusive of earniags oa Government securities)
were estimated by multiplying the amounts for
October, 1939# through February, 19lP» by 2.U#
exoept that adjustmeats were made la the figures
fo r Hew York aad St. Louis as described below.
la oomputiag the estimates of earnings
aad expeases fo r the Hew York Baak earalags aad
expenses of the Aaaex Building were excluded from
the figures for the base period aad to tho result
thus obtaiaed budget amounts for earalags aad
expeases o f the Annex Building for 19l)0 were added.
The estimate of expenses fo r the St. Louis Baak
obtaiaed la accordance with the regular formula
was increased by |150,000, as was doae at the time
of the January 1 reallooatloa. I have discussed
these adjustments over tho telephone with Mr* Behreas.
Very tru ly yours.

htj
J* R. Van Fosseat Asst. Chief,
Division of Bsak Operatioas.

Enclosure 1 .

f o r Vi h
r

^

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

25
O
M
Eh!
O CD

REALLOCATIO* OF (X>VER10fE*T SSCURITm I I STSTKM OPES XHBm ACC001T OS APRIL 1, 19l#

cn

(2a thousand* o f d o lla r*}

cr*
w T5T
CSC
x
■f

' Systssi

KxxMMMriMt
1. }£ottaatod current aacpenses, 19^1/
B * Earning*
1* Istiaated current earnings, 19M*
(exclusive of earnings oa 0o*t*.)±/ /
2, Estimated earnings m Govt*
securities to March 31
3* Set p ro fit* on sales o f Oott*
securities to larofe 26
4.

*S*4**

m —
BOW

York

Phila­
delphia

C le W - ] kiehland

Atlanta

Chicago

Minn- Kansas
St,
^LoiiiJL aurella ■filter

Dallas

[Fnmciigfl

28,822

2,119

7,270

2.316

2#879

1.700

1,333

3.337

1.513

1,007

1,682

1,21?

2.1M

1.590

79

305

214

108

112

73

217

21

55

18?

36

156

770

3,268

883

1.098

5Jj6

436

1,160

483

318

50ii

1*10

887

1(2

165

1)8

57

30

2b

63

26

18

28

22

48

891y

3.738 '

1.172 y

1.263 v

533 y

1,1*140 y

530 y

391 '

15.896 ^ 1,228 ‘

3.532 -

1.11*1* y

1,616 - 1,012

805 y

1,897

983

10.763
571

'
/

12,921* >

Total

C * Excess o f *A-1* o w

Boston

688 7

y 616

'

719 y

1£8 7

1,091

963 '

71*9 ;

1,353

B - Allooation r e t i r e d (on basis o f 1.7315^
earning* rat# on Gorfcs.) to produce
1,218,6117 94.128

£ * Estimated dividends 3/
?

Allocation o f reaaiador o f Syvtea
holdings (# 2, 1175, 270,000 leas
11,218,611,000) m basis o f *S*

8,166 •'

561

270.731*

87.690

123,869

77,572

61.705

ll*5 ,lp 8

3.067

715

Qlfi

316

278

815

471.978

110,031

129,267

0 * Total allooation o f Sowmwmt
securities ("D" plus *F*)

2,U75,270 180,460 • 7142.712

197.721

H - Present allocations

2.U75.270 177.032

751.585

202.976

-8.873

-5.255

1 - Change ia allooations

1.256.659 J86,332

_

♦3.428

1/ See l e t t e r t o Mr* Rouse
2/ A c tu a l r a t e used - . 0130 I46 (275/365 X 1.73156#)
J / D ividen ds a c cru ed , Febru ary 29, p lu s 5?® o f p a i d - i n c a p i t a l stock on March 20



1(2,781

125,420

75.31*9 1*7.218
2k7
‘V#

177

38,010 27,238

73,816

57.1*12

103,710

262

246

61)2

1(0,319

37,857

98,797

253,136 126,201 101*^36

270,828 113,359 74,456 lll*,1 3 5

95.269

202,507

252, 1*62 125,506

100,372

266,822

94.302

204,057

♦4.114

♦4.006

♦967

-1,550

♦674

1*8.629

♦695

111,031

73.261 115,861*

♦2,328 *1,195

-1,729

rry O
‘ r
o >
* in

—- C/3.
5> 3
» g

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D ECLA SSIFIED
Authority

12358

April 1 reallocation

Hr, Sinead
Hr, Van Posaen

In oonneotion with the fortboosting reallocation in
theSystsei Open Hsricet Aocount, ttie question arises &# to h(W
we should arrive at th# lew York estimated earnings and #x~
penses for 19^0 in vi«v of th# fact that #arning# and expense#
in connection with th# Annex Building will be reported a# such
currently instead of being included for th# year as a whole in
th# Deesmber figure# |i m s don# in 1939 *
Sit York1# functional expens# report she**#, that ex~
pen### in oonneotion with the Annex Building during. 1939 totaled
$93,726,92 and earnings 162,116,19, These amounts, a# indicated
above, were Included in the December earning# and expense state**
inents. Following i# a table aiuariijg various estimates of 19^.0
earning# and expanse# as wall aa the actual figure# fo r 1939
n*ti«h, o f oourse, inolude figures connected with the Annex
Building* You will note that lay suggestion is that th# figure#
of both earnings and expense# obtained according to the usual
fonsula be reduced by $ 125, 000, I t may be that this. slig h tly
over eatisates th# asioimt of the expen###, but it 1# believed
that it definitely over states the earnings and, accordingly,
it is believed that the net result is satisfactory and incidentally
pretty closely in line with the 1939 actual figure#,
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF S M YORK

'Earning#
other than
o r Oorts,

Expense#
(m thousand# o f d ollar#}
1939 * Aetual
IS m - Jan, 1 estimate*
April 1 ##ti»at#**
Six times Jan, & Feb.
April 1 estimate adjusted
Proposed adjusted eatiraate

7,312
7,3**6
7tW4
7,303
7*2*3*
7#53&

3^3
229
I|25
266
299
3®®

eBased on Ju ly to loveaber aooording to fomula
**Based on October to February aocording to forsaila

-

*

>




R

L

E

C

O

P

Y

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D ECLA SSIFIED
Authority fc.Q* 12358

strictly c

o

n

f

i

d

e

n

t

I

APR 2 61968
PROFITS ON SWITCHES IN SYSTEM ACCOUNT |

3 3

3 ,

*

~

A question has been raised as to whether the present accounting
procedure used in the System Account may at times be a deterrent to the
,
proper administration of the Account, The procedure in question is that
/ y y' 0
by which profits on switches in the Account are added to current profits
and the securities purchased taken up at cost. The alternative under con­
sideration is to use the profits to write down the premium account on the
System^ books.
In carrying out the policies of the Fodcral Open Market Com­
mittee seeking to maintain orderly market conditions, it is frequently
desirable to make shifts in the System Account by selling individual is­
sues that are in considerable demand and buying issues in considerable
supply, particularly if the shift would be advantageous to the Account.
These shifts can properly be made at times when the market as a whole does
not need outright purchase© or sales by the System Account, At times like
the present when the market is above book value, each shift (l) increases
.the book value of the System Account, although the par value remains un­
changed, (2) reduces future income from the Account, and (3) increases
current profits.
The suggestion has been made that the accounting practice should
be reconsidered, because there is a possibility that it may militate
against the execution of transactions that are desirable from the point
of view of both the market and tho Account, At times when the market is
above book value there may be some hesitancy to undertake otherwise desir­
able transactions, because (l) to the extent that the book value is written
up and immediate profits are taken the possibility of incurring losses in
the future is increased and (2) to the extent that current income is re­
duced the possibility of failing to meet System expenses in the future is
increased. At times when tho market is below book value there may also be
hesitancy to undertake otherwise dosirable transactions, because of an un­
willingness to take losses*
An alternate procedure would be to use the profit on the issue
sold in a switch to write down the cost price of the issue purchased,
either directly or after this profit has been carried through the profit
and loss account. If this principle were applied when securities are
sold at a loss, it would be necessary to add the loss to the cost of the
issue purchased. From the accounting point of view a switch may be con­
sidered in either of two lights* The present accounting practice considers
the purchase and the sale in a switch as two separate transactions. From
another point of view a switch is somewhat in the nature of an exchange,
because in most routine switches both sides of the transaction are com­
pleted simultaneously and the total par value of the System^ investment
in Government s#curities is not altered. From this point of view the dif­
ference between book value and selling price is not the same kind of a
profit or loss that results from outright sales* The existing practice
amounts in effect under present market conditions to a write-up of the
System1s portfolio whenever a switch is made in the Account and results
in a decrease in the current rate of earnings on the Account,




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D ECLA SSIFIED
Authority

12358

It is recognized that the ultimate return to the System Aocount
on its investment in Government securities will not be known unless and
until the entire Account is liquidated. The ultimate return at that time
would be the same, regardless of the accounting practices that are fol­
lowed in the interim. The question for consideration is whether better
current results are provided by the existing procedure or by the use of
profits either on switches or on outright sales as well to write down
the cost of the issues purchased. Incidentally, if profits on sales of
securities were used to write down premiums, changes in the holdings of
the several banks in the Account on quarterly reallocation dates would
be substantially less than under the present procedure.
It may be noted in this connoction that profits and losses are
distributed-among individual Reserve banks on the basis of average hold­
ings in the Account since June 30, 1936, The premium account and current
earnings, however, are distributed on the basis of the current participa­
tion. Should it be decided to use profits to write off premiums paid,
the simplest procedure would be to make the entries on the basis of cur­
rent holdings rather than to continue to distribute profits on the basis
of average holdings since June 30, 1936. This is a question, however,
that would need to have the consideration of the committee.




REALLOCATION OF GOVErJ&EIJT SECUTttTI* c I.

System

0 ^ ^ ^ s t i i i a t e d ourrent expenses, 19^0 28,772

T New Phila­
Boston 1 York delphia
2,079

7,3l»6

2 ,3 3 5

SYSTM

C le v e ­
la n d

2,891

OPEK 1ARKLT ACOOUi’T 01. JAI.UAP.Y 1, I 9L0

R ich­
A tlanta^ Chicago
mond

1.669

1,2 6 5

Minn­
e a p o lis

§ t;
Lo u is

3,286

1 , 1.86

998

Kansas
C it y

1,7 11

San
Dallas Franoisco

1,210

2 .U76

1

Got* t s )
C* Excess o f A -l orer B -l

1,502

92

229

216

111

loll

51

211

2h

65

1SU

hi

lfl*

27,270

1,987

7 ,1 1 7

2 ,1 1 7

2,780

1,505

1.211;

3,075

1.W 2

935

1 .5 1 7

1,16 9

2,312

&• Allooatlon required (on basis of
l«75li0( earn ingrate an Got* ts )
to produce earnings equal to *C " l,557,0l|0
1« Estimated dividends, 19b0
F. Allocation of remainder of System
holdings (*2,i*fl!t,270,000 less
•l#357»ObO,000) on basis of nE"

8 ,13 1

927.230

113,1.52 1406,36012c;875158,730 90,1»99
563

3,057

727

830

310

ai.2O53li8.609 82,905 9li,650 3 5 .3 5 1

69,316 175,57!;83,1)76
275

£08

31,360 9 2 ,li2

53,386

2U|.

176

27,825

20.070

86,616
259

29,535

66,71*7 132,009

2l|lt.

636

27,825 7 2 .7 55

0* Total allocation o f Got* ts
( " i f plus " F * )

2 ,bBk, 270 177.6 55 75li.969 203,780 253, 530125^50 100.676 267,716 111,301 73,l.'-56 116,151 9I1.572 2oL.,76l*

Mm Present allocations

2 ,!i8/.'.,270 18 0 .36 1771,537 212,62t 259,222 126,855 100,391 273,11-6

8!',222

+285 - 5,!'30

+27,079

!• Change in allooations




- 2,726 - 16*568 - 8 ,91k - 5, 8li2 -3,005

67,I'M 112,90c
+6,015

♦3,9/j 6

90,0li5 20t'.,131
♦It, 527

*633

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D ECLA SSIFIED
Authority

12358

v

I

f e ’D IN RECORDS SECTION)
\\VV




APR1 $ 1968
Fe d

era l
of

R

eser v e

B

ank

N e w Yo r k

December 29, 1959

Dear Mr, Smead
We received your letter of December 28jand have
today sent to the Reserve banks a copy of the computation
showing the adjustments to be made in participations in the
System Open Market Account on January 2, 1940, as of January
1, 1940, pursuant to the plan adopted at the meeting of the
Federal Open Market Committee on November 50, 1957.
Enclosed herewith is copy of the letter of trans­
mittal together with three copies of the computation, also
copy of the telegram which was sent to each of the Federal
Reserve banks today.
lours faithfully,

Manager, System Open
Market Account.
Mr. E. L. Smead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations,
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System,
Washington, D. C.

Ends. (5)

4

R eproduced from the U nclassified

I D eclassified H oldings of the N ational A rchives

~DECLASSIFIED

.orrty L/)- llHSo

SiAllur letter aent to Pr©«id«nt of «aoh Federal Reaterye Bank except New York




ttr* fm m g i
Ib *o#^'rd®aao* trlife
fcrtrirwtttJa

t©l»grsifc of to^Iay# X sueload

of i&*

to t># *&&« om

Janu* 17 tf 1940, *9 of ^ms&ary 1, 1940, of* tfcw
o-f % im

f a m r T * b m fc * In th©

% « s ll*;ritrfc port­

folio*
Y<5mr# f&lf&fclly*

iob«rt 0* Bos**,
S«®.e^)0r^ %*t*« Qrp%&
Barkat AocoaPt

Honorable Boy A* Young, President,
Fi&Wjfl*! Rc*enre B«©k o f B© atoll*

i o ^ t ^ §&*#«

patios*

December m» 1939,
P I m m * m & following t*legraa to each President of the Federal Reserve Banka
as Indicated belewi

Bader the plan fo r realloeation o f Government aeeuritiea adopted ty
the Federal Open Metricet

Geastttee

SoveKber

50,

19 57, a readjustment o f participa­

tion* in Government securities held ia the Astern Account is ealled for January
1, 1940*

the computations showing adjustments to be made ia participations of

the several Federal Reserve beaks i t being sent to all Reserve banka today*
M

These computations indicate an
on famaxy 1*

decrease

of .mrr-irii.n-.•.v«r«.

in your participation

We shall wire yon on January f the detailed entriea to be made

on that date ae of Januazy

1*
JOTS!

iasxsm

Jmmg
Sinclair
Vlesdsfcg
'"W
Parker
Sehaller
Martin
f^r%m
Hamilton
Hilbert
Day




Bo aton
Philadelphia
Cleveland
Meiiaond
Atlanta
CMoago
it* Louis
Mlnttaapol f fi
Kansas 0l1y
Bailee
San Francisco

«o»
«#o*»
«*o*»
«*0*»
285,000
27*079*000
8,015,000
5,940,000
4^ 7,000
655,000

t e a m

| £,728,000
8,014,000
8,842,000
$,005,000
5,480,000
«#0#»

mQmn
■wO"*
••0*“

f

o ONj IDE-TIAL

REALLOCATICK OF GOVEMilEL'T S E C U x L T r c

I.

SY STH

OIKK IAKKLT AC^Oi :.T Oi, JA M ’A fY

(in thousands of dollars)
New Phila­ Cleve­ Rich­
Atlanta Chicago
mond
York delphia land

San
Dallas Francisco

998

1 ,7 1 1

1,?10

2l-

63

19*'

111

Id

3,075

1,1:62

935

1,5 17

1,169

2 .312

‘^ ,3 1 6 175.57li

83,176

08

2U<

176

299

2lJ’

638

31,360 92,11 2

27,825

20,070

29, *535

2 7 ,°2 5

72,755

253,^0 125,850 100,676 267,716

11 1 ,3 0 1

73,l'-56

Boston

A. Expenses
( 1) Estimated current expenses, 19^0

28,772

2,079

7,31)6

2,335

2,891

1,689

1,265

3,286

1,1.86

P ’'Warnings
( l ) Estimated ourrent earnings, 191-0
(exclusive of earnings on
Gov* ts)

1,502

92

229

216

111

Id '

51

211

27,270

1,987

7 ,1 1 7

2 ,117

2,780

1,5^5

D. Allocation required (on basis of
1.7 5 1W earning rate on Gov’ ts)
to produce earnings equal to "C” l,557,OliO
E. Estimated dividends, 19^0
F . A llo c a t i o n o f remainder o f System
h o ld in g s ($2,l'8l'.,270,000 le s s
* l
p j r s l . r\ r v r v r ^ ^
^
#
1 .5c 5
7 .OJjO.OOO) cm b e a is o
f "E "
G

Jotal a l lo c a t i o n o f G ov*Is
(" D " p lu s HFn )

H. P resen t a l lo c a t i o n s
I * Change in a l lo c a t i o n s

4




113 ,J.52 1*06,360 12(^875 158,730 90,1-99

8 ,13 1

5&> 3*057

927,230

6Ll,20331'8,609

727

177,655 75L,969 203,780

2 , 1:81',270

1 ^ 0 , 3 8 1 771,537

—

630

310

82,905 9^,650 35,351

2 , J'.Bl', 270

212,64i

1 9 l’0

Kansas
City

St#
Louis

System

C. Excess of A -l over B-l

1,

259,222 128,855

- 2,726 - 16*568 -e , 911.1 - 5 , 81-2 -3 ,0 05

1,21!

275

100,391

273 , 11:6

♦2 8 - - 5 , 1*30

Ivtinrieapolis

53,3R6 86,6l6

1 1 6 ,1 5 1

8)*, ° ?2 67, 1-M 1 1 ? , ° 0K
+?7 , 0?(v

♦ 6,015

♦5 ,9 )i6

2 ,1(76

66,717 1-3‘-.009

9f-,572 2o1',761i
° o , o l -5

20) ,1 3 1

+1*, 527

+633

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority £..Q« V23SB

December 28,

1939*

M r. R* 0* House, V ic e P r e s id e n t ,
f e d e r a l Reserve Bank o f How Y o rk ,
New Y o rk , New York#
Bear M r. Rouset
There i s en closed a oopy o f the t a b le showing the
changes n e ce ssary i n h o ld in g s o f U n ited S ta te s Government
s e c u r i t i e s # d i r e c t and gu a ra n te ed , by th e m r io u s F e d e ra l Re­
s e rv e banks on January 1, 19U0, under th e form ula f o r R e ­
a l lo c a t i o n s o f the System Open Market Aooount.
^ C u rre n te x p e n se s and c u rren t e a rn in g s (e x c lu s iv e o f
ea rn in g s on Governments) hr.-*e been estim ated b y m u lt ip ly in g the
a c t u a l amounts t h e r e o f f o r J u ly through November 1939 hy 2 .U *
We have deducted from the e stim ate o f c u rre n t expenses f o r
Chicago o b ta in e d on t h is b a s is tljlj.,000 i n v ie w o f an adjustm ent
i n annual d e p r e c ia t io n ch arges on th e Chicago and D e t r o it b u i l d ­
i n g s . We have added 1150,000 to the estim ate o f cu rren t ex­
penses fo r S t . Louis b ec au se o f th e p r o s p e c t iv e in c re a s e in
d e p r e c ia t io n o f fi x e d m achinery and equipment due t o the
i n s t a l l a t i o n o f a i r c o n d itio n in g a t th e head o f f i c e and
branches «




Very t r u l y y o u rs ,

E . L* Smead, C h ie f,
D iv is io n o f Bank O p e ra tio n s*

n m o c «io ji or oarsm an swrnmm a srsm c m huxet mcodvt or jum xt i, 19(10
(la thwuwaad* ef * «lU r «)
m/mrnmmmmm
^ 5 ---T O
UWMNW
n r ga r
Atlanta Chioa#;# Un^«
Loul* j—r>nl|<
ft ia r iw *
m m XI# @1# *"****il^ftlMla

i q w ■«

fH

>vT

A* B4& s L m *'>
(| M ^ M

■WV m u ?
Bertoa
m
mmvmk York id*lphlfl<i |A8i

l"<F■m
‘
enrvmt <ni>«MM,19i«0 «»7 T « /

(il|s*&ffgjk*d •urrait •*rning*»l&&
#rf«*3dhl**
m m ln & m m
0®**#)
6* !* * • • * o f A»S i w

1*§

8*079 7,jW

7
1.5087
*7 ,a r® /

1.927

2,395 2,891 1,629

1.265 5.886

1,1.86

2U

2b

6J

5,075

1J»6*

955

*a&8?$i$©*730 90A99 #*3t£f?S*5&

•54*76

229

216

7.117

2 .U 7

U1
2*7*0

lCt

1,585

1.21b

992

1,711

1*210

2,1*76

ISt

Ul

16b

1,517

1.1#

2.512

$* Alloeotien roqt*ir#<i (oa t e t li of

1.751& ••mlncrrmt* on 0*r* to)
/
t# produo# oorali*. oquftl to *e* *»99M t* U9#Xi9B
K. Sotiaftto*

19l*©

V# A-Xloootion of romolxuior o# fty>t>—
holding* (|2gii6li#a70»000 looo
| i #597#0U0#000) m b o tii of * * "

y

565

176

25 J

638

*0 1

aU»

3*#5*0 9t*lU r

87**25

20,070 29,555 27,825 72,755

MJ&J79 177.655 75fc.9<9205.7eo2«,yo 125350 I00,fir6 26*716 U1.301

73^56 116.151 9b,572 20b,76b

2^tti,2TO/ 180.5» 771.557 » M * 29*222 UM95 100,391 275^6

67*1.1*1 112,205 90,0fi5 2eti.l51

*#W

T27

8P

55,3#6 26,616 66,71*7 152,009

275

sS)L

/
tifettgJhM flf 8a#9©5 9 M 9 » 35#351

«• Total alloootion of Set***

{• if pltto *F*)
Ii* PrtWBt allooatioa#
I * Citoago In allocation*




— / -4,726 -I6568 >«,91Ii -5,8i*2 -?,005

«*,222

*285 -5,1*30 *27,079

*6,015 *3,9fi6 4,527

*653

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority fc.Q* 12358

MB mirror
U E Cl 2 9

EXPLANATION OF COMPUTATION OF ITEMS INDICATED
(R e a llo c a t io n o f Government S e c u r it ie s January 1, 19^40)

A~1

2»l4. tim es c u rren t exp en ses, July-Novem ber, a d ju s te d as
f o llo w s ;
1*

^lil^OOO deducted from Chicago in v ie w o f
adjustm ent in d e p r e c ia t io n ch arges on
Chicago and D e tro it b u ild in g s t o 2 p er
cent o f g ro s s book valu e#

2#

|150,000 added to St# L o u is in v ie w o f
p ro s p e c tiv e in c re a s e i n d e p r e c ia tio n on
fi x e d m achinery and equipment ( i n s t a l l a ­
t io n o f a i r c o n d it io n in g )•

B -l

2#U times c u rre n t e a rn in g s ,

D

Rate as o f December. 28, 1939# from Mr. M i l l e r b y t e le p h o n e .

E

6

H

As o f December 28, 1939, from Mr. M i l l e r by teleph o n e#




July-Decem ber.

p e r cent o f p a i d - i n c a p it a l on December

27 ,

1939*

Dooscfcor 22,

Mr, T. Guy Hitt,
F irst Ties President,
Fodoral R H « m Bezik of St* Louis,
St* Louis, Missouri*

1939

V

Doar Mr. Hitti
Roforonoe la nstdo to your l* t t * r of J)*oojsber 18*/1939*
in rexard to tho prospective lnoroases In expense* of your Bank
la 19U0 Incident to tha installation of air conditioning equipMBt in tho hood o ffloo and branch buildings*
A aunber of th* other Federal Reserre bankt whloh hay*
Installed a ir conditioning equipment la rooent years hare sot
aside a epeoial reserve at the md of the yoar In whloh th* in­
stallatio n was ooapletod equal to the entire oost of the in sta lla ­
tion snd hare charged such oost to p ro fit and loss rather than
current expenses* It w u ld seem that whenever a Federal Resery*
bank wishes to dopreoiato now equipment over a period of ton
yoars the charge should be aside to current expenses, but shen It
wishos to w rit* o f f substantial anounts within the oourse of oa»
Or two years that I t is preferable to nake ths charge to profit
aad lees* as otherwise current eiqpenses aro unduly inflated during
suoh years* It Is suggested* therefore, that I f you wish to charge
the oost of ths a ir conditioning o ff within a two-year period that
you antes tho #mrge diroot to profit aad lo ss. In order to allow
fo r approximately h a lf of this cost’ s being written o ff in 19^0,
wo shall Include $150,000 for this purpose In our estimate of e » pcnsoc of your Bank in the Januaiy 1, 194*0* real loo at ion of
M ourltios in tho Systna Opon Market Account*




Tory tru ly yours.

B. L* Smead, Chief,
Dirision of Bank Operations.

R ep rod uced from tiie U nclassified I D ecla ssified H oldings of the N ational A rchives

D E C L A S S IF IE D

Authority E.&

•

•

•

•

J
,

3

-

« U

'/ 5 7

Fe d e r a l R e s e r v e B a n k
of

N ew Yo r k
Deceniber 15, 1959.

