View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

st. i*23G. 8 7 4

Summary of r e p l i e s received i n answer to the Board*s l e t t e r St.Ul67 of
July 29, 1924, subject "Expense Budget, w
GENERAL S M A Y
U MR
I Banks having some form of Budget Control:
In e f f e c t
1. New York
2. Cleveland
3. Chicago
4. Kansas C i t y ( p a r t i a l )

Results

Big f a c t o r i n reducing
expenses.
Since July 1, 1924
Too e a r l y to r e p o r t .
(Operating Depts.:Jan. 1,1924 Has been a material
(Agent*s Dept.: Foi .13 years, f a c t o r i n reducing expenses.
During l a s t 2 years
S a t i s f a c t o r y f o r some
departments.
Sinc-e Jan. 1, 1921

I I Banks planning to i n s t a l l Budget System:
1. Richmond
2. Minneapolis

January 1, 1925
As soon as possible

I I I Banks not operating under any form of Budget Control and which have made no plans
f o r i n s t a l l i n g such a system;
1. Boston
2. Philadelphia

3, Atlanta
4. St. Louis

5. Dallas
6, San Francisco

DETAILED S M A Y
U MR
BOSTON
1. Has never undertaken to i n s t a l l a budget system.
2. Budget might be established and lived up to i n a few departments,
3. Certain expenses cannot be a n t i c i p a t e d : Example - Note issuance and Fiscal
Agency.
4. Operations i n such departments aa Discounts, Transit and Currency are more
.,
a c t i v e at c e r t a i n times of the month and at c e r t a i n seasons of the year
than at others and f o r c e must be maintained to handle peak loads.
5.

Trend i f ' expenses haa been downward during past two years: Expenses covering
f i r s t half of 1924 are $80,000 l e s s than f o r corresponding period i n 1923.

N W YORK
E
1. Has operated under ejgpense budget since January 1, 1921.
2. Has been one of the biggest f a c t o r s i n reducing the operating expenses.
3. Plan i s as follows:
a. Detailed f i g u r e s covering the p r i n c i p a l items of expenditure during the
past two years are submitted to department heads to a s s i s t them i n making
estimates. Committee of three o f f i c e r s reviews these estimates and makes
report to O f f i c e r 1 s Council and the budget i s then submitted to directors
f o r f i n a l approval.




-

2 -

St. 4 6 3 6 ^ 3 7 5

b. A monthly, departmental expense report with c-croparative f i g u r e s shows
whether expenses a r e running within "budget and a l s o whether they have
increased or decreased over t h e same period of the year b e f o r e .
4. Supplementing t h e budget i s the following system of making purchases:
a. Every r e q u i s i t i o n must be signed by o f f i c e r s i n charge of department
and i f i n excess of $100 must be approved by s e n i o r o f f i c e r as well,
b. Requisition then goes to Planning Division, which passes on i t s n e c e s s i t y
and whether or not the a r t i c l e i s standard both f o r manufacturer and f o r
bank.
c. Deputy Governor then v i s e s a l l purchase r e q u i s i t i o n s a f t e r which they a r e
made upon a s t r i c t l y competitive b a s i s ,
PHTLADEIPHIA
1 . Has not put any departments on a budget*
2. In a few i n s t a n c e s r e s t r i c t e d appropriations have been made.
3. Cost of food i n c a f e t e r i a i s limited to approximate r e c e i p t s .
CLEVELAND
1. Has j u s t e s t a b l i s h e d a budget f o r the l a s t s i x months of 1924,
2. Budgeted the expense u n i t s a s now reported i n the Functional Expense Reports.
• 3* Too e a r l y to r e p o r t r e s u l t s .
Plan i s as f o l l o w s :
a. Furnished each o f f i c e r w i t h a form showing cost f o r t h e f i r s t half of
192k of the expense utoits under h i s supervision and requested a report on
the probable expenses f o r t h e l a s t half of year. Budget Commit tee r e viewed e s t i m a t e s and approved f i g u r e s were reported back to o f f i c e r s with
statement t h a t the amounts approved were the maximum amounts t h a t could be
expended and even these should be f u r t h e r reduced i f p o s s i b l e ,
BI OSMOND
1. Has not yet i n operation a budget control but expects to i n s t a l l one by
January 1, 1925.
2, Present system of expense control i s a t a l l times under the c a r e f u l superv i s i o n of the executive o f f i c e r s and i s designed t o maintain a r i g i d superv i s i o n over s a l a r i e s of employees, promotions and t r a n s f e r s , terminations and
replacements, a s well as a l l purchases of supplies and equipment and the d i s t r i b u t i o n of s u p p l i e s from s t o c k .
m a m
1, Has never e s t a b l i s h e d a budget system.
2; Purchases a r e made on a competitive bid b a s i s and approved by Managing
Committee.
3. Board of Directors reviews s a l a r i e s of employees every 30 days.
4, .
CHICAGO
1. Operating departments now working under budget plan f o r f i r s t y e a r , although
Agent's department has used budget f o r three y e a r s .
2. S u b s t a n t i a l reduction has been e f f e c t e d i n operating f o r c e and general ex-, 4*>
penses of bank and the establishment of the budget i s considered a m a t e r i a l
factor,
3# Plan i s as f o l l o w s :




