View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

X-3764
FEBE EAL

B S 3 E 1 V E

BOARD

STATEMENT $0* THE PRESS
i
•

;

'•

For release lb Morning Papers,
Saturday, June 30. 1923 •
3he provisions of the Federal Reserve Act which
authorize the establishment of a Federal Reserve collection
systeko were designed wholly for the benefit of the banking
end commercial interests of the country. The system is now
in operation between banks which in number, are about $2 per
cent of all banking institutions and which have approximately
98 per cent of the total banking resources of the country.
The Federal Reserve collection system has become a necessary
instruroentality in effecting the country's domestic exchangee,
ite operation, including final payments through the Gold
Settlement Fund, has been of inestimable value and has resulted
in enormous saving to those actively engaged in carrying on
the commerce of the country and there are no other facilities
for operating a collection system which could approximate it
in economy of operation. It has eliminated a Very large
portion of the time formerly consumed in the collection of
checks and has cut down the cost of making the country1 s exchangee to the minimum. Even though an involuntary collection
system may not be imposed upon the Federal Reserve Banks by
the Federal Reserve Act, as interpreted by the Supreme Court
of the United States in its recent decision, the system has
fully justified its operation and is of such- value to the
banlflng and commercial interests of the c o u n t r y that its continuance as a voluntary system is of vital importance. Certain
changes in the basis of the par clearance system are advisable
in view of the recent decision of the Supreme Court*
The Board believes that participation in the par
clearance system should be based upon the principle of
reciprocity and that hereafter Federal Reserve Banks should
not receive'for collection checks on any non-member bank which
will not agree to remit in acceptable funds without deduction.
The recent opinion of the Supreme Court makes it certain that
the Federal Reserve Banks are not permitted by law to pay
exchange. It mast be clear tiiat the more inclusive a collection
system is tae more efficient it will be and the greater will be
the service it can render alike to the business and banking
community. Therefore, since it is the object of the Federal
Reserve Board to maintain an efficient system of par collection




X-3764
whi cb. must a t the same time "be a v o l u n t a r y system a s f a r
a s non-member banks a r e concerned, the c o n c e s s i o n s involved
and t h e r e s u l t i n g b e n e f i t s -should be made and r e c e i v e d by
a l l p a r t i c i p a t i n g banks. I t i s c l e a r t h a t t h o s e nonmember
banks which a r e u n w i l l i n g to r e m i t w i t h o u t d e d u c t i o n f o r
checks drawn on themselves have no r i g h t to s h a r e i n t h e
a d v a n t a g e s of t h e par c o l l e c t i o n system.
The F e d e r a l Reserve Board, t h e r e f o r e , i n t h e e x e r c i s e of i t s l e g a l a u t h o r i t y , h a s amended R e g u l a t i o n J ,
S e r i e s of 1920, i n such a way a s t o p r o h i b i t any F e d e r a l
Reserve Bank f r o m r e c e i v i n g on d e p o s i t or f o r c o l l e c t i o n
any check drawn on any non-member bank which r e f u s e s t o
r e m i t a t par i n a c c e p t a b l e f u n d s and t o r e q u i r e F e d e r a l
Reserve Banks to make a c o l l e c t i o n charge f o r t h e i r s e r v i c e s
i n c o l l e c t i n g checks which b e a r the endorsement of * o r a r e
drawn by or emanate from any non-member bank which r e f u s e s
t o r e m i t a t par i n a c c e p t a b l e f u n d s , such c o l l e c t i o n charge
t o be a t a r a t e n o t t o exceed one t e n t h of one p e r c e n t .