> c

* ***&•-*•'V

.t

C» t

S ires
*k/v»\

iL»Mb t

The board of directors of this bank, at it s regular meeting on December
14 , 1959 at which a quorum was present, adopted the following resolution:
"VOTED to declare a dividend for the six months* period ending
December 5 1, 1939, at the rate of six per centum per annum on the
paid-in capital stock of the bank, payable on the 50th day of
December, 1959, to stockholders as shown by the books of the bank at
the close of business on that date.n
There are enclosed two copies of a statement of estimated income and
expenses for the year 1959 In comparison with actual income and expenses for the
year 1958*
This statement was presented to the directors in connection with
their consideration of the above-mentioned dividend and the deductions from net
earnings shown in such statement have been considered by the directors and of­
fice rs and are deemed appropriate.
Among the adjustments upon the books of the bank reflected in the en­
closed statement is the transfer to "Reserves for Contingencies” of the amount
o f the p ro fit on sales of United States Government securities, shown in the
statemsat as $948,000.
The directors authorized the transfer to this account
o f fits total p rofit during the year 1959 on sales of Government securities so
that the figure of $948,000 may not be the fin al figure when the books are
closed for this year.
Before authorizing this transfer, the directors con­
sidered the possib ility of applying the amount of the profit on sales of Govern­
ment securities in reduction of the book value of this bank*s participation in
the System Open Market Account, but they fe lt that such an application of this
amount would be less desirable because of the bookkeeping problems involved in con­
nection with future reallocations of this bank's participation in the System Open
Market Account and because i t probably would be less revealing of the actual results
o f our participation in the Account than the course adopted.
We should appreciate receiving the Board* s approval of the payment of
the above-mentioned dividend and the making of the adjustments indicated in the
statement*
The fin al adjustments would be made, of course, on the basis of the
actual year-end figures.
Respectfully,

X

Herbert H. Kimball,
Secretary.
Beard of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System,
Washington, D. C.

333.3
files. (2)



Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

12358

*

Mr. Smead

'O C T 1 1 1939
Octgiber 34, 1939

Formula for reallocation
X

Mr* Van Fossen

of System account.

%

Following Is a statement shoeing the changes in participations
in the System account on April 1, July 1 , and October 1, and for purposes
of comparison the corresponding changes that would have occurred if (A)
securities not needed to cover expenses and dividend requirements had been
alloeated in proportion to total expenses and dividends combined, and
(6) if tbe reallocations on April 1, July 1, and October 1 had been made
on tbe m e m basis aa the January 1 allocation, i*e*# if accrued earnings
and exposes and profits during the current year had been disregarded and
the allocation aade to cover a twelve month period rather than the period
to the end of the current calendar year*
1939 w j & w c k y i o m of system accost
_____.................................................................. ...

Revised on basis of
distributing securities not needed to
cower expenses and
dividends in propoiv
■ti0» to expenses and

Actual

Federal
Reserve
Bank

|
1 Revised on basis of
j a 12 month estimate,
(disregarding earnings,
(expenses, and profits
j
to date

July
July
Oct* (April
April
Oct*
July Oct*
April
.1 ... .. 1 . .1 ....„;
. 1 .. ... 1 . ..1 .. J..1 . ....X. .r ......
Boston
Hnr York
Philadelphia
Cleveland
Richmond
Atlanta
Chicago
St* Louis
Minneapolis
Kansas City
Balias
San Franc&aeo




♦3
-3

♦1
*5

♦1
-2
♦6

-3
♦n
♦4,

♦2
♦10

♦7
-9

-10

-10

*•$
-3

mmm

•*4

-2.
♦43

-6
•5

-10

-5
♦5
-30
-3

-10

~4
♦4

♦3
—3

♦1

-3
♦36

♦n

-5

♦4

♦1
~2
♦6

♦7
***9

-10

♦3
-69
-4
♦9

#10

~4

♦1
♦1
-1

♦7
♦17
-13

♦5
♦4

H

-g

-3

*■6

♦8
♦16

^4

-7
-5

-10

♦2

♦7

♦11

—
1
♦9
♦5

♦2
♦5
-3
-4

-2
♦28
♦3

♦6
-8
—S

♦2

-2

-n

—
2

-2

-3

-3

—
2
-4

—
6

<*4
♦3

*
■

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority £..()« 12358

Mr* Smead
It irt.ll be noted that the reallocation on April 1 and July 1
would not have been affected by adoption of Plan A above mentioned,
but that on tha October 1 reallocation results would have been affect­
ed quite materially# and that in the case of six banks the change in
participations would have been greater than at any quarter date as
actually made* It will also be noted that under Plan B referred to
above changes in participations would have been much less pronounced
than under the existing formula or imder H a n A♦ It is also reasonable
to assume that changes on the forthcoming January 1 reallocation would
be reduced if Plan B had been used for the October 1 reallocation*
Tou will recall that in Bjy discussion of this matter with

Mbssts* Bouse and Hiller at New Tork they expressed the opinion that
the present formula is satisfactory, as evidenced by th© fact that it
has been in use for a considerable period of time and no criticisms
have been received for at least a year from any of the Federal Reserve
banks* Mr* Rouse also stated that he would dislike to make any change
in the present formula until he has had further opportunity to study
the matter*
Under the circumstances and particularly since results on
the January 1 reallocation would not be likely to differ greatly under
either of the proposed new formulae from those under the existing
formula, it is suggested that no change be made in the formula until
after the January 1 reallocation, and that steps be taken to obtain
accurate Information as to what the results would have been in 1939
under Flans A and B referred to above if they had been used during the
current calendar year* I have not discussed this matter with Hr.* Miller#
but the Federal Reserve Bank of New Tork is in position to compile such
figures and I do not believe that the undertaking would require an
excessive amount of work*
The foregoing does not contemplate, of course, any change in
the present objective of distributing the System account on the basis
fundamentally of expense and dividend requirements in excess of earn­
ings from other sources* It may be desired# however# to five considera­
tion again to the possibility of distributing the System account in
such a manner as to tend to equalise the position of the Federal Reserve
banks as regards their capital accounts# either as a whole or exclusive
of capital paid in and surplus (Section 13b)* In this connection it is
well to bear in mind that to accomplish this latter objective it is
necessary to establish some standard for determining what the capital
account of one bank should be as colored with another* I think the fact




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

Mr* Smead

V2358

- 3 -

that the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia has a paid in capital of
$12,116,000, Cleveland 113,790,000, and Chicago 113,603,000, is suf­
ficient to show that capital paid in would not be a satisfactory basis*
In my opinion the most equitable basis would be to relate capital
account to total deposits of meafcer banks in each Federal Reserve dis­
trict, and a somewhat less satisfactory basis would be to relate capital
account to required reserves of the banks in each Federal Reserve dis­
trict* The first mentioned plan is based on the theory that total de­
posits of ossber banks is a pretty good measure of the relative importance
of the various Federal Reserve districts and of the possible risk In­
volved in granting discount accommodation* Of course expense and divident requirements would be provided for before any distribution of the
System account was made with a view to equalising the capital account,
lhat has been said above, I believe, is sufficient to demonstrate that
the problem of deciding upon a satisfactory standard for comparing the
capital set-up of the various Federal Reserve banks is a very difficult
6ns and that it would be very optimistic to anticipate that the twelve
Federal Reserve banks could be brought into agreement on this subject*
A second problem already suggested by implication is as to whether we
should be concerned in this connection with the total of paid in
capital* surplus, and reserve for contingencies or only with Section 7
surplus and reserve for contingencies* This in itself would probably
prove to be a difficult problem to solve Inasmuch as it is likely that
there would be considerable disagreement on the part of the Federal
Reserve banks in the matter*
Assuming that agreement had been reached as regards these two
subjects, there would remain the problem of deciding how securities not
needed to cover expenses and dividends should be allocated with a view
to equalising the oapital position* There are any number of ways, of
course, in which this could be done and I should imagine that getting
agreement on this point would not be the least of our troubles* My own
suggestion would be that after providing for estimated expenses and
dividends with some litt&e margin for error any securities remaining
should be divided equally aiaong the Federal Reserve banka that were
below the System average as regards capital, for example, if at this
stage 3200*000*000 of securities remained and eight Federal Reserve
banks had a ratio of capital, surplus and reserve for contingencies to
total deposits of member banks less than the System ratio, each of
these Federal Reserve banks would be given 125,000,000 in the final
allocation* An additional allocation of 325,000*000 which would, of
course, be subject to change at the end of three #®nths would represent
earnings of something like #100,000 during a three months period* In
the course of time, if the Federal Reserve System had substantial excess
earnings, it is obvious that om by one the banks that were originally
below the System average nould be brought up to the System average, and
in the meantime the System average would Itself be rising so that
ultimately all Federal Reserve banks itould be brought up to the level of
the highei
□




REALLOCATION 0 1 GOVhHMEi.T SECliPiTIES H i SYSTEL OPEN iARKET AGCOVi T Oh OCTOBER 1, 1939

q eo
I ^

"I

„

....

•

System

Boston

New
York

2,135

7,236

5 Jk:~ #j$>enses

yj

a

1. E stim ated c u rre n t expenses, 1939

28,1'89

P h i la ­
d e lp h ia

2 ,3li8

C le v e ­
land

R ich­
mond

A tla n t a

Chicago

2 ,83k

1,673

1,535

3,267

*1

San
Francisco

1,35k

9U2

1,718

1 ,1 9 1

2,U58

i

B *f^ r a in g s

1* Estimated

w

Kansas 1
Minn­
sit.
Dallas
C ity [
Louis e a p o lis

c u rre n t e a rn in g s , 1939
( e x c l u s i v e o f e a rn in g s on Govts.)
2 . E stim ated e a rn in g s on Govts, to
S e p t. 30
3. Net p r o f i t s on G ovts, to Sept. 27

1 ,5 °2

110

258

175

115

78

56

208

25

65

197

h6

169

26, Ol-l

1,158

2,858
260

1,220
107

778
75

1,317

101

116

1.033
90

2,l6o
199

1,920

7 ,Ji72

170

670

2,137
197

2,601
230

1,387

2,337

29,880

2,200

8 ,I:-00

2,^09

2 ,9ii6

1,587

1,315

3,326

1,352

918

1,630

1,169

2,528

3 ,05k

725

822

305

272

823

239

175

256

2ia

Q h

1,890

56k

710

391

292

76L;

2Ll

199

3V 1

263

5^

127,295 h b l ,062

liiii,1 '56

181,851 100 ,1L 6

7li,789

195,682 61,727

50,9c9 88,108

67,362 12 4 ^ 5 6

1 ,082,880

75,308 1.07,785

96,805

1*0,725

36,319

109,891 31,912

23,367 3U,182

32,180

Gr» T o ta l a l lo c a t i o n of Govts. ("E” plus "F") 2,803,809

202,603 891,867

2)-l,26l

291,608 110 ,8 7 1 111,108

305,573 93,639

711,536122,290

99,5^2 229,111

H. P re s e n t a llo c a t io n s

20)’,7 lii 8>‘8 ,^'l

239,252

2*1,203 15 0 ,6 11 115,901

300,90^ 123,689

77,215132,709 103,988 22li,983

-2,111 +1-3,226

+2,009

I4..

Total

c. Bstisated dividends

8 ,110

D. Exoess of A -l plus "C" over B4+

6,719

K. Allocation re q u ir e d (on b a s is o f 1 * 51+90^
earnings r a t e on Govts.) to produce
earnings October-Decem ber equal to ” DW 1,720,923
F. A llo c a t io n o f rem ainder o f System
h o ld in g s (1 2 ,803 ,809,000 le s s
4 #1,720,923,000) on b a s is o f "C*

I.

Change in a llo c a t i o n




2,803,809
—

h97

109,757

+ 1C ,/-05

122

-9,7J'0

-k,793

+[.,670 -50,050

-2,879 -10,1-19

rU,lili6

8k , 655

+li, 128

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority fc.Q* 1235%

a 8? 8ECQR0S SECTION
A Pftl 91968
Fe d

eral

R

eser v e

Ba

nk

o f N ew Y ork

September 29, 1 9 5 9 .,^

D ear Mr* Smead:
We r e c e iv e d y o u r l e t t e r o f September 28/and have today
sent to th e Reserve banks a copy o f the computation showing the
adjustm ents to be made in p a r t i c i p a t io n s in the System Open Mar­
k e t Account on O cto ber 2, as o f O cto ber 1 , pursuant to th e p la n
adopted a t the m eeting o f the F e d e r a l Open Market Committee on
November 50, 1937*
E nclosed h erew ith i s

copy o f th e l e t t e r o f t r a n s m it t a l

t o g e t h e r w ith t h re e c o p ie s o f the com putation, a ls o copy o f the
tele gram which was sent to each o f the F e d e ra l R eserve banks t o ­
day.

Market Account

Mr. E. L . Smead, C h ie f,
D iv is io n o f Bank O p e ra tio n s ,
B oard o f Governors o f the
F e d e r a l Reserve SSystem,
W ashington, D. C.

E nds.




(5 )

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
r

M IS C . 1 4 0 A

Authority fc.Q* 1235B

15 M 8 - 3 7

FEDERAL

RESERVE BANK OF N E W

YORK

P le a s e send f o llo w in g telegram to each F e d e ra l Reserve bank

m

in d ic a te d b «lo w j

Under the p la n for r e a llo c a t i o n o f Government securities adopted b y the
fe d e ra l Q o m

M arket Commit te© November F*0t 1937, a readjustm ent o f p a r t i c i p a t i o n *

.in Government s e c u r i t i e s h e ld in the j^rstem Account i a c a lle d f o r O ctober 1 ,

th e

com putations showing adjustm enta to be made in a a r t i c t p a t i o n s o f the s e v e r a l F e d e r a l
R eserve banks i s

b ein g sent to a l l Reserve banks 'tedagr.

increase

These com putation* in d ic a t e

— ^ _\

aa

of
in y o i r r ~ ^ r f c lB ^ ^ t i o n on v c t o b e r 1*
We s h a l l
d e crea se
/
w ir e you on O cto b er 2 the d e t a i le d e n t r i e s to b©\ made o iH th a t d a te as o f O cto ber 1#

8PR00L

INCREASE
lo u n g

Sinclair
H eadng

Leaoh
Parker
S c h a lle r
M artin
Peyton
Hamilton
G i lb e r t

Dagr




Boston
P h ila d e lp h ia
C levelan d
Rtctoaond
A tla n ta
Chicago
S t . L o u is
M in n ea p o lis
Kansas O ily
D a lle s
San Francis©©

#

#

2, 111,0 0 0

2,009,000
10,405,000

9$740,000
4*793,000
4,670,000

BO,060,000
2.879.000
10,419,000
4.446.000
4,128,000

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D ECLA SSIFIED
Authority

M IS C . 14 0 A

IS M

123 5 8

8 -3 7

FEDERAL

RESERVE BANK

OF N E W

YORK

S im ila r l e t t e r sent to P r e s id e n t o f each F e d e ra l R eserve bank*

September 29, 1959*

Dear Mr*

Youngs
In accordance w ith ay t e l e g r ^ o f today, X c-itclo^e h ere­

w ith computation o f the x «a d jtt«ju M n ^ r-io ^ b a made on O ctober

?9 aa

o f O ctober 1 , o f the p a r t i e i j ^ t l o n s o\ the f W e r & l Beaerva banka
in the $ r a t « * Open & * r k a js p o r t lM io * /

Allan Sprout
'First Vice President

Honorable fioj A. Young, P r e s id e n t ,
F a d e ra l i^ s e r v e Bank ©f B oston ,
Boston, $&a«*

Sae.l»

BRB/JS




CC97IDSBTIAL

REALLOCATION

Ob

In thousands o f d o l l a r s )
P h i la ­
New
C le v e ­
Boston
d e lp h ia
land
York

R ich­
mond

A tla n t a

Chicago

2B.489

2,155

7.256

2,51*8

2,851.

1,675

1,55 5

3.267

1,554

942

1,718

1.191

2.456

1,502

110

258

175

115

78

56

208

25

65

197

1*6

169

26 , OM

1,920

7,1; 72

170

670

2,137
197

2,601
230

1,387

122

1,15 8
101

2,858
260

1,220

778

2,337

107

75

1,3 17
116

1,033
90

2, l 60
199

29,880

2,200

8 ,L.OO

2,509

2 , 9li 6

1,587

1,315

3,326

1,352

918

1,630

1,16 9

2,526

8 ,110

56h

3,051+

725

822

305

272

823

239

175

256

21+1

63U

6,719

h97

1,890

710

391

292

76k

2ltl

199

263

56k

18 1,8 5 1 100 , 11x6

71-1,789

195,682 61,727

50,9c9

88,108

67,362 3 ii,li5 6

System
.. 1 ------- — ------------ —
A - Bxpenses

---------- -------

1

■ 1.... ^

1* E s tin a te d c u rre n t expenses, 1939
B -E a rn in g s
1 . Estim ated c u rre n t e a rn in g s, 1939
(exclusive o f earn in gs on Govts.)
2 . Estimated ea rn in g s on Govts, to

8ept« 30
3 . le t profits on Govts, to
h*

Total

c . B stiafcted
D. E xoess

S ept. 27

of

dividends
A - l p lu s nC"

over

B4*

E . A llo c a t i o n r e q u ir e d (on b a s is o f 1#5U90^
e a rn in g s r a t e on Govts.) to produce
e a rn in g s October-Decem ber equal to "Dw 1,720,923
F . A llo c a t i o n o f rem ainder o f System
h o ld in g s ( # 2 , 803 , 809,000 le s s
#1 ,7 2 0 ,9 2 3 ,0 0 0 ) on b a s is o f "C"
i

GOVERNMENT SECURITIES IN SYSTEL OPEN MARKET ACCOULT ON OCTOBER 1, 1939

127,295 148!',082

1Hm-i- Kansas
S t.
C it y
Louis eap o l i s

D a lla s

San
Franciseo

1,082,886

75*308 1i07.7B5

96,805

109,757

1 -0,725

36,319

109,891 31,912

23,367 31,162

32,180 8^655

G. T o ta l a l l o c a t i o n o f Govts. (" E * p lu s " F " ) 2,803,809

202,603 891,867

21.1,2 6 1

291,608

U>0,871

11 1,10 8

305,573 93,639

7l+,336122,290

99,5^2

229,111

H. P r e s e n t a l lo c a t i o n s

20l-,7lli 8 li8 ,6 L l

239,252

281,203

15 0 ,6 11

115,901

300,903123,689

77,215132,709 103,988

22L.,983

-2 ,1 1 1 +1i3,226

+2,009

+ 1C ,) j05

- 9.7110

- i t ,793

+JU,670 -30,050

I.

Change in a l lo c a t i o n




2,80^,809
—

-2 ,8 7 9 - 10 , 1 ' 19

nl4.,Lli6

tLi,12B

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
■4,

Authority fl.Q* 12358

'•

■Af

"t '

September %

Mr* Allan Sproiil,
flrit Vie© President,
Federal Beaerve Bank of Hew Tork,
Hew fork, So* Tork*
Dear *r. Sproul*

There ia encloaed a copy of the table showing the
change© neoeaaary i s holdings of halted Statea Government aecari~
tlaa by tl>« varloua Fadaral Heaerre banka on Qetober 1 1939
wader the forwila for reallocations of th# grates Open Market
Account.

,

,

Carreat expenses have been eatlnated by amltiplying
the anoints for J«B»ary through August by 1*5, and 1b the eaae of
Atlanta adding 170,000, aa at* done at the tlae of the July 1
reallocation. I have received a le tte r fro* St. Louie ateting
lt a Installation of air-condi tioaiag and ventilating equipaent
w ill not ba completed this year, and accordingly we have s&de no
adjmataacit o f eatinated expenaea for St. Louis.
latinated current earnings (exclusive of earning® on
Goveraaenta) were confuted by amltiplying each eamlnga for ternary
through Asguat by 1*5. We have adjuated the eatinate for' Richmond
stained os thia baaia by deducting f2$,000 In view of the recent
falling off in earnings on industrial advances.




fery truly y o u r s ,

E.
L. Snead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operationa.




unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

*•

DECLASSIFIED
Authority £ .0 * 12358

wmMu&tm or coitptjTAfio* or it h is imiCArw
(Reallocation of Gorarnaent Securities October 1 , 1939)

*
i

1*5 tlaei c u r r e n t expenses January-Auguet, adjusted as
follow*!
Atlanta— 170,000 added to cover unusual ehargeoffs
and depreciation on account o f air conditioning and
general improvements of branch bank building* to
be completed till year*
1*5 tlaas earnings {excluding earning* on Governments)
January-August, adjusted aa follows*
Richmond— 125*000 deducted in view of recant falling
off in earninge on industrial advances*
Obtained or confirmed by telephone from Wav lorlc, September
27.
Dividend* paid and accrued through August 31 plus 2%
of paid-in oapital etocic on August 31*
Aetna! rate usad
§92/365 X 1.54900}.
fro* law Ior| by telephone September 27.

Bata obtained

- ---

----

For Filet
S. E Haiafet

A -

Expenses
1* E s t i i » t e d c u rre n t ex p en ses, 1939

B - E arn in gs
1 . Estim ated c u r r e n t e a r n in g s , 1939
{ e x c lu s iv e o f e a rn in g s on Gov+s.)
2 . E stisiated e a rn in g s on G o vts. to
Sept# 30
3* Ket p r o f i t s on Govts# to Sept* 2?

P h ila ­
d e lp h ia

Cleve­
la n d

Rich­
mond

7*236

2,3fi8

2,33k

1,673

258

175

115

78

2,137

2,601
230

1*38?

197

122

Boston

Hew
York

2*133

7

HO

26. 0f i l *

1,920

2,337 '

1?0

System

2B Ji89 /

1,50 2

ijm

670

A t la n t a | C hicago

1.5 3 5

K ansasf
S t,
Minn­
D a lla s
Louis e a p o lis C it y |

San
F rancisco

3.267

1.35k

9i|2

1,71B

1,191

2 ,! l58

206

25

65

197

h&

16?

1.15 8
10 1

2,858

1,220

260

10 ?

m
75

1*317

1.033

2,160

90

199
2,528

116

29*880 7

2,200

0 , 1*00

2.509

2,9k6

U557

1*315

3,326

1.352

918

1,6 30

1.1<59

C* E«tiaated dividends

8,110 7

56b

3.0 &

725

822

305

272

823

239

175

256

aJUi

6&

D. F«©ess of A-l plus •c* over B—jU

6*719 /

U97

1,890

5®*

710

391

292

?6k

2fil

199

M

263

5&U

i>«

Total

E. A llo c a t io n r e q u ir e d (<s* b a s is o f 1,5^90^
e a rn in g s p a te on ^ovta.) t o produce
ea rn in g s October-Decemb©r equ al t o WD*

v

127,295 LBli,082

1,720,923

F . A llo c a t io n o f remainder o f Syat#®
h o ld in g s (12*803*809.000 less
| l #?aD#923#000) on b a s i s o f "C*

1*082,686

G. Total a l l o c a t i o n o f G o v t a .(nE* p lu s " F " )

2 ,8 0 3 ,609 7

lU t.h ^6 181,851 100.1L6 7h , 7B9

195,682 61,7a?

50,969 86,106

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

H-'ALLOCATi'.OI;
< Ot n O Y S - S m ^ SECUFiTIES IM SYSTKti OPEN MARKET ACCQFi.T OK OCTOBER 1, 1959

6?,}62 lM-, 1i56
>
c
0r

C

8l -,655

1*07,785

96*805

109,757

1.0*725

36,319

109,891 31.912

23,367 ^ ‘.182

32,180

202,603 891,867

2fi l , 26l

291*608

li*o* 87l

111,108

305.573 93.639

711, 356122*290

9 9 . ^ 2 2^,111

l

239,252

28I,2©3

150 *6 11

115*901

300, 903123,669

3#226

*£*009

+ 10 , 1*05

-9,7?*0

**•7 9 3

*£1, 670 - 30,050

75,306

t S!
jr^ p
1a >
*

H . P re s e n t a llo c a t i o n s

I . Change in allocation




2,803,809

7 2o!

,7 lli

8li8 , %

- 2 * 111 ^

77*215132,709 105,988
-2 ,8 7 9 -10,?’19

—J?0hho

22h.,m3
♦J?.,126-

i

uo

!§ l
OS ^
°® o

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority £.»Q* V2358

F

»D IN FILES SECTION

^

JUN30 1939 . ^

3 5 3 * 3 1 3 ..... 1
■ 0

f i j */
June 29. 1939

Hr* Allan Sproul,
First Vice President,
Federal reserve Hank of !lenr York,
?terr York, Neir York.
Dear Mr* Sproul?
Referring to ay letter of June

26,

there is

enclosed a coper of the revised statement showing the
changes under the formula in holdings of United States
Government securities by the various Federal Reserve
banks on July 1, 1939# based upon the aiaount of United
States Ooverrmenfc securities in the System Open llarket
account as of June 2C*
Very truly yours,

J
E* L* Saead, Chief,
Idvision of Bank Operations*

Enclosure - 1




muficwriot m

mmmmmm

ta c m tn m

m

m m m , m m

w m m

te a m t m

( I i thocaaada ©f g a ll mm)

3»J— ^g-^. "W m "
SjrttaK ,WBmwtm
Tort
r a r m t axpaaaaa# 1959

m m

i* 1999

' A

T O T SKMHUi
"TECEP: S im *
Atlanta Chicago 1it* , aapoll*
Uad ..........
Louia
City

\W9
*&4t&yi

7.857

8*310

t#7ff

117

85b

in

U6

1*851

b.770

M j0 *

1#^

t*m

JLy» r
Win

fiallaa

2»b38

i# W

$?&

(X ) Wm*J m M I mar rant wmtwfaiga# 1 ^ 9
(aautlBi&v# iwf airntW|^> on
1*537

(2 ) lstJ a*l*6 aarmiajpl <S*fc
mob&i t» <?mmi 50

<3 ) Bat pmf%*m m Qmmrwmat*
tm J w m S it

1*675

im

w

lit

l#b90

T o tal

C • Wsmmm of A -l a ** r B«L
H * A ll«c*tio® required (on I m I « e f
I#336££/£ p
t t w a c a d m * rat*
on OwrH*) fc* j w r i d * aarttls^t
4l»ly*D *a«abar a ^ m l to * 0*
& • &*ti**t*4 d ir t d m x l* * 1 9 3 9
¥

188

u m

8.5J7

6!<T

io e

m

19b

b8

170

«

en?