°76
,

3 -

St.4236.

a. O f f i c e r s were furnished with forms showing detailed expenses f o r
' 1922 and 1923 and asked f o r estimates f o r 1924-. Procedure Comnittee
reviewed estimates and made necessary r e v i s i o n s . Relationship between actual expense and budget i s shown i n monthly expense r e p o r t s .
ST. LOCJIS
1, Ho budget system in e f f e c t as local procedure camiittee has been unable to
r see wherein a b e n e f i t would be derived from i t s adoption.
2, If budget system i s established, i t should i n no way i n t e r f e r e with the
present p o l i c y of the bank regarding economy and e f f i c i e n c y , which has
been very succ.es sful*
MINNEAPOLIS
1. Has never established a budget system f o r the c o n t r o l of expenses,
2. Suggestion, however, appeals to Governor and such a system w i l l be put
in operation as soon as p o s s i b l e .
3. Points out t h a t there are some departments, f o r example, "Failed Banks"
where the budget system would not be applicable,

K N A CITY
ASS

1. Ho regular budget system although such a system p a r t i a l l y i n operation during l a s t two years,
2. Estimates of expenses made a t various periods and i f a c t u a l expenses exceed estimates, an i n v e s t i g a t i o n i s made.
3. At present operating costs are being compared with expenses f o r corresponding period of 1923 said any increase w i l l be immediately investigated.
b. Believe i n budget system as a Whole but could not toaintain e f f i c i e n t
service i f kept within a cost of operation that was estimated during a
previous period when conditions may have been quite d i f f e r e n t .

m m

1. Budget has not been established because i t was thought that on account of the
size of the organization end t h e character of work performed, the expenses
could be controlled i n other ways.
2. If the Board concludes, a f t e r a f u r t h e r study, that the plan would work to
the advantage of a bank of t h i s size and perf orming the character of operations
performed by us we would be glad to give f u r t h e r consideration to the matter.

SAN FRANCISCO
'
1. Has not adopted a budget system as a means of controlling expenditures.
2. Functional expense reports have been an admirable means of detecting any
material v a r i a t i o n i n the cost of conducting the d i f f e r e n t operating functions
of the bank. These r e p o r t s do n o t , however, provide the e s s e n t i a l f a c t s f o r
an • i n t srj9 i s t r i c t - xt oqiaris en. t>fexpenses.
3. Greatest help we could receive would be a v i s i t from an operating representa t i v e ; of Board's Committee to determine whether or not the bank i s
economically and e f f i c i e n t l y conducting i t s various operations.