T0i

an

£88

l.b 8 5

165

m

It

©

65

lb3

,lb 8

801

1.738

563

389

ti9b

i*w

9*

i.<78

1*753

5b

907

A3

m

583

/

/

/

l*8b3«61b

9*098

77

✓

S

/

7 7 *0 2 b3*b98
880

56b

/

S
,5 «

57.71*9

10},C88

8 »

2b0

633

• Allocation of r w iln lif of Syata*
*>14fcig« {feS 9 < V tf? aftafe l i M

ae tafia o f *g?
£ • t o ta l

tUaetti«M i

W • ^ N tttst a lle a a tle tK




{£8.918

116.85b

H 8*3b8

b9.066

b5.7b6

8.550,637 187.081 753*161

214*06

855.566 U A .U 9 lW .b 8 8 875.898 Uft.817 7U 7b3 !2 b*7 3 »

133.785 H5.97b

3i*?36

im * M

101*990 t i ^ n

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

cH /

1235B

hi RECORDS $ECTtC$

7^'




APR1 91968
F ed eral R eserve Bank
of

N e w Yo r k

June

1959.

D ear Mr, Sineads
We r e c e iv e d y o u r l e t t e r o f June 26 .and have today
sent to the R eserve banks a copy o f th e computation showing
th e adjustm ents to be made i n p a r t i c i p a t io n s in th e System
Open Market Account on J u ly 5, as o f J u ly 1 , pursuant t o th e
p la n adopted a t the m eeting o f th e F e d e ra l Open M arket Com­
m itte e on November 50, 1937.
E nclosed h erew ith i s

a copy o f the l e t t e r o f t r a n s ­

m it t a l and t h r e e c o p ie s o f th e computation which was r e v is e d
in accordance w ith tele p h o n e co n v e rsa tio n .
Yours Ja^fcM & lly | ^

■

///,

* / / / # / /

,
/

'

A lla »^ s ¥ o u i
M anager, Eastern Open
Market Account

M r, E. L . Smead, C h ie f,
D iv is io n o f Bank O p e ra tio n s ,
B oard o f Governors o f the
F e d e r a l Reserve System,
W ashington, D. C.

E nds.

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority E.O* 12358

/

SECURITIES DEPT
rhb/j i

June 29, 1959

P le a s e send fo llo w in g telegram to each F e d e r a l R eserve Bank as in d ic a t e d belovt

Under th e p la n f o r r e a llo c a t i o n o f Government s e c u r i t i e s adopted by the
F e d e r a l Open M arket Committee November 50, 1957, a readjustm ent o f p a r t i c i p a t io n s
i n Government s e c u r i t i e s h e ld i n the System Account i s c a lle d f o r J u ly 1 .

The

com putations showing adjustm ents to be made in p a r t i c i p a t io n s o f the s e v e r a l F e d e r a l
R eserve Banks i s b e in g se n t to a l l R eserve Banks tod ay.
an

* n c r®4*® 0f
d e crea se

These computations in d ic a t e

_________________ ______ in your p a r t i c i p a t i o n on J u ly 1*

We s h a l l

w ir e you on J u ly 5 the d e t a i le d e n t r ie s t o be made on th a t d a te a s o f J u ly 1»

SPROUL

m m m
Young
S in c la ir
Flem ing
Leach
P ark er
S c h a lle r
M a rtin
Peyton
H am ilton
G ilb e r t
Bay




Boston
P h ila d e lp h ia
C lev elan d
Richmond
A tla n t a
Chicago
S t . L o u is
M in n ea p o lis
K ansas C it y
Dallam
San F ra n c is c o

-0 110,904,000
5.525.000
7.504.000
-0 -0 -O -0 -0 -0 -0 -

m om m
$5,509,000
-0 -0 -0 8,546,000
10,481,000
7,565,000
5,814,000
6,982,000
5,406,000
9,976,000

R ep rod uced from the U nclassified / D ecla ssified H o ldings of the N ational A rchives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

M IS C . 1 4 0 A

13 M 8 - 3 7




FEDERAL

RESERVE BANK

OF NEW

YORK

Similar letter sent to President of each Federal Reserve bank

Jm m

2tf 1959

Dear Mr. Immgi
la aeoordance with my tel<

o f today, X encloee

herewith OMptrUtlaa e f th*

t « ta be aade on July S

it* of WLy % of the particij

th*\Fed«ral Reaerre baake

ia the flgratea

Opm

lUrkel

Allan Sproul
I« i* ff« r f gfpatm open
Market Aeoorrat

Honorable Roy A, Tom*, Preaideat,
Federal leaerre Baak o f Boatoo.
Boaton, Haas.

ftio,

19

REALLOCATION OF GOVi£hN)ii;r;I :>ECUKLTI£S IN SYSTEM OPEN MAKKE': ACCOUNT ON,JULY 1, 1939
(in thousands of dollars)

oystem

A - Expenses
jj^ l) Estimated current expenses, 1939

ooston

rtSV
York

Phila­
delphia

Cleve­
land

r.ichmond

>
Atlanta

| chicago jLouis
I
!

Minneapoli 6

Kaneas
City

Dallas

San
Franc i of 0

28,498

2,137

7,257

2,345

2,797

1,698

1,323

3,232

1, 4SC

936

1,711

1,190

2,432

1,537

IVi

254

171

116

108

58

209

25

67

194

48

170

16,?G9

1,251

4,770

1,361

1,666

883

774

1,673

805

522

871

688

1,425

1.675
20,121

122
1,490

480
5 ,& 4

l* 1
1,673

165
1,5^7

87
1,076

72
904

186
2, 2&S

77
907

5-4443

8,377

647

1,753

672

830

620

429

964

523

293

1,243,614

96,051

260,243

99,762

123,a8

92,043

63,688

143,111

77,642

8,098

564

3,054

724

820

304

271

819

F - Allocation of remainder of System
holdings (#2,550,637 le ss
♦ l , 243,614) on basis of " V

1,307,023

91,030

492,918

116,854

132,348

49,066

43,740

G • Total allocation of Governments
("D " plus " ! * )

2,550,637 187,061

753,161

216,616

255,566

141,109

H - Present allocations

2,550,637 190.39C

716,898

205,712

252,041

♦10,904 ♦ 3,525

- Earnings
(l)Estimated current earnings, 1939
(exclusive of earning8 on
Gore rnment s)
(2 )Estimated earnings on Govern*
menta to June 30
(3)Net p ro fits on Governments
to June 24
(4)
Total
C - Excess of A -1 over B -4
D - Allocation required (on basis of
1*33622^ per annua earning rate
on Gov’ ts*) to provide earnings
July - December equal to ”C*
2 - Estimated dividends, 1939

I • Chnnge in allocations




♦ 58,076
♦ 58,076

“ 3,309

*36,263

83

1 , 1* 6

65

143

^801

1,738

563

38?

694

43,498

83,58i

57,7*9

103,028

239

175

255

240

633

132,187

38,575

28,245

41,157

38,TJ(

102,167

107,428

275,298

116,217

71,743

124,738

96,485

205,195

133,725

115,974

285,779

123,780

77,557

131,720

101,890

215,171

♦ 7,384

• 8,546

- 10,481

• 7,563

“5,814

- 6,982

* y,4C5

- 9,976

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority fc.C- 12358

fv

S*J

June 26^939,

Mr, Allas Sproul,
First Vice President,
^ Federal Reserve Bank of Sev lork,
lew fork, Sew lork.
Beer Mr* Sproult
There is enclosed a copy of the statement we have pre­
pared showing the changes under the fornula in holdings of^ffii^ted
States.^Govenment securities by the vario^^Eeserve banks on July
1, 19391 the date of the next quarterly reallocation of securities
in the Systea Open Market Account*

I an also enclosing a copy of

t

sone notes explaining certain computations*

Tou will note that we

have adjusted the estimates of current expenses obtained in the
usual way by adding #70,000 at Atlanta, 162,000 at St* Louis, and
$4,000 at lansas City*




feiy truly yours,

y
£* L. Snead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations*

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

12358

EXPLAHATIOI OF COMmATiai OF ITEMS INDICATED
(Reallocation o f Governaent Securities July 1, 1939)

2+4 times current expenses January-May (1939)#
adjusted as follows*
Atlanta— $70,000 added to cower unusual chargeoffs
and depreciation m account of a ir conditioning and
general laproreaent of branch bank buildings to be
completed this year.
St* Iiomis— 162,000 added to cower estinated increase
in depreciation expense on account of in stallin g a ir
conditioning and ventilating equipment at the head
o ffic e and branches*
Kansas City— $4,000 added to cover estinated increase in
depreciation expense tm account og in stallin g new
elevators snd a power plant at the head office*

2*4 tiaes earnings (excluding earnings on Governments)
Jannary-May (1939)
B-2)
B-8 )

Obtained or confirmed by Hew fork on talephone, June 26.

D

Actual rata used, .6700#?% (134/365 I 1.32925*).
tained fro * Hew Xork by phone, June 26*

1

Actual dividends accrued to May 31> plus 3*5* of paid-in
capital stock on May 31.




Bate ob­

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

BEALLOCA 10^ OF ^0V1F»?OT SECURITY S Xr SYS?,?/ CPE* #AT?KLT /f'Cf-tNT OK JULY 1* 1939
( I n thousands o f d o l l a r s )

- Expenses
( 1 ) Estim ated cu rre n t expen ses *1939
*

E arn in g *
( 1 ) K atinated c u rre n t e a r n in g $#1939
(e x c lu s iv e o f a& m ln ^ s on
Governments )
{ 2 } estim ated e a rn in g s on Govern-*
meats t o June 30
( 3 ) S et r r o f i t s cm Ooverxssents
t o June 2k

System JBoston

Weir
York

28*1498' 2*137

7*257

2.3fi5

2.797

1*696

P h ila ­ 1 C le W d e lp h ia 1 la n d

Chicago

S t.
Louis

1,333

3*232

l# t 3 0

R iel mond jA t la n ta

Minn­
e a p o lis

Kansas
C it y

j D a lla s

1
San
jir a n c is c o

930

1*711

1,190

2 *ii32

1*537

117

25k

171

116

108

56

209

25

67

19k

lie

170

16*909

1*251

!i*770

1,361

1 ,6 %

ee3

77h

1*^73

805

*522
Cm.

871

088

I,li2 5

72
5a >

186
2*268

77

65
W '

l*7 3 B

hm
1,675
122
T r o 7 r a > .i ; i $ 0 v "T S 5 8 T 7 —

llt l

8?

17m 7

165
1^577

1*753.

672

330

620

Jj29

96!*

523

293

563

389

69k

* A llo c a t io n r e q u ire d (o n b a s i s o f
1,32925$ p e r annum e a rn in g s r a t e
on Gov’ t s ) to p ro v id e e a rn in g s
July-O eo ember e q u a l t o *C*
1,250*136*96*555 261*608

100,285

123, Soil

92*525

6Ji,cei

llt3,862

78*050

1x3*726

8L.019

56*058

103,509

7214

820

30!»

271

819

239

175

255

2h0

633

(h)

T o ta l

• Excess o f A~1 o v er 3

* Estim ated d iv id en d s# 1939

8,377 v

8* 09a -

6b7

561(

3*05t

- A llo c a t i o n o f rem ainder o f System
holdirsr© (i2 *5 6 Ji,0 1 5 *0 0 q#less
$1*250*136*000} on b a s is o f *E « 1*313*879" 9 **506 1*95*503

r ,w ~

*

—

w

5k
: ...... ..... s e t ”

83
'" “X I E F 7*

'

>
S
c
or

*r«1 §!
O
117»li67

1 3 3 *^3

!i9.3?3

1i3.969

132,SB1

36*778

28*393

l-tl*373

38*939

1€£:,702

r
£> >
*

- T o ta l a llo c a t i o n o f Governments
(mrf p lu s wFn )

2 #56li*0151S^0i>3 757*111

217,752

256*90?

H jl.eJ iS

107,990

£76.71*3

116,828

72*119

125*392

96*991

200*271

-

2# 56ii*015 191^22 721*957

206,9C?

253*398

13**227

llo,Ii22

287,127

12i4*17ii

77* M i

132*11:0

102*282

2 16 ,2 15

+10,S! j5

♦3*509

♦7,621

-6 ,!;3 2

-10,3Gti

-7,3l>6

-5 *7 2 5

~6*7k8

-5*291

-9*9W *

P re s e n t a llo c a t i o n s

- Change in a l lo c a t i o n s




—

•'$*259

+35*15^

i

i/ i

s g>>-<
K
O

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority fc .Q* 1235%

im j

V ’

April 12, 1939.

I'r. Hugh Leach, President,
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond,
Richmond, Virginia#
Bear Mr* Leach:
lieferenee is made to your letter of April 7 inquiring
as to the method used in estimating current earnings of the
Federal Reserve banks for 1939, exclusive of eamines on Govern­
ments, as used in the April 1 reallocation of the System holdings
of United States Government obligations*
It is our practice to base the estinate of earnings,
exclusive of earnings on Governments, on average earnings during
the five months (eight months in the case of the October 1 re­
allocation) preceding the month in ifoich the computation is made.
Thus the estimate used in the January 1 reallocation was based on
average earninrs during the period July to November inclusive,
and the estimate .for the April 1 reallocation on the period
October 1938 to February 1939, inclusive* Had interest received
on past-due paper of closed banks been excluded from the figures
as a non-recurring item, the estimate for your bank used in the
April 1 reallocation would have been reduced by about 50,000*
According to the above nentioned practice, for the July
1 reallocation the estimates will be based on average monthly earn­
ings from January to !-Iay inclusive, and for the October 1 realloca­
tion on average monthly earnings from January to Aunist inclusive*
Obviously the estimates for the July 1 and October 1 reallocations
are likely to be more closely in line with actual figures for the
year, and the reallocations on July 1 and October 1 will thus take
into account any departure of actual earnings and expenses from
the estimates used in the previous allocations for the year*




Very truly yours,

E* L* Sraead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations*

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority

£.0. ll«8

recd

w

in

f il e s

APR 2 5 1939

Fe d e r a l Re s e r v e B a n k
-C P
o f

Ric h m o n d

April 7, 193?>
\
Mr. E. L. Sraead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations,
Board of Governors
of the Federal. Reserve System,
Washington, D. C.
Dear Mr. Smead:
In the computation of readjustments as of April 1,
1939 of the participations of the Federal reserve banks in the
System Open Market portfolio the estimated current earnings
for 1939 (exclusive of earnings on Governments) were shown for
this bank as §170,000. We have endeavored to verity the esti­
mate, but even on a rather liberal basis have been unable to
estimate earnings of more than $107,000. I am enclosing a
statement showing the earnings of this bank (exclusive of
earnings on Governments) for the first quarter of 1933, the
year 1938, the first quarter of 1939, and an estimate for the
year 1939.
You will note that our earnings for 1938 were only
$-153,280, which included larger earnings on industrial advances
and commitments than can be expected for the year 1939 and a
non-recurring item "Interest received on past due paper of closed
banks" of $22,135* You m i l also note that the earnings of this
bank for 1938 were 117,000 less than the estimate which was used
as a basis for the reallocation of Government securities as of
April 1, 1939.
It is icy understanding that the computation referred
to is prepared in your office, and if you will let me know how
you arrived at the estimated figure of £170,000 it will be very
much appreciated.

Very truly yours,

Ht£gh Leaih,
President.
Enclosure

& *** *-///



9*

SECT*

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

\2fl58

EARNINGS FROM SOURCES OTHER THAN GOVERNMENT SECURITIES
(C en ts om itted)

1939

193$
J an . .F e b . .Mch.

From
D iscounted b i l l s
Purchased b i l l s
I n d u s t r i a l Advances
Commitments to make
i n d u s t r i a l advances

A l l o th e r (E x c ep t G o v * t s .):
Income from banking house
I n t e r e s t r e c e iv e d on p a s t due paper o f c lo s e d bks.
M is c e lla n e o u s item s
T o t a ls

Year

J an. .F e b . .Mch.

E stim ated
fo r Year

I

2,840

$ 2,237

I 9,042

27

112

28

112

25,243

82,454

17,920

70,000

3,349

15,074

2,383

10,000

5,267

20,903

5,234

20,940

3.560

$

714

480

22,135

1,007

-.i,.560

716

137,610

$153,280

$26,995

(a )

$107,452 ( b )

(a )

The r e c e iv e r s h ip s o f a l l suspended banks have been c lo s e d , t h e r e fo r e
we w i l l not have any ea rn in g s to r e p o r t a g a in s t the item , " I n t e r e s t
r e c e iv e d on p a s t -d u e paper o f c lo s e d b a n k s ,” f o r 1939.

(b )

The estim ated amount o f th ese e a rn in g s on which the Committee based
i t s r e - a l l o c a t i o n o f s e c u r i t ie s on A p r i l 1 s t i s $170,000 - on
Janu ary 1 s t was $186,000.




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives




"

DECLASSIFIED

Authority fc.Q* V235B

RE

J IN FILES SECTION

vv APR 1 1 1939

£

March 30, 1939.

Mr* Allan Sproul, Manager,
System Open Market Account,

Federal Reserve Bank of New York,
New York, New York*
Dear 12r* Sproul i

Thank you for your le tte r of March 22
advising that Mr* I d l e r w ill be glad to come to
Washington at some mutually convenient time to
discuss possible improvements in the formula now
used in allocating securities in t&e System Open
Market Account* We are s t i l l experimenting with
various suggestions that have been aade, and i f
and when we are able to work out revisions in the
formula that we fe e l ’would be helpful in reducing
the size of quarterly changes in allocations, we
shall be glad to get in touch with him*
Sincerely yours,

E* L* Smead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations.

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority E..C* 12358

I’D IN FILES SECTION

Iw

ISarch 30, 1939

Ur* 0* M* Attebery, Vice President,
Federal Reserve Bank of St* Louis,
St* Louis, Missouri
Bear Ifr. Attebeiyi
Referring to your letter of March 20* /
enclosing a copy of Mr* Martin's liarch 13 letter to
Mr, Sproul, in estimating expenses of the Federal
Reserve banks in connection with the April 1 realloca­
tion of the System Open Market Account, an allowance
of $70,000 was made in the estimate for your bank to
cover the anticipated increase in depreciation on
fixed mchinery and equipment*




Very truly yours,

S* L* Smead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations#

APR 12 1939

^

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives




DECLASSIFIED
Authority fc.Q* 12358

i

'

Fe d

era l

Re

ser v e

Bank

o f N ew Y ork

March 27, 1939.

D ear Mr. Smead.

.

^

3

^

We r e c e iv e d you r l e t t e r ' on March 25 and have today

b„,.,

sen t to the R eserve banks a copy o f the computation showing the
adjustm ents to b e made in p a r t i c i p a t io n s in the System Open M arket
Account as o f A p r i l 1 , pu rsu ant to the p la n adopted a t the m eeting
o f the F e d e r a l Open Market Committee on November 30, 1937,
A copy o f the l e t t e r o f t r a n s m it t a l and two c o p ies o f
the computation a r e en clo sed h e rew ith *
Y ours fa ith J

■>
*, System Open
Market Account.

Mr, E . L* Smead, C h ie f,
D iv is io n o f Bank O p e ra tio n s ,
B oard o f Governors o f th e
F e d e r a l R eserve System,
W ashington, D* C.

Encs*.

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

1235&

J-B-15M-10 3 8

Similar letter sent to President of each Federal Reserve bank.

March 27, 1959.

Dear Mr. Young:
In accordance with my telegram of today, I enclose
herewith computation of the readjustment^ to b
April 1 of the participations of ti?1

*al'

made on
serve banks

in the System Open Market poi

Allan Sproul
Manager, System Open
Market Account

Honorable Hoy A. loung, President,
Federal Reserve Bank of Boston,
Boston, Mass.

Encl.




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D ECLA SSIFIED
Authority

. 140A

12.35%

15M 8 - 3 7

FE DE RA L RESERVE BANK OF N E W

SECURITIES DIPT,
RHB/J3J

YORK

March 27, 1959.

Please send following telegram to each Federal Reserve Bank as indicated belowt

Under the plan for reallocation of government securities adopted by the
Federal Open Market Committee November SO, 19 37, a readjustment of participations
in government securities held in the Sjjrstem Account is called for April 1 .

The

computations showing adjustments to be made in participations of the several
Federal Reserve Banks is being sent to a ll Reseijye Banks today.
These computations
Increase
your participation on April 1 .
indicate an decrease
of
be made on that date*

Be shall advise you on April 1 the de

SPROUL

DECREASE
Young
Sinclair
Fleming
Leach
Parker
Schaller
Martin
Peyton
Hamilton
McKinney
Day




Bostem X .
Philadelphia's.
Cleveland
Richmond
Atlanta
Chicago
St. Louis
Minneapolis
Kansas City
Dallas
San Francisco

J

) $ 5,516,000
1.048,000

mmQm,

4,526,000
705,000
awO**

6,527,000
4,561,000
«*0***
42,000

1,981,000
<n»0“»
»Qam

2,610,000
4,156,000

172,000

CONFIDENTIAL

New
York

TpPhila-

System

|~ Boston

29,003

2,171

7,313

1,743

113

337

208

8,363

613

2,364

671

307
10,413

22
743

39
2,790

13,535

1,423

4,528

) - Allocation required on basis of
1*33995? per annum earnings rate
on Governments) to provide earning s
April-Dece.nber equal to nC"
1 340,987

140,959

448,533

564

3,062

- Expenses
(l) Fstimated current expenses, 1939
- Earnings
(1) Estimated current earnings, 1939
(exclusive of earnings on
Governments)
(2) Estimated earnings on Govern­
ments to March 31
(3) Net profits on Governments to
March 22
(4)
Total
! - Excess of A-l over B-4

- Estimated dividends, 1939
- Allocation of remainder of System
holdings (f2 ,564,0 15 ,000, less
? l t 3^0,987,000) on basic of "E"
i - Total allocation of Governments
("D" plus "F")

I - Present allocations
! - Change in allocations




8,097

Cleve- T' Rich­
mond

At­
lanta

Chicago

St.
Louis

idinne- 1 Kansas
aDolis 1 City .

Dallas

San
Francisco

1,703

1,332

3,317

1,469

977

1,741

1,230

2,533

131

170

52

204

25

76

190

53

189

841

436

336

916

391

262

431

347

705

26
905

1,002

16
622

13
451

34
1,154

14
430

348

1 , 37

1,318

1,081

931

2,163

1,039

629

1,105

818

1,613

7,081

92,223

214,262

102,921

62,307

109,459

81,029

159,780

304

271

816

233

174

254

233

632

723

321

10 ____ 15—
636

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

RELOCATION OK GOVERN.VEIJT SECURITIES IN EYSTrLi OPEN MARKET ACCOUNT ON APRIL 1, 1939
(amounts in thousands of dollars)

___ 1 2 .„ ____ 26.
412
920

_
>
C
5r

1

j

* §
rn Q
723,028

7,146

24,199

72,365

21,253

15,537

22,681

21,253

56,435

191,322

721,957

206,907

253,398

134,227

116,422

287,127

124,174

77,844

132,140

102,282

216,215

,564,015

183,006

7 2 1 /6 3

205,359

257,92a

133,524

118,.{03

230,300

119,323

80,454

132,093

106,418

216,043

+1,043

-4,526

+703

-1,981

+6,327

+4,351

-2,610

+42

-4,136

+172

-2,706

—

i

>
U)
C/I

1° *-

2,564,015

♦3,316

o'o

R e p r o d u c e d fr o m th e U n c l a s s i fi e d / D e c l a s s i f i e d H o l d i n g s o f th e N a t i o n a l A r c h i v e s

_________ ^

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority £ . .0 - 123 5 % ^

7)w.

Hr. Allan Sproul,
fir s t' Vice President,
Fed#r#I Reserre Borne of
Hew lork, Bew lork.
0 #*r

Hr#

New l o r k ,

S prou lt

There 1* enclosed the statement of changes in alloca­
tions of th# Systam Open Market Account necessary on April X
on the basis of the estimates of w tslitgif expenses, sod d ivi­
dends shown*
estinating current expense# and currant earning#,

In

exclusive of earning* on Gorernaenta, anounts for the five
•o n tha ending

basis*

February

haTe been multiplied

by

2-4/10 a# a

% ese estimate# of current expense# have been adjusted

by adding #70,000

deducting
ad d itloo atl

at

St*

Louis

#180,000 a t A tla n t a

amounts at

•xpeoted increases
ment for the year*
made in Tie#




28

of

in

H .

and #90,000

and

Louis

$70,000

and

depreciation

JUnsas

at

Kansas

Cltgr

at Chicago*

and

The

C ity a re in

riew of

on f i x e d machinery #cd

equip­

The adjustments at Atlanta and Chicago were

unusually large anoucte reported for

fu r n i t u r e

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority fc.Q*

E x p lan atio n o f Computation of Items In d ic a t e d
R e a llo c a t io n o f System Open Market Account
A p r i l 1, 1939

A-l

2.1, times current expenses October-February, adjusted as follows:
Atlanta— $180,000 deducted on account of unusual charges for
"Furniture and equipment" and "Repairs and alterations" in
November and December 1933.
Chicago— $70,000 deducted on account o f u nu su al charges f o r
’’F u rn itu re and equipment" and "D e p r e c ia t io n " in December
1938.
S t . L o u is — 170,000 added to co v er estim ated in c r e a s e in "De­
p r e c ia t io n " (s e e correspondence w it h Mr. M a r t in ).
Kansas C ity — 190,000 added to co ver estim ated in c r e a s e in
" D e p re c ia t io n " due to i n s t a l l a t i o n o f new e le v a t o r s and
power plan t#

B -2

A c t u a l ea rn in g s to March 22.
E stim ates o b ta in ed from New York by phone, March 22.

B -3

O btained from New Y ork by phone, March 22.

D-

A c t u a l r a t e used 1.00951358

E-

D iv id e n d s accru ed on F e b ru a iy 28 p lu s
a t F ebruary 28.




(275/365 X 1 .3 3 9 9 *)

5% o f

p a i d - i n c a p i t a l stock

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority E..C* 1235%

/




HEC’D IN FILES SECTION

^

APR 11 1939 K

Fed eral R eserve Bank
of

N e w Yo r k

March 22,^1939.

Mr. E. L. Smead,
Chief, Division of Bank Operations,
Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System,
Washington, D. C.
Dear Mr. Smead:
Referring to yoyr letter of September 28, 1938>
and to our subsequent conversations, Mr. S. A. Miller,
Manager, Securities Department, has been studying the
quarterly adjustments of participations of the Federal
reserve banks in the System Open Market Account. He is
not very optimistic about reducing the size of these ad­
justments so long as the present principle governing
participations in the Account is maintained, but he is
ready to talk to you about the whole matter. If and when
you want to have a conference, I am sure that he can arrange
to go to Washington at some mutually convenient time.
Personally, I do not think the question is one of
prime importance and I assume that you feel the same way
about it, but, of course, if a better system than the one we
no?/ have can be devised, we should want to adopt it.

Allan Sproul,
Manager, System Open
Market Account.

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives




DECLASSIFIED
Authority fc.Q* \2fl58

*■

I'D IN FILES SECTION

^
Fe

d e r a l

Re

s e r v e

Ba

n k

i
>3

OF

S t. L o u i s
March 20, 1939.

Mr* E. L. Smead, C hief,
D ivision of Bank Operations,
Board of Governors o f the
Federal Eeserve System,
Washington, D. C.
Dear Mr. Smead:
For your inform ation, I enclose copy
o f le t t e r Mr. M artin addressed to Mr. Sproul,
Manager, System Open Market Account, under date
o f March 13> 1939.
Yours very tr u ly .

APR 1 2 19?°

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives




DECLASSIFIED
Authority E..Q* 1235%

COPY.

March 13, 1939.

Mr. Allan Sproul, Manager,
System Open Market Account,
Federal Re serve Bank of New York,
New 2ork, N. Y.
Dear Mr. Sproul:
The Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System has approved the recommendation of our
Board of Directors that we be authorized to spend not
more than $175,000.00 for air conditioning the four
buildings occupied by this bank and its branches. We
have employed an engineer who is wording on the plans
and specifications and the installations, we understand,
v/ill be completed about July 1.
In keeping with the accounting instructions
from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, tu© expenditure will be capitalized and depre­
ciated monthly, which will result in added operating
expense for the latter part of the year of approximately
$75,000.00.
We are bringing tnis information to your
attention in advance of the reallocation of securities
which v/ill take place on April 1.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) WM. McC. IdaRTIN
President.

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives




DECLASSIFIED
Authority fc.Q* 12358

i K 'W ifs

TM

I*"* T

rx h i I

M

vv APR 1 2 1939
3

^ #

*• </ V5.

S '

V, !

Jt?9

<r

^Federal R eserve Bank
of

N e w Yo r k

March 17, 1939.A

Dear Mr. Smead:
In a l e t t e r dated March 13., Mr. Wm. McC. M artin
a d v ised me, in advance o f the q u a r t e r ly r e a llo c a t i o n o f se­
c u r i t i e s i n the System Open Market Account, on A p r i l 1, o f
an a d d i t i o n a l expense o f ap proxim ately |75,000 to be in c u rre d
by the F e d e r a l R eserve Bank o f S t . L o u is d u rin g the l a t t e r p a r t

r
o f the y e a r , in conn ection w ith an ex p en d itu re o f not more than
$175,000 f o r a i r c o n d itio n in g the b u ild in g s occupied tjy t h e bank
and i t s

bran ch es.
In case you have not been f u l l y inform ed i n t h i s r e ­

g a rd , I am e n c lo s in g a copy o f the above-m entioned l e t t e r ,

to ­

g e th er w ith a copy o f my r e p l y , dated March 16.
Yours f a i t h f u l l y ,

^

—

-

ig e r, System Open
Market Account.
Mr. E. L . Smead,
C h ie f, D iv is io n o f Bank O p e ra tio n s ,
Board o f Governors o f the F e d e ra l
Reserve System,
W ashington, D.C.

TO*
V

£

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

V2358

COPY
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
OF ST. LOUIS

March 15, 1959,

Mr. A lle n S p ro u l, Manager,
System Open Market Account,
F e d e r a l R eserve Bank o f New York,
New Y o rk , New Y o rk .
D ear Mr. S p ro u l:
The B oard o f Governors o f the F e d e ra l R eserve System
has approved the recommendation o f our Board o f D ir e c t o r s th a t we
be a u th o rize d to spend not more than $175,000 f o r a i r C o n d itio n in g
the fo u r b u i ld i n g s occupied by t h i s bank and i t s bran ch es.
We
have employed an e n g in e e r who i s w orking on the p la n s and s p e c if i c a t i o n s
and the i n s t a l l a t i o n s , we u n derstan d, w i l l be completed about
J u ly 1.
In k eepin g w ith the acco u n tin g in s t r u c t io n s from the
Board o f Governors o f the F e d e ra l R eserve System, the exp en d itu re
w i l l be c a p i t a li z e d and d e p r e c ia te d monthly, which w i l l r e s u l t
in added o p e r a t in g expense f o r the l a t t e r p a r t o f the y e a r o f
ap proxim ately $75,000.00.
We a re b r in g in g t h i s in fo rm atio n to y ou r a t t e n t io n in
advance o f the r e a llo c a t i o n o f s e c u r i t ie s which w i l l take p la c e
on A p r i l 1.




Very t r u ly y o u rs,

(S ig n e d )

Wm. McC. M a rt in ,
P r e s id e n t

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority fc.Q* 12358

• y,
W ise.

1 4 0 A 15M 3 -3 8

FEDERAL RESERVE B AN K OF N E W YORK

Sarah 16, 1939.

Mr* 1ft* McC. Martin,
troaldant, 7*4«r*l Bae«rTa
Bank of St. Louis,
it . Louie* Mo.
Soar Sr. Martini
Thla w ill acknowledge receipt of your le tte r o f X&reh 13§ ad­
vising M| In advance o f tho quarterly reallocation o f aeeurltiea la tho
Syatea Open Market Account, on April 1 , of A additional ozponao of
apprexiaately f75,000 to be incurred b y ro u r bank during tha latto r part
of tha year, In connection with an MpeMttwcA of not nor# than 1175,000
fo r a ir conditioning tha bulldinge/^ccupled byymtr bank and branohea,

Bader tho preaant pr^oedmk for ataarterSy^ reallocation af
participations In tha Syatew 0pea l(ki^t^coouxitf tha figure* covering
eetiaatcdand actual earning*, I ej^**eea>s^vid*od*, and charge* or addi­
tions to net earning* of>he^parw e b*nk*Xare aaseafelad for tha 6m h
alttee by tha offlea of/the
of Governor® of tha federal Baeerve
Syatea. l«iB | to tha faot that ybqhave^received instruction* froa tha
Board with reepect to toe acccmattrc^proeedure covering tha expenditure,
I t«««aa that tha aatter a^ould automatically ha taken into consideration
at tha tlaa tha next realisation of participation* ia effected.
Sowever, In ordar to bo oartain that Hr* Saead, &t Washington*
la fu lly inforaed concerning the propoaad apaolal expenditure of your bank,
wa have oallad tha aattar to hla attention.
lour* faithfully,

Allan Sproul,
Manager, fiystea Opaa
VMvWV* ASQiWi#

SAMfAS(H)




FOr’
I B S*>

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives




DECLASSIFIED
Authority £ . 0 * 1235B

KS.CD IN FILES SECTION

JAN 3
•

F ed eral R eserve Bank
of

N e w Yo r k
December 29, 1938,

Dear Mr. Smead:

i
We have your l e t t e r o f December 27ja n d have today sent
to the R eserve banks a copy o f the computation showing the a d ju s t ­
ments to be made in p a r t i c i p a t io n s in the System Open M arket
Account as o f January 1 , pu rsu ant to the p la n adopted a t the
m eeting o f the F e d e r a l Open Market Committee on November 30,
1957.
A copy o f the l e t t e r o f t r a n s m it t a l and two c o p ie s o f
the com putation a re en clo sed h e re w ith .
Yours

All*
Manager, System Open
M arket Account

Mr. E. L . Smead, C h ie f,
D iv is io n o f Bank O p e ra tio n s ,
Board o f Governors o f the
F e d e r a l R eserve System,
W ashington, D. C.
E n c l.

1939

1

3 V

K

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives




DECLASSIFIED
Authority fc.Q* 12358

Copy o f s im i la r l e t t e r sen t to P r e s id e n t o f each F e d e r a l R eserve bank,

December 28, 1958.

Dear Mr. Young:
I n accordance w ith my tele gram o f to d ay , I

en c lo se

h e rew ith computation o f the readju stm en ts to be made on
January 3 a s o f January 1 o f the p a r t i c i p a t io n s o f the
F e d e r a l R eserve banks i n the System Open M arket p r o t f o l i o .
Yours f a i t h f u l l y ,

A lla n S p ro u l
M anager, System Open
M arket Account

H on orable Roy A. Young, P r e s id e n t ,
F e d e r a l R eserve Bank o f B oston ,
B o sto n , M ass.

CONFIDENTIAL

REALLOCATION CF U. S. SECT7? ^IES V ! SYS'?7&. OPEN KARKZT ACrxm VT OF JfiW J APT 1, 1939
(E a rn in g s on s e c u r i t ie s estim ated a t 1*313 Per cent

System

Boston

New
[ P h i l a - C le v e York | dolph ii . land

R ic h ­
mond

per annum)

r ......
[A tla n ta

1

-

S t•
Louis

Chicago

A - Expenses
(l)

Minn­
Kansas
e a p o lis . C i^ r _

D a lla s

San
F ran o iso o

i

Estim ated c u rren t
exp en ses, 1939

28,803

2,121^

7# 3142

2,305

2,857

1.692

1,78U

121

350

206

137

186

27,019

2,003

6,992

2,099

2,720

• 1.506

1,375

3# 216

l# l 406

995

1#720

1#263

2*506

191

28

82

1914

61

163

1,202 •

2*325.

* • - E a rn in g 8
( 1 ) E stim ated c u rre n t earn ­
in g s , 1939 (e x c lu s iv e o f
ea rn in g s on G o v 't s )

C - Exoess of A - l over B-l

D - A llo c a t i o n r e q u ir e d (o n b a s is
o f 1 . 313 # earn in gs r a t e on
G o v 't s ) t o produce ea rn in g s
equal t o WC*
2,057*807

1 • Eatinated dividends 1939
.
(j

8,067

- Allocation o f rem ainder o f
System holdings ($2,561*# 015,000
less #2,057#807#000) on
506,208 .
basis of *E*
G » -T o t a l a l l o c a t i o n o f G o v 'ts
( • D » p lu s * F " )

-Present a llo c a t i o n s
I -Change in a llo c a t i o n s




152 , 552. 532,521
565

3 #062

I42
1,333

3#022 ■

159,863 207,159 lH+#699 *101,5^3 230,160
733

809

300

269

807

1#378

1014, 9 5 1 '
237

913 . 1#526'

69 *5 3 6 - 116,222 .
17k

253

91*5te* 177*075
257

621
>
C
&•
O

35*h5h

192,1142 li5,996

50,765

18,825 16,880

50,61*0

114,872

1Q918

15#8?6

114,872

38,968

1

1
|

t g!

m p;

"o >
Ifi:
2,56U,015

188,006 72l+#663 205,859 257#92l4 133#52li 118J^03 280,800 119#823

80,1*51* 132#098

106,148

216,010

2,5614-#015

192,971 815,1422 222,761 257,820 120,321 1014,521 276,389 106,791

56#815 113#2ii9

9l*#258

202,697

+14,1411 +13,032 +23,639 +18,8149

+12,160

+13»3l|6

-14,965 -9 0 ,7 5 9 -1 6,90 2

+IOI4 +13#203 +13,882

fo Ef
~ jw
>rwji:
w:
o.

R e p ro d u c e d fro m th e U n c la s s ifie d / D e c la s s ifie d H o ld in g s o f th e N a tio n a l A rc h iv e s

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority £ ..0 * ^ .35% ^

?'D IM FILES SE&TION

JAN 5

Decisbtr 27. 193S

Ur. i lli r i Sproul,
F irst Vice President,
Federal Reaerre Bank of Sew York,
New York, law York

Baar Mr* Sproul»
There Is inclosad a etatenant prepared from aral labia
infarmatioo ahowin^ aatisatad expensea of each Fadaral Beaarra bank fo r 1939 and changes 1 b allocations necwaaary in tha
Systam accowit aa o f January 1# 1939# o» the baais of these
eatiHates.
The oai* sioc fr o * tha computation o f the item prior
service contributions to Retirement Syst«a has, of course#
materially affected tha result*

In estlaatin^ 1939 expenses,

figuraa for the fiv e months July through SoracAwr of the curran'
yaar have been used aa a basis with an

of 360,000 in

expenses a t the Federal Eeaerre Back of Kanaaa City to conrer an
anticipate! increase in depreciation reserres.




?ery tru ly your®,

S. L. Snead, Chief,
DiTiaioc of Baak Operationa.

1939

HKALLOC.ITION or « . 8. SECURITIES Ut SYSTEM o m KABKET ACC0TJ1T 01 JASUAHT 1, 1959
(■•rallies m ••ourlti** t i t t e t d at 1*313 par aant par u n a )

Boston

8 y»t*»
A * Ixp*fti«i
{1 ) 5 «tim t*d mtrront
oxpanaoa* 1939

0 * Sk«h» of A»X onr B»1

T

995

1.780

1*263

2*508

550

806

157

186

ip

191*

28

82

19U

61

I 83

^ 2,003 6,998

8,099

2,780

1.506

1#333

3,022

1*378

913

1*526

1*202

2*325

69.536 116.822

91. 5 W

121

35,1*54

0. -Total allooation of Oer'ts




San
Fran*itoo

1*1*06

- Allooation of raaalodar ef
B y tttm holdings (t2.56b.015/H0
lass $2,057,807,000) s d
506, 208'
tesla of *8*

X -Chang* in allocations

Dalla*

3*216

565

H.-Praasnt allooation*

Minn- Kama*
•ap o lii ct^r .

1*375

8,067"

(»T>* plus *F»)

St*
Louis

1*69®

D • Allooation raquirad (aa t e ili
af 1*3X3^ aaruing* rata «
Owr*ts) ta pradnea aarslngs
aqual to *c*
2.057.8C7/158.558 538.581 159.063 807.159 1U*,699 »J U *3
B * Sstiaatad t lt U r a d i 1999

Chleago

2,857

l#78U y
27#019

2.1211 7. 31*8

Atlanta.

8.305

26,803 y

i * » B m in g i
(1 ) Kitiaaatad ourrant darn­
ing*, 1959 (•x e lu air* of
aaralngc oa 0 o r*t«)

"Httr T O " fila r*York
dolphli 1 land

2,561**015 v

3. 06e

733

192, 11*8 1*5.996

809

50,765

300

869

830.160 10i*,951
807

857

x n ,m

171*

853

837

681

lt »1 8

15.876

lit. 878

38.96*

188,006 781*.663 205,859

857,981*

80.1*51* 132.098

106.1*18 216,01*3

815. 1*88 822.761

257.820

56.815 113.81*9

94,258 288.697

-i*,965 -90.759 - 16,908

♦lot*

♦83,639 *18,81(9

2.5614,015 ' 192,971

♦12.160

*13.31*6

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority fc.Q*

EXPLANATION OF THE BASIS FOR COMPUTING ITEMS INDICATED

A-l

2.4- of current expenses July-November 1938
plus f60,000 at Kansas City for expected increase in
normal depreciation (fixed machinery and equipment)

B-l

2.4 of current earnings, exclusive of earnings on
Government securities, July-November 193S.

D

E




-Rate used obtained by telephone from Mr. Miller
December 27, 1938.
6 percent of paid-in capital stock on December 21, 1933.

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority

Fed

eral

Reser

ve

12.358

Bank

O F

*»

Ka

n sa s

C

it y

I

December 5, 1938,
AIR MAIL
Mr. E. L . Smead, C h ie f,
D iv isio n o f Bank O p eratio n s,
Board o f Governors o f the
F e d e ra l R eserve System ,
Washington, D.C.
Dear Mr. Sneed:
Under d ate o f November £9.1 wrote to H r, A llan S p ro u l, a s Manager
o f the System Open Market Account, re q u e stin g th a t c o n sid e ra tio n be given
to some unusual exp en d itu res we are about to make when f ig u r in g r e a llo c a t io n s
o f p a r t ic ip a t io n s a s o f Jan u ary 1 , 1939.
I arr t h i s morning in r e c e ip t o f h is
re p ly in which he s t a t e s th a t under the p resen t procedure f o r q u a rte rly r e a l ­
lo c a t io n s o f p a r t i c i p a t io n s , the f ig u r e s coverin g estim ated and a c tu a l earn­
in g s , exp en ses, d iv id e n d s, and ch arges o r a d d itio n s to net earn in g s o f the
re se rv e banks, are assem bled by the Board o f Governors o f the F e d e ra l R eserve
System f o r the Committee.
He s u g g e s t s , th e r e fo r e , th a t I a s c e r t a in whether
you have been f u l l y informed concerning the proposed s p e c i a l e xp en d itu res o f
t h i s bank.
Our d ir e c t o r s and the Board o f Governors, have approved an expen ditu re
o f approxim ately #175,000 to cover the i n s t a l l a t i o n o f e ig h t new au tom atic
e le v a to r s in our b u ild in g , c o n tr a c ts f o r which have been sig n e d .
In a d d i­
t io n , we have under c o n sid e ra tio n the i n s t a l l a t i o n o f a power p la n t f o r the
m anufacture o f our own e l e c t r i c i t y a t a c o st o f from f 65,000 to $ 7 5 ,0 0 0 .
I t i s "orobable th a t la r g e payments w ill be made on th e se c o n tra c ts e a r ly next
y e ar and we unaerst&nd th a t under the accou n tin g manual in s t r u c t io n s we would
be p r iv ile g e d to charge o f f ap p roxim ately $90,000 on th e new e le v a t o r s during
the y e a r.
As to the power p la n t, we un derstand th e e n tir e exp en ditu re could
be c a p it a liz e d sin c e t h i s i s an a d d itio n r a th e r than a replacem en t.
I t i s hoped th a t you w ill g iv e c o n sid e ra tio n to th e se exp en d itu res
wben essem b lin g fig u r e s f o r u se o f the Open Market-Committee in making the
■next r e a llo c a t io n o f open m arket p a r t i c i p a t io n s .
I t w ill be a p p re c ia te d a ls o i f you w ill l e t me have your views as
to the accoun tin g procedure we should fo llo w in connection ■with th e se expen­
d it u r e s .
We have given c o n sid e ra tio n to the s e t t in g up o f a l i a b i l i t y item ^
FiS to the e le v a to r s and making p ro v isio n s f o r r e se r v e s b e fo re the c lo s e o f
th is year.The only reaso n I can see why t h i s might not be a p p ro p ria te i s
th a t e f t e r making p ro v isio n f o r the proposed prepayment o f p r io r s e r v ic e
l i a b i l i t y to the R etirem ent System , about vhich I wired you tod ay , our net
earn in gs w ill probably be exhausted and any such charge a s we are now d i s ­
c u ssin g would have to be made a g a in s t s u r p lu s .
i t i^ p o s s ib le th a t we may
not have s u f f i c i e n t earn in g s a f t e r payment o f d iv iden ds and s e t t in g a s id e




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority

FEDERAL

RESERVE

BANK OF

1235B

KANSAS^: IT \

•

•

•

•

the u su a l r e se r v e s to make th e prep a:,Trent o f p r io r s e r v ic e l i a b i l i t y in f u l l
vdthout a charge to s u r p lu s .
Any h elp you may be a b le to «:ive u s on th e se problems w ill be
a p p r e c ia te d .
S in ce th e se q u e stio n s w ill come up fo r d is c u s s io n a t our
d ir e c t o r s * m eeting on Thursday, December 8 , I w ill a p p re c ia te a te le g ra p h ic
r e p ly .
Yours very t r u ly ,

C. A» W orthington,
F i r s t V ice -P re sid e n t

CW:L




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority fc.Q* 12358

Mr. Smead

Quarterly allocation of

Mr* Tan Fossen

S&rstem account*

The procedure and formula adopted effective January 1 , 1938, for
the quarterly allocation of the Systea account provides fo r the allocation
in two steps, f i r s t , in an amount sufficient to cover the excess of expenses
for the year'over estimated earnings and profits on the sale of Government
securities to the date of allocation plus estimated earnings, other than on
Government securities, for the remainder of the yearj and second, in pro­
portion to dividend requirements*
Inasmuch as the relative share which the various Federal Reserve
banks receive in the f i r s t and the second steps of the allocation d iffe r con­
siderably, anything that materially changes the amount of Government securities
allocated in the fir s t step, as compared with the previous quarterly allocation,
w ill result in disproportionately large changes in individual allocations.
Estimates of expenses and of earnings other than on Governments
can be made with sufficient accuracy as not to cause any marked changes for
the quarter in the amount of securities allocated in the f i r s t step.

Profits

on the sale of Government securities and changes in the annual earning rate
cm the System account, however, are two factors, for which mo allowance can be
made, and liiich are lik e ly to cause marked fluctuations in participations.

Ob­

viously profits realised on the sale of securities and an increased rate of
earnings both mould have the effect of decreasing the amount of securities
allocated in the f i r s t step and accordingly would result in an increase in the
participation of the Sew Tork and other banks that have a relatively large




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

12358

Mr* Smead - 2
paid-in capital.

Conversely, losses on the sale of Government securities or

a reduction In the earning rate would increase the amount of securities re­
quired to be allocated in the f i r s t step and would reduce the participation of
the Sew York bank and other banks with a relatively high paid-in capital*

8

During the current year profits on Government securities have amounted

to approximately £8, 000,000 and the earning rate on allocation dates has varied
from a maximum of 1 .5 7 percent to a minimum of 1.26 32 percent.

The unforeseen

p rofit of about 18,000,000 on sales of Government securities is equivalent in
it s effect to an error of about 37 percent in the January 1 estimate of the
amoigpt of securities needed to cover the excess of expenses over earnings*

The

corresponding error on April 1 was about 24 percent and on July 1 about 7 percent*
As regards the earning rate, which now is 1*29 percent, an Increase in the rate
to 1.39 percent per annum would have the same effect on the allocation as m
error of over 8 percent in the estimated net excess of expenses over earnings,
and a reduction of the rate to 1.19 percent would have an approximately similar
effect.
I f the amount of securities in % ste® account were increased, additional
securities would be allocated to the Federal Reserve banks in accordance with the
second step in the previous allocation, i . e . , in accordance with dividend re­
quirements.

Accordingly, an increase in earnings due to an increase in the Sys­

tem account would increase a ll participations uniformly in proportion to dividend
requirements and would have no effect on the next reallocation,

tro fits on the

sales of Government securities, however, are distributed not in proportion to
dividend requirements but in proportion to average participations since July 1 ,

1936.

Under the formula now in use the f i r s t step in the allocation automatically

offsets the effect of not distributing profits during the preceding quarter in




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

12358

Mr* Smead * 3
accordance vith dividend requirements*

Where, as during the f i r s t and second

quarters of 1938, profits are substantial this results not only in reducing
greatly the n o w t of securities allocated in the f i r s t step but also changes
greatly the proportion thereof allocated to individual banks*

Differences

la total allocations may therefore be due as such to these differences in
step one as to those in step two previously referred to*
A number of possible modifications of the formula have been con­
sidered with a view to obtaining a formula that would not produce such marked
changes in participations*

The simplest and most effective Means of avoiding

substantial changes in participations due to profits would be to disregard
profits in the allocation and in effect to make each quarterly allocation on
essentially the save basis as the January 1 allocation is made*

This procedure

would be somewhat undesirable9 however, in that i t would f a l l fa r short of
attaining the objective of equalising dividend coverage*

I t would not, further­

more, eliminate fluctuations in participations due to changes in the annual
earning rate*
A

more satisfactory procedure, I believe, would be to combine steps

one and two of the present formula so as to make the f i r s t allocation in such
amount, i f possible, as to cover the excess of expenses and dividends over earn­
ings (other than those on Governments after the allocation date) and profits*
By so doing the effect of a change in the earning rate would be largely
eliminated, Inasmuch as in the absence of such disturbing factors as profits
the percentage of the securities allocated in this stage allocated to each bank
would not vary greatly from quarter to quarter*

Any excess earnings could,

of course, be allocated as at present in proportion to dividends, and i f this




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority fc.Q* 12358

Mr. Saead - A
were done r e m its would be identical with those under the present formula
whenever the earning rate was high enough to aalce an allocation under the second
step necessary.

I t does not appear, however, that distribution of earnings in

excess of expenses and dividends in proportion to dividend requirements has
anything to coaaend it#

A aore desirable procedure, of course, would be one

that would tend to equalize the position of the Federal Reserve banks in respect
to capital, surplus and reserves for contingencies*

There is rooa for a great

deal of difference of opinion as to what this should mean in actual practice
»n^| as to how the objective could best be achieved*

I t seeas to ae that the

logical thing to do would be to equalize insofar as possible the position of
the various Federal Reserve banks as regards the ratio of total deposits of
aeaber banks to the sub of the Federal Reserve banks* own paid-in cap ital, sur­
plus and reserves fo r contingencies*

This is preferred because differences in

paid-in capital of the Federal Reserve banks re fle ct differences aerely In
capital and surplus of aeaber banks and the capitalisation of member banks in
soae Federal Reserve d istricts is auch greater in proportion to deposit lia b i­
lit ie s than in other Federal Reserve d istricts*

I would recoaaend that after

expenses and dividends have been covered any securities reaaining be so allocated
as to give each Federal Reserve bank an aaount equal to five percent of it s divi­
dend requirementb aerely as an insurance against shortcoaings in the estiaates
resulting in the unexpected failure of earnings to equal expenses and dividends,
and then to distribute any reaainder equally aaong a specified number, six
perhaps, of the Federal Reserve banks having the highest ratio of total deposits
of aeaber banks to the Federal Reserve banks* own paid-in capital, surplus,
and reserves for contingencies*




Attached is a revised forwola in accordance with the above recommendation.

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority fc.C* 12358

A*

Expanses aad dividends*
(1)
(2)
(3)
U)

B,

Estimated current expenses during year
Prior service contribution
Estimated annual dividend®
total

Earningbj
(1)
(2)

(3)
U)

Current earnings to latest available data
Estimated for remainder of yaar
(exclusive of earnings on Government®
after date of & location)
lei profit e& Soveraaents sold to date
Total

0*

Excess of k M

D.

Allocation required (os basis of current annual rate of
earnings on Governments) to furnish earninge equal to *&*

E.

Allocation of remainder of System account**

F.

total allocation (D * E).




*

over B(4)

Allocate to each bask an awaunt, If avail­
able, sufficient to give additional earn­
ings equal to 5 percent of estimated divi­
dends and divide any remainder equally
among tha sis banks having the highest
ratio of total deposits of aeaber banks to
the sua of its own paid-in capital, surplus
and reserves for contingencies#

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

" DECLASSIFIED
Authority fc.Q* VM58

|Rw OIK RtCOROS SECIluii
ALLOCATIONS OF SYSTEM OPEN MARKET ACCOUNl

APR 2 5 1968

(In thousands of dollars)

April 1,
1933

A.

July 1,
1933

Oct* 1,
1938

Jan, 1,
1939

Net change
Jan. 1, 1933
to
Jan. 1, 1939

CHANGES UNDER PRESENT FORMULA

Boston
New York
Philadelphia
Cleveland

-3,300
+6,300
-1,100
-7,200

+11,200
+34,300
+20,200
-5,600

-3,200
+35,300
-8,000
+17,600

-700
-114,900
-8,900
-12,400

+4,100
-39,000
+2,300
-7,600

Richmond
Atlanta
Chicago
St. Louis

+3,700
+4,000
-5,200
+4,700

-12,800
-200
+1,600
—4,800

-6,900
-6,700
—2,400
-7,600

+22,400
+7,400
+13,000
+19,600

+6,500
+4,500
+7,000
+11,900

Minneapolis
Kansas City
Dallas
San Francisco

+5,100
-7,500
-2,500
+2,800

-14,900
—6,000
-12,300
-10,700

-16,600
-5,400
+9,300
-5,200

+27,600
+23,100
+7,100
+16,500

+1,200
+4,200
+1,600
+3,400

B.

ESTIMATED CHANGES IF, ON APRIL 1, JULY 1, and OCTOBER 1,
SECURITIES R3&&INING AFTER EXPENSES AND DIVIDENDS ARE
COVERED ARE DISTRIBUTED IN PROPORTION TO ESTIMATED
EXPENSES AND DIVIDENDS.

Boston
New York
Philadelphia
Cleveland

-3,000
-7,800
-2,000
-7,700

+13,000
-700
+18,700
-7,500

-1,500
-7,400
-11,300
+17,600

—4,400
-23,000
-3,200
-10,200

+4,100
-39,000
+2,300
-7,600

Richmond
Atlanta
Chicago
St. Louis

+6,300
+5,300
-3,200
+7,000

-7,100
+3,300
+6,300
+900

+500
—2 ,800
+1,800
-300

+6,700
-1,300
+2,100
+4,300

+6,500
+4,500
+7,000
+11,900

Minneapolis
Kansas City
wallas
San Francisco

+6,800
-4,500
-1,200
+3,900

-11,300
+1,900
-10,000
-7,700

-12,500
+3,800
+14,200
-2,100

+18,200
+3,100
-1,400
+9,100

+1,200
+4,200
+1,600
+3,400




Reproduced from the Unclassified IDeclassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority £..()■ 12358

April 1,
1938

July 1,
1938

Oct. 1,
1938

Jan. 1,
1939

Net change
Jan. 1, 1938
to
Jan. 1, 1939

C. ESTIMATED CHANGES IF PROFITS ON SALES OF U.S. GOVERNMENT
SECURITIES ARE DISREGARDED (AS IS DONE ON JAN. 1
REALLOCATIONS) AND PRESENT FORMULA. OTHEMISE FOLLdfED.
Boston
New York
Philadelphia
Cleveland

-3,000
-21,600
-3,200
"-7,200

+12,100
-30,600
+15,300
-6,600

-2,200
-1,700
-10,500
+17,200

-2,800
+15,000
+700
-11,000

+4*,100
-39,000
+2,300
-7,600

Richmond
Atlanta
Chicago^
St. Louis

+7,900
+6,500
-800
+9, -400

-2,700
+6,200
+10,500
+6,300

-800
-3,200
+1,600
-1,100

+1,900
-5,000
-^4,300
-2,600

+6,500
+4,500
+7,000
+11,900

Minneapolis
Kansas City
Dallas
San Francisco

+8,4-00
-2,300
+200
+5,800

-7,000
+6,500
-6,200
-3,900

-11,800
+1,400
+13,200
-2,000

+11,600
-1,300
-5,500
+3,500

+1,200
+4,200
+1,600
+3,400




Reproduced from the Unclassified IDeclassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority E..C* 12358

n

M r?-

tp
2_

/< c _

a
(& **■ •* f T *
JA/Iv j £ ^ *

H
s

6

ar>

J0

^

P

7<X^T^

$
a
\o
i\




to .S C O jB S S K X
APR 2 51968

iu k

li> '

i

M

a
>

‘f* Ji ^r.,4

I

*rf

r

-

v




CHANGES IN PARTICIPAT IONS OF FEDERAL RESERVE BAMS
IN SYSTEM.? OPEN MARKET ACCOUNT

Federal
Reserve
Bank
Boston
New York
Philadelphia
Cleveland
Richmond
Atlanta
Chicago
St. Louis
Minneapolis
Kansas City
Dallas
San Francisco

Reallocations required by
present approved procedure
Estimated changes
Approximate changes
January 1, 1939
October 1, 1938

FOR PILES
I A M gtone
[

Estimated changes
on January 1, 1939* if
no reallocation is made
on October 1* 1938*

+ 29,000,000
-9 ,o c o ,o o o
+18,000,000

-11,000,000
-112,000,000
-8,000,000
*12,000,000

- f c , 000, 000
-83,000,000
-17,000,000
+5,000,000

-6,000,000
-6,000,000
-2,000,000
-6,000,000

+22,000,000
+7*000,000
+13,000,000
+19,000,000

+16 , 000,000
+1,000,000
+11,000,000
+13*000,000

-16,000,000
- 14, 000,000
+10,000,000

+27,000,000
+22,000,000
+ 7#000,ooo
+16,000,000

+11,000,000
+18, 000,000
+17,000,000
+12,000,000

-13,000,000

-5 ,0 0 0 ,ooo

♦Changes on October 1, 1938, if made, combined with subsequent changes on
January 1, 1939, would equal the changes necessary on January 1, 1939*
as shown below, in the event that no reallocation was made on October 1, 1938.

as

bw

ov^
E
-«
O
w cr,
CQ OO
63
.1 IN_

I

28,695
2 ,5 2 1
3 1,2 1 6

2 ,1 7 5
179
'2 / 5 5 +

7.336
639
* 7,9 75

2,1+38
193
2 ,6 3 1

2,763
1,6 77
220
157
*279® " 1783U

StV
Atlanta Chioago
Louis
3,21+0
1 ,3 1 7
91+
333
1,1+11 ~ 37573

1,1+15
11+5
1,560

I Minn­
e ap o lis
1,007
83
1,090

Kansas
Dallas
City
1,665
171
1,836

1.15U
109
” 1,2 5 3

San
Francisoo
2,508
198
2, 7 o5“

IDeclassified

ses
( 1) Estimated ourrent expenses#
1938
(2) Prior service contributions
(3)
Total

System

(Amounts in thousands of dollars) ___
Phi la - |Cleve-~ RichHew
Boston
delphia[ land
mond
York

Reproduced from the Unclassified

REALLOCATION OF UNITED STATES SECURITIES IN SYSTi-M OPEN MARKET ACCOUNT ON OCTOBER 1 , 1938
Earnings on Seourities estimated at 1«297& per annum

,v>£

C« Excess of B-1+ over A-3
Estimated dividends, 1938
E« Allocation required (on
of
1«29£ earnings rate on Gov'ts)
to produoe earnings Oct*-Dec#
equal to *D* minus "C"
b

a

s

G. Total allocation of Gov'ts
(•E " plus "F ")
H* Present allocations
I* Change in allocations




139

379

218

lhk

133

1+3

212

to

83

195

66

167

26,111+

1,931

7,682

2 ,2 12

2 ,5 12

1,3 7 2

1,12 0

2,81+7

1,18 2

831+

1,278

961

2 .18 3

573

2,230
10,291

671
J.1'0 1

787
3*hhi

I422
1,9 27

3142
IV 505

899
3,958

371
1,59 3

271
1,18 6

1+01
17371+

313
1731*0

693

1+.690

289

2 ,3 16

1+70

I460

93

91+

385

33

98

38

77

337

8,017

561+

3,057

735

799

298

267

790

231+

171+

250

236

613

7.973
“ 15T906T *

>
&
&

i s

F« Allocation of remainder of
System holdings (|2 , 56I+, 015, 000
less |1,0 2 3# 222,000) on
of "D*
b

1,8 19

a

s

Holdings of the National Archives

B* Earnings
( 1 ) Estimated current earnings,
1938 (exclusive of earnings
on Gov'ts)
(2) Estimated earnings on Gov’ ts
to Sept* 30
(3) Net p ro fits on Gov'ts to
Sept* 28
(I*)
Total

2 .

1 , 023,222

al+,576 227,895

81,501 1 Oil, 260 63,01+8

53,206 121+, 558 6 1,8 18

23.371+

65,201

itB.901

81*, 884

!

ii
M

i

« es

i s

1.51*0.793 108,395 587,527 H a ,260 153,560

57,273

5 1 ,3 1 5 15 1,8 3 1

l+i+,973

33.1*1+1

1+8, Oi+8 U5.357 1 1 7 ,8 1 3

2, 56I+, 015* 19 2,9 71 815.1*22 222,761 257,820 12 0 ,32 1 10l+,521 276,389 106,791- 56 ,815 113.21+9 9l*»258- 202,697'
2 , 561+, 015 196,203 780, ll+7. 230 ,771 21+0,262 127,221+. 1 1 1 ,1 9 6 278,831 111+,1+U. 73.1+30- 118,631* 81*.963- 207,9l»6M

-3 .2 3 2 +35,275

-8 ,0 10 +17,558

-6,903

-6 ,675

- 2.I4I42 -7,620 -16 ,6 15

-5 .5 «

■*9.295
, V: i

- 5 #2l(9

'

* w!
rn Q
'o >
o
in

Reproduced from the Unclassified IDeclassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority E..C* 12358

A P R ! 91968
F ed eral R eserve Bank
of

Ne w Yo rk

September 29, 1958*

Dear Mr. Saead:
Receipt is acknowledged of your letter of September 28,/
nil iii ni»mwr«iwwn».... wmjiM
M
wimnifUK'iiNul/

enclosing computation showing adjustments to be made in the par­
ticipations in the System Open Market Account on October 1, pur­
suant to the plan adopted at the meeting of the Federal Open Mar­
ket Committee on November 50, 1957,
Two copies of the computation showing the adjustments
to be made are enclosed herewith together with a copy of telegram
which was sent to each of the banks today and a copy of the letter
of transmittal which was sent with the computation.
I note that you have been studying, without reaching any
conclusions, the matter of large fluctuations in allocations on
quarterly dates.

When I have had a chance to become familiar

with this problem I shall be glad to discuss the subject with you.
Veiy

Alii
Manager, System Open
Market Account

Ends. (4)




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

12358

Following telegram sent to each Federal Reserve Bank as indicated below:

Under the plan for reallocation of government securities adapted
by the Federal Open Market Conmittee Uoveiaber S0f 1957, a readjustment of
participations in government securities held in the System Account is called
for on October 1.

The computations showing adjustments to be made in par­

ticipations of the several Federal Reserve banks is being sent to all Reserve
Banks today.

increase
These computations indicate an decrease

in your participation on October 1*

of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

We shall advise you on October 1 the de­

tailed entries to be made on that date#




SPR0UL
XIICRKASB
Xoung
Sinclair
Fleiaing
Leach
He*ton
Schaller
Martin
Peyton
Hamilton
McKinney
Day

Boston
Philadelphia
Cleveland
Richmond
Atlanta
Chicago
St. Louis
Minneapolis
Kansas City
Dallas
San Francisco

rntjQ+m
.Q.,,
# 1 7 ,558,000
-0 —
-0—0—
-0—0—■
-39 ,2 9 5 ,0 0 0
—0—

DECREASE
$3,232,000
3 ,0 1 0 ,0 0 0
«()•
8 ,9 0 3 ,0 0 0
6 ,6 7 5 ,0 0 0
2 ,4 4 2 ,0 0 0
7 ,6 2 0 , OCX)
16,615,000
5 ,3 3 2 ,0 0 0
-0 —
5,249,000

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLA8SJF1ED
Authority

1235%

Similar le tte r sent to rresident of each Federal Reserve tfank except Hew York




Septesber t9 , 1958*

Dear lr * Yotmgs
U accordance with agr telegram of today, I enclose
herewith coafntatioa of the roedjnstaeate to be made, m
October 1 , of the participations of the Federal Reserve
beaks ia the % it« a Open Market Account*
▼ery truly yotirs,

Allen Sproul
Manager, % a tm Opm
Market Jkcoomt

Honorable 8cy A. Young, Freeldeot,
Federal Keserve Beak of Boston,
Boat n, &*se«

fe e l.
m /m

REALLOCATION OF UNITED STATES SECURITIES IN SYSTEM OPEN MARKET ACCOUNT ON OCTOBER 1 , 1938
Earnings on Securities estimated at 1»29$ per annum

[ Sy«t “
A. Expenses
(1) Estimated ourrerrt expenses#
1938
(2) Prior servioe contributions
(3)
Total

1,665
171
1,836

h5

212

Uo

83

195

66

lo7

1,3 7 2

1,120

2,8U7

1,18 2

8314

1,278

961

2,18 3

I422
179^7

3142
1,50 5

899
3,958

371
1,59 3

271
1,188

iTWU

91+

385

33

98

38

77

337

267

790

2314

1714

250

236

613

53,206 1214,558

6 1 , 81d

23,371+

05,201

148,901

5 1 ,3 1 5 151*8 31 . kk*973

3 3 ,^ 1

148, 0*48 U5,357 117 ,8 13

133

2,212

2 ,5 12

2,230
10,291

671
5,101

787
3,V*3

289

2 ,316

U70

I460

56U

3,057

735

799

139

379

218

26,1114

i,9 3 i

7,682

7*973

573

C* Excess of B-lj. over A-3

U,690

D* Estimated dividends* 1938

8,017

2,508
1,15U
198
109
1,263 ‘ 2,70^

1,007
83
1,090

Ibh

1,8 19

San
Francisco

1,U 5
li*5
l,56o

1 ,3 1 7

2 ,1 7 5
179
~sW 5S

_____________ _____.
^ " '“ ’MDallas
leapolla l City \______

3*2Uo
9h
33,3
"
37573
1 J 4I I

1,677
2,763
220
157
2,953 ~ 1783U

2,1+38
7 ,336
193
639
'77975 " 2 7 6 3 1

28,695
2 ,5 2 1
" l i ; 216

B« Earnings
(1) Estimated current earnings,
1938 (exclusive of earnings
on Gov*ts)
(2) Estimated earnings on Govfts
to Sept* 30
(3) Net profits on Gov*ts to
Sept* 28
(I4)
Total

_
ohieaeol St*
S

(Amounts in thousands of dollars)
-----rTeiw
|FhSTa-TcT£Ve- I
jB o a to n J ^
|d«lphia_[ land
mond . J

93-

298

Uoi

693
313
i , 3Uo “ S.oWT

b* Allocation required (on basis of
1.2 9 $ earnings rate on Gov’ ts)
to produce earnings Oct»-Dec*
equal to "D1* minus ”0"

1 , 023,222

F* Allocation of remainder of
System holdings ($2,5614,015,000
less | 1 , 023, 222, 000) on basis
of 11D"

1 , 51+0,793 108,395 587,527 141,260 153,560

G* Total allocation of Gov’ ts
("E" plus **FW)

2,56U ,015*192,971 815, i|22 222,761 257,820 120 ,321 10U, 521 270,389 106,791- 56,815 113,2^9

9^4,258 2 0 2 ,6 9 7

H* Present allocations

2,56U,015 196,203 780,1147.230,771 21+0,262 127,2214-111,196 278,831 l l i ^ l l . 73,1430 118 ,6 31

8^,963 207,9U 6

I* Change in allocations




—

8U,576 227,895

- 3,232 +35,275

81,501 10*4,260 63,0148

- 8,010 +17,558

57,273

-6,903

-6,675

-2,1442

-7,620 -16 ,6 15

-5-382

+9,295

8I4, B8I4

-5 ,2U 9

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority fc.O-

S

M

^

r *

f

i r

F

e

j n
s

d

S

t
e

Y
r a

i o
l

p

e

R

r o a X

P

r e

e s e r v

s

e p

t e m

b

e r

2

8

,

1 9

r e p

a

r e d

e

e n

3 6

*

f r

o

#

i d

e

e

n

t ,

B

e a k

c

l o

o

f

B

o v

Y

o

s t a

t e

r k

,

e

n

timr York, H. I .
D

e a r

H

r *

T

'

U

b

m

h

s h

a n

i n

S

p

r o

e r e

o w

k

f o

r

t h

e

S

i s

i n

g ’

1 9

3

y

d

s

h

u

r i n

a

q

o p

y

u

y o

t o

a

t o

r t e

t h

u

g

a

t o

8

s t i m

,

h

e o m

r

a

t e

s

r l y

d

a

a

a

a

*

t t a

e

a

r

l y

a

t e d

e

n

a n

t

1

r .

f a

s o

u

s s h

s

d

a

t o

s *

r

d

u

i z ^

n

e

c h

M

s o

t e

d

r

a v e

s

a

c c o

t t e

s

a

s a

A

t h

i s

t

e

l a

e d

l )

i n

s t s n

l a

I

u

a

V

s

y

e

t e

a

a

r n

g e s

i n

g

^

i n

a n

t h

r *

H

n

m

a n

a

e

b

l l o

a

s

s e

t h

s

w

i t h

t h

t

t h

e

m

a r k e d

t ,

b

s

u

n

t

o

X

t

s

r e a

s h

o

d

a

i s

d

do

n

p

c

a f c t e s o %

F o e

h a m

t

s o




r e

e a e h

o

f

O

a

s e

f

t h

e

a

t e

d

J o n

o

b

f l u

l d

m

j e

c

t ,

c

t u

a

m

t g r

e d

I *

s c l o

f

s

w

l i k

s

e

s

r k

I

f

c o

t o

b

F

c t o

1 9

3

s

f o

r m

l e

*

t h

o

s

s s

i b

i a

n

c l u

d

i s o

d

,

a

s i o

u

s s

l e

d

e r

2

5 *

t e

b

e

a

p

n

i l a

s t i m

m

t i o

e

a

o

n

e

v

s e s

o

a

a

e

i v

i s i o

I * .
n

S
o

f

o

s a
B

a n k

C
- O

h

i e
p

t n

r a

l

n

e

1

f o

r

l e

s

c e

a

e

-

e

r

t e

s s a

r y

s *

8

,

l l o

n

I

s

u

o

c

a

l a

f

t i o

s

w

i t h

t h

e

s a

*

D

X

p

t i o

s o

c h

u

x

a

f ,

e r a t i o n

* .

t a

t e

m

t h

m

f i n

n

d

i n

d

i n

s

r e

f c j e

s

o

g

o

a

p

e

t

c

w

a

t

u

s e

a

t

i t h

R&ALLOCATIOH OF UNITE-) STAtES SECKKITIES 1M STST.P o m m MARKET ACCOUNT OS OCTOBBB 1, 1938
Warnings on Seeurities estimated at 1*29^ per anman

System
IV Expenses
( 1 ) Estimated current expenses#
1938
(2) Prior service contributions
(3)
Total
Earnings
( l) ^stisaated current earnin s,
1930 (exclusive of oamings
on Gov*ts)
(2) Est3»ated earnings on 0©v*ts
to Sept. 30
(3) Net profits on Gcrr^ts to
Sept* 28
(ii)
Total

Boston

Jtew
York

g t ; - - MinnFh ila-~ e i s w - i "Tfch -"'
Atlanta j Chicago
eapolis
delphia land ] mond
Louis

2,1+38
7,336
26,695 7 2 ,1 7 5
2 ,5 2 1 /
193
639
179
" ^ r n f i T S - 5 3 5 5 .i s m "'"§ 7 6 31

2,763
220

1,6 77
157
1,"15T

Kansas
Dallas
c i «y

San
Francisci

3,2iiO
1 ,3 1 7
333
9*t
i . i j i " T .^ I T

l,i4X5
11*5
1*560

i,oor
83
!,<£&

1.605
171
1. 8&

I . I 5U
109
1,26 5

2,508
198
£,706

liO

83

195

66

167

139

379

218

H4I1

133

U5

218

1 ,9 3 1

7,682

2 ,2 12

2,5X2

1,3 7 2

1,12 0

2,81,7

1,18 2

83lt

1.27 8

961

2 ,18 3

2,230
573
7,9 73 '
“ 5530 S- ™ n r , w " t e s s t

dTt
y,T$T

78?

li2g
...i ; w

31*?
899
17555" "37§ 5t

371

271

2*3
1.5 * 6

693

it im

1*01
■ ” lysTC

i,a i 9
26,1114 '

c. Excess of B-I4 ever A-3

it*690

289

2 ,3 16

k7Q

I460

93

9*t

385

33

98

38

77

337

D. Estimated dividends# 1938

8.017

56ii

3,057

735

799

29a

267

790

231*

nh

250

236

613

8 1,50 1 10^,260

63,c^8

53.206 121*, 558 6 1,8 18

23,37it 65.201

1*8,901

81*, 881*

l,5i*o ,79 3'108,395 587,527 lla#260 153,560

57,273

5 1 .3 1 5 15 1.8 3 1

33.W4I

Allooation required (aa basis of
l*290t earnings rate on Oov *ts)
to produce earnings Got*-Dec*
equal to *0* minus WC*
P. Allocation of remainder of
System holdings ( 1 2 ,5 ^ # 015# 000
less #1 , 023, 222, 000) on basis
of *D*
0* Totalallocation of Gov fts
{*£" plus *?*)
H* Present allocations
I . Change in allocations




1,CB3,222

8^,576 227,895

iik,973

2,56i4,0 15'l92.971 815,1422 222,761 257*820 120 ,321 10t*,521 276,389 106,791
2 , 56i+, 0 15' 196,203 780,11*7 230 ,771 2140,262 127,2214 1 1 1 ,1 9 6 278,831 1114,1+11
— .

-3 ,2 3 2 ♦35,275

-8 ,0 10 +17*558

- 6,903

-6 .675

-2,Wl2

i»8,0l*8 1*5.357 1 17 ,8 13

56.815 Il3.2it9

9U.258 202,697

73.it30 118 ,6 31

8U.963 2C7,9li6

-7,620 -16 ,6 15

-5.382

♦9,295

-5.2ij9

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

V235B

• ^0 IN RECORDS SECTION
PARTICIPATION OF FEDERAL RESERVE
BANKS I N SYSTEM OPEN L-ARK3T ACCOUNT

APR.l 9 1968
_ _ 33_ 3, 3 / 3

The procedure fo llow ed in a llo c a t in g p a r t ic ip a t io n s in the System
Open Market Account p ro v id es f o r r e a llo c a t io n s a s o f Jan u ary , A p r il, J u ly ,
and October 1 s t o f each y e a r .
The form ula now u sed f o r a l lo c a t in g p a r t ic ip a t io n s in the System Open
Market Account among the tw elve F e d e ral R eserve banks p ro v id e s, among o th er
th in g s , t h a t each F e d e ral R eserve bank s h a l l be a l l o t t e d s u f f i c i e n t s e c u r i­
t i e s to produce earn in g s equal to i t s expenses and oth er fix e d c h a rg e s, and
th a t any s e c u r i t i e s then rem aining u n d istrib u te d be a llo c a t e d to the F e d e ral
R eserve b ark s on the b a s is o f d iv id en d req u irem en ts.
Sin ce p r o f i t s on s e c u r i t i e s sin c e January 1 , 1936, have been excep­
t io n a ll y l a r g e , approxim ately $ 7 ,8 0 0 ,0 0 0 , e arn in g s to d ate have been s u f f i c i e n t
to cover a l l o f the expenses o f th e F e d e ra l R eserve banks f o r the ca le n d ar
y e a r 1938 and p a r t o f accrued d iv id e n d s.

A cco rd in gly , under the e x is t in g

form ula th e s e c u r i t i e s in th e System Account would be r e a llo c a te d among the
F e d e ral R eserve banks a s o f October 1 in the p ro p o rtio n o f dividen d r e q u ir e ­
ments o n ly .

At the beginn ing o f the y e ar the s e c u r i t i e s in th e Account were

a llo c a t e d , a s s t a t e d above, on the b a s i s of expenses and then d iv id e n d s,
and sin c e fo r th e l a s t q u a rte r

o f the y e a r th ey would, under the form ula,

be a llo c a te d on the b a s i s o f div id en d requirem ents only, i t i s apparent th a t
i f the expenses o f a given bank bear a h igh er r a t i o to th e t o t a l expenses o f
the System than i t s dividen d requirem ents b e ar to the t o t a l dividen d r e q u ir e ­
ments o f the System , i t would g e t a s u b s t a n t ia l d e cre ase in i t s p a r t ic ip a t io n
in the Account f o r the l a s t q u a rte r o f the p re se n t y e a r .
Beginning Jan uary 1 , 1939, the s e c u r i t i e s in the Account w i l l a g a in
be r e a llo c a t e d among th e F e d e ra l R eserve banks on th e b a s i s o f expense and




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

12358

dividen d req u irem en ts, and presum ably a s in th e p a s t , -without making allow ­
ance a t t h a t tim e f o r p o s s ib le p r o f i t s during th e y e a r .

The a tta c h e d s t a t e ­

ment shows the approxim ate changes which, on the b a s i s of the e x is t in g
approved form u la, should be made a s o f October 1 , 1938, in the p a r t ic ip a t io n s
o f th e tw elve F e d e ral R eserve banks i n the System Account, and e stim ate d
changes in a ll o c a t i o n s a s o f January 1 , 1939, (a) i f the r e a llo c a t io n i s
made a s o f October 1 , and (b) i f the r e a llo c a t io n i s n ot made a s o f October 1*
I t i s ap paren t from th e attach e d statem en t th a t

i f th e r e a llo c a t io n

i s made a s o f October 1 the changes in p a r t ic ip a t io n s a s o f Jan u ary 1 , 1939*
w i l l be much l a r g e r th an th ey would be a t th a t tim e i f no r e a llo c a t io n i s
made on October 1 .

In the circu m stan ce s, and sin c e th e re i s no p a r t i c u l a r

p o in t in a ll o c a t i n g s e c u r i t i e s among th e F e d e ral R eserve banks on the b a s is
of dividen d requirem en ts on ly, a s would be the c a se i f th e October 1 , 1938,
r e a llo c a t io n i s made, i t may be w e ll to co n sid e r whether any fu r th e r r e a l l o c a ­
tio n o f s e c u r i t i e s in the System Account should be d e fe rre d u n t i l January 1 ,
1939.
I f i t i s thought a d v isa b le not to make any r e a llo c a t io n a s o f October 1 ,
1938, i t presum ably w i l l be n e c e ssa ry f o r th e F e d e ra l Open Market Committee
to tak e th e m atter up w ith each F e d e ral R eserve bank.

Attachment
9/22/38 .




CHANGES IN PARTICIPATIONS OF FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS
IN SYSTEM OPEN MARKET ACCOUNT

Federal
Reserve
Bank
Boston
New York
Philadelphia
Cleveland
Richmond
Atlanta
Chicago
St# Louis
Minneapolis
Kansas City
Dallas
San Francisco

Reallocations required by
present approved procedure
Estimated changes
Approximate changes
January l f 1939
October lf 1938

Estimated changes
on January 1, 1939, if
no reallocation is made
on October 1^ 1938a- ..
....

-43,000,000
+29,000,000
-9,000,000
+18,000,000

-#1,000,000
-112,000,000
-8,000,000
-12,000,000

-44,000,000
-83,000,000
-17,000,000
+5,000,000

-6,000,000
-6,000,000
-2,000,000
-6,000,000

+22,000,000
+7,000,000
+13,000,000
+19,000,000

+16,000,000
+1,000,000
+11,000,000
+13,000,000

-16,000,000
-4,000,000
+10,000,000
-5,000,000

+27,000,000
+22,000,000
+7,000,000
+16,000,000

+11,000,000
+18,000,000
+17,000,000
+12,000,000

-x-Changes on October 1, 1938, if made, combined with subsequent changes on
January 1, 1939, would equal the changes necessary on January 1, 1939,
as shown below, in the event that no reallocation was made on October 1, 1938*




Reproduced from the Unclassified IDeclassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority £ ..()« 12.35B

RATIO OF EACH FEDERAL RESERVE BANK’S REQUIREMENTS
FOR EXPENSES AND PRIOR SERVICE CONTRIBUTIONS AND
FOR DIVIDENDS TO SUCH REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SYSTEM AS A WHOLE

Federal
Reserve
Bank

Percent to System Total
Expenses and
Dividend
Prior Service
Requirements
Contributions
7.5

7.0

25.5

38.1

Philadelphia

8.4

9.2

Cleveland

9.6

10.0

Richmond

5.9

3.7

Atlanta

4.5

3.3

Chicago

11.4

9.9

St. Louis

5.0

2.9

Minneapolis

3.5

2.2

Kansas City

5.9

3.1

Dallas

4.1

2.9

San Francisco

8.7

7.7

100.0

100.0

Boston
New York




TOTAL

CHANGES IN PARTICIPATIONS IN SYSTEM OPEN MARKET ACCOUNT RESULTING FROM RE­
ALLOCATION OF SECURITIES ON DATES INDICATED
(in thousands o f d o l l a r s )

co

of.)j— --- —---------- -- — ~
F e d e ral R eserve
©1
Bank
j
r° j
Boston

A p ril 1,
1938

Ju ly 1,
1938

- 3,277

+ 11,241

150

+ 6,301

+ 34,292

+ 9,635

- 5,243

- 1,082

+ 20,243

+ 4,458

-13,613

+ 3,44-7

- 7,161

-

2,501

+ 7,907

- 3,837

+ 1,901

+ 3,682

- 12,755

+

832

+10,753

- 2,117

- 4,778

+ 3,955

219

Chicago

-

5,174

- 7,523

- 7,128

+

- 5,151

S t . L o u is

- H,118

+

245

- 7,451

+ 1,995

♦

M inneapolis

+

4,110

- 5,279

- 5,366

*

237

+

Kansas C ity

+

2,928

+

- 5,352

+

6,841

- 7,477

-

D a lla s

+

7,067

- 5,671

+

884

+

36

- 2,484

- 12,320

San F ran cisco

+

1,913

+

- 2,807

-

6,130

+ 2,822

- 10,708

O ctober 1,
1936

Jan u ary 1,
1937

A p ril 1,
1937

January 1,
1938

+ 12,477

+ 1,4-88

+ 1,617

+ 1,445

New York

- 15,318

+ 7,017

+35,535

-

P h ila d e lp h ia

-

2,191

-14,213

C leveland

♦

9,975

Richmond

-

A tla n ta




746

72

399

i

5,616

+

1,592

4,7m

-

4,809

5,130

-■ H,945
5,996

Prepared for Mr* Sinead September 1938.

\X

X

CHARGES IS PAmCIPATK»S Ili SISTSM 0PI8 MARSFT ACCOUKT RF80LTI8G FHOM Kh~
ALLOCATION OF 8BCDBZTZES OK DATES IKDICATSD
(In thousands of dollars)
Federal Reserve
Bank

October 1 ,
____ 1936

January 1 ,
1937

April 1 ,
__ .... 1937 „

January 1 ,
1938

April 1 ,
_.1938

July 1 ,
1938

Boston

♦ 12 ,4 7 7

♦ 1,488

♦ 1 ,6 1 7

♦ 1,4 4 5

- ,3 ,2 7 7

♦ 1 1 ,2 4 1

Sew Tork

- 15,318

♦ 7 ,0 17

♦35,535

-

150

♦ 6,301

♦ 34,292

Philadelphia

-

2 ,19 1

-1 4 ,2 1 3

♦ 9,635

- 5,243

- 1,082

♦ 20,243

Cleveland

♦

9,975

♦ 4,458

-1 3 ,6 1 3

♦ 3,447

- 7 ,1 6 1

-

Kichwwtd

*

2,50 1

♦ 7,907

- 3,837

♦ 1,9 0 1

♦ 3,682

- 12 ,7 5 5

Atlanta

+

332

♦10,753

- 2 ,1 1 7

- 4,778

♦ 3,955

219

Chicago

-

5,174

- 7 ,5 2 3

- 7,12 8

♦

- 5 ,1 5 1

♦

1,59 2

6 1. Louis

- 1 4 ,1 1 8

*

245

- 7 ,4 51

♦

♦ 2,742

-

4,809

Minneapolis

♦

4 ,HQ

- 5,279

- 5,366

♦

237

♦ 5,130

— 14,945

Kansas City

♦

2,928

♦

- 5,352

♦ 6,841

- 7,4 77

-

Balias

♦

7,067

- 5,6 71

♦

♦

36

- 2,484

- 12,320

Sm Francisco

♦

1,9 1 3

♦

- 2,807

- 6,130

♦ 2,822

- 10,708

Prepared, f o r Mr.




Smead

746

72

September 1938.

884

399

5,616

5,996

? 32?

; o v
f
M A
■ie-f

oj CO
II iX
' w oo tO

COMPARISON OF ESTIMATED CURRENT EXPENSES (MADE IN CONNECTION WITH REALLOCATION OF
SYSTEM OPEN MARKET ACCOUNT AS OF DATES INDIGATED) WITH ACTUAL CURRENT
EXPENSES

r—
i ■'tQ,
f

B <C
“O Or
ieral Reerve Bank

35 Si
Cfl «
3 U*
\{J

Reproduced from the Unclassified




Percenib to actual i"or 1938**
esti[.mated as of
July 1 ,
Jan. 1 ,
April 1 ,
1938
1938
1228 _

98.8

98.6

97.7

97.8

100.9

98.0

99.1

New York

106.3

10 1.0

9 7 .1

97.0

9 8.1

10 1.4

10 2.4

100.0

Philadelphia

104.6

100.8

99.8

100.7

99.1

100.2

99.8

100.0

Cleveland

97.3

10 1.7

10 8.7

102.0

97.5

10 5.8

102.6

100.0

Richmond

10 0 .1

98.7

100.8

100.0

98.0

10 5.5

105.6

100.0

Atlanta

97.3

98.2

109.0

10 7.8

97.4

10 3.9

105.6

10 3.9

Chicago

10 3.4

100.6

106.8

102.6

97.5

10 2.2

99.9

100.0

) St, Louis

1 1 3 .4

10 1.3

10 5.4

10 1.5

9 5 .1

98.8

1 0 1 .1

100.0

Minneapolis

9 8 .1

10 3.4

10 5 .1

99.5

95.3

105.9

109.5

10 1.5

Kansas City

95.2

99.8

99.9

97.9

98.4

106.9

100.6

100.0

Dallas

92.6

1 0 1 .1

99.3

100.8

94.2

1 1 2 .5

10 7 .1

100.0

San Francisco

99.3

100.7

10 3.9

10 2.4

10 1.6

10 1.6

10 1.6

100.0

Total

10 1.3

100.6

10 1.9

10 0 .1

97.9

102.9

10 2 .1

100.2

J

IDeclassified

■

Percent to actual for 1937
estJmated as of
April 1 , 1 July 1 ,
Jan, 1 ,
1937
I 1937*
1937

92.3

\ Boston

'a £
0
1
<

Holdings of the National Archives

Percent to actual for
1Q36 estimated as of
June 30, 1 Oct. 1 ,
I
1936
1936

* Date qf proposed reallocation
* * On fiv e 'months1 basis*

*\

Prepared for

M

r ,

Smead September

} £5
|h 4

fO

i K

CD

I w co fO

Vjs^
*N I

w

? H _.
I &« *-» t<)
I ?
IS “O
$ <•*3f
I?
*o
i ieral ReW
■ro
k
Bank

(

Perceni i to actual for 1938**
esti .mated as of
Jan. 1 ,
July 1 ,
April 1 ,
1938
1 9 2 8 .....
____ i m
.....

1

j

5

\

98.6

97.7

97.8

100.9

98.0

99.1

New York

106.3

10 1.0

9 7 .1

97.0

9 8.1

10 1.4

10 2.4

1QQ.0

Philadelphia

104*6

100.8

99.8

100.7

99.1

100.2

99.8

100.0

Cleveland

97.3

10 1.7

108.7

102.0

97.5

10 5.8

102.6

100.0

Richmond

10 0 .1

98.7

100.8

100.0

98.0

10 5.5

105.6

100.0

Atlanta

97.3

98.2

109.0

10 7.8

97.4

10 3.9

105.6

10 3.9

Chicago

10 3.4

100.6

106.8

102.6

97.5

102.2

99.9

100.0

S t. Loui8

1 1 3 .4

10 1.3

105.4-

10 1.5

9 5 .1

98.8

1 0 1 .1

100.0

9 8 .1

103.4-

10 5 .1

99.5

95.3

105.9

109.5

10 1.5

>
Io

<£
r*

Kansas City

95.2

99.8

99.9

97.9

98.4

106.9

100.6

100.0

Dallas

92.6

1 0 1 .1

99.3

100.8

94.2

1 1 2 .5

10 7 .1

100.0

San Francisco

99.3

100.7

10 3.9

102.4-

10 1.6

10 1.6

10 1.6

100.0

Total

10 1.3

100.6

10 1.9

100.1

97.9

102.9

102.1

100.2

* Date of proposed reallocation
* * On fiv e months* basis.
Prepared for Mr. Smead Septeaker 1938.




■1

DECLASSIFIED

\

Percent to actual for 1937
estimated as of
Jan. 1 , j April 1 , 1 July 1 ,
1937
J
1937
j 1937*

98.8

Minneapolis

\

Percent to iictual for
1936 estimai ;ed as of
June 30,
Oct. 1 ,
......
........ 1.936 ____ ...... 1?36
92.3

Boston

1

COMPARISON OF ESTIMATED CURRENT EXPENSES (MADE IN CONNECTION WITH REALLOCATION OF
SYSTEM OPEN MARKET ACCOUNT AS OF DATES INDIGATED) WITH ACTUAL CURRENT
EXPENSES

cenptgnw or n n u t o onom m m (u n a om ens* n a m u o cm o « or
num ora u a o s acoowt a or boss noicrne) ixtb ienuu. cm iu t
m in i

P
f

i

t

• *

e

t

r v

o

l

a #
B

n

o

1 9

~

J

k

r e

a

o * t o m

8

* v

F

h

I o

i l «

r k

d

*

l p

h

i i i

t

t i S

u

i i c

t o

M

1

B

M

1 6

3

0

t

u

,

O

c

«

S

«

.

A

t l o

N

a

K

S

t *

L

o

*

i *

I»> t»
M

B

l *

m

C

i t y

*

F

r * »

c i »

T

o

l

t a

c o

1 6

*

r e p




a r e d

f o

r

. *

1 0

b

i . 4

io o .«

0

, 1

9

7

. 3

1 0

3

U

3

U

. l

0

1

. ?

* 6

9

* 1

e t o

u

l

t o

r

1 9

1 7

F

t e T

A

p

r

i l

1

1 9

1 7

9

* 7

7

,

1
1

M

r

* »

m

97*0

7

9

t

*

M

m

9

J a m

1

* a

1 0

0

a

1 0

1 * 4

1 0

2

* 6

* o

1 0

5

* 5

1 0

5

* 6

100*0

1 0

5

* 6

1 0

3

* 9

99*9

1 0

0

. 0

0

1 0

0

* 0

9

S

. #

. 3

1 0

5

* 9

* 4

9

. 0

1 0

1 0

5

5

* 4

. 1

9

9

9

97*9

9

* 9

1

9

9

* 3

1 0

0

* #

. 7

1 0

3

. 9

1 0

2

. X

1 0

0

101*9

95*1

* 5

9

3

8

,

5

9 #

94.2
m

. 1

hU
yroyeawl m i U m i U c i
f l l » M*th»* U l l t ,
1 9

. 0

. #

101*5

e r

0

5

1 0

b

1 0

1 0

101*3

t e m

* 0

7 * 5

* 2

e p

0

9

2

* 6

1 0

. 0

1 0

0

4

2

7 * 5

1 0

* 1

1 0

9

, 3

9

io#*7

* 6

1

^

#

9

9 * - ®

1

3

#

* #

2

1 0

1 9

1

9

1 0

0

l y

9

io6.a

1 0

a

* 2

106,4

. 3

..............

f
J

0

* 9

9

o

1 0

3

9

r

* 1

1 0

1 *

l

9

7 * 4

1 0

u

i l

9

9

. *

r

* 7

* #

2

M
p

0

7

9

A

1 0

1 0

. 4

m

* 9

1 0

3

ostaMii for 193i*#

t o

j

9

* t

t i *

r t j L

,

i

9 #

#

M
«

99»#

99*#

S

7

9 #

7

,

w

* 0

. 2

a d

3

1

t o

t i

0

5

M

U

•

1 0

9

S

«

f t t

•

loo.i

*

r .

r t o

9«*7

9

H

o

1 9

101*0

•
**
P

J

. 3

1 0

P

,

6

U

H a sn ^ i

r

1 0

t a

& !* * «•

1

9

)

1

i

f o

t .
1 9

w iw tt >in
S l o h M

l

A

*

9

6

7 * 9

1

1

. 1

100*0

1 0

9

* 5

101*5

106*9

1 0

0

* 6

1 0

112*5

1 0

7

* 1

1OO.0

1 0

1 0

1

. 6

100*0

1 * 6

102*9

102a

1 0

0

0

* 0

. 2

Reproduced from the Unclassified IDeclassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority fc.Q* 12358

0,
Fe d e r a l R e s e r v e B a n k
DIVISION OF
BANK OPERATIONS

o f N ew Y o rk

June 27, 1938,

Dear Mr. Sinead:
We have your letter of June 25 ^and have today sent to
the Reserve banks a copy of the computation showing the adjust­
ments to be made in participations in the System Open Market
Account as of July 1, 1938, pursuant to the plan adopted at the
meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee on November 30,
1957.
A copy of the letter of transmittal is enclosed here­
with.
We note that you will make a further study of the
formula now used.
Very truly yours,

W. ft. Burgess
Manager, System Open
Market Account

Mr. E. L. Smead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations,
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System,
Washington, D. C.

Encl.




JN

0

A

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

12358

Similar letter sent to Presiuent of each Federal Reserve Bank as follows*

rHotffcon: '
Philadelphia
Cleveland
Richmond
Atlanta

$U, 241,000+
20,245,000+
5,616,000—
12,755,000219,000San Francisco

$ 1,592,000
4.809.000
14.945.000
5.996.000
12.520.000

Chicago
St. Louis
Minneapolis
Kansas City
Dallas
$10,708,000 -

+
-

June 27, 1938.

D

e a r

H

r ,

H

a

r r i s o

n

i

In connection with the plan for 7Hllo<sttlM of goveraaont
s

e

c

u

r

i t i e

s

adopted by the Federal Open Harket Committee at its

m

e

e

t i f t f

on November SO, 1957, a copy of the computation showing the adjustments
to be made in participations as of July 1, 1958 ia being sent to all
Beserve banka,

A cojgr of this statement is enclosed herewith, which indicates
that your participation in the ^rstem Open Market Account will be in­
creased $54,292,000,
Changes in allocations are somewhat more marked than usual snd
are due in no email part to the size of profits which the %-stea ban re­
ceived on governments since January 1.

To the extent that earning# ex­

ceed expenses they are allocated in accordance with dividend requirement#
which are somewhat differently distributed among the reserve banks than
the requirements for earnings.
We shall advise you on July 1 the detailed entries to be made
on that date,
truly yours,

W, E, Burgess
Manager, ^jrstem Open
Harket Account
Ir* George L, Harrison, President,
Federal Beserve Bank of Hew Tork,
Sew fork, If. Y,
Encl.
 mm m


REALLOCATION OF UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SECURITIES IN SYST13K1! OPEN MARKET ACCOUNT ON JULY 1, 1938
Earnings on securities computed at 1.2 6 32 percent per annum
'Amounts in thousands of dollars)
*

1

J*
—

.

—

I
A* Expenses
( 1) Estimated current expenses,
1938
( 2 ) i-'rior service contributions
(3)
Totsi
B. Earnings
( l) Estimated current earnings,
1938(exclusive of earnings
on Gov'ts)
(2) Estimated e5rTHr~s on Gov’ ts
to June 30
(3) Net p ro fits on Govt’ s to
June 2I4
(h)
Total
C. Excess of A—3 over B-1+
V

llooation required (on basis of
1,2632^ per annun earnings rate
on Govts) to produce earnings
July-Decenbar equal to "C"

I

28,662
2 ,5 2 1
3 1* 18 3

2 ,17 8 *
179
2 ,35 7

1,78 9

—

Tc**- IdelpMa

land | mond

2,1*81
193
2,67^

2,708
220
2,928

1,6 7 5
157
1,8 3 2

137

376

227

lWi

17,9 87

1,30 9

5,209

1,1431

6,67 h
26,/+50

h!9
1,9 2 5

1,861+

l+,733

1+32

71+3,259

67,81+0
7.0 5

\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

7 ,350
639
7,989

E. Ratio of estimated dividend re­
quirements for ye^r to systen total 100.00
F. Allocation of remainder of System
holdings (12,561+, 015 less
#71+3,259*000) on basis of "E"

I Fh il a - j C l e v e - I Rich-

—

Atlanta Chicagoj

1 ,3 2 1
91+

i*t. I Minn- Kansas
Lpul8 jeapolis _C«3L. Dallas

San
F

r a

n

c

i s c o

l,l45

3 ,^ 5 1
333
3s i m

1,1*10
11+5
1*555

83
1,096

1,65U
171
1,825

1,111
109
1,220

13 1

39

227

35

51+

191

68

160

1 ,7 5 1

968

767

1,966

819

601

902

691

1 ,5 2 3

659
2,551+

353
1,1*52

287
1,0 93

751+
2,91+7

3 11
1 ,16 5

227
882

336
262
1 , 1+29 1,0 2 1

580

7,Uf9

562
2,270

5^0

hok

37k

380

322

637

390

216

8U*800 63,1+1+3 58,732

59,671+

38.19

9 .19

9.97

1,8 20 ,756 12 8 ,36 3 695#3^7 16 7,328 18 1,5 2 9

3 .7 1

67,550

1,015

50,566 1 00,033 61,21+5 33,920
3.33

9.82

2.92

2 .1 7

60,631 178,798 53,16 6 39 ,510

2,506
198

TTm 1

2.263

199

1*1*3

6 2 ,18 ? 3 1 ,2 5 1

69,56#

396

3 .1 0

2 .9 5

7.60,

56,1+1+1+ 5 3 ,7 12

13 8 .5 W

( «*p«* + wpw)

2 ,5 6 k ,015 196,203 780,11*7 230 ,771 21*0,261 127,221* 1 1 1 , 1 9 7 278,831 U l^Jjll 73.U30 118 ,6 3 1 8l*,963

20T.9U6

H.; Present allocations

2 ,5 6 1 ,0 1 5 I8t*,962 71*5,855 210 ,528 21*5*877 139,979 111,1* 16 277,239 119,220 88,375 12l*,687 97,263

218,^51*

G# Total allocation of Gov'ts)

I* Change in allocations




+1 1 , 21*1 +31**292 +20,21*3

-5 ,6 16 -1 2 ,7 5 5

-2 19

+1,592 -1*,809-il*, 9l*5 - S 996 -12,320

-10 ,W

1
■

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

(U
June 25, 193S

Mr. I. B. Matteson, Asst. Vice President,
Federal Reserve Bfmx of Hew York,

New toric,

1.

Dear Mr. Mattesom
In accordance with our understanding over the telephone
this morning, there is enclosed a copy of our « ilculation on the
■Reallocation of United States Government Securities in System Open
Market Account on July 1, 1938*.
Changes in allocations are somewhat more sarked than
usual and Mr. fan Fossesn advises me that they are due in no small
part to the larger profits which the System has received on Govern­
ments sines January 1.

For example, tha expenses of your hank are

about 25 percent of th« expenses for tiie Systea as a whole, whereas
the dividend requirements for your bank amount to about 38 percent
of the requirements for the System as a whole.

Consequently, under

the preseat formula the more earnings exceed expenses the larger
your relative participation in the System account.

I hope 'to have

Mr. Van Fossen do some work on the formula during the coming months
and if he is able to develop anything which would reduce somewhat
the marked fluctuations in allocations on quarterly dates, we shall
take the matter up with Dr. Burgess.
Very truly yours,

ELS/jbs



fu

REALIA CATXOF OF imiTlv-i STATLS G0VERTOHT SfcCTFRITILS IK SY^'wi-’ OPEII MAKJCL? ACr0ir:T

OH JtLY

1 , 1938

Earnings on securities computed at 1.2632 percent per annum
(Amounts in thousands of dollars)
P h ila ­ <5ieve-]Wiolvt e r * Vinn- K ansas
7System
~ 1 7 ~B oston
7 — jr Tyork
sr
A tla n ta Chicago
delphia land j mond
Louis eapolis City

A# Expenses
(1) Estimated current exponses#
1938
( 2 ) P rio r s e r v ic e c o n trib u tio n s
(3)
Total
B. Earnings
(1) Estimated current earnings,
193B(©xolusiv© of earnings
on Gov*ts)
'(2) i-stimated earnings on Oo'v’ts
to June 30
(3) Net profits on Govt’s to
June 2l+
(k)

Total

<

C* Excess of A-3 over B-1+
i** Allocation required (on hasis of
1,2632$ per annum earnings rate
on >ovts) to produce earnings
Jui^-'Deoembsr equal to nCn

28,662

7,350
639
7,989

2JM
193

31,183

2,1?8
179
2,35?

1.789

137

376

227

17,987

1,309

5,209

6 ,6 7 k
26,1*50

t79

1,661+

1,925

i4,733

1*32

71+3,259

67*61*0

2 ,5 2 1

Sat to of estimate'! dividend requirenents for year to system total 100.00

7* Of?

1 M 9

1,675

198
2,706

ik k

131

39

227

35

1.1,81

1,751

968

767

1,966

819

601

902

691

1,523

562
2.270

659

353

267

7%

311

227

336

262

580

2,551*

I#l452

1,093

2 *9 k 7

1,165

882

1,1+29

1,021

2,263

322

637

390

216

39o

199

kk3

50 ,5o6 100,033 61,21*5 33*920 62,167 31,251

69,568

J fk

360

Bli,S00 63.U*3

56,732

99,671+

9*19

9.97

3*71

167,$2B

181,529

67,550

38*19

2,508

1,Ij15

ltd.

rM

1.1U

1 ,$ 5 2

157

1,321

San
ra n o isc o

3,251
333
375W

2 ,6 7 l

2,708
220
2*928

D a lla s

9k

3*33

9.82

1,U0
lli5
1.555

1,015
83
1,096

1.65U
1*825

109
1,220

51*

191

68

160

2.92

2.17

171

3,10

2*95

7*60

A ll 00ation of remainder of System
holdings (12,5614,015 less
I7t3,259,000) on basis o/3 «s»

00ation

(i* total all

£nr.n + if'«o i|

60,631 178,796 53,166 39,510

5o,iM 53,712

136,378

127.?2 h 111,197 278,^31 Ult.1.11 73 . 1-30 118 ,o 31 814,963

207,91,6

2,561.,015 1014,962 7fc5.855 210,526 81,5,(77 139,979 111.1,16 277,239 U & 220 8P..375 121*,<327 97,283

218,651,

+1,592 4,,f?09 -il*9h$ -5.9 9 6 -12,320

- 10,708

of Gov’ts)

Prosent allocations

Change in allocations




1,820,756" 126,363 &5,5l7

2 . 561.,015 196.2-3 7 PO.1 J47 230,771 22. 0.261

—

m .e ljl +3J4,fe92 +P0.PI.3

-5 ,6 16 -12 ,7 5 5

-819

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority E..O* 12358

Footnotes to statement on reallocation of Govern­
ment securities July 1, 1933.

A, (1)

Estimated current expenses, 1933 a/

B. (2)

Estimated earnings on Gov’ts, to June 30 b/

D. Allocation required (on basis of 1.2632$ per annum earnings
rate on Gov’ts.) to produce earnings July-I'ec. equal to "C” c/
Ratio of estimated dividend requirements for year to System total cl/

a/

2.4 of current expenses Janusry-May, less *,.19,000 at Boston
to adjust for estimate of salaries on monthly basis while
payment is made weekly, plus *.50,000 at Atlanta for renairs
and alterations to bank building, and plus $15,000 at
Minneapolis for furniture and equipment.

b/

Actual January 1 ~ June 26 plus estimated for remainder of
June (obtained by phone from Mr. Behrens at .New York, June

2 1 ),

c/

Actual rate used .63679$ (1&C/365 of 1.2,632$)

d/

Based on dividends accrued January-May plus 3.5$ of paid-in caoital
stock, May 31.




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority fc.O* llfl58

Fe d e r a l R e s e r v e B a n
o f N ew Y o rk

March ta , 19 53.

Bear Mr* Sbteads
In accordance with telephone conversation today, we have
sent to the reserve hanks a copy of the computation showing the
adjustments to be made In participations in the System Open Market
Account as of April 1 , 1958, pursuant to the plan adopted at the
meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee on Hovember SO, 19 37.
A coggr of the le tte r of transmittal i s enclosed herewith*
Veiy tru ly yours,

Y* & Burgess
Manager, System Open
Market Account

Mr* B* L. Snead, Chief,
Division of Bank Operations*
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve SJystem,
Washington, D* C.




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

12358

March

1938.

Dear Mr. Sinclair*
la connection with the p lm fo r reallocation o f government
seoarltle# adopted bf tho Federal Open Market Gomnittee at It# »o*t-

tug cm love®bar 30, 19 57, a copy o f the c©spoliation showing tho adJastaent# to be a*de In participation# a# o f A pril l f 1 $ M i» being

sent to a ll Reserve bank#*
A copy of th is atateaent 1# enclosed herewith, whloh in­
dicates that your participation la the %*tea

OpmMarket Account

w l H be decreased tX,0$£,OOO«
«e shall wire you on April 1 the detailed entries to be

nade cm 'that date*
Veiy truly your#,

f* E* Burgees
Manager, %#taa Oped
Market Account

Hr* John 8* Sin clair, President,
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia,
Philadelphia, Penn.




REALLOCATION Oi? UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SECURITIES IN SYSTEM OPEN MARKET ACCOUNT ON APRIL 1 , 1938
EARNINGS ON UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SECURITIES COMPUTED AT 1.39 8 7* PER ANNUM.
(Amounts In thousands of dollars)

System
"A" - Expenses
1 . Estimated for 1938
2. Prior service con­
tributions
3.
Total
B" - Earnings
1 . Estimated January to Dec,
(except on Gov'ts)
2. Earnings on Gov'ts.Jan-Feb.
3 . Estimated March earnings
on Gov'ts
A. P ro fits on Cov1 t s .Jan-Maich23
5*

Total

"C" - Excess of "A "(3) over
•B»(5)

New York

Phila­
delphia

Cleve­
land

Richmond Atlanta Chicago

S t.
Louis

Minne­
apolis

Kansas
City

D&llas

San
Francisco

29,215

2 ,15 4

7 ,5 2 7

2,475

2,778

1,76 8

1,3 4 2

3,248

1,426

1,095

1,664

1,19 0

2,548

2 ,5 2 1
31,736

1TO
2 ,333

639
8,166

193
2,668

220
2,998

157
1,9 2 5

9Z.
1,4 36

333
3 ,5 8 1

1A5
1 ,5 7 1

83
1,17 8

17 1
1,8 3 5

109
1,299

198
2,746

1,989
6,288

162
462

438
1 ,8 1 3 .

310
519

139
620

154
334

64
264

233
693

41
281

53
204

19 1
324

77
245

12 7
529

3,085
2.818

226
202

890

255
238

304
278

129
121

340
319

138
131

100
96

159
1 L2

120
111

14 ,18 0

1,0 52

3,926

1 ,3 2 2

1,3 a

164
1A9
801

578

1,5 8 5

591

453

816

553

260
246
1 ,16 2

17 ,5 5 6 .

1 ,2 8 1

4,240

1,3 4 6

1,6 5 7

1 ,1 2 4

858

1,996

980

725

1,0 19

746

1,5 8 4

402,353 12 7,728

157,240

106,662

81,420 189,410

92,997

68,999

96,698

70,791

15 0 ,313

38.25*

9 .2 2 *

9.87*

3 .7 1 *

3.3 4 *

9.78*

2.9 2*

2.18%

3 .11*

2.95*

7.6 1*

343,502

82,800

88,637

3 3 ,3 1 7

29,995

87,829

26,223

19 ,5 7 7

27,929

26,492

68,3a

"D" - Gov'ts required (on basis
of 1.3987% earnings rate)
to pr*oduce earnings April
- Dec, equal to "C*
1,6 6 5 ,9 7 1
•E " - Ratio of dividend require­
ments Of each bank to
System to tal

Boston

100*

"F" - Allocation o f remainder of
System holding* ($2,564,015,000
l e u $1,665,971,0 0 0 ) on bMia
of *E"
898,8*4

12 1,5 6 0

7.06*

63,402

■G" - TotAl allocation of
Gov'ts ("D* & «F")

2,564,0 15

184,962

745,855 210,528

245,877

139,979

1 1 1 , 4 1 5 277,239

119 ,2 2 0

88,376 12 4 ,6 2 7

97,283

218,654

"H* - Present allocations

2,564,0 15

188,239

739,554 2 11,6 10

253,038

136 ,2 9 7

107,460 282,390

114 ,4 7 8

83,246 132 ,10 4

99,767

215,932

■I" - Change in allocation

—

-3 ,2 7 7

-1,0 6 2

-7 ,16 1

+3,682

-5 ,15 1

+4,742

-7 ,4 7 7

-2,484

+2,822




+6,30 1

+ 3,955

+ 5,130

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

1235%

IN FILES SECTION

j

.IPR 1

193D

3 ^ C

b il 3 0

Kerch 2% I<m

B

r «

F

a

f
d

l e

v

l e

e

.

a

R

r a
Y

r

*

l

B

E

o

r k

B

r *

o

,

l a

f o

t

r s a

f
l t a

o

f

t h

s
t h

e

a

*
r

a
y

h

e r e

o

f

e
s *

a

s

8

e

B

1 *
i t h

r a
A

o

l

p

a

f i g

,

s s ,

f l e

e a k

e
e

f

P

r e

8

e »

d

a

s

i d

e

f o

r

n

t ,

k

,

s s t

i a

c l o

r e

s

i l

a

t e

U

n

u
c

i &

e

p

e

e
c

t

B f c e s e r i r e
r

s t i m

i s

3

e

w

d

s e

1 9

r g

n
e

e

Y *

a

t i l o
b

,

e

.

B

i o
F

*

e n

a

i &

e a c h

r g

e r r e

M

T

o

u

a

r

l n

X

n

s *

e

e

s

s

i i r e

S

f o

t o
b

c e

t »

i t e d

r

t h

e a k

s s a
e

t a

s t a

r y

t h

s

e

m

e

e

f o

O
f l a

a

t i n

o

T

g

e
e

r

l a

s t i m

t e

t e

n

t

t i a

p

&

t e
a

a

5 8

t h

e

$

y »

g

e x

p

e n

t

s

o

a

t h

s

g

i s

l s

d

a

t h
o

i s

a

l e

t i o

t r

a

s

t t

e

d

n

l a

t i a

i n

t i o

l a
a

a

s

e
s

o

i

w
t r

i a
r

w
,

f

i t h

r e

t

i *

i t h

r e

i a

l

a A

t h

e

%

B

e

c e

a
a

b

s

e

p

e

o

t

p

e

c

a
r

s

n

r a &
t e

t

c e s
A

e

t

t o

b

e

l i r

t o
a a d

c c o

23
,

u

1 9

n
3

a
r e

t h

e

e

o

t ,

n

t i n

d

t e a
s e s
e

c

r n

i n

e

e

a

c c o

a

u

n

r

c t o

d

e

g

h

a

u

s

r ,

a

s

i a

y

a

i l a

b

l e

^
g

n

- e

i t i e
b

o

e

s

t

a

i a

o

r n

a

t h

i i i g

,

«

e

h

1 9

3

7

h
a
r e

r

e

d

s

i r a

b

l e

a

n

d

l i n

g

o

a

g

c

i t a
f e

e

r e

n
n

t e
c

jg4 s*n to
tnir

,

a

l l o

e

b

s ,

o

a v

e

t h
n

t o

F

c
a

*
s

e

i s

r

e e d

e b

r u

­

e

i t

a

v

t o
f

Kl*

a p s fc v w n

w v m h l

e

a
a

i l a
a

k

e e r &

b

e

l e
a

l a

d

o

t w

t o

^

d

e

n

h

i a
m

j^iPiP4n4»a^K»MP
t o

a

y

i x i g s

7 *

s

c h

a n d

a

a

a n

e x p

i a

g

p

s

a a

d

a
e

x

y

t r a

B
i T

i a

l j r

*

I * .

i o

a

y

S
o

f

e

a

a o a
l e

r

s

d
a

,
k

r

e n
t i d

l a

.

C

h

i e

O

p

e

f ,

r a

t i o

n

l l

g e

J

D




a

t h

O

d

f «

Ineloeure

t

f r

.

St«#*
* vw* iiM*»iaw■w <taip^Nnan
<1» ifl
ipwM Pww sctive
w w o a » ¥ i p ^H
l e

e

n

,

a r e d

d

1 9

e r a a e n

*

r e p

s *

a

t

s e s
p
n g r

e

-

W

193s

reax & ocatiok of uxitsd states ooyiaiaim securities ia system o p m makket accouht on april i,

of

rVv*
Reproduced from the Unclassified

EARMMQS* Gii UNITED STATES TMVERHSIEKT SECURITIES COMPUTED AT 1*3987* ?ER ASIiUH.

(Amounts In thousands of dollars)

T Boston (He* Tort |2 ff£ »i £ S T

Systea
29,215*

2 ,15 4

3 1,7 3 6 -'

......a 39 n .JLi3_2 ,3 3 3 • 8,166 * 2,668 ■

5 * .

T

o

t a

l

*C* - Excess of *A*(3) over
*B«{5)

2,77*

2,475

1,76$

1,3 4 2

3,248

1,4 2 6

438
1 ,8 1 3

310
519

139
620

3,085 ‘
2.818 •

226
OQS

890

255
238

304
278

14*180 •

1,0 52 •

3,926 • 1,3 2 2 *

1,3 4 1*

17 ,5 5 6 :

1*28 1 ‘

4,240 . 1 ,3 4 6 .

1,6 5 7 •

340
219
578 • 1,5 8 5 *
1,996 .

858.

1 ,1 2 4 •

2,548

1,299 •

2,746 •

77
245

12 7
529

19 1
324

San

Francisco

120
260
100
138
159
1 3 1 .......3$. ....m ___ ......m ..... . ....... 246, .
1 ,1 6 2 •
816 *
553 .
453*
591.

129
12 1

164
..... 1X9
801 •

1,190

53
204

41
281

233
693

64
264

154
334

162
462

1,664

1,095

____,“ -2~
1 ,5 7 1 * 1 , 1 7 8 ’ 1*835 *

dm ...... JLxt__ _____ 34-—__ JLU_
1,9 2 5 . 1,4 36 . 3 ,58 1 •
2,998 •

1,989 ‘
6,288 '

Balias

725 • 1,0 19 .

980 •

74 6 .

1,58 4 •

*B* - Gov1 ts required (on basis
of 1.3957S6 earnings rate)
’

i P

T

l l l

&
?
,

6

6

5

, 9

7

1

'•

*E* - Ratio of dividend require­
ments Of each bank to
System to tal
100^
)
*F* -. Allocation of remainder of
System holdings ($2,564,015,000
less $1,>65,971,000)
898,044 •
of «t«

121 560
,

7

'

, 0

6

63,402

*

4

0

3

2

9

, 3

, 2

5 3

5

*

1 2

7

9

, 7

. 2

2

2

3

*

1 5

7

, 2

4

0

9 . 8 7 5 1

'

106 662
,

3

'

. 7

W

343,502* 82,8CK)*

88,637

3 3 ,3 1 7

3

1 , 4

3

. 3

2

4

0

%

29,995

1 8

9

9

, 4

. 7

1 0

5

?

9

2

2

, 9

. 9

9

2

7

*

87,829

26,223

S

* , 7 9

2

. I S

9

*

19 ,5 7 7

9

6

3

, 6

. 1

9

1

8

*

27,929 '

TO,791

15 0 ,313

2.95*

7.6 1*

26,492

68,341 •

•0* - TotAl allocation of
Gov’ts («D* * *F»)

2,564,015 ‘ 184,962

745,855 210,528

245,377

139,979

1 1 1 ,4 1 5 277,239

119,220

*3,376 124,627

97,283

218*654

■H* - Pi^sent allocations

2 ,5 6 4 ,0 15 ‘

188,239

739*554 2 11,6 10

253,038

136,297

107,460 282,390

114,478

33,246 132,10 4

99,767

a * * 832

-1,0 8 2

-7 ,1^

♦3,682

•5 ,1 5 1

♦4,742

-7 ,4 7 7

-2,484

*1* * Change in allocation



Holdings of the National Archives

*B* * laming#
1* Estimated January to Bee*
{ except oa Gov’ ts)
2* Earnings on Gov#ts«Jai*~Feb.
3 , Estimated March earnings
on Gov’ %d
4* Profits on Covf ts.Jan-Mapdi 9%

7 ,527

Kansas

] ” g £ ....Stiff

IDeclassified

*A* - Expenses
1 0 Estimated for 1938
2. Prior service con-*
tributioas
3.
Total

Atlantajchlcgo j

—

.

-3 ,2 7 7

♦6,301

♦3,955

♦ 5,130

*

!
®!

P P :
a >
\n
(O Ki
^ >>s-<
qti
t*3
% O'

:
.-:

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority

£ ..Q «

1 2 .3 5 * 8

J -

*




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

12358

REC’D in f i le s section

MAR 11 m s '
.. ^

Mr. Sntesd
Messrs. Van Fossesn end Daniels

Reference is aade to your »e»orandu» of January 14, 1933, to Mr. ¥an
Fossen, requesting that we give consideration to *uestions referred to in let­
ters froa Mr. Leach, Sir. Sinclair, and Mr. Peyton on the formula to be used
for reallocations of the System Account.

The Presidents of the Federal.Reserve

banks were requested in Mr. Morrill **» letter of Deceaber 6, 1937, to subnit
their views regarding the proposed forwila to be used in saaking reallocations.
In their replies three of the Federal fieserve banks made suggestions as follows*
Philadelphia
That the amount payable to the Secretary of the Treasury
under Section l^S be included in the ordinary charge-offs
in arriving at tha expenses for formula purposes.
Richmond
a. That the net debit or credit of profit and loss, except
losses on bills and securities and miscellaneous assets,
be used in arriving at item *C* in the fonault*, and
b. That earnings, expenses and losses on industrial loans
be excluded from the forwula.

Minneapolis
That the formula include (1) provision for recognised losses or
reserves for recognized losses end interest accrued to the
Secretary of the Treasury for funds advanced for industrial
loans end (2) recoveries on charge-offs, and exclude profits
or losses on {System Account sales.
The case for excluding earnings and expen&es of 13b operations has been
covered in Mr. Ven Fossen*s Memorandum of December 15, 1937, and It is recommend­

ed thet this b e done.

Aside froa* suggestions relating to adjustments in the

formula because of industrial loan operations there were only two suggestions




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority E..O* 12358

Mr. Saead - 2
1.

That all profit «nd loss items be included in the estimates ex­
cept year—end losses on bill8 and securities snc miscellaneous

assets, &nd
2*

That profits and losses on Government securities be exeluded*

Consideration has been given at various times to including estimates
of profit and loss items in asking the reallocations.

The basis used for the

reallocation on June 1, 1936, gave consideration to estimated "nora&l chargeoffs find fixed charges" and in arriving at the September 30, 19%, sllocations
net expense of other reel estate was included in the estimates.

During 1937

the basis used for the reallocations gave consideration to prior service con­
tributions, net profits on seles of securities end assessments for the Board’s
building*
Theoretically, the case is cleer for considering #11 profit end loss
items, except those relating to 13b operations, in arriving at the estimates
of net earnings required by the various Federal Reserve bisnks.

It is believed,

however, th^t as a matter of 'r&ctieo no benefit would result fro® doing so.
In the first place such iteas »r© difficult to estimate*

Secondly, excluding

prior service contributions, net profits on sales of securities, end assessments
for the Board*s building, profit and loss items have been and will probably
continue to be relatively small, and In addition the credit and debit itatt^tend
to offset one mother.

During 1937, excluding the three profit md. loss items

which were considered in the reallocations, the net debit for the System of
profit and loss items was less than 1/2% of currant expenses, and the only
individual banks having a net debit or net credit greater than

5% of current

expenses were Chicago, because of the large credits for releases from prior
service contributions and Board building assessment reserves, and Atlanta, be­
cause of the large reserve set up at the end of the year for building improve­
ments.



R ep rod uced from the U nclassified / D ecla ssified H oldings of the N ational A rchives

“
r

d e c l a s s if ie d

-

Authority

12-35%

■
I
1

f c r *

U

f l b a a d

b

m

a

a

p

d

i a

e

l t a

c u

-

3

T

b

a

e

x

a

l

l w

l t o

s a

l o

a

a

B

l u

g

M

s

y

s

e

B

a d

a

< u r e

^

a

t B

a

a

c a

a

a

a

l a

t

w

a

c

e

t h

a

t

o

n

o

f

o

a

b

t

u

a

,

a

r

a

a a a p

i v

i n

a

t

t h

a

m

i

n

t H

i t a

B

g

a

b

H

p

i r l

l *




a

b

a a

a

B

a

t

B

«

r o

v

i d

t

o

f

a

e

a

e

a r e d

g

i t i a

( S

w

i t h

t h

a

m

&

b

a

s a

i d

r n

i n

n

o

l i B

a

p

t *

e a

a

a

t o

f

a a a

7 }

o

m

r

t l c

a

r e

a

e

d

i v

&

a

t a

a

t a

a

o

f

l i t

f

a « « m

x E

t h

a

n

o

t h

a

t *

o

t

t

p

B

r o

a

t

l e

f i t *

a

a

a

o

m

e

r

l t

t l a

i

w

e

i d

e

r a

t h

a

t

a

l * &

g

a a

r

e

a

l l o

g

*

s

u

t

t o

c o

v

e

f o

r

r e

f o

r

a t

i a

l e

e

,

v

i p

e

s a

i e

t i o

l l y

r v

a

e

i d

r e

s

e

f o

n

s

o

e

r v

d

e

o

s

b

b

e o

l d

i n

l v

e

r

t h

c o

d

r e q

r v

e

a

n

y

o u

u

*

*

e

o n

G

r o u n

d a

f o

r

t h

a

b

i n

*

g i w

a

a

g

e

a e

,

o

t h

t h

a

a

p

t i n

r

m

c o

o

n

i t

e

f y

a

r

t a

i

b

l o

g

n

c i e

e n

c o

n

i

c

c

h

a

r v

g ®

u

t s

a o

a

a

t i n

g

l d

t

c i e

s

e

a

k

l a

s

r

a

e i n

n

t *

h

a v

f

* *

e

e

o T

e r n

t h

p

u

a

a a n

t

r p

t h

o a a

i o h

t h

a

$

r *

e n

s e

s ,

l a

p

e r h

l a

t i v

e

r

o

e

e g

t i a

a a

d

l a

d

o

a

a

* e

t r

t o

h

p

%

o

e a

x

g

t e n

1 b

w

o

f o

t h ©

t o

c i a

a n

e

b

a

a

a

c c o u

b

n

b

i c

o u

n

t i o

s i c

s

e

a

e

e

a

A

w

^

a

h

t h i n

i s

t i n

r

r a

r o

e

a

a

r

n

t i a

t x p a a

a u

i r e

f o

e

a a *

n

r

i c h

e a

i e

f o

h

a r w

s

g

i t h

r e a

f f i c

l o

t

• •

e

y

u

n

c

a

d

u

r

l -

r a

e r

i t i a g *

a

a

r

l a

f

w

a

p

a

r

r

f

t t o

b

%

l a

e

a

o

h

e s

p

r

o

e c *

T

a

o

i t

e

t a f e e a

a x

a

t h

a

i n

r

t o

t l a

o

l a

d

r

t o

a

e

v

a

t t a

e

t t a

e

a

o

a

e

c g

t h

a

a

x

a

l i e

a y

p

f l a

o

e

t o

o a r d

a

i r

f r

l a

«

i

r e

f o

d

i t

t o

r y

e

p

c a

p

e

a

r

l i m

l i s h

f n

r e

n

i a

a

o

I a

l e

a

a

a p

l y

a

s

l *

g

b

e

e

l y

a

t h

e

i r

o

t i o

q

u

t o

e

p

e r i a o

a

n

r a

a

a

r r a

t *

«

t h

g

a

n

n

a

t a

r

o

i b

e

e

e

l i a

w

a

b

a

u

e

a

A

c c o

»

-

a

a

l i i h

-

b

k

a

a

u

n

t

a

a

-

a

a

l M

a

r e

f i t

t h

r o

e n

j e

o

b

a

« B

l a

t i a

e

f

e

i t h

r a

c

h

e

t i v

a

a

t h

a

p

a g

a

e

t

t o

i d

t a

- i n

l

Reproduced from the Unclassified IDeclassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority fc.Q* 1235%

F orm V. R . 131

V
^ F ^ C ^ R A t FULjj^^yE S Y S T E M

Office Correspondence ^
T o ______

M

From.

Mr-^Smaad

\

r .

V

a n

F

o

a s a n

1

/

____________

Subject

In connection with letters to I r . Leach, Mr. Sin clair, and Mr. Peyton
regarding allocations of participations in the*Syste» Open Maiket Account,
I would appreciate I t i f 70a and Mr. Daniels w ill g±Te the questions re­
ferred to "in these le tte rs praspt consideration and give me your views
thereon.
I think i t would also he helpful i f we prepared a menorantitm promptly
on relationships between surplus accounts and contingent reserves, as
requested by the Board.

DigitizedfeJUL
for FRASER


FOR FILES* 1
I< B. Smith'

Reproduced from the Unclassified IDeclassified Holdings of the National Archives

D E C L A S S IF IE D
Authority

1235%

Ur-* Hngh keach, trmMm%9
Federal Eeserve Beak of Richmond,
Virginia
DeiO* Ei‘* uBixChl
Keferenee is made to your le tte r o f Deceaber 21 In. regard
to the proposed foranla fo r determining allocation© la tbe System
0pfca
Account
Jaan&ry 1, 1933*
b

e g i n

n

i &

g

Mr. Sme&d tiacus&ed ilt h you over the telephone the reai
wms for and against taking into- consideration income, expenses,
j
losses, and payment© to the Secretary of the Treasury in connee■ /
tie©. utth Industrial advance# and caamitaents in determining parJ
tlcipatio&& of the various Federal Reserve books in th© System
I
Account. While i t was agreed to sake no change in the procedure
1
at thie tim*f i t is- radarstood that the setter w ill be thoroughly
|
reviewed and ®h©nld industrial advances and coas&itaenia outs t id in g ’ j
eontim e to decline, i t f i l l probably be advitable to disregard
'j'.
a l l income, expenses, losses, m& payments to the Secretary of tha .; f;
TrefiUs&iry in connection
th industrial advances and eowdtnanta
; \j
In determining participations in the Systeat Account m of A pril 1,
'I

J

1938.

^

lour suggestion that it night be desirable to awend the
foiwola b o m to t&ic© lato account the net debit* or net credit*
in the currant profit sad loss acco-oat is noted aad will receive
careful c m atderation before the next reallocation.




fery truly yours,

Chester Morrill, Secretary,
Federal Open Market Comaittee.

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority E..O* 12358

January 14 , 1938

Hr* Im S* S in cla ir, President,
Wmieral Reserve Beak of Philadelphia,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Dear Mr* Sin clairi
Reference i s Bade to your le tte r of December 18 ia regard to
the proposed formula fo r determining allocations la the System Op«a
laik et Account beginning January 1 , 1938*
Mr. Smead discussed with you over the telephone tha reasons
fo r and. against talcing into consideration lncoae, aaspeases, losses,
and payments to tha Secretary o f the Treasury ia connection *Lth ia duatrial advances and eomssltaeats in determining participations o f the
various Federal Reserve banks in the System Aecount*

While i t eas

agreed to sake no change ia the procedure at this time, i t i s understood
that the aatter *111 be thoroughly reviewed aid should industrial ad­
vances aad commitments outstanding continue to decline, i t * 1 1 1 prob­
ably be advisable to disregard a ll income, expenses, losses, and paymeats to the Secretary o f the Treasury in connection i&th industrial
advances and coaaitmeats ia determining participations in the Systsm
Account as o f A pril 1, 1938*




Chester M orrill, Secretary,
Federal Opea Market Coaaittee

Reproduced from the Unclassified / Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority E..O*

January

14., 1938

Hr. J . H* Peyton, President*
Feders1 Heserve Bank of Minneapolis,
Minneapolis, Minnesota
B

e

a

r

I r

*

P

e y t o

n

*

Befersnce la nade to your le tte r o f December 14 la regard to the
proposed procedure for handling transactions in th# Systesi Open Market
Account beginning ■January 1 # 1938.
It is noted that you suggest that the forsmla. include provision
for recognised losses or reserve® for recognized losses end interest ac­
crued to the Secretary of the Treasury for funds advanced for industrial
loans, and that profit# or louses on sales from the Systaa Account be
oaitted*
Ia estimating earnings and expenses of th# Federal Reserve banks
for the purpose of allocating participation# in th# Systea Open Market
Account it ha# been, the practice to include all known md regularly re­
curring charges, tut no- attest haa bean nade to include special reserve#
or charge-offs tfilch are aad# at the md of the year on. the basis of the
information them elating* Under this procedure all known profits and loss## on sales of Govenmtmi securities which affect all Federal Eeserve
banks la relatively the same proportion are Included in the calculations.
Careful consideration has b##n given froa time to time to th# d esirability
of including in the fonsula provision for losses and r##erv#s for loss##
which it is customary for the banks to set up at the end of the year,
but owing to the d iffic u ltie s involved in such procedure md particularly
in treating all banks alike, the decision has always
against it#
adoption. In the ca## of noet bank#, at least, vk&% additional r#s«rv#
will be needed is not detersined un til about th# end of the y#ar and,
consequently, no provision can b# aade for #uch r#serves in the figure#
us#d In determining participations in the System Account. Account could,
of course, be tak«* of actual loss## charged off, and further considera­
tion will be given to your suggestion# in thi# respect.

With r#sp##t to Including provision for payment# to the Secretary
of the Treasury under Section 13b in determining participations in the
System Account, i t i s , o f course, Impossible for us to t e l l in advance




Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives
d e c l a s s if ie d

Authority

Hr.

1235B

* . Peyton ~ #2

what reserves a Federal Reserve bank is likely to set aside at the end of
the year on Industrial advances, which largely determines what the payment
to the Secretary o f tie Treasury w i n tie and, accordiagly, i t would be
impossible to sake intelligent provision fo r mmh payments in our calcula­
tions, It is quite provable, however, that approximately the m m result#
as those you have in mind could be obtained by leafing out o f the net earn­
ings calculation all income, expense®, losses, and payments to the Seeretaiy
o f th* Treasury in connect!on with industrial advances and commitments.
I f industrial advancs# m& commitments continue to decline, i t is quite
probable that better v a u lts w ill ba obtained if such income, expenses,
losses, and patents aye Quitted froa the estimates tised in determining
participations in the ftrste* Account* This matter will receive careful
consideration and i t is expected that a decision with respect thereto will
be reached before A p ril 1, 1938, the time o f the next reallocation o f
participations in the Syatera Account*




Very truly yours.

Chester Morrill, Secretary,
Federal Open Market Conaittef*

January 4, 1938.

Ur. ?u R. Burgess, Vice President
Federal Heserre Bank of Sew Tork
Mew Xork, t*ew lork
Dear Dr. Burgess*
In connection with our telephone conversation with respect
to reallocation of participations in the System Open Market
Aocount, there are inclosed copies of the letters we received
fro® ;;ne Federal He serve Banks of Philadelphia* Richaaond* and

(v1

aad a copy of the letters we have drafted with respect
to the suggestions contained therein.

It will be appreciated if

you will go over these letters and make any changes in them which
fat H you think advisable.
tA )K
\
Ho suggestions for changes ia the forsula were aade by any
other federal Reserve banks and, accordingly, it ia not necessary
for the secretary of the coaaibtec to address letters to the® at
this time.
Sincerely yours,

V'
E* I*. S m ad, Chief,
Civision of Bank Operations,
\

|nclosures«

PAW




P ^ J U 1)1-

I

R eproduced from the U nclassified / D ecla ssified H oldings of the N ational A rchives

""

D ECLASSIFIED

Authority

E£crt> ;Jlf FXfcES SlciTioK
'WSSU&fe u s a ilfl SAKS t r

0

tteomtim* 19, WJ?

O ffie, 0f

President
■

i*## ■<£* 'ifefyllii
1 m*tm*§A $*$%*&$*$ with # «r !©***# $£
■
iHa ptp&pwwdi
-#»a?
- im rn&m m w tf* th* Sjr«t«i Opt* 8Urk®t Account
fm m vy 1* WM*
Our B#&f$ 3m# aatawl
IS '
t f * proposed p * m * u » m d
J****r*i*Ng Vm f t i ^ l f * t & Ifct** #&%%
if
»4vtmUm§ t# **i## asusi*
«*
s5H|r fe# #»$»##
®r «wSvi*t>&'fe&i is tb# fw m ltw *
I t I t gtnt-m tif &w i&c*t#&t tfw t t&# ?!#& fo r
4ti'l#«*ti$s» i# « * * i*
« i « « » to*
-tin#*# tb*
.

f# t o

t*»t> ta» mo*a*t# piymfc*# t# ...'.]
lltt Treasury Wi£*r t l *
f
#£
Wh hftve Mb fa**a ijQ0ltt4*d i&
a^iaatfy I
QhH*$+**if* t» ■iiPti’rlsif *$ *fc# ^swaswwi
|
I t ■••ar ^ t*fc* Br* t o f * # # aad i t * f t * * *
j
&»<*«'
tl&#
w& M m ^ t a s ^ a e il %tyfr
i t i i ti$sFt§*
ssttfch
fc&r

f# ty t f « i f ,| ti# «j

I.
t




i& m

m * * *m%m * « f l U , 3«cr*t*ry
Qp«m
'$®*i*ifct*#
Board #£ 0 * m « * r t **
?«&««& R*«*nr# dy*U*L
iiuMrflK>% i * &*

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

1235%

;K6

IM

EL r-KV*1^

f 'V

*V--V
h 1 > § I v

FSDEELAL RESXRfl BJJHC

h

of wQwMfo
D

M

* »

C

F

a

d
C

b

o

a

r a

* t a
l

a r #

of

a a *

e

n

M

i o

of

b

t l »

F

a #

c o

l o

u

n

i l l ,
r f e

a

H

a

t

of

d

a

r a

i a i a g t o &

G

l

»

a

a

C
o

a

•

t a

a

v »

» ©
&

r a

o

i y

i

i t t o

a

,

y

a

r a o

r »

* « r v «

S

C

*

a

i t i *

t

t o

t a

e r

2

1 ,

a r

6

,

l f a

r k

I

f

a n

d

J

?

.

s ,

tto srillt

r *

s u

r
l a

o a r d

f «
c

r

p a a

W

B

r
G

a o a a b

r e

i u i v e

s ,

a

r o

l t ? *

r e

a d

s

p

e

c

a a o f t

i a

*

*

M

i «

t o

r

t t i a

a

*

s

t

h

a

y o m
l d

r

l e

l a

t

t t e

l *

r

S

o

y

f

B

s t e

a

o o
O

o a b

p e n

a

t

A

c -

t *

f \m m m p M t e i for allocating profit® aad Io#aoa oa transac­
tion* in tbe aoooaxit ia «aUr«ly s&iiafaetory to Hi aad i» baliavad to be
aa iaprovoaoot over ta* old a o t M U
1 %

accounting
4 #

|

a

f K

E * f >

,

*

m

*

t o

a

r o o o d u r o

a a a a «

m

*

a a d

1

.

Q

2

.

E

s s t &

a r r o

3

.

S

e

t

a

&

n

t

t f e a t

i g

h

a

o

o

a

4

*

Prior

5

.

t o

B

a u

r s i s g e

r

d

o

a

t - * C

a

t i o

s

e

t a

a

r r a

*

s

t a

e

d

e x ? > e a a < * a

H

a n

t h

b o

t i i e

a e t e d
d

t

a

t

e

a * r e a

t

P

r m

d

a

o

t i o

a

s

o

t o

a

f o
t e

d
x

a

t e

p

o

o

f i t

r

a

s

l *

g

i v

r a

o

o

f r

o
e

o

f

e

©

l l o

s

f o

r

a n

d

L

o

j O

*

a

o

a

a

| i a g e
l y

a r a i a g a

c

a

r a
o

a
t e

t i o

a

s s

n

3 *

S

o

G

t

4

*

f t
t r i b
#

t i o

s

#

o

a a

g

i v

e x p
i a

#

d

a a d

n

e

of

l a

i o

a

u

a

w

*

o

c

u

i e h

v e

e n

e e #

« ®

d

o

a

t r l a
^

X

A
o

i




d
o

s

a

d

i c

a d

e

d

e

o

a

i t i o

n

®

p

t a

t

p

e

r g

v a o o a o )
f f

a

t

r

k

f f a
a s ^

t i i o

o

*

a

f '

y

t h

e

s

!

w

p

r o

p

>

a e d

*

a

i a

d

o

r

a

a

r *

a

c c o

u

n

t

o

't o

d

a

t e

l i i d

o

r

of

; «

o

f

t r i b

i i t i a

a

fo r

e

F

o

a a

i r

«

t o

< M

u r $ lliig s

—

*

r r e

a

a
a

,
o

a a d

a n

l l o

l a

v i d
e

d

a

t

d

P

a

r

r

o

f i t

y

e

a

a n

d

o

a n

r

( a

x

«

L o » #

l a

a

«

c c o

l *

u

o f earning#

»

n

t

t o

p

r i o

d

a

t e

s

e

of

.

f i t

f

t

r o

t a

- o

m

t s )

n

o
I

e

r o

e n

i t - C

t

a

m

t i o
l *

mmM
k

d
a

*

o

f

*

r v

t a

n

d

r i t i e

o

t e

r r e

. a r a

a b

a

u

tlao

t o
e

c

t o

n

o

e

e
h

r e

l l o

l l o

l *

o v e r n

a

a

o

f o

* * >

1* Current earning# to data a f allocation.
2* l» t t a t « d for
of
o n

I

c

o

i a

I n

t o

a

e

i s o

l o
t i o
o

a
n

i o

»

a o

*

a

d

o

fo r is

e d

x

d
a

a
a

o

of

o

c o

f t
l l a

a

t l a o

s

o

a

t

i o

a

a

e #

o

o

a

a

y a a r #

C

i n

o

a

a

&

a

o m

a ll
a

t

t f c a r

t l »

u

o

c l u

wall aa

a

e
b
a

i s o

m
a

e

i n

H

g

i l l #
,

r

i t t e e 1

r n

t a

d

p

w

b

e
o
a

s

*

n

e

o

f o

r

l o

u

r v

i c

ami
p rofit#

f i t s

e

a

e

#

r m

u

l a

i t i o

#

,

a

d

d

a n

d

a

o

d

i c h

X

o a a o a

a

*
n

? *

r l t i a
a

a
r

t

f o

»

o o -

d
r m

e a r n

( i a
«

©

oa
a n

»

to

#

e

#

c
t l B

l a

i n
d

u

l a

g ®
i a

t a t a d

g

,

\

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority fc.Q* 12358

H

r *

j r a

G

d

b

a

a

r a

a

l

t a

r

H

0 p # »

f l a a

h

i n

r t o

n

*

«

s g

N

M

* t

d

n

a

t r

l a

a

t r

i i a

# 1 "

f U

D

f l a

i s

i i i d
B

u

a t i k

| X

&

4

i n

d

u

#

o n
l

3 0 3
s

t r

o

t

d

u

a &

t

y

e

i t a a a r w

a

l a

s

f o

t a

s t a
( w

n

d

i n

i f c l i

X

o a n a

X

o a n

9 5 S

o

f

o
* 8

X

v

a n

d

l o

a c c o

u

U
o

S y a t a m
o a n a

®

a
n

u

a

r a

a

a

t a

o
f

e

r a
&

w

h

l

t a

r y

,

- 2

-

D

e c a a b

a r

2

1 ,

X

f 3

7 *

i t t c e ,

i c h

l o

t *

r
&

f o

#

r m

t a r o

u

o
a

m

a a r a

r p
a

o o m

l a g
r a

o
X

t a

n

i e d

a b

o

u

u

a

t

t

l »

r

m

f

S

n

t

f m

r

i a

X

f

n

t o

&

a a d

l a

a

n

U

i d
r n

e

a *

n

i a
b

l t m

a a t a

a n

f m

i

f

m
l y

*

? b

a

* $

»

o

t h

a

t

X

a r g m

o

a

m

a

o

a

a

a

i t g

m

#

#

t i o

J b

e

X

3 b
m

$

a

*
a

f u

&

f

a n

d

t t o a t

f e

r n

m

b

k

d

o

n

i n

d

u

#

u

l a

«

b

* u

f

a

a

o
o m

u g

f u
e

d

X

a

f

b

o

t

m

i n

g

l

S

t r i a

X
t

u

e

n M

r d

r t d

% h #

a

f f e

g

m

3

I l i a

l f

o

of

u

r #

c

t

n g

*

e x p

l u

a

o n

a n

k a

t t »

d

,

a

t o

t o
i a

j

t ­
b

$

! *

&

1

a

I

t b
u

60

d

©

#

f
o

.

%

a

a

j
f

o a a a *

g

i a

m

i e

p

n

d

o m

e

l $

i f i I n
u

*

f «

X

a r o

j
I

r i n

H
t a

t a

e

u

t

c o

X

t m

i n i

t o

d

o

r t «

d

a n
m

r a

a

a

s

u

c

o n
l t t X

g

a

a

m

i n

^

i r a

r e

o a a a a

m

i a

t b

l u

r n

a

g a d

f r o m

m

a
X

3 * 0 0 0

b i i i a d

o

t u

f f s

f
F

t i a

1 X

a a n r n a *
m

t

o
a

r a

e

&

t

«
#

d

u

h

f o

©

*

a n

n
T

d

l u

f i l l s

*

u

i r a r y

t b

a n

c o
*

s e

a u r p X

a

a n

b

t a

d

b a d

1 4

f

a r * a

s a

t i s a

n

o

o

$

r p

c l u

a o o #

l a

a

a

a n

m

b

g

a a t #

i l l

#

a

i n
t o
a

a X
1 $

&

t h

s

l &

o

t

w
H

)

l t a

r n

t h

X

r

t J s a
m

m

a

r

i t o

s t
i n

f

f e a t
f o

a

a

q

a a

t f c a

i m

t t m

o a n

a

o

* * ¥ 1

t

t h

a

p
k

v
a

3 7 #

2 * 0 0 0

a

t a

A

# 2 X

m

a n d
t h

X

t

t o
a d

t o

f

e

j m

r

t h
o

f t m
t i r

M

f o

l o

*

l

t

1 #

,

o

u

u

not

g

o a a a

t i o

i i r a d

*

a s
b

*

l a

p

a

%

a

o a o a r n

t e

t i o

m

t i n

a p

# fft4

*

9 5 » 9 9 0

n

o ,

p

n

i s i a t n

o u

w

a

a

n o w

o

r a o

*
o

m
a m

t a f c a a d
i n

t s

o

a
s o

p t k f m

f o

w

t w

x

r

$

m

f n n i r
a

l a
i a

t h

o a o s

r

u

o

l $ %

k *

S
- o

t r

d ,

r

X

a

a .

l o a n ®

a n

g

t h

a

l

r
b

r m

d

f o

r i a X

l ,

C »

a h a c m

i a

a

r i X

a r i c o t

.

I f l t l
i a

n

H

u

»

a n

( a

c

t r
a

l a

l

e s ,

c t i c m

7 )

a u r p l u ®

(aaotian 7} aooounifi o f taa ram ining banks* I f tJaJLa 1* tha proper in ta r*
S»rstat&oi* of on# *rraa«a»aat with tha Traaaury, i t watXd soam XogioaX to
o

m

i t

f l X

3

y

a t o

O

f u
o

n

u

i a $
d
I a

d

r
#

i f f a
a

a

«
,

f

a

m

«

t o

«

n
n

9

*

1
m

f

a

r a
r v

n
c




p

«

n

t t a
b # m

s f i f i f i s .

o
t m

4 i a p o a « L X
»

D

s a
i n

r

I m

s

w

i t h

e

f

a a

t l m

r

r m
1

1
i m

t
a X

t b

m
b

a n
X

d
o

e

a f wi

M

m

d

m

t a a a t a

,

w o

t h
i m
o

X

1 f » a a a a

s

m
o

a

n o
a

m
f

O

d o

n

T r e m

m
i a

o

o n

m

o

n

i n

d

v a n

o

f r o
u

t

a

a
f

«

o

t r i a

s a e n

d

* m

t r y

w a g r

i o

i n

t

u

m

b

o

^

a

r
l

a

s

i a

w

l

h

a t

u

t

I o

«

o

o

r t o

i m
a

n

o

u

r

e

!■ » * * * «

t t i »
a o

l n

l m

l o
a

t r

«

#

i n

g

l t m
w

o u

i t i e

s

y

u

f r o m

f i n

a

e i u

r n

f r

o

I m
l d
t o

m

l

t k

®
l n

I t t f o
f o

t l »

v

a

r

y

t r

u

l y

o

r a

,

(Signal) Sugii l*aNiMaili
F

r a

s i d

a

n

y

r i o

k « *

f a

a ,

a

a n

t *

f o

a t o o « o

g

t h ®
a k e

e

o x i i n
x w

r v

u

a p
u

s

r m

u

l a

t h

o

f

Y

o o t o d

i M

o

n

i a

o

f

o

i a b

p

r o
F

*•

a d

*

e

t

o a j m
X

a r a X

e

^

Reproduced from the Unclassified I Declassified Holdings of the National Archives

DECLASSIFIED
Authority

12358

/EDk«AL ftKME&VK
of m r n m m m

I r e c d ih files section

I—

4 0

— -

1

Mr. Chester Morrill, Secretary,
of &o*sraors
B

o a r d

F

e

d

e

o

r a

l

R

e s e r v

e

S

y

s

f

t e

t i »

a

,

Washington, D* C.
Bear Sr# Horrllli
^ Sudor dat« of leoosbtr
191?, you m\ml% »Proposed
Accounting frmmSmm tor Handling transaction* in Syate» Open Market
Acomiat Bfglnaittg January t$ %9 M m§ *ad request tbet we review It and
advise yoo of any views ini night like to bave eotsldored before tbs
prooed-mm reooanended. ia tbe report Is pmt into offset*
On Pag# 3 yoa state
of m several Federal resorvt banks
will b* «ad* quarterly a# of Jmanary
of m f e ye?sr, ia. accordaaoo with th#

that adjusttteata m i partioipatio»s
ia tfes Systea 0p#a tiar^et Account
1, April 1, July 1, tal ©otober I
foilowlisg formula*

•ixpeiiseii
I* Istiaated currant expenses during the year
2. Prior service contributions
3. total*
Aa used by m m auditors and a* defined by the Board ♦Ksti*Bted current
expenses tfuriae tbo year* wo^ld iaclmd© no looses, Would it oot be
fairer to word tiais *lstlaai#d carremt expenses during the year after
i»clading provisioo for roooiaised losses or reserve* for recognised
losses a M ■Interest accrued to tfe* Secretary of the Treasury for funds
advanced for industrial loans*, leaving out profit# or leases oa Systea
Aooouat tales* As an offset, recoveries oa charge-offs should be in­
cluded in tS* earnings for tbat year*
Qa Fage J* water lamiiifs, *iot profit o» goveroaents
sold to date* set t*p as aa addition to earnings doe# not tee* to ms
as sound* 'ft bellow that ail principal profits or losses scorned froa
tbm purchase or sale of Systes Accouot boads should be credited or
charged directly to reserve account or surplus account so. tbe yearly
earnings of a Federal reserve bank would not fee affected by either
principal profits or losses*
Capital losses of tfc&s character.should
b# absorbed by reserves, surplus, or capital* If profits froa the
System Account are to be considered in figariag tbe yearly profit, then
losses tmm- W m sale of *s ets froa the Systea Account afaould logically
be considered
yet sueft is not the procedure outlined*
Tory truly years,
(Signed) J, *# Peytott
JSPiB